The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication APPLICANT 12/7/2010 . . :City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 . . Site Plan Review OBO Ente rises LLC Phone: 541. 954.0217 Fax: A licant Name: Nick Bo les Address: ~,..'j 1390 Grosbeak Court, Redmond, Ore on 97756 , A licant's Re .. Kristen Ta lor Phone: 541-687-1010 ex 15 Com an : TBG Architects & Planners/lnc Fax: 541-687-0625 Address: ',p.. Owner: Same as A licant information above Phone: Com an Fax: Address: -, 11 '_~ ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-33-32 TAX LOT NO S : 6300 & 6200 5175 & 5195 Main Street (Tax Lot 630 29,185 & (Tax Lot 6200) 37,026 Acres 0 S uare Feet [ZJ Pro osed Name of Pro"ect: II ~ ,"~, ", ". .& Description of Pro osal: If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Mixed-use development: Community Commercial retail/restaurant multi-tenant building development and a Medium Dcnsit multi Ie-unit housin com lex. Use: Associated A lications: <..~ Pre-Sub Case No.: -\' Date: Si ns: Reviewed b Case No.: Date: Reviewed b A Iication Fee: $ -.3 3% ~ tf) - Technical Fe~FUBMITTA' ~~ J Posta e Fee: $ .--- - DFr "l ?Oln PROJECT NUMBER: TOTAL FEES: Revised 11/19/09 1 of 11 .. ,,',,;:r ,1' .";: ",,' ,'. ' L" . ";' '~~'_:. .' 3~i. tt~E"i ' _t' . \c OwnerSlgnatures~""(l",;!iy ::' ' '-:~'i: '_ :,.',) '_1::':' '~.;:3~::tf;imi-:;/}~1:2:U~~:):. r::;~,_ .' _', ",.:~ . ";;--.,;', .- :,' This a pplica~ioni fqf~ij~; u~~fllfcir rb6th the, required' pre-submittal; ineeil~g~ ~nd!su bsequent completeapplicat!o~JubrT1ittal;' tqwnersignatures are required 'at both sta'ges)r1 the application ~rocess',.'~:';:.::~l~~I~"lJ:~S ,';< , :,' , ,",' '" ' ,;:'l~i,::" ,',' , An applic~t~~J:l'?)pI'i~M~~:,.theOwnet:'s original signature: wi,JIiri;otl,!?e accepted. 5:"K::~lii1tj;-,Wj~~~;;; '-~1;~:~:t::; :~~" ~~. ji i. ,to' ';~- ~1:" ~':~'~ '. Pre-Submittal :, '\""'i-"~ "i"~ ",' ".' J ',;;', .c, , ,!J "< J ;~Ilr..q j:' ',j~"~~~1 ~ ~ : ~' ~. '.I "'~ _ "';>..;u I\{ ~,- J. ";;;"1",, :. '-I -I , ~. - " , ~< ~ HI,'" <;",,---~. It I .. ;, f' 1" l:~l ;,'t~;'\', liHi'~" ~'l '. : I .~. . The ,tmdersigne9':ackriciwledges"that the '~" ~ 1-"~' ,'. . Owner: ,j , , , f, ~' , , '. .' " , ;, .,1 ~;Hy'jU.1i:ii:j;;}1~,'i~, . .~ f Subm.ltta-I~,"\"'r\.'l" r:ij;\'~l':\ ~\'[',;; ~ -,. b~ ,,.!.It', ;;''',ijl'''! ,>.c" p <-', ' ''''.''1 ' , 1'1_1' j"! ',f 1, ! ~, ,,}q Ii t' j ':t.:f., ,it ir,,;l , '!~" ,-' , .'." ~-~i': '.\~f{l'{<' '>:' "k .' .,' :;,~' II, f..al .Jo1'~:;li;~' ;'q,: ~ 1 _ i~ '~'" ),~ '{/l'; ':~I,HI<,'I.,n"'~.;[~i'<t;" '" ' ";{ f I 'a.,'LI :1~;11 "Ill: .ltrl1" '" \ ~.~ ~Pf.~?f2,~t~!~!~~J?-~I~~911"~ ~.8?imPlete! for .su,bmlt~l. tO,the C1~. Cq~~l~t~nt ~!t~. ~~:~~mpletene~s.check "', perform~d'9,n,tfil~.lappli~tI0I1!attne;Pre",SubmlttaFMeetingf Faffirm the.lnformatlon; ldentlfled(~y the1Clty as "; ~ne~~~~a.rY.1.fi1,h:'.B~q:~%s~!ijgj~'~i~~PI~~tion i~l provided ,,~~r~~.niRi: t~e;ir;fo;r~~,tipn ~i1~::riBt:~~~; p~oy!~ed' i( not otherwise contai,ned wlthlf1!_the,submlttal.;3:mdthe'C1ty may begln_ proceSStn_9 the appl.l.catlon-witllthe informatIon as "submitted:'r:rhTs'1statement'sfkves:as writt~nnotice purslia~nt.to:the requirements!of!O'R,'g 227.:i178 pertaining to a owner::!CO~:~I~;~~~,Ji~t~itt~l!!j\J;'~';~f ~i)"!i, " ~I ;., :':;'~D' 'a' ;t:'el{.rj1;ilrnJ~Jrfljr[)o.,}1,i~ ': . p .< . ." tj([ij "t;?i-' , ; 1, 1m":!! ~~f'ljlr'"I;ij~!i~ \~fl!!~, ,; .~ ~ ''Ii'" ',... i', j'I,".rtl,"'i<Pi I'l,.h;r- ~ 'ji,' . . ! i '-!; ,~~~., !l~i,i\~ . 'J;<~ ,; '" 1 Ii :"1" ,'IJP1;,~ '. 'fl'l,,' .AT'!) t,jln~!!J '::,':1 :, ~"?':~!I!;,I~I,~k' I " ' '1 ; r '; . . i'. ,I. ; I iJ ~;.l~; 'i~; ., : ,; )~: I !l~Jt~JI~~ :"f)l . "". ",J""..,."",!.",I,!', ..I'IIT' 1-' .' .}\ i.! , ~ '~::.I..r\,t': :'i-t.f::!n~ir'i :~n;;~:' ': ,,:;i 't i,,'!!-!>Jt~ ; ~~_HI!';,t!n ~~in~, ' ':'eRE.sW~MI~~J~fQl~; ~:~lii:' : '.;i ;8{' ~ ~e ~.~ ~~lJ '\'~ Jj~'- ";;:'.' "DE "" ."",, e'~1O \J:"j~ , ' 1. "." ,~I ~ ' I hIll . ~:IJ_ .,. t t~. )',' ',:1 in [~,,; ;~'" , ,~', , . 1 i ;! : ;'~. I' ~> .' .~~~. 'I;'l~: q1!1'''~I!'' ,1:11:, t,~ "'1"-5" i ;1 ~l:' [~, I ~>I L . J-.t>: c'" ,", ,';1 j, I" f \.1 ,H,J, ~ P. , '_ If 't., h~f ~__; r~f:j:~11",Jt1Ik~ill!!,m~]\ . : 1(1~ t,. -';~ .r" -: '~l ~' '.j r ' ' ,,::If ~f;ill;~ j!!,;J,['~ltim!~ 71 , ;i' il .n q J !' ;." fJ' iJ. \ 'I i :1 ~ ~ . ',f ,I .;1 , 'I :i "'; 1:1 rt !i '.' :1 " J ; , " .'~ , , " < , , i i " "it, .,\ " "J.;' , 1 c, " 2'of 11 Revised ~i fi? ~r! 'i :~, . . Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: . ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre-Submittal and Submittal. . If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. !8l !8l !8l !8l !8l !8l !8l !8l !8l !8l Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the pre-submittal and submittal stages. Site Plan Review Application Form , Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the property, and any additional informat'ion that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees and future expansion plans, if known. Copy of the Deed , Copy of a Preliminary Title Repor~ issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. Copy of the Site Plan Reduced to 8'h"x 11", which will be mailed as part of the required neighboring property notification packet. Right-of-Way Approach Permit Application provided where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. Three (3) Copies of the Stormwater Management System Study with Completed Stormwater Seoping Sheet Attached - The plan, supporting calculations and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. ' Three (3) Copies of the Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in " accordance with SDC 4.2-105 AA. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system. In general, a,;TIS must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also address, if needed, City, metro plan ~nd state land use and transportation policies and objectives. Seven (7) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre-Submittal OR Eighteen (18) Copies of the Follo'!l'ing Plan Sets for Submittal !8l All of the following plans must inqlude the scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of preparation. !8l All plan sets must be folded to 8V2" by 11" and bound byPi~~~~~3Ml~M REC'D " a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions DEe 7 l010 !8l Prepared by an Oregon licensed Lfndscape Architect or Engineer Revised 11/19/09 4 of 11 ~ Vicinity Map ~ The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings. D The name, location, dimensions, direction offlow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department (NI A) D The lOa-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision (NI A) D The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in thel Development Services Department (NI A) ~ Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 V2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings (The only physical features are 9 trees 5" dbh or greater) ~ Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of , Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table . . b. Site Plan ~ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, or Engineer ~ Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and' distance between buildings ~ Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs . ~ Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact and disabled parking spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping ;I ~ Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces D Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district (NIA) ~ On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation ~ Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed .~ Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces D Location of existing and proposed transit facilities (NI A directly adjacent to the subject sites) PRE-SUBMITTAL RECIO ~ Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved f.or t".1 d th "I bl' n~J" ,.,.2111[11' common open spaces, recrea lona areas, an 0 er slml ar pu IC anuJserl'lI-puu IC uses Revised 11/19/09 5 of 11 . . D Phased Development Plan - where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water, and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply to the Site Plan application being ~ubmitted. c. Improvement and Public Utilities Plan [g] Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer [g] Location and width of all existing and proposed easements (There' are no proposed easements) [g] Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development, including ownership and maintenance status, if applicable. [g] Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting '[g] Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities [g] Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails [g] Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points , d. Grading, Paving, & Stormwater Management Plan [g] Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer [g] Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwat~r management system [g] Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations [g] Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns [g] The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained D Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be ap~E~~otsntnvaIS) (.!f/ A) [g] Amount of proposed cut and fill U MI Al REC 0 DEe 7 2010 e. Landscape Plan [g] Drawn by a Landscape Architect [g] Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of landscape coverage (Reference Architectural Site Plan, Sheet A1.) [g] Screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 D Written description, including specifications, of the permanent irrigation system (The permanent irrigation system will be proposed at the time of building permit application submittal) Revised 11/19/09 6 of 11 . . ~ Location and type of street trees ~ List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species,common name, quantity, size, spacing, and method of planting (Exact locations, sizes and species of trees and plants will proposed at the time of building permit application submittal) f. Architectural Plans ~ Exterior elevations of all buildings .and structures proposed for the development site, including height (Exterior elevations of the commercial buildings will be submitted before building permit application submittal once tenants for the commercial buildings are identified) ~ Conceptual floor plans (Conceptual floor plans of the commercial buildings will be submitted before building permit application submittal once tenants for the commercial buildings are identified) g. On-Site Lighting Plan ~ Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached (Exterior building ,and site lighting will be submitted at the time of building permit application submittal. This submittal only includes the parking lot lighting.) " ~ Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles, and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area ~ Photometric test report for each light source ~ Additional Materials That May be Required IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120: ~ D ~ D ~ D. ~ Revised 11/19/09 Where a multi-family development is proposed, any additional materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240 Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW (N/A) A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present (A Geotechnical Report is submitted even though there are not hazardous conditions) Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district (N/A) If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 (WII,G ~ StfIVUI~ !<Jtt- 0110 plJlfJ Y/WJ10W ~mAnVb) A wetland delineation approvea by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property (N/ A) Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has beeh submitted for review (ODOr'1iRR!9ht-vofTWa'~EC'D Approach Permit) t: uU1:l1 IlllAl K DEe 7 2010 7 of 11 [gJ D D Revised 11/19/09 . . Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land , and Drainage Alteration permit, must be submitted prior to development Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 (NIA) An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city iirilits but within the City's urban service area and can , be served by sanitary sewer (NI A) PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D DEe 7 2010 8 of 11 -. "- . . December 7, 2010 Mr. Steve Hopkins City of Springfield - Development Services Planning Division 225 5th Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 RE: 51 "_52"d & Main Street Redevelopment Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application (200913/1.3) Project Address: Assessor's Map & Tax Lot: Applicant: 5175 and 5195 Main Street Daytime Phone: Mailing Address: 17-02-33-32 Tax Lots 6200 and 6300 OBO Enterprises, LLC Nick Boyles 541-954-0217 1390 Grosbeak Court Redmond, Oregon 97756 q ualityapartments@q.com E-mail Address: Applicant's Representative: TBG Architects & Planners/lnc Kristen Taylor 541-687-1010 132 East Broadway, Suite 200 Eugene, Oregon 97401 ktaylor@tbg-arch.com Daytime Phone: Mailing Address: E-mail Address: TBG '\ ARCHITECTS & PlANNERS/INC 132 East Broadway Suite 200 Eugene, Oregon 97401 541-687-1010 541-687-0625 Fax On behalf of OBO Enterprises, LLC, enclosed is a package with an application for a Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application for the proposed 51"-52od & Main Street Redevelopment. In accordance with the Site Plan Review submittal requirements under SDC 5.17-100, the following is provided for review by the City Staff: 1 Copy: Site Plan Review Application Form Property Deeds Title Reports Site Plan (8%" x 11 ") Oregon Department of Transportation Right-of-Way Approach Permit 3 Copies: Transportation I mpact Study Stormwater Management System Study with Stormwater Scoping Sheet Geotechnical Report PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D DEe 7 2010 John E. Lawless, AlA Principal James F. Alberson III, AlA Principal Oarrelll. Smith, NCARB, FA1A Principal - '- . . City of Springfield December 7, 2010 Page 2 of 2 Attachments - 7 Copies: Narrative Exhibit A - Parking Lot Lighting Fixture Specification & Photometric Test Report Exhibit B - FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map Number 41 039Cl162 F Plan Sets - 7 Copies: T1 - Title Sheet C1 - Site Review Assessment of Existing Conditions C2 - Site Review Utility Plan C3 - Site Review Grading and Paving Plan C4 - Site Review Civil Details C5 - Site Review Basin Details A 1 - Site Plan A2 - Conceptual Floor Plans A3 - Conceptual Floor Plans A4 - Exterior Elevations AS - Exterior Elevations L 1 - Planti ng Plan If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at your convenience. Thank you for your time and consideration of this proposal. Sincerely, Kristen Taylor, CSBA Project Manager PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D DEe 7 2010 KT/nl cc: Nick Boyles, OBO Enterprises, LLC Damien Gilbert, Branch Engineering, Inc. Carol Schirmer, Schirmer + Associates, LLC Z:\PROJ\200913 080 51st-52nd & Main\CorrespV\gency\Site Plan Review\PresubmittaI\200913-Site Plan Review Presubmittal Cover Letter.doc . . December 7,2010 Mr. Steve Hopkins City of Springfield - Development Services Planning Division 225 5th Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 RE: 51 "_52nd & Main Street Redevelopment Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application (200913/1.3) Project Address: Assessor's Map & Tax Lot: Applicant: 5175 and 5195 Main Street Daytime Phone: Mailing Address: 17-02-33-32 Tax Lots 6200 and 6300 OBO Enterprises, LLC Nick Boyles 541-954-0217 1390 Grosbeak Court Redmond, Oregon 97756 q ualityapartments@q.com E-mail Address: Applicant's Representative: TBG Architects & Planners/lnc Kristen Taylor 541-687-1010 132 East Broadway, Suite 200 Eugene, Oregon 97401 ktaylor@tbg-arch.com PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D DEe 7 2010 Daytime Phone: Mailing Address: E-mail Address: NARRATIVE In accordance with the Site Plan Review submittal requirements, this written statement describes the proposed development and demonstrates that the proposal complies with the criteria under SDC 5.17-100. The proposal is subjectto the Type II application review process per SDC 5.17-11 O(B). I. Land Use Request The present request is for approval of a mixed-use development including an approximate 3,000-square-foot multi-tenant commercial building and an approximate 2,500-square-foot drive-through restaurant building with associated site infrastructure, parking and landscaping located on the northern portion of the site along Main Street. There are two multiple-family residential buildings proposed on the southern portion of the site adjacent to the neighboring Low-Density Residential (LOR) zoned properties. Building One is a two-story building with 11 units facing South 52nd Street. This larger Building One has three multiple-unit structures connected together with a covered outdoor stair and corridor system. The two structures located along the internal drive aisle facing South 52nd Street have ground TBG I ARCH ITECTS & PlANNERS/INC 132 Eust Broadway Suite 200 Eugene, Oregon 97401 541-687-1010 541-687-0625 Fax . . ". -",-.-_...:o:.il John E. Lawless, AlA Principal James F. Alberson III, AlA Principal Darrelll. Smith, NCARB, FAIA Principal . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7,2010 Page 2 of 32 structures located along the internal drive aisle facing South 520d Street have ground floor garages and second floor one-bedroom residential flats. The third structure located adjacent to the LDR property to the south and facing South 52"d Street has two floors of two-bedroom residential flats. Building Two is a two-story building with 4 townhouse units tucked in the back southwest corner of the site facing Building One. Tenants have not yet been identified for the commercial buildings. Therefore, conservative assumptions of possible tenant uses have been presented for the purposes of the Site Plan Review process. It is likely that the commercial tenant uses will be use categories such as retail sales, personal services and eating and drinking establishments. Generally, tenants will not be identified until after the core and shell construction of the buildings. Additional details regarding this proposal are provided on the Site Plan Review drawings, the remainder of this written statement, and other materials attached herein. Design Intent: The 51"-52od & Main Street Redevelopment project represents an effort to raise the standard of typical commercial and medium-density residential development in the East Mai n Street area. . to enhance the quality of local commercial and medium-density residential development; . to reduce the blighted appearance of large expanses of parking along Main Street; and . to ensure compatibility between the Main Street commercial corridor and the surrounding low-density residential neighborhood. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D DEe 7 2010 . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7, 2010 Page 3 of 32 The proposed uses are consistent with the Springfield Development Code (SDC), the East Main Refinement Plan (1988) and the Eugene-Springfield Metro Plan (2004 Update). The subject properties are within the Community Commercial (CC) zoning district, and are designated as Commercial with a Mixed-Use Area Overlay on the Eugene-Springfield Metro Plan, Plan Diagram. The parcels are located on the Mixed- Use Area #3 in the East Main Refinement Plan, Plan Diagram. Per SDC 3.2-310, retail sales, personal services and eating and drinking establishments are allowed in the Community Commercial zoning district. Per the East Main Refinement Plan (Mixed-Use Element, Area #3, page 11) Medium- and High-Density Residential uses are allowed under the Community Commercial zoning district. Therefore, a mix of commercial and multiple-family residential uses are allowed on the parcels subject to Site Plan Review approval. Additionally, consistent with the applicability of the Site Plan Review process and the Springfield Development Code, the project addresses anticipated post-development changes in stormwater patterns to maintain the integrity of the City's watercourses by preserving water quality. Similarly, the site and building design and orientation minimize any possible adverse effects on surrounding property owners and the general public. This application also addresses traffic impacts in the supplemental Traffic I mpact Study. The project was designed with the understanding that its long-term viability as an active mixed-use development depends on the economic and ecological health of the local community. To this end, the 51 st_52nd & Main Street Redevelopment proposal attempts to balance economic concerns with careful attention to neighborhood compatibility and land stewardship. This request for Site Plan Review is proposed under the general approval criteria. As demonstrated in Section IV below, the subject request meets all applicable code criteria and should be approved as proposed. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O DEe 7 2010 . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7, 2010 Page 4 of 32 Design Team: Owner and Applicant: OBO Enterprises, LLC 1390 Grosbeak Court Redmond, Oregon 97756 (541) 954-0217 Contact: Nick Boyles q ualityapartments@q.com Applicant's Representative and Architect: TBG Architects & Planners/lnc 132 East Broadway, Suite 200 Eugene, Oregon 97401 (541) 687-1010. Fax (541) 687-0625 Contact: Kristen Taylor ktaylor@tbg-arch.com . Civil and Transportation Engineers and Surveyor: Branch Engineering, Inc. 310 North 5th Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 (541) 746-0637 . Fax (541) 746-0389 Engineer: Contact: Damien Gilbert, PE damien@branchengineering.com Surveyor: Contact: Renee Clough, PE, PLS renee@branchengineering.com Landscape Architect: Schirmer + Associates, LLC 375 West 4th Street, Su ite 201 Eugene, Oregon 97401 (541) 686.4540. Fax (541) 686.4577 Contact: Carol Schirmer carol@schirmerassociates.com PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D DEe 7 2010 . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 6, 2010 Page 5 of 32 II. Site Description A. Location and Site Context This Site Plan Review Presubmittal request applies to Tax Lots 6200 and 6300 of Lane County Assessor's Map 17-02-33-32. Tax Lot 6200 is about 0.85 acres (37,026 square feet). Tax Lot 6300 is about 0.67 acres (29,185 square feet). The total OBO Enterprises LLC development site is approximately 1.52 acres (66,211 square feet) in size. The development site as described will be referred to in this application as the subject site. The subject site is located within the Springfield City limits and Urban Growth Boundary on the south side of Main Street between South 51" Place and South 520d Street. Main Street is classified as a principal arterial. South 51" Place and South 520d Street are classified as local streets. The OBO Enterprises LLC properties are zoned Community Commercial (CC). Currently, Tax Lot 6300 is developed with a single-family residence with access from 520d Street. Tax Lot 6200 was developed with a single-family residence with access from Main Street, which burned down a couple of years ago. The properties located on both sides of Main Street in the area of the subject site are zoned CC developed with a mix of commercial uses such as auto-oriented uses and eating and drinking establishment uses. The properties located to the south of the subject site are zoned Low-Density Residential (LOR) and developed with single-family residences. The properties located to the west of the subject site are zoned CC; the CC property located directly adjacent to Tax Lot 6200 is currently developed with a single family residence and the properties across 51" Place are developed with an auto-oriented use. The properties located to the east of the subject site are zoned CC and developed with a single-family residences. The development site is serviced via Lane Transit District (L TO) Route 11 (Thurston). There is a bus stop within a half a block of the subject site on either side of Main Street for eastbound and westbound transit riders. The route is serviced every 10 to 15 minutes throughout the day. Reference the Traffic Impact Study, Appendix C, for the L TO route schedule. PRE.SUBMIITAl REC'D DEe 7 2010 . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7,2010 Page 6 of 32 B. Existing Conditions and Site Access The subject parcels are relatively flat with street right-of-way frontage along Main Street, South 51" Place and South 520d Street. Currently, South 51" Place is unimproved to the City's public street standards. Main Street and South 520d Street are improved public streets with sidewalks. South 520d Street only has a sidewalk on the on the east side of the street. As stated above, Tax Lot 6300 is currently developed with a single-family residence with access from South 520d Street. Tax Lot 6200 was developed with a single-family residence that burned 'down a couple of years ago with access from Main Street. The proposed redevelopment relocates these existing two driveways and adds a new full access driveway on South 51" Place. These three proposed driveways provide safe access to and from the site and are consistent with the Springfield Development Code as outlined below. The applicant has filed a Right-of-Way Approach Permit with the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) for the proposed limited right-in and right-out shared access from Main Street in the general location of the existing driveway. Please reference the attached copy of the pending ODOT Right-of-Way Approach Permit application. There are 10 existing trees on the site, of which 9 have a diameter breast height of 5" or greater. Except for one 4" cedar tree located at the southwest corner of the site, all existing trees on the site are proposed for removal to construct the new buildings, site infrastructure and required on-site stormwater infiltration and detention system. III. Land Use History As stated above, the subject site is located within the Springfield City Limits and Urban Growth Boundary. The subject properties are zoned Community Commercial (CC) on the Springfield Zoning Map and designated as Commercial with a Mixed-Use Overlay on the Eugene-Springfield Metro Plan. Plan Diagram. The parcels are located in the Mixed-Use Area #3 on the East Main Refinement Plan, Plan Diagram. Per SDC 3.2-310, retail sales, personal services and eating and drinking establishments are allowed in the Community Commercial zoning district. Per the East Main Refinement Plan (Mixed-Use Element, Area #3, page 11) Medium- and High-Density Residential uses are allowed under the Community Commercial zoning district. Therefore, a mix of community commercial and multiple-family residential uses are allowed on the parcels subject to Site Plan Review approval. PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'D DEe 7 2010 . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7, 2010 Page 7 of 32 IV. Approval Criteria - Site Plan Review Supporting Facts and Findings This section is organized by the applicable approval criteria per Article X.II. Applicable Site Design Review approval criteria are outlined in bold below, followed by proposed findings in normal text. Additional applicable zoning code criteria needing to be addressed as part of the Site Design Review approval criteria are identified in bold italics. A. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram, and/or the applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual Development Plan. Findings: Per the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan, Plan Diagram, the subject property falls within the Urban Growth Boundary and the Metro Plan Boundary. The subject site is clearly designated Commercial with a Mixed-Use Area Overlay on the Metro Plan Diagram, which is consistent with site's current Community Commercial (CC) zoning district. The subject site falls within the adopted East Main Refinement Plan area. The parcels are located in the Mixed-Use Area #3 on the East Main Refinement Plan, Plan Diagram. Per the East Main Refinement Plan (Mixed-Use Element, Area #3, page 11) Medium- and High-Density Residential uses are allowed under the CC zoning district. Therefore, the zoning is consistent with the refinement plan. The proposed uses are consistent with the Springfield Development Code (SDC), East Main Refinement Plan and the Eugene-Springfield Metro Plan. Per SDC 3.2- 310, retail sales, personal services and eating and drinking establishments are allowed in the Community Commercial zoning district. Per the East Main Refinement plan (Mixed-Use Element, Area #3, page 11) Medium- and High- Density Residential uses are allowed under the Community Commercial zoning district. Therefore, a mix of community commercial and multiple-family residential uses are allowed on the parcels subject to Site Plan Review approval. Therefore, the zoning and proposed development is consistent with this criterion. B. Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including but not limited to, water and electricity; sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded and the public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by this Code and other applicable regulations. The Public Works director or a utility provider shall determine capacity issues. PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'D Findings: The applicant is proposing to construct two single-story commerciaDEC 7 2010 buildings and two two-story multiple-family residential buildings on CC zoned land with adequate public and private facilities. Reference the attached civil . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7, 2010 Page 8 of 32 engineering drawings for details on existing and proposed facilities. Per SDC 4.3- 125, all private utilities on the proposed development site will be placed underground whenever possible. The public improvements proposed as part of this development include half-street improvements along the frontage of South 51 ~ Place, including roughly 18'-0" of new asphalt, curb and gutter, sidewalk, a street light, street trees and the proposed driveway approach. Additionally, the proposed driveway approaches on Main Street and South 52nd Street will be replaced and will meet current ADA standards. All public improvements will be constructed per City standards under a Public Improvements Permit (PIP). The proposal has adequate water service available from an existing 6" public water main located in South 51~ Place adjacent to the subject site's western property line. An existing 6" public water main is also located in South 52nd Street with adequate water service. This main is located on the far side of the right of way. There is an existing fire hydrant located in the public right-of-way on Main Street to the north of the subject site at the intersection of South 52nd Street and Main Street. All of the proposed buildings (commercial, residential and trash enclosures) will be sprinklered. Due to the fact that all of the proposed buildings are located at least 600'-0" from the existing fire hydrant there are no additional private fire hydrants proposed in this development. The existing fire hydrant has an adequate flow rate to serve the site. There are existing overhead electric lines running east-west adjacent to the site's northern property line, which provide adequate capacity to serve the proposed development. There are two existing public sanitary sewer stubs (4" stubs) located adjacent to the subject site's western and eastern property line conveying sewage from the site to the 8" public sanitary sewer lines located in South 51" Place and South 52nd Street. The existing public sanitary sewer has adequate capacity to serve the development's needs. There is an existing 4 W' gas line located in Main Street. There are existing 1" gas lines located in South 51st Place and South 52nd Street, which provide adequate capacity to serve the proposed development if gas is used. The existing homes were likely connected togas. These existing services will be disconnected. There is an existing 48" storm pipe located along the south side of Main Street. An existing 12" storm main is located in South 52nd Street and an existing ~f)~ SUBMITTAL REC'O storm line is located South 51" Place. As part of the P.I.P., the South 51" Pla<':e." III <;2<isting roadside ditch will be removed and a new 12"storm line will be instal1ed DEe 7 2010 with a stub out to provide service to the subject property and to convey the upstream flows. A new storm lateral is proposed to connect into the existing 12" . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7, 2010 Page 9 of 32 storm line in South 52nd Street as well. No connection is proposed to the 48" storm line located in Main Street at this time. In addition, as noted above, the owner proposes to make public sidewalk improvements along the property's frontage on South 51" Place as required Due to City Staff identified storm system requirements, the proposed development includes on-site retention to the fullest extent possible. Special emphasis is placed on infiltrating the stormwater and limiting the flow rate to the existing public storm system. See the attached Stormwater Management System Plan for more information. The existing public street and traffic safety control systems will not be exceeded with the addition of the proposed development and are available to serve the site at the time of development. Reference the attached TIS, October 13 2010, for details, which is adopted and incorporated herein. In addition, as noted above, the pending ODOT Right-of-Way Approach Permit for the limited access driveway on Main Street is attached for reference. A geotechnical analysis was prepared for building construction. Please reference the attached Geotechnical Investigation, dated July 19, 2010. As demonstrated above as well as in the drawings and referenced attachments, capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including but not limited to, water and electricity; sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets and traffic safety controls have not been exceeded and the public improvements are available to serve the site at the time of development. Therefore, the proposed development is consistent with this criterion. C. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations. Due to the subject parcels' Multi-Use Area designation in the East Main Refinement Plan, SDC 4.7-210 Residential Uses in Commercial Districts and per City Staff direction, the northern portion of the site complies with the applicable CC Base Zone Development Standards and the southern portion of the site complies with the applicable MDR Base Zone Development Standards and SDC 3.2-240 Multi-Unit Design Standards. Reference the attached Site Plan for the CC and MDR area boundaries. There are standards within the MDR Base Zone Development Standards and Multi-Unit Design Standards that do not apply due to the fact that the proposal is for a mixed-use development on a CC zoned site. As required, this written statement addresses the provisions in the Springfield Development Code that are applicable to the proposed mixed-use development on CC zoned parcels as outlined below. Reference the attached Site Plan for details. PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'D DEe 7 2010 . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7, 2010 Page 10 of 32 SDC 3.2-200 MDR Base Zone Development Standards: Findings: Per the East Main Refinement Plan (Mixed-Use Element, Area #3, page 11) Medium- and High-Density Residential uses are allowed under the CC zoning district. Therefore, a mix of community commercial and multiple-family dwelling uses are allowed on the CC zoned parcels within this area subject to Site Plan Review approval. SDC 3.2-205 Establishment of Residential Zoning Districts and SDC 3.2-215 Standard Lots/Parcels and Maximum Lot/Parcel Coverage are not applicable because the base zone of the subject parcels is Cc. There are two multiple-family residential buildings proposed on the southern portion of the site.. Building One is a two-story building with 11 units facing South 520d Street. This larger Building One has three multiple-unit structures connected together with a covered outdoor stair and corridor system. The two structures located along the internal drive aisle facing South 520d Street have ground floor garages and second floor one-bedroom residential flats. The third structure located adjacent to the LOR property to the south and facing South 520d Street has two floors of two-bedroom residential flats. Building Two is a two-story building with 4 townhouse units tucked in the back southwest corner of the site facing Building One. The design intent of the residential portion of the site is to create a quiet residential community within the proposed mixed-use development located along the busy Main Street corridor by facing the main . entrances to all of the units towards a shared internal outdoor stair and corridor system. This outdoor central area between the residential structures provides opportunity for landscaping, a shared common area and increased natural daylighting and ventilation into the units. The residential portion of the development complies with the applicable MDR Base Zone Development Standards as follows: . SDC 3.2-215: The minimum building front yard setback for the MDR portion of the development is 10'-0" minimum. Building One is setback a minimum of 12'-0" from the street frontage on South 520d Street, which exceeds the required front yard setback. The residential portion of the development does not have a street side yard. . SDC 3.2-215: The interior and rear yard building setbacks are 5'-0" and 10'-0" minimum respectively. Along the rear southern property line adjacent to the adjacent LOR zoned property, the multiple-unit buildings are setback a minimum of 12'-0", which exceeds the required 10'-0" rear yard setback. Along the interior western property line adjacent to the adjacent CC zoned property, the multiple-unit buildings are setback a minimum of 1 0'-0", whif~(E.SUBMlrrAl REC'O exceeds the req u ired 5 '-0" setback. . SDC 3.2-215: The front yard setback for garages is a minimum 18'-0" DEe 7 2010 measured along the driveway from the property line fronting the street to the far wall of the garage where the face of structure is perpendicular to the street. . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7, 2010 Page 11 of 32 The proposed garage entrances and driveways face the interior of the site with residential units located above the garages on the second level. Therefore, although the garages are perpendicular to South 52nd Street, the garages are incorporated into the design of the larger multiple-family residential building (Building One) and do not appear to be garages from the street facing fac;ade (South 52nd Street). However, the far wall of the garage where the face of the structure is perpendicular to South 52nd Street is setback 18'-0" in compliance with the required minimum. Reference the Site Plan for details. . SDC 3.2-215: The height of the proposed multiple-unit residential buildings is no greater than about 26'-0" (at the ridge of the highest hip rooO, which is less than the required 35'-0" maximum. Reference the attached Exterior Elevations drawings for details. . SDC 3.2-225 Base Solar Development Standards: These criteria are not applicable to the proposed development because the subject parcels are zoned CC and located on the north side of the adjacent LDR zoned properties. SDC 3.2-240 Multi-Unit Deshm Standards: Findings: As noted above, there are standards within SDC 3.2-240 Multi-Unit Design Standards that do not apply to the proposed residential portion of the development due to the mixed-use nature of the development proposal located on a CC zoned site. The residential portion of the development complies with the Multi-Unit Design Standards as follows: SDC 3.2-240(B) Purpose: The two two-story multiple-unit residential buildings with private patios or balconies are compatible with the adjacent single-family residential development to the south and provide an appropriate transition between this single-family residential neighborhood and the commercial development along Main Street to the north. The MDR portion of the proposed mixed-use development promotes higher residential density inside the urban growth boundary along the Main Street commercial corridor and adjacent to low- density residential neighborhoods. The proposed medium-density residential housing will use existing infrastructure and improve the efficiency of public services and facilities. SDC 3.2-240(C) Review: This written statement and other supplementary information describes the proposed multi-unit development and demonstrates that the proposal complies with the Site Plan Review criteria under the Springfield Development Code (Section 5.17-100), which is subject to the Type II application review process. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D DEe 7 2010 . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7, 2010 Page 12 of 32 SDC 3.2-240(D) Design Standards, the residential portion of the development complies with the Design Standards as follows: . SDC 3.2-240(D)(1)(a) Building Orientation: The outdoor covered stair and corridor system is the primary entrance to Building One, the larger multiple- unit residential building, which faces South 52nd Street. Building One's primary outdoor entrance directly connects to South 52nd Street, to the exterior front doors of all of the residential units in both Building One and Two as well as to the pedestrian walkway system throughout the site. The street facing outdoor entrance for Building One will be enhanced by decorative signage and pedestrian amenities such as a masonry seating walls and a trellis archway. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(1)(b) Building Orientation: The front street facing fac;:ade of Building One is located about 12'-0" (outdoor staircase) to 18'-0" (far wall of ground floor garage) from the front property line on South 52nd Street, which is within the maximum 25 feet requirement. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(1)(c) Building Orientation: Off-street parking and vehicular circulation is not placed between the residential structures and the street facing fa<;ade on South 52nd Street. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(1)(d) Building Orientation: There are no wetlands identified on the subject properties and the properties are relatively flat, therefore, this criterion is not applicable. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(2)(a) Building Form: The proposed two-story residential structures have continuous horizontal distances between about 83'-0" to about 111 '-0", which are less than the maximum 160'-0" (measured from end wall to end wall) allowed. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(2)(b) Building Form: With the exception of a couple of minor building elements outlined below, the proposed two-story residential buildings (Building One and Two) have hip roofs with a roof pitch that is about 5 to 15 which meets the minimum 3 to 12 pitch requirement. Reference the attached Exterior Elevations for details. Adjustment: The front and back porch awnings on Building Two's townhouse units are shed roof forms and Building One's outdoor stair and corridor system is covered, respectively, by a shed and flat roof form in order to provide more appropriate and improved design and construction details for these elements. The proposed adjustment to these building roof forms are discussed below under SDC 3.2-250 Multi-Unit Design Standards Variances. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(2)(c) Building Form: The front facades of both Building One (facing South 52nd Street) and Building Two (facing Building One) contain the minimum required 15 percent windows and doors. All proposed windows and doors on Building One a~d :wo have 4-inch trim to provide shadowing:.SUBMITIAL REC'D as reqUired. Therefore, thiS Crltenon IS met. rl\L DEe 7 2010 . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7,2010 Page 13 of 32 . SDC 3.2-240(D)(2)(d) Building Form: The ground floor garages in Building One are attached to living units above on the second floor but the garages are not accessed from the street (front setback), so this criterion is not applicable. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(2)(e), (f), (g) and (h) Building Form: All of the exterior elevations of Buildings One and Two incorporate design features including offsets, projections, balconies, covered porches, or similar elements to preclude large expansions of uninterrupted building surfaces. Along the vertical face of all of the residential structures, there are a minimum of 2 recesses (minimum depth of 3'-0"), extensions (minimum depth of 2'-0" (with two exceptions) and minimum length of 4'-0") and/or offsets or breaks in roof elevation (2'-0" or greater in height), which occur at a minimum of every 30 feet, and on each floor. Reference the attached Exterior Elevations for details. Adjustment: Discussed below under SDC 3.2-250 Multi-Unit Design Standards Variances, the minimum depth of the proposed extensions on the east and west exterior elevations of Building Two (townhouse units) are proposed to be adjusted from the required minimum 2'-0" depth to 1 '-8" depth (allowed maximum 20 percent adjustment of the requirement). . SDC 3.2-240(D)(3)(a) Transition and Compatibility between Multi-unit and LDR Development: The adjacent single-family residence located on the same side of South 52nd Street and same block is located within 75'-0" south of Building One within the multi-unit residential portion of the subject development site. The front fa<;ade of this single-family residence is located about 16'-0" from the front property line. Building One is setback about 12'- 0" from the front property line, which is within the permitted 5'-0" of the setback provided by this nearest single-family residence. Therefore, this criterion is met. Reference the attached Exterior Elevations for details. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(3)(b)(i) Transition and Compatibility between Multi-unit and LDR Development: There is no vehicular circulation (i.e., driveways, drive lanes, maneuvering areas, and private streets) proposed within the buffer area between the multi-unit residential development and the LDR zoned property to the south. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(3)(b)(ii) Transition and Compatibility between Multi-unit and LDR Development: A site obscuring 6'-0" high cedar fence and landscaping are proposed along the subject property lines that abut a LDR zoned property to the south. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(3)(b)(iii) Transition and Compatibility between Multi-unit and LDR Development: There are no primary entrances to the multi-unit residential buildings that face an abutting LDR zoned property. Buildings One and Two do not exceed 21 '-0" in height within the buffer area, and they c?mply with all other applicable setbacks and transition area standard~/{1~-SUBMI1TAl REeD discussed elsewhere In the narrative. DEe 7 2010 Adjustment: The minimum 15'-0" buffer area (with the allowed 10'-0" building encroachment into the 25'-0" buffer area) between portions of the multi-unit residential buildings (ground floor porch roofs, second floor . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7, 2010 Page 14 of 32 balconies and building extensions) and the abutting the LDR zoned property line is proposed to be adjusted to 12'-0" and 13'-0" (allowed maximum 20 percent adjustment of the requirement). In addition, the heights of the primary roof (per code definition) for Buildings One and Two are proposed to be adjusted from the maximum 21'-0" within the buffer to 21'-8" height as discussed below under SDC 3.2-250 Multi-Unit Design Standards Variances. Reference the attached Site Plan and Exterior Elevations for details. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(3)(b)(iv) Transition and Compatibility between Multi-unit and LDR Development: The proposed active recreation area is located outside of the 25'-0" buffer area in the center of the multi-unit residential buildings. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(3)(b)(v) Transition and Compatibility between Multi-unit and LDR Development: There is no proposed parking lot lighting located within the residential portion of the development. The exterior building and path lights will be proposed at the time of the building permit application submittal in compliance with the 12'-0" maximum height limitation and shielded so that light does not allow direct illumination onto adjacent LDR property or into dwelling units. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(3)(b)(vi) Transition and Compatibility between Multi-unit and LDR Development: Mechanical equipment will be screened from view (i.e., as viewed from adjacent properties and street), and will be buffered so that noise does not typically exceed 45 to 50 decibels as measured at the LDR property line. The Mechanical equipment will be proposed at the time of the building permit application submittal in compliance with this and all other applicable standards. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(3)(b)(vii) Transition and Compatibility between Multi-unit and LDR Development: The proposed residential portion of the development does not propose rooftop equipment. All mechanical and electrical equipment will be located within the residential building structures. Mechanical and electrical equipment will be proposed at the time of the building permit application submittal in compliance with this and all other applicable standards. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(3)(c) Transition and Compatibility between Multi-unit and LDR Development: The proposed buildings, and portions of buildings abutting the LDR zoned property lines outside of the buffer area do not exceed a building height greater than 1 foot for each foot distance from the LDR property line up to about 26'-0", which is less than the required maximum 35'-0" building height. Reference the Exterior Elevations for details. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(4)(a) Storage: Adequate, accessible and secure storage space is proposed for each dwelling unit in private garages (each approximately 250 square feet). The garages are located on the ground floor of Building One, adj?ining all dwelling units in Building One a~d ~wo via ~1l".SUBMlTIAL REC'D outdoor covered stair and COrridor system. Therefore, thiS criterion IS me~.l: Reference the Site Plan, Sheet A1, and Conceptual Floor Plans, Sheet A2, for DEe 72010 details. . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7, 2010 Page 15 of 32 . SDC 3.2-240(D)(4)(b) Storage: The proposed residential portion of the development provides an enclosed trash area attached to the west end of Building One that is screened from view by placement of a masonry wall, about 6'-0" in height, and obscuring landscaping around all exposed sides of the wall except where breaks are provided for doors. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(4)(c) Storage: There are no trash receptacles proposed in any front yard setback, or within 25'-0" of property lines abutting LDR zoned properties. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(4)(d) Storage: Ground-mounted equipment, including exterior transformers, utility pads, cable television and telephone boxes and similar utility services, will be placed underground, where practicable. When placed above ground, the equipment will be placed to minimize visual impact; or screened with a wall or landscaping as required by code. Ground- mounted equipment will be proposed at the time of the building permit application submittal in compliance with this and all other applicable standards. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(5)(a) Open Space: The proposed medium-density residential portion of the mixed-use development permanently reserves approximately 30 percent of the gross site area (limited only to the residential portion of the site area totaling about 25,820 square feet) as open space, which exceeds the required minimum 15 percent. The total required open space is the sum of setbacks, common open space, and private open space. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(5)(a)(i) Open Space: The proposed residential portion of the mixed-use development is not proposed in mixed-use buildings, therefore, the exemption to these standards does not apply. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(5)(a)(ii) and (iii) Open Space: The proposed density for the multi-unit residential portion of the site is about 27 units per acre (limited only to the residential portion of the site area totaling about 25,820 square feet or 0.59 acres), which is less than 30 units per gross acre so the development complies with the other applicable code sections specified below. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(5)(b)(i) and (ii) Common Open Space: The proposed common open space has no dimension less than 15'-0" in width. The proposed total residential floor area (excluding garages) is about 16,964 square feet. Therefore, the required minimum common open space is 2,832 sq uare feet. 0.25 x 16,964 square feet = 4,241 square feet 4,241 square feet - 1,320 square feet private open space (SDC 3.2- 240(D)(5)(c)(iii)) = 2,921 square feet The proposed common open space for the multi-unit portion of tR~E-SUBMIlTAL REC'O development is 2,921 square feet, which exceeds this required 2,832 square feet minimum. Therefore, these criteria are met. DEe 7 2010 . SDC 3.2-240(D)(5)(b)(iv) and (v) Common Open Space: The proposed common open space has no dimension less than 15'-0" in width. A natural play area composed of basalt stepping and climbing stones and covered . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7,2010 Page 16 of 32 benches are proposed in the center of the residential buildings, which exceeds the required minimum 250 square feet area of active recreation area. The natural play area is not proposed in any required setback or transition area. Therefore, these criteria are met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(5)(b)(vi) Common Open Space: Fifty percent of the required common open space area is landscaping, which is consistent with the requirement. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(5)(b)(vii) Common Open Space: The proposal does not include indoor or covered recreational space, therefore, this criterion is not applicable. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(5)(b)(viii) Common Open Space: The exception to the common open space standard does not apply to the proposed project because the development is slightly outside the 1/4 mile distance (measured walking distance) to a public park. However, within only 0.4 miles, there are two public active recreation areas (Bluebell Park and Riverbend Elementary School) easily accessible by the tenants via a direct, improved, permanent, public, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)-accessible, lighted, maintained pedestrian sidewalk between the site and the parks. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(5)(b)(ix) Common Open Space: The proposed common open space areas will be built at the time of the construction of the residential portion of the mixed-use development. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(5)(b)(x) Common Open Space: The common open space areas are proposed outside of the required yards or transition areas. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(5)(c)(i) Private Open Space: All of the proposed multi- family units have private open spaces, which are directly accessible from the dwelling unit through a doorway. The ground floor units have a covered front entry and a back patio. The second floor units have a covered front entry and balcony. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(5)(c)(i) Private Open Space: The 7 proposed ground floor dwelling units (3 flats and 4 townhouses) provide 120 square feet of patio area, which exceeds the minimum of 96 square feet of private open space. The proposed minimum dimension for all of the ground floor patios is 10'-0", which is more than the required 6'-0". Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(6)(a) Landscaping, Fences and Walls: About 30 percent of the residential portion of the site (25,820 sq uare feet total) is landscaped with a mix of vegetative ground cover, shrubbery and trees per City standards, which is more than the required 15 percent minimum. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(6)(b) Landscaping, Fences and Walls: Although optional, the proposed development will provide a planter strip along South 52"d Street, a local street. PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'O . SDC 3.2-240(D)(6)(c) Landscaping, Fences and Walls: As part of this development, street trees selected from the City Street Tree List are proposed DEe 7 2010 to be planted in the public landscape strip along the property's frontage on South 51" Place and South 52"d Street as required per the City's Engineering City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7,2010 Page 17 of 32 . . Design Standards and Procedures Manual and Springfield Municipal Code. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(6)(d) Landscaping, Fences and Walls: The proposed development does not propose fences in front yards and along any frontage used to comply with the building orientation standard. There are pedestrian amenities and signage proposed within the front yard setback in front of Building One in order to enhance the entrance to the residential buildings. The amenities include two 20" high seating walls and a 7'-0" high trellis archway. The fences proposed in other yards comply with the fence standards specified in Section 4.4-115, and the vision clearance standards specified in Section 4.2-130 as noted below. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(6)(e) Landscaping, Fences and Walls: All landscaping will be irrigated with a permanent irrigation system unless the project's licensed landscape architect submits written verification that the proposed plant materials do not require irrigation. The irrigation system will be provided at the time of building permit application submittal in compliance with code standards. The property owner will maintain all landscaping. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(7)(a), (c) and (d) Pedestrian Circulation: The proposed development provides continuous internal walkways throughout the site connecting the residential and commercial portions of the development and all tenant primary entrances to South 51" Place, South 52nd Street and Main Street public right-of-ways. The continuous on-site walkway system also connects all buildings and tenant primary entrances on the site to the. parking areas, bicycle parking, garages, common areas, and existing (Main Street) and proposed (South 51" Place) abutting public sidewalks. Therefore, these criteria are met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(7)(b) Pedestrian Circulation: The proposed residential portion of the on-site pedestrian walkways are separated by a minimum of 5'- 0" from the dwelling units, measured from the sidewalk edge closest to any dwelling unit. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(7)(e) Pedestrian Circulation: The proposed on-site pedestrian walkways are proposed to be a combination of concrete, asphalt or masonry pavers, at least 5'-0" wide. Reference the Site Plan for details. The proposed asphalt emergency vehicle access (east-west drive aisle) is a minimum of 22'-0" wide, which exceeds the required 20'-0" width. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(7)(f) and (g) Pedestrian Circulation: Where the proposed on-site pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular circulation area or parking aisle, they are clearly marked with elevation changes, or striping. There are no proposed internal walkways that are parallel to a vehicular circulation area. Where the proposed on-site pedestrian walkways abut a vehicular circulation area the sidewalk is raised or separated from the vehicular circulation by.Ra.SUBMITIAl REC'O raised curb, landscaping or other physical barrier. In the locations th~t ~ raised sidewalk is proposed, the ends of the raised portions have curb ramps. DEe 7 2010 The proposed on-site pedestrian walkways and ramps comply with Americans City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7, 2010 Page 18 of 32 . . with Disabilities (ADA) requirements. Therefore, these criteria are met. Reference the Site Plan for details. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(7)(h) Pedestrian Circulation: The proposed on-site pedestrian walkways will be lighted to a minimum of 2 foot-candles. The exterior site and building lighting plan and details will be submitted at the time of building permit application submittal in compliance with the code standards. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(8)(a) Parking: The proposed residential vehicle parking is placed in individual unit garages and on the west side of Building One. There is no parking proposed along the South 520d Street frontage in front of the multi-unit residential buildings. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(8)(b) Parking: Proposed parking lot lighting is provided for safety purposes, and focused/shielded to avoid glare on adjacent properties and dwelling units as specified in Section 4'.5-100 below. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(8)(c) Parking: There are 23 vehicle parking spaces required for the proposed residential portion of the mixed-use development. Fifteen of those vehicle parking spaces are located in individual unit garages. As noted above, the remaining 8 vehicle parking spaces are located directly west of Building One. There is a planter island located on each side of the row of 8 spaces, which meets this criterion. Adjustment: As discussed below under the SDC 3.2-250 Multi-Unit Design Standards Variances, the width of the landscape island located at the eastern end of the residential parking aisle is proposed to be adjusted from the required 6'-0" width to 4'-0", exclusive of the curb. These parking lot planter islands will contain 1 shade tree (a minimum 2 inches (dbh) in caliper at planting) and vegetative ground cover. A detailed planting plan with exact locations, sizes and species will be provided at the time of building permit application submittal in compliance with all applicable code standards. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(8)(d) Parking: The proposed residential buildings do not have any ground floor living area windows that front the parking area. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(8)(e) Parking: The proposed residential parking aisle is connected to all primary building entrances on the site by means of the continuous on-site pedestrian walkway system. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(8)(f) Parking: All proposed walkways or planters located adjacent to parking stalls on the site have been widened by 2'-0" beyond the minimum dimension required to allow for vehicle encroachment. The walkways and planters are protected by a curb not less than 6 inches in height per code standards. Therefore, this criterion is met. PRE.SUBMIITAL REC'O . SDC 3.2-240(D)(8)(g) Parking: The proposed residential portion of the mixed-use development is not located on the corner of the parcels. DEe 7 2010 Therefore, this criterion is not applicable. . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7,2010 Page 19 of 32 . SDC 3.2-240(D)(8)(h) and (j) Parking: The proposed residential parking and maneuvering areas that abut South 51" Place and 52,d Street have perimeter landscaping. The proposed perimeter landscape island is about 8'-6" wide along South 51" Place and about 20'-0" wide along 52,d Street provide, which exceeds the required 5'-0" wide. The perimeter planting strips will be planted with shade trees, a minimum 2 inches (dbh) in caliper, and a low level (e.g., 30 to 40 inches) evergreen hedge. A detailed planting plan with exact sizes and species will be provided at the time of building permit application submittal in compliance with all applicable code standards. The parking area landscaping on the entire site is designed to reduce storm water runoff (e.g., through infiltration swales and other measures), as practicable. Reference the attached civil engineering and landscape architecture drawings for details. Therefore, these criteria are met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(8)(k) Parking: The proposed bicycle parking for the residential portion of the development is provided within the individual dwelling unit garages located on the first floor of Building One as allowed under SDC 4.6-150(6). Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(9)(a) Vehicle Circulation: The on-site drive aisle and driveway system for the proposed mixed-use development connects with Main Street, South 51" Place and 52,d Street. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(9)(b) Vehicle Circulation: The proposed mixed-use development with commercial and residential uses on two parcels share the 3 proposed driveways, which minimize cross turning movements on adjacent streets. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(9)(c) Vehicle Circulation: The proposal residential portion of the development site is about 0.59 acres (about 25, 820 square feet), which is less than 8 acres. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(9)(d) Vehicle Circulation: The proposed parcels do not abut an alley so this criterion is not applicable. SDC 3.2-250 Multi-Unit Desi1{n Standards Variances: SDC 3.2-250(A) Description: Adjustments of up to 20 percent to the Multi-Unit Design Standards listed in Section 3.2-240 under Building Form; Transition and Compatibility Between Multi-unit and LDR Development; and Parking are proposed below. Finding: Consistent with this criterion the following adjustments are proposed: Building Form Adjustment: There are two alternate roof forms proposed on minor building elements: the front and back porch awnings on Building Two's townhouse units are shed roof forms and Building One's outdoor stair and the corridor system is covered, respectively, by a shed and flat roof form,. PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'D DEe 7 2010 . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7, 2010 Page 20 of 32 Building Form Adjustment: The minimum depth of the proposed extensions on the east and west exterior elevations of Building Two (townhouse units) are proposed to be adjusted from the required minimum 2'-0" depth to 1 '-8" depth (allowed maximum 20 percent adjustment of the requirement). Transition and Compatibility between Multi-unit and LDR Development Adjustment: The minimum 15'-0" buffer area (with the allowed 10'-0" building encroachment into the 25'-0" buffer area) between portions of the multi-unit residential buildings (ground floor porch roofs, second floor balconies and building extensions) and the abutting the LDR zoned property line is proposed to be adjusted to 12'-0" and 13'-0" (allowed maximum 20 percent adjustment of the requirement). In addition, the heights of the primary roof (per code definition) for Buildings One and Two are proposed to be adjusted from the maximum 21'- 0" building height within the buffer to a maximum 21 '-8" building height. Parking Adjustment: The width of the landscape island located at the eastern end of the residential parking aisle is proposed to be adjusted from the required 6'-0" width to 4'-0", exclusive of the curb. . SDC 3.2-250(8) General Criterion: The proposed adjustments are necessary due to requirement that the CC zoned subject parcels be developed as a mixed-use development per the East Main Refinement Plan without clear and objective development standards, which preclude full compliance of the Multi-Unit Design Standards. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-250(D)(1) and (2) Building Form: The adjustments to the roof forms proposed on the minor building elements and the adjustment to the proposed extensions on the east and west exterior elevations of Building Two (townhouse units) from the required minimum 2'-0" depth to 1 '-8" provide equivalent neighborhood compatibility by providing similar building mass and architecture while allowing for contrasting building form. The adjacent structures within 300 feet have shed and flat roofs on building elements like porches, storage structures, ete. similar to what is proposed. . SDC 3.2-250(F) Transition and Compatibility Between Multi-unit and Low Density Residential Development: The proposed development requests adjustments to the buffer area between portions of the multi-unit residential buildings (ground floor porch roofs, second floor balconies and building extensions) and the abutting the LDR zoned property line from the required 15'-0" minimum (with the allowed 10'-0" building encroachment into the 25'- 0" buffer area) to 12'-0" and 13'-0" (allowed maximum 20 percent adjustment of the requirement); and the adjustment to the heights of the primary roof (per code definition) for Buildings One and Two from the maximum 23i:P' SUBMITTAL REC'O building height within the buffer to a 21 '-8" height. These propose~' I iii adjustments result in minor changes that do not alter the intent of the code DEe 7 2010 and continue to provide a compatible transition between multi-unit dwellings and the neighboring LDR properties by a reduction in noise and/or light that . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7, 2010 Page 21 of32 would otherwise impact adjacent LDR areas; stepping down building height; providing roof lines that compliment adjacent uses; and similar elements that effectively accomplish the intent of the standard. . SDC 3.2-250lj) Parking: The adjustment to the width of the landscape island located at the eastern end of the residential parki ng aisle is proposed to be adjusted from the required 6'-0" width to 4'-0", exclusive of the curb. This proposed adjustment does not impact the ability to meet the applicable landscaping and screening standards. There are no existing trees in the area of this proposed landscape island. SDC 3.2-300 CC Base Zone Development Standards: Findings: The tenants for the proposed multi-tenant commercial buildings have not yet been identified. However, all uses will be consistent with the allowed use categories listed under the CC base zone per SDC 3.2-315 at the time of tenant infill building permit submittal. Specifically, the commercial portion of the development complies with the CC Base Zone Development Standards as follows: . SDC 3.2-315: The lot standards required under SDC 3.2-315 do not apply for three reasons. First, the subject site was created prior to 1982. Second, the minimum lot size and frontage standard of SDC 3.2-315 is a standard imposed for the creation of new lots or parcels. The proposed development does not include partitioning or subdividing the subject property. Third, this standard is not a design or construction standard, and therefore not applicable. . SDC 3.2-315: There is no specific maximum lot coverage for CC zoned parcels. As noted above, the MDR base zone lot coverage is not applicable because the proposed development is a mixed-use project proposed on CC zoned properties. There are no other standards or sections in the code that limit the lot coverage. . SDC 3.2-315: the minimum building front yard setback in the CC zone is 10'- 0" and parking and driveway front yard setbacks are 5'-0". The buildings, parking and driveways either meet or exceed the required front yard setbacks along Main Street, South 51" Place and South 520d Street. Therefore, these criteria are met. Reference the Site Plan for details. . SDC 3.2-315: The residential portion of the mixed-use development is located adjacent to the interior and rear yards of the subject parcels so buildings, parking, driveway and storage are setback in compliance with the applicable MDR and Multi-Unit standards as discussed above. . SDC 3.2-315: As noted above, the multi-unit residential buildings in the I mixed-use development meet the building heights per the applicable ,..!1B'R.SUBMITIAl REC 0 an~ Multi-~nit standards. The commercial buildings do not have a building DEe 7 2010 height requirement. . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7,2010 Page 22 of 32 SDC 4.2-100 throuf!h SDC 4.6-150 and 4.7-210 Development Standards: SDC 4.2-105 Public Streets: Findings: There are no public streets proposed with this development. Therefore, the criteria under this section are not applicable. Main and South 520d Streets are built to city standards with an adequate width for the designated street classification. The public improvements proposed as part of this development include half-street improvements along the frontage of South 51" Place, including roughly 18'-0" of new asphalt, curb and gutter, sidewalk, a street light, street trees and the proposed driveway approach. Additionally, the proposed driveway approaches on Main Street and South 520d Street will be replaced and will meet current ADA standards. All public improvements will be constructed per City standards under a Public Improvements Permit (PIP). SDC 4.2-110 Private Streets: Findings: There are no private internal streets proposed with this development. As outlined above and in the attached TIS, adequate access is already provided through the adjacent street network and the proposed internal on-site circulation of the development. Therefore, the criteria under this section are not applicable. SDC 4.2-115 Block Length: Findings: There are no public or private internal streets proposed with this development. As outlined above and in the attached TIS, adequate access is already provided through the adjacent street network and the proposed internal on-site circulation of the development. Therefore, the criteria under this section are not applicable. The applicant proposes on-site drive aisles that connect to Main Street, South 51" Place and South 520d Street. Limiting access to a right-in and right-out only driveway on Main Street allows safe ingress and egress to and from the development from this principal arterial. SDC 4.2-120 Site Access and Driveways: Findings: The subject sites have street right-of-way frontage along Main Street, South 51" Place and South 520d Street. Currently, South 51" Place is unimproved to the City's public street standards. Main Street and South 520d Street are improved public streets with sidewalks. South 520d Street has a sidewalk on the east side of. the street. These side.walks and the o~-site pedestrian walk'Pty~.SUBMITTAL REC'O system provide pedestrian connectivity to the public rlght-of-ways and adJacent~ and nearby residential, commercial and industrial areas. DEe 7 Z010 . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7, 2010 Page 23 of 32 As noted above, the public improvements proposed as part of this development include half-street improvements along the frontage of South 51" Place, including roughly 18'-0" of new asphalt, curb and gutter, sidewalk, a street light, street trees and the proposed driveway approach. Additionally, the proposed driveway approaches on Main Street and South 520d Street will be replaced and will meet current ADA standards. The proposed shared driveway approach on South 520d Street is located approximately 88'-0" from the Main Street intersection (measured to the start of the South 520d Street intersection radius curve). The proposed driveway approach on South 51st Place is located approximately 94'-0" from the Main Street intersection (measured to the start ofthe South 51st Place intersection radius curve). The proposed driveway approach on Main Street is located approximately 132'-0" from the South 51 st Place intersection and 118'-0" from the South 520d Street intersection (both measured to the start of the Main Street intersection radius curve). All public improvements will be constructed per City standards under a Public Improvements Permit (PIP). Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the criteria under this section. As outlined above and in the attached TIS, the existing public street and traffic safety control systems will not be exceeded with the addition of the proposed development and are available to serve the site at the time of development. Reference the attached TIS, October 13 2010, for details, which is adopted and incorporated herein. In addition, as noted above, the pending ODOT Right-of- Way Approach Permit for the limited access driveway on Main Street is attached for reference. SDC 4.2-125 Intersections: Findings: As stated above there are no public or private streets proposed in this development, therefore, there are no street intersections proposed. All proposed on-site drive aisle and driveway intersections are at right angles to the intersecting streets, Main Street, South 51" Place and South 520d Street. The offsets for the proposed access points to the nearest existing public street intersections comply with City requirements. Therefore, the criteria under this section are met. SDC 4.2-130 Vision Clearance: Findings: In accordance with the vision clearance standards, the two corners of the proposed development at the intersections of Main Street and South 51st Place, and Main Street and South 520d Street provide adequate sight distance for the approach traffic. Reference the attached Site Plan for details. Considering these findings and the site plans submitted herewith, the proposed project is consistent with the criteria under this section. PRE-SUBMITIAL RECID DEe 7 2010 . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7, 2010 Page 24 of 32 SDC 4.2-135 Sidewalks: Findings: There is only one public sidewalk proposed as part of this development, which will be constructed per the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual, the Public Works Standard Construction Specifications and Springfield Municipal Code. The proposed public sidewalk and planter strip will be located wholly within the public right-of-way. The sidewalk is proposed to be 5'-6" wide with a curb and gutter. There is also an approximate 6'-5" landscape bed proposed between the public sidewalk and the subject western property line, which exceeds the minimum 4'-6" width requirement per SDC 4.2-135. Therefore, the criteria under this section are met. The existing public sidewalk and bike lanes on Main Street provide access to adjacent and nearby residential, commercial and industrial areas. The site plan shows on-site circulation for pedestrians, bicycles and vehicles as required by the Springfield Development Code. The proposed continuous on-site pedestrian walkway system connects the primary building entrances of each commercial and residential building, to the existing public right-of-way on Main Street, South 51" Place and South 520d Street, and to the adjacent residential and commercial properties. On-site pedestrian and bicycle access is provided between the buildings and parking areas on the site by clearly marked either striped or raised paved walkways. SDC 4.2-140 Street Trees: Findings: As part of this development, street trees selected from the City Street Tree List are proposed to be planted in the public landscape strip along the property's frontage on South 51" Place and South 520d Street as required per the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual and Springfield Municipal Code. There are two existing street trees proposed for removal as part of this development. The existing 28" cedar street tree located at the intersection of 520d Street and Main Street is proposed for removal because it is located within the vision clearance area. In addition, the commercial building proposed on this corner will significantly impact the existing tree's critical root zone. The existing 3" cedar street tree located at the southwest corner of the Tax Lot 6200 on South 51" Place is proposed for removal because as noted above, a new public sidewalk is proposed in this location. New street trees will be planted to replace these existing trees per the Street Tree Replacement Standards. The new street tree replacing the existing street tree at the intersection of South 520d Street and Main Street will be planted farther south on South. 520d Street outside of th~Kis~onBMITIAL REC'O clearance area. Therefore, the enterla under thiS section are met. r t;)U DEe 7 2010 . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7, 2010 Page 25 of 32 SDC 4.2-145 Street Lighting: Findings: As noted above, there is one street light proposed as part of the public improvements on South 51" Place. Reference the attached civil drawings for details. All public improvements will be constructed per the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual, the Public Works Standard Construction Specifications and Springfield Municipal Code under a Public Improvements Permit (PIP). Therefore, the criteria under this s~ction are met. SDC 4.2-150 Bikeways, 4.2-155 Pedestrian Trails and 4.2-160 Accessways: Findings: There are no public bikeways, pedestrian trails or accessways proposed as part of this development. Therefore, the criteria under these sections are not applicable. As noted above, Main Street is classified as a principal arterial and currently developed to City principal arterial standards including existing on-street bike lanes. The development of the subject site includes the provision of on-site pedestrian facilities that connect to Main Street, South 51;t Place and South 520d Street and the existing bike lanes. SDC 4.3-105 Sanitary Sewers: Findings: As noted above, there are two existing public sanitary sewer stubs (4" stubs) located adjacent to the subject site's western and eastern property line conveying sewage from the site to the 8" public sanitary sewer lines located in South 51" Place and South 520d Street. The existing public sanitary sewer has adequate capacity to serve the development's needs. Therefore, the criteria under this section are met. SDC 4.3-110 Storm water Management: Findings: There is an existing 48" storm pipe located along the south side of Main Street. An existing 12" storm main is located in South 520d Street and an existing 12" storm line is located South 51;t Place. As part of the PIP, the South 51" Place existing roadside ditch will be removed and a new 12"storm line will be installed with a stub out to provide service to the subject property and to convey the upstream flows. A new storm lateral is proposed to connect into the existing 12" storm line in South 520d Street as well. No connection is proposed to the 48" storm line located in Main Street at this time. In addition, as noted above, the owner proposes to make public sidewalk improvements along the property's frontage on South 51" Place as required Due to City Staff identified storm system requirements, the proposed development includes on-site retention to the fullest extent possible. Special emphasis is placed on infiltrating the stormwater and limiting the flow rate to the existing public storm system. See the attaclfeRE.SUBMITTAL REC'D Stormwater Management System Plan for more information. Therefore, the criteria under this section are met. DEe 7 2010 . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7,2010 Page 26 of 32 SDC 4.3-115 Water Quality Protection: Findings: The site is not identified on the Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) Map, therefore, there are no identified watercourses or riparian areas located on the site subject to specific water quality protection. As noted above, the proposed development includes on-site retention to the fullest extent possible. Special emphasis is placed on infiltrating the stormwater and limiting the flow rate to the existing public storm system. See the attached Stormwater Management System Plan for more information. Therefore, the criteria under this section are met. SDC 4.3-120 Utility Provider Coordination: Findings: All utility providers will be responsible for coordinating utility installations with the City as required. The applicant will be responsible for the design, installation and cost of the utility lines and facilities to the satisfaction of the utility provider consistent with the criteria under this section. SDC 4.3-125 Underground Placement of Utilities: Findings: All utilities are proposed to be constructed underground in accordance with policies of the City of Springfield, SUB, Qwest or other applicable utility providers. See civil engineering drawings for proposed utility layout. Considering these findings and the drawings submitted herewith, the criteria under this section are met. SDC 4.3-130 Water Service and Fire Protection: Findings: The proposal has adequate water service available from an existing 6" public water main located in South 51" Place adjacent to the subject site's western property line. An existing 6" public water main is also located in South 520d Street with adequate water service. This main is located on the far side of the right of way. There is an existing fire hydrant located in the public right-of-way on Main Street to the north of the subject site at the intersection of South 520d Street and Main Street. All of the proposed buildings (commercial, residential and trash enclosures) will be sprinklered. Due to the fact that all of the proposed buildings are located at least 600'-0" from the existing fire hydrant there are no additional private fire hydrants proposed in this development. The existing fire hydrant has an adequate flow rate to serve the site. Therefore, the criteria under this section are met. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D DEe 7 2010 . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7, 2010 Page 27 of 32 SDC 4.3-135 Major Electrical Power Transmission Lines: Findings: As noted above, there are existing overhead electric lines running east- west adjacent to the site's northern property line, which provide adequate capacity to serve the proposed development. Major electrical power transmission lines are not proposed in this development. Therefore, the criteria under these sections are not applicable. SDC 4.3-140 Public Easements Findings: Public easements are not proposed in this development. Therefore, the criteria under these sections are not applicable. SDC 4.3-145 Wireless Telecommunications Systems Facilities: Findings: There are no wireless telecommunication system facilities proposed in this development. Therefore, the criteria under these sections are not applicable. SDC 4.4-105 Landscaping: Findings: The landscape architecture drawings show landscaping which meets or exceeds the CC zone and parking lot landscape requirements for the commercial portion of the development site per SDC 4.4-105. Per SDC 4.4-105(F)(2), the proposed development includes a minimum of 5 percent landscaping in the interior of the parking lot because there are 24 parking spaces located between the street side of a building and Main Street, and are visible from any street. The MDR portion of the site either meets or exceeds the landscape requirements for the residential portion of the development site per SDC 4.3.2-240 and SDC 4.4- 105. As noted on the landscape architecture drawings, landscaping will be provided in all required setback areas and installed per the applicable code standards. As noted above, all landscaping will be irrigated with a permanent irrigation system unless the project's licensed landscape architect submits written verification that the proposed plant materials do not require irrigation. The exact sizes, species and locations of plantings as well as the irrigation system will be provided at the time of building permit application submittal in compliance with code standards. These findings and the attached landscape architecture planting plan, schedules and details, demonstrate that the landscaping requirements have been met. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D DEe 7 2010 SDC 4.4-110 Screening: Findings: Adjacent to the LDR properties to the south, cedar fence screening is provided because a commercial district and multi-family buildings abut a . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7, 2010 Page 28 of 32 residential district in accordance with SDC 4.4-11 O(A)(l) and (6) and SDC 4.4- 110(B)(3). The proposed outdoor trash receptacles are screened with masonry 6'-0" partial height walls per SDC 4.4-11 0(B)(3)(c). Reference the architecture and landscape architecture drawings for details. Therefore, the criteria under this section are met. SDC 4.4-115 Fences: Findings: As noted above, there is a screening fence proposed along the property lines that abut the adjacent to the LDR zoned properties as well as the CC zoned property (Tax Lot 6203) to the south. Per Table 4.4-1, the base height of this proposed fence shall be 6'-0". The fence details shall be proposed at the time of building permit application submittal consistent with the requirements outlined under SDC 4.4-115. Therefore, the criteria under this section are met. SDC 4.5-100 On-Site Lighting Standards: Findings: Exact outdoor building lighting will be proposed at the time of building permit application submittal in accordance with the On-Site Lighting Standards. All proposed site lighting will be installed in compliance with the requirements of this code section and the applicable Multi-Unit Design Standards as outlined above. The proposed site lighting is the minimum illumination necessary for the on-site parking and loading areas. All proposed exterior site and building light fixtures will be shielded so that direct glare and reflection are contained within the boundaries of the property, and directed downward and away from abutting properties and public rights-of-way. Parking lot light fixtures are prop~sed to be a maximum height of 20'-0", which is less than the required maximum 25'-0" per SDC 4.5-11 O(B)(l). There are no parking lot light fixtures proposed within 50'-0" of the residential zoning district to the south. These findings, the Site Plan and attached proposed Parking Lot Light Fixture Specifications demonstrate that these criteria are met. SDC 4.6-105 through 4.6-125 Vehicle Parking: Findings: Vehicle and bicycle parking calculations for the commercial buildings are based on assumptions of a possible tenant mix. Per the assumed commercial tenant uses and 15 multi-family units, a minimum of 58 off-street parking spaces are required per Table 4.6-2 (see vehicle parking calculations on Sheet Al). The applicant is proposing to provide 15 individual garages for each unit as part of the total parking count. The applicant proposes a parking lot design in compliance with SDC 4.6-115; all standard stall widths are g'-O" wide and 18'-0" in length including a 2'-0" bumper overhang over landscaping beds and walkway's , (reference drawings for specific locations). The compact spaces are either w!Q~.SUBMIITAL REC 0 wide and 18'-0" in length or 8'-6" wide and 16'-0" in length including a 2'-0" DEe 7 2010 bumper overhang over landscaping beds and walkways. The dimensions and proposed striping of the parking spaces and drive aisles meet the parking area City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7, 2010 Page 29 of 32 . . standards per SDC 4.6-115-120. These findings, together with the architecture and civil engineering drawings, demonstrate that these standards have been met. SDC 4.6-130 through 4.6-135 Loading Areas: Findings: There is one proposed delivery and loading area provided in addition to the required parking spaces that is located on-site outside of the required setbacks. The total proposed on-site loading area is 500 square feet square for the approximately 27,175 square feet of total commercial building area, which meets the minimum loading area for the site per SDC 4.6-135(C). The loading area is 10'-0" wide and about 50'-0" long (excluding pedestrian walkway), which meet the required minimum dimensions (10'-0" wide by 25'-0" long). Therefore, these criteria are met. SDC 4.6-140 through 4.6-150 Bicycle Parking: Findings: The proposed bicycle parking spaces, location and facility design complies with SDC 4.4-145-150. As noted above, vehicle and bicycle parking calculations are based on assumptions of a possible commercial tenant niix. Based on those assumptions, the commercial short-term and long-term bicycle parking spaces provided exceed the number required (reference Sheet A 1 for bicycle parking calculations). The 6 unsheltered short-term bicycle parking spaces are located along the on-site pedestrian walkway system with ramps that connect to Main Street, South 51" Place and South 520d Street. The proposed racks are hitching posts or staple racks. The long-term bicycle parking spaces for the commercial buildings will be located inside building tenant spaces in a secure location, which will be proposed in compliance with SDC 4.4-145-150 at the time of individual tenant infill building permit application submittals. The long- term bicycle parking spaces for the 15 residential units will be located inside each individual unit's garage. Therefore, these criteria are met. SDC 4.7-210 Residential Uses in Commercial Districts: Findings: The proposed subject parcels are located in the Mixed-Use Area #3 on the East Main Refinement Plan, Plan Diagram. Per the East Main Refinement Plan (Mixed-Use Element, Area #3, page 11) Medium- and High-Density Residential uses are allowed under the Community Commercial zoning district. Consistent with this criterion, the proposed multiple-family residential portion of the mixed- use development site meets the applicable MDR Base Zone Development Standards and Multi-Unit Design Standards contained in this code because the refinement plan does not specify development standards for this area. As demonstrated on the Site Plan Review drawings, the remainder of this written statement, and other materials attached herein, this criterion has been met. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D DEe 7 2010 City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7,2010 Page 30 of 32 . . D. Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas; minimize driveways on arterial and collector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable regulations and comply with the ODOT access management standards for State highways. Findings: The orientation of the buildings, parking and ingress-egress points serve to maximize efficiency for access, on-site circulation and function while minimizing impact to the adjacent properties. The site plan is organized so that the more intensive commercial uses and associated parking are located along Main Street and the residential portion of the site is located adjacent to the LOR zoned properties to the south of the subject properties. The driveway on Main Street is a limited right-in and right-out access point primarily serving the commercial buildings located along the principal arterial. The proposed residential buildings are located between the LOR properties to the south and the main east-west drive aisle running through the mixed-use development site with access from South 51" Place and South 520d Street. The proposed raised crosswalk located towards the center of the site that crosses this main drive aisle provides safe on-site pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular circulation between the residential and commercial portions of the development. As noted above, the site plan shows on-site circulation for pedestrians, bicycles and vehicles as required by the Springfield Development Code. The proposed continuous on-site pedestrian walkway system connects the primary building entrances of all commercial and residential buildings to the existing public sidewalk on Main Street, South 51" Place and South 520d Street, and to the adjacent residential and commercial properties. The existing public sidewalk and bike lanes on Main Street provide access to adjacent and nearby residential, commercial and industrial areas as well as Bluebell Park, Riverbend Elementary School and other neighborhood activity centers. Safe pedestrian and bicycle circulation is provided between the buildings and parking areas throughout the site by clearly marked striped or raised paved walkways. The subject parcels are serviced via Lane Transit District (L TO) Route 11 (Thurston). There is a bus stop within a half a block of the subject site on either side of Main Street for eastbound and westbound transit riders. The route is serviced every 10 to 15 minutes throughout the day. Reference the Tf'N~SSUBMITTAl RECIO Impact Study, Appendix C, for the L TO route schedule. DEe 7 2010 As noted above, the existing public street and traffic safety control systems will not be exceeded with the addition of the proposed development and are available to serve the site at the time of development. Reference the attached TIS, dated October 13, 2010, for details: In addition, there is only one driveway proposed City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7, 2010 Page 31 of 32 . . on the principal arterial, Main Street, which is shared between the two subject properties. The pending ODOT Right-of-Way Approach Permit for the limited access driveway on Main Street is attached for reference. Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been designed to safely facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian circulation and avoid congestion as well as provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residential and commercial areas. Therefore, the criteria under this section are met. E. Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil or geologic conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their associated riparian areas; wetlands; rock outcroppings; open spaces; and areas of historic and/or archaeological significance, as may be specified in Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-760, 358.905-955 and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in this Code or in State or Federal law. The subject site is flat. With the exception of 10 existing trees and the existing house on Tax Lot 6300, the site does not have any other notable landscaping like significant clusters of trees and shrubs. Additionally, the site does not have any watercourses and associated riparian areas, wetlands, rock outcroppings, open spaces or areas of historic and/or archaeological significance as specified in Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-760, 358.905-955 and 390.235-240. Per the Soils Survev of Lane County Oregon, the site is (119) salem-urban land complex. This soil has a highwater table depth of >6'. Based on the results of the geotechnical investigation, no geologic or geographical hazards were identified on the site that would prohibit the construction of the proposed development. Reference the attached Geotechnical Investigation, dated July 19, 2010, details. Furthermore, the site is located within a shaded FEMA Zone X flood hazard zone (an area determined to be outside of the 500-year flood plain). Reference the attached FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map Number 41039Cl162 F. Therefore, the site will not be a significant risk to public health and safety in terms of stormwater control or flood hazard. As the site is flat and is located outside the 500-year flood zone, slope failure and soil erosion are not concerns associated with this site. The site does not have physical features as outlined above that require protection as specified in the Springfield Development Code or in State or Federal law, therefore, the criteria under this section are met.. PRE.SUBMITTAl RECID DEe 7 2010 City of Springfield Site Plan Review Presubmittal Application December 7, 2010 Page 32 of 32 . . V. Conclusion Based on the information and findings contained in this written statement, associated attachments and drawings, the proposed Site Plan Review meets the criteria of approval contained in the Springfield Development Code. Therefore, the applicant requests that the Director approve the proposal as presented. Both the applicant and the applicant's representative are available for questions as necessary. If you have any questions about the above application, please do not hesitate to contact Kristen Taylor atTBG Architects & Planners/lnc (687-1010). Sincerely, Kristen or, CSBA Project Manager cc: Nick Boyles, OBO Enterprises, LLC Damien Gilbert, Branch Engineering, Inc. Carol Schirmer, Schirmer + Associates, LLC Z:\PROj\200913 080 51 st-52nd & Main\Corresp\.Agency\Site plan Review\Presubmitta!\200913-Site Plan Review Presubmittal.doc PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'D DEe 7 2010 u co f- I;-go>! .t~;:,. hi~ ~ ~'" ~ t <<:<P^",,, S '" a"'.. ~ ~ s : \~/L ~/ IlLt'L6 31~~NI~dS D " _0 1.33~lSNI. ,6LS'S'SLlS ~~~~ ~ M31AJll NVld HIS Z ; <( ::)11 S3Sllld1l31N3 080 ~ . lN3V\1d0l3A:lm~ 133~lS NIVV\I ~ PUl5-:)SL5 ~. !IIi ~ ! i' Ii' !!d '! I i ! ,dill 41!1!!ii! II' 'I<! I · il!!'! 1111 ,i.dl,' 'I ~ !1111~l!lil ill II 1I!l1i11i I. ~ il!1 !!ii,l,l hl'li !Ii!:,.!! U d ~ 'I '. I"'j' ,!.I !'I :', ',' ,I il!IIi1liliIIlUlililllilill!l lJ ~ .; .; ~ " Ln ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ h ~ n ~ ~ i! ~.!. ~~ ~ ~~~~~~~;! ~ S ",::J!'!:J :l:li ~.... - t::.. ~ -- - J:j - N - I~ ~ I l I I i !i i II III; Hili, I,I! i, III III III I Ilill IIII i! In II!!,I Gz i! ~ ! !~! !! Ii! i ii !l III i !l li ~ ! Iml IMl M ih i!II!!! - l' . I ! '"",' '" ! " I' . ' ! '"', ,,' i2 ,I ~ I" i j l Ii i i; m 11; Ii ~ Ii! i i c:: n ~ :: E ~ ~ ~~~ ~b 8ss t ~b d ~ ~ a l ~ ~ ! I I I i I. o II I I !l I iEl!iJn~lR1l! 8~LJt&j~ I ~ I , ! II i III ! Iii ' I il! I -f.I1-@ III ,,' \ I ~ U ~~ ~ ~iH HlI~ liP ~ lIUlIlIII II ';t 'i;oa ~!!~.. ~~;l t u~g~~ ~ g ~~~ !!~_:l ..~~ i! ~,.. ~.: rj" " ~...'" ... 5 '" ;.2 & - - ~ ~ .",.. N 2' II i i III! ! :s I ~ I! !~ III !! a lil' III I!W Iii ~ I' I ,I !!! 'l! ~ ! !l1I1! I I !II UlI m <( g ~ " ~!! h " -- 1 3:l ~ 1 5 0_ ~ ~ H 1 nos ~,~ ~. > , ~ . N Z z < , ih!i"" ~~ U g~i! 3:JVld g ~.s Hlnos ~ Ii , ! l ,i Ii I ~I Ii 1.J Z 52 0< ;E ~ w '"' '" h::: ~ ~~ h~.Q-.lo ~ ,I I ::c -+-11 0< I I ~ 0 l!1 1 I!ai, L~_J ~; c 0 LLI = a::: = ---' '" ~ t- ~ U co :::;) W <J> Cl . LLI 0::: a.. <(~ ""'.....'~.,,~..., ..~~-,......"""-,-..... . . Win Title - == CASCADE TITLE CO. PAGE 1 INVOICE BRANCH ENGINEERING INC. 310 5TH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 OUR NO: YOUR NO: DATE: 0269495 09-159 11/30/2010 ATTN: DAN NELSON OFFICER: SUSIE LOVELL SELLER: OBO ENTERPRISES LLC BUYER: Description U/22/10 Status of Record Title Rep . Policy Amount Premium Amount 300.00 Grand Total 300.00 PLEASE SHOW OUR NUMBER ON YOUR REMITTANCE PRE-SUBMITTAl REC'D DEe 7 2010 Please Remit to.' 811 Willamette Street. Eugene, Oregon 9740] Phone: (54].) 687-2233' Fax: (541) 485-0307' email: info@cascadetitJe.com . . - -= CASCADE TITLE . CO. 1IIIIIImllmlllllllllmllllllllllllmrn STATUS OF RECORD TITLE REPORT BRANCH ENGINEERING INC. ATTN: DAN NELSON 310 5TH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 EMAIL: DANN@BRANCHENGINEERING.COM Our No: CT-0269495 Date: NOVEMBER 30, 2010 Charge: $300.00 As requested, Cascade Title Co. has searched our tract indices as to the following described real property: A parcel of land in the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 33, Township 1'7 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at ia point on the South -line of the McKenzie Highway at a point which is 158.47 feet North 890 44' West of the intersection of the East line of the A..W. Hammet Donation Land' Claim No. 38, Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian; run thence South 00 05' West 352.42 feet; thence North 890 44' West"215.78 feet; thence North 00 05' East 352.42 feet to the South line of the said highway; thence South 890 44' East 215.78 feet to the place of beginning, in Lane County, Oregoni EXCEPTING that portion conveyed to the City of Springfield for roadway, recorded January 101 1972, Reel 568, Reception No. 81516, Lane County Official Records, in Lane County, Oregon; ALSO July Lane EXCEPTING that portion conveyed to Kenneth L. Rolfe, et ux, by deed recorded 28, 1976, Reel 805, Reception No. 7638158, Lane County Official Records, ,in County, Oregon. and. as of: NOVEMBER 29, 2010 AT 8:00 A.M., we find the following: Vestee: OBO ENTERPRISES, LLC Said property is subject to the following on record matters: 1. Highway Construction permit, including the terms and provisions thereof, recorded May 16, 1966, Reception No. 47494, Lane County Oregon Deed Records. 2. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, recorded August 4, 1967, Reception No. 93869, Lane County Official Records. continued- Account No. 0135994, Assessor1s Map No. l7 02 33 3 2, #6200, Code 19-00, the amount of $1,999.0~Rt~U6wilTiAt~EC'D DEe 7 2010 NOTE: Taxes I 2010-2011, in MAIN OFFICE * 811 WILLAMETTE ST. * EUGENE, OREGON 97401 * PH: (541) 687-2233 FLORENCE * 1901 ffi1Y 101 - S. 2 * FLORENCE, OREGON 97439 . PH: (541) 997-8417 EUGENE FAX: 485-0307 * E-MAIL: info@cascadetitle.com * FLORENCE FAX: 997-8246 . '. NOTE: The vestee acquired title under deed 98103904, Lane County Official Records, and date, recorded December 29, 1998, Reception No. has been in continuous title since that This report is to be utilized for information only. This report is not to be used as a basis for transferringi encumbering or foreclosing the real property described. The liability. of Cascade Title Co. is limited tolthe addressee and shall not exceed the premium paid 'hereunder. CASCADE TITLE CO., by: / . jf!Title Officer: SUSIE LOVELL PRE-SUBMITIAl REC'O DEe 7 Z010 ~ ~ S~S"B'E; g r') C'<sa,62' 81-:. ~ ':=) , 09'J c,<o ", '-.. -:- ~ .32 S O4'15"/: ~5!