Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotes, Work APPLICANT 6/17/2011 " . . " I City of Springfield o'evelopment'Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield,OR97477 SITE PLAN REVIEW PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Project Name: Fred Meyer Fuel Facility Project Proposal: Construct a new fuel center on a developed 7.8 acre commercial site Case Number: PRE11-00013 Project Address: 650 Q Street Assessors Map and Tax Lot Number(s): Map 17-03-26-24, Tax Lot 5500 Zoning: Community Commercial (CC) Overlay District(s): Drinking Water Protection (DWP) Applicable Refinement Plan: N/A Refinement Plan Designation: N/A Metro Plan Designation: Commercial Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: June 17, 2011 Application Submittal Deadline: December 14, 2011 Associated Applications: ZON201O-00001; TYP111-00013 POSITION REVIEW OF NAME Proiect Planner Land Use Planning Andy Limbird 726-3784 TransDortation Plannino Enoineer TransDortation Michael Liebler 736-1034 Public Works Civil Engineer Utilities, Sanitary & Storm Clayton McEachern 736-1036 Sewer DeDutv Fire Marshal Fire and Life Safetv Gilbert Gordon 726-2293 Community Services Manaoer Buildino Dave Puent 726-3668 i;~PPUC~NJ:rSP:EM-=J.:[QpMENcr;;gE~iEWJ:EA.Mm:stlili;i;li !<f:;::';:t>;;h~::;jp'JiL .~ . ;-~:(dr:i~;~~:@ll~;;;l:~ill ;'<>.',;<< -~',;,i;'-<"'''<:;<d -; ;hiili4i;;~ET jn Applicant Owner Chris Ferko Ji m Coombes Ba rg ha usen Consulti ng Engineers Inc. Fred Meyer Stores Inc. 182 1 5 72nd Avenue South 3800 SE 22nd Aven ue Kent, WA 9803 2 Portia nd, OR 97242 Revised 10/25/07 Date ?~eceived: 6//7/;;0/1 / / P!armer: AL . . TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PLANNING o Application fee - discuss the applicable fees o Copy of the Site Plan reduced to 8'h"x 11" Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~ iii 8 V," x 11" Copy of Site Plan o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) iii ~ 1 Deed and Preliminary Title Report o Brief narrative explaining the purpose of the development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees and future expansion plans, if known. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~ ~ o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) 2 ~ ~ l';ZI.c 5i1 ~ ~ ~ I';ZI ~. 3 ~ iii..... ':"".. ....'" Revised 10/25/07 Brief Narrative Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, or Engineer Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact, and disabled parking spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, parking and Date, Received: ?1't7~// Planner: AL / / . I2?J I2?J f'1'J E::1 f'1'J lLfu5J ~~ ffF' &G_ I2?J 4 I2?J f'1'J 6ilJ f'1'J lL!I I2?J 5 . vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses Location of existing and proposed transit facilities o Phased Development Plan Where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water, and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply to the Site Plan application being submitted. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) I2?J ~ o Landscape Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~ I2?J f'1'J ~- f'1'J ~ JI:311 l22St 8ii1 kiitl JI:311 ~ 6 JI:311 ~. is&'I lZfr::J ~ ~~. '''''"' ,,,,Wi *Comment Revised 10/25/07 Phased Development Plan Drawn by a Landscape Architect Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of landscape coverage Screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 Written description, including specifications, of the permanent irrigation system Location and type of street trees List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size, spacing and method of planting Date, Received: ,I]/~f/ I I Planner: AL . . o Architectural Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~ rFJ ~ Exterior elevations of all buildings and structures proposed for the development site, including height Conceptual floor plans r<:;;:;l.'4 r;:-Ji la1 \.:iJl o On-Site Lighting Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) IV'1 ~ Ii! Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area Photometric test report for each light source ~ lil~. 5$U;. "",,-. r<:;;:;l ~ r;]il ~ Planning Notes: 1. The submitted title report is from April, 2010; please provide a current title report with the site plan review submittal. 2. Please ensure the professional engineer of record signs the plan sheets. 3. Please provide a plan sheet detailing the proposed changes to the parking spaces and garden center fence along the north edge of the site. 4. Show the location and number of required bicycle parking spaces on the site. 5. Show the location of the existing bus stop and transit park and ride spaces. 6. The planting plan references Sheets L-2, L-3 and L-4; however, these sheets are not included with the site plan submittal. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: . Staff advises that regulatory compliance standards have changed significantly since the Fred Meyer store was constructed more than 20 years ago. Therefore, principal Development Code compliance issues for the site will be evaluated and addressed, as necessary, with the Site Plan Review submittal. These include, but are not limited to: water quality protection and stormwater drainage; outdoor storage of materials and equipment; provision of adequate bicycle parking; striping and directional marking for parking spaces and driving aisles; maintenance, replacement and/or repair of site landscaping, curbing, and pedestrian access ways; and compliance with ADA accessibility requirements. . Please confirm that the new lighting installed with the fuel center is under-canopy illumination. . There are a significant number of shopping carts and a large shipping container in the northeast corner of the site. This area is shown as parking spaces on the site plan (although a plan detail is needed per Note 3 above). Revised 10{25{07 Date, i'<8Ceived: ~)7/;m11 PI I I armer: AL . . TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Engineer: Clayton McEachern Case#: PREll-OOOl3 PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) [!gJ [!gJ [!gJ i:iiI 8 i:iiI L:S 1 i:iiI ~ i:iiI l.d! n/a ~~~' .,:L ~"", ~ n/a [!gJ [!gJ [!gJ i:iiI ~ Revised 10/25/07 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer Vicinity Map The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department ~ The