HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 11/15/2010
r
.
.
:Clty of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Site Plan Review Minor Modification
Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section)
A Iicant Name: Deb France AlA
Com an : Oh . lannin +desi n
Phone: 503-280-8000
Fax: 503-224-5442
Address: 115 NW First Ave. Suite 300' Portland OR 97209
n
Phone: 503-280-8000
Fax: 503-224-5442
A Iicant's Re .: Deb Scot t
Address: 115 NW First Ave. Suite 300' Portland OR 97209
Pro er Owner: Lewis Darrow
Phone: 650-527-5005
antec Cor oration Fax: 650-527-0698
Address: 350 Ellis Street. Mountain View CA 94043
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17031540 TAX LOT NO S: 700
Pro er Address: 555 International Way; Springfield, OR 97477
13 .5
Virtual Su ort Lab Generator and Enclosure
Description of If you are filling In this form by hand, please attach your proposal descrtptlon to this application.
Pro osal: Add 1250 Kva generator and new service. Provide new (approx) 14 'h x 251w x 46 'I screen.
landsca e area.
Associated A Iications:
. 0 - c)04DO
Case No.: \ ,-'.
D-CC0
Date:
A Iication Fee:
o
TOTAL FEES:
..... - - € -~W-
~
.0)
PROJECT NUMBER:
0063
--"""'~~ "'.-
Date Received:
"
~.
NOV 1 5 2010
Original submittgl
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
1 of 10
.
.
Signatures
Applicant:
d acknowledges that the Information in thIs application Is correct and accurate.
Date:
O.e,b f\l{j)(~
Print
If the applicant Is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act In his/her behalf.
Owner:
Lf
(jJnatur~
Ltw. ~ 'I):u-"", W
Print
Date:
II 5"" 2vIO
Date Recej\l(":"
..,....l,
it..
r:"
"(>" j.., ~" 1
IV '.. .,~... ,J
OrlglilJI 81.:~n:;r:':;
I
,
,
I
Revised 1/15/09 ddk
2 of 5
.
.
Site Plan Review Minor Modification Application Process
1. Applicant Submits a Site Plan Review Minor Modification Application to the
Development Services Department
. The application must conform to the Site Plan Review Minor Modification Submittal
Requirements Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet.
. Planning Division staff screen the submittal at the front counter to determine
whether all required Items listed in the Site Plan Review Minor Modification
Submittal Requirements Checklist have been submitted.
. Applications missing required items will not be accepted for submittal.
2. City Staff Conduct Detailed Completeness Check
. Planning Division staff conducts a detailed completeness check within 30 days of
submittal.
. The assigned Planner notifies the applicant in writing regarding the completeness of
the application.
. An application Is not be deemed technically complete until all information necessary
to evaluate the proposed development, its impacts, and its compliance with the
provisions of the Springfield Development Code and other applicable codes and
statutes have been provided.
. Incomplete applications, as well as Insufficient or unclear data, will delay the
application review process and may result in denial.
3. City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision
. this Is a Type I decision and thus is made without public notice and without a public
hearing since there are clear and objective approval criteria and/or development
standards that do not require the use of discretion.
. Decisions address all the applicable approval criteria and/or development standards.
. Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied.
. The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which
is effective on the day It is mailed.
. The decision Issued is the final decision of the City and may not be appealed.
Date Received:
NOV 1 5 2010
Original Submittal
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
3 of 10
.
.
.
Site Plan Review Minor Modification Submittal Requirements Checklist
o Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule Is available at the Development Services
Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the
pre-submittal and submittal stages.
o Site Plan Review Minor Modification Application Form
o Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the
property, and any additional Information that may have a bearing in determining the
action to be taken, including findings demonstrating compliance with SD.C 5.17-125, Site
Plan Review Criteria.
o Copy of the Deed
o Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting
ownership and listing all encumbrances.
o Right-of-Way Approach Permit Application provided where the property has frontage
N/A on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility.
PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY CITY
STAFF. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PLANNER ASSIGNED TO YOUR APPLICATION MAY
REQUEST ANY INFORMATION ON THIS LIST DURING COMPLETENESS REVIEW IF IT IS
NOT SUBMITTED WITH THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL AND IS NECESSARY FOR
REVIEWING THE APPLICATION.
o
N/A
o
Three (3) Copies of the Stormwater Management System Study with completed
Storm water Scoping Sheet attached - the plan, supporting calculations, and
documentation must be consistent with the City's Engineering Design Standards and
Procedures Manual.
Eight (8) Copies of the Modified Plan Sets Including the Following:
o All of the following plans must Include the scale appropriate to the area involved and
sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of
preparation.
o All plan sets must be folded to aw' by 11" and bound by rubber bands.
a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions For proposed area only
o Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer
o Vicinity Map
o The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb
cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly Indicating what Is remaining and what
Is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also Indicate present use, size,
setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings. Date Received:
NOV j 5 2010
Original Submittal
4 of 10
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
.
.
. N/A 0 The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses
and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Umlted Watercourse
Map on file in the Development Services Department
D The lOO-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest
adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment
or Letter of Map Revision
o The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead
Protection Areas Map on file In the Development Services Department
o Physical features Including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when
measured 4 Y2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian
areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings
N/A 0 Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified In the Soils Survey of
Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted
concurrently If the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable
soils and/or a high water table
b. Site Plan For affected area only
o Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, or Engineer
o Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the
parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and
distance between buildings
. D Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage,
trash receptacles, and signs
o Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact and disabled parking spaces;
including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping
o Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site
proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and
other Impervious surfaces
N/AD Observance of solar access requirements as specified In the applicable zoning district
o On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation
o Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, Including the location and
dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed
N/AD Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces
N/AD Location of existing and proposed transit facilities
N/AD Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for
common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses
N/AD Phased Development Plan - where applicable, the Site Plan application must Include a.
phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries
and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street
connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other
required public Improvements, Including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater
management, water, and electricity. The applicant must Indicate which phases apply
to the Site Plan application being submitted.
c. Improvement and Public Utilities Plan N/A
o Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
Date Received:
NOV 1 5 2010
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Mar1<arlan
s or 10
Origln:: Submitta!_
.
.
o Location and width of all existing and proposed easements
D Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of all existing and proposed
streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed
development, including ownership and maintenance status, If applicable.
D Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting
o Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles,
transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities
o Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks,
sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails
D Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including
sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas,
telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points
d. Grading, Paving, &.Stormwater Management PlanN/A
o Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
D Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed landscape Architect where plants are
proposed as part of the stormwater management system
o Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations
D Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns
D The size and location of stormwater management systems components, Including but
not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater
quality measures; and natural dralnageways to be retained
o Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot Intervals (for
land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals)
o Amount of proposed cut and fill
e. Landscape Plan N/A, will be provided for Building Permit Application
D Drawn by a landscape Architect
D location and dimensions of landsc"aplng and open space areas to include calculation of
landscape coverage
D Screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110
o Written description, Including specifications, of the permanent irrigation system
D location and type of street trees
D list in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground
cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size, spacing,
and method of planting
f. Architectural Plans
D Exterior elevations of all buildings and structures proposed for the development site,
Including height
N/AD Conceptual floor plans
g. On-Site Lighting Plan N/A
Date Received:
NOV 1 5 2010
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
Original Submittal
6 of 10
I
.
.
.
'0 location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing
and attached
o Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles, and type of illumination,
wattage, and luminous area
o Photometric test report for each light source
o Additional Materials That May be ReqUired N/A
o Where a multi-family development Is proposed, any additional materials to
demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240
o Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of
bank of any Water Quality limited Watercourses (WQlW) or within 100 feet of the
top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQlW
o A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if
there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present
o Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional
standards of the overlay district
o If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified
in SDC 5.19-100
o A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State lands must be
submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property
o Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence
the permit application has been submitted for review
o Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a land
and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development
o Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified In SDC 5.9-100
and 5.21-100
o An Annexation application, as specified In SDC 5.7-100, where a development is
. proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can
be served by sanitary sewer
Date Received:
NOY 1 5 2010
~~~m't~= --.
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
7 of 10
spr _map Page 1 of 1
TYP11 0-0001 0 'te Modification Minor - '-03-15-40 Tl 700
Symantec Corp.
