HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket, DIM PLANNER 12/8/2010
. .
RECF~;}ED
CflY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING
DISTRIBUTION DATE: December 8, 2010
TO:
Current Planning Staff: G. Karp, J Donovan, L Pauly, T Jones, By'
M Metzger, L Miller, A Umbird, S Hopkins, M Markarian .
Jeff Paschall, Supervising Civil Engineer, Public Works Department
Ken Vogeney, City Engineer, Public Works Department
Matt Stouder, AlC Engineering Supervising Civil Engineer, Public Works
Richard Perry, Public Works, Engineering
Kristi Krueger, Civil Engineer, Public Works Department
Brian Barnett, Traffic Engineer
Michael Liebler, Transportation Planning Engineer, Public Works
Gilbert Gordon, Deputy Rre Marshall, Fire & Life Safety Department
Melissa Fechtel, Rre & Life Safety Department
Greg Ferschweiler, Maintenance, Public Works Department
Ronni Price, Planner, Willamalane Park and Recreation District
Thomas Jeffreys, Emerald Peoples Utility District (EPUD)
Tamara Johnson, Springfield Utility Board (Electric)
Bart McKee, Water Engineering Supervisor - Springfield Utility (Water)
Amy Chinitz, Springfield Utility Board Board
Scott Nelson, OOOT (copy of packets) 9-8-10
Dave Puent, Building Official
Will Mueller, L TD
Norm Palmer, Quest Communications
Tom Boyatt, Public Works
Tim Hanley, Rainbow Water District
Chris Moorhead, City Surveyor
Celia Barry,(Shashi Bajracharya) Lane County Transportation
Jim Henry, Central Lane Communications 911
Dave Shore, Northwest Natural Gas
Tom Henerty, Comcast Cable
Jerry Smith, Police Chief
Chuck Gottfried, Water Resource Coordinator, ESD
Susie Smith, Public Works Director
Len Goodwin, Public Works
Jeff DeFranco, Springfield School District 19
Joe Leahy, City Attorney
George Walker, Storm water Facilities Planner, ESD
John Tamulonis, Economic Development Mgr.
Courtney Griesel, Planner 1 (EDM)
Bill Grile, DSD Director
Brenda Jones, Administrative Specialist (DIM Annexations)
eEe. - B llllO
D I t^. {> a.cJu.:;t-'
\ o-t- 12.~
A Development Issues Meeting will take place on Thursday December 30,2010 @ 1:30
- 2:30 p.m. in the DSD Conference 616 @ Springfield City Hall. Please review the
enclosed information, and come prepared to discuss this application with the Planner
and applicant. Should you have any questions, please contact @ Andy Limbird
(541) 726-3784.
Revised: 11-16-09
e
e.
DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
MEETING
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
SPRINGFIELD CITY HALL
225 FIFTH STREET
DSD Conference Room 616
Meeting Date: December 30, 2010 @ 1:30 - 2:30 p.rn.
1. DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MTG #PRE10-00008 AMERICAN MEDICAL CONCEPTS/McMAC
Assessor's Map: 17-03-15-40 TL 3500
Address: 300 International Way
Existing Use: Vacant
Applicant submitted plans to discuss constructing a two-story management office building within
the Liberty Professional Center Business Park.
Planner: Andy Limbird
.
SPRING.LD
'l.
225 FIFTH STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
PHONE (541)726-3753
FAX (541)726-3689
www.ci.springfiefd.or.us
December 8, 2010
Bill Houston
American Medical Concepts, Inc.
28050 SW Boberg Road
Wilsonville, OR 97070
RE: PREIO-00008 (17-03-15-40 TL 3500) Development Issues Meeting - Applicant submitted plans to discuss
constructing a two-story management office building within the Liberty Professional Center Business Park.
Dear Mr, Houston:
Thank you for your Development Issues Meeting submittal. The following meeting has been scheduled:
TYPE:
DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING
PLACE:
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
DSD CONFERENCE ROOM 616
225 FIFTH STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477.
DATEffIME:
Thursday, December 30, 2010 at 1:30 - 2:30 p.m.
