HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket, Pre PLANNER 2/22/2011
. . PRE-SUBMIifIAL
. DISTRlBUTi'tJN LIST:
..
Date Distributed:
J<- ~~-I /
V Dave Puent"':'" Building
v Gilbert Gordon/Melissa Fechtel:"" Fire
\ /' Michael Liebler - Traffic
/' Matt Stouder - Public Works/Engineering
Ch.ris Moorhead, s~
Planner, 7r; I1Ak ~_
RFCE~VED
FEB 22 2011
By: "Pes-Ptl~
I of 33p~
.
,
.
City of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
541-725-3753 Phone
541-726-3689 Fax
S....~.R.I..N.GF. I.E.L.~
.~
. "~'" "4
~
. OREGON
Pre-Submittal Meeting
Case Number Assigned:
PRE 11-00006
Date Submitted:
02/22/2011
Project Name:
Project Description:
Glenwood Medical Office Building - Franklin & Glenwool
New 2-story medical office building approx 19,900 sf (pRJ11-00006)
Mark Metzeer and Mollv Markarian planners
Application Type:
Job Address:
Assessor's & Tax Lot #:
Pre-Submittal Site Plan Tentative
o Vacant - Glenwood & Franklin Blvd
1703343100900
1703343400201
DISCLAIMER: Applications will not be exempt from Development Code or procedural amendments that may occur between the
time of the Pre;-Submitra1 Meeting and Submittal of the Application for Development Review. Please contact our office at
541-726-3753 with,any questions or concerns.
A Planner will be assigned the following business day and will contact you to confirm the meeting date and time.
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O
FEB 2 2 20lf
C:\temp\PL_FRM_PRESUB {4996E209-9ABD-4A5E-B94F.98B4984E968C}.rpt
2122/2011
.
.
Pre-Submittal Meeting
Development Services Department
Room 616
PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING DATE: Tuesday, March 1,2011
1. PRE-SUBMITTAL MTG #PRE11-00006 (Site Plan Tentative) - GLENWOOD OP, LLC
Assessor's Map: 17-03-34-31 TL 900
Assessor's Map: 17-03-34-34 TL 201
Address: Vacant - 3500 block of Franklin Blvd, between Glenwood Blvd and Henderson Ave
Existing Use: Vacant
The applicant submitted plans to construct an approximate 19,900 sq ft new 2"story medical office
building.
Meeting Dateffime: Tuesday, March 1,201111 :00 - noon DSD 616
Planner: Mark Metzger/Molly Markarian
PRE-5UBMIITAl REC'D
FEB 2 2 2011
.
.
City of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Site Plan Review
Glenwood Op LLC, c/o Frank Gibson w/ Hutchinson, Cox, Coons 541-':686-9160
A Iicant Name: Du riest &. Sherlock P.C. Phone:
Com an :
Glenwood 0 LLC
777 Hi h Street Eu ene OR 97401
Fax:
541~,343-8693
Address:
A licant's Re . Scott Stolarcz k
Phone: 541,,342-8077
Com an :
Robertson/Sherwood/Architects c
Fax:
541-345-4302
Address:
132 East Broadwa Suite 540 Eu ene, OR 97401
Com an
Glenwood 0 , LLC
Phone:
Fax: .
Owner:
Address:
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO:
17-03- -31 and 17-03-
34-34
TAX LOT NO S : Lot 900 and Lot 201
3500 Block of Franklin Boulevard between Glenwood Blvd and Henderson Ave.
Size of Pro e
75666 s uare feet 1.73 acres
Acres 0 S ual'e Feet 0
Pro osed Name of Pro"ect: Glenwood 0 Medical Office Buildin
Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Pro osal: New 2-sto medical office buildin
42 775 sf
. -. -...
Associated A
Si ns:
Pre-Sub Case No.:
Reviewed b
Case No.:
Date:
Reviewed b
A Iication Fee: $
Technical Fee: $
-
TOTAL FEES:
ECT NUMBER:
1\-0000"
Revised 11/19/09
FEB 2 2 2011
1 of 10
Owner Signatures
.
.
This application form is used for both the required pre-submittal meeting and subsequent
complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application
process.
An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted.
Pre-Submittal
Owner:
The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and
accurate for scheduling of the Pre~ Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the
owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf.
I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for aI/statutory
timelines'Zi /nforma,n,requests and requirements conveyed to my representative.
'~///i . .
~ ~~I, 1---'.---- . Date: ~-:' / / r/ !/
Signature' 7
t
;<;i,.. t~:
/" ,
( ?-:.'" <..~ -
, / '-"_.
Print
Submittal
I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check
performed on this application at the Pre-Submittal Meeting, [ affirm the information identified by the City as
necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise
.contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as
submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a
complete application.
Owner:
Date:
Signature
Print
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O
FEB 2 2 2011
.~,-,-,,--,,-. ,..1
Revised 11{19/09 2 of 10
spr map .. Page I ofl
'. P~E11-00006 pre!Ubmittal Mtg (~ite Tent!ve) 17-03-34-31 TL 900,
17-03-34-34 TL 201 Glenwood Op
~- .. . -- - -- -
C I
> I
al I
g )
3:
z
W
...J
l.:'
,,"', ".
..., . -. ,..,'; - ,- . ;-"", . '~
',.,
." ':::'}';~
.'- :,( , .<",'0:;'~t>
N
A
PRE-SUBMITIAl REC'D
FEB 2 2 2011
http://spifs020/mapguide2009/mapviewerphp/printablepage. php?SESSION=04c2b80c-0000-1 000... 2/22/20 II
-Type II Site Plan Approval Narrate for:
Glenwood Op Medical Office Building
3500 block of Franklin Boulevard
Eugene (Glenwood), Oregon
18 February 2011
Applicant/Property Owner
Glenwood Op LLC
c/o Frank Gibson
Hutchinson, Cox, Coons, Dupriest & Sherlock P.C.
777 High Street, Eugene, OR 97401
Phone: 541-686-9160 Fax: 541-343-8693
Architect/Applicant's Representative
RobertsonlSherwood[Architects pc
132 East Broadway, Suite 540
Eugene, OR 97401
Phone: 541-342-8077 Fax: 541-345-4302
Attn: Scott Stolarczyk, AlA, LEED AP
Civil EnQineer
KPFF Consulting Engineers
1201 Oak Street, Suite 100
Eugene, OR 97401
Phone: 541-684-4902 Fax: 541-684-4909
Attn: Anna Backus
Landscape Architect
Cameron McCarthy Landscape Architects
150 East Broadway
Eugene, OR 97401
Phone: 541-485-7385 Fax: 541-746-0389
Attn: Justin Lanphear, ASLA
Project Description:
This application is for site plan approval of a new 2-story medicai clinic and office building of
approximately 19,900 square feet, to be located in on a vacant lot on the south side of Franklin Bouievard,
between Glenwood Boulevard and Henderson Avenue.
View at BuildinQ from the North (Franklin Boulevard)
PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'O
FEB 222011
Glenwood Op Medical Office Building
Site Plan Review Narrative
Page 1
Feonuary 2011
. .
Project Location: .
The project site is located on the south side of the 3500 block of Franklin Boulevard in the Glenwood area.
The site is currently vacant and undeveloped.
Approvals Requested:
Type II, Site Plan Approval
Attached Information (included in this Pre-Submittal package):
. Type II Site Review Application (1 copy)
Check for Pre-Submittal Application Fee
Stormwater Scoping Sheet and Report (3 copies)
Geotechnical Report (1 copy)
Exterior Light Fixture Cut Sheets (1 copy each)
8-1/2x11 Site Plan
Drawings (7 copies)
GO Project Information
Topographic Survey
LO Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
L 1 Site Plan
L2 Vertical Control Plan
L3 Landscape Plan
C 1 Civil notes, Legend and Abbreviations
C2 Storm Drainage and Utility Plan .
E1 Site Plan- Electrical
A 1 Building Plans/Exterior Elevations
Additional Information to be Provided for Completeness:
Preliminary Title Report
Deed
Additional Drawing Sets as Required
Site Ownership:
Glenwood Op, LLC is the owner of the two lots, totaling 1.73 acres, shown for development in this site
plan review application.
Project Use:
Combined medical clinic and offices. Employment projections are approximately 60 at the time the
building will be occupied. The clinic and offices are part of one business.
Hours of Operation: Normal operating hours will range from 8:00 AM to 7:00 PM, Monday through Friday,...
except holidays. Saturday operation my occur as the client base grows.'
Phasing:
The project will be constructed in one phase.
Zoning: .
The site is within the City of Springfield's Urban Growth boundary and within City limits and is zoned CC,
Community Commercial. A medical office building use is a permitted primary use in this zone. The
Eugene/Springfieid Metro Area General Plan Diagram (per the 2004 Metro Plan with December 2009
updates) indicates the site is designated at "Rural Commercial". However, the Metro Plan states that this
rural designation appiies to land outside of the current Urban'Growth Boundary.
Adjacent Uses:
The property to the west is an automotive repair/car sales business. The properties to the east are a
photocopy supply business and radiator repair business. The property to the south is L TD's fleet
maintenance facility.
Glenwood Op Medical Office Building
Site Plan Review Narrative
PRE-SUBMITIAl REC'D
FEB 2 2 2011
Page 2
February 2011
.
.
Refinement Plan:
The applicable refinement plan for the subject site is the Glenwood Refinement Plan. The sit!' is part of
Subarea 7 and is designated as a Commercial Industrial/Mixed Use zone. For development fronting
Franklin Boulevard, the Refinement Plan specifically addresses the following criteria (as noted in Section
E.4.b):
(1) Landscaping, including street trees, shall be provided where possible along Franklin Boulevard.
