The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNotes, Work PLANNER 6/15/2010 '-, . . City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 SITE PLAN REVIEW PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Project Name: Waterstone Apartment Complex Project Proposal: Construct a ten building, 120-unit apartment complex on a 6.1 acre site Case Number: PRE2010-00007 Project Address: 240 & 250 S. 67th Street Assessors Map and Tax Lot'Number(s): Map 17-02-34-44, Tax Lot 1000 Zoning: Medium Density Residential (MDR) Overlay District(s): Applicable Refinement Plan: N/A Refinement Plan Designation: N/A Metro Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential (MDR) Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: June 15, 2010 Application Submittal Deadline: December 12, 2010 Associated Applications: ZON2009-00020 De ut Fire Marshal Communit Services Mana er REVIEW OF Land Use Plannin Trans ortation Utilities, Sanitary & Storm Sewer Fire and Life Safet Buildin NAME And Limbird 726-3784 Jesse Jones 726-3720, Clayton McEachern 736-1036 Gilbert Gordon 726-2293 Dave Puent 726-3668 -A'etPt.:litAI't1l1~S'~EVEt.O'PMISNDl'.;RISV:liISW:;rEAM; ;""'.; .t. .(,;,;<:':.::..':Jl ., ; .,.;,'f",;,,':,",';.,'.;, , > , , """"<<""'-';;;;;:>"1 Applicant Owner Mark ~ Gre.I\2.. Joe Williams Multi/Tech Engineering Services Inc. Slayden Construction Group 1155 13th Street SE P.O. Box 247 Salem, OR 97302 Stayton, OR 97383 Revised 1O{25{07 Date Received:_~ic/ .f.qL,9_ Planner: AL . T . . TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PLANNING o Application fee - discuss the applicable fees o Copy of the Site Plan reduced to 8'h"x 11" Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) I2'&l l1l#I ~ 8 V," x 11" Copy of Site Plan o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) I2'&l ~ Deed and Preliminary Title Report o Brief narrative explaining the purpose of the development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees and future expansion plans, if known. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~ Brief Narrative o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~ I':'Vl l2:8$I r::::l W r::::l ~. ~ r::::l I1]J1 *Comment Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, or Engineer Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact, and disabled parking spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, parking and ~ ~w Erg ........ I2'&l l1l#I.. I;.2;;I Revised 10/25/07 Date Received: 2/' ~J. Planner: AL o Phased Development Plan Where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water, and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply to the Site Plan application being submitted. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) *Comment . rEI rEI rEI rEI n u [], i_i", rn:;w ~ r;'l t::llil *Comment r;'l ILilJ rEI 1 rEI r;'l 13 o Landscape Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) 2 [] ~ rgj [] """ ~ r;;1 t.lr:J rgj rEI rgj [] [] 3 *Comment Revised 1O{25{07 . vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses Location of existing and proposed transit facilities Phased Development Plan Drawn by a Landscape Architect Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of landscape coverage Screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 Written description, including specifications, of the permanent irrigation system Location and type of street trees List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size, spacing and method of planting Date Received: r./.!JodJ Planner: AL / I . . o Architectural Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) l2?J ~ Exterior elevations of all buildings and structures proposed for the development site, including height Conceptual floor plans ~ c;a o On-Site Lighting Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) l2?J ~ c;a ~ 4 Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area Photometric test report for each light source ~ Planning Notes: . 1. Show or describe the location of the nearest transit stop on Main Street. 2. Site landscaping plan must be stamped and signed by a certified Landscape Architect or Landscape Designer. 3. Provide information on the proposed site irrigation system on the landscaping plans. 4. Provide cut sheets for the proposed site lighting fixtures. Lights must be fully shielded and downcast. Please note that the two freestanding light fixtures are limited to 12 feet in overall height in accordance with SDC 4.5-110.B.2.b Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: . Outdoor trash receptacle elevations db not show appear to show a roof covering, unless a flat roof is proposed. Please include proposed roofline on the trash enclosure side elevations. · Show the location and dimensions of all existing and proposed easements affecting the subject property. Upon dedication of the 10-foot wide strip of S. 67th St. ROW, a 7-foot wide PUE probably will be required along the property frontage. . Please show and describe project phasing (if any). . Landscaping plan materials shall specify minimum 2" caliper size for all site landscaping and street trees. '. Upon dedication of additional S. 67th Street ROW, there will be sufficient room for on- street parking along the developed site frontage. The applicant's project narrative should be revised to account for the future street improvements. Additionally, because the project has extensive street frontage, but doesn't propose placing the buildings close to or primarily facing the street, staff recommends that the applicant uses the Type III alternative design standard provisions of SDC 3.2-240.C. This option requires a Planning Commission review and public hearing. . There is no outdoor bicycle rack for Building 1 depicted on Sheet CO.3. . Proposed drainage swale along west and north property lines is a concern: excavation . of drainage swale along hillside could undercut existing tree roots and lead to erosion control problems. Similarly, the proposed detention pipes also could jeopardize Revised 1O{25{07 Date Received:-#.J-01o Planner: AL . . hillside stability and undercut existing tree roots. . Please provide a copy of the wetland delineation report with the tentative site plan application. . TIA should reference South 67th Street, not Avenue. Other typographical corrections and edits to the document are recommended. . FYI - On the City's Conceptual Street Map, a portion of the future Dogwood Street extension appears to intersect the extreme southwest corner of the site. Date Received:-6!" ~/ d-tJID Planner: AL / / Revised 10/25/07 . . TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST .' Engineer: Clayton McEachern Case#: PRE20l0-00007 PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) ~ ~ ill ~ ~ !TB;J 1.:1::l ~ !TB;J lf2j n/a ~ ~ .