HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotes, Work PLANNER 6/16/2011
,
. .
TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
\
\
Engineer: Clayton McEachern Case#: PREll-00013
PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING
Complete
o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
~
~
rgJ
rgJ
r::"1
E2EI
~
rgJ
rgJ
I'0a
~.
Revised 10/25/07
Incomplete See PW
Note(s)
~
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect
or Engineer
Vicinity Map
The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site
features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and
impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is
remaining and what is being removed. For existing
structures to remain, also indicate present use, size,
setbacks from property lines, and distance between
buildings
The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and
top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian
setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited
Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services
Department
The 100-year floodplain and flood way boundaries on
the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood
Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map
Amendment or Letter of Map Revision
The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200
and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map
on file in the Development Services Department
Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5"
in diameter or greater when measured 4 V2 feet above
the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs,
riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings
Soil types and water table information as mapped and
specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A
Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be
. submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates
the proposed development area has unstable soils
and/or a high water table
[Ffl
l1.J.
1
n/a
n/a
r::"1
t.:.2l
~
Date, Received: 1t/~/""'1/
Planner: AL
,
.
.
.
o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan must be in compliance with the regulations of
SDC Sections 5.17-100, 4.1-100, 4.2-100, and 4.3-100 and must include the following
information:
Complete Incomplete See PW
Note(s)
~
~
~
~
'*I
~.
~
Q
IZr:l
Q
l.ttt:I
o Grading and Paving Plan
Complete Incomplete See PW
Note(s)
~
~
'*I
o
~
I'S7l
@
~
~
r;:l
li3:d
~
'*I
~
'*I
ct:..1
'*I
W
~
2
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
Location and width of all existing and proposed
easements
Location of existing and required power poles,
transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar
public facilities
Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on
and adjacent to the site, including sanitary sewer
mains, stormwater management systems, water
mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV.
Indicate the proposed connection points
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed
Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as
part of the stormwater management system
Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations
Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns
The size and location of stormwater management
systems components, including but not limited to:
drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention
ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural
drainageways to be retained
Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours
lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope
over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot
intervals)
Amount of proposed cut and fill
o Stormwater Management System Study - provide four (4) copies of the study with
the completed Stormwater Scoping Sheet attached. The plan, calculations, and
documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and
Procedures Manual.
Complete Incomplete
~ ~
Revised 10/25/07
See PW
Note(s)
Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management
System Study
Date, Received:~"I)u/'
Planner: Al
.
\
.
.
.
PW Notes:
1. Hatching artefact(?) is obscuring northeast portion of the map.
2. Existing roof downspouts are not shown coming out of the building adjacent to the
proposed fueling area. The exact location of these downspouts may not drain into
the fueling area, but this is not clear on the plans.
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:
. A sign adjacent to the valve box for the curb inlet should be installed stating that the
valve should be closed in case of fuel spill.
. Not clear how the drainage will be routed to the flow-through planter with adequate
residence time and contact with the vegetation to be effectively treated. Is the
linework along the northern edge of.the flow-through planter meant to show
openings in the curbline?
. An underdrain is not necessary in the flow-through planter area if ~n increased
planting medium (topsoil) depth of 2' or greater is used.
. Drop in filter inserts should be installed in all catch basins across the Fred Meyer site
as part of the overall site work to meet storm water quality requirements
. There are numerous broken and missing curbs around the site that need repair
and/or replacement to clearly show travel lanes and protect lar;1dscaping and contain
planting material.
. The striping in the parking lot has faded to the point of not clearly showing locations
of travel lanes and parking stalls.
. One of the loading docks at the northeast corner of the building does not have
adequate overhead cover. The City is currently using the City of Portland design
manual for these standards and this requires that all truck docks be hydraulically
isolated, covered and drain to sanitary. As this is an existing dock, the required
upgrade will be limited to overhead cover only.
. There are numerous outside garbage storage containers/compactors at the northeast
corner of the building. Most of these do not require any modifications, but the
easternmost appears to contain food waste and is adjacent to a storm drain
catchbasin. This dumpster requires an overhead cover and isolation from the catch
basin due to proximity and the nature of the material it contains.
Revised 10/25/07
Date Heceived: t/,15/do/J
Planner: AL