Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotice PLANNER 6/23/2010 . . PRE-SUBMITTAL PLAT DISTRIBUTION LIST: Date Distributed: ~- ~ 3-10 / Dave Puent - Building ./ Gilbert Gordon/Melissa Fechtel- Fire ../ ,_UeS~~5, Traffic I v' Matt Stouder- Public Works/Engineering ./ Chris Moorhead, Surve~ing ./ Rebecca Templin, Spjld Vtility Board (Water) ;7" Tamara Johnson, Spjld lItility Board (Electric) Thomas Jeffreys, Emerald People's Utility District Planner, .c4V'J.LJ I . I' . City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 541-725-3753 Phone 541-726-3689 Fax . . Pre-Submittal Meeting Case Number Assigned: PRE2010-00010 Date Submitted: 6/23/2010 APPLICANT: MCKINNEY ANDREA 541-746-2543 PO BOX 1352 SPRINGFIELD OR 97477 541-746-2543 Proiect Name: A. MCKINNEY 2L T PART 6595 MAIN Project Description: , ....,.. ..':' Pre-Submittal Partition Plat - 2 lot MDR partition Application Type: Partition Plat Job Address: 6595 MAIN ST Assessor's & Tax Lot #: 1702344401201 DISCLAIMER: Applications will not be exempt from Development Code or procedural amendments that may occur between the time of the Pre-Submittal Meeting and Subwi~aL9f,t~e. ~pplication for Development Review. Please contact our office at 541-726-3753 with any questions or concerns. A Planner will be assigned the following business day and will contact you to confirm the meeting date and time. JUN 2 3 2010 PlanJobPrint.rpt 6/23/2010 9:35:49AM 'j;" . . Pre-Submittal Meeting Development Services Department Room 615/616 PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING DATE: Friday, July 2, 2010 1. PRE-SUBMITTAL MfG #PRE20l0-000l0 (pART PLAT) MCKINNEY Assessor's Map: 17-02-34-44 TL 1201 Address: 6595 & 6597 Main Street Existing Use: MDR The applicant submitted plans to plat a two-lot partition. Meeting Date/Time: Friday, July 2, 2010 11:00 - noon DSD 616 . Planner: Steve Hopkins PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D JUN 2 3 2010 City of Springfield Development Services Departme[1t 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 . . u"v- t 5 l '-" i Land Division Plat Partition, Subdivision A licant Name: Andrea McKinne Com an : Phone: Fax: Address: P.O. Box 1312 S rin field OR 97477 ...... . -I: A licant's Re .. Rex A. Betz, PLS Com an : , Inc. Phone: Fax: Address: 310 Fifth Street, S rin field OR 97477 "'t'"" - "'.,'; Owner: Andrea Mckinne Trustee Shalece M.B. Amor Trust Phone: 541 746-2543 Com an Fax: Address: P.O. Box 1312, S rin field, OR 97477 ""'I' "", ';>,t' """', -< r.'~'" -,. ',> . <"''''l'~.,.~.~ ..,-~' .""""" ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-34-44 TAX LOT NO S 1201 6595 & 6597 Main Street S rin field, OR 97477 Size of Pro e 17811 Acres D S uare Feet [;gJ Pro osed Name of Subdivision: N/A " ,. . -~'-',-~, ." .'-'~','. .. .> " ,','f ',.:"-' ",. ;c' '- >,< _'. <.' ""';- 'J" -- ','W " -'.",'- Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Pro osal: Existin Use: Multi-Famil Tentative Case #: 5UB2010-00002 Associated A lications: .-- Pre-Sub Case No.: Date: Reviewed b Case No.: A Iication Fee: $ TOTAL FEES: $ ~ Revised 11.20.09 60 Date: Technical Fee: $ p ~~~~~~~R: 101. 6 f.~.",.s.if'.;.'" '~'2:~'W";"lrml""~,;:,,,,~,,,,"~"'_"',_'~H'*:'_""~l'i~"".';~,'.~,..'>(;(Pi'Xf",,,.,,-..:_~.=,''':Y:;:j..'~:C'I~c.,,,,)i~.,,. . . Owner Signatures This application form is used for both the required pre-submittal meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted. Pre-Submittal Owner: The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. I/we'do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory timelines, information, requests and requirements conveyed to my representative. ':~~~\J'/ ~ yI, Date:X to - H- \ f) Andrea McKinney, Trustee Print Submittal I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check performed on this application at the Pre-Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will 'not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a complete application. Owner: Date: Signature Print PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D JUN 2 3 2010 Revised 11.20.09 20f6 , . . Land Division Plat Pre-Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: If you feel an item does not apply, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D 19 D D g D D D Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees, are collected at the pre-submittal and submittal stages. 1\'> '3 Lt&,. 