HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/26/2004 Work Session
.
..
.
City of Springfield
Work Session Meeting
MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION MEETING OF
THE SPRINGFIELD CITY COUNCIL HELD
MONDAY, JANUARY 26, 2004.
The City of Springfield council met in a work session in the Jesse Maine Room, 225 Fifth Street,
Springfield, Oregon, on Monday, January 26,2004 at 5:35 p.m., with Mayor Leiken presiding.
ATTENDANCE
Present were Mayor Leiken and Councilors Ballew, Woodrow, Lundberg, Fitch, Ralston, and
Malloy. Also present were Assistant City Manager Cynthia Pappas, City Attorney Joe Leahy,
City Recorder Amy Sowa and members of the staff.
1. Budget Committee Interviews.
Finance Director Bob Duey presented the staff report on this item. The Budget Committee has a
vacancy in Ward 5 due to the December 31,2003 term expiration of Daniel Bowie. Mr. Bowie
has served only one term and is eligible to reapply. The person appointed will serve a three year
term which will expire on December 31,2006.
The Budget Committee has a vacancy in Ward 6 due to the December 31,2003 term expiration
of Roxie Cuellar. Ms. Cuellar has served only one term and is eligible to reapply. The person
appointed will serve a three year term which will expire on December 31, 2006.
In response to news release dated September 26, October 20, November 7 and December 3, two
applications have been received for the Ward 5 opening on the Budget Committee and one
application for the Ward 6 opening. .
The council is requested to interview two applicants for Ward 5 (Mr. Daniel S. Bowie and Mr.
Fred B. Simmons) and one applicant for Ward 6 (Ms. Rita R. Castillo). The appointments are
scheduled to be ratified at the Regular Session Meeting on February 2,2004.
I) Council discussed the interview questions.
Council interviewed Daniel S. Bowie.
Council interviewed Fred B. Simmons.
Council interviewed Rita R. Castillo.
Council discussed the candidates interviewed during this work session. The recommendation
was to appoint Daniel Bowie to the Budget Committee for Ward 5 and Rita Castillo to the
Budget Committee for Ward 6. Appointments will be made at the February 2, 2004 Council
Regular Meeting.
Mayor Leiken will contact the candidates to notify them of the council's decision.
Mr. Duey announced that Christine Larson has submitted her resignation for her Ward 1 position
on the Budget Committee. He asked for council direction.
City of Springfield
Council Work Session Minutes
January 26, 2004
Page 2
.
Council directed Mr. Duey to post for the Ward 1 Budget Committee Position.
2. 42nd Street at Westbound Highway 126 Ramp Intersection.
Traffic Engineer Brian Barnett presented the staff report on this item. The City received
approval from the Lane County Board of Commissioners for a $200,000 project at the 42nd
Street/Highway 126 westbound ramp. The Board approval was part of the Capital Project
Program (CaPP) funds. Transportation staff concludes that a traffic signal at the westbound
ramp terminal is more appropriate than a roundabout. Additional traffic lanes may be
constructed prior to and as a separate project from installation of a traffic signal. The ramp
project is scheduled for summer of 2004.
.
Transportation staff analyzed intersection control alternatives to determine if a traffic signal or
roundabout best services traffic needs at that location. The traffic signal uses the existing lane
configuration of: one southbound lane, one through lane and one left turn lane northbound, and
one right turn lane and one left turn lane eastbound. The roundabout has one approach and
departure lane in each direction and one circulating lane. Construction cost for either
intersection form is approximately $165,000. No right-of-way is required for either intersection.
The crash rate of the existing intersection is 0.46 crashes per million entering vehicles (MEV).
This is considered an acceptable rate. Installation of a traffic signal is not likely to change the
rate of crashes but the type of crashes should change from right angle collisions to rear end
collisions. If a roundabout were installed a reduction in crash frequency of about 29% would be
expected. Crash severity is likely to decline to a greater extent than the decline in frequency.
The Level of Service (LOS) on opening day of a single lane roundabout or a traffic signal with
existing lane use will meet the City standard of LOS D. Using 2021 traffic data projections, the
roundabout has substandard LOS and the traffic signal has acceptable LOS provided a second
northbound left turn lane is added. Traffic projected 18 years in to the future is not reliable
enough to make project specific decisions today. The poor LOS of the roundabout in the future
is due to a relatively uninterrupted northbound left turn flow preventing the southbound traffic
from entering the roundabout. This situation could be remedied by installing a queue detector
that turns on a signal that meters the northbound flow during the periods of extremely high flow.
