The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication APPLICANT 2/15/2011 [City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 . . Site Plan Review . ,-- Com an : OBO Ente rises LLC Phone: 541. 954.0217 Fax: Nick Bo les Address: 1390 Grosbeak Court, Redmond, Ore on 97756 ~!"'~~=M.'!II'i~.>it;H*-""'~W";'~=,':n~ll':'~~_"?::0-""Thb",ll<jW'4i~>;<i!'-~~,'(_':l~'l.-~~_~.<t:""":l':<:jMU__~_"'_<0/l~""t;:jf.~%:7~__""'-~>t.K""J!!l<';;';:*'<!<#.~>',"'':.'m''_;<'l< A Iicant's Re .: Kristen Ta lor Phone: 541-687-1010 ex 15 Com an : TBG Architects & Planners/lnc Fax: 541-687-0625 Address: lili~"";.,;"";i!,'''''II:~:j:#$a:''''''.~'f'<;:_.~~.""''ili",;""""""w>"_,,*~=--=,,,,,,,,,;;;e:;IIf<<~=~~"~'."'<<M--,=~...",~"M~:o::;">>.;;mm=_~'$'=-ll'"-<"~,,,__"""W_~';.:>.-;;,,w-<1I."i'ID~~_- Owner: Same as A Jicant information above Phone: Fax: Com an Address: '='\\~_.1~~t"""n;_=;=~::;'_'Y?:<:n.~~,~:*",,{,.~Ni'!;"I::f_1'iii~~_1>IIl'1(i!;lIi!t1,,=~_~,_~_~'~w_~~Ji!t._..,...,:,)M'~h';t:f;."'V_~,-.w_1ill!' ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: . 17-02-33-32 TAX LOT NO S : 6300 & 6200 Address: 5175 & 5]95 Main Street (Tax Lot 6300) 29,064 & (Tax Lot 6200) 36,606 Size of Pro ert :, . . ,. ., J Pro osed Name of pro"ect! Acres, 0 , -S uare Feet IZI -. ." ~ ~.. ',. x.....J -.,l ~ ., OO;I_K:_~l:I,._",_.=.W"''i!'~~;;_j'i.t~-",~j'''_''''''''''';;;<i<."","='''M-./;ti",';r--'t.iC\,_~itl'}____1'il:W".,.:.~<i'_'i.~~'.wc~\~M'l':3!','I';~'.,~.~,.~"'_~~...~_.t~:;w;'lllE!,1lNi'!*~''',1lh\C Description of Pro osal: Use: , , If you are fjJIing in this "form by hand, please attach your proposal I description to\this application. Mixed-use development: Community Commercial office/persoriiti'-s~rVjce/retai1/restaurant multi-tenant buildin develo rnent and a Medium-Densi multi Ie-unit housin com lex. . Gross Floor' Area : sf riate box on the next . -. Associated A lications: Pre-Sub Case No.: - oDt:09 Date: . Reviewed b : ~ Case No.: - C:J::XJD'L Date:Z I I ( Reviewed b : +z.-YZ-. A lication Fee: l'Q@jfliBft~l:!~ : 26), /:r 160 TOTAL FEES: FES 1 5 49ltOJECT NUMBER: 'FRsll-OOOOS ;:i1.'<:l':;~~)}.;'~~~:X?'~~\Al;;$'$,,~~~1(f'..:iUM1t~~"'~0;f;;:;.><:;;~"';:::C~":;":I;t:11~Sil';~.k~~c,t~~"i<~1l!k.v~"'m<tJ&1ii',:'Il\re'jf.!~"111Yi-'!!lt>!'t:WJ:r.J2~$.~i~l~ltiJ~l~'Ii"~~~::t:~~jgjl it'i:tJ~::1~qjl:':ili::i'~,>f\l? Revised 11/19/09 Original Submittal 1 of 11 . . OWUler Signatures This application form is used for both the required pre-submittal meeting and subsequent c complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the applicatio process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted. Pre-Submittal The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory timelines, information, requests and requirements conveyed to my representative. Owner: Date: Signature Print Submittal I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check performed on this application at the Pre-Submittal Meeting, 1 affirm the information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be proVided if not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the ~ity may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a complete application. Owner: d ~ ~A Date: Signature . '--7/1, Jc ?- . ~ Print ~ Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal DO\lieod 11/1 o/no ? nf 11 . . Site Plan Review Application Process 1. Applicant Submits a Site Plan Review Application for Pre-Submittal . The application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet. . A pre-submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre-submittal meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon. . Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre-submittal meetings within five to seven working days of receiving an application. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre-Submittal Meeting . The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre- submittal meeting. . The meeting is held with representatives From Public Works Engineering and Transportation', Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes. . The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre-Submittal Checklist specifying the items required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the applicant has 180 days submit a complete application to the City. 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision . A complete application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet. . A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application. . Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property. . There is a 14-day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed. . Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice. . Applicationsmay be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. . At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision prior to issuing the final land use decision. . The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. . The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official. Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal Revised 11/19/09 3 of 11 . . Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: · ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre-Submittal and Submittal. . If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at t e pre-submittal and submittal stages. Site Plan Review Application Form , Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employee and future expansion plans, if known. Copy of the Deed Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. Copy of the Site Plan Reduced to 8'!2"x 11 ", which will be mailed as part of the required neighboring property notification packet. Right-of-Way Approach Permit Application provided where the property has frontag on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. Three (3) Copies of the Stormwater Management System Study with Completed Stormwater Scoping Sheet Attached - The plan, supporting calculations and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedure Manual. Three (3) Copies of the Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in , accordance with SDC 4.2-105 AA. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also address, if needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. Seven (7) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre-Submittal OR Eighteen (18) Copies of the'Following Plan Sets for Submittal ~ All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficientto show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of preparation. Date Received: ~ All plan sets must be folded to 8V2" by 11" and bound by rubber bands. ,n\:', '. , , FEB 1 5 2011 a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions ~ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or EnOOh~rSubmittal Rpvic;;prl 11/1 Q/()q 4 nf 11 . . IZI Vicinity Map , IZI The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings. o The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department (N/A) o The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision (N/A) o The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department (N/ A) IZI Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 V2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings (The only physical features are 9 trees 5" dbh or greater) IZI Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high, water table b. Site Plan IZI Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, or Engineer IZI Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings IZI Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs IZI Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact and disabled parking spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping IZI Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces o Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district (N/A) IZI On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation IZI Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be ser.ved, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed IZI Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces o Location of existing and proposed transit facilities (N/ A directly adjacent to the subject sites) , ' IZI Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicateg~6~ ~~EKIf common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar publi~ and semi-public uses , ';'.'. ' ' f-tB I 52011 ~)riJin'! Sub~it!'Fh ..._..:_~,..r ii/io/nQ . . o Phased Development Plan - where applicable, the Site Plan application must include phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundari s and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting stre t connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwat r management, water, and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply to the Site Plan application being submitted. c. Improvement and Public Utilities Plan [8J Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer [8J Location and width of all existing and proposed easements (There are no propose easements) [8J Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of all existing and propose streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development, including ownership and maintenance status, if applicable. [8J Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting [8J Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities [8J Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails [8J Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site includi g sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points d. Grading, Paving, & Stormwater IManagement Plan [8J Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer [8J Planting plan prepared by anOregoll licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of thestormwater management system [8J Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations [8J Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns [8J The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwate quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained o Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (fo land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) (NI A [8J Amount of proposed cut and fill Date Received: e. Landscape Plan FEB 1 5 2011 [8J Drawn by a Landscape Architect .. . b .Ii"! . Onglnal Su n"t....__ ___ [8J Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation 0 landscape ;coverage (Reference Architectural Site Plan, Sheet Al) ".rL ~ '." " , [8J S~~ee~ing 'in accordance with SDC 4.4-110' O"Writfen de~cription, including specifications, of the permanent irrigation system (The permanent irrigation system will be proposed at the time of building permit application submittal) ". RRVisp.r1 t 1/1 qlOq n of 11 . . [8J Location and type of street trees [8J List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). . Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size, spacing, and method of planting (Exact locations, sizes and species of trees and plants will proposed at the time of building permit application submittal) f. Architectural Plans [8J Exterior elevations of all buildings and structures proposed for the development site, including height (Exterior elevations of the commercial buildings will be submitted before building permit application submittal once tenants for the commercial buildings are identified) . [8J Conceptual floor plans (Conceptual floor plans of the commercial buildings will be submitted before building permit application submittal once tenants for the commercial buildings are identified) g. On-Site Lighting Plan [8J Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached (Exterior building and site lighting will be submitted at the time of building permit application submittal. This submittal only includes the parking lot lighting.) [8J Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles, and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area [8J Photometric test report for each light source [8J Additional Materials That May be Required IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120: [8J Where a multi-family development is proposed, any additional materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240 o Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW (NI A) [8J A Geotechnical Report prepared by an. engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present (A Geotechnical Report is submitted even though there are not hazardous conditions) Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district (NI A) If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permitas specified in SDC 5.19-100 A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the prop:aEl:tea~eeeived: Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review (ODOT $t'I"Oft0rI'Y Approach. Permit) "., D.. [8J 0 [8J Revised 11/19/09 Original Submittal 7 of 11 . . rgj Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development o Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 (NIA) o An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer (NI A) Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal Rpvic::pn 11/1 Q/nQ 8 of 11 , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r .;: r T"~~"'I ~ ~~I " Vl r- - I -~-'I':;" ~ ~~~ ~,---~~~~~ ~ . I j;~I~'" 1\ ~ \!h ~-- .~" 'j ;Q . - \ \ 1 ~ ;; i ~ ~I- ~~~i~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~,,~Ii~ 'l~:!H ;>:l Si! ~u ~ ~ ~ g " Cl , , 'I' P' 'I' "" .,. , . '0' Cl .. - J ~ i I ~ i ~ n H j! ~~ U &U i ~ i ~,~ ~ ~ U ~ ~n Ii n la,~~n~~ n~u Ui~i~ Ii ~I'~ ~ Ii' " , , , , !' " ,I "'. '.' . I ' , ,. - "j I'" ,"'. ,'1,1 dl''''', ,~ ..;~iH ~~j ~~!~ ;~@i~ ~~~~~ ~ I~ ;~ ~t ~~ ~e ~~ ~~ ~ i~~ ~~' ~~! e I~ U ~ ~L.~ it ~i ~!n~g da,~~ a~~,~~~ Ii ~i r- --~,q f"" ~~ ~~~~~ R~""~ i% ~6 ~ " ! ~ ~'t ~ ~~ ~~ ~'1' I ~~ n -~t;; ~~ ~~ f~~ll-~ ~r ~ i~J-~ , ~~ z \"~:-~~~~ .~~~~! ~i@~~ ~~~~~; ~! ~ 2 ~ ~ ~i 12~ 8U a~~ ii ~ !~I ~~;~ !~Hi~ ~.Ii: ~-~~~U "i ~~ 8 " !!!llio' Ie "! I, I I I I,! ! Ii r * !i ~ !i, I! Ii i!m! Ih! !lUll j 'j Gi ~~ e :.. ~~ ~ ~ e ~ Ii!:j' Ui ~~:i :~,nu !n~ '~~l~~!~ ~ ~ ;,_,~a l<" I '" 0 '~~ ~a." L!~ ~ ~H~,q~ ~ ~ <: >~. '. - \ ">' - ~ N g g r:: ~ Z ~~ 'I~;~ I~U~' A;i; ~~~~~ ! ~ ;;:f+"~.. :;t~. .. ,\ ~;;I j~~~ j~~ ~ ~~ ij t3 ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ Vl i~ li~; ~!,>~~~ zdi h!i.! " ~ Ji+"l,~d~;~N.;'~;~:~~ t-=1.~, ,::~[l !Jl:~ ~ j~ g ~ ~ ij 1 ,1< ~11 !F'~~ ~~a ji~~~ ~ ~ i ::J !!!. C/l ~ I'TI c: CD C' 3 - ~ U1 ~ = - - --.-..-.""".......--.......""..... -.....",,,.,- . ~> 'DU1H"..n^Cl , ^ ':2 " s: Z 'OU'" "",!"" @ @@ @ ! H! ~ "'" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ! I , } ~ - ~ G G G 0 G G I! G 0 01! <;: ~ ~g~~~':::~~~,iZ ~~~i~:~Z:~o ~ ....~~~I~---liC ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~ Vl i i J ~ f if:~ .~ ~ , I;j 0 I., " , " .,-> >0' " 1-'" "" ,> ., I' 0 .. .@~ c ,,~ ~~~ ~~: ~~ q!i~ ;:: ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ m q ~q ~;1.. ~~ "gi';n ~ ~~. ~_.~ ;<I-~ ~;.!> "'_> 1'1' OZ ;;!i h ;;: 'i:e ~~ ~rq ~~ ~i ~6 ~ ~ _~ ~:< ~~ A ~t ~?i ~1i:S ~~ ~G ~~ ~ );; ~~ ~~ '; g~ 5;: "~~ ~; ~!; ~~ ~ ii e: ~~ I~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~5; g ~ ~ ~ ~_8 - Vl ~:< ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G 0 0 01 : ~ ! ~ Ii i i ! ,! - 1 - ~ J I~ ~p~~ B~,~ ~~; ~~~ :! ;s~~~; :;;~ ;; gs:: ~:: I' 5~~~t: hg1 ,,~~ f ~ ",,> ,,,, II ,- ~:i1!~~ ~~H l ~~,~ ~1;~~t l'~~.. '~ ~~ ij C a~!~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~g !. :; .~~ ~;~~ ~~ ~~ CD :;u CD g ;C' ~ @@ @ '!I~ H ! ~i ~~ ~I~~ ;1 I~l =~i~ ~ ~~~ ' "!' ',I' ~"~ ~~~ i ~~ :. gn ~ !::j; ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ i ~~ ,. )> -' ~~";;;D 'II! ~ , , m " <;: Z ~~t~ 51 st-52nd & MAIN STREET REDEVELOPMENT OBO ENTERPRISES LLC SITE PLAN REVIEW - OPTION A S175&519SMAINSTREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 ~"-1 ~~,..,.., g a c)'^' z. n. . ~> < I' ~ z , ! ~ , ;~i ~~~ ~~~ "l I 'I, ,._-~- ~,~~.,,--+---~----J -. 5 ~ - 0-' _ g I~ ~~h~ ~B!~~I'~ ~ ~ l::~" il <> ~ s- P.'1I'~,!~ ~;~~i ~~~~ ~ ">t~~, ~~li2 .~ B~n "~~ I; ~ ~ ~ \:. ~ ~ :g.: I' '::::: ~~. 3 ~~H ~~~~ !'ii Hi 1',,'<:' ~'i' iii.! . : /,- . - . 0 ~~ ~~ H ~~ ~'iH~!:~ ~~ ~~~-~~~ q nnp~ ll"d! ;; : ~ ~ ~ ~ :a ~ t~ ~ " ' , ,. . '" g~ , 9 ~ n c ~ is Z ~ .~-]~ /',!? .- \/I\,_! ,_Y a@I'lrl~~ llli1IL~!lJz i! ~ i 0 ~~ ~ ~ ! , !. ; , ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ , , , , i ! j m;i 'ii I, ' I~~ ;~ l~ ~~ ~." - I! ti ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s~~H >:<: ~\p! jJ !~~ .., ",:"'11:'.0 '" P' "- ~,,\ li,-7 "~D~' L !Q [ ~'h'" mJ !I~":' H l! :d!! ~ ' ~s ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ 5 ~ ~:;;..~ ~ ~~ q~ '" ~ , ~ " 'I ,! 'I 'I ,1 I ~ '" g~ ~ ~ ~ ~o. ~~ ~ i Ii! j I ! ill " ~~ ~ Sl 9 ~~ @ ~ l'i! ! I I" ~ , ~ c ; i i Ie, , ~e ~ ~ ! 51st-52nd & MAIN STREET REDEVELOPMENT OBO ENTERPRISES LLC SITE PLAN REVIEW - OPTION B ---,,,,,,-.-...- -_..."..;....~ . ~> , ^ ;'" '~ ;;: z @ @@ @ ! ! ~ ! . Ii I If" ~ , G G G , ~ i " , ~ ! o G G'! G G G! !.' ~. !.! ,!' 00. ",! .~,: i =.:,- ~ ~ ~:i .! '! " I' Il! n !!l "i 'j :1 I ~ ~ <":I\'~ ~ ~ K.', i HI '3 ~" , ~~ ~! fi/j "-ti Uh ;:;:r e " I' " 'I ,. ~ll !! ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~i~ ~~ ~i ','I"' ~~ Ilh ~~ i~!1 ~~ ~~ ~~Q ~~ te ~q ?: ~~ ~~8 ~1 g~ ~s Q &1 ~I~ s~ ~I I~ ~ ~~ -1'1: ~ roii;e ~s ~ ~~ ~~ ~::. ~~ i ~ ~, ~ z~ Z ~~ ~ ~ G G e ~ ~ ~ i i i i~2.:l~ l: ~~ ~~~ ~~~~ i! ~~ g'l~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~ o~; ','-' ,- I- .~~~~i II ~ ~ 'I"" , ! ".,"', . ~~~~'355~ ~-~H .t /i.~ ~~ ?i ~;; ~::.~ ~a 01! ! .' ~ :~ " ~ g i , , 'Ill! ~~ : . i~ ~~ ~~ r~ r I!i ~ g ;;,~ 'i,l '1., m!! 'i~ ' ~5~~ e ~~l' . _t>~1 ~ ~E ~ !, , " ~&~ e ~.:: ,,~; ~ [') '" ;:q' '" z [') '" .., ~ Vi ~ ~ () -, 15' :i' 0 .~ II) (<) "T1 .-+ c ITl <D cr to :;0 2, - ~. . c.n <D ,.. n @. N <D = <' - - <D i , '"" i ~ S . '. i I )> i -' ~~f~ ,. 18 ::;J ~. '" ''"' '-,", 1 ~~~r ~J6Iu~~.- ;:0 . I E; ~'", I ";-II-- I;;I! ",1',.1' ;:0 ~ . '. ' 3:"L_---1~\ O;l -, \ I ~ \ ,i! ; E ~~ i~ ~ ~ i ~~ giS ~ Z ;! ~j J ~ [') ~ ~ ~ ~ i'! ~ " ; mini '}j' ,i -,,,.j..,, ~u ii~ ~~ ~~j ~~~~g ~~~~ ;J.H'i'l~ ~~~ ~~ll g~llllil ii'!i'<: ~~~~a(i ~,<:tl ~~ ~~@~ i~~~ ,1;'11 Iii' il ! !lii.' II ' ~E~I ~~~ " !!~~.."T ;;:~::.. 'Ill ~iinn U~ ~ ~~ D 5175 &5195MAJNSTREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 . ~)< + j-iw Pl^CE~1 I 50UTH 51 S1 ru;.::""""1, *60"' ~'!~ ~~ ~~ " ,~ ~ =i .~ ~ ;;: z < > z >: z 0 c ~ ~ n 0 , 0 i ~ , z g~ 0 ~~~ .., ~~~ ~ , ~ 50 UT H S 2 NO ST R E ET 1lL<A'-luT) , ~HF ,.. ,! lj~~~~ ~; ~;! ~ iq~~ dgd ~~ a ~ (i ~ ~ l Ut::I-~ ~~~;;~ ~ ~~ q~ ~ ~Q~~~ ~ g~ 'FI' "'1'" ,; 1,' i "1'1 a !< h~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ h~~ ~ - i'.: e ~ ~ ~ Ii' ~ ~~ s~ fl 5 ~~i ~~ ~ ~ j, ' I~ ~ _ _ N [:1 ..._~i, .__~_~.~ ~ ~~n g~~~i~ !lH ~.~ . .~- ,.,-:-- '.-: I DO [In II ~ 0 - i ~ $ , ! I, 1 , ~ :> ;>;l r(T;"::-:c-. <;; 'VrI. , n '~../' " :> h c ~ :> .., 6 z ~ a 9~ Pq~~~ "" \\ ~ ~ ~ , 'I'" " I'i" ~ ~ B iUi h~~~n ~! ~ ~ i i ' ~ " ~~ ~: 11 I~ ,I ~':; ~ ~H i~f_ ii, ~~~ Ii ~~ ~~ ;, i, ~, ., ! , , 1 ~~H~ ~ "P:~~ j , ~H~H~ ~~:'::'::':B ~ ~ l" l! , , 'll~ ~ ? ~ g p f' ~ ~ i ~ ,-~ .- ...-~ ~ 'li'l I" ' ^ ~~)3 118~ & i 1:1 I;'!! - ~ - ~ ~ ~ il i ! , ! ! ; , ~~ " ~~ ~ !i<s !!~ ~~ n 'I:> ~~ r- I" n 01 c 'I>: ,:::; , 0 ~z ~ , Cl Iii I'll .';; I!F!i! lli'I' !jil,'li Ii II z n.; ~~ ~o,~ ~O!~~~! ~:i:~~ ~-~~. ~ h ",i ~ ,,1'" 'b", ,0', ""!!'l '52 ~~~ !~ ~~~ h~~~;~ -I'~I!~ h~ih~ i[ j~ r ," !; !1""'li) '!i"'!:!" ! z ,~! I, 1 ",.,.. '!'j' J,.,., ',L 0 ~i~ ~a ~g ~~~~~;~ h~9~ ~1~;8~~ !.~ ~~ -1 H~ i~ i~ !~~~~~~ u~:;~ ~iH!~~~ ~I n rn ; ~ ~ ~ll. ~O: ~ll ~ ~~- '~. H ~ - 2 Ii' ljljllh!ll 'HI hh'i '! ' I'" I, I, ~'il"l! h"i il!!! i ra ~~ : ll.V _ ~ij~ ~~!b (l ~ l ;. ~~ ~ ~~ iri ~ Ii ~~ ~ i~ ~ ; i , , ~ ~~ ~t~ " v "'.~ '~o~~ j, if ' ;~H --I OJ [') --'-''''''-'-'''''''-", ....w...."'.._ . ~), 'I, ~A ~ ~ :; z ~ ~ ~~ " H ~~ ! 'OU'" ,,_.'''''' @ @@ @ e ! ! ! 1 ! , ! i , ! j , ! 1 ! , f H j~ ~ ~~ ~~ i';Q -OQ ;; "'~ ~ ;>~ ~~ ~ ~I 1 ~tl (i~ ~ ~ " <;::a ,,~ "., :<' ~'i ~~ s: 'l~ ~ ~~ ~! ~ !.~ ~ ~~ ~ z e G.. G e G j! e G Gi! ';; ! , i 1 i, ! ! I" Z " , " " "" " . 'Ii 0 ~::;::~~~~t1:~ ~i~~~'i~~~~~ f~il"~~ I~~ '"" " " 0 ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~i! ~ !~ I\~ ~~ ~ ~ ~Ii ,; !! ,,;! ,j, ".1; Z PQ ;':)1 ~!! ,,,OJ ll" ~ ~ ~g ~ 0 ~~~ ~~ ~,~ ~~ 'li ~ ~ ~~, ~ -! ,,~~ ~,:: H ~ ~ ~ ~ m ','" , "" , I~' I Ii i' . I I I" o 0 01~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ' : I! , i I' ,,: ,,: ,,; II H: II, !, i 'II" l! '1 ;~I ~~ ~~ i~ il,: ~~ ~~ I~ ld~ !!s _1:. :~~ ~! n o ! i G~ 0 li~ ~ ~ e ~8 ,; : I~! ~" '! I~ , "'1 f./5' ::> e!- m <:: tT 3 ;:;: - e!- >: ~~~ ! !" ~ ~~~ ~ ~~i il ~~> i "I 5 ~~~ i; ~,ii ,.", ll"O ,Is, ! , ~ c~~ 'i '^ ~ ~g~ ~ ii ," "" "~Ii ~ i!~ ,,~; ~i.l , 1 " ~ ~" o Il) - CD ;U CD ~ <' CD a. ~iN ~~~ ~~ <;l .:! .~~!! I!: , ", . 'I; ~~ ~~~,~ ~>,~ :c 1 j ~ '; i ~ ~ o Lj" I! I'~~ " .'-/, Jl-:..I > ~~~ ~ Pi-'! -. ~ ~H -'<! .0 '" !!. / rT'1 It ,.,. TiTT ~ ~ ~ I ~, ~ .~' 'I ",. . , ", ",' ,-' T lJ ^ ~ --~ rT'1 il I I I 'i", .t N ~ i';~ ;E~' ;)." ~~~~~ ~~L_ --LJJ ~ Z CJ ." IT! a:J - <.rI ~ C> - - ~L ,~ 'i'i z ,. CJ S; ~ ~ z CJ '" ~ ~ ::' v; ;" 'I" !'-' '" ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ .i ~i 'B.~ ~I. fiR:~ I "1 t ~ ~ .F; ~3 ~~ !~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ 0; l> ~ ,~ '-'!'"'' Iii' ,", !"" ,I, ! i II " l~~ ~f;~~~ ~ ~ --~ ~~.d . I~ ~~ ~~ ~ it, ~~ .~ l! "_-~ ,,-~ ~ z: i~~H~~~t ~~~ ~i!~ ~:I~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ 4 ~(l ~~ i~ ~ ~*~ ~~~ ~ ~ E.~~~~~~~ 2~~ ~~" ~~g~~ ~ ~[i jl' > l> " ~il: ~ _~s~ ~'I1l; ~ ~~_~~~~~ ~IG ~g ~~!ie~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 5 ~~ ~,,~ 8~~ ~ ~!!-!<!I ill " I. i '~l" I II III f !' i !ll Ii ./ i I!! ,". "i ;'1 ~ [;~ 7 ~~ ~ ;: ., ~- .' . ! ~~ ~~ ;, ~ i i~~!;:;",::c;~;t~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~'~ s l~qm m! II lP i I 'I H I Ii! ',',' 'i~ hi Ii ~~~ ~~:~ ~!i~. ~~ ~~ !l'll ~~r. ~2 a~~ ~~ ~h ~! !~E I ~~ II!: l! "'" !i ~~s, > Ill! , ' '" ',. r r u ~.QPD 'I,' ~ ~~; m ~~m ~ . < > z J--- ,,-,o.' ,,_~ ll'i.~ SOUTH 52.~.U STREET """-.......,. ~~~ "OC""rmn !<;j ,..,. , r.'-<" 0<'" . '- ~i:! s I' s~H~ g~<:i:ii~;; ~~i!'~ ~\1~~~.~ ",il/!i!:l ~S~~~I~~~~~ "il! ! Ii i !"'! "I, H~:l j" ~ ~~ C 3 ~ ~ Q 3 ';; .:" ...."'1' ~~n: ;;l ~\P';~ ~~~~~ ~ ~H i ~~"' g 9 ~ Ii ~ n; i;l r W lllj;! '.'! ',,5" ~ J;:l 0 ~ ~ g ii l> H~ B~~H h ~U~ ! i! ~ ~ --'1, _ rT'1 f""'?~ '" i >- ~'/ ~ '~ 0 .. r- ~ H n ~ Xt C ~ -~ ;; a ~~ -! ? ~', o ' ~~ Z I, V1 !3 tr ~~ " ~ i ~I im I] I'..,; ~ ~ li1~L -~Z " I I I 0 ~f ~ ,. !I j ~ ~ ~ i 1. .~ , " I ! ! 'iJ H~' P,' kH ~~ ~?,~G~ ~S !'~H ~~ ; 'Ii!: 'I ~ ~hU ~ g 'ill! l ~~~~ ~:: H~_~~~ ~I ~ H ~? 6~ -0 Et ~ '! ^ , - "_ z 'ICJ " ~ i! r , () he il';; ,::; g~ ~ "CJ p~~>::~; HijP H~~~il> s~ ~. m ~~~~~~i ~~Qn ~.~i~~J ~~ ~g ~ '!,!". ,h,j ,"!l!~ I, h ~ ~~~~\ill~ ~~~H ~~8i~~~ g~ ~~ f:: ~~~~~g~ a~~~.~ ~~illR"iF~. ~~ l~. Z j~ '~~t ~8~ . ~.~~~. ~ ~. ~~ 0 ~~~~;~l ~!~~~ ~~l~~ ~ ~~ ~.~ -! ",l,!" ',.1" I,""'" '.' m ,E~~~_~ ~ .?,~ . ~~ .~ ll'b l! V> "","'"" 'Iii "'~" ,,! ~~ ~~~~ ~IU ~~~~~a ,;. ~ ~HHh ~i~~ dni! i ~ ~~~~ a ~ij~! ~<1[b i~~ l ~~ ~l~~ 51st'52nd & MAIN STREET REDEVELOPMENT ~f\ OBO ENTERPRISES LLC o ,~, Lf 2 --I SITE PLAN REVIEW, OPTION C ~ ~< ~ gi f: CO ~ ~ 'i!i-\:S' ~~ ~~ 5175 & 5195 MAIN STREIT ~o,".JD~ ~~~H Cl SPRINGflELD,OR97478 ;;;..;. ~ ,- . . February 15, 2011 Mr. Steve Hopkins City of Springfield - Development Services Planning Division 225 5th Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 ARCH ITECTS & PLANNERS/INC 132 East Broadway Suite 200 Eugene, Oregon 97401 541-687-1010 541-687-0625 Fax RE: 51't_52nd & Main Street Redevelopment Site Plan Review Application (200913/1.3) Project Address: Assessor's Map & Tax Lot: Applicant: 5175 and 5195 Main Street E-mail Address: 17-02-33-32 Tax Lots 6200 and 6300 OBO Enterprises, LLC Nick Boyles 541-954-0217 1390 Grosbeak Court Redmond, Oregon 97756 q ualityapartments@q.com Daytime Phone: Mailing Address: E-mail Address: TBG Architects & Planners/lnc Kristen Taylor 541-687-1010 132 East Broadway, Suite 200 Eugene, Oregon 97401 ktaylor@tbg-arch.com Applicant's Representative: Daytime Phone: Mailing Address: On behalf of OBO Enterprises, LLC, enclosed is a package with an application for a Site Plan Review Application for the proposed 51"-52nd & Main Street Redevelopment. In accordance with the Site Plan Review submittal requirements under SDC 5.17-100, the following is provided for review by the City Staff: Date Received: 1 Copy: Site Plan Review Application Form FEB 1 5 2011 Property Deeds Title Reports Original Submittal Site Plan (8-1/2" x 11 ") Oregon Department of Transportation Right-of-Way Approach Permit Letter of Written Authorization from Owners i t 3 Copies: Transportation Impact Study Stormwater Management System Study with Stormwater Scoping Sheet Geotechnical Report lohn E. Lawless, AlA Principal James F. Alberson III, AlA Principal Darretll. Smith, NCARB. FA1A Principal .,'" . ;~ . . City of Springfield February 15, 2011 Page 2 of 2 3 Copies: Narrative Exhibit A - Parking Lot Lighting Fixture Specification & Photometric Test Report Exhibit B - FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map Number 41039Cl162 F Three Plan Sets (Option A, Option B and Option C) - 18 Copies Each: Tl - Title Sheet Cl - Assessment of Existing Conditions C2 - Utility Plan C3 - Grading and Paving Plan C4 - Civil Details C5 - Basi n Detai Is A 1 - Site Plan A2 - Conceptual Floor' Plans A3 - Conceptual Floor Plans A4 - Residential Buildings Exterior Elevations L 1 - Planting Plan If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at your convenience. Thank you for your time and consideration of this proposal. -- Kristen Taylor, CSBA Project Manager Date Received: , KT/nl cc: Nick Boyles, OBO Enterprises, LLC Damien Gilbert, Branch Engineering, Inc. Carol Schirmer, Schirmer + Associates, LLC FEB 1 5 2011 Original submittal Z:\PROJ\200913 OBO 51 st-52nd & Main\Corresp\A.gency\5ite Plan Review\Tentative\200913-Site Plan Review Tentative Cover Letter.doc . . TBG ~L ,L/ JL",~",lt J6~",V ( I" ,- February 15, 2011 Mr. Steve Hopkins City of Springfield - Development Services Planning Division 225 5th Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS/INC RE: 51"_52nd & Main Street Redevelopment Site Plan Review Application (200913/1.3) 132 East Broadway Suite 200 Eugene, Oregon 97401 541-687-1010 541-687-0625 Fax Project Address: Assessor's Map & Tax lot: Applicant: 5175 and 5195 Main Street E-mail Address: 17-02-33-32 Tax Lots 6200 and 6300 OBO Enterprises, LlC Nick Boyles 541-954-0217 1390 Grosbeak Cou rt Redmond, Oregon 97756 q ualityapartments@q.com Daytime Phone: Mailing Address: Applicant's Representative: TBG Architects & Planners/lnc Kristen Taylor 541-687-1010 132 East Broadway, Suite 200 Eugene, Oregon 97401 ktaylor@tbg-arch.com Date Received: Daytime Phone: Mailing Address: E-mail Address: FEB 1 5 2011 NARRATIVE Original Submittal In accordance with the Site Plan Review submittal requirements, this written statement describes the proposed development and demonstrates that the proposal complies with the criteria under SDC 5.17-100. The proposal is subject to the Type II application review process per 5DC 5.17c11 O(B). I. land Use Request The present request is for approval of three possible mixed-use development options (Site Plan Option A, B, and C). In each option, the proposed residential portion of the development remains unchanged. There are two multiple-family residential buildings proposed on the southern portion of the site adjacent to the neighboring Low-Density Residential (LOR) zoned properties. Building One is a two-story building with 11 units facing South 52nd Street. This larger Building One has three multiple-unit structures connected together with a covered outdoor stair and corridor system. The two structures located along the internal drive aisle facing South 52nd Street have ground floor garages for all of the residential units and second floor one- bedroom residential flats. The third structure located adjacent to the LOR property to John E. Lawless, AlA Principal James F. Alberson Ill, AlA Principal Darrell L Smith, NCARS, FAIA Principal City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 2 of 37 . . the south and facing South 52nd Street has two floors of two-bedroom residential flats. Building Two is a two-story building with 4 townhouse units tucked in the back southwest corner of the site facing Building One. The commercial portion of the development, located on the northern portion of the site along Main Street, slightly varies in each option due to the pending Oregon Department of Transportation (OOOT) Right-of-Way Approach Permit application decision for driveway access to Main Street. Option A is the preferred option with a shared driveway access to Main Street. Option Band C are site plan options without driveway access to Main Street in the case that OOOT denies the requested Approach Permit application. Site Plan Option A: The commercial portion of the development includes a 3,000- square-foot multi-tenant commercial building and a 2,500-square-foot drive-through restaurant building with a limited right-in and right-out driveway access from Main Street in the general location of the existing driveway as well as associated site infrastructure, parking and landscaping. Site Plan Ootion B: The commercial portion of the development includes a 3,000- square-foot multi-tenant commercial building and a 2,500-square-foot drive-through restaurant building with associated site infrastructure, parking and landscaping. Site Plan Ootion C: The commercial portion of the development includes a 6,000- square-foot commercial building with associated site infrastructure, parking and landscapi ng. Tenants and tenant uses have not yet been identified for the commercial buildings, therefore exterior building elevations and more accurate building footprints will be submitted once tenants have been identified. The applicant has presented conservative assumptions of possible tenant uses for each option for the purposes of the Site Plan Review process. It is likely that the commercial tenant uses will be eating and drinking establishments and similar use categories such as retail sales, personal services, and small scale offices (as noted on the site plan for each option). Per discussions with Steve Hopkins at the Presubmittal conference, if the tenant uses and building footprints (approximate building area and basic form) remain generally consistent with the proposed Site Plan Review plans, changes to the building articulation (recesses and projections, entryways; patios, awnings, etc.) for instance, will only require a Type I Site Plan Review Modification application. Additional details regarding this proposal are provided on the Site Plan Review drawings for each option, the remainder of this written statement, and other materials attached herein. Date. Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 3 of 37 Design Intent: The 51>l_52od & Main Street Redevelopment project represents an effort to raise the standard of typical commercial and medium-density residential development in the East Main Street area. . to enhance the quality of local commercial and medium-density residential development; . to reduce the blighted appearance of large expanses of parking along Main Street; and . to ensure compatibility between the Main Street commercial corridor and the" surrounding low-density residential neighborhood. " The proposed uses are consistent with the Springfield Development Code (SDC), the East Main Refinement Plan (1988) and the Eugene-Springfield Metro Plan (2004 Update). The subject properties are within the Community Commercial (CC) zoning district, and are designated as Commercial with a Mixed-Use Area Overlay on the Eugene-Springfield Metro Plan, Plan Diagram. The parcels are located on the Mixed- Use Area #3 in the East Main Refinement Plan, Plan Diagram. Per SDC 3.2-310, uses such as retail sales, personal services, small offices and eating and drinking establishments are allowed in the Community Commercial zoning district. Per the East Main Refinement Plan (Mixed-Use Element, Area #3, page 11) Medium- and High-Density Residential uses are allowed under the Community Commercial zoning district. Therefore, a mix of commercial and multiple-family residential uses are allowed on the parcels subject to Site Plan Review approval. Additionally, consistent with the applicability of the Site Plan Review process and the Springfield Development Code, the project addresses anticipated post-development changes in stormwater patterns to maintain the integrity of the City's watercourses by preserving water quality. Similarly, the site and building design and orientation minimize any possible adverse effects on surrounding property owners and the general public. This application also addresses traffic impacts in the' supplemental Traffic Impact Study. The project was designed with the understanding that its long-term viability as an active mixed-use development depends on the economic and ecological health of the local community. To this end, the 51>l_52od & Main Street Redevelopment proposal attempts to balance economic concerns with careful" attention to neighborhood compatibility and land stewardship. This request for Site Plan Review is p,roposed under the general approval criteria, As demonstrated in Section IV below, the subject request meets all applic~e co~ ' d' criteria and should be approved as proposed. ate ecelve . FEB 1 5 2011 . . .' r,. .~. '-1-.' ",1r , r:" :''''';f\ :.-ULH II ~l,;~'_'___~__ . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application' February 15, 2011 Page 4 of 37 Design Team: Owner and Applicant: OBO Enterprises, llC 1390 Grosbeak Court Redmond, Oregon 97756 (541) 954.0217 Contact: Nick Boyles q ualityapartments@q.com Applicant's Representative and Architect: TBG Architects & Planners/lnc 132 East Broadway, Suite 200 Eugene, Oregon 97401 (541) 687.1010. FaX (541) 687.0625 Contact: Kristen Taylor ktaylor@tbg-arch.com :~c '1. , .~~;. .:',~'_." . Civil and Transportation Engineers and Su rveyor: Branch Engineering, Inc. 310 North 5th Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 (541) 746.0637. Fax'(541) 746.0389 Engineer: Contact: Oamien Gilbert, PE damien@branchengineering.com Surveyor: Contact: Renee Clough, PE, PLS renee@branchengineering.com landscape Architect: S.:hirmer + Associates, llC 375 West 4th Street, Suite 201 Eugene, Oregon 97401 (541) 686.4540 . Fax (541) 686.4577 Contact: Carol Schirmer carol@schirmerassociates.com Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 5 of 37 II. Site Description A. Location and Site Context This Site Plan Review request applies to Tax Lots 6200 and 6300 of Lane County Assessor's Map 17-02-33-32. Tax Lot 6200 is about 0.84 acres (36,606 square feet). Tax Lot 6300 is about 0.67 acres (29,064 square feet). The total OBO Enterprises LLC development site is approximately 1.51 acres (65,670 square feet) in size. The development site as described will be referred to in this application as the subject site. The subject site is located within the Springfield City limits and Urban Growth Boundary on the south side of Main Street between South 51" Place and South 52"d Street. Main Street is classified as a principal arterial. South 51st Place and South 52"d Street are classified as local streets. The OBO Enterprises, LLC properties are zoned Community Commercial (CC). Currently, Tax Lot 6300 is developed with a single-family residence with access from South 52"d Street. Tax Lot 6200 was developed with a single-family residence that burned down a couple of years ago with access from Main Street. The properties located on both sides of Main Street in the area of the subject site are zoned CC developed with a mix of commercial uses such as auto-oriented uses and eating and drinking establishment uses. The properties located to the south of the subject site are zoned Low-Density Residential (LDR) and developed with single~family residences. The properties located to the west of the subject site are zoned CC; the CC property located directly adjacent to Tax Lot 6200 is currently developed with a single family residence and the properties across South 51st Place are developed with an auto-oriented use. The properties located to the east of the subject site are zoned CC and developed with a single-family ~~~ I The development site is serviced via Lane Transit District (L TD) Route 11 (Thurston). There is a bus stop within a half a block of the subject site on either side of Main Street for eastbound and westbound transit riders. The route is serviced every 10 to 15 minutes throughout the day. Reference the Traffic Impact Study, Appendix C, for the L TD route schedule. Date Received: B. Existing Conditions and Site Access FES 1 5 2011 The subject parcels are relatively flat with street right-of-way frontage ~rM~ifubmittal Street, South 51" Place and South 52"d Street. Currently, South 51" r'lace is unimproved to the City's public street standards. Main Street and South 52"d Street are improved public streets with sidewalks. South 52"d Street only has a sidewalk on the east side of the street. . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 6 of 37 As stated above, Tax Lot 6300 is currently developed with a single-family residence with access from South 52nd Street. Tax Lot 6200 was developed with a single-family residence that burned down a couple of years ago with access' from Main Street. All three site plan options relocate the existing South 52nd Street driveways and add a new full access driveway on South 51" Place. Site Plan Option A proposes to relocate the existing Main Street driveway. Site Plan Option Band C remove the Main Street driveway access. The proposed driveways provide safe access to and from the site and are consistent with the Springfield Development Code as outlined below. The applicant has filed a Right-of-Way Approach Permit with the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) for the proposed limited right-in and right-out shared access from Main Street in the general location of the existing driveway as shown on Site Plan Option A. Please reference the attached copy of the pending ODOT Right-of- Way Approach Permit application. There are 10 existing trees on the site, of which 9 have a diameter breast height of 5" or greater. Except for one 4" cedar tree located at the southwest corner of the site, all existing trees on the site are proposed for removal to construct the new buildings, site infrastructure and required on-site stormwater infiltration and detention system. A Tree Felling Permit to remove these existing trees has been submitted concurrently with the Site Plan Review application consistent with the required criteria under SDC 5.19-125. III. land Use History As stated above, the subject site is located within the Springfield City Limits and Urban Growth Boundary. The subject properties are zoned Community Commercial (CC) on the Springfield Zoning Map and designated as Commercial with a Mixed-Use Overlay on the Eugene-Springfield Metro Plan,. Plan Diagram. The parcels are located in the Mixed-Use Area #3 on the East Main Refinement Plan, Plan Diagram. Per SDC 3.2-310, uses such as retail sales, personal services, small offices and eating and drinking establishments are allowed in the Community Commercial zoning district. Per the East Main Refinement Plan (Mixed-Use Element, Area #3, page 11 ) Medium- and High-Density Residential uses are allowed under the Community Commercial zoning district. Therefore, a mix of community commercial and multiple-family residential uses are allowed on the parcels subject to Site Plan Review approval. IV. Approval Criteria - Site Plan Review Supporting Facts and Findings This section is organized by the applicable approval criteria per Article X.II. Applicable Site Design Review approval criteria are outlined in bold below, followed by proposed findings in normal text. Additional applicable zoning code criteria needing to be addressed as part of the Site Design Review approval criteria are identified in bold italics. As noted above, the residential portion of the development remains the same in each site plan option. Therefore, all applicable criteria to the residential portion of the development are addressed only once for all three options. -0 Q) - > - 'Q) <=> "" 0 ~ Q) ~ - CD Q) L.I.J - u.. III 0 . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 7 of 37 Where the three options vary, findings for each option are individually addressed under the approval criteria. SDC 5.17-115 Site Plan Review Phased Development A. A Phased Development Plan shall be submitted with the Site Plan Review application as specified in Section 5.17-120. SDC 5. 17-120(G): A Phased Development Plan, where applicable, that indicates any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase as specified in Section 5.17-115. Phasing shall progress in a sequence that promotes street connectivity between the various phases and accommodates other required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water and electricity. Finding: A phased development plan has been schematically submitted for each development option, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. In all three options, the entire residential portion of the development will be constructed during Phase I, which includes the residential buildings, storage, common open space, landscaping and fences, pedestrian circulation, required 23 parking spaces (minimum 8 surface spaces and 15 individual garage spaces), and the main drive aisle running east-west through the site from South 51st Place to South 520d Street as well as the associated site infrastructure (consistent with the Multi-Unit Design Standards). The phasing boundaries for Phase I are slightly different in each option, which are outlined below and illustrated on the attached drawings, Sheet Tl, for each option. The phasing, boundaries and sequencing for the commercial portion of the development site also vary in the three options as outlined below. Site Plan Option A: In addition to the scope of Phase I noted above, Phase I also includes the construction of the Main Street driveway and drive aisle. The commercial portion of the development will be constructed in two phases (Phases II and III). As noted above, the tenants for the commercial buildings have not yet been identified. Therefore, the phasing sequence for the commercial portion of the development will depend on the identification of tenants. Phase II and Phase III are proposed to be the following depending on the timing of tenant identification for the commercial buildings: Phase II will include the construction of the 3,OOO-square-foot commercial building on the corner of Main Street and South 52nd Street, 23 parking spaces and associated trash area, on-site pedestrian walkways, landscaping and site infrastructure. Phase III will include the construction of the 2,SOO-square-foot drive-through restaurant building on the corner of Main Street and South 51st Place, 12 parking spaces and associated on-site pedestrian walkways, landscaping and site infrastructure. "0 ! Q) - > - 'lD c c.... U ...., .l!! Q) - c:: - 'E Q) CD .a. LLl " ..... lJ... en ro 0 (ij t: '5> .;;: 0 . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 8 of 37 OR Phase II will include the construction of the 2,500-square-foot drive-through restaurant building on the corner of Main Street and South 51" Place, 31 parking spaces and associated on-site pedestrian walkways, landscaping and site infrastructure. Phase III will include the construction of the 3,OOO-square-foot commercial building on the corner of Main Street and South 52,d Street, trash area, 4 parking spaces and associated on-site pedestrian walkways, landscaping and site infrastructure. Site Plan Option B: Phase I is described above. The commercial portion of the development will be constructed in two phases (Phases II and III). As noted above, the tenants for the commercial buildings have not yet been identified. Therefore, the phasing sequence for the commercial portion of the development will depend on the identification of tenants. Phase II and Phase III are proposed to be the following depending on the timing of tenant identification for the commercial buildings: Phase II will include the construction of the 3,OOO-square-foot commercial building on the corner of Main Street and South 52,d Street, trash area, 31 parking spaces and associated on-site pedestrian walkways, landscaping and site infrastructure. Phase III will include the construction of the 2,500-square-foot drive-through restaurant building on the corner of M'ain Street and South 51" Place, 7 parking spaces and associated on-site pedestrian walkways, landscaping and site infrastructure. OR Phase II will include the construction of the 2,500-square-foot drive-through restaurant building on the corner of Main Street and South 51" Place, 34 parking spaces and associated on-site pedestrian walkways, landscaping and site infrastructure. Phase III will include the construction of the 3,OOO-square-foot commercial building on the corner of Main Street and South 52,d Street, trash area, 4 parking spaces and associated on-site pedestrian walkways, landscaping and site infrastructure. Site Plan Option C: In addition to the scope of Phase I noted above, Phase I also includes the construction of 6 parking spaces on the north side of the main drive aisle running east-west through the site from South 51" Place to South 52,d Street. The commercial portion of the development will be constructed during Phase II. Phase II includes the construction of the 6,000-square-foot commercial restaurant building with attached trash area on the corner of Main Street and South 51" Place, 56 parking spaces and associated on-site pedestrian walkways, landscaping and site i nfrastructu re. "'0 Q) - > - 'Q) <::> '" 0 Lr') Q) c:: Q) CXl I.U ...... u- rn 0 City of Springfield Site Plan Review. Application February 15, 2011 Page 9 of 37 . . The proposed phasing for all three options progresses in a sequence that promotes street connectivity between the various phases and accommodates other required public improvements, including but not limited to sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water and electricity. Reference the attached drawings, Sheet Tl, for each option. Therefore, the proposed phasing for the three options is consistent with this criterion. B. The Director shall approve a time schedule for developing a site in phases, but in no case shall the total time period for all phases be greater than 2 years, with a possible 1-time 1 year extension as specified in Section 5.17- 135. Finding: Due to the fact that tenants have not yet been identified, the applicant does not propose a specific time schedule for developing the site. The applicant requests flexibility to develop the site within the allowed 2 years, with a possible 1-time 1 year extension as specified in Section 5.17-135. C. Approval of a phased Site Plan Review application shall require satisfaction of the following approval criteria: 1. The public facilities required to serve each phase shall be constructed in conjunction with or prior to each phase, unless during the Site Plan Review process the Director finds that a public facility necessary for a subsequent phase is necessary as part of an earlier phase; and 2. The phased development shall not result in requiring the City or other property owners to construct public facilities that were required as part of the approved development proposal. Finding: The public facilities required to serve each phase in all three options will be constructed in conjunction with or prior to each phase, unless during the Site Plan Review process the Director finds that a public facility necessary for a subsequent phase is necessary as part of an earlier phase. In addition, the phased development in all three options does not result in requiring the City or other property owners to construct public facilities that were required as part of the approved development proposal. Therefore, the three proposed development options are consistent with these criteria. ' Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 10 of 37 . . SDC 5.17-125 Site Plan Review Criteria A. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram, and/or the applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan Districl map, and Conceptual Development Plan. Findings: Per the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan, Plan Diagram, the subject property falls within the Urban Growth Boundary and the Metro Plan Boundary. The subject site is dearly designated Commercial with a Mixed-Use Area Overlay on the Metro Plan Diagram, which is consistent with site's current Community Commercial (CC) zoning district. The subject site falls within the adopted East Main Refinement Plan area. The parcels are located in the Mixed-Use Area #3 on the East Main Refinement Plan, Plan Diagram. Per the East Main Refinement Plan (Mixed-Use Element, Area #3, page 11) Medium- and High-Density Residential uses are allowed under the CC zoning district. Therefore, the zoning is consistent with the refinement plan. The proposed uses are consistent with the Springfield Development Code (SDC), East Main Refinement Plan and the Eugene-Springfield Metro Plan. Per SDC 3.2- 310, uses such as retail sales, personal services, small offices and eating and drinking establishments are allowed in the Community Commercial zoning district. . Per the East Main Refinement Plan (Mixed-Use Element, Area #3, page 11) Medium- and High-Density Residential uses are allowed under the Community Commercial zoning district:. Therefore, a mix of community commercial and multiple-family residential uses are allowed on the parcels subject to Site Plan Review approval. Therefore, the zoning and proposed development options are consistent with'this criterion, B. Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including but not limited to, water and eleclricity; sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded and the public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by this Code and other applicable regulations. The Public Works direclor or a utility provider shall determine capacity issues. Findings: In the three development options, the applicant is proposing to construct single-story commercial building(s) and two two-story multiple-family residential buildings on CC zoned land with adequate public and private facilities. Reference the attached civil engineering drawings for each option for details on existing and proposed facilities. Per SDC 4.3-125, all private utilities on the 'proposed development site' will be placed underground whenever possible. Date Receive FES 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 11 of 37 The public improvements proposed in all three development options include half- street improvements along the frontage of South 51" Place, including roughly 18'- 0" 'of new asphalt, curb and gutter, sidewalk, a streetlight, street trees and the proposed driveway approach. Additionally, the proposed driveway approaches on Main Street (Site Plan Option A only) and South 52"d Street will be replaced and will meet current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards. All public improvements will be constructed per City standards under a Public Improvements Permit (PIP). A PIP application has been submitted at the time of this Site Plan Review application with the understandi ng that Tentative Site Plan Review Approval is required prior to the PIP application approval. All three proposals have adequate water service available from an existing 6" public water main located in South 51" Place adjacent to the subject site's western property line. An existing 6" public water main is a/so located in South 52"d Street with adequate water service. This main is located on the far side of the right of way. There is an existing fire hydrant located in the public right-of-way on Main Street to the north of the subject site at the intersection of South 52"d Street and Main Street. All of the proposed buildings (commercial, residential and trash enclosures) will be sprinklered. The existing fire hydrant and the addition of the required new public fire hydrant at the entrance to the property on South 52"d Street have an adeq uate flow rate to serve the site. Reference the attached civi I drawings for the approximate location of the new fire hydrant. There are existing overhead electric lines running east-west adjacent to the site's northern property line, which provides adequate capacity to serve the three proposed development options. There are two existing public sanitary sewer stubs (4" stubs) located adjacent to the subject site's western and eastern property lines conveying sewage from the site to the 8" public sanitary sewer lines located in South 51" Place and South 52nd Street. The existing public sanitary sewer system has adequate capacity to serve the three development options. There is an existing 4-1/2" gas line located in Main Street. There are existing 1" gas lines located in South 51,t Place and South 52"d Street, which provide adequate capacity to serve the three proposed development options if gas is used. The existing homes were likely c,onnected to gas. These existing services will be disconnected. There is an existing 48" storm pipe located along the south side of Main Street. An existing 12" storm main is located in South 52"d Street and an existing 12" storm line is located in South 51" Place. As part of the PIP, the South 51" Place existing roadside ditch will be removed and a new 12" storm line will be installed with 'a stub out to provide service tei the subject property and to convey the upstream flows. In all three Site Plan Options, a new storm lateral is proposed to connect into the existing 12" storm .line in South 52nd Street as well. No "'C Q) - > - = "(j) c-.. 2 u ..., Q) :!:": 0::: - E CD ~'" Q) LLJ ;J ..... I.L. (J) III 7i 0 'I:: "(3) 0;:; 0 City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 12 of 37 . . connection is proposed to the 48" storm line located in Main Street at this time. ,In addition, as noted above, the owner proposes to make public sidewalk improvements along the property's frontage on South 51" Place as required. Due to City Staff identified storm system requirements, all three proposed development options include on-site retention to the fullest extent possible. Special emphasis is placed on infiltrating the stormwater and limiting the flow rate to the existing public storm system. See the attached Stormwater Management System Plan for more information. The existing public street and traffic safety control systems will not be exceeded with the addition of any of the three proposed development options and are available to serve the site at the time of development. Reference the attached Traffic Impact Study (TIS) dated October 13, 2010 for details, which is adopted and incorporated herein. In addition, as noted above, the pending ODOT Right- of-Way Approach Permit for the limited access driveway on Main Street is attached for reference (Site Plan Option A only). A geotechnical analysis was prepared for building construction. Please reference the attached Geotechnical Investigation, dated July 19, 2010. As demonstrated above as well as in the drawings and referenced attachments, capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including but not limited to water and electricity; sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets and traffic safety controls have not been exceeded and the public improvements are available to serve the site at the time of development. Therefore, the three proposed development options are consistent with this criterion. C. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations. Due to the subject parcels' Multi-Use Area designation in the East Main Refinement Plan, SDC 4.7-210 Residential Uses in Commercial Districts and per City Staff direction, the northern portion of the site complies with the applicable CC Base Zone Development Standards and the southern portion of the site complies with the applicable MDR Base Zone Development Standards and SDC 3.2-240 Multi-Unit Design Standards. Reference the attached Site Plans for the CC and MDR area boundaries. There are standards within the MDR Base Zone Development Standards and Multi-Unit Design Standards that do not apply due to the fact that the proposal is for a mixed-use development on a CC zoned site. As required, this written statement addresses the provisions in the Springfield , Development Code that are applicable to the proposed mixed-use developm~te Received on CC zoned parcels as outlined below. Reference the attached Site Plans for details. FEB I 5 2011 Original Submittal . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 13 of 37 SDC 3.2-200 MDR Base Zone Development Standards: Findings: Per the East Main Refinement Plan (Mixed-Use Element, Area #3, page 11) Medium- and High-Density Residential uses are allowed under the CC zoning . district. Therefore, a mix of community commercial and multiple-family dwelling uses are allowed on the CC zoned parcels within this area subject to Site Plan Reviewapproval. SDC 3.2-205 Establishment of Residential Zoning Districts and SDC 3.2-215 Standard Lots/Parcels and Maximum Lot/Parcel Coverage are not applicable because the base zone of the subject parcels is Cc. . For all three development options, there are two multiple-family residential buildings proposed on the southern portion of the site. Building One is a two- story building with 11 units facing South 52nd Street. This larger Building One has three multiple-unit structures connect~d together with a covered outdoor stair and corridor system. The two structures located along the internal drive aisle facing South 52nd Street have ground floor garages and second floor one-bedroom residential flats. The third structure located adjacent to the LDR property to the south and facing South 52nd Street has two floors of two-bedroom residential flats. Building Two is a two-story building with four townhouse units tucked in the back southwest corner of the site facing Building One. The design intent of the residential portion of the site is to create a quiet residential community within the proposedmixed-use development located along the busy Main Street corridor by facing the main entrances to all of the units towards a shared internal outdoor stair and corridor system. This outdoor central area between the residential structures provides opportunity for landscaping, a shared common area and. increased natural daylighting and ventilation into the units. The residential portion in the three .development options complies with the applicable MDR Base Zone Development Standards as follows: . SDC 3.2-215: The minimum building front yard setback for the MDR portion of the proposed development options is 10'-0" minimum. Building One is set back about 12'-0" from the street frontage on South 52nd Street, which. exceeds the required front yard setback. The residential portion of the proposed developments does not have a street side yard. ' . SDC 3.2-215: The interior and rear yard building setbacks are 5'-0" and 10'-0" minimum respectively. Along the rear southern property line adjacent to the adjacent LDR zoned property, the multiple-unit buildings are set back about 12'-0", which exceeds the required 10'-0" rear yard setback. Along the interior western property line adjacent to the adjacent CC zoned: property, the multiple-unit buildings are set back about 10'-0", which exceeds the required 5'-0" setback. . 1- I . . SDC 3'.2-215: The front yard setback for garages is a minimum 18'-0" measured along the driveway from the property line fronting the street to the far wall of the garage where the face of structure is perpendicular to the street. The proposed garage entrances and driveways face the interior of the site' with . . "0 (1) - > - Q .~ N iii ....., ;lj (1) - 'E 0::: !Xl ..a (1) \.J.J :1 - LL. OJ co Ti 0 L: '01 .;:: 0 City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 14 of37 . . residential units located above the garages on the second level. Therefore, although the garages are perpendicular to South 520d Street, the garages are incorporated into the design of the larger multiple-family residential building (Building One) and do not appear to be garages from the street-facing fa<;ade (South 520d Street). However, the far wall of the garage, where the face of the structure is perpendicular to South 520d Street, is set back 18'-0" in compliance with the required minimum. Reference the Site Plans for details. . SDC 3.2-215: The height of the proposed multiple-unit residential buildings is no greater than about 26'-0" (at the ridge of the highest hip roof), which is less than the required 35'-0" maximum. Reference the attached Exterior Elevations drawings for details. . SDC 3.2-225 Base Solar Development Standards: These criteria are not applicable to the proposed development options because the subject parcels are zoned CC and located on the north side of the adjacent LDR zoned properties. SDC 3.2-240 Multi-Unit DesiJm Standards: Findings: As noted above, there are standards within SDC 3.2-240 Multi-Unit Design Standards that do not apply to the proposed residential portion of the development options due to the mixed-use nature of the development proposal located on a CC zoned site. The residential portion of the development complies with the Multi-Unit Design Standards as follows: SDC 3.2-240(B) Purpose: The two two-story multiple-unit residential buildings with private patios or balconies are compatible with the adjacent single-family residential development to the south a nd provide an appropriate transition between this single-family residential neighborhood and the commercial development along Main Street to the north. The MDR portion of the proposed mixed-use development options promotes higher residential density inside the urban growth boundary along the Main Street commercial corridor and adjacent to low-density residential neighborhoods. The proposed medium-density residential housing will use existing infrastructure and improve the efficiency of public services and facilities. SDC 3.2-240(C). Review: This written statement and other supplementary information describes the proposed multi'unit development options and demonstrates that the proposals comply with the Site Plan Review criteria under the Springfield Development Code (Section 5.17-100), which is subject to the Type II application review process. Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 15 of 37 SDC 3.2-240(D) Design Standards, the residential portion of the development options complies with the Design Standards as follows: . SDC 3.2-240(D)(1)(a) Building Orientation: The outdoor covered stair and corridor system is the primary entrance to Building One (the larger multiple- unit residential building), which faces South 520d Street. Building One's primary outdoor entrance directly connects to South 520d Street, to the exterior front doors of all of the residential units in both Building One and Two as well as to the pedestrian walkway system throughout the site. The street-facing outdoor entrance for Building One will be enhanced by decorative signage and pedestrian amenities such as a masonry seating walls and a trellis archway. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(1)(b) Building Orientation: The front street-facing fa~ade of Building One is located about 12'-0" (outdoor staircase) to 18'-0" (far wall of ground floor garage) from the front property line on South 520d Street, which is within the maximum 25 feet requirement. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(1)(c) Building OrIentation: Off-street parking and vehicular circulation is not placed between the residential structures and the street- facing fa~ade on South 520d Street. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(1)(d) Building Orientation: There are no wetlands identified on the subject properties and the properties are relatively flat, therefore, this criterion is not applicable. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(2)(a) Building Form: The proposed two-story residential structures have continuous horizontal distances between about 83'-0" to about 111 '-0", which are less than the maximum 160'-0" (measured from end wall to end wall) allowed. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(2)(b) Building Form: With the exception of a couple of minor building elements outlined below, the proposed two-story residential buildings (Building One and Two) have hip roofs with a roof pitch that is about 5 to 15 which meets the minimum 3 to 12 pitch requirement. Reference the attached Exterior Elevations for details. ' Adjustment: The front and back porch awnings on Building Two's townhouse units are shed roof forms and Building One's outdoor stair and corridor system are covered by a shed and flat roof form, respectively, in order to provide more ap'propriate and improved design and construction details for these building elements. The proposed adjustment to these building'roof forms are discussed below under SDC 3.2-250 Multi-Unit Design Standards Variances. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(1)(c) Building Form: The front fa~ades of both Building One (facing South 520d Street) and Building Two (facing Building One) contain the minimum required 15 percent windows and doors. All proposed windows and doors on Building One and Two have 4" trim to provide shadOWing as required. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.1-240(D)(2)(d) Building Form: The ground floor garages in Building One are attached to living units above on the second floor but the garages are not accessed from the street (front setback), so this criterion is not applicable. -c Q) - > - c::::> 'Q) ...... ."ijj 0 Q) LL :::: 0:::: - 'E en .0 Q) l.IJ ::l' - u.. (/) ltl "ijj a c: '0> .;:: 0 . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 16 of 37 o SDC 3.2-240(D)(2)(e), (f), (g) and (h) Building Form: All of. the exterior elevations of Buildings One and Two incorporate design features including offsets, projections, balconies, covered porches or similar elements to preclude large expansions of uninterrupted building surfaces. Along the vertical face of all of the residential structures, there are a minimum of two recesses (minimum depth of 3'-0"), extensions (minimum depth of 2'-0", with two exceptions, and minimum length of 4'-0") and/or offsets or breaks in roof elevation (2'-0" or greater in height), which occur at a minimum of every 30 feet, and on each floor. Reference the attached Exterior Elevations for details. Adjustment: Discussed below under SDC 3.2-250 Mufti-Unit Design Standards Variances, the minimum depth of the proposed extensions on the east .and west exterior elevations of Building Two (townhouse units) are proposed to be adjusted from the required minimum 2'-0" depth to 1 '-8" depth (allowed maximum 20 percent adjustment of the requirement). o SDC 3.2-240(D)(3)(a) Transition and Compatibility between Multi-unit and LDR Development: The adjacent single-family residence located on the same side of South 52nd Street and same block is located within 75'-0" south of Building One within the multi-unit residential portion of the subject development site. The front fa<;ade of this single-family.residence is located about 16'-0" from the front property line. Building One is set back about 12'- 0" from the front property line, which is within the permitted 5'-0" of the setback provided by this nearest single-family residence. Therefore, this criterion is met. Reference the attached Exterior Elevations for details. o SDC 3.2-240(D)(3)(b)(i) Transition and Compatibility between Multi-unit and LDR Development: There is no vehicular circulation (i.e., driveways, drive lanes, maneuvering areas and private streets) proposed within the buffer area between the multi-unit residential development and the LDR zoned property to the south. Therefore, this criterion is met. o SDC 3.2-240(D)(3)(b)(ii) Transition and Compatibility between Multi-unit and LDR Development: A site-obscuring 6'-0" high cedar fence and landscaping are proposed along the subject property lines that abut a LDR zoned property to the south. Therefore, this criterion is met. o SDC 3.2-240(D)(3)(b)(iii) Transition and Compatibility between Multi-unit and LDR Development: There are no primary entrances to the multi-unit residential buildings that face an abutting LDR zoned property. Except as described below under Adjustment, Buildings One and Two comply with all other applicable setbacks and transition area standards, as discussed elsewhere in the narrative. Adjustment: The minimum 15'-0" buffer area. (with the allowed 10'-0" building encroachment into the 25'-0" buffer area) between portions of the multi-unit residential buildings (ground floor porch roofs, second floor balconies and building extensions) and the abutting the LDR zoned property. line is proposed to be adjusted to 12'-0" and 13'-0" (allowed maximum 20 percent adjustment of the requirement). In addition, the heights of the "'0 I Q) - > - .m <::l C'I .0 ...., Q) 0::: - .2 ffi <ll I.L.. C/) a (ij c: .;:: 0 City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 1 7 of 37 . . primary roof (per code definition) for Buildings One and Two are proposed to be adjusted from the maximum 21'-0" within the buffer area to 21'-8" height as discussed below under SDC 3.2-250 Multi-Unit Design Standards Variances. Reference the attached Site Plans and Exterior Elevations for details. . SDC 3.1-140(D)(3)(b)(iv) Transition and Compatibility between Multi-unit and LDR Development: The proposed active recreation area is located outside of the 25'-0" buffer area in the center of the multi-unit residential buildings. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.1-140(D)(3)(b)(v) Transition and Compatibility between Multi-unit and LDR Development: There is. no proposed parking lot lighting located within the residential portion of the development options. The exterior building and path lights will be proposed at the time of the building permit application submittal in compliance with the 12'-0" maximum height limitation and shielded so that light does not allow direct illumination onto adjacent LOR property or into dwelling units. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.1-140(D)(3)(b)(vi) Transition and Compatibility between Multi-unit and LDR Development: Mechanical equipment will be screened from view (i.e., as viewed from adjacent properties and street), and will be buffered so that noise does not typically exceed 45 to 50 decibels as measured at the LOR property line. The Mechanical equipment will be proposed at the time of the building permit application submittal in compliance with this and all other applicable standards. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-140(D)(3)(b)(vii) Transition and Compatibility between Multi-unit and LDR Development: The proposed residential portion of the development options does not propose rooftop equipment. All mechanical and electrical equipment will be located within the residential building structures. Mechanical and electrical equipment will be proposed at the time of the building permit application submittal in compliance with this and all other applicable standards. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-140(D)(3)(c) Transition aild Compatibility between Multi-unit and LDR Development: The proposed buildings and portions of buildings abutting the LDR zoned property lines outside of the buffer area do not exceed a building height greater than one foot for each foot distance from the LDR property line up to about 26'-0", which is less than the required maximum 35'-0" building height. Reference the Exterior Elevations for details. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(4)(a) Storage: Adequate, accessible and secure storage . space is proposed for each dwelling unit in private garages (each approximately 250 square feet). The garages are located on the ground floor of Building One, adjoining all dwelling units in Buildings One and Two via the outdoor covered stair and corridor system. Therefore, this criterion is met. '. Reference the Site Plans, Sheet A 1, and Conceptual Floor Plans, Sheet A2, f.oate Received. details. FEB 15 2011 Original Submittal City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 18 of 37 . . . SDC 3.2-240(D)(4)(b) Storage: The proposed residential portion of the development options provides an enclosed trash area attached to the west end of Building One that is screened from view by placement of a masonry wall, about 6'-0" in height, and obscuring landscaping around all exposed sides of the wall except where breaks are provided for doors. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(4)(c) Storage: There are no trash receptacles proposed in any front yard setback, or within 25'-0" of property lines abutting LDR zoned properties. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(4)(d) Storage: Ground-mounted equipment, including exterior transformers, utility pads, cable television and telephone boxes and similar utility services, will be placed underground, where practicable. When placed above ground, the equipment will be placed to minimize visual impact; or screened with a wall or landscaping as required by code. Ground- mounted equipment will be proposed at the time of the building permit application submittal in compliance with this and all other applicable standards. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(5)(a) Open Space: The proposed medium-density residential portion of the mixed-use development options permanently reserves approximately 30 percent of the residential portion of the site area only (about 26,074 square feet) as open space, which exceeds the required minimum 15 percent or 3,912 square feet. The total required open space is the sum of setbacks, common open space, and private open space. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(5)(a)(i) Open Space: The proposed residential portion of the mixed-use development options is not proposed in mixed-use buildings, therefore, the exemption to these standards does not apply. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(5)(a)(ii) and (iii) Open Space: The proposed density for the multi-unit residential portion of the site is about 25 units per acre (the residential portion of the site area totals about 26,074 square feet or 0.60 acres), which is less than 30 units per gross acre so the development complies with the other applicable code sections specified below. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(5)(b)(i) and (ii) Common Open Space: The proposed common open space has no dimension less than 15'-0" in width. The proposed total residential floor area (excluding garages) is about. 16,964 square feet. Therefore, the required minimum common open space is 4,241 square feet. Per SDC 3.2-240(D)(S)(c)(iiiJ, private open space may be deducted from the minimum common open space requirement. 0.25 x 16,964 square feet = 4,241 square feet 4,241 square feet - 1,320 square feet private open space (SDC 3.2- 240(D)(5)(c)(iii)) = 2,921 square feet The woposed common open space for the multi-unit portion of the deveiop~ent is 3,318 square feet, which exceeds this required 2,921-sqlf'"ate Received: foot minimum. Therefore, these criteria are met. . FEB 1 5 2011 Orl~if!~' ~Y9m;ttal . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 19 of 37 . SDC 3.2-240(D)(5)(b)(iv) and (v) Common Open Space: In all options, the proposed common open space has no dimension less than 15'-0" in width. A natural play area composed of basalt stepping and climbing stones and covered benches are proposed in the center of the residential buildings, which exceeds the required minimum 250 square feet area of active recreation area. The natural play area is not proposed in any required setback or transition area. Therefore, these criteria are met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(5)(b)(vi) Common Open Space: A minimum of fifty percent of the required common open space area is landscaping, which is consistent with the requirement. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(5)(b)(vii) Common Open Space: The proposals do not include indoor or covered recreational space, therefore, this criterion is not applicable. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(5)(b)(viii) Common Open Space: The exception to the common open space standard does not apply to the proposed project because the development site is slightly outside the 1/4 mile distance (measured walking distance) to a public park. However, within only 0.4 miles, there are two public active recreation areas (Bluebell Park and Riverbend Elementary School) easily accessible by the tenants via a direct, improved, permanent, public, ADA-accessible, lighted, maintained pedestrian sidewalk between the site and the parks. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(5)(b)(ix) Common Open Space: The proposed common open space areas will be built at the time of the construction of the residential portion of the mixed-use development during Phase I for all three development options. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(5)(b)(x) Common Open Space: The common open space areas are proposed outside of the required yards or transition areas. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(5)(c)(i) Private Open Space: All of the proposed multi- family units have private open spaces, which are directly accessible from the dwelling unit through a doorway. The ground floor units have a covered front entry and a back patio. The second floor units have a covered front entry and balcony. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(5)(c)(i) Private Open Space: The seven proposed ground floor dwelling units (three flats and four townhouses) provide about 120 square feet of patio area, which exceeds the minimum of 96 square feet of private open space. The proposed minimum dimension for all of the ground floor patios is about 10'-0", which is more than the required 6'-0". Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(6)(a) Landscaping, Fences and Waifs: About 30 percent of the residential portion of the site (26,074 square feet total) is landscaped with a mix ()f..[ vegetative ground cover, shrubbery and trees per City standID"Eite Received: which'is more than the required 15 percent minimum. Therefore, this criterion is met. FEB 1 5 2011 r . '0 ~, Si"brnittsL__...--_ . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 20 of 37 . SDC 3.2-240(D)(6)(b) Land:;caping, Fences and Walls: Although optional, the proposed development will provide a planter strip along South 52nd Street, a local street. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(6)(c) Landscaping, Fences and Walls: As part of this development, street trees selected from the City Street Tree List are proposed to be planted in the public landscape strip along the property's frontage on South 51 st Place and South 52nd Street as required per the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual and Springfield Municipal Code. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(6)(d) Landscaping, Fences and Walls: The proposed development options do not propose fences in front yards and along any frontage used to comply with the building orientation standard. There are pedestrian amenities and signage proposed within the front yard setback in front of Building One in order to enhance the entrance to the residential buildings. The amenities include about two 20" high seating walls and a trellis archway approximately 7'-0" high. The fences proposed in other yards comply with the fence standards specified in Section 4.4-115 and the vision clearance standards specified in Section 4.2-130 as noted below. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(6)(e) Landscaping, fences and Walls: All landscaping will be irrigated with a permanent irrigation system unless the project's licensed landscape architect submits written verification that the proposed plarit materials do not require irrigation. The irrigation system will be provided at the time of building permit application submittal in compliance with code standards. The property owner will maintain all landscaping. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(7)(a), (c) and (d) I'edestrian Circulation: The proposed development options provide continuous internal walkways throughout the site connecting the residential and commercial portions of the development and all tenant primary entrances to South 51 st Place, South 52nd Street and Main Street public right-of-ways. The continuous on-site walkway system also connects all buildings and tenant primary entrances on the site to the parking areas, bicycle parking, garages, common areas, and existing (Main Street) and proposed (South 51 st Place) abutting public sidewalks. Therefore, these criteria are met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(7)(b) I'edestrian Circulation: With the exception of the second floor dwelling units in Building One, Structures Band C, the proposed residential portion of the on-site pedestrian walkways are separated by a minimum of 5'-0" from the dwelling units, measured from the sidewalk edge closest to any dwelling unit. Therefore, this criterion is met. Adjustment: The proposed second floor dwelling units in Building One, .j (~{,.KGiV0U: Structures 'B and C, are proposed to be adjusted from being separated by a minimum of 5'-0" to being located directly adjacent to the second floor on-siter:3 1 5 2011 pedestrian walkway as discussed below under SDC 3.2-250 Multi-Unit Design ~, Standards Variances. Reference the attached Site Plans for details. Original Submittal City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 21 of 37 . . . SDC 3.2-240(D)(7)(e) Pedestrian Circulation: The proposed on-site pedestrian walkways are proposed to be a combination of concrete, asphalt or masonry pavers, at least 5'-0" wide. Reference the Site Plans for details. The proposed asphalt emergency vehicle access (east-west drive aisle) is a minimum of about 23'-0" wide, which exceeds the required 20'-0" width. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(7)(f) and (g) Pedestrian Circulation: Where the proposed on-site pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular circulation area or parking aisle, they are clearly marked' with elevation changes or striping. There are no proposed internal walkways that are parallel to a vehicular circulation area. Where the proposed on-site pedestrian walkways abut a vehicular circulation area the sidewalk is raised or separated from the vehicular circulation by a raised curb, landscaping or other physical barrier. In the locations that a raised sidewalk is proposed, the ends of the raised portions have curb ramps. .The proposed on-site pedestrian walkways and ramps comply with ADA requirements. Therefore, these criteria are met. Reference the Site Plans for details. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(7)(h) Pedestrian Circulation: The proposed on-site pedestrian walkways will be lighted to a minimum of 2 foot-candles. The exterior site and building lighting plan and details will be submitted at the time of building permit application submittal in compliance with the code standards. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(B)(a) Parking: The proposed residential vehicle parking is placed in individual unit garages and on the west side of Building One. There is no parking proposed along the South, 52nd Street frontage in front of the multi-unit residential buildings. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(B)(b) Parking: Prop~sedparking lot lighting is provided for safety purposes, and focused/shielded to avoid glare on adjacent properties and dwelling units as specified in Section 4.5-100 below: Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(B)(c) Parking: There are 23 vehicle parking spaces required for the proposed residential portion of the mixed-use development. Fifteen of those vehicle parking spaces are located in individual unit garages. As noted above, the remaining 8 vehicle parking spaces are located directly west of Building One. There is a planter island located on each side of the row of 8 spaces that is 6'-0" wide, exclusive of the curb, which meets this criterion. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(B)(d) Parking: The proposed residential buildings do not have any ground floor living area windows that front the parking area. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(B)(e) Parking: The proposed residential parking aisle in all options is connected to all primary building entrances on the site' by means of the continuous on-site pedestrian walkway system. Therefore, this criterion ~ate Received: 'met, FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal - City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 22 of 37 . . . SDC 3.2-240(D)(8)(f) Parking: All proposed walkways or planters located adjacent to parking stalls on the site have been widened by 2'-0" beyond the minimum dimension required to. allow for vehicle encroachment. The walkways and planters are protected by a curb not less than 6 inches in height per code standards. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(8)(g) Parking: The proposed residential portion of the mixed-use development. options is not located on the corner of the parcels. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(8)(h) and (j) Parking: The proposed residential parking and maneuvering areas that abut South 51 ~ Place and 520d Street have perimeter landscaping. The proposed perimeter landscape islands range from a minimum of 5'-0" wide along the southern property line adjacent to Tax Lot 6203 to about 20'-0" wide along 520d Street provide, therefore, the proposals either meet or exceed the required 5'-0" wide. The perimeter planting strips will be planted with shade trees, a minimum 2 inches (dbh) in caliper, and a low level (e.g., 30 to 40 inches) evergreen hedge. A detailed planting plan with exact sizes and species will be provided at the time of building permit application submittal in compliance with all applicable code standards. The parking area landscaping on the entire site is designed to reduce stormwater runoff (e.g., through infiltration swales and other measures), as practicable. Reference the attached civil engineering and landscape architecture drawings for details. Therefore, these criteria are. met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(8)(k) Parking: The proposed bicycle parking for the residential portion of the development is provided within the individual dwelling unit garages located on the first floor of Building One as allowed under SDC 4.6-150(6). Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(9)(a) Vehicle Circulation: The on-site drive aisle and driveway system for the proposed mixed-use development options connect with Main Street, South 51" Place and 520d Street. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(9)(b) Vehicle Circulation: The proposed mixed-use development options with commercial and residential uses on two parcels share either the three proposed driveways (Site Plan Option A) or two driveways (Site Plan Option B and C) which minimize cross turning movements on adjacent streets. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(9)(c) Vehicle Circulation: The proposed residential portion of the development site is about 0.59 acres (about 25,820 square feet), which is less than 8 acres. Therefore, this criterion isrlOt applicable. . SDC 3.2-240(D)(9)(d) Vehicle Circulation: The proposed parcels do not abut an alley so this criterion is not applicable. Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 23 of 37 SDC 3.2-250 Multi-Unit DesiJm Standards Variances: SDC 3.2-250(A) Description: Adjustments of up to 20 percent to the Multi-Unit Design Standards listed in Section 3.2-240 under Building Form; Transition and Compatibility Between Multi-unit and LDR Development; and Parking are proposed below. Finding: Consistent with this criterion the following adjustments are proposed: Building Form Adjustment: SDC 3.2-240(O)(2)(b): There are two alternate roof forms proposed on minor building elements: the front and back porch awnings on Building Two's townhouse units are shed roof forms and Building One's outdoor stair and the corridor system is covered, respectively, by a shed and flat roof form. Building Form Adjustment: SDC 3.2-240(D)(2)(g): The minimum depth of the proposed extensions on the east and west exterior elevations of Building Two (townhouse units) are proposed to be adjusted fro'm the required minimum 2'-0" depth to 1'-8" depth (allowed maximum 20 percent adjustment of the requirement). Transition and Compatibility between Multi-Unit and LDR Development Adjustment: SDC 3.2-240(D)(3)(b)(iii): The minimum 15'-0" buffer area (with the allowed 10'-0" building encroachment into the 25'-0" buffer area) between portions of the multi-unit residential buildings (ground floor porch roofs, second floor balconies and building extensions) and the abutting the LDR zoned property line is proposed to be adjusted to 12'-0" and 13'-0" (allowed maximum 20 percent adjustment of the requirement). In addition, the heights of the primary roof (per code definition) for Buildings One and Two are proposed to be adjusted from the maximum 21 '-0" building height within the buffer to a maximum 21 '-8" building height. Pedestrian Circulation Adjustment: SDC 3.2-240(D)(7)(b): The proposed second floor dwelling units in Building One, Structures Band C, are' proposed to be adjusted from being separated by a minimum of 5'-0" to b.eing located directly adjacent to the second floor on-site pedestrian walkway. . SDC 3.2-250(B) General Criterion: The proposed adjustments are necessary due to requirement that the CC zoned subject parcels be developed as a mixed-use development per the East Main Refinement Plan without clear and objective development standards, which preclude full compliance of the Multi-Unit Design Standards. Therefore, this criterion is met. . SDC 3.2-250(D)(1) and (2) Building Form: The adjustments to the roof forms proposed on the minor building elements and the adjustment to the proposed extensions on the east and west exterior, elevations of Building Two (townhouse units) from the required minimum 2'-0" depth to 1 '-8" provide 1:1 Q) - > - 'Qj c .... m u Q) U"'l - "" 0:: - E Q) CD .c I.LI ::> - LL. en ro 0 m c: '51 .;: 0 City of Springfield. Site Plan Re'view Application February 15, 2011 Page 24 of 37 . . equivalent neighborhood compatibility by providing similar building mass and architecture while allowing for contrasting building form. The adjacent structures within 300 feet have shed and flat roofs on building elements like porches, storage structures, etc. similar to what is proposed. . SDC 3.2-250(F) Transition and Compatibility Between Multi-Unit and Low Density Residential Development: The proposed development requests adjustments to the buffer area between portions of the multi-unit residential buildings (ground floor porch roofs, second floor balconies and building extensions) and the abutting the LDR zoned property line from the required . 15'-0" minimum (with the allowed 10'-0" building encroachment into the 25'- 0" buffer area) to 12'-0" and 13'-0" (allowed maximum 20 percent adjustment of the requirement); and. the adjustment to the heights of the primary roof (per code definition) for Buildings One and Two from the maximum 21 '-0" building height within the buffer to a 21 '-8" height. These proposed adjustments result in minor changes that do not alter the intent of the code and continue to provide a compatible transition between multi-unit dwellings and the neighboring LDR properties by a reduction in noise and/or light that would otherwise impact adjacent LDR areas; stepping down building height; providing roof lines that compliment adjacent uses; and similar elements that effectively accomplish the intent of the standard. . SDC 3.2-250(1) Pedestrian Circulation: The adjustment to the pedestrian circulation system from the required minimum 5'-0" separation from dwellings to no separation from the second floor dwelling units in Building One, Structures Band C, provides an equivalent degree of pedestrian circulation, safety and comfort consistent with the pedestrian circulation standards. The pedestrian circulation system on the second floor of Building One, Structures Band C, is attached to Building One for structural reasons, therefore the second floor dwelling units located in these structures are located directly off the approximate 6'-0" wide pedestrian circulation system. The second floor circulation system will be used exclusively for the dwelling units located on the second floor, including 8 dwelling units (two units in Structure C and three units each in Structures A and B), which provides direct, safe and comfortable access to these upper units from two locations on the ground level. SDC 3.2-300 CC Base Zone Development Standards: Findings: The tenants for the proposed multi-tenant commercial buildings in all three options have not yet been identifi.ed. However, all uses will be consistent with the allowed use categories listed under the CC base zone per SDC 3.2-315 at the time of tenant infill building permit submittal. Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 25 of 37 Specifically, the commercial portion of the development complies with the CC Base Zone Development Standards as follows; . SDC 3.2~315: The lot standards required under SDC 3.2-315 do not apply for three reasons. First, the subject site was created prior to 1982. Second, the minimum lot size and frontage standard of SDC 3.2-315 is a standard imposed for the creation of new lots or parcels. 'The proposed development options do not include partitioning or subdividing the subject property. Third, this standard is not a design or construction standard, and there(ore not applicable. . SDC 3.2-315: There is no specific maximum lot coverage for CC zoned parcels, As noted above, the MDR base zone lot coverage is not applicable because the proposed development options are mixed-use projects proposed on CC zoned properties. There are no other standards or sections in the code that limit the lot coverage. . SDC 3.2-315: The minimum building front yard setback in the CC zone is 10'- 0" and parking and driveway front yard setbacks are 5'-0". The buildings, parking and driveways either meet or exceed the required front yard setbacks , along Main Street, South 51" Place and South 52,d Street in all three options. Therefore, these criteria are met. Reference the Site Plans for details. . SDC 3.2-315: The residential portion of the mixed-use development options is located adjacent to the interior and rear yards of the subject parcels so buildings, parking, driveway and storage are set !;lack in compliance with the applicable MDR and Multi-Unit standards as discussed above. . SDC 3.2-315: As noted above, the multi-unit residential buildings in the mixed-use development options meet the building heights per the applicable MDR and Multi-Unit standards, The commercial buildings do not have a building height requirement. SDC 4.2-100 throuJ!h SDC 4.6-150'and 4.7-210 Development Standards: SDC 4.2-105 Public Streets: Findings: There are no public streets proposed with these development options. Therefore, the criteria under this section are not applicable. Main and South 52,d Streets are built to City standards with an adequate width for the designated street classification. The public improvements proposed as part of the three development options include half-street improvements along the frontage of South 51" Place, including roughly 18'-0" of new asphalt, curb and _, gutter, sidewalk, a streetlight, street trees and the proposed driveway approach. Additionally, the proposed driveway approaches on Main Street (Site Plan Option A only) and South 52,d Street will be replaced and will meet current ADA standards. All public improvements will be constructed per City standards under a PIP. "0 <1> - .> - c <1> N (ij 0 Ln <1> :I:: a:: - 'E <1> Q:l .a LLJ :;] - I.L. (/) to 0 (ij c .5 '': 0 . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 26 of 37 SDC 4.2-110 Private Streets: Findings: . There are no private internal streets proposed with the three developrnent options. As outlined above and in the attached TIS, adequate access is already provided through the adjacent street network and the proposed internal on-site circulation of the development. Therefore, the criteria under this section are not applicable. SDC 4.2-115 Block Length: Findings: There are no public or private internal streets proposed with the three development options. As outlined above and in the attached TIS, adequate access is already provided through the adjacent street network and the proposed internal on-site circulation of the development. Therefore, the criteria under this section are not applicable. In all three development options, the applicant proposes on-site drive aisles that connect to Main Street (Site Plan Option A only), South 51 ~ Place and South 52nd Street. Site Plan Option A only proposes limited access to a right-in and right-out only driveway on Main Street, which allows safe ingress and egress to and from the development from this principal arterial. SDC 4.2-120 Site Access and Driveways: Findings: The subject sites have street right-of-way frontage along Main Street, South 51" Place and South 52nd Street. Currently, South 51" Place is unimproved to the City's public street standards. Main Street and South 52nd Street are improved public streets with sidewalks. South 52nd Street has a sidewalk on the east side of the street. These sidewalks and the on-site pedestrian walkway system in each option provide pedestrian conn~ctivity to the public right-of-ways and adjacent and nearby residential, commercial and industrial areas. As noted above, the public improvements proposed as part of the development options include half-street improvements along the frontage of South 51~ Place, including roughly 18'-0" of new asphalt, curb and gutter, sidewalk, a streetlight, street trees and the proposed driveway approach. Additionally, the proposed driveway approaches on Main Street (Site Plan Option'A only) and South 52nd Street will be replaced and will meet current ADA standards. The proposed shared driveway approach on South 52nd Street is located approximately 88'-0" from the Main Street intersection (measured to the start of the South 52nd Street intersection radius curve). The proposed driveway approach on South 51" Place is located approximately 94'-0" from the Main Street intersection (measured to the start of the South 51" Place intersection radius curve). In Site Plan Option A only, the proposed driveway approach on Main Street is located approximately 132'-0" from the South 51" Place intersection and 118'-0" from the South 52nd Street intersection (both measured to the start of the Main Street intersection radius "'0 (1) - > - -(1) = C'-I fl 0 Ir) Q) 'E 0::: - 00 .0 Q) LLl =' .... LL. en ro (ij 0 c: '51 '1:: 0 . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 27 of 37 curve). All public improvements will be constructed per City standards under a PIP. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the criteria under this section. As outlined above and in the attached TIS, the existing public street and traffic safety' control systems will not be exceeded with the addition of the proposed development options and are available to serve the site at the time of development. Reference the attached TIS dated October 13, 2010 for details, which is adopted and incorporated herein. In addition, as noted above, the pending ODOT Right-of-Way Approach Permit for the limited access driveway on Main Street is attached for reference. . SDC 4.2-125 Intersections: Findings: As stated above there are no public or private streets proposed in the three development options, therefore, there are no street intersections proposed. All proposed on-site drive aisle and driveway intersections are at right angles to the intersecting streets, Main Street (Site Plan Option A only), South 51" Place and South 52nd Street. The offsets for the proposed access points to the nearest existing public street intersections comply with City requirements. Therefore, the criteria under this section are met. SDC 4.2"130 Vision Clearance: Findings: In accordance with the 'vision clearance standards, the two corners of the proposed development at the intersections of Main Street and South 51" Place, and Main Street and South 52nd Street provide adequate sight distance for the approach traffic in all three options. Reference the attached Site Plans for details. Considering these findings and the site plans submitted herewith, the proposed project options are consistent with the criteria under this section. SDC 4.2-135 Sidewalks: Findings: There is only one public sidewalk proposed as part of the development . options, which will be constructed per the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual, the Public Works Standard Construction Specifications and Springfield Municipal Code. The proposed public sidewalk and planter strip will be located wholly within the public right-of-way. The sidewalk is proposed to be 5'-6" wide with a curb and gutter. There is also an approximate 6'-5" landscape bed proposed between the public sidewalk and the subject western property line, which exceeds the minimum 4'-6" width requirement per SDC 4.2- 135. Therefore, the criteria under this section are met. The existing public sidewalk and bike lanes on Main Street provide access to adjacent and nearby residential, commercial and industrial areas. The site plans for each option show on-site circulation for pedestrians, bicycles and vehicles as "0 (]) - .