-1-":::::::::::: eo1-=- ~, ...,
~3, 39tr1':"S"9S9~
Ma~and Farm Rd
I -1Z..
3803, 395J, 3959 a.~
,tvlaple.lslandXanp RiAlef.fi~', .-
ft..1~rt. \ 's o1f-0ill Corporate Way
"C . '.' J
"
"
,
.
, H
, ~ I
0:(( INTERfi.JATION
iio rn
pt, y ,
~~ '
.~ ~
V:l .-(\
~ ~
, ~
~
~
~ADMOND FERRY RD
pat~cian I---r\ l :
MHP-LL\ ..
~ \
"J)
>-
- <(
~ I~
.
,
,
,
,
,
lNTER
ATIONAL WAY
...-... - -.....
AME FARM RD
---1
d~
'N~'
~ . . . ~
'- I( A" ~ ?i
N
A
Date Received:
NOV t 5 2010
Original Submittal
http://spifs020/mapguide2009/mapviewerphp/printablepage.php?SESSI ON=d3eaa542-ffiT- ffiT-8... 11/15/2010
NOV 1 5 2010
.c
,
"
"
,
--
.~
?
'.
"
:-
Date Received:
Original Submittal
~
f
~
~
~
~
I ~
~
~
\:j
~
t:
~
.
.
~
r Date Received:--"
,
~
~
~
NOV 1 5 2010 :1
,
Original submittal
.
~ .
\
I
I
I
I
DRII1I1UIII
.":-_- ..
. .
-c
I Q) c:>
I > 6
"ii) ~
0 Lr"l
Q)
0::: -
>
I Q) C>
- :z
ro
I 0
I
If\
~
~
~
f
~
~
~
~
}
~
~
~
i
~
.
~
~
.
C>-
l{?
co
IS' 0
~ Q)
C/l 7- ....
c: q (I)
O' <. ...,
3 - ""
~~ '-~' ~
r> (I)
\ () ;20
\ <-' ~
I "
,
i
.
. .
.
i:;
~
"Qj
o
CIl
cr
2
<1J
a
~
~
U")
J
~
oE
.J:)
:::J
C/)
(ij
c:
051
8
-
~
~
--
I
,
~ .
I
1
i
~
~
~
~
...
~
~
~
l
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
.
'&
.
I
i:..
5"
~
" .
'-,
,
".,..
~ ::s !:;~~
IT <: --.
3 _ toO'
a U1 ~
!!!. .... ~
c:> <'
5 (l)
a.
"0 C
. >. e ~ Q) <= L- a Z
U Ctl C Ol " > c; a
S a om w .~ '" -- :;:::::;
v h ~ Ctl Ctl 0
0> -0" .... L- U .....J I-
~ - ~ +~ .cd; ~ ~ 'E u -- Q)
~ Ctl Ol~ ~~ - c 0 <{ 0 I-
eU Q) Q) c Cl.. I-W
c 0 .- " g > .c ......
ro c.": .~ N .! ::l - E Q) a. 0:::: <{
a e.<: z, ~ (:) 00 c W -<.9
~ :;:::::;-0 co!! ~l: (U :z: Ctl a.C9 <( ...... ~~
0.'" -" - lii W """) ~ "
Ctl_ e E 'S 06 ......
.c c "0 . 0:::0
c Q) 'OJ a ...... Z 0 0::::
L- .- >. CY Q) Woe:(
Q)'- .;:: :2: ......
_0> a (f.)wu W 0:::: 0 t.: a. a.
Q)
" c c 0 '2: L- a; ~ 0... .0
- 'C a E LL E
'" ::J
I.{) Cl.. Q) C z Z z
I.{) (f.) (f.) :2: Cl Cl
I.{) -0 c - c
Q) a; '~ '~
'Q ro '" ~
a: ~
0 0 0
>-
0::
<(
~
~
=>
(j)
I--
()
W
....,
o
0::
a..
ro
o
.;::
-
o en
0) e
(j)0)
~ ~
0) 0
e en
en ~
0) 0)
-oe
..:1.c
() .-:::
.S ~
- ....
00
.~ co
o ....
.... 0)
o.e
'00)
O)Ol
en-o
Oe
0. co
e 0)
0.0
.!{l'~
.cO)
I--en
~
<(
W
I--
I--
t)
W
...,
o
0::
a..