0 D Land Division Plat Application Form Letter Addressing Conditions of Approval - lists and addresses each condition of approval, detailing the actions taken and current status of each item. .A-itahL ~~ -to CeNev- e vIer-. Nine (9) Paper Copies of the Plat stamped and signed by the surveyor. Two (2) Copies of Closure Sheets for the boundary and each lot or parcel and all common areas, dedicated areas, and easement areas that are not simple parallel offsets. Two (2) Copies of Title Report or Subdivision Guarantee for the parcel being divided. The title report must be dated within 30 days of submittal at the time of the final submittal. An older report is OK at the pre-submittal stage. Two (2) Copies of Each of the Reference Documents and Plats listed on the plat. Two (2) Copies of Each of the Supporting Documents - the vesting deed (must vest title to the owner listed on the plat), existing easement deeds, and documents listed as exceptions in the title report, etc. Two (2) Draft Copies of any street dedications. }JVVI5L reC( (/I..\vecf, Two (2) Draft Copies of Any New Easements or Restrictions being created by separate document, improvement agreements, maintenance agreements, jOint use ingress/egress and utility easements, sewer hook up in lieu of assessment, and any other documents that will be recorded together with the plat or that are required by the Conditions of Approval. ) } ~ ' Two (2) Copies of a Consent Statement (Concurrence) on the plat (to be signed by the lender prior to final approval) OR Two (2) Copies of an Affidavit of Consent by separate document is required from all Trust Deed, mortgage', or other secured loan interest holders against the property to be recorded simultaneously with the plat IF any public dedications or easements are bein'g made and/or any other interests are being transferred to the public per ORS 92.075 (2-4). p~ , eq (A ,v-ecf. , Copies of Wetland Documents as required. ]V "'V\}L yeq, VL.y-<'ce Copies of ODOT Access Permits as required. t \,;. L . ,r 8~L l.A.,'V C>~, Draft Copy of Bargain and Sale Deed for Reserve Strips - City Survey Section has a template. )VC/""\.!L req lA.,yet.-f. Verification that Street Tree Agreement is in Progress as required. )J~ r""1. ut'.,ec-.( Draft Copy of the Conditions, Covenants &. Restrictions (CC&.Rs) as required. )JCN\JL ye4 vt.va.{. PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'D JU~of5 3 2010 Revised 11.20,09 [gJ [gJ [gJ . . Post Monumentation Deposit as required for subdivisions only. City Survey Section has current fee schedule and .templates. N / A ,". Location of Any Floodways in accordance with SDC 3.3-400. proyJ"'Y"-\:'( \..:e S M ~X. Existing Easements Clearly Identified with Their Recorded Reference. o . New Easements and Reserve Strips Referenced in Owner Certificates of Dedication and Purposes of Easements Identified on Plat. NOTE: When, as part of the approval process, the application has been conditioned so that the recordation of a document is required, the applicant shall be responsible for paying the Lane County recording fee for any such required document. Documents which may require recordation include, but are not limited to: Development Agreements; Improvement Agreements; Deed Restrictions; Future Development Plans; Easements; Joint Use Access/ Maintenance Agreements; and Dedications of Right-of-Way. Land Division Plat Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: If you feel an item does not apply, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. o Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services Department. The application, technology, and postage fees, where applicable, are collected at the time of complete application submittal. o Land Division Plat Application Form o Two (2) Copies of the Deed o Two (2) Copies of a Title Report issued within 30 days of the date Lane County will record the plat. o Original Plat on Mylar with notarized owner(s) signature(s) and signed surveyor stamp. o ,Copy of the Mylar on Bond Paper o Original and Copy of all Required D~cuments with signatures where appropriate. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D JUN 2 3 2010 Revised 11.20.09 6 of 6 . D CITY OF SPRINGFIELD VICINITY MAP PRE2010-00010 6595 & 6597 Main Street MAIN ST J~ l ~ (0 . MAIN ST SITE Map 17-02-34-44 Tax Lot 1201 PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D JUN 2 3 zaw North + . . @ Branch Engineering, Inc. Corporate Headquarters (541) 746-0637 310 5th Street Springfield, OR 97477 Salem Engineering OffICe (503) 779-2577 147 Commercial Street NE, Suite 10 Salem,'OR 97301 Principals M. Lane Branch, PE Oamien Gilbert, PE Renee D. Clough, PE, PLS Rene' Fabricant, PE, SE Ronald J. Derrick, PE www.BranchEngineering.com June 22, 2010 Branch No. 10-024 Mr. Steve Hopkins DEVELOPMlliNTSERVlCESDEPARTMENT URBAN PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF SPRINGFIELD 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Re: Submittal of Final Partition Pre-Mylar Application for ANDREA MCKINNEY Planning No. SUB 2010-00002 Main Street, Springfield Dear