HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence PLANNER 12/30/2010 (2)
I
\
.
.
L1MBIRD Andrew
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
L1MBIRD Andrew
Thursday, December 30,20103:42 PM
LIEBLER Michael
FW: Floodplain Information - Lot 4
Michael: Please let me know your thoughts on the traffic study issue and I'll send a coordinated response back to Mr.
Lewis. A Master Plan amendment could be done prior to or concurrently with the Site Plan Review. Depending on the
timing of submittals, issuance of the Site Plan Review decision could be conditional upon completing the Master Plan
amendment. I would think an updated phasing plan diagram and addendum describing the revised Phase 1
improvements would suffice.
Andy
From: Jim Lewis [mailto:JLewis@glas-arch.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 3: 16 PM
To: UMBIRD Andrew
Cc: Jeff Elder
Subject: RE: Floodplain Information - Lot 4
Andy,
Thank you for the follow-up. After the meeting Jeff asked me to evaluate the access drive location issue. If we pursue
the access at the southwest corner of our site as our only initial access, you mentioned we would need to provide a
supplemental traffic study, and also amend the master plan. There are a couple more questions which' would also
appreciate your response to:
What would the timeline .be for a master plan amendment? Could it occur concurrently with site review?
Would the amendment need to be a revision to the entire original document, or could it be processed as a separate
"addendum" document describing the revision only?
Would we be required to include the supplemental traffic study with our site review application, or could this follow
later?
Thanks,
Jim
From: UMBIRD Andrew [mailto:alimbird@springfield-or.gov]
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 2:49 PM
To: Jim Lewis
Cc: MCEACHERN Clayton; GREENE Kyle
Subject: Floodplain Information - Lot 4
Jim: Attached is the Floodplain Overlay decision issued for the Liberty Professional Center. According to the staff
findings, the Base Flood Elevation for Lot 4 is between 429.0 - 429.4 feet. The base flood elevation information should
be stated on the final plat sheet and a monument should be installed somewhere on the property.
Two quick reminder items as the p'roject heads to Site Plan Review:
1
Date Received:_ap~/"
Planner: AL
j . . .
. ~ 1. Stormwater infiltration facilities (eg. bioswales) will require additional dePTh of planting medium to address
groundwater quality issues. For this site, 18-24" of planting medium will be required.
2. Floodproofing of public and private utilities installed to serve the development site will be required in
accordance with Conditions 2 & 3 of the Floodplain Overlay permit. I apologize for not mentioning this during
the meeting.
Please let me know if you have any questions, and all the best as we head into 2011.
Andy Limbird
City of Springfield
2
Date Received:.L',7;6I~/o
Plenne;: AL