The project proposes adding trees along the Franklin Boulevard frontage, per current Ci~ standards.
(2) Placement of parking areas in side yards and rear yards shall be encouraged.
All vehicle parking is located in the side and rear yards. There is no parking between the proposed
building and Franklin Boulevard.
(3) Placement of chain-link fencing within 20 feet of the right-of-way shall be discouraged.. If fencing is
needed within this 20-foot setback area, ornamental iron fencing or it's equivalent shall be provided.
Ornamental fencing is proposed adjacent to Franklin Boulevard. The ornamental fencing will return
back along the west and east property lines for a minimum of 20' from the north property line.
(4) Signs shall be set back ten feet from the right-of-way.
Signage is proposed to be mounted on the building is setback from the right-of-way as required
(5) Where development abuts a public street that intersects with Franklin Boulevard, the site design
shall reinforce recognition of the street (as opposed to just another driveway).
This criteria is not applicable.
(6) Where commercial or industrial development is adjacent to residential development, illumination
shall be oriented away from the residential development
This criteria is not applicable.
(7) Safe and efficient ingress and egress
Ingress and egress from Franklin Boulevard is designed in accordance with Oregon Department of
Transportation guidelines. The proposed driveway is space away from exiting adjacent driveways to
the fullest extent possible. Ingress and egress from East 14th Street will be designed in accordance'"
with City of Springfield Standards.
Site Access / Transportation:
Primary site access will be provided via a driveway off Franklin Boulevard at the north side of the site.
Secondary vehicle access is provided via a driveway off East 14th Street at the south side of the side.
Primary pedestrian access will be provided via a sidewalk off of Franklin Boulevard.
Based upon the square footage and use of the building, and using Institute of Transportation Engineers
standards, the development would generate to over 500 daily trips, the threshold for requiring a
Transportation Impact Study (TIS) per City of Springfield requirements. However, conversations with City
of Springfield staff and Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) representatives have indicated that
a TIS will not be required for this development, given the current capacity of Franklin Boulevard and that
there are proposed changes in use, density, and infrastructure for the Glenwood area.
According to ODOT representatives, there is not an approved permit for an approach to Franklin
Boulevard from the site. While ODOT has indicated their preference would be for this property to create a
shared driveway with an adjacent property they have said they will approve a new driveway approach for
the development as long as it is located as far away from eXistin~~~:~UBsMrrrArREt'D
Glenwood Op Medical Office Building
Site Plan Review Narrative
FEB 2 2 2011
Page 3
February 2011
,
.
.
Lane Transit District (L TO) currently owns a 10' wide piece of property that sits for between the project site
and Franklin Boulevard for most of the project sites length. This property was purchased by L TO during
development of their EmX bus line several years ago. L TO's intention was to transfer ownership of this
property to ODOT so it would become part of the public right-of-way. During our research of the property
it was discovered that L TO had not yet started this transfer process. L TO has submitted paperwork to
ODOT to complete this transfer. Per conversations with City of Springfield staff and ODOT
representatives, it was agreed that since L TO is still in the process of transferring the property, we may
submit this application for Site Plan Review even though we have not yet submitted an application for an
ODOT approach permit. It is understood that the ODOT approach permit will need to be appr'bved prior to
gaining final Site Plan Review approval with the City. .
Off-Street Parking Facilities:
All off-street vehicle parking will conform to the standards listed in SDC Sections 4.6-110 through 4.6-120.
The minimum number of parking spaces is calculated as follows:
Vehicle Parking:
Code Required: 1 g,900 SF / 300 SF per parking space = 67 parking spaces
Total vehicle parking spaces provided: 85 spaces
Compact Parking: Maximum 30% of spaces
25 compact spaces allowed
25 compact 'spaces provided
Bicycle Parking:
Covered long term bicycle parking will be provided at the southwest corner of the building. Short term
parking will be provided adjacent to the primary building entrance at the southeast corner. All bicycle
parking spaces will conform to the standards listed in SDC Sections 4.6-140 through 4.6-150.
Bicycle Parking
Code Required: 1 9,900 SF /3,000 SF per space = 7 spaces
25% long term: 2 spaces
75% short term: 5 spaces
Total bicycle parking spaces provided: 7 spaces
2 long term
5 short term
Loading Areas:
Loading requirements are minimal and primarily for office/building supply deliveries. A dedicated loading
area is provided as the southwest corner of the building.
SDC Article 3.2-440(C) requires screening for truck parking for vehicles necessary for the operation of the
facility. Since there is no manufacturing or sales occurring on site, this screening requirementis not
applicable.
Transit Facilities:
. There is currently a Lane Transit District (L TO) transit stop for the east bound leg of the EmX line located
immediately in front of the site along Franklin Boulevard. The west bound leg of the EmX line is located
on the other side of the street and west approximately one block at the Glenwood Boulevard intersection.
Utility Infrastructure:
The project site is served by adequate public utilities for sanitary sewer, water, electricity, and natural gas.
The project proposes to extend these utilities onto the project site, to provide adequate fire protection and
utility services for the proposed office building development. There is no public stormwater infrastructure
and so all on-site runoff will be held on site via a series of rain gardens.. All new utilities will be' placed
underground. Refer to the drawings included with this application for description and location of the
proposed utility extensions, and for stormwater management strategies. .
Glenwood Op Medical Office Building
Site Plan Review Narrative
PRE-SUBMllTAl REC'D
FEB 2 2 2011
Page 4
February 2011
.
.
Easements:
Refer to the survey included in the drawing set for description of easements associated with the project.
Stormwater Management:
The site is not served by any public stormwater infrastructure and so all stormwater runoff will be held and
maintained on site. A series of "rain gardens", or swales, are incorporated into the site design;lto capture
and hold all runoff. Percolation testing has been performed and the data used to properly size,the rain
gardens. Refer to the Landscape and Civil drawings for detailed information on the design of stormwater
facilities.
View at Southeast Corner of Buildinq
Floodplain:
The property is not located within a flood plain or floodway.
Wetlands:
The property is not in areas identified in the Springfield Local and National Wetland Inventory Map.
Drinking Water Overlay District:
The site outside the Zone of Contribution (Time of Travel Zone) as shown on the City of Springfield's
Wellhead Protection Area Map.
Fire Protection:
The proposed building will be fully sprinklered. Location of the fire department connection.(FD~) will be
coordinated with the Fire Marshal. Fire truck access to the buildings is accomplished by a paved 26 foot
wide access route through the side, providing fire department access to all points around the building.
Trees: .
There are no existing trees on the site.
Signs: ,
Per SDC 8.248, at total of 3 wall signs totaling 350 square feet are allowed, and 1 freestanding,:sign with
100 per face or 200 square feet total is allowed. The signage currently proposed for the project will
consist of two wall mounted signs' on the north side of the building, totaling approximately 204 ~quare feet
in size, located on the north facade of the building. Other signs on site may include directional :~igns and
are exempt per SDC 8.234.
Glenwood Op Medical Office Building
Site Plan Review Narrative
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D
FEB 2 2 20ll
I' Page 5
Feb'ruary 2011
"
.
.
~ftJ
11~'uml:'I~~'~;lIlm.IHlI Geotechnical & Construction S€rviceS
Glenwood Op, LLC
Ms. Carole Knapel
1201 Oak Street-
Eugene, Oregon 97401
January 17, 2011
Geotechnical Investigation
Glenwood Op Project
Franklin Boulevard
Eugene, Oregon
Project #2107170
Dear Ms. Knapel:
We are providing geotechnical engineering services for the above referenced site as
outlined in our proposal. This letter provides a summary of our findings and' provides
geotechnical recommendations for design and construction' of the proposed
foundations as well as a discussion of seismic considerations.
. BACKGROUND
A new building and associated parking is being designed for a currently vacant parcel
on Franklin Boulevard in Eugene, Oregon. The site location is shown on the attached
Vicinity Map (Figure 1). The proposed improvements at the site include construction of
a new two story building and associated concrete slab, parking and access pavements
and landscaped areas.. The. proposed structure has a :tao foot by :t130. foot footprint.
The proposed development area is relatively level and currently includes gravel
surfacing with some grass and brush over much of the parcel. Minor site grading is
anticipated for the improvements. The building is expected to have a finished floor
elevation slightly above existing ground elevations with pavement grades closely
matching existing site grades. The conceptual site layout and proposed building
location is shown on the attached site plan (Figure 2). We understand that portions of
the site will be landscaped and used for stormwater detention and treatment.
Thisreport andlor enc',osed test data is the confidential properly of the c1ientt~ whom it is addressed and pe~R~o.SYs~MJ~AL REC'D
process and/or material evaluated.. As such, information contained herein shall not be reproduced in part or full and/Qt'.nDPCW 2 2011
thereof be dIsclosed without FE! Testing & Inspection, Inc.'s written authorization. r ~D !J
750 NWComellAvenue' eoIVallis, Oregon 97330, phone (541) 757-4698. fax (541) 757-2991 I
29540 BAirportRoad' Eugene, Oregon 97402. phone (541) 684-3849, fax (541)684-3851
63050 Corporate Place, Surte2' Bend, Oregon 97701. phone (541) 382-4844. fax (541) 382-4846 II
.
.
SITE CONDITIONS
Surface Conditions:
The proposed development location is a relatively flat, gravel covered parcel. It
. appears that the site was previously developed with much of the parcel including gravel
surfacing. Grass, blackberries and brush are present over much. of the parcel. The
Willamette River is located a short distance to the east of the site. The' site is
surrounded by existing development with Franklin Boulevard to the north of the site and
an existing bike path located along the south property boundary.