Ongoing study will determine how to best utilize the CaPP funds available from Lane County.
Either additional lanes or a traffic signal will be constructed with the $200,000 budget.
Discussion with Oregon Department of Transportation is ongoing.
,Mayor Leiken asked if this would have the design similar to that on Mohawk.
Mr. Barnett explained the design and the flow of the traffic.
Discussion was held regarding this work and future improvements at this location.
Councilor Ralston discussed the east bound traffic flow and another option.
3. Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan Update: Presentation and Review of
Draft Plan.
.
Planner Kitti Gale presented the staff report on this item. . At this work session, Willamalane
staff will update the council on the Draft Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan, and request
that council review and comment on the draft plan. The updated plan will provide a framework
for decision-making over the next 20 years. The active involvement of the city is critical in
City of Springfield
Council Work Session Minutes
January 26, 2004
Page 3
.
ensuring the adoption of the Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan as a community wide
vision for parks, recreation and open spaces, and as a refinement to the Eugene-Springfield
Metropolitan Area General Plan. Willamalane Board adoption is scheduled for March 2004.
Once Willamalane's Board of Directors has adopted the Park and Recreation Comprehensive
Plan, it will be forwarded to the City Council for adoption.
Ms. Gale introduced Superintendent Bob Keefer, Planning Manager Greg Hyde and Park Planner
Rebecca Gershow from Willamalane Parks and Recreation District.
Mr. Keefer thanked the council for allowing Willamalane staff to attend this evening. This has
been a two-year process looking at the next 20 years for parks and recreation in Springfield.
About 95 percent of the plan is complete. In November 200 I, the City Council reviewed the
work program and, as recommended by the Planning Commission, appointed a City Councilor to
serve on the project's Citizen Advisory Committee (CAe). Councilor Ralston is the current
representative on the CAC. Mr. Keefer discussed the input received from over 700 residents.
This is a community plan with representation from the whole community of Springfield. Mr.
Keefer said Willamalane will bring this back to council this summer and they would hope to
have council's support to integrate this into the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General
Plan.
.
Ms. Gershow said on October 21,2002, Willamalane staff updated the City Council on the
Plan's Community Needs Assessment, which included input from over 750 residents, as well as
a technical analysis of parks and facilities, programs, and finances. Willamalane also developed
a Community Profile, a Facility Assessment and a Program Assessment. The bulk of what they
have worked on over the past year is the actual Plan Development. She referred to the recently
completed Draft Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan included in the agenda packet. It
responds to identified community needs and provides strategies, actions, a capital improvement
and operations plan; and performance measures to ensure the most effective use of community
resources.
The Project Management Team, Technical Advisory Committee, Citizen Advisory Committee
and Willamalane Board of Directors have already reviewed and provided input on the draft plan.
In addition, Willamalane staff updated the Lane County Board of Commissioners on January 14
and the Springfield Planning Commission on January 21. There will be a public open house on
the draft plan on January 28 from 4-7 pm at the Memorial Building Community Ce~ter, 765 A
Street. The Willamalane Board of Directors will receive the final plan at their public hearing in
the middle of March 2004. Willamalane will then return to the Planning Commission and the
City Council to ask for adoption as a refinement plan to the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan
Area General Plan.
Ms. Gershow presented a power point presentation on this project. She discussed the six basic
pieces of this plan. The last piece, the needs assessment, is located in Appendix A in the draft
plan. Tonight she would be highlighting the first five pieces of the plan: the Planning
Framework; the Highlights of Improvement; the Strategies and Action; the CIP and Operations
Plan; and the Performance Measures.
.
The Planning Framework is the piece that was developed with committees and the Willamalane
Board to help develop and implement the plan. They developed fourteen core values, which are
the services Willamalane is based on such as affordability, accessibility, teamwork, stewardship,
environment, etc. They developed a vision summary, a mission statement, and fourteen different
goals. The Planning Framework is on page 8 of the Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
.
City of Springfield
Council Work Session Minutes
January 26, 2004
Page 4
included in the agenda packet. After developing goals, strategies and actions were developed
which are the bulk of the plan. They also developed performance measures, which are
measurements of success.
Willamalane's vision summary states "We enhance quality of life in our community through
people, parks and programs."
Willamalane's mission statement is "To provide exceptional park and recreation services that
enhance the livability of our community and the lives ofthe people we serve."
