HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotes, Work PLANNER 5/24/2011
.
.
!City of Springfield
Development Services Department'
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
LAND DIVISION TENTATIVE
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Subdivision
Project Name: Williams subdivision
Project Proposal: 4 lot residential subdivision
Case Nu'mber: PRE11-0001O
,Project Address: 475 35th sTreet
Assessors Map and Tax Lot Number(s): 17-02-31-24-11800
Zoning: Low Density Residential (LOR)
Overlay District(s): Drinking Water Protection (DWP)
Applicable Refinement Plan: Mid-Springfield
Refinement Plan Designation: Low Density Residential (LDR)
Metro Plan Designation: Low Density Residential (LDR)
Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: May 24, 2011
Application Submittal Deadline: November 20, 2011
Associated Applications:
POSITION REVIEW OF NAME
Proiect Planner Land Use Planning Steve Hopkins 726-3649
Transportation Engineer Transportation Michael Liebler 736-1034
Public Works Engineer in Training Utilities, Sanitary & Storm Kyle Green 726-5750
Sewer
Deputv Fire Marshal Fire and Life Safetv Gilbert Gordon 726-2293
Building Official Building Dave Bowlsbv 736-1029
~APPI!!IGAN:tJ;r$D:E:vt:1..0mN:tJ;:,gEUt:W:L;tt:AM,mL;~L"Em:'.:,mt'.'.' ..,.:'",;"'....:.,; .
Applicant Applicant's Representative
Scott and Bonnis Williams Renee Clough
PO Box 2158 Branch Engineering
Jasper OR 97438 310 Fifth Street
oJ
Springfield OR 97477
"'dM:'>
'''J...o;
"0..j
5-zA~1\
HS :JeuUB\d
:ps^leoaB alBa
..... ., ,-' ~ .... ~ .
~ ~. - .
Revised 10/25/07.
~. .."
, ./,.
. .
LAND DIVISXON TENTATIVE PLAN APPLICATION
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
PLANNING
o Application fee - these are estimates. The actual fees will be determined at submittal.
Current Fee for Tentative review
base fee # lots rate/lot
$5,518.00 4 $237
base total
$6,466.00
tech %
5%
tech $
$323.30
mail
$160
total
$6 949.30
base total tech %
$2,666.00 5%
tech $
$133.30
total
$2,79930
o Copy of the Land Division Plan reduced to 8'h"x 11"
Complete
Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
~
8 V2" X 11" Copy of Land Division Plan
o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past 30 days
documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant is not the property
owner, written permission from the property owner is required.
Complete
Incomplete
See Planning
Note(s)
1
Deed and Preliminary Title Report
~
l'&1
l22iiJ
o Brief narrative explaining the purpose of the development, the existing use of the
property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the
action to be taken.
Complete
Incomplete
See Planning
Note(s)
I'}/,I
~
~..
~
Brief Narrative
o Land Division Tentative Plan
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
~
l'&1
~
IBm
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Land
Surveyor in accordance with ORS 92
City boundaries, the Urban Growth
Boundary, and any special service district
boundaries or railroad right-of-way which
cross or abut the property
r;;;;],=
~
.',"
!. ,
. . ~-l0 - '\
Date Received.
Planner: SH 2
-<
Revised 10{25{07
~
~
~
R/l
IUSI
~
13
!:7i'I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
8
~
~
f"';l
l:.Jill
. ':-'(.J . ".,. l
Revised 10/25/07
. . - . .:.,r,;'"l; .
.
.
Location and width of all existing and
proposed easements on and abutting the
property
Boundaries of the entire area owned by the
property owner, of which the proposed land
division is a part, as well as dimensions and
size of each parcel and the approximate
dimensions of each building site indicating
the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale
Location, widths and names of all existing
and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or
other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the
proposed land division. Proposed streets
should also include approximate radiu.s of
curves and grades and relationship to any
projected streets as shown on the Metro
Plan, TransPlan, Conceptual Development
Plan, or Conceptual Local Street Map
Location of existing and required traffic
control devices, fire hydrants, power poles,
transformers, neighborhood mailbox units
and similar public facilities
Location of existing and proposed street
lighting, including type, height, and area of
illumination
Location and dimensions of existing and
proposed driveways
Location of existing and proposed transit
facilities
Location and width of all existing and
proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps,
pedestrian access ways, and bike trails
Location, size, and type of plantings and
street trees in any required planter strip
The locations of all areas to be dedicated or
reserved for public use, with the purpose,
condition, or limitations of the reservations
clearly indicated
Location and size of existing and proposed
utilities on and adjacent to the site including
sanitary sewer mains, stormwater
management systems, water mains, power,
gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the
proposed connection points.
