The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNotice PLANNER 4/20/2006 , ~- . . ~()Y- . , AFFIDA VIT OF SERVICE ST A TE OF OREGON) ) ss. County of Lane ) I, Karen LaFleur, being first duly sworn, do hereby depose and say as follows: 1. I state that I am a Clerk III for the Planning Division of the Development Services Department, City of Springfield, Oregon. 2. I state that in my capacity as Clerk III, I prepared and caused to be mailed copies SiJC32.,oOb-Dalt3. . <; of (See attachment "A") on z..o ,2006 addressed to (see Attachment B"): by causing said letters to be placed in a U.S. mail box with postage fully prepaid thereon. J!t~ eNt d/ A6MA K R La'FLEUR STATE OF OREGON, County of Lane ~.dlO , 2006. Personally appeared the above named Karen LaFleur, Clerk III, w acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary act. Before me: ~~ on MIf My Commission Expires: /I~Z!rf6 I I .' OFFICIAL SEAL , SANDRA MARX \, .J NOTARY PUBLIC. OREGON ',,' COMMISSION NO, 385725 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOV, 12, 2008 Date Received: i.f.- 20- Dc:' Planner. ' 5D I of l'oe~ ;. . . NOTICE OF DECISION - PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENT DATE OF LETTER April 20, 2006 JOURNAL NUMBER SUB2006-000 13 Owner: Civil Engineering Consultants Symantec Corporation Balzhiser & Hubbard Engineers Contact: Gary Robak Contact: Clell Goodwin, PLS 555 International Way PO Box 10347 Springfield, OR 97477 Eugene, Oregon 97440 Applicants: Property Location SARES REGIS Group of Northern California 555 International Way Contact: Zach Wilson, Project Manager Springfield, OR 97477 90 I Mariners Island Boulevard, Suite 700 San Mateo, CA 94404 ~ Assessor's Map 17-03.-15-30, Tax Lot 500 650-377-5821 Assessor's Map 17-03-15-40, Tax Lot 700 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL This is an application to move the common property line between two tax lots owned by the Symantec Corporation. The purpose of the request is to place the common property line between the two main wings of the existing structure. Approval of the requested property line location and a proposed deed restriction will resolve building setback issues and provide guidelines for separation of the properties if necessary in the future. SITE INFORMATION AND BACKGROUND The site proposed for this property line adjustment is the existing Symantec Campus on the north side of Game Farm Road at Maple Island Road, in Springfield. Thepioperty is zoned Campus Industrial (CI) and designated for Campus Industrial use in the Metropolitan Area General Plan. The west wing of the existing structure is nearing completion under Site Plan Approval (DRC2005-00047); partition plat lines on the property were recently vacated (LRP2006-000 I). DECISION . Preliminary.Plan approval with conditions is granted as of the date ofthis letter. Preliminary Plan approval expires 90 days from the date ofthis letter. Final Map Approval shall be granted upon receipt of the final map delivered to the Development Services Department together with any documents required as a condition of approval. -, . . CRITERIA OF APPROVAL (SDC33.060) The application shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied based on compliance with the criteria of Section 33.060 of the Springfield Development Code (SDC). SDC 33.060 states that the Property Line Adjustment shall not: (1) Create a new lot or parcel; Finding #1: This proposal adjusts the property line between two pre-existing lots. No new lots are being created. (2) Create a landlocked lot or parcel; Finding #2: Both lots have street frontage and access on Intemational Way and Game Faml Road East. No landlocked lots or parcels will be created. (3) Reduce an existing lot or parcel below the minimum size standard or reduce setbacks below the minimum established. by the applicable zoning districts in this Code; The properties involved in this request are zoned CI and are therefore subject to the lot size standards of SDC 21.070(1) which requires 10,000 square feet and 75 feet offrontage. SDC 21.070(2-4) sets setback standards of 50 feet for exterior boundaries, 30 feet of planted setbacks from collector street frontages and 20 feet of building separation (zero lot line construction allowed in accordance with adopted building codes). . Finding #3: Both tax lots, as adjusted through this application, meet the lot size requirements of SDC 21.070 because both exceed 10,000 square feet of area and 75 feet of frontage. Finding #4: The setbacks of the existing structure from exterior boundaries of the CI District along Game Farm Road (E) south of the site, where abutting the CC and LDR Districts, comply with SDC 21.070(2) because approximately 70 feet of setback is provided. Finding #5: Pursuant to SDC 21.070(2), the two-winged structure straddling the proposed common property line constitutes a zero setback as allowed by the Springfield Development Code. (See other Conditions Imposed under Criterion 4, below). Finding #6: The submittal complies with the applicable lot size and setback standards of the Springfield Development Code. . . (4) Violate any previous conditions the Approval Authority may have imposed on the lots or parcels involved in the application; Finding #7: The proposed deed restriction satisfies the requirements of Condition #8 contained in DRC2005-00047, Site Plan Approval for Phase II of the Symantec campus. There are no other previous conditions of approval imposed on either of the lots involved in this application. Conclusion: The Director, in consultation with the Building Official and the City Attomey, find that the building designs approved under Site Plan DRC2005-00047, in conjunction with the ~ubmitted property line adjustment and deed restriction, meet all applicable zoning and building 2 Property Line Adjustmelll SUB2006-000/3 April/9. 