.....J
<(
-
I--
0::
<(
a..
""
e
Cl
'w
0)
o
0)
-
ro
-
en "- >.1"---
WO) rot-
(ijg' ~~I.l)
2ai -0>0
u... ro...... 0
-:2: e u... I.l)
~ e .2 0 ~
e 0 co ~N
L..:;J()c.32LO
COOQ)"-Q)_
",:02c2t;::o
Q)cn-CtIcClLt)
c::.~ ~ E;;;'E~
a~ 0) 0 >,I.l) 0. ..
....IuOOI.l)OO I--
0)0
""0
.3",
o
0) 0)
--
:c "3
~oo
ro -
0)
e::lO>
CleO :t::
<('w O)NON R
O)>t-o'<t~
<(-0<(0> 0 '<t 00
+-......COI.l).o
~ ...... en u.. I I
0) ~'....Oo'<t 0)
.;..; O.!:'- CO N 0
oeeLL -NN..
Q)COC>"'OI.-
",'-,"->CM("I')O
'-LL-"'Z rooo ro
'fi.o Cl.1.l) t I.l) I.l) C
<('- 0)0.c~ 0.... 0
o ~c..I--LLU
a..
<(
~
>-
I--
-
Z
-
t)
-
>
W
I--
ii;
1
~1o,\'f'R4
","" li
i j
: ~
~ ~ h~
~ l nil J
i ~ jl~
>,- ~ ~
ro .
~.l ~q. t
~ rUG </'... ,J ~
,g..o ~ @
co ~ /: /' .;\'
-E...CiQ-_==I.....~ ;.ml-.~.
""jBdi;::.. ~.~.. -~;e;;{
E.~ ~r -'l';-?"!
I.l) a. ~~ Jo~' ,
:goo 'IIr.:;;/7'
00
I--
Z
W
oo~ 00 :2:
I-- 0
I--z Z Z
Zw W W -0
~:2:OOoo:2: :2: ~ 0)
<( U E
001--1--0 ....
>- 00 .!!l
zzrEzz I-- 00 ro
WW:2:ww 0
:2::2:0:2::2: ....I ~ 0) ""
. <( 0<( l!l <Il <Il -0 <Il -0
~ <(wZzw -0 -00-0 <Il
I.l) WI--WWI-- 00 0 o U 0 ....
0 00 U <Il
0 ~<(~:2:<( W () ~() -'>It.
N >, >, (ij >, e
1--1-- <(I-- U -
e ooOOWwOO U .~ ~ 0(3-; .;::
0 Cl.
:;:; ZZ~I--Z <( II .- <Il Ti en
II <Il llCl.
::l 001--<(0 Z Cl.<Il ~oo ~ >,
.... (?fBooti)fB 0
- OO'8OO(ijOO .... .... ::l
en (? en en ....
e ~o::~zo:: - 0 tntnN 't;'(;)N
ro U ro'- Ol
0 W .... e e -0
II oo(?oo 0:: ::l <Il,~ ro'- NO~ NO~ <Il
.... L.. It- ..c -
(ij I.l) (?I.l) 0 II ,- _.c E ~I.l) - ~I.l) - ro
'<toWwo e ::lLLllO I.l)(OO> I.l)(OO> ....
e .="O~Q).2 - -0> - - 0> ,
800::0::0 LL 0 '<t'<t, '<t'<t, e
Cl 0 :;:; OO(j)w:2:c.. 0
.;:: N~OO~ II 00 00....
~ ~~;g~;: W ::l C t;:: C C c N~i5 N~O e
>- >, S .... 0g>000 , , 0 , , 0 l!l
"" - 0>._ en OJ Cl en
l!l (")0 I.l) en molJ... <(OLL
0:: (")ON(") 0 :c e ~o..~~~ <Il
Cl 00 00 '00 0 ClO-o ClO-o .... <Il
e ~N~~N 00 U 000000 e- c- o - 0
en ._ LL e ._ LL e ro
<( '5 <Il '<t oocot-co -0_0 -0_0 <Il li=
UUU()U II 0 ~ .,.....,....000 =cnu =r.nu I.l) 0. 0
~ ::l l!lc..:2:LLW II 0 <Il 00000 :::1.= Q) :::1.= <D (") >,
. l!l _=>__z <( N Z NNNNN l!lLLOO l!lLLOO ~ I-- l!l
~ ro
<Il <Il
:J ....
