The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNotes, Work PLANNER 12/21/2010 \ '. TYPE II TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION, PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST . Project Name: Jasper Meadows Phase 10 Subdivision Project Proposal: 21 Lot Residential Subdivision Case Number: PRE10-0001O Project Address: South of Orchid Lane at South 57th Street Assessors Map and Tax Lot Number(s): Map 18-02-03-33, TL 100 (Ptn.) Zoning: Low Density Residential (LDR) Overlay District(s): Applicable Refinement Plan: Refinement Plan Designation: Metro Plan Designation: Low Density Residential (LDR) Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: December 21, 2010 Application Submittal Deadline: June 19, 2011 Associated Applications: PRElO-00003 ICITyT()F SPR1NGFIELDDEVELOPMENT. REVIEW TEAM J POSITION Pro'ect Planner Trans ortation Plannin En ineer Public Works Civil En ineer Public Works Civil En ineer De ut Fire Marshal Communit Services Mana er REVIEW OF Land Use Plannin Trans ortation Utilities Sanita & Storm Sewer Fire and Life Safet Buildin NAME And Limbird Michael Liebler Cia ton McEachern Cia on McEachern Gilbert Gordon Dave Puent PHONE 726-3784 736-1034 736-1036 736-1036 726-2293 726-3668 APPUCANT'SDEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM ..... ... Owner I Applicant Engineer Craig Horrell Renee Clough, PE HLM Inc. Branch Engineering Inc. 2464 SW Glacier PI, Suite 110 310 Fifth Street Redmond, OR 97756 Sorinafield OR 97477 Revised 9{24{07 Oatc) ReceiV~(:1:~II:)-O,{) . Planner: AL I " . . TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PLANNING o Application Fee discuss the applicable fees o One additional copy of the Land Division Plan reduced to 81fz"x 11" Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) r,;;;J uat IX:?! ~ 8 W' x 11" Copy of Land Division Plan o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past 60 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~ IJEl Deed and Preliminary Title Report o Tentative Land Division Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) r::'I ~ [;] r::'I L:L2I. ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Land Surveyor in accordance with ORS 92 All existing and proposed easements Dimensions and size of each parcel and the approximate dimensions of each building site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale Location, widths and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division. Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways and bike trails Location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip r::'I ~ ~ 2 ~ r,;;;J U1lliJ ~ r::'I 1::1 12/16/10 Date ReeeiVeg:J,l#~)~/() Planner: AL 2 r:;pj l..:21l I!\Z 1ZbjJ. . 3 . Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points. o Phased Development Plan required if redivision is proposed. The plan must include the boundaries and sequencing of each proposed redivision. Any redivision must progress in a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other required public improvements. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~ Phased Development Plan ~ Planning Notes: 1. Name of the east-west public street serving Phase 10 cannot be "Quartz Avenue" in accordance with adopted Lane County road naming guidelines. An alternate name must be selected that meets the naming guidelines. 2. Show the location of required traffic control signage including stop or yield-controlled intersections and vehicle barricades/warnings. 3. Please show the size and location of proposed water mains including the connection with the proposed fire hydrant. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: . The City is undertaking a concurrent Jasper Meadows Master Plan amendment for relocating the "Quartz Avenue" intersection, which is a necessary prerequisite before the proposed Phase 10 subdivision can be platted. . Provide Knox boxes and/or Public Works locks on the gated emergency access road. . Staff does not support installation of an 8 to 10-foot high retaining wall along the rear of Lots 10-21. Slope-adaptive housing is recommended for these lots. . The proposed 4-foot high retaining wall on Lots 1-9 will likely require an engineered design. . The face of the proposed 4-foot retaining wall on Lots 1-9 must be located at least two- feet inside the property lines and not require maintenance access onto or through Tracts A, B or C. Additionally, disturbance caused by construction and installation of the retaining wall shall not encroach within the adjacent regulated wetlands unless proper mitigation measures are implemented. . The applicant shall verify the status of wetland mitigation measures for the Jasper Meadows neighborhood. If completed, Tract A shall be partitioned from the developable remainder on the east side of Bob Straub Parkway (Phase 9) and dedicated to Willamalane prior to or concurrent with the Phase 10 subdivision (ref. Jasper Meadows Master Plan approval condition #20). . Emergency access driveway connection to Bob Straub Parkway will require a Lane County Facilities Permit or an acceptable written authorization. . All utilities installed to serve the subdivision shall be placed underground. . A Tree Felling Permit will be required for the proposed removal of trees within the project area. . The subdivision proposal shall meet the cluster development standards of SDC 3.2-230. 12/16/10 Dat~ Receiver.tJ.,,!