Subsurface Conditions:
Subsurface conditions were explored at six locations on December 16 using a rubber
tired backhoe. The approximate'test pit locations are shown on the Site Plan (Figure
2). . The test pits were extended to depths of :t4 to 6 feet below existing site grades..
We observed wet soil conditions and ground water seepage in the gravel stratum in
some of the test pits at the time of our exploration. Ground water seepage as shallow
as 3.8 feet below grade was observed at the time of our exploration in December.
Therefore, we anticipate that a relatively shallow ground water level is presentll at the
. J .
site throughout the year. A narrative summary of soil conditions at individual test pit'
. locations are attached. A brief summary of the various soil strata encountered is
provided below.
Fill:
Fill materials were observed in the upper portion of the soil profile across the
site. The upper "=4 to 6 inches of the fill material typically consists of 'I.-inch
minus crushed rock surfacing. The fill thickness varies from "=1 to 3 feet in the
area of the proposed building. The fill in this portion of the site includes concrete
slabs and foundations associated with a previous structure at the property. The
fill also includes concrete, asphalt and metal debris that has been placed on the
site.
The fill profile encountered in explorations in the proposed pavement. areas'
, typically was less than 1 foot thick. The fill at these locations generally consists
of sandy gravel to silty or clayey gravel.
Sandy Silt Alluvium:
Generally, the upper fill transitions. to medium stiff sandy silt to silty sand
alluvium. The silt stratum was absent at TP-4.' The silt stratum varies in
thickness and consistency across the parcel. The silty soils were observed to be
"=1 to 3 feet thick, where encountered. The silt generally became sandier with
increased depth and was relatively sandy at the transition from the fill at some
locations. The silt is brown, moist to very moist, and non-plastic to low plastic. .
The sand is generally fine grained, with some coarse sand noted with increased
depth.
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O .
.,
FEB 2 2 ZOll
Geotechnical Investigation
Glenwood op Project
Eugene, Oregon
2.
January 17, 1011
Project No. 2107170
.
.
Sandv Gravel Alluvium:
The silt and sand alluvium transitions to sandy gravel with depth. The gravel is
typically :!:3-inch minus, rounded and well-graded. The sandy gravel contains
some to trace silt and is very moist to wet. The sandy gravel extends to the limit
of our exploration at the site (:!:6 feet).
INFIL TRATION TESTING
Infiltration testing was conducted at two locations (P-1 and P-2). The approximate'test
locations are shown on Figure 2. The testing was conducted to assist in estirhating the
hydraulic conductivity of the soil beneath the site for use in disposal of storm water.
The falling head infiltration method was used for the testing, in general conformance
with the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual - July 2006. The water le.vels were
monitored over a five hour period with variable infiltration rates observed. Bas~d on our
observations, it appears that thesubgrade soils are expected to have low to 'moderate
permeability. The infiltration rates are expected to increase with depth i~ the soil
profile. A summary of test depths, subgrade soils and infiltration measurel]1ents are
provided in Table 1 for individual test locations. We recommend using an infiltration
rate no greater than % incheslhour for average infiltration rates in the upper *18 to 24
inches of the soil profile at the site. The design infiltration rate may be increased to 4
inches/hour if the infiltration artilas are excavated to the sandy soil subgrade and
relatively free draining material is used to backfill the excavation to the design subgrade
level.
Table 1. Infiltration Testing Summary
Test Test Depth Measured
Subgrade Soil Infiltration
Location (in.) rate (in./hr.)
P-1 24" Sandy Silt :!:12 in./hr.
P-2 18" Silt :!:1.5 in./hr.
DISCUSSION OF GEOTECHNICAL ISSUES
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D
FEB 2 2 2011
Weather Conditions:
The site work should be conducted during dry weather, to the extent practical. The site
grading is expected to be minimal and will. primarily be excavation of the existing fill
material for the building pad and footings. The subgrade soils will typically include silt,
. which is expected to be moisture sensitive. The excavation depth for the footings and
pavements will have to be increased and a thickened rock section used for site
preparation during wet weather conditions. Therefore, wet weather construction is
expected to have higher site preparation costs.
Buildino Site Preparation:
We understand that the new structure will include slab on grade construction that will be
elevated above existing site grades. All fill materials and debris will need to be
excavated from the building area and hauled from the site as the exca\(ation is
Geotechnical Investigation
Glenwood op Project
Eugene, Oregon
3.
January 17. 1011
Project No. 2107170
.
.
conducted. The building site preparation should include . compaction of imported
aggregate base over the approved subgrade soil. Due to'the variability of the fill across
the' site, we anticipate that site observation will be required throughout the building
excavation to verify suitable subgrade soils. Based on the observed depth of fill, we
expect that the building pad will include a minimum of 12 inches of aggregate base with
some areas requiring :t3 feet of imported aggregate base.
Foundations and Drainaqe:
We anticipate thaUoundation excavations will extend :t2 feet below existing grades at
the site to provide adequate footing embedment and bypass existing fill material. The
upper silt alluvium is expected to be. adequate to support relatively light foundation
loads without excessive settlement. We have provided recommendations for
constructing the footings over :t12 inches of compacted aggregate base to 'provide a '
working surface during construction. If footing excavation work is completed during wet
weather, we expect that the required excavation depth and rock thickness will increase.
We have assumed that site grading will be conducted to elevate the slab above existing
grades' and provide positive drainage away from the structure. The site includes a
seasonally shallow ground water surface. Therefore, we have assumed saturated
conditions in our bearing capacity evaluation and foundation drains should not. be
required. However, we recommend that the building slab include a vapor barrier due to
the anticipated shallow ground water levels. We have assumed that rain drains from
the building will be transmitted to the storm system at the site.
SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS
Our observations of the foundation soils underlying the proposed site and knowledge of
the area suggest that the seismic risks at the site are relatively low. A summary of
several.considerations are outlined below.
Fault Rupture: ,
Fault rupture is not believed to be a concern at the site, since there are no known faults
in the immediate vicinity.
.,......"..,....
Relative Amplification Hazard:
The deeper soil profile at the site is expected to include dense gravel alluvium overlying
weathered rock. The upper soils include a stratum of medium stiff silt and medium
dense sand. . Based on the limited thickness of the upper medium stiff/dense soil, we
believe that there is a low amplification hazard at this site, and that the typical
correlations ,provided by the Oregon .Structural Specialty Code (OSSe) site
classifications are appropriate for design.
, Relative Liquefaction Hazard:
The foundation soils include medium stiff sandy silt to silty sand in the upper portion of
the soil profile transitioning to dense sandy gravel. Shallow ground water is anticipated
at the site that may impact the upper sandy soils. The sandy alluvial soils are expected
to have a moderate risk of liquefaction or strength reduction during a design
earthquake. However, due to the limited thickness of the sand stratum and density of
the underlying sandy gravel, we anticipate that the hazard would result in o'1RE1~a~MITTAL REeD i
settlements to the structure. The li uefaction risk could be miti ated at the siYe'6 I
Geotechnical Investigation January 1, 12 2 2011 i .
Glenwood Op Project Project No. 2107170 II
Eugene, Oregon 4.
.
.
extending the footing excavations through the upper sandy soils to the sandy gravel
and backfilling with compacted aggregate base. .
SEISMIC DESIGN
The average soil conditions in the upper :1:100 feet beneath the proposed structure is
expected to consist predominately of medium dense to dense alluvium overlying
bedrock. Therefore, we believe that use of a site class D is appropriate for seismic
design. In our opinion, the spectral accelerations and attenuation relationships
provided in the 2007 OSSC are appropriate for seismic design of the new structure.
We recommend using the General Procedure of OSSC, SeCtion 1613 to develop
parameters for seismic design of the structure.
Peak ground accelerations and spectral accelerations (on rock) were determined for
design using 2% probability of exceedence in 50 years (i.e., :1:2,475 year return interval).
We have used the 2002 USGS modeling for the sitE;!. This modeling considers a variety
of seismic sources including crustal and subduction zone earthquakes. However, the
principal source of the design ground motion is due to a large magnitude (Mw 8.3 to 9.0)
earthquake along the CSZ with a source distance :1:35 miles from the site. Crustal
earthquakes were also considered, but do not contribute significantly to the design
ground motion. The peak ground acceleration (PGA) on rock for the site is 0.27g with a
short period acceleration (S5) of 0.66 at 0.2 second period and long period spectral
accelerations (S,) of 0.32 at 1.0 second period. The parameters for establishing the
General Procedure Response Spectrum using OSSC Section 1613 are summarized in
Table. 2. The values for Sos and SOl include a two-thirds reduction as discussed in
Section 1613.5.4.
Table 2. OSSC 2007 Seismic Design Parameters
Site S. SI Fa Fv SMS SMI SOS SOl
Class
D 0.66 0.32 1.28 1.77 0.84 0.56 0.56. 0.37
GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS .
Bearinq Capacity:
We conducted bearing capacity analysis for modest foundation loads which are
anticipated for the new structure. Foundation loads are expected to include continuous
footings with loads as great as 4 kips/linear foot and spread footings witn loads as great
as :1:50 kips.
Moderately loaded footings may be constructed over the upper silt and sand alluvium
using an allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. All continuous perimeter footings
should have a minimum width of 18 inches. Isolated spread footing foundations should
.have a minimum dimension of 24 inches. Our analysis assumed that the footings
would be underlain by a nominal :1:12 inches of compacted crushed rock thCP~SUB~TTAL REC'D
FE~ ~ 2 2011
January 17,1011
Project No. 2107170
Geotechnical Investigation
Glenwood Op Project
Eugene, Oregon
5.
.
.
minimum of 6 inches beyond the limits of the footing. The base of all perimeter footings
should be embedded a minimum of 18 inches below finished grades.