Steve, Attached is our submittal package for the subject Pre-Mylar Application along with a copy of our Summary of actions taken with regards to the Conditions of Approval dated May 26, 2010. Partition monuments have been set as shown on the subject partition plat. We request that your survey division perform a field check at their earliest convenience. A summary of items included in this application is attached. Please call if any further information is needed. Yours truly, / /tf-v~" Rex A Bet2, PL Survey Manager Xc: Mr. Chris Moorehead. City Surveyor, City of Springfield 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O JUN 2" 3 2010 CIVIL STRUCTURES TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICAL SURVEYING . . Letter to Steve Hopkins June 22,2010 PARTITION PLAT FOR ANDREA MCKINNEY, TRUSTEE SUB 2010-00002 SUMMARY OF ACTIONS TAKEN WITH REGARDS TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL DATED MAY 26, 2010 The address sign, as well as any other trees, on-site vegetation, and/or other obstacles to vision, have been removed so as to maintain adequate vision clearance triangles at the comers of the driveway per SDC 4.2-130. End SUMMARY OF ITEMS INCLUDED IN TillS APPLICATION 1. A check from our client in the amount of$346.00 for the Pre-Submittal Fee. 2. . The signed Land Division Plat Application Form. 3. A summary statement that details actions taken regarding the conditions of approvaL (attached to the application transmittal letter ). 4. Nine paper copies of the partition plat, stamped and signed by the surveyor. 5. Two copies of the closure sheets for the boundary, each parcel and easement areas that are not simple parallel offsets. 6. Two copies of a Title Report dated March 23, 2010. An updated report will be provided with the final mylar submittal. 7. Two copies each of the following reference documents and plats listed on the partition: a. Ref. 1: Public Utility Easement (Rec. No. 2005-047489). b. Ref. 2: Easement (Reel 355R, Rec. No. 92663). c. Ref. 3:. Declaration of Private Easements (Rec. No. 2008-58922). d. Ref. 4: Land Partition Plat Number 2008-P2306. e. Ref. 5: Highway Construction Permit (Reel 289D, Rec. No. 50713). f. Ref. 6: Declaration of Private Utility Easement (Records with partition). 8. Two copies of the vesting deed. 9. Two copies ofODOT Permit No. 3173 dated March 1,2006. Branch Engineering, Inc. Page 2 of 2 PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'O JUN 2 3 2010 .J . . Notice of Decision - Partition Tentative Plan Project Name: McKinney Project Proposal: divide one lot into two parcels Case Number: SUB2010-00002 Project Location: 6595 Main Street Map and Tax lot: 17-02-34-44 TL 1200 Property size: 17,SOO sf Base Zone: MDR (Medium Density Residential) Overlay District(s): Metro Plan Designation: Low Density Residential Refinement Plan/Designation: Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: April 2, 2010 Application Submitted Date: AprilS, 2010 Decision Issued Date: May 26, 2010 Appeal Deadline Date: June 10, 2010 Other Application(s): DRC2005-00007 (four-plex, two duplexes); SUB2008-00016 (partition). " CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM . . PosmON REVlEWOF NAME PHONE Project Manager Planning Steve Hopkins 726-3649 Transportation Public Works Utilities, Sanitary & Jon Driscoll 726-3679 Storm Sewer Deputy Fire Marshall Fire and Life Safety Gilbert Gordon 726-2293 '. APPLICANf'~ D,EVELOPM~REVIEWTE~ ,">":' ..... ........... -.',.( ". . ." """'. :.., .....J.( Owner/Applicant: Representative: Andrea McKinney, Trustee Renee Gough Shalace MB Amor Trust, UA 6/28/02 Branch Engineering PO Box 1352 310 Fifth Street Springfield OR 97477 Springfield OR 97477 -. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D JUN 2 3 2010 McKinney Case No. SU8Z010-0000Z Site: McJ<jnney . . f, Case No. SUB20 I 0-00002 PRE.SUBMI1TAI. REC'O JUN 2 3 2010 2 . . Summary of proposal: The property has been divided into 3 parcels (SUB2008-00016). All parcels are identified with a single tax parcel number (1200). This application will further divide Parcell, which is most northern of the three parcels. " The northern half of tax lot 1200 has a delineated wetland, as well as a single-family detached house, a four-plex, and two duplexes, all of which take access from a driveway off Main Street. These existing structure and associated site development, including the required recreation area, were approved in Site Plan Review case No. DRC 2005-00007. There are also two rights- of-way that have been reserved for future dedication: Aster Street on the northern half of the property, and Dogwood Street on the southern half of the property. The property is encumbered by a deed restriction prohibiting future development