-o/J-c 10 Planner: AL 3 '. . . LAND DIVISION TENTATIVE PLAN APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Engineer: Case#: prelO-OOOlO PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions ~ o Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer Vicinity Map The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees, and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use and required setbacks from proposed property lines The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 '12 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ o Revised 10/25/07', . \ Date, ~(~ce!ved: 1.J.,6,/J% P!E1!1ner: AL / / . . ,.' documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) [gJ 0 Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management System Study PW Notes: 1. Transformers and mailboxes not shown. If neighborhood mailboxes are not required for this development please note 2. no planting plan included for detention ponds Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: .. Paving along the frontage for lot 10 will need to be extended past that lots driveway . A PIP will be required for constructed S 57th st, Quartz and all associated utilities. This will include the emergency access road to Bob Straub . An Ldap will be required before any grading is started for phase 10 . A detailed maintenance agreement for the detention ponds will be required . As part of the planting plan provide a note stating that all detention basins must be protected from compaction during construction and/or have all compaction due to construction activities removed. . Quartz Avenue will probably need to be changed to Quartz (u.) to reflect that it is a cul-de-sac and not a through street. . Revised 10/25/07 Date, HeeeIVedj2A/~/" P!armer: AL / . . Memorandum City of Springfield Subject: December 17th, 20 I 0 Andy Limbird - Planning Michael Liebler, E.IT, Civil Engineer PREIO-OOOIO Jasper Meadows Phase 10 - Comments Date: To: From: The Transportation Division has reviewed the materials provided with the subject application. The required findings and conditions outlined below are provided for your implementation into the land use decision. General Finding: Approval of this proposal would create a 21-lot SFR subdivision, Jasper Meadows Phase 10 subdivision. Site Access and Circulation Comments: . Existing drawings are in compliance with minimum street depth to the cul-de-sac. Given that secondary emergency access will be provided to the cul-de-sac, the maximum street . length of 400 feet may be extended to more efficiently utilize the developable area. (This would need to be vetted with fire prior to approval!) . Finding: Various street trees located on the plans are too close to the street lighting according to Springfield Engineering Design Standard 6.02.4. Street tree clearances will need to comply with this code. . Finding: A traffic impact study will not be required for this development. DatE': Necelved: /.2/;/;9<')/0 pi / / .2'1'1Sr: AL V:\development revjew\Oevelopment Applications\201 O\PRE1 o\PRE1 0-00010 Jasper Meadows 10\Oraft Transportation Comments.docx ,. . . TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Deputy Fire Marshal: Gilbert Gordon Case #: PRE10-0001O FIRE o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Fire Note(s) ~ ffi0iI ~ On-site vehicular circulation o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete See Fire Note(s) ~ ~'~ '''''''. iWfi." Location of existing and required fire hydrants and similar public facilities Fire Notes: 1. dditional comments not related to the completeness of the application: he proposed fire hydrant on Quartz Avenue appears to exceed the 600 foot maximum distance per 2010 Springfield Fire Code 507.5.1, exception 1 from the farthest point on Lot 10 to the hydrant. Relocate tfire hydcant approxLmately 100 feet east on Quartz Avejlue to meet;:h)s requin\ment. ~/~ ~~ h:> cz LJ4a4 ~~H~r ..LXC-.e~ bOO I / . "7 2. Provide "No Parking-Fire Lane" signs or curb markings (red striping with white letters or yellow striping with black letters) on one side of Quartz Avenue and both sides of the fire apparatus access road from the cul-de-sac bulb to Bob Staub Parkway per 2010 Springfield Fire Code 503.2.1, 503.3 and SFC Appendix D 103.6. 3. Provide public works locks on the proposed manual gates on the fire apparatus access road. PW locks can be obtained from Heyman's Lock, Safe and Security at 131 14th Street in Springfield (Phone: 541-747-6713). ~1~~~~;.C~ived: /'5~/GI ,.........'-.:h. . \,.L . Revised 9{24{07 . . ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR PERMITS \ IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS OR APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE- APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION: Applicable Not Applicable IB@ l1::tJ fg] fg] I1iEiI ~ [g1 I'3'l ~ I1iEiI LZ:J IB@ ~ [g1 I1iEiI [..:J [g1 O~' L. [g1 IB@ ~ [g1 [g1 o ID I'0iI ~ 12/17/10 Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's Association Agreement Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster Subdivision proposal as specified in SDC 3.2-230 Riparian Area Protection Report For properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present Where the development area is within an overlay district applicable, address the additional standards of the overlay district . If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the' development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 ~~t~~~~C~i~ed: 1#)<OllJ , .._.___.l:.. "~_ 4 . . " THIS APPLICATION IS: o COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING [gJ INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE o This is ot a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Section 504- 105 and O~egon Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a limited land use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete. The 120-day processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is submitted or when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must indicate by either signing this forr;, or by submitting a written response to the City within seven days of the date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing information. If you indicate herein or in your written response that the missing information will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre- Submittal Review to provide the City with the missing information. If you refuse to submit the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee, the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120-day clock and begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after the start of the 120-day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the 120-day processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the 120-day period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if the new information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is sent out and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects the application proposal and additional review is required. I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the City within the lBO-day timeline. ~ (C- ,1O/Zllo Ow rjAppli ignature 12/16/10 . Date Received: /2,6,I:H>/t'J P!anl1c': AL / / 5