Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit Mechanical 1998-8-20 r I RESIDENTIAL PERMIT APPLICATION Inspecllons: 726-3769 Office: 726.3759 LOCATION OF PROPOSED WORK: lib 35 331' ASSESSORS MAP: LOT: OWNER. lI('ln Itlic.leJ ADDRESS': b 6"7 t)1I.d I?V CITY: S:/Jtld.' , , . SPRINGFIELD . 9501S-5---- (,) IA " j( IL'J BLOCK: Rd. STATE: ..12r JOB NUMBER 225 Fifth Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 1-1 TAX LOT' t') 6 roo SUBDIVISION: PHON'" 7&/-7 ~7/ ZIP' ~7~77 DESCRIBE WORK: add ~ he.;;. 17 j>tIAM-/o w /lk;/Jile hdn4.e.. NEW REMODEL ADDITION./ DEMOLISH OTHER CONTRACTOR'S NAME GENERAl' PLUMBING' MECHANICAl' G-<9rl~;;;'l.\ I-lG~-tIM ~ " ELECTRICAl. ADDRESS CONST, CONTRACTOR # EXPIRES ,~ PHONE '1:J.()7 W 5U, ;:u..t>Mt.L t?r 1'7#z.. / ATTENTION:Oregon law requires you to_ OFFICE USE _ follow rules adopted by the Oregon Utility QUAD AREA'.... .." . -, ~rulesaL"'Mn~ Notlln.,auull....,bIIU;U. I -.VoiJIQ tt:;l':)'\:1 # OF BLDiBS)ARQ!i2-001-0010throughOAe~~h: 80'~9. You may obtain copies of the rules by . OCCY GR 'D ... .~. the tec"...=I>. TYPE, alllll~ Ule' ,",'OIUOI. \1~Ultf. replro11tr # OF STORIllsmhAr for the Oreaon Utility N<H\!iAiltilliURCE: Center Is 1-800.332-2344). RANGE:_ WATER HEATER: .st.f'r' )..#/ FLOOD PLAIN: NO'fIC~: ZONING CODE:_ THIS PERMIT SHALL EXPHlEetlilil:!lS,wORK AUTHORIZED UNDER T~\~M~!~MfTyI~~QiI" COMMENCED OR IS Ae~B..Q~P8bWGE: ANY 11m IJA Y flEAIOo. To request an Inspection, you must call 726.3769. This Is a 24 hour recording. All Inspections requested before 7:00 a.m, will be made the same working day. Inspections requested after 7:00 8.m. will be made the following work day. o Temporary Electric O Site Inspection - To be made after excavation, but prior to setting forms. o Undorslab Plumblng/Eloclricall Mechanical - Prior to cover. o Fooling - After trenches are excavated. o Masonry - Steel location, bond beams, grouting. o Foundation - After forms are erected but prior to concrete placemont. o Underground Plumbing - Prior to filling trench. O Underfloor Plumbing/Mechanical - Prior to Insulation or decking. o Post and Beam - Prior to floor Insulation or decking. o Floor Insulation - Prlor to deckl ng. o Sanitary Sewer - Prior to filling trench. o Storm Sewer - Prior to filling trench. o Water Line - Prior to filling trench. o Rough Plumbing - Prior to cover. REQUIRED INSPECTIONS o Rough Mechanical - Prior to cover. o Rough Electrical - Prior to cover. o Electrical Service - Must be approved to obtain permanent electrical power. o Fireplace - Prior to facing materials and framing Insp. o Framing - Prior to cover. o Wail/Ceiling Insulallon - Prior to cover. o Drywall - Prior to taping. . o Wood Stovo - After Installation. o Insert - After fireplace approvlIl and Installation of unit. o Curbcut & Approach - After forms are erected but prior to placemont of concrete. o Sidewalk & Driveway - After excavation Is complete, forms and sub-base ma.terlal in place. o Fence - When cOi"I"lpletcd. o Street Trees - Wh~n all required tree.s Bre planted. o Final Plumbing - When all plumbing worle; Is complete. . . o Final Electrical - When all electrical work Is complete. f\:7I Final Mechanical - When all yo...,J mechanical work Is complete. o Final Building - When all required Inspections have been approved and bulldl ng Is completed. OOlhor MOBILE HOME INSPECTIONS o Blocking and Sot.Up - When all blocking Is complete. o Plumbing Connoctlons - When home has been connected to water and sewer. o Electrical Connection - When blocking, set-up, and plumbing Inspections have been approved and the home Is connected to the service panel. o Final - After all required Inspections are approved and porches, skirting, decks, and