<Il <( Cl. <Il
-0 >, 0.
(j) 0 Cl I-- >,
U e e I--
<Il :2 0 >,
W :n ::l ro :;:; 0
II e
ro l!l <Il ::l ro
0 .~ .... .... 0.
en <( -
Ci en en ::l
0 0 <Il e II
Cl. .... "" 0 II
<( (? 00 U 0
() <i. l!l U 0 W
.
.... C Z
>- ~ -c 0 0
. C - +:: 0
m C 0> , CD = m
U "ill .. > - m ....J l-
S 0 . = .... C) -
(l) 0) -0" '~ .~ C'oI Iii C)-a> 0 <( U I- W
+ ~ >~ U a> C C !::<9
~ m a> 0>2 <~ ...., :::: C.
.... 1!!5 CD E _a>a> C. ...... 0:: W <(
cu . N:2;2
CO ._" ~ . re~ c:::: - C E (9
c~ .~ .0 <( ...... W ~
ro C'<= z. ,,;,.; > -,
0 ClH' ~~ SS .$ C) ::::J mC. ...... c:::()
~ :;::;15 0.'" OJ':": :z: C/) E 'S~ "0 Z 0 0:: Woe:(
m- m lii 0 ......
C a> .c c c >- 0- a> :2: ...... W 0:: 0 '-' 0.0.
.... .- "6l Cl)WC) Q)
a>- iD .0
_0) .t: .~ .... E C) 0.... LL E
0 0 ::>
C .f: 0 III Z
~ a> C z Z
- .... Cl
LOC. CI) .- Cl
~ c c
LOCI) ij iD .~ .~
Q) III
LO "e ro ~ ~
0
0- 0 0
.
>-
<
~
...J
<
Z
o
i=
<
z
0::
w
I-
Z
Dc=-
~
I .
e
0
,i .
. e.
.
.
0
O' .
:0 0
:00
<D
o
. : ~'Bc[lD
o
.
.0 1
~
o
o
yoss-/+
o
o
'.
.
~
Ullllllllllllclcl,tlcllU
C::::::::::::::t7
oll
"" Q)
o Q)
"laC/)
"". VI
CIlCll Cl
c"""tlc
Q)::::J Q)._
Cl VI..c ""
o CIl
,._U"tl
;> U ell C
CUe::
Z CIl ell ~
o
o
.
.
I-
C/)
<
w
c
<
o
0::
:!:
0::
<
u.
w
::!:
<
t:l
z
<(
.....J
a..
W
r-
en
o
w
r-
z
<(
~
>-g
en;::
'-
.
.
OWNBR'S SCHEDULE 8
BXCIlPTIONS FROM COVBRAGB
This policy do.... not insure ..g..~n8t loss or d"""'ge (and the Company will not pay costs,
attorney's fees O~ expenses) wh~ch arise by reason oil
GENERAL EXCEPTIONS
1 Taxes or assessments wh~ch are not shown as eXlst~n9 l~ens by the records of
any tax~n9 author1ty that lev~es taxes or assessments on real property or by
the publ1C records, proceedings by a publ1c agency Wh1Ch may result 1n taxes
or assessments, or not1ces of such proceedlngs, whether or not shown by the
records of such agency or by the publ1C records
2 Any facts, r1ghts, 1nterests, or cla1ms which are not shown by the publlC
records but which could be ascertained by an 1nspect1on of sa1d land or by
mak1ng 1nqu1ry of persons 1n possess. on thereof
3 Easements. encumbrances, or cla~ms thereof, not shown by the publIC records,
unpatented min~n9 clalms, reservat10ns or exceptlons 10 patents or 1n acts
authorlzlng the issuance thereof, water clghts, cla~ms or tltle to water
4 Any l~en or r19ht to a llen, for servlces, labor, or materlal heretofore or
hereafter furn1shed, Imposed by law and not shown by the publIC records
5 Dlscrepancles, confl~cts In boundary lines, shortage In area, encroachments,
or any other facts wh.ch a correct survey would d1sclose
SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS
6 Easements for ut~l~t~es and slopes as shown on Land Partlt~on Plat
Numbers 94-P0499 and 94-POSOO, f.led May 6, 1994, Lane County Oregon Plat
Records, ~n Lane County, Oregon
7 Not.ce of Annexat.on Agreement, .nc1ud.ng the terms and provls.ons
thereof, recorded May 6, 1994, Recept10n No 94-34937, OffICIal Records of
Lane County, Oregon
Waiver of T~me ~lm1t.on Consent to Annexatlon, an Addendum to the Consent
to lumexat.lon Documentt,~:'1.ncluding the terms and provislons thereof, recorded
May 6, 1994, Recept10n No 94-34938, Off.cial Records of Lane County, Oregon
8 Condlt1ons for Easements, ~nclud1n9 the terms and prOV1Sl0ns thereof,
recorded May 6, 1994, ReceptIon No's 94-34939, 94-34940 and 94-34941,
Officlal Records of L~n~ County, Oregon
Date Received:
NOV 1 5 2010
Original Submittal
.