Date Received:
Planner: SH
::7/?i\"-)\
3
.
.
o Future Development Plan where phasing or large lots/parcels are proposed as
specified in SDC 5.12-120 E.
Complete
!Zi;j
Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
~
Future Development Plan
Planning Notes:
1. The title report indicates the owner is "Whole Loan Trust 2010 LLC". Provide
evidence that the Williams have authority to submit the application.
2.
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:
. Joint access shall conform to SDC 3.2-220 and 4.2-120
Revised 10/25/07
'~~: I .~> 0" .
~ ' C,~ - J \
Date Received:
Planner: SH .
J
".~.1 . . ,'f' _'.,: '
4
. .
ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR
PERMITS
IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS OR
APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD
CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE-
APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION:
Applicable
Not
Applicable
r;;;m."
LJill
q
~
q
~
lPi'1
~
I5J
q
~.
r;;;m
C3J
1;;'1
UZ1l
o
r;;;m
t=:1
o
0....
1:;.0:
El
0..
.~j.
I5J
q."....
u:Il
q
fBili1
r;;;m
~
0'..:
,.......
r;;;m
o
~
q
I.;D;$j
....
. ,
:/"t;- ';1
Revised 10/25/07
Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's
Association Agreement
Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster
Subdivision proposal as specified in SDC 3.2-230
Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150
feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses
(WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct
tributaries of WQLW
A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be
submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high
water table present
I
Where the development area is within an overlay district, address
the additional standards of the overlay district
If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling
Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100
A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State
Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland
on the property
Any required federal or state permit must be submitted
concurrently or evidence the permit application has been
submitted for review
Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the
development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be
submitted prior to development
An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where.a
development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the
City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer
All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include
the approximate time of installation and method of financing
Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified
in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100
Date Received:
Planner: SH
's'z:-~('\\
5
.
.
THIS APPLICATION IS:
o COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING .
o INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE
City Planner
Date
This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Section 5.4-
105 and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a limited land
use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete. The 120-day
processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is submitted or
,
when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must indicate by either
signing this form or by submitting a written response to the City within seven days of the
date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing information.
If you indicate herein or in your written response that the missing information will be
submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre-
Submittal Review to provide the City with the missing information. If you refuse to submit
the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee,
the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120-day clock and
begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after the start of
the 120-day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the 120-day
processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the 120-day
period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if the new
information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is sent out
and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects the
application proposa'l and additional review is required.
I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the
City within the l80-day timeline.
Owner/Applicant's Signature
Date
. .; -c:.-4 -q
Date ReceIved.
Planner: SH
.'
Revised 10/25/07
6
. .
i LAND DIVISION TENTATIVE PLAN APPLICATION
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Engineer: Clayton McEachern Case#: PREll-0001D
PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING
o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
Complete Incomplete See PW
Note(s)
~
~
~
TiiT1l
~
rr;;}
u
rr;;}
~.
nla
EI
nla
~
~
l,
~
rr;;}
~
r
Revised 10/25/07
',j': "J;",. ,
I,; .
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect
or Engineer
Vicinity Map
'The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site
features including buildings, curb cuts, trees, and
impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is
remaining and what is being removed. For existing
structures to remain, also indicate present use and
required setbacks from proposed property lines
The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and
top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian
setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited
Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services
Department
The 100-year floodplain and f100dway boundaries on
the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood
Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map
Amendment or Letter of Map Revision
The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200
and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map
on file in the Development Services Department
Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5"
in diameter or greater when measured 4 Y, feet above
the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs,
riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings
Soil types and water table information as mapped and
specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A
Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be
submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates
the proposed development area has unstable soils
andlor a high water table
<?~Z~')\
Date Received:
Planner: SH
.
o Land Division Tentative Plan
Complete Incomplete See PW
Note(s)
~
~'
~
~
~
~
Ifliil
~
~
Ifliil
i$!J
~
.
