The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNotes, Work PLANNER 3/1/2011 ,;{, -'1'<" . ..,1 y, <.~ -.'- ...... .....,: ~ \ . , iCity of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 . . SITE PLAN REVIEW PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Project Name: Glenwood OP, LLC Project Proposal: To construct a 2-story, 19,900 sq ft medical clinic in Glenwood. Case Number: PRE11-00006 Project Address: undeveloped land east of the intersection of Glenwood and Franklin Blvd. Assessors Map and Tax Lot Number(s): 17-03-34-31 TL 900, 17-03-34-34 TL 201 Zoning: Community Commercial (CC) Overlay District(s): N/A Applicable Refinement Plan: Glenwood Refinement Plan Designation: Subarea #7: Commercial-Industrial Mixed-Use Metro Plan Designation: Community Commercial with a Mixed-use Overlay. Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: March 1, 2011 Application Submittal Deadline: August 28, 2011 Associated Applications: N/A t' -\ POSITION Pro'ect Planner Trans ortation Plannin En ineer Engineer-in- Training Deputy Fire Marshal REVIEW OF Land Use Plannin Trans ortation Utilities, Sanitary & Storm Sewer Fire and Safet Buildin NAME Mark Metz er 726-3775 Michael Liebler 736-1034 Kyle Greene 726-5750 Life Gilbert Gordon 726-2293 Communit Services Mana er Dave Puent726-3668 r:?A~~hIG7,lI\l::t'S'.QEY':I.:.()'PMENfI";RE~'Ew'::te'4li11;;Hi :;"dCii,C:;',. , .... "1 Owner/ Applicant Applicant's Representative Glenwood OP, LLC, c/o Frank Gibson Scott Stolarczyk Hutchinson, Cox, Coons, et. al. Robertson Sherwood Architects 777 High Street 132 East Broadway, Suite 540 Eugene, OR 97401 541-686-9160 Eugene, OR, 97401 541-342-8077 (f) Date Received: Planner: MM P5' "3/1 / If 1-[; Revised 10/25/07 . . . TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PLANNING o Application fee - discuss the applicable fees o Copy of the Site Plan reduced to 8'h"x 11" Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) l2iiI 8 V2" X 11" Copy of Site Plan o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) l2iiI Deed and Preliminary Title Report o Brief narrative explaining the purpose of the development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees and future expansion plans, if known. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) l2iiI ~ Brief Narrative o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~ J'F:'TI.......~.. ~ ~. <, . ..~:.. . See note #1 Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, or Engineer Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs' Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact, and disabled parking spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, parking and ~ ~~. j>C,< "~". ~ J'F:'TI ~ ~ J'F:'TI ~ Revised 10/25/07 ~ . . vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses Location of existing .and proposed transit facilities . 1ZJ 1ZJ ~ tiillffil ~ R7I I2'i8f r:<<1;I ~ P71 EJ ~ 51 o Phased Development Plan Where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water, and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply to the Site Plan application being submitted. Complete Incomplete See Planning N/A Note(s) G P71 ~ Phased Development Plan o Landscape Plan Complete Incomplete !gJ P71 o Ift0;I 1.;.J.eJ. See Planning Note(s) ~ See note #1 Drawn by a Landscape Architect Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of landscape coverage Screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 Written description, including specifications, of the permanent irrigation system Location and type of street trees List in chart form the proposed types of -landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size, spacing and method of planting ~ ~ ~ ~ 51 51 51 P71 ~ o Architectural Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~ Revised 10/25/07 Ift0;I t:::J Exterior elevations of all buildings and @ . . structures proposed for the development site, including height Conceptual floor plans I2S1 S r:::1Jill o On-Site Lighting Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) I":1l ~ /i;l Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area I2S1 @j0 I2S1 See 'note#2 Photometric test report for each light source Planning Notes: 1. Please include a table summarizing the percentage of coverage for the site that includes buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces and a calculation of landscape coverage. ,2. Please provide the required photometric test report for each light source. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: . Please be aware of the new SDC and application forms. . SUB and Fire and Life Safety have indicated that the back-flow preventer vault must be located within 10 feet of the water main that is being accessed. . The dimensions of the backflow device and its current location do not allow it to be easily accessed. Revised 10/25/07 GP . . ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR PERMITS IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS OR APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE- APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION: Applicable Not Applicable fVI. .. '122SI o o ~ fg[ o o o ~ ~ ~ I"'l L:tj. ~ ~ o I"'l." ill!J ~ fg[ I"'l W Revised 10/25/07 Where a multi-family development is proposed, any additional materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240 Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the to"p of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present Where the development area is within a.n overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be serviced by sanitary sewer @'I . . THIS APPLICATION IS: D COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING [gJ INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE City Planner Date This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Section 5.4- 105 and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a limited land use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete. The 120-day processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is submitted or when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must indicate by either signing this form or by submitting a written response to the City within seven days of the date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing information. If you indicate herein or in your written response that the missing information will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre- . Submittal Review to provide the City with the missing information. If you refuse to submit the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee, the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120-day clock and begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after the start of the 120-day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the 120-day processing time. Upbn receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the 120-day period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if the new information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is sent out and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects the ' application proposal and additional review is required. I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the City within the lSO-day timeline. Owner/Applicant's Signature Date Revised 1O{25{07 Q TENTATIVE\ITE PLAN REVIEJtAPPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Deputy Fire Marshal: Gilbert Gordon 'Case #: PREll-00006 FIRE o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Fire Note(s) (g] r0'l I!;;J On-site vehicular circulation o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan. Complete Incomplete See Fire Note(s) 1. Location of existing and required fire hydrants and similar public facilities ' IS::<'! ~ Fire Notes: 1. Fire hydrant location on north side of Franklin Boulevard will not wor~ for fire operations due to high traffic volumes and unable to support sprinkler FDC location on the above ground vault. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: I' A. Location of the above ground backflow preventer vault will not work since it is inaccessible to the fire department at the proposed location. Also, it is not within 10 feet of the public water main connection per SUB Water Department rules (refer to Bart McKee's comments). The above ground vault with a fire department connection (FDe) supporting the proposed sprinkler system shall be relocated meeting SUB requirements and in an area capable of supporting fire apparatus. B. Provide a fire hydrant for a water supply for supporting the FDC on E. 14th Avenue placed within 10-30 feet of the FDC meeting 2010 Springfield Fire Code 507 and Appendix C requirements. C. Fire apparatus access roads shall support an 80,000 lb. imposed load per 2010 Springfield Fire Code 503.2.3 and SFC Appendix Dl02.1. D. Provide Knox keyed gate switches at the electric gates per SFC 506.1. Date Received: '. :7 It II / Planner: MM Revised 9/24/07 . . TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE..SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST ~ Engineer: Kyle Greene Case#: PREll-00006 PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING Incomplete o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions Complete See PW Note(s) 1 r;;;;l l.liEJ ~ [g1 [g1 lei EJ r;;;;l ~ lei N/A ~ I.