The footings should be designed using an ultimate subgrade friction coefficient of 0.4
for foundations constructed on compacted crushed rock. A factor of safety of 1.5 is
appropriate for this coefficient to minimize relative movements when considering long-
term loads. .
Soil parameters used in the bearing capacity evaluation were also used to estimate the
modulus of subgrade reaction beneath the proposed slab. Our calculations suggest
that slab design using a ks value of 80 kips/fe is appropriate for the site assuming a
minimum aggregate base thickness of 12 inches over the silt subgrade.
Settlement: "
Considering the relatively light foundation loads' and stiffness of the underlying alluvial
soil, we do not believe that structure loads will result in significant settlement. However,
subsurface conditions vary across the site. We recommend that all footing and building
slab excavations extend through the upper fill materials and expose medium stiff, native
silt and sand alluvium. Proper subgrade preparation and fill placement and compaction
will be necessary to adequately support the" structure. Proposed foundations are
expected to result in minor long-term consolidation of the alluvial soils. Therefore, we
recommend that the structures be designed to accommodate maximum total and
differential movements of % inch.
Pavements:
We have conducted pavement thickness analysis using assumed traffic, based on our
experience with similar"facilities. Our assumed traffic includes a daily volume of 200
cars and pickups and 2 light two-axle delivery trucks (28k gross vehicle weight) and one
three-axle truck (50k gross vehicle weight). The light traffic applied over a 20 year
design life results in an Equivalent Single Axle Loading (ESAL's) of :1:30,000. A Mr
value of 4,000 psi was selected for our analysis based on available correlations and our
experience with similar compacted silt subgrade soils. We assumed a 20 year design
life for our analysis, a reliability of 90% and terminal serviceability of 2.0. Our"
calculations suggest that a pavement section consisting of 3 inches of asphalt over 12
inches of aggregate base should be used for pavements at the site.
.., < '~..<.'
.'.""-"'.'-~-'
CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS
Materials:
Unsuitable soils at the site should include fill materiills containing debris, organics or
plastic clay and any organic soils. Stumps, large roots (over:1:1 inch in diameter) or
deeper concentrations of sofisoil conditions or organic material should also be
considered unsuitable. Unsuitable soils should be hauled from the site. Required
excavations are expected to include an existing building slab and associated footings
that previously occupied the site.
Aggregate base as defined in this report should consist of % to 1-inch minus, well
graded crushed rock. The rock should be relatively clean with less than 5% (by weight)
passing the #200 sieve. PRE-SUBMITiAL REC'D
FEB 2 2 11 January 17,1011
2 0 Project No. 2107170
Geotechnical Investigation
Glenwood Op Project
Eugene, Oregon
6.
.
.
All imported aggregate base should be moisture conditioned and compacted to at least
95% relative compaction. The maximum dry density of ASTM 0 698 should be used as
the standard for evaluation of relative compaction.
Site Preparation (Dry Weather):
The existing fill material should be excavated' from beneath all proposed slab and
foundation areas. We recommend that the underlying subgrade surface be evaluated
during dry weather by proof Jolling the relatively undisturbed alluvium to identify any
areas of soft or yielding subgrade' that may require additional excavation and
replacement. The engineer should identify the extent. and depth of the existing fill
. material that needs to be excavated and replaced with imported crushed rock.
Footing areas should be excavated. as required to allow placement and compaction of
:t12 inches of aggregate base. All softened or disturbed subgrade materials should be
excavated to firm subgrade. The subgrade soils beneath the foundations should be
observed and approved by the engineer at the time of excavation. The approved
foundation soil should be covered with a leveling course of ::!:12 inches of compacted
aggregate base.
All structural fill should be documented to confirm adequate compaction. Field density
testing should be conducted where 8 inches or more of compacted aggregate base is
required to attain either bottom of footing or slab elevations. Fill material should be
placed in loose lifts no greater than 12 inches thick. Final compaction of the building
pad in slab areas should be conducted after all plumbing and electrical trenching has
been completed. Field density testing should be conducted on the completed building
pad fill to confirm' adequate compaction of the aggregate base.
Site Preparation (Wet Weather):
Additional excavation and placement of aggregate base will be required to support
construction operations if the site preparation. work is delayed until wet weather
conditions.. Dewatering of required excavations at the site is anticipated for work
conducted during wet weather months. The aggregate base thickness beneath
foundations and slabs should be increased to at least 18 inches for wet weather'"
construction. The excavation work should be completed using a smooth bucket and
conducted in small sections to allow fill placement as the work progresses. The
excavation should be inspected through'out the work to delineate any. unsuitable
subgrade soils exposed in the excavation. Wet. weather construction should be
conducted to minimize disturbance to ,the 'subgrade to the extent practical. Placement
and compaction of aggregate base will not be practical during periods of extremely
heavy rainfall. Therefore, the sitework should be delayed during periods of heavy rain.
In addition, use of a higher quality granular fill and placement of a thickened initial lift
may be required. .
Foundation Construction:
Footing excavations should extend into the relatively undisturbed native alluvium. The
base of all perimeter footings should be at least 18 inches below the finished grade or
paved surface. Place and compact a minimum of 12 inches of aggregate base beneath
all footings.
Geotechnical Investigation
Glenwood .Op Project
Eugene, Oregon
7.
PRE.SUBMlTIAl RECID
. FEt3 2 ? ?Oll
January 17, 1011
Project No. 2107170
.
.
Pavements:
Pavements should be constructed during dry weather to the. extent practical.
Construction of the pavement sections will require a thicker aggregate base section
during wet weather to support construction operations. In addition, paving may not be
practical during wet weather.
Excavate as needed in the pavement areas to attain the design subgrade elevation. .
The subgrade should be evaluated at the time of pavement section construction to
identify any areas of soft or unsuitable material. We anticipate that some areas may
encounter unsuitable fill material at the design pavement subgrade level. Therefore,
the pavement subgrade should be evaluated by the engineer at the time of excavation
to determine the limits of additional excavation required. The finished subgrade should
be evaluated by proof-rolling the surface using a loaded 12 cubic yard dump truck and
.conducting field density testing at regular intervals. Any areas of excessive deflection,
rutting or pumping or failing density test results should be identified and either
processed and compacted or excavated and replaced with compacted granular fill.
Place and compact the required base section over the approved subgrade as soon as
practical. We recommend a minimum base section of :t12 inches for the section
constructed over fine-grained soils. We anticipate that the base . section will support
limited construction traffic during dry weather conditions. Field density testing should
be completed on the aggregate base prior to paving to confirm adequate compaction.
. Compact the asphalt cement pavement to a minimum of 91% relative compaction
according to the theoretical maximum density calculated from the Rice specific gravity.
Conduct field density testing on the asphalt pavement at the time of compaction to
confirm the required density is being achieved. .
LIMITATIONS AND USE OF THIS REPORT
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Glenwood Op, LLC and their
design consultants for the proposed' Glenwood Op project located on Franklin
Boulevard in Eugene, Oregon. Information contained herein should not be construed
as a warranty or guaranty of site or subsurface conditions. Our explorations indicate
soil conditions only at specific locations and only to the depths penetrated. They do not:.
necessarily reflect soil strata or water level variations that exist between or beyond
exploration locations or limits. Soil and ground water conditions at other locations or
times may differ. Our work should not be assumed to represent any environmental
services; we have assumed that those services are being provided by others. Our
work, at the time this . letter was prepared, has been conducted in accordance with
generally accepted principals and practices. No warranty or other conditions,
expressed or implied is made.
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D
FEB 2 2 2011
Geotechnical Investigation
Glenwood Op Project
Eugene, Oregon
8.
JanuafY 17, 1011
Project No. 2107170
i
,
I
I
I
i
I.
I
i
I
,
. i
.
.
We trust this information meets your current needs. Please feel free to contact us with
any questions.
Sincerely,
FEI Testing and Inspection, Inc.
~ VVlL
IA.~~
Michael L. Meyer
Vice President
Mel McCracken, P.E.
Project Engineer
Narrative Test Pit Logs (pages 10 through 12)
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Site Plan
Attachments:
"
f EXPIRES: _ j 2"t? ~.Tr '2- ;
.. ---...,,~..,...---
PRE-SUBMITIAL RECID
Ii
FEB 2 2 2011
Geotechnical Investigation
Glenwood op Project
Eugene, Oregon
9.
January 17. 1011
Project ,No, 2107170
.
.
NARRATIVE TEST PIT SUMMARIES
Glenwood Op Project
Franklin Boulevard
Eugene, Oregon
Project No. 2107170
Excavated on December 16, 2010
. TP-1
Elevation N/A
Depth (ft.) Soil Profile Description
0-2.9 Crushed rock surfacing
Medium dense silty GRAVEL with some debris and clay: brown, moist, debris
inciudes wood, concrete and asphalt, rounded to subangular gravel to 0103 inches,
(Fill).
2.9 - 5.0 Medium dense silty SAND; brown, moist, fine sand, rounded non-plastic silt,
(alluvium).
5.0-6.0 Medium dense gravelly SAND; grey, very moist, rounded gravel to i:3 inch diameter,
(alluvium). Minor caving of test pit sidewalls
No groundwater infiltration encountered.
TP-2
Elevation N/A
Depth (ft.) . Soil Profile Descriotion
0-1.9 Crushed rock surfacing
Two concrete slabs below 0106 inches.
Medium dense sandy GRAVEL with some silt to CLAY with some gravel: grey,
. slightly moist, crushed :!:%-inch minus base aggregate and open-graded :!:3 inch
gravel, (Fill).
1.9 - 5.0 Medium dense silty SAND; brown, moist, fine to medium sand, (alluvium).