~O'__ . '.\ L "'/i5.70' Sa1"3S'30'"E. NB1'53'~5'E ~ /-(. ~~ LC=<6S' LC"'6:..10' \'-' --I ~-~-- ~-_0:..32'~'~_____ .!t:>A6:.:....---- ,'::1_ L"267,B3' I " 3102 2 , 3114 ~ o ~ , z , 14 3000 0.32 AC ~ '1::r.:I" r / r /6 569.44'E 3104 4 3105 3103 ~ o o 9. 5 3106 LC~1i5 /i0' S80'42'30'€ 3113 LC=<65.02 588'21'45"E ~ 3112 \ /\3111 \(\J .s' 13 co' N83'S1'2Z"E 3109 ~ ~ 9 N .~. 569'44;E 12 . T 11 10 " 2700 0.79 AC 2900 0.69 AC 2800 0.69 AC ~ ~ N 72. 43.40' "'. 3002 : . N 1.21AC' 3001 ~ , .16AC , , '" \.: , n.as' " , I , " I ", , , I , , 56.94' I 57.06' ASTlINE 30' '-3D' , r I I I W: 0: ::i ~ " , ,~ ': I~ '" o ,Z I I , , I '" 1-: Cf): ~ I..C1 I 30' , F " o z b ~ 116' HIGHWAY " 165.78' 6200 0.85 AC ~ ~ , I , 589'44'E I I , 6203 I I g I I I , " SBS"44'E 105.78' 6201 , g , I I 185176' I 6202 I gO.26AC I I I , 30,1 : I ~ , I : I I " ~ : i , , I' 01 ~;;;il,!~~~~~:~~ S~- s Z- ," ~Ii ~ 'I" "', _. ,Jrll~"rMAgd~,0'O ASSIST LOCA , "\,,,,\ f ,l;:\IIJ)i:~_l (~ql?;liI;'\m!!T8S'COMPANY ASSL 'ffi'e '7'iO:l'~" ,';:.g'i\:gW,~IF!]t,'\FOR INACCURAI , ,,:-,;," ,,,:..(.;:,Q,. .'/; :i\~\;Q':.;"t;:j;'f;:Y} ..;" .~tE AP,,' ;"'::11792 ~~4, " "::"'f[;"'" .:' 126.47 6300 0.69 AC ~ l6 :;i ~ " N '" ,';.' " '" -"-' ,-,:-,:",,-;. ".,..: , ". ~.; ,;:[:~ -".'<":.' :,-, . . Win Thle iii CASCADE TITLE CO. .' , PAGE I INVOICE BRANCH ENGINEERlNG INC. EMAIL: DANN@BRANCHENGINEERING.COM OUR NO: YOUR NO: DATE: 0269496 09-159 11/30/20 I 0 ' ATTN: DAN NELSON OFFICER: KURT BEATY SELLER: OBO ENTERPRISES LLC BUYER: Description 11/2211 0 Status of Record Title' Rep Policy Amount Premium Amount 300;00 Grand Total 300.00 PLEASE SHOW OUR NUMBER ON YOUR REMITTANCE PRE.-SUBMITTAL REC'D DEe "1 2010 Please Remit to: 811 Willamette Street. Eugene, Oregon 9740] Phone: (541) 687-2233' Fax: (541)485-0307' email: info@cascaaetitJe.com . . .' ::-. - Pn:J CASCADe ,ITLE co. 11111111II1111I1I1I1~1I111111111111111111111~! STATUS OF RECORD TITLE REPORT BRANCH ATTN: EMAIL: ENGINEERING INC. DAN NELSON DANN@BRANCHENGINEERING.COM Our No; CT-0269496 Date; NOVEMBER 29; Charge: $300.00 2010 As requested, Cascade Title Co. has searched our tract indices as to the following described real property: ( A T T A C H ED) and as of: NOVEMBER 19, 2010 at 8:00 A.M., we find the following: Vestee. : DBD ENTERPRISES, LLC Said property is subject.to the following on record matters: 1. Rights of the public in and to that portion lying within the bounds of 52nd Street on the East. 2. Easement for slope and storm drainage facilities, including the terms and provisions thereof, as granted to the State of Oregonl by and through its State Highway Commission by Highway Construction Permit recorded July 21, 1966, Reception No. 554871, Lane County Oregon Deed Records. 3. Easementl 5.0 feet in width, including the terms and prov~s~ons thereof, granted to the city of Springfield, as set forth in instrument recorded September 17, 19911 Reception No. 9144657/ Lane County Official Records. NOTE: Taxes, Account No. 0136000, Assessor's Map No. 17 02 33 3 2, #6300, Code 19-00, 2010-2011, in the amount of $1,175.80, PAID IN FULL. This report is to be utilized for information only. This report is not to be used as a basis for transferring, encumbering or foreclosing the real property described. The liability of Cascade Title Co. is limited to the addressee and shall not exceed the premium paid hereunder. CASCADE TITLE CO., by; !/;/ ac!Title Officer: KURT BEATY PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D DEe 7 2010 MAIN OFFICE * 611 WILLAMETTE ST. * EUGENE, OREGON. 97401 · PH: (541) 667-2233 FLORENCE * 1901 EWIY 101 - S. 2 * FLORENCE, OREGON 97439 * PH: (541) 997-6417 EUGENE FAX; 485-0307 * E-MAIL: info@cascadetitle.com * FLORENCE FAX: 997-8246 -' '" . . . PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Beginning on the South.line of the McKenzie Highway to a point North 89~ 44' West 5.0 feet from the inters~ction of said Soutp line and the East line of the A.W. Hammit Donation Land Claim No. 38, Notification No. 7187, Township 17 South, Range 2 West of th~ willamette Meridian; running thence North 890 44'1 West along the South line of said highway 153.47 feet; thence South' DO 5' West, 217.8 feet; thence South 890 44' East 153.47 feet; then-ce North 00 5 I East 217.8 _feet to the place of beginning I in Lane County, Oregon; EXCEPT THEREFROM a parcel of land lying in the A.W. Hammit Donation Land Claim No. 38, Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian, in Lane County, Oregon, and being a portion of that property described in that certain deed to William prociw, recorded in Book 318, Page 68, Lane County Oregon Deed Records, the said parcel being described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the West line of 52nd Street with the South line of the existing McKenzie Highway; thence West al~ng said South line 2S feet; thence Southeasterly in a straight line to said west line at a point 2S feet South of the point of beginning; thence North along said West line 25 feet to the point of beginning, in Lane County, Oregon; ALSO EXCEPT the East 10 feet thereof conveyed to the City of Springfield for road purposes by deed recorded September 17, 1991, Reception No. 91-44657, Lane County Official Records, in Lane County,Oregon. PRE.SU~MITIAl RECIO DEe 7 20\0 " 72. 43040' ~ 3002 : 3001 ~ ~ 1.21 AC' , .16AC I I ~ , 1:l.B6' , , , .., , " , , , I , , 58.04' 57.au' ASTlINE HIGHWAY 00' 1-30, 1115.7B' , 1211.47' I , , , 6200 , 6300 I I I 0.85 AC I 0.69 AC W: I ~ I U: " I " I I ::i , ,;fil I ~ c: I "' ~. , SS9'44'E I I~ , " rfii , " I 6203 I 0 , z , , g I , I I I I I , SSS'44'E s. . 105,711' , , 6201 I b 1--: g I , (fJ, I teSr7B' r--' I Ld 6202 I g 0.26AC I , I , I , '.B ., . H9'44'E 104 4 3105 " 3102 2 3103 , z S'S'16'~ C"5D.52' ~ g ': o " "" ~~) lc,,~%'J5'~""'" 'J ?:. .3~' S 114'15-1; .3::.70- [j l "liS.7a' ::;81'J~JO'e: -.\ LC"E5' ". " "-. -- . -. - _ .0:05'25' S7.,.~" --l"iiiteV'- '55'€" WI1,!S:!6'(;. LC=e!l.70' " 3114 ~ lC;,s5,IIIJ' seo'42'Jll'!: 3113 ~ lC=65.QZ LC"'bb. l> S8I1'Zl'.;5"E NIlJ'S1"Z2'E " 3112 ,,\3111 g ?\-r' ,. 13 w ~ " z g 8 . 14 SB9'44:e ~2 3000 0.32 AC 2900 0.69 AC " " " " .8-7' t1 " , '~; ~.,.'r 5 'Svv.;POR 'H.JbHSt) D:U}; 6~ '. vi , _._~-.i~ a:;ASS-- , - " I \ NWCQR. pGORbAI D.L.C.'46 . .,:" 3109 ',' 5.7.' . 'NIlll' <\ ~ >;,"SE }/,( 10 ....... .7' , 2700 0.79AC "".',," ", ". '., 2800 0.69 AC '" ~ , ~'" :.....,- '.-:", 116' . ". :1..... b . , .. ~" i 00,1 'I........ ...... : I ,. 3' .... !,:'~'/:::;' H :". II,'," r?t:l ;')~:,\,;,~~! i' 'R,"EC'D ~~t\ u'f.liil';llikl. , I '. _'. ..'_ ~ : i I E(7.2010 , , . 01 ~ ...'.... ".o:'. .. '.' ~:.:;;W~;b.'~ 75:'- ~ Z- :.:..:.,....,.,. :,.,.._c',I"\.,_." Als1iMAfi;;IS{;TO ASSIST LOCAT 'i'fbPERTI{;',jI:lECOMPANY ASSU~ O',WABILi:rr:)OR INACCURACI '.i:::;:~:;":,;:~, ~ ::.i_;{-.~,'~;:\.../ >. :;; '!: ":.1,' -,'. .. .;- .I l'I/1':::I /;', ",of ""~.; If .t" 'f' '._~,.<"" "",,,"1" . SC~R INSTRUCTIONS To: Western Pioneer Title Co. Date: December 28, 1998 You, are hereby instructed to act as our ~crivener in preparing a Barg~in and Sale Deed f'r,om, Jana' Lee Olson., as. Grantor, to 080: Enterprises, LLt , as Grantee, covering, the foll~,.;+rig described property: AssllOwn ..on., Bargain and Sale Deed dated December 28, 1998 signed by J,ma Lee 'Olscin. . The"ccirisiderat.{o'n on. the,"Deed. is.. to be: for a membership interest in OBO Enterpr:.ises, LLC,.' --',-,';~\,'" You: are fU'rtheradvised"and'instbjetedcas fbHows' '.' 1 . .. h' . . 'h' . 'd" i" d h . . . ... d .a' nd' .' 'h'er'. .e..b...y'......a... p' p' ro.......v'e. ".!t' h'e D' .ee'd p'r'.'e'..p' .'a'.'r..ed' : Tn '. . . iE1Sb':": Af'_,::f:'..~r.,un:,.~_k~, :~ne'-'_:::'.."a~e'..ex~m~nE{ ","" . " . .O:~~6'or~iiih(;.e\'\./it:tf. -'d'{~s~:: ih8truct-iori~ ~ :1 i., AnY-;::~(;)ns,'J:(fef~tlqh~ :_fqt:':Yt#~ 2cJT1v~y,an:c~!:~.-of;';: th~:L.prop~i:tY., shall be;;:pa'ii:i, between the~':.,:.' uncler'sl.gned-':""outside,_of .We'stern 'Pioneeri'T111e~', . . ,,~ 3. N()',:.,,~~~:l,e rE;_p,o~t__9r'._~-i5,1~ ,: in.sl1P~nce ,poliex. ~S'-~f:),' :be:ol:ita~ne9. .or. iSf?,ued in c.o'h] un'hi6o'..wlth ..tliis'tii3.ns'ai::tion"'aj\i:J'~reref9{~Weet.eril Pibhe'er"Ti tle:'shaI i'have nb:T.Li'hiUty 'or.,,'espons'ibiHty withreg,l,'rd to the condition of tide to the proP.~"t:?{.. 4. . ,-: "', ~ ", ,', _ ,,' ",. _" '." - "c,' _".' , .\.'" ". ",', ',' _,,', - ,'" -. - ' , -, __ "'.'" . __' _' -'-"" ,- ,.:' ., ,_' '" __, _ _' '. weste'rn "pi'oueer' 'Tit,le i'~{ dtrecte.d:-' not~;to""noti~y:' ~i:J.y exJst;.ihg en'ci:imbranc~-ti61der (s) o'f this ',tra1)saction or contact ani e:Xis:t-ing el?cumbran.;:~holder (s,) for any. 'purpose relating to thi's 'conveyance. It is 'acknowledged t-hat if the loan documents of any existing encumbranceholder' -'contain a,. ':'due on .sille_. clause,' -it may allow it to recjuirefun pay'ment of the' loan balance upon an undisclosed sale of. the 'property. The Grantor and. Grantee have both. had an opportunity to review.the loan documents and to seek the advice, of an attorne'y- about the consequences of an undisclosed sale. 5. After you have received the signed and notarized Deed and these fully-signed instruc~ions, you are to ~ecord the 'peed in the Lane County Records. , . . " IT' '. IS>'UNDERSi'OOD,,';'BY, THE': PARTiES,,;:(/.~:tG~~~fi:i . t~E' . ABOYE" :b~.. A:rTACHED :i:NSTRUCT:i:ONSTHATTHE INSTRUCTIO.N'S ARE THE COMPoLETE IN8.TRUCTIONS BETWEEN TIUSi!,'F,l;@1f'V;'AsJ, (,~'S;~~Gg.9i:!iI ~~J;:~'l';;N'l:Q!;;..rc::n'!;i:l'I,!>)~;;gB::J::~.Gli!',w,. .,.j'!'9."f)'l'~,E:'.~;.E:~.Ggow TRANSACTI()N;"" ''l'HESE,;.'INSTRUCTION'~''',MA'll.N()T'':rN()LU!)E:ALL.TH-E; TERMS, .,Oll: 'THE 1\GREEif.#~Ti;;~IGH-';;;:rfH~HE:t;~Yii4}j~'l'~ot,;T!r~~:(;~qC~9-W;~;y:!i~igl:,'i!i~S.E;;;i.~~'!!RPc;TioNS' CAREFULLY,:"AND;iDOSJ:qOT'i. S:rGN;',THE:M:UNLESS.THEY.ARE,.ACCEP.TABLE; TO."YOU;.:' Q:4~~~ Jan. .'Lee .Olson'- - " . . '--:. . . , OBO ENTERPRISES, LLC BY'~~ JolOlson PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'O DEe 7 2010 INDIVIDUAL BARGAIN AND. SALE.DEED JANA LEE DLSON ,Grantor, conveys to 0.00 ENTERPRISES, LLC the following described reol property situated in Lane. County . Oregon. to.wil:- A parcel of land in the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of. Section 33, Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette. Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of the McKenzie Highway at a point which .is. 158.47 feet North 89"44' West of the interseCtion of the East line of the. A. W; Hammet Donation Land Claim No. 38, Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian, run thence South 0."05' West 352.42 feet., thence Nqrth 890.44' West 215.78 feet, thence North 0.0"05; East 352.42 feet to ,the South line of the said highway, thence South. 1 -.. . ". _ 89044' East 215..78 feet to the place of beginning" in Lane County, Oregon. Excepting that' portion conveyed to the City.of Sprifjgfield for roadway, recorded January 10.; 1972, Reel 568, Reception #81516. . Also excepting that portion conveyed to Kenneth L Rolfe, et ux, by deed recorded July 28, 1976, Reel 80S, Reception #7638158, Official Records, Lane County, Dregon. , Grantee, ~-. The true consideration for thiHonveyonce is $ for' a membership interes.t in OED Enterprises, LLC "tHIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THEPROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS'INsTRUMENT IN VIOLATION Of APPLICABLE . LAND USE LAWS.AND REGULATIONS, BEFORE SIGNING ORAC<ipTlNGTHISINSTRIJMENT, THUERSONACQUlRING FEE TitLE TO THE PRDPER'rY SHOULD CHECK WiTH THE ApPROPRIATE (:!TY OR COUNTYPLAt:-lNINGDEpARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ONLAWSllITS'.AGAINST FARMIt:-lG OR FORESt PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN.0RS 30.930." Doted: Dec.ember 28, 1998 Qt2/1An -~~ Ja Lee DIson . PRE-SUBMllTAl REC'D DEe 7 2010 U-,"'~1. ,"V,I, ....='I.U, 'r_., . .l.....:c:"?"~_\ UV..J 1 .-.~~~8""J.;v",~, . 1t,I ~:-'~:~~,.:'1:0::'~_. ,V.l..;J,;:J......J..~,':7"".:....'::=.......V.L'-.AO:/" .1..IO_LlC "':'i< .. ~~,~~.JJ. ;. .) "'~I:-U~~.l".' Thetrue.considerationlorthis.conveyonceis$ for a membership interest in OBO Enterprises, LLC "THIS INSTRUMENT Will NOTAllOWUSE OF THE PI!ClPERrf DESCRIBEp IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN ViOLATION OF APPUCABLE LAND. USE LAWS ANDREGULATiONS.BEF6RE'SIGNIN(;.OIlACCEi>TI~GTH.IS INSTRUMENT,THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THEPROPERTY:SHOULDCHECK WITH THEApPROPRIATECITY OR COUNTY PLANNINGDEPARTMENqO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY UMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTlCESAS DEfiNED IN ORS 30.930." Dated: Deceniber 28,1998 '~/II~'y(~~ Ja Lee . Olson . ".---S"fATEOF;' 0REGON"-' .}. ,. '0 ..... ,... 'T ss. County of Lane. 1 this instrument vias acknowledged. before me on December Jana Lee Olson ,- ....,.,'~..,~.,.'" 199B . .IOMBERLY A spiCER 'NOTARYPUBUC'OREGON COI,IMISSION NO. 304077 It(c:oM!olIS~ION EXPIRES AUGUST 20, 2001 otaryPubld r Orego My com.mission expires: Until ~ change is requesled; 611 taxstat"~el1ts shall be sent to1lkefoli6wing address: No change in address for tax statements Ak"r recording return to: Western Pioneer Title Co., P,O. B6~ 10146, Eugene, Oregon '97440 PRE-SUBMIiTAL REC'O DEe 7 2Q11l '.'.'., - .by ." - ..... ~ . Ipartment of Transportation ODOT District 5 644 'A' Street Springfield, OR 97477 (541) 744-8080 Fax: (541) 726-2509 John.DOWNING@odOl.state.or.us File Code: PMT 4~07 September 16, 2010 Damien Gilbert Branch Engineering, Inc 310 5th Street Springfield, OR 97477 Subject: Supplemental Documentation Required (Checklist) to Continue Processing of Application:for State Highway Approach Highway Number 015, (McK;enzie), at Mile Point 5.72 I Application Number 10859 Dear Damien Gilbert: The Oregon Department of Transportation has c9mpleted an initial review of your Application for State Highway Approach, and has determined that supplemental documentation is required in order to. properly evaluate your application. The Department may require supplemental documentation before an application is deemed complete. (OAR 734-051-0070(6)1. . The supplemental documentation required for the Department to continue processing your application is identified and defined oelow.. o Detailed information on the type of development, including the number and square footage of buildings and units with a complete description of the proposed land uses of the property(s) to be served by the approach (es). Vicinity map(s) showing: o Location on state highway by milepost, engineer's station, or other landmarks; o Existing highway plan and access management controls; o Existing land uses and zoning; o Existing ingress or egress e~sements; o Adjoining lots showing the development footprint and all approaches, and any other approaches onto any existing, planned, and proposed abutting roads and streets abutting tl)e site to show at least twice the applicable o 1 If you would like a complete copy of the Chapter:,734 Division 51 Rule, you may obtain them by either visiting our website at: http://www.oreqon.qov/ODOT/HWY/ACCESSMGT/technicalbulletins.shtml or by contacting ODOT's Rules Coordinator at (503) 986-3171. PRE-SUBMlTIAL REC'O DEe 7 2010 . Supplemental Documentation Required to caue Processing of Application " for State Highway Approach Additional Documentation Required Highway Number 015, (McKenzie), at Mile Point 5.72 Application Number 10859. Thursday, September 16, 2010 Page 2 spacing standard on both sides of the roadway along any roadway available for ingress and egress from the property; and '0 Structures and other features (e.g., traffic signals, drainage ditches and pipes, streams, ponds, lakes or railroads). o A preliminary drainage plan of the site showing impacts to the highway right-of- way. o A drainage study prepared by an Oregon Registered Professional Engineer. o Map(s) showing existing and proposed, if known, utility locations before and after development in and along the highway. o Site plan to scale, including: o Existing and proposed appr(Jach(es) from the property to the highway as well as to other existing, planned and proposed streets and roads; o Existing, planned and proposed utilities, if known, including in and along the highway; o Right of Way survey and land donation (if applicable); o Identification of protected resource areas such as wetland, timber, or archeological sites, and any identified location or mitigation; o Identification of proposed traffic mitigation measures; o Existing and proposed buildings; o Existing and proposed property lines; o On-site traffic flow pattern; o Parking, including number and arrangement of all spaces including disabled; o Drive through windows/gas pumps; o Existing, planned or'proposed transit facilities, such as turnouts; o Sight clearance including landscaping; o Existing, planned and proposed sidewalks on site or on the highway right . of way; o North arrow on drawings. and o Pedestrian and bicycle accomodations o Grant o Indenture [g] Transportation Impact Study (see Attachment regarding the Technical Memorandum Review) o An Access Management Plan as a mitigation measure (see Attachment o Hazardous material collection and/or treatment system report. o Other All of the above supplemental documentation must be submitted to our office by November 15, 2010 unless you and the Department agree to a time extension before November 15, 2010. Please note that this application will expire if the supplemental documentation or an extension is not received by November 15, 2010. Unless a time extension is agreed to, submittal of any information aftep~~datelloflexRi(ati,9{l will be processed as a new application. /" ;)UtlIV '11iL ~t(; U ! DEe 7 2010 .'.'-' . Supplemental Documentation Re"quired to .tinue Processing of Application . for State Highway Approach Additional Documentation Required Highway Numbar 015, (McKenzie), at Mile Point 5.72 Application Number 10859. Thursday, September 16, 2010 Page 3 Please contact John Downing, Permit Specialist at (541) 744-8080 if questions arise in the process of providing the supplemental documentation. c: John Downing, Permit Specialist David Knitowski, Regional Access lIt1anagement Engineer PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D DEe 7 2010 T · Oregon Department Of'ransportation Application for State Highway Approach , . FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Permit Specialist Permit Type: New Change of Use Temporary Restricted Modification of Existing: 0 Yes. 0 No Deviation: 0 Yes .DNo. NOTES: Hwy#: f"...OONod Stamp I Milepoint: Station: CHAMPS ID#: Required Information The applicant must submit the following information with the Application for State Highway Approach. ODOT will notify the applicant if additional infomnation is required. . . All attachments required by answers on the application fomn, including applicant signature. . If the applicant is not the owner of the property to be served by the approach, then the property owner must authorize the applicant as a designated agent The applicant must have the property owner complete the Authorization of Designated Agent block on this fonn OR submit a signed letter from the property owner authorizing the applicant as the designated agent. . Site plan and vicinity map approved or currently .being reviewed by the local govemment . . A Land Use Compatibility Statement (LUeS) for a State Highway Approach (page 4 of this application) must be completed by the local government. . A copy of the current County tax lot map for the property served by the approach. Map must highlight all property that would be served by the approach and list all owner name(s) on adjacent properties. Make a note on map if ownership of adjacent property is same as subject property. Identify the location of the proposed approach on map. . A copy of the recorded easement(s), if the subject property has an existing easement(s) for access to the property. . A copy of any existing state or local government approach pemnits for the property. In addition to the above submittals, the applicant may be required to place stakes or markings near the highway shoulder at the proposed approach location. Definitions for commonly used temns are in the attached brochure. The brochure is also available on the ODOT website located at: hitp://wvN{.oreoon.aov/ODOT!HWY/ACCESSMGT! Aoolicant Information Last Name: Gilbert I First Name: Damien I Company: Branch Engineering, Inc Street Address: 310 5th Street City: Springfield I State: OR Zip Code: 97477 I County: Lane Mailing Address: 31 0 5th Street City: Springfield I State: OR Zip Code: 97477 I County: Lane Phone Number: 541-746-0637 FAX Number: Cell Phone Number: E-mail Address: damien@branchengineering.com Is applicant working as an Agent of the Owner? YES:~ No:D If YES, the owner must complete the Authorization of Designated Agent section below, OR ATTACH a letter from the owner authorizing applicant to act as his/her agent Aoproach Location Highway Name - May be a statewide highway name such as Pacific Highway, or a local name like East Main Street Route Number - The posted highway number, e.g. 1-5 or US-84 Highway Name: McKenzie Hwy Route Number: 15 eountf.iR!;a!'~DnAITT^ I ... - ~"r' Mile Point: 5.72 Side of Highway: North 0 South ~ East 0 o .. UUIJIYIlIIf1L i\;~\" V West Is the highway in a national forest area?: Yes 0 No IZI DEe 7 2010 . , o!\~)'<; 734-2680 (8/08) Page 1 of 4 ~@.. Authorization of Desi I Nick Boyles Damien Gilbert my agent in the matter of this highway approach permit application. Owner Signature: (printed name of property owner) authorize (printed name of applicant) to represent me as AppJican'fSi nature NOTIFICATION TO APPLICANT: The ODOT District Office will contact you when your application has been reviewed. If additional documents are required to continue the application process you)/JiII be notified. When all of the necessary documents have been received, the application will be deemed complete. If your compl,eted application is approved, preliminary construction specifications will be issued. A performance bond and liability insurance will b~ required before any construction work can begin on the highway right of way. For the complete rules regarding approach permitting, see OAR Chapter 734 Division 51. . j The Applicant declares, certifies, and affirms under penalty of applicable state or federal laws that all information provided on this form and attachments are true and complete to the best of his/her knowledge. Printed Name: Damien Gilbert AdditiohalA' roach Information . - ". Application is a request for (check all that apply) , _ I - o New Approach - There is no existing permitted or grandfathered approach road at the location requested in this application o Temporary Approach - The approach requested will be removed after a specified period of time 129 Existing Approach - This application affects, or may affect, an existing approach o Restricted Use Approach - The approach requested is "for emergency services, government, utility access or similar specific uses with limited traffic Vehicle'TlJrnin Movements Turn movements requested (check all that apply) All movements: 129 OR Right In- 0 Right Out: 0 Left In: 0 Left Out: 0 Pro e Owner Information (If different than applicant) Last Name: OBO Enterprises LLC Street Address: 1528 Ferry St #11 City: Eugene Mailing Address: 1528 Ferry St #11 City: Eugene Phone Number: First Name: State: OR Zip Code: 97401 County: Lane State: OR Zip Code: 97401 FAX Number: County: Lane Cell Phone Number: 541-954-0217 E-mail Address: Are there additional owners of the subject property? YES: 0 NO: 129 If YES, ATTACH the same contact information as above for each of the co-owners on a separate sheet of paper. Pro elnformation (attach additional page(s) if space is insufficient) Subject property address(es):#5175 & #5195 Main Street. City: Springfield Zip Code: 97477 Township(s) 17S Range(s) 02W Section(s) 33 County: Lane Tax lot(s) 06200 & 06300 Current zoning: CC ,;Proposed zoning: CC In the boxes below, describe the existing and proposed land use(s) on the property, including ~gu;3r~_(oQ\<!g~ Q[,<!"r.~ge. Existing: Proposed: t'1<!:-;)UDIVIlIIf\L KI:\" IJ residential, Area 1.50 Ac multi-family, fast food, Area 1.50 Ac DEe 7 2010 734-2680 (8/08) Page 2 of 4 . Site Plan & Vicinity 'Map'Requirements Local governmentsitE!.plan . 1- . . " . .,..'~::" ;-';,'!,;~~~;~~!~]*~~,~~:~,,;~.':\:,~, Has the local government approved a site plan or is the local government currently reviewing a plan for the proposed land use? DYes (If yes, attach a copy of the plans being reviewed by the local government.) r;;a No Submit drawing(s) no larger than 11" x 17" in size. Site plan(s) shall include all applicable information listed below: Property location and property lines, including: . North arrow . Show all lots or parcels that are part of the property or development with their ~orresponding tax lot numbers identified . Distance from the property lines to the center of the proposed approach Using solid lines, show: . Proposed approaches with requested width and turning movements shown . Proposed & existing buildings and structures to be retained . Proposed use of existing buildings and structures to be retained . Other proposed equipment or facilities and their proposed use . Proposed access or "cross-over" easements with neighboring properties . Nearest approaches on both sides of the highway within 500' of the proposed approach center-line Using dashed lines, show: . Existing approaches with width and turning movements shown . Place an "X" on approaches to be removed . Existing buildings and structures to be removed . Existing equipment or facilities to be removed . Other existing facilities to be removed . Existing access or "cross-over" easements with neighboring properties Show proposed on-site circulation, including: . Travel lanes with travel directions indicated . Travel lane widths . Parking spaces or parking areas . Access locations to the parking spaces or areas PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O DEe 7 2010 Show nearest landmark or cross street: . Provide nearest cross street name . Distance from the requested approach location to the nearest cross street . All public streets that abut the property(s) 734-2680 (8/08) Page 3 of 4 F U1-\It:Kt:Gt:.IVt:Ut:SYUUUI .;Jr' . ' IJ~' Oregon Department of Transportation land Use Compatibility Statement (lUCS) CHAIS ID # What is a LUCS? A Land Use Compatibility Statement (LUCS) is the fonn ODOT uses to ensure that Highway Approach Pennits are consistent with local land use requirements, Why is a Lues Required? ODOT Coordination Rules, OAR 731-015, identify Highway Approach Pennits as pennits that affect land use, State law requires ODOT activities that affect land use to be consistent with acknowledged local comprehensive plans... When is a LUCS Required? An ODOT LUCS must be submitted with every ODOT Highway Approach Penntt Application. How to Complete the LUCS; The applicant completes Section 1, Section 2 must be completed by the local jurisdiction_ The applicant then submits the completed LUCS to ODOT as part of the Highway Approach Penntt Application, :SECTJON1: Applicant & Sitelnfoimation Print applicant name: Damien Gilbert I Applicant signature: Property owner name: OBO Enterprises LLC Subject property address: #5175 & #5195 Main Street, Springfield, OR Site description: , residential lots, the house is removed from #5175, the house remains on #5195 but will be torn down for new development Describe the proposed activity, use, or development, includin9 type and volume of traffic it will generate, llulti-family use, fast food drive through restaurant : Township(s) Range(s) Section(s) Tax lot(s) 178 02W 33 06200,06300 SECTION 2 must be filled out by a local Planning Official SECTION 2: Determination of Compliance with local land Use Requirements fhe subject property is: Sil'lnside 0 Outside City Umns Ifi Inside 0, Outside UGB ~urrent Comprehensive Plan designation: k'\;}, ~ d lJbe Current zoning: C 601110 un;.,[ 1 (6 mrn.,f (' ',", \ s a Comprehensive Plan or zoning amendment proposed? YES 0 NO Itl f YES, list the proposed plan designation: proposed zoning: )oes the activity, use, or development require land use review to detennine compliance with land use regulations? YES IX( NO 0 f NO, tt means that no local land use review is needed. Skip to Local Planning Officiallnfonnation below. fYES, what is the status of the land use application: 0 Approved 0 Denied 0 Under review ~Notyet received Ust file number(s): Is the decision final: YES 0 NO 0 Comments: (1~ {'-/::7 'rint planning official's name and titie: k-,n'So} ?Ifl{'\l"\fl- Z :mail: Zip Code: <1 J -4 f Fax: '^ 5., \. 7z.Lr:- _._ ..... .....1\ Ill'" a I 1"\"'''11''\ jJI<i:-;)Ul:iIVIIIIMI. 1\1;\1 LI DEe 7 LU ~ailing Address: - Z' -. f L :-:J l--\'-1fl.\ S ;ity: () \ '5 '-mr.-I;-i'(' Ie )hone:) A 5' \ 1- /2, r' .'S&:: "1 c. c) , Of!.. ~1 5 =C=' - ,c;c1 - c.' - 7':)" 1')001"1 fOlt"'lO\ n~_.....A ....L.II N "'a -' '" w_ ~i.L~ N C> n o ~ co t'- g::~ ~~fJZ iif~ci ~:i;:! "I::'"' ~ 15::11'" ~~~3 2 z ci , ~ g ~ ,. ~ N . . s ~ ~ g ~ " ~ g ::< ;s:g :s:~ " .< ~ gg o (\.1"- 1 !i 5 ;=-~::- w ui~ ~z. "":6 -Q '" "'w oz. w::d Ul , n '<I'N '-.~ ~ N ~~ Ul~ '<I'~ '-.w :s: z .,; ~~ . ~ mm It IT <:0 U c:flffl 33S ,~~ ~~; a~ti '-!~3 ~.-! ~a:ci Iil;l:(l .....~.,_ , , ,~ g ".:::. . ,. 'N cl- ..~ <> ::.-\"'-il"i ....... " ~l ;;0.: . ~ ~ ., .~-.;;;::~--- ~ ....'........-. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i. ! . ~ ;~ - HI , . ~ ~ ~ . ~ .~ . , 0 . , 0 ~ g'\ <r= 0 ~; ....... A..""", , j , ~ n g ~ . " ~ . g . :.-----p;;..;;;::.!J-"'P.;;;;..-- - ...........-.----:-.........s -........_,1" ........."""'" AlNO NOllliXlil ONIi lN3~SS3SSIi dO.:! x~ ~u ~. ~4- l?Zt:ZOHd'lffl:ES ;n! 'to ;I.. ;; ~ ~ ~ N , he , . . ~ l ! ~ ~ ~ ~ -- i !i: "':; '0 .~ . -J~"""'#=0N2s.L _ - - ~ . . ~~ ~ ~ C!l :;: . '. N ~' "'l'o&f:'O l ~-35'tilJ- .I""'Z I i.. ~ H~ 0 H~ c:; I~.. .. ~ ~ .ISIS . , -,--......- ). ;; . . I n........._ _A..........' . . ~ " g w .:: ~ , 0 ~ ~ :.. lDlllS---- ~ 8 ; '. o ; .---....--- '. .~ W ~I W . "" u ::;: ....:.-":-."Y , \ . 0 ~1. '~ J' =:!!J'~= "':"~"....-:;:". PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D DEe 7 2010 N "'a --' "'w "'G:: N" o~ n::: t'-Q.. Ul . n ~ ~ ~ !j; IJ! n n -, to",," 3.~~ I I'l ;:,., ~ ~ J~~ . I t: g . , ;; 8 . I . ~~ I _ 1l10g '. 8 '!l! j J. t gO' 1'0' wI. 01 <( ..;.,jl ,a.., I L " I': I~ ~ " I~ ~ g ~ )" I~ ) " . tnl liOl .30' j.3.' L;-- f 60' . . T,"\Y ['ViA ~ T)G'rl~\l,. n - 01.-<5'5 - 3;2.. HIGHWAY I x~ I . 1~ 10:: :~ . ~ ~~I ,~ 'if S; 8... ""'e, '53.41' e Ron & Robin Spencer (\j "-'! 'C.2-3?"-~'I~' - ~ ~. () t,q 0\- I Ig"" ~ I IBS, 78' 'I I JAa.41' 6300 0.69 AC. 6200 f ~ " clBO Enteirises OBO Enterprises , ~;, . . :1..; ~~ I j 87 "4-+'.E I f/O' 6203 ~ . Harold &;, ;., I o . ~ ~ "' Paullne 1>, . '" . Mesberg ~ .... lJD=' .r. 86'#'''. ~ ......0-lA'1'I. /df.7',r -"0 6201 h ~ '" Vidalia Ort z ~ & Nereo Bur g / .?". :7 J' ~ 6202 ~ . , " . ~~ . " f., #n'H~ IBS.78~. 589""'44'E SEE MAP, 17 02 33 34 .. ;,..-,M,IVIHTAl REC'O DEe 7 2010 ;;{ ~ G ~,,~ ~g g~ 2~~ ., gLtL6 NOQ3~0 '0l3L:1QNI~dS ~~l-aI ,-- ;~(.!lg :l:l:'lg',,$!ll)lD :::JZ o ~N UllJ)- '0 ..OJ ,......0 133~lS NIVI^J <;;6l<;; l\' <;;n<;; ?il';::- . QJ0[J g~o ,.... ><~ r<{ " - J;'z dial.~ ~~:g . 0.. ...J ~ ffi -z . Wo.. . f-- 5 <! ~ ~ ., ',. . Jll SJSI~d~J1NJ 080 g ",-' .0 e U ~ u "Q. 0 ZW t; ~ 133dlS NI\i~ puze; J? tSle; 01- aLl'! @ UVl g:f5o~ ~ z w E'y: gz I- U If) --' .,,-: iE:2 h2 <( '---/ --' <( (L U :z ozl-- is .z ii.:l (J) - <{ ii.:l <J) - :2 . w w 0:::: I- (f) u.J U 2 2~ 0",<( !D~iiZ >u<( p U LU 0 e:::c; ~:'. :2: rnU cr:; Cl , 'w .. -, ..... f .. 01 ~ .. .. .. -: --:... .. .. ~,~ .. .. .. .. . .. ;_1 "'5+ .. .. .. .. I> .. to ~.- '" .. ~O-,i7,2 .... .~- .. T................ ....... L_......... .. .. .. .. .. .. "II )l~ r I-- - - -+==-~ .!. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ~ it . ..... - NIY'J" r -,.: -. ~ · ... · I I I. .! · · '::2; ,6-p ..; . ., "' 1 I \: ~ 00 · -. · L I ",,' . · ~7' - - >--_-1 . 0 If) ..., ( l . '" '--, I , .. ~ ~ ... - - I-- ,r- I ..... .... U-J ...J ...... 0.... .... C\JLL ...... <:( N 0 _ t-.--.J .. .. .. .. .. ::;;1")0 I-- 1 ..-" . . . II") I ........ ... _(j) to C.D _ I _-.J .. .. .. .. .. n::: n I- -' .. .. -* .. 010.-1--, .... 1'.', lfl N -' I ::2; 1 [;J 'T x C >--_-1 L' · :.a 0 · · lfl I"- <( 1-. 1 => ~ r .' ,I lfl~1- I 0 ... <( If) ...... . _ ~_-1 C . .. :l5 ~ ... .. ...J ... ::::r NLL ... <( .. .... b ... I l- J." 5~i0 . .I::l - Z . ::2; 0 ::l I .2 '.' ~iRl!) . . ::2; 6::::' .. )-, :r: (f) . .. Dl u.J .. o~~ .. .. \--oZ . (f) ::2; <( .. .. C\! Lt <...!) .. .... ~\ ~<. :-. ~ .. 1>. . . . .,:.:. . . . . ~.. .1 . . . . ., . . . . . ., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . '1 . . . . . . e-- . dhl. , ~I~' .o-,~ (Q ::2; 0u.J 0> ""0 Olfl u.J<( Ifllf) -I- ~:'S ~LL (.Q;JeJ1S lVJOl) :3>-, 6~ (" 9~ '::1 iiZlS rrJ~ ~rk1 1 :3 :3 ~ 1 S o N z ~ )f;'/ --,....... '.... - ., ... t . " . .. . .,......,.... .j............. (.~ ~.~, . . . . . . . I' , · . . , . . I ' . . . . . , . . . . . . . . o LL ::::!Z<eOJ <(&l 9lt! 8 -<(0 ::l _ Ifl (1') >-- ib ~ ~ u.J >u -1 o u.J ~f ~ o :5 :r /-, . I ~ {II . ., at ., . · . . . I:......J . " >-, . <(~ u.J 01- 2' > 3:ifi >-, "0 iiZ. ::2; <( l!)u.J i1; ['ll ~ ~ U) > u.J> u.JUJ ~ 0; ~ 8~ ru ... <.9 ~t.{ ~ ....[6 o<U ;\~ ~~ u.J6[] \' ~%~ ~~=~ ....... [6};-;F;;;:u.J" ~( -1 "Lt. t. ~<~>-' 1~\I,-~- ... . ij-r;{2 i6 ~ ~ 0 iiZ. -I ." ~.'j' 0 ~ -I-. 1 ..' , · "" O::l 0 0 .of-'.: 0 I .. ' · · , U 0 2 . 9[ "" 0 -1 LL <( -, ,'I'?J' 'Q [Q ",. r:-- V u.J<(... 1 --. ./ Ifl(f) I I- :::: ~ - ...._-1 . f ~LL ~I---, "O-,V2 ,~,...._JO-,:J2 (' 1-. 1 I ~, -1 . o u.J 2 W i'S 3: u.J Ifl . . . .e .e .... ;()- ~ jO-,:J2 f . ( ~ 'V .O.,v2 .,:J~ . . -.. D~2(f) I 1 0;':::J I u.J00 __ -1 N <0 I- I: b , 't N , O(f) u.Jlf)", (f)0:::J ~es~ ~ /.... ~ .:.~ ., . . . . !.... i"\ ';J 11""'-, H ! N .,.. ::2; o ~ o :l5~ _LL - . ., . . ., . .. .. . o " .. .. . . . '- I I g~gj --I, u.Joo '" NIflI-I: \: .. . tt " . .. . \. .. " t\.. .. .. " t " .. ".\" . .. .. '" ::2; o ~ O(f) :l5:s NLL ~ I::: .-- ~ . . . . . . . . . - t-- . . . . . . . . . . ~ 10.......& .' <- '>~":"Antl\\ 1\ \l!1-1I1 IIl1nll II t .. .. · .. · ~...".,... ~ .... ~.... .. ( . ~~1. . . .. ~ ~ ,.::. ~ ::::....-: l- t b- ... .. 'n .... . ~ .. . . . ( . 1= .. . . . .. !I- ... .. Ii= .. Il>> .. .. . I> e -:-: . . . . }-- t. o i;=; .. ~ :: ~:: · .. .. .. ... ...." 0> . .. . .. C1 l .. . .. .. .. ., .. .. . 0+ .. .. . ..'.. . . . . . .. .. ., .. . . .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. . ",. ., . . . .. .. .. . .. . .. .. ~. . . . III" .. · . .. .. .. · .. .. · . · . · .. .. .... . . . '....... .-- ::2; o ~ Olf) :l5~ NLL . a.. ... I' E ~.:.:. ~~. . . , . . . .. .. .. . . _t .. . t . Ib . . · .. .. .. .. .. tC> ...... 'Ill'" .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. l8 .. .. .. .. ~.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... ...... · · ~~. . .. .. ..lpt...t 0.( <(NO ::;;'(~ lfll")lO '0::':1- o lflN:J lflO W lfll"-<( lfl~1- '<( ,. I: 01- ::l2LL ~~lf) I:::l0 1-<(0 u.JrlO ~~N- o .- I '" -d ~~ ~~. .0 ;, , .1 ~ '1 ~ , u.J LL . [6 Non dAL dAL "O-,:Jll rlO-IV2 I '" "::2; iiZ , I 1- '" . ;- , en . .. .. .. ~ .. .. .. .. ..