Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket, DIM PLANNER 12/8/2010 . . RECF~;}ED CflY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING DISTRIBUTION DATE: December 8, 2010 TO: Current Planning Staff: G. Karp, J Donovan, L Pauly, T Jones, By' M Metzger, L Miller, A Umbird, S Hopkins, M Markarian . Jeff Paschall, Supervising Civil Engineer, Public Works Department Ken Vogeney, City Engineer, Public Works Department Matt Stouder, AlC Engineering Supervising Civil Engineer, Public Works Richard Perry, Public Works, Engineering Kristi Krueger, Civil Engineer, Public Works Department Brian Barnett, Traffic Engineer Michael Liebler, Transportation Planning Engineer, Public Works Gilbert Gordon, Deputy Rre Marshall, Fire & Life Safety Department Melissa Fechtel, Rre & Life Safety Department Greg Ferschweiler, Maintenance, Public Works Department Ronni Price, Planner, Willamalane Park and Recreation District Thomas Jeffreys, Emerald Peoples Utility District (EPUD) Tamara Johnson, Springfield Utility Board (Electric) Bart McKee, Water Engineering Supervisor - Springfield Utility (Water) Amy Chinitz, Springfield Utility Board Board Scott Nelson, OOOT (copy of packets) 9-8-10 Dave Puent, Building Official Will Mueller, L TD Norm Palmer, Quest Communications Tom Boyatt, Public Works Tim Hanley, Rainbow Water District Chris Moorhead, City Surveyor Celia Barry,(Shashi Bajracharya) Lane County Transportation Jim Henry, Central Lane Communications 911 Dave Shore, Northwest Natural Gas Tom Henerty, Comcast Cable Jerry Smith, Police Chief Chuck Gottfried, Water Resource Coordinator, ESD Susie Smith, Public Works Director Len Goodwin, Public Works Jeff DeFranco, Springfield School District 19 Joe Leahy, City Attorney George Walker, Storm water Facilities Planner, ESD John Tamulonis, Economic Development Mgr. Courtney Griesel, Planner 1 (EDM) Bill Grile, DSD Director Brenda Jones, Administrative Specialist (DIM Annexations) eEe. - B llllO D I t^. {> a.cJu.:;t-' \ o-t- 12.~ A Development Issues Meeting will take place on Thursday December 30,2010 @ 1:30 - 2:30 p.m. in the DSD Conference 616 @ Springfield City Hall. Please review the enclosed information, and come prepared to discuss this application with the Planner and applicant. Should you have any questions, please contact @ Andy Limbird (541) 726-3784. Revised: 11-16-09 e e. DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT SPRINGFIELD CITY HALL 225 FIFTH STREET DSD Conference Room 616 Meeting Date: December 30, 2010 @ 1:30 - 2:30 p.rn. 1. DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MTG #PRE10-00008 AMERICAN MEDICAL CONCEPTS/McMAC Assessor's Map: 17-03-15-40 TL 3500 Address: 300 International Way Existing Use: Vacant Applicant submitted plans to discuss constructing a two-story management office building within the Liberty Professional Center Business Park. Planner: Andy Limbird . SPRING.LD 'l. 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE (541)726-3753 FAX (541)726-3689 www.ci.springfiefd.or.us December 8, 2010 Bill Houston American Medical Concepts, Inc. 28050 SW Boberg Road Wilsonville, OR 97070 RE: PREIO-00008 (17-03-15-40 TL 3500) Development Issues Meeting - Applicant submitted plans to discuss constructing a two-story management office building within the Liberty Professional Center Business Park. Dear Mr, Houston: Thank you for your Development Issues Meeting submittal. The following meeting has been scheduled: TYPE: DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING PLACE: CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DSD CONFERENCE ROOM 616 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477. DATEffIME: Thursday, December 30, 2010 at 1:30 - 2:30 p.m. CONTACT PERSON: Andy Limbird [fyou have any questions, please call me at 541-726-3784, Sincerely, Andy Limbird Planner CC: Randy G McPherson, Representative McMac, LLC POBox 1318 Eugene, OR 97401 . . 'city of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfieid, DR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section) Prospective A licant Name: -2/10. Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: I Pro ert Address:.Ed? s. Acres Description of If you are filting in this form by hand. pledse attach your proposal description to this application. Pro osal: du/acre Existin Use: # of Lots Parcels: I Prospective Applicant: Date: ;)2-(,;,-/0 Signature tJ'L-L/~ M. IloiA')i"tv Print . -. Reviewed b :~ Case No.: A Iication Fee: Technical Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: 51.1, g2, PROJECT NUMBER: Date Received: Revised 1/1/08 Molly MarkarIan 1 of 3 DEe - 7 2010 Original Submittal . . Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist 0" Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. B Development Issues Meeting Application Form o Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions. G2I Ten (10) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions & Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. ~ ~ [0' go ~ 12I 0' o Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17" Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' North arrow Date of preparation Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area Location and size of existing and pro~sed utilities, including connection points '56e t-n"tIcfl-sD MAsllilt A..AI'\ ~T jI .r:;. On-site drainage corlection syste',;, an flow pafl:erns, the size and location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained Nor 'fer \4lDWN. Area an~ dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces - tJo~, DIMs Related to Land Divisions ~ o Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots o How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets DIMs Related to Site Plan Review ~ Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height ~ Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces Date Received: B Parking and circulation plan DEe - 7 2010 Original submittal Revised 1/1/0B Molly Markarian 3 of 3 . . gLAs Architects,' LIe James M, Lewis, AlA Trace A. Ward, AlA Walter R. GresL AlA Reid O. Anderson Mary A Pearch, AlA Jonathan S, Price, AlA Principal Principal Principal Senior Associate Senior Associate Associate Decenlber 6, 2010 Date Received: American Medical Concepts Inc, gLAs Project No. 10051 DEe - 7 2010 Original Submittal . Development Issues Meeting Application American Medical Concepts, Inc, is planning to construct a two-story management office' building on Lane County Assessor's Map No, 17-03-15-4, Tax Lot 3500, This property is within the Liberty Professional Center Business Park, for which a Master Plan was approved on July 17, 2007, The Master Plan designates this property as Lot #4 which is identified for office use, The propertY is zoned CI Campus Industrial. Conceptual sketches of the proposed building are attached to this application, Although very conceptual at this stage, they do describe the general configuration of the site plan and building, Utility connection points will be in accordance with the Master Plan, per the attached Master Plan Sheet No, 5. We are applying separately to the Springfield Utility Board for a Drinking Water Protection Exemption, In preparation for our Development Issues Meeting, we have identified the following questions.and issues for discussion: I. The approved Master Plan for Liberty Professional Center is based upon the premise that Lot #3 would be the initial phase of development. This development has not occurred, and it appears likely that this project on Lot #4 will be the first to be developed. This presents a couple of questions related to phasing: . .' a.). The Master Plan shows two driveway entrances for Lot #4, one within the common easement at the west' side of Lot #5, and one at the easement at the' southeast corner of Lot #2. We propose to utilize.the access at Lot #2, and . to postpone the development of the shared driveway at the west side of Lot #5 until the adjoining Lot #3 and #5 properties are developed and there is a need created. Please confirm that this would be acceptable. . b.) The Master Plan indicates two options for extending water to Lot #3, via a public easement across the west side of Lot #4 or else via a looped water liht; extending through the driveway easement at the west side of Lot #5. We propose to omit this water line at this time, since Lot #3 is not currently posed for development. Please confirm that this would be acceptable. 