5.0 - 5.5 Medium dense to dense sandy GRAVEL; grey and brown, moist, rounded gravel to
:!:3 inch diameter, (alluvium).
i
No groundwater Infiltration encountered.
PRE-SUBMITIAU REC'D
FEB 2 2 ?Ol1
I
I
,
i
.1
I
,
Geotechnical Investigation .
Glenwood Op Project
Eugene, Or!39on
10.
January 17, 1011
Project No. ?'07170
.
.
TP~3
Elevation N/A
Depth (ft.) Soil Profile Descriction
0-1.1 Crushed rock surfacing
Medium dense silty GRAVEL to gravelly CLAY: grey to brown, moist, rounded to
angular gravel to ,"3 inches, (FILL).
1.1 -2.0 Medium stiff sandy SILT; brown, moist, fine sand, (alluvium).
2.0-4.5 Medium dense to dense sandy GRAVEL; grey, very moist to wet, rounded gravel to
:t4 inch dia'meter, (alluvium). .
No groundwater infiltration encountered.
TP-4
Elevation N/A
Depth (ft.) Soil Profile Descriotion
0.-2.6 Crushed rock surfacing
Medium dense clayey GRAVEL with abundant debris; grey to brown, moist, debris
includes several concrete posts and footings, metal fencing, rounded to angular
gravel to ,"3 inches, (FILL).
.
2.6 - 5.0 Medium dense to dense sandy GRAVEL; grey, moist to wet, rounded gravel to :t6
inch diameter, fine to coarse sand, (alluvium).
Minor cavinQ of test oit sidewalls.
No groundwater Infiltration encountered.
TP-5
Elevation N/A
Depth (ft.) Soil Profile Descriotion '''c,'
0-0.5 Crushed rock surfacing
Medium dense silty GRAVEL to gravelly CLAY: grey to brown, moist, rounded to
angular gravel to '"3. inches, (FILL).
0.5 - 3.2 Medium stiff sandy SILT grading to silty SAND; brown, moist to very moisi, fine to
coarse sand, (alluvium).
3.2 - 4.0 Medium dense to dense sandy GRA VE:L; grey, very moist to wet, rounded gravel to
:t3 inch diameter, (alluvium).
Moderate ground water infiltration noted below :t3.8 feet.
PRE-SUBMITTAL RECID
FEB 2 2 2011
Geotechnical.lnvestigation
Glenwood Op Project
Eugene, Oregon
11.
January 17,1011
Project,iNo.2107170
TP-6
.
.
Elevation N/A
Depth (ft.) Soil Profile Descriotion
0- 0.9 Crushed rock surfacing
Medium dense silty GRAVEL with some sand and clay: grey to brown, moist,
rounded to angular gravel to 0103 inches, (FILL).
0.9-4.0 Medium stiff sandy SILT grading to SAND with some silt; brown, moist to very moist,
fine sand, some coarse below 0103 feet, (alluvium).
4.0 - 4.2 Medium dense to dense sandy GRAVEL; grey, very moist, rounded gravel to :1:4 inch
diameter, (alluvium).
.
No ground water infiltration noted.
PRE.SUBNlITIAL REC'D
FEB :2 2 2011
Geotechnical Investigation
Glenwood Op Project
Eugene, Oregon
12.
January::17,1011
Project No. 2107170
. I
j
I
I
.
.
~
_~~~:F.:..~~>~fl~ .~.. q.:id). -~r"'f
,...,:.~..:;Jfi..IIl~_~!1l.!.I~ ;J~.' I :1;,/
~~~_'~~"_.~,~:~:.~~:~.:.t- .~.~;
..t'~"
. ! ".
i -;
-,
.. ~
.
.
"'..
. .
. .
~---':"::-:"~;
: ;i;..J6jC'..
., ,
"{,-
... I
. . '.. ,,-
. ..f~....". ,."
B ut;t~;'#'V:r
: .' 'It;:~;~,.
I 'f: .,'.- -~..... J:.~t1l'~ ~ "'.->.~-~
"0' '.' ./;1-- [I 'q~~~=-: ;
,q; ;'. ?:'U' ',~ . ,.,-,~lt..~>.:t
j: . ~'..,',' l' ," "-=--\1.. .2rr.
"J.~''';'~....-' '\ ..J.............l~.~'-l2)..~..~
j; ,-,..' -,;' .~' . - .:-.~ -.".~
I;' 'i --!II'-:I.., .:,~~~~...,
j _~.;~=-;~-~t ._~<.
.;
.
,.
i
",t.
~ ,~
33."
......
FEI Testing & Inspection, Inc.
Geotecmical & Construcflon Services
29540 B A~ort Road
E"sana, Oregon 97402
phone (5411 684-3849 lax (5411 684-3851
VICINITY MAP
FI GURE NO.
GLEN WOOD OP PR9.~J: ;
. EUGENE, OREGoYf(t.~UBMIITAl
'0 1
.
.
I
225':l:
)
\
~i:'. ".
,..
..,..,..tt...~
. - . ."
=------..........~._-
FEI Testing & Inspection. Inc.
Geotectnlcal & ConstructiO'l Services
29540 B Airport Road
Eugene. Oregon 970102
phone (5411 684-3849 lax (5411 684-3851
L
SITE PLAN
EXPLORATION LOCA TJONS
GLEN WOOD OP PROJECT
EUGENE, OREGON
~
.. it
.,L
!'.
. ~.
,
i
I
I
I
I
FIGURE NO.
2
.....-'- ,~
--".... ..........,"',.-. -
AH.H.IV:P uozu..iI1
~ lOIOa......,_1 NO!l3HV:J NVld 31lS T"""
""'......._""'ro ....J
" Spaj!4JJ\llpOOMJa4sluospaqOlj UOn.:JnJJsuo:J JOI JON
:UOlSSlwqns MilAa/:laJIS .-.
I .1 .~...
, II . I t . Lw
! , i ~ 'I 'S
. I ,.
. I i. I , .
3 , , I ~ . j !
! IJi a , Ii , I' !
, ~ , i ~l ! ~ i
~ , 'J ! l ~ !! !i !i .i iI! .
! ~: ! ~ I I
a , p I~ 1 1 I ~ i ~~ , I I .
, !! ,! !. .. , , ,
o0~w .
D I I ~ I I \-') t, l
.. = II I
I=< . <1> \i,' H .
, + ~
i II! H I III . HII;! h;i il i I -
I, 11 1111 II! I -
! ! :a~ ;I t1;;il'" . ' fll! Ii 'lIt )1 j I =
~ II II - ""
" I ~ ffll fl, ift} Ii! I I:'l
z
" , I'; Ii ",I" 1 j ~
~ it i!: H ~ 'I ~ I jf!~ll!! If I! ill Ifill Ii 11 i
~ CO
w .. I I' ~ hi!: HI 13""0 111: !~, Ilj I if .J I w
~ II hi ~ W w-
nlln g ) u ~ !iiJ;dI fHl m ,uH flU
" w
w !, ..,. I ~
iii .J f~~ ,.. ~~ > 0
"'- ..-- ,.. % " , , , , , .
lh i
iH!i
~~J !f~
..,'if
I .
i '
, , '
. .~ l!
Ii "~ gl
> . ~\ -
jf~~;i ~! .
'l~i
ii Ii
lj Ij
~, ~.
~;. .
;~;
!,'
.~.
~l
.,
.,
<,
"
z
<(
..J
a..
w
I-
(j)
\
\
! IPi i ~ !
~ !j h I
~. Q~ ~o j
~ Hi
!
wI
~~
j1. !
!I !
~! ~
I ~
i
~
'I
, I
! I
'1;1
:!I
I.
1
1
I
I
.,".''''''.I.........I...''_HIIO''.
job:
Type:
Nqtes:
Page I of 3
~G 1'1 . ™
dI U ,I wing
G 13 AreaiLuminaires
The Gardeo GuJlwingN is an area luminaire defined by its sleek profile and rugged construction. The housing is
one-piece, die cast aluminum and mounts directly to a pole or wall without the need of a separate support arm.
The rotatable, multifaceted arc-image duplicating optical systems provide IESTypes 11.111. and IV distributions.The
door frame is single-piece die cast aluminum and retains an optically dear tempered flat glass lens. The luminaire
;s completely sealed and gasketed preventing intrusion from moisture, dust and insects. GuJlwing'" luminaires
. are finished ~ a fade and abrasion resistant TGICpowderco3t. Flat glass lens luminaires provide full cutoff
performance. Sag Lens luminaires provide cutoff perfonnance.
PREFIX
MOUNTING DISTRIBUTION WATTAGE VOLTAGE
H H H H H
H
I
fiNISH
OP;TIONS
Entt:r the order code into the appropriate box above. Note:Gardco re.se~ the right to refUse a CDnfiguratiOn. Not all combirJOtiollS" and conpgurmions
are valid. Refer to notes below for e.\'C/usions and limitations. For questions or concems, please consult the (octary.
PREFIX
MOUNTING
DISTRIBUTION
Gll [3" GuJlwing" Luminaire
I
2
2@90
3
3@120.'
4
W
WS
Single Pole Mount
Twin Pole Mount at 1800
Twin Pole Mount at 900
3-way Pole Hount at 900
3-way Pole Mount at r 200
4-way Pole Mount
Wall Mount, Recessed J-Box
Wall Mount, Surface Conduit
GI3EMC' 13" Gultwing'"" Luminarre
Emergency Cold Temperature
I. Available wtrh (2) 32TRf lamps and MTS optics only.
(I) 32TRF operates in emergency mode.
WATTAGE ANDVOLTAGE
/:f!Q
LAMP IVOLTAGE CHART - Gll HID
Voltap'~
ill
CosmoPolisTlllG Go
EJearonic.a
5y_
60CHPE
90CMPE
140CHPE
CosmOPorlSm ~s are supplied with lamp included.