~ - = (]) ('-.J g (.) U"> (]) - a:: - 'E ~ .0 (]) I.J..J ~ - L!... en (ll 0 '. ro c: C!) .;: n . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application ~brua~1~2m1 . Page 28 of 37 required by the Springfield Development Code. In the three development options, the proposed continuous on-site pedestrian walkway system connects the prima~ building entrances of each commercial and residential building to the existing public right-of-way on Main Street, South 51~ Place and South 520d Street, and to the adjacent residential and commercial properties. On-site pedestrian and bicycle access is provided between the buildings and parking areas on the site by clearly marked, either striped or raised paved walkways. SDC 4.2-140 Street Trees: ' Findings: As part of the development options, street trees selected from the City Street Tree List are proposed to be planted in the public landscape strip along the property's frontage on South 51~ Place and South 520d Street as required per the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual and Springfield Municipal Code. There are two existing street trees proposed for removal as part of this development. In all three development options, the existing 28" cedar street tree located at the intersection of 520d Street and Main Street is proposed for removal because it is located within the vision clearance area. In addition, the commercial building proposed on this corner will significantly impact the existing tree's critical root zone (Site Plan Options A and B). In all three development options, the existing 3" cedar street tree located at the southwest corner of the Tax Lot 6200 on South 51" Place is proposed for removal because as noted above, a new public sidewalk is proposed in this location. New street trees will be planted to replace these existing trees per the Street Tree Replacement Standards. The new street tree replacing the existing street tree at the intersection of South 520d Street and Main Street will be planted farther south on South 520d Street outside of the vision clearance area. Therefore, the criteria under this section are met. SDC 4.2-145 Street Lighting: Findings: As noted above, there is one streetlight proposed as part ofthe public improvements on South 51~ Place. Reference the attached civil drawings for details. All public improvements will" be constructed per the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual, the Public Works Standard Construction Specifications and ~ield Municipal Code under a PIP. Therefore, the criteria under this section are met. SDC 4.2-150 Bikeways, 4.2-155 Pedestrian Trails and 4.2-160 Accessways: Findings: There are no public bikeways, pedestrian trails or accessways proposed. as part of the development options. Therefore, the criteria under these sections are not applicable. As noted above, Main Street is classified as a principal arterial and currently developed to City principal arterial standards including existing on- -0 (J) - :> - c::> "8 ...... ...., (J) - ~ CO (J) UJ +-' U. Cll 0 City of.5pringfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 29 of 37 . . street bike lanes. All three development options for the subject site include the provision of on-site pedestrian facilities that connect to Main Street, South 51" Place and South 520d Street and the existing bike lanes. SDC 4.3-105 Sanitary Sewers: Findings: As noted above, there are two existing public sanitary sewer stubs (4" stubs) located adjacent to the subject site's western and eastern property lines conveying sewage from the site to the 8" public sanitary sewer lines located in South 51" Place and South 520d Street. The existing public sanitary sewer has adequate capacity to serve all three development options' needs. Therefore, the criteria under this section are met. SDC 4.3C110 Storm water Management: Findings: There is an existing 48" storm pipe located along the south side of Main Street. An existing 12" storm main is located in South 520d Street and an existing 12" storm line is located South 51" Place. As part of the PIP, the South 51" Place existing roadside ditch will be removed and a new 12" storm line will be installed with a stub out to provide service to the subject property and to convey the upstream flows. In all development options a new storm lateral is proposed to connect into the existing 12" storm line in South 520d Street as well. No connection is proposed to the 48" storm line located ;n Main Street at this time. In addition, as noted above, the owner proposes to make public sidewalk improvements along the property's frontage on South 51" Place as required. Due to City Staff identified storm system requirements, the proposed development options include on-site retention to the fullest extent possible. Special emphasis is placed on infiltrating the stormwater and limiting the flow rate to the existing public storm system. See the attached Stormwater Management System Plan for " more information. Therefore, the criteria under this section are met. SDC 4.3-115 Water Quality Protection: Findings: The site is not identified on the Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) Map, therefore, there are no identified watercourses or riparian areas located on the site subject to specific water quality protection. As noted above, the proposed development options include on-site retention to the fullest extent possible. Special emphasis is placed on infiltrating the stormwater and limiting the flow rate to the existing public storm system. See the attached Stormwater Management System Plan for more information. Therefore, the criteria under this s"ection are met. Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal____..__. City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 30 of 37 . . SDC 4.3-120 Utility Provider Coordination: Findings: All utility providers will be responsible for coordinating utility installations with the City as required. The applicant will be responsible for the design, installation and cost of the utility lines and facilities to the satisfaction of the utility provider consistent with the criteria under this section. SDC 4.3-125 Underground Placement of Utilities: Findings: All utilities are proposed to be constructed underground in accordance with policies of the City of Springfield, SUB, Qwest or other applicable utility providers. See civil engineering drawings for proposed utility layout. Considering these findings and the drawings submitted herewith, the criteria under this section are met. SDC 4.3-130 Water Service and Fire Protection: Findings: The proposed development options have adequate water service available from an existing 6" public water main located in South 51'1 Place adjacent to the subject site's western property line. An existing 6" public water main is also located in South 52nd Street with adequate water service. This main is located on the far side of the right of way. There is an existing fire hydrant located in the public right-of-way on Main Street to the north of the subject site at the intersection of South 52nd Street and Main Street. All of the proposed buildings (commercial, residential and trash enclosures) will be sprinklered. The existing fire hydrant and the addition of the required new public fire hydrant at the entrance to the property on South 52nd Street have an adequate flow rate to serve the site. Reference the attached civil' drawings for the approximate location of the new fire hydrant. Therefore, the criteria under this section are met. SDC 4.3-135 Major Electrical Power Transmission Lines: Findings: As noted above, there are existing overhead electric lines running east- west adjacent to the site's northern property line, which provide adequate capacity to serve the proposed development options. Major electrical power transmission lines are not proposed in this development. Therefore, the criteria under these sections are not applicable. SDC 4.3-140 Public Easements Findings: Public easements are not proposed in this development. criteria under these sections are not applicable. Date Received: Therefore, the FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 31 of 37 . . SDC 4.3-145 Wireless Telecommunications Systems facilities: Findings: There are no wireless telecommunication system facilities proposed in the development options. Therefore, the criteria under these sections are not applicable. SDC 4.4-105 Landscaping: Findings: The landscape architecture drawings for each option show landscaping which meets or exceeds the CC zone and parking lot landscape requirements for the commercial portion of the development site per SDC 4.4-105. Per SDC 4.4- 105(F)(2), the proposed development options include a minimum of 5 percent landscaping in the interior of the parking lot because there are 24 parking spaces located between the street side of a building and Main Street, and they are visible from any street. Reference the attached Site Plans, Parking Calculations, for details. The MDR portion of the site either meets or exceeds the landscape requirements for the residential portion of the development options per SDC 4.3.2-240 and SDC 4.4-105. As noted on the landscape architecture drawings, landscaping will be provided in all required setback areas and installed per the applicable code standards. As noted above, all landscaping will be irrigated with a permanent irrigation system unless the project's licensed landscape architect submits written verification that the proposed plant materials do not require irrigation. The exact sizes, species and locations of plantings as well as the irrigation system will be provided at the time of building permit application submittal in compliance with code standards. These findings and the attached landscape architecture planting plan, schedules and details for the three developme'nt options demonstrate that the landscaping requirements have been met. SDC 4.4-11 0 Screening: Findings: Adjacent to the LDR properties to the south, cedar fence screening is provided in all three development options because a commercial district and multi-family buildings abut a residential district in accordance with SDC 4.4- 11 O(A)(l rand (6) and SDC 4.4-110(B)(3). The proposed outdoor trash receptacles are screened with 6'-0" partial height masonry walls per SDC 4.4- 110(B)(3)(c). Reference the architecture and landscape architecture drawings for Date Received: details. Therefore, the criteria under this section are met. FEB 1 5 2011 SDC 4.4-115 fences: . _ Original Submittal Findings: As noted above, in all three development options, there is a screening fence proposed along the property lines that abuts the adjacent to the LDR zoned properties as well as the CC zoned property (Tax Lot 6203) to the south. Per Table 4.4-1, the base height of this proposed fence shall be 6'-0". The fence . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 32 of 37 details shall be proposed at the time of building permit application submittal consistent with the requirements outlined under SDC 4.4-115. Therefore, the criteria under this section are met. SDC 4.5-100 On-Site Lighting Standards: Findings: Exact outdoor building lighting will be proposed at the time of building permit application submittal in accordance with the On-Site Lighting Standards. All proposed site lighting will be installed in compliance with the requirements of this code section and the applicable Multi-Unit Design Standards as outlined above. In all development options, the proposed site lighting is the minimum illumination necessary for the on-site parking and loading areas. All proposed exterior site and building light fixtures will be shielded so that direct glare and reflection are contained within the boundaries of the property, and directed downward and away from abutting properties and public rights-of-way. In all development options, parking lot light fixtures are proposed to be a maximum height of 20'-0", which is less than the required maximum 25'-0" per SDC 4.5- .11 0(B)(1). There are no parking lot light fixtures proposed within 50'-0" of the residential zoning district to the south.. These findings, the Site Plans and attached proposed Parking Lot Light Fixture Specifications demonstrate that these criteria are met. SDC 4.6-105 through 4.6-125 Vehicle Parking: Findings: In each option, vehicle and bicycle parking calculations for the commercial buildings are based on assumptions of a possible tenant mix. Site Plan Option A: As required by the assumed commercial tenant uses (eating and drinking establishment and retail, personal service and/or small office uses) and the multi-family dwelling use, a minimum of 58 off-street parking spaces are required per Table 4.6-2 (see vehicle parking calculations on Sheet A1). The proposed development option provides 15 individual garages (one for each residential dwelling unit) and 43 surface parking spaces, totaling 58 parking spaces. The applicant proposes a parking lot design in compliance with SDC 4.6- 115; all standard stall widths are g'-O" wide and 18'-0" in length including a 2'-0" bumper overhang over landscaping beds and walkways (reference drawings for specific locations). The compact spaces are 8'-0" wide and 18'-0" in length including a 2'-0" bumper overhang over landscaping beds and walkways. The dimensions and proposed striping of the parking spaces and drive aisles meet the parking area standards per SDC 4.6-115-120. In this development option, there are 24 compact spaces proposed (41 percent of the required parking spaces), which exceeds the maximum allowed 30 percent per SDC 4.6-120(G). The Metro Plan and East Main Street Refinement Plan both support mixed-use or nodal development to more efficiently use land. Consistent with this objective, the increased number of compact parking spaces proposed in -0 (1) - > - <=> (1) N 0 U") (1) 0:: - (1) m I.LI ...... I.L. Cll Cl City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 33 of 37 . . Site Plan Option A allows efficient use of the site by meeting the number of parking spaces required while at the same time accommodating the increased driveway throat depth requirements for the proposed Main Street driveway, reducing the impervious coverage of surface parking area and maintaining the higher density of development. Note that all of the compact spaces have a standard length dimension and only have a compact width dimension. Site Plan Option B: As required by the assumed commercial tenant uses (eating . and drinking establishment and retail, personal service and/or small office uses) and the multi-family dwelling use, a minimum of 58 off-street parking spaces are required per Table 4.6-2 (see vehicle parking calculations on Sheet Al). The proposed development option provides 15 individual garages (one for each residential dwelling unit) and 46 surface parking spaces, totaling 61 parking spaces. There are 15 compact parking spaces provided or 25 percent of the required parking, which is less than the maximum 30 percent allowed per SDC 4.6-120(G). The applicant proposes a parking lot design in compliance with SDC 4.6-115; all standard stall widths are 9'.0" wide and 18'-0" in length including a 2'- .0" bumper overhang over landscaping beds and walkways (reference drawings for specific locations). The compact spaces are 8'-0" wide and 18'-0" in length including a 2'-0" bumper overhang over landscaping beds and walkways. The dimensions and proposed striping of the parking spaces and drive aisles meet the parking area standards per SDC 4.6-115-120. . Site Plan Option C: As required by the assumed commercial tenant eating and drinking establishment use and the multi-family dwelling use, a minimum of 83 off-street parking spaces are required per Table 4.6-2 (see vehicle parking calculations on Sheet A 1). The proposed development option provides 15 individual garages (one for each resi~ential dwelling unit) and 68 surface parking spaces, totaling 83 parking spaces. There are 24 compact parking spaces provided or 29 percent of the required parking, which is less than' the maximum 30 percent allowed per SDC 4.6-120(G). The applicant proposes a parking lot design in compliance with SDC 4.6-115; all standard stall widths are 9'-0" wide and 18'-0" in length including a 2'-0" bumper overhang over landscaping beds and walkways (reference drawings for specific locations). The compact spaces are 8'- 0" wide and 18'-0" in length including a 2'-0" bumper overhang over landscaping beds and walkways. . The dimensions and proposed striping of the parking spaces and drive aisles meet the parking area standards per SDC 4.6-115-120. These findings, together with the architecture and civil engineering drawiniate Received: demonstrate that these standards have been met. FEB 1 5 2011 SDC 4.6-130 through 4.6-135 Loading Areas: . Original Submittal_ .. Findings: In all three development options, in addition to the required parking spaces, there is one proposed delivery. and loading area provided that is located on-site outside of the required setbacks. In all three options, the total proposed . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 34 of 37 on-site loading area is 250 square feet square for the approximately 5,500 square feet (Site Plan Options A and B) and 6,000 square feet (Site Plan Option C) of total commercial building area, which meets the minimum loading area for the site per SDC 4.6-135(C). In all options, the loading area is a minimum 10'-0" wide and over 25'-0" long (excluding pedestrian walkway), which meets the required minimum dimensions (10'-0" wide by 25'-0" long). Therefore, these criteria are met. SDC 4.6-140 through 4.6-150 Bicycle Parking: Findings: . The proposed bicycle parking spaces, location and facility design complies with SDC 4.4-145-150. As noted above, vehicle and bicycle parking calculations are based on assumptions of a possible commercial tenant mix. Site Plan Option A: As required by the assumed commercial tenant uses (eating and drinking establishment and retail, personal service and/or small office uses), the commercial short-term and long-term bicycle parking spaces provided exceed the number required (reference Sheet Al for bicycle parking calculations), The six unsheltered short-term bicycle parking spaces are located along the on-site pedestrian walkway system with ramps that connect to Main Street, South 51" Place and South 52nd Street. The proposed racks are hitching posts or staple racks. The long-term bicycle parking spaces for the commercial buildings will be located inside building tenant spaces in a secure location, which will be proposed in compliance with SDC 4.4-145-150 at the time of individual tenant infill building permit application submittals. The long-term bicycle parking spaces for the 15 residential units will be located inside each individual unit's garage. Therefore, these criteria are met. Site Plan Option B: As required by the assumed commercial tenant uses (eating and drinking establishment and retail, personal service and/or small office uses), the commercial short-term and long-term bicycle parking spaces provided exceed the number required (reference Sheet AI for bicycle parking calculations). The six unsheltered short-term bicycle parking spaces are located along the on-site pedestrian walkway system with ramps that connect to Main Street, South 51" Place and South 52nd Street. The proposed racks are hitching posts or staple racks. The long-term bicycle parking spaces for the commercial buildings will be located inside building tenant spaces in a secure location, which will be proposed in compliance with SDC 4.4-145-150 at the time of individual tenant infill building permit application submittals. The long-term bicycle parking spaces for the 15 residential units will be located inside each individual unit's garage, Therefore, these criteria are met. Site Plan Option C: As required by the assumed commercial tenant uses (eating and drinking establishment), the commercial short-term and long-term bicycle parking spaces provided exceed the number required (reference Sheet A 1 for bicycle parking calculations), The eight unsheltered short-term bicycle parking -0 \ Q) - ::::- - c::> '8 ..... ~ Ln ~ - 'E CO .0 :J .$ I.LJ (j) CO . u.. iij 0 c: 'OJ 'r: 0 . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 35 of 37 spaces are located along the on-site pedestrian walkway system, with ramps that connect to Main Street, South 51" Place and South 520d Street. The proposed racks are hitching posts or staple racks. The long-term bicycle parking spaces for the commercial building will be located inside building tenant space in a secure location, which will be proposed in compliance with SDC 4.4-145-150 at the time of individual tenant'infill building permit application submittals. The long- term bicycle parking spaces for the 15 residential units will be located inside each individual unit's garage. Therefore, these criteria are met. SDC 4.7-210 Residential Uses in Commercial Districts: Findings: The proposed subject parcels are located in the Mixed-Use Area #3 on the East Main Refinement Plan, Plan Diagram, Per the East Main Refinement Plan (Mixed-Use Element, Area #3, page 11) Medium- and High-Density Residential uses are allowed under the Community Commercial zoning district. Consistent with this criterion, the proposed multiple-family residential portion of the mixed- use development options meets the applicable MDR Base Zone Development Standards and Multi-Unit Design Standards contained in this code because the refinement plan does not specify development standards for this area. As demonstrated on the Site Plan Review drawings, the remainder of this written statement, and other materials attached herein, this criterion has been met. O. Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas; minimize driveways on arterial and collector streets as specified in this Code or other' applicable regulations and comply with the OOOT access management standards for State highways. Findings: In all three development options the orientatiol) of the buildings, parking and ingress-egress points serve to maximize efficiency for access, on-site circulation and function while minimizing impact to the adjacent properties. The site plans are organized so that the more intensive commercial uses and associated parking are located along Main Street and the residential portion of the site is located adjacent to the LOR zoned properties to the south of the subject properties. In development Option A, the driveway on Main Street is a limited right-in and right-out access point primarily serving the commercial buildings located along the principal arterial. In all three development options, the proposed residential buildings are located between the LDR properties to the south and the main east-west drive aisle running through the mixed-use development site with access from South 51" Place and South 520d Street. In the development options, the proposed raised crosswalk located towards the center of the site that crosses this main drive aisle provides safe on-site pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular circulation between the residential and commercial portions of the development. " "0 - > - .~ c ('I rn "'" ~ :!:< 0::: - E co .0 I.LI ~ ..... u. (/) C1l 0 rn c '0, ';:: 0 . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 36 of 37 As noted above, the development option site plans show on-site circulation for pedestrians, bicycles and vehicles as required by the Springfield Development Code. In all three development options, the proposed continuous on-site pedestrian walkway system connects the primary building entrances of all commercial and residential buildings to the existing public sidewalk on Main Street, South S1" Place and South 52nd Street, and to the adjacent residential and commercial properties. The existing public sidewalk and bike lanes on Main Street provide access to adjacent and nearby residential, commercial and industrial areas as well as Bluebell Park, Riverbend Elementary School and other neighborhood activity centers. Safe pedestrian and bicycle circulation is provided. between the buildings and parking areas throughout the site by clearly marked striped or raised paved walkways. The subject parcels are serviced via Lane Transit District (L TD) Route 11 (Thurston). There is a bus stop within a half a block of the subject site on either side of Main Street for eastbound and westbound transit riders. The route is serviced every 10 to 15 minutes throughout the day. Reference the Traffic Impact Study, Appendix C, for the L TD route schedule. As noted above, the existing public street and traffic safety control systems will not be exceeded with the addition of the proposed development options and are available to serve the site at the time of development. Reference the attached TIS dated October 13, 2010 for details. In addition, only in development Option A, there is one driveway proposed on the principal arterial, Main Street, which is shared between the two subject properties. The pending ODOT Right-of-Way Approach Permit for the limited access driveway on Main Street is attached for reference. In all development options, parking areas and ingress-egress points . have been designed to safely facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian circulation and avoid congestion as well as provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residential and commercial areas. Therefore, the criteria under this section are met. E. Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil , or geologic conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their associated riparian areas; wetlands; rock outcroppings; open spaces; and .areas of historic and/or archaeological significance, as. may be specified in Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-760, 358.905-955 and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in this Code or in State or Federal law. The subject site is flat. With the exception of 10 existing trees and the existing house on Tax Lot 6300, the site does not have any other notable landscaping like significant clusters of trees and shrubs. Additionally, the site does not have any watercourses and associated riparian areas, wetlands, rock outcroppings, open spaces or areas of historic and/or archaeological significance as specified in Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-760, 358.905-955 and 390.235-240. I -0 \ (\) - ,. - c "8 ("oJ (ij lr> ~ (\) - 'E ~ ffi .0 ;j (\) (/) 1li u... (ij 0 co 'm .c 0 . . City of Springfield Site Plan Review Application February 15, 2011 Page 37 of 37 Per the Soils Survey of Lane County Oregon, the site is (119) salem-urban land complex. This soil has a highwater table depth of >6'. Based on the results of the geotechnical investigation, no geologic or geographical hazards were identified on the site that would prohibit the construction of the proposed development. Reference the attached Geotechnical Investigation dated July 19, 2010, details. Furthermore, the site is located within a shaded FEMA Zone X flood hazard zone. (an area determined to be outside of the 500-year flood plain). Reference the attached FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map Number 41039Cl162 F. Therefore, the three proposed site development options will not be a significant risk to public health and safety in terms of stormwater control or flood hazard. As the site is flat and is located outside the 500-year flood zone, slope failure and soil erosion are not concerns associated with this site. The site does not have physical features as outlined above that require protection as specified in the Springfield Development Code or in State or Federal law, therefore, the criteria under this section are met. V. Conclusion Based on the information and findings contained in this written statement, associated attachments and drawings, the proposed Site Plan Review meets the 'criteria of approval contained in the Springfield Development Code. Therefore, the applicant requests that the Director approve the proposal for three development options as presented. Both the applicant and the applicant's representative are available for questions as necessary. If you have any questions about the above application, please do not hesitate to contact Kristen Taylor at TBG Architects & Planners/lnc (541.687.1010). Sincerely, Date Received: Kristen Taylor, CSBA Project Manager FEB 1 5 2011 cc: Nick Boyles, OBO Enterprises, LLC Damien Gilbert, Branch Engineering, Inc. Carol Schirmer, Schirmer + Associates, LLC Original Submittal Z:\PR0J\200913 080 51st.S2nd & Main\Corresp\Agency\Site Plan Review\Tentative\200913-Site Plan Review Tentative.doc ~ City of Springfield - Site Pla!eView Application 51 "_52nd & Main Street Redevelopment February 15,2011 . EXHIBIT A Parking lot lighting Fixture Specification & Photometric Test Report Date Received: FES 1 5 2011 Original Submittal , r'#..,. ,."..'-A....~. ---... .,... -...- 'A1JTHDNIA ",fbHTING' -- fEATURES & SPECifiCATIONS INTENDED USE- Ide!!l for parking areas, 3treet lir;;hting, wall:.VJOlYS lnci car lots. CONSTRUCTION _ ,~ugged, die-cast. 50ft corner :l.luminum nousina with D.IT nominal '......all ::hickness. Die-castdollr frame has imo1.lcr-resis1:ant, tem;leren,qiasslalls:natisfwJyg:s;!;ketilo 'Nnh one-oiece ttdJUlar siiicalle. FINISH - Standard finish is dar!: ,rooze IODB) ;'loiyester ;1owcierfini;;h, wi~~ other :1rchitec- tural colors available. OPllCAl SYSTEM -Anodited. dluminum hydroiormed rgflect:)r5: IES.fu!1 o;lJtorr distnoutions R2!asymmatricl, RJ.(:!svmmetric/,R4 (forward tilrowl and R5S lsquare) 3re int!!rchan'~eao!!!. Hiqh-perinrmance IInodized, .iagmented 31uminum rellec~rs ~ES full ';lltoff distributions SR! (asymmetric!. SR3 {asymmetric} and SR4SC (for....vard :hrow, shar":] ::utoff). Segmented renec- tors ,mach with ,ool-Iess fastaners and are rotan3ble.and interc ha:lgeable. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM - Ballast High reactance, high power factor for 70-1S0W. Constant wattage lurotransformer for 'ils-,mow. Metal halide lSO\N and below arE! standard with pulse-start ignitor :echnology; super CWA ;:JUlsa-:;tart ballast requir:!d for lOOIN. 320W and 35[JW (SCWA option]. Ballast is copper.wound and 100% factory-tested. Super CWA pulse 3tart balla:its. 88% efficient and EISA ::or:lplinnt, 3re retjuired lor 15.1-4lY.)W (must order SCWAo~tioni forUS shipments only. Notavailab(e: 175M SCWA. CSA NOM orlNTl required for probe start shioments outside the us. Socket Porcelain, horizontally oriented medium bsse socket for 70-15lJM. Mogul base socket ~or 175M and above, and 70-4005, with COpptlf o1l!Oy, nickel~pl1lted 3craw~hell :lod centercontlct UL listed lSaOW, sonv, LISTING - !JL listed !.mndardJ. CSA Certified (see Optionsl. IJL listed for 250C ambient and wetlocalions.IP65ratedin accordance wilh.standard.!EC529. Specilicat:ons subject eO ~hange without notice. ---' " Catalog Number Notes Type 'jy ~. Soft Square Lighting Specifications EPA:LZft1. 'Weight 35.9 Ibs116.28 ,g) Length: 17.1/2' 144.5 em} Width:17-1/2"I,..5.cml Oepth::7-1IS'(1S.1 eml 4JNeight as cOliiigured in axampiebelow. q ~4'-J (10.2 em) KAD MH: 10W.400W HPS: 10W.400W 20' to 35' Mounting ]-r 7.I/B' 1I:C1 I 17-li2' 144.5 em) ORDiERING INFORMATION !<Ail ~~ fMIl! Metal lililh. h!ili.!;tg orp..ssure 70Ml,2.J ~1 100M' 70S' 150M' lOOS 115M' 150S' 200M' 250S 't5!llll!l 4ll0S 3201\114 Ceramic 350~A' . metal halide 4COM' 50MHC 70MHC 100MHC 150MHC Distribution HvdrofC'lfmed reflectors R2 lEStype 1\ asymmetricii rR3 '1~~tVP~J]I~sy-ni.n.eIric~1 R4 IES type IV forward throw" ~.~s IES. !y~e V S~IJ;lr9 Seomented reflectors SRZ IES type II asymmetric' SR3 IES type W asymmetrieS SR4SC IES type IV 100ward throw NOTES: 1 Not availahl9 with SCWA. 2 Not available with 4.IroV 3 Not 3vailable'NithiSV. 4 Mtistbellrdered.....ithSCWA. 5 ileducedjacketE}Zarequiredraf SRZ. SR3and SR4SC"ptics. 6 House,sida shield 3,jailable. MuscspacifyCWl for 'Jsa in Canada. Ivol:~ 120 zoa' 140' 177 347 480' [Tli~; 2305aH~10 For shortest lead times; configure product using standard options (shown in bold), Example: KAD 400M R3 T8 SCWA SPDC4 LPI Mounting I ~ Tvop i.mJJi!h" (blank) Magnelic SPD_ Square 04 4' ann ballast pol~ CWI Constant RPO Round (B 6~~rm - 0 wattage pole 9 9" arm isolated WBO Wall 12 li'arm bracket WWD_ Wood pore or wall OAOIZP Degree ilrm Ipole)" Degree srm [wall}" Decorative wall bracketl2,13, Mast arm external fi~er Twin mou~ting bar Shinned installed in fixture SF Single fuse 120, 177, 347V" OF Double fuse 208, 240, 48014 PO Power traylS PER NEMA twist-lock recep- tacle only (no photocontrol)' GRS Quartz restrike system16 ORSTD ORS time delaylO,15 WTB Terminal wiring blocl<IS LH~::~Qif~_e.:side_ s~i~ld~ CS'>: CSA Certified INTL AI/'dilable.for MH probe start shipping outside the U.S. Shinned senaratelv17 PEl NEMA twist.lock PE lI10, ZOa,,140VI . PE3 NEMA twist.lock PE {347V\ PE4 NEMA twist-lock PE (4aOV) PE7 NEMA twist-lock PE IZ71VI ~"". SC Shortening cap for PER .'-;-:1"/8"". -. , : ~" .... option //r. "~>" Date ,..1/6 Vandal Jlu~~ (/ . . '-I. ~eeel\filll1\ll. NIGHf11ME 1 Ii FRIENDLY /1 \.. Con~iSlentwiL~LEEDZ go3ls \~ & ~r~en Globes'" :rtteria ;' / '. icr!ig!llpollu'.i.m:tduC'Jon./. "\ / / .". './ '~ ."....... . Options ~!/'i! (B SCWA Super CWA pulse start b~llast NOTE: Forship'ments to U.S. territories, SCWAmustbe specifiedtocomply with EISA. FEB 1 5 2011 -=d=p" L.:~ LPI Lamp included Less lamp LA? Finish!' (blank) Dark bronze While Slack Medium bronze Natural aluminum DAD 11WB WBA KMA KTMB Option"l multi-tap hallastl120. i08,240, 271V;in Canada: 120,277,J4.7Vl.: Gpliona.i iivll-,ilP iJ"'ilG~t 1120, 20:, Z~~. 277.4801/). 10 Consult factory for available wattages. II 9" arm is required when llNo or more luminaires an'! oriented on 800" drillin'gpattern, 12 Ships separately. 13 Availablewith SPD04 and SPD09. 14 Must specify voltage. N/A withTB. \5 Only availahla with SR2, SR3, & SR4SC optics. 16 Maltallawablcwatto1geI3maincludad. 17 MaY06:)rderedasanacce'ssar'l_ 18 See wwwJithonia.~om/archolors for additionalcoloroptiolls. 19 Must be specified. ~[J MustuseRPO[J9 DWH DBl DMB DNA 0"" ,,' ... ~ . [ Accessories IIglno.~ o.,Jo\.t...illl 't#; IIllm ~.~ """"'u,~ ~~lll.l~~ wMhar. Tenon Mounting Slipfitter Number JUilNtes T,non 0.0. One T'No@IBO' Two@90' Thre.@IZ0' Three@90' Four@90' 2.3/8" nO-190 no.zao nO-Z90" nO-320" TZO.390w TZO.490" Z.1/B' T25-190 TZ5-Z80 T25.Z90" TZ5.3Z0 n5-390" T25-490" 4' T35-190 T35.Z80 T35.190" T35-3Z0 T35-390" T35-490" KAOVGV,ndal guard KAOWG Wire' guard ~..~"~ Outdoor AL .310 Sheet #: KAD,M,S ) 250M RJ (PROBE) _ OlUdoor Photometnc Keport Ilnp:!lWWW.VISUiU-JU.l,;UllIIlUVI:)'LJIlULUU1l;UII,j VleW!;tl U"law~.~pA: tU-..'~ PARKING LOT L1Gt4t FIXTURE PHOTOME.IC TEST REPORT fA 1.ITHDNIAI.IGHTlNG" ~CfJityBtands. Li,i'r.cg , :<AD 250M R3 (PROBE) - OUTDOOR PHOTOMETRIC REPORT :<AD 250M R3 (PROBE) AREA LUMINAIRE, 250W MH, R3 REFLECTOR, FULL CUTOFF MEETS THE 'NIGHTTIME FRIENDLY' CRITERIA. M250/U ONE 250-WATT CLEAR 6T-28 METAL HALIDE, HORIZONTAL POSITION, LAMP OUTPUT: 1LAMP(S), RATED LUMENS/LAMP: 19500 INPUT WATTAGE: 297 lLUMINOUS'OPENli.IG:RECT ANGLE. (L:'.1':20FT;W:: riOFT)-] '--...._-_.-- ."-'- .'- . "--'-.--.,...-'. .~,.-- _.,- - .---, CATALOG #: LUMINAl RE: LAMP CAT #: LAMP: - . NIGHTTIME FRIENDtY Product Page Spedfic'ation Sheet EFFICIENCY: 67% TER CATAGORY: AREA ft SITE LIGHT - TYPE II TER VALUE: 26 MAX CD: 7,119.0 AT HORIZONTAL: 65', VERTICAL: 67.5' 'lCUTq[FC~-"-::jYLl~IJl:Qm ROADWAY CLASS: SHORT, TYPE II 7.~OO 5,000 4,SOQ 3,500 2.400 1,200 CDIO 1.200 2AW 3.500. 4,800 5,000 7.200 1lI-0'H i!il .90' H Polar Candela Oistribution 1.~.;) po~ 1.&P 1.S(P ~~ VA:;);; 10~ 2~ 30;) 4{P ;: ~ ' 180' H Ilil - Max Cd: 65'H _.______..__.______.. ..._...._____~_._._ n___'__"" ,LUMENS PER ZONE i ;..,.._____.~--_-.O_.----_. ZONE LUMENS % TOTAL ZONE LUMENS % TOTAL -.---.-----.---.---...--.--.. ..'--.-' ....--.-.-.-.--.- 0-10 201.1 1.5% 90-100 0 0% 10-20 621.3 4.8%. 100-110 0 0% 20-30 1,151.8 8,8% 110-120 0 0% 30-40 2,036.4 15,6% 120-130 0 0% 40-50 2,644,9 20.2% 130-140 0 0% 5 IsofoDtcandle Plot 5 4 3: 2 1 0. ! 2 .3 ..;. S 13D' 5 !20~ 4 .~ , llCP 3 ID".r 2 ,"/~'" I. \ /\ ; t \ 90' 1 SIl' o 70' 60' 2 -. ~~---- SO~ 3 4 . ...J, ....~... . "-,... 5 '.0 llil20 fe c:: 1 fc r~ount height: 10ft lI10 fc ml 0.5 fe Total LLF: 1 illS fc "'J 0.1 fe II SO',', Max Candela Distance in units of mount height - - - Max Cd Value : ZONAL LUMEN SUMMARY ZONE LUMENS % LAMP % LUMI NAI RE -_.._--_._.-.~---._-_..- 0-30 1,974.2 10.1% 15,1% Date Recei~: 4,010.6 0.60 9,216.0 FEB 1 5 20ltO-90 3,854.5 0-90 13,070,5 Original Subrnittal_____ 20,6% 30,7% 47.3% 70.5% 19.8% 29.5% 67% 100% D,.250iVl R3 (PROBE) . Outdoor Photometric Report . 50-60 2,560.5 60-70 2,375.2 70-80 1,422.4 80-90 56.9 19.6% 140.150 18.2% 150-160 10.9% 160-170 0.4% 170-180 o o o o http://www.visual.jd..comttoolstpnoromemcvlewer/aeraWLaspx..lU=.. . . . 0% 90-180 0 0% 0% 0-180 13,070.5 67% 100% _.__..__.,,_..-....~-.. -.,. ,-- ,,- ......-. -"-'-""~' EFFICIENCY TOTAL: 67% 0% 0% 0% Date Received: hj' FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal .- -. . City of Springfield - Site Plan Review Application 51 "_52nd & Main Street Redevelopment February 15, 2011 EXHIBIT B FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map Number 41039C1162 F . Date Received: FEB I 5 2011 Original Submittal , . . .' A c D -. . /~ .-. -- -.._....._........_..oc.o__ =:".;.,.""""_......__..SWT>I. OTT OP SPJUNGl'IFll) <.tIl92 " ~ I, I l ~ ~ :: :::: LEGEND fDI :::~~,,:,,-=..=-'" _.. __J,....__ .-....-- -.. --.,....-- ----.....- -~_.............. -... ~~----.. ----- _.---- -. .......--....- ------ -.. ------ ---.......- II!!I...--.........."..,.. ~ o:=.-:'~~~:::.:: :.:-..."':.:::-". D '=:-"'--...-- --- ~ "? ~ ':==----~_.- .~ ---.... --..- ...... --- ---- -.........- - . ... - -- -.........- ---"- -......- >- .....-..-.... ~-. @----@ -- -, ----- .-.....-- --...-... ~ [t~...s;.E~:::;:-~ =---=------..--. ::;:':.t:::":;'::"'..=-----' ..- ---.-....---.-.. =.=.-=:::..;F".::::.--;-:?"':: --- ...-=..-:..===.-:--:..:.:-;:.-::.... ;:--::::::~?:..-==.::::..E ==-~=:-;:.::;:.::: ~-=..~=-::?_':.;;":..- ::-~.:"~.::-..--- ::.-=-:.:-.=.::.~~=-- -=-...::.:...._- ~~"'_TO....-., ::.:..=::..-::.:::r:..=.=:: ~-::.:::::::::~::"-=--_. .. -"""..- ... . - --- IWMUIlW """'., """""" ...,... Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal II , , , @ , - . . Branch Engineering, Inc. Corporate Headquarters (541) 746-{J637 310 5th Street Springfield, OR 97477 Salem Engineeting Office (503) n9-2577 4310 Cherry Avenue N Salem, OR 97303 Principals M. Lane Branch, PE Damlen Gilbert, PE Renee D. Clough, PE, PLS Rene' Fabricant, PE, SE Ronald J. Derrick, PE, GE www.BranchEngineering.com July 19, 2010 Mr, Nick Boyles, Manager OBO Enterprises, Inc, 1528 Ferry Street, #11 Eugene, Oregon 97401 RE: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION 5175 & 5195 MAIN STREET SPRINGFIELD, OREGON Branch Engineering Inc. Project No. 09-159 Branch Engineering Inc. (BEl) has performed a geotechnical engineering investigation of the subject sites for development oftownhomes and commercial buildings at 5175 & 5195 Main Street in Springfield, Oregon. The accompaiJ.ying report presents the results of our site research, field exploration, field andJaboratOIY testing, data analyses, and our conclusions and recommended geotechnical design parameters for the project. Based on the results of our study, no geologic or- geotechnical hazards were identified on the site that would prohibit the planned development, provided that the recommendations of this report are implemented in the design and construction of the project.- Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions regarding this report. Sincerely, - Branch Engineering Inc. \~, /".-, . ," '~'l':J, "' ',i,l ......J '.j , . ~ ; '......1 . Richard Walker, KIT Staff Engineer Ronald J. Derrick, P.E., G.B. , d' Principal Geotechnical EngnQate Receive . FEB 1 5 2011 CIVIL STRUCTURES TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICALOriginaSGlBbmi\tabr. , -)",",!~,,"-';i:J l ~J> /1 ii:.!~" . . TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .....:.......................................................................................................................1 1.1 Project and Site Description ......................................................................................................... .....1 1.2 Scope of Work...... ....... ........ ........ ........ .............. ........ .............. ....... ........... ............ ............................ 1 ].3 Site Information Resources .......................:.................................... ...................................................] 2.0 SITE SUBSURFACECONDmONS ..............................................................................................2 2.1 Ground Water ....................................................................................................................................2 3.0 GEOLOGIC SETTING .....................................................................................................................2 3.1 Regional Geology ..............................................................................................................................3 3.2 Site Geology ................ ........ ......... ......... .......... ............ .......:...... ...... .......... .............. ............... ............3 4.0 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................................... ....3 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................,...........................4 5.1 Site Preparation and Earthwork............................................................................. ............................4 5.1.] Fill ............ ...... ........................ ........ ............. ......... ................... ..... ............................. ........ ....4 5.2 Fill Slopes. .................... .......... .......... .......... ......... ............:........ ........... .......... .......... ...................... ....6 5.3 Cut Slopes .......... ........ .......... .......... ..................... ..................... .................. ............ ...........................6 5.4 Utility Excavations ........................... ............ ........ .................... ......... ........... ..... ............... .............. ....6 5.5 Drair1!lge ....................... ............. ................ ................ ............. ............ ..:.,....,., .,............ ........ ..,..;...;...6 5.6 Soil Bearing Capacity........... .......... ...... ....................... ............ ........ ......... ............ ........ ....,................6 5.7 Slabs-On-Grade ... ..........:........... ..... ....................... ........... ....... ........ ......... ...... ................ ........ ...........6 5.8 SettIemenL............. .......................................................... ......:..................... .............. ............. ........... 6 5.9 Friction Coefficient and Lateral Earth Pressures..............................................:................................ 7 5. I 0 Pavement Design Recommendations ................................................................................................ 7 5. I I Seismic Site Classification ................................................................................................................ 7 6.0 REPORT SUMMARY AND LIMITATIONS..................................................................................7 Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original submittal '. , '. -'. . . 5175 & 5195Main Street Springfield, Oregon 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results and findings of Branch Engineering, Inc. (BEl) field observations, testing, and research. for the subject site. Our investigation included the evaluation of the subsurface soil conditions at the site and provides geotechnical recommendations for the design and construction of the proposed building foundations, utilities, and pavement design. Our work was performed in accordance with the generally accepted practices oHms area. 1.1 Project and Site Description The subject site consists of two parcels located at 5175 and 5195 Main Street. Both addresses are located south of Main Street between 51" Place and 52nd Avenue in Springfield, Oregon. Currently, 5175 Main Street is a vacant lot with a gravel driveway and home foundation remnants from a previous home that burned down several years ago. The remainder of the property is overgrown by taIl grass and blackberry bushes. 5195.Main Street is an occupied single family residence with an existing garage, driveway, garden area, bum pile and maintained grass field. In total, both sites comprise approximately 1.5 acres and are designated as Tax Lots 6203 and 6300 on Tax Map 17-02-33-32. The property is located at _ Latitude 44002'43"N, Longitude 122056'27"W._ Both lots are relatively flat at approximate elevation of +497 feet above mean sea level based on a recent topographic map. It was raining at the time of our field investigation on June 2, 2010, but no surface water ponding waS observed on the properties. The project proposal, as described to BEl, is to construct 2-story towohome structures along the south site boundary, and two single-story office commercial buildings adjacent to Main Street, with parking facilities in between. Construction will include complete demolition of the existing buildings, driveways, and remnant building foundation. Anticipated foundation loads, are not expected to exceed 3 kips per foot on linear footings and 20 kips on individual column footings. 1.2 Scope of Work Our scope of work included a site visit and subsurface investigation on June 2, 2010. Seven exploratory test pits were advanced to a maximum depth of six feet at the approximate site locations shown on Figure 1. Dynamic cone penetrometer and in-situ vane shear testing were conducted TP-7. All test pits were logged- by a BEL field engineer and backfilled with the excavated material immediately after completion of logging. Soils were visually classified in accordance with the American Society of Testing and .Materials (ASTM) Method D-2488. Field log summaries of the site test pits are presented in Appendix A, along with copies of nearby well logs from the Oregon Department of Water Resources on-line database and area soil survey. Representative samples were collected from the test pits for laboratory in- situ moisture (ASlMD-4643), Atterberg limits (D-4318) testing, and shrink/swell potential (IS 2720). 1.3. Site lnformatilm ResrJl!rce.f The following site investigation activities were performed and literature resources were reviewed for pertinent site information: . Review of the United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey (USGS) on-line Quadrangle Map, 7/1/1973. . Review of on-line aerial photograph -of site area on 7/24/2000. . '\' , r- . Sev-;'u exp'16ratorytest pits were excavated on site at the approximate locations as shown on Figure 1. hV ;:. ..,:/ Date Received: FEB 1 5 20\1_ , . . : r ~, t...,..tiL.i...; '-. . Branch Engineering, Inc. Page 1 of8 Original Submittal . . 5175 & 5195 Main Street Springfield, Oregon . Review of the Lane County area Web Soil Survey, United States Department of Agricultural (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) . Review of the USGS Geologic Map of Oregon, USGS 1991 . Review of Oregon Department of Water Resources Well Logs 2.0 SITE SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS . " Our analyses, conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they presently exist and assume the exploratory test pits, listed herein, are representative of the subsurface conditions throughout the site. If, during construction, subsurface conditions differ from those described in the test pit logs; BEl shall be informed and if necessary review site conditions and revise recommendations berein. ' Tbe surface soils in the project area are mapped as Pleistocene age, semi-consolidated, lacustrine and fluvial deposits of clay, silt, sand, and gravel. These alluvial terrace deposits are expected to be several hundred feet deep with various aquifer zones. Observed on our test pits, the upper stratum of the site subsurface stratigraphy consists of 1.5- to 2- feet of soft, wet, dark, organic, topsoil. Beneath the surficial topsoil/fill layer, site stratigraphy generally consists of brown and gray Clayey Silt (ML) with traces of fme sand to depths ranging between 3- to 5.5 feet below the ground surface. The Clayey Silt overlies brown and grey rounded gravel in a sandy silty matrix, commonly known as Bar-Run down to the extents of our excavations. 1n general, depths to Bar-Run tend to increase toward the northwest being shallowest at the southeast comer of the property. Additionally, organic topsoil tends to be thickest toward the southeast portion of our exploration. Nearby well logs from the Oregon Water Resources Department online well log query document silt, sand, gravel, and siltstone to depths around 20 feet below ground surface. The NRCS Web Soil Survey maps the site along the Salem_Urban.land .complex,.whIcbisdescribed as well-drained,. alluvial terrace soil. This soil descriptioll. and those of ll.earby well logs ate consistent with the observed field conditions. 2.1 Ground Water Ground water seepage was not encountered within our test pit excavations on June 2,2010. Nearby well logs indicate groundwater levels ranging from 9-feet below ground surface in January 1999, to 12-feet in October 1994. We anticipate that groundwater level in both the regional and perched water tables will fluctuate with the seasons and should be anticipated to be at the highest level in late winter or spring when fllinstotniS are more intense and more freque1l.t and at the lowest level in late SllIl11l1er or fall when rainfall is less frequent. The regional'ground water level is also expected to be influenced by the level of the McKenzie River, approximately I-mile to the nOlthwest, and the Willamette River, approximately 1 Yz mile to the south. 