HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence PWT 9/8/2009
.
.
L1MBIRD Andrew
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
DRISCOLL Jon
Friday, September 04, 2009 5:09 PM
'Ric Christian'
L1MBIRD Andrew
RE: traffic flow on Chan site
Ric,
This looks much better from a transportation viewpoint.
room for a delivery/garbage truck to enter and exit the
is cut in half, and there is room for delivery vehicles
The one way traffic will give the
site, the number of conflict points
to load/unload.
You might check with Sanipac to see if the trash enclosure would located better, as the front
,end loaders could not easily access it in this configuration. 'r,
This is a significant, though not necessarily major, modification, so I have forwarded this
on to planning and engineering.
Have a good weekend.
Sincerely,
Jon
Jon Driscoll EIT, PLS, WRE
Transportation Engineer in Training
City of Springfield, Public Works
22S Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97478
Phone: (S41) 726-3679 Fax: (541) 726-3781 idriscoll~ci.springfield.or.us
-----Original Message----- ,
From: Ric Christian [mailto:ric@geomax.us]
Sent: Friday, September 84, 2889 3:12 PM
To: DRISCOLL Jon
Subject: traffic flow on Chan site
Jon:
These are the changes we are proposing in order to allowable circulation on the Chan site for
a 38' single unit truck. This will certainly be the largest vehicle on the site other than
fire apparatus. No change is proposed for the fire apparatus hammerhead turn around.
This plan is based on AASHTO Exhibit 2-4, A Guide for Highway and Street Design.
I have changed the size and configuration of the building slightly to accommodate traffic
flow.
I would also like to move the trash pick-up to the rear of the lot.
The delivery spaces are eliminated due to the loading area at the rear of the building.
Please let me know if this meets with your satisfaction so I can change the site and grading
plans. oIJ. /
RIG- c.HIlJ'i."M 1, . '. h~,,"\L-4-f/"""
Planner: AL
.
.
L1MBIRD Andrew
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
STOUDER Matt
Friday, September 04, 2009 9:33 AM
BOYATT Tom
DONOVAN James; SMITH Susan; L1MBIRD Andrew
RE: Geomax--Chan project
HiTom,
I talked with Jim about this project. It sounds like Andy has already responded to this letter. Let's get together for 20
minutes or so on Tuesday to get on the same page. Andy is out today. Thanks,
Matt
From: BOYATTTom
Sent: Friday, September 04,20098:14 AM
To: STOUDER Matt
Cc: MCEACHERN Clayton
Subject: RE: Geomax--Chan project
I have two copies on my desk - and you can have one. It was addressed to Andy and cc'd to Grile, Smith, Vogeney and
me.
From: STOUDER Matt
Sent: Friday, September 04, 20098:12 AM
To: BOYATT Tom
Cc: MCEACHERN Clayton
Subject: RE: Geomax--Chan project
Okay - do you know what letter Susie is talking about? Also, I didn't meet last week, but I think Clayton met with Jon to
discuss some transportation issues. Thanks,
Matt
From: BOYATTTom
Sent: Friday, September 04,20098:07 AM
To: STOUDER Matt
Subject: FW: Geomax--Chan project
Matt - please discuss with Jon and then check in with me. We should get this out of the way today. Thanks, T
From: SMITH Susan
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 S:41 PM
To: BOYATTTom; STOUDER Matt
Subject: Geomax--Cnan project
Could you guys give me a brief status report on this? I think some of the points in the letter regarding the Chan project
had a bit of merit. Could you fill me in on the meeting you had last week? Thanks, Susie
1
Date Received:-i~'
Planner: AL