=:.J r;;;;l ~ N/A [g1 lei ~, [g1 EJ Revised 10{25{07 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer Vicinity Map The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department The 100-year floodplain and f1oodway;: boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services D'E~partment Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 '12 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table (J) Date Received: ,5.1-1 / Planner: MM fd' 1- f . . o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan must be in compliance with the regulations of SDC Sections 5.17-100, 4.1-100, 4.2-100, and 4.3-100 and must include the following information: Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) 2 r:=J W lZl lZl lZl r:l W2I r:l ~ lZl r:=J 8 o Grading and Paving Plan Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) ~ 3 lZl 4 ~ ~ [] [] lZl lZl ~ 5 6 r:=J E2J. ~ r:l ~ []~0" ~:"'" .. '."" N/A Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer Location and width of all existing and proposed easements Location of existing and required power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities Location and size of existing and proR,osed utilities on and adjacent to the site, including sallitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer I, Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are",proposed as part of the stormwater management system Roof drainage patterns and discharge: locations Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns The size and locatiop of stormwater rT)anagement systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells anCl/or detention ponds; storm water quality measures;:and natural drainageways to be retained Existing and proposed spot elevations,: and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) Amount of proposed cut and fill o Stormwater Management System Study - provide four (4) copies of the study with the completed Storm water Scoping Sheet attached. The plan, calculations, and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) 7 rx::1l ~ Revised 10/25/07 , Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management System Study o . . PW Notes: 1. Per SDC 5.17-120 (B) the Site Assessment of the entire development area shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer" A stamp is required by either an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer. 2. Per SDC 5.17-120 all site plan applications that contain structures over 4,000 square feet of gross floor area shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect or Engineer. A stamp is required by either an Oregon licensed Architect or Engineer for this plan sheet. 3. Per SDC 5.17-120 (F) a registered professional engineer shall stamp the grading and paving plan for site plans greater than 5,000 square feet of new paving area. 4. Per SDC 5.17-120(F) where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system, an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect may be required. A stamp will be required by an Oregon licensed Landcape Architect on the Landscape Plan. 5. Per SDC 5.17-120 (F)(l) roof drainage patterns and discharge locations need to be clearly shown on the plans. The plans do not clearly show where water flows on the roof and how it discharges from the roof. 6. Per SDC 5.17-120 (F)(2) pervious and impervious area drainage patterns need to clearly be shown on the plans. The traffic directional arrows should not be shown on the Vertical Control Plan to be confused with the flow arrows. :' 7. The applicant proposes to capture all stormwater up to and including the 25 year storm, and has shown stormwater calculations for the 10 year storm event. Per EDSPM 4.03.1 show overflow events for the 25 year storm and how it will not affect public infrastructure or the building. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: o Per SDC 4.02-105 (G) an Improvement Agreement will be required for 14th Avenue as a part of this development. , o The stormwater report indicates a 5 minute time of concentration. This is overly conservative and the City only requires a 10 minute time of conc~ntration to be used. The storm water report may be adjusted to a 10 minute time of concentration. o It is difficult to determine how the impervious area slopes in some areas. It would be helpful if additional spot elevations were shown on the Vertical Control Plan. o Protect infiltration basin areas from compaction during constuction or return basin areas to pre-development condition after construction is complete, to maintain infiltration rates. o Trees should not be planted in the middle of a water conveyance ditch. o Per SDC 5.17-120 (A)(9) an elevation view of the trash enclosures will be required for site plan approval. o Prior to site plan approval, the depth of top soil and mulch for the Infiltration Basins will need to be specified on the Landscape Plan. The quantity, species, and location of plants to be placed in the Infiltration Basins will need to be shown and the plant list will need to specify the species for every plant listeq. o Per EDSPM chapter 3 and the BES manual chapter 3, a maintenance agreement for the stormwater Infiltration Basins will be required prior to site plan approval. o Per EDSPM 3.03.4.C all building rooftop mounted equipment shall be' provided with secondary containment or a weather resistant enclosure to prevent leaks, spills or any fluids from migrating into the storm drainage system. Revised 10/25/07 cj) CITY 0 NGFIELD SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARG JOURNAL OR JOB NUMBER ESTIMATE NAME OR COMPANY: Glenwood Op Medical Office Building LOCATION: MAP & TAX LOT NUMBER: 1703343100900 & 1703343400201 DEVELOPMENT TYPE: ESTIMATE NEW DEVELQPEDAREA (S.F.):' EXISTING DEVELOPED AREA (S.F.): TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (S.F.): No Public Connection 1. STORM DRAINAGE NEW IMPERVIOUS SQ. FT. . REIMBURSEMENT COST: IMPERVIOUS SQ. FT. B. IMPROVEMENT COST: IMPERVIOUS SQ. FT. RKSHEET 19,900.00 630 ITE: 630 lTE: LOT SIZE (S.F.): MWMC: MWMC: 630 630 7;666 x. $ 0.231 PER SF x $ 0.337 PER SF $ 0.567 TOTAL STORM DRAINAGE SDC: Cost er SF= 2. SANITARY SEWER-CITY (see reverse side) A. REIMBURSEMENT COST: NUMBER OF DFU's B. IMPROVEMENT COST: NUMBER OF DFU's $ 104 131.72 PER DFU x 104 $ 64.29 PER DFU $ 196.01 TOTAL LOCAL W ASTEW A TER SDC: x $20,384.73 3. TRANSPORTATION BLDG AREA TGSF x TRIP RATE x COST PER ADT x NEW TRIP FACTOR NEW: A. REIMBURSEMENT COST: 19.90 x 31.45 B. IMPROVEMENT COST: 19.90 x 31.4; EXISTING: A. REIMBURSEMENT COST: 0.00 x 31.45 B. IMPROVEMENT COST: 0.00 x 31.45 0.95 NTF $30,879.26 I x $ 51.94 PER TRIP x NTF $ 112,542. 75 I x $ 189.29 PER TRIP x 0.95 x $ ; 1.94 PER TRIP x 0.95 NTF $0.00 I $ 189.29 PER TRIP x 0.95 NTF $0.00 I S 241.22 TOTAL TRANSPORTATION REIMBURSEMENT SDC: TOTAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT SDC: TOTAL TRANSPORTATION SDC: $143,422.01 x 4. SANITARY SEWER- MWMC NEW: . REIMBURSEMENT COST: NUMBER OF FEU's 19.90 x. $87.40 PER FEU $1,739.281 B. IMPROVEMENT COST: NUMBER OF FEU's 19.90 x $1,143.06 PER FEU $22,746.95 I C. COMPLIANCE COST NUMBER OF FEU's 19.90 x $19.40 PER FEU $386.00 I EXISTING: A. REIMBURSEMENT COST: NUMBER OF FEU's 0.00 x $87.40 PER FEU $0.00 I B. IMPROVEMENT COST: NUMBER OF FEU's 0.00 x $1,143.06 PER FEU $0.00 I C: COMPLIANCE COST: NUMBER OF FEU's 0.00 x $19.40 PER FEU $0.00 MWMC CREDIT IF APPLICABLE (SEE REVERSE) TOTAL MWMC REIMBURSEMENT FEE: TOTAL MWMC IMPROVEMENT FEE: TOTAL MWMC COMPLIANCE FEE: MWMC ADMINISTRATIVE FEE: TOTAL MWMC SDC: $ 24,882.23 SUBTOTAL (ADD ITEMS 1,2,3, & 4) $ 188,688.97 5. ADMINISTRATIVE FEES: BASE CHARGE (SUBTOTAL ABOVE) $ 188,688.97 x 5% $9,434.45 TOTAL SEWER ADMINISTRATION FEE: TOTAL TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION FEE: $ Kyle Greene 2/28/20 II DATE TOTAL SDC CHARGES $0.00 $1,739.28 $22,746.95 $386.00 $ 10.00 $24,882.23 $1,174.06 8,260.39 $198,123.42 . . DRAINAGE FIXTURE UNIT (DFU) CALCULATION TABLE NUMBER OF NEW FIXTURES x UNIT EQUIVALENT ~ DRAINAGE FIXTURE UNITS (NOTE: FOR REMODELS, CALCULATE ONLY THE NET ADDITIONAL FIXTURES) ESTIMATE FIXTURE TYPE FIXTURES NEW OLD UNIT EQUIVALENT DRAINAGE FIXTURE UNITS BATHTUB 3 0 DRINKING FOUNTAIN 2 I 2 FLOOR DRAIN, FLOOR SINK 3 3 9 INTERCEPTORS FOR GREASE/OIUSOLIDSIETC 3 0 INTERCEPTORS FOR SAND/AUTO W ASHlETC. 