HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotes, Meeting PLANNER 11/30/2005
~,
I
,
DRC REVIEW
PUBLIC WORKS REVIEW
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
~
DRC REVIEW: October 18, 2005
Le!!acv Estates Subdivision
Prepared by Matt Stouder, EIT
SUBDIVISION TENTATIVE
SUB2005-00047
Planner: Jim Donovan
The above.application was reviewed by Public Works Engineering and determined
to be incomplete for review.
SANITARY SEWER
I. The sanitary sewer system shall be designed-to extend to the limits of the
development for future service to lands to the south. The sewer extension through
lots 9 & 1 o will only be allowed in the event cover requirements dictate' (i.e. -
cover does not exist to place se\ver in public streets).
()/r. 2.. The existing septic tanks and drain fields located on the property should be shown
on the existing conditions sheet. A note should be added to the plans indicating
the tanks will be decommissioned in accordance with state law.
STORMW ATER MANAGEMENT
3. As required in Section 1.4 of the annexation agreement prepared for this property,
the applicant is responsible for constructing public stormwater management
systems to collect, treat, convey'and discharge stonnwater from the subject
property and the upstream tributary areas within the Springfield UGB to an
approved outfall into the McKenzie River. As such, the following requirements
apply: -
....(' Section 35.040(3)(c) of the Springfield Dev~lopment Code (SDC) requires
the size and'location of stormwater management systems and components,
including drain lines and storm water quality measures, be shown on the
stonnwater management plan. The location of the proposed drainage
channel should be shown on the plan set in its entirety, along with Tax Lot
400. Flow lines, pipe sizes andlor channel sections should be cle'lfly
defined on the plans. The location of the proposed swale outfall should be
clearly shown on the plans. Associated easements with the swale should
also be shown on the plans, in accordance with the annexation agreement.
./b:
Section 35.040(6)(n) requires the applicant provide evidence that any
required federal or state pennit has been applied for or approved. This
information should be submitted concurrently with the subdivision
application. Agencies to coordinate with include the Division of State
Lands, the Anny Corps of Engineers, Lane County and potentially the
Oregon Department ofFish & Wildlife.
I o{'2
~
Date Recelved:..J \- ?f) -1l5
Planner: .d J)
l~ ~ntP I,/N /Ir
oJb / IS /filA-if!
.^
I
I
,
,
I Ensure the location of the proposed drainage swale is not located In the
disputed Tax Lot 300, as shown on recorded Partition Plat 92-P0235. The
location of any public improvements will not be allowed in the un-
annexed disputed area of Tax Lot 300, unless the applicani can
demonstrate the property is annexed imd owned by the Prodens.
/. Clearly show how the proposed stonnwater system will pick up and
convey drainage from surrounding streets and systems. Specifically,
provisions for the drainage from sUlTounding areas, including 16th, 17th
and Vera Streets should be made. The applicant shouldclearly show how
the existing public stonn drainage system from Grand Vista Drive will
connect to the proposed swale.
I Please submit a detailed hydrological study map for the proposed drainage
basin (including the off site areas in their entirety). Refer to Section'
4.03.1 of the City's EDSPM for details. Specifically, the study map
should include the well defined drainage basin, flow arrows in streets and
. . ditches, and contours or spot elevations for verification of direction of
overland flow and pipe cover. A specific narrative pertaining to the off-
site flows and basin boundary would be beneficial.
V 4. An updated hydrology study, with revised drainage basin area, revised hydrologic
calculations, and revised hydraulic calculations needs to be submitted.
CIA- 5. The well houses shown on the existing conditions plan sheet will need to be
decommissioned in accordance state law.
.16. Sheet 4 shows a 24 inch stonn pipe extending to Tax Lot 400, then into a
proposed conveyance swale. A note on the plans states to extend this pipe as an
18 inch pipe. Please revise this conflict prior to the next plan submittal.
C6~
WATER QUALITY
7. A planting plan will be required for the propo'sed swale to ensure water quality
standards set forth in the Splingfield Development Code and EDSPM are met.
The planting plan should be consistent with the City of Portland's Stonnwater
'Management Manual, and can be prepared by the engineer, or a licensed '
Landscape Architect.