3.0 GEOLOGIC SElTING The following sections described the regional and local site geology. Our field findings ate consistent with the geologic mapping of the site area by the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (Walker & MacLeod, 1991). Date Received: , .' l.: .'-~ ~.:' 1 \.~~'!'. <~' FEB 1 5 2011 " ; I Branch Engineering; Inc. Pag'3 2 of 8 ..., . Original Submh;rL--- . --..- '.:' -:". <IfF ''';', . "',I . . . 5175 & 5195 Main Street Springfield, Oregon 3.1 Regional Geology The subject site lies within the southern portion of the WilIamette Valley Geomorphic Province (WVGP), east of the Coast Range and west of the Cascade Mountains Provinces. The WVGP is regional lowland that extends from just south of Eugene, Oregon to Vancouver, British Columbia. In Oregon, this alluvial plain is approximately 130 miles long and ZO- to 40-miles wide (Orr and Orr, 1996), and is drained by the north flowing Willamette River. Willamette River Valley in the area of the subject site is believed to have been formed in the Quartmary epoch from lacustrine and fluvial deposits of silt and clay. These Quarternary deposits within the subject site are believed to be underlain by Tertiary sedimentary and volcaniclastic rocks and undifferentiated tuffaceous sedimentary rocks, tuffS, and basalt from the Miocene and Oligocene epochs. Deposits of sand, silt and clay from fluvial and lacustrine environments covered the bedrock to various depths dur:1D.g the presence of low energy streams and lakes in the southern WiIlamette Valley. Compression forces, along with upli:ftiilg of the Cascade and Coast Range Mountains, durlngthe Miocene and Pliocene epochs depressed the Willamette River Valley. Rapid uplift of the Cascade and Coast Range mountains steepened stream gradients causing increased erosion of the mountains and resulting deposition of gravel layers incised within the fluvial and lacustrine deposits. Approximately 13,500 years ago the WiIlamette Valley was cyclically flooded by catastrophic breaks in the ice dams of Lake Missoula These flood events filled the valley to a depth of about 350 feet before. retreating, causing sequences of upward fining deposits of silt and clay. 3.2 Site Geology . The observed site conditions are generally consistent with the mapped geology of the site and that of the general geologic setting described above. Generally, the upper 1.5- to Z- feet of site is organic topsoil. Below the topsoil are native alluvial terrace deposits of clay, silt; sand, and gravel to depths over 100-feet. There are several falll(!; .!l1l1Ppe~I within 1 g- tOZOcmiles. of the site to the east, west and south; none of these faults are not known to be active; however, seismic activity has been felt in the area as evidence by the 1993, 5.7 Richter magnitude Scotts Mills earthquake and the 1993, 6.0 Richter magilitude Klamath Falls earthquake. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS Based on our field observations, subsurface explorations, and data analyses, We conclude that the site is geotechnically suitable for the proposed development provided that the recommendations of the report are incorporated into the design and construction of the project. The approximately 2-foot topsoil zone at the site is thicker than normal for the area and will require complete removal under building foundations and structural pavements.. The clavev silt that covers the Bar-Run is compressible and is susceptible to settlement under load. The subject site will require additional excavation and subgrade preparation that is typically not required fOr the area, but there are no specific site features or subsurface conditions observed that will impede the proposed site development. . It is our understanding that there are no significant grade changes planned fOr the site, cut and fill depths are not expected to exceed two feet. Due to the fine-grain soils on site, earthwork :is recommended to be performed dUring the dry season, generally May through October; however, we understand construction time constraints and have prOVided alternatives for wet weather conditions~ Date Received: 'J.iJ~"'h~'<r.i~': ... I""", j ...... ~ ~ J :,./.,,') .j FEB 1 5 2011 ~t~~.~ Branch Engineering, Inc. Page 3 of 8 Original ~ubmittal " . . 5175 & 5195 Main Street Springfield, Oregon 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The following sections present BEl's recommendations for anticipated geoteclmical aspects of the site development. Site specific specifications are presented below. 5.1 Site Preparation and Earthwork" The following recommendations are for earthwork in the building foundation areas. Earthwork sliall be performed in general accordance with the standard of practice as generally described in Appendix J of the 2007 International Building Code and the recommendations herein. The site grading is expected to be minimal for the area; however, any fill placed below structures or pavements shall be observed, documented, and tested for compliance with project specifications by competent, trained persormel. Q Stripping: All areas intended to directly or laterally support structures, road/parking areas, retaining walls, or fills in excess of I-foot in thickness shall be stripped of vegetation, organic or soft soil, existing fill, and/or any other deleterious material. These strippings shall either be removed from the site or used in nonstructural areas approved by the Ge"otechnical Engineer of Record (GER). · Subgrade Approval: Once and area is stripped, the GER shall observe and approve the subgrade prior to placement of any fill, separation fabric, base rock, "or foundation forms. Based on the conditions observed, additional excavation, placement of snbdrains, or other mitigation measures may be required by the GER. The site soils are very moist, which may cause soft subgrade conditions. The site work contractor should be cautioned when excavating for foundations or pavements and minimize heavy truck traffic on site. · Drv-Season Earthwork: The in-situ moisture contents of the site soils within about 6 feet of the existing ground surface are 10% to 15% over their optimum moisture content for compaction. Earthwork is recommended to be performed during the dry seaSon; "generally M~y throiigh October, so that moisture contents of native fill soils can be reduced by spreading and turning the soils, if necessary. The options for moisture control of fill soils during the dry season are more cost effective and generally do not require any specialized equipment other than a water-truck or a plow device. . Wet-Season Earthwork: Fine-grained site soils are moisture sensitive and soften with "prolonged exposure to rainfall, particularly when uocompacted. Should wet season earthwork be required to meet project deadlines, specialized processes would likely be required to control soil moisture contents, sllch as lime or cement treatment of the" soils, soil drying kilns, or llse of imported granular materials. These methods can be expensive, time consuming, and would require additional fill control oversight and testing. 5.1.1 Fill BEl anticipates that on-site native soils will be used for structural fills if necessary, although use of imported granular material may be more cost effective for minor fills due to the ease of moisture control and compaction effort., Native soils are suitable for use as structural fill provided our recommendations are incorporated into the design and construction of the project. e ;'Recommended Soil "Compaction:' After subgrade is approved by the GER, soil subgrade shall be scarified to a depth' of 4 inches, moisture conditioned to within 2% of the optimum moisture content of the soil, and blended with the first lift of fill material. The fill placement an<!.. compaction equipment shall be appropriate for fill material type, required df>"atefReClliij,V,i!il. Branch Engineering, Inc. Page 4 ot8 ..~,.. 1 :: ~ -,~\ rt.J I ,; ( .~ . t- ,.,. ~ "'l C(~.." '"1:::i1 -.J1...iJ.ll1t.\ --~ -~_.- . . 5175 & 5195 Main Street Springfield, Oregon uncompacted lift thickness. Assuming proper equipment selection, the total uncompacted thickness of the scarified subgrade and first fill lift shall not exceed 8-inches; subsequent lifts of uncompacted fill shall not exceed 8-inches unless otherwise approved by the GER. Fine-grain soil fill is generally most effectively compacted using a kneading style compactor, such as a sheeps-foot roller. Structural fill shall be compacted to at least 90% of the materials maximum dry density as determined by AS1M Method D-1557 (or equivalent) and the soil moisture content shall be within +/-2% of the optimum moisture content for compaction . . Imported Structural Fill: All imported material to be used for structural fill shall be approved by the GER prior to the material's delivery to the site. Most commonly, imported structural fill material is granular and shall not contain more than 5% passing the No. 200 sieve. Aggregate fill shall be angular (surface fracture of at least 70%) and well-graded, and shall be compacted to at least 95% of the materials maximum dry density as determined by AS1M Method D-1557 (or equivalent). . Soil Shrink/Swell Potential: Representative samples of the clayey silt soil were tested for their free swell potential (IS 2720) and found to range from 20% to 30%, which is considered to be low to.moderate. The Plasticity Index of the soil is. 9.4, based on Liquid and Plastic Limits moisture contents of 43.7% and 34.3%, respectively. The shrink/swell of the soil will not adversely affect these structures; however, the soils should still be protected from soil moisture fluctuations by providing positive surface drainage and covering with aggregate soon after exposure of the subgrade. The shrink/swell potential of the Bar-Run is low. Periodic site observations by the GER are recommended during the construction of the project; the specific phases of construction that should be observed are described below in Table 1: Table 1: RECOMMENDED CONSTRUCTION PHASES TO BE OBSERVED BY TIlE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OF RECORD At completion of site stripping and foundation Subgrade observation by the geotechnical excavation engineer before placement of geotextile fabric or fill Imported fill material Observation of material or information on material type and source Placement or Compaction of fill material Observation by geotechnical engineer or test results by qualified testing agency .Date Received: >J~".Jif: ';,~~. ......~, . , ',. ..'T"'''-.#'. ,rv..~.,"._\." . ...~.',..:..<..~;._,..-;';.~':.~ ~;J ",_.: . FEB t 5 20tl ,..:.... Branch Engineering, Inc. Page 50r8 OrigInal Submittal . . 5175 & 5195 Main Street Springfield, Oregon 5.2 Fill Slopes . Site fill slopes in excess of 2-feet in height are not expected for this project 5.3 Cut Slopes Permanent cut slopes are not expected for this site. 5.4 Utility Excavations Utility excavations within the Clayey Silt site soils should stand near vertical to at least 4 feet in depth; some surface sloughing and sidewall caving may occur due to perched ground water lenses or areas of non-cohesive soiL Utility excavations through the Bar-Run may incur sidewall caving due to the non-cohesive gravels. Heavy equipment should not be placed Within 10 feet of an open trench. Site soils are classified' as OSHA Type B. 5.5 Drainage A complete site drainage system is expected to be engineered for this project; alteration of existing grades for this project Will likely change drainage pattems but should not adversely impact acljacent properties. Perimeter landscape and hardscape grades shall be sloped away from the foundations and water shall not be allowed to pond adjacent to footings during or after construction. 5.6 Soil Bearing Capacity Based upon our site observations and testing, the dayey silt soil beginning at a depth of 18- to 24-inches below the ground surface has an allowable bearing capacity of 1,200 psf and the Bar-Run material found in our test pits at 3- to 6-feet below the ground surface has an allowable bearing capacity of 3,500 psf. The respective bearing capacity of each nf these materials catibe increased by 113 for sh6iftei::iii loiiding; such as wind and seismic events. The clayey silt is compressible and due to the varying thiclmess of this soil over the site, BEl recommends that all building foundations bear on the Bar-Run material to mitigate the potential for differential settlement to occur. The estimated settlement potential of the clayey silt is presented in a Section 5.8 of this report. . 5.7 Slabs.On-Grade After preparation of the subgrade as described in Section 5.1, those areas to be overlain by load bearing concrete slabs or beam shall be underlain by ageotextile separation fabric and a minimum of 8-inches of compacted granular material. A clean, free draining, crushed aggregate is recommended beneath structural slabs. The modulus of subgrade reaction (k) of the soil at is 100 lb/in'. Under floor drainage should be addressed by the designer. 5.8 Settlement BEl estimates that with an allowable bearing capacity of 1,200 psf that foundations bearing on the clayey silt soil between 1.5- to 5.5-feet below the ground surface may incur total settlements of 1- to 2.5-inches and differential settlements up to 1.5-inch depending on loading and thethickness of the clayey silt below the foundation. Therefore, it is recommended that all foundations either bear directly on the dense Bar- RUll n;tllteria\ or at?p. crushed aggregate fill compacted in lifts to at least 95% of the materials maximum dry density'as' deterliiiiJed by ASTM Method D-1557. Structural fills shall be tested for compliance with this compaction specification. R 'ved" -r' - Date ece! " 1.-",,3:: }~.. ~+ -":1 Ji~\ Branch Engineering, Inc. Pag" 6 of 8 FEe 1 ~ ...~." ., "', -.-; ~. t..J; , r> '.~ ....:1.IJ.."'.~,.' 01.-,...,;'...,,0,9 .."ilil. l-.c.~._..~_..~.._.- 1!..j'J\....1 ....-'" . . 5175 & 5195 Main Street Springfield, Oregon If necessary, settlement mitigation measures in the clayey silt may include preloading and settlement monitoring, modifications to building pad grading to create a uniform subsurface, or underpinning of foundations. BEl can further discuss the settlement issues with the design team upon review of detailed grading and fonndation pIaos. 5.9 Friction Coefficient and Lateral Earth Pressures Although retaining wall structures are not anticipated for this project, the following design parameters are provided. The coefficient of friction ofthe native clayey silt soil is 0.30, and for the Bar-Run it is 0.45 for concrete poured neat against these materials with no disturbance ofthe exposed material face. The passive earth pressure of the clayey silt soil within 6-feet of the existing ground surface is 200 pcf equivalent fluid pressure (EFP).. However, the upper I-foot of the native site soil should be neglected for design purposes unless covered by strUctural fill or pavements. Passive pressure of the Bar-Run is 400 pcfEFP. Active earth pressure for a cantilever wall' capable of movement of at least 0.2% of the wall height at the top of wall is 40 pcf EFP; the at-rest or top restrained wall EFP is 50 pCL A lateral load increase of 6H2 (H = wall height) is recommend to be applied to the wall for seismic conditions. The EFP active earth pressure in the Bar-Run is 28 pcf and 38 pcfforat-rest conditions. The EFP earth pressures stated above assilme a level backfill with no surcharge loads and a free-draining, well compacted, crushed aggregate backflllwith no hydrostatic pressure applied to the wall. . 5.1 0 Pavement Design Recommendations The correlated California Bearing Ratio (CBR) for the near surface clayey silt found below the topsoil zone is 3, thereby placing the soil in the poor subgrade class. The parking lot areas are generally expected to have light vehicle traffic while the site access roads will be subject to delivery and garabage trucks. Using the guidance of the 20Q3revisedAsPl1altl':J,velll,ejlt P~sign, G\lide,p\lblished. by .the .Asphalt Pavement ASSOCiation of Oregon Based, a calculated Structural Number of2.4, and based on the criteria of a 20-year design life with up to 75% reliability, the recommended pavement section in parking areas is 3 inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over 10 inches of aggregate base for the native soil. The accessways are recommended to be 4 inches of AC over 10 inches of base rock. Pavement sub grades shall be observed and proof-rolled prior to placement of base rock; the base rock shall he crushed with a fractured surface area of at least 70%, and compacted to at least 95% of the material's maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Method D1557 or equivalent. BEl recommends using a geotextile separation fabric (Appendix C) between the subgrade and base rock. The base rock shall be tested to measure compliance with this compaction standard prior to placement of asphalt concrete. 5.11 Seismic Site Classification Based on the soil properties encountered in our site test pits, field test results, and nearby well log information to depths of over 50 feet, a Site Class D is recommended for design in accordance with Tables 1613.5.2 and J.61~.5;5 ?91W ;Z007 Oregon Structural Specialty Code. . . "","~I_\.-, , 6.0 REPORT SUMMARY AND LIMITATIONS This report has presented BEl's site observations and research, subsurface explorations, geotechnical engineering analyses, and'recoillIllendations for the proposed site development. The conclusions in this report are based on the condition~'d~lcribed in this report and are intended for the exclnsive use of OBO Enterprises, Inc. and their representatives for use in design and construction of the development described herein. The analysis 'and recoIiunendations may not be suitable for other structures or purposes. Services performed by the geotechnical engineer for this project have been conducted with the level o~ . d ' ,LldU:n''(eCeIVe : Branch Engineering, Inc. Page 7 of 8 FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . . 5175 & 5195 Main Street Springfield, Oregon skill exercised by other current geotechnical professiouals in this area under similar budget and time constraints. No warranty is herein expressed or implied. Conclusions in this report are based on the site couditions as they curreutly exist and it is assumed that the limited site locations that were physi cally investigated generally represeut the subsurface conditions at the site, Should site development or site conditions chimge, or if a substantial amount. of time. goes by between our site investigation and site development, we reserve the right to review this report for its applicability, If you have any questions regarding the contents of this report please contact our office, Date Received: fEB' 510\\ . \ submittal eriglna " .' '. " , ...,. 1 ~ '4 ,.j:'\ . ," '... , Branch Engineering, Inc. 'j"' Page BofB ...-,.....-....--. ~ :;..... '" .,"..d!ll''''' ~.\ APPENDIX A TEST PIT LOG SUMMARIES, WELL LOGS, & ON-LINE SOIL SURVEY ", '"1 .'1 .~tf1..'l' ~"''-J' .' Date Received: J j, , ,i , l.~..' .~. ;;' i ')] - -, FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . . ~_' '.1' . r . , ~ 'e' ...._/.{,.. r . . SOIL CLASSIFlCA nON CRITERIA AND TERMINOLOGY Granular Material SPT N.Value Densitv Gral<efs: 50% br.more retained on lhe No_ 4 sieve. Sands: more than 50% passing the No.4 Sieve .SPT N-Value <2 2-4 4-8 8 -15 15-30 >30 Clean Gravels Gravels with Rnes Clean Sands Sands with Rnes" Sill and Clays Low PlasDdly Rnes 5111 and Clays High PlasUdty Anes Hiahlv Omanic Soils USCS Grain Size Classification of Terms and Content. NAME: MINOR Constituents (12-50%); MAJOR .' Constiluenls (>50%); Slighlly (5-12%) Relative Density or ConsistencY Color MoIslure Content PlaSUdly Trace Constil1Jenls (0-5%) Other. Grain Shape, Approximate gradation, Organics. Cement Structure, Odor_.. Geclogic Name or F-onnation: (Fill, WiJlainette Silt, Till. Alluvium;__) 0-4 Ve nose "4-10 Loose 10 - 30 Medium Dense 30 -50 Dense >50 Ve Dense Moisture content . Dry: Absence of roolsfqre. d.u~ty~ dry to the touch. . Damp: Some moisblre but leaves no mofslure on hand Moist: leaves molsture.on hand _ Wet Visible liee Wafer. likelY rroni below waler Iable Plasticity. Dry Strength Dilatancy Toughness' I Non to Low Nbn 10 Low Slow 10 Rapid Low. can't mil I tow to Me<L Mediuri1 to High None to Slow Medium j Med to High Low 10 Medium None lo Slow Low 10 Medium I Med lo Hi<lh Hioh !aV. Hioh None Hioh . . . UnlfiedSoil Classification Chart Msual-Manual Procedurel (Similar to A~m.i DesiQnationP-248!i\ i i Major Divisions Group: Typical Names I svrnbols . ! .GW Well nraded nT.:weJs and nravel-sand mbctures little or no fine!; Ii GP POOI1tJ-Qraded qraveJ.s and Qravel-sand mixtures,little or no fines GM' salv "I'3VI:ls...JLraveI-send-S111 mixlures . GC . ' ~ ravel-san av mixbJres l SW Welf..araded sands and oravellV sands. little or no fines i SP Poo(hq,raded sands and gravelly sands, ftWe or no fines I SM Snfvsands,sand-siltmixtrJres I SC Clayey sands, sand~ay mixtures ML lnomanic sills rock flour c1avev sills I Cl Inomanic da= of low 10 medium plasticity, Plavellv days. sandY daYS, lean days I OL - Omanicslltando=nlcsMaysorlowofaslidtv. ' .MH Inorganic sills, dayey sills CH Inol!l8n1c days of high plasticily, ralclays I OH Oro;:mic. dav:s of medium to hioh olastidtv J PT peat, muck.. and other hinhlv ofQanic soils ! <#200 (.07S mm) 1f200 - #40 {.425 mm #40 - #10 (2 rom) triO - tI4 {4.75}' #4 - 0.75 nell 0,75 inell ~ 3 inelles 3 to 12 inches; scallered <15% esL, I numerous >15% est > 12 inches Fines Sand Fine Medium Coarse Roe Coarse ML CL MH CH Coarse Grained SOIls: More than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve Rne-Grnined Solis: ,50% or more Passes No. 200 Sieve Glavel Cobbles Boulders Relative Densltv or Gonsistehcv Fine-Grained Icohesive) Materials Pocket Pen fsf Manual Penetration Test Unconfined . Consfstencv >0.25 VerY Soft 0_25 ~ 0.50 Soft O.5G-1.CO Medium Stiff 1.00 - 2.00 Stiff 2.00 -4.00 Very Stiff >4,00 Hard Structure . Slratified: Alternating layers of material oreator >6 mrri thick - . laminated: AUemafing layers < 6 mm thick F~ure{l: Breaks along defin.ete fraclure planes _ SlIckenslded:' Slrialed, perIShed. org!ossy liaciure planes .. Blocky: Cohesive Soilulat tan be broken down into small angular lumps which resist further breakdown' . Lenses: Ha"s small pockets of different soils, note thickness HomOgeneous: ~e mlor and appearance throughout Torvane lot Shear Slrennlh <0.13 0.13 "0.25 0.25 -11.50 0.50 -1.00 1.00 - 2.00 >2.00 , Easv several inches bv fist Easv. severallnches bv thumb Moderate several inches bv thunib- . Readily iridented by thumb Readily indented bv thumbnail Difficult bv thumbnail ,J ._..~ . ,\., ~L\.:.-. ::. ':./1: C}._'\... ......-- ._!- ~ ~;~-'-~ i: ? ',. " , d' Date Recewe . fEB , 5 20\\ OriginaISllbmittal------ 0 ...J ...J 0:: .n 0 ... -0 III '" .;:: Qi '" c. "; - ;;:: ~ Cl '" r: 0 ';:: W c. 0 <n m 0 ;: ;.,: 0 .. :;:: .c '" E u 0 ::l ...J 2 .. - - u u u .. .. .. .- .- .- 0 0 e .. - a. a. a. . . 000 *~ 21- '0'" <(00 Jri7? ",W "''''' ~I- m " ii5 c::c:: e <(W :::J-i:!~ :;;:J: Vi.!2 € WI- . 0"" 0::0 , ,"" ::;; '" , , , I I Q) " 0 E "" ,91 ~ ~ '" - ;!: 01 ~ j;. m 2 ""''' .0 " a.", ~ c:: 0 p el'" .~~ i= "' -'" ro {!:.~ a. li "';!: ..J 0 ,S- it: E w ~ >-". '" 0 0 .2 +-l "''' <n '0 Q) ~~ .0" Q) ;!: -0 W ~g. 0 E"" el ro ""' ro o E 'Om ...J ..J ~ UJ,f;' ~ .~ < ;;:01 0"00" 15-q; it: -" 0 1-'" ~-6- "E w ..J ro ..'!!" I- ~ - '" C)@5 ~ ~ < ..J "';!: >"'0:: ~~ :a; > 0 15 w.a ...J uf "- o. ~ c:: Q) ro ~ ~ 00 > - o:c@ '0 ~ a. <('0 fr" 0 -:Jc o -g.w ~'" I- U :Jl a. u ;!: '" " JaqwnN aldwes , I , I . I I I - ... 9 .dAl'ldwes I a. I- wlllld'a I ~ ~ I I I ~ ~ - '" ~ ... "' " ii: - '" :\1 ~ ::l N ; ~ ~ III (y) uogehaB ~ ~ ~ ~ m .. i i i "[ "[ "[ i l- i i ..~ en <(Ii; oow ",I- 0::0:: <(w ;;::J: wI- 0::0 I I , I I. I I Q) " 0 ;::; l\f ,91 ~ 1.1 - 'j; 0, " j;. ,..:; -0 ~ 2 .0 '0 a. c 'ag 0 p (!l co i= '" -c -", ro '" " a. li 00 ;!: .!-a it: E ..Jo .E W ~ l18 0 ::> . >-". <n '51ii ~:l1 .0" Q) ;!: - 0 w "",- 0 E"" (!l co J!!'> ,..:;ro o E '0" ...J ..J- W~ .." < :ECl "'", a 'w - - it: ~ _'0 '" '" '" ~-6"2 "E w '" !:i ro ..'!!" !;( ~ - '" (!)a1::l " m ..J oo;!: >"'0:: Ci10 :;;: >0 .E" 15 11I.a -I" Vr ro 0" 00 >- - O:~CD " ~ I- ll. :S'2 0.0- 1tGJ 0 0.00) "'>5 '. I- o :Jl a.83 ~~ , I I I . I ~II.' JaqwnN 'ldweS Date Received ..... 9 .dAl'ldwBs a. .1- (D}llld'a . I ~ I. I I ~FEB 1 5 2011 - <:> ~ ., ... "' .ii: "1 .. - ~gin~ Sub"iltal III (D) uogBA'S ~ '" '" lI; ::l ~ ~ ~ .. "[ "[ i "[ I- OJ > .!!! ,;; ~ .. .. l!! I!! ::> Cl .2> u. " .. .. t: ~ 0 1il ~f z .. t: -liY III 2t t: 1ii :E '" ... ~ '" c 'M c:: ~ '" .9 "' ~ :;; ~~ ,9 ~ '*" "' ii ~c:3 u .3 ;;: '" .. ... - '" '" .. "! ., ~- ~ ii -.2: 0", If '8.~ ~,; "" IN 0'" ... '" ~ '" " ... c ~ ~ ;1 ~ .......2 0", B~ gOl 'i:oll Jj co - co ... of . " c " .., '. , '0 og ~- 0'" '" =" "' ~-~ ~~ ~ ~l~ ~&: . " "oll w o .... .... ll: o vi '" '" 'r:: Q, .. '" - c w o m o '0 '" OJ '" :;:: ~ Cl '" C 0 'r:: Q, f/) .;.:: '-' '" '0 .. D.. .c:: 1.: .2 a.I _ .c rl E . 0 " .... z '0 u: '" '" '0' '0' ... ... 0. 0. ;;; ~ ;::- ~ ... ~ E 5. Cl ii: .. ~ .. g ~ :z ! 11l. ... .{g" (j) ::J 0 C '" () 'iii :E '" t:: '" c 'iii 0:: w c .2 '- ~ .Q lDl1> 1ii roJ3 0 0.'3 '" '" ..; " = il S: "- .. ... '" '" ~ .. ;: .. 15 .., I- '" '" !i t: <> ~ <> '" '" .. C =>, .., ~ \~ . 0. -"" I _ Iii: 'lii '" I- '1:l .c c_ ..~ 0,9: .Q'ffi ~_~] E ro~~~~'S UJ UJ UJ . OUl 21- <!Ul UlW l.:1- 0::0:: <!W :;;:r WI- 0::0 z o 1= n. i'2 o f/) w o .... <! i'2 Ul ~ ::;;: ~ o . a.. I- - ii: - '" '" I- . . JaqwnN "Jdweg adA.i ordweg . (U) 41daa <> (u) uogaJIaS ~ i .~CI) <!~ UlW l.:1- 0::0:: <!W :;;:r WI- 0::0 z o 1= n. 1'2 o f/) Ul o .... q; i'2 w ~ ::;;: JaqwnN "rdweg adA.i aidwes (u)41daa <> (u) UOne^"S to; i ~ fa !:. --' 5 CIl n. o I- o ~ --' 5 Ul n. o I- I Q) " i" - I :Ii " :m...; ~~ E6f => ~ '60) Q)u E c ,'" ~c ..J.:;: :;;0 -... 1-.0 --' ' -j;' II) " ~o w- ~ .0, :511 olJl I I ~ 11 T 11 T I .. " ~ I :Ii " ~ '" li E .:::! +I U Q) Q) So E, >: :J'~ :;;'" _'0 I- C --' '" - C II) So >- 0 w15 >- ' :511 o lJl I I ~ I ... w ~ T ~ i ~~t---; iCO(,,)~ "'~" ... ~ II :::J E e :::I. ia~~:!2 (d-lI):::, . 0 lU t:r ..5;:!;ii::::J N :;r '" T .. , ~~ "'-'0 n. c (!) .. -" II) '" --'0 W - > .0, ~~ (!) .. o E w~ o "en ~€2 G~:::J >-Ul~ ..J '... ~~~ 0.0- 0.0- a.g~ I ~ ~ l!; T . , T I '" l!; T . I I " ,,!!! ~ u " -" :l::::c:; ~g ~! en ~ "''' -"" ~8.. .eo, ll:!~ ~~ " " "E ~" !.! E ~ u" ;;~ l}$ ~~ I ~ 1.1 i gj T I I I .c>: ~f5, ...-u "- " Cl .. - c ~~ W.o ~ ' tX~ (!)1ii o E w~ o Ojjj ~il- (!)~5 :>-..0:: ...J '... a:{g('l:J o:a!B. 0.0- n. P~!!i . I I I , I I I I '" I "- r .. 1 ~ T ~ T . I , , " " ~ " " -"" O!::.g {t" t!} o .; " "''' ",,0 1iig. ~'iii 10" _.l!! " " "E ~" .. " -a- E ~ 01) ~~ 0- ~:!ii_: ed' " I'J . I I I=EB \ '5 '21"\ l I. T I co ...:~~~. eo.__~--.-. Odg'1'\~\ ~;.~hDf'~~~'d'-----~ i T T T ~ 1.l i . U ...J ...J a:: Ii 0 Gl .,; Ul ." "i:' iii It) c. ... ~ ;;:: , Gl tll ,." - C Cl c ." W C. 0 m' aI 0 , ;. C ;.: 0 Gl :w JJ .. E u 0 ::J ...J Z .;; - '- u u U Gl <II <II '0' '0' '0' ~ ~ ~ a. a. a. ~ .!! ;=- ,,:; ~ .. ~ m ~ i3 " '" u: " .. " l: .!!!. 0 11 z 'il " ~ '" 1h ~o l: ~ ;;; :a '" l!! '" l: '" a: '" C ,Q 0; C " -" ,Q ~ .!l" 0; 0; ~8 .3 " s: '" '" ~ .. .. '" .. ..; 0 ~' C ~~ .......2 00; H ~ > 1; ~ti! Q~ a " x a 0," << U) ~ ;: ~ '" I! '" c .., I- C n -g .......2 00; ~> a _ ro S'd ~ u ~Ifj ,"0 '" ~ '" '" N ~~. , '.:ClJ, ".f .....'.... l: " .., . '.," ~ log c_ JB DC =" ro Ii} roE > ~~ i.!ll'l ~.l:i aitri "'" . Om 21- <Cm IIlW 5!~ <CW :;;:1: wI- ocO 2: o i= a. 0:: () 11l W o ...J <C 0:: w !;( ::;;; .., Cl , a. I- - ii: 1ii Gl I- JaqwnN a[dums ad.ll aldwes (Y)'Ilda(] '" (y) UOW!^8B ~ i ~m <c1ii mW ~1- ~ffi :;;:1: wI- ocO z o i= a. 0:: u m w o ...J ~ a:: w !;( ::;;; ,. JaqwnN aldwBS It) ~ ad.llajdwBS I- - Ui)'Ilda(] '" ii: 1n' ';r"') -,',.i', Q) '(w uogeAal3 't;; l- i . o !::!. ....I o en a. g ~ ;,. !::!. ....I o III a. o I- , , <1> o jg I j; '0 - , mQi 0.;:: E ,,:; " ~ :003 <1>'0 ~ffi .:J' c ~~ 1-.0 ..J - Cii~ >- 0 W:O >- - ::s-g u 31' I I ... ~ '" ~ i ~ 'f I ii o +> . "'li -[~ E ,,:; ~.~ '60) <1>-0 E C '" --c ....I;:: :;;0 j:'.o ....I - Cii~ o >- 0 w:n >- - :s-g olll I j ... ~ ~ ~ i ~ T <1> o jg J I I ., ~ ~, i :fir; ~c, __"C a. c C) '" -c ~H W ~ >-"- ii!:l1 C) .. o E wE? C '(jj ii!-fi'- G[ij3 >-~oc ....I -~ ~~~ 0-"- 0..010 0. g ~ r ~ ~ T . :.sr; .~ OJ __"C a.c Cl '" -c ~ ~ W ~ > .0_ ~~ Cl '" o E wE? C"oo ~€'2 C) ~ :::s >-",oc ....I - ~ o::~ri3 0-"- 0.0- a.8~ I I .. I '" ~ ~ Sf i I , " J!! :J:1 o ro .a ~ c:; ~:,g ~~ . .E- ",0 "''' .Q,(:: 1D&. ,e" tq~ ., " 1ii1Q " E .i!!" ..., " ~~ o 1l ~~ ~:S ~ .~ -, I .. I r '" .. ~ ~ i g: 0; i i " I " " ~ " ro .Q "'''' t~ ~~ ,E '" 0 "''' .a", H. ~~ ~.i!! ro .. " E .i!!" {~ E ~ D .. " ~ 'll." "'O'i ~~ I' I .. 0; i , I I I I I .... I '" II i ill i I , Date Receivl . . -. -r rt." I 5 2Dff -! II i '" ~ ~ i . Gi > .!! ~ >. ~ l!! ~ m " ~ C> <:l ii: m m m r:: .!!!- !l 1;; m" '" u~ ~ ~~ iii r:: f2S? ;;; ::; '" '" ~ '" r:: 'il 0: -~ ~J C ii; .2 = ~ '" ~6 m '" "" ... '" ~ OU) '" - 2:1- ~'" i <(UJ '" m" Nlnfl)Q.E C~~ UJUJ ..!..:9:a~E :.:1- (tl. I c:. ctJ a: a: QJtt:::tt:::~..r:: U 1il _.2 E <(UJ ..c:omo:;t:Q. ~ cia'x l;O (1)(\I(")OlOE ..J :6 'li B ~l ::;:r: ~ I.lll"':. 3: (W)~:.'=' ..J It: UJI- 1U~~.2Elo iJ 0 t5&lt3ill<t7) a:O >It)lD(QO~ .. --C '" 0> '" oil: a; It) 0 Co - g ~ ;;:: . ~ <II '" ... ii - c 0 ~ <= '" 2 c .;:: C 0 w Co .. 0 :0=; . ..., j:: "'0; 0 '" I- ~~ m 0. 0 ii2 E >. '" U " 0, <II '6 W "'"0 cH E c o 0 0 '" -g o~ ~ 0 ..J -"c 8: ~~~~ <l: -'s: q&:'- ><&j 0 ~e ~I 5:w 0 ii2 w 0 1--" -' - I- ~ -Q <l: -' U) 0 :;; 0 > 0 c UJ]5 ~ .~ UJ > - .C , - ,.:...:. - 0. ::s-g ... ... 0 .. l- t) iJl C ji..: r:: JaqwnN aldwes 0 " .... .., :;:: .c' ..... .. E 'i' adAl aldwas tJ " .0. 0 :> . I~ ..J Z .- 'J. -~; . r'~ -- OJ) 41daQ .;.;.----- 16 ~f Q ~ ;I:: '" - .. '" .. 'U (J f,) 0. .. Gl .. ro ~~!1 E - of' "e' '0' ~ ii; C)fj ni.g <Il (lIluO~"^"13 ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ .. 0 ~ ~ ~ D. 0. 0. ~Jj~~Jj~ I- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . .c":; j15, ...."0 D. c (!) '" - c ~H wl; ~ - ((.~ (!)m o E wE c'in: ~?ic offi;::J >,,0:: -' -- ~~~ O-"~ 0..015 a.. 8 3: L,;'......."" ." III :!2 o '" .Q " ~~ !-.!!! ~~ o .; 0 "''' .QO Qig. .eftj ~~ " .. ." E .e." ~ " ~l o " o ~ '" " f}", ~j .. ., ... ., ~Or,g\tf1\ SU~'~~I~~l~.L;_--- --",. . . "- v '" " v ovg91BV . ooa9LSV if . 5 .9 ~ ,$ .'G('.l ij , , , , ; o . M '" ~ .9~ $ .ZU .0 ~ " :20. !;2 " 0 . II> ;? .. , '" ,;. o " .. <: c o 1il " .. 0 0 N 0 ~ 0 ~ g N 0 0 o w .0 ~ . 1l '" i o w ~ o ~ . z<O( ec~~~: .9t ,gg .iZ~ '- ~ '" ~ 0099_ FEB.l 5 2011 ~ '" 'riginal Subnflttal OM -- 00 ~~ ~'" ~'" ,,"ro 0.. " . "-0 o ro >- '" 1: " "' ~15 1:"' "", en";;: =m ~~ .00 ",0 ;;:0 rn c .Q 1ii z o o v Il '"1' 1l", Sen o c. ,"0 01; ",ro -1: E2".Q) ,,'" _c roc ZO ~~I c o '" ID 00 -" "''' " - ~U5 ,.,.E ~~ 8~ ,,~ c<o ~tO ,.... g-e ::;; "0 Ul ....~...-'C-...,.. ...,.. . '" " ~ '" z o i= ~ :!!: a:: o LL ~ ll. ~ :!!: x '" e- " '" '" <( c o "" J!! c <= c. '" a '" a ~ ;,; ;;; o en c. " ::;; 15 c. 00 ~ o a en g- ~ ~ c z w Cl W -I ll. ~ :!!: 6'" o :!. " e . _0 0= <<. 0 -", 1;; l'.! e << J!! ..E ~D~ < ~ .. .' o a o <5 ~ " "" " c. ar .E E !!! " ;; o <( ~ " 0 o '" >- " " c '" 0 ~ ~ E 0 o '" o " '" :u .0 " '" ~ >. ~.i ~ 0 C :J ~~ f1J ~ 2? (5 ([):::J '" '" '" " "" ~ "'" I- n:E -. '. ,i,-'..k':" c. " E 2 I! '" 8 '" ~5 - '" ".. '"." Ul'" '" C . ~E roc " 'M CD ~O'J '",,0 c",<( o'"z U=z ,"00 8~""" -"" 5~ a ~ i::i.N "'''''::;; -"'l- I! ::J "'.. OJ...! zO::.. ::JE >oJ!! "lVtO c.c: >. ~::s(l) _CIl.!. 0= to sg=6 :;.c 0 S~8 " " ~ '" c. '" E ~ ~ 5 ~ E " "'. If '" c :; . ~ o u; ~ " m 15 "" " 'S ~ Cl '" . ~ "S g,-",; \1\:-> 8. ~~ ,: t:.{ ~t{.g '" '" c' ::> ~ ~ " 00 ~ .f' " m m ... il: '5 " ... ~ e c 0_ 0 '0 m a:I 0.. . ~ ~ 5 - o '" " '" " 'U 'U ID '" 'e " o Ul o '" z <: o Ul ::J " :5:: Eo 0- -" - .0 """" 2" "m m= c- ID~ "'" .!!!ca 15"" ",c .".2 el!! 0." ~ > ~:5 ~ c '" '" ~ f'o '" 10 Iii 3!. E 0- :; ~ ~ . . 2:! ~ io . ~ c o .. '" e ~ -0 ~ ~ ." '" . '" '" '" 0 5 (5 u ;; g ;) IlSI * . ~ '" t"i- t ,'. - , '., . , " , :;7'1 c o "'0 !!!- 00 '" m - ,,0> -.0 <( " ,.,u. ~05 oc 0.2 "I!! c" ~> ..s "'" f'o <( '" >-" " - ,,<( "'>0 Ul" =" 0'" enUl a: 0; > f' Cl x <0 o o ~. :g: '" '" C lD ~ - ~ """ '" 3:s::o '"~c IDO- .!; o,E =-a,Q) omE ,".0 0 ",,'" .t:::6"": :;:;E3 o '" :co!!! ;::J::m...: '" c c....CI.l(l) o~<(:g fi=i5 2. ~ E.z.mm wii E.o en..o Q) >- ([100m "O.....QlE _ c.~ Q)"'C- (Il 15~5~ .- " o'~-g-g .g=a ~:::I 0-0- 0 ..c c: 0...0 c..aI'~~ o '0 c :Ell ~~ OCiU'lro 1II E ~E ~85o t ~ o :;: . 1ii I ~ '" ~ o o . c :;; . VI '-g J!! 0 5 ~ '" 0 '" " ::> " '" '" o . c .l'! 0; u '" :;; ~ ~ ]; ~ <5 " c . ~ a. .;; ID ~ C. m C, .ll o '" c. i!! " ;; '" ID '" '" J; :;;; Oi '" E J!! '" o ~ <5 c " " '0 C '" '" E '" f' 15 II .!!1 c <5 .E'" ~ o ~ I ~ t! @ < .;j ~ @ @ .> ;~; ~ ( a ~ '" ~ ;;; > f' " ~ E ~ " ~ B ~ ~ m ::E E '0 C '" ~ " o u: '" > ~ ~ .; '" '0 m o '" ;;; u o ~ ""; ~\'i c. J: u '5 o ~ o o '" a ~ '" ~ " '0 0(;53 "- "- en (JJ >- III ~ ~ ~ :g 'iii ~ a; -E II) (J) U) UJ + . III 0. A ~. '" - o '" ~ 0> '" "- ,., ID " '" en "0 Ul " ." ro ~ c. o o o m c o ~ Z B- iD 3 . " iD a "- w ~ c .e 00 a ro "- ~ ~ ~ '5 0: o "- '" '" ~ o 1: '" -w " ~ 00 '" .- ID_ ",m -1: '" " - "' .a ~ m 0 20 Iff Q Date Received: < Cl ~ ::> FEB 1 5 2811 '>0,#' I ;~ i\;~,.:.,,: . . Soil Map-Lane County Area, Oregon 5175/5195 Main Street Map Unit Legend ., '~. ;~ .ii{:,,\;);:"::,) /;:~:'.:j,.\::.":;"":.~ ~:. "\?/" :':~!:~~~~){:~#~~;S9~?:~::~~~;~~qi~9~~:(9.~~:~.?).-':~\}.~'/}>:,:~}<S.~:/ ::::~){.y};:~):;~':'!,:.:y..:::/;j)r\:~{~,\:::>;. ".~:; '::.\)'~:!.:~~p\;:~.if~Y'~bPf\. ,:....;~ ,-:,,;,;~\~ /~:.~~'.~~V~ii':~.~m~>>:'~ ,:'.'.:,~;:':. ,,,,", //)~.~~.#)~:~p(;~':'i:-:U ":i.. :'. <:p,~rCe.nt bL401 >":::.:.;".,:-.,.. 32 Coburg-Urban land complex 1.6 7.2% 101 119 Oxley-Urban land complex Salern--Urban land complex 0.4 1.9% Totals for Area of Interest 19.9 21.9 90.9% 100.0% ',' . v' 1 . d~. '\....I ',,,' ~ ~ ~'e~;. ',' ,-;;"1' . '....j . ~ I . , ,'..... .~. j-rl . ,( ... ," Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal USDA =:- Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soli Survey 7/21/2010 Page 3 of 3 . . Map Unit DescrIption: Salem-Urban land complex-Lane County Area, Oregon 5175/5195 Main Street Lane County Area, Oregon 119-Salem-Urban land complex Map Unit Setting Elevation: 300 to 800 feet Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 60 inches Mean annual air temperature: 5'2 to 54 degrees F Frost-free period: 165 to 210 days Map Unit Composition Urban land: 45 percent Salem and similar soils: 45 percent Description of Salem Setting Landform: Stream terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Gravelly mixed alluvium Properties 'and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately hi!lh to high (0.57 to 1.98 inihr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency off/ooding: None Frequency of ponding: None, , Available water capacity: Low (about 4.8 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 2s Land capability (nonirrigated): 2s Typical profile o to 7 Inches: Gravelly silt loam 7 to 26 inches: Gravelly, clay loam 26 to 60 inches: Very gravelly sand Date Received: Description of Urban Land Interpretive groups Land capability (nonirrigated): 8 FEB 1 5 2011 ,~' . -,;- '-'. , '1 '- ,:!,".",;::..Data,'S6urce Information Original Submittal ;"t:' ,Soil Surve~ Area: . '~Survey Area Data: Lane County Area, Oreg'on Version 8, Feb 9, 2010 . ;:.;S~;:; '\':S;:1:7,-:~,J-':~., ';i3j\,;~" ,:'~ 1 USDA = Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 7/21/2010 Page 1 011 8TA:rn oFoIlliGtt 'J--- IIONITO:i:ING WELL REPORT IS required by ORB 537.765 & OAR. 690-240.095) InstroctionsCorcom . this are on the last ~/If':; :f(F-'~'!=n / ::::;;0rm.1 OV 1 1994StartCard# -1 NATr:R ;l::sL6L J;.O.!;;.A;r!.Ql'i,OFWELLBy legal description M, V{J!~Pl County Lane Thwnsbip T17S lNo@Rmlge R2W (Em@) Section 33 . 1. NE !/4of SW !/40fabovesection. 2. Either Street address of well Iocalion 5251 Main S1:rppt . Springfiplri, OR q7477 or Thx.I~tll1llIlher~fwenlocati.on Unknown 3. ATJl\.CH MAPWITH LOCATIONIDENTIElED. Map sbaII include approxirmrle scale and nodh arrow.. l) OWNERlPROJEC'n WEILNO. lffire . Rex Kessin er and Marvin n t n illdress 789 Fair Oaks Dr. and 2145 _~tonecrest Or o' Eu ene . ...; 0. Zi 2) TYPE OFWORK: jj New CO!l~tio_n o Conversion D' Alteration <Rej:air/ReconditioD) . ___ . ~--.-- ~- _ 0 D~~ _ 0 Ab",donment - 3) DRILLING METHOD o RotnIy AiE 0 Rotny Moo [l1 H~llowStem~ger 0 'plh;"--::-- (ORE HOLE CONSTRUCTION "\'Os No 00 . Stmdanls 0 [] Depth o! ':'.~leted w~n \!mIl {" o ft. " If:' . --Lft. :. Seal 1 ft. TO ift. . Filter fllpack I1-1-tt.. TO 20 It \Y.tter-tigbt cover Surface flush vault Locking-.:ap Casing 0 (9) WELL LOG: diameter 2 in;. nmmri& Sch. 40. PVC 'lll>Jded Threaded Gllltd o \XJ.D Liner dllune~ m. . nmmri& Welded Threaded Glued DoDd- Vk:Il seal: Material Bentonite Amonot 3/8" ( 150 1 b Grontweighr 14.1 1 bsl Borebole diameter . gal . 12 in. Deahle 0 0 _ _'!:::...:,,: . f.-' 20. It Land surface !!.=tn~ plug at least 3 ft. thick Screen nmrerial $ch. 40 PVC interval(s): From~Th 20' From--=-=-- To ...- Slot size .020 in. Filierpaclc 'Mmerial Silica sand Size 10-20 in.. (7) STATIC WATER LEVEL: 15 Ft.belowIand_ Artesian Pressure Jb/sq.in. Date D"'" 10-18-q4 (8) WATER BEARING ZONES: _ Depth at whicb water was fiI1;t fonnrl g 0 . - From 1b EsL Flow Rate SWL 15' 20' 1 nnm -- . Ground elevation 4qq' Material From Th SWL [Fine s~nn\T Hll no .,. m~teri"l ROllnder! ,.iIlPY> ,.n,,~ .,. . ?nO . W Imi r"", dl+11 cl~" m~+~iy:""'n,,1r . SiiA ~~"~M~ 10" denth ,,'I . _Dare ~.tmed 10./18/'14 In/1R/q4- Comp]~ted (tinbonOed) MOnitor Vkll Constructor O:rtificalion: 1 certify that the work I performed on the construction, alteraJion, or abandonment of this well is in compliance with ~na~tmc~'1P._~. staodards. Materials nsedand information~'Wa:lU. ~ . knDwJedgeand tielie!: 0 . MWCNnmber __ ;) o Flowing~es!3? o GPM. -- - !tto 20 Signed ~ 52en--. It (bonded) MOn!totWell ConstrnctorCertificatiOQ; lacceptresponsibility forlhe eo~oS~eot work: performed. on this well during the constimitfuiidatesreported aboVe. All ft. work performed this time is in compliance with Oregon well construction standards. 0 rt is Ime In the of my knowledge and belief MWCNumber 102BB NameofsnpervisingUeoJogist/Engineer Robert Goodfe 11 ow ORIGlNAL & FIRST COPY-WAT.ER RR'jOURCES DEPARTMENT THmD COPY-CUSTOMER . . '" , *i .... .. ~ 'w' ~ \4 !. J\\ , \\, \;-. I \~\ . .- \ I. 0 9 , -.. ..~TATEOFO.REGON \. ;1JGGOlIse.98e -wjNITORING WELLREPORf 1!J"!>1I (')>requlred.by ORS 537.765 & OAR 690.240-095) /.!!1stroclions for comnletinD this tenort are on the last ......... of this fon>>. (1) OWNERlPROJECT: WELL NO. MW-l Name John's: Gas & Groceri es Address 5390 Main' St. City Springfleld S,"te Oregon Zio 97478 (2) TYPE OF WORK: o New constructjon o Convep;ion LJ Alter..llion (Repair/Recondition) o Deepening o 'Abandonment (3) DRilLING METHOD o Rotary AU- 0 Rotary Mud U Hollow Stem Auger 0 Other o Cable WELL. r: L23776 111080 Stan Card # (6) LOCATION OF WELL By legal description Well Location: Coumy Lane ToWnship T 17 SiN or 51 Rmlge R 2 WE or W) Section 33 I. NW 1/4 of S E 1/4 of above ,ection. 2. Either Street addre.>;s of wen location 5390 Main St.. Springfield. OR or Tax lot J1umber of well location fi>603 3. AT/JI.CH MAPWI'IlI WCATION IDENTIFIED. Map shall include approximate scale and. north arrow. (7) STATIC WATER LEVEL: 10 ' Ft below land surface_ Arte,o;ian Pressure Ib/sq_ in. Dale 9/2/98 Dale ., : BORE HO~: C~:STRUCTION , :ial Standanls 0 [3 Depth of completed well '';:If{'. 'i TO . . . . . f . ---1..:ft.. .. Seal --5.' ft. TO ~ft. 1I1~ Filler pack !41 ft I . I TO' -20-' ft. 20' ft. (8) WATER BEARING ZONES: Depth at which water was first found 1 n I . From To EsL Flow Rate SWL 10' ::'0' 1 nnm (9) WELL LOG: Ground elevation 505 I . Land surface Water-tight cover Surface flush vault Locking cap Casing diameter 211 in. materialSch. 40 pve Welded Threaded Glued o 00 o Material From .. To 0' .5' .5' SWL Liner diameter maleriu! \\elded TIll"aded Glued o 0 0 Weu seal: Malerial Rp-ntonitp- Amount 150 1 bs Groutwdght 14 1 lbs.1 Borehole diameler 1?" in. Bento~ plug at least 3 fL thick Screen , inaterial Sch 40 pve. - iruerval(s): From~ To ?O' From To Slot size O?O in. 1&.0;... I.',':' . . - 'Filter' pack: Material Sil;"il Silnd Size 1O-?0 in. in. S n irie .. ... .5 10' 0' 10' 20' DEe 8 WATER RESOURCES DEPT. Date started 9/2/98 Completed 9/2/98 (unbonded) Monitor wen Conslructor Certification: . I certify that the work. I performed olllhe construction. alteration. or abandonment of this well is in compliance with' Oregon wen construction standards. Materials us d infl alion reported above are true to the be~t knowledge lief o Bailer .~ WELL TESr. o Pump Permeability Conductivity ~ f 55U .I.cmperaruTe 0 w:tter. __ Was water analysis done? aYes By whom? PNI Depth of st:.rata to be analyzed. From Remarks: .- 'OA;r -Yield PH o FlowingArtesian GPM OF/C Deplh artesian flow found ONo 5' ft.lo ?O' Sign 10348 8 ft. ft. (bond Morn onsuuctor Certification' la, tres i.' fortbecons~ction.al~A.ir!ad}ttttent wo perfomed on 15 well during the construction dt"tes reporfM'.Move, All worK perfonned during this time is in compliance with Oregon -well construction standards. This s true to th f'S't'J15m;ng.EJief. . . MWc~umber ' Date ~ THIRD COPY-CUSTO Name of supervising GeologistlEngineer Mikp nriY'l i ng) RRJ1.11 Signe ORIGINAL & FIRST COPY.WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT SEC .. N MW-3 o 01: 2.5 T: 2.3 ~ NO X: 1.7 j i i ! I , j j i i i I i I i i I i. j i i i i i j! I j i i j i i i j j i i j i i i i i i i j i j i i t I [ .. ~ Undove-loped I Lot i i i I i i 2AsPhalt2 500 Gallon 1dW-2. Wast. Oil UST ~ B: 25.000 T: 27.000 e:: 2.100 X: 1 0.000 Al'artment Complex RECenflEf). DEC 11 1998 WATESR RESOURCES OEP1 ALEM, OREGON r---, I L___J rs:ooo -Oallon 1 !6:ooo Gallon i lUST jjUST I _____....__ _... . ---......-- Is.ooo Gollon 116.000 Gallon I lUST IIUST I ...-- _ ___"'1-__ _ _ ~ 2-2 ~ "MW-l B: 3.000 T: 27 e:: 73 X: 380 Monitoring WeJJ Loc.otion and Identification Number 8enzen. ("giLl Toluene (1J9/L~." ! ; . \~; . Eth'ylbenZene' JJg/L) . Xylen.. (JJg/L -f[-.. ;0',:'" , ~ i1 PropertY,.,une, 1 ~',~" :..t_ , ',,; ~ 'J ; J;"., ( ) Ganopy ( ") Coneret:tt MAIN :~ o fP'll -, .-- ~o 10 RECEIVED (mT) OCT 2 8 1998 WATER SAlE REM SOURCES DEPr , OREGON 2"'"2 I G'lClN:IWA1l!ft A.cW~,,,,,, Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 . MW-l Original Submitu@: 8: 3.000 T: 27 e:: 73 X: J80 FlCllJfIe 1 JOHN'S GAS &: GROCERY. 5390 Main Street, Springfield. Oregan SITE PLAN . Sergeson-Boese de Associates. Inc. Environmental Engineering . 65 Centennial Loop Eugene, 0"'900 97401 (541) 484-.9484 Job, Code: JGGQ1CON.98C CADO File: JGGQI.DWC $cat.e: f. == ZOo Of'mln: ROBERT ROBINSON Chedwd: RONAI.D BERGESON Date: .9/f~/9'8 . SThmOFO~GON . GEOTECHNICAL ROLE REPORT (as required by OAR 690-240-035) LAN!:: 00075 4- o/1AJ.;:zd8J{/~ Od)C:; (1) OWNE~ROTECT' Name'- Ie mber G/'--3 ~ (9) LOCATION OF HOLE by legal description: CoWlty ~~ Latitude - LoDgitude Townsbil1 -;;7;T?-S N ~ge ~~ E <@HM. Section -.::t3 Nur-1/4 5.:...r-1/4 Tax Lor LoE Block Subdivision Stfeet ~ddress orWell (or ~earest address 00 Address Ci (2) TYPE F W. New 0 ~eiring. 0 Alleration (repair/reconditi (3) CONSTRUCTION: o Rotary Air 0 Hand Anger ORotary Mod 0 Cable Tool (4) TYPE OF HOLE: ~Uncased Temporary o Uncased Permanent (5) USE OF HOLE: .. " SUlle Zi Abandonment DHollow Stem Auger NPusbProbe OOth" . o Cased Pennanent o Slope Stability 0 Other (10) STATIC WATER LEVEL: 6;2; h ft below land surface. . . Artesian pressure ____ lb. per square inch. (11) SUBSURFACE LOG: Dale 02 -/-3~ Dale .. Ground Elevation ~~/ (6) BORE HOLE CONSTRUCTION: i Special Constructi~n approval 0 Yesk;; Depth of Completed Hole /6" ft Material Descri tion From To SWL HOLE SEAL From To ,,' - Saclts 01" pounds '~ / '- Date Slarted Date Completed Backfill placed from ----rr:- to Filler Pack: placed from fL to --th-' Material it.. - 'Size of p'al.:k . (12) ABANDONMENT LOG: (7) CASINGIS Diameter From o MnteriaI Des!..'; tion From To Sacks or Pounds Casing" Screen: Dateslarted (8) WELL TEST: o Pump DB,;ler 0 Ajr Penneability , Yield Conductivity PH ...... Temperarureofwater -5"'""'~~ Deplhartesjanflowfound~fl WLlS'waleranalysisdone? ..8jYes 0 No By whom? ~-&~~.. Depth of slrala analyzed. From /...2" f[. to ) - < Remarks: . .'. '~',""} ... >~ ';.;:.\~. oj /C" o Professional Certificatioll (to be R;g~ed by l.I licensed water supply or monitoring well construc!or. tI( Oregon registered geologist or civil engineer), 1 accept responsibility for the construction. alteration. or abandonment wl~rk per!"orrne~ ~uril!g ~e cons~clion dates reported above. All work performed dunng UIIS lIme rs In compliance with Oregon's geotechnical hole construction slandards.,.This report is lrue to the best of my knowledge and belief. giStralion Numbe"r .k~ o Flowing Artesian GPM _ fL 'I~ 1 ORIGINAL.. WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FIRST COPY - CONSTRUCTOR SECONDCOPY_~y~ 2011 n.iMi!"'O",! ~~: d:"irr7lttsl ./ .!'J to. Z ,MAl ,- ~ 1iIJ: ... I- 0011684 I~ ~{ Mohawk '" ! Geological Survey Oregon .., .__ ;.".::1 from aerinl 1967 , " '. ;"', iJ*GN ~N , "'~"~," ;A . .--...-- '. 0"03' .1.!!- TMIL 3:38 MILS '.,', :;' ~ t_' . . .~_.---- -- 1 ~:~ 1000 0 h _.. t:""""-~ .....- '--- O HlIin-' (""""11"",1 r""",~E" 1'24COUa'<: o 1000 2000 1:"7:.~, ._~ 30()(l 4000 ----..J:- - o !-.::'I =-.. ...._ __. 5000 6000 71 ;an datum a!esystem. 1 ,5 F.=r.::".~~.t-;-:'1._ I. Krl MI ..._~ . . LANE 69549 04-21-2009 (9) LOCATION OF WELL (legal description) 'County Lam: Twp 17 on s N/S Range, no w See ...ll--... ~ 1/4 of the SW 1/4 Tax Lot 2400 Tax Map Number Lot Lat 0 , "or L -0-'-" or oog___ (D', Street address of weU r Nearest address ~18 52NDPLACE SPRINGFIELD, OR 9;478 @l.DRlLLMETHOD [ IZQRotaryAir DRotaryMud DCable DAuger DCableMud (10) STATIC WATER LEVEL Dale DReverse Rotary 0 Other. SWL(PSi) + SWL(ft) (4) PROPOSED USEIZIDomestie o Irrigation DConuDunity ~~:~;'e~~:I;redeepening 104-70_7000 I 'H 10 I DlndustriaV Conunericia! 0 Livestock DDewatering Flowing Artesian? 0 Thy Hole? 0 DThermal DInjection 0 Other WATER BEARING ZONES Depth water was first found 19 ~~P:;~;!~~ ;~~S~~~CT~N S::bndard OAmA1tltC:aCOICbkss~) I~~:I Fro~1 TO"IEst;tWISWLIOSiJl ~ Oia From To Material From. To ~ ,~ ! ~~ /rm,nt I 0 1'0 ~(Il)WELLLOG Method 0 A DB (gJc DD [JE Materia! OP SOIL LOAM GRAVEL WlTHSOMECLAY STA TE OF OREGON WATER SUPPLY WELL REPORT (as required by ORS 537.765 & OAR 690-205..0210) (1) LAND OWNER OwnerWeU ID. First Name BRUCE Company Address 418 52ND PLACE City SPRINGFIELD State OR .Zip 97478 (2) TYPE OF WORK ~NewWell DDeepening D Conversioo o Alteration (repairlrecondition) 0 Abandonment Last Name PETERSEN How was seal placed: DOther Backfill placed from tt to Filter pack from -roo Explosives used: Oes Type- ft Material ft. Materia! Siz< Amount (~ CASINGILINE;R I~~ Shoe [gJ inside DOutside 0 Other Location ofshoe(s) 'Ul Temp casing Dyes Dia From To (7) PERFORA nONS/SCREENS . Perforations Method Holte Air. '. Screens Type Fro~ To. Gauge 25 su Plstl: Wld Thrd I~~ 2 58 .', P.' I - "Material Perfi'S caSing! Screen. . Sem/slot ,Slot # of Tele/ creen Liner Dia From To 'wid!h IbD7th slots pipe size m ~'f"I."'I"'W (8) WELL TESTS: Minimum testing time is 1 hour o Puunp 0 Bailer @ Air 0 Flowing Artesian Yield e:aVmin Drawdown Drill stemlPumn deoth Duration (hr) 1- 11 I. . " ~~' I 1 Tempenrture 1~ OF Lab ~ysis O:ie"{ '.,By , Water quality concerns? []Yes, (describe below) rmm I Tn I n,oeript;~n, ': : Amount B / Page 1 ofl WELL LABEL # L 1101202 START CARD # 11006620 FJW WM DMS or DD DMS or DD Ground Elevation From n , , To , ,- " IllIte Started 04-?O-?009 Completed 04.?O_700Q (unhonded) WatcrWeU Constructor Ce.rtificatiOD I certify that the work J performed On the coristruction, deepening, alteration, or abandonment of this weU is in compliance with Oregon water supply welJ COnstruCtiOIl standards. Materials used aIld information reported above are true to the best afmy knowledge and belief License Number 177fi Date 04-?1_100Q Electronically Filed Signed DorTCH A~ n TIIr.KFR (RMfiJed) (bonded} Water WeD Constructor CertificatioD I accept responsibility for the construction., deepening, alteration, or abandoruneot work performed on this well during the construction dates reported above. All work perfonned during this time is in coinpliance with ,Oregon .water supply well ~nstruCtiOD Sbndards. TIils report is true to theDEif~ R~~eJ(f&~!e[ LlcenseNumber 1141 Date04-?l_?OOQ Electronically Filed Signed CASEY TONFS IR IF-file'" I:FB , 5 201t---- Contact Info (optionaJ) ORIGlNAL - WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT 1"\.' , ,] '" b . 'HIS REPORT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT WlTIllN 30 DAYS OF COMPLETl'8l'I'€illIWoRRU mlttal Form Version; 0.89 f~l 1I1'mlet;"li~'~IQI[lIntlna Geotechnical & Construction Services . . September 21,2010 Ms. Janet Lobue University of Oregon 1276 University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon 97403 Project No.: 2107120 Report No.: E-26687 Re: UO Allen Hall Material Testing University of Oregon Campus Eugene, Oregon Dear Ms. Lobue, . Attached are the results of the testing performed by our representatives on the existing wall materials at the above referenced project on September14 & 15, 2010. The testing program included brick mortar shear strength and epoxy anchor tension testing in the 1922 building and laboratory compression testing on fifteen (15) concrete cores obtained from the walls of the 1954 building, as outlined in emailletters from kpff Engineers dated July 20 and August 17, 2010. We trust the attached information meets your current needs. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office at 541-684-3849. . Sincerely, ;1. 't. /Jun - Michael L.'~e~~ Vice-President Attachments: brick shear tests - 1 page anchor tension tests - 1 page . compression tests - 1 page floor plans - 3 pages hydraulic ram calibrations - 2 pages pictures - separate PDF attachment Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 c: TBG Architects - John Lawless (email) Kpff Engineers - Josh Richards (email) Original submittal MLM:sc '. , .' This report and/or enclosed test data IS the confidential property of the client to whom It is addressed and pertains to the specIfic proc6?5'alJd/or material evaluated. As such, information contained hereIn shall not be reproduced in part or full -' . and/or any part thereof be disclosed without FEI Testing & InspectIon, Inc.'s written authorization. f.;I~ /1 .., ... , ' 750 NWCoo1e! Aven.e 'COCWiS, Clr9p1 S7:nJ.p;rre [5411 757-46SB .fax (5411757-2001 2S540 B Aiport Poad '8Jgere, Clregc<1 S7402.p;rre (541) 68<hl84il fax [541' ~51 6297SN~Pla)eauD1ive, Suile3' Bend, Oreg"" 9n01. phone (541) 382-4844 . fax (541) 382-4846 . . ~- ~ CD , ><.... lI>N "tl"tl C._ - '" .J:."tl -C Cl", C_ lI>lIl ~U 1Il1ll -:J "'- ~1Il 1Il"tl -0 .5.J:. 