~ .. .. .. .. . . . .. .. .. .. --. ~ (.Q;JeJ1S lVJOl) ~ 022 b o <( ~~ (1') 02::2; :3 J V l d 1 S ~ _0lt! u.J- ~(f) 20 -1 j, () " '. (f) Z o f- <C ---.l ~ OJ <C f- C) Z ~ u::: <C [l o z w C) W ---1 LL 0 to Z <C ~ D- o n W l- t{) - (J) 0 ~ '<( :=) I- D- W U "0 I, Z "0 I") 0 II U , ~ z(~ (f)(f)(f) u.Jll.Ju.J U~U <((L<( (L .~ (L (f) "' (f) If)(1')C() _'l"lf) <.'l II 2 0 ~ 2 0': ~II <(-1 01l(L<( u.J(f)ll.Jb (f)u.JUI- 00<( (La ~'\Q o<<(::J lL0(f) u . O(f)[j(f)(f) If)t5y~t:3 N<(~<(<( J,n...o...n...(L .(f)(f)lf)lf) 'l"0l!)(1')C() ':I_C\lNl!) Ifl ~ 1/511 II e::.oo 02011 2 - ~~-10 ilZul-- <(<(zx (L(L<( u.J(f)""(f) ::::J ::JI- u=:!<(z :c ~<( ~I-::J II u.J 0-' > 2<( Ol.l...t1-.-1- it!l!)lf)::Jf2 -Oo!;! ::J000 OOl!) ll.J . -l!) 1:1.:::::('\')(\1_ f-- 2 iiZ 5 f2 o 2. is =! ::::J [(J _1Omx..llpa~_5 <( it! <( u.J lL <( U If) o 2 S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - -e- - -=- -=- -=- ""::-OH =-=- ~~ - - - - - r - - - - - - - - - - - ' P ,:J -=--=--=--=--=--=-=-=-=-=15" SF--illiP- == III .~~_ . .. 7& . . ,,51st PL . 'O'v'------~ =1:l1'\' ~960--8 ww---------..".,---.8" ww-_.--Gg_~.~,,- -L ___ HHH" -----:::--"l=' a ~/ /-\igu ""1 I -495 a ' I 8' 51 -=' ":.... . 6" W '" - T . ! 4960---~"i.___. ~6.Q=; _~ -496. '~ . ~I~~ I J-c""-'c 'IIi I a 1 I /A 'd" -' 9&8 11 . \1'" 0 'i' 500'OI'41"W 152.16",'1 ~I )i: ....111 .11, :J:;~I", ]~I-: .)It ;ijll 'III r ,dll ,'II ~ ~ " 1 'l 1 t:: I .:;: ;;! >< ~ o iri Rl o o .. '" .... o o ~"'- """, "'a "'a a 1- '8 0/ ",! co <0 -" ... a- a r.,~ . ~'" "" "'13 "'0 <::J C) '" ~ "oJ NOO'OI' 1 "f 52;:: 14.36 ;;::iJ ~ ~ /.> , 1-~ / ' ..90 'V /'u> " <:: ,... '" '" ~ ~ Z II\.. ~ fTl x 'D =;. (]) Y! '-- <:: OJ Cll tN .0 '" 0 - '" ~ z;g 2 ~ ~e ~~ -1!ti~ ~ z ~ " o '" "-:> ' .:, I I ;;:; "" , , 1- '8 '0> :g <0 -" ... ci. a ",' '... ~~~ ,----------- -~- ~ ~ ....QZ. C) ~ .....".......... ~ ~. " ;;~,-J --'19/.0--., -s <;> I I I ~ .~ I '" "" I I ~ I I ~ .1 I "1 I I I I I I ... -S . r p:j.t>.. ~~ "':u co '" " a a (- .~~I g~1 "'t;1 . -< I III 11 500'01 '41'W' 80.1c \ 1- '8 't> ;:- .- ~ ~ ~~~Cl~ ~~~~~\.: ;::S2:u,.", '& a C") S::::!,:;::! 'q ~[tlS3~'" ) a , o / ,. ", .> .",. :.... :" \ '.;:~~.." '.. .' :.::.~::?~ .....( ,", b.' . ~", ,.' " ~ /.> '0 \r ~ '? 217.80 ,fi // // // // // // 1( /(/ o-<-<:J/ /,/ // "/% 1- 'tc 00 "~~ ~:- - 1 ) II 1 II ! ~~. ~ . t:: 1 ! @@ B ~ m 8 ~m 1 + '" 0 X 0- {; (!II (!:I ~II iI i : ," I I I 1 . . , I I I I I "'OJ 1 de: , 'tJ'" , II I I - .1 r I , I I '" II 'i' ~2~~~9~ tn ltI ltI ltI ltI ltI ~. ~~~~~~~ I.:l (;) I.:l c;') I;"j.., l;) ~~~~~~8 ~ it: ~ ::t::!; g ~3:n ~~g s: ~ ~ I!! 1>'1 Ul ~6M z~~ ::t ~ :ti ~ fT1 ~ g g g g g g g g ~ g ~ ~ g ~ ~ g~ g g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul ltI ltI Ul ltI ltI ltI ltI ltI ltI ltI Ul ltI ~ ltI ltI ltI 0 0 ~ i i i ~ ~ i i i ~ i i i i i i i i i z i i i ~ ~ ~ I.:l I.:l I;) l;) I;) l;) I;) I;) I.:l a I.:l n I;) I.:l n I.:l I;) I;) I.:l I.:l c;') I.:l ~ ~ ~ ~ ltI V I.:l ~ I;"j n m ~ ~ 0 I.:l ltI ~ ~ m ~ > ~ 0 > ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 8 ~ c 0 ~ P 1>'1 ~ Ul ~ M M > ~ b 0 ~ ~ Ul ~ 0 ltI 1>'1 n ~ I.:l Z ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ M ~ 1>'1 ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~.., B B ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ltI ~ $ Z ltI I.:l M fT1 ~ ~ z Z 1>'1 ~ ~ 5 > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z c c ~ ~ ~ "l ~ Z Z '" ~ . Salem Office 147 Comm~rdol SL NB. Sullo 10 Salem, Orecon 07301 1003)710-2577 PROJCCT TlTlC: OBO ENTERPRISES, LLC 5175 & 5195 MAIN STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR REVISIONS REVISION DESCRIPTION: BY: o .., ~ 11 ~ Branch Engineering, Inc, M i>t~ DATE: H..dquortm :1I0FiIIhBtreel Sprlncfield,Orelon07m (MI) HlI...{1637 '" >: '" .9. ~ o n (:) .... g f t::I t:I ~ 1( ~ tn l;) l;} III "'" :" '" 0 '" " ~ DCSCRIPTlON: ODOT DRIVEWAY PERMIT APPLlCA nON lf1'Fll".BrlillchEnginecring.com -- . ,..\/1...."1'"'..',.. ..............',....,,"1'"'1"'\.1.'.... . . . . STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN AND DRAINAGE STUDY FOR 51st-52nd & Main Street Redevelopment Springfield, OR "'~"':. December 6,2010 Prepared For: TBG Architects 132 E. Broadway, Suite 200 Eugene, OR 97401 Branch Engineering, Inc. 310 5th Street Springfield, OR 97477 Phone (541) 746-0637 Fax (541) 746-0389 ~ Branch Engineering, Inc. Branch Project # 09-159 PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D DEC:'7201O 11/17/2010 12:09 FAX 541 7~021 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD . IgJ002 PUBLIC WORJ(S DEPARTMENT / Engineering Division , Fax; (541) 736-1021 ;"~~~?f~;:~~( (~~,l7;' X;;L;;/~~{~~~~:1.'~t:.~-t~~~f'~~~2;"il!~~{::~L~t,~:.'~~~l:'!;'~~:"~{~~ ~~ 'j SPR1NGFlI:L.D STORMW ATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK _ (ATea below Ihi.linefUled oul by AppllclUlt)- (pleaseretllm 10 Mati S(ol,lder@City of Springfield PrlbHc Work. Engineering; Fax # 736-1021, Phone #73~l035,) Projec:t Name: OBO Enterprises, LLC Assessors Parcel #: 17-02-33-32 TL 6200 & 6300 Land Use(s): Community Commercial (CC) Project Size (Aeres): 1.5 acres Approx.bn,~~~u8 Af~a: , 1.07 acres Applicant: Date: Phone #: Fu#: Emai1: .com :,;,;:,., Project DelIcription (lndude a copy of Assessor's'map): 1.5 acres site with two commercial buildings near Main Street and a IS unit apartment building to the south of the commercial buildings with associated landscaping ";d parking facilities. Drainage Proposal (public eonnection(s), discharge loeation(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: West side of the site will drain toward 5 I" Plaec and connect to the existing storm line in the street. The east side of the site will drain towa,d 52nd Stieet and connect to the existing storm line in the ,treet. Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices: Infiltration basins and planters will be used on-site witb overflows and trapped carch basins. , ',., ',' 'rA;;;a b~iow this IlIre filled out bv II,e Citvand Re(Jlrned /0 the A"plicant) ,..,' " ,,(Ar a minimum, all baxes checked by the City on I},.front and backofihis:;.,.'eeishalf heiubm}ried. ." . '.:._.)q~;Wi cpplicalion to bE! cOT!lpletc for submittal, although ,othe,. relJ1.lir;em~~s.may be ne~~s~~) ,;.~. '>:. Draina!?:" Study Tvv" (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): <Note. un may be substituted for Rational Method) o Small Site Study - (use Rational Method for dlculations) If4 Mid-Level Development Study - (useVnit HydTDgmph Method for caJculatiom) o Full Drainage Development Study - (use Unit Hydrog.-aph Method for calculations) Environmental Considerations: !y Wellhead Zone: '1l:\ '<t:,--( @ WetIandlRiparian: . , If) Soil Type: 11'1 - ~ ,,"^ ~~ ..'10 Downstream Analvsis: ~ OB NIA o Flow line for starting water swiace elevati~n: o Design HGL to ';se for starting water surface elevation: o Manhole/Junction to take analysis to; I Hillside Development: ~ Floodway/Floodplain: "J/f Other Jurisdictions: OD~ Return to Matt Stouder email: mstoude L\(P0Ll q. z- ., Rp.vISe:d 11/] 9109 9 of 10 11/17/2010 12:09 FAX 541 7~021 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD ... 141003 ~ Zi 10 ~ iiI COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS I Fo,Offici.J U" Only: tq.A<: % Based 'UpOJ1 the ;nformaz;on provided on the Font oflhis Shef!I~ the. following represents 0 minimum of what is neededfor an application /0 be complete for submittal with resp.ct 10 dro(nage; however, Ihis lisl shauld not be IIsed in lie" oflhe Springfield Development Code (SDC) or the City's Engineering Desigri"Marrual. CompUonce. with these. requirements does nor constitute site approval; Additional site specific infonnalion may be required. Note: Upon seoping sheet submittal, ensure compleled form has been signed in the space provided below: Interim Desigu StandardslWater Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3) Reg'd N/A . iii 0 AD non-building toollop (NBR) impervious sumces shall be pr..-treated (e.g. multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil filtration media) fOT stormwater quality. Additionally, a minimum of 50% oftbe NBR impervious surfaGe shall be treated by vegetated methods. . o WheTe required, vegetAtive stonnwarer design shall be coosistent with interim design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth by the Bureau of Environmcntal Services (BES) or Clean Water Services (CWS). o For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified by ule BES for vegetative treatment. o If a stonnwater treatment swale is proposed, submn calculations/specjfiG.tions for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes, bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with either BES or ews requiroments. o Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 oftbe EDSPM o All building roollop mounted equipment, or Olber Iluid containing equipmcnt located outside of the building, shall be provided with secondary containment or wca~er resistant enclosure. General Study Requirement. (EDSPM Section 4.03) Iii 0 Drsin.ge study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon. o 0 A cOlllplete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1. including a hydrological study map. ~ 0 Calculations showing system capacity fOT 112-ye~ storm event and overflow effects ofa 25-year storm event. 51 0 The time of concentration (TG) shall be determined using a JO minute stan time for developed basins. " . Review of Downstream System (EDSI'M Section 4.03.4.Q o fti. A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSe).' o ~. Elevations of the HGL and flow Iioes for both city and privare systems where applicable. Design o.f Storm Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04) jjj... 0 Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and .sizes clearly indicated on !he plan set. o IJi Minimum p;pe cover shall be 18 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plaiJ) concrete Wld plastic pipe m8tcrials~ or proper engineering calculatiolls shall be provided when Jess. The cover shan be sufficient to support an 80,000 Ib load witbout failure of the pipe structure. D ell Manning', "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with TAble 4-1 of the EDSP. All stonn p.ipes shall be designed to achieve a m.in;.nlUm velocity ofthrcc (3) fcet per,s~ood at 0.5 pipe full based on Table 4~1 as welL OtberlMisc 3d 0 Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains fJI 0 Private stonnwater easements shan be clearly depicted On plans when private stormwarer flows from one property to anotber o l1& Drywells shall 1)ot receive runoff from any surta.ce w/o being treated by one or more BMPs~ with the exception of residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03.4:A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to the websjte: www.deo_state.or.uslwa/l!roundwa/uichome.hcmfor more infomlation. ~ 0 Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre-development mtes for the 2 through 25-year storm events "Thlsform slrall be included as an att~chment, inside tlteftont cover, oft/Ie stormwaler study 1 As the engineer of record. ] hereby certify the above requ~ed items are c~mp]ete and included with the submitted stOJmwater study and plaa-, set. Signature: . IMPORTANT: ENGINEER PLEASE JlEA.D PELOW AND SIGN! Date: PRE.SUBMITTAL RECID DEe: 7 2010 Revised 11(19/09 10 of 10 . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51".52od & Main Street Redevelopment Introduction This evaluation was prepared to summarize the drainage system proposed for the 5lst-52nd & Main Street Redevelopment. This storm drainage evaluation will determine the type and size of water quality/quantity facilities that are acceptable to the City of Springfield. The 5 I st-52nd & Main Street Redevelopment is located on the south side of Main Street and east of 5 I st Place and west of 52nd Street in Springfield, Oregon. The proposed project site is comprised of two tax lots, TMI 7023332 TL 6200 and TL 6300. Kristin!!: Conditions The existing site is bounded by Main Street to the north, 5 I 51 place to the west, 52nd Street to the east and residential to the south. The site consists of an existing building, a burned down existing building, driveways and landscaping. The impervious surfaces consist of roofs. The pervious surfaces consist of landscaping. According to the Soils Survey of Lane County, Oregon, by the Natural Resource Conservation Service, the soil at the site is Salem Urban Land Complex (Soil Number: 119, Hydrologic Group: B). Refer to Appendix A for soils map information. Proposed Site Conditions The proposed project includes two new commercial buildings, three buildings with townhomes with associated parking, sidewalks and landscaping. The parking and drive aisles will consist of asphalt pavement and the sidewalks will be concrete. Water Quality Treatment and Storm Water Conveyance System The City of Springfield is encouraging as much infiltration on this site as possible. Therefore, the site is proposed to have drainage basins which will flow to infiltration basins located across the site. The infiltration basins will be landscaped with appropriate vegetation and topsoil to allow treatment and infiltration of stormwater. Infiltration testing was conducted and the site was detennined to have adequate infiltration rates to serve the proposed improvements. See the table below for infiltration results and information. Test Test Location Test Test Soils Measured Depth infiltration Rate I Northwest corner 48" 0-12" Topsoil of site 12-36" light brown clayey silt moist 4.5 incheslhour 36"-42" light brown clayey silt 42"-48" Bar Run See Appendix B for the infiltration testing data. There are three proposed infiltration basins proposed on the site. Each is primarily treating parking areas however one is also infiltrating runoff from one of the proposed buildings roof. See Appendix C for the proposed Drainage Basin Map for location of infiltration basins and the areas they are treating and infiltrating. Below is a brief description of each. Infiltration Basin A Infiltration Basin A is located on the west side of the site and east ofthe proposed drive-thru restaurant. Infiltration Basin A will have asphalt parking, building rooftop anll.t4ln9.'i<;iUliJJ.g,.lka~ to it. The basin draining to Infiltration Basin A is 0.43 acres. One side has a 3rt<ti~'/lHM\b ~.D DEe .'7 l010 Storm Drainage Evaluation 51 s'.5Znd Ii Main Street Redevelopment other has a short retaining wall. Infiltration Basin A has approximately 2,000 cubic feet of storage. Infiltration Basin A is bisected by a concrete sidewalk and a 6" storm pipe is proposed to go under the concrete sidewalk to allow Infiltration Basin A to act as one basin. Infiltration Basin A is two feet deep from the top ofthe growing medium to the overflow. This depth was required because the overflow for Infiltration Basin B is piped to Infiltration Basin A and the invert of the overflow pipe from Infiltration Basin B required this depth. The overflow for Infiltration A is connected to a proposed curb inlet in 51 s, Place that will be constructed under a Public Improvement Permit. . . Infiltration Basin B Infiltration Basin B is located on the north side of the site along Main Street and west of the proposed aD aT driveway approach. Infiltration Basin B will have asphalt parking and landscaping draining to it. The basin draining to Infiltration Basin B is 0.15 acres. Infiltration Basin B is one foot deep from the top of the growing medium to the overflow and has 3:1 side slopes. Infiltration Basin B has approximately 485 cubic feet'of storage. Infiltration Basin B is bisected by a concrete sidewalk and a 6" storm pipe is proposed to go under the concrete sidewalk to allow Infiltration Basin B to act as one basin. The overflow for Infiltration Basin B is piped to Infiltration Basin A. Infiltration Basin C Infiltration Basin C is located on the north side of the site along Main Street and west of the proposed commercial building. Infiltration Basin C will have asphalt parking and landscaping draining to it. The basin draining to Infiltration Basin C is 0.43 acres. Infiltration Basin C is one foot deep from the top of the growing medium to the overflow and has 3: I side slopes. Infiltration Basin C has approximately 213 cubic feet of storage. The overflow for Infiltration Basin C is directed to a nearby private storm line to be conveyed offsite to the existing 12" storm line in 52nd Street. Other drainage basins on the site will be treated by double chambered catch basins with filter inserts and conveyed through storm pipes to the public storm system. Stormwater Runoff Peak discharge rates for the post development conditions were generated using the Santa Barbara Unit Hydrograph method. The King County Department of Public Works, Surface Water Management Division, Hydrographs Programs, Version 4.21 B computer program was used to assist in the hydrologic calculations. See Appendix D for the stormwater runoff results. Below is a summary of the results for each drainage basin. Proposed Conditions Peak Discharge Rates (cfs) Storm Basin A Basin B Basin C 2 Year (3.3 inches/24 hours) 0.26 0.09 0.05 25 Year (4.8 inches/24 hours) 0.40 0.13 0.08 PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'D DEe /.7 2010 . . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51".52'" 8: Main Street RedeveLopment InfIltration Basin Sizine Each infiltration basin is characterized in a spreadsheet to be used with the King County Department of Public Works, Surface Water Management Division, Hydrographs Programs, Version 4.2lB computer program for routing the developed storm through the infiltration basin. The routing data can be found in Appendix D as well as the infiltration volumes and the required storage for each infiltration basin. Below is a summary of each infiltration basin. Infiltration Basin A Below is a sununary of the peak flow rates and the peak elevation the stormwater will get in Infiltration Basin A during the 2 year and 25 year storm. Pror osed Infiltration Basin A Storm Peak inflow (cfs) Peak outflow (cfs) Water Elevation (feet) 2 Year 0.26 .06 495.20 25 Year 0.40 .07 495.95 Infiltration Basin A has approximately 2,000 cubic feet of storage. The overflow is set at an elevation of 496.00. The results show that even during the 25 year storm, the water does not reach the overflow. This will maximize infiltration opportunity and provide an additional factor of safety. The infiltration basin will be landscaped in accordance with the City of Springfield requirements. Infiltration Basin B Below is a sununary ofthe peak flow rates and the peak elevation the stormwater will get in Infiltration Basin B during the 2 year and 25 year storm. Proposed Infiltration Basin B Storm Peak inflow (cfs) Peak outflow (cfs) Water Elevation (feet) 2 Year 0.09 .04 496.34 25 Year 0.13 .05 496.58 Infiltration Basin B has approximately 485 cubic feet of storage. The overflow is set at an elevation of 496.90. The results show that even during the 25 year storm, the water does not reach the overflow. This will maximize infiltration opportunity and provide an additional factor of safety. The infiltration basin will be landscaped in accordance with the City of Springfield requirements. Infiltration Basin C Below is a sununary of the peak flow rates and the peak elevation the stormwater will get in Infiltration Basin C during the 2 year and 25 year storm. Pror osed Infiltration Basin C Storm Peak inflow (cfs) Peak outflow (cfs) Water Elevation (feet) 2 Year 0.05 .01 496.58 25 Year 0.08 .07 496.79 Infiltration Basin C has approximately 213 cubic feet of storage. The overflow is set at an elevation of 496.75. The results show that the 2 year storm is completely contained within Infiltration Basin C but during the 25 year storm, the storm water will reach the overflow and the stornpm:!SUBMlffAL REe'D DEe '7 2010 Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-520' & Main Street Redevelopment inch above the overflow elevation. The overflow is connected to an on-site private storm line that eventually flows to the public storm system in 52nd Street. The infiltration basin will be landscaped in accordance with the City of Springfield requirements. . . The rest of the site will drain to double chambered catch basins with filter inserts located in the parking areas and roof drains from the east commercial building and the townhouses will be directed to on-site private storm line that eventually flows to the public storm system in 52nd Street. See Appendix D for stormwater runoff, routing and infiltration basin stage-storage-outflow calculations. See Appendix E for Infiltration swale section and double chamber catch basin with filter insert. PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'D DEe " 2010 . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52'd 8: Main Street Redevelopment Appendix A Soil Maps and Soil Data PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'O DEe"7 2010 ci=' oz "'w i"::;; 0"- -0 "'-, i"w "=> ,.,w -0 5w 00: Of- "w cw "'0: -'f- 6.", "z e- t')"= -::;; '006 "'0 .9 Z "'N .2", o . ~f- "OlI) ,.,~ Ie o o o ci <:'! t " "" '" n; "0 " 2i .e '" E Q; " "" '" 0. '" E z o i= <( :E 0:: o u.. Z D.. <( :E " ~ in > ~ 0 " "= N '.. "= c o "0 " co 'c a. - x "" :; ~ g, " " 5 .!!! Q) 0.. (ij E u o '" u t- o <<> m n; L> = " CIJ ;;; . >- C 2 ~ 0 c ~ z. E III ~ <D " " '" '" '" '" " " 0: E ~ 13 '" a. '" ::;; '0 '" " "" f- o z w Cl W ...J D.. <( :E o ,,;. .. . ~ i5 E ;!..o ro ;; . ~ .;c ~ -= - ~ "j ~ e '~...l "0 < '" a. '" E " n; " 8 '" i'l1; .- '" 2: '" ,,"0 "'''l ,Q 11 me ~ >.~ ""0 ~~<{ o~z u=z Ulgo i'lL>~ ~ " " 6 ~ g ~ ci.N 0:"'::;; -""f- ~..=> n;-' z~E ,.,2 ci.~~ ~:J(I) lI)" o=m 8~:5 :;~ 0 ~~8 2 E ::> o ro :E '0 '" '" e>< c " ro "' oGDIIDDl1m '" . o <: - o '" '" '" n; "0 "0 " '" " i'l '" U 0: Z <l: o '" ::> " "" . - ;< Eo Edi - L> "0"0 2 " "'u; ii)= c- ,,~ "''' .~ m _"0 u c " 0 "0._ e I!? c." '" > ~:E "' o iD c o "'0 i"~ 00 N "'- ,,'" ~L> "=" ",LL c - ,,"' DC () ,9 " I!? c" ~> '" c Q) ;g ~ "" " "0 '" ;: c 0 ~ 5 .!: .~ ~ E -><" '0 ~ E '" L> 0 "" '" ~~....; ~E~ :ce~ 3:;- ro.....; c ~ CIJ ~ o ~ <(:E g." :f ij) E~mQ) Q)~E.o :<<.g ~ ~ ~ o.~ E Q)"U +' <II .s Q) C .~ O.t:::f 0 m o15,~-g .B '5 ~ 6 O"U 0..0 "5. ~ .!!?~ o "0 c .c u ~::I VI t::~Q)Q. ID 0 a..rnfO m Q) ErtlE o ~ 8.So i '" o o N ;, iD -0 " "" a. '" 0, o "0 "" 0. i" " ;0 '" " '" '" .!; .. co "'- " '" ~o "=", ,.,,, " ~ 2:< " ,., lI) " ._ 2: o " ",lI) " .~ '" . :0 -" " > ro " c o u . 1'! " o i3 o " z '" '" e ~ .a u ro . ~ .. o " :2 0 .e o . .. ;: ~ '" '" . E 8 B . . ~ Il '" '" c . " u c ro . E ro E in . !!! c "ffi ~ 0::: . " o o '" c ~ .... ,$' ~ < . ,., ~ ~ e> :i: ... '" ~ . E . . '5 o "' "' ::> . u ro o "' " 'm :E . u ro o '" ~ o ~ on 0'0 ~N -" N '" ~'" "- ,., " 2: " '" iU'5 2:'" " " VJ .~ ._ en o ~ lI)~ L> 0 " 0 s:U " c o .~ Z " u (I) .~ " " ~lI) " e: 00 In:w 0: '" -l: '" " ~ '" Be: '" 0 zu g\1 _,1 <: .~ DEe Hydrologic Soil Group-Lane County AreatgOn . 51ST-52ND & MAIN STREET REDEVELOPMENT Hydrologic Soil Group . _" '";. ~. '.<.' ". \ .:. .~' }\~'Ydfo~09iC Soil Group- Summary by MapUriit~. Lane County Are-~. Oregon ".: ~.Ma,P:~~W.~Yrn"bO_I'.:':\,:;>. ';. )tilap unit name Rating Acres in'AOI ,- .-?~,~r~ent9f"Aql":/,' - 119 Salem-Urbanlandcomplex Is' 1.5 100.0%1 Totals for Area of Interest 1.5 100.0% Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (AID, BID, and CID). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, .soils that have a c1aypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (AID, BID, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Lower 'USDA ""-= Natural Resources Conservation Service ;'Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'D DEe Ii 2010 12/1/2010 Page 3 of 3 . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52,d & Main Street Redevelopment Appendix B Infiltration Testing Report PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'O DEe ,.. 7 2010 . . Project Name: 0(2, 0 Vl\",XfI :Sl-~ <; it-<. Project No.: o"l-I~q Project Location: '5 It! PfG,(.(. j Sf"'''qC-rdc), Date ofField Work: Illb/to Comments: lx-~ r'r-UI,VK ~,,\kS. (,U"l-tr oj: lottoWl 6\ ~\t 11'\ PI{l( I, i:'< ',: ~ 1", ,,! I ), /'\ "'at t "' lev"'! ~v...vqh\-, b:'a< (-0 L~v0 ~.& 1--z:(f(( (1.~I&} heJovJ hp of-. f~) /fT wV'tv I .; ',', "'jn. (t(.lt(;1 Infiltration Test No. () Depth '+ Diameter J Vol. of Pres at. , ",.L Soil Description: ....:' ffll".~ d- 11'-"1' O~...,., o-J'"' "L't~I$". 11.- 7lI ...~tt r ,.f, ~ 1\-1\. r.v.rI 'Z-J'b " -0- Depth to Water '? Zit tI .6.:=- D Vol. of Water Added Time Time El<l<lSed "-- Infiltration Test No. Soil Description: Depth Diameter Vol. of Presat. Time Time Ela sed 'loAd pI\'-- IOj"'~n De th to Water -'111 -:J 'I b -:'O.(P~' hl- \:J~ OU~ --2ro ">, " ~~ PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'O DEe '., 72010 (/3 . Project Name: oBt? Mi/tl(l Sjrlj.-r S ;-..-( Project No.: 011-1,0} Project Location: r? (~J: pIlAr.<.. f t'v\'P\;f'r 'Sf F(d' Date ofField Work: 1(('3110 Comments: 5-e..e; Pi{ I Infiltration Test No. Z Depth Soil Description: Time Time Elapsed 1 ,5".t;> fM d> 'Ar" ~ Depth to Water '2, It (j II J 1~ A _....,," ,t--:. -- o. , Infiltration Test No. 3 Depth Soil Description: Time Time Elapsed ; /00 \l'rl'. ~O",,~h Depth to. Water ,~ € p\/c \ '" ~J;; % b:- Q.lc;l' . Diameter Vol. of Presat. Vol. of Water Added ", l '? ~ i~f~A "") "?.~1<9~! ) i .;.,,- . .... :;. '~;' / " II mi0 ---lZ tz> 7-" It" bH>G<jh+- Diameter Vol. of Pres at. Vol. of Water Added. .,;;;... I; ~. "'f' " "j if.;,; ~';i1 "?: ~ l"!' . i p . - oioY~:. J 1 '''''',1; -, ; 19 (1S"ri1 -;" P'r-t- bmJo.h.\--- V PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O DEC'7 20m tv "2.. ->/g" L/3 . . Project Name: ogo M.-," <;i". $;.<< Project No.: eoV;-IS-&' . I Project Location: 5' ,s..'" P\,kGt J s((f (0 Date ofField Work: II/5/[0 Comments: ~ pq , InfiItration Test No. tf Soil Description: Depth Diameter Vol. of Pres at. -, Time Time Elapsed -1' ~ ''D'- l"'h ..... ,-\ ....."",,\,, ,,' - Depth to Water "SiJ(~ lJ' n b:: 0") VoL of Water Added 4r. n , , t.:,.....'..'..<i,... O\~ 01) , ~5 _ A.S ,-1'\ "h lVIv- 19 ,ie; e.ver~' 10 fYtlf'.V bf' I ~ Pi l i.o-. \-;( {LVc~ --- Infiltration Test No. Soil Description: Depth Diameter Vol. of Presat. Time Time Elapsed Depth to,Water VoL of Water Added PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O DEe "7 2010 3/3 . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51st_52od Ii Main Street Redevelopment Appendix C Proposed Drainage Basin Map PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O DEC7 2010 ~ INFIL TRA TION TEST #1 '?; '." ,~ . / / / 1"1 0 ;\ . "-- --- , \'" J, 0 ! u:i "If ~ 'I; 'i li\ 1 ' h ct,! 1 : iJ)~ j1 ?il I, IJ , J~ 'o~~"> ~ ~ / / , M A IN / /"j STREV ,/ (' j , " --s:_ ~ I , I , t;l:. -.; i -; 1 . "i J I' / ~ to " () I ! " GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 1 5 30 60 ~II I ( IN FEET ) @ Branch Engineering, Inc. Headquarters Salem/Keizer Office 310 Fifth Street 4310 Cherry Avenue N,E. Springfield, Oregon 97477 Saiem. Oregon 97303 (541) 746-0637 PRE-SUBMmACREC~D www.BranchEngineering.com Civil' Structures . Transpo@ffi& . ~~I . Surveying PROJECT #09 159 III .:/ ,; /" . - '; ~ ,g ---- ....' -:~~-=--- ~ __ 1 ----- \; "--'-- -:-i I ~ 'j ~ 'I I , , ~ , . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"_520d & Main Street Redevelopment Appendix D Stormwater Runoff & Infiltration Basin Sizing Calculations PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O DEe '7 2010 . Ul ~ ~ <0 00 ..... 0> <n .f>. w N ~ or ~ 0 (Q CD .f>. .f>. .f>. .f>. .f>. .f>. .f>. .f>. .f>. .f>. .f>. m <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 (Q ro 0> 0> CJ> <n <n <n <n .f>. ;I>- .f>. .f>. S < <n N 0 ..... <n N 0 ..... <n N 0 - 9!. 0 <n 0 <n 0 <n 0 <n 0 <n 0 o. :J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <0 00 ..... 0> 0> w)> g>en 0> <n .f>. N ~ 0 ..... ..... 00 <0 ~ .o~ ::j.OJ N ~ 0 00 ..... ..... . CD OJ ~. w <n w ..... ..... ~ 0 .f>. w ..... .f>. 3.0> 0 :J CD _<Ul N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ..... <n w ~ ();o - CD ..... W <0 0> w 0 c '- 0 Q) 00 <n .f>. 0> 0 . c -. ((.l N W 0> W N .f>. ..... 0> <0 .f>. ~'3 ~ 5" .f>. N ..... ~ W N '-"";'CD CD - :J 0 0 --1.;0 "" en 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" a Q,m ?i OJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" ~ '" 00 00 ..... ..... 0> 0> <n <n .f>. w 0 _CD o. S :J 90 ~ (:J 0 0 0 (:J 0 0 0 0 0 - ,.(j) < <0 ..... 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 CD ~::r::j. 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (/),,00 - .f>. N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -~o <g ~ 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 in. )> 0 0 0 (:J (:J 0 0 0 0 ..... 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~::r <= ..... co ..... ..... 0> 0> <n <n ... w 0 '" OJ - ~ !!!. (Q CD . OJ ;;0 0 Z 0 en c:: 0 'TI ::t. m - Z z ::s :J r- 9!. 9!. CQ ro -I <. <. 0 -i3 ~ CD CD ~ II) in. Ul Ul z &r CD ~ Q. 9!. '" -I 0 0 <. C3 - CD CD CD <0 0 , '" '" Ul ~ Iii. Iii. ~ <n Z :J :J .!9 c:: "" " lJJ .. :J OJ :J CD "" "" 0 "" ~ '" '" 0 '" ~ ~ ~ ?i 9!. 9!. ~ en or 0 ;; o. o. ~ o. - or :J :J Ul :J Z CD ;:0 ;:0 OJ ;:0 < OJ OJ CD OJ ~ CD ro ~~ !if .. ::u iii' iD <n 0 .. C !" N ~ -I -l m N N .f>. , 0, - or 0 N 0 Z CD <n <n 0 0 .. s. G) CD :J 0- 3' - C1' ::r C iil 0 0 '" e e C CD ~ ~ ~ .. 0 !'! > Q Q ~ ~ 00 0 G'l ~ < < s. s. CD CD a ::j.;:j, ~ CD CD GJ -0 s: s: ~ ~ ~ = 0 ll> ll> '!:. CD ;:0 fC a. 0- m 00" 3: 2. 2. :J 3 3 (Q < ll> CD s: 9!. ~ c- o 0 0 e- ll> o. ll> CD 0- :J ~. 3 '" en Iii. Iii. e = :J :J 3 " :!l ~ :J OJ "" ;:;: "" 0 "" .f>. iil '" 0 '" ~ ?i ~ <0 - 9!. ~ 9!. CJ> 00 0' o. o. 0 o. 0 ::J ~ :J :J Ul:J 0 iil ;:0 ;:OOJ;:O lD OJ mc:Dro ~ ~~ CD ~ s. 0 .f>. ::r ll> 0> en w m N N b 0 0 0 <n 0 0 0 s. s. - - C1' ::r ::r 0 0 en e e ll> ~ ~ 0 " o m " PRE.5UBMllTAl REC'O DEe ...7 2010 . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51 ".52od a Main Street Redevelopment Inmtration Basin A - 2 Year Storm ******************** 5.C.5. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.30" TOTAL PREelP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.09,61,0.34,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .4 .1 61.0 .3 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) .26 7.83 3942 ENTER [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 9159-2a.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159a.rd DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? y ROUTING DATA: STAGE (FT) 494.00 494.25 494.50 494.75 495.00 495.25 495.50 495.75 496.00 496.25 496.50 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .03 .04 .05 .05 .06 .06 .07 .07 .78 2.07 STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 164.0 349.0 556.0 787.0 1042.0 1323.0 1631. 0 1967.0 2332.0 2724.0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES II NCH PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 ENTER [do] [path]filename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 9159-2a.dev INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .26 .06 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 10.67 PEAK STORAGE: 980 CU- FT OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 3898 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 495.20 PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'O DEe.. 7 2010 . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52nd & Main Street Redevelopment InfIltration Basin A - 25 Year Storm ******************** S.C.5. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* 25-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4.80" TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.09,61,0.34,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A eN .4 .1 61. 0 .3 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .40 7.83 6037 ENTER Cd:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF ~OMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 9159-25a.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY Cd:] [path]filename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159a.rd DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? y ROUTING DATA: STAGE (FT) 494.00 494.25 494.50 494.75 495.00 495.25 495.50 495.75 496.00 496.25 496.50 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .03 .04 .05 .05 .06 .06 .07 .07 .78 2.07 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 164.0 349.0 556.0 787.0 1042.0 1323.0 1631. 0 1967.0 2332.0 2724.0 .0 MINUTES II NCH PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 ..0 ENTER [do] [path]filename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 9159-25a. dev INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) .40 PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .07 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) .00 TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) 12.67 PEAK STORAGE: 1900 CU-FT OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 6041 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 495.95 PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'O DEe: . 7 2010 . (f) Q) 01 ... W '" ~ iii <0 CD ... ... ... ... ... ... m CD CD CD CD CD CD m ..... Q) Q) Q) Q) 01 ;:p:Qi ~ CD m :,. ~ CD -'!:!': 01 0 01 0 01 0 .0 ::J a> ..... 01 ... W '" Ui'}> g>OJ 0 0 a> ..... ..... a> .n ~ 4-111 m w ..... CD CD CD . .CD Q) ~. Em 0 ::J CD _<(f) OJ Q) ... w ~ o 0 ~ a> c - 0 III ..... a> '" CD 0 . c ~ ... m ... ~ ... ;ot>3~ <n =r -CD CD :J - OJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 -;u= 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Q) ~ III OO'.-+ll> <n ... ... w '" '" 0 -<D!:!: ::J 0 ::J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -.00' < 01 0 0 0 0 0 00 CD -:::; 4- '" 0 0 0 0 0 <n III Q) 0 0 0 0 0 -ca 0 CD :< 0 0 0 0 <:> <:> 0 __ en" }> 00 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 - :::; ;:: ..... ... w '" '" 0 <n III -~ ~ <0 CD lD o o m " 00 < < CD CD 4-:::!, -0 ~ :< CD ;u moo" < CD !!l.~ 0.0 :::J w. ... CD Q)Q) CD o ;::I! S' o :::; CD <n . c: III CD :e :3' n :3' CD < CD .. iii ~ III !" -i :3' CD Cil 0- Cil C III !'! Cl .. o :e 5" lI:l i!: CD Q. C 3 5" ::!l .. il - o '" il - CD z !!l. <. CD (f) Q. o .CD <n <5. ::J ::J =" "" ~ !!l. o. ::J ;u III ~ Z III ~ <. CD (f) g z !!l. o <. CD CD ~. en ~ g -,,- "lll " :::!!g.~ !:jo!:t III ~ III gQ..g "(f)" ;Ulll;U Q) CD Q) ro~ ~ 01 '" m , .0 m "''''... "'001 moo C1: <n CD o ::J 3' o c ~ Gl (3 :< =r <0 ;::: CD a. c 3 o CD <n <5. ::J ::J =" "" ~ !!l. o. " ;U III CD Gl ~ o ;!;. ::J <0 ;::: CD a. c. 3 o CD <n <5. " - " " III ::J ~n.=:!1 ~o=f III ~ III ~o~ 0-0 ::J (f)::J ;Ulll;U OJ CD Q) !if~ CD ... m w m , o 01 "'~'" 000 000 C1: <n CD o 5. - :::; o c ~ 5. - :::; o c ~ Gl (3 :< 5. <0 ;::: CD a. c 3 ::J 3' o c ~ ::0 o l:: C!: ~ IC o III &t o OJ o m ::J CD ~ " ~ w. CD <n Z ." - r- -f ~ Ci::! ~O ~Z lJJ )> en - z lJJ :;;tJ o c:: -f - z G> C ~ PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O DEe . 7 2010 . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52'd Ii Main Street Redevelopment Inf"Iltration Basin B-2 Year Storm ******************** s.c.s. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.30" TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.04,61,0.11,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 .0 61. 0 .1 98.0 10.0 PEAK-;-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) .09 7.83 1294 ENTER [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 9159-2B.DEV RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159B.RD DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? Y ROUTING DATA: STAGE(FT) 495.90 496.15 496.40 496. 