HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/30/2003 Regular
.
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL REGULAR MEETING OF
THE SPRINGFIELD CITY COUNCIL HELD
MONDAY, JUNE 30, 2003
The city of Springfield council met in special regular session in the Council Meeting Room, 225
Fifth Street, Springfield, Oregon, on Monday, June 30, 2003 at 7:00 p.m., with Mayor Leiken
presiding.
ATTENDANCE
Present were Mayor Leiken, Councilors Ballew, Woodrow, Burge, Ralston, Malloy and Fitch.
Also present were Assistant City Manager Cynthia Pappas, City Attorney Joe Leahy, Acting City
Recorder Amy Sowa and members ofthe staff.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Leiken led the Pledge of Allegiance.
CONSENT CALENDAR
IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILOR FITCH WITH A SECOND BY COUNCILOR
BALLEW TO ADOPT THE CONSENT CALENDAR. THE MOTION PASSED WITH A
VOTE OF 6 FOR AND 0 AGAINST.
.
1. Other Routine Matters
a. Authorize the City Manager to Execute Payment in Lieu of Taxes Agreement with the
Springfield Utility Board.
b. Approve Liquor License Endorsement for the Music Box, formerly El V olcan Restaurant
& Bar, 535 Main Street, Springfield, Oregon.
c. Approve Liquor License Endorsement for Sofia's Restaurant and Bavarian Brewery,
formerly Spencer's Restaurant & Brew House, 980 Kruse Way, Springfield, Oregon.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Transportation System Maintenance Fee
ORDINANCE NO.1 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SPRINGFIELD MUNICIPAL
CODE TO AN INITIATED MEASURE REPEALING ORDINANCE 6036 AND SECTION
7.600, 7.602, 7.604, 7.610, 7.620, 7.640, 7.660, 7.664, 7.666, AND 7.668 OF THE
SPRINGFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
.
Technical Services Manager Len Goodwin was present for the staff report. Mr. Goodwin said
that a petition containing sufficient valid signatures has been certified by the County elections
division on the question of the repeal of ordinance number 6036. As a result, on or before July 2,
2003, the City is obliged either to repeal the ordinance or refer the matter to the next election,
which we understand will be September 16,2003. Ifthe City refers the matter, it may also refer a
companion or competing measure, or, on or before July 17, 2003 adopt the repealer ordinance and
withdraw the referral to the September election. Drafts of appropriate documents for either repeal
I
I
Springfield City Council
Regular Session Minutes - June 30, 2003
Page - 2
.
or referral are attached. Mr. Goodwin noted that at its meeting of June 23,2003, the Council
tabled action on this matter until tonight's meeting.
Mr. Goodwin said that tonight council has the option of adopting the ordinance to repeal
ordinance 6036, or adopt a resolution referring this to a vote ofthe people at the next election to
be held in September 2003.
Mayor Leiken opened the public hearing.
No one appeared to speak.
Mayor Leiken closed the public hearing.
Councilor Ballew supports repealing, only because we have a large street fund problem. We will
eventually have to solve our own problem.
Councilor Burge is hopeful that in repealing our ordinance our County Commissioners will find it
in their hearts to come up with a methodology to allocate funds more appropriately to the cities.
All citizens are both city residents and county residents. There are other methods that need to be
explored if a solution is not found.
.
IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILOR FITCH WITH A SECOND BY COUNCILOR
BURGE TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 6056 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
SPRINGFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE TO AN INITIATED MEASURE REPEALING
ORDINANCE 6036 AND SECTION 7.600, 7.602, 7.604, 7.610, 7.620, 7.640, 7.660, 7.664,
7.666, AND 7.668 OF THE SPRINGFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY. THE MOTION PASSED WITH A VOTE OF 6 FOR AND 0 AGAINST.
Mayor Leiken noted that he feels the council has acted courageously in voting to repeal our
ordinance. We do not have a guaranteed solution at this time, but he is hopeful a solution can be
found. He referred to his state of the city address where he spoke of meeting with Mayor Torrey
and a Lane County Commissioner to discuss this issue to find a solution, both short term and long
term. They also had to work with the State legislature. Because the transportation bill just
passed, we should be seeing some of that funding. He thanked Rep. Beyer, Commissioner Pape,
City of Springfield staff and Mayor Torrey in getting this bill passed. He feels the discussions
with the Board of Commissioners have been a good progress in getting a short term solution. We
will begin to look for a long term solution in the next couple of years. This is step one and he is
confident we will continue until we find a more permanent solution.