.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
PAACBL I
Seglnn~n9 at the Southeast corner of Parcel 2 of Land Part~t~on Plat No
94-P0500 as f.led and recorded 1n the ,Plat 'Records of Lane County Oregon,
thence South 890 56' 00" West a dlstance of 686 62 feet along the NOl;therly
r~ght9of-way of Game Farm Road, thence leav1ng Sa1Q r19ht-of~way Norch 00 00'
39" West a d1stance of 975 54 feet to the Southerly r.ght-of-wa~ of
Internat.onal Way, thence along last sa.d r1ght-of-way North 89 56' 08" East
a d1stanCe of 89 99 feet, thence along the arc of a 966 00 foot radlus curve
to the rlght, wh~ch has a central angle of 160 27' 0911 and a chord bearlng
South 810 50' lau East 276 44 feet, a dlstance of 277 39 feet, thence along
the arc of a 1034 00 foot radlus curve to the left, 'whlch has a central angle
of 160 10' 09" and a chord bearlng South 810 41' 47" East 290 83 feet, a
dlstance of 291 80 feet, thence South 890 46' 52" East a dlstance of 3S 23
feet to the East llne of the afore.descrlbed Parcel 2, thence leav1ng last
S81d rlght-of-way, along sald East 11nes South 00 00' 39" East. a dlstance of
893 46 feet to the pOlnt of beglnnlng, In Lane County, Oregon
PAACEL II
An easement as set forth 1n that certain Easement ~greement, by and between
Sony Music Entertalnment Inc , a Delaware corporat~on and the Symantec 2001
Trust, a Delaware statutory buslness trust, recorded Aprl1 6, 2001, Receptlon
No 2001-019542, Official Records of Lane County, Oregon
,. /Date Received:
F' NO': I' ~ ~"lll
,. ,I ... (~"',U
Original Submit!:;;!
"
.
.
L
.
OWllE1l. . S SCIlEDULE A
Policy No. 9801.8
Order No. 192477
AmQunt of Iusurance $33,827,774 00
Prem1um $11,070 69
Date of Policy: March 6, 2003 at 9 42:02 a m
l. N~~ of Xnauredz
SYMANTEC CORPORATION, a Oelaware corporat1on
2. The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this policy is.
Fee Slmple as to Parcel I,
An Easement as to Parcel II
3. Title to the estate or interest in the land 1S vested in.
SYMANTEC CORPORATION, a Oelaware corporatlon
4. The land referred to ~n this pol~cy is described as follows:
ATTACHED HERETO
. c
Date Received:
:'\G"'IS~, ;-'." ~-' ~"
NOV 1 5 2010
Ut'" :V"' Original Submittal
I~..;n' ':. Cf ~ nl~'
.
..
