Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotes, Work PLANNER 6/16/2011 , . . TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST \ \ Engineer: Clayton McEachern Case#: PREll-00013 PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING Complete o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions ~ ~ rgJ rgJ r::"1 E2EI ~ rgJ rgJ I'0a ~. Revised 10/25/07 Incomplete See PW Note(s) ~ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer Vicinity Map The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department The 100-year floodplain and flood way boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 V2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be . submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table [Ffl l1.J. 1 n/a n/a r::"1 t.:.2l ~ Date, Received: 1t/~/""'1/ Planner: AL , . . . o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan must be in compliance with the regulations of SDC Sections 5.17-100, 4.1-100, 4.2-100, and 4.3-100 and must include the following information: Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) ~ ~ ~ ~ '*I ~. ~ Q IZr:l Q l.ttt:I o Grading and Paving Plan Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) ~ ~ '*I o ~ I'S7l @ ~ ~ r;:l li3:d ~ '*I ~ '*I ct:..1 '*I W ~ 2 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer Location and width of all existing and proposed easements Location of existing and required power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site, including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) Amount of proposed cut and fill o Stormwater Management System Study - provide four (4) copies of the study with the completed Stormwater Scoping Sheet attached. The plan, calculations, and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Complete Incomplete ~ ~ Revised 10/25/07 See PW Note(s) Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management System Study Date, Received:~"I)u/' Planner: Al . \ . . . PW Notes: 1. Hatching artefact(?) is obscuring northeast portion of the map. 2. Existing roof downspouts are not shown coming out of the building adjacent to the proposed fueling area. The exact location of these downspouts may not drain into the fueling area, but this is not clear on the plans. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: . A sign adjacent to the valve box for the curb inlet should be installed stating that the valve should be closed in case of fuel spill. . Not clear how the drainage will be routed to the flow-through planter with adequate residence time and contact with the vegetation to be effectively treated. Is the linework along the northern edge of.the flow-through planter meant to show openings in the curbline? . An underdrain is not necessary in the flow-through planter area if ~n increased planting medium (topsoil) depth of 2' or greater is used. . Drop in filter inserts should be installed in all catch basins across the Fred Meyer site as part of the overall site work to meet storm water quality requirements . There are numerous broken and missing curbs around the site that need repair and/or replacement to clearly show travel lanes and protect lar;1dscaping and contain planting material. . The striping in the parking lot has faded to the point of not clearly showing locations of travel lanes and parking stalls. . One of the loading docks at the northeast corner of the building does not have adequate overhead cover. The City is currently using the City of Portland design manual for these standards and this requires that all truck docks be hydraulically isolated, covered and drain to sanitary. As this is an existing dock, the required upgrade will be limited to overhead cover only. . There are numerous outside garbage storage containers/compactors at the northeast corner of the building. Most of these do not require any modifications, but the easternmost appears to contain food waste and is adjacent to a storm drain catchbasin. This dumpster requires an overhead cover and isolation from the catch basin due to proximity and the nature of the material it contains. Revised 10/25/07 Date Heceived: t/,15/do/J Planner: AL