SOMH
70HH
100MH
ISOMH
175MH*
'" I 75MH nat available (or sale in the United States.
70CHHE' UNIV'
IOOCHHE' UNIY"
150CHHE'l!) UNIV'
SOHPS W.:a
70HPS
100HPS
150HPS
18lPS ~~B
Pulse Start
Metal Halide
^:1agneticBallast
StDndaTd
Mew/Halide'"
Pulse Start
Ceramic Metal Halide
8eCtrOnicBallast
High Pressure
Sodium
Magnetic Ballast
Law Pressure Sodium
CD
Wattages marked with Circle "E" meet (ech:ral enerx)' effidency standards
applicable to 150 watt through 500 watt metal halide luminaires only.
Combinations marked with a dot, with "UNIV" or with '7.00-277V" 011: available for ordering.
1611 Clo'ti:s Barker Road, San Marcos., TX 78666
(800) 227-0758 (SI2) 753-1000 fAX: (512) 7S3-7855 sitelighting.com
e 2010 Koninklijke Philips Electrcnks N.V. All Rights Reserved.
Phil1ps Gardco reserves the right to change: materials or modify the design of its product: without
nodflClldon as part. of the company's continuing produa improvement pn:lgram.
79115-DOII210
2XL
3XL
4XL
MTSJ
Type 11, Horizontal Lamp
Type Ill. Horizontal Lamp
Type IV; Horizontal Lamp
Medium Throw with Solite* Lens
,I
2NotavailablewithF'TFoptton.
3.Avoilablewithpuorescentsourceson,y.
LAMP /VOlTAGE CHART. G I 3 fluorescent
Ruarescent
IMTS Olllio OnlvJ ill
Volt:aft!
277 347 480
.k~
(J)J2TRf'"
(J)4URF"
UNIY'
UNIY'
.I~
LAMP IVOLTAGE CHART. GI3EMd'
Ruorescent
IMTSO/lDCSOnNJ '120
(2)31.TRfu.>
CF Cam/J<1d Fluon=ent TRF Triple Tube Ruoresc~
4. Ruorescent and CMHE ballasts accept 120V through 277V, 50hz to 60hz. input
Specify "UNIV" for /20Vhrough 277V.
5.Lampstartingtemperawreis O-F/-IB'"C.
6. for emergency made lumen output see submittal data sheet 79/15-155 _
"Gardco Emergency Ught Output Information."
7. (I) lamp operates in emergency mode.
PRE-SUBMITTAL RECID
,
FEB !i2 2 2011
PHILIPS
0, GARDeO
Page 2 of 3
FINISH
BRP
BLP
WP
NP
OC
Bronze Paint
Black Paint
White Paint
Natural Aluminum Paint
Optional Color Paint
SpecifY Optional C%r or
PAL ex: OC.LGP or OC-RAL7014.
Special Paint
Spcd(y.MustwpplycoJorchip.
SC
DIMENSIONS AND EPA
.
OPTIONS
F
LF
PC'
PCR
POLY'
HS
QSro
QSTIO
Q92410
QT92410
SPA"
TRill
TR2I]
PTF2
PTFl
PTF4
MFll
L61~
L814
L10H
Fusing In Head
In-Line/ln-Pole Fusing
Photo control and Receptac:Je
Photo control Receptacle only
Polycarbonate Sag Lens
Internal Houseside Shield
Quartz Standby
Quartz Standby - Timed Deiay
Quartz Emergency
Quartz Emergency. Timed Delay
Square Pole Adapter
Single Transition
Twin Transition
Pole Top Fitter. 2 3/8" - 3" Oia. Tenon
Pole Top Fitter. 3" - 3 112" Dia. Tenon
Pole Top Fitter" - 3 112" _ 4" Oia. Tenon
Mast Arm Fitter
LumiStep" Ballast 6 hour
LumiStep'" Ballast 8 hour
LumiStep" Ballast 1 0 hour
.
~GullwingTM
G 13 Area Luminaires
8. Not av<li/ab/e in 480V. Pro'lide specific input voltage.
9. 100Wau HID maximum. Polycarbonate lenses cany 1 yearwumrnty llII/y.
10. 100w Quartz lamp max, Nat available with Ruoresccnt,
EMC, CMHE ar CMPE types,
I I. Required [or mounting to rtraight squan: poles.
I L Mounts to 0 2.3/S" top tenon. Spedfy a pole with
].00" top 00 for a smooth transition.
13. Mounts to a 2-3/8" 0.0. most arm.
14.Available with CosmoPolis" system only. See submittal sheet
GE10O-a05 for complere informarian on LumiStep~ bollasts.
22 1/2"
57.25 em
~
~
.
8 112"
21.5-4 em
~
1611 Clovis Barker Road, SiU1 Marcos, TX 78666
(800) 227-0758 (512) 75).1000 FAX: (512) 75).7855 sitelighting.com
@2010KoninkJijkePhlllp$ElectrOnicsN.V. All Rights Reserved.
Philips Gwdco reserves the right to change materials or modify the design of its product without
notiflcatlon as part of the company's continl.ling product Improvement program.
79115-1]0{1210
r
13 1/2"
34.16 em
~
1
.8 It'
.07m!
EPA
1
1.6 ft'
.15 mJ
3-4
2.2 ft'
20mJ
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D
FEB 2 2 2011
PHILIPS
c;,
GARDeO
Ii'
,
.
Page 3 of 3
SPECIFICATIONS
.
~GullwingTM
G 13 Area Luminaires
GENERAL DeSCRIPTION: The Gardea Gullwing"" is an area
luminaire defined by its sleek profile and rugged construction. The
housing is one-piece. die cast aluminum and mounts directly to a pole
or wall without the need of a separate support arm. The rotatable,
multifaceted arc-image duplicating optical systems provide IES Types
II. III, and IV distributions. The door frame is single-piece diecast
aluminum and retains an optically clear tempered flat glass lens. The
luminaire is completely sealed and gasketed preventing intrusion from
moisture. dust and insectS. Gullwing.... luminaires are finished with a
fade and abrasion resistantTGIC powdercoat.
HOUSING: A one-piece die cast aluminum housing mounts directly
to a pole or wall without the need for a support arm. The low profile
rounded form reduces the effective projected area of the luminaire to
only.8 fe1.07m::l..
LENS ASSEMBLY: A single-piece die cast aluminum lens frame
hinges down from the housing and is secured by a stainless steel
lanyard and hinge pin. An optically clear, heat and impact resistant
tempered flat glass lens is mechanically secured with six retainers. The
electrical and optical chambers are thoroughly sealed with a one-piece
memory retentive hollow-core EPDM gasket to prevent intrusion by
moisture, dust, and insects.
OPTICAL SYSTEMS: The segmented optical systems are
manufactured from homogenou~ sheet aluminum which has
been electrochemically brightened, anodized and sealed. The
multifaceted arc image duplicating systems are designed to
produce IES Types II (2XL), III (3XL). and IV (4XL). The reflector
facets form a conical fan around the arc tube with each facet
positioned to be precisely tangent to the top of the arc tube". The
lampholder is glazed porcelain with a nickel plated screw shell.
HID luminaires feature porcelain medium base lampholder:s.
Fluorescent luminaires use a Medium Throw reflector with a Solite@
glass lens (MTS).
EMC Luminaires: In the event of power !nterruption. integral
battery pack will power (I) 32W compact fluorescent lamp at
reduced 'light levels for a minimum of 90 minutes. Maintemince
free battery is rated for ambient temperatur~s down _40F/_20oC.
Indicator light is visible through the lens. A test switch is accessible
through the door assembly. EMC units do not b~~r CUL label.
ELECTRICAL: All electrical components are UL recognized,
factory tested, and mounted on a unitize'Ci plate with quick
electrical disconnects. For luminaires provided: with Cosmopolis 1M,
each high power factor ballast is ele'ctronic, designed
specifically for the Cosmo Polis 1M high performance ceramic
metal halide electronic sytem. Each HID :high power factor
ballast is capable of providing reliable lamp starting down to.
_20oF/_290C. Standard fluorescent ballasts are solid state.
FINISH: Each stan~ard color luminaire receivJ a fade and abrasion
resistant, electrostatically applied, thermally cured, triglycidal
isocyanurate (TGIC) textured polyester powd~'rcoat finish. Standard
colors include bronze (BRP), black (BLP), white (WP), and natural
aluminum (NP). Consult factory for specs on'l optional or custom
colors. '
LABELS: All luminaires bear UL or CUL (where applicable) Wet
Location labels.
WARRANTY: Gardco luminaires feature a 5 year limited warranty.
See Warranty Information on www.sitelightirig.com for complete
details and exclusions. Polycarbonate lenses carry a , year warranty
only.
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O
FEB 2 2 2011
FULL CUTOFF PERFORMANCE: Full cutoff performance means a luminaJre distribution where zero candela intensity occurs at an angle at o~ above 90. above nadir.
Additionally, the c:andela per 1000 lamp lumens does not numerically exteed [00 (10 percent) at a vertical angle of 80. above nadir. This applies to all !Iateral angles around the
luminalre.
CUTOFF PERFORMANCE: CUT-off perfonnance means a lumlnaire dIstribution where the candela per 1000 lamp lumens does not numerically exceed 2S (1.5 percent) at an
angle at or above 90. above nadIr, and 100 (10 pen=enc) .at a vertical angle of 80~ above nadIr. This applies to all lateral angles around the luminaire. ;1
1611 Clovis Barker Road, San Man::os, TX 78666
(800) 227.0758 (SI2) 753-1000 FAX:(512) 753-7855 sitelighting.com
@lOIOKoninldijkePhilipsElel;troniaN.Y.AlIRightsReserved.