74/5 Pearl Street- Eugene, Oreg~:m 97401 - (54/) 686-2014 - FAX (541) 686-20/7 . Development Issues Meeting Application December 6, 2010 Page 2 . i 2. Springfield Development Code Section 21.070 (3) states "There shall be planted setbacks from property lines of20 feet in front, street-side and through-lot rear yards where adjacent to local streets, and 30 feet where adjacent to arterial or collector streets" . We are showing a 30 ft. setback along the front yard facing International Way, and 20 ft. setbacks at each side yard. The rear yard is not adjacent to any local street, and we therefore are showing only a 10ft. wide setback at the rear. Please confirm that this is acceptable. 3. The Oregon Structural Specialties Code Section 1108.3.1.1 allows an exception to the . requirement for an elevator in a building offewer than three stories when the upper level does not exceed 3000 sq. ft. The attached sketches depict a second floor plan with an occupied area of approximately 2400 sq. ft., excluding stairway and mechanical areas. Please confirm that there is no requirement for an elevator withthe proposed configuration. 4. The Master Plan states that exterior wall materials shall be fire resistant. The Owner 'would prefer to use cedar siding. Would cedar siding be permitted by the City? Would . we need to apply for a variance? 5. The site plan configuration, driveway locations, and utility connections are nearly identical to the approved Master Plan. We are hopeful that the Site Review process can be accelerated because of this. Please provide an anticipated timeline for Site Review, as it would apply to this specific project. Attachment Date Received: DEe - 7 2010 Original SubmittaL_-,..-- spr _map PRE10-0000s!ev Issues Mtg 17-03-15.1 TL 3500 Page 1 of 1 "", ~; ~; .' ',.,' ," :., .\, . . u .> :".";, ,\ .... ..".- " " ." ,- . ~ fr .LWAY INTERNATIONAL WAY' ""''.".S' ~ t' '." N A Date Received: DEe - 7 2010 Original submittal http://spifs020/mapguide2009/mapviewerphp/printablepage.php?SESSI ON=6391 f42e-0000-1 000-... 12/8/2010 I j I I I I : I j I ) J I 1 I 11 / . I '" If, 1~1 IE.! . I~!I ~- ~ ..~ J ,. ~ ~ -g~ ~ -' 1-= -1--.. . -;z ....... < !z ;:; ._. \ \\- ~ ~~~'; E ~_. . I I t~;i fl~Hf Ii 3&{.!~!:iU:; ~l I . I-' <>. ,. '" S; "' tr.. . ~ I . ..,. ::: t . \' l 1 l I f. i : ! -',: . .1 " .~~ ;;:r. \Ii !u '9a:~ I-:'<J't!i.. ~ lp . ~~r:- _ ~:r tR~l::; . ==.-=----:.~.~.c+ . . -' . .- . -- . ~- .- . '" ~" ", . . I -Zb'el-z,.' - I . I ~ ='IOt I ~--.. ! st. ~ 1.:7 ~- - ~ d:> '\o~ . , I I 'I -- ,OQ''CI-z. . ~ ~ J:~ :>", -~1fi ' j: '~~ '~ I- 2:: ~ .:t~ .~ . ~ ' ). i 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ 0, bl-lK- t~~ , - ~~~.~ ....._\{\O -:'<t-v~ \I..: \I)' tl. --L. : 'j\l) ..... ...!l..'. p'.". ~t-7r:d \lO<S:l~1'f\ ~ -,t."""':- Ii ~: ~..i 0- o ,~. I ..J): >:-'> .,1 . ",.,,: \.) ::l ~ 13' ~~ ~~ . . ~i,;, .,. ~ ~ . " . ~ ~. '" ~~ g~. ~, , ~g, !~ z .. ~ .. >- S >- :> ii. ~ ~ fil i ~ ~I <J NO!)3l:l0 ~Cl3I..:1!)NIl:ldS J..'r/M WNOLL'r/Nl:l31NI .LN3V'ld013^3Q)lH 'v'd SS3NISnS H3.LN3::> 1'v'NOISS3..:10HdHH3SI1 .~. ~ >~ ~ II" e I ~ ~.. . .! h ~I~ ~~~ n~ ~: la n~'n~uHI ~~ I~h~h~ I ~"~ J I I ~ ~B ~ ~ l;uh ~ ~ i ~~ V n l3~ ~ . '~~ U . ~>i'" . IUlu;1 :'~ ~. ~;miIMmHIH ~~. ..c--Z ~e~ ~~ II i II I I I II ~!!j!..~ .~~ i" : 1111 I I ~ '.' 1 , , I I n ~, ! IT'. ..f) . . ~!il II " ~ II IlnTI II ~ IIII .~ f:l i II I I II o ~ilie~ I iil ~r.1 ~:!8 jg, . "il ~B;; '! ,II i~ ~Ii 'I" . .. . U ." " 1 II I 1 II. I I II I .1 II I I II I 1 n I 5.,~' . I ~ ! ~:. I II I il'!! III I !l,"' III I h~~ III I III I III I l~ I I' 1 III f II I I ~, "-. ....~-:.:::::-, "" "" . I - I" ...,Eo.. ~~.~ ~ i" , ,hI ~~ itlt.tlt ~13~k~ II! ~ ' , r ~ o o N I ~ i7 ~ o 11 L.O !~ "N ;~ ! , ~. "- . ~~ ::l' s~ z ~ cL .~ 2: " .."..!>..f~,~ :"A~<:!i~t~ 01 . ~I -I) I.!? aDl ~\'iO:::> /)S/?I~W tJ\bI<i~V "':!'S ~tJgL ~g.'/ "Ci0G1d ~^~ aH \ rm----Wl -l-L - \, .91X'EI .sIYS\ ..51 X 01 I a,1.:i;:lO ~,'W,O 0 " ~~,) I ~~~,..,r:;:i. I I I I I ,~ '0 SIYol '0 WIJ2. ~~ {lfl . j){) ~UWM03 I f --- J/l <::> \ f .~, , I ,5lxol '0 '0 ,() <n~ctt ~() ~ ~Qj,s - ~---t ~l'~- -\ -- - ol.~I.1I 150.0\ 1I0-,I:/'1!1 'd<3 o~-z. : ~V~ ~^qj '2i~ 101.:, t "4 . . t .=is'~ Im~g, ~)( .f(l., \ ,'()~ ."1 .~~ \ i . di.v~ , 14<1 '~ qat:. ~ '> 1 -O'~Y~ I 0 - ,'. \ I ~""l.bL.y' '~aW \ i r ' , -"'~t'llOO1~ J -l- - -L 7" at-Jl1.LW ' , ,--- '--J 01. cal . JJ l.sool NoUVf\St19 .J.sv9 ol.~l . \I (5aol NollvMW (.J.NOGkl)...j.UJ)o<; . . '.rMooNJM . .a1~V~~ . . q\a-{4\U ~.1/1 (l~ . . ~~l:::iad;::J -1 ,