~ n/a ~ ~ ~ ~ y Revised 10/25/01'" , i J Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer Vicinity Map The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 '12 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table Date f'{eceived:_~/d Planner: AL PW Notes: 1. landscaped plans not stamped-otherwise appear complete 2. Cannot locate cut/fill total. This number is required for LDAP permit Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: . A PIP (Public Improvement Permit) will be required for the widening of S 67th St. Chapter 12 of the Springfield Engineering and Design Manual has more information on this procedure. . How will excess runoff be captured at the south end of the proposed widening along S 67th ST . . Please provide section/calculations for pavement design showing ability to support 80,000 Ib load for fire access. Typical city section is 4/12. . There appears to be pages missing from the appendix of the storm drain report for post developed conditions. All that is provided is the Water Quality storm results. . . Revised 10/25/07 Date Received:_t!,.lk,b Planner: AL / . . .I , TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Transportation Engineer/Planner: Jesse Jones Case#: PRE201O-00007 Applicant: Waterstone Apartments TRANSPORTATION ,0 Right-of-Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has frontage on a Lane County or an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) o;;;J Ilili:ill Copy of ROW Approach Permit Application ~ o Traffic Impact Study - four (4) copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance with SDC 4.2-105 AA. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also address, if needed, City, Metro Plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) o;;;J D Traffic Impact Study I)VI ~ o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) o;;;J II;S Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including t~e location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed ~ ,0 Improvement and Public Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) I)VI ~ l':/l ~ !4';l ~ Id Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails Location, widths (of paving and right-of- way) and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications, Date Received:--6jL.!J.:ei.e....-. Planner: AL ~ o;;;J ~ Revised 10/25/07 I .' access easements or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development, including ownership and maintenance status, if applicable Location of existing and required traffic control devices . j2g o Transportation Notes: Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: TIA shows all traffic exiting site and heading north to 67th/Main intersection. Some traffic will likely exit and proceed east through the existing residential neighborhood to the signalized intersection at 69th/Main. . Revised 10/25/07 Date Heceived: ~1ctivo Planner: AL r: . . TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Deputy Fire Marshal: Gilbert Gordon Case #: PRE201O-00007 FIRE o Site Plan Complete Incomplete IVI k::sI ~"ili "*" .~'* See Fire Note(s) 1-3. On-site vehicular circulation o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete See Fire Note(s) rs::Y1 L2:2J ~ lE2j. Location of existing and required fire hydrants and similar public facilities Fire Notes: 1. Fire apparatus access roads shall support an 80,000 lb. imposed load per 2007 Springfield Fire Code 503.2.3 and SFC Appendix D102.1. 2. No parking allowed on both sides of the 26 foot fire apparatus access roads except for the designated parking areas as shown on the site plan per SFC Appendix D105.2. 3. "No Parking-Fire Lane signage" shall be posted on both sides of the fire apparatus access roads per 2007 SFC 503.3 and SFC Appendix D103.6. Option: After July 1, curb markings meeting 2010 SFC 503.3 and SFC Appendix D103.3 assuming adoption. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: 1. Underground fire line for the proposed NFPA l3R sprinkler systems for the buildings are not shown. Show underground fire lines, post indicator valve locations for each building, above ground vault for the double detector check valve and fire department connection meeting NFPA 24, Standard for the Installation of Private Fire Service Mains and Their Appurtenances, 2007 edition. 2. Landscaping: A 3 foot clear space shall be maintained around the circumference of fire hydrants (2007 SFC 508.5.5). 3. Landscaping: Immediate access to fire department connections shall be maintained at all times and without obstruction by fences, bushes, trees, walls or any other object for a minimum of 3 feet (2007 SFC 912.3). Revised 9/24/07 Date Received: ,/;./,)-014 Planner: AL ! / . . PRE2010-00007 250 S. 67'h SI. Waterstone Apartments Building comments- Submittal is complete, the following items are advice for permit application documents: 1) Please show Location of FOe's PIV's Storage under open egress stairs prohibited Sheet CO.3 2) Some smoke alarms missing, prohibited location, Sheets AO.7 AO.8 3) Dryer duct length Max 25' 4) Provide listed assemblies for rated walls 5) Fire-resistive rating on partial wall of assembly building 11: purpose? 6) Please define Code edition 7) Provide one set of permit documents wet-stamped/signed 8) Submit ODOE energy forms for SUB with application Date P\eceived:....fN~.... Planner: .AL {!, t?Jf'><.fi=7v~a. &//r . . ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR. PERMITS IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS OR APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIOER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE- APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION: Applicable Not Applicable ~ lB ~ Where a multi-family development is proposed, any additional materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240 Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21"100 An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be serviced by sanitary sewer ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.. t_"" 1;\< ~ llid [8] ~ l!!J [8] ~ I'iiiI t.t::!!J [8] [8] Revised 10/25/07 Date Heceived:~Mcf-O'O Planner: AL . . THIS APPLICATION IS: " o COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING ~ INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE ()/I> This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Section 5.4- 105 and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a limited land use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete. The 120-day processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is submitted or when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must indicate by either signing this form or by submitting a written response to the City within seven days of the date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing information. If you indicate herein or in your written response that the missing information will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre- Submittal Review to provide the City with the missing information. If you refuse to submit the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee, the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120-day clock and begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after the start of the 120-day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the 120-day processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the 120-day period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if the new information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is sent out and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects the application proposal and additional review is required. I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the City within the lS0-day timeline. a;~~. Owner/Applicant's Si ur 6-/5"-//7 ' Date Revised 10/25/07 . . Date f'leceived: ~/I?-u/O Planner: AL . . TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST ,~ '. Engineer: Clayton McEachern Case#: PRE2010-00007 PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING Complete o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions Incomplete See PW Note(s) [gj [gj [gj r:::::l Q r:::::l W r:::::l ~ [gj B r:::::l t:1J n/a r:::::l tf:Jj r:::::l ~ n/a 1)21 ~ [gj w u.A Revised 10/25/07 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer Vicinity Map The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 V2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table Date Received:_,/Lr/Jo,o Planner: AL ;- . . o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan must be in compliance with the regulations of SDC Sections 5.17-100, 4.1-100, 4.2-100, and 4.3-100 and must include the following information: :~ Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) ~ ~ g l""I '-'-l g [g) ~ g o Grading and Paving Plan Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) ~ g g ~ 1 ~ ~ [g) r::::J ltZJ E.;l g" -~; "'=, [g) I1ki'I J!EJ g,~ ;.~'.' hh. ~ 2 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer , ,Location and width of all existing and proposed easements Location of existing and required power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site, including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system . Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) Amount of proposed cut and fill o Stormwater Management System Study - provide four (4) copies of the study with the completed Storm water Scoping Sheet attached. The plan, calculations, and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) ~ g Revised 1O{25{07 Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management System Study Date Received:~/JJ: /:J.AJd Planner: AL r;-=-- , . . , . PW Notes: 1. landscaped plans not stamped-otherwise appear complete 2. Cannot locate cut/fill total. This number is required for LDAP permit Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: . A PIP (Public Improvement Permit) will be required for the widening of S 67th St. Chapter 12 of the Springfield Engineering and Design Manual has more information on this procedure. . How will excess runoff be captured at the south end of the proposed widening along S 67th ST . Please provide section/calculations for pavement design showing ability to support 80,000 Ib load for fire access. Typical city section is 4/12. . There appears to be pages missing from the appendix of the storm drain report for post developed conditions. All that is provided is the Water Quality storm results. Revised 10/25/07 __ _.C' ,-:,,,r.;elVed: Planner: AL ~/t.r jd<J/o I / . " . . . TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Transportation Engineer/Planner: Jesse Jones Case#: PRE2010-00007 Applicant: Waterstone Apartments TRANSPORTATION o Right-ot-Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has frontage on a Lane County or an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) l2&l I!ij Copy of ROW Approach Permit Application o Traffic Impact Study - four (4) copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in . accordance with SDC 4.2-105 AA. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also address, if needed, City, Metro Plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) l2&l .EJ Traffic Impact Study o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) !81 I!ij Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) I"G1I ~ lr'i u::::J I;;J Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails Location, widths (of paving and right-of- way) and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications, i....::tz, i(8ceived: 6/I'}/.J.tNt> / Planner: AL ~ !81 I;:;::l ~ Revised 10/25/07 . . . access easements or other right-oF-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development, including ownership and maintenance status, iF applicable Location of existing and required traffic control devices Bl [J Transportation Notes: Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: TIA shows all traffic exiting site and heading north to 67th/Main intersection. Some traffic will likely exit and proceed east through the existing residential neighborhood to the signalized intersection at 69th/Main. Revised 10{25{07 Date Received: ~;!1)clb Planner: AL