PhiJ1ps Gardco reserves the right to change materials or modify the desigIl of its product without
notification as part of the l;Ompany's continuing product improvement program.
~115-[3011110
PHILIPS
c;, GARDeO
r~gjl~~Jl~
IntendedUSl!
Forwalkwa~,pJazasor
p~estrlanall'as.
Construction
Houslng:KB_6;Battom
hOlllingis0.125"extruded
aluminum. Top cover is
0.156" cast aluminum. KB_8:
Bottom housing ls 0.156"
extruded aluminum. 42"
overall height standard on
KBDandKBA6.43"overall
heiglltstandardonKBA8.
FI~h-fittinglensisl/4".
clear, 100% virgin aaylic. All
exposed lIardware is tamper-
lMistantstainlt5Ssteel.Fout
. 1/2"xll"anchorboltswilh
doublenutsiwashersand4-
In"dlameterboltdrcletem-
Hiohoressure
sodium
3551
50S
70S
lDOS
1505
.
plate provided far mounting
(shipped separately).
Finish: Dark brllnze (DDB)
corrosion-resimntpolyester
powder finish standard.
Additional architectural
cololsavallable,see
www.llthonia.rom/armcolors.
Optics
Refltctorsystemincorpotates
an anodized. 5pun aluminum,
flaredcon~andananodized,
hydroforrn~d, flutedllpp~r
r~flectl1rprovldin9aTypeV
(symmetric)Cl!tl1ffdistribll.
tloll.Op.tionalqllndtical
1l1werreflectororCilStalumi-
num louver5 available.
: 26TRT
UTRT
Electrical
E1ectrica! components an!
unitized on removable
power module and accessible
throllghbottomofbollard.
POsitlve-ll1cking,qllick-
disconnect on secondary
drcuit. Ballast:AII balla5t5
are 100% factorytened. HIgh
reactance,highllowerfactor
for 150Wand below. Compact
f111orescentusesanelectronk
high-frequency ballast.
SacketMedlum-bmporc!-
lain 5ocket, 4KV pul~e rated.
Compactflllarescenthas
follr-pin,whili!lherrnoplastic
badywlthqllick-cannea
pU5h-inwiringterminaI5.LP!
Is standard 35KfarCFL
Standard flared cane
RS TypeVdistributlan
Oouanalcvlindriralteflectar
CYA Specularalzak
CYS Blackalzak
CYG Goldafzak
lll1Nenlll"on\vl
LV lauvers
(blank) Oark brcnze (s<<L) 01G
OWH White OBR
OBL Black 058
OM' Mediumbrcnze " Enhanced corrcalon resl5tance
ONA Naturalalllminum SDDS. Oark bronze stripe
055 Sandstone SOWH White stripe
OGe Charcoal gray SDSl Slad:strlpe
AomTIONALINFORMATION'
RJr additional product informatian, visit wwwJlthoilia.mm_
~i1
Standard
ftaredcona
Op1Jonal
cynndricalreflal:tor
PSG10
www.1ithonia.comI1-800.279-8041
.
Listlngs
UlUsted(standard).CSA
Certified (seeOplions). Ul
Ustedforwetloc.ations.
"'0
lB'
MVOlP
ShlDsinslalled
SF SinglefU5e,120V,277V,347V
OF OOUb!efuse,208V,240V
H24 24" overall height
H30 3Q" averall height
H36 36" overall heighl
FD Festaonoutlet
FG Festoon outlet with duplex
ground fault receptade'
Natural aluminum stripe
Tennis gret!n stripe
Srighl red stripe
Oartblueslripe
Yellow stripe
Dr.JWlng~arl'fordimensJonaldetailonlyandmaynotrl'pll!~enlactual
med1..nical amftgul'iIllon. Dimen~ns aJl! ~hawn in inchl!S (cenllmllfrs)
unles1D1I1trW"~noled.
KBAG
l.cuver
Notel
1 Spedfylamptype.nddls!Jibutlon.SeeConftgul'illion~table.
212OVanly.
3 Requi~~~dlamp.
4 KIHi:116Wffi.lampnotinduded..
5 KS-8:1SOWmax.,lampnolinduded.
6 lDuVl!r must be lMd. Multh'olr d~ctnlnic ballan (for compact
nUOrl'Scentlamp,only)G1pableafcprl'illlngananyOnevoltage
from 12OV-277V.
u:lI15u1rf.lClDryforuseinCanada.'
OpliDllalmulli-tapbaJlast(12OV,20SV,24OV,277V).
In Canada 12OV,2T7V,347V;shijllas12OVI347V.
9 ClWer ~hijlS sepal'iltely. . 'I
10 Choosr primary lixturl' ftnlsn ana ~lripe tolar if deslrl'd.
T
T
".
(lOG.7l
1
4'-
(106.7)
1
h,gJlj
KBA8-lV
h,g'li
KBD8-lV
1111'11
KBDG
Max-weight 34.9 Ibs (lS.9kgl
"Also available In 24"/H24J, 3lT (H3II) and 36" (H36):
SpecifiGltion
KBA
KBD
KBA
Example: KBAB 10M RS 1B lPI
(SA Meets Canadian
standards
.Shtcssecaratelv
R6S : Half-~hield (6' round)
! RBS Half-~hield (8" round)
~ KBAS Anchor bolts
~.,;;;
-
P~t"~"RMI1TA'~~Cll UTHD;;"A LIGHTING"
FEB 2 2 2011
Job:
Type:
Notes:
Page I of 3
~ Gul1lwing™
G 18 Area: Luminaires
The Gardeo Gultwing TN is an area luminaire defined by .its sleek profile and rugged construction. The housing
is one-piece, die cast aluminum and mounts directly to a pole or wall without the need of a separate support
arm. The multifaceted arc~image duplicating optical systems provide IES Types I. lJ. Ill. IV and V distributions. The
door frame is single-piecediecast aluminum and retains an optically dear tempered flat glass lens. The luminaire
is completely sealed and gasketed preventing intrusion from moisture, dust and insects. Gullwing Thl luminaires
are finished with a fade and abrasion resistant TGIC powdercoat. Rat glass lens luminaires provide full cutoff
performance. Sag Lens luminaires provide cutoff' performance.
PREFIX
HOUNTING DISTRIBUTION WATTAGE VOLTAGE
H H H H H
H
I
FINISH
OPTIONS
Enter the order code irrtD the appropriate box above. Note: Gardea reserves the right to refuse a con~guration. Not all combinations and con~gurrrtions
ore vaRd. Refer to notes be/ow (or exclusions and limitations. For questions or concerN, pleose consult the (OaDry.
PREFIX
MOUNTING
GIS
IS" GuHwing'" Luminaire
I Single Pole Mount
2 Twin Pole Mount at 180a
2@90 Twin Pole Mount at 900
3 3~way Pole Mount at 900
3@120G1 3-way Pole Mount at 1200
4 4-way Pole Mount
W Wall Mount,.Recessed J-Box
WS Wall Mount, Surface Conduit
I. Not available with PTF optian.
WATTAGE
IOOMH' 150PSMH iD 3S0PSHH' lD B75PSHH'
Pulse Start MH 150MH' 250P590- !II 400PS~H' <tl IOOOPSMH'"
Magnetic BaDast 175PSMH '" l20PSMH' <tI 750PSMH'
StondardMH 175MH" 250MH' 400MH"~ IOOOMH'u
Magnetic Bollast
CDsmoPo/is m rJ
Electronic System 6DCMPE 90CMPE 140CMPE CosmoPuli$fM and
(See Notes 6,],9) MarterCoIor@
MasterColor@ Efrte ~ 1IOMCE-1KltI 115MCE-JKiD Note:347Vand EIiteSystemsare
480VMCE.syrtems wpplied with
Electronic System 2 210MCE-4KiD lISfr1CE-4KiD indIuIeandrequirellll lamp.
(See Nates 6.7.9.10) awilOarytronsfanner.
Pulse Start MH
Bectronic Ballast 150PSEJ iIl 17SPSE iD 2S0PSE iD 320PSE'- iD
(See Notes 6.7.9)
70HPS 150HPS 400HPS 750HPS'
High Pressure Sodium
Magnetic Banast . IOOHPS 250HPS 600HPS
Low Pressure Sodium lSLPS
Magnetic Ballast
. I 75MH, 250MH and 400MH na[ avai/able /fir sale in the United States.
"'* 250PS90 includes a 90% efficient magnetic PSMH ballast, meeting the requirementt of
CalifomiaTrtJdO,effectjve 11112010.
@ Wattages marked with Circle "E." meet federal energy effidency standards
applicable to 150 watt through SOD watt me~1 halide luminaires only.
DISTRIBUTION
I'
2XL
3XL
4XL
BLC1
Q'
Type I. Horizontal Lamp
Type II, Homontal Lamp
Type III. Horizontal Lamp
. Type IV, Horizontal Lamp
Backlight Control
Type V, Horizontal Lamp
2. NClt avai/able above 400WDttt.
VOLTAGE
120 240 347
208 277 480
200~277 CMPE,MCE and PSE types only.
3. Requires ElBlanB /amp.
4. Furnished wtth sag glan lelIS only.
5. Mogul base lamp nlquired.
6. UL Uned Clt 40"C ambient
7. CMPE types available /20Vor 200-277'{anly.
PSE types avoiloble 200 - 277V only. Mc:E types
availob/e 200-277V, Oli weN lU 347V and 4BOV.
B. See /000 Wllttlomp tDbles below.
9. See QS I Q924 Table an pa~ 2.
/0. "-JK"suffix specifies a JOOO.K /amp and
""'K"suffix specifjes a .wOO"K /amp.