,
,
\ WPTCO 164469 10-58606 \
17 03 15 40 700, part 17 03 15 30 500
"
,
V. Mia Weber
Cooley Godward LLP
5 Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Road
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Division of Chief Depuly Clerk 'BBI.BlncIB
Lane Counly Deeds and Records 'VU V ~v'U
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 $41.80
00163455200100195400040040
04/06/2001 09:31:57 A"
RPR-DEED Cnl=1 Sln=6 CASHIER 05
$20.00 $11.00 $10.00
.l
,0
\\- After recording, return to:
Until a change is requested, mail all tax
statements to:
The Bank of Nova Scotia
580 California Street, Suite 2100
San Francisco, CA 94104
Attention: Ed Kofrnan
Tax Account No. 51-6521385
WARRANTY DEED
SONY MUStC ENTERTAINMENT INC., a Delaware corporation, Grantor, conveys
and warrants to THE SYMANTEC 2001 TRUST, a Delaware statutory business trust, Grantee,
the real property described on the attached Exhibit A, free of encumbrances except as .
specifically set forth herein. The true consideration for this conveyance is two million nine
hundred thirty-six thousand six hundred thirty-five dollars ($2,936,635).
THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED
IN nus INSTRUMENT IN VIOLA nON OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LA WS AND
REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE
PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE
APPROPRIATE CITY OR CQUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED
USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LA WSUlTS AGAINST FARMING OR
FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930.
THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT MAY NOT BE WITHIN A
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT PROTECTING STRUCTURES. THE PROPERTY IS
SUBJECT TO LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS, WHICH, IN FARM OR FOREST
ZONES, MAY NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION OR SITING OF A RESIDENCE AND
WHICH LIMIT LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED
IN ORS 30.930 IN ALL ZONES. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS
INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD
CHECK WITRTHE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO
"--
Date Received: .
'--
NOV f 5 2010
Mter Recordm~ R.turo 10:
W-cstero illl:meer IIt'e La.
DO Box 10146
lugene, IJR 97443
~
40108144V3
Original Submittal
.
.
"
i
VERIFY APPROVED USES AND EXISTENCE OF FIRE PROTECTION FOR
STRUCTURES.
DATED:-Ar" \ ""} lPO\
SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT INC., a
Delaware corporation
~\
By:
Its: ~R. If. P. ()~~
'.
Date Received:
NOV 1 5 2010
Original Submittal
40108144V3
.
..
i
~
,
.
EXHlHIT A
WARRMITYDEED
All of the real property in the City of Springfield, County of Lane State of Oregon
described as follows: ' "
Beginning at the southeast ~orner of parcel 2 of Lanp part1t10n Plat No.
94-POSOO as fi,ed and recorded in the Plat Records of Lane ,County Oregon.
thence South 89' 56' 00' West a distance of 686.62 feet along the Northerly
rivht-Df-V~ of Game Farm Road~ thence 1eav;ng said right-of-wRY North O. 00'
39 West a distan~e of 975.54 Teet to the southerlY r1ght-of-w~ of
International Wayi thence along last said right-of~waY North 89 56' 08" East
a di stance of 89.:19 feet; thence along the arc of a 9li6.00 foot yoadtus curve
to the right which has a central angle of 16" 27' 09" and ,a chord bearing
South 81'60' 18' East 276.44 feet, a distance of 277.39 feet; thence along
the arc af a 1034.00 foot radtus ~urve to the ,eftt which has a central angle
of 16" 10' 09"and a chord bearing south 81" 41' 4 ' East 290.83 feet a
distance of 291.80 feet. thence South 89" 46' 52' East a distance of ~5.23
feet to the East line ot the afore-described Parcel 2; thence leaving last
said right-of-wilY, along satd East ltnes South 0" DO' 39" East a distance of
893.46 ,feet to the point of beginning, in Lane County, Oregon. ,
"
r Date Received:
NOV 1 5 2010
Original Submittal
40108144V3
.
.
.
, .
,
.', .
.
;
STATE OF "~I?: ~~
COUNTY OF LANIr"
)
) ss.
)
, , ~OD(
This ins~nt ,:"as acknowledged before me on~, by
-;r~n~~ ~ ~/~.. Sr. vice President of Operations for Sony Music
Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation
OFFICIAL SEAl.
I) .JOANNA K. CROSS
"'".,,/ NOTARY PUBLIC. OREGON
COMMISSION NO. 331373
MY COMMISSION EXPIReS FEBRUARY 7, 2004
~~~!oi
y commission expire on: 01-j~~
...