2006 . . conditions imposed on the subject properties. The proposed deed restriction is acceptable as submitted and shall be filed pursuant to the following condition: Condition I: Prior to Final Survey Approval or Final Occupancy (as applicable), the applicant shall submit a copy of the proposed Deed Restriction with Attachments and Exhibits for review, .approval and filing with the final survey and lot descriptions. (5) Detrimentally alter the availability of existing public or private utilities to each lot or parcel in the application or to abutting lots or parcels; Findiug #8: The availability of existing public and private utilities will not be altered by the approval of this property line adjustment because both properties are under the same ownership 'and the existing location of, and access to, easements has been reviewed and approved under Site Plan Approval DRC2005-00047. (6) Increase the degree of non-conformity of each lot, parcel or structure that is non-conforming at the time of application. Finding #9: The lots involved 'with this property line adjustment were not non-conforming at !he time of application nor will they be under the proposed property line adjustment. There are no non-confonning structures on either lot. CONCLUSION Based on these findings of fact, staff finds Property Line Adjustment SUB2006-000 13 complies with the criteria of Article 33, Section 33.060 of the Springfield Development Code and is therefore approved with the conditions as specified below. WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE BY THE APPLICANT TO OBTAIN FINAL APPROVAL Within 90 days of the date ofthis letter the following conditions and procedures shall be met: 1. Prior to Final Survey Approval or Final Occupancy (as applicable), the applicant shall submit a copy ofthe proposed Deed Restriction with Attachments and Exhibits for review, approval and filing with the final survey and lot descriptions. 2. Tbe applicant shall submit a Final Survey prepared, stamped and signed hy an Oregon registered Land Surveyor in accordance with ORS 92.010(7) (b), ORS . 92.060(3) and ORS 209.250. 3. One copy ofthe Final Survey shall be delivered to the Development Services Department together with any conditioned documents. 4. Once the Director and City Surveyor have certified that all conditions listed under p'reliminary Survey approval have been met, the Final Survey may be recorded at the Lane County Surveyor's Office. 5. The owners ofthe lots or parcels included in the application shall record with Lane County Deeds and Records Property Line Adjustment deeds, as specified in ORS 92.190(4). The Property Line Adjustment deeds shall contain the names of the parties, the description of the adjusted line, reference to original recorded documents and signatures of all parties with proper acknowledgment. The Property 3 Proper{v Line Adjllstl'r:ent SUB2006-000/3 April/9.2006 . . Line Adjustment deeds shall also identify the PlaI!ning file uumber and shall contain a statement declaring that the purpose of the deeds is for a Property Line Adjustment. Reference to the affected properties by map and tax lot number shall be in addition to reference by legal de.scription. In the case of serial Property Line Adjustments processed under Type II procedure, each Property line Adjnstment deed for the lots or parcels in the series shall be recorded separately, in the sequence of City approval. . 6. A copy of the recorded Final Survey and deeds shall be delivered to the Development Services Department together with any other recorded documents that may have been required.as a condition of approval. . EXPIRATION OF APPROVAL The Property Line Adjnstment preliminary approval shall become null and void if: I. The Final Survey and any conditions of approval have not been submitted to the City in a complete form within 90 days of the date of Preliminary Survey approval; or 2. The Final Survey is not submitted to the Lane County Surveyor within 30 days of the City approval; or 3. The Property line Adjustment deed or other conditioned documents have not been recorded with Lane County Deeds and Records. with the Final Survey. APPEALS This Property Line Adjustment request is considered a decision ofthe Director and as such can be appealed to the Planning Commission. An appeal must be filed at the Development Services Department by an affected party by 5:00 P. M. on May 4,2006. An appeal must be in accordance with the Springfield Development Code, Article 15, Appeals. The appeal must be submitted on a City form and be accompanied by a $250 filing fee. TIle fee will be returned to the appellant if the Planning Commission approves the appeal application. OUESTIONS Please call Jim Donovan in the Development Services Department at (541) 726-3660 if you ha,:e questions regarding this application. 4 Proper~1' Line Adjustment SUB2006-000 /3 April /9, 2006 ...._~ -....... .~....... .......,,,'......"'" PLANNING DEPARTMENT 225 FIFTH !3TREET SPI'1INGFIELD, OR 97477 ............... .~._.". ....-..~._-- PLANNING DEPARTMENT 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 r.M-Ml-- U DEVELOPMENTSERWCES PLANNING DEPARTMENT 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 --- .... . . Symantec Corporation Gary Robak 555 International Way Springfield, OR 97477 Balzhiser & Hubbard Engineers Clell Goodwin, PLS PO Box 10347 Eugene, OR 97440 ~~~ Sares Regis Group Zach Wilson 901 Mariners Island Blvd, Ste 700 San Mateo, CA 94404 ()::tt-~ r~