HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence PLANNER 11/16/2005
.
.
DONOVAN James
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Michael Shippey [MINISHIP@peoplepc.com]
Wednesday, November 16, 20058:35 AM
'David Corey'; STOUDER Matt
STEPHENS Colin; 'Michael Shippey'; 'Pam Goebel'; DONOVAN James; VOGENEY Ken
RE: Legacy Estates Project #SUB2005-00047
Good Morning David and others,
At that meeting, we received some good input from the Oregon Department of State lands and
the US Army Corps of Engineers as to the processes we will likely face. I have since
conducted delineation of jurisdictional areas at the subdivision and stormwater facility
portions, and the delineation report is underway. I have coordinated with the Oregon
Department of Fish and Wildlife, and have not received any indication from them that our
project will face significant issues.
I hope this helps.
Mike Shippey
-----Original Message-----
From: David Corey [mailto:david@teamcorey.com]
Sent: 'Tuesday, November IS, 2005 10:07 PM
To: STOUDER Matt
Cc: STEPHENS Colin; Michael Shippey; Pam Goebel; DONOVAN James; Ken Vogeney
Subject: Legacy Estates Project #SU82005-00047
Hello again,
I received a copy of the DRC Review dated 10/18/05 from Jim Donovan yesterday.
~n that you comment about how how section 1.4 of the annexation agreement requires that I
construct a public stormwater management systems and that I show proof that I have started
that process. It was my understanding per my conversation with Ken Vogney and others that
setting up that meeting that you attended along with all the other State agencies that you
mentioned in your comments would be proof enough fqr you that I had started that process.
I have hired Mike Shippey to head up the process of working with all the Agencies to
accomplish what was needed to allow us to install this stormwater management system. But
now per you letter, you make it sound like non of this was ever discussed and agreed upon
because you say that I have not supplied you with alot of information.
I would sure like some clarification as to what we agreed upon was necessary to allow us
to submit this project for tentative subdivision approval because it sound like you have
changed your mind and are looking for more information now than what was previously agreed
to.
Also, you'say that you want a updated hydrology study. I know that a updated study was
provided to you with our 'submittal that was different than the original and the updated
one was completed as your wishes in our pre-submittal meeting.. Are you changing your mind
on that now too and want something different than you originally requested in the pre-
submittal meeting. All this stuff cost money and I know its not your money, but it is
mine and I don't mind getting you what you need as long as I am only paying for it once.
We are having a meeting at the City at 2:00 p.m. on Wed_ with Jim Donovan and I would hope
that you would be' there to clarify all this stu'iJ for us.
Thanks, David Corey
'\ H le--OS
Date Recelved:-
Planner. . (J\)____.___
...d
1
'"