65 496.90 497.15 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .03 .04 .05 .05 .58 STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 84.0 191.0 324.0 485.0 674.0 PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES/INCH ENTER [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 9159-2B.DEV INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-I~(CFS) .09 PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .04 OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 1268 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) .00 TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) 8.17 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 496.34 PEAl, STORAGE: 160 CU-FT PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'D DEe. ..7 2010 . . Storm Drainage EvaLuation 51".52od & Main Street Redevelopment IniIltration Basin B - 25 Year Storm ******************** 5.C.8. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* 25-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4.80" TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.04,61,0.11,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 .0 61. 0 .1 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK (HRS) VOL (CU-FT) .13 7.83 2002 ENTER [do] [path]filename[.extJ FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 9159-25B.DEV RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY Cd:] [path]filename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159B.RD DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? Y ROUTING DATA: STAGE (FT) 495.90 496. 15 496.40 496.65 496.90 497.15 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .03 .04 .05 .05 .58 STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 84.0 191.0 324.0 485.0 674.0 PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES !INCH ENTER Cd,] [path]filename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 9159-25B.DEV INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) .13 PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .05 OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 2124 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) .00 TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) 8.50 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 496.58 PEAK STORAGE: 280 CU-FT PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'O DEe .- . 7 2010 . 'en CJ> U1 -" W N ~ or co m -" -" -" -" -" -" m co co co co co co CD --J CJ> CJ> CJ> CJ> U1 -< ;::::I:"w 0 --J U1 N 0 --J -~ 0 U1 0 U1 0 U1 0 ~ _ Ul w W N N ~ ~ (fJ)>COJ U1 0 U1 ~ CJ> w ~m=t~ (X) CJ> CJ> 0 CO ~ a'oo ~ S' m _<Ul OJ N N ~ 00- (X) W C_O W CO ~ -" U1 (X) 0 ' C ~ (f> CJ> w w ;:l!3~ S' -m m 5' 0 -';0 =" OJ c::> 0 0 0 0 "" 'l.w ~ w 0 0 C) 0 0 0 (f> - ~ (f> N N ~ ~ ~ 0 -m S' 0' ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-.:(fj" < W 0 C) 0 0 0 0,0 m ~::J" ~ U1 0 0 0 0 0 (f> W ~ 0 0 0 0 0 -,...., 0 CO ::;: m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _'(ii' )> o 0 0 W C) C) 0 C) C) -.:::y....... --J N ~ ~ ~ 0 (f> W to -~W CO - m . ;0 0 - 0 OJ Z l:: 0 ." c:t. m - Z Z :::II ~ !:i ~ ~ a:I ro ~ <' <' C '0 ~ m m ~ II>> 00' en en z S- m Q, Q, ~ (f> 0 0 <' (3 - m m m CO 0 , (f> (f> en ~ ro <0' <0' Q, U1 Z ~ ~ -n= ~ c: 5' m '" ~ W ~ CD =" :::!!O ~ )> "" -.......= :e ~ ~O~ ~ W ~ w rn ::r ~. 0 t:!: lr 0' o ~ 0 - 0 ::r ~ ~ en~ Z CD ;0 ;OW;o < W wroD> 0 - ~~~ CD "! .. ;; ::c CD U1 0 '" 0 !II N c: -t m N~~ -t , ::r 0 NO U1 - CD U1 U1 0 0 Z .. CD ~ S' G) 0- 3' - <!: ::J" Cil 0 0 C m (f> c c c m ~ ~ '" 0 )> !'! -t )> " GJ GJ 00 a a < < G) ::;: ;;;, m m a S' ~ ;:j,~ co co GJ -0 :e :;:: :;:: a ~ ::;: s- m m ;;; m ;0 fC c. c. ro (Ii" i!: c' c' ~ 3 3 co < m CD :;:: ~ ~ Cl. 0 0 0' 0 C m m m ~ iij' 3 (f> (f> c. <0' <0' c 5' ~ ~ 3 -n ::. 5' ~ w 5' ;::;: =" :::!!o =" -" iil "" - - "f ?l 0;-0 co - w ~ w CJ> -" 5" t:!:o~ '-' ~ ,j' o ~ 0 ~ ~ en~ '" iil ;0 ;oW;o - w m&oo CD ~ ~~ ~ ;:l! S' 0 -" ::J" m 0> (f> w m "'~ N b 00 0 U1 00 0 S' S' - 3' <!: ::J" 0 0 (f> c c m ~ ~ 0 PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'O DEe '7 2010 . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51".52,d & Main Street Redevelopment IniIItration Basin C - 2 Year Storm ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.30" TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV}, CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.02,61,0.07, 98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES} A CN A CN .1 .0 61. 0 .1 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) .05 7.83 814 ENTER Ed:] [path]fi1ename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 9159-2C. DEV RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY Ed:] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159C.RD DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? Y ROUTING DATA: STAGE (FT) 495.75 496.00 496.25 496.50 496.75 497.00 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .01 .01 .01 .02 .37 STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 38.0 85.0 143.0 213.0 296.0 PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES/INCH ENTER Ed:] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 9159-2C.DEV INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .05 .01 OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 884 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 8.83 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 496.58 PEAK STORAGE: 160 CU-FT PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'O DEe .7 2010 . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51".52"d &: Main Street Redevelopment InfIltration Basin C - 25 Year Storm ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* 25-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4.80" TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.02,61,0.07,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .1 .0 61. 0 .1 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .08 7.83 1249 ENTER [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 9159-25C.DEV RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY [do] [path]filename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159C.RD DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? Y ROUTING DATA: STAGE (FT) 495.75 496.00 496.25 496.50 496.75 497.00 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .01 .01 .01 .02 .37 STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 38.0 85.0 143.0 213.0 296.0 PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES/INCH ENTER [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 9159-25C.DEV INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLQW(CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .OB .07 OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 1244 INITIAL-STAGE ( FT) TIME-OF- PEAK (HRS) .00 8.00 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 496.79 PEAK STORAGE: 220 CU-FT PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O DEC. 7 2010 . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52"' & Main Street Redevelopment Appendix E Vegetated Infiltration Basin and Double Chambered Catch Basins with Fossil Filter Insert PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O DEe ... 7 2010 I( 9 FT MINIMUM 1 FOR PARKING LOTS, TIRE STOPS OR' CURBS W/CUIS 12.x12" ClEAR FlOW AREA AT CUTOUTS 2" 3:1 YAX. SJOE SlOPES (lYP.) ---, 2fT HAT BOTTOM OVERflOW ELEVATION '-.' '.' 9--18" (SEE NOTE 2B) '.: 18" ,," (SEE NOTE 6) 1 , . 'I .' (> / ...~".;:~' ,:\'::V ~-'~;"' ,]~lf(j{~i'i?ii:4:,~~*~?n,~ ",- .'.. ALTER FABRIC. SEE NOTE 7 1. Provide protection from all vehicle traffic, equipment staging, and foot traffic in proposed infiltration areas prior to, during, and after construction. 2. Dimensions: a. Width of basin: g' minimum. b. Depth of basin (from top of growing medium to overflow elevation); Simplified: 12~, Presumptive: 9"-18". c. Flat bottom width: 2' min. d. Side slopes of basin: 3:1 maximum. 6. Drain rock: 8. Size for infiltration basin: 1 ~ - _ :x.n washed b. Size for flow-through basin::X" washed c. Depth for Simplified: 12~ d. Depth for Presumptive: 0-48", see cales. 7. Separation between drain rock and growing medium: Use filter fabric (see SWMM Exhibit 2-5) or a gravel tens (% - X inch washed, crushed rock 2 to 3 inches deep). 3. Setbacks (from midpoint of facility); a.lnfiltration basins must be 10' from foundations and, 5' from property lines. b. Flow.through swales must be lined with connection to approved discharge point according to SWMM Section 1.3. 8. Growing medium: a. 18~ minimum b. See Appendix F.3 for specification or use sandJloam/compost 3-way mix. 4. Overflow: a. Overflow required for Simplified Approach. b.lnlet elevation must allow for 2" of freeboard, minimum. c. Protect from debris and sediment with strainer or grate. 9. Vegetation: Follow landscape plans otherwise refer to plant list in SWMM Appendix F. Minimum container size is 1 gallon. # of plantings per 1 OOsf of facility area): a. Zone A (wet): 115 herbaceous plants OR 100 herbaceo\Js plants and 4 shrubs b. Zone B (moderate to dry): 1 tree AND 3 large shrubs AND 4 medium to small shrubs. The delineation between Zone A and B shall be either at the outlet elevation or the check dam elevation, whichever is lowest. 5. Piping: shall be ASS SchAD, cast iron, or PVC SchAD. 3~ pipe required fDr up to 1,500 sq ft of imperviDus area, otherwise 4w min. Piping must have 1% grade and follow the Uniform Plumbing Code. 10. Install washed pea gravel or river rock to transition from inlets and splash pad to growing medium. (li{ 't H"f.\'(i \OT TO .~:C'\U:. 11. Inspections: Call BOS IVR Inspection line, (503) 823-7000, for appropriate inspections PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'D 2010 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL TYPICAL DETAILS ~ - Simplified I Presump\ive Design Approach - Basin NUMBER SW-140 Bureau of Environmental Services ... '" r::l ~ ~ C\l OUTLET I I... 53" i , '. I' , II: , - Ii 48" LONG , .: ; PLAN VIEW' [ ! I ' f ~EDlMENT TR~ -l-' Lw/ HINGED I LID : SEDIMENT : TRAP I SILT & DEBRIS CONTAINMENT AREA L2~x2~x?6 FRAME 53" , I i ~2:;f ~~l_ 1-- I I [ [ [ I I I 0-_ , OUTLET z ~ ;::;: ~ C\I I~ 48" SIDE VIEW HIGH FLOW BYF ASS ... ~ FL GARD ™ FILTER INSERT (MODEL FGP-24F) WOVEN MESH FILTER BODY NOTES: (J) C\l BOX FABRICATED FROM 10 G A MATERIAL NEOPRENE GASKET (TWO SIDES) DUCTILE IRON SOLID LID & DUCTILE IRON GRATE BIKE PROOF, HEAVY DUTY TRAFFIC GRATE SUPPORTS AASHTO H25 LOADS ;:." ~ ~ cO REPLACEABLE ABSORBENT POUCHES ISOMETRIC SEDIMENT & HYDROCARBONS FILTRATION SYSTEM . STATE APPROVED - ASPHALT D'IPPiPRE.SUBMIlTAl REC'O 24"x42" - 6"0 OUTLET DEe 7 201 ~ SB SAND COLLECTOR CATCH BASIN Gibson Steel Basins smCE 1972 PROJ. MAN. DOUG P. DATE: JAN. 2.3. 06 DWN. PAUL G SCALE MODEL: 5CBFJO-42HB-6 DWG # FS NONE 247 Washington Sf Eugene. Or. 97401 ph:(541) 687 - 8672 tox:.344-0207 . . @ , . Branch Engineering, Inc. Corporate Headquarters (541) 746-0637 310 5th Street Springfield, OR 97477 Salem Engineering Office (503) 779-2577 4310 Cherry Avenue N Salem, OR 97303 . Principals M_ Lane Branch, PE Damien Gilbert, PE Renee D. Clough, PE, PLS Rene" Fabricant, PEt SE Ronald J. Derrick, PE, GE www.BranchEngineering.com July 19,2010 Mr. Nick Boyles, Manager OBO Enterprises, Inc. 1528 Ferry Street, #11 Eugene, Oregon 97401 RE: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION . 5175 & 5195 MAIN STREET SPRINGFIELD, OREGON Branch Engineering Inc. Project No. 09-159 Branch Engineering Inc. (BEl) has perfonned a geoteclmical engineering investigation of the subject sites for development of townhomes and commercial buildings at 5175 & 5195 Main Street in Springfield, Oregon. The accompanying report presents the results of our site research, field exploration, field and.laboratory testing, data analyses, and our conclusions and recommended geotechnical design parameters for the project. Based on the results of our study, no geologic or geotechnical hazards were identified on the site that would prohibit the planned development, provided that the reconunendations of this report are implemented in the design and construction of the project. . . Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions regarding this report. Sincerely, Branch Engineering Inc. \~ ..---., ./;;:~'t.1J PR. 00',\ ,I <--0'';; /"~'_ v&: ' ~'<l"lN>;>> i2--.' , ,. ,- ..r..:-:,..,.,~,\. '.1"_ \ '2f!!. / #1617'. \ ~ \ '.. OR ~;ol~j~~-<-- " '~' . (~>~<,o-! 15, ;'~~~U/ "~D J. \)S~/. ----.... expires: December 31. 2011 Richard Walker, E.LT. Staff Engineer Ronald J. Derrick, P .E., G.E. Principal Geotechnical Engineer ?RE-SUBMllTAl REC'O DEe 7 2010 _11 CIVIL STRUCTURES TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICAL SURVEYING . I .r//<i~?~;{1 f ~.?) II t1/~ . . TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................1 1.1 Project and Site Description ..............................................................................................................1 . 1.2 Scope of Work....... .............................................. ............................... .......... ....... .......... ................. ...1 ].3 Site Information Resources .......................:.......................................................................................1 2.0 SITE SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ..............................................................................................2 2.1 Ground Water ........................................................................................................................... .........2 3.0 GEOLOGIC SETTING ........ ... .......................... ................................................................................2 3.1 Regional Geology................. .................... .............. .................. no....................... ...............................3 3.2 Site Geo logy............................................................... .............. ........ .................................................3 4.0 CONCLUSIONS ....................................................... .......................... ..............................................3 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................................................4 5.1 Site Preparation and Earthwork...................... ...... ......................................................................... ....4 5.1.1 Fill.........................................................................................................................................4 5.2 Fill Slopes..................... .................................. .......................... ......................................................... 6 5.3 Cut Slopes ........... ............... ...... .................... ............. ............... .......... ........... ............. .......................6 5.4 Utility Excavations......................:.................................. ................... ............................... .................6 5.5 Drainage .......... ............. .................... ........... .............................. ................. .,.,.,............. .......,.,..; .......6 5.6 Soil Bearing Capacity...................................................................... .................................................. 6 5.7 Slabs-On-Grade..... ......................... ........ ............ ........ ....... ......................... ............................ ...........6 5.8 Settlement........... ...... .......... .................. ................................... ................. ....... ......................... .........6 5.9 Friction Coefficient and Lateral Earth Pressures............................................................................... 7 5.10 Pavement Design Recommendations ............ .................................................................................... 7 5.11 Seismic Site Classification ......... ....................................................................................................... 7 6.0 REPORT SUMMARY AND LIMITATIONS.................................................................................. 7 PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O DEe, . 7 2010 . . 5175 & 5195 Main Street Springfield, Oregon 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presentsJhe results and [mdings of Branch Engineering, Inc. (BEl) field observations, testing, and research for the subject site. Our investigation included the evaluation of the subsurface soil conditions at the site and provides geotechnical recommendations for the design and construction of the proposed building foundations, utilities, and pavement design. Our work was performed in accordance with the generally accepted practices ofthis area. 1.1 Project and Site Description The subject site consists of two parcels located at5175 and 5195 Main Street. Both addresses are located south of Main Street between 51" Place and 52"Avenue in Spripgfield, Oregon. Currently, 5175 Main Street is a vacant lot with a gravel driveway and home foundation remnants from a previous home that burned down several years ago. The remainder of the property is overgrown by tall grass and blackberry bushes. 5195 Main Street is an occupied single family residence with an existing garage, driveway, garden area, burn pile and maintained grass field, In total, both sites comprise approximately 1.5 acres and are designated as Tax Lots 6203 and 6300 on Tax Map 17-02-33-32. The property is located at Latitude 44002'43"N, Longitude 122056'27"W. Both lots are relatively flat at approximate elevation of +497 feet above mean sea level based on a recent 'topographic map. It was raining at the time of our field investigation on June 2, 2010, but no surface water ponding was observed on the properties. The project proposal, as described to BEl, is to construct 2-story townhome structures along the soUtll site boundary, and two single-story office commerCial buildings adjacent to Main Street, with parking facilities in between. Construction will include complete demolition of the existing buildings, driveways, and remnant building foundation. Anticipated foundation loads, are not expected to exceed 3 kips per foot on linear footings and 20 kips on individual column footings. 1.2 Scope o/Work Our scope of work included a site visit and subsurface investigation on June 2, 20]0. Seven exploratory test pits were advanced to a maximum depth of six feet at the approximate site locations shown on Figure I. Dynamic cone penetrometer and in-situ vane shear testing were conducted TP-7. All test pits were logged by a BEl field engineer and backfilled with the excavated material inmlediately after completion of logging. Soils were visually classified in accordance with the American Society of Testing and Materials,(ASIM) Method D-2488. Field log summaries of the site test pits are presented in Appendix A, along with copies of nearby well logs from the Oregon Department of Water Resources on-line database and area soil survey. Representative samples were collected from the test pits for laboratory in- situ moisture (ASIM D-4643), Atterberg limits (D-4318) testing, and shrink/swell potential (IS 2720). 1.3 Site In/(Jrlnation ResoliFces The following site investigation activities were performed and literature resources were reviewed for pertinent site information: , o Review of the United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey (USGS) on-line Quadrangle Map, 7/1/1973. o Review of on-line aerial photograph of site area on 7/24/2000. o Seven exploratory test pits were excavated on site at the approximate locations as shown on Figure I. ., Branch Engineering, I nc, Page 1 of 8 PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D DEe i '1 2010 , , l . . 5175 & 5195 Main Street Springfield, Oregon . Review of the Lane County area Web Soil Survey, United States Department of Agricultural (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) . Review of the USGS Geologic Map of Oregon, USGS 1991 . Review of Oregon Department of Water Resources Well Logs 2.0 SITE SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Our analyses, conclusions and recommendations contained. in this report are based on site conditions as they presently exist and assume the exploratory test pits, listed herein, are representative of the subsurface conditions throughout the site. If, during construction, subsurface conditions differ from those described in the test pit logs; BEl shall be informed and if necessary review site conditions and revise recommendations herein. The surface soils iIl the project area are mapped as Pleistocene age, semi-consolidated, hicustrine and fluvial deposits of clay, silt, sand, and gravel. These alluvial terrace deposits are expected to be several hundred feet deep with various aquifer Zones. Observed on our test pits; tpe upper stratum of the site subsurface stratigraphy consists of 1.5- to 2- feet of soft, wet, dark, organic, topsoil. Beneath the surficial topsoil/fill layer, site stratigraphy generally consists of brown and gray Clayey Silt (ML) with traces of fine sand to depths ranging between 3- to 5.5 feet below the ground surface. The Clayey Silt overlies brown and grey rounded gravel in a sandy silty matrix, commonly known as Bar-Run down to the extents of our excavations. In general, depths to Bar-Run tend to increase toward the northwest being shallowest at the southeast comer of the property. Additionally, organic topsoil tends to be thickest toward the southeast portion of our exploration. Nearby well logs from the Oregon Water Resources Department online well log query document silt, sand, gravel, and siltstone to depths around 20 feet below ground surface. The NRCS Web Soil Survey maps the sitea/ong the SalemcUrban. ]andcomplex, which.is . described as well-drained, alluvial terrace soil. This soil description and those of nearby well logs are consistent with the observed field conditions. 2.1 Ground Water Ground water seepage was not encountered within our test pit excavations on June 2, 20]0. Nearby well logs indicate groundwater levels ranging from 9-feet below ground surface in January 1999, to 12-feet in October 1994. We anticipate that groundwater level in both the regional and perched water tables will fluctuate with the seasons and should be anticipated to be at the highest level in late winter or spring when rainstorms are more intense and more frequent and at the lowest leve] in late summer or fall when rainfall is less frequent. The regional ground water level is also expected to be influenced by the level of the McKenzie River, approximately I-mile to the northwest, and the WiIlamette River, approximately I Yz mile to the south. 3.0 GEOLOGIC SETTING The following sections described the regional and local site geology. Our field findings are consistent with the geologic mapping of the site area by the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (Walker & MacLeod, 199]). Branch Engineering; Inc. Page 2 of8 PRE.SUBMllTAL REC'O DEe 7 2010 . . 5175 & 5195 Main Street Springfield, Oregon 3.1 Regional Geology The subject site lies within the southern portion of the Willamette Valley Geomorphic Province (WVGP), east of the Coast Range and west of the Cascade Mountains Provinces. The WVGP is regional lowland that extends from just south of Eugene, Oregon to Vancouver, British Columbia. In Oregon, this alluvial plain is approximately 130 miles long and 20- to 40-miles wide (Orr and Orr, 1996), and is drained by the north flowing WilIamette River. WilIamette River VaIley in the area of the subject site is believed to have been formed in the Quartinary epoch from lacustrine and fluvial deposits of silt and clay. These Quarternary deposits within the subject site are believed to be underlain by Tertiary sedimentary and volcaniclastic rocks and undifferentiated tuffaceous sedimentary rocks, tuffs, and basalt from the Miocene and Oligocene epochs. Deposits of sand, silt and clay from fluvial and lacustrine environments covered the bedrock to various depths during the presence of low energy streams and lakes in the southern WilIamette Valley. Compression forces, along with upliftmg of the Cascade and Coast Range Mountains, during the Miocene and Pliocene epochs depressed the Willamette River Valley. Rapid uplift of the Cascade and Coast Range mountains steepened stream gradients causing increased erosion of the mountains and resulting deposition of gravel layers incised within the fluvial and lacustrine deposits. Approximately 13,500 years ago the WilIamette Valley was cyclically flooded by catastrophic breaks in the ice dams of Lake Missoula. These flood events filled the valley to a depth of ahout 350 feet before retreating, causing sequences of upward fming deposits of silt and clay. 3.2 Site Geology The observed site conditions are generaIly consistent with the mapped geology of the site and that of the general geologic setting described above. Generally, the upper 1.5- to 2- feet of site is organic topsoil. Below the topsoil are native alluvial terrace deposits of clay, silt, sand, and gravel to depths Over laO-feet. There are severaf fa~I1:t;InaPPed withinl Q- . to 20.cmiles of the site to the east, west and south; none of these faults are not known to be active; however, seismic activi1y has been felt in the area as evidence by the 1993, 5.7 Richter magnitude Scotts Mills earthquake and the 1993, 6.0 Richter magnitude Klamath Falls earthquake. . . 4.0 CONCLUSIONS Based on our field observations, subsurface explorations, and data analyses, we conclude that the site is geotechnically suitable for the proposed development provided that the recommendations of the report are incorporated into the design and construction of the project. The approximately 2-[00t topsoil zone at the site is thicker than normal for the area and will require corrlDlete removal under building foundations and structural pavements. The clavev silt that covers the Bar-Run is compressible and is susceptible to settlement under load. The subject site will require additional.excavation and subgrade preparation that is typically not reqUired for the area, but there are no specific site features or subsurface conditions observed that will impede the proposed site development. It is our understanding that there are no significant grade changes planned for the site, cut and fill depths are not expected to exceed two feet. Due to the fine-grain soils on site, emthwork is recom.tnended to be performed during the dry season, generally May through October; however, we understand construction time constraints and have provided alternatives for wet weather conditions. Branch Engineering, Inc. Page 3 of 8 PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'D DEC7 2010 . . 5175 & 5195 Main Street Springfield, Oregon 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The following sections present BEl's recommendations for anticipated geotechnical aspects of the site development. Site specific specifications are presented below. 5.1 Site Preparation and Earthwork The following recommendations are for earthwork in the building foundation areas. Earthwork shall be performed in general accordance with the standard of practice as generally described in Appendix J of the 2007 International Building Code and the recommendations herein. The site grading is expected to be minimal for the area; however, any fill placed below structures or pavements shall be observed, documented, and tested for compliance with project specifications by competent, trained personnel. . Stripping: All areas .intended to directly or laterally support structures, road/parking areas, retaining walls, or fills in excess of I-foot in thickness shall be stripped of vegetation, organic or soft soil, existing fill, and/or any other deleterious material. These strippings shall either be removed from the site or used in nonstructural areas approved by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record (GER). . Subarade Aooroval: Once and area is stripped, the GER shall observe and approve the subgrade prior to placement of any fill, separation fabric, base rock, or foundation forms. Based on the conditions observed, additional excavation, placement of subdrains, or other mitigation measures may be required by the GER. The site soils are very moist, which may cause soft subgrade conditions. The site work contractor should be cautioned wheu excavating for foundations or pavements and minimize heavy truck traffic on site. · Dry-Season Earthwork: The in-situ moisture contents of the site soils within about 6 feet of the existing ground surface are 10% to 15% over their optimum moisture content for compaction. Earthwork is recommended to' be performed during the dry season,generally May throiigh October, so that moisture contents of native fill soils can be reduced by spreading and turning the soils, if necessary. The options for moisture control of fill soils during the dry season are more cost effective and generally do not require any specialized equipment other than a water-truck or a plow device. . Wet-Season Earthwork: Fine-grained site soils are moisture sensitive and soften with prolonged exposure to rainfall, particularly when uncompacted. Should wet season earthwork be required to meet project deadlines, specialized processes would likely be required to control soil moisture contents, such as lime or cement treatment of the soils, soil drying kilns, or use of imported granular materials. These methods can be expensive, time consuming, and would require additional fill control oversight and testing. 5.1.1 Fill BEl anticipates that on-site native soils will be used for structural fills if necessary, although use of imported granular material may be mOre cost effective for minor fills due to the ease of moisture control and compaction effort.. Native soils are suitable for use as structural fill provided our recommendations are incorporated into the design and construction of the project. . Recommended Soil Comoaction: After subgrade is approved by the GER, soil subgrade shall be scarified to a depth of 4 inches, moisture conditioned to within 2% of the optimum moisture content of the soil, and blended with the first lift of fill material. The fill placement and compaction equipment sball be appropriate for fill material type, required degree of blending, and PRE-SUBMIITAl REC'O DEe .. 7 2010 Branch Engineering, Inc. Page 4 of 8 . . 5175 & 5195 Main Street Springfield, Oregon uncompacted lift thickness. Assuming proper equipment selection, the total uncompacted thickness of the scarified subgrade and first fIll lift shall not exceed 8-inches; subsequent lifts of uncompacted f1.l1 shall not exceed 8-inches unless otherwise approved by the GER. Fine-grain soil fill is generally most effectively compacted using a kneading style compactor, such as a sheeps-foot roBer. Structural fill shall be compacted to at least 90% of the materials maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Method D-1557 (or equivalent) and the soil moisture content shaH be within +1-2% of the optimum moisture content for compaction . Imoorted Structural Fill: All imported material to be used for structural f1.l1 shall be approved by the GER prior to the material:s delivery to the site. . Most commonly, imported structural fill material is granular and shall not contain more than 5% passing the No. 200 sieve. Aggregate fIll shall be angular (surface fracture of at least 70%) and well-graded, and shall be compacted to at least 95% of the materials maximum drY density as determined by ASTM Method D-1557 (or equivalent). . Soil Shrink/Swell Potential: Representative samples of the clayey silt soil were tested for their free swell potential (IS 2720) and found'to range from 20% to 30%, which is considered to be low to moderate. The Plasticity Index of the soil is 9.4, based on Liquid and Plastic Limits moisture contents of 43.7% and 34.3%, respectively. The shrink/swell of the soil will not adversely affect these structures; however, the soils should still be protected from soil moisture fluctuations by providing positive surface drainage and covering with aggregate soon after exposure of the subgrade. The shrink/sweB potential of the Bar-Run is low. Periodic site observations by the GER are recommended during the construction of the project; the specific phases of construction that should be observed are described below in Table I: Table 1: .' RECOMMENDED CONSTRUCTION PHASES TO BE OBSERVED BY TIIE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OF RECORD At completion of site stripping and foundation Subgrade observation by the geotechnical excavation engineer before placement of geotextile fabric or fill Imported fIll material Observation of material or information on material type and source Placement or Compaction of fill material Observation by geotechnical engineer or test results by qualified testing agency ., PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'O DEe 7 2010 Branch Engineering, Inc. Page 5 of8 . . 5175 & 5195 Main Street Springfield, Oregon 5.2 Fill Slopes Site fill slopes in excess of 2cfeet in height are not expected for this project. 5.3 Cut Slopes Permanent cut slopes are not expected for this site. 5.4 Utility Excavations Utility excavations within the Clayey Silt site soils should stand near vertical to at least 4 feet in depth; , some surface sloughing and sidewall caving may occur due to perched ground water lenses or areas of non-cohesive soil. Utility excavations through the Bar-Run may incur sidewall caving due to the non-cohesive gravels. Heavy equipment should not be placed within 10 feet of an open trench. Site soils are classified as OSHA Type B. 5.5 Drainage A complete site drainage system is expected to be engineered for this project; alteration of existing grades for this project will likely change drainage patterns but should not adversely impact adjacent properties. Perimeter landscape and hardscape grades shall be sloped away from the foundations and water shall not be allowed to pond adjacent to footings during or a1}er construction. 5.6 Soil Bearing Capacity Based upon our site observations and testing, the clayey silt soil beginning at a depth of 18- to 24-inches ' below the ground surface has an allowable bearing capacity of 1,200 psf and the Bar-Run material found in our test pits at 3- to 6-feet below the ground surface has an allowable bearing capacity of 3,500 psf. The respective bearing capacity of each cfthese matetialscaii be increased by'V3 for shoitteTIii loadmg; such as wind and seismic events. The clayey silt is compressible and due to the varying thickness of this soil over the site, BEl recommends that all building foundations bear on the Bar-Run material to mitigate the potential for differential settlement to occur. The estimated settlement potential of the clayey silt is ,presented in a Section 5.8 of this report. 5.7 Slahs-On-Grade After preparation of the subgrade as described in Section 5.1, those areas to be overlain by load bearing concrete slabs or beam shall be underlain by a geotextile separation fabric and a minimum of 8-inches of compacted granular material. A clean, free draining, crushed aggregate is recommended beneath structural slabs. The modulus of subgrade reaction (k) of the soil at is 100 Ib/in'. Under floor drainage should be addressed by the designer. 