Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence Miscellaneous 6/10/2010 , . . HOPKINS Steve From: Sent: To: Subject: Nicole Ankeney [nicolea@willamalane.org] Thursday, June 10, 2010 11:17 AM HOPKINS Steve RE: River Heights Steve, Per your request, here is an attempt to clarify our concern and request regarding the final plat and the "Preservation Easement." . As has been discussed previously, the Tentative Subdivision Decision is clear that the preservation easement designation will not be necessary on Tract A if it is to be dedicated to Willamalane for open space use (page 28). Tract A is indeed to be deeded to Willamalane. That will happen once the plat is recorded. . In response to our earlier inquiries, the applicant and City have reiterated that the Preservation Easement designation does not apply to Tract A. . In response to our May 19, 2010 request to see a copy of the final plat that is currently under review, you sent us a "Development Plan" dated April 30, 2010, which shows a preservation area on Tract A. Since it does not apply, that designation should be removed from Tract A in the "Development Plan" and should not appear there in the final plat. . Our request is that the preservation area designation be removed from Tract A in order to avoid future confusion. Thanks, Nicole Ankeney. RLA landscape Architect/Parks Planner WiHamalane Park and Recreation District 250 South 32nd Street Springfield, OR 97478 541-736-4055 From: HOPKINS Steve [mailto:shopkins@cLspringfield.or.us] Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 9:59 AM To: Nicole Ankeney Subject: RE: River Heights Nicole, If you could send me your concerns with a more detailed explanation, I will look through the development plan and the land use decision to determine if we can do that and what the options are available. Steve From: Nicole Ankeney [mailto:nicolea@willamalane.org] Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 9:45 AM To: HOPKINS Steve Subject: RE: River Heights Date Received: (; 1//) ,h /) Planner: SH 1 , . . Good morning, Steve. I reviewed the PDFs of the development plan with Greg Hyde: He had some concerns about Tract A being shown as a Preservation Area because it could affect future park development and improvements. Is it possible to have the developer remove that distinction from Tract A? Thanks, Nicole Ankeney, RLA Landscape Architect/Parks Planner Willamalane Park and Recreation District 250 South 32nd Street Springfield, OR 97478 541-736-4055 From: HOPKINS Steve [mailto:shopkins@ci.springfield.or.us] Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 3:55 PM To: Nicole Ankeney Subject: RE: River Heights Nicole, Attached is a PDF of the River Heights development plan. I don't have a PDF ofthe plat, but this may work. The city surveyor expects to finish his review ofthe plat next week. Then I can do my final check, which takes about 1 week. Let me know if you have any questions: Steve Hopkins, AICP Planner /I Urban Planning Division, Development Services Dept. City of. Springfield 726-3649 From: Nicole Ankeney [mailto:nicolea@willamalane.org] Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 4:05 PM To: HOPKINS Steve Subject: River Heights Good afternoon, Steve! I just wanted to touch base with you about River Heights. If possible, we would like to get a PDF copy ofthe final plat map and the environmental report for the development. If digital files are not available, I'd be happy to come down and make hard copies of the file. Also, is there a timeframe on approval and recording it with the county? Thanks, Nicole Ankeney. RLA landscape Architect/Parks Planner Willamalane Park and Recreation District 250 South 32nd Street Springfield, OR 97478 541-736-4055 Date Received: & /)(J /)/'J I I Planner: SH 2 '\ . . o . Date Received: & - I iA /1/1 Planner: SH ~ 3 .