CONTACT PERSON:
Andy Limbird
[fyou have any questions, please call me at 541-726-3784,
Sincerely,
Andy Limbird
Planner
CC: Randy G McPherson, Representative
McMac, LLC
POBox 1318
Eugene, OR 97401
.
.
'city of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfieid, DR 97477
Development Issues Meeting (DIM)
Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section)
Prospective
A licant Name:
-2/10.
Address:
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: I
Pro ert Address:.Ed?
s.
Acres
Description of If you are filting in this form by hand. pledse attach your proposal description to this application.
Pro osal:
du/acre
Existin Use:
# of Lots Parcels: I
Prospective
Applicant:
Date:
;)2-(,;,-/0
Signature
tJ'L-L/~
M. IloiA')i"tv
Print
. -.
Reviewed b :~
Case No.:
A Iication Fee:
Technical Fee: $0
TOTAL FEES: 51.1, g2,
PROJECT NUMBER:
Date Received:
Revised 1/1/08 Molly MarkarIan
1 of 3
DEe - 7 2010
Original Submittal
.
.
Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist
0" Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services
Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the
time of complete application submittal.
B Development Issues Meeting Application Form
o Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer
during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five
questions.
G2I Ten (10) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to
review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on
the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible
given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate
with the level of detail provided in the application.
Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in
the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions &
Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review
Submittal Requirements.
~
~
[0'
go
~
12I
0'
o
Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17"
Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and
related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100'
North arrow
Date of preparation
Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number
Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area
Location and size of existing and pro~sed utilities, including connection points
'56e t-n"tIcfl-sD MAsllilt A..AI'\ ~T jI .r:;.
On-site drainage corlection syste',;, an flow pafl:erns, the size and location of drain
lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained
Nor 'fer \4lDWN.
Area an~ dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for
common open spaces - tJo~,
DIMs Related to Land Divisions
~
o Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots
o How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets
DIMs Related to Site Plan Review
~ Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area),
setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height
~ Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways,
sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces Date Received:
B Parking and circulation plan
DEe - 7 2010
Original submittal
Revised 1/1/0B Molly Markarian
3 of 3
.
.
gLAs
Architects,' LIe
James M, Lewis, AlA
Trace A. Ward, AlA
Walter R. GresL AlA
Reid O. Anderson
Mary A Pearch, AlA
Jonathan S, Price, AlA
Principal
Principal
Principal
Senior Associate
Senior Associate
Associate
Decenlber 6, 2010
Date Received:
American Medical Concepts Inc,
gLAs Project No. 10051
DEe - 7 2010
Original Submittal
. Development Issues Meeting Application
American Medical Concepts, Inc, is planning to construct a two-story management office'
building on Lane County Assessor's Map No, 17-03-15-4, Tax Lot 3500, This property is
within the Liberty Professional Center Business Park, for which a Master Plan was
approved on July 17, 2007, The Master Plan designates this property as Lot #4 which is
identified for office use, The propertY is zoned CI Campus Industrial.
Conceptual sketches of the proposed building are attached to this application, Although
very conceptual at this stage, they do describe the general configuration of the site plan and
building, Utility connection points will be in accordance with the Master Plan, per the
attached Master Plan Sheet No, 5.
We are applying separately to the Springfield Utility Board for a Drinking Water
Protection Exemption,
In preparation for our Development Issues Meeting, we have identified the following
questions.and issues for discussion:
I. The approved Master Plan for Liberty Professional Center is based upon the premise
that Lot #3 would be the initial phase of development. This development has not
occurred, and it appears likely that this project on Lot #4 will be the first to be
developed. This presents a couple of questions related to phasing: . .'
a.). The Master Plan shows two driveway entrances for Lot #4, one within the
common easement at the west' side of Lot #5, and one at the easement at the'
southeast corner of Lot #2. We propose to utilize.the access at Lot #2, and
. to postpone the development of the shared driveway at the west side of Lot
#5 until the adjoining Lot #3 and #5 properties are developed and there is a
need created. Please confirm that this would be acceptable. .
b.) The Master Plan indicates two options for extending water to Lot #3, via a
public easement across the west side of Lot #4 or else via a looped water
liht; extending through the driveway easement at the west side of Lot #5.