6 0 LAUNDRY TUB 2 0 CLOTHES W ASHERJMOP SINK 3 0 CLOTHES WASHER - 3 OR MORE (EA) 6 0 MOBILE HOME PARK TRAP (l PER TRAILER) 12 0 RECEPTOR FOR REFRlGERA TOR/WATER ST A TIONIETC I 0 RECEPTOR FOR COMMERCIAL SINK! DISHW ASHERlETC 3 0 SHOWER, SINGLE STALL : 2 0 SHOWER, GANG (NUMBER OF HEADS) 2 0 SINK: COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL KITCHEN 2 3 6 SINK: COMMERCIAL BAR 2 0 SINK: WASH BASINIDOUBLE LA V A TORY 2 0 SINK: SINGLE LA V A TORYIRESIDENTIAL BAR 21 I 21 URINAL, STALUWALL , 5 0 TOILET, PUBLIC INSTALLATION 11 6 66 TOILET, PRIVATE INST ALLA TlON 3 0 MISCELLANEOUS: 0 NUMBER OF EDU'S' TOTAL DRAINAGE FIXTURE UNITS ~ I 104 I "'BDU (Equivalent Dwellin~ Unit) is a discharge equivalent to a single family dwelling (20 DFU) set at 167 gallons per day CREDIT CALCULATION TABLE: BASED ON ASSESSED VALUE IF IMPROVEMENTS OCCURRED AFTER ANNEXATION DATE IN TABLE, CALCULATE CREDITS SEPARA TEL Y YEAR RATE PER $1,000 YEAR .. RATE PER $1,000 ANNEXED ASSESSED VALUE ANNEXED ASSESSED VALUE 1979 or before $5.29 1992 1980 $5.19 1993 $1.45 1981 $5.12 1994 $1.25 1982 .. $4.98 1995 . $1.09 1983 $4.80 1996 $0.92 1984 $4.63 1997 '. .. $0.72 1985 .-'. $4.40 1998 $0.48 1986 $4.07 1999 ',,"t $0.28 1987 $3.67 2000 $0.09 1988 $3.22 2001 $0.05 1989 $2.73 2002 $0.00 1990 $2.25 2003 $009 1991 $1.80 2004 $0.00 CREDIT FOR PARCEL OR LAND ONLY IF APPLICABLE IMPROVEMENT (IF AFTER ANNEXATION DA TEl x x $0.00 $0.00 J CREDIT TOTAL $0.00 ==:J I , -, . . TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Transportation Engineer/Planner: Michael Liebler Case#: PREll-00006 Applicant: Glenwood OP., LLC TRANSPORTATION o Right-of-Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has frontage on a Lane County or an Oregon Department of Transportation (GDOT) facility. Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) (3) Copy of ROW Approach Permit Application ~ ~ o Traffic Impact Study - four (4) copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance with SDC 4.2-105 AA. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic: operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also address, if needed, City, Metro Plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. Complete Incomplete ~ IiJ E1 See Transportation Note(s) (1) Traffic Impact Study o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) IiJ ~ Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed ~ o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) ~ t8l IiJ ~ ~ Revised 10/25/07 (j) Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails Location, widths (of paving and right-of- way) and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications, - Date Received: 3.-1-1/ Planner: MM ~ 1-:: -g.... IZSJ (2) ~ . . access easements or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development, including ownership and maintenance status, if applicable Location of existing and required traffic control devices 'l jg} 17:'%'1 C1;ill. Transportation Notes: 1. A Transportation Impact Study is not required for this development. Surrounding transportation facilities currently operate well below capacity thresholds. Traffic associated with this project will not significantly affect surrounding transportation facilities operations. 2. A joint use access agreement connecting the adjoining southwest parcel with the proposed Franklin Blvd. site access shall be executed for final approv:al. This agreement shall include an access easement extending from the Franklin blvd. access location through the site to a yet to be determined location along the west property line. In .Addition, this agreement would include a city right to terminate such easement when further development of 14th St. is performed. 3. Jurisdictional transfer from LTD to ODOT of a section of land along the Franklin Boulevard frontage of this site is currently in process. The City recognizes that this process has postponed the application for approach at this location. An approved approach permit shall be provided before final site plan approval. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: . Subsequent submittals shall include a drawing showing future shared site access configuration depicting the impacts of future Franklin Boulevard imp~ovements and associated reductions in parking supply. This future shared access shall require a joint use access agreement and easement to allow for continued access of associated parcels. . The applicant is advised that future reduction of parking due to Franklin Boulevard improvements and reconfigured site access would likely not reduce the number of parking spaces below current minimum numbers required for this type of development. Revised 10/25/07 Q