Date Received:
NOV 15 2010
Original Submittal
40108144V3
.
.
Architecture
Planning
Design LEED Consulting
115 NW First Ave, Suite 300
Portland, OR 97209
tel 503.280.8000
fax 503.224.5442
Oh planning+design
architecture
November 11, 2010
Mr. Jim Donovan, Planning Supervisor
Ms. Liz Miller, Planner I
Urban Planning Section
Springfield Planning Division
Development Services Department
City of Springfield, Oregon
225 Fifth Street, Springfield, OR 97477
.'
. \.'
Subject:
Narrative of
Site Plan Review Minor Modification for
Symantec Springfield
555 International Way
Virtual Technical Support Lab
New Equipment Service and Generator
Building Permit S10-004000
Dear Jim and Liz:
Symantec has need for new electrical service and an emergency generator to support their Virtual
Support Computer Lab (Building Permit S10-004000).
The design team has refined the equipment location based on the proposed equipment's technical
requirements and budget constraints in keeping with the building's aesthetics and the City of
Springfield development requirements.
.
.
The equipment and screening is proposed to be located on the north side of the building
near the existing loading dock.
. The equipment would sit between the existing building and existing pedestrian
sidewalk.
.. The front face of the screen is proposed to be approximately 550' from the curb of
International Way.
. The rear face of the screen is proposed to be approximately 11' from the exterior face
of the building.
Date Received:
NOV 1 5 2010
0ri0'
. Submittal
'..---..--
..
.
City of Springfield, Urban Planning Section
November 1, 2010
Page 2
m
. The equipment will be fully screened from view at street level.
. The generator will be surrounded by a combination of a metal architectural screen wall
and a "green screen" wall. The architectural screen wall will fully conceal the
generator. The "green screen" provides texture, visual interest, and a better
experience for those who would see the screen from inside the building. It also helps
reduce the scale of the metal architectural wall, and it relates to the building's
fenestration by aligning with the existing glazing.
. The new electrical service vault will be flush with the ground plane.
Please refer to the attached architectural site plan and architectural renderings for additional
information.
Sincerely,
Oh planning + design
Deb France, AlA
Principal
r Oat" ~eceived:
~''i': 1 5 2010
. " ,,,I 5...umittal
.
.
Oh planning+design, architecture
115 NW First Avenue, Suite 300
Portland, Oregon 97209
503-280-8000 tel
503-224-5442 fax
Transmittal
To:
Planner on Duty
City of Springfield
Development Services
Community Services Dlvision
225 Fifth Street
Springfeld, OR 97477
Date: 11.12.2010
From: Deb Scott
Oh Project #: 70020
,i-'
RE:
Symantec Springfield Structural
Improvement Package 1
Delivery Method: Overnight
Bsets 11.11.10 Symantec Virtual Support Lab Generator Equipment Minor
Modification Packaae
1 $1,303.05 fee
Greetings!
We've been working with Jim Donovan and Liz Miller to put together this minor modification.
It's in response to a letter Liz sent on October 11, 2010 regarding Building Permit 810-00400.
I've included a checklist and highlighted the items Liz and I reviewed over the phone to clarify
what things are not included. Please give me a call once you've been able to do intake.
Thank you!
Date Received:
NOV 1 5 2010
Original Submittal
Optimism: anticipation of the best possible outcome
health: flourishing condition of well-being
,.~.
.-'
.
J .
_..._, I';'" r.. .j:.."',,.,.r.. ;~,'...,......:..;.,;!'~ r ,-.. H:I;~:'. " ", ....". ".;!"::~.' :'1' . t J! ,-
I
i
.
I ii .' I e~
II' ,Ill
I
-
. r~41
!. J~i t
~ C .
t" I .I I
r ' I' Il II
.~~: ~
+t roO, ;, '; ;~'
". I ;~
'-,r' ;}
( f,j
~t - ~
l \ 04
\ r :
3. ' ~, e
t::l
,.. .. , [)
-
~
Q ~ j
~. .
~ ~
;~ " a
. ~~ 1~11
Date Received: -
NI'lV 1 5 2010
Original Subl1'l:t~;;;i
: I
. 1
.