Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotes, Meeting PLANNER 1/18/2011 . . [City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 SITE PLAN REVIEW PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Project Name: East Congregation of JW church Project Proposal: church building and parking Jot Case Number: PRE11-00002 Project Address: Vacant; formerly 885 S 42nd Assessors Map and Tax Lot Number(s): 18-02-05-21 TL8700 Zoning: Low Density Residential (LDR) Overlay District(s): Applicable Refinement Plan: N/A Refinement Plan Designation: N/A Metro Plan Designation: Low Density Residential (LDR) Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: January 18, 2011 Application Submittal Deadline: July 17, 2011 Associated Applications: DRC2009-00016, discretionary Use (approved on POSITION REVIEW OF NAME Proiect Planner Land Use Planninq Steve Hopkins 726-3649 Transportation Michael Liebler 736-1034 Public Works Civil Engineer Utilities, Sanitary & Clayton Mceachern 736-1036 Storm Sewer Deputv Fire Marshal Fire and Life Safetv Gilbert Gordon 726-2293 Community Services Building Dave Puent726-3668 Manager l~pipI!.:Ie~NI'!'S'llEVE1.!()piM"EN'1"'{RE\lfEwtE~ML,}~;rUr:1 . '"'L'>L''''f''' ,':"d' .' "',t ;":~ 1m";:,""':}"'" . "1 Applicant Applicant's Representative Thomas Pavia Poage Engineering East Congregation of Jehovah's Witness 990 Obie st 251 N 51st Eugene OR 97401 Sprinqfield OR 97477 Revised 10{25{07 . . TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PLANNING o Application fee - discuss the applicable fees $6,141.85 site Ian fees base fee >10 OOOsf $4,222.00 29,500 fee $5,697.00 mail total $160.00 $6141.85 o Copy of the Site Plan reduced to 81h"x 11" Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~ Gl1.~ >0<; ,.. t~ 8 W' x 11" Copy of Site Plan o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~ ~ 1 Deed and Preliminary Title Report o Brief narrative explaining the purpose of the development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees and future expansion plans, if known. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) !Q'l ~ ~ Brief Narrative o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~ Gl1 Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, or Engineer Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact, and disabled parking spaces; ~ g ~ r;!:4 ~ ~ r;!:4.S1: ~ Revised 10/25/07 . I'V'l L:CSI F'7:1l liii f3j f3j I'V'l 1m f3j m m r:"'I ~ m<< ~Hi "N.'. f3j . including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses Location of existing and proposed transit facilities o Phased Development Plan Where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water, and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply to the Site Plan application being submitted. Complete Incomplete See Planning N/A Note(s) IB r:"'I ~- o landscape Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) !B:I f3j 1'771 ~ m r:"'I LLll I'V'l ~ ~ ~ r:"'I ~ m m Revised 10/25/07 Phased Development Plan Drawn by a Landscape Architect Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of landscape coverage Screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 Written description, including specifications, of the permanent irrigation system Location and type of street trees List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size, spacing and . . method of planting o Architectural Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~ r;;;] LlLa Exterior elevations of all buildings and structures proposed for the development site, including height Conceptual floor plans j2g] o ~ o On-Site Lighting Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) 2 ~~' --';;4- ~.,. .. ~ j2g] o ~ Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area Photometric test report for each light source j2g] o ~ Planning Notes: 1. The title report is dated February 27, 2009. The title report should be dated within 30 days of submittal of the application. (SDC 5.4-105) 2. The maximum height of a free standing light fixture in a residential area is 12 feet. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: . Once the site plan receives tentative approval, you have 90 days to submit the final site plan application. That fee is listed below. That application will take less than one week to process and approve. The final step in that process is the Development Agreement. It will be prepared by staff and documents the approval of your site plan. It will need the notarized signature of the owner. The DSD dept. has a notary that will be available. Once the Development Agreement is signed, building permits can be issued. 10% $569.70 tech 5% 5% Tech $ $28 total $598.19 The conditions of the Discretionary Use are listed below for reference: Condition 1: The site plan shall comply with all conditions of the Discretionary Use. Condition 2: To comply with SDC 4.7-130, install a 6' solid wood fence or comparable barrier, or move , the parking lot meet the 15' setback. Condition 3: Dedicate a 7' public utility easement along the frontage of S 42nd Street. Prior to occupancy, submit a copy of the recorded easement. Condition 4: The area marked "future expansion" shall contain a curb, fence or other barrier to prevent its use as a parking area. Revised 10/25/07 . . ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR PERMITS IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS OR APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE- APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION: Applicable Not Applicable Ej fB lEJ f""9 W f""9 ~ "!ii1 ~ [[lo,~ ,,0' tii;~.: !;::;1 I2.:Zl Ej ~~~ iNfO .:..:~ !;::;1 8 Ej Ej,,,, cc!f," .N... fB IEJ [[I' .0;0"': ""fr' fV'I ~ ~ fB ~ Revised 10{25{07 Where a multi-family development is proposed, any additional materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240 Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW ' A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be serviced by sanitary sewer . . THIS APPLICATION IS: o COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING ISl INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE \- )DD"}\ Date This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Section 5.4- 105 and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a limited land use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete. The 120-day processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is submitted or when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must indicate by either signing this form or by submitting a written response to the City within seven days of the date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing information. If you indicate herein or in your written response that the missing information will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre- Submittal Review to provide the City with the missing information. If you refuse to submit the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee, the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120-day clock and begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after the start of the 120-day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the 120-day processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the 120-day period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if the new information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is sent out and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects the application proposal and additional review is required. I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the City within the ISO-day timeline. ~~~~ COer A hc igna ure /-:- /8-// Date Revised 1O{25{07 . . TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Engineer: Kyle Greene Case#: PREll-00002 PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING Complete Incomplete o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions l0'i!l ~ [gJ See PW Note(s) 1 [gJ [gJ 153 ~ l0'i!l ~. [gJ ~ [gJ r!iil = =,,",. [gJ [gJ 153 ~ [gJ F'rl lid Revised 10/25/07 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer Vicinity Map The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department The 100-year floodplain and f100dway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 V2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted 'concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table . . o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan must be in compliance with the regulations of SDC Sections 5.17-100, 4.1-100, 4.2-100, and 4.3-100 and must include the following information: Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) I:8l ~ IMWI ~ l'0 ~ ~ Lt;;;J Iil I:8l Iil o Grading and Paving Plan Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) ~ IMWI ~ Iil I:8l 2 ~ ~ I:8l Iil IMWI c:.wg Iil'"" .""', ~''''~ ~ I:8l Iil Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer Location and width of all existing and proposed easements Location of existing and required power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities Location and size of existing and proposed utilities" on and adjacent to the site, including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as " part of the stormwater management system Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) Amount of proposed cut and fill o Stormwater Management System Study - provide four (4) copies of the study with the completed Storm water Scoping Sheet attached. The plan, calculations, and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) 3 ~ r:::lI ~ Revised 10/25/07 Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management System Study . . PW Notes: 1. Please include a stamp by a registered professional engineer or licensed landscape architect. 2. The landscape plan does not appear to be prepared by an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect for the "Landscaping & Raingarden Area". 3. An infiltration test will be required for the rain garden area. In addition any existing compaction of soil in this area will need to be removed and the area protected from equipment during construction. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: . Manufacturers specs or show secondary containment for Package HVAC Units. Manufacturers cut sheets usually show this information. If area where this mechanical equipment is stored does not receive stormwater treatment additional containment may be required. . City records show the site falls within the 99 year time of travel zone. . The stormwater facilities do not appear consistent between sheets 2 and 3 near the catch basins. It is generally desired that stormwater systems use catch basins as 'manholes' when possible. . On the Landscape Plan, sheet 3, Moyers Heavenly Bamboo is a species of plant that we discourage the use of based on Department of Agriculture recommendations. Revised 10{25{07 . . TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Transportation Engineer/Planner: Michael Liebler Case#: PREll-00002 Applicant: East Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses TRANSPORTA nON o . Right-ot-Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has frontage on a Lane County or an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) N/A Copy of ROW Approach Permit Application ~ GJ o Traffic Impact Study - four (4) copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance with SDC 4.2-105 A.4. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also address, if needed, City, Metro Plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. Complete Incomplete ~ f"'1'1 W;;.;;J See Transportation Note(s) N/A Traffic Impact Study o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) ~ f"'1'1 ~ Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) ~ ~ f"'1'1 I2f1I Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails Location, widths (of paving and right-of- way) and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications, EJ ~ f"'1'1 ~ Revised 10/25/07 . 1"':3 I2fiJ 1"':3 l:EZ.f N/A . access easements or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development, including ownership and maintenance status, if applicable Location of existing and required traffic control devices Transportation Notes: 1. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: . The 6 compact parking stalls at the southeast corner of the lot may be considered as non-compact if the landscaping is allowed to fulfill the requirements ofSDC 4.6- 120 (C) (Exception). . Existing fencing at the driveway entrance is located in the vision clear zone per SDC 4.2-130. Please show vision clearance triangles on the site plan. . The north-south parking movements imply two-directional traffic flow, but the northernmost east-west movement implies single direction traffic flow. If single direction traffic flow is the intent of the design, wayfinding should be provided to indicate it is single direction only, and which direction the vehicular traffic will flow. . Current angled parking is contra-flow to operations within the parking area in terms of typical driver expectations. Current proposed angle parking should be adjusted to allow for safe and efficient flow thru the parking facility. . Existing bicycle parking location is inconsistent with SDC 4.6-150. Bicycle parking should be re-Iocated to a more visible location from the front entrance. Revised 10/25/07 . . TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Deputy Fire Marshal: Gilbert Gordon Case #: PREll-00002 FIRE o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Fire Note(s) 1. On-site vehicular circulation ~ ~ o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete See Fire Note(s) rum .~ Location of existing and required fire hydrants and similar public facilities " ~ ~ Fire Notes: 1. Fire apparatus access roads shall support an 80,000 lb. imposed load per 20~0 Springfield Fire Code 503.2.3 and SFC Appendix D102.1. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: Rolling gate shall have a public works lock if it is man"ual operating or a Knox Company keyed gate switch if it is electrical operating. Revised 9/24/07