HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 3/8/2011
City of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
.
.
Development Issues Meeting (DIM)
Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section)
Prospective
A licant Name: Bob Alexander
Phone: 714-281-0091
Fax:
Address:
6929 E. Shorecres! Dr. Anaheim Hills. CA 92807-0091
Prospective
A licant's Re .. Tim O'Dell
Phone: 541-915-5231
Com an :
H brid Real Estate
Fax:
541-343-2023
Address: PO Box 5932, Eu ene, OR 97405
Owner: Phone:
Fax:
Address:
Address:
Size of Pro e
18030221 TAX LOT NO S : 1600
~-~ 5 J..~,* S 512.- JtN..e:t5
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO:
2.24
Acres IZI S uare Feet 0
Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Pro osal: Develo as a sin Ie buildin site
Existin Use: Vacant
1/2.24 du acre
# of Lots Parcels:
Prospective
Applicant:
Date: 3/812011
Signat
Tim O'Dell
Print
Required Project Information (City Intake Staff: complete this section)
Case No.: Ij? (<::./1 - O~-:r-
Date: ?
/1
Reviewed b : ~
A Iication Fee:
I Technical Fee: 0 Posta
S2f - ov Date '~~9:NUMBER:
MAR 0 8 2011
TOTAL FEES:
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
Original Submittal
1 of 3
o
.,
cO'
:i"
!!l.
CIl
c:
CT
3
S
'"
=
-
-
t
! ill'II' !Ijl;' il'm .WII'II' :II,m 'illll;m WU II:'
i ml d U'~:! ai!!i! l'I:;;~i~;i l;d~li! U~~!imli"I!;III" Iii!
t ~ ,I :1 ~Im I"~'; '.lli~1 il,~ ;s l,hl,'n .ii~ h. i
i iI~~ .i I iU ::;1 1:lh:!:~ I:'!~i; ml~m: :!;:: Il~! B
.;~ i~ .v~ 'II!! !~*Ii!! i~hlll :,;,;Iili ~.Ii~ Iii" ~
iii I; ;~Ih i"i'!i !~elm!ii '!il;=! l:i1iilll Ml ii~1
~l. Ii ilili ii II it "5! I'lllll "11obll ~ tlld s';'
:i~ I~ ~i~.' ;UI nl~lii;lliur; C~'l.i;5 l!li5 'I!I
;i: ~: I~~~! I:iii iill~;i:= il!~!: i!il~;;~i ~lli Iii
~
>
=
=
00
1
.
.
i
I
I :- r
! ~ ~ :
:i!li
~ /
{;v
-
'<J
.-
.
"u
~.~
&.
.
,
.
.O"llll,"" _<<I ~
_m "....,. \ ~~
"
J!
i~
b
I~..l~
~ ell
I ,
" ,.".. ...... ,.
~ : ~ it; ~; ; e; ~; i
h a I a a fa qll~ I
. , a i' · ij "a I~ I
! i : i ~ i i! i ~I It ~ ~
a j ~ a ;11 h ~ll ~
- I i! d~ ~~
~ .1"5'
i ~q:"
!; ~!i ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ "I
~; ~!B n In d~ I
"J , , ~ ~ ~ ~ - "
~n!I" f d :i
Ill. P P P.
" ~5i .' I' e "'
J ~~ i i ~ ~ ~"
e 'j II .. 'I
I'> ~.I
......,~ al
i ~ n } ~~
Iqqq!( liln
~ ~ ~. I~ ~ ~ I~
l = = p~ ;: ;PI
I ~ I g I h ~q
I'
,
. . .
- - ~
~L
. .
p inii
~.. ;..
.t
IIi
~
.
.
ALEXANDER F AMIL Y
Willamette Heights Property
Development Options
Currently per the City of Springfield Planning and Development Department the site is a
single legal lot within the city's Urban Growth Boundary (UBG) and outside of the City
of Springfield. The City of Springfield has jurisdiction over properties located within the
Urban Growth Boundary; however formal annexation to the city is required before full
city services can be provided.
Per meeting with City of Springfield Planning and Development, in order for a property
to have access to city water and sewer the subject property must be formally annexed to
the city of Springfield. Annexation would likely take 2-4 months. Per the planner, a
successful petition for annexation is likely; he suggested scheduling a Development
Information Meeting (DIM) wherein the property owner and all relevant department
representatives discuss the process and obstacles to annexation and platting a minor
partition (I lot to 3 lots). Before a building permit is granted, South Third Street would
have to be improved to current required standards along the property east boundary
frontage, and the property adjacent to the North. No costs have been determined
regarding construction of a city street over 360 feet frontage an estimate of $_ per
lineal foot is.
In order for a building permit to be granted, the city will require that the property meet
criteria of the planning department as well as the Fire Marshals Office. At this time, a fire
hydrant capable of supplying the required flow is not available to the property. This will
likely be the case for many years as the city has not even approved construction of a
pumping station and has no plans to do so in the immediate future. There are several
options to remedy this situation which must be addressed whether potable water is
derived from city water mains, or the installation of a private well, however there are
significant added costs associated with meeting these requirements. Each home would
need to have a sprinkler system and water storage equipment for fire suppression.
Preliminary research suggests that city water and sewer are likely available at the
properties West boundary along South Second Street. There is a city wastewater system
stub out near the Northwest comer of the property. The property owner would be
responsible for all costs associated with hooking up to city services. Storm water will
likely have to be handled on site through an approved storm water filtration and
management system, with some possibility of conveying storm water through a culvert
under South Second Street then on to the Willamette River.
Option I
"As is", one legal lot without city water and sewer.
Requirements for approval of a building permit
The installation of a well meeting minimum water quality and flow requirements
I have yet to research the availability of subsurface water at this time.
Date Received:
MAR 0 8 2011
Ori"'n'Jl Submittal
"
.
.
Approval from Lane County for on site septic system
Septic approval is not assumed. The sanitarian will require testing of the soils and
review the geology of the area. Cost of permits and contracting for a septic approval
are estimated at approximately $4,500. A septic system requiring filtration could
add $20,000 to construction costs.
Approval from Lane County for on site storm water system
Construction of a road within existing public right of way from "G" Street to home
site which meets the city building requirements, and requirements of the
Department of Fire and Life Safety.
A gravel road is acceptable. Costs could vary depending on location of home site
and engineering requirements. The city would require recordation of an agreement
to fund street frontage construction at some future date.
Option n
Annexation and platting of minor subdivision
Although it may be feasible to create a minor subdivision, the costs associated with
street front development, engineering, planning, permits and surveying are too high
at this time to warrant the investment. The property owner adjacent on the North
may agree to share a portion ofthe street front development costs, which could be as
much as $70,000. Economies of scale would alleviate some of the infrastructure costs
for a development of a large subdivision.
Date Received:
MAR 0 8 2011
Original Submittal