Note 9: 1000 Watt lamp tables.
For 1000 Watt Metal Halide use:
Brand Product Code Cataloll Number
Venture 53702 MS]OOOW/HORlBT37/JK
G.E 18205 MVR lOOOlufBT37
Ven[ure ISJJ2 MHIOODWIU/ST37
For 1000 Watt: Pulse Start Metal Halide use'
l!GruI Product Code Catalo(ll Number
G,~ 10389 MVRI~fU/BTJ7IPA
Venture -49111 MS I OOOW/HORfT2.5/PS
WARNING: Use of other lam~5 voids warranty.
::~~) ~~';:~7~;'""~~;'';';J~~O~",;:'~:~:~:3.7B55 ,;'elighdng,<om PRE.SUBMITIAL REC'DpH I LI P~
@2010KoninklijkePhUlpsElectronicsN.Y.AIIRightsReserved. 2 2011
Philips Gardco reserves the right [~chan~ ~a[erlaJs or~odify the design of,its produawlth~EB 2. 'c;,
notification as pan: of the company s Continuing produa Improvement program.
79]]5-8511210
GARDCO
9.SecQSIQ92Hable.
II.Nat avoilab/ealxNe 4lJ0watt.
12Nat available in 4BOY.
Provide speci~c input valroge.
IJ.250W maximum. Polycarbonatt: IellS"es
canya I rearWll'rrontyanly.
/4.ln lieu afflat glass. Supplied standard and required with 7S0 watt and higher wattages.
/5. Required for 3P 0.0. round ar tapered round poles where tOp 0.0. is less than 4".
/6. Required for 4~ - 5" 0.0. round poles.
/7. Maunu to a 2-3111' 0.0. mast arm.
lB. Maunts to a 2.318"Tap Tenan.SpeciJY a pale with a 4S0w 0.0. (or a smooth transitiCll1.
19. Nat avaUable in /20~ mounting can~gurotions.
20. Requires a 2.318"0.D. x 4R tenan ar a 2A" round pale top 0.0. SpecifY Orilnng (1,2,2@90, 3 or 4 only.)
2/.Available anly with 17SPSMH through 400PSMH and /50HPS through 400HPS wattages.lndudes
dual-lcvel capacitor and wiring to connect to Gardco Motion Response System. .
22Available with CosrnoPoUs" system only. See submittal sheet GElOO-005 {or complete in(ormation on LumiStep'" ballasts.
Page 2 of 3
FINISH
BRP
BLP
WP
NP
OC
Bronze Paint
Black Paint
White Paint
NaturalAluminum Paint
Optional Color Paint
SpecifY Optional Colar or
RAL ex: OC-LGP or OC-RAL7024.
Special Paint
SpecifY. Must supply color chip.
SC
DIMENSIONS AND EPA
.
.
~ Gullwing ™
G 18 Area Luminaires
OPTIONS
F"
TRill Single Transition
TR211 Twin Transition
PTF219 Pole Tap Fitter - 2 3/8" -]" Di~ Tenon
PTFJI9 Pale Top Atter.]".] 1/2" Di~.Tenan
PTF419 Pole Top Atter . ] 1/2". 4" Dill. Tenon
SQPTFlO Square Pole Top Fitter
GMR21 Provision for Gardea Motion R'~sponse
L622 LumiStep'" Ballast 6 hour II
L022 LumiStep" Ballast 8 hour Ii
L I 022 LumiStep'" Ballast I 0 hour
Fusing In Head
In-Unelln-Pole Fusing
Photo control and Receptacle
Photocontrol Receptacle only
Polycarbonate Sag Lens
Sag Glass Lens
Internal Houseside Shield
Quartz Standby
Quartz Standby - Timed Delay
Quartz. Emergency
Quartz. Emergency - Timed Delay
]" Round Pole Adapter
4" and 5" Round Pole Adapter
Mast Ann Fitter
I'
'.
'(Nd~"r~QS'fQ92.4T"'ellL~_'
LF
PCl2
PCR
POLyl]
SGI.
HS
QS'
QST'
Q924'
QT924'
RPAI'5
RPA216
MF'1
HID Maximum Quartz
LampWacts tamp Watts
[75w.1.tt$cr[ess ~i IOOWatts
AbcV1! 175 watts ,1150WattS
up tc 400 watts I,
QS,QST,Q924.QT924 are notavai/ab/ewfth CMPE.MCEor
PSE wattages or ill luminaires ~ 400 watb" HID.
RE.SUBMITTAL REC'D
1611 CI~;. Buke, Road, S~ M=o, TX 78666 FEB 2 2 2011
(800) .'127-0758 (512) 753.1000 FAX: (512) 753.7855 sitelighting.com
e 20 1 0 Koninklijke Philips ElectrOnics N.'/. All RIghts Reserved.
Philips Gardea reserves che rIght co change materials or modify che design of its product wichout
notification as part of che company's continuing product improvement program.
31 112"
BO.Ol em
:/?
79[ [5-85/1210
.
IB"
45.nem
I
II [/2"
29.21 em
-L-:
l
With Sap' Glass Lens
:/?
............-.........
t
B"
1120.32 em
, [
Ii ,
:/?
EPA Data
1 1 3-4
1.2 It' Hit' l.21t'
.[[ m1 .22ml JOml
PHILIPS
0., GARDeO
.
Page 3 of 3
SPECIFICATIONS
.
GGullwing™
G 18 Area Luminaires
GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Gardea Gullw;ng™ is an area
Juminaire defined by its sleek profil~ and rugged construction. The
housing is one~piece, diecast aluminum and mounts directly to a pole
or wall without the need of a separate support arm. The multifaceted
arc-image duplicating optical systems provide IES Types I, II, 111, IV and
V distributions. The door frame is single-piece diecast aluminum and
retains an optically clear tempered flat glass lens. The luminaire is
completely sealed and gasketed preventing _ intrusion from moisture,
dust and insects. The Gullwing Th'I luminaires are finished with a fade
and abrasion reslstantTGIC powden:oat.
HOUSING: A one-piece die cast aluminum housing mounts directly
to a pole or wall without the need for a support arm. The low profile
rounded fom reduces the effective projected area of the luminaire to only
1.1 ft'1.1 I m'.
LENS ASSEMBLY: A single-piec:e diecast aluminum lens frame
hinges down from the housing and is secured by a stainless steel
lanyard and hinge pin.
An optically clear, heat and impact resistant tempered flat gla~s lens is
mechanically secured with eight retainers. The electrical and optical
chambers are thoroughly sealed with a one~piece memory retentive
hollow~core EPDM gasket to prevent intrusion by moisture, dust, and
insectS.
OPTICAL SYSTEMS: The segmented optical systems are
manufactured from homogenous sheet aluminum which has been
electrochemically brightened, anodized and sealed. The multifaceted
arc image duplicating systems are designed to produce IES Types I (I),
II (lXL). III (JXL). IV (4XL and BLC). and V (Q). With the lXl., 3XL
and 4XL luminaries, the reflector facets for"m a conical fan around the
arc tube with each facet positioned to be precisely tangent to the top
of the arc tube.
The lampholder is glazed porcelain with a nickel plated screw shell.
Position~oriented mogul base sockets to accept high output horizontal
metal halide lamps are supplied standard.
ELECTRICAL: All electrical components ,~re UL recognized
and factory tested. Electronic and magnetic HID ballasts are high
power factor and mounted on a unitized tray ,with quick electrical
disconnects. Magnetic HID ballasts are the separate component type.
Electronic and magnetic HID ballasts are capable' of providing reliable
lamp starting down to -20'"F I _290C. Standard fluore$cent ballasts are
solid state.
Luminaires provided with the CosmoPolis 1M or MasterColor@ Elite
high performance ceramic metal halide electrc:mic systems include
high power factor electronic: ballasts, designed specifically for the
system selected.
FINISH: Each standard color luminaire receives a fade and abrasion
resistant, electrostatically applied. thermally cured. triglycidal
isocya.nurate (TGIC) textured polyester powdercoat finish. Standard
colors include bronze (BRP). black (BLP), white (WP). and natural
aluminum (NP). Consult factory for specs on" optional or custom
colors.
LABELS: All luminaires bear UL or CUL (where applicable) Wet
Location labels.
WARRANTY: Gardea luminaires feature a 5 year limited warranty.
See Warranty Information on www.sitelighting.com for, complete
details and exclusions. Polycarbonate lenses carry a I year warranty
only.
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D
FEB 2 2 201l
FULL CUTOFF PERFORMANCE: Full cutoff perlonnance means a luminalre distribution 'Where zero candela Intensity occurs at an angle ilt or Olbove 90. above nadir.
Additionally, che candela per 1000 lamp lumens does not numerically exceed 100 (10 percent) at a vertical angle of BO. abOWl nadir. This applies to alIi lateral angles around the
luminaire.
CUTOFF PERFORMANCE: Cutoff perfonnance means a luminaire distribution where the candela per 1000 lamp lumens does not numerically exceed 15 (15 percent) at an
angle at or abQve 90. ilbove nadir, and 100 (10 percent) at a vertical angle of 80. above nadir. This applies to a1llater.U angles around the luminalre. ,
1611 Clovis Barker Road, San Marcos, TX 78666
(800) i27-0758 (511) 753-1000 FAX: (512) 753-7855 sitelighting.com
@2010KoninkliJkePhilij>>ElectronicsN.Y.AIIRightsReserved.
. Philips Gardco reserves the right to change materials or mocrfy die design of fa product widlout
notification as part of die company's continuing produa Improvement program.
79115-85/1210
PHILIPS
c;,
GARDCO
"