lOa-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 V2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Solis Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table Date Received: g/I7/JooJJ . I Planner: AL . . o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan must be in compliance with the regulations of SDC Sections 5.17-100, 4.1-100, 4.2-100, and 4.3-100 and must include the following information: Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) "'" ~ ~ ~ ~ GlJ l!]J GlJ L..:JI GlJ ~ o Grading and Paving Plan Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) ~ ~ EJ ~ ~ ~ ~ EJ ~ GlJ ~ GlJ l!EJ EJ 2 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer Location and width of all existing and proposed easements Location of existing and required power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site, including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) Amount of proposed cut and fill o Stormwater Management System Study - provide four (4) copies of the study with the completed Stormwater Scoping Sheet attached. The plan, calculations, and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Complete ~ Revised 10/25/07 Incomplete ~... ~''t,,,: '",.,"- See PW Note(s) Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management System Study Date! f~eGei\fed: ')71),7/1 Planner: AL / I . . PW Notes: 1. Hatching artefact(?) is obscuring northeast portion of the map. 2. Existing roof downspouts are not shown coming out of the building adjacent to the proposed fueling area. The exact location of these downspouts may not drain into the fueling area, but this is not clear on the plans. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: . A sign adjacent to the valve box for the curb inlet should be installed stating that the valve should be closed in case of fuel spill. . Not clear how the drainage will be routed to the flow-through planter with adequate residence time and contact with the vegetation to be effectively treated. Is the Iinework along the northern edge of the flow-through planter meant to show openings in the curbline? . An underdrain is not necessary in the flow-through planter area if an increased planting medium (topsoil) depth of 2' or greater is used. . Drop in filter inserts should be installed in all catch basins across the Fred Meyer site as part of the overall site work to meet storm water quality requirements . There are numerous broken and missing curbs around the site that need repair and/or replacement to clearly show travel lanes a'nd protect landscaping and contain planting material. . The striping in the parking lot has faded to the point of not clearly showing locations of travel lanes and parking stalls. . One of the loading docks at the northeast corner of the building does not have adequate overhead cover. The City is currently using the City of Portland design manual for these standards and this requires that all truck docks be hydraulically isolated, covered and drain to sanitary. As this is an existing dock, the required upgrade will be limited to overhead cover only. . There are numerous outside garbage storage containers/compactors at the northeast corner of the building. Most of these do not require any modifications, but the easternmost appears to contain food waste and is adjacent to a storm drain catchbasin. This dumpster requires an overhead cover and isolation from the catch basin due to proximity and the nature of the material it contains. Revised 10/25/07 Dated~eceived: ~/I7/)o// Planner: AL I I . . TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Transportation Engineer/Planner: Michael Liebler Case#: PRE2011-00013 Applicant: Fred Meyer TRANSPORTATION o Right-of-Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has . frontage on a Lane County or an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) r:;;;;, lLSt W 1.2lliil Copy of ROW Approach Permit Application o Traffic Impact Study - four (4) copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance with SDC 4:2-105 AA. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also address, if needed, City, Metro Plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. Complete Incomplete Q LbEll ~ See Transportation' Note(s) 1,2 Traffic Impact Study o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) ~ Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served,. including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete' See Transportation Note(s) ~ l2?l r;;!) ~ Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails Location, widths (of paving and right-of- way) and names orall existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications, Date, r~eceived: 6/;7/),,// / I Planner: AL ~ ~ Revised 10/25/07 . . t25J r:i?1 ~ access easements or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development, including ownership and maintenance status, if applicable Location of existing and required traffic control devices Transportation Notes: 1. Submitted application includes an additional parking demand study. This Parking study is the basis for allowing parking reductions below city required number of spaces. The site plan submitted as part of the parking study differs significantly from the site plan found throughout the rest of the application. This parking study will need to be amended to reflect the latest proposed site plan parking numbers. 2. Submitted TIA as part of this application is complete. The applicant is advised that completeness does not constitute acceptance. Cursory review of the submitted TIA has revealed assumptions and methodologies that may not allow for acceptance of this TIA for final site plan approval. The city is open to discussion and refinement of this TIA in order to properly address transportation impacts associated with this development. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: . Additional information regard existing conditions for the northern portion of re- stripping shall be required in future submittals. . Landscape islands at the south ends of the angled parking rows are recommended to clearly delineate the parking and fueling areas. Revised 10/25/07 Date Received: ~) 1;':>/1 . Planner: AL . . TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Deputy Fire Marshal: Gilbert Gordon Case #: PREll-00013 FIRE o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Fire Note(s) rg] On-site vehicular circulation o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete See Fire Note(s) ~ r:;i;i! B!:!!J Location of existing and required fire hydrants and similar public facilities Fire Notes: 1. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: a. The construction fence shall go around the fire hydrant so as not to impede fire fighter access to it. The fence shall maintain a minimum 3 foot clear width around the circumference of the fire hydrant meeting 2010 Springfield Fire Code 507.5.5. This also goes for vegetation encroaching on the hydrant space. b. Provide an additional gate on the north side near the northeast corner. The purpose is to keep water supply hose lay distances to within 600 feet on the west side of the Fred Meyer building to its northwest corner per 2010 Springfield Fire Code 507.5.1, Exception 2. c. Provide public works locks for the construction gates to maintain fire access to the west side of the Fred Meyer building. Public works locks can be obtained at Heyman's Safe, Lock and Security at 141 14th Street in Springfield (541-747-6713). Revised 9/24/07 Date Received: 6/7/JdII Planner: AL I I . . ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR PERMITS IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS OR APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD' CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE- APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION: Applicable Not Applicable ~ ~. ~ I!ij;l ~ D...... t::12.l ~ ~. ~..ili '^;m ~-, . ~ lZSI D ~ ~ ~ [] ~ I!ij;l ~ ~ D 1Z.::Jf. ~ ~ Revised 10/25/07 Where a multi-family development is proposed, any additional materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240 Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are' unstable soils and/or a high water table present Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be serviced by sanitary sewer DateReceived: '//7/;'// / I Planner: AL . . THIS APPLICATION IS: o COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING [gJ INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE Date This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Section 5.4- 105 and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a limited land use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete. The 120-day processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is submitted or when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must indicate by either signing this form or by submitting a written response to the City within seven days of the date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing information. If you indicate herein or in your written response that the missing information will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre- Submittal Review to provide the City with the missing information. If you refuse to submit the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee, the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120-day clock and . begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after the start of the 120-day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the 120-day processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the 120-day period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if the new information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is sent out and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects the application proposal and additional review is required. I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the City within the lSD-day timeline. CYIL-- ~/(f Itl I Owner/Applicant's Signature Date . Date, Received: 6)7/JtJI/ Planner: AL I I Revised 1O{25{07 :.0 " . . TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST ~F";' Transportation Engineer/Planner: Michaelliebler Case#: PRE2011-00013 Applicant: Fred Meyer TRANSPORTATION Q- o Right-of-Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has frontage on a Lane County or an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) ~ ~ Copy of ROW Approach Permit Application o Traffic Impact Study - four (4) copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance with SDC 4.2-105 AA. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the' traffic impacts and' mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also address, if needed, City, Metro Plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) 1,2 Traffic Impact Study CJ ~ o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) ~ r;:J 19 Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) ~ r;:J l1:dI rz:;::J 42Il Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails Location, widths (of paving and right-of-- way) and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedicatio s, Date t~eceived: '/7 'JI7// Planner: AL jgI ~ l5'J ~ Revised 10{25{07 ~ \' , . . ~ n U=iI access easements or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development, including ownership and maintenance status, if applicable Location of existing and required traffic control devices Transportation Notes: 1. Submitted application includes an additional parking demand study. This Parking study is the basis for allowing parking reductions below city required number of spaces. The site plan submitted as part of the parking study differs significantly from the site plan found throughout the rest of the application. This parking study will need to be amended to reflect the latest proposed site plan parking numbers. 2. Submitted TIA as part of this application is complete. The applicant is advised that completeness does not constitute acceptance. Cursory review of the submitted TIA has revealed assumptions and methodologies that may not allow for acceptance of this TIA for final site plan approval. The city is open to discussion and refinement of this TIA in order to properly address transportation impacts associated with this development. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: . Additional information regard existing conditions for the northern portion of re- stripping shall be required in future submittals. . Landscape islands at the south ends of the angled parking rows are recommended to clearly delineate the parking and fueling areas. Revised 10/25/07 Date, Received: ,;j; 7/;01/ / I P!anl"!er: AL