venting have been Installed. , Lot faces Lot ~ype . Interior Lot sq, flg, Lot coverage Corner Topography Total height Panhandle' Cul-de-sac BUILDING PERMIT ;, ITEM so. FT. X $/SO. FT. Main Garage Carport Total Value Building Permit Fee Slate Surcharge Total Fcc (A) SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGE (SDC) (B) PLUMBING PERMIT ITEM Fixtures Residential Bath(s) N' Sanitary S~wer '\ Water FT. FT. Storm Sewer FT. Mobile Home Plumbing Permit Stato Surcharge Total Charge (C) MECHANICAL PERMIT Furnace Exhaust Hood Vent Fan N' . Wood Stovelln~ertlFlreplace Unit Dryer Vent ~J /h"'P-- Mechanical Permit Issuance State Surcharge Total Permit (D) MISCELLJl;NEOUS PERMITS Mobile Home State Issuance State Surcharge Sidewalk ft Curbcut ft Demolition State Surcharge Total Miscellaneous Permits (E) TOTAL AMOUNT DUE (excluding electrical) (A, B, C, D, and E Combined) :::.- i;~ :'..;:\;, ", 1;1.'! ~ Setbacks I PL. HSE GAR Acc.1 IN Is . i. THE PROPOSED WORK IN THE, . . HISTORICAL DISTRICT. OR ON THE HISTORICAL REGISTER? If yes, this application must be signed and approved by the Historical Coordinator prior to permit issuance. vv___ ,E VALUE " FEE /5.()j) / p. () tl <K./ 75 ..ft oz.".U/ APPROVED: , " BUILDING VALUE, PLAN CHECK AND BUILDING PERMIT This permit is granted on the express condition that the said construction shall, in all respects, conform to the OrdInance adopted by the City ".of Springfield, Including the Development Code, regulating the construction and use of oulldings, and may be' suspended or revoked at any time upon violation of any provisions of said ordinances. Plan Check Fee. , Date Paid: ., Receipt Number" Received By: Plans Reviewed By Date Systems Development Charge is due on all undeveloped properties within the City limits which are being Improved. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS By signature, I state and agree, that I have carefully examined the completed application and do hereby certify that all Information hereon Is true and correct, and I further certify that any and all work performed shall be done In accordance with the Ordlnanees of the City of Springfield, and the Laws of the State of Oregon pertaIning to the work described ,herein, and that NO OCCUPANCY will be made of any structure without permission of lhe Building Safety Division. I further certify that only contractors and employees who are In compliance with ORS 701.055 will be used on this project. I further agree 10 ensure that all required inspections are requested at the proper time, that each address Is readable from the street, that the permit c d Is located at the front of the property, and the ap v set of pl~s will remain on the site at all tI s In nst ctlon, SignaturE" / Date /' <Y /~/ 7B VALIDATION: 6311L!/ DATE PAID f /2- () 1ft AMOUNT RECEIVED I ?1'iJ"- () ;J RECEIVED BY IAA tJaJ/. RECEIPT NUMBER OG S . OREGON . , GEOTECHNICAL "- " , SERVICES "- " To: Don Mickel 649 Quarry Rd. Springfield, OR 97477 July 10, 1998 CC: Lome Pleger City of Springfield Development ServiceslPublic Works 225 5th Street Springfield, OR 97477 {57 (}.~jJq. Re: Construction Inspection - Subgrade Verification and Compaction Testing: 657 Quarry Rd., Springfield, Oregon; City Job #980155. The purpose of this letter is to record that on the dates of June 15, July 7 and 9, Oregon Geotechnical Services staff provided inspection of the residential.construction at 657 Quarry Rd., Springfield, Oregon. Inspection consisted of observation and lesting of thesubgrade exposed in the buil~ng. excavation, and certification of the fill placed to bring the site back up to grade after over~,. ':..."