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Land Surveyor in
accordance with ORS 92
Location and width of all existing and proposed
easements on and abutting the property
Boundaries of the entire area owned by the property
owner, of which the proposed land division is a part,
as well as dimensions and size of each parcel and the
approximate dimensions of each building site
indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to
scale
Location of existing and required power poles,
transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar
public facilities
Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on
and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer
mains, stormwater management systems, water
mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV.
Indicate the proposed connection points
o Stormwater Management Plan
Complete
~
~
Ifliil
~
~
~
"'4
~
~
Incomplete See PW
Note(s)
~
~
1
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed
Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as
part of the stormwater management system
Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations
Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns
. The size and location of stormwater management
systems components, including but not limited to:
drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention
ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural
drainageways to be retained
Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours
lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope
over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot
intervals)
Amount of proposed cut and fill
o Stormwater Management System Study - provide four (4) copies of the study with
the 'completed Storm water Scoping Sheet attached. The plan, calculations, and
, ." Date Received: '::> --z..4 _ 1\
',' Planner: SH
Revised 10/25/07
Ifliil
lSJ
r;n
~
n/a
li;7l
.~.
~.
.. .
documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and
Procedures Manual.
Complete
Incomplete
See PW
Note(s)
1Bsl
~
8..l::J
Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management
System Study
PW Notes:
1. The use of a sand filter is acceptable in lieu of vegetative treatment with some
conditions. The proposed location may require modification due to driveway
restrictions. If the current.location is used the sand filter must be protected from
traffic. The facility will also require a maintenance agreement to be attached to
the property on which it is located.
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:
. The proposed development has two driveways immediately adjacent to one another.
It appears that the site could be easily modified to eliminate one of the driveway
openings and the stormwater treatment facility relocated to a position that would
allow it to be removed from traffic.
. Due to maintenance costs a vegetated treatment option might be desirable for the
. property the facility is located on.
Date Received:
Planner: SH
6-2:-1-/)\
Revised 10/25/07
.. .
LAND DIVISION TENTATIVE PLAN APPLICATION
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
,
Transportation Engineer/Planner: Michael Liebler Case#: PREll-00010
Applicant: Casarez
TRANSPORTATION
o Right-of-Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has
frontage on a Lane County or an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility.
Complete Incomplete See Transportation
Note(s)
r:::;;!'l
~
L3
Copy of ROW Approach Permit Application
o Traffic Impact Study - four (4) copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in
accordance with SDC 4.2-105 AA. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze
and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's
transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given
development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations,
access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also"
address, if needed, City, Metro Plan and state land use and transportation policies and
objectives.
Complete Incomplete See Transportation
Note(s)
r:::;;!'l
LCst
Traffic Impact Study
o Land Division Tentative Plan
Complete Incomplete See Transportation
Note(s)
L2J"
h;!;l
l:.!J
L2J
EiI~"
~~.."
.. ~::
I"W
GIlt
(1)
Location of existing and proposed street
lighting, including type, height, and area
of illumination
Location of existing and proposed transit
fad I ities
Location and dimensions of existing and
proposed driveways
Location and width of all existing and
proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps,
pedestrian access ways, and bike trails
Location, widths, conditions, and names of
all existing and proposed streets, alleys,
dedications, access easements or other
" right-of-ways within"or adjacent to the
proposed land division. Proposed streets
should also include approximate radius of
curves and grades .and relationship to any
Date Received:
Planner: SH 5" -' zA- - 1\
L2J
EiI
L2J
~
n
w
Revised 10/25/07
.
.
~"
>- ~
"
~
lEEEI
projected streets as shown on the Metro
Plan, TransPlan, Conceptual Development
Plan, or Conceptual Local Street Map
Location of existing and required traffic
control devices
Transportation Notes:
1. Submitted plans show an 18ft and 12ft driveway directly adjacent to each other at
the NW corner of the property. The proximity of these two driveways is problematic
in terms of safety, operation, and installation of these approaches.
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:
.
~ I?' " i~t . . ',..: .:
Revised 10/25/07. "