beyond the existing development until such a time as one or both of the rights of way are constructed and provide location street access to the southern half of the property. Decision: Tentative Approval with conditions, as'ofthe date of this letter. The standards of the Springfield Development Code (SDC) applicable to each criterion of approval are listed herein and are satisfied by the submitted plans and notes unless specifically noted with findings and conditions necessary for compliance. The Final Plat must conform to the submitted plans as conditioned herein. This is a limited land use decision made according to dty code and state statutes. Unless appealed, the decision is final. Please read this document carefully. Other Uses Authorized by the Decision: None. Future development will be in accordance with the provisions of the SDC, filed easements and agreements, and all applicable local, state and federal regulations. Review Process: This 'application is reviewed under Type IT procedures listed in SDC 5.1-130, the Tentative Plan Criteria of Approval, SDC 5.12-125, and the Land Division Standards of Article 5.12-100. Procedural Findings: . Applications for Limited Land Use Decisions require the notification of property owners/occupants within 300 feet of the subject property allowing for a 14 day comment period on the application (SDC Sections 5'.1-130 and 5.2-115), The applicant and parties submitting written comments during the notice period have appeal rights and are mailed a copy of this decision for consideration. . Notice was sent to adjacent property owners/occupants within 300 feet of the subject site on April 14, 2010. . On April 27, 2010, the City's Development Review Committee reviewed the proposed plans. City staff's review comments have been reduced to findings and conditions only as necessary for compliance with the Tentative Plan Criteria of Approval contained in SDC 5.12-125. This decision was iSsued on the 48th day of the 120 days mandated by the state. . In accordance with SDC 5.12-145, the Final Plat shall comply with the requirements of the SDC and the conditions imposed by the Director in this decision. The Final Plat PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D JU~ 2 3 2010 McKinney Case No, SUB20 I 0-00002 . . J otherwise shall be in substantial conformance with the tentative plan reviewed. Portions of the proposal approved as submitted during tentative review carmot be substantively changed during Final Plat approval. " Comments Received: The applicant and parties submitting written comments during the notice period have appeal rights and afl~ mailed a copy of this decision for consideration. No comments were received. SDC 5.12-125 Tentative Plan Criteria The Director shall approve or approv,~ with conditions a Tentative Plan application upon determining that all applicable criteria have been satisfied. If conditions cannot be attached to satisfy the approval criteria, the Directof..sh.all deny the application. In the case of Partitions that involve the donation of land to a public agency, the Director may waive any approval criteria upon determining the particular criterion can be addressed as part of a future development application. A. The request conforms to the provisions of this Code pertaining to lot/parcel size and dimensions. Finding: The proposed parcels comply with the dimensional standards of the MDR (Medium Density Residential) Zone. Parcell contains 8400 sf with 84 feet of frontage to Main Street. Parcel 2 containS 9400 sf. In accordance with SDC 3.2-220(8), access is by an irrevocable access easement. Finding: SDC 3.2-220 A.4. states that no more than four lots/parcels or eight dwelling units shall take primary access from one multiple panhandle driveway. The proposed land division would result in the nine existing dwelling units taking primary access from a multiple panhandle driveway. However, given that the driveway was approved to serve nine dwelling units as part of Site Plan Review Case No. DRC2005-00007 and the panhandle standards are only being triggered due to the division of the existing developed land, SDC 3.2-220(A)(4) will not be applied to the subject land division. Conclusion: The proposal complies with SDC 5.12-l25(A). B. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and/or applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map,. and Conceptual Development Plan. Finding: The Metro Plan designates this area as Medium Density Residential and the site is zoned MDR. Finding: This proposal will place the existing dwelling and four-plex on separate lots. The proposal will not alter the existing density. Conclusion: The proposal complies with SDC 5.l2-l25(B). PRE-SUBMIIT41 REe'D JUN .2 3 ZuiU McKinney Case No. SUB20 I 0-00002 4 _:;-~:..;;~- .' . . '., C. Capacity requirements of public' and private facilities, including but not limited to, water and electricity; sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets and traffic safety 'controls shall not be exceeded and the public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by this Code and other applicable regulations. The Public Works Director or a utility provider shall determine capacity issues. Transportation System Impacts Finding: Abutting the subject site to the north, Main Street (a major arterial) is a 66-foot wide, five-lane street within 80 feet of right of way. The street is fully improved with curb/ gutter, sidewalks and metal halide street lighting. Average daily traffic along this street is estimated to be 20,000 vehicle trips per day. Finding: Existing off-site transportation facilities would be adequate.to accommodate additional trips that would be generated by the proposed development. Finding: Sanitary sewer is already approved and installed under previous applications and permits; therefore, sanitary sewer service requirements are met. Finding: Storm water management systems have already been approved and installed under previous applications and permits; therefore, storm water requirements are met. Conclusion: As conditioned, the proposal complies with SDC 5.12-125(C). D. The proposed land division shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations. Finding: SDC Section 4.3-125 requires all utility lines to be placed underground, including those lines serving existing dwellings. Overhead utilities for the parcel that contains the existing single family dwelling will be placed underground when that parcel is redeveloped. The other parcel is currently served with underground utilities. Finding: Section 4.3-140.A of the SDC requires applicants proposing developments make arrangements with the City and each utility provider for the dedication of utility easements necessary to fully service the development or land beyond the development area. The minimum width for public utility easements adjacent to street rights of ways shall be 7 feet. The minimum width for all other public utility easements shall be 7 feet. The plans submitted show compliance with this requirement. Conclusion: The proposal complies with SDC 5.12-125(D). E. Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil or geologic conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their associated riparian areas; wetlands; rock outcroppings; open spaces; and areas of historic ancVor archaeological significance, as may be specified in Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-760, 358.905-955 and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in this Code or in State or Federal law. PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'D .IUN 2 3 2010 McKinney Case No. SUB20 I (gJ0002 5 . . J Finding: The Natural Resources Study, the National Wetlands Inventory, the Springfield Wetland Inventory Map, and the list of Historic Landmark Sites were consulted. No historic or cultural resources have been identified on this site. Finding: The Metro Plan and any applic~ble refinement plans, Water Quality Limited Watercourses Map, Stt!te Designated Wetlands Map, Hydric Soils Map, Natural Resources Map, Wellhead Protection Zone Map, FEMA Maps, Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan, and the list of Historic Landmark sites have been consulted, and there are features needing to be protected or preserved on the subject property. Finding: A wetland was delineated and Department of State Lands (DSL) permits were obtained for the subject property as part of Site Plan Case No. DRC2005-00007. The wetland, identified as M3 and not locaIIy significant on the City's Local Wetland Inventory, is located on the northern half of the property, south of the southernmost existing dwelling units. Since the subject application involves only land division and no actual structural development, no additional protection of the wetland is required at this time beyond that which was previously required at the time of Site Plan Review. Conclusion: The proposal complies with SDC 5.12-125(E). F. Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas; minimize driveways on arterial and collector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable regulations and comply with the ODOT access management standards for State highways. Finding: As per SDC 4.2-130, vision clearance triangles (shaped with 10 feet triangle "legs" as shown in SDC Table 4.2-A) at the corners of.aII site driveways must be maintained, keeping aII obstacles out of the area between 2.5 and 8 feet above the established height of curb. Finding: Transportation made a sight visit on April 26, 2010, and found a large address sign in the vision clearance trianl~le. Condition: Prior to approval of the plat, move the address sign as well as any other trees. on-site vegetation. and/ or other obstacles to vision to maintain adequate vision clearance triangles at the corners of the driveway per SDC 4.2-130. Conclusion: As conditioned, the proposal complies with SDC 5.12-125(F).. G. Development of any remaindf,r of the property under the same ownership can be accomplished as specified in this Code. Finding: The remainder of the property contains wetlands and significant slopes. These constraints significantly diminish the development opportunity on the remainder of the property. Finding: No evidence has been presented that the proposed partition will not preclude further development of the property. . PRE.SUBMITTAI. REC'D JUN 2 3 2010 McKinney Case No. SUB20 I 0-00002 6 ..-:,....11........'" . . Conclusion: The proposal complies with SDC 5.12-125(G). H. Adjacent land can be developed or is provided access that will allow its development as specified in this Code. Finding: The surrounding properties are developed with single family dwellings. The proposed partition will not preclude further development of adjacent properties. Conclusion: The proposal complies with SDC 5.12-125(H). I. Where the Partition of property that is outside of the city limits but within the City's urbanizable area and no concurrent annexation application is submitted, the standards specified below shall also apply. Finding: The site is inside the city limits. Conclusion: The proposal complies with SDC 5.12-125(1). J. Where the Subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is proposed, the following approval criteria apply: Finding: This is not a subdivision of a manufactured home park. Co~clusion: The proposal complies with SDC 5.12-1250). DETERMINATION: Based on the evidence in the record, the Director determines the proposal complies with SDC 5.12-125(AHT), subject to the Conditions of Approval attached to this report. What Needs To Be Done? SDC 5.12-140 states: The subdivision Plat pre-submittal meeting shall be held within 1 year of the date of Tentative Plan approval (the date of this letter). The mylars and application fee shall be submitted within 180 days of the pre-submittal meeting. If the applicant has not submitted the "Partition Plat within these times, Tentative Plan approval shall become null and void and re-submittal of the Tentative Plan shall be required. A Final Plat application is charged upon submittal of the complete application and all required documents, and after all conditions of approval are met, including the construction of public and private improvements and extension of utilities required through this decision. Upon signature by the City Surveyor and the Planning Manager, the Plat mylar may be submitted to Lane County for recordation. No individual lots may be transferred until the Plat is recorded and the mylar copy of the filed Partition is returned to the City Surveyor. Summary of Conditions of Approval Condition: Prior to approval of the plat, move the address sign as well as any other trees, on-site vegetation, and/ or other obstacles to vision to maintain adequate vision clearance triangles at the comers of the driveway per SDC 4.2-130. McKinney Case No. sUBio I 0.00002 PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D JU~ 23 2010 .. . Additional Information: The application, all documents, and evidence relied upon by the applicant, and the applicable criteria of approval are available for free inspection and copies are available for a fee at the Development Services Department, 225 Fifth Street, Springfield, Oregon. Appeal: This Type II Tentative decision may be appealed to the PlarmingCommission. The appeal may be filed with the Development Services Department by an affected party. The appeal must be in accordance with SDC, Section 5.3-100, Appeals. An Appeals application must be submitted to the City with a fee of $250.00. The fee will be returned to the appellant if the Planning Commission approves the appeal application. In accordance with SDC 53-115(B) which provides for a 15-day appeal period and Oregon Rules of Civil Procedures, Rule 10(c) for service of notice by mail, the appeal period for this decision expires at 5:00 p.m. on June 10, 2010. Questions: Please call Steve Hopkins in the Plarming Division of the Development Services Department at (541) 726-3649 if you have any questions regarding this process. Prepared by: 5~ Steve Hopkins, AlCP Pla:nner II Development Services - Urban Plarming Division PRE-SUBMITIAI. REC'D JUN 2 3 2010 -.'-" -~,._" McKinney Case No. SUB20 I V-00002 8