5.8 Settlement BEl estimates that with an allowable bearing capacity of 1,200 psf that foundations bearing on the clayey silt soil between 1.5- to 5.5-feet below the ground surface may incur toial settlements of 1- to 2.5-inches and differential settlements up to 1.5-inch depending on loading and the. thickness of the clayey silt below the foundation. Therefore, it is recommended that all foundations either bear directly on the dense Bar- Run material or atop crushed aggregate fill compacted in lifts to at least 95% of the materials maximum dry density as determiried by ASTM Method D-1557. Structural fills .shall be tested for compliance with this compaction specification. Branch Engineering, Inc, Page 6 of 8 PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O DEe ,7 2010 . . 5175 & 5195 Main Street Springfield, Oregon If necessary, settlement mitigation measures in tbe clayey silt may include pre loading and settlement monitoring, modifications to building pad grading to create a uniform subsurface, Or underpinning of foundations. BEl can further discuss the settlement issues with the design team upon review of detailed grading and foundation plans. 5.9 Friction Coefficient and Lateral Earth Pressures Altbough retaining wall structures are not anticipated for this project, tbe following design parameters are provided. The coefficient of friction of the native clayey silt soil is 0.30, and for the Bar-Run it is 0.45 for concrete poured neat against these materials with no disturbance of the exposed material face. The passive earth pressure of the clayey silt soil within 6-feet of the existing ground surface is 200 pcf equivalent fluid pressure (EFP). However, the upper I-foot of the native site soil should be neglected for design purposes unless covered by structural fill or pavements. Passive pressure of the Bar-Run is 400 pcfEFP. Active earth pressure for a cantilever wall capable of movement of at least 0.2% of the wall height at the top of wall is 40 pcf EFP; the at-rest or top restrained wall EFP is 50 pcf. A lateral load increase of 6H2 (H = wall height) is recommend to be applied to, tbe wall for seismic conditions. The EFP active earth pressure in the Bar-Run is 28 pcf and 38 pcffor at-rest conditions. The EFP earth pressures stated above assume a level backfill with no surcharge loads and a free-draining, well compacted, crushed aggregate backfill with no hydrostatic pressure applied to the wall. 5.10 Pavement Design Recommendations The correlated California Bearing Ratio (CBR) for the near surface clayey silt found below the topsoil zone is 3, thereby placing the soil in the poor subgrade class. The parking lot areas are generally expected to have light vehicle traffic while the site access roads will be subject to delivery and garabage trucks. Using the gnidance of the 2003 revised. Asphaltl:'aveIlleIlt Pesign Guide,publisbed by the Asphalt Pavement AssoCiationof6regon Based, a calculated Structural Number of 2.4, and based on tbe criteria of a 20-year design life with up to 75% reliability, the recommended pavement section in parking areas is 3 inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over 10 inches of aggregate base for the native soil. The accessways are recommended to be 4 inches of AC over 10 inches of base rock. Pavement subgrades shall be observed and proof-rolled prior to placement of base rock; the base rock shall be crushed with a fractured' surface area of at least 70%, and compacted to at least 95% of the material's maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Method D1557 or equivalent. BEl recommends using a geotextile separation fabric (Appendix C) between the subgrade and base rock. The base rock shall be tested to measure compliance with this compaction standard prior to placement of asphalt concrete. 5.11 Seismic Site Classification Based on the soil properties encountered in our site test pits, field test results, and nearby well log information to depths of over 50 feet, a Site Class D is recommended for design in accordance with Tables 1613.5.2 and 1613.5.5 of the 2007 Oregon Structural Specialty Code. 6.0 REPORT SUMMARY AND LIMITATIONS This report has presented BEl's site observations and research, subsurface explorations, geotechnical engineering analyses, and recommendations for the proposed site development. The conclusions in this report are based on the conditions described in this report and are intended for the exclusive use of aBa Enterprises, Inc. and their representatives for use in design and construction of the development described herein. Thl! 8.l)alysis and recommendations may not be suitable for other Structures or purposes. Services performed by the geotechnical engineer for this project have been conducted with the level of care and Branch Engineering, Inc. Page 7ot8 PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'O DEC, 7 2010 . . 5175 & 5195 Main Street Springfield, Oregon skill exercised by other current geotechnical professionals in this area under similar budget and time constraints. No warranty is herein expressed or implied. Conclnsions in this report are based on the site conditions as they currently exist and it is assumed that the limited site locations that were physically investigated generally represent the subsurface conditions at the site. Should site development or site conditions change, or if a substantial amount. of time goes by between' our site investigation and site development, we reserve the right to review this report for its applicability. If you have any questions regarding the contents of this report please contact our ofiice. Branch Engineering, Inc. Page 8 of 8 PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O DEe. . 7 2010 . . APPENDIX A TEST PIT LOG SUMMARIES, WELL LOGS, & ON-LINE SOIL SURVEY c PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'O DEe .. '7 2010 . . SOIL CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA AND TERMINOLOGY 'I I I Classification of Terms and Content. uses Grain Size i NAME: MINOR Coostituents (12-50%); MAJOR Fines . <#200 (.075 mOl) I .' Constiluents (>50%); SlighUy (5-12%) Sand F.ine #200 - #40 (.425 mOl Relative Density or Consistency Medium #40 - #10 (2 mOl) [ Color Coarse #10 -114 (4.75) . Moisture Content Gravel Rne #4-0.75 ncl1 PlaSticity ,Coarse 0.75 indl ~ 3 inches , Trace ConstibJents (0-5%) Cobbles 31012 inches; Other: Grain Shape, Approximafe gradation, scattered <15% esL. Organics, Cement. Struclure. Odor.... . numerous >15% est Geologic Name or f;ormation: (Fill. Wi!lamette sm. Titl, Boulders > 12 inches Alluvium;...) Relative Densitv or Consistehcv Granular Material Fine-Grained (cohesivel Materials SPT .SPT Torvane tst Pocket Pen tsf Manual Penetration Test N-Value Densitv N~Value Shear Sfrennth Unconfined . ConsIstencu <2 <0.13 >0.25 Venr Soft . Easv several inches b" fist .. 0-4 VervLoos~ 2-4 0.13 '0.25 0.25 - 0.50 Soft Easv several inches bv thumb "4 -10 Loose 4-8 0.25 - 0.50 0.50 -1.00 Medium Sliff Moderaleseveral inches bvthurrlb. 10 -30 Medium Dense B -15 0.50 -1.00 1.00 - 2.00 Stiff . Readilv iridented bv thumb 30 -50 Dense 15-30 1.00 - 2.00 2.00 - 4.00 Verv Stiff Readilv indented b\1 thumbnail >50 Very Dense >30 >2.00 >4.00 Hard Difficult bv thumbnail Moisture Content Structure Dry: Absence of roolsfu.re. d.u;;ty ~ dry to the mum. _ . Slrcllified: Afternating layers of material or color >6 rom thick:- Damp: Some moisture but b;aves no moisbJre an hand Laminated: Alternating fayers < 6 mm lhick . Moist La.aves moisture on hand . F~ure:9: Breaks along definate fracture planes Wet Visible free Waler. fikelv IrOni below waler fable Slick.~nsided:~. Striated, ~-orlShed, or glossy fracture planes ., Plasticity . Dry strength Dilatancy Toughness. Biocky: Cohesive soillhat can be broken down into small angular lumps which resIst further breakdown. ML Non to Low Non 10 Low Slow to Rapid Lo,-:/. can't mil Le~: Has small pockets of different SOIls. note Ulickness CL Low to Med. Medium to High None to Slow Medium Homogeneous: S~e color and appearance throughout . MH Med 10 High low fo Medium None to Slow low 10 Medium CH Mod to Hioh Hioh ro V, Hioh None Hioh Unified Soil Classification Chart Nisual-Manual Procedure) (Similar to A!>TM DesionationO-248BI Major Divisions s~r;P. Typical Names S bols Coarse Grav.els: 50% Clean .GW wen oraded cmweJs and C1ravel-sand mixtures little or no fines Grained br.more Gravels GP POOfIv-oraded aravels and oravel-sand mixtures. little or no fines Soils: retained on Gravels GM Siltv~ls, oravel-sand-silt mix1IJres More than Ihe No_ 4. sieve with Fines GC .a vets. Qravel-sand-da mixtures 50% relained Sands: more Clean SW Wel(..Qraded sands and aravellv sands. little or no fines on No. 200 than 50% Sands SP PoorIy.:Qraded sands and gravelly sands. nWe or no fines sieve passing thE! Sands SM Sntv sands, sand-silt mixtIJres No.4 Sieve wiUl Rnes SC Clayey sands. sand-day mixtures Rne-Grained Silt and Clays ML Ino nicsilts rode flour c1avev sills Solis: CL Inomanic daYS of low to medium olastidlv~ oravellv days. sandv da~. lean davs .50% or more Low Plasticity Rnes OL. OmanIc SIlt and oroanicsiltv davs or low nlasticitv. Passes No. SH I and Clays .MH Inorganic silts. clayey silts . 200 Sieve CH Inorganic days of high plasticity. fal days High Plastid~ Fines OH Oroanic days of medium to hi h olasticitv Hiohlv Oroanic Soils PT Peal, muck. and otherhiQhlv orqanicsoils PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'O DEe ' . 7 2010 U ...J ...J 0:: v; 0 ., .,; UI '" ';: Qj '" Q. .... ~ ;;: . ., Cl '" - l: 0 l: .;: W Q. 0 rn m 0 c ;.: 0 ., ;; J:l to E " 0 " ...J Z +: - - u u u ., ., ., "e- 'e '0' ~ 0.. 0... 0.. 0; > .2! .,. >; ~ .. ~ s - Cl Cl ii: .. .. .. c .e c 1il b '" e l1J~ ~r in 50 c = .. ::;; "' to- ~ "' c 'iii '" 00 e .Q 1ij e ;;; ~~ .Q = jllm B " ~<3 m 0 ~ ~ '"' ... - to- '"' '" ... "' .; ~ m ~ e ~d _.2 01ij .- m => U B& ;;~ mx ow .00 3= ~ '"' .. ~ ;; ., .... e il ~ IO~ :5ffi: ~ 3d] u u ~.ll w '" ~ '" .. " m ~ ~ ., ~ tog e_ m oe =m ~ ~~ ~J:; 1Jll~ eu u.~ ~CLi mx hl1w w . . Cu) ~* z.... <00 <tu) .0, ",w <0 II o,~ ~.... ~j 0::0:: <tw ".2 ::;;:I: ~(I)~ w.... '10..c: 0::0 .s~CfJ Q) " " ;,:; m g .<: ~ ~ IV C, 0 ;5 .. Z --'0 -0 '0 0.. c "''' 0 :zi Cl to ~g 1= IV -c ~! 0.. 1i '" ~ ir E oJ 0 .E w - > .a. 00 0 U => . "'0 tn 'a1il DB -0 " Q) ~ - 0 W m "- 0 E ;,:; Cl to <'! " ..J --IV C E <0" ..J - w~ ~~ <I: :;;0> ir -" Cl '00' .. .. Q .... c 'Cii~c " E w ..J IV J!!" ~ !:!. - c el ai ::J J!!.. ..J '" ~ >"'''' ~~ :;; > 0 0 W.a oJ .- o. .. u) > a:.m&l u ~ <t-o 0.0- '" .. 0.. :}.., 0 oJ c 0.010 U iJl IJ. 8 ~ q)~ .... I-' ~ JaqwnN aldwes N 0 ad.\l ajdwe . 0.. .... (D)ll1daa - Q ~ '" .. ... "' '" to- O> ii: - - :\l ;: :;! lli Q iil Q UI (D) uo~e^aB m 1l m ., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I- .~ Ul <tlii u)w :.::.... 0::0:: <tw ::;;:I: w.... 0::0 Q) " " ~ .. g E i ;5 .~ c, .. Z -- " '" .13 0.. ~ "''' 0 ~ Cl m *~ 1= IV -c 0.. 1i '" ~ ~-! ir E oJ 0 .E w - > .D. oo 0 U => ' "'0 '- - tn '0 Q) DB -0" Q) ~ - 0 w .eg- O E ;,:; Cl IV --IV C E ~~ ..J oJ - <I: ::;;0> w~ ~.s ir -" C'w .. .. Go .... c ~~- " E w ..J IV J!!" I- :::. - c ~ ~ 5 -" .. <I: ..J '" ~ >"'''' . E- ~ ::;: 0 > E! ..J .- 0" W.o a:: 1I1 CO 00 u) > -0 _CD _ x 0.D- '- " 0.. ~ :}.., 0 C 0.D ., IV 0.. 8 m'" .... U '" ~ I-' ~ JaqwnN aldwes .... Cl ed.\l ajdwas . D.. I- fil)ll1daa - Q ~ '" .. ... ... .. to- O> ii: - - .. & :;! lli III (D) uo~.^aI3 Q Q :\l '0 ., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I- o ..J ..J It: on 0 III Ul ';: Co ~ 2! " w o CD o ti III 'e- o. ,,; ao ai ~ ;;:: I CI ao " Q ';: Co en " o :;:: '" " o ..J - " III 'e- lL ~ C o 2 ~ ~ -VI ~ 1! is, " ii: ~ ~ ~ II f! Iii c m :E .. .. ~ .. c 1ii 0: ~.o .g'6 ~o <no . c .0 1ii <::; G3 '- 2:.2 ..c :] 13 m 0.3 ~ '" .. .. .. .. ... '" .. ~ ~ ~ C j:! '" .. t: III ..c E " z - " III '0' ~ lL '" ~ <> N ,.; .. C " , ;; ~ . 0", 2.... ..:'" ~~ l!:l!: ..:W :;;:t: W.... 0::0 z o i= lL 2 o U) w C ..J <t 2 w !;;: :;; ... Q . 0. I- - ii: - III Gl I- JaqwnN a[dwes ad.\l aldwes fill 4ldaO .. fiI) uogeAal3 ~ . ~ Ul ..:lii "'w "'.... 0::0:: ..:W :;;:t: w.... 0::0 z o i= 0. 2 o en w C ..J <t 2 w I- <t :;; .., Q . 0. I- - ii: - III ~ JaqwnN aldwes ad.\l aldwes (U)41daO .. (y) UOne^al3 ~ "''' ~oq:C'j <0"'''' t\i:l!. II "t:E:"'" .. ..... .~ l!!~::J ~~~1J Vi.!2 UJ '5 S~a::3" ia ~ ;fi " "" . Ul- ~~ g ~ :CO) Ql" E c _ ro -c ~ ~ ;:-.0 :!~ '" " >- 0 w- >-..0 :3-g tJ lJl -' 5 '" 0.. o .... N ~~ ;:: c, -''' 0.. c l!l ro -c '" ;:: -'0 w ~ > ..0_ ~~ l!l .. C E w~ O"rn ~~c ~ ~ ::I >-Ull!: -' - ~ <<~~ 0..0- o.c1i) D.. 8 3: . "b '" ~ u ~ -<> ~ c:: s~ '" ~ ~l a8 -<>" ~ 0 .!g. on" tti .~ 101; "b E J!!"b ~ ~ "-~ E ~ 8 ~ 1S.QJ "'5 ~~ ~ .. .. " .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ql U jg o ~ -' 5 '" 0.. o .... ;fi " 1ii .. 1i E " . 'Ow Ql ;:: E - -::6; -' ~ :;;0> -" .... c -' .. - c '" ;:: >- 0 W.a >- - :3-g tJ lJl '" ~ ~ ~ ... '" ~ ~ tl ~ lli ~ "b ~ ~ ~ .., " _ 0 :s.~ "'- ~ "-E '" 0 .0 ia Qig. -Sra ~:m ~ ~ "bE J!!"b ~ ~ "li~ E ~ o II o >< " ~ g..., ~~ ~ .. .. ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ :S :>;. ~~ -''' 0.. c l!l .. -c '" ;:: -' 0 w ~ >..0_ ~J1 l!l .. o E w~ 1:1 "00 ~~c CJ @ ::J >-Ull!: -' - ~ a::J!~ 0..0- o..ca:; a.. 8 3: ... '" ~ ~ ~ .. " p DEe 7 2010 o -l -l II:: .n 0 .. Ul .;: c. ~ .. - C W o lD o ...'" Qj ~ i;:: I Cl '" C Q ';: C. UI 11 .. '0 ~ D. C i.: .2 4f _ J:l ~ E o ::> -l Z - u .. '0 ~ D. ~ c o '" a; > .!!! ,.; ~ ~ ~ ~ l!! .. " ~ to CI ;;: ~ ~ ,!!!. d) Ql.O e o. 0) ~o C '"u 1; ::;; '" .. ~ '" c '.. '" " c .Q '- ~ .~ .... 1'1 .." <5 c3~ '" '" ~ '" .; ~ '" .. c c. ....... .Q .2 1_CO 015<0 8: :E ~ ~ g:CD~G'itti8 '" ~ '" ... .. ~ C " .., - U .. '0 ~ D. ijl o'~ ~ ~ ro 1U<<.iE ~_;;::>l= aJ~~o8'5 mJj<1ll3j>.i.t ~ " .., .... ~ = ro ~ s: ... .. ... o . CUI 2.... <(UI UlW ~I- 0::0:: <(W :;::t: WI- 0::0 Z o i= D. ii: o l'J c -l <( ii: ~ W 0 I- ~ <( ...J 2 5 UI c.. o I- '" Q . D. I- - ii: - Ul .. I- JaqwnN Qjdwes ad.\l ajdWES (y)lfldaa '" (Ill UORMal3 ~ CUI ..z I- <(UI UlW ~I- 0::0:: <(W :;::t: wI- 0::0 Z o i= D. ii: o UI w C -l <( ii: w !;: 2 '" Q . D. I- - ii: 'tii .. I- JaqwnN aidwES ad.\loidwES (y)lfldaa '" (y) UORM"l3 ~ I '" " g I ~ '13 :;::l . "'w ~3 E ,;; :> ~ =00) "'0 E :ii :Fe :;: ~ ;:-.0 =~ tJl " > 0 W:O > . ::\-g u m. , , I . I I I . I " ~ l:1 u m .Q ~ c:: SJ5 ~~ ~E- '" 0 o,u .Q" - 0 ~g. "'... ~.~ mil; " E .l'!" -a.e E ~ om u ~ 'li~ "'''' ~~ I I i I I ..'. ~ ., ~ ~. ~ ~ ... .. ~ l;l Sl ~ 0 il ~ a Q 1i: Q 1 I T 1 1 1 1 I ~ .. ~ ...J 5 UI c.. o I- I ..c~ j Ol -''0 c..c Cl '" -c UI~ ..J 0 W ~ >-". r2~ Cl llJ C E w~ o 'w ~~t <!) ~ ::J >"'0: ..J . ~ o::~~ O-"~ o-8'Q; c.. " ~ I I I I I I '" -g " .c ,;; ~ g ~ llJ ,ii 0, m -"'0 .Q .Q c.. c ~ ~ rJQi Cl .. .s.~ -c '" " c.~ tJl ~ ~-a ,;; ..J 0 II) ~ E w ~ " ~ >-" o,u :00) ~ x' .Q" :;; - 0 "''0 ""- E c Cl" ~" llJ o E "'... -'c ("j't::; ..J ~ IU~ _.l'! :;: 0 C"w " m -- ~~c " E 1--" .l'!" ..J - -~ C) &i ::J !.E UI " >",0: E !!! > 0 ..J - ~ 0" W:o o:=j1~ " " > - :!:::ii3 ::\-g 0.0- :;}", o.g1D ,," tJ l)l c.. " ~ ....'" I I I I I I I ~ ~ T I CO< ~ T ~ ~ ~ ~ T :;: i l'I i II I .. PRE:SUBM!1TAl REC'O ~ lii m T inLI" .1 - ?hto -. G ~ ;; > .!! ~ ,.; ~ " '" " 5 is CI i! " " " c !!!. ~g 0 10 z ! iii {l-g ~a C ~ 'i;j :;; '" en ~ '" c 'm '" m c .2 " c Iii ~2 .Q = ~~ " " u m ~t5 a 50 ~ "' ... '" :i . b c d 0 ~ o~ ~1 ~ Xu --' = > ~1 --' ~& n~ II:: m X a~ Iii ow <(U) 0 .. -a en 0- ';: Gi It) c. - .. ;;:: . ~ .. "" 0- - C C> ~ "' C ';: C w C. N 0 III -, I- m 0 c it a Ol o~ => ~ ~&l _ m ~ a ~~ w() <> ~ <> '" .. " C ;.: c " 0 <II -, ~ .c u E 0 ::r --' Z ii - - OJ c c_ U U o~ Oc .. .. .. ]j =m 'e- .""""...... !:5~ ~.~ 0.0 1*" =m .. .. ~.Jj co \~~ 0.. 0.. 0.. mx ill . ern 21- <(00 OOw ~I- 0::0:: <(w :;;:I: wI- 0::0 z o i= 0.. 0: o III W C --' <( 0: w !;( :;;: '" ~ ~ ~- " "", C\I (I) II) Q.. E ,!..c..al!E ClJ"C:(\)' lUot=~:::J-t: .I:OIJ)O:u:Q.. (1)N(")OU)e (l)lOt'-S':(O;I'lj fa ~(O=.2 E rc, > lJ')U) a} 0"" '" " Jg ~ o !:!. --' o rn 0.. o I- ~ ~ . '" - -[~ E ,.; " !'! '00) "'0 E c - ., :ic :;; ;:: -Ie 1-.0 ='~ rn " >- 0 WJ5 >--0 <( c --' '" (j '" . :5>; -~ ~ ~-g Cl '" -c ~H ~.o iH Cl '" o E W~ o 'w ~iJc (!)~:::r >-",0:: --' -~ a::j~ 0.0- ~8~ " " ~ " .. .0 ~ ~,g .s" "'- .!E' " ,; " "'~ .0 " _ "- " " .8!10 10 .~ 1ii1O "E Ja" ~~ ~~ a" " " ~~ l}:s '" .- "''' JaqwnN aidwes ..... C> atMl aldwes . 0.. I- (u)41daa - '" ~ .. '" ... '" '" ... .. a: - ~ ~ ~ N en M uo~""aI3 m II ~ ~ 0 0 0 .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I- e o '" '" ."- -a; roID ~J::: <CCIl -"'E ero 15:2 0'" '" "'- e", ro_ -,,,, I~ 0.'" ro- :2 "0 CIl "9€:,~ OZZ~ "9~.9S~L .9<$.'" ~~, PRE-$JBMITIAl REC'O DEe 7 2010 . . f- .~ '" :,. ~ ~ M '" ~ ""'LLllY 0969L8\l' OZ69iBV OM/9LSV OBa9ia;. 009918V o N m 5l o m ro ~ o ~ .. . .. ~ , '" '" ~ .. '" e 0 ~ ~ "- lil 0 0 lil ~ ~ 0 ;; ~ 1i 00 ~ :!1 lil ~ ~ o ~ 0099l9V '- ~ '" ; , .9L.9SgZZL . . .. "0 ~ o ~ o ~ ~ N o z-< 0<"> ~- 00 "'!~ ~'" ",!", ....ro a. .. . ~o o '" >> '" " " CIl ~~ "CIl "", (I).~ =n; o~ CIll'i .00 ",0 SO 0; e .Q " :2 o ., o o N o ~ o !'l U'l'~ !'l", !sCll o e. 000 Q); ",ro _Co E'" ,,00 _e roo ZO . . OM ~- 0 - '" a 0 0. 0 ~ ~'" a ro '" iE a E .. I!! '" " 0 '" :2 i':: '" ro ~ 2 > m ~-g '" !l. " 0 :s I!! u '" " '" " ;; m " ~ oj " wo.!:: " " 8 "" " ., .S ~E ~ ~ " ro If) '" t a =x '" " " 0. ~ ~ " a '0 u E 0. .E ~ ro Z ~ '" 0 U "'.0 0 - 0 ~ E ;; .. ~ If) ~ mil) W x " ~ 'M CJ 0 <D' ~., - i= I!! ~ lD 6)co '" "'a ;E'3 '" " '" "'~O 2 I!!- u '" <C e " 0. ~,,<C < 00 ij :ce~ is .. 0",2 '" " 3::; ro..... :2: " E 0152 0 nf - ~ ." '<C If) "m 0. C '- U) c ~ "'",a ro o~<(~ c:: w 1J.o ~ ::J -.0 " U <C" :s, 0 <C '" - " " " >."- ~:o & ~ 0 " 0 ~ >. ~ g~ :s ., ?i ~oi 15 E~ClIlD LL 0 " 0 Xl i::iN E 0 ~ mi6 E.n Z " ~ 0- 0 ~ 0. " " "'"':;; -" U.Q I!! en..c 4) >. .E 0. rn -~I- -.0 "l!! al 0 UI t1J D- E " l" ::J "'0 " ~ a.~ E :s. 0 '" " .. 2" ~~ " JJ-g~.~ <C '" " - -.... ..- .... '" .. "", lU~ :2: a m .0 2::J E " o NO'" ,s ~- -, ro m ._. rn '" " ,,~ ro o'g-g-g a w oS >.2 "''' "'- .S ~ >. l::.!!! "11) CIJ .!!!ro " '" 0::0 >'::1 " 0. e >. -0 :;;; 01:l.!!!o e 0 ~ ~::lCf.) _ " <C ro -a:ii.~~ iri " >." _(1)$ g:s >." <0 -E " - m '" ~~ 0= en " - e<C ro 0,,"0 c " Q) O,l:: o w ..r:: (lJ~;:J If) '0 " " u CJJ =0 am " >. w 1::::=mD. w '" '" If) " ]f o tLO)n1 0. ID m ro ~.c 0: ",> e 10 E <<toE ro " " ~~8 ~fi '0 " ro ~ a: '::85'0 :;; l- E If) If) .0 >. " ~ e 0 " '" If) I!! >,= Dc " 0 ." elf) ro " "" m- tIJ:5 ~U5 >..5 '0 l" " ~~ If) 0. .0 0 a., " 0 Urn $~ ,,~ .. ~!!1 '" '" ~ ro., ro .~ -'.... " ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ m c 0 " a.., U 2 ro_ ~ u; ~ :;; ., '" ~ ~ 0> '" ~ ~ ~ ~ :;: '" ~ ~ " m " " '0 ~ 15 " m -" " .l' 0 ;;; 1ii m m '5 0 If) 1ii ~ E " '" "' " m m ~ 0 ~ '" " ~ " ro -" e '" :; m ~ ~ ~ u. " 0 ~ e ,:!! m ~ e " or u ~ i5 " ~ i5 " (j ~ 1ii 0 m .E "' 0 0 " "' 1ii 0 .!l '" => :> .... ::; " i! " ;; C ;; u. ~ " 0 z <3 ... < " "- "I " - ~ ~ w " e -" I ~ ':;;.-; "' '0 m {i;f, Cl " ;: I- W -I D- O ~ -0 <C ~ .~ :!. 0 ~ "' :2: ~ ~ '" :i E ~ ~ " ~ -" '" ~ 15 " '" ~ 0 ~ " .m 3 ;, " E 0 " ~ ~ 0 15 .9- => ]j " '" " " u -0 W -0 " -0 " :s c: 15 "' 3 C " ~ u; u 0 0. 0 c: " ~ m '5 0 m 0 ro m '5 ~ '" 0 " '" " "' "' ~ " :; "' <' "' '" ~ $. 15 :> " 0 3 "' ~ " m '" IT: ~ " ~ 0 m ~ ~ " " u. E " ~ 0 ~ " 3. m > > ~ " '" m u " tl .5 ~ " " u " ii1 c x 'D a ~ 1;; m 0 " 0 ~ ~ c > ;, ~ '" ~ > B 0 -If) a c " m 0 .. " " c 0 ~ ~ <' "' 15 ;;; '" (j (j " " ~ ~ :> ;; ;; "- '" "' "' "' u; u; "' "' 1ii " 0 J!l "- o 0 .E ;;; l3:w - " " 181 * . X .. @ "'" -il ~ @ @ > + III <> 0 .... fII <::J "'~ 0 D 0 " f m " 0. " ~ a "' .a '" 0 <C "' '" 0 ZCJ 9.\, =:lJi PRE.SUBMITTAL REe' DEe 7 2010 . . Soil Map-Lane County Area, Oregon 5175/5195 Main Street Map Unit Legend ::':. \ \' .: ~, .~:)::'.:; '.: :;.,::.:: \:'.:":; '. ..",.. "'- ....:' \ :'-..:,'!)',<>. ;)i~j;:":~.~~:S9..~~~~~~:~~~.~:,;qf~~~Bi:.(.9_~~;~i)-:;~:'~,;},:~',\t'Ji::\:.>\i~:::(~: . ","il ., '>.'i::'r~':: ,:.i,'~ " '.;~- " ':::':.~: ;",: :i:\ :",/~::;~"':,:-i.;; ... ;" . .,.' '. ;':'~-"" !'-',,\. '..:,; ):.:i,;\~':'.,; '. " : \~' i ~:. ,:.:-. ,. '.'" I ", "1 /)~~p ;lin.ii.~yi1i~:q(~!:;}\J ~.;.~:i{~!~;J\'Y~ap~~.~it'.~.~~:~:>.~~>~,t/ ,~:\.:)~.s~ 'ir:i'~~Q(<{.{:' )}!.~;y\,(;;_~~:~~~t.~r:Aq(\\'/'i.:;::\~:~r ; . " 32 Coburg-Urban land complex 1 .6 7.2% 101 Oxley-Urban land complex 0.4 1 .9% 1 19 Salem-Urban land complex 19.9 90.9% Totals for Area of Interest . 21.9 100.0% PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'O DEe . 7 2010 USDA = Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 7/21/2010 Page 3 af 3 . . Map Unit Description: Salem-Urban land complex-lane County Area, Oregon 5175/5195 Main Street Lane County Area, Oregon 119-Salem-Urban land complex Map Unit Setting Elevation: 300 to BOO feet Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 60 inches Mean annual air temperature: 52 to 54 degrees F Frost-free period: 165 to 210 days Map Unit Composition Urban land: 45 percent Salem and similar soils: 45 percent Description of Salem Setting Landform: Stream terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Gravelly mixed alluvium Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None A vailable water capacity: Low (about 4.8 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 2s Land capability (nonirrigated): 2s Typical profile o to 7 inches: Gravelly silt loam 7 to 26 inches: Gravelly clay loam 26 to 60 inches: Very gravelly sand Description of Urban Land Interpretive groups Land capability (noninigated): 8 Data Source Information PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O DEe 7 2010 Soil Survey Area: Lane County Area, Oregon Survey Area Data: Version 8, Feb 9, 2010 USDA ~ .- Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 7/21/2010 Page 1 of1 : I STATE oForoi&i 1- MOl'llITOltlNG WELL REPORT (as ""1_ by ORS 537.765 & OAR 690-Z40-095) Instroctions Cor com letin this are on the last LAAlf :ECF-'''fF!l 0-;:;:'] OV 1 1994StartCard# W-71440 -1 ~',A_TI'"R ~l5~ J;.O~AJ!.Ql'1.0FWELLBy legal description M, vtl\~P1 County Lane 'lbwnsmp Tl7 S (N o@Range R2W (E rn@) Section :n 1. NE U40f SW U40fabovesection. 2 Eithe. Slreet 3drlressofwell location 5251 Main Strppt Springfiplri, OR Q7477 or Thx lot nnmber of well location Unknown 3. ATIACH MAPWITH LOCATION IDENTIFIED. Map shall Include approximate scale and north arrow. (1) OWNERlPROJEC'Il WELLNO. _. Name Rex Kessin er and Marvin n t n ~ 789 Fair Oaks Dr. and 2145 StoneCrf>5t Dr City Euqene . s~ OR Zi; 97401 (2) TYPE OF WORK: cJ Newco~~lion o Conversion Q~_mti?::~~~n) _ ,_ o D~~ . 0 ~~nment . (5) WELLTES'Il.... oPump . -o.B.aiIeL .=-..DAir Permeability ~Jd-- ConductivitY PH 'Thmperature of water 55 ~ 1?epth artesian flow.found Waswateranalysisdone? ~~ a!:i~ . _ By wbom? Un known Depth of stra'" to l!e@llJyzed.,':f!!>m .' 5 Remarks: (3) DRILLING METHOD o RolaIy Ai! . 0 RolaIy Mud [2J HoUow Stem!>-.nger 0 'plher -- ~ - a:ORE HOLE CONSTRUCTION fu No .. . . Stlndards 0 It! Depth ~f C(ll~!,leled w"ll \\mIt { , o ft. .-: e?'ft. :; Seal 1 ft. TO .-!.. ft. ., Filte. .pack 8-!-ft. TO 20 ft. ..~ o Cable' .. -.. 20. ft. Landsurt'ace water-tight cover Surface flush vault Locking ""p Casing diameter 2 ir!- ~ Sch. 4n PVC Welded Threaded Glllfd o 1KJ.0 Liner diameter ~ \\;,]ded Threaded Glued DoD - VkIl seal: Material Bentonite Amonnt 3/8" (150 lb GroutWeight 14,1 lbsl Borebole diameter gal , 12 in. ~E!!: plug at least 3 fl thick Screen matciaI Sch. 40 PVC interval(s): From~ Th 20 I From--==- To -- Slotsize .020 in. Filter pack: Material Si 1 i ca sand Size 10-20 in.. .0 Flowing~es!~ GPM ftto 20 (7) STATIC WATER LEVEL: 15 Fl below land surfuce. Artesian Pressure Ib/sq. in. Date Dale lO-lR-Q4 (8) WATER BEARING ZONES: _ Depth at wmch water was tin;t found 11; , - Th EsL Flow Rate S 15' 20' 1 nnm -- . (9) WELL LOG: Ground elevation 4gQ' in. MamriaI From 'lb SWL Il'ine sonn" fill o. ~, moterinl Rounderi rn"~ ~ ' ?n' w/minnV' ~onn" dlh clo" mo+V'h_V'n~" siz" "noV'~"V' wI denth Il _Date.!tarted 10/1 R/g4 Completed 10/1R/Q4 (tinbonaed) MOnitor ~n ConstIuctor Certification: 1 certify that the work: I performed on the CODSrrnction, aIteralian, or abandonment of Ihis weD is in compliance with Oregon weD construction . s~dards. MalerlalSusedandinformationreported~~'fY&iNtW:tl "'.- ~ . knowledge and tielid . .rllWt:~~CfD 0 ft. Sigoed ------ DateDEC ~7 lulO (bonded) Monitor wen COllStrnctorCertification: I accept resPonsibility for the constrUction, aIterntion, or abandonment work performed on this well dming the construction dates reported above. All ft. work performed . this time is in compliance with Oregon well construction standards. . "is true to the of my knowledge and belief. MWC Number 10288 l1/1R/Q4 THIRD COPY-CIlSTOMER . Name of supervising1:leologistlEngineer Ro be rt Good fe 11 ow ORIGINAL & FIRST COPY-WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT j.; , r', ~ *, . . '~] 1,\ I '\\ , "\, I \;-. I i::-. ~'\ .- \ o 9, I I . . , '~F.1J> . 1,,:<;=,':~L~' ~O ) . _~ ~ t . !Jf n..... ~:i - ~ T; 'D~'''~ 0 r- nrJr.JnnElDl:Illrh. -,U~l _' u. . """~, , ... , , I ~ '&url.: . . ~ :;; ~ ,~TATEOFOREGON ~ ;1 JGGOlISC.98C ~ .WjNITORING WELL REPORT ~IJ ~reqUired by ORS 537,765 & OAR 690-240-095) / ~struclions Cor COll1nletinp this renort are on the last DW!e of this form. (1) OWNER/PROJECT: WELL NO. MW-l Name John's Gas & Groceries Address 5390 Main'St. City Springfield' SIale Oregon Zip 97478 (2) TYPE OF WORK: o New construction o Conversion U Alter.uion (Repair/Recondition) o Deepening 0 Abandonment WEL.U f' L23776 111080 Start Card # (6) LOCATION OF WELL By legai description \\en Location: County Lane Township T 17 SIN or S) Range R 2 WE or W) Section 33 I. NW 1/4 of S E 1/4 of above section. 2. Either Street address of well location 5390 Main St.. Springfield. OR or Tax lot number of well location f~6 0.3 3. ATTACH MAP WITH LOCATION IDENTIFIED. Map shall include approrlmate scale and north arrow. (3) DRILLING METHOD D Ro,ory Air D Rotary Mud f] Hollow Stem Auger D Orher D Cahle 9/2/98 (7) STATIC WATER LEVEL: 10 ' Ft below land surface. Artesian Pressure Ibfsq. in. Date Date (8) WATER BEARING ZONES: Depth at which WDter was first found 10 I materiaJ VokJdcd Threaded Glued o DOS n &sil t Wellsenl: Malenal Bentonite 3/8 Amount 1!iO 1 bs . Grout weight 14' 1 lbs./ Borehole diameter 1?" in." ~nto!!.!!.e plug at least 3 fL thick Screen I ., : BORE HO~: C~oNSTRUCTION :ialStandards D.[1F Depthofcompletedwell_.~~----,ft. land surface "";~I f{L -. q j TO . . 0 , "I . ---1:. ft., .' Water-tight cover Surface flush vault Locking cu~ Casing. II dltlmeler 2 in. matenalSch. 40 PVC Welded Threaded'lGlued Seal --5..' ft. malenat Sch. 40 PVr. - interval(s): From~To ?O. From_ To Slot size O?O in. Filter pack: Material Si 1 i ca Sand Size lO-?O iu. D 00 D Liner diameter TO ~ft. 1111. jl Filter pack ,4t ft nt-' TO -ZO-' ft. "1 WELL TEST: DPump DBailer D Air D F10wingAllesiau Penneability Yield GPM Conductivity PH Temperature of water 5SU OF/C Depth artesian flow found ft. Wu.'i water an:Jly,~'i.~ done? [}Yes 0 No By whom? PNI Depth of strata to be analyzed. From !i I ft. to 2" 0 I ft. Remarks: Name of supervi<;.ing GeologistlEngineer Mi k p nn yol ; ng, RRRoA" ORIGINAL & FIRST COPY-WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT 'From To E.'ll Flow R;;ite SWL 10' ?Ot , nn~ . (9) WELL LOG: Ground elevation 505 I Material From 0' .5' in. 10 ' To .5' SWL ine . .510' matri 10' 20' in DEe 8 WATER RESOURCES DEPT. Date started 9/2/98 Completed 9 2 98 (unbonded) Monitor Wen Constructor Certification: I certifY that the work I perfonned on !he consUlIction. lllteration, or abandonment of this welf i!i in compliance with Oregon well COnstruction standards. Materials us and infl ation reported above are true to the best knowledge lief MWC Number 10348 / (bond ODSlJUctOr Certification; Is eptres i." forlhe.constructi()n.altera~bandin~10 war perfOJ1l1ed on IS well dunng the construction dates reponed above, All worK performed during this time is in compliance with Oregon well construction standards, This re s true to the besl of knowledge and belief. MWC N?i!f?~ ' Date ~ D COPY-CONS RUCTOR THIRD COPY-CUSTO ..f.t.-.~ Property Line i , i , i i i i i i , I i , i i , i j i , i j jl I I j i i s: 25.000 j T: 27.000 i E: 2.100 i X: 10.000 i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i j i i ~ I! ~UndeveIOPl!d i Lot i i i I , i l.E!leI:! ~MW-l a: J.OOO To 27 E: 73 X: J80 . . .. N Apartment Complex 20 : RECE'VEi); o F"\.~-- ~ 10 RECEIVED (IUT) MW-3 ~ 8: 2.5 T: 2.J E: NO X: 1.7 DEC 1. 1. 1998 WATER RESOURCES DE?! SALEM, OREGON . OCT 2 B 1998 WATER RESOURCES DEPT. SALEM, OREGON . 2AsPl10f12 2'''"'2 500 Gaffon MW-2. Wosle Oil UST o r- -- __ ""'I_-___~ l 6.000 Gallon I: 6.000 GaJlon : lUST ItUST I ------ --.... ....-- -.... i 6.000 Gou;;-j rs:ooo Gallon I lUST IIUST I ...._________oJ ....____ _.... ( ) Can"l'Y IllI'IOlHlWA1i3'f Pl.DW ~HL.... 2_2 ( ) Concrete MAIN :ma:er AIW-l o s: 3.000 To 27 .E; 7J X: J80 Monitoring Wen locrJtion and Identification Number aenzene ("giLl Toluene (JJ9/L~ Ethylbenzene J./g/L) Xylon.. ("9/L RGUflE 1 JOHN'S GAS &: GROCERY. 5390 Mein Street, Springfield. Oregon SITE PLAN .Bergeson Boese 8< Associates. Inc. 0 Environmental Engineering 65 Centennial LOaD Eugene. Oregon 9740 1 (541) 484- 9484 . LANt: 00075 , " .p.L> ~ oM,;z~ r/. 0 ~~ STATE OF OREGON GEOTECHNICAL BOLE REPORT (as required by OAR 690-24Q..035) (1) OWNE~ROJF:(:T: Name" Address moo, G/'--3 Cit " State . z; (9) LOCATION OF HOLE by legal description: County, ~~ - Latitude - Longitude Townsh;~ -;:r;7.,?'-.s N ~ang, ~~ E o@.vM. S,ction J3 AI~1I4 Sw..r-1I4 Tax Lot Lot Block Street ~ddress orWell (or lJearest address .. (2) TYPE F Wi New 0 ~ening, 0 Alteration (repairlreconditi (3) CONSTRUCTION: DRolaryAir o Hand Auger DHollowStemAuger ORotaryMud o Cahle Tool 1\JPushProOO Oath" (4) TYPE OF HOLE: . t!uncased Temporary 0 Cased Pennanent o Uucased Permanent 0 Slope StabiHty 0 Othe, (5) USE OF HOLE: Abandonment (6) BORE HOLE CONSTRUCTION: ". i Special Construction approval 0 Yes k~ Depth of Completed Hole /6" fl (10) STATIC WATER LEVEL: /~ ,. fl below land surface. ~sian pressure ___ lb. per square inch. (II) SUBSURFACEWG, Dale e.2 -/-3 c=. Date GroWld Elevation ~;7; .I Material Descri lion From To SWL HOLE SEAL - To Sacks or pou[ids 'E I Date Slarted Date Compleled L Backfill placed from ----n:- to Filler Pack placed fl'QIR fL to -fe. Malerial fL - ,Size of pack' (12) ABANDONMENT LOG: Diameter From Material Des<.Ti tion From To Sacks or Pounds (7) CASINGJS Slotsi Datesrarted . Casing- Screen; (8) WELL TEST: o Pump o Bailer 0 Air Permeability Yield Conductivity PH ~ TemperaNre of w.arer ..s-~~ Depth artesian flow found:==:=:ft. Was water analysis done? ~ Yes D No By whom? ~.J'">>of.. '" Depth of slrala analyzed. From /,,2 '" ft. to - Remarks~ l!> /.1: .- o ProCessional Certificiltion (to be signed by <l licemied Wlllcr supply or monitoring well Constructor. nr Oregun registered geologist or civil engineer). I ac::cepl responsibiJily for the construction. aheration. or abandonment wnrk per:orme~ ~uri~g ~e c::onst!l.1l:1ion ~tes repo~ed above_ All work performed dunng thiS hme IS In compliance WIth Oregon s geotechnical hole construction standard,;_, This report is lrUe to the best of my knowledge and belief. /.. Lie gistration Numbe.r ..k~ o Rowing Artesian GPM - fL '.', I THIS REPORT MUST BE SUBMmED TO THE WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF WORK SECOND COpy -gRe,~BMITTAL REC'D DEe. .72010 ORIGINAI... WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FIRST COPY _ CONSTRUCTOR 'j ;': ,Geological Survey Oregon from aerial 1967 :an datum ate system. . J*DN 'N l~J,~ I f'~I~ ./ .-.-- I ~:t:-:-:'~':::-~~.. 1000 0 1000 -'--- l:""'"""~'""""1 I 5 F.=f"_'~~'1 .'=1.. 5000 6000 11 " !..:o.].=.__...._....: ] KllOMI .._.._--._._...._~ . . STATE OF OREGON WATER SUPPLY WELL REPORT (as required by ORS 537.765 & OAR 690~205-O210) LANE 69549 04-21-2009 (1) LAND OWNER Owner Well I.D. First NameBRUCE Company Address 4] 8 52ND PLACE City SPRINGFIELD Sm,. OR Zip 97478 (2) TYPE OF WORK ~N.w Well 0 Deepening 0 Conversion o AJteratioD (repair/recondition) 0 Abandonment @lDRILLMETHOD {zgRotaryAir DRoiaryMud OCable DAuger DCableMud DReverseRotary OOther (10) STATIC WATER LEVEL Dare SWL(psi) + SWL(ft) ~xisting Weill Predeepening I I I a I (4) PROPOSED USEr:><:JDomestic DIrrigation DCommnnity ~ompleted Well 04-70_7000 10 DlndustriaV Commericial D Livestock 0 Dewatering Flowing Artesian? 0 Dry Hole? 0 DThennal OInjection DOther WATER BEARING ZONES Depthwaterwasflrstfound 19 ~~p~~~o=~::~ ~~~S~~~CTI~N Special Standard DAttach copy) 1~~:91 Fro~ I TOiR lEst ;:ow ISWLIOSl) I ~ BORE HOLE SEAL sacks! Dia From To Material From, To Amt lbs ~ ,00 I ~: !r'm'"' I 0 I '0 m (11) WELL LOG Method DA DB ~C DD DE Shoe o Inside DOutside 0 Other Temp casing Dyes Dia From (7) PERFORATIONS/SCREENS Perforations Method Holte Air Screens Type How was seal placed: [}nher Backfill placed from ft to Filter pack from -aio Explosives used: Des Type- (6) CASlNGlLlNE;R U~. Perf/S Casing! Screen creen Liner Din From gnl Last Name PETERSEN ft. Material It Material Amount Size From To 58 Gauge .25 SU Plstc Wid Tlrrd In 2 Location ofshoe(s) 'iR To Material To 'if) Scm/slot Slot # of Telel width len7th slots pipe size 1"'1 m (8) WELL TESTS: Minimum testing time is 1 hour Temperature ~R OF Lab analysis DYes By Water quality concerns? DYes (describe below) I Fmm , Tn o Pump 0 Bailer Yield ~al/min Dmwdown I 1 I @ Air 0 Flowing Artesian T' steru/P,":" deoi Durati~n (hr) I n"'to,.r;ptin" Amoun' g] I Page 1 ofl WELLLABEL#LllOI202 START CARD # 11006620 (9) LOCATION OF WELL (legal description) County r :mf'; Twp 17 00 s N/S Range ';) no w Sec -31- ~ 114 of the ~ 1/4 Tax. Lot 2400 Tax Map Number Lot Lat 0 "or Lon -"-'-"or g--- (fi', Street address of well C Nearest address rI8 52NDPLACE SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 FJW WM DMS or DD DMS or DO Ground Elevation Material From o ~ , To , 3 58 OP SOIL OAM liRA VEL WITH SOME CLAY . Date Started 04-'Jo~?nOQ Completed 04~20~?OOQ (unhanded) Water Well Constructor Certification I certify that the work 1 performed on the construction, deepening, alteration. or abandonment of this well is in compliance with Oregon water supply wcll construction standards. Materials used and information reported above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. License Number 177M Date 04-'J1_7nOQ Electronically Filed Signed nOTlr.r A~ 1) T1TrKPn rF-filp.rll (bonded) Water Well Constroct(]r CertificatioD I accept responsibility for the construction, deepening, alteration, or abandonment work performed on this well during the construction dates reported above. All work performed during this time is in compliance with Oregon ,water supply well construction standards. This report is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. LicenseNumber 1"i.41 Electronically Filed Signed CA SF.Y rONFS m fF~filf';rf\ Contact Info (optional) Date~C'D rlcr ... ?nm ORIGINAL - WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT TillS REPORT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF WORK Form Version: 0.89 . . Sf;) 11~'mlll:"ft~'~I.IIII~Ulfi.' Geotechnical & Construction Services September 21, 2010 Ms. Janet Lobue University of Ore90n 1276 University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon 97403 . Project No.: 2107120 Report No.: E-26687 Re: UO Allen Hall Material Testing University of Oregon Campus Eugene, Oregon Dear Ms. Lobue, Attached are the results of the testing performed by our representatives on the existing wall materials at the above referenced project on September 14 & 15, 2010. The testing program included brick .mortar shear strength and epoxy anchor tension testing in the 1922 building and laboratory compression testing on fifteen (15) concrete cores obtained from the walls of the 1954 building, as outlined in emailletters from kpff Engineers dated July 20 and August 17, 2010. We trust the attached information meets your current needs. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office at 541-684-3849. Sincerely, A,';I(.Aw. - Michael L.' Mey~ Vice-President Attachments: brick shear tests - 1 page anchor tension tests - 1 page compression tests - 1 page fioor plans - 3 pages hydraulic ram calibrations - 2 pages pictures - separate PDF attachment c: TBG Architects - John Lawless (email) KpffEngineers - Josh Richards (email) MLM:sc This report and/or enclosed test data is the confidential property of the client to whom it is addressed and pertains to the specific process and/or material evaluated. As such, information contained herein shall not be reproduced in part or full and/or any part thereof be disclosed without FEr Testing & Inspection, Inco's written author" 700 WI Com3! A~ 'CoM;ls, Oregon 9733O'pIrre 1541) 7574698 .fax (541) 757-2991 29540eAiport fboj 'Eugere, Oregon 97402.pIrre (541) 684-3849 fax (541) 684-;3851 62979 NE Plateau Drive, Suile3' Bend, Oregon 97701. phone (541) 3824844 . fax (541) 382-4846 DEe, REC'O 7 2010 - U> , ><.... GlN 'tl'tl c .. -'" .r:'tl "c tll", c.. Gltll .. "U tIllXl "::I "'- ~1Xl tIl'tl "0 .5.r: 0" ...,Gl ..2 '" I 1::.., Oq 2.... ~.., c~ Ou ~2 21- tIl <I: .. '" Gl.r:. .c'CJ>< tIlcGl ..Gl'tl c .. C .-.. - otll ..., c Ul ::J'tl'tl c"'c ._ 0 ::J ><...J ~o "', :!i - Gl Gl" C)::I:=- ::J Ul SUl .. Ul ell!! c.. ... OUlUl "'... Gl ~.5 ..c: .....ou .......,c Ul .- Ul 'tl ..;. e &llil el - .. 'c ::IUl 1nSUi' Gl'-Gl I-Ul.r: .. c u - Gl C tllc'- f!.- - Gle > <I: .. . Ul 0 ~z . CO"""NCOCOCOM..qCO ~~~COC0C'O~,.....~ ID<DCO('l')~N-.:tC"')'V N..q~<DNOOCOCO COCD"I""""'<:tLONOI"--LO CO~~LONoq-,....oq-<D 000000000 LOOl!)LOoOaOLO ~~g~o>~~~~ """,o..qcoacooooq- o>ocn(()ooooOO> C":icici~w~cci.q.ci (Q(O(O(()<DIDCD<O<O ~ ~~ ~ ~ M'<;f'C"'>C")COMN CI") N:;:NNMN;::NN - XNXXN XC'\l'l"'"" X coX~=:tX~XN~ t::oqo('f)('f)'l:t('l')~)(('I? ("')MMMXMX"'ltM x('l')xx.=:tx~xx :::tx~~T"""~"I""""CX)~ T'""CO.......'I"'""CO'l"'""CO ,- co coco co aJ ......C\lM..qIDCOr--COcn en en en en en en en en en 0; E o C '0 .l!l m E ~. 0> '0 C m c o ,:.;::::; o :E - o C 0> '0 IE 0> o o Q) c 'Vi ::J '0 0> C 'n; 15 o 0> .c '0 "3 o :;:~ ...N ~ci ...~ 0> c ::J 0 ca'.;:::i >~ >.u> .c " - '00> ~..::. ::J U> 'OU> ~~ ...u> g Q)' > ~'(j) :;: ::l ~ xc. 0> E '00 .so , III c: o :;:: .. u o ...J ... Ul Gl I- . . c: o :;:: .. u o ...J '" 0> ' E!i ~U> -0> :;:.s 0- 'g-W .-c: _ :;:E W :;: ::J > 0- ~$_ID8 -oQ)(l)..c...... c: 0 >" 0 :Jc:~cot) 00 N rn '-u'O"CQ) OJ C:c: Q)~5C1]~ ~ 0 rn c>N .c -g I]) .5 '0 ('is :>"0 c: " M 0 c rn t--'l:;t..c.!!1w C\I (lJ Q) E "'0 -g" a. (I] CroCOrnJ::: rn '" 0 I-w"Ocn3: OJ c:: c Q) 0 E'-coQ)'O o 8 LO ~ .S o ' :;: en g>m 0 ~ C._ 00 u"Cwt;::O -= 4)1:1 Ii:: "3:J c:c;; 1:1 ... .o.o:":NC:: 000'- ___.....NoDOO 0'000 wc;::q:: C:O:::..Q _..c-->Q)wQ)- . (1)."5 ~ ~ 0 > > :> Q.l CDOID,..cOOO> lUll) ::>m..c..o.cO N'" .~br.... (TJ,,(fJ ro~ N~('t)LONm"l""""(..,,, J I I I I T'""N~~ m()~<(<( I d, r r ~"'f"(1")~:::~co:!",,", T'""(l')T'""N('I')N~(",)T'"" E~EEEENE'" , 0 !5 goo 0 E 0 ,E eo~eeegeg -~=-- ~ '- ro=cu1ii1ii1ij==m= :;: ~ :;: :;: :;: :;: m :;: m ..c ..c..c..c ~ ~ t::1D'5tt::=1D:51D gm@gg5~5'~ ~,-,-,-,-f/)>f/);> OOOOQ'-'-'-'- 'C 'C.C'C .c,Q.Q ,Q ,2 w w ~ w w '- '- '- '- ....................X'wwQ.)Q.) ti'i~~~wE.EEE , c:i z .. Ul Gl I- T'""C\IM"'f"lOtof'-..COm (f)enenenenen(f)(f)en U> c: m a. o o -= '0 0> .c: o j1l 1ii 0> 0> U> . RE.SUBMITTAL REC'O DEe 7 2010 co co 'OJ' W :!! I- III <C I J!l II) l\l I- "0 III a ..J ... "0 lIJ .. a .c <.l c <C "0 IlI_ a II) ..J"O "OC .. = ~.e <C e = II) ~:= ~a C> ::. III Cl ... III . Ql a I-z . III '" .. III E l\l a:: " ~ ....0 <5 0'; .0 .oe: >: >:" o 0" (i) IDo .0 .0'" " "E "'C"O"'C"'C"C-couoo"C 2.2L~222~2~~2 oooooo~O~rno cc:cc:c:c::OC:Uc:c c:c:c:cc:c:~c15t5c g2~~~2c::gc:~~ CUCGCU<UctJcu'-ro:'-xCD EEEEEEj2Ej2"E L... L... I... '- '- '- 0 '- 0 .... .e.e.e.e.EJ2cuJ2cuffi.E OlQ)Q)Q.)Q.)Q)t5WornQ.) "O"'C"O\J"O"'C "C Q.)"O ....'-'-'-I-I-Q)L...Q.)"CI.-. 00000 o.~ 0.5..... 0 c:ccccc:;::c:i:::C5C: .9 .Q ,2 ,Q ,2 ,2 'co ,2 'm .0 ,2 oooo1)u..c:t)..c::]o ctlrocorororol<tlI.....Ct1 '-1-1..."'" L... L..."'O 1-."'00 '- XXXXXXQl)((]).ox Q)Q)Q)Q)Q)Q)oQ)o~Q) ooooooc:ocoo ZZZZZZe:Ze:a;z g :8.0 " "Ol rn ['IJ.,x:" ~ ~e Ol " .0 o 0 t5 Z Z't: tIl oooa'oooaago aooaoooooND LOLOLOi.OLOLOlOLOl,{)C")LO M("')MC"')("')C"')Cf)("')C")+lt"') aooooooaoga LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO I.() to<O<.O<OtOtOco<.oco~co '(-C\lM">tLOc.of'-..COOl~::: tIllOlOtIltlltlltlltlltlllOtIl " " ~ 0> Ol "C t::! ~....:. N~ N~ ...0 ",t::! ",M ,,0 .oOl .ani e:"C "e: ~.Q g~ -g'o.. '" ij "'''' ~ ~ 0.0. "" ~;n >-00 I" ~clS =0) Ion 0><.0 e:N '000::: :JrJ) ow 'Cf) :!w d,1 00 cO o'=- "'.c: ~o.. 0" .c:"C "C ... ~ ffi 8 E .5 -g -0.0 Q) E =Ol Ol_ u;~ .S "'"' "C~ o~. ~ +1 -oc ~'" ",.c: w:=: E>: "'Ol "E:o> " e: .0'" . "C r--~ ~'" x>: e: . >: ~o M"C u; .e o z III C a :;::; III <.l a ..J ... II) Ql I- . . C a :;::; III <.l a ..J 0> c :a: ID e: E l2 jg ~ >: '" 0 " -0 '" C Q) .3: ~ ~ ~ g 3: o 0=0 o 1e -0 Q5 '+= M.S > -g ...... 3: ~ Q) N C I- "t:J'Q) w ..... ll.l 0 c: '- > 0 0 0 ::s 0 Q)..... .~;;::: c: - ell '0-0 eo"O Q) ct!(:: cnuc3:; _N OJ aJ:J" 0.... :>>eo (1)0 o 0 O)~ (I) a. ..o-gfl)"'O .0"'.8 '" >c 0, in 0 ro ;: ;: ..... ...CI Q) 0.2 ,oroE -Q.) "O~:: ctI J5? C-oCOIo... t'OcM- Cot-.. a;rnu~ _'0 10- c: 0 C c E ~ ctl"O co ct'l 810...1.0.5: cC: tn8C'i>: EE c C)W 0 :J .2 :0 C(/)Olo-Io... I... 10... cO :-'-W-.::OoOo,,-oO S:2c: 00000 - .o's:="g -.:: l;:. t;:: I; 0'15 0 -..ooC'J(l)dlQ)wii=a-a; 0...... ::>>=>>Q)cu..... -ocnooo..2o>1::c m€ m~~-g::Cl]-g~?3~ ::: o~::: LOMO)U,:: rn ctl r-...C('f)CO"l"""~~"I"""CO , 'C;t:: N [ I N I I co I I I I I O? <( tD'7<(<(~~ffi~..q-r...:~ "V(j)~I!)-r"'''-C'?''I''""c.9('f') ('f') "'''I''""N N C") E ...-C')"I"""N E E C/) E~EEEoEoE"o oEoogegeg~e OOOOIo..._c.......'-_...... '-O'-Io.........o'+-o_rno ="""==o_o_oc= ro=COca ---- <<l "~~,,~~~q~,, J::................s:: :>.c J:: o.J:: 't:cn:J:"t1;i::;1ii'-"cnO"i:: omooctloaJ5Q.l......0 :~~:cur.n~(/)~~: .g.g.g,g,2,Q.2.Q.Q.g.g Q) Q.l Q.) Q) 10... 10... '- '- '- Q) Q) xx.xxlY22.2!2xx WLUww.!:.!:EEEww c:i Z ... II) l\l I- "I"""C\lM.....LO<or--comOT"" mc.cCOO:lOJa:lOJ1DlDcom '" e: '" 15. ~ o o 0= "0 Q) .c: " l'l ... '" " " '" , P MITTAl RECIO DEe 7 2010 . . N '<t (,) :e I- Ul <I: I ... 1/1 Gl l- e o "(jj 1/1 l!! Q. E o (,) .2l l!! c.l e o (,) 'tl ell ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u- eIlen ~ 0) ;:!: 0"> ~ '" r- a) '" N a) '" r- 0"> N 0"> 0"> 0) CD '" r- N ...,. CD ~ r- 0 r- N l:Q. C') '" 0) C') 0) '" '" 0) 0) '" 0) N ...,. '" C') 0 0 e 0 .. :0::00 0 0 0 '" 0 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" U..._ C') r- 0"> ..,. CD ..,. ~ a) r- 0 0 '" r- 0 CD eIlU..J 0"> '" 0"> 0"> 0"> 0"> 0"> 0"> '" 0 "! '" 0"> "! '" .. III cO cO cO cO cO cO cO cO cO ~ ~ ci cO ~ cO aLL. (,) ell > .- .c Ill... en C):::- 0 CD ~ '" LO CD '" t"- o 0 0 N a) 0 N !r::! 0 ~ co 0"> CD LO 0) ..,. 0 '" co N 0"> 0"> 0) c.\!! '" 0 r- LO r- CD 0 0) LO <0 ~ co ~ r- 0) ..,. 0) 0) 0) 0) N 0) 0) 0) '" 0) N ...,. N 0) E'" oU) 0 E 'iii :l'tl'tl LO LO '" 0 LO LO a LO lO 0 0 lO a lO lO E .. C ~ 0 ..,. a) ~ lO a) ..,. CD N a) 0> 0 ...,. ...,. .- 0 :l co 0 0) r- N 0) 0 r- '" r- 0> C') a) 0 co ~..J~ ..,. LO ~ 0"> ~ 0) a) r- 0) ~ 0"> C') ..,. lO ~ C') N 0) '" 0) 0) 0) N ...,. '" 0) N 0) 0) ..,. \!! 8.c'iii ~afD 0) a) 0 0 LO a) LO 0) 0 a) 0 C') lO '" co eIlc.c ~ 0) 0 LO '" 0) r- <0 LO 0) 0 ~ N 0 0) c.eIlg "" .,.; o:i "" o:i .,.; "" .,.; o:i o:i cO <Ci .,.; cO o:i Q...J :: .. 0 '" .. 0 O.i::'iii ."...", a LO 0 0 co LO lO LO lO LO 0 co a LO 0) ell Cl.c LO r- 0 LO 0) '" r- r- '" N lO C') lO '" ~ ...Cu "" .,.; o:i ..,. o:i .,.; "" .,.; r-: o:i cri r-: .,.; cri o:i U ell C g-':::: )( LlJ ..~ CD .s U) .. ell ell LO LO LO lO lO 0 '" lO 0 lO 0 lO lO a '" OE.c '" '" N '" N 0 a '" 0 N 0 N '" 0 '" o .. U .,,; .,,; .,,; .,,; 0) "" "" 0) "" .,,; "" .,,; .,,; "" "" ._ c Q:: c 0 .s::: .s::: .s::: <1>.2 Z ~ 'i' ~ '" 1ii - :; 1:: , , ~ '" eo :J ~ 0 0 01; E , N 0"> '" , , 0"> 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ <0 CD a LlJ rJ) N rJ) Z LO co OUo 0 0 ~ '" N N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J: ~ ~ 0) 0) .3 0 > > '" 0 '" N '" 0) 0) c:: '" J: J: cO ~ , o 'i' 0> '" c: o "0 Q) 1ij C. E 8 Ul '" ;: OJ .!: Cii jIl c: o 'iii Ul ~ "- E o () "0 c: '" '" ..,. u :;;: f- rJ) <t: 5 .~ CD Q)~ ()"O c: c: .g)eo ..", 8~ ~> c: - :Co Q)~ " ~ ctl _ ~ 0 E b '08 ~~T'""l;;. ("') I l s:: I .!Q~'- :mrnma1 ro~oc ~" c '00 " 00.:0 r---.T'""-cO C:CCUQ) QOc'- '- 1-'- Q,) Q)jIl.l!l;: (llw..crJ) EEoQ) rn.~ ~ 0 :c"'O~::. ~:5(fJ~ ~~~o o ouo,;: Uu .~ iJi ~ Z PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O DEe 7 2010 . /IIO!mlOJOJ..lISn^lImIO o~oz '4HL Elunr u6!saO:J!lewal.l:lS H~A + B81 ~ '" @ -----<'I If' - m ii:l II) en -< . lapowaClpue UQisuedgl(1!HUall\;l uoBa.tOJoAl!SJBA!Un .L"'.9VL:eI8:lS N'Ir1dOV'l3G L 131\31 o z w c.9 W ...J c.9 z f= if) W f- ~ ~ z. w ~ ~ '" w > U5fil "'. w- g:g ~" O~ "c w~ ~. ~~ "0 zo o " . . < ~ " 0 o . ::J ap (Jl :J Lt>C!': <( ~ ~~. L'5 ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ m ~< ~ffi ~ q.g all. W Z..J I- 0...1 !;;: ....oc<! ~~~ 0 (/)(2!d I-- ~'" 9 w...Jt;:: ceo:?: t ~~~~tn~I: <~'z(.J~F ~ ~~!:l1~5j w ~Qa~(/)g ~ uillg O~~ a 0. t ~ ill 0 o.l l\\ ~. ~ . T . i~ _ ~.i. _~=",j,....,-,r~"I""'.' ==~e;..1..b__ ~. II;. If a~ iIV---m'1 . ::' .,~.,j':r, \111' '" ~~, ...!. ~ -'. oJ I.~- . JI 11:j,,: 'K,-~. :~i - II - d\1 .iI ;" ~.' !, \. I:i 1L,\ L1l ~. it -llt:'~~-=~:_::: - . It- lii.'~ I lr.li II - Ii ill -~-rtrii-- IJ Ii :11 ;11 - ii~' a f-": iii_,=, ;:;;~_~:I,[~ f?- -J\,...\ -l-- U , ~.;'P~7 =- ~l' II' ff-11':,t':' .~' ~. I ~; >:: 1~:n::';~=:"1II\ II il I , "lI'i<'l'II'" III III I.J t.J-L ~II i'm-~ 1t -I -~. u (~':_-' _ . ~ II III : ~... - IU ~IU: j..lp:. L.. 1",.",'1 f".''='''= I.~ 1\ " \ 1.-) 11 I I if ~ - ~~:\'!~I~ - II! - -<II::: I 3~~ ~ "I.... I L.~====J ":: ".=_=.__'::: - '71(4 --...~ "".:", I I - :i4-"-I:--i,t.----I,-:1=~ 1 \ I I " ,Il .' I' I I n.J, , , <J t---L-~,=,~~,'[--~2"-,..,".;::;-~~" I =~~ r,1 60_ --,'~ "1"~";.!i+--t r - -- --,...........<=r~- - I ,l""~t ,.---.--........,r:1 ' 1 ----- ~: \~ I' 1'[, , 'I' I' "1-' I' Ii:! jllJi- i 'l1tt~~~[rJI i 1'1" ) 'I I 'I ~~h,_:1 'I j, 'I l'l II' :~'~!-I~Ll'l:'I' [,~r"nl~flll 'I '::' -- '~f===~ I' II ,I ~ 1./ I" II I l I 1:1 '....' I ,,~ r; I ;;~,J,)J I I ~ I 'Ij~:: _J: l ~~ j ~ II "-I""---,!. ~L!~Jf I 1- 1~1!!,J___O~=--{ll=,Jl1 -- J,I!~_l_~ ~~:-d. ~I' ::J[~]kl LJ-~:: !:i ii,'JiLI II, 'il;1J';~fl1clil' !Ii IT ~r~fPlr,]r tJ li-:;) . II L_ i -=11 '-L 1- _jl.~_=-----cml' I ,! >::i" 'li'l LJ ~~~ - 1-' ':1' ;1 !~ L -- fC "7 '(~,\ fr-.' t r'~~\ 'I I, tJl.I ..,Jt-;.."Jrjl~i1~:.] , :1 il-- - 1'111':_ 1,'J1 i'Jr rl ~ 'il~ I" __ '" I,ll ,il: _I' ;I;jJr~~Jl:I:~l =~1 = I '--,~=~~T~._J-T~~"='r~==-lr~"=~=~=n~'"-=I~~i-- -1~ i i i i i Ii I I ! I ! Iii i ~ i ii' , "R.o {-..-LJl::,H... I I i ~~~€48~M~8 III o z w o w ~ z 5 ' c : ~ i : ~ i': z o o .0 ~<" !iIDo 8E~ 1JJ~~ i~~1!! ~~fu~ ~~~~ o:::J a: < O"'Cl>- cu....;:"", u:~t5::i ~~~~ 5~5i= [LJ~~ '<-" o <( .EEl ~: w "" ~" "0 <0 j~ ". Z" -< ,Z ~!.2 0" 50 ~~ ". ~D " 0" z~ 0, ~o a~ ili~ ~~ .= " L REC'O DEC, 7 2010 . . I'iO~11l0Jo.u.rS~1J\lNoJO H~^ + 001 O~Ol:'4IHeUrlr u6jseOO!leW1l4:lS lepOW;Jijpue uCIsueGlG1I2HuelW U06eJOJO^<!&J911IUn ,,'=,,9~H :sll!oS N\fld Ol"l30 Z 13A31 N o <( U\ \1) ti.. r~9 -f-~:':~r;; L,lf"'''''''''l-- - !ifi'l~~'- "'\J:' -;--if-~ tJ~:;:~~' !~- II' -1l~~ r~,:l'_-"--'__'._'_.{ \: I II !f--l~ -. ':7 \~~:~jF~ -lPir-- I -~;.r~~mm lill ~J' Ii ",f"'~"""~ 1rllj'--=-~' -, f~7 I't 1,~~1\__ -,:i-- ~, - . i'! 'j: t-- II I...;; "1 I" II V\ ~[II[--'i~ '~~I" ~=E' -I: ~'rj1 ~ ~- ./"- _~,==--ML~~ - l[l'---~- -~-"";I " ,,1-"11;1 i! '] ,,'J I ~" ~ ' . I ~_.r--~IL~<J:-~4:\ '-'-~:::-fPt.s-'-=7i I I I , ~!' ,ii I" I' ili"/'~:l~?I-,-{~ ,.~-=-_~, , , u i ---~'="'~=r-~~r~=:=;~ \-'''.i~Wt:~rr~t =-=r--~~Y--l l ' ~I' J' ' '1- :, I, Ii I, i~lillli~-lllr1 'I I 'I il_ 'II , i~ ' I I' '-II~~I' 1'~:'-!i.L0)liLl 'i::ll I ;;:-mmnnl Jl i ~ ]~J'Cll i I II ~ I I 1. ~!Ilt!i!i! , .., ',' ~.I II f "I" 'I I I ' U"=u~' m I Iji __I --J=-=f1-rJ~J',~~!~],l-,---j'i _ ' i __J _I~~]! J ~i~ -, fT~7~i \ ,- l '-r--t =I-~ 1'~'-'-1'-r-I-~~ ~~ ~ ,j ~ I ',- "I' -'- ;'11 I' lie ftll~ I 'I' 1'1 I' II'IL.' ill L.' -I I; ;,i }l_ -I'; l~' 'IQ ~l _..a...;L--=_.Jj '.JjJ I i i:1 I! ql Ii ~:';'oC'.J'" f 1j~7"1:7l= ~ I Iii I II ......'-1'1'- \111 \~"~I::jj::~l-::;-i~-....:r~ l ~- 'jl_-;-o J,..;7.:-l. ~ ~ .-l I "j'l ":1 i -J!~""l '" ----9:1 dL':I' rl } _1 " I.: 1'1.' jl/ jl/ Ii-' i!'! I'i! Ii I' :~, Ih l!f~, rl'- h--:. i. j. ~~ i~ ~1l iR I ~i I II ~ I ffl I~ l::d iit~ !.I ~.'---.---~ I ~ I I ~ I J 14- 111___.__ ';- <( I' - - - ::^--:;;;;;;....;:;...-"I.:-=--::---=-I.;;;"..;-.;;--...:,.--'+-~-=-jl;I:;..~..;;;;;;o--1 "~rl .;;;.J,..$I......~~'~-.J~.i;~'.!-.:.:;.:~::tll- - ~~ ~ 1 - - - - ~ - .- --1Iu ----(------ I 1 --:-1 - -- ~ , ! I ! ! 'I I, II II ! ! ! ~ I I I 1 I I, 'I' , , ' I I I i ji ""~"I Ii ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~.~~ ~ 9 ~ I ':j , z ' S ~ zEB r: l. o ~ w -' 't- \(\ Ci z w 19 w --' ~ ~ ~ z w '" ~ w w > u;fil ffi~ "''' ~w "" ow uo: w~ t;;~ "'~ uo zu o u ~ W ~ 53 a :::; ~~ 0 & ~~ ~~ ~z i::o: ~~~ ~2 ~Q 8~~ ~~ ~ffi ~~~ ~g\i)?~ ~~~~ f-~S w~~ UJt'}fu~ UJu,i= I-u.'" Cl.?;o::o ~~ffi gj2~ ~~W~ cd;:> ICIl5 lUiijo::< L5~~ ~I!!~ ~~~~ ?;;~~ <ta:::l ~a:t)5 v, => >-;;;<1: <ow- :.::~g xzt;j CIla:~tu ~IIlO o~;; t;~<..li!' ffi it ~\:l~~ w ~~ "u <0 "" "" "" z" -< !;(;!;; wO 0" ~~ ~F ;::~ "" 0" z< " 915 5Z ZW w" w< "" ~~ '" ":i- ~ 19 z F (fJ w r- " II I I @ PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O DEC7 2010 , e;k;-------- ,--~--"-"'--~ -~~-~~'I..:;- .'-~-21(' --"t',' -::;:~~ir-- l!'l l1:' 2~t"'~' ~:__= 'i! II t::, I 1111 r _J1. =..=~ c.... "\ W> J kill :: 1: -ii- l-'" .. l i' ; h l .~" I' ,;, [,' '~\'" 1 I'~~"/ ...---'"-""-' -- "'..... ~~ll ( l: \- I - i~ i\ -- f','''''''';;:a, F="'=='" ;; lJ " ,} !i-- 1 r', i~ JMtul---+~~1i. I".... l;-rrm'fT 'I III III -~~~~~)~-i ,Ii, t-'-------i:- : II ,,' 1'1' 00 II \1,.1, U\ il Ii) I I' ---I -It:-~ !~m.~i.{.. 'I: ~1 ' 11'-' Ii ,:1 \'0 IIJ. ~ '1,' U\---- \f~ _~ -Iii '" -- r - ~,}ihoJ. - ._I-"~~~J~r:--:J----:"~~ - _ -"4' -~", - ~ -'B'~"T""'/t. ,~:=="-~ Iln ..... f'~ I ~ ',~,.,..( ~ ,il,1 I' -"'-,",1 ~~ --i~ ITAt:~~'~-iT:t,.j~<,l !-i'r-7! I I I . ~' Itl, ...--.t... '.J,{ t '..I i...1L_-1 I , 1- I V-l I W 101...... =-f -:.. I~___.J pI' '" - -r=o';i:o: =~~I~r~I"'-C(\' 1:'~I',1~j~~~,~~~j..~;~--~ -!:<'i' 'I -F.~.." -"1 ~ I III ~ I 1 I ~ 1- ......s;:J"9, I'"' -~ "I~' i I ~ 1I1 I ""I ~ I. e'l' ,) I I ~ I If I r"', 1- '11 ~ ---ll /, 'I I r1'r----' I tl, u~ '-).r'...::.- ~)!! I :L../' /U I I. ii! "Hr' L' ., "i .[ 'Ill : I r .J~~~5~i I' m rr-fl~t'TI-"-Y-1 'i,!".I"f~~i~ /~l' "} I 11'.1 - '::1~:..~:.jt I ~~ .. r' I ~~ l ~ ~,.Iiir . Sl l ~:-"\~~~~!:., ' 'I I, ji t~,~ +i: " 1 ~I: !: i Ii I r ~ fIJfc:j <C L - =- j ;c-=o_-~:r--~-""-"U.--J-'-~"li~, """~~~"~~"-J-, i "",..;'~ ::: _ -i ~ ! ! ! ! ! 'I' I, II' 'II ! ! ! ~ I I I I I I, 'I' , , ' I I I ~ i r ~ ~ ~ ~"~. ~ I i NO~~HOlldAJ.l$nIlIN(l1 0 ~ ~ - - ro" In \I) Cl \'Ci . . HOA + 881 o~oz '41l ~ aunr 1I6IS9a~!leWa~:lS lepowal::lpUB uOjsuedl<3l1EHl!:JUV uo6aJo.o~~SJa^IUn ',l".9\./I:al~s N'Vld Ov.l30 E 13^31 9 9 r r o z w (9 w --' (9 z i= CJ) W f- " 0- ~ 2 ~ '" in w > wS on. ~5 o.@ ". Ow u~ w' Iil~ "'~ Uo 20 o U :::f' lU < w . ffi o w ::J o~ ~ ~i5 . -. ~ i=li! rz ~u '8Q ....2 :55 ~ffi 0,.0 all- .Z..J I- 0-' l-fi2;:naS!:<l UJf211j-"'t;; ~;;!~~~~ e::~> :ctiig i1i~ffi ~~~ :r.o::::;: <0-3 ~~a ~~~ S2G;g o~~ '" 0. m W I I I z o o ~o ~~'" ~[fJo 0-0 00" lli~~ i~~~ ~~~~ [;59lli~ w:Jr:r:<l: WO)(:I), IrLL<(:..J u::OI-;;! ~~~~ UlO::-1l.I liiwi3i':' ~~~~ C0 o <( D ~ I ~ . , z S 0. zEB ~: D > W D w .. .<" .t <0 "~ .. Z" -< t(~ w. o. SO ~~ ~l5 ee o. z~ ge "g "w .. .< t;;!;: ~I' L RECID '12010 DEe E III 0:: .~ :; III .. -g, J: ..... o <: o :;; III .. :e (ij () '" ~ :J .so.. III C c: o :;; ~ :e iii () . . o o "' ... -0 o o ... o o o N N (!sd) amssaJd aBnel) CIl 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 00 CIl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 '" 0 0 0 g 0 00 CO <Xl 0 N ... CO "'... ~ 00 0 0 <Xl ON ... '" '" '" '" 00 0 0 0 N ... NN N N N N'" CO <Xl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g '" (!) ",0 "'0 '" "'''' <Xl'" 0"' ",CO "-CO '" '" "'''' <Xl'" <Xl <Xl "-'" 'tl", "'<Xl <Xl'" ...0 ~N '" <XlN "'''' "'0 CO~ O~ "'~ ~N CO~ "- N<Xl <Xl'" ",0 ~ ~ "',,- N<Xl ...'" "'0 "", '" COCO "-"- ~ .s", ~ ~ NN "'... I -' <l: .- N ~~~~C~ :r:......ao~a... c: b ~ g C'~,1 "'"" ~......t:::a""":;t: <!C\IQ).....- a.. I Q) ~ Q) .I 'tl '" D -' 'tl Q) 0;' a Q) o ~ Q) c w c '6 '" Q) C( 1l,0 :J '" t'J 'It "'u Q) a. (J '" Ol .2..-G):JEE e e 'E m ctI ::J 0.. 0...0 Cl C( 0.. " :f! 'tl '" o -' 1000 E-5UBMITTAL REC'O DEe ;. . 7 2010 E III a:: .!:! :::l III ... "'C :>. :r: ... o c o :;:: III ... :f! Iii u III .. Ill. C C o :;:: III ... .c Iii" U ...J . ,. , . o o o CD o o o '" 000 000 000 V M N (!sd) e,"sSeJd e6ne!) o o o ~ 28000 27000 26000 25000 24000 23000 22000 21000 20000 19000 18000 17000 16000 - 15000 g 14000 " .. 13000 .3 12000 11 000 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 o o ~ ::J '" '" " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 D.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N v CD co 0 N V CD co 0 N V CD co 0 N V CD co 0 N V CD co 0 g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N N M M M M M V V V V V '" III C) Ill~ co 0 '" 0 co co 0 '" M M 0 0 '" 0 co '" '" 0 0 0 '" '" 0 0 "- m v 0 co CD m v m v "- 0 '" ~ "- ~ "- '" 0 CD r- V '" '" o~ ~ ~ M V M V V CD "- "- "- co co 0 0 ~ N '" CD CD CD CD CD CD ~ N M V '" CD "- co m 0 ~ N M V CD "- co m 0 ~ N M V '" CD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N N N N ...J <{ ro 0 0 "w c ~ IN~ '1""""000("') c:"NOI-n. (1)or::oo"- ~NO;~N:;t a. I al Q; I "0 '" o ...J "0 al .!::: 0 "'0 al", OM ~ al C ill OJ c il '" al a:: alV OJ", ffiCD 19 .. ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ Co 'O'o!::JEE a. a. .g ~~SUBMITI DEC. 7 2010 GLy of Springfield - Site_n Review Presubmittal Appiication · 51't-52,d & Main Street Redevelopment December 7, 2010 EXHIBiT A Parking Lot Lighting Fixture Specification & Photometric Test Report PRE.SUBMIITAL REC'O DEe 7 2010 rl"\nl"-II"'U L..V'I L-I'\o.AI I I I Il'\.l VI ,'-- ',j L1THDNIA ~GHTING. - fEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE _ Ideal for parking areas, street lighting, walkways and car lots. CONSTRUCTION - Rugged, die-cast. soft corner aluminum housing with 0.12" nominal wall thickm:ss. Die-cast door frame has impact-resistant, tempered, glass lens that is fully gaskemd with one-piece tubular silicone. FINISH _ Standard finish is dark bronze (ODBl polyester powder finish, with other architec- rural colors available. OPTICAL SYSTEM -Anodized, aluminum hydrofarmed reflectClrs: lES full cutoff distributions R2 (asymmetric), R3 (asymmetric). R4 (forward throw) and R5S (square) are interchangeable. High-performance anodized, segmented aluminum renectors IES full cutoff distributions SR2 (asymmetric), SR3 (asymmetric) and SR4SC (forward throw, sharp cutoff). Segmented reflec- cars attach with tool-less fasteners and are rotatable and interchangeable. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM - Ballast High reactance, high power factor for 70-150W. Constant wattage autotransformer far 175-400W. Metal halide 150W and below are standard with pulse-start ignitor technology; super CWA pulse-start bal1as~ required for WOW. 320W and 350W (SCWA option). Ballast is copper.wound alld 100% factory-tested. Super CWA pulse start ballasts, 88% efficient and EISA compliant. are required for 151-400W (must order SCWA optionl forUS shipments only. Notavailable: 175M SCWA. CSA, NDM or lNTL required for probe start shipments outside the US. Socket Porcelain, horizontally ariented medium base socltet for 70-150M. Mogul base socket for 115M and above, and 70-400S, with copper alloy, Ilickel-plated screw shell and centercontactULlisted 1500W,600V. USTING _ UL Usted (standard). CSA Certified (see Optionsl. UL listed for 250C ambient and wet locations. 11'65 rated in accordance with standard lEe 529. Specifications subject to change without notice. "". '--.. Catalog Number Notes , .11 Tvpe ~@ ~ Specifications EPA: 1.2 h' 'Weight 35.91bs [I6.2S k91 Length: 17-1/2" [44.5 cm} Width: 17-1/2" (44-'; cml Depth: 7-IIS" (IS.1 cml .JIoWeight as configured in example below. q ~4"~ (10.2 cm) 17-112" (44.5 cml Soft Square lighting KAD MH: 70W-400W HPS: 70W-400W 20' to 35' Mounting J' 7-IIS' (IJ:I I ORDERING INfORMATION For shortest lead times, configure product using standard Gptions (shown in bold), Example: KAD 400M R3 TB SCWA SPD04 LPI KAD ~ IKAD" IVol~~ no 20S' 240' 277 347 4S0' 'TS'r 23050HZIO Mounting I ~ ~ Wl.g!h17 (blank) Mag.atic SPD_ Square 04 4" arm ballast pn\e (B 6"arm CWI Constant RPD Round, wattage - pole 09 9' arm isolated WBD Wall 12 lZ'arm bracket WWD_ Wood pale or . wall ~ Metal !:lli1.!l bAll..Q.g Dres~ure 70M1.2.3 ~1 100M' 70S' 150M' 100S 175M' I 50S' 200M' 250S '250M 1 400S 320M' Ceramic , . metal 350M halide 5- 400M 50MHC 70MHC lOOMHC 150MHC WBA OADI2P Degree arm {polel" Degree arm (wall)12 Decorative wall. bracket1t13 Mast arm external fitter Twin mounting bar DAD 12WB Distribution KMA Hvdroformed reflectors R2 IES type II asymmetric6 ,R3 IES typem asymmetric" R4 IES type IV forward throw' R5S IES 1:Vpe V square ~enmentp.d 'reflectors SR2 IES type II asymmetric' SR3 IES type III asymmetric' SR4SC IES type IV fOIWard throw KTMB .8 Qptionalmult\-tap ballast(120,20B,240, 277V;ln Canada: 120,277,341Vl. Oprional five-tap ballast (120, 203, 24[), 217,4S0VI. 10 Consult factory for available wartages. 11 9" arm is required when two or more luminaires are oriented on a 900 drilling pattern. 12 Ships separately. 13 Available with SPD04 and SPD09. 14 Must specify voltage. N/A with TB. 15 Only available with SRl, SR3, & SR4SC optics. 16 Max aUowable wattage lamp included. 17 Maybe ordered as an accessory. 18 See 'NWw.lithonia.com/archolors for additional color options. 19 Mustba specified. 20 MustuseRP009 NOTES: 1 Not available with SCWA. 2 Not availahle'Nii.h~80V. 3 Not available with TBV. 4. Must be ordered with SCWA. 5 Reduced jacket EDZa required for SR2, SR3 and SR4SCoptics. 5 House-side Shield available, 7 Must spE!cify CWI for use in Canada. ,SniDned installed in fixture SF Slngle fuse 12Q, 217, 347V" OF Double fuse 20S, 240, 4S0" PO Power tray15 PER NEMA twist-lock recep~ tacle only (no photocontroll Quartz restrike system1S QRS time delayl0,\S Terminal wiring blockl5 House-side shield ~ CSA Certified Available for MH probe start shipping outside the U.S. Shioned seoaratelv17 PEl NEMA twist-lock PE (120, 20S, 240VI PE3 NEMA twist-lock PE 1347V) PE4 NEMA twist-lock PE (4S0VI PE7 NEMA twist-lock PE (277VI SC Shortening cap for PER option VG Van~J..iiHard PRE.SUBMI1ii{~l'^11e~9~@ DEe 7 2010 .':"1ff..:'r! ~ SCWA Super CWA pulse start ballast NOTE: Forshipments to U.S. territories, SCWAmustbe- specified to comply with EISA. @ LPI Lamp iocluded W Less lamp Rnish1& (blank) Dark bronze DWH While DBL Black DMB Mediom bronze DNA Natural aluminum ~. NIGHTTIME FRIENDLY Consi~tenlwi!llLEED~ goal!! & 6reenGlcbes'"alleria for IIgMl pollution ~educticn . Oi1!lI~_ls..sePllratll ~lIrnlog number. Tenon Mounting Slipfitte'r - .. ...", , Numbllr of nlCtUllIS Tenon 0.0. One Two@180o Two@90o Three@120o Three@90o Four@900 2-3IS" nO-Iso nO-2S0 nO-2g020 T20-32020 nO-39020 T20-49020 2-7/S" T25-ISO n5-2S0 n5-2S020 T25-320 T25-390" n5-4S020 4" T35-1S0 T35-2S0 T35-2g020 T35-320 T35-390" T35-49020 KADVG Vandal guard KADWG Wire guard Options GRS GRSTD WTB tiS CSA INTL Accessories n......I_.... AL -370 Sheet #: KAD-M-S ~D 250NI R3 (PROBE) - uutctoor t'nOWmeITIC .Kepun lLlll-'.!lVl/ VYW,VL':lUa.l-JI..I..IJVI1.IJ CVVl':>I l""'-JCVtUIJU.i'" 01"''' ..il...."''"........~,....'''~a,...... I", PARKING LOT L1G~FIXTURE PHOTOME~C TEST REPORT @ I./THDNIAJ./GHTINt:r ~(llifvBrands . I L'yh[irtg KAD 250M R3 (PROBE) - OUTDOOR PHOTOMETRIC REPORT KAD 250M R3 (PROBE) AREA LUMINAIRE, 250W MH, R3 REFLECTOR, FULL CUTOFF MEETS THE 'NIGHTTIME FRIENDLY' CRITERIA M250/U ONE 250-WATT CLEAR BT.28 METAL HALIDE, HORIZONTAL POSITION. LAMP OUTPUT: 1 LAMP(S), RATED LUMENS/LAMP: 19500 INPUT WATTAGE: 297 LUMINOUS OPENING: RECTANGLE (L: 1.20FT, W: 1.20FT) , CATALOG #: LUMINAIRE: LAMP CAT #: LAMP: EFFICIENCY: TER CAT AGORY: TER VALUE: MAX CD: CUTOFf CLASS: ROADWAY cLASS: 67% AREA f1 SITE LIGHT - TYPE II 26 7,119.0 AT HORIZONTAL: 65', VERTICAL: 67.5' fULL CUTOfF' SHORT, TYPE II NlGHTrlME FRIfNDlY Product Page Specification Sheet ..._..~.~... -' _.~...'-' -_.- ... .- ....-...,- ,.-"-""-" ..-.--.-...------'" 7.200 6.000 4.SOO 3,500 <.400 1,200 CD. 0 1.:200 20400 3.600 4,SOll ..000' 7.200 III - Q'H I@ . 9Q' H Polar Candela Distribution 1~'.1~ l,SlP 150~ ~~ Isofootcandle Plot 5 4 ~ ;2 1 O. ! 2 .3..4 5 6 13ll' 5 1200 4 1100 3 1000 2 90' ! SIP o 711' 60' 2 3 4 50' ... ,..-' -.~ V.A.:Ui: l{P 2Q'2 30' 4:P i:: ' 18Q' H . - Max Cd: 6S' H 5 -w' Illzo fc ::'.11 fc Mount height: 10ft . lHc 1m a.s fc Total LLF: 1 II 5 fc iliJ Q.1fc lIS 5ij'b Max Candela Distance in units of mount height u: Max Cd Value LUMENsPERZONE~-- --:-----~-----1 PRE-SUBMITTAl REC'D:zONAL LUMEN 5UMMARY------, ~~~ LUM~NS % ~~TAL__~ON~__LU~EN5_~_TO~_L_ DEe 20 ZONE_~MENS % LAMP %~~MINAIRE 0-10 201.1 1.5% 90-100 0 0% 7 10 0-30 1,974.2 10.1% 15.1% 10-20 621.3 4.8% 100-1.10 0 0% 0-40 4,010.6 20.6% 30.7% 20-30 1,151.8 8.8% 110-120 0 0% __..~. ," ;2"',,-.. __:..10-60 9,216.0 47.3% 70.5% 30-40 2,036.4 15.6% 120-130 0 0% 60-90 3,854.5 19.8% 29.5% 40-50 2,644.9 20.2% 130-140 0 0% 0-90 13,070.5 67% 100% AD 2_50M~i(PR~B,E) - Outdoor Photometric lOr! 50.60 2,560.5 60.70 2,375.2 70.80 1,422.4 30-90 56.9 19.6% 140-150 18.2% 150.160 10.9% 160-170 0.4% 170-180 http://www. visual- 3 d. cltOO]S!Photometric Viewer! defauJt.aspx?id=." o o o o 0% 0% 0% 90.180 0 0% 0% 0-180 13,070.5 67% 100% ,~,--~--"'._''"'''''- "-_..._",._,,-~~._,.,_.- EFFICIENCY TOTAL: 67% 0% . .....,.--- .....R.'... ..,".~:Pc "'~, PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'D DEe 7 2010 , -' -~ -."-. -~ ~.... ~ ./ / ~ City of Springfield - Site.n Review Presubmittal Application' 51"-520" & Main Street Redevelopment December 7,2010 EXHIBIT B FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map Number 41039Cl162 F . PRE.SUBMITTAl RECIO DEe 7 2010 "" . .. ..., , c , . ~ tON" NO",........,"C_.,..."'~'_"lO(:ATUI"""'''' ~::'::':".::...IO""'...>JC".,rn....'_...".o<m<. " CIT'iOPSl'lUNOflEUI .om " ;; . ~ , I I I ~. fa LEGEND ~-_....._"" -. -..--- ....~ -...-- ,...- ---...--- '---- ,..... --."..--- ....---.- -..-........- Ill!JlI -- ~~--_.... .----- -,~.....- I.... =:':-..::"-:::"'-= ...... -"'--'-'- --...-- -................ ~ O'::.OO>>~"i;::::..~ 00.::.......:::...._..__ ~=-~_._~ ~ ---- ---- "- _.- ....--- - -...- -I'J- - .- -- .. .-..---- --_.... --- - ---'"-- ~ .~ -, --..-..... --...'-.. ~m ~~~J:~~~~=~ _..k_.______.O.._ ...-.......~-- '---.........------. --.----.--- ----~--_.. ----.-....- ,---- '--'-'--""-'-'- .... .,--,----.-.."'- -------...--- ,--.-------- ---....----..- -------....-.---- ....--.--.-.- ....---.--.-- .._-_.__..._.~_-.. --...--....--....- -.......---.-..--. ..-----.--- -.....----- ::.':::"-..-------- ..,...----- -"":..~..""'" --.........-.....- -..."""--...----- ....-.-----.-.. -~--_._-_......~ ::.::::::.;:::=:...-=:.:::::---- . _.......~.." - . - -~~ Il1P ~U~IER (ImCll&lf tmCllVttlTE: NRE2,1933 PRE.SUBMITTAL RECID DEe .7 2010 . I'. --- ;" 0f~") . INDIVIJ)UAB.BARGAf!t. AND .SALE,DEED JANA.LEE OLSON, grantor, conveys. to OBO ENTERPRISES, LLC, grantee the following described real. property situated in Lane County Oregon, to wit: Begimiing on the' South line of the McKenzie Blgl;1way to a 'point North 89 degrees 44' West 5.0 feet from the intersection of said South line and the East line of the A. W. Hammit Donation L~d claim. No. 38., Notificati6n.No. 7187,. Township 11 South, Range 2 West of the'Willamette Meridif:U.l; runni'ng thence North 89 degrees 44', West along 'the South line of said highway 153..47 feet; t~ence S,?uth 0 degree 5' West, 217.8 feet; ,then_c;e South 89 degrees 44' East 153.47 feetj" thence North 0 degree 5' East 217.8 feet to the Place of Beginning, in Lane Co~y, 'Oregon; EXCEPT THEREFROM a parcel of land lying in the A. WoO Hammit Donation L~d Claim No. 38; Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the 'Willamette 'Meri<li~, i..., Lane C;:OU.'1ty, Oregon, an~ beL'1.g a portion' of that property described in that certain deed to William Prociw, recorded in: Book 318, ,Page. '68, Lane County Oregon Deed Records, the sai,d parc~l being described as folloWs: B~gipn;ing' at' the intersection of the West line of .52nd Street with the South line' o.f the exis:ting McKenzie Highway; thence West along 's,aid South J.!..ine 25 feet ( ,thence Southeasterly in a straight line to said West line at a point,-25 -fe'et, Sou~Iiof tne Point- o~ :~gi~nihgi."th~I1de North along said West line 25 feet to the PoiTlt, of B'eglnning, in Lane'County; Oregon.. ALSO :EXCEP,T the East 10 feet"-thereoi cohveyed' to the City'o:f Springfield'lter road:"-purPOf!e~ by" de~drecorded September IT, 1991, Recori::ie~" 5 Recept,ion.No., 91':':'4465-7" Lane-,CoUnty Oregon. Official Recon;is. The tr.ue considera-(:ipl1 for thiscpnveyance is. for a membership interest inOBQ Enterprises ,LLC" "This instrument will riot.allow use of the property described iii this instrument in viola.tion bf applicable land use 'laws .and regl:llati()ns.. Before signing or accepting. this instrument; the person acquiring fee title to.the property Should check with the appropriate city btcounty planning department to verify approved uses and. to determin.e: any limits on .lawsuits.against farming .or forest practices as defined. in ORS. 30.9'30. ". Dated: '/(P/{r3Ja~~/!rgJ~-;::ePj {t2e1~ State' of Oregon ) ) ) ss. County of Lane This instrument was acknowledged before by Jana Lee Ol.son . N~~~O(~~~ My comission expires: ,yuiJ g:?:7JL/ me on -:J;", [t.. -, 2003, I) OFFICIAL SEAL. . ., SlEp,HANIE:BUZZARD .. .! NOTARYJ?UBLlC,-OREGON . "./ .COr.lMISSION NO.A336378 . .. MYCOMMISSIONEXPIRESJUlYl1.2004 Until a change is. requested, all tax statements shall be sent to the foll.owing address: OBO Enterprises; LLC, 10.01 River Loop 1, Eugene, Oregon 97404. After recording return to.:OBO Enterprises, LLC, 1001 River Loop 1, Eugene, Oregon 97404 PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O DEe 7 2010 ~ ~! 1'\. ,1.) ! 'I ;. .:\ i ~.< . D~~ision of~hie.~:t~ Cl~;1<. Lane County Deeds and Records -,;;..~. {'J --_.-'-- -------- ~-~ .---.-- l~~~a~~!o~1 '~'..' 1111111111111111111/ 11111111111111111111111111111 00376739200300015470010018 . 01/07/2003 02;13:07 PM CASHIER 04 $26.00 .RPR-DEED Cnt=1 Stn:7. $5.00 $11.00 $10.00 INDIVIDUAL BARGAIN AND SALE DEED JANA LEE. QLSON, grantor, conveys to OBO ENTERPRISES, LLC,grantee the follpwing. described real.property situated in Lane County Oregon, to wit: Beginning on- the'S6uth,line of the McKenzie Hi!ghway to.a.point -North 89 degrees 44' West 5.0 feet from the -intersection of said South line and the East Tine of the A~ W. 'Barimiit Donation Land claim No. J8, Notification No. 7187, Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian;. running, thence North 89 degrees 44'. West_ along the South line, qf said higp.way 153447 feet; thence Sout:h.O degre~ 5' West, ,217'.8 feet; thimc.e South 89 degrees 44" East 153.4'7 feet; then'ce North Odegr'ee 5,1 'E~t 2:p.8 feet to ,th~_Pl.ace o~ Beginning" in Lane Cotinty-.'0regon; , ..'. . EXCEPT THEREFROM: a- parcel of land lying'in theA. W. Hammit Donation Land Cla.iin Nq. 38, Township 17' South, Range 2 ~'1est: of the Wiliamette Meridian, in Lane County, Oregon, and 'being a portion of that pro~rty described in that certain deed to William Prociw, recorded in Book 318:. Page. 68, Lane County' Oregqn Deed Rep9rds., the said parge1 being described 'as follows: Beginnirig at the inter-section of.: the West' l.ir:!e'of 52p.d Street with the South line of the eXisting McKenzie' Highway; thence West along-3aJ.d South line 25 feet; thence Southeasterly in a straight line to said West line at a point, 25 feet' South of the Point of Beginning; thence North along said West line 25 feet to the Point of Beginning. in Lane County, Oregon. ALSO EXCEPT the East 10 feet thereof cot:J,yeyed to the City of Springfield for road purposes by deed recorded September 17, 1991, Recorde;r's Reception No. 91-44657 r Lane County Oregon Offic-ia).., Records. The true consideration for this conveyance is for a membership inte~est in OBO Enterprises, LLC. "This. instrument will not allow use of the property described in this instrument'in violation of applicable land use laws and regulations. Before "signing or' accep:ting: th;i.sinstrument, .'the person acquiring fee title to the property should check with the appropriate city or county planning department to verify approved uses and to determine any limits on .lawsuits. against farming or forest practices as. defined in ORS 30.930." Dated: {lip /o~3 ( Ja9f~t2l~~;1tRt~~ITAfREC'D DEe 7 2010 State of Oregon County of Lane ss. .---;- r-/ This instrument was acknowledged before me on ,/4'Vl(k --, 2003, "" ~;~t~~!::Ei!i~:fL~t!~!!f~:~~:;'!E~:~;:~.~:~rtb:;~;~e~~~~~~ 318, 'Page 68,. Lane Coun~y,Opegon-'peeQ.Records, the ~ai<tparc~l .being described as follows: Begilining, ai the: intersection of the West line of 52rid Str_eet wH:h -the South line: of. the existing McKenzie:HighwaYi thence West along. said south',line' 25 fe~t; thence Southeasterly in ? straigp,t l~e to said West lIne at a 'point' 25 feet S6rith.6f the PoInt of'-Beginning; thence North a+ong s~d' w~st -line 25 feet to the Point of BeglnT!-in~, in Lane County r 'Oregon_ ALSO EXCEPT the East 10 feet thereof conveyed to the Ci"tY of Sprin_gfield for road purposes by deed recorded SepteInl::Er 17 t 19sn, Recorder"s Reception No~. 91-44657, Lane County Oregon. Official' RecordS. The true consideration for this conveyance is for a members~ip interes.t in OBO Enterprises, LLC.. "Thts instrument "iii not allo" use of the property described in this instrument in violation of applicable land use la"s and regulations. Before sTgning or accepting thisinstrumentithe.person acquiring fee title to the property should" check with the 'appropriate city or county planning department to ver.ifyapproved uses and to determine any.limits on lawsuits against farming or forest practices as defined in ORS 30.930." Un/hi) .J~..e.-" me0 <"7,"-J . Jafi(# Lee Olson .~. . . Dated: I //,7 /tr3 , I State ofOr~gon 'C61:lhtY<of Lane ) } ss. } ",."",,..,' .--,.,",".,. ". .".....~-~ This instrument was acknowledged before me on '~~1~ -----, 2003, . . by Jana Lee Olson ~~~&~~ Nota. Public for 0 e on '~1 Ii. :;J/).L/ Until a change is requested, all tax statements shall be sent to the folloWing address: OBO Enterprises, LLC, 1001 River LOOp I, Eugene, Oregon 97404. After recording return to:OBO Enterprises, LLC, 1001 River Loop I, Eugene, Oregon 97404 My comission expires: OFFICIAL SEAL . STEPHANIE BUZZARD NOTARY f'UBLlC~ OREGON COMMISSION NO. A336378 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 11,2004 PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'O DEe 7 2010