Highlights of Improvement are summarized into eight strategies and actions. Those are 1)
Partnerships; 2) School District/Willamalane Cooperation; 3) Park Development; 4) Community
Center; 5) Natural Areas, Linear Parks and Trails; 6) Park and Facility Rehabilitation; 7)
Recreation Services Plan; and 8) Park Maintenance and Operations. Ms. Gershow described
each of these highlights as outlined on pages iii and iv in the Park and Recreation
Comprehensive Plan included in the agenda packet.
Discussion was held regarding the current use of the Memorial Building and the possibility of
relocating the community recreation center to another location. Mayor Leiken addressed the
need for meeting space and asked if that was something being considered when looking at a new
community recreation center.
Ms. Gershow said one of the key features of the community center that Willamalane' s consultant
emphasized was multi-use space.
.
Discussion was held regarding citizen opinion on possible bond issues to help facilitate some of
these improvements and plans. Things have changed in the community over the last seven or
eight years since they last went out for a bond measure. Mr. Keefer said the Memorial Building
is at the end of its design life and they need to look at other options.
.
Ms. Gershow referred to maps on pages 25 through 28 in the Park and Recreation
Comprehensive Plan included in the agenda packet. The map on page 25/26 shows the existing
and proposed park and recreation resources and the map on page 27/28 shows the existing,
planned and proposed multi-use paths and bikeways. Ms. Gershow gave details related to each
map. These maps show the key major acquisition and development projects. Willamalane has
tried to keep this plan reality focused by developing a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for two
phases. There are three phases of projects. The first two phases would fund about 50 percent of
their proposed plans. Phase I, from 2004-2009, with the revenue remaining status quo would
fund about $6.7 million in improvement projects, most of which would be park development
projects. Ms. Gershow referred to the Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan pages 67 and
69 which give the CIP details. Phase II, from 2010-2015, includes $16 million of projects
including an $11 million bond measure which would help fund the Community Recreation
Center and a variety of other park development and acquisition projects. She outlined the
percentage of funding in each area. If the bond was unsuccessful they would not proceed with
all of the projects. Phase I and II capital costs would come to about $22.9 million. All projects
within this draft would cost approximately $50 million to complete over the next 20 years. This
gives a potential capital funding shortfall of about a $27 million. She referred to page 70 which
outlines more detailed lists. These options would not make up for the entire $27 million
shortfall, but would be a starting place for discussion in looking for other options for capital
projects.
City of Springfield
Council Work Session Minutes
January 26, 2004
Page 5
.
Ms. Gershow discussed the Operations Plan. If all Phase I projects were implemented, there
would be an additional cost of $137,000 at the end of that phase to maintain and update those
new facilities. At the end of phase II, the additional operations cost would be approximately
$701,600. Highlighting maintenance and operations insures they are keeping up with these costs
as they are developing. She discussed options for meeting additional operational costs including
using more volunteers, lowering maintenance standards, and postponing development of new
projects until additional funds are available.
Ms. Gershow said Performance Measures are linked to the Plan Goals. This is a way to evaluate
plan implementation and guide for future planning. She gave examples of performance
measures. Ms. Gershow concluded her presentation and asked council for questions or
comments.
Mayor Leiken appreciated Ms. Gershow's comment that this is a living breathing plan. It is
important as these plans are developed that they are able to grow and change. He complimented
Willamalane for a great job in creating this plan. He discussed after school programs.
Mr. Keefer said this plan is more a parks and facilities plan than a recreation plan. They will
bring the recreation plan to council at a later time. Willamalane does work now with the
Springfield School District to provide after school programs and will continue to work with them
in the future.
Councilor Ballew asked about the parks and open spaces in the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan
Area General Plan and how Willamalane and the City implement those plans.
.
Ms. Gershow said there is an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) between Willamalane Parks
and Recreation District and the City of Springfield to implement Goal 8, which is parks and
recreation. They do not implement GoalS, which is natural resources, open space and
preservation. She said Willamalane does have a number of natural area parks, where people can
recreate in natural areas so there is some overlap.
Mr. Hyde said there is a recreation element in the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area
General Plan which contains some broad guiding policies for the metro area. The IGA between
the city and Willamalane states that Willamalane will prepare a refinement plan which looks at
the parks and recreation system. That is how they implement Goal 8. The city is responsible to
the state for implementing all of its goals, but Goal 8 is delegated to Willamalane through this
IGA.
Councilor Fitch acknowledged the time and effort put into this project. The response from
citizens is impressive and makes this a document that can be living, breathing and growing with
the community.
Councilor Lundberg said this was very well researched with a great deal of public comment. She
is very pleased that it is going through the metro plan process. By doing so, it gives Willamalane
recognition and opportunity. This will be a good thing for the city and the park district.