0- ,lI> -:2 '" I 1::", 00 :2' .... ~~ c.... Ou III "':2 :!I- (f) '<1: - '" Q)S~ .J:. Cl ~ lIlc'tl +Jet: C__ '0 1Il , E Vi ~'tl'tl E '" C .- 0 ~ ~,..I g :2-= Gl lI> - Cl::l~ 0'- ~ 0:,9111 "'G> CI- a.. ... o J!l0 "'eGl ~._ .c ...0<..> .......,C III .- IIl'tl ,.;. o Gl '" CilXl~ - 'c :::10 ti)Scn lI> '-lI> !-"'.J:. C1J ii g Cl s.- CO'._ - G;O ~ - . 00 ~z . COt'--Nco c:oco(Y').q-OJ ('l')l"'--('I') co ('I') (00 1"-0 ............N ,......... LO<DCOM......N'VC"J"1' N~""'"<ONOOCOro COCD'<"""".qLONOI"-LO CO~~LON'V"""""'u) 000000000 LOOLOLOOOOOlO ro ~ g ~ Q):~ ~ ~ ~ "1'0"1'0000000'l:t o>oo>coorooom ('l'jcici~cD~cci-.:ici IDCOCOC!>COCO<OIDtO ~ ~~ f!2 ~ .M-.:tMMOOMN ('l') N~NNMN;::~N xC\lXXNXN~X a).x...,.....,.)(""'" XN~ r:::VC15C0"':t'M"=:tXM C")M('l')(Y')XMX.q-M x('l')XX~X~xx :tX~:::!:T-:s!"""C:O~ ......co...-......OO"l""""CO ...... co row co co ,., ',t.~.(-~\.J :'-C\IM v lOW f'-.OO 0> (/)(/)(/)(/)(/)(/)(/)(/)(f) 0,;1; '" E o e: u 2 to E "" 00 lI> U e: to e: o .:;::; o ~ - o - e: OJ '(3 Ii:: OJ o o Ol e: 'en ::J u OJ e: 'n; :E o OJ .J:> :2 ::J o So~ _N J!ci -~ OJe: ::JO ro:r5 > OJ ,., W .J:>.. - 'COJ OJ ~ ,,- ::JW 'CW OJE ~- _00 o OJ e: > ~'w ~'" ~ E xa. OJ E 'Co e: " , III C o ~ '" o o ..J - III lI> I- . . C o ~ '" <..> o ..J '" OJ ' E.... ~~ -OJ So,S 0- -gro ,- e: So E a; So::J iD OJ .215 -........-Q)() -oQ)(])..c- c '- >::: 0 :Jg~co(j) e 8 "O.~ m '" e:e: Q.)g!5(l]~ > 0 '- O)N O.oele .0 ro Q)'_ "0 co >"0 C ::: (.., 0 c tU ~..q.o!!:!lJ) 'CtOOJE "'0 s:::::: a. co ffiro~~J:: Q)~ mu (t) 3: c c cu 0 EI.-.(lJQ)"'O o 8lO J::.!: " ' So en ~m 6 l- .;:~ (/)~ g ;g:= 0)'0 co:: :J :J CC:"'CI !.- lo- l- ...o..a=C'\lC 0001... _---NOOOO OOOOQ)q::q:::t;:.Q .-....c.............> ww....... . fJ)...... (J) U) 0 ~ > > Q) ctI:Jrow.oooo> Q) ~ Q> 3: ctl.a ,.0 .a 0 " ' " " " ctl ctl ro.c C\I" "'"or--- " <tl N~('I')LOC\lCn""""M" 1 I I I I ..-N~~ OJ <{<{<{II, VOLOI.O~CDCO<o:;t] ('f)...:tM~..-..-CO..-"," ..-M'rC\lMNT'""M'r ~E N '" EE EEE E '0080oo.EoE eo~eeegeg _.....=__ '- I- ro=ctlCij(ij~=~= ~ ~ ~ ~ So So ro ~ ro .c: .c:.c:.c: So So tUi'5-et:5Ui:5t) om 0 0 o-~ m ~.~ e:OJooe:e:O,.O,. -'- '- '- '- '- f/J;;. en;;. 00000'-'-'-'- .~.;:: 'C";:: ';:: ,Q.Q ,2 ,2 (l)mQ)Q)Q)'-'-'-~ x: x x-x x $ 222 WWWUJw.E.EE.E ci z ... '" lI> I- 00 e: ro C. ~ o o <;: 'C OJ .c: o J!l ro OJ OJ 00 . "l"""C\IM~LO<Ot'--com (/)(/)(/)(/)U)U)(/)(/)(/) Date Ree eived: FEB t 5 2011 C"~'~21 Submittal '" '" "" w .:!; f- lIJ <l: I J!l III 41 f- "0 "' o ..J .... "0 lD "0 :gO; ..J"O "05 ll> ' r~ <l: ... o .s:: .t.l c <l: ll> .. :::l III III 41:= ~S Cl :::l "' Cl .... III . 41 0 I-Z . III -" ... "' E Cll 0:: 0) _ _.0 (3 0.;3 .D .oc: ;;: :;: OJ o o~ d3 mo .D .aUl '" OJE "'0"'0"0"0"0"0 ~'O g 0-0' 222222-2-ol=2 oooooo~O.J.:::c)'O cc:c:cc:cocOcc cc:r::c:c:c:gc~t5c ,Q.Q.Q,2,2.Q c,Q.c ro.Q 10 10 rn 1ii m 1U .- m .- ~ m EEEEEEg1Eg1O)E L...L..I.....L-L...L-Ol....o L... .E.E-E.E.E.EctI.EroCj2 <U <D <D ID m Q) L... <l) \-.m (l) '0 "'0 "0 "'0 -a "'0 0"'0 0 g"O L-L...L..l...L...L...a)L...Q).o'- oooooO.S;O.f:_O 6ag55g~a~o6 ._._._._._._ co._ m..o._ t)t)t)-Ut5t5.ct5..c::lo CG ctl co ctI co m I CtI I ....... <tI L...L...I.....,,-,-C-ob-O-L... X X X >< X X Ql x' Q.) 0 x Q.) Q,) Q) CV Q) IDe Q)o~.Q) oooooococ:oo zzzzzZc:Zc:-z 0'. 0 cD :.t:l :.=..0 t.l "0) ~ ~.::.:: x xe 0) (]).a o 015 Z z,t:; lD . ooooooooogo ooooooooONO \'ol!)L{')LOLOLOlt>LOLOMLO ('0M(V)('I')CV)('t)('l')(Y')('I')+I('t) 00000000'080 LOLOLOLOLOI.OIJ')LOLC') 10 COCD(o<O<OCO<<><<><O~<D ~C\l('l')VlO<Ot--.comoy- co a:J []J m a:l co"m co m co co ., ., ,. -.,.--.-' 0) E OJ (]) " (:1 ~--'- N~ N~ _0 lilt:' Ul'" ",0 .g.s -ro c" OJ c Eo o+:::i Ul ~ -g'o. ro~ .~~ o 0 c.c. OJ OJ o- N'" , ~ :>-co :r:"" ""ell =0) :r:", OJ'" cN 'ii)o:: :JCJ) ow ~CJ) ~w dol o() c() o'=- Ul..: .!2"Q. 0", .c:" " - '" c ~ Q). 8E .=--g .".0 0) E =ll> .!= Ul(:1 .f: T'"" "0 - 0-. ~ +1 "Oc ~lIl <u.c: ~~ s:: -0) -- cOJ (]) C .Dill h"E _Ill >< :;: c ~:;: M.g in ~ z III .c o .. l\I l.l o ..J .... Ul 41 f- . . c o .. co " o ..J OJ .S ." 0) c E ~ ~ 2i :;: III 0 " '0 Ul C '" .~ l'! ~ "" 0 ~ 0 :;: o "" 0 o ~ "0 (i)':= '" .E ]lID ~ "E~ "OQ)w- 0.>0 c:L.->O ~..Q ::I 0 Q)~ . - e 5,:; m -c.o OJUc3: ~~ Q) <ll:::J" 0"'- >>eo 0)0 oOO)'\"""" UJ a... .a-SO)'" roO (Uw>c ..a........ o,u,OCO 3~ "l:t '0 ~ WE .Q ~ "'C v" _ Q).o C"O CX) ~ .J:J_ ctICM- Co.t- l-rn:"O~ -0 Q)L..cO "'C cO)Ill"O c:C '- C (I] ca 8o~.~ c~ O)uM EC .f: C)W (; :J ..:2 "'C.~UJOL..L..OI.- 08 332~[i::ggooou_ .o"S;'='g w:: q:: to:: g.Q '0 0 '+--..c'QNQ)Q)<D(]J-L...w O,+-- 3>>>><l)a.>..... 1;jotloOoEo>cc ca..cro03.Q..oco.cOIDQ) Q)t:Q)..CI_CO<O" m-gu;: " g~" LoMOllol; 10 co t--. ",CO'l"""".,..."I'""'\""""CO I "". N I I N I I co I I I I I '" <( Me:( CH,Offi""1" .'1"""" WIU')<(U)'I""""CO..-..q-f'..'I"""" ~mM~'\"""""'NC'?~C>M -"'~NNEEEEUlE '\""""E Eo 0 <Do 5Eo~gegeg~E OOOOI.-_I.-_t..;....'+-- 1-0"-"-_o,"-o_mo = "-~= 0_.,0_ 0 c:= ~~~ ~~~r~~~ ~ .c: ............c::-,J:; .c: o.c: t:::UJ:Jt:::....._1i)+-'t)ut omoorn::JQ)::Jeu_o Ca.>fhCCOO::Os;oc ....L...L.L..([)(/) rn L.L.. .Q.Q.Q.Q 0 0 0 0 2;.9.Q W m ~ m'~'c'c'c'c ~ ~ xxxxJH$2$2-s<x wWLUwEEEEEww o z ~N"''''''''~~''':' m [l) m m co CILlaIUiIiiRlI M'lti'<;;..i '" .... III l!!. FEJ j r. 2 :'1 Origin=il Sut;.;: Ul c: ro C. ~ o o "" " Ql .c: " .J!l ro ~~.. ~Ul' , ,.. 1".I.".~_____'_ -c .! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " in 0; '" ..,. '" ~ 0 r- <0 0 '" <0 ()) t- ()) '" f ()) r- '" CO U) t- '" ..,. CO ~ t- O t- '" ... a- '" N '" '" cry '" N cry '" '" cry N ..,. N cry 0 c:i U ~ , 0 '" , '" 0 t: 0 C " o ... Q) .- 0 0 0 0 U) 0 0 on 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 on w -U..,O cry t- '" ..,. CO ..,. ~ 00 r- 0 0 m r- 0 CO a. "":J m m m '" 0> m m 0> m 0 "! ()) m "! m E ... t: ,- .c 0 Ill... .iii f/J't:>>= 0 co ~ N Ii) co N r- 0 0 0 N 00 0 '" "' ! c fI'i 0 ~ co m co on '" ..,. 0 '" co '" m m '" ~ c.eQ. '" 0 r- on r- co 0 '" on co ~ co ~ t- '" N ..,. '" cry '" cry N '" '" '" '" cry N ..,. N '" 0- 'lit E'" E () oUl 0 0 :; u " c 1-. ro 1Il N <1: ..,. 0 I :;; .... E I- III III (f) ell :l -c-c on on on 0 on on 0 Ii) on 0 0 on o. on on <( l- E <11 C ~ 0 ..,. co ~ on co ..,. CD '" co m 0 ..,. ..,. co 0 cry r- N '" 0 .... m .... m '" co 0 co 0; C '~ 0 :l ..,. on ~ 0> ~ '" co .... cry ~ m '" ..,. on ~ ...J 0 '" N '" N cry cry '" N ..,. '" '" N '" '" ..,. .:;: co 0 <1l~ '(ii ::!! 0" III t: t: 2! .gJro Co ~O> o~ E tl~ 0 f ro> t: . U 0 ._~ .! U.clll ,,0 ... Gl '" co 0 0 on co on '" 0 co 0 cry on 0 co QJ~ 2! -c Cl.c ~ '" 0 Ii) N cry .... <D Ii) '" 0 ~ N 0 '" f,: ~ V) Gl C (J .; <ri cO .; cO u:i .; on cO cO o:i cO u:i o:i <0 "' ~ u E o.CIlC (,) o....J - o 'o-g C <11 ...qoq-T"""L- 0 U ('f) I I C () I lJ) lO._ . - T""""O ~romm (IJ~OC Gl ", c,rn ~ ::: 0 015 0 r--..,-"Oo U.c III c c C1J Q.l -c"'CIl 0 Ii) 0 0 co on Ii) Ii) on Ii) o. co 0 Ii) '" 00 C I- Q) C>.J: l..... \-'- OJ on .... 0 Ii) cry '" .... t- '" N on '" on '" ~ Q)2Jg~ ... C (J .; to cO .; cO .; to r-.: cO oi r-.: to oi cO (J Gl C on w: Q)..c tf) <1I...J_ E E C Q) ... m.~ ~ 0 ... >< :0-0 CD U W :!::!:~N .o....Clw___ Q)~~o '- 003: .. 8001- Gl III en 2! ... Gl Gl on on Ii) Ii) Ii) 0 0 on 0 Ii) .0 10 Ii) 0 0 Q) 0 E.c N N ~ ~ ~ 0 0 N 0 N 0 N N 0 0 (5 U <11 (J i.,M '" cry '" '" .; .; '" .; '" .; '" '" .; .; Z ._ C ': .~,,\ '_,;~....i- :"..'\). "",.,/.:.~~,'l c- ""'I'l;..r:.,.JJ ~~t-L')\"j "'/ ci , Date Received: C .<: .<: .<: CIl .S! z ~ N ti ... :J 1:: ~ N , , ~ C")' ro :J ~ 0 0 .. ... , , N 0> . 0> , 0> 0 o <11 E ~ W N (f) Z Ii) co ~ 0 ~ ~ co <D 0 (f) o u.o 0 0 ~ ~ ~ N N N N ~ ~ ~ FEB ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J: ~ '" '" 1 5 2011 o 0 > > '" 0 0 ...Ja:: '" N cry '" '" J: J: nginal Submittal /IlD:l'OllQlO'uISllXAIJln/O \I) -"- . . .,-- HDA + El!ll O~O1: '4H~ eunr uEi!saa:l!leWa4~ lapoWa'l:lPUe uOlsuadX3IIEHUa/l\f uoflQlOJb~SJaI>Jun '~",9~n :aluos NIrId OVll3a ~ 13A31 o <C ~ N N ~\fl"t\l "" .... .. I~ I Il~ -t,-~=~"cr_,. ,-=~" " ',' ~,,1 I"', - _.m._..... i ,.", ." , II ",' 1'1" ,. ':~ "j' ,,, ~ 1'1 ~ r, 'Ii: J II _ -, -, -' oJ I.'. . ~ ~,i J; ~1" ~' - 11 f,~: ,\;1-, HI' "I,n~~3--- ~~ ~--~- i!J II h1 ill! II 'I 1-...\ ilL - __1 JJ- " 1I I . I J11U1Ii: - _ I{ _ ~ _ _ .. _ .:; ~uuu~!l -j ~, ~ I"~ I. 'L~_~' ~1 !!f d r~n==== FrI I J '....rl~~fi3:1 ';j-.fO~__ II -j;=~~,~ 'llT-~' rnr----' Ii. :! II I ;~' ~I Y 1 ~ ..., r-....... II I I i L" II I , r-:-'rT ~T I I ea~'~ II:! I !tl- · ~r ~. ~_-=_::J ~ ~ 0 ! I zEB z \" w CO w ~ Z . . s , "- , , 0 , , " , w ~ . : 0 '~ . . . . ". . 0 z ~~ :I: 0 . 0 zo Ii 0 0" ~ 0 <0 ~ ". .0 j~ z. "0 ~ ~~" NZ "" W 0 ;o~ . Z" ~ h < ~13c ~~ 'r ,"0 0 00 .0 m 8E~ 01= ...2 .Q Z w :)< Wo: z l1iQ~ o~ > o.g g~ 0 W tf.ifiJ 5 ~. Z'" I- 0... ~~~~ ~;o (j ff}!!; -... 00' ... w lfa ~~13~~~ 9 rz< ~. z.~ cO -' .,,~ W...J~ o::t:l~ t;' 9m~ rr ~g~~m~ OZ (j e~ , z~ ~~ . a::;:J a:: < ~~ <(:;:!:!:Ut--i= OmCl>- Z LUli!w Zz:) I;; 01>-<::1 ~l<:~ <(~;;! .0 u:~ti;j f- w. c. zw ~z ~~g ~ ~ti z. !i~~Ej .~ C/) 00 Q~ ~\;: W zo UctloO z 58oi!: f- e Ii a.- t. ffi ~~ ~;o 0 m W O. I I I '" ~ r " ii! , 1------ ~~ 'N::~-€,:::~ ' I I I ~,--H,-----!---~1= ~ -1 I I I " I I t I I __J I I I @ i ....l-~~~t - -. i " -lr~, ',' ~!J1~Jrl ll' h"li I' I' I' I I' p, I~--"} I ,~,~j I' l':i t=== l' ~.j v ~t !i~ Ii ,'~, t,' 11 "D '.. ,~.J ,j la. ~7 " i, ij!;;,Ll~i"JL-,,- J~;-~_l_i~::~L kj~ _ -, I:t~]k i ~,l djr, ' I:: !'i' 'iJJ111' U I~J'!ti7~1 !I~ [11, ~r~~l~~F/; '~~I" l i'"y 1 L"'I,=J J ._el'" fl'11=-.A I ' ,it" !r I>!: r",J; ~, .. ~ 'I.J.., 1--" '" r--..,"~'. . - 1J ({I'i, rF-i\JI"'~"',Iif'~\lj'~'~'1 'I' II~<'" , I.. '"iC' ',I, ::I"~' ,', fA -. ';'~': a,Jl!' '~'Ii B' ii' I .' >fi' i I.ol- ,,'- :j _oj <: -.:- ___ _ ~ """=......_-:.LJ,-L ~ ___~"=J~,,=_J.=-~ ' .:~J1...:;",j~.:__.....-:;;r ___ --.1 5 .- h --- - - u_ -- ----- 1! --- - -r-- . I I T.~ - - ~ ! ! ! ! ! 'I I, II II ! ! ! ~ I I I I I I, 'I' , " I I I ~ i i ~ ~ ~.. J~' m~tk~~ited: r ;' I .~ I , ..i.... I '."f- ..,: '<"'I WI" ? ~ \' .f. ' l'r~ " ., '. ~.,..___.......,~__l.'.:"'i~' .1'" :";"'1: ,! FEP. 1 :; '1('(1, ~ .... L-...,.. , r"'" ...:',,",,,r Original vUO,: :,lc,;,.______ . . l'lo:mrOlo).!!SnA1NoIO. HflA.joEl8.1 OWt'4J~~ aunr uBjseo:>newalpS lepOWa~pu'B uOlsuedX3Jlf!HU911V uo6eJOJoAijsJell!Un ,~=.9~1~ ;GWJs N\fld Ol/BC 1: 131\31 N' o <( U\ IS) fl,. 9 1> A._-~---- ~- =-----1 _ j;~. - ;,"..,.--..; ,~= ~--~ "f--O(."'~ __ ::~_ -,.. .. , :l l r ~ ~ . II ' ~ /1 fl;; 1/ - ;-~-"-~-" "'" ___ ~l_~ II i~ II ~ I ....J I It; \1\ :J~.~~ ' ,:~~~ I U' li..o!:.....:~ !~; _-+_ ..I. 1____ ,~' _~ ![""..~"" , -, ':~1 1: " i~ "-nk"'==~" -:~"*lr-'1f: I liiHtHtlll ,III r.t,__!i -- -, t-'--i~~==Jt." !IU- -- ----J f~ ~~ It! -4--ji-- I '';-- ill ",' ,i!.~~o i \'- 111."'....- . ~ ,-, (.~. --.I ~ ~"'" ~ -l~'v-~-r 1:71: _,t".JL~ h!:-:-------~ ~rr " I '. '~ ., ,,~!, ( ,-.}!! ~ -~::b"" ...!I:~- ," -' '.J<.i'l _ _ /_ I ----IL - '.... --HI -~----::~~~t4..--j- II I I I I I I~ IiI) (2 I ~~ l!l f I /....-,,=r:J1' 1 ~~=t I",:::::J '~-=-_.j I I I j1j i, ]I,'! I, il':,' j! Ii Id!'kll! I' ,I ii, I, I' !1,=" I' II ~ ~ I ~""1'GI I I' II 'I ;~IW'~111l N ,! : II!l::F .,t ../j ! J' 1 I I ~lJHhliB ,II I . , l < "11"1" I "'""iliu~ ' L ..L I :_-.J,.-J}:tLj;. -~;"_~l'), " lNi' j I !IT:K]! J ic I' 1r'-'~\i'rJ.i;~~~'\iL~-J~' ,," '''I ",i-r fl'h-'~j"'"'IJj!" t1 :;l ~... ') -;~ a.. I" ~\:: I I I ~ I I...... I I"" !i "~ }! _:r;_li[ffi' I Ll' ~ I -- I I III II: Ii ~--; ft: ~ ;11 '1::;-;::- ~ i. II ......!--. l.. ~ ~"";;"9 -=~;:-""'i~:---"""- I ~tf1[f: J...;J;.j ~'!~ ~, 1',11', ',Jl,' 'dr"'I: '" -="L_rC IL;2.;i :1"lt...'J1 l/ It.' l.' It.' ~v Ii 'II Ii' : I L, ~ II' ~L~h-'.i Ii I, i' i' II il I I. I:'" : ~ II i I:.J : ::' /; .'i...---..--iT! I! I ) : I I ~I ok d,' ~~ ~ I" - - - i;~~==~-T-~~-'~r~-~-r::r~=~~'"-(':1=1r~l~:-).~l:;;:;:-, -=~Ii i i i j i II 'I ,I I, i i ii " ~ ! I zEB I. 9 2 ' , :\ ~ o ~ w .... '::l- ~ b z w C9 w -' C9 z i= [f) W I- :r >- ~ 2 W 0: >- ro w > g:~ w- 0:5 ~w :>" ow u~ w' I;;~ o:~ UO 20. o U ~ ~ o @ ~~ ~ ~2 )- il.:li! J:z 5:U ~Q ...J2 ::i~ Wo:: 0,.8 ~~ Z..l I- O....l -.....l (/).....J 1-5(j~~~ fIT~~ a:: ~~ ~~~'~!i;g iti~tl ~;~ v:i:r:::~ <(~<i! ~~g S<ffit1 !2mo Ol-~ 0: ~ " w z o o to "". .~- ~Eg ~:!~ m~::!: ~~~~ w~fu~ !;:~a:o ~;Jlli~ w~O::< W"'l':I)- oclJ.<(...J tr.oi3...l ~5~5 .~z~ I;; oe l=! ~~ ~~ ~g ~~ <. ~. w. 0< 50 .w wi' <. ~o 0" =< . 9tJ ijz ,. .~ ~e ro~ :l- VI " I I I u. I Ii " '" f~ ,\1 :::j /i 'l,.;~ ... "l - :. Iii, Jff t.' ' FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal " , - t7'=='7==- "=*-~''"'===11-- ti " ilL' C;'t~' Ii ':1 II ~ II ; ",.. II r ~ /~ .-===~ II L' I I' , l! =___~.. "\;; 1 --~ --::;::; to.,. ~ '~ T p.._ ~ 1:; II ... II.. I' " I..... I, '\;; l r ~~~ ~-- , ,- I ' . '--, i- 'I .., r--- '} , 1 1../ I I ~. Il J'~~~Tl. II l:-fTnT"!'t!'l- I - ~~~~~: 1 to ./ '1' ---l~, ,"-~ ~ 11 g~ ,) I~ !tv-- ~ ,~.. -=i1:: "7 J'!! i: ~ n U\--- ~ -- - [i i' ',J --- i : f . l I ~. 1 ~ ____l____L -- .'r~-:::.lr:J- ~-~:tt~:-:-(~fT~;~:;ft~4 ~ -1l~ ~1~11~,..-_:;i-... I ~;"'-tJ ",I ruL_J I I ,'~ I~I I r- ~ IClII..... ...&;:""'f+-~ IIIJ.__'" I ert---~=~~~ =~r(:~', '~,:' ~~t,.~l; "I,r~(" - - ~1---1 " ~j i ,r, Il ~''''''j~I\1''J--!i! I I ~"I , , I In I [', I. '11 t, ,-01..)', ~ '~' I" ,'" -' :~----, I ~\ ~ "l'i '-.J\\ Ii lit\( t 'I ~"'j l -F i ~"It-n-..," I ;, ' , ' ~-L---i' p. - . .. bb ... ft~ ~r)(ijl j ~ I! ~ -t'-I;--~I' '..: ~'k~~, ~~ 8~ I 'I,t:"!: I'V 'I' : il~.I: B ~r---:l-':'~l ~ l'" 8lI' I fi..l; If!, I ~J I ~~~[~1~ v j i;[ ,'-- - ~-O-J r!! L1 ! i'l! !! i I, i t/ i' :rli~~~ _ ~---~____ j _ .j 1 __~~~, L.~~llL.- i i___;J----~ . - i---T~----r---T --r----y-,---rr=-t: .mr --~cr-=-li I Iii i Ii ! I : ! !! i I i ~1 i i ~ ~ ~ tt~~; I i . NO~1I0dd..L1.1SU-hUffilO mOZ'l.M~oonr u5!saO:l!leWaI.pS I-lDA+881 9 ~. ~ I .. 9 ~ ro In I/) " " * Ii !i~ ,- " ., ~'.);..:"'. . IllpoW&l:lpue lJO!Sll!ldX31I1?H UillfV uotlaJOlO~SJlMlun C'0 o <( ,L".9LH:aJe:>$ N'Vld OW30 t 13A31 D ~ ! I z ' , :5 ~ zEB \" o '" W D :J: to z w '" ... i:i ~ ~ ~lil CD tag;. L1.l g:@ ---' ". (9 8~ Z w' I;;~ i= "'~ (J) Uo llJ zo J-- 8 ~ ~ o ffi ;J o~ ~ ~2 ~% E~ IUO ~o u- ulO :]5 ?;ffi 0,.0 oc.. :Z....I f-C....l ...Wz~~ Cf.l1I.j::I-",Ul .~:c;!a: n::o~ ~~g ~m~ rCC:~ <(i5~ ~~a S<~t; 9g:;g o~!: '" ~ m W % o o W ~o wz ~~. ~fflc 850 w_~ ~~::;: ~\!;.~~ Wc;lfu'" ~~a:@ i35~Q UjlDCl>O 0::11...0;:;.) li:~ti~ !;(o~- ~~~~ ~~ ~~ v -~ !;(~ w" o. ~~ ~~ b~ z. 9" 5% Zw .~ ~~ ~~ I I I 11', l'i:':' .1 _: Original submiHtl__ .-.--- J! ,.\ _ ...".,._........_.__.~...j''f. "t)'j ;':" ii.,J: . . 12000 11000 10000 9000 8000 E III ~ 7000 u :J ,g. III .... SOOO "'0 "0 >- " 0 J: ...J ..... 0 5000 s:: 0 .... III 4000 .... .0 (; U o o '" "" o o o "" o o '" '" o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 <:) L() 0 lO ('t) N N ~ (!sd) aJnssaJd a6ne~ o .0 o ~ ., .... :J (Jl , (Jl ., 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o. 0 0 0 0 .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.. 0 0 0 0 N "" <0 C1) 0 N "" <0 C1) 0 N "" <0 C1) 0 N "" <0 C1) 0 ~ ~. ~ = A ~ N N N N N '" '" '" '" '" "" .. .. , :J " " , " ". .. , \ . ~ .-. . 10 'l() 0 l() 0 '" '" C1) C1) '" l() l() '" l() l() C1) l() 0 '" l() <0 "- <0 " '" ~ ~ N "" 0 ~ N l() C1) N C1) '" C1) C1) '" 0 "- N OJ "" '" "" 0 <0 ~ ..... N C1) '" '" l() 0 <0 ~ "- '" CD ~ ~ N N '" "" "" l() l() <0 <0, J'-, "- <9 '" 0) 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ III ... III o s:: .2 C) ... r: .!J (;"0 U ...J ...J <( = 0 0'05 N co C\l "I"'"" 0... C 0) 3:;"1"'""0006: c/'-.~ol--. ll)O",ON...- :<N05~"I"'""~ 0.. I .' . .. '.. - - "" ., Co .,., Ol ............ Q) ::J E E e e 1U ~ CO ::I 0.. 0...0 C) 0:: 0.. 2000 1000 a o. o '" o ., .... ., I "0 ro o -' '0 OJ .... '00:0 OJ o OJ ,~ '0 ro OJ 0:: :!l,O ::J ro <!J .... OJ C w a e eceived: FEB , 5 2011 Original Submittal Cl> ~ :J Ul '" E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b 00 0 0.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 N .... '" CO 0 N ... "'CO 0 N ... <0 CO 0 N ... '" CO 0 N ... "'CO 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N N (') (') (') (') (') ... ... ... ...... LO :J '" 0 CO 0 LO 0 CO CO 0 LO (') (') 0 0 '" 0 CO '" LO 0 0 0 '" LO 0 0 '" Q) ..... Q) ... 0 CO '" OJ ... OJ ... ..... 0 '" ~ ..... ~ ..... LO 0 '" ..... ... LO LO 0 ~ ~ ~ (') ... (') ... ... '" ..... ..... ..... CO CO 0 0 ~ N LO <0 <0 '" <0 <0 <0 ~ N '" ... LO <0 ...... CO OJ 0 ~ N '" ... <0 ..... CO OJ 0 ~ N (') ... LO <0 '..::."I, .J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N N N N' - --.'. E <tI c::: .~ :J <tI ... 'U >- :t .... o c: o :;:; '" ... :e iij u III ... III C l: .2 f!) ... III ... .c 1Il"tl u -' .. . o' o o co 000 000 000 ... '" N (!sd) aJrlSSaJd aBne~ g o o o o LO -' <( rooo'Ujc~ I~ooO(") c,....."C\Iol-Q... Q)Ot:::dQ =T'"""_ON <('NO'>'r" 0.. I .. - - -g g ~ 0- O'O'!::lEE l.o ... CO ~ (0 ::s c..c..Cf!)D::c.. ~'c '1 -. .; .,;., ~; ,; 28000 27000 26000 25000 24000 23000 22000 21000 20000 19000 18000 17000 16000 15000 g . 14000 "tl '" 13000 .3 12000 11000 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 o o ,,( ;/ . .: '.' . ; <: STORMWATERMANAGEMENT PLAN AND DRAINAGE STUDY FOR 51st-52nd & Mai et Redevelopment OPTION A Springfiel , February 15, 2011 Prepared For: TBG Architects 132 E. Broadway, Suite 200 Eugene, OR 97401 Branch Engineering, Inc. 310 5th Street Springfield, OR 97477 Phone (541) 746-0637 Fax (541) 746-0389 -'-'..- ~ Branch Engineering, Inc. Branch Project # 09-159 Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal 11/17/2010 12:09 FAX 541 73.21 ; ~ p. I4J 002 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD PUBLlC WORKS DEPARTMENT / Engineering Division Fax: (541)736-1021 STORMW A TER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK .. _ (Area below/hi. line fOled out by Appllc<ml) ~- .' (pleaser:e/Um 10 Mati S/ouder.@Ci1y ofSpri:nlifield Public Work. Engineering; Fax # 736-1021, Phone f1]J~'03S.) Project Name: OBO Enterprises, LLC Applicant: Branch Engine<ring Assessors Parcel #: ] 7-02-33-32 TL 6200 & 6300 Date: 1 J/03/IO Land Use(s): Community Commercial (CC) Phone #: 541-746,0637 Projert Size (Acres): 1.5 acres Fax#: 541-746-0389 Approx. Impervious Area: 1.07 acres . Email: greg(iiJbranchengineering.com '." .: :"." _:.'-'..-_.:'_" .c....-...... . ";'.,," Projed:t Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map): 1.5 acres site with two commercial buildings near Main Street and B 15 unit apartment building to the south of the commercial buildings with associated landscaping and parking facilities. Drainage Proposal (public connection(s), discharge locarion(s), etc. ArtBch additional sheet(s) if necessary: West side of the sire will drainlOward 51" Place and connecr to the existing storm line in the street. The east side of the site will drain toward 52n(1 Street and connect to the existing storm line in the gtreet. Proposed Stormwatcr Best Management r...actices: Infiltration basins and planters will be used on-site with overflows aod trapped carch basins. .' . ~ (Area lielow rhis line filled out hv tIle Citv <md ReTUrned io tile AVIJlicant) . .... .'. ":' .. .. . ...(At a mirzil?mm, all boxes c{1ecked by the City on lht:from and backc?ft(Jis:~.h.'eeisha.l1 he iu:~mJrieij. "... '~:'/fqf:(J1J application 10 b~ completefor submillal, although.other )'!!q1tir..em~n~s.may be ne~e~sa,y,).;.: .->:.-. . .. '. .",. . Drainage Study Tvve (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note, un may be substituted for Rational Method) 0 Small Site Study ~ (use Rational Method for calculations) i?J Mid-Level Development Study - (useUnil Hydrograph Method for calculations) 0 Full Drainage Development Study - (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculation,) Environmental Considerations: g Wellhead Zone: '11 '<t:.,.-..(, ~ Hillside Development: ~ Wetland!Riparian: Floodway/Floodplain: IQ- Soil Type: 11<1 - ~ ~ ""J.ti~A-kMO Other Jurisdictions: ODlJ'\ Downstream Analysis: ~ Date Received: ~ NlA I 0 Flow line for starting water surface elevation: FFBrs ZOU 0 Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation: 0 MaILl:tole/Junction to take analysis to: Original Submittal Return to Matt Stouder Ial City of Snrinl!field. email: mstouderlalci.snrinl!field.or.u5, FAX: (541) 736-1021 Rpvl~IH1 , 1 '1 Qrnq 9 of 10 11/17/2010 12:09 FAX 541 736~1 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD P~~ I4J 003 COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS I Fo,Offici,1 Use Only: N1-A<: r Based upon the informadon provided on theji-onl Of1his sheet, the following represenrs a minimwl1 a/what is ner::dedfor an applieo/ionTo be complete/or submi!tal WiIh respect 10 drahlage; however, this {;s! shauld not be used in liell o/The Springfield Development Code. (SDC) or the City's Engineering Design Manum. Compliance wi,h these requirements does not constitute site approval; Additional site specific information may be required. Note.: Upon scoping sheet submittal, el7sure completedfarm has been signed in the space provided below: J:Yj $ 10 'WJ ~ Interim Design Standard.twater Qnality (EDSPM Chapter 3) Req'cl N/A iii D All non-building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall he pre-treated (e.g. multi-chambered catchbasin w/oi] filtration media) for stormwatcr quality. Additionally, a minimum of50% of the NBR impervious smace shall be treated by vegetated methods. o \Vhere required, vegerfuive s!ormwater design shall be consistent with interim design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth by the Bureau of Environmenta] Someos (BES) or Clean Water Services (CWS). D For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 squaro foct, a simplified design approach may be followed as "Pecified by the BES for vegetative:: treatment. D If!l stonnwater treatment $Wale is proposed, submit caIculations/spec.ifjcations for sizing, velocity, flow) side glopes7 bottom slopt::, lllid seed mix consistent with either BES or CWS requirements. o Water Quality calculatioos 05 required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM o All building rooftop mmlDted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the buiJding1 shall be provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure. General Study Requirements (EDSPM Seetion 4.03) . 0 Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state: of Oregon. D 0 A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03. J, including a hydrological study map ~ 0 Cak;uIations showing system capacity for a 2-year storm event and overflow effects ofa 25-year stann event. ~ 0 The lime of concentration (T c) shall be determined lJ~ing a. 10 minute start time for developed basins. Review of Downstream System (EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C) o ~ A downstrell1l1 drainage analysis as desclibed in EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC). o ~.E!evations of tile HOL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable. Design of Storm Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04) ~. 0 Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations. pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set. o liJ. Minimwn pipe cover shall be 18 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 h;u:::hes for plain concrete and plastic pipe matc=rials, OT proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The Cover shall be sufficient to support an 80.000 lb load witboUT failure of the pipe stJUct!lfc. o ail MilllIling's "n" yalues for pipes shaJJ be CO)1sistentwith Tabk 4-1 of the EDSP. All storm p.ipes shall be designed to achieve a minimum velocity of three (3) feet pcr- SCl:ood at 0.5 pIpe full based on Table 4~1 as well. OtherlMisc W 0 Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot intErvaL Include spot tIevations and site grades showing how site drains fjI D Private stOI1I1water easemems shall be clearly depicted On plans when privare stormWBter flows from one property to anothe.r o 18 Drywells ~hall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of residential buildmg roofs (EDSP Section 3.03.4.A). AdditiQ)1al provision' apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to the websire: www.deo.state.or.us/wafe::roundwoJuichome.hcm fOf more information. ~ D Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre-dtyelopment rote, for the 2 through 25-year stOllll events fl11ds form sltall be included ll!J an attachment, inside tile frout cover. DIffie srormwater study * IMPORTANT: ENGINEER PLEASe REA>> BeLOW AND SIGN! As the engineer of record, I here.by certify the nbovc: required items are complete and included with th plat") $eL Signature: Date: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal Revised 11/1 9/09 10 of 10 . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51 "_52od & Main Street Redevelopment - Option A . Introduction This evaluation was prepared to summarize the drainage system proposed for the 51 st-52nd & Main Street Redevelopment Option A. This storm drainage evaluation will determine the type and size of water quality/quantity facilities that are acceptable to the City of Springfield. The 51st-52nd & Main Street Redevelopment is located on the south side of Main Street and east of 51 st Place and west of 52nd Street in Springfield, Oregon. The proposed project site is comprised oftwo tax lots, TM17023332 TL 6200 and TL 6300. Existin2 Conditions The existing site is bounded by Main Street to the north, 5151 place to the west, 52nd Street to the east and residential to the south. The site consists of an existing building, a burned down existing building, driveways and landscaping. The impervious surfaces consist of roofs. The pervious surfaces consist of landscaping. According to the Soils Survey of Lane County. Oregon, by the Natural Resource Conservation Service, the soil at the site is Salem Urban Land Complex (Soil Number: 119, Hydrologic Group: B). Refer to Appendix A for soils map information. Proposed Site Conditions The proposed project includes two new commercial buildings, three buildings with townhomes with associated parking, sidewalks and landscaping. The parking and drive aisles will consist of asphalt pavement and the sidewalks will be concrete. Water Quality Treatment and Storm Water Conveyance System The City of Springfield is encouraging as much infiltration on this site as possible. Therefore, the site is proposed to have drainage basins which will flow to infiltration basins located across the site. The infiltration basins will be landscaped with appropriate vegetation and topsoil to allow treatment and infiltration of stormwater. Infiltration testing was conducted and the site was determined to have adequate infiltration rates to serve the proposed improvements. See the table below for infiltration results and information. Test Test Location Test Test Soils Measured Depth infiltration Rate 1 Northwest corner 48" 0-12" Topsoil of site 12-36" light brown clayey silt moist 4.5 inches/hour 36"-42" light brown clayey silt 42"-48" Bar Run See Appendix B for the infiltration testing data. There are three proposed infiltration basins proposed on the site. Each is primarily treating parking areas however one is also infiltrating runoff from one of the proposed buildings roof. See Appendix C for the proposed Drainage Basin Map for location of infiltration basins and the areas they are treating and infiltrating. Below is a brief description of each. Infiltration Basin A Infiltration Basin A is located on the west side of the site and east of the proposed drive-thru restaurant. Infiltration Basin A will have asphalt parking, building rooftop and lamatSJA&~h7~: to it. The basin draining to ]nfiltration Basin A is 0.43 acres. One side has a 3:] side slope and the FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal Storm Drainage Evaluation 5t"-520" a Main Street Redevelopment - Option A other has a short retaining wall. Infiltration Basin A has approximately I ,685 cubic feet of storage. Infiltration Basin A is bisected by a concrete sidewalk and a 6" storm pipe is proposed to go under the concrete sidewalk to allow Infiltration Basin A to act as one basin. Infiltration Basin A is two feet deep from the top of the growing medium to the overflow. This depth was required because the overflow for Infiltration Basin B is piped to Infiltration Basin A and the invert ofthe overflow pipe from Infiltration Basin B required this depth. The overflow for Infiltration A is connected to a proposed curb inlet in 51st Place that will be constructed under a Public Improvement Permit. . . Infiltration Basin B Infiltration Basin B is located on the north side ofthe site along Main Street and west of the proposed ODOT driveway approach. Infiltration Basin B will have asphalt parking and landscaping draining to it. The basin draining to Infiltration Basin B is O. I 5 acres. Infiltration Basin B is one foot deep from the top ofthe growing medium to the overflow and has 3:1 side slopes. Infiltration Basin B has approximately 473 cubic feet of storage. Infiltration Basin B is bisected by a concrete sidewalk and a 6" storm pipe is proposed to go under the concrete sidewalk to allow Infiltration Basin B to act as one basin. The overflow for Infiltration Basin B is piped to Infiltration Basin A. Infiltration Basin C Infiltration Basin C is located on the north side of the site along Main Street and west of the proposed commercial building. Infiltration Basin C will have asphalt parking and landscaping draining to it. The basin draining to Infiltration Basin C is 0.09 acres. Infiltration Basin C is one foot deep from the top of the growing medium to the overflow and has 3:1 side slopes. Infiltration Basin C has approximately 172 cubic feet of storage. The overflow for Infiltration Basin C is directed to a nearby private stonn line to be conveyed offsite to the existing 12" storm line in 52nd Street. Other drainage basins on the site will be treated by double chambered catch basins with filter inserts and conveyed through storm pipcs to the public storm system. Stormwater Runoff Peak discharge rates for the post development conditions were generated using the Santa Barbara Unit Hydrograph method. The King County Department of Public Works, Surface Water Mamigement Division, Hydrographs Programs, Version 4.2 I B computer program was used to assist in the hydrologic calculations. See Appendix D for the stormwater runoff results. Below is a summary of the results for each drainage basin. Proposed Conditions Peak Discharge Rates (cfs) Storm Basin A Basin B Basin C WQ (0.83 inches/24 hours) 0.06 0.02 0.0] 2 Year (3.3 inches/24 hours) 0.26 0.09 0.05 10 Year (4.3 inches124 hours) 0.35 0.12 0.07 25 Year (4.8 inches/24 hours) 0.40 0.13 0.08 Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 OrIginal Submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51 "-52"d 8: Main Street Redevelopment - Option A . Infiltration Basin Sizing Each infiltration basin is characterized in a spreadsheet to be used with the King County Department of Public Works, Surface Water Management Division, Hydrographs Programs, Version 4.2IB computer program for routing the developed storm through the infiltration basin. The rbuting data can be found in Appendix D as well as the infiltration volumes and the required storage for each infiltration basin. Below is a summary of each infiltration basin. Infiltration Basin A Below is a summary of the peak flow rates and the peak elevation the stormwater will get in Infiltration Basin A during the 2 year and 25 year storms. Pro osed Infiltration Basin A Storm Peak inflow (cfs) Peak outflow (cfs) Water Elevation (feet) WQ 0.06 0.02 494.30 2 Year 0.26 0.05 495.61 10 Year 0.35 0.08 496.01 25 Year OAO 0.14 496.04 Infiltration Basin A has approximately 1,578 cubic feet of storage. The overflow is set at an elevation of 496.00. The results show that the 10 year storm just begins to overflow and during the 10 year storm it gets to elevation 496.0 I. During the 25 year storm, the water begins to overflow and gets a half inch above the overflow. The infiltration basin will be landscaped in accordance with the City of Springfield requirements. Infiltration.Basin B Below is a summary ofthe peak flow rates and the peak elevation the stormwater will get in Infiltration Basin B during the 2 year and 25 year storm. Proposed Infiltration Basin B Stoml Peak inflow (cfs) Peak outflow (cfs) Water Elevation (feet) WQ 0.02 0.01 496.12 2 Year 0.09 0.02 496.61 10 Year 012 0.03 496.83 25 Year 0.13 0.04 496.91 Infiltration Basin B has approximately 473 cubic feet of storage. The overflow is set at an elevation of 497.00. The results show that even during the 25 year storm, the water does not reach the overflow. This will maximize infiltration opportunity and provide an additional factor of safety. The infiltration basin will be landscaped in accordance with the City of Springfield requirements. Date Received: FEB t 5 20tt Original submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52od &: Main Street Redevelopment - Option A . Infiltration Basin C Below is a summary of the peak flow rates and the peak elevation the stormwater will get in Infiltration Basin C during the 2 year and 25 year storm. Pro osed Infiltration Basin C Storm Peak inflow (cfs) Peak outflow (cfs) Water Elevation (feet) WQ 0.01 O.oI 495.90 2 Year 0.05 0.01 496.71 10 Year 0.07 0.07 496.79 25 Year 0.08 0.08 496.80 Infiltration Basin C has approximately 172 cubic feet of storage. The overflow is set at an elevation of 496.75. The results show that the 2 year storm is completely contained within Infiltration Basin C but during the 10 and 25 year storms, the storm water will reach the overflow and the storm water will get a half inch above the overflow elevation. The overflow is connected to an on-site private storm line that eventually tlows to the public storm system in 52nd Street. The infiltration basin will be landscaped in accordance with the City of Springfield requirements. The rest of the site will drain to double chambered catch basins with filter inserts located in the parking areas and roof drains from the east commercial building and the townhouses will be directed to on-site private storm line that eventually flows to the public storm system in 52nd Street. See Appendix D for storm water runoff, routing and infiltration basin stage-storage-outflow calculations. See Appendix E for Infiltration swale section and double chamber catch basin with filter insert. Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52"d & Main Street Redevelopment - Option A Appendix A Soil Maps and Soil Data Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal ..Vi': .9; .i':l~ 0. ~ ~ :i: 0. :0: ~ 0 ~ ere=- Oz g'W ~ ~2 0,,- roO 0 m-' ~ ~W <t> >-W cO ~W 0 8'" ::' mf-- 7 0 eW ~ ",W -'''' If-- QW ~z ~ 0_ ~<t '::'2 0 '00:6 ~ Wo ,2z rnN 0", e~ 0 "OW ~ >-~ 7 I~ ~ 0 0 " ~ " ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ro ro ~ 0 ~ ;2 ~ ;! ~ ..or .9~ .ll ~ , " N ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ . . ~ " ~ ~ 0" DC !C'r "'" NO ~a 11 .,Vl".9;.l"U 1ii . ~o. 00 (j ~c 2:U ~ ~ ~~ c?;~ .0' m' S~ o , , i 2 g 1ii . 1;; " 0; 1ii >'0. M '" "'- . " 0; << c o u " C " g a ro ~ a M t; ~ ~ a , tI)':;: 1l i :;~ 0. 0 ",0 0,):;: "'" -2 "'a ~~ "'0 ze . )j "' ~ ~ a a z ..:;;( Ol99l9\> ~\II ::J1:.1 FEe 1 5 2Q!1 " ~ OrIginal submittal cr:- OZ o>w i"~ 0,,- -0 "'-, i"w "'> "w -0 sw 00: 0>- "w Cw "'0: -'>- b.U) 6Z C9~ _:2' '006 ~O .- Z O>N .Q~ 0. ' ~>- "'U) "- I~ . . z o i= < ::iE 0:: o u. z a. < ::iE ro "' " ~ .E rn E " :;; '" 3 e (5 '" o o C'. o '" ~ 0. " " ~ .~ E 0. o :;; .0 " fIJ .5 . in c: 2 2: 0 c: ~ i ~ " ~ ~ ~ '" '" " " a: E ro oS .0 ~ " .0 >- 0. rn E " ~ ~ o o rn > " 0. .~ OJ i> rn ""' U);g ,Q i3 co C 2: >.~ ~~O c~'" o~Z Uoz ~~o B..o'<"""" ~ ~ ~ 0::::::: 0 ~ (iN O:"'~ _.0>- I" ::> ~ .. roe2 Z::>E ,,2 i::i.~~ ~="(/) u)" o=ro ~~:6 ::; -g 0 ~s8 - 0. W rn rn ro "' "' " "" 'E " o U) o 0: Z J: o U) ::> " .0 . - 3 Eo 2Qi - .0 U"' 2 " rn- ~ w Q)= c- ,,!!2- "'." .!!?ro _u o c ~.Q 0. w o..ID w> .- /D' .0.0 >-- c o "'0 "- AD _N rn . ,,'" ~.o '" " "LL ~tO 0. c o .Q " ~ c" j> 0> C Q) ~ ~ .0 "u w 3: c 0 :8 ~ .~ .!:: rn E -~" :6 ~ E w.o 0 " " W L.c. ......- :;; -E3 o w :c 2 ~ 5:~ctli C L.. U) on o~<:(:Q g-:o ~~ E~rnQ) w-gE.o (1).0 Q) >. 2l e ~ E ~ 0..0 ([)u.......fIJ ~ ~ ~ 5'~ Cl) ._ ro rn o'-~~-g .~ 0 U >.. ~ _ rn 0. o -u 0...D -E ~ .~ ~ 2-0-03: t~ Co. o"il Q) rn ID E ~ E ~ 8.s '0 O~ DC ~~ - , N , " n i " .0 ~ x " N .~ '" c o "' " c .~ ... o '" OJ ro o U) 0. rn ~ Q; " .0 W 0. '" E .0 o rn " c 0. " ro o ~ ~ o o N ;;0 ro "' " .0 0. I" '" 0. -0 .0 0. i" " 3 mil:! " rn .:;00 ~~ i>'" :J >. UJ U) Q) m '0 ~ co U) U) 0 ro .~ rn if 5;'1 i> U ~ ~ U)~ " '0 a U) , .0 , ill , SL " , .f ro > m c m Z " 15 rn 3 '" 0 .0 W . c m :;; .c u . . => " c I . u u Cl is E u m . . m m ~ . 0. 0 W m . . m "3 '" "- '5 " , c E l' 0 '" ....J m . . m m '" '" " ro ;; . .0 0 0 0 15 ~ . . . ~ c " . .m- 0 :.: . ;;: "' 0 0 0 e u iii E U> 0 a. ~ U> '" 0: '" 0 0 Z .. 0 0 '" => " ~ . c iJ " <( E ~ . . ~ m " . ::iE 15 '" D D IrfI D D I D m ~ 0 0 ~ t ~ < . '" .0 ..C" :2 0 . . . U> .. c ': .0 15 . :.: ~ Q. ;: ;::. , c ~ .~ <.> , ~u: o < ~ < Q);: OC ~ ~ It .3 ~ '" < ZC Date Received: ~\. FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal HYdrOI~giC Soil Group-Lane County Area, or. ~T-52ND & MAIN STREET REDEVELOPMENT Hydrologic Soil Group Hydrologic Soil Grou~ Summary by Map Unit - Lane County Area, Oregon M~p unit symbol I Map unit name I Rating I Acres in AOI I Percent ofAOI 119 !Salem-Urban land complex .8 1.5: 100.0% Totals for Area of Interest , 1.5 ! 100.0% Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (AID, BID, and CID). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration ra'te when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefty of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine.texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefty of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a c1aypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (AID, BID, or C/O), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group 0 are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Lower Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 USD,'\ O-C_i=r';g Original Submittal Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 12/1/2010 Page 3 of3 . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52od & Main Street Redevelopment - Option A Appendix B Infiltration Testing Report Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 OrIginal Submitt81 . . Project Name: 0(2,0 vVlc<\n :S~"<.<-i,. ':>'K Project No.: o"i -,'''I . Project Location: S I'i! P(c-.u;. j Sfr-,;"cjt:rdd. Date ofField Work: If!l;/IO Cormnents: t.\.{.~k. (r~(.oS.Vi-{ l'oI\.L.n,~S ~l)t-tttr c. '" ' . - f" ,;;, ,",0 'ft'"",, . I; 1.;" l t ,", '1M "'_ r,.. lev"') bvcvoh~ f "'0 ,\ 'F i ^,,' l 2 "Fe.' ..2"",'V.''''''"' /'\ ';oo! (- "' ",:.~(, ('0 L{.vd l1f:11-'l-'(f" J-vp of- ff'pz) ~l IN"f-v I l(.V'0 (,.c.:" :iJ. . .', ......,- Inmtration Test No. () Depth '+ Diameter J Vol. of Pres at. I "~L Soil Description: ,.,: TII P s. ~ ,,-114 & I&-I+f" O~....., 0..""' SlLT~'S":r. 11.- TV &.1 c.tt r ,.t ~".l\, t.wI Time Time EJa,o;sed Z ~..!Io . ~ Depth to Water Vol. of Water Added """{ z: if.- i! b If:, "-~ ~-=-O InfIltration Test No. Soil Description: Depth Diameter Vol. of Presat. Time Time Elapsed '2, :40" Pil~ ~ 0 J~"1 ~ ~""i Depth to Water ~n "1 ~. It b -:-o,G~' Vol. ofIWater Added (""';/d. 11\ j, ,tl . J '- / p' . 1"- " I pc , ht- \,0~w~ ...s2:t<' "l- 'S It" Date Received: FEB , 520ft Original Submittal ( /3 . Project Name: 08v IVq?,'!". Sh'~'-r col-H Project No.: oC1. (,0 , , ci'('1 ~r:' c,,{rr!' Project LocatJOn: t; i ',~ i.tAu.. t iI',,,,',,,! .e\ .... Date ofField Work: ! f (S (Iv Comments: Su. Pi I Infiltration Test No. Z Depth Soil Description: Time Time Elapsed ...-, =' ~ 8->. '~.. i\ ;lA,:-......, ,I '":-';~'; f'l"'," V' '... . .0. Infiltration Test No. ..J Soil Description: Time Time Elapsed ~ 'A" "- '''''V''~Y''' \,vw,',,,. Depth to Water -:; ~ ~n H ~; J"t . b:::'o,'~" Depth Depth to Water '-l <' f\~ ~ \ LY:" 0 'Ie; .' . Diameter Vol. of Pres at. Vol. of Water Added /0"_" I /'bl;\ ~~ -;:;._/~:,:,l .( ..... !. ''';'''. j 0.--.-11 , . I.) ..5Z.. broUjht" Diameter Vol. of Pres at. . Vol. of Water Added ...."'-" tit ;,; '.;;} - ""'" {\ <1 -,,0. ' ~ ~7 ;{~~ r<1 ~ 6' I " (i) tl" I" P\(<-~' 'cDc/O\",\" 'l Date Received: FEB f 5 2011 Original Submittal h., ,-" /5 " to '5/. ,., 2 g 2/s . . Project Name: oto ,t-,,,,;n <;" <;:;+e Project No.: (')1>,-r<:;G, I Project Location: "I S'" P i".,,_ I S (i'f (v' Date ofField Work: \ \}, fro Comments: s..u... pq I InfIltration Test No. 1 Soil Description: Depth Diameter Vol. of Pres at. Time Time Elapsed A~,: 1.0 ""y IOI'.-.\f' Depth to Water 1ft ,6 Z 0,')" Vol. of Water Added ;e- fA \;\.R.Yl1J)R.... rGl) C ,I' .' tve.rlj jo t1'l;r,vk5 ,- 4S ,'nc..h }hv 1~0l,n;'~: {LO'\.R --------- Infiltration Test No. Soil Description: Depth Diameter Vol. of Pres at. Time Time Elapsed Depth to Water Vol. of Water Added Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal 7/. ;; . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52"d & Main Street Redevelopment - Option A .' Appendix C Proposed Drainage Basin Map Date Received: FEB q 2011 Original Submittal ~ ;2; ~E-t ~ 0.. ~ o~ :"l1 r..; ~ ~ ::;:j :::~~~c ~-~~ 0 ~~ Ci.i ""Q 1"'1 - to, lO II 'o:t: ...... ~ ~ = Q:l~OO~>-<~ ~to,:~~~~~~ ~~ E-4~:"l1 :"l1 ..\( ~ ~::s t...:l ~lO~O~~~ ~ I ~ ~~ ~E-t~ ~ rJ)~ ~ lO - " ~ ~ o to OJ l[) I OJ o """ -;;; u S 'Q 0'" U ~ boo .9 Ji ~ . ..~ :; -U~:.::l aJ~t_ i:: ::>.d &.6 ~ .~~ ~N _ 0:. tJ I'l:l (U ~ ':""':S:: o ClJ.il. . ._. .... b(I ~ me.- E 4)Cl)I'-LLP=IQ,l en 4.l c5 M .....G! .0 t;~ ~fJE :1, "':g"~ U (j) ::; oS G.l ...,. ? __ '" " 0:: " ;J ,'j cr'ii;: b(I C en ~ -g .~ ~ . .~ ~::c.;';!;; 1: t:J) ...... C":I en - U 1'.:. o t: ~ ._ Z ..... ., ..... ~ 0 o ~., ~" .... ~ '" ~ ~ ~ f:: ..... 0 o.n Q.l I-'> UN ;:.::: r:: Q) I .......... ~ c5 ~ S u _ f'-o ~ 0 ~ M ca ;; CiI ~ en . Ul_ f.-. ~ ..., o 0:: Q ;;'; (J) <l w 0 en ..J r<) '" <t '" u ~ (f) L{) <l '''- <,,! - a: I a 0.. ~ <t I a: I (9 0 t5 I I I ~ I I 0 r<) c.J ~ ...... I::>.() ~ ...... ~ Q) Q) I- ~ ...... W I::>.() W LL ~ ;;; ~ ...c: c.J ~ ctI ~ o:i ~ .. e. e ~ '" : ~; ~/-;"rn~ R'~"~~"..;.if~g~l~ . ",'. .'. .:jl~:J' ~~~~.~vi~~~'~~:;,-==--'-~:~':I.-'-~' , I \' ,''''.L/'- (.--- -~~- ---...~ dH<...--.~ - ..:;::,::;:.".,./....>r--'--~-'-.... . <. I'V ?~ )- --,.~~.- " -. ::'"'-- I i!'~"~ ;; #-{:( --; --; --; --;~ ~/ <<}{/ ~ %;:;: ~~);;//; Iii I //~//:~ j :I;).,{/I' / /'o,'/_y / /S.9,'/ ~/"./ /~'i';/ I 11'1'~'1 ~//~// ~(// /~~(a<1 //~h%;.s!l~>>(~'/~; I . ~ l~/ / ...~ /: / /q " ;/~ ~~// ~ / /;" I : ;;1.: d;0 // ;:! :~~'f~i:.::~//~~~'l;/~~; ~ ! 'I il! ,,1/ / / /.. ,;; >: (, l&1/ '/r:'//::~ /1/ ~'I:%,<'/ //0,' /t;;/ ' I'", ' '.;- , >>: / / / / / / /~I// / ~/// V /1"/ , J :,J,-'," -....;:... ,.~'/~--)(~,.L,L...L,L".-,.(o' / ~~~ / / . ",' / /. / /~li~// / /"J ., -I-y- :-7;: ,,,,",f'.... ".;:....]~ '/'Y/y/:" /j /~" / / <;.) '. /' /~~;y/, // / .'. I ~I i~, ~~ ~>~t'0,~S~ 1~j[':///II~Vjj ~~' ;~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~ ~ ;/;S;~ 1,~, ~ ~I " ; \ ",. <;.) ":, //, / / / / / / / Cl ~ ~ /. / //, / / ./ ~ , ; '1'1 ,I Qli>='Qli",,,., '~'/'5/ // /:"/~{~~~~ /' / /v/>~/ / / // / i 11\ I~~,,~I~~~ % 1~~,/~W~~O~~;;:81~~0 ':~~h I 11'1' ~ ~'\~ ~ ~ ~"- '7 j'V"t Y;;</,~:/ //~:~~. / / / / i' / / / / )I/, ~ /t. ./ ~~ i'-' .....:~Cl ~ "- /~-:(Y//II' / / ,//.KV/ / / /I~~: //> //// ~~ I I;~ N K','''-:,-'''-,,,- "- "Z. ,,"- ,/77 /,;17'7'/.7/ / / / / . / / / / / / / IS ~/~ .//// /, / i ~ '"' I, "- , " "- "- '- .~ L / / / hJ~"'as .,/ / / ,c. / .:::--./ / . , . . .' .. /, / / / ' I; , /" ~.~. ,/11 / /. '<"~"-"Ji'-..',,-,,' '-'\:///~,( V/.1a:;:~Cf;r;, // ///1).// / ; CO ., ......' \:.... .~ / /Vif z////.: I/X/, ! / ij/ >='Qlil()'.:......~ .........,,~ . :; /: / // ~ / 8.// .: tl~ ~<~(A!U~,,~~'S;~>>iJ~~{~~~ ! ~ 8 N1~ /1'15 e:! ~:~~~"i-,"-I" Ik~ ....." " . .~~/. / ~ ~/ //Ah/ / /~~ / i "!.~ /te::;z: ~YIIJ"jWl1 /.,..6, ~ /11'-' '-~ '..... "- ~. · / ,~"'/ / / / / // ~ /Z~,~ <> ;~~/ / I I' /1/ T /- / / -/ ., '- ",- k'.; /~~/ / ;/ , / ''->', l"- e-. ! I -. 7/ :j..,/ /' ////';"(.,;o;':.";I~)IK11,''':-S:''0 L "-., ~t;;~.. >;~~~ /' ~ "/ ~ ~ ~/ ;,/'... < ~l Il~:/i j~'?~@m:~~!I~~~~ ~'j~k~~/Jd,~ ;;~ fI.l.~ I ',;! ~.' /" ~/ /. / / ('=1'-:11'- " " " . .~, ... '-~ / / /. ///. / / / / / ;/ / :"/ ' I~ ~~~~I~~~~~~~:r~:~~~n(~;~'~ l!ii I~ i //;;;:; ~~~~~~" h";;Y/W////;~////:; ;j I +'! J. ~V/ :1:""",,\ _..; ,,-\fl~~ "'.., "~~~~iV~/ //, /. /1 I Ti . I / / / / . ~ <: <:" "- "-~ I.,,~. . "-.'" ,,~ ... " , ~ Ii I 'Ii .. .. -11\ " ........ ,,- ~ -q; "- " "~~':\ '- ~ "- ...'........... ~: I :!~. I ..........~0':.........~,~~;~~"~~~~1~0....<::~~~~'\}:" ~~ ~ "~ I .....-...:-, '.:;- '. ~:.........~~~ ~ g 'if'" ~ ~<:~ '!I~",,~>SS"- '" 1"- '- _ o ~I;'I:" ,/1........'''-j ".....~' : Iii :~ "-.,,-.,., . < '..... " ~~....."..........., " ,,_ ~IN._ ~ I " I .'-~..... ...... '- '. ~~'-" ","- " I"" I .1 -"-11 ~~.., , ....,~...." 'r'.... ~ ' :,\ 'h- .11 > "" '--......., '\.O.J\ ," :'~ ). , , ciil oi', I IIII <; ~~~ ...... '-e~.... ~ '\ .. '<11," ......1L ~ ""'- _'- _ 't I ,J I " "... ",," I~ ~ , "~~'~ I . '. . . T,-, ; ~ ~ . ~ I~' ,I,> ..'.... . .. . . ,V,I; " . ~ ," ~I.. " - ,d ~ ~ > ' . I', . . c. . ''''' . . . ~ ~ ~ 1 I i :~~"'~ C _ . "\ 'I.llS rg, ,,,,.'-;L~"~ .::::.', .,.... ._. .' . . ~ . . ' I.., ..7:,i'-~--.~,~-.,.._-- "'''---''-'-'-'~''"-""',,,-,-,,. f" ; -1; :-.,' ---- -.' ,. - ' '.', '-'- ." I' - I;.. ....'" ~ 1- ~ . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52od ft Main Street Redevelopment - Option A . Appendix D Stormwater Runoff & Infiltration Basin Sizing Calculations Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51st.52'd ft Main Street Redevelopment. Option A InfIltration Basin A - Water Quality Storm ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* I-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** .83" TOTAL FREelP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CNIPERV), AIIMPERV), CNIIMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.09,61,0.34,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .4 .1 61. 0 .3 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T- PEAK (HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .06 7.83 773 ENTER [d:] [path]fi1ename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-wqaa.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY [d:] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159aa.rd DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? y ROUTING DATA: STAGE(FT) 494.00 494.25 494.50 494.75 495.00 495.25 495.50 495.75 496.00 496.25 496.50 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .02 .03 .03 .04 .04 .05 .05 .06 .59 1. 56 STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 106.0 242.0 410.0 611.0 843.0 1098.0 1377 . 0 1685.0 2023.0 2392.0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES/INCH PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 ENTER [d:] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDRDGRAPH: 159-wqaa.dev INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .06 .02 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 8.33 PEAK STORAGE: 130 CU-FT OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 830 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 494.30 Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52od 8: Main Street Redevelopment - Option A Inmtration Basin A - 2 Year Storm ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOOR STORM **** 3.30" TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.09,61,0.34,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN .4 .1 61. 0 .3 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) .26 7.83 3942 ENTER [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-2aa.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159aa.rd DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? y ROUTING DATA: STAGE(FT) 494.00 494.25 494.50 494.75 495.00 495.25 495.50 495.75 496.00 496.25 496.50 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .02 .03 .03 .04 .04 .05 .05 .06 .59 1. 55 STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 97.0 223.0 379.0 568.0 786.0 1026.0 1290.0 1578.0 1891.0 2229.0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES!INCH PERM-AREA(SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 ENTER [d:] [path] filename [ . ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-2aa.dev INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .26 .05 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 10.83 PEAK STORAGE: 1140 CU-FT OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 3903 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 495.61 Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 ".. I<:!b 'ttl \.mg!n::l. .~IJ. ml a . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51".52,d & Main Street Redevelopment - Option A InfIltration Basin A-I 0 Year Storm ******************** s.c.s. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* lO-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4.30" TOTAL PREelP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CNIIMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.09,61,0.34,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .4 .1 61-0 .3 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T- PEAK (HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .35 7.83 5330 ENTER [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-10aa.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY [do] [path]fiIename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159aa.rd DISPLAY ROUTING DATA IY or N)? y ROUTING DATA: STAGE (FT) 494.00 494.25 494.50 494.75 495.00 495.25 495.50 495.75 496.00 496.25 496.50 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .02 .03 .03 .04 .04 .05 .05 .06 .59 1-55 STORAGE ICU-FT) .0 97.0 223.0 379.0 568.0 786.0 1026.0 1290.0 1578.0 1891.0 2229.0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES/INCH PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 ENTER [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-10aa.dev INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .35 .08 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAKIHRS) .00 10.67 PEAK STORAGE: 1690 CU-FT OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT)' 5322 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 496.01 Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . '. Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52od ft Main Street Redevelopment - Option A InfIltration Basin A - 25 Year Storm ******************** 5.C.5. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ******.*** 25-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4.80" TOTAL PRECIP. ****k** ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.09,61,0.34,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .4 .1 61. 