<..'; excavation. Work was performed in accoTdance with tht< special inspection requests oftht<Ci.tY of . Springfield, and a previously prepared geotechnical evaluation which recommended construc~on inspection for the subject property (see "Geotechnical Site Evaluation, Mickel Property, 657 Quarry Rd., Springfield, Oregon", dated April 15, 1998, by Oregon Geotechnical Services). This inspection was performed by David E. Reich, Certified Engineering Geologist (OR Lic. # El227) and Andrew W, Lamb, Geotechnical Associate, of Oregon Geotechnical SerVices, 38401 Place Road, Fall Creek, Oregon, 97438. Field work included site reconnaissance, visual inspection, and manual testing of the subgrade material to verifY soil composition and strength as documented during initial site evaluation (see "Geotechnical Site Evaluation, Mickel Property, 657 Qwirry Rd., Springfield, Oregon", dated April 15,1998, by Oregon Geotechnical Services). Work also included inspection of the fill in the building area to verifY bearing capacity in the foundation areas. In addition to manual soil testing, and visual inspection of the subgrade, proof-roll testing was performed in the building area with a fully loaded 10 cubic yard dump truck (gross wt - 50,000 lbs), to verifY the suitability of the subgrade and/or fill, and certifY the site as suitable for the proposed building construction. MickelCl. 7/98 Orogon Geot.ohnical Selvices lof2 38401 Place Road. Pall Creek. Oregon 97438 . Phone/Pax: (541) 937-8747 . . Summwy As recommended, clayey surficial soils were removed from the building area, exposing hard rocky material of SU-B and RU-l 0, Before placement of rock, the rocky subgrade was smoothed with a track mounted backhoe. Approximately 1.0 to 2.0 feet offill was placed on top of the dense, native sub grade. The first lift of the fill consists of 3" minus crushed rock, and the remainder of the fill consists of 3/4 minus crushed rock. Lifts were placed in 2-4 inch layers, brought to an appropriate moisture content, and compacted with a walk-behind plate compactor until no tracks were left by the compaction effort. Tests confirm that the structural fill is appropriately constructed and adequately compacted Testing confirms that a relative compaction of approximately 95% (ASTM D 1557) has been achieved in the aggregate fill. A bearing capacity of greater than approximately 1500 PSF can be expected for footings placed directly On the structural fill. Runoff from downspouts and surface drainage should be directed away from the footings, to avoid differential settlement of the foundation. The landscaping and ground surface around the perimeter of the footing should be graded so that the ground surfaces slope away from the foundation. Limitations This report was prepared for the exclusive use of Don Mickel and his authorized agents. Professional services were rendered in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical services, and using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by firms or individuals practicing in similar locations. Analysis, conclusions and recommendations included in this report relate to conditions at the time the services were performed. Data was accumulated from overall site reconnaissance and limited subsurface exploration in select locations. In the event that changes in the I1llture, design or layout of the project are made, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed and verified in writing, and no warranty is expressed or implied. If you have any comments or questions please give us a call at 937-8747. Sincerely, Oregon Geotechnical Services ~L.~ David E. Reich, PG, CEG ~~.u.~ Andrew W. Lamb, Geotechnical Associate MickelCL.7/98 Oregon Geotechnical Services 2of2