Councilor Ballew asked about self support of programs and if Willamalane anticipates they
would have to make their programs more self-supportive.
.
City of Springfield
Council Work Session Minutes
January 26, 2004
Page 6
.
Mr. Keefer said there is a balance between what they offer and what citizens can afford. He
noted some of the regional significant facilities they have developed with the city's help. They
do look at those figures and will have to make some decisions regarding this issue in the future.
Ms. Gershow said that citizens want the fees as low as possible, but consultants who work with
communities all over the west coast say that Willamalane's fees are too low. The board wants
the fees kept low, so there is a balance.
Councilor Malloy said it is important to consider developing their new community recreation
center out at Willamalane Park. There are three schools within walking distance and that would
be a great resource near those schools. He suggested looking at the needs of those schools when
developing this facility.
Mayor Leiken announced the walls would be going up on the sports center next week. An
anonymous donation of $100,000 was given to Broadbase for this project.
Mr. Keefer said they have had a great partnership with the city and thanked the City Council and
city staff for their efforts. He noted several projects when Willamalane and the city have
partnered. Having a strong partner with the city is very beneficial when Willamalane applies for
grants. He said we are community and that is what this project is all about. He appreciates the
support from all of the community and the council.
4. Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) Between City of Springfield and Willakenzie Fire
District (WPD).
.
Assistant City Manager Cynthia Pappas and City Attorney Joe Leahy presented the staff report
on this item. The City Council and the Willakenzie Rural Fire Protection District (WPD) Board
members met on January 12 to discuss two outstanding issues in the intergovernmental
agreement (IGA). The two issues discussed were 1) governance; and 2) disposition of the lands
and buildings. Both the City Council and the WPD Board agreed to discuss these two issues on
their own and bring their recommendations to the negotiating team for final resolution.
The issue of governance and the transfer of city-owned Fire Stations and land have been
addressed in further discussion with representatives ofWillakenzie Fire District. The
negotiating team lead by Councilor Fitch and inCluding Mike Kelly, Cynthia Pappas, Joe Leahy,
and Bob Duey met with Steve Cornacchia on January 21 to discuss these two issues. The
governance issue was resolved by language suggested by Mr. Duey. This is additional language
in the intergovernmental agreement (IGA) which describes the establishment of a Budget
Committee. The negotiating team would recommend that additional language to council as
resolution to the governance issue.
.
Mr. Leahy said there was good discussion on the real property and buildings. The council's
concerns were conveyed to Mr. Cornacchia. To Mr. Cornacchia's credit and the WPD Board's
credit, they brought forth a proposal that was within the instructions council had given the
negotiating team. The negotiating team would recommend acceptance of that language as well.
He summarized some of those changes. The city would make the repairs that are specified in
Exhibit I of the IGA; the gender repairs required and the repairs necessary to keep the buildings
workable and in decent, sanitary, safe condition. He described the options regarding the fire
station on 5th and M Street as outlined in the IGA and referred to in Attachment A, page 1
inCluded in the agenda packet. The remaining real property and buildings will be leased for $1 a
year as long as the District needs and utilizes the properties for fire station sites. The city would
City of Springfield
Council Work Session Minutes
January 26, 2004
Page 7
.
pledge to work with property owners and developers as the need for WPD to secure a new fire
station site arises. The city is not obliged to buy such a site.
Councilor Ralston said he did not see any mention of transferring of title of the fire stations. Mr.
Leahy said we are not going to transfer the title of any of the fire stations. Councilor Ralston
asked about the district appointing the Budget Committee members and if that is what council
had agreed upon.
Mr. Leahy said that is by law.
Councilor Ralston said he understood that council could make recommendations.
Mr. Leahy said council could make recommendations, but the WPD Board would be making the
appointments.
Councilor Ralston asked if there was language regarding the proportional number.
Mr. Leahy said there is not. It is not a requirement of state law.
Councilor Malloy asked how council would determine which of the three choices regarding the
fire station on 5th and M Streets would be appropriate.
Mr. Leahy said it would be whichever council agreed upon. He went over the options and how
council would proceed once the WPD requested an action on this property.
.
Ms. Pappas said the IGA would be coming to council on February 2, 2004 for formal adoption.
The Lane County Boundary Commission meeting is scheduled for Thursday, February 5 at
7:00pm in the Eugene City Council Chambers.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:22 pm.
"'-.
Minutes Recorder - Amy Sowa
Attest:
-..::]tL.u'e ec,C( <cov
lJfl.)" 80wa
City Reesl'eer
.