0 .3 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T- PEAK (HRS) VOL (CU-FT) .40 7.83 6037 ENTER [d:] [path] filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-25aa.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY [d:] [path] filename [.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159aa. rd DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? y ROUTING DATA: STAGE(FT) 494.00 494.25 494.50 494.75 495.00 495.25 495.50 495.75 496.00 496.25 496.50 Dr SCHARGE (CFS) .00 .02 .03 .03 .04 .04 .05 .05 .06 .59 1. 55 STORAGE (CO-FT) .0 97.0 223.0 379.0 568.0 786.0 1026.0 1290.0 1578.0 1891.0 2229.0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINOTES!INCH PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 ENTER [do] [path]filename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-25aa.dev INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-I~(CFS) PEAK-QUTFLOW(CFS) .40 .14 INITIAL-STAGE(FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 8.67 PEAK STORAGE: 1730 CU-FT OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 6041 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 496.04 Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 ,. Original Submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51 "_52od & Main Street Redevelopment - Option A . InfIltration Basin B - Water Quality Storm ******************** s.c.s. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* l~YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** .83" TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. I 0.04,61,0.11,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 .0 61. 0 .1 98_0 10.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) .02 7.83 250 ENTER [do] [path]fi1enarne[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF ,COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-wqab.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY [do] [path]fi1enarne[.ext] OF ROUTING OATA 09159AB.RD DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? Y ROUTING DATA: STAGE(FT) 496.00 496.25 496.50 496.75 497 . 00 497.25 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .02 .02 .03 .04 .57 STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 80.0 183.0 314.0 473.0 661.0 PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES/INCH ENTER [do] [path]fi1enarne[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-WQAB.DEV INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .02 .01 OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 77 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 8.67 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 496.12 PEAK STORAGE: 30 CU-FT Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51".52od & Main Street Redevelopment - Option A . InfIltration Basin B-2 Year Storm ******************** S.C.S. TYPE~lA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.30" TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: AIPERV), CNIPERV), A(IMPERV), CNIIMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.04,61,0.11,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOuS IMPERVIOUS TCIMINUTES) A CN A CN .2 .0 61. 0 .1 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAKIHRS) VOLICu-FT) .09 7.83 1294 ENTER [d:] [path] filename [ . ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-2ab.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY [do] [path]filename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159AB.RD DISPLAY ROUTING DATA IY or N)? Y ROUTING DATA: STAGE 1FT) 496.00 496.25 496.50 496.75 497.00 497.25 DISCHARGEICFS) .00 .02 .02 .03 .04 .57 STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 80.0 183.0 314.0 473.0 661.0 PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES II NCH ENTER [do] [path]filename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-2AB.DEV INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .09 .02 OUTFLOW-VOLICU-FT) 1263 INITIAL-STAGE 1FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 8.83 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 496.61 PEAK STORAGE: 240 CU-FT Date Received: FEB , 5 2011 Original submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52od a Main Street Redevelopment - Option A . InfIltration Basin B -'10 Year Storm ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* lO-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4.30" TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.04,61,0.11,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 .0 61. 0 .1 98.0 10.0 PEAK~Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) .12 7.83 1762 ENTER Cd:] [path]fi1ename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-10ab.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY Cd:] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159AB.RD DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? Y ROUTING DATA: STAGE (FT) 496.00 496.25 496.50 496.75 497.00 497.25 DI SCHARGE (CFS) .00 .02 .02 .03 .04 .57 STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 80.0 183.0 314.0 473.0 661.0 PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES/lNCH ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-10AB.DEV INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK- INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .12 .03 OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 1700 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 8.83 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 496.83 PEAK STORAGE: 360 CU-FT Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51st_52od Ii Main Street Redevelopment - Option A . InfIltration Basin B - 25 Year Storm ******************** 5.C.5. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* 25~YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4.80" TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), AIIMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.04,61,0.11,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 .0 61.0 .1 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T- PEAK (HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .13 7.83 2002 ENTER [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-25AB.DEV RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY [do] [path]filename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159AB.RD DISPLAY ROUTING DATA IY or N)? Y ROUTING DATA: STAGE 1FT) 496.00 496.25 496.50 496.75 497.00 497.25 DI SCHARGE I CFS) .00 .02 .02 .03 .04 .57 STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 80.0 183.0 314.0 473.0 661.0 PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES !INCH ENTER [d:] [path] filename [. ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-25AB.DEV INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-QUTFLOW(CFS) .13 .04 OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 2112 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 8.67 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 496.91 PEAK STORAGE: 410 CU-FT Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52od &: Main Street Redevelopment - Option A . InfIltration Basin C - Water Quality Storm ******************** s.c.s. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* * * * * * * ** '* I-YEAR 24 -HOUR STORM * *** .83" TOTAL PREel P. * * *** ** ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.02,61,0.07,98,10 DATA PRINT~OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .1 .0 61. 0 .1 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) .01 7.83 159 ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: l59-wqac.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY [d: ] [path] filename [. ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09l59AC.RD DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? Y ROUTING DATA: STAGE (FT) 495.75 496.00 496.25 496. SO 496.75 497.00 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .01 .01 .01 .01 .36 STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 30.0 67.0 115.0 172.0 240.0 PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES !INCH ENTER [d:] [pa thJ filename [ . ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-WQAC.DEV INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .oi .01 OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 29 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 8.17 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 495 . 90 PEAK STORAGE: 10 CU-FT Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52od & Main Street Redevelopment - Option A . Inmtration Basin C - 2 Year Storm ******************** 5.C.5. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.30" TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.02,61,0.07,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN .1 .0 61. 0 .1 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T- PEAK (HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .05 7.83 814 ENTER Ed:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-2ac.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY Ed:] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159AC.RD DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? Y ROUTING DATA: STAGE (FT) 495.75 496.00 496.25 496.50 496.75 497.00 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .01 .01 .01 .01 .36 STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 30.0 67.0 115.0 172.0 240.0 PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES/INCH ENTER Ed:] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-2AC.DEV INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .05 .01 OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 886 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 8.83 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 496.71 PEAK STORAGE: 160 CU-FT Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation sl".52od & Main Street Redevelopment - Option A . InfIltration Basin C - 10 Year Storm ******************** 5.C.3. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* lO-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4.30" TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.02,61,0.07,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .1 .0 61. 0 .1 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .07 7.83 1102 ENTER [do] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-10ac.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY [do] [path]filename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159AC.RD DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? Y ROUTING DATA: STAGE(FT) 495.75 496.00 496.25 496.50 496.75 497.00 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .01 .01 .01 .01 .36 STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 30.0 67.0 115.0 172.0 240.0 PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES !INCH ENTER [do] [path]filename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-10AC.DEV INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-I~(CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .07 .07 OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 1103 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 8.00 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV (FT) 496.79 PEAK STORAGE: 180 CU-FT Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52od & Main Street Redevelopment - Option A . InfIltration Basin C - 25 Year Storm ******************** 5.C_5. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* 25-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4.80" TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.02,61,0.07,98,10 DATA PRINT-OOT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOOS IMPERVIOOS TC(MINOTES) A CN A CN .1 .0 61. 0 .1 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CO-FT) .08 7.83 1249 ENTER [do] [path]fi1enarne[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPOTED HYOROGRAPH: 159-25ac.dev RESERVOIR ROOTING INFLOW/OOTFLOW ROOTINE SPECIFY [do] [path]fi1enarne[.ext] OF ROOTING DATA 09159AC.RD DISPLAY ROOTING DATA (Y or N)? Y ROOTING DATA: STAGE(FT) 495.75 496.00 496.25 496.50 496.75 497.00 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .01 .01 .01 .01 .36 STORAGE (CO-FT) .0 30.0 67.0 115.0 172.0 240.0 PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINOTES/INCH ENTER [do] [path]fi1enarne[.ext] OF COMPOTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-25AC.DEV INFLOW/OOTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-QUTFLOW(CFS) .08 .08 OOTFLOW-VOL(CO-FT) 1242 INITIAL-STAGE (,T) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 7.83 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 496.80 PEAK STORAGE: 180 CO-,T Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52od ft Main Street Redevelopment - Option A . Appendix E Vegetated Infiltration Basin and Double Chambered Catch Basins with Fossil Filter Insert Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal f 9 n MINIMUM 1 FOR PARKING LOTS, l1RE STOPS OR CURBS W/ClITS '2MX12~ CLEAR FLOW AREA AT CUTOUTS '" L 3:1 MAX. SIDE SLOPES (lYP,,) ~ , n FLAT BOTlQM ~ OVERFLOW ELEVATION 9"-lB" (SEE NOTE 28) 12" (SEE NOTE 5) >:.'~ ~\\~<'"~ ' -' \. ~,~/)\'X\ \ \, ......\. .'.......<::.......(........-?..<:....~:.\..'........:..(,..-,...\;.-:..c\.~,_\,;.....~~......~:..~~..~.~\\;...;;1 , \ ,)\ \0\>:08:. ~s\;\\\::<~>~~ ,'., ~ ~~, .. -,' ,- '_\ ~ ~;:(;Y'" \'.-\'\,v(\/\y.~\\\\ ~\',-'''''C:\YA\V\'( .-",\y.;.'\'./\\.'\.A\ ..'..-."....,,\ \\..\.:;..""",/;..,..\\0.....\..', ,\.,\<','\"';.,\"/:../...:,'..' \ \',-<'-./ ,,/'.\\ ",\\ -:/v'/>v"':'\ . \~ /, - ~ J c" ,>., GROWING.~,l~~\ ',~\' \__'\'._"- ,\~ ~ , '\' ,-\/..--'y,_\V'\ "/~\"'-' - ,'..;'('(/'.y\ \/.'i ::. r~J:v;'-~\).5:(\?~(0V \<~EO)U~\\\\\(/,/\:.<,,\~~," . ',. ~"'I.C?:_'-j-'\j;_ ~-\.y-.\ \';(\'~ '-;-::\'~:;,\..,.\/:,-~\ \~,_--: >'':,: ~=i ~ j ~- ;_--.1 !~OL.l j.'-~' A_A' . '-//' ;"-A .l.:: ~ ~;...~_>' -/ ._/' .;"- ~ \. :C;\ ~r,-~)\ ;c)\ '"- 'lLYr~':~i' "Q'1fjRAJf(~OC\('Z~r/--R-':- ~ f~, Ji...-,~ 1_"", Y'----"-i J-- . ':_::" :~:'~ A'\-,\,. ~~<!:.--A."\ " 18' J , ., , F1lTER FABRIC. SEE NOTE 7 SEE SW-150 fOR P'P'NG J' CONFlGURA11ON. 'l-:<ISnNG 'SUBGRADE . 1. Provide protection from all vehicle traffic, equipment staging, and foot traffic in proposed infiltration areas prior to, during, and after construction. 6_ Drain rock: a. Size for infiltration basin: 11'~" -:;"" washed b. Size for flow-through basin: 0/," washed c. Depth for Simplffied: 12" d. Depth for Presumptive: 0-48D, see calcs. 2. Dimensions: a. Width of basin: 9' minimum. b. Depth of basin (from top of growing medium to overflow elevation); Simplified: 12~, Presumptive: 9......18..... c. Flat bottom width: 2' min. d. Side slopes of basin: 3:1 maximum. 7. Separation between drain rock and growing medium: Use filter fabric (see SWMM Exhibit 2-5) or a gravel lens (% - % inch washed, crushed rock 2 to 3 inches deep). 3. Setbacks (from midpoint of facility): a.lnfiltration basins must be 10' from foundations and 5' from property lines. b. Flow-through swales must be lined with connection to approved discharge point according to SWMM Section 1.3. 8. Growing medium: a. 18" minimum b. See Appendix F.3 for specification or use sand/loam/compost 3-way mix. 4. Overflow: a. Overflow required for Simpllfied Approach. b. Inlet elevation must allow for 2" of freeboard, minimum. c. Protect from debris and sediment with strainer or grate. 9. Vegetation: Follow landscape plans otherwise refer to plant list in SWMM Appendix F. Minimum container size is 1 gallon. # of pJantings per 100sf of facility area): a. Zone A (wet): 115 herbaceous plants OR 100 herbaceous plants and 4 shrubs b. Zone B (moderate to dry): 1 tree AND 3 large shrubs AND 4 medium to small shrubs. The delineation between Zone A and B shall be either at the outlet elevation or the check dam elevation, whichever is lowest. 5_ Piping: shall be ASS SchAD, cast iron, or PVC SchAO. 3" pipe required for up to 1,500 sq ft of impervious area, otherwise 4" min. Piping must have 1% grade and follow the Uniform Plumbing Code. 10. Install washed pea gravel or river rock to transition from inlets and splash pad to growing medium. 1,. Inspections: Call BDS IVDateti~e'Cel\9El~3-7000, for appropnate Inspections. 'J;" ';t, ;', '-',1' FEB 1 5 2011 ~ -- - - Simplified I Presumptive Design Approach - Basin NUMBER STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL TYPIC SW-140 Bureau of Environmental Services . 53" ... W r=l ~ ~ C\l A ii ; I! " ; I' OUTLET I i.. 48" LONG PLAN VIEW SILT & DEBRIS CONTAINMENT AREA L2~x2~Xl~ FRAME HIGH FLOW BYP ASS 53" , Z1 ~~ ~::;;: c_ OUTLET r-_ , z i I , I r ~EDIMENT TRA; -l- lw/ HINGED : LID : SEDIMENT : TRAP , ~ N I.. 48" .. SIDE VIEW .. FLO&D ™ FILTER INSERT (MODEL FGP-24F) WOVEN MESH FILTER BODY NOTES =--: BOX FABRICATED FROM 10 G A. MATERIAL NEOPRENE GASKET (TWO SIDES) DUCTILE IRON SOLID LID DUCTILE IRON GRATE BIKE PROOF, HEAVY DUTY TRAFFIC GRATE SUPPORTS AASHTO H25 LOADS ~"" '" '" cO REPLACEABLE ABSORBENT POUCHES ISOMETRIC SEDIMENT & HYDROCARBONS FILTRATION SYSTEM STATE APPROVED - ASPHALT DIPPEiO)ate Received: 24"x42" - 6"0 OUTLET FEB 1 5 2011 DWG SAND COLLECTOR CATCH BASIN Original Submittal PROJ. MAN. DOUG P DWN. PAUL G. SCALE NONE DATE: JAN. 23. 06 MODEL: SCBFlO-42HB-6 Gibson Steel Basins SINCE 1972 # F5 247 Washington St. Eugene, Or. 97401 ph_-(541) 687 - 8672 fox:J44-0207 ~ . . STORMWATERMANAGEMENT PLAN AND DRAINAGE STUDY February 15, 2011 Prepared For: TBG Architects 132 E. Broadway, Suite 200 Eugene, OR 97401 Branch Engineering, Inc. 310 5th Street Springfield, OR 97477 Phone (541) 746-0637 Fax (541) 746-0389 6XF'. /2-3/-/Z- ~ Branch Engineering, Inc, Branch Project # 09-159 Date Received: FEB 1 5 20\1 Original submittal 11/17/2010 12:09 FAX 541 736.1 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD p~ i4J 002 ISPRtNGFII:l-,P rn.~l:;'"" .J.i1c~~~~~ '. l~..~' ~~ . .~~.~v PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT I Engineering Division Phone: (541) 726-3753 Fax: (541) 736-1021 STORMW A TER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK r ~ (Area below this line filled out by Applicant) -:- .,. (pleaserefum to Matt S(ouder@CityofSpringjietdhblic Work. Engineering; Fax #. 736-1021, Phone #.73~'03S.) Project Name: OBO Enterprises, LLC Applicant: Br81lch Enginemng Assessors Parcel #: ] 7-02-33-32 TL 6200 & 6300 Date: I I103110 Land Use(s): Community Commercial (CC) Phone #: 541-746-0637 Projed Size (Acres): L5 acres Fax #: 541-746-0389 ApproSo Impervious Area: J .07 acres Email: grel.;(a)branchengineering.com .. ., "" .c................ ". . . .,.,.... Projed Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map): 1.5 acres sit" with two commercial buildings near Main Street and a 15 unit apartment building to the south of the commercial buildings with associated landscaping and parking facilities. I Drainage Proposal (public connection(s), discharge loeation(s), etc. Artach additional sheet(s) if necessary: West side ofthe site will drainlOward 51" Place 81ld conneetlo the existing storm line in the street. The east side of the site will drain toward 52nct Street and connect to the existing storm line in the stre:eL Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices: Infiltration basins and planters will be used on-site with overflows and trapped catch basins. , ." ., . .~ (Area below this Ime filled out hv tile Citv <<ndRetumedio tfleAvr,'licatrt) . '. .... .... ". : ',. -{~.t ,0 m/n. "~n~n. ~ll Q:-!ies che.cked by the Cio: on Jhe from and back o!.i~~s.:.~.h'e~i shall he:iu/)?~1f.~ed..' ..>.','.: {.:.:. :::,[or;;WJ appllcattOn 10 be complet~/or submZltal, although .o/her reqUlr..€7!"en!s.may be net;:e~s.t!,ry).:_; ',".:-. : :.: .' Drainage Study Type (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): <Note. UH may be substituted for Rational Method) o Small Site Study - (ube Rational Method for calculations) ~ Mid-Level Development Study - (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) o Full Drainage Development Study - (use Unit Hyclrograph Method for calculations) Environmental Considerations: IU Wellhead Zone: '91 'ttl>--(. @ WetlandlRiparian: I{) Soil Type: 11'1 - ~ HI\~~""tO Downstream Analvsis: (~Jl.~ 6)a NIA -- {'- . o Flow line for starting waler surface elevation: o Design HGL to use for staning water surface elevation: rrD t I: "no. o Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: . "-.;\;1lT Return to Matt Stouder (Ii); City of Sprinefield, emaU, m6touderthlCl-sprineg~.P.b'l~Js~Rf!tt"'t i Hillside Development: FloodwaylFloodplain: Other Jurisdictions: 1; OIl~ Date Received: .~ >1 (}"F,1"l 11/1712010 12:09 FAX 541 7J6~1 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD P\~ I4J OOJ CO:MPLETE STUDY ITEMS I Fo,Oflici.1 Use Only: tv}A<: % Based UpON the in/armarian provided on thefi"onl a/this shetZ.l, the fallowing represents a minimum of what is neededfor an appliCaTion to be comp/etejoT submittal with respecr 10 drainage; howf?Ver, this list shauld not be used fn/ieu althe Springfield Developmenr Code (SDC) or the City's Engineering Design MOhual. Compliance with these re{I'.liremems does not constitute size approval; Additional site specific infarmario/1 may be required. Note: Upon scopingsheet submittal, el7sure completedform has been signed in the space pro\Jided below: at B [0 ~ II)j! Interim Design StandardslWatcr Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3) Reg'd N/A IiJ 0 AD non-building rooftop (NBR) impervious surlaces shall be prl'-treated (e.g. multi-chambered catchbasi)) wloil filtration media) for stormwatcr quality. Addj[jOllBlly, a minimum of 500/0 ofthe NBR impervious surface shall be treated by vegetated methods. o Where requirc:d, vegetAtive stonnwater design shall be consistent with interim design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02). set forth by the Bureau of Environmental Services (BES) or Clean Water Services (CWS). o For new NBR impervious area Jess than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed a' specified by the BES fOT vegetativl: treatment. o If El stonnwater treatment swale is proposed, submit calculations/spec,iDeations for sizing. velocity, flow~ side 3topes. bottom slopt:. lffid seed mix consistent with either BES or CWS requirements. o Water Quality calculations a5required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM o All building rooftop mOllTIted equipment, or other fluid containing equipmc:nt located aurgide ofthe building, shall be provided with secondary containment OT weather resistant enclosure. General Study Requirements (EDSPM Section 4,03) 1M 0 .o,-ainage study prepared by a Professional CjviJEngineer licensed in the state of Oregon. o 0 A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map. ~ 0 Calculations showing system capacity for Il 2-year storm event and overflow effects ofa 25-year storm cv~nt. Ii) 0 The lime of concentration (Ic) shall be. determined u~ing fI 10 minute start time for developed basins. Review of Dowustream System (EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C) o II!- A downstream drainage analysis as desClibed in EDSPM Section 4.0JA.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the Oregon Plumhing Specialty Code (OPSC). o ~'Elevations oflhe fIG1- and flow lines for hoth city flJId private systems where applicable. Design o.fStnrm Systems (EDSPM Secl10n 4.04) w.. 0 Flow lines, slopes) rim elevations> pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set. o f!JJ. Minimum pipe COver shaH be I g inches for reinforced pipe and 36 incl1es for plain concrete and plastic pipe mat~ria1s> or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when Jess~ The cover shall be sufficient to suppOrt an 80.000 lb load without failure of the pipe struct!1Tc. o ~ Mflnning's "n" values for pipes shaJI be consistent with Tobie 4-1 of the EDSP. All storm p.ipes shall be designed to achieve a minjmum velocity ofthTec (3) fcet per second at 0.5 pipe full based on Table 4-1 as welL OtherlMisc ad 0 Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot i.ntervaL Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains fiI 0 Private stormwater easements shall be clearly depicted On plans when private stormwater flows from one property to another o JZj Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of resideotial building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03A.A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to the WebSl[e: www.deQ.stat~.or.us/wo/Q:roundwaJuichome.hcm for more infomlation. ~ 0 Dctention ponds shall be designed to limit TUTloff to pre-dtvelopment mtes for the 2 through 25-year storm events 'n'lsform sl/all be included 113 an attachment, inside tllefro..t cover, of tI,e stormwaler study * lMPORTAJI!T: ENqINEER PLEASE REAJ> BELOW AN:D SIGN! As the enginee.r of record, 1 hereby certify the above required items are complete and included wiOs_ tr study and plat' set. Signature: Date: EEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal Revised 1111 glOq ,n ,,;0 ~ n . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-520d 8: Main Street Redevelopment - Option B . Introduction This evaluation was prepared to summarize the drainage system proposed for the 51 st-52nd & Main Street Redevelopment Option B. This storm drainage evaluation will determine the type and size of water quality/quantity facilities that are acceptable to the City of Springfield, The 51 st-52nd & Main Street Redevelopment is located on the south side of Main Street and east of 51" Place and west of 52nd Street in Springfield, Oregon, The proposed project site is comprised of two tax lots, TM 17023332 TL 6200 and TL 6300, Existine Conditions The existing site is bounded by Main Street to the north, 51st place to the west, 52nd Street to the east and residential to the south, The site consists of an existing building, a burned down existing building, driveways and landscaping, The impervious surfaces consist of roofs, The pervious surfaces consist oflandscaping, According to the Soils Survev of Lane County. Oregon, by the Natural Resource Conservation Service, the soil at the site is Salem Urban Land Complex (Soil Number: 119, Hydrologic Group: B), Refer to Appendix A for soils map information, Proposed Site Conditions The proposed projec1 includes two new commercial buildings, three buildings with townhomes with associated parking, sidewalks and landscaping, The parking and drive aisles will consist of asphalt pavement and the sidewalks will be concrete, Water Quality Treatment and Storm Water Conveyance System The City of Springfield is encouraging as much infiltration on this site as possible, Therefore, the site is proposed to have drainage basins which will flow to infiltration basins located across the site, The infiltration basins will be landscaped with appro'priate vegetation and topsoil to allow treatment and infiltration of stormwater. Infiltration testing was conducted and the site was determined to have adequate infiltration rates to serve the proposed improvements, See the table below for infiltration results and information, Test Test Location Test Test Soils Measured Depth infiltration Rate ] Northwest corner 48" 0-12" Topsoil of site 12-36" light brown clayey silt moist 4,5 inches/hour 36"-42" light brown clayey silt 42"-48" Bar Run See Appendix B for the infiltration testing data. There are three proposed infiltration basins proposed on the site, Each is primarily treating parking areas however one is also infiltrating runoff from one of the proposed buildings roof See Appendix C for the proposed Drainage Basin Map for location of infiltration basins and the areas they are treating and infiltrating, Below is a brief description of each, Infiltration Basin A Infiltration Basin A is located on the west side of the site and east of the proposed drive-thru res,tauran1. Infiltration Basin A will have asphalt parking, building rooftop andm4~~~~r9~,g to]1. The basin draining to Infiltration Basin A is 0.43 acres, One side has a 3:Krcte slope and the FEB t 5 2011 Original Submittal , . Storm Drainage Evaluation 5t"-520' & Main Street Redevelopment - Option B other has a short retaining wall. Infiltration Basin A has approximately 1,685 cubic feet of storage. Infiltration Basin A is bisected by a concrete sidewalk and a 6" storm pipe is proposed to go under the concrete sidewalk to allow Infiltration Basin A to act as one basin, Infiltration Basin A is two feet deep from the top of the growing medium to the overflow. This depth was required because the overflow for Infiltration Basin B is piped to Infiltration Basin A and the invert of the overflow pipe from lnfiltration Basin B required this depth. The overflow for Infiltration A is connected to a proposed curb inlet in 51 SI Place that will be constructed under a Public Improvement Pennit. . . Infiltration Basin B Infiltration Basin B is located on the north side of the site along Main Street and west of the proposed aD aT driveway approach. Infiltration Basin B will have asphalt parking and landscaping draining to it. The basin draining to Infiltration Basin B is 0.13 acres. Infiltration Basin B is one foot deep from the top of the growing medium to the overflow and has 3:1 side slopes. Infiltration Basin B has approximately 473 cubic feet of storage. Infiltration Basin B is bisected by a concrete sidewalk and a 6" storm pipe is proposed to go under the concrete sidewalk to allow Infiltration Basin B to act as one basin. The overflow for Infiltration Basin B is piped to Infiltration Basin A. Infiltration Basin C Infiltration Basin C is located on the north side of the site along Main Street and west of the proposed commercial building. Infiltration Basin C will have asphalt parking and landscaping draining to it. The basin draining to Infiltration Basin C is 0.08 acres. Infiltration Basin C is one foot deep from the top of the growing medium to the overflow and has 3:1 side slopes. Infiltration Basin C has approximately 172 cubic feet of storage. The overflow for Infiltration Basin C is directed to a nearby private storm line to be conveyed offsite to the existing 12" storm line in 520d Street. Other drainage basins on the site will be treated by double chambered catch basins with filter inserts and conveyed through storm pipes to the public storm system. Stormwater Runoff Peak discharge rates for the post development conditions were generated using the Santa Barbara Unit Hydrograph method. The King County Department of Public Works, Surface Water Management Division, Hydrographs Programs, Version 4.21B computer program was used to assist in the hydrologic calculations. See Appendix D for the storm water runoff results. Below is a summary of the results for each drainage basin. Proposed Conditions Peak Discharge Rates (cfs) Storm Basin A Basin B Basin C WQ (0.83 inches/24 hours) 0.06 0.0] 0.0] 2 Year (3.3 inches/24 hours) 0.26 0.07 0.05 ]0 Year (4.3 inches124 hours) 0.35 0.10 0.07 25 Year (4.8 inches/24 hours) 0.40 0.1] 0.08 Date Received: FEB t 5 20n Original Submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52"d & Main Street Redevelopment - Option B . Inmtration Basin Sizine Each infiltration basin is characterized in a spreadsheet to be used with the King County Department of Public Works, Surface Water Management Division, Hydrographs Programs, Version 4.21B computer program for routing the developed storm through the infiltration basin. The routing data can be found in Appendix 0 as well as the infiltration volumes and the required storage for each infiltration basin. Below is a summary of each infiltration basin. Infiltration Basin A Below is a summary of the peak flow rates and the peak elevation the storm water will get in Infiltration Basin A during the 2 year and 25 year storms. Proposed Infiltration Basin A Storm Peak inflow (cfs) Peak outflow (cfs) Water Elevation (feet) WQ 0.06 0.02 494.32 2 Year 0.26 0.05 495.61 10 Year 0.35 0.08 496.01 25 Year 0.40 0.14 496.04 Infiltration Basin A has approximately 2,200 cubic feet of storage. The overflow is set at an elevation of 496:00. The results show that the 10 year storm just begins to overflow and during the 10 year storm it gets to elevation 496.01. During the 25 year storm, the water begins to overflow and gets a half inch above the overflow. This will maximize infiltration opportunity and provide an additional factor of safety. The infiltration basin will be landscaped in accordance with the City of Springfield requirements. Infiltration Basin B Below is a summary of the peak flow rates and the peak elevation the stormwater will get in Infiltration Basin B during the 2 year and 25 year stonn. Proposed Infiltration Basin B Storm Peak inflow (cfs) Peak outflow (cfs) Water Elevation (feet) WQ 0.01 0.01 496.13 2 Year 0.07 0.02 496.73 10 Year 0.10 0.02 496.99 25 Year 0.11 0.04 497.01 Infiltration Basin B has approximately 475 cubic feet of storage. The overflow is set at an elevation of 497.00. The results show that the 10 year storm does not reach the overflow but during the 25 year storm, the water does reach the overflow. This will maximize infiltration opportunity and provide an additional factor of safety. The infiltration basin will be landscaped in accordance with the City of Springfield requirements. Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52od fr Main Street Redevelopment - Option B . Infiltra1ion Basin C Below is a summary of the peak flow rates and the peak elevation the stormwater will get in Infiltration Basin C during the 2 year and 25 year storm. Pro osed Infiltration Basin C Storm Peak inflow (cfs) Peak outflow (cfs) Water Elevation (fee1) WQ om 0.00 495.87 2 Year 0.05 0.01 496.58 10 Year 0.07 0.05 496.78 25 Year 0.08 0.07 496.79 Infiltration Basin C has approximately 2 I 8 cubic feet of storage. The overflow is set at an elevation of 496.75. The results show that the 2 year storm is completely contained within Infiltration Basin C but during the 10 and 25 year storms, the storm water will reach the overflow and the storm water will get a half inch above the overflow elevation. The overflow is connected to an on-site private stomlline that eventually flows to the public storm system in 52nd Street. The infiltration basin will be landscaped in accordance with the City of Springfield requirements. The rest of the site will drain to double chambered catch basins with filter inserts located in the parking areas and roof drains from the east commercial building and the townhouses will be directed to on-site private storm line that eventually flows to the public storm system in 520d Street. See Appendix D for stormwater runoff, routing and infiltration basin stage-storage-outflow calculations. See Appendix E for Infiltration swale section and double chamber catch basin with filter insert . Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-520' ft Main Street Redevelopment - Option B . Appendix A Soil Maps and Soil Data Date Received: FEB t 5 2011 Original Submittal. " . . <- ~ v N N :: v v 0<'"> ~- "l1l.9S .llL >>\Tl.9S .lU 00 ~~ ::::'" NO ~ m 0.. 0 ~ 3 m ~ v 0 ~ 0 ~ 3 ~ Ii: 3 ~ c;:C Oz g'w \I ~:;; 00.. 3 roO ~ "'~ ~w , <(> ~ >-w cO ij ~w 0 ~c Ocr :? ;; of- 0 iil ~o ~u "'w ro ,,2 :i;w (f};i ~cr =(0 It;; O. "- U)1 ~z 0 .DC o- N ",C ~<( ~ SC ~:;; N 2 QU( 0 ['f- g uu) ~ >-~ ~ 0 I~ ~ " 0 ;; "0 ;; M ~ 0 ~ iil ~ m "- ~ . 0 N 0 .. ro m " m iil c 0 ~ 2 c '- ~ se 0 ~ M 0 0 ~ m m C < _c z~ roc ZC eceived: ~\, ..ac .95 .lll ..DC.S; .lZL O\T5~Lav OC69L9v Ol69LS\>" OL69lB\T 0069L61> OSS9LS\> 0889L81> OL99L8\7 FEBj 5 2011 ::Ji; " v v N N ~ Original Subfl1ittal v ci=' oz "'w ~:> 0,,- -0 ro-, ~w <(> "w -0 3w 0'" 0>- "'w Cw ro", -'>- 6.C/) 5z c94: -:> '006 C:;o .- Z "'N 2", o ' ~>- "'C/) "- Ie . . o~ ~ - ,,; '0 '" o , 0 "- c f:'~ ro w ~ , 0 E ro '" N ,,; L , ro :V'" " N '" > ro w n ro '" 0 ~ c <; ~ u '" '" w ~ i ro .~ ro " '" o .~ u "'''' '" c mE '" u "' '" '" ID ro if) w t 0 =~ ID L C. ~ 0 u w c. .E c on ID N '0 rn E Z rn .Q u u ;, WD 0 E <D ro co if) c ID ID W 0 - 03 - ID ~ .", 0 0 ..c...c.~ '" L lD ~co '" "'0 ~E-S i= x :v W w~o Z ~- u W <( in ~ c. c~<( J: 00 -0 .- 0 ID .c ~ ~ e is ro owz _N ID ~ - ro ~ ~ E U:Oz 0 rn - L C ~ III ~ " <( if) ,,'" c. 0::: .c WWD ;:0 ~.o ~ o~<(:!2 N ~ u BoO"- <( " .;;; ro '" g.:o ~ if; 0 0 ID ~ " ID " "LL 0 <( " c 6! g E " C - " E.?>rtla> IL c " 0 :I1 Ci.N E ~"' L <p-gE.o Z 0 '" 0 0 c c. " cr"';; 0- 0,9 (1).0 ([) >> '" 0. ~ '" ~ ro _L>- -D ~ (tf 0 III CI:l a.. ID E u ~ ;:0 "", " ID .0 '- Q) E C 0 W 2 " C ID ~ ~ c..c ~ j> ",,- W <( .~ u m -.:..i ro- w " ro ro", ~ W :5 ill C ." ~ D Z;:o E (])= ID D.!:::! 0 m .- E c- '" t- ID ,,2 ID2- .. ro ro o:g,-g-g 0 W E "'ID rn- .~ '" " on .. III III w- ID ro 015>-:) c c.~" ~o _ rn 0 " 0 c ._ ro <(rn ro 0"'0 "'Q..D ~ ~::;(j) -'" .!!> ~ ,," u " "" .~ ..ceU}..... -E if) ID 0.. m .- .- W o=ro -5.Q ID ~ o u c ro ~ ~ ~<( ro :2 ~ c:- ~ u B~ ~ ow if) '0 ID ~ 0..:0 ~ " "' W W W if) ID Q) 0"0.. Q.l m c. " ro ro ~ D ~ W > ~ ID E g> E ro ID " ~ ID 0 :.c~ '0 ro L ~s8 ~ L 8 J~ '0 ;; >- 0:: E >-- if) if) 0 >- 0 5J "c ~ u ~ ~ Wi' , 0 " VJ , D , " , s<. -; , , .~ " " " " 0 .. W W 0 "- > ro ~ ro c ro Z "' <5 ro ~ " U ~ W " E c " ~ " W " => " c I " u u Cl E ro ro ro i5 0 u W ID " 0 0 W -0 " " " " -S '" '" ~ ~ . W c E "' 0 ...J ro ro ro " '" " ro ;; " 0 0 0 <5 ~ .~ . " ~ . " .". 0 "' 0 . ;;: in U E 0 e 0 U5 c E OJ 0 a.. e OJ ~ " co u 0 z 0 0 '" => '" ~ ."l ,g ro , .. <( . " ro c ro ~ . " ~ '0 '" 0 0 ~ 0 0 II CJ ro ~ 0 E ~ Q. t ~ ~ . " '0 0 . W ( . "' " c '0 <5 E . :t OJ "- ;!: 0- , .~ ::: , o , ~u " o , W ( (I). cr' , ro , ~ . .::! , ro ( Z<. .:3\' '!;" -, Date Received FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal. . .. . Hydrologic SOil Group-Lane County Area, Oregon . 51ST-52ND & MAIN STREET REDEVELOPMENT Hydrologic Soil Group Hydrologic Soil Grourr- Summary by Map Unit - Lane County Area, Oregon Map unit symbol I Map unit name I Rating I ,Acres in AOI I Percent of-AOI : 11 9 I Salem-Urban land complex ; B 1.5 : 100.0% ! Totals for Area of Interest 1.5 ! 100.0% Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (ND, BID, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefiy of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefiy of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefiy of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (ND, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Lower Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 USDA ~ Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil SUlve'y National Cooperative Soil Survey Original Submittal 1211/2010 Pane 3 of 3 . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52od a Main Street Redevelopment - Option B Appendix B Infiltration Testing Report Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . . Project Narne: 0& 0 '~G"n S~",-<-!,. 'C>,K Project No,: 0"1 -{'''I . Project Location: '5' Ii! PI.,,-(, i Sf.;ncj[rdc!. Date ofField Work: tif';/IO Cormnents: IxA--(.v~h. n\U~SUK oo/u.-l-'LtS Wtl l:r ^ '" . I' - t 0+ l;.D'r."O}\'i 6\ b..:.,\ I('"~ ,lift( ICv'<-.( Lv CV({~, ~ ('l ~i& i. l,c. ioc-J /"'\ ':>ot (- '" b:.d< i0 Ltyt-! ~.It11-'l...'lr J-up 0 I- f'I"-) ~T ~J"'tv / ltV"-' . , ( .' .. """';!'. I, ,.~. :. c,,... '. InfIltration Test No. () Depth 1.f Diameter J VoJ. of Presat. I (;014 L Soil Description: ,.,: tuP".. 'l.11- &1'-1+1' O~..".1l1 0.."" $I~T '~IS"T. 11.- TV LI~ttF ,.f, 61\-1\.. ~~ Time Time Ela;osed 2.;3'0 ~ Depth to Water Vol. of Water Added J 1./1& It W ,fJ "'"'-..- b.-=-O 1nf'lltration Test No. Soil Description: Depth Diameter VoJ. of Presat. Time Time Elapsed ~l, :40" P i)"-. i 0 i"'1 ~ t"\ Depth to Water -'?,I! ..J 11 b -:.o,(ot' , Vol. oj/Water Added (~I /1\ ..> lr I \.... / p' . 1"- l\, DC , , hl- \:)!("ou~. SZ +-0 \ .' -L- 'S1f, Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal {h . Project Name: OGD ~tr\li'cif' Sh--{<.-f" cor-H Project No,: oC1.r,0 Project Location: ro'f";' {llv,,-<-+ (iM-,;!" sff'll Date ofField Work: Ii (,:: flu Comments: .'U'_ py I Infiltration Test No. Z Depth Soil Description: Time Time Elapsed ...--:, "--"~,"'~ 41 M 't () ~;"-~~" 1 ":.':;rIO;'"" '-.~ -, Depth to Water "'? I 1n l~ ,-; f"t; j). =- 0 ".;-" Diameter . Vol. of Pres at. VoL of Water Added ~ Infiltration Test No.'.) Soil Description: Depth Time Time Elapsed "1. ,()CJ 0 I,() W,;h <1 \Y\^\ Depth to Water "J. '-/'fl \' I' D:' Q'lC; Diameter ./ "'-" f :-. ~ ,~~ t,t " ..,. 7 "1:,:./f::.f!) 0" I S-H bf-OG<jht JL Vol. of Presat. VoL of Water Added ~':-c, ,;, ."~ ". ;' vI '\12 - t '$/g~' vI- Ot"'; I" PI,s- br-DUO\H---- V Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original submittal h, L O/f," ffi -2 -5/y,-,_l ------ L /z . . P. NO' c;~ ~ ;.Lc. roJect ame: 000 .11\... ,t'. \. . ,~ Project No' C)/i)'fS""G, , Project Lo~~tion: ",>..... pkGl... I sff lo! Date ofField Work: \ 'I, [[0 Comments: 'S.vt.. pq I Infiltration Test No. If Depth Soil Description: Diameter Vol. of Presat. n D z a,le; Vol. of Water Added dfT. I) Time Time Elapsed '''Z ' '" ,)'" -\.v I e",~" :-~.' ,VlJ.,,-'t-. Depth to Water .'C ~ j::i l! . " ... ~ I C\ \}..~.YllcI-fL 0, -, z:; q) e. ve.rlj )0 t1"tnv~5 ,. 4S l'Ac..-~ )MV' 1~0lTrv\; {L(lcK --- Infiltration Test No. Soil Description: Depth Diameter Vol. of Presat. Time Time Elapsed Depth to Water Vol. of Water Added Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original submittal 3r . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52"d & Main Street Redevelopment - Option B . Appendix C Proposed Drainage Basin Map Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original submittal ~ ;2; ~~ ~ Q.., 0""'1 ~ ~ c;""'I ~ CQ ~~~ ~ ~ ~...ej 0 J;~ CIj ~ l!';) II ~ ~ ""'I:: Q:l~Oos:>-.""'I ~~~~~~~ c;_t'\" rz::i E-t ~ ~ ;: :"l: .. \L ::::.: l"'I c;:::i l:) ~lO~O~~CIj ~ I ~ ~~ ~ ~ I;1;:i CIj tI)~ .... lO ~, - '---~,.'~._- . ,. J,S puzs I ~~ " , I! I ! I "- I '" eJ , I II T ~J "" " I, _~ ' l<~-=--;;____ ': f:fJi~ --dHO - .-" ,.. s'- l- I ! . - -"'7 - 1- 'I/O' ,- '-----<'" i;;<::f'-'~ .:>:J ' : ..s,: ~--l -. ,--, ". . ,-,. -~ 'Cl, y I 11"- ;ij/h47,{~/-:'h;%~~f~~;{~/~ I ! II / / ' ~j / ~ :x / is.9, / / / is .9/ / . / / / I : il~ ~:;~~~V/~/~0~~/ , ! ! i II / '/ . - ~- '/ ///;'j/~(/-~;' ~ " " 'lJs 0" .. / / / / / '; is .;, / /Ie" / / / / .:'> ' ,'''~~ ~i~/Lk / /;L/n>~ ~7 / ,,' /~2~~~~7 -j-I't < \" "0: ::i /:'ZV '-x ~ /<0/ / % / / v , IT ~: ~1';3~. ~I S; /:~~~:~//0%/(/.;h '" ~ II / /, 0 ~ Q), / % / / /j ~ " II ! - ~~ ~ :~~'% ,~.c /;:,;; , ';/;/ I II .1 ' - t3~~'iT~1I /"'/F<::l~5t;:;~. / /~~.: /, /( ~0r::;:S'l1l , /; ,/// ri / / /",.v, / /vh ! II ~~~~~~~M~)~;/////~~)ar / !! i 1 Ii ~ ~ '\ ~ ,'/:./ / /////~~'/ / /,1 l-<:'~ , / / / ~ 1 I ~"" "" '" '" '. /-/--;/'7Y;/,:;:C:I:/ / / /1/ Jx '/ / / / /';?O./ / / / '/ / //, , ' ! II / LV ~.~.~.~.} , .r / /.,,""'" "",' ""'.//~// :/'YM~0r5<>'~' ~//// / / / /h"- '" "'" '),"" '" "'II" t / / 'Y~>/ /:' / " // , II -'l"@ · ~"'~"""~~~W'i~%~~i~/ ! /:;:;:;~ '00.~ ~:-;N l'i 0 ,1//, , I II ,I'i/ ~~~~ /5 I ~ '''I~:/~'>rr~' ~~~~ /%> i II' _ t3 ;?; ~ 0/. ,,'::\:' / ,/ /. / / / /::: / --t- , II /* ,<::l r;: /1 ." ':;,', ~I'':.;~;;:~~~~/ / //,N~///8-~ _', i 1/\ / /" ..' - -'" ""'1./ 1$ ~t /' it/'> . TT'" l. " " ~', '~~",; ';/":%'- / , '/ ~ / / / /; /, ! I! / (; i7 ,/, · '} " "" ':" '" b! /~ ~ /, / / ~~ / / rt.ll ~E:;;///mA~"'~I~I~~ ~~ A~ ~J!~ /;~ 1i , 'I '~~ I,~; v '/ /:;;V-~ L /_~ ,'!I,II!'-.. " " " '<:'-...:: ,'~. / / '/ / / ~/ " /~V,':. ~"~~~~'='l(/1) ~~~./ ~! " ~ II I'I~ . '/: t% ~ ~ " I' ~ Ij: / / / ~A, 7^<l? A'.8''/. / I -0~!~ ~ ~~~~/~j/;0;::;;;/'///////~ I ",,' 11 " i~"~"~~etn~"~~" '{" , i II . : ",,\ ~ as ~ " . ,n'" ~ ::\:1'1'-1" ~ ,....-- I I' i~ ::\:~ ~ o~r'~~~ ~ __ _~, ' I ~ , i ~ , I' ~ ; , ;;5' ~ ~ ~ "~ '-- " f:: ,,-:-0 1', ' ; I '~ ~~" ~,,<::l ~ -;;;[8 "'~I;}. '~" N" '0 I ., f ':\> ;:::. ~[ , , - - ~- - ;;l 'i",r- i r- I ~'~~:~~~~~>,~ ~ ~ ..' , " I ; Ii ~ ~ ~}G.'<""~~' '-- ' I, ~~.~ ~ " ~~.",~'~~- ~,~~ I II " I{~ ' " "~'I~ 'I,~ ~ " ({,,, '" r.JIIS'(lNpL'(</l:l(1NI, " '> 9 V, I'-.. ',,' _'~ I_ I I ! . "'> " , , , ,,;:.~.. """.~, '"" "" '" " , ' r ''', '"'''''''''''''' "..,. " '0 I ,;; " /" ",' ", ,,1\['\\ ; .. I V "'Ii >:,;;i;;ft,',:i",>I-:''".': 1;;';'>><1:;> ! ~iU " I' I ''\-c,~ ~ ;J j Td lSrSj , __._ I 1 , : ) ---- 'i'-- \,.,.., ':'9'-""'-.,-.,,,, \"""";:"'N-,;:::;~-"-;::I::,,c:<:.;~:c;:~,.;:c;::::,_,:;_f~:': ~T:,::~",,::I.; ,~,,:::-:' ,-,-"_;.-_~"~-::,' ': ~-' ' I : '-r-- -,- / I", ~ """ >- ~ <: o ;::: ~ f-" --J G:: ~ 0 lD . '" ' .. Ol <:.l " "l ,e, It) ~ ,_ z - .... '"' .... ~ Q ~ I ..... o ~ '"' ~ ~,.. Ol ... ~ '" '" 0 Q1) ~ :: = f:: """ ~ ~ '03 I>'-. ~~ ;; ~ t:: ~ I u >- <:( ..... ........... Ol) 0 ~ S] u co w 0 ... IS e .,.. o u Lu -' r<'J Q,) QJ 8_. ~ ~ -, 19 Q,) .... co ~ ~ bD 0 0 <l c'l:I c:; a; c <'5 Cl:: ~ u ~ CI) ~ '" '~- Q (f) ..... > ~- <:( L[) Q1) .~ ~~ <l: -...,,- U - ~ ~ a I ~ '~", Cl. ,.. Q) c 0 'E ~ <l ~a:: Ii I CY ..c:: '" .c I t9 0 <:.l ~.! ;j ts I ~ en I ~..~ ~ ~ '" ~ iii I CIl ttl Q).... ~ I ... ~ .., co n c I o::l ..::l en.c I '51 '"4 ~ -'" ~ ~ ~ i:!: (5 ~ "', .. '" .", ~~ . .. ,- OJ 2 Q. ~ 'S! :t:Mcn_ U -11 I ~ . · D. l. Storm ramage Eva uatlOn 51"-52"d & Main Street Redevelopment - Option B Appendix D Storm water Runoff & Infiltration Basin Sizing Calculations Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52"d ft Main Street Redevelopment - Option B InfIltration Basin A - Water Quality Storm ******************** 5.C.5. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* I-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** .83" TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.09,61,0.34,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .4 .1 61. 0 .3 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .06 7.83 773 ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-wqaa.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY [do] [path]filename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159aa.rd DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? y ROUTING DATA: STAGE (FT) 494.00 494 . 25 494.50 494.75 495.00 495.25 495.50 495.75 496.00 496.25 496.50 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .02 .03 .03 .04 .04 .05 .05 .06 .59 1. 56 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 106.0 242.0 410.0 611. 0 843.0 1098.0 1377.0 1685.0 2023.0 2392.0 .0 MINUTES/INCH PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 ENTER [do] [path]filename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-wqaa.dev INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-QUTFLOW(CFS) .06 .02 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 8.33 PEAK STORAGE: 130 CU-FT OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 830 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 494.30 Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original submittal . . InfUtration Basin A - 2 Year Storm Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-S2"d ft Main Street Redevelopment - Option B ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.30" TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. I 0.09,61,0.34,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .4 . I 61. 0 .3 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .26 7.83 3942 ENTER [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-2aa.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159aa. rd DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? y ROUTING DATA: STAGE (FT) 494.00 494.25 494.50 494.75 495.00 495.25 495.50 495.75 496.00 496.25 496.50 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .02 .03 .03 .04 . .04 .05 .05 .06 .59 1. 55 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 97.0 223.0 379.0 568.0 786.0 1026.0 1290.0 1578.0 1891.0 2229.0 .0 MINUTES/INCH PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 ENTER [d:] [path] filename [.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-2aa.dev INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) .26 PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .05 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) .00 TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) 10.83 PEAK STORAGE: 1140 CU- FT OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 3903 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 495 . 61 Date Received: FEB 1 52011 Original Submittal . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52od ft Main Street Redevelopment - Option B Inidtration Basin A -10 Year Storm +******************* 8.C.5. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* IO-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4.30" TOTAL PRECIP. ******-J. ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.09,61,0.34,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .4 .1 61. 0 .3 98.0 10.0 PEAK -Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CO-FT) .35 7.83 5330 ENTER [d:] [path] filename [.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPOTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-10aa.dev RESERVOIR ROOTING INFLOW/OOTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF ROOTING DATA 09159aa.rd DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? y ROOTING DATA: STAGE(FT) 494.00 494.25 494.50 494.75 495. 00 495.25 495.50 495.75 496.00 496.25 496.50 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .02 .03 .03 .04 .04 .05 .05 .06 .59 1. 55 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 97.0 223.0 379.0 568.0 786.0 1026.0 1290.0 1578.0 1891. 0 2229.0 .0 MINUTES/INCH PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 ENTER [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-10aa.dev INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK~OUTFLOW(CFS) .35 .08 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 10_67 PEAK STORAGE: 1690 CU-FT OOTFLOW-VOL(CO-FT) 5322 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 496.01 Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52"' ft Main Street Redevelopment - Option B InfIltration Basin A - 25 Year Storm ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* 25-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4.80" TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.09,61,0.34,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .4 .1 61. 0 .3 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) .40 7.83 6037 ENTER [d:] [path] filename [.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-25aa.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY Cd:} [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159aa.rd DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? y ROUTING DATA: STAGE (FT) 494.00 494.25 494.50 494.75 495.00 495. 25 495.50 495.75 496.00 496.25 496.50 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .02 .03 .03 .04 .04 .05 .05 .06 .59 1. 55 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 97.0 223.0 379.0 568.0 786.0 1026.0 1290.0 1578.0 1891. 