BUSINESS FROM THE CITY MANAGER
1. Complete Negotiations for Property Purchase and Signing of the Jasper Road Agreement.
Councilor Burge recused himself due to a possible conflict of interest.
.
Economic Development Manager John Tamulonis and City Attorney Joe Leahy were present for
the staff report. Mr. Tamulonis said that council directed staffto continue negotiations on the
proposed purchase of about 13.03 acres and obtain information on its market value.
.
Springfield City Council
Regular Session Minutes - June 30, 2003
Page - 3
.
Mr. Leahy explained the cost from the appraisal from John Brown of Duncan and Brown for the
13.03 acres of approximately $250,000. It is an appraised value based on the after project value.
He described the costs and the money to be gained in additional sales of 'surplus' parcels and tax
income. The City would pay approximately $312,720 for total costs, but could recoup if we sold
the properties at those prices $116,000, which leaves a net to the City of $44,000 down the road
assuming the property goes forward and we sell it after the project is done. There is no cost to the
City until there is dedication from the County. This same condition applies to the railroad spur
cost. He noted that if the County receives the property, but does not go forward with the project,
the properties will go back to the City and no SDC's will be paid or credits on the right-of-way up
to 60 feet. He said it is unusual to pay project enhanced value. Normally, if an agreement could
not be reached with the property owner with fair market value, you would go to an imminent
domain proceeding, acquire the property and you would have to pay the fair market value.
The negotiations on the JRE agreement are nearly complete. However, during the recent review
with property owners, McDougal indicated having revised estimates of costs for relocating the
rail spur and asked to include revised terms in the JRE agreement. The changes will be described
for Council to consider accept, modify, or reject. Payment for the rail spur would not occur until
confirmation from Lane County intends to require JRE right-of-way dedication. The Council
may then direct the City Manager to continue and complete the negotiations with the property
owners and Lane County and authorize the City Manager to sign the JRE agreement.
.
The proposed purchase would include about 4.28 acres for right-of-way needed for the JRE right-
of-way. (Exhibit A-I, shaded Area D) In addition there would be two 'surplus' parcels of 6.38
acres (Area A + Area C) and 2.36 acres (Area B) for later sale or other use. Milland agrees to
sign the JRE agreement with the new south intersection provided there is access across Area B.
Lane County agreed to extend the signing of the JRE Agreement another 45 days after May 21,
2003. That extension ends on July 5, 2003.
Staff is looking to Council to authorize the City Manager to complete negotiations and sign a
purchase agreement of approximately 13.03 acres from Milland Properties Limited Partnership
that conforms with the Jasper Road Extension (JRE) agreement dedicating right-of-way for JRE
construction and to authorize the City Manager to complete negotiations on the terms of the JRE
agreement with the prqperty owners and Lane County and sign the JRE agreement.
Councilor Woodrow asked if in the case the property is dedicated and the road is not built, when
would the property be returned to the City.
Mr. Tamulonis said it would be January 1,2010.
.
IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILOR FITCH WITH A SECOND BY COUNCILOR
BALLEW TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO COMPLETE NEGOTIATIONS
AND SIGN A PURCHASE AGREEMENT OF APPROXIMATELY 13.03 ACRES OF
THE MILLAND PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP THAT CONFORMS WITH THE
JASPER ROAD EXTENSION (JRE) AGREEMENT DEDICATING RIGHT-OF-WAY
FOR JRE CONSTRUCTION AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
COMPLETE NEGOTIATIONS ON THE TERMS OF THE JRE AGREEMENT WITH
THE PROPERTY OWNERS AND LANE COUNTY AND SIGN THE' JRE AGREEMENT.
THE MOTION PASSED WITH A VOTE OF 5 FOR AND 0 AGAINST (1 EXCUSED).
..
.
.
\.
Springfield City Council
Regular Session Minutes - June 30, 2003
Page - 4
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:20 p.m.
Minutes Recorder Amy Sowa
\:
Attest:
f2,~Jowlt-J
Amy So
Acting City Recorder