We propose to omit this water line at this time, since Lot #3 is not currently
posed for development. Please confirm that this would be acceptable.
74/5 Pearl Street- Eugene, Oreg~:m 97401 - (54/) 686-2014 - FAX (541) 686-20/7
.
Development Issues Meeting Application
December 6, 2010
Page 2
.
i
2. Springfield Development Code Section 21.070 (3) states "There shall be planted
setbacks from property lines of20 feet in front, street-side and through-lot rear yards
where adjacent to local streets, and 30 feet where adjacent to arterial or collector
streets" .
We are showing a 30 ft. setback along the front yard facing International Way, and 20
ft. setbacks at each side yard. The rear yard is not adjacent to any local street, and we
therefore are showing only a 10ft. wide setback at the rear. Please confirm that this is
acceptable.
3. The Oregon Structural Specialties Code Section 1108.3.1.1 allows an exception to the
. requirement for an elevator in a building offewer than three stories when the upper
level does not exceed 3000 sq. ft. The attached sketches depict a second floor plan
with an occupied area of approximately 2400 sq. ft., excluding stairway and
mechanical areas. Please confirm that there is no requirement for an elevator withthe
proposed configuration.
4. The Master Plan states that exterior wall materials shall be fire resistant. The Owner
'would prefer to use cedar siding. Would cedar siding be permitted by the City? Would
. we need to apply for a variance?
5. The site plan configuration, driveway locations, and utility connections are nearly
identical to the approved Master Plan. We are hopeful that the Site Review process can
be accelerated because of this. Please provide an anticipated timeline for Site Review,
as it would apply to this specific project.
Attachment
Date Received:
DEe - 7 2010
Original SubmittaL_-,..--
spr _map
PRE10-0000s!ev Issues Mtg 17-03-15.1 TL 3500
Page 1 of 1
"",
~;
~;
.'
',.,' ,"
:., .\,
. .
u
.>
:".";,
,\ ....
..".- "
"
." ,- . ~
fr
.LWAY
INTERNATIONAL WAY'
""''.".S'
~ t' '."
N
A
Date Received:
DEe - 7 2010
Original submittal
http://spifs020/mapguide2009/mapviewerphp/printablepage.php?SESSI ON=6391 f42e-0000-1 000-... 12/8/2010
I
j
I
I I
I :
I j
I )
J I
1 I
11
/ .
I '"
If,
1~1
IE.! .
I~!I ~- ~ ..~
J ,. ~ ~ -g~
~ -' 1-=
-1--.. . -;z ....... < !z ;:;
._. \ \\- ~ ~~~'; E ~_.
. I I t~;i fl~Hf
Ii 3&{.!~!:iU:;
~l I . I-' <>. ,. '" S; "' tr.. .
~ I . ..,.
::: t . \'
l 1 l I
f.
i :
! -',: .
.1 "
.~~
;;:r.
\Ii !u
'9a:~
I-:'<J't!i..
~ lp .
~~r:-
_ ~:r
tR~l::;
.
==.-=----:.~.~.c+ . .
-' .
.-
. --
. ~-
.- . '" ~" ", . .
I -Zb'el-z,.'
-
I
. I
~ ='IOt I
~--..
!
st.
~
1.:7
~-
-
~
d:>
'\o~ .
, I
I
'I
--
,OQ''CI-z.
.
~
~
J:~
:>",
-~1fi '
j:
'~~
'~
I-
2::
~
.:t~
.~
.
~ '
).
i
8
~
~
~
~ ~
_ 0,
bl-lK-
t~~
, -
~~~.~
....._\{\O
-:'<t-v~
\I..:
\I)' tl.