0 2229.0 .0 MINUTES !INCH PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 ENTER [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-25aa.dev INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS; PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .40 .14 INITIAL-STAGE(FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 8.67 PEAK STORAGE: 1730 CU- FT OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 6041 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 496.04 Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51".52"' Ii Main Street Redevelopment - Option B . InfIltration Basin B - Water Quality Storm ******k************* S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ** * * * * * * * I-YEAR 24 -HOUR STORM * ** * .83" TOTAL PRECIP. *** ** ** ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.04,51,0.09,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .1 .0 51. 0 .1 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .01 7.83 204 ENTER [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-WQBB.DEV RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159BB.RD DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? Y ROUTING DATA: STAGE(FT) 496.00 496.25 496.50 496.75 497.00 497.25 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .01 .02 .02 .02 .55 STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 63.0 141.0 235.0 345.0 472.0 PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES !INCH ENTER [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-WQBB.DEV INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .01 .01 OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 47 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .OD 8.50 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 496.13 PEAK STORAGE: 30 CU- FT Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52od & Main Street Redevelopment - Option B InfIltration Basin B-2 Year Storm ******************** 5.C.5. TYFE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ***-k***** 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.30" TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.04,61,0.09,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .1 .0 61. 0 .1 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .07 7.83 1071 ENTER [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-2BB.DEV RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY [do] [path] filename [ .ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159BB.RD DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? Y ROUTING DATA: STAGE(FT) 496.00 496.25 496.50 496.75 497.00 497.25 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .01 .02 .02 .02 .55 STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 63.0 141. 0 235.0 345.0 472.0 PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES !INCH ENTER [do] [pathlfilename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-2BB.DEV INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-QUTFLOW{CFS) .07 .02 OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 1079 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 8.67 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 496.73 PEAK STORAGE: 220 CU-FT Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52"d & Main Street Redevelopment - Option B . InfIltration Basin B -10 Year Storm ******************** 8.C.8. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* lO-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4.30" TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.04,61,0.09,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .1 .0 61. 0 .1 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T- PEAK (HRS) VOL (CU-FT) .10 7.83 1467 ENTER Cd:] [path]fi1ename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-10BB.DEV RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIfY Cd:] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159BB. RD DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? Y ROUTING DATA: STAGE(PT) 496.00 496.25 496.50 496.75 497.00 497.25 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .01 .02 .02 .02 .55 STORAGE (CU-PT) .0 63.0 141.0 235.0 345.0 472.0 PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 _ 0 _ 0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES!INCH ENTER [d:] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-10BB.DEV INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .10 .02 OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 1386 INITIAL-STAGE(FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 9.00 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV (FT) 496.99 PEAK STORAGE: 330 CU- FT Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51".52,d 8: Main Street Redevelopment - Option B . Inf"Iltration Basin B - 25 Year Storm ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* 25-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4.80" TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.04,61,0.09,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .1 .0 61. 0 .1 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .11 7.83 1671 ENTER Cd:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-25BB.DEV RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY Cd:] [path]filename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159BB.RD DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? Y ROUTING DATA: STAGE (FT) 496.00 496.25 496.50 496.75 497.00 497.25 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .01 .02 .02 .02 .55 STORAGE (CU- FT) .0 63.0 141.0 235.0 345.0 472.0 PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES !INCH ENTER [d:] [path] filename [ . ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-25BB.DEV INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .11 .04 OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 1597 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 8.50 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 497.01 PEAK STORAGE: 340 CU-FT Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 . Original Submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51st.52" &; Main Street Redevelopment - Option B . Infiltration Basin C - Water Quality Storm ******************** s.c.s. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* I-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** .83" TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERVj, CN(IMPERV), TC ,OR BASIN NO. 1 o . 01, 61, 0 . 07, 98, 10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN .1 .0 61. 0 .1 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) .01 7.83 159 ENTER [do] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE 0, COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-wgbc.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUT,LOW ROUTINE SPECIFY [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159bc.rd DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? y ROUTING DATA: STAGE(FT) 495.75 496.00 496.25 496.50 496.75 497.00 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .01 .01 .01 .01 .37 STORAGE (CU- ,T) .0 39.0 88.0 147.0 218.0 301.0 PERM-AREA (SQ-,T) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES/INCH ENTER [d:] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-wqbc.dev IN,LOW/OOTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-QUTFLOW(CFS) .01 .00 OUT,LOW-VOL(CU-,T) 29 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-O,-PEAK(HRS) .00 8.33 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 495.87 PEAK STORAGE: 10 CU-FT Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52,d & Main Street Redevelopment - Option B . InfIltration Basin C - 2 Year Storm ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.30" TOTAL PREelP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.01,61,0.07,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .1 .0 61. 0 .1 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .05 7.83 796 ENTER Cd:] [path] filename [.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-2bc.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY Cd:] [path]filename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159bc. rd DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? y ROUTING DATA: STAGE (FT) 495.75 496.00 496.25 496.50 496.75 497.00 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .01 .01 .01 .01 .37 STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 39.0 88.0 147.0 218.0 301.0 PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES/INCH ENTER [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-2bc.dev INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK- INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .05 .01 OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 882 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 8.83 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 496.58 PEAK STORAGE: 170 CU-FT Date Received: FES I 5 2011 Original Submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-520' & Main Street Redevelopment - Option B . IniIltration Basin C -10 Year Storm ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* lO-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4.30" TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN{IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.01,61,0.07,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC{MINUTES) A CN A CN .1 .0 61. 0 .1 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) .07 7.83 1067 ENTER [do] [path] filename [.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-l0bc.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECI FY [d: ] [path] filename [ . ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09l59bc.rd DISPLAY ROUTING DATA "(Y or N)? Y ROUTING DATA: STAGE(FT) 495.75 496.00 496.25 496.50 496.75 497.00 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .01 .01 .01 .01 .37 STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 39.0 88.0 147.0 218.0 301. 0 PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES/INCH ENTER [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-10bc.dev INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .07 .05 OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 1098 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 8.17 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 496.78 PEAK STORAGE: 220 CU- FT Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52od ft Main Street Redevelopment - Option B . InfIltration Basin C - 2S Year Storm ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* 25-YEAR 24-.HOUR STORM **** 4.80" TOTAL PREelP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.01,61,0.07,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .1 .0 61. 0 .1 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .08 7.83 1204 ENTER [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-25bc.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY [do] [path]filename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159bc.rd DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? y ROUTING DATA: STAGE(FT) 495.75 496.00 496.25 496.50 496.75 497.00 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .01 .01 .01 .01 .37 STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 39.0 88.0 147.0 218.0 301.0 PERM-AREA(SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES !INCH ENTER [do] [path]fi1ename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-25bc.dev INfLOW/OUTfLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .08 .07 OUTfLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 1236 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 8.00 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 496.79 PEAK STORAGE: . 230 CU-FT Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51st-52"d ft Main Street Redevelopment - Option B . Appendix E Vegetated Infiltration Basin and Double Chambered Catch Basins with Fossil Filter Insert Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 , Origin.al Submittal ( 9 Fl MINIMUM I 2" 3:1 MAX. SIDE SLOPES (lYP.) ~ 2 n FLAT BOTTOM-----1l OVERflOW ElEVATION FOR PARKING LOTS, TIRE STOPS OR CURBS W/CUTS 12w~12" CLEAR flOW MfA AT CUTOUTS 18' " , \<\e/,/\,y ",( NY"'\>;"'/V~\\"5~0'0':J~;..~: \~~(~::~:';;~y~,~,~~~~::~\\,-' 2\~~':);-)~\~,(y'~~,~~,,\:>:;\- .', v'I(" -"/ ;-\\'-' " , . GROWlNG '.,;.-:\'.,. ''---.' ....,. " -'\~<'-\ '.;;\\'{.:::..~'~...-,/'>.):\\\\/\\\ ~-"';"'\It:', ',y /.\\/'::"\Y),\'!:\\\':::~'~" - ',\/-...,\~, r.~\'/~\/. \. V''NlLf'lJUM'' v\t/~/. ,-" (Jo..., '<c/~ --;\'. /"/.y """;}(":;.-"'\,.-'\\\/'\//'/.' ,~~~':-)'~<;~\>:\\'S:;:\<~;::~;:..;>:\\;:<t:?-::~ \1~::-;1' \: . ,f)-"J I~ .'~' I'. t.'-....i, ~l !'::.~'-../ ~\ ''t \ y '-~, ,. A ,\ ".._A ..-...-I ~.( ~-jk- ..;-,r/".._J... ~,,- -- --. , . \' "; (- --; ( )(;:~'}I ') ,~':):, -. --"-, \,s~~r-\v.:''''' 'Q:--~.nRAfN- -ROC' ',r\R'---" ,--~"';>" /' tr--y' K:'l >::,-( .~,'" ~f 'K--' !,,""< 4 "-<<"',,' jr""" )" -~ ..r=<;;) j~,,: __.__..__:?~~'=;.~ ../~7---:......_A.:~T<~~~/~ ,;'.... '..-~ FILTER FABRIC, SEE NOTE 7 9"-16" (SEE NOTE 28) 12" (SEE NOTE 5) '.-~. J SEE SW"150 FOR P1P1NG J CONFIGURATION. ".' . EXISTING SUBGRADE 1. Provide protection from all vehicle traffic, equipment staging, and foot traffic in proposed infiltration areas prior to, during, and after construction. 6. Drain rock: a. Size for infiltration basin: 1%" - 0/.," washed b. Size for flow-through basin: %" washed c. Depth for Simplified: 12" d. Depth for Presumptive: 048", see cales. 2. Dimensions: a. Width of basin: 9' minimum. b. Depth of basin (from top of growing medium to overflow elevation); Simplified: 12", Presumptive: 9"-18".. c. Flat bottom width: 2' min. d. Side slopes of basin: 3: 1 maximum. 7. Separation between drain rock and growing medium: Use filter fabric (see SWMM Exhibit 2~5) or a gravel lens (Y.. - % inch washed, crushed rock 2 to 3 inches deep). 3. Setbacks (from midpoint of facility): a. Infiltration basins must be 10' from foundations and 5' from property lines. b. Flow-through swales must be lined wilhconnection to approved discharge point according to SWMM Section 1.3. B. Growing medium: a. 18" minimum b. See Appendix F.3 for specification or use sand/loam/compost 3-way mix. 4.0vertlow: a. Overflow required for Simplified Approach. b. Inlet elevation must allow for 2n of freeboard, minimum. c. Protect from debris and sediment with strainer or grate. 9. Vegetation: Follow landscape plans othelWise refer to plant list in SWMM Appendix F. Minimum container size is 1 gallon. # of plantings per 100sf of facility area): a. Zone A (wet): 115 herbaceous plants OR 100 herbaceous plants and 4 shrubs b. Zone B (moderate to dry): 1 tree AND 3 large shrubs AND 4 medium to small shrubs. The delineation between Zone A and B shall be either at the outlet elevation or the check dam elevation, whichever is lowest. 5. Piping: shall be ASS SchAD, cast iron, or PVC SchAO. 3D pipe required for up to 1,500 sq ft of impervious area, otherwise 4" min. Piping must have 1% grade and follow the Uniform Plumbing Code. 10. Install washed pea gravel or river rock to transition from inlets and splash pad to growing medium. 11. Inspections: Call BOS IVR Inspection Line, (503) 823-7000, far appropriate inspectians"Date Received: . , '. I:. . \\.,;' \. . ; '.,i ,,_ ~ -- - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL TYPICAL DETAILS - Simplified I Presumptive Design Approach - Original Su mittal NUMBER Basin SW-140 BUTeau of Environmental Services :~ 53" (U r=l ~ 'OJ- C\1 ii. " ; I!_ OUTLET 48" LONG I... , fllr: PLAN VIEW SILT & DEBRIS CONTAINMENT AREA L2~x2~xrl3 FRAME HIGH FLOW BYF ASS 53" o Z~ '"~ ~:::;;: r_ , , , , , , ~ , OUTLET r-_ ~'" '" '" z ~ ::2' I , , t-SEDIMENT TRAi -l-" wI HINGED , LID : SEDlMENT : TRAP , '" cv .1.... 48" .. SIDE VIEW .. FLO RD ™ FILTER INSERT (MODEL FGP-24F) WO VEN MESH FILTER BODY NOTES: BOX FABRICATED FROM 10 GA MATERIAL NEOPRENE GASKET (TWO SIDES) DUCTILE IRON SOLID LID & DUCTILE IRON GRATE BIKE PROOF, HEAVY DUTY TRAFFIC GRATE SUPPORTS AASHTO H25 LOADS cO REPLACEABLE ABSORBENT POUCHES ISOMETRIC SEDIMENT & HYDROCARBONS FILTRATION SYSTEM STATE APPROVED - ASPHALT DIPPElDate Received: 24"x42" - 6"0 OUTLET SB FEB 1 5 2011 SAND COLLECTOR CATCH BASINoriQlnalSUbmittal PROJ. MAN. DOUG P. DWN. PAUL G. SCALE NONE DATE: JAN 23, 06 MODEL: SCBFiD-42HB-6 # F5 Gibson Steel Basins SINCE 1972 247 Washington 51. Eugene, Or. 97401 ph:(541) 587 - 8672 lox:344--0207 . . STORMWATERMANAGEMENT PLAN AND DRAINAGE STUDY FOR 51st-52nd & Ma . t Redevelopment OPTION C February 15, 2011 Prepared For: TBG Architects 132 E. Broadway, Suite 200 Eugene, OR 97401 Branch Engineering, Inc. 310 5th Street Springfield, OR 97477 Phone (541) 746-0637 Fax (541) 746-0389 'n"~"_>.' . Inc. Branch Project # 09-159 Date Received: FEB t 520ft Original submittal 11/17/2010 12:09 FAX 541 736~1 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD PW~ I4J 002 6P":G=D'"~l~":,:~. .ib'''''''\:1.1@ "'_ . ,. .~ ~ . PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT! Engineering Division Phone: (541) 726-3753 Fax: (541) 736-1021 STORMW A TER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK ~ (Area below this line filled out by AppllclPlt) -:-- ... (pletlSe remm ttJMan SfoulJer:@City of Springfield Public Works Engineering; "Fax # 736-1021, Phone #.73~'03S.) Project Name: OBO Enterprises, LLC Applicant: Branch Engineoring Assessors Parcel #: 17-02-33-32 TL 6200 & 6300 Date: J I/03/] 0 Land Users): Community Commercial (CC) Phone #: 541-746-0637 Projed Size (Acres): 1.5 acres Fax#: 541-746-0389 Approx. Impervious Area: 1.07 acres Email: greg(jiJbranchengineeringcom '.. '.' .........".,.;. '.., ....:.. . .' "...".'..... Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map): 1.5 acres site with two commercial buildings neRr Main Street and a 15 unit apartment building to the south of the commercial buildings with associated landscaping and parking facilities. Drainage Proposal (public connection(s), discharge loealion(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: West side of the site will drain townrd 51" Place and connect 10 the existing SfOrm line in the streel. The east side of the site wjll drain toward 52no Street and connect to the existIng storm line in the street. . Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices: Infiltration basins and planters will be used on-site with overflows and trapped catch basins. . . .. . .' . ~ (A~{J bdow this 'lne (illed out bv 'lie City ami Remmel! to tile Applican') . ..... ". : . ...(At a mi!1fJ?nu1t, all qoi~.f checked by the City onlhefrOrlr and backof0is:~AeeishqlJ he Su.b.mi.~eit. ........ :" '~:-..)qr;(1fl' cpplicalion if> be complete for submittal, although olher J"~qItir/~~?n~s.'may be nece~sa;Y)""':"':'/-': :.: .. - .. .' . -'. . Drainage Study 'fvpe (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note, un may be substituted for Rational Method) 0 Small Site Study ~ (use Rational Method for calculations) ~ Mid-Level Development Study- (useUni[ Hydrograph Method forc.lealalions) 0 Full Drainage Development Study - (use Unit Hyclrograph Method for calculation,) Environmental Considerations: ~ Wellhead Zone: '1l'\ '<1:.....(, I Hillside Development: ~ WctIandJRiparian: Floodway/Floodplain: ro SoilType: 11'1 - ~ .. M ~~ f'\O Other Jurisdictions: Ol)~ DO"VDstream Analvsis: ~ ifli1 N/A I 0 Flow line for starting waler surface elevation: 0 Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation: 0 Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: Cate-Recei\lp.d' Return to Matt Stouder tm City of Suringfield emaU: mstouder!iil.d.sprinl!field.or.us ....v. (541) 736-1021 tt.~ I :l LUll Original Submittal Do=>ul"...rt "" orrin Q /if If''l 11/17/2010 12:09 FAX 541 736~1 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD P~ 141003 COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS I Fo,OfficiaIUseOnly: fv'rA<;: <;t; Based upon The information pl"Ovided on Ihf:: frOnl of this ShIN.I, the following represenrs 0 minimum of what is needed for an applicOlion ro be complete/oT submittal with respect to drainage; however, this list shauld not be lIsed in lieu of The Springfield Development Code (SDC) or the City's Engineering Design Manual. Compliance wM~ these requirements does not constitute site approval; Additional site specific informCttiol7 may be required Note: Upon reaping sheet submittal, ensure completedfarm has be.en signed in the space provided below: 3Ii Jm ~ ~ ~ Interim Design StandardslWatcr QUlllity (EDSPM Chapter 3) Req'd N/A IiJ 0 AD non-building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfuces shall be pm-treated (e.g_ multi-chambered catchbasin wloil filrration media) for stnrmwatcr qunlity. Additionally, a minimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by vegetated methods. o Where required, vegetAtive stonnwater design shall be consistent with interim design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02)) set forth by the Bureau of Environmental Services (BES) or Clean Water Services (CWS). o For neW NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square fect, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified by the BES for vegetative treatment. o [f (l stomiwater treatment swale is proposed, submit calculations/spec.ifications for sizing, velocity, flow~ side slopes. bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with eithe'r BES or CWS requirements. o Water Quality calcuJations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM o All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other flujd containing equipment located outside of the building) shall be provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure. General Study Requirements (EDSPM Section 4.03) IiM 0 Drainage study prepared by a Protessional Civil Engineer licensed in the statE: of Oregon. D 0 A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map. ri1 0 Calculations showing system capacity for 1l2-year storm event and overflow effec[s ofa 25~year stonn CV~nt. &I 0 The time ofconcenn-ation (Tc) shall be det~cd using a 10 minute start time for developed basins, Review of DOMlstream System (EDSPM Section 4.03-4.C) o ~ A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Soction 4.03.4.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC). o ~'Elevations of the HOL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable. Design of Storm Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04) ~. 0 Flow lines, slopes. rim elevations, pipe type and sizes. clearly indicated on the plan set. o [iJ. Minimwn pipe cover shaH be 1 & inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plajo concrete and plastic pipe materials, or proper engineering, calculations shall be provided when Jess. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 80,000 Ib load without faiJme of the pipe structure. D ~ Manning's un" values for pipes sbaJl be consistent with Table 4-1 o[the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to achieve a minjmum velocity of three (3) feet per st.~o.od at 0.5 pipe full based on Table 4~1 as welL OtberlMisc W 0 Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains @iW 0 Private stormwater easements shan be clearly depicted On plans when private stormwEl.ter flows from one property to another o ra. Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03.4.A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to the website: www.deo.state.oLuslwa/e::roundwalllichome,hcm for more infomlation. ~ 0 Detention ponds shall be designed to lim;t nmoff to pre-development mtes for tho 2 through 25-yeat' storm events 'n'lsform shall be included as an rUJachmmrl, inside tltefro1lt cOYer, Of the stormwater study Received: . As the e.ngineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stOTIDwater smdy and pl;:u. ScL * IMPORTANT: ENGINEER PLEASE REA1J BELOW AND SIGN! Signature: Date: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal Revised 11/19/09 10 of 10 . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51".52"d 8: Main Street Redevelopment. Option C . Introduction This evaluation was prepared to summarize the drainage system proposed for the 5lst-52nd & Main Street Redevelopment Option C This storm drainage evaluation will determine the type and size of water quality/quantity facilities that are acceptable to the City of Springfield. The 5lst-52nd & Main Street Redevelopment is located on the south side of Main Street and east of 5 151 Place and west of 52nd Street in Springfield, Oregon. The proposed project site is comprised of two tax lots, TM 17023332 TL 6200 and TL 6300. Existine: Conditions The existing site is bounded by Main Street to the north, 51 st place to the west, 52nd Street to the east and residential to the south. The site consists of an existing building, a burned down existing building, driveways and landscaping. The impervious surfaces consist of roofs. The pervious surfaces consist oflandscaping. According to the Soils Survey of Lane County. Oregon, by the Natural Resource Conservation Seryice, the soil at the site is Salem Urban Land Complex (Soil Number: 119, Hydrologic Group: B). Refer to Appendix A for soils map information. Proposed Site Conditions The proposed project includes one new commcrcial buildings, tluee buildings with townhomes with associated parking, sidewalks and landscaping. The parking and drive aisles will consist of asphalt pavement and the sidewalks will be concrete. Water Quality Treatment and Storm Water Conveyance System The City of Springfield is encouraging as much infiltration on this site as possible. Therefore, the site is proposed to have drainage basins which will flow to infiltration/detention basins located across the site and pervious pavers will be installed in some parking spaces. The infiltration/detention basins will be landscaped with appropriate vegetation and topsoil to allow treatment and infiltration of storm water with storage above for detaining storm water. Detention of the storm water runoff for the 10 year storm is used to determine the reduction in service development charges. Infiltration testing was conducted and the site was determined to have adequate infiltration rates to serve the proposed improvements. See the table below for infiltration results and information. Test Test Location Test Test Soils Measured Depth infiltration Rate I Northwest corner 48" 0-12" Topsoil of site 12-36" light brown clayey silt moist 4.5 inches/hour 36"-42" light brown clayey silt 42"-48" Bar Run See Appendix B for the infiltration testing data. There are two proposed infIltration/detention basins proposed on the site. Each is primarily treating/detaining parking areas. See Appendix C for the proposed Drainage Basin Map for location of infiltration/detention basins and thEYc!it~~ed: treating and infiltrating/detaining. Below is a brief description of each. FEB 1 5 2011 Original submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51 "_52od & Main Street Redevelopment - Option C . Infiltration/Detention Basin A lnfiltration/Detention Basin A is located on the west side of the site and west ofthe proposed restaurant. lnfiltration/Detention Basin A will have asphalt parking and landscaping draining to it. The basin draining to lnfiltration/Detention Basin A is 0.22 acres. One side has a 3: I side slope and the other has a short retaining wall. lnfiltration/Detention Basin A has approximately 800 cubic feet of storage. InfiJtrationlDetention Basin A is bisected by a concrete sidewalk and a.6" storm pipe is proposed to go under the concrete sidewalk to allow lnfiltration/Detention Basin A to act as one basin. Infiltration/Detention Basin A is two feet deep from the top of the growing medium to the overflow. There is another 6" of freeboard above the overflow. The overflow for lnfiltration/Detention Basin A is connected to a proposed 8" storm line that is connected to a proposed 12" storm line in 51 st Place that will be constructed under a Public Improvement Permit. The outlet structure has a 1-1/2" diameter orifice set at elevation 494.50 to control the flow of water out of the infiltration/detention basin and allow for a reduction in service development charges. lnfiltration/Detention Basin B Infiltration/Detention Basin B is located on the north side of the site along Main Street and west of the proposed ODOT driveway approach. Infiltration/Detention Basin B will have asphalt parking and landscaping draining to it. The basin draining to InfiltrationlDetention Basin B is 0.29 acres. Infiltration/Detention Basin B is 1'-6" deep from the top of the growing medium to the overflow and has 3: I side slopes. Infiltration/Detention Basin B has approximately 887 cubic feet of storage. The overflow for Infiltration/Detention Basin B is connected to a proposed 4" storm line that is connected to the existing public storm system in 52nd Street. The outlet structure has a I -I /2" diameter orifice set at elevation 495.25 to control the flow of water out of the infiltration/detention basin and allow for a reduction in service development charges. Other drainage basins on the site will be treated by double chambered catch basins with filter inserts and conveyed through storm pipes to the public storm system. Stormwater Runoff Peak discharge rates for the post development conditions were generated using the Santa Barbara Unit Hydrograph method. The King County Department of Public Works, Surface Water Management Division, Hydrographs Programs, Version 4.21B computer program was used to assist in the hydrologic calculations. See Appendix D for the storm water runoff results. Below is a summary of the results for each drainage basin. Proposed Conditions Peak Discharge Rates (cfs) Storm Basin A Basin B WQ (0.83 inches/24 hours) 0.03 0.04 2 Year (3.3 inches/24 hours) 0.15 0.20 10 Year (4.3 inches/24 hours) 0.20 0.27 25 Year (4.8 inches/24 hours) 0.22 0.30 Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52od ft Main Street Redevelopment - Option C . Int1ltration Basin Sizin!! Each infiltration/Detention basin is characterized in a spreadsheet to be used with the King County Department of Public Works, Surface Water Management Division, Hydrographs Programs, Version 4.21 B computer program for routing the developed storm through the infiltration basin. The routing data can be found in Appendix D as well as the infiltration volumes and the required storage for each infiltration/detention basin. Below is a summary of each infiltration/detention basin. Infiltration Basin A Below is a summary of the peak flow rates and the peak elevation the stormwater will get in Infiltration Basin A during these specific storms. Proposed Infiltration Basin A Storm Peak inflow (cfs) Peak outflow (cfs) Water Elevation (feet) WQ 0.03 0.01 494.32 2 Year 0.15 0.07 495.10 10 Year 0.20 0.08 495.36 25 Year 0.22 0.09 495.51 Infiltration Basin A has approximately 800 cubic feet of storage. The overflow is set at an elevation of 496.00. There is a 1-1/2" diameter orifice in the outlet structure and it is set at elevation 494.50. The 10 year storm event will be detained as much as possible to allow for a reduction in the service development charges. The orifice and outlet are set above the water quality storm event to allow for maximum storm water treatment. The water quality storm will infiltrate within 21 hours. The infiltration basin will be landscaped in accordance with the City of Springfield requirements. Infiltration Basin B Below is a summary of the peak flow rates and the peak elevation the storm water will get in Infiltration Basin B during these specific storms. Proposed Infiltration Basin B Storm Peak inflow (cfs) Peak outflow (cfs) Water Elevation (feet) WQ 0.04 0.02 494.99 2 Year 0.20 0.09 495.56 10 Year 0.27 0.10 495.82 25 Year 0.30 . 0.11 495.96 Infiltration Basin B has approximately 887 cubic feet of storage. The overflow is set at an elevation of 496.25. There is a I -1/2" diameter orifice in the outlet structure and it is set at elevation 495.25. The 10 year storm event will be detained as much as possible to allow for a reduction in the service development charges. The orifice and outlet are set above the water quality storm event to allow for maximum storm water treatment. The water quality storm will infiltrate within 21 hours. The infiltration basin will be landscaped in accordance with the City of Springfield requirements. The rest of the site will drain to double chambered catch basins with filter inserts located in the parking areas and roof drains from the east commercial building and the townhouses will be directed to on-site private storm line that eventually tlows to the public storm system in 520d Street. Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 oricinal submittaL . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52od fr Main Street Redevelopment - Option C See Appendix D for stonnwater runoff, routing and infiltration basin stage-storage-outflow calculations. See Appendix E for Infiltration swale section and double chamber catch basin with filter insert. Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52'd & Main Street Redevelopment - Option C . Appendix A Soil Maps and Soil Data Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal e~ Oz g'W ~:s; 0,,- ",0 ",-, ~W <C> >-W cD ~w 80:: ",>- eW roW -'0:: 1>- 0U) ~z 0_ ~<C ~:s; 'ooi:\ (/)0 gz cnN 0", e~ -o(/) >-~ I~ ..\71': .90; .lll ..DE .9S .ll'~ ~ N ;r o o v N v V 0\769L9\7 0(:69L9\1 Ol69le" mS9LB\7 0069L9\7 0699l81> aaaaLa\>' OL99L9\1 o ro 11 ~ :2 !;; o ~ o w ~ Iii o ~ 11 ~ ~ 11 ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ Iii ~ ~ o m 2; ~ o ro w ~ o ~ w <'> ~ Ov69LBv 0\:69L9v Ol69l9\7 OL69Lev 0069L8\7 0689L8\7 0899t9\7 OL99LBv " v N " . FEB 1 ~ 2011 Original Submiftal ..1>1':.9'; .(;(;1 8 ~ ~ o ro ~ o ~ o ~ N 0," oc "'~ ~a: NO ~n "- -. . ~o ro , 1 u iVe "u ~ , ~~ g~ "'< "'< s~ , < < ~ 2 o N ;;; . fi " 0; -. "0 ~ := in '"- . N .;; << c o u . " "- o N o ro s o ~ ~ o W . jj 00 ~ ro " Q ., ~ ~ su 0< ~ < Q):::: 0::" -< i"Q ~ ' -< m< Zc 00 o o ~~~ c~ oz "'w i":2 0,,- -0 "'-, i"w >-w cO ~w 00: 0>- "'w Cw "'0: -1>- ~UJ 1;z G~ _:2 000 ':;0 "- Z "'N .2", o , ~>- ~UJ Ie z o i= <l: ~ a:: o u.. Z 0- <l: ~ rn " '" ~ ~ '" E '" ID in ~ ~ (5 - '" w .~ E o " rn E w >- '" 2 ~ w "0 00 '" ~ >- ~ '" E '" ~ ~ " " '" $! ID '" ~ 00 ~ '" E ~ " '" '" C o '" ro " w ro .0 '" ~ ~2 o C ~E ~ ~ '" ~ w w '" '" '" '" ii:E > '" 0 .~ 0) 2", "''' UJ<g c '" .Q ~ rn c C >.::2 "''''0 ~c:<{ o~z u'Oz Wwo 8.D .- ~ '" '" ~ ~ c 0::::: 0 ~ i:iN a::::~2. -~>- l" ::J ~ "" - -' ~o::.. ::JE >-2 i:i.~~ ~::J(J) ......(/)2 0= ClI ~~:6 ::;.go ~s8 . - o w ro ro ro u u '" "' E '" " UJ o 0: Z J: o UJ ::J '" ~ " - ~ E 0 em - .0 "" 2", ",- ~ w v= . c: VI "'- "'''' .!!2 ro -" " c ~ 0 " "- e ~ ~'" w > :.c~ >-- c o "'0 i"_ 00 N ro - ",a> ~.o -LL ~rO o c u.Q '" l" c '" j> "" ro "'- ~d - VI U) Q) ill o ~ rn UJUJ 0 . '" o o N ;, <:0 '" c E ~ L: "'" 00 ;:: c: 0 i3 5 .~ .!: rn E -~'" '0 ~ E w.o 0 '" '" W ~J::~ :;; -E"S " w :.ce~ ~ '; co i c'- CI) Q) o&<i::Q g-u ~ ~ E2:-l'IJ(l) lV.g E .0 (I)..D Q} >. .2i e i3 E ~ ~~ :5-g-;;.~ o.~ 0 ~ '-::::"'0"0 OO'lQ)C .8 U fu"' 5 0"00...0 -5. ~.!!! ~ o "C :E-g~::I oc.~g- Q) E ro E ~ 8.~ '0 ID '" ~ w x '" N "w OJ ~ ro c ro Z -;;; " ro , '" '" c Ll ~ W " " u m w w C> E => " c I w u u 6 ~ u ro '" '" ro ro '" w ., 0 0 W "6 ro w ~ 0: ~ " l' c E 0 0: ...J ro . w ro ro 0: " ~ ~ 2! " ro ;; '" 6 0 a 0 "6 . '" ~ "m "m 0 4. . 0 c U) ll.. i" U) m <( 'i' en m u U a z i! Ll ~ 0 u; ,g 0: E => " 0 2 ~ ro i! -' <l: '" ro -= ~ ro " ~ ro '" 0 0: 0 0 ~ 0 0 I 0 " ~ 0 ~ ro '" "0 Cc~ :E <') . t ~ ", < '" "0 U) 2 c ,; 4. " ro ro U) "- ;;: 0::. o~ DC to'~ , N , ~ " n , 2 & iDe 2V ~ , UJ_ " '0 l... UJ 1 .c , '" , SC " c c ~ 2 . c ~ .~ " . ~r.r. o c w C Q)~ '" . - 2 '" . ~ . '" c '" c ZU Date Received: Ali' 0,\ -, Original Submittal H'YdroI09IC'SOil Group-Lane County Area. orl t.T-52ND & MAIN STREET REDEVELOPMENT Hydrologic Soil Group Map unit symbol ;119 Hydrologic Soil Group- Summary by Map Unit - Lane County Area, Oregon . I Map unit name f Rating I Acres in AOI 1 i i Salem-Urban land complex : B 1.5 : , Percent of AQI 100.0% [Totals for Area of Interest 1.5 ! 100.0% Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (AID, BID, and C/O). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a clay pan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (AID, B/D, or C/O), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group 0 are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Lower Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 USDA .,.,-= Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey Original Submittal 12/1/2010 Page 3 of3 . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52"d ft Main Street Redevelopment - Option C Appendix B Infiltration Testing Report Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 . Original Submittal . . Project Name: Q&O ~"'ln :s~""-<.-~ 'S,K Project No.: 0"1 -/'''1 . Project Location: S I'U Pfv.(.<, J Sf" ~r,~C-rcid, Date ofField Work: 11{.;IIO Comments: L'<.h/........" (r.U<>VK "",-vctS 'J.!,":t:: r r r" t. I' - {} l)~ ~DvOw'\ 0-, \co., lvi.. ll{<e If'v'<.f b'fn/C!h\- (1.S/Z') (,dovj /\ '::>oll- , ",:d< '" LO./A lJ't11-i'/ftl fup 61- P'{lz) ..:r I W6'tv ( (tV"" ( . : .. "'ilj, ',., ./,"- InfIltration Test No. I) Depth l.f Diameter J Vol. of Pres at. I t;jflL Soil Description: ...: f"F 'S,.. d- & 1&-~1' O~....., 0..,,", $I~l: '~'S;T. ,1..-rt J.'~ttr ,.f. ~,..I\, e:.w' 'Z::Jo ~ Depth to Water Vol. of Water Added ,.." ~/'t; I' t~ . ~ '--_ Lc.-=-O Time Time E]~sed . Infiltration Test No. Soil Description: Depth Diameter Vol. of Presat. Time Time Elapsed ~2- : 4_0 P i~-" } 0 i~-l ~ \-"1 Depth to Water .rl 1\ ", ~ II b -;'O,(jJ"r:; Vol. oj/Water Added l!~r;I1) . piA. ~ ,pc \)'f ()u~h {- X TO .' '1.- <'Ir, Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal { /3 . Project Name: OeD thOtir, Sh-~"-r- c,,-r-< Project No,: II 0 - w0 Project Location: t:; 1'0' Plv,Q :$ (i/,,,,':r! Sf rid" Date ofField Work: II (S I Iv Comments: "U- Pq } Infiltration Test No. Soil Description: <"7 L-- Time Time Elapsed -! ~ ::-~~',; V ~~'- '~() ,r.:.i\... (i--.... i.. ~-..if -'- 1 "- ~ '" Infiltration Test No.....! Soil Description: Time Time Elapsed 7..- loCO. 0" '"'- .1\ "t'\.'\'{h .4 \" 10' \'r '-' Depth Depth to Water ~ ! t H , .. 'Q -, --.) I ~ ' ," p:::.o:1. Depth Depth to Water f .f\~ ~, Diameter Diameter . Vol. of Pres at. ."~ ;- /- tt ~'1 k -"\ i '." ..... i: / ..Q. to L- cs If, " br-ouqht- " 0;/0 Vol. of Presat. VoL of Water Added 1 '$:f~; ~\ 1 t' b:'O'l<;" , ..- $. ~,,'. "d", <,:, \'.",~, 19 ("I;; i1 ~" PI r"'- 6rDuO,i-J-- V Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal to "2 '5lg" LIz, . Project Name: o{Z,o ;v,..;", <;", <;; ;+{ Project No,: o";-fS-C, i Project Location: "IS" pit-Gt J s(j'f (v' Date ofField Work: 1\ /, {(Q Comments: S<<- p~ I Infiltration Test No. 1 Depth Soil Description: Time Time Elapsed Depth to Water Ii' -~ n <:6::'0,1) """ '0 '--, .. ~ ~ -.J ' ~ ""' . _. \Oiv,\If'-, 0\ vIJY1Jcl>rL t9 ,iSG1) tve.r~ J [) 'VI ~t\vk5 - Diameter . Vol. of Presat. VoLofWater Added 49- t',--.... ;-. it - I} 4S,I'\C--Vl ,hv ---------- Infiltration Test No. Soil Description: Depth Time Time Elapsed Depth to Water Diameter Vol. of Presat. Vol. of Water Added I ~ f-. (inf,\-; {Lc."R Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal 7./- ./ ' . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51 "_52od ft Main Street Redevelopment - Option C Appendix C Proposed Drainage Basin Map , Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52,d 6: Main Street Redevelopment - Option C . Appendix D Stormwater Runoff & Infiltration Basin Sizing Calculations Date Received: FEB 1 5. 2011 Original Submittal . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51".52"' 8: Main Street Redevelopment - Option C Infiltration Basin A - Water Quality Storm ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* I-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** .83" TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.03,61,0.19,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 .0 61. 0 .2 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .03 7.83 432 ENTER [do] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-wqca.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECI FY [d: ] [path] filename [ . ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159ca.rd DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? y ROUTING DATA: STAGE (FT) 494.00 494.25 494.50 494.75 495.00 495.25 495.50 495.75 496.00 496.25 496.50 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .01 .02 .05 .06 .08 .09 .10 .11 .82 2.11 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 57.0 125.0 205.0 298.0 404.0 524.0 660.0 812.0 982.0 1171.0 PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 MINUTES !INCH INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK STORAGE: 70 CU-FT ENTER (d:] [path] filename [.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-wqca.dev PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .03 .01 OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 359 INITIAL-STAGE(FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 8.33 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 494.32 Date Received: FEB 1 5. 2011 Original Submittal . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52od & Main Street Redevelopment - Option C Inrdtration Basin A - 2 Year Storm ******************** 5.C.5. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.30" TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.03,61,0.19,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 .0 61. 0 .2 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q{CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) .15 7.83 2167 ENTER [do] [path]fi1enarne[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-2ca.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW RO~TINE SPECIFY Ed:] [path]fi1enarne[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159ca.rd DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? y ROUTING DATA: STAGE (FT) 494.00 494.25 494.50 494.75 495.00 495.25 495.50 495.75 496.00 496.25 496.50 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .01 .02 .05 .06 .08 .09 .10 .11 .82 2.11 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 57.0 125.0 205.0 298.0 404.0 524.0 660.0 812.0 982.0 1171. 0 .0 MINUTES/INCH PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 ENTER Ed:] [path]fi1enarne[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-2ca.dev INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) .15 PEAK-QUTFLOW(CFS) .07 INITIAL-STAGE(FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 8.17 PEAK STORAGE: 340 CU-FT OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 2206 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV{FT) 495.10 Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . · Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52od &: Main Street Redevelopment - Option C InfIltration Basin A -10 Year Storm ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* IO-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4.30" TOTALPRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.03,61,0.19,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 .0 61. 0 .2 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) .20 7.83 2907 ENTER [do] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-10ca.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY [do] [path]filename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159ca.rd DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? y ROUTING DATA: STAGE (FT) 494.00 494.25 494.50 494.75 495.00 495.25 495.50 495.75 496.00 496.25 496.50 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .01 .02 .05 .06 .08 .09 .10 .11 .82 2.11 STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 57.0 125.0 205.0 298.0 4.04.0 524.0 660.0 812.0 982.0 1171. 0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES/INCH PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 ENTER Cd:] [path]filename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-10ca.dev INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .20 .08 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 8.33 PEAK STORAGE: 450 CU-FT OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 2908 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 495.36 Date Received: FEB 1 5.2011 Original Submittal . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51".52"d & Main Street Redevelopment - Option C Inmtration Basin A - 25 Year Storm ******************** S.C.s. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* 25-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4.80" TOTAL PRECIP. ******-/.- ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. ] 0.03,61,0.19,98,]0 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (P,CRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 .0 61. 0 .2 98.0 ]0.0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU~FT) .22 7.83 3282 ENTER Cd:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-25ca.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY Cd:] [path]filename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09]59ca.rd DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? y ROUTING DATA: STAGE (FT) 494.00 494.25 494.50 494.75 495.00 495.25 495 . 50 495. 75 496.00 496.25 496.50 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .01 .02 .05 .06 .08 .09 .10 .J] .82 2. J] AVERAGE PERM-RATE: STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 57.0 ]25.0 205.0 298.0 404.0 524.0 660.0 8]2.0 982.0 ll71.0 .0 MINUTES/INCH PERM-AREA(SQ~FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 ENTER Cd:] [path]filename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-25ca.dev -INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) .22 PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .09 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) .00 PEAK STORAGE: TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) 8.33 ]900 CU-FT OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 3130 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 495.51 Date Received: FEB I 5 20fl Original Submittal . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51".52od & Main Street Redevelopment - Option C . InfIltration Basin B - Water Quality Storm ******************** 5.C.5. TYPE~lA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* I-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** .83" TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.03,61,0.26,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 .0 61.0 .3 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T- PEAK (HRS) VOL (CU-FT) .04 7.83 591 ENTER [do] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-wqcb.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY [do] [path]filename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159cb.rd DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? y ROUTING DATA: STAGE (FT) 494.75 495.00 495.25 495.50 495.75 496.00 496.25 496.50 DI SCHARGE (CFS) .00 .02 .07 .09 .10 .11 .11 .65 STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 92.0 208.0 351.0 520.0 704.0 887.0 1071.0 PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES/INCH ENTER [do] [path]filename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-wqcb.dev INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .04 .02 OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 521 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 8.50 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 494.99 PEAK STORAGE: 80 CU-FT Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52"d & Main Street Redevelopment - Option C Inmtration Basin B-2 Year Storm ******************** 5.C.5. TYPE-IA ********* 2~YEAR 24-HOUR STORM DISTRIBUTION ******************* **** 3.30'1 TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.03,61,0.26,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 .0 61. 0 .3 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T- PEAK (HRS) VOL (CU-FT) .20 7.83 2946 ENTER Cd:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-2cb.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY [do] [path]filename[.ext] OF ROOTING DATA 09159cb.rd DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? y ROUTING DATA: STAGE (FT) 494.75 495.00 495.25 495.50 495.75 496.00 496.25 496.50 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .02 .07 .09 .10 .11 .11 .65 STORAGE (CO-FT) .0 92.0 208.0 351.0 520.0 704.0 887.0 1071. 0 PERM-AREA(SQ~FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES/INCH ENTER [do} [path]filename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-2cb.dev INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .20 .09 OUTFLOW-VOL (CO-FT) 2937 INITIAL-STAGE(FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 8.17 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV (FT) 495.56 PEAK STORAGE: 390 CU-FT Date Received: FEB 1 5.2011 Original Submittal . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52" &: Main Street Redevelopment - Option C Inmtration Basin B -10 Year Storm ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* * -/0' * * * * * ** IO-YEAR 24 -HOUR STORM ... * * * 4.30" TOTAL PREelP _ * * *** ** ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.03,61,0.26,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 _ 0 61. 0 .3 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .27 7.83 3939 ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-10cb.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159cb.rd DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? y ROUTING DATA: STAGE(FT) 494 .75 495.00 495.25 495.50 495.75 496.00 496.25 496.50 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .02 .07 .09 .10 .11 .11 .65 STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 92.0 208.0 351.0 520.0 704.0 887.0 1071. 0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES/INCH PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-10cb.dev INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .27 .10 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 8.50 PEAK STORAGE: 570 CU-FT Inmtration Basin B - 25 Year Storm OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 3963 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 495.82 Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original submittal . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52'd ft Main Street Redevelopment - Option C ******************** 8.C.8. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* 25-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4.80" TOTAL PRECIP. ******* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.03,61,0.26,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 .0 61. 0 .3 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK (HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .30 7.83 4441 ENTER Cd:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-25cb.dev RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY Cd:] [path]filename[.ext] OF ROUTING DATA 09159cb.rd DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? y ROUTING DATA: STAGE(FT) 494 . 