HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit Miscellaneous 1987-3-12
~oe/E..~
SPRINGFIELD '
CITY OF SPRING.ll'lliLD
Planning Department
March 12, 1987
Mr. Ri ck Roberts
Operations Manager
Sycan B
3405 Baldy View Lane
Springfield, OR 97477
SUBJECT: Follow-up Discussion of Simax Commercial Park
Dear Rick:
This letter is meant to provide a summary of our discussion on March 5,
regard to' the conditions of preliminary approval of Simax Commercial
specified in Cynthia Harmon's letter to you, dated 2/20/87 (attached).
this will assist you in the development of your property.
1987 in
Park as
I hope
1. Dedication of Right-Of-Way on Game Farm Road East. This issue was resolved
after some discussion regarding equity in dedication requirements. An off-set
center line was the culprit. Dedication of 30 feet from center line is a
consistent standard and is applied equitably here. Dedication would be to
Lane County.
2. Improvements to Game Farm Road East. This would include curb, gutter,
sidewalk, storm and sanitary sewer, street lights, street trees and a two
thirds width street. The existing AC mat mayor may not be adequate for this
improvement. You would be responsible to provide us with test results. The
design of these improvements would be compatible with future improvement of
the remainder of Game Farm Road East. Coordination with Lane County Public
Works is required.
3. Public Utility Easements for the perimeter of the subdivision. Requirements
for new PUE's on this subdivision are as follows:
a. 7 foot PUE along the Game Farm Road East frontage of lots 14 and 15.
b. 10 foot PUE along the Gateway Street frontage of lots 15 and 16 so that
Rainbow Water District can relocate their distribution line. This will
also require a 23 foot PUE between lots 16 and 17.
4. Panhandle access to Gateway Street. This is not permitted by Code unless no
reasonable alternative exists. A proposal to create a street intersection at
this location sometime in the future is not desirable because of the short
distance between existing intersections and the projected traffic volumes for
this area.
225 North 5th Street · Springfield, Oregon 97477 · 503/726-3759
"
5. Curb return driveway on East Beltline. This cannot be permitted until we have
ver1fication that 1,000 or more trips per day will be generated by the user of
the site. It was agreed that Beltline would be fully improved up to the
location of the proposed access. At this point only the curb and gutter would
continue to the east property line. At the time of development of lot 14 a
curb return driveway could be constructed if the previously mentioned 1,000
trips per day are verified, or; if a north-south street dividing lot 14 is
proposed a curb return design ~ould be standard.
6.
Additional access to East Beltline.
East Beltline. Future re-division
1 i mi ta t ion.
No additional access will be allowed on
of this property is subject to this
The development requirements listed in the attached letter are unchanged unless
the preceding items have caused their alteration. Your revised tentative plan
must be submitted showing these requirements.
If I can be of further assistance, please contact me at your convenience.
Cordi a 19;
~ .'M6V\
Gregory S. Mott
Development Code Administrator