The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit Correspondence 2006-6-29 Community Services Div, Building Safety CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 225 5th Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Ph. 726-3759 4 Subdivision Lot # J>- Mountaingate Subdivision - Phases I & II I Site InvestigatiOli Questionnaire for Consulting Design Professionals SITE ADDRESS La '-flflo FORst tcJq~~r. CITY JOB # Foundation: requirements - new struct~res on residential lots This form may be used as a verification to allow construction to continue on the job site until the stamped' AlfJ:ilUA VIT For Site Investigation Questionnaire' is . submitted to the City. This form must be completed by a licensed design professional (engineer or architect) or his/her authorized representative, and submitted to the building inspector prior to requesting City inspections or placing foundation concrete. It is important that all questions be answered completely for the foundation site to be approved for construction. Owner and/or COJ.ltractor \.TGt-t-r~ C (l~I~U , '.~ 0 A. Date(s) of the design professional's site evaluation? \:f\t I t-D - W J ~! ) ?(\Ol.n. B; Has the design professional reviewed a copy of the geotechnical information that was prepared. for the subdivision relating to this site? Yes L./No_ If not, please contact this office for a copy of the report. The design professional must be familiar with the geotechnical information before completing this form. C. In which Geotechnical Investigation area is this site located? (Level I sites are lots # 3-20, 43-49 & 49-71) Level I ~ (Level II sites are lots #1-2, 21-42 & 50-54) Level II Note: Level II reauires a site-soecific I!eotechnical investil!ation & renort - - Were site conditions identified that would change the category? YES _ N 0 ~ (For criteria determining category, see the accompanying documenttitJed: Geotechnical Requirements for Individual Building Lots Moul1taingate Subdivision - Phases 1 & 2) If"yes", explain (use the reverse side of this sheet or an added sheet if necessary) lof5 Community Services Div, Building Safety CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 225 5th Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Ph. 726-3759 Subdivision Lot # 9~ Was a geotechnical engineer involved at the site to verify that conditions are suitable for construction of the pro~d building(s)? Yes VNo_ Name of geotechnical engineer fDVlAA--J 0.. S \ th((;:;. fro "'A. D. What was the nature of the excavation and lor fill? ~A (\ Il.a ,( () f- ~6 ,.is ..:ir-> Je.h.i.L:e.,,J q..r-r. rJ p <;, ~ j P fa. c..~Vl.A ~ ft.:f- ~~," k"" pr-npt\'!- ,pA iJt-- i/.J....C t---{! re.... , __ ' Was exjsting non-structural fill or expansive soil encountered on the lot? Yes~o_ If "yes", what types" depths and locations, and how doe, s it, affect the building foundation? 'S~\ \()W rl~,Qi:h 9.1: I +---1 cJ,^-v., ""I:.- + l.l. n.<;'" r1?rv...cn I~..A " (\ What measures were taken to remedy the soil condition (include type of engineered fill used to stabilize the soil)? --2lR cJfk.U ~^t'l utL$. r:.e~V\A..('\ \/ 1 A . ~ -- Is the site as prepared adequate ~dequate 0 to maintain constant moisture content in the sub grade? Note: Verification ofmoisture stabilization in the sub grade is a requirement for site preparation, and must be affirmed before construction can continue. If inadequate, what measures are to be taken to provide constant moisture content in the sub grade? Is the site, as prepared, adequaterB-lnadequateD to support the proposed structure? An ajjirmative answer is requisite to proceeding with construction. If inadequate, what additional work is needed to provide adequate foundation support? E. Did the design professional witness placement and compaction of the engineered fill, or isthere a special inspection report forthcoming from a qualified agency? I witnessed Placement 0 Special Insp/compaction report ~' 20f5 Community Services Div, BuileJing Safety CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 225 5th Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Ph. 726-3759 Subdivision Lot # 9 cj . F. The design professional intends to use the following method for installation of perforated perimeter footing drains: The design on the attached drawing provided by the design professional. . .. 0 The method shown on the original construction drawings.. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. g-- The typical 'Foundation Drain' drawing attached to permit.. ........... ...... 0 Perforated perimeter drains are not required.............. ........ .. ..... .... 