75 495.00 495.25 495.50 495. 75 496.00 496.25 496.50 DISCHARGE (CFS) .00 .02 .07 .09 .10 .11 .11 .65 STORAGE (CU-FT) .0 92.0 208.0 351. 0 520.0 704.0 887.0 1071. 0 PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: .0 MINUTES !INCH ENTER Cd:] [path]filename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 159-25cb.dev INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK-I~(CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) .30 .11 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) .00 8.50 PEAK STORAGE: 670 CU-FT OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) 4425 PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) 495.96 Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 r . . -I ~,. ,Co.. .It". ~.mgfn;.,~~":l~l, II '04 ,_..__ . . . Storm Drainage Evaluation 51"-52'd 8: Main Street Redevelopment - Option C . Appendix E Vegetated Infiltration Basin and Double Chambered Catch Basins with Fossil Filter Insert Date Received: FES 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . , f 9 n MINIMUl.A )1 2- 3:1 MAX. SIDE SLOPES (TYP.) ---, 2 n FLAT 80nOM ~ OVERFlOW ElEVATION FOR PARKING LOTS. TIRE STOPS OR CURBS W/CUTS 12.x12R CLEAR FLOW AREA AT CUTOUTS 9"-18" (SEE NOlE 28) 1 ..'~ . .~ ./~ (./\'\',->, . ' . , /~ .\ 0,-"\ ,><~\.,:'::~: \' /.'-"'/,.....-'\ ,\, , " "?::\\\<"\-::"\~ ~ ~\\\;'\<"-;">/)\<\\;"\',..:-:; \\:\>\'V....-~~\\.\\\...\~..)..~\\' " v/~\ _ ,\ "v",\'/ ....~. -"\ \....\\,/\ '.y~\ - ",\,'" /\'i'..)/~\ \ \<\ v.r;"'> (/\-"':-"/);\ ~\ ~.\", /'v-:\\.\.;:~;{-::-.~~\y~-\ \<\ \'~-;\:::~\0:~'\\ ,\ "\h\ --, 'A ''\ ,/ .'. ';"~.\G.,,'RQW1"""v\)J:)'0;\-(";;--:r /, Y_'\'::\\\"\~::-~:.::?:-'B\\ V"-.MEmW\\\-(\C;:<\\~\\>\ \ (~\ ---:-V\~" \\ :-<"'--;:'...-... >'A\\.A:\',/':':\..<~\\:, ./ '\.,. . k,C? -/-'\;-'. .. ,-\\'):\\V /\';/\\'\....\'\..-'..,./ \\.'....~/- 1'--..1' ."--.... .'.J .: J,.- -::...:/'.1\ l~-" '. ....\. _,)~ <. _./-.-..::.~ jr :.t F" Jr=-<-;- y=!: . -- ,,-,. je- "'c ~':,-/< .k"'-"""'>:. . \('-;; \c"'')? ',--)' / \~::y~r-=~<;:?.::..,/.-. J"~~',-(~-v"R~'~>R.OCj'& o-~.' p,.;j jS--'''''~ p..., _~~;n "_.:':-~ k \'0--" ~~~-,,J-'::- /{ ,fI. '." "",-. lB' ,,- (SEE NOTE 6) SEE SW-150 fOR PIPING J . CONFIGURATION. FILTER fABRIC, SEE NOTE 7 EXISTING 'SUBGRADE ;. 1. Provide protection from all vehicle traffic, equipment staging, and foot traffic in proposed infiltration areas prior to, during, and after construction. 2. Dimensions: a. Width of basin: 9' minimum. b, Depth of basin (from top of growing medium to overflow elevation); Simplified: 12", Presumptive: 9"-18". c. Flat bottom width: 2' min. d. Side slopes of basin: 3:1 maximum. 6. Drain rock: a. Size for infiltration basin: 1}';~ -~" washed b. Size for flow-through basin: %" washed c. Depth for Simplified: 12" d. Depth for Presumptive: 0-48", see calcs. 7. Separation between drain rock and growing medium: Use filter fabric (see SWMM Exhibit 2-5) or a gravel lens (~- % inch washed, crushed rock 2 to 3 inches deep). 3. Setbacks (from midpoint of facility): a.lnfiltration basins must be 10' from foundations and 5' from property lines. b. Flow-through swales must be lined with connection to approved discharge point according to SWMM Section 1.3. 8. Growing medium: 3. 18" minimum b. See Appendix F.3 for specification or use sandlloam/compost 3-way mix. 4. Overflow: a. Overflow required for Simplified Approach. b. Inlet elevation must allow for 2" of freeboard, minimum. c. Protect from debris and sediment with strainer or grate. 9. Vegetation: Follow landscape plans otherwise refer to plant list in SWMM Appendix F. Minimum container size is 1 gallon. # of plantings per 100sf of facility area): a. Zone A (wet): 115'herbaceous plants OR 100 herbaceous plants and 4 shrubs b. Zone B (moderate to dry): 1 tree AND 3 large shrubs AND 4 medium to small shrubs. The delineation between Zone A and B shall be either at the outlet elevation or the check dam elevation, whichever is lowest. 5. Piping: shall be ASS SchAD, cast iron, or PVC SchAD. 3" pipe required for up to 1,500 sq ft of impervious area, otherwise 4" min. Piping must have 1% grade and follow the Uniform Plumbing Code. 10. Install washed pea gravel or river rock to transition from inlets and splash pad to growing medium. 11. Inspections: Call 6DS IVR InsQataiRe0EIiMeOJioo, for appropriate inspections. 'l,,:'''\i'\'-'''' ';" ,.' FEB 1 5 2011 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL TYPICAL bmittal ~ -- - - Simplified I Presumptive Design Approach - Basin NUMBER Bureau of Environmental Services SW-140 -.. w <=> :;; 'OJ- cv A OUTLEY I 1 I""" lClI: 48" LONG PLAN VIEW SILT & DEBRIS CO NT AINMENT AREA L2~x2~xrl; FRAME 53" HIGH FLOW BYPASS , :z:~ 'OJ-~ ~:::s -'" '<I" '<I" '" .,,_., "'- r- OUTLET 1- _ , :z: ~ :::s 1 - - 1 ~ SEDIMENT TRAt -l-' WI HINGED 1 LID : SEDIMENT : TRAP 1 'OJ- N 1- 48" .. SIDE VIEW FLO RD ™ FILTER INSERT (MODEL FGP-24F) WOVEN MESH FILTER BODY NOTES: BOX FABRICATED FROM 10 GA. MATERIAL NEOPRENE GASKET (TWO SIDES) DUCTILE IRON SOLID LID & DUCTILE IRON GRATE BIKE PROOF, HEAVY DUTY TRAFFIC GRATE SUPPORTS AASHTO H25 LOADS cO REPLACEABLE ABSORBENT POUCHES ISOMETRIC SEDIMENT & HYDROCARBONS FILTRATION :trateEReceived: STATE APPROVED - ASPHALT DIPPED 24"x42" - 6"1> OUTLET SAND COLLECTOR CATCH BASIN PROJ. MAN. DOUG P. DATE: JAN. 23. 06 Gibson Sleel Basins SINCE 1972 DWN, PAUL G. SCALE MODEL: SC8FlO-42H8-6 # F5 NONE 247 Washington 51 Eugene. Or. 97401 ph (541) 687 - 8672 fox 344-0207 . 'epartment of Transportation ODOT District 5 644 'A' Street Springfield, OR 97477 (541) 744-8080 Fax: (541) 726-2509 Jobn.DOWNING@odot.state.or.us File Code: PMT 4-07 September 16, 2010 Damien Gilbert . Branch Engineering, Inc 310 5th Street Springfield, OR 97477 Subject: Supplemental Documentation Required (Checklist) to Continue Processing of Application for State Highway Approach Highway Number 015, (McKenzie), at Mile Point 5.72 Application Number 10859 Dear Damien Gilbert: The Oregon Department of Transportation has completed an initial review of your Application for State Highway Approach, and has determined that supplemental documentation is required in order to properly evaluate your application. The Department may require supplemental documentation before an application is deemed complete. (OAR 734-051-0070(6)1. . The supplemental documentation required for the Department to continue processing your application is identified and defined below. o Detailed information on the type of development, including the number and square footage of buildings and units with a complete description of the proposed land uses of the property(s) to be served by the approach (es). Vicinity map(s) showing: o Location on state highway by milepost, engineer's station, or other landmarks; o Existing highway plan and access management controls; o Existing land uses and zoning; o Existing ingress or egress easements; o Adjoining lots showing the development footprint and all approaches, and any other approaches onto any existing, planned, and proposed abutting roads and streets abutting the site to show at least twice the applicable o 1 If you would like a'co~plete copy of the Chapter 734 Division 51 Rule, you may obta~ ijamaived: . visiting our website'at: http://www.oreaon.aov/ODOT/HWY/ACCESSMGT/technicalbulletins.shtml or by cont~cting ODOT's Rules Coordinator at (503) 986-3171. FEB r 5 2011 .. .' :~.: ~r.' {\' Original Submittal . . Supplemental Documentation Required to Continue Processing of Application for State Highway Approach Additional Documentation Required Highway Number 015, (McKenzie), at Mile Point 5.72 Application Number 10859. Thursday, September 16, 2010 Page 2 spacing standard on both sides of the roadway along any roadway available for ingress and egress from the property; and '0 Structures and other features (e.g., traffic signals, drainage ditches and pipes, streams, ponds, lakes or railroads). o A preliminary drainage plan of the site showing impacts to the highway right-of- way. o A drainage study prepared by an Oregon Registered Professional Engineer. o Map(s) showing existing and proposed, if known, utility locations before and after development in and along the highway. o Site plan to scale, including: o Existing and proposed approach(es) from the property to the highway as well as to other existing, planned and proposed streets and roads; o Existing, planned and proposed utilities, if known, including in and along the highway; o Right of Way survey and land donation (if applicable); o Identification of protected resource areas such as wetland, timber, or archeological sites, and any identified location or mitigation; o Identification of proposed traffic mitigation measures; o Existing and proposed buildings; o Existing and proposed property lines; o On-site traffic flow pattern; o Parking, including number and arrangement of all spaces including disabled; o Drive through windows/gas pumps; o Existing, planned or proposed transit facilities, such as turnouts; o Sight clearance including landscaping; o Existing, planned and proposed sidewalks on site or on the highway right of way; o North arrow on drawings. and o Pedestrian and bicycle accomodations o Grant o Indenture ~ Transportation Impact Study (see Attachment regarding the Technical Memorandum Review) o An Access Management Plan as a mitigation measure (see Attachment ) o Hazardous material collection and/or treatment system report. o Other . All of the above supplemental documentation must be submitted to our office by November 15, 2010 unless you and the Department agree to a time extension before November 15, 2010. Please note that this application will expire if the supplemental . documentation, or an extension is not received by November 15, 2010. Unless a time extensioriis~greed to, ~ub'!littal of any information after the date of etDjn~'Re't!~RJed: pro~ssed,as a new application. . . t'd " ,'. I .:..' ,. .' FES 152011 . -. . . _:~~". . J.f/.;' .>H': -. . Original Submittal . '. . Supplemental Documentation Required t.ntinue PrOC~SSing of Application' . for State Highway Approach Additional Documentation Required Highway Number01S, (McKenzie), at Mile PointS.72 Appiication Number 10859. Thursday, September 16, 2010 Page 3 Please contact John Downing, Permit Specialist at (541) 744-8080 if questions arise in the process of providing the supplemental documentation. c: John Downing, Permit Specialist David Knitowski, Regional Access Management Engineer . :." ~. ~. ...i I ~ ., " I) ~: ::\ . Date Received: FEB f 520ft ...._ ......_,.~. ". ...i.;:"':";!,,;'~r,:{ (;~~~:~':':' Original Submittal '1r . . Oregon Department of Transportation Application for State Highway Approach , FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ", '.DateR'Eiceived Staho Permit Specialist Permit Type: New Change of Use Temporary Restricted Modification of Existing: 0 Yes, 0 No Deviation: 0 Yes :0 No , ' .. NOTES: Hwy#: Milepoint: Station: CHAMPS 10 #: Required Information . . The applicant must submit the following information with the Applicalion for State Highway Approach. OOOT will nOllfy the applicant if additional information is required. . All attachments required by answers on the application form, including applicant signature. ' . If the applicant is not the owner of the property tD be served by the approach, then the property owner must authprize the applicant as a designated agent. The applicant must have the property owner complete the Authorization ofl Designated Agent blDck on this form OR submit a signed letter from the property owner authDrizing the applicant as the designated agent. . Site plan and vicinity map approved or currently being reviewed by the local gDvernment . . A Land Use Compatibility Statement (LUGS) for a State Highway Approach (page 40f this application) must be completed by the local government . A copy of the current CDunty tax lot map for the property served by the approach. Map must highlight all property that would be served by the approach and list all owner name(s} on adjacent properties. Make a note on map If ownership of adjacent property is same as subject property. Identify the location of the proposed approach on map. I . A copy of the recorded easement(s), if the subject property has an existing easement(s} for access to the propertY. . A copy of any existing state Dr local gDvernment approach permits for tht'!> property. 1 In addition to the above submittals, the applicant may be required to place stakes or markings near the highway sho Ider at the proposed approach location. , I Definitions for commonly used terms are in the attached brochure. The brochure is also available on the ODOT website located at: http://w\,,",w.oreoon.oov/ODOT!HWY/ACCESSMGT/ I Applicant Information Last Name: Gilbert Street Address: 31 0 5th Street City: Springfield Mailing Address: 310 5th Street City: Springfield Phone Number: 541-746-0637 Cell Phone Number: I First Name: Damlen I Company: Branch Engineering, Ine I State: OR Zip Code:g7477 I County: Lane I State: OR Zip Code: 97477 FAX Number: I County: Lane E-mail Address:damien@branchengineering.com Is applicant working as an Agent of the Owner? YES:~] NO: 0 I If YES, the owner must cDmplete the AuthorizatiDn of Designated Agent section below, OR ATTACH a letter from the\, Dwner authorizing applicant to act as hislher agent. _ n......... . . Approach Location . ,....-. Highway Name - May be a statewide highway name such as Pacific Highway, or a local name like EastMaiQ ~tr~et.Ol Route Number.; The posted,highway, number, e.g. 1-5 or US-84 t'tD 1 :J l 1 Highway Na~'~:' McKenzie Hwy Route Number: 15 County: Lane '" Mile Poi~t':,'5.7?:iln\:':;:i.>,:$ide of Highway: North 0 South 181 East 0 West c:Priginal Submittal , ". ---.. - . " ~ Is the highway iri'a'ria'ti~nal forest area?: Yes 0 No 181 734-2680 (8/08) Page 1 of 4 ~ @ \P -;.~~';: ,,".., -.-"- --+ ~ ' AuthoriUition of Desi ent I Nick Boyles Damien Gilbert my agent in the matter of this highway approach permit application. Owner Signature: (printed name of property owner) authorize (printed name of applicant) to represent me as A 'lica'n.t'Si nature NOTIFICATION TO APPLICANT: The ODOT District Office will contact you when your application has been reviewed. If additional documents are required to continue the application process you willpe notified. When all of the necessary documents have been received, the application will be deemed complete. If your completed application is approved, preliminary construction specifications will be issued. A performance bond and liability insurance will be required before any construction work can begin on the highway right of way. For the complete rules regarding approach permitting, see OAR Chapter 734 Division 51. The Applicant declares, certifies, and affirms under penalty of applicable state or federal laws that all information provided on this form and attachments are true and complete to the best of his/her knowledge. Printed Name: Damien Gilbert :Addit!ohiIlA roach Information Application is a request for (check all that apply) o New Approach - There is no existing pemnitted or grandfathered approach road at the location requested in this application . o Temporary Approach - The approach requested will be removed after a specified period of time 129 Existing Approach - This application affects, or may affect, an existing approach o Restricted Use Approach - The approach requested is for emergency services, government, utility access or similar s ecific uses with limited traffic Vehicle TiJmin Movements Tum movements requested (check all that apply) All movements: 129 OR Right In: 0 Right Out 0 Left In: D Left Out: D Pro e .. Owner Information (If different than applicant) Last Name: OBO Enterprises LLC Street Address: 1528 Ferry St #11 City: Eugene Mailing Address: 1528 Ferry St #11 City: Eugene Phone Number: First Name: State: OR Zip Code: 97401 County: Lane State: OR Zip Code: 97401 FAX Number. County: Lane Cell Phone Number: 541-954-0217 E-mail Address: Are there additional owners of the subject property? YES: 0 NO: ~ If YES, ATTACH the same contact information as above for each of the co-owners on a separate sheet of paper. Pro elnformation (attach additional page(s) if space is insufficient) Subject property address(es):#5175 & #5195 Main Street City: Springfield. ....:.'M.....'..~.,."....:... .. Zip Code: 97477 Township(s) 17S ~,~~ge(sJ 02W Section(s) 33' -,', ., ",. . '~ ' /: County: Lane Tax lot(s) 06200 & 06300 Current zoning:CC' Proposed zoning: CC In the boxes below, describe the existing and proposed land use(s) on the property, includi Existing: Proposed: residential, Area 1.50 Ac multi-family, fast food, Area 1.50 AcfEB 1 ~ 2011 acreage. 734-2680 (8/08) Page 2 of 4 >flG'fk. . ._:.:.."c.:.....__.__.___ . . Site Plan & Vicinity MapiRequirements Local government site.plan .. . "~'-'. :~:.:,;):..;:,~.:.,)\~~~~*~~~:: 'tt.7:?:?:' ::":.: "S::~~{;~,t.i}~Ji~"$i!(~F':i;.. Has the local government approved a site plan or is the local government currently reviewing a plan for th proposed land use? o Yes (If yes, attach a copy of the plans being reviewed by the local government.) ~ No. i~J.;)'~~t~!,e ~ .., Submit drawing(s) no larger than 11" x 17" in size. below: Property location and property lines, including: . North arrow . Show all lots or parcels that are part of the property or development with their ~orresponding tax lot numbers identified . Distance from the property lines to the center of the proposed approach Using solid lines, show: . Proposed approaches with requested width and turning movements shown . Proposed & existing buildings and structures to be retained . Proposed use of existing buildings and structures to be retained . Other proposed equipment or facilities and their proposed use . Proposed access or "cross-over" easements with neighboring properties . Nearest approaches on both sides of the highway within 500' of the proposed approach center-line Using dashed lines, show: . Existing approaches with width and turning movements shown . Place an "X" on approaches to be removed . Existing buildings and structures to be removed . Existing equipment or facilities to be removed. . Other existing facilities to be removed . Existing access or "cross-over" easements with neighboring properties Show proposed on-site circulation, including: . Travel lanes with travel directions indicated . Travel lane widths . Parking spaces or parking areas . Access locations to the parking spaces or areas Date Received: FEB , 520ft Show nearest landmark or cross street: . Provide nearest cross street name . Distance from the requested approach location to the nearest cross street . All publicstreets:that abut the property(s) .' . '. ,.,. .. Original Submittal 734-2680 (8108) Page 3 of 4 DATE RECEIVED BY ODOT 'J -. Oregon Departlnt of Transportation land Use Compatibility Statement (lUCS) C'IPS ID # What is a LUCS? A Land Use Compatibifrty Statement (LUCS) is the foon ODOT.uses to ensure that Highway Approach Permits are consistent with local/and use requirements. Why is a LUes Required? ODOT Coordination Rules, OAR 731-015, identify Highway Approach Peonils as peonits that affect land use. State law requires ODOT activities that affect land use to be consistent with acknowledged local comprehensive plans... When is a LUeS Required? An ODOT LUCS must be submitted with every ODOT Highway Approach Permit Application. How to Complete the LUCS: The applicant completes Section 1. Section 2 must be completed by the local jurisdiction. The applicant then submits the completed LUCS to ODOT as part of the Highway Approach Peonit Application. SECTION 1: Applicant & Sitelnfotmation Print applicant name: Damien Gilbert I Applicant signature: Properly owner name: OBO Enterprises LLC Subject property address: #5175 & #5195 Main Street, Springfield, OR Site description: residential lots, the house is removed from #5175, the house remains on #5195 but will be tom down for new development Describe the proposed activity, use, or development, including type and volume of traffic it will generate. multi-family use, fast food drive through restaurant Township(s) Range(s) Section(s) Tax lot(s) 178 02W 33 06200,06300 SECTION 2 must be filled out by a Local Planning Official SECTION 2: Detennination of Compliance with Local Land Use Requirements The subject property is: 1fl'nside 0 Outside City Limits l;ii Inside 0 Outside UGS Current Comprehensive Plan designation: I.'\;}.,,; d LJt>e Current zoning: CO "1Q1 vn; 11 (6 rf\fI1f<( (' J-,\ \ Is a Comprehensive Plan or zoning amendment proposed? YES 0 NO I;iQ If YES, list Ihe proposed plan designation: proposed zoning: Does the activity, use, or development require land use review to deteonine compliance with land use regulations? YES f;(( NO 0 If NO, it means that no local land use review is needed. Skip to Local Planning Official Information below. If YES, what is the status of the land use application: 0 Approved 0 Denied 0 Under review ~Not yet received List file number(s): Is the decision final: YES 0 NO 0 Comments: Local Plannin Official Information R uired: Jurisdiction: (',I- c.,.j.':5 ; rv,{] t: \ d ~rint planning official's name and title: "'._'-- +.0 u 0 1-) ~ k' ? I ') -- ~ \.. t...' .nSI t1'...."fiL Date Received: lAailing Address: Z Z -- ,- . f ~ '-1'1 II '5 :;ity: S -lnr..t7~\~f";~";- ~.; ....,J~. ~hone: =mail: Zip Code: 'll 4 I Original Submittal Fax: 5 -4 ,. 72(.1." l'S 7':}.. I"'lcon 101/"\0' rI___ A _~ A ; g ::;: :s:: ~ c" ~. ,~ : 3:. d '" ~ p oq _ ~~ ~z. "":6 ...,() I')w 'z ()..", ~...J! ....~ ,~ ~N :i~ ui~ ....~ ,. :s:: z '" 1')0 ...J I') w_ I"") LL en ",e>:;;" o ~ co a::: " 0.. ~ .... ~N id6~ ~~~ ~!i~ '!Jl~~~ c 'il . . : g N ~ g .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..~ . . Im~~ It IT m LL dWt J:3S ; Hi I" .. ~~~ '" 1')0 1')--' ,..,!!! LL ",C> o~ a::: "0.. ~cn oil1~ oi~; &~~ ~~3 ~:i:ci ili:ci - I <liaS-!.. ~ . , i- I-' _ ~ en _ " r . ~ . .... ~ ::l ....J~......, g ~ .~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ , ~ , , I to -----. - -1 f I i: Ii! i .~ lo I "8 ~ ~ g "Ir ::'-,. ~ ~ lI! ~ : " 0 ~ To!<' 'j , 3:lIfld .... ~ ~--~~ I ::l i..l il l~' ;; II \~r _ W ... ~ g ~ -- .. ~ " ! ~ . I:l .ISIS . -..:......,- ~ -.' J '6 . If ; ij Gfis--.-. g ~ 8 , ~ ~ , " j . " ~ ! i I' I :ii.-._ "' ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 I a ~ a .. i I - I ~ \ ~ ~ I I ~ 0 ~ ~ "".... . "lOll I ~ I I ~ 8 I ~ ; I Q'\ 8" r= ~: I ~ i I I ------......~...A.;;;;;..-- ------ ;~ I w I N .,--_....- z Il w ~ I ~ ,- ; '" , i ~ u =-- ."--" - ::l: - " ._"". -........-, ....,~- :~ ~. ~ ~ )"lNO.. ,. "I', ' NOIIVXV['ONV' IN3~SS3SSV C:lO.:J . ,,~ ~~.. Date Received: Li> ?:t zo Lt .rm ::as .J.. "... ---- FEB 1 5 2011 Original submittal t 9~' 1'0' wi 01 <( ...JI ]0../ I L I~ ~ I ~ , ~ :! r tn, linl J"D' ~.' """ l It o ~ . . ,^y VIii A ~ T)GTA \ l- II - 0"2.. - :n - ; z. HIGHWAY 185. 8' 'I I 6200 f ~ ~ OBO Ente1'rises I J:8rD4.5f-',Ec I &'0' 6203 :Ii . Harold "- " I o l' .. .. to Pau l.ne ~ 0 b ~ ',' Mes erg '-< .~ So-oo' .r. 88#'$, ~ .... . 'VI. /df. ".r .\. 6201 ~ ~ Vidalia Ortl z " & Nereo Burtl}- 'F,'" ~ 6202 ~ 185. 7": SB9G44'E /:lB..4-7' I , I ..., Ifl 10:: :tn '~I ,~ 6300 0.69 AC. OBO Enterprises , ~. ~~ ~~ if oS: 8..0 44'E. '53.47' e Ron & Robin Spencer (\j \ -I 'O~ t3; ~~/! ~i - ~ I SEE MAP 17 02 33 34 Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal 9LtLS N083CJO 'Gl31.:18NICJdS 133CJ1S NIVV'4 !;;Sl!;; l\' !;;n!;; U~""""'(J"ti~gg~~~ cn(J')~.B~Nir,...SIl)~ t-ES ~l;I~6(Jl1"""1 CO~z :2~~.r m~~ -z ti ..... : +-~~ .[! . .3= I z w e~ ~ tn u :;t 83:2 ~'--' --' <( "- a. Z' iiZf- lS . . -[ .10- ~ --. .. ."1 .<fE........ .. .. .. .. tl .. .- 5' .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. uO~IV,G .... ...~.. .................... '1 .. L __It -!.... .. ... ...............11 I' - ri-----.-......==r.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .~ [:t · ~ .. ... . !'lIt'" r - ";' 1-. · ... · I '." II ~ 1_, 1.1.1, ~.:.: ~ '-'~~I '" I':ii' · L-r - c ~_.J · CI lI) · · · · · .1 l ,1-., 1\...... ~ ~ '..1 it) > ~ N o~..:.r · . · . :- :- :- lW iiZ :::;;: t<) 0 _ o-_~ ,," . . . > 11'0 I ....... ... o!!:! U1t<)lD J · · · · · ~ ~ gs 7 b -:::~, -: -: --J* · : .1 <.!l (f) i:i --l I ..::;; . . [Q I x .. ~_.J L . ..I 0 · I · . (f) r--. <( - 0-. , --..., ~ . r~ · . · . (f) ~ I- I -s' CllI) .... · <( C .---..1 L · .. ilSN ~ ... 1"'--. .. rL ... :::r ~ .o-,irZ ;0: ,. JO',9Z , ,,',9~ · . · . · . g .J- ( .... .. .... I l- · · i= "" lI) . I '-' :> l- t .. ::) .. z . ::;;l..!>:::l · . '1 ~ ~ ll) · · ::;; 5:::: . . If) . . ~:r: lLJ .. o~~ .. .. I--~ . lI)~<( .. .. C\J ~ <.!) . .. \ i~.<1 . . .1-: : : :1 . . I ...... . . . . . .1 . . . ......1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 . . . . . . ~.d)i I ~I~. .6-,~ . .. .. .. .. . . . .. .. .. . . . . ...,r . . 133dlS Jll S3SItjdtj31N3 080 NIV~ puZS; J?? JS 19 g ::;; OlW ~6 CltO lW<( tOll) -I- @~ ~lI- lW U Z ~02~ !D~ >u u;mw;; 1'v'J01) CI lW)- 6~ <; 9> ~~ ~j ~ \'~ tj 1 SON z 1 ::I ::I ,,-... ...~. r r . I,,-!- - };+ ./.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ~... .. .. .. .. .. .. ..... -' .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ~ ~.<: /:< . . . . . . . I. · · . . . . . I . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . l..!> lI- :!z~(j) <(-etO ~~<(a to Cfl >- r--, w I ~ .. .. .. o L. · · . ~ ... ~ I:...... ilS · "'?i: lW O' ii5 ~ g ~ IdA ~ if1~ ~ ,~ icl e ~ iiZ 0- ::;: lI) lI) CI. aL 0 (('\ ......... .... <.!) (L[j LLJ 00 ~ ....it) aLO \" ....... \ a..<( ti.... ~~~~~~ ' . ,!--.~--:-~u~~ -: :~'% ;V ~ ~~~ '" ;~~~~~~~tJ ~ · . i)~,'i1Z . ilZ ~ 5 CI CI -i~'..:.; j 8!!t l It . . . . U 0 Z ,.-' ~ oL a _ ~_.J lI- <( ~"". CI to . . ilS <( ... '--, - - . '1 If) I II 110 I II 1-' ::. ~ .. ~_.J ~n: ... '---, "O',vZ .OJ ~_jo-,9c ~ ... '--J C FE ~::: ~ ( ....J... 0.. ........ <(NO Iw. ......J:S ~ ~ 9 · . · .. · · · · · ._~ r\.] ......._ V) tf) I..U 1 ~~ · .:.. ~. · · · .,.1 ~t<)1- 1,. · o '., (f)N:::J (f)0 W (f)r--<( (f)~1- <( . .. .6 .6 - N 9 '" N , CllI) lWlI)~ \D:ii<( ;;2u:;: ~,1 :SZlI) I ' a:?;:::l I lW 0 0 __..I N to I- :r: .,... ..-~ -' ~ f.... .~~..... .. 1"..... v. ..... . . ,............ . ::;; t... 0 D :ii T~-'l ~:s 1_ _IL 1 ~~~ --\ lWOO C:I NtOl-:r: . -- .... , .. q . ....., . . .'. . .. .\. .. .. .. ., .- ... .,' .... .. · .. w.,. ::::E o :ii CllI) ~~ NlI- w w ;-;~ . . . . I. . . . 0--0' .. . . .. .. ..:..~ ::;; o :ii CllI) ilS~ NlI- " 0::: f- (J) -:-::~.:..^'n\1 j\ 11011 . .. ~ t'.. A...... .. & .... t · ''l<' >>r / . . . . . . ~~/. . . . . ['ill':: ; ::::.... -. . . . "'" .. . . . ( . = .. . . . . . . L. ~ .. . . . !:: : :::: · Fl .. . . . ~ -: ~~~'~::. .. ~~. t... ... . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . .. . .. . . .. ~- · .. · .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . . .. I ................. t..O ~.....", . ... . . . . .. . . . .. .. .. . . . f-~ . L........L............. ~ . o Q Z CQ~lS llfJOl) ~ 8z<( ,,<!l~ !!::!m04 ?i: ii5 ~i;Z ZCI L -l ~~ z od rt~ ~~ 04 . . , ~ .1 ~ . LLJ lI- · it) ~u- , . ::;; '" . ~ . . . ~ . . . . ..21- . . . . . . . . . .. . --. I I I I I -- -- 1- <Co (l') ~~ :::l lI- ~ lI) ~:::lO <(0 , !-'Il) lW ~ _ > N iiZ CI / I " :2 Non d)J. .D-,irZ , d)J. ,,0-,9/1 OJ ::I J V l d 1 S ~ rl V' <{ :::lZ I-<{ , 0.. --l wo.. U zw 01- U(/) ., 't:I Q) > '8 Q) 0:: Q) - m a - - C) N. on ,':Ill 'E .0 =' w Iii .5: - CD LLI LI.. ..... o ~ ~~G' ~"1~8 ~" N l; .-' ~ ffi ~ ~ hl~ ~Q Q ~ "0 lD Z <.( --.J D- a t') W f--- in ~ - if) 0 --.J <.( ~ f--- (l W U a I Z a t') 0 II U = ~ ,-- 9 . z(~ iDlfliD o~u <(IL<( fl1lf)~ Il)Cfl!Q _'I'll) (J) Z o f- <C .-J :=J OJ <C f- <!l II z <!) ~ ~~ 01l1L<( iMiDLLJb o<!)~1- 1L0 ;;2\!z oL<(:::l ,,-l..!>lf) C) Z ~ 0:::: <( Cl G' O(f)[j[j[j (f)l:Juuu N<(<(<(<( ,).. (L 0... 0.... 0..... ~(f)(f)(f)(f) "0 Il)Cfl !Q ~_NNll) lD ~ il"i II II ~OO <!)~Oll Z_-LI) ;2 LLJ ~ , i>Zu~- C:C:;;2x ~(f):::>i!l u~<(z :c ~<( ~I-:::> II LLJ <!)--l > z<C 0"-"-30 i!;Z(f)(f)~1- 5880 OOIl) LLJ " .en l:l.!::c<)C\1_ o z w U W -.l f- Z 1i2 [5 o "- <!) z 9 5 lD ~ <( LLJ ~ U (f) o ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - ---: - *-, ~ - -=-~OHP- Y - - - - - r=- - - -IS' ST:..:atJP- -- II -;~ ... .. .... . ... :=7& , ~=6 - -8" 'IIIv_51 st - - PL_ - -0, _ _ -8" W\V- _d.l~~~e-:.L':'--'~-1\' ,"fjO~ 0.---/ Q'~' -f'~~ --- ,,50, ' ':11.- ~(S<c . I>S"O'O~90~1"41'W' ~<",~..,- ~iti ---------___ .!I,.' <"~ 152.16 'I ~ ",,:;;:' 'P~I-S i;J r,o 1\,.11, ~ (;l <0-11' ' .111 "" ,-----.------ II I ~. :'--- ii\ii"'. J. ' ~........,ll a .\~;;x;; lO -~ :t:~~t-..) ii.... q ~i"" ~~'-....II-' , ~ ~ "' ~'----...,J '19~0--. ])1 f I .!l1 I 'III I dll 1 '.11 I I I 1 l. ~ ~ I' /;l I t: I ~ s ~ o i;! 1?J o o ~ '" '" o o r:1'" <: n~ "'0 "" ~ "d 0/ ~ <0 '" ... o' o "" ;::jot 2: (')~ "'0 "" ~ '" '-J lj2S:: ;;j~ J- ~ o , ~~ -' '. "'ovu> /'v> " " o o 2 ~ % ;::; 0 - Z---<l- " ~ o t rTJ x -0 '" (1) en t- ::J C1l l>J P '" 9 ~ SOO'OI'41"W 8 ~ I '" II , ~ , I , I""" ~ "d 0...,. '" ... , ~ 1 <0 ." ~ "d 00 c.- ,~l~: g~1 ""\,: -;1 -S il I ' 11 I' I I I ~ :!i.:'. · D Ul <::~ ::o~":tlo<:(')_ ; rr,'-' ~::O,K- , s::~:o)>~ cg, '. DC')3:::::::! .) . ~~",~~ "" d / / ". . .':. \ ~ o '0 'v> li, '? . ..... ...... -(> '1:t 00 "" // // // // // // 1( /(/ )>'f'/ // jr I I , 1 ) I i I I I ! I I oo@"..,~.l,.,.,I~liilji!j Iii ~lIl1l::l::lIl1l1l1~lIl::lIl::lIl::lI\l\l\l\l\l\l\l\l\l\l\l\l~B; ~~~~~i ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ C') !;') l;') 0;) (} -, l;') l;') l;') l;') 10),. C') l;') '> !;') l;') .., l;') lOl l;') (;) l;'l !;') Ii) l;') C) C') l;') 0 ~ -t ~ ~~~~gs 8 ~~~~~~~~~s~~~~~~~~~~g~iee ~q 2~ g \l..~~~~LiS~P~~~~q~~..~~~ ~ ~ <; ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ c ~ 0; 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ ~ . ~ > ~ ~~~ ~n>l~~'" U~ ggli ~H~~ ~ ~'" ~~i:l ~~~ ~ ~ ~ :z~c ~ S 1"1 1"1 ~ ~ I It I --IL 1 i I UlOJ III CiC:: ."Ul II II I - qll , ~ '1'1 I I ! ~ I '" ~ z;g Q ~ Branch Engineering, Inc, PROJECT TITLE: REVISIONS ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ 080 ENTERPRISES, LLC 0...1(' REVISION DESCRIPTION: BY, 0 ~ r;; 01 5175 & 5195 MAIN STREET .., !tin ,." " ~ " SPRINGFIELD, OR 0 g l!Md~ Salem Office '" "-.:>. Cl :110 Filth Htmll l('/'CIlnmmlllalSl.NB, g . !ll Bprlnlfllld,Ofel1lDll74T1 Suite 10 DESCRIPTION: ~ I 0 0 ,. II I6II)7<H637 SalIm, Orecan U73111 S 0; " " 0: .. :' I"l) 110-2617 ODOT DRIVE:WA Y .. o. '" PERMIT APPLlCA nON <;;' " 1!"1rlf .BraDchEuginceriDg. Clom ,~ ~ r-VI("T'U/I""\ "'''./I'''IITll''''\l/'''' - --..-.. .----....- ;; "'to'.'.;,.. . 0>. l 'I , ~"if " ..-.-.".-...,-.,...-,........,.;-. ; S~~ INSTRUCTIONS To: Western Pioneer Title CO. Date: December' 28, 1998 You are' hereby instructed to act as our scrivener in preparing a~ar9~in aI1d: sa).e Oeed from Jana' Lee Olson 8 as Grantor, to 080 Enterprises, LLC ; as Grantee, covering ~~e foil~~i~g described property: .As .shown o~,'.ll.argain . and Sale Deed dated December '28, 1998 signed by Jana Lee' 'Olson. The"'.i!onsideiatior\ on. the Deed is. to be:' for a membership interest'in oilo Ent.erprises, LLC. . -.' -...-......., You are further aih,i:sed:and instructed as fonows:' . , I, '*at:h '. ~ft:hE!undeisl9nedhav~ examined . accordilnc'e,.:~~:th' . ,t'heee iri'structibris.. and herebyappr~veth~ need .prepare(I in .'., 2. Anyi!onsiderati:oIi:'for.tlie conveyance of: the' property uncle'rsigned'outside ..of we.stern Pioneer'Title. shall be. paid . between the ..... . . . - . . ,_. . , - . . . , : -C..,.,,"'_ '_.", ;. :.... . _ . ','.-': ',", 3. NQ.~i~l.. r..port or title insurance policy is to .be .obtained or iesm,d.in 'conjuncti6rilirit.h' this t.ransactionianClt;herefore west..i-n pioneer Title'shall"hav'e 'no'liabUlty or respqnsibiHt:Y with tegarCl to the condftj,on Of title t.o the pro~~~y~ 4 .wesf~rn .'. Pi6he';li:Titi~ isdir...ct;;d' not. to' n6~iN any 'exi'~t.ing enc,ufubi'an'ce'-h61'der( s) o(t~is fra~~actio~ or contact any existing encumbtanceholder(s) for any' purpose relat'ing to this conveyance~ It is acknowledged that 1f the 10"an documents of any existing encumbranceholdercontain. a -due on sal~. clauB~, it may allpw it to require full. payment of t.he loan balance upon an undisclosed sale of the property. The Grantor and Grantee have both had' an opportunity to' review \:heloan documents and to seek the advice of an attorney about the consequences of an undisclosed sale. 5. Aft.er yoti have received the signed 'and'notarized Deed and theseftillY'-signed instructions, you are to record the Deed in the 'Lane County Records. IT.IS'uNDERSTOoD,BY THE..... PARTIEfl,'SIG~~N'!L . 'J1IE '.~OYE, ..O.a,.. A'l''l'ACHED INSTRUCTIONS THAT THE INSTRUCTIONS ARE THE COMPLETE INSTRUCTIONS BETWEEN THIS: \E'IRKi.,.'.A$ ::\AN '.: ESCROW AGENT.AND.YOU.AS.A, PRINCIPAL.:..TO.',.THE .,. ESCROW . TRANSt\CTfoN .\\; ,'i'IlE~Ef:NSTRUCTIONS, . !6.Y}i()TINCLUPEi\t.T. .....TlII!:TJiRkSQF.THE . AGREEMENT..\....\WHICH.fs.,mSUBJECT.... OF.'THfsESCROW...... READ ..' THESE'INSTRUCTIONS CAREFtJl:'Ly,;AND.DQ;NQT:.sIGN' Til:EHtJNLE~ljT:ilEY .ARE.i\CCEl?TABLE::TOYOU;'.'," '. ~'~'.~ 4.Ncl-- .'. .ab ..... ...... ....... '.. Jan ''Lee bls_on ",.:-,. .'0 :''-':' _' ..'::~ ,,"C'-'", ._.....:..-.c.-'......-.,..,. OBO ENTERPRISES, LLC BY:~~ ,",.,'." .~, .'"r' >';,"1 Date Received: .. -I lc.f~\-.~' (~ ;,' t :~.> ~ J ~ ~ L. . FES t 520ft _._~__.~. '..:(~ ,,rl~.8 ~<4if:~H'. Original Submittal JO/Olson INDlVlDUAL BARGAIN AND SALE DEE . , .,- JANA LEE OLS(N I Grantor, conveys.to OBO ENTERPRISES, LtC th" following des<;ribedreal ~ situated in to-wit:- ". A parcel of landin the ~orthw.est 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 33, Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the WillaIi1ette Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of the McKenzie Highway at a point which .is 158.47 feet North 89044' West of the intersection of the East line of the A. W;' Hamme Donation Land Claim No. 38, Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the Wil1amette Meridi run thence South 0005' West 352.42 feet... thence North 89044' West 215.78 feet, thence North 00'05' East 352.42 feet. to the South line of the said highway, thence South 89044'East 215.78 feet to the place of beginning, in Lane County, Oregon. Exceptirig that portion conveyed to the City of Springfield forroad1.ray, recorded January 10, 1972, Reel 568, Receptionil81516. . Also excepting that portion conveyed to Kenneth L Rolfe, et. IlX' by d.eed rec.orded July, 28, 1976, Reel 80S, Reception 117638158, Official Records, Lane County, Oregon. I Grantee, Lane Counly Oregon The true consideration forthis.conveyonce is $ for amelllbership interest in OBO Enterprises, Ltc "THIS INSTRUMENT Will NOT AJroW USE OF THE PROPERTY OESeR/BED IN THI~ INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPUCABLE . LAi~D USE LAWS.AND REGUlATIONS, BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQuiRING FEE TITLE TO TliE PROPERTY SHouiD cHEcK WnllTHE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTVPIANNING.DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY lIMITS ON 1AWSlJITS AGAINST FARMINGORFoRESr pRACTICES As DEANED IN ORS 30.930.. . . ---- , , Doled: De<:elIlber 28, 1998 ~~.~~ Ja tee Olson . . "I ~ ;-.'. /~ . . " <:.~\ , ....:..- J........ Date Received: ~l'l .:~ ., ~- ,. FEe 1 5 . 2011 . .w__ . ~_.~.~: j':;' ;:~ }1.';4:~'''I~t Original Submittal } ,.. ,r.~:~,.r.:._:".~,U 1 .~':'t,?I?V<-'\~;S:y}:01.0:~~.:~~~!i',;;' ,~/.,_~.JO.L~~:t,:~:.:,~~.~~~~~.L :~~.:.~,~,-:.~~,;;~::tg0;~~/ .~~9!1-<::.. '.') The true considerotion for this cOnveyance is $ for a membership interest in 000 Enterprises, LLC ."THIS INSTRUMENT W1iJ. NOT Al.10W USE OF THE PR()PERTY DESCRIBE.D IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPUCABLE lAND USEIAWS AND REGUlATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THEPERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PlANNING DEPARTMENT 10 VERIFY APPROVED. USES ANOIO DETERMINE ANY UMlTS ON lAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.93().u Doted: DeCember 2B, 199B ~.~.~ . .. /l-r.o - . .. . . .. Ja Lee Olson ~ sTArFOF . .OREGON> . .;:}~~~\ County of . Lane ) This instrument vias acknowledged before me on Jana Lee Olson ,"',,,.,,.-, ........,,',.,..,,-,.,-;..,.,>'.... -,',,;." 'o'--;,.-,-".,..' .....,..... December 1998 by taIAIleRLYA SPlCER HOTARYP\JB\.IC-OREGOIl (;OllMISSlON NO. 304071 .,"CXlIlMISliION EXPIRESAUGUST2O, 2001 Until ~ change is .requested, all taxstotemeilts shall be sent.to the foliciwing oddiess: No change in address for tax statements After recording relUm to: Western Pioneer Tide Co., P.O. BOx. 1 0146, Eugene, breiJon 97440 Date Received: FEB t 5 20f1 Original Submittal ,- . p, .--- \) (.,t t...:.. 1-...... . INDIVIDUAL . BARGAIN AND SALE DEED JANALEE OLSON, grantor, conveys to OBO ENTERPRISES, LLC, grantee the following described real property situated in Lane County Oregon, to wit: Beginning on the South line of the McKenzie Highway to a point North 89 degrees 44' West 5.0 feet from ~J;e in~ersection of 'said South ;J.)..ne and the East line of the A. W," ~~t Donation Land cla.illi No.. ]~, ~otification No. 7187,. Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian; :i:uzUiingthEmce Nprth89 degrees 44' west along the SOUth ~e of said highway tS3.47 feet; th~p:ce South 0 degree' S"West, i17.8 feet; theJ1..ce'South 89 degrees 44~ East 153..47 .feet;' t.henC?e North 0 degree 5' EaSt 217.8 feet to the Place of Beginning, in LflIle County, Oregon; EXCEPT' THERE~OM a _parcel of laJ!d lying in. the A. W.. Hanmdt DOnation 'J;.an~ ~lai.m No'. 38; Township 17 South, ,RaI:ig~ ,2. ~st of 'the'Willamette Meridian, i..~~ane County, Oregon,- an~ bei.h.9' a -portion of ,that property d.escribed in that certain deed to Willl~ prociw, recorded' in BOok JU1, Page 68, Lane-CqUnty Oregon Deed Recorcls, the ~'ai4 ~el.bein9' desCribed as foiloWs~ ~irmiDg !lot' the 'interseotion ,of the Weilt iine of 52nd' Street with 'the South'liIie o.f't.h.e existing McKeri:de Highway; thence We~t along said South line 25 feet; .thence S<;>utheasterly in a straight iine to said West ~.4le at a_ point 25 feet soutl1 of toe Point: o:f Beginning; thence North along s~g Wes~ lipe 25 f~et to the Point of Beginning, ip. LaDe-County; Oreg6ri.. ~O '_EX;CEPT the East 10 feet thereaf conveyed to the -C~ty of Springfield 'for road purpo~es by de~.d recorded September 17'; 19~h, Rec6b:le;-"s .Reception No. 91-446S'i" Lane'CoUnt-y Oi:'ego!l . Official Records. The true consiperationfor this conveyance is .for a membership inte~est in OBO Enterprises, LLC. "This instrument wiil riotilllo.... use of. the property described iil this instrument in violation Of applicable land use laws and regulations. Before .signing or accepting this instrliIilent, the person acquiring fee title to the. property. should check with the appropriate city or county planning department to verify approved uses .and. to determine any Limits on lawsuits against farming or forest practices as defined. in ORS 30.930." . .. ~///fr; :J~PcJW~ Jan Lee Olson . Dated: d~ /0'9 , I State of Oregon ) ) ss. ) County of Lane. This instrument was acknowledged by Jam~ Lee Ol!>bn . ~Yf~.~ Nota Public for oleo before me on --:Jj,.t-t(k . , 2003, .. OFFICIAL SEAL STEPHANIE BUZZARD .. iNOTARYf'\jBLIG,- OREGON . . / . COMMISSION NO.A33637B. . . .t.tYCOIolIolISSIONEXP1RESJUlYll,2()04 ;~ 1i:hW Until a change is requested; all tax statements shall be sent to the following address: 0130 Enterprises, LLC, lQOl Rive:r::-t,.oop I, Eugene, Oregon 97404. After recording 'returnto:OBO Enterprises, LLC, lool RDate ~iv.ed: Eugene, Oregon 97404 ; . My cOI)lission expires: ,;: . FEB 1 5 2011 ..>:.,...,.... .".,-.....,'.,. ....,...', ' '. . .,~ Orl9ln~1 Supmlttal . . .' ----., .~".,.,"': Division of Chief Depuly Clerk Lane Counly Deeds and Records ~003.0m1 ~..- ---~ ~ ./ 11111I111 1/111/11111111111I111 1111111111111111111 00376139200300015470010018 . ..... . . ..01/071200302:13:07 M CASHIER 04 $26, 0 RPR-DEED Cnl=1 Sln=7 $5,00 $11,00 $10,00 INDIVIDUAL BARGAIN AND SALE DEED JJrnA LEE QLSON, grantor, conveys to aBa ENTERPRISES, LLC, grantee the fOllowing described real property situated in Lan~ county O:r:egon, to wit: BeginI14--riq on t~ SOuth ~ine cif the ~~n.'zi.e fligh~y to ,a point North 89 degrees. 44' West 5.ii feet .from the. intersection. of s_aid South linl: and the East line of the A. W. 'Hammit" Doriation Land claim No.'3S.-, Notification No. 7181-, 'l'O\Jffiship"17 South; Range 2 West of the Wi:;Ll~tte Meridian; running thence North 89 degrees 44" West along the south line of s~d,highw?Y 153.47 feet; thence South 0 degreeS' West-, -217.8 feet; thenc~ Sputh ~9 degrees 44" East 153. .f] feet; thence North 0 degree 5' E~ 2~.7. 8 feet to the Plaoe of Beginning, inLarte County, 'OregOn ~ E;XCEPT THERE_FROM a, parcel ,of land lying in the -A. 'W. HamIilit DOnation Lari~ :Cla.lin No.. 3.8, . Township 17" South, 'Range 2 West of the Willamette- Meridian ,in ':Lane C9~ty, 'Oregon, and ,being a portiori of that property described in that certali1 deed to Wil:liam Proc'iw, recorded in Book 31S:, Page 68, Lane C6unty- oreg'oji, oeedReeordl:?, the. l;l~d parcel being described 'as folloWs: Beginning at the intersection of::. the West litle of 52pd Street, with the South lii1.e of 'the eXist,l.ng]-i.~Kenzie'R:lghway;. thence We_it along said South line 25 feet; thende.Sotitheaste';-ly in a straight line to said We-st line at a ,point_ 25 feet South_ 6f the Point of ~gi@ing; thence North along said We-at tin'e 25 .feet to' the Point of Begiritiiri:g, in ~e County, Oregon ~ ALso EXCEPT the East', 10 -feet thereat' c<?n~yed to t.he city' of Springfield for r~ purposes by . deed recorded S~ptenlber 17, 1991, R,ecord~'1=I. Reception,~o. 91-44657, Lane County Oregon Official R~ords ~ The true consideration for this conveyance is for a membership interest in OBa Enterprises, LLC. Dated: "This. instrument will not allow use o:f the proper.ty described in this Lnstrument in 1iLolatioti of applicable land use laws and regulations. Before signing or accepting t!)is instrument, the person acquiring fee title to.the property should check with the appropriate city or county planning department to v"rify appr6:ved uses and to determine any limits on lawsuits. against farming or forest: practices as defined in ORB 30.930." Ja~{;~p, ~;:ed , Ii /p/or3 , / ;~. : I ; r,. ' State of Or,e.999 . -- -. .'<2gdgf~\6f La.ne.'. . . ) Original Submittal __ _ F c_ ~. ......~~{~~~'._E:;:+.~~f:~~~~i!!:1lt~:._:;~i~~','tin;~~:;~)-g;;gBh::' 'k~ '~i~g a portion of that property des;cri_l?efi.in that cert_ain de~ tq ltilliam Procj~, reqo~dee) in ~~ 318, Page .68, Lane County Ortegon Deed Records, the said parcel being described as follows: Beg'inning at the .intersection _of the lfest line of 52nd 'Street with, the South line of the existing McKenzie .Highway; the,nce west along Bai~ South line 25 feet~ theD~e southeasterly in -? straight lilie to said west line at a 'point 25 feet ~6uth of the Point of ~gii1ning: thenc'e lIIorth ~on9 said We'st _~ 25 feet to th.e P<?int of Begi~g, in Lane Countrt OregoI:1. ALSO EXCEPT the East 10 feet thereof conveyed to the City of Springfield for road purposes by deed recorded September 17, 1991, Recorderia Reception No.. 91~44657 r Lane Comity Oregon Official Records. The true consideration for this conveyanGe is for a membership interest in OBO Enterprises, LLC~ "This instrument will nClt allow USa of the property descr.i,bed in this instrument in violation of applicable land use laws and regulations. Before signing or accepting this instrument, the person acquiring fee title to the property should cheek with the. appropriate city or county .planning department to verify approved uses and to determine any limits on lawsuits against farming or forest practices as defined in ORS 30.930." diP /0:3 n /)02 r'] --/; ~~ 1 JatirL~eVl Ol~o~~~j .. .. .-. . Dated: State of OF~g9:9 ...............t6di1'tyot- Liirie ..C.,.,. ,} ., ) ) .'.......'.,.,...;... . .>-,~ . . -,.".-,;," ss. This instrument was acknowledged by Jana Lee Olson ~~~~ N~ta PUblic forO e on before me on --:;;;vt!k . ... , 2003, . OFFICIAL SEAL STEi>HANIE BUZZAAD , . j . NOTARY PUBLlc~OREGON , . ./ COMMISSION NO, A336378 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 11, 2QQ4 ,"(7;--':; /t:?7;L/ Until a change is requested, all tax statements shall be sent to the follOWing address:OBOEnterprises, LLC, 1001 River Loop I, Eligene, oregon 97404. After recording return to:OBO Enterp:dses, LLC, 1001 River Loop 1, Eugene, oregon 97404 My comission expires: Date Received: FEB f ~,201f Original SUbmittal c - / . . ~, -- 1ft; CASCADE TITLE CO. . . I ~I~IIIIIIIII~ III1I11111 ~llll~~ 1m 1111. STATUS OF RECORD TITLE REPORT WILLIAM OLSON 1390 GROSBEAK COURT REDMOND, OR 97754 Our No: CT-0270167 Date: FEBRUARY 14, 2011 Charge: $300.00 As requested, Cascade Title Co. has searched our tract indices as to the following described real property: ( A T T A C H ED) and as of: FEBRUARY 6, 2011 AT 8:00 A.M., we find the following: Vestee: OBO ENTERPRISES, LLC Said property is subject to the following on record matters: 1. Rights of the public in and to that portion lying within streets, roads and highways. 2. Highway Construction Permit, including the terms and prov1s1ons thereof, recorded May 16, 1966, Reception No. 47494, Lane County Oregon Deed Records. (Affects Parcell) 3. Easement for slope and storm drainage facilities, including the terms and provisions thereof, as granted to the State of Oregon, by and through its State Highway Commission by Highway Construction Permit recorded July 21, 1966, Reception No. 54871, Lane County Oregon Deed Records. (Affects Parcel 2) 4. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, recorded August 4, 1967, Reception No. 93869, Lane County Official Records. (Affects Parcell) 5. Easement, 5.0 feet in width, including the terms and provisions thereof, granted to the City of Springfield, as set forth in instrument recorded September 17, 1991, Reception No. 9144657, Lane County Official Records. (Affects Parcel 2) 6. A copy of the Articles of Organization and/or Operating Agreement of OBO Enterprises, LLC, should be furnished to Cascade Title Company for the purpose of ascertaining members authorized to execute on behalf of the Limited Liability Company. Date Received: Continued- FEB 1 5 2011 MAIN OFFICE * 811 WILLAMETTE ST. * EUGENE, OREGON 97401 * PH0rifR~8~S~~1n~3 FLORENCE * 1901 HWY 101 - S. 2 * FLORENCE. OREGON 97439 * PH: (5?l) 997-8417 EUGENE FAX: 485-0307' E-MAIL: info@cascadetitle.com * FLORENCE FAX: 997-8246 . . NOTE: The property address as shown on the Assessor's Roll is: . 5175 And 5195 Main Street Springfield, OR 97478 NOTE: Taxes, Account No. 0135994, Assessor's Map No. 17 02 33 3 2, #6200, Code 19-00, 2010-2011, in the amount of $1,999.08, PAID IN FULL. Taxes, Account No. 0136000, Assessor's Map No. 17 02 33 3 2, #6300, Code 19-00, 2010-2011, in the amount of $1,175.80, PAID IN FULL. This report is to be utilized for information only. This report is not to be used as a basis for transferring, encumbering or foreclosing the real property described. The liability of Cascade Title Co. is limited to the addressee and shall not exceed the premium paid hereunder. CASCADE TITLE CO., by: (~ - ac/Title Officer: DOUG PIERCE Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Oiiginc;l Submittai._____ . . . PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1: A parcel of land in the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 33, Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line or" the McKenzie Highway at a point which is 158.47 feet North 890 44' West of the intersection of the East line of the A. W. Hammet Donation Land Claim No. 38, Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian; run thence South 00 05' West 352.42 feet; thence North 890 44' West 215.78 feet; thence North 00 05' East 352.42 feet to the South line of the said highway; thence South 890 44' East 215.78 feet to the place of beginning, in Lane County, Oregon; EXCEPTING that portion conveyed to the City of Springfield for roadway, recorded January 10, 1972, Reel 568, Reception No. 81516, Lane County Official Records, in Lane County, Oregon; ALSO EXCEPTING that portion conveyed to Kenneth L. Rolfe, et ux, by deed recorded July 28, 1976, Reel 805, Reception No. 7638158, Lane County Official Records, in Lane County, Oregon. PARCEL 2: Beginning on the South line of the McKenzie Highway to a point North 890 44' West 5.0 feet from the intersection of said South line and the East line of the A.W. Hammit Donation Land Claim No. 38, Notification No. 7187, Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian; running thence North 890 44' West along the South line of said highway 153.47 feet; thence South 00 5' West, 217,8 feet; thence South 890 44' East 153.47 feet; thence North 00 5' East 217.8 feet to the place of beginning, in Lane County, Oregoni EXCEPT THEREFROM a parcel of land lying in the A.W. Hammit Donation Land Claim No. 38, Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian, in Lane County, Oregon, and being a portion of that property described in that certain deed to William prociw, recorded in Book 318, Page 68, Lane County Oregon Deed Records, the said parcel being described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the West line of 52M Street with the South line of the existing McKenzie Highway; thence West along said South line 25 feet; thence Southeasterly in a straight line to said West line at a point 25 feet South of the point of beginning; thence North along said West line 25 feet to the point o~ beginning, in Lane County, Oregon; ALSO EXCEPT the East 10 feet thereof conveyed to the City of Springfield for road purposes by deed recorded September 17, 1991, Reception No. 91-44657, Lane County Official Records, in Lane CountYt Oregon. Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal . ., 9 3000 0.32 AC , i002, 21 AC: I I I I I I I I I 'R nL.INE ~ \ ~\,.J SS9'44:E 12 \ 2900 (l.I!li;JAC .. l:! .'l\l ~ 3001 .1liAC ~ ~ 1US' , ~, , , , I 51.06' , /V\ Pt., t-.J l;I '1;9.."'" (to m 3110 9 N 11 2700 O.79AC 2800 a,BeAC 1'1-0 -"3'7:>~~L.. THIS MAP IS 0 ASSIST LOCATING PROPERTY. TH COMPANY ASSUMES ~ hm LIABILITY M(m INACGlIRACIES. ~ lS' I I I rl ~ ~ : I :t , 61 ~ HIGHWAY b .. 30' 1-30, 165.76' , ,128. , , ~ , ~ , 6200 6300 , 0.85 AC , 0.69 AC I W: , ... , ~ , (): l?! I I 5 , l:11l I .. I l:i 0..:. I 5SS'44'E I Ii;! I ~ ,~ I 6203 , 0 'Il: ~, Z '0 i5 P I '8 ~l IZ , , I , $89"44'E I 105.78' I 6201 I I 1-: , lil I U): I 18517a' ~ I 6202 I Ld I , g 0.26 AC I I I 30' I r "r(l . . 9 FEBRUARY 1, 2011 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: WE, WILLIAM D. AND JANA L. OLSON, GIVE AUTHORIZATION FOR NICHOLAS T. BOYLES TO ACT ON OUR BEHALF AND ON BEHALF OF OBO ENTERPRISES, LLC, IN REGARDS TO ANY DECISIONS MADE ON THE 51ST-52ND & MAIN PROJECT IN SPRINGFIELD, OREGON. /LI/~. i? ~ WILLIAM D. OLSON OBO ENTERPRISES, LLC. ~tf~ OBO ENTERPRISES, LLC. Date Received: FEB 1 5 2011 Original Submittal