--L. : 'j\l)
..... ...!l..'. p'.".
~t-7r:d
\lO<S:l~1'f\
~ -,t."""':- Ii
~: ~..i 0-
o ,~. I ..J): >:-'>
.,1
. ",.,,:
\.)
::l
~ 13'
~~
~~
.
.
~i,;,
.,.
~
~
.
"
.
~
~.
'"
~~
g~.
~,
,
~g,
!~
z
..
~
..
>-
S
>-
:>
ii.
~
~ fil
i ~
~I <J
NO!)3l:l0 ~Cl3I..:1!)NIl:ldS
J..'r/M WNOLL'r/Nl:l31NI
.LN3V'ld013^3Q)lH 'v'd SS3NISnS
H3.LN3::> 1'v'NOISS3..:10HdHH3SI1
.~. ~ >~ ~ II" e
I ~ ~.. .
.! h ~I~ ~~~ n~ ~: la
n~'n~uHI ~~ I~h~h~ I ~"~ J
I I ~ ~B ~ ~ l;uh ~ ~ i ~~ V n l3~ ~ . '~~ U
. ~>i'"
. IUlu;1 :'~ ~.
~;miIMmHIH ~~. ..c--Z
~e~ ~~
II i II I I I II ~!!j!..~ .~~ i"
: 1111 I I ~ '.' 1
, , I I n ~, ! IT'. ..f) . . ~!il II
"
~ II IlnTI II ~ IIII
.~
f:l i II I I II o ~ilie~ I iil
~r.1 ~:!8
jg,
. "il
~B;;
'!
,II
i~ ~Ii
'I"
. ..
.
U
."
"
1 II I
1 II. I
I II I
.1 II I
I II I
1 n I 5.,~' .
I ~ ! ~:.
I II I il'!!
III I !l,"'
III I h~~
III I
III I
III I
l~ I
I' 1
III f
II
I
I
~,
"-.
....~-:.:::::-,
""
""
. I
- I"
...,Eo..
~~.~
~ i" ,
,hI
~~ itlt.tlt
~13~k~
II!
~ '
,
r
~
o
o
N
I
~
i7
~
o
11
L.O
!~
"N
;~
!
,
~.
"-
. ~~
::l'
s~
z
~
cL
.~
2:
" .."..!>..f~,~
:"A~<:!i~t~
01 . ~I -I)
I.!? aDl
~\'iO:::> /)S/?I~W tJ\bI<i~V
"':!'S ~tJgL
~g.'/ "Ci0G1d ~^~
aH
\
rm----Wl
-l-L -
\,
.91X'EI .sIYS\ ..51 X 01 I
a,1.:i;:lO ~,'W,O 0 " ~~,) I
~~~,..,r:;:i.
I
I
I
I
I
,~
'0
SIYol
'0 WIJ2. ~~
{lfl . j){)
~UWM03
I
f
---
J/l
<::> \
f .~,
, I
,5lxol '0
'0 ,() <n~ctt ~()
~ ~Qj,s
- ~---t
~l'~-
-\
-- -
ol.~I.1I
150.0\
1I0-,I:/'1!1
'd<3 o~-z. : ~V~
~^qj '2i~
101.:,
t "4
. .
t .=is'~ Im~g, ~)( .f(l., \
,'()~
."1 .~~ \
i . di.v~
, 14<1
'~ qat:. ~ '>
1 -O'~Y~ I
0
-
,'. \ I ~""l.bL.y' '~aW \
i
r '
, -"'~t'llOO1~ J -l- - -L
7" at-Jl1.LW ' ,
,--- '--J
01. cal . JJ
l.sool
NoUVf\St19 .J.sv9
ol.~l . \I
(5aol
NollvMW (.J.NOGkl)...j.UJ)o<;
.
. '.rMooNJM
. .a1~V~~
. . q\a-{4\U ~.1/1 (l~ .
.
~~l:::iad;::J -1
,