0 Comments: Note: City inspectors will inspect installed drains prior to cover upon request... Call: 726-3769 to schedule inspection. G. Low-point crawl space drains are required to prevent the build-up of excess moisture inside the foundations during (and after) construction. This drain may be installed after foundation placement onlv with the express permission of the desi{!n nrofessional. a. The design professional has determined the following: The crawl space drain is required when the foundation is installed... .. 0 The low-point drain can be installed after foundation placement without a significant moisture build~up problem within the foundation... ... ... .... g:..--- (I'h, e low-point drain may be installed at the (1,& r:.r--Ol?c.t-/' a....t~stage of construction) . post earn, rarnmg, roofmg, etc. b. Has the design professional observed and approved the installation of the required low point drain?.. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... '" ... ..... . Yes, No if 'yes'~ where is the low point drain located under the building and where does it terminate at this time? (Must be an approved location, i.e. street gutter, storm sewer, sump pump and discharge line to the street, etc.) The design professional must determine whether the approved permit drawings have adequate foundation steel. Is any additional foundation steel required that is not shown on the found~n drawings for the building? Yes No . ~ If 'yes ", describe additional steel required (or provide drawing). 30f5 Community Services Diy, Building Safety CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 225 5th Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Ph. 726.3759 Subdivision Lot # n The individual doing the observations and providing direction for the excavation and site preparation work on the property must sign the following statement. The undersigned design professional (or authorized employee) attests that he/she observed required moisture stability procedures on this site, and that such procedures were accomplished before any changes occurred in the moisture content of the sub- grade under and around the building (where expansive soils were encountered). The undersignedfurther attests that the sub-grade, as prepared, is adequate to support the building proposed for this site. Additional comments: (Note): A copy of this report shall be kept on site with the approved plans at all times. This report shall be followed by an affidavit, signed and stamped by the design professional under whose auspices this report was completed, affirming the information herein. The signed/stamped affidavit together with a copy of this report shall be submitted to this office prior to requesting framing inspection for the building. Signaturf-, R.,.M!.P..4J,., ~tr~ Name~AAe10... s., ~ UtJ.Ls1::rtl M.;. Title ~E- Company 1-L.'1 1I;' (\". \p EII\ '?r' t'\ee..--rtll CI Phone ~-(\(~'7 (J . ([ Licensee ~J^^P to. ~ t H-.'{ is. froY\./'-- .. License # ~t.f-x'L?_ expires u:~(\ It)-; The geotechnical report for the Mountain-gate Subdivision Phases I & II makes recommendations for placement of building construction ,on each site. The report also recommends that site preparation during wet weather conditions be avoided unless special measures are taken to mitigate soft soil conditions and moisture collecting in or around the foundation areas during and after the construction process. Positive site drainage must be provided. 40f5 Community Services Div, Building Safety CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 225 5th Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Ph; 726-3759 Subdivision Lot # 9+ -- AFFIDAVIT For Site Investigation Questionnaire Foundation Sub-Grade Approval for Residential Building Site in Mountaingate Subdivision Phases 1 &2 The undersigned hereby affirms that the excavation, structural fill and moisture stabilization methods for the building site at the address shown above were observed by me or an authorized employee of my firm and that the, following is true: 1. The geotechnical information for the subdivision, specific to this site, was utilized as part of the determination for foundation preparation and drainage requirements. 2. The foundation sub-grade is capable of supporting a minimum of 1500 psf, and is adequate to support the building proposed for this site. 3. The moisture content of the excavation was adequately maintained during the site preparation process and the site is adequately graded and drained for discharge to an approved location in order to maintain stable moisture content throughout the construction process and thereafter. 4. The accompanying report titled "Site Investigation Questionnaire for Consulting Design Professionals" containing field observations and instructions made on (date) ,Jv,J U-- 0-2(;)J ~\ Lt:f::in for this building site was completed either by me or by an hLthorized repr~sentative under my supervision. To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in that report is complete and accurate. ~ J --.,- "I ,,,. " ~ c(\nl1~~~~.~~9;:~~~:,~~.~1J