HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 11/8/2010
.
.
'City of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Site Plan Review
SPRINGFIELD
WiL.
. - . ~... ~
A licant Name: Sonn
Com an :
541-744-8080
Address:
644 A Street S rin field OR 97477
A licant's Re
Fox
Phone: 541-683-6090
Com an :
Address:
OBEC
Fax:
541-683-6576
920 Count Club Rd. Suite 100B Eu ene OR 97401
Owner: ODOT
Phone: 541-744-8080
Com an
Address:
Fax:
644 A Street S rin field OR 97477
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO:. 17-03-33-44
TAX LOT NO S : 2600
Address:
Size of Pro e
on Franklin Blvd. beneath and east of 1-5 Brid es
2.78 tax lot shown above
Acres ~ S uare Feet D
Pro osed Name of Pro'ect: South Bank Viaduct Pro'ect
Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Pro osal: 1100 foot Bike/Ped Viaduct 800 feet within S rin field 'urisdiction
. -. -...
Associated A
TVf!1O 'OOM T'fP 310 . ~ooo I
Iications: Flood lain Greenwa DU
Si ns:
A
Date: Jl~ &-} 0
Te4~aW e;:
G
Pre-Sub Case No.:
Date:
TOTAL FEES: $
PROJECT NUMBER: t>R6IO- 0
Revised 11/19/09
1 of 10
.
.
Owner Signatures
This application form is used for both the required pre-submittal meeting and subsequent
complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application
process.
An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted.
Pre-Submittal
The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and
accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the
owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf.
I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory
timelines, information, requests and requirements conveyed to my representative.
Owner:
Date:
Signature
Print
Submittal
I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check
performed on this application at the Pre-Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as
necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise
contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as
submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a
complete application.
Owner:
~=J fJA du&c
Signatur
Date:
II - /5 - /0
5'''''l'\j fA.. Ch/ckc.v-,
Print
Date Received:
NOV - 8 2010
Original Submittal
Revised 11/19/09
2 of 10
.
.
Site Plan Review Application Process
1. Applicant Submits a Site Plan Review Application for Pre-Submittal
. The application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements
Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet.
. A pre-submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre-submittal
meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon.
. Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre-submittal meetings within five to seven
working days of receiving an application.
2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre-Submittal Meeting
. The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre-
submittal meeting.
. The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and
Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning
Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes.
. The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre-Submittal Checklist specifying the items
required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the
applicant has 180 days submit a complete application to the City.
3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and
Issue a Decision
. A complete application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements
Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet.
. A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless
appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application.
. Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the
property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition,
the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property.
. There is a 14-day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed.
. Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their
comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval
criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those
given notice.
. Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied.
. At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision
prior to issuing the final land use decision.
. The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is
effective on the day it is mailed.
. The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15
calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official.
Date Received:
NOV - 8 2010
Original Submittal
Revised 11/19/09
3 of 10
.
.
Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist
NOTE:
. ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre-Submittal and Submittal.
. If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please
state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form.
D Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services
Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the
pre-submittal and submittal stages.
D Site Plan Review Application Form
D Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the
property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the
action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees
and future expansion plans, if known.
D Copy of the Deed
D Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting
ownership and listing all encumbrances.
D Copy of the Site Plan Reduced to 8'h"x 11", which will be mailed as part of the
required neighboring property notification packet.
D Right-of-Way Approach Permit Application provided where the property has frontage
on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility.
D Three (3) Copies of the Stormwater Management System Study with Completed
Stormwater Scoping Sheet Attached - The plan, supporting calculations and
documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures
Manual. .
D Three (3) Copies of the Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in
accordance with SDC 4.2-105 AA. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze
and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's
transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given
development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations,
access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also
address, if needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and
objectives.
D Seven (7) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre-Submittal OR
Eighteen (18) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Submittal
D All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and
sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of
preparation.
D All plan sets must be folded to 8'12" by 11" and bound by rubbffW~eceived:
a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
D Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer NOY - 8.2010
Original Submittal
Revised 11/19/09 4 of 10
.
.
D Vicinity Map
D The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb
cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what
is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size,
setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings.
D The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses
and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse
Map on file in the Development Services Department
D The lOO-year floodplain and f100dway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest
adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment
or Letter of Map Revision
D The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead
Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department
D Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when
measured 4 V2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian
areaSi wetlands and rock outcroppings
D Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of
Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted
concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable
soils and/or a high water table
b. Site Plan
D Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect,'or Engineer
D Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the
parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and
distance between buildings
D Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage,
trash receptacles, and signs
D Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact and disabled parking spaces;
including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping
D Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site
proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and
other impervious surfaces.
D Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district
D On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation
D Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and
dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proPO!@t!l~ Re(J@W@d:
D Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces
D Location of existing and proposed transit facilities NOV - 8 2010
D Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicatedO?rgr~t'l1t.1mf1
common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses
D Phased Development Plan - where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a
phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries
and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street
connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other
Revised 11/19/09
5 of 10
.
.
required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater
management, water, and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply
to the Site Plan application being submitted.
c. Improvement and Public Utilities Plan
o Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer. I
o Location and width of all existing and proposed easements
o Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of all existing and proposed
streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed
development, including ownership and maintenance status, if applicable.
o Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting
o Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles,
transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities
o Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks,
sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails
o Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including
sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas,
telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points
d. Grading, Paving, &. Stormwater Management Plan
o Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
o Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are
proposed as part of the stormwater management system
o Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations
o Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns
o The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but
not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater
quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained
o Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for
land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals)
o Amount of proposed cut and fill
e. Landscape Plan
o Drawn by a Landscape Architect
o Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of
landscape coverage
o Screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110
o Written description, including specifications, of the permanent irrigation system
o Location and type of street trees
o List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials.lt~~L.. Shr.ubsd.ground
cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common namV,~FMty~~, spacing,
and method of planting
NOY - 8 2010
f. Architectural Plans
Original Submittal
Revised 11/19/09
6 of 10
.
.
D Exterior elevations of all buildings and structures proposed for the development site,
including height
D Conceptual floor plans
g. On-Site Lighting Plan
D Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing
and attached
D Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles, and type of illumination,
wattage, and luminous area "
D Photometric test report for each light source
D Additional Materials That May be Required
IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL
STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE
APPLICANrSHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS
DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120:
D Where a multi-family development is proposed, any additional materials to
demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240
D Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of
bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the
top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW
D A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if
there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present
D Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional
standards of the overlay district
D If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified
in SDC 5.19-100
D A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be
submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property
D Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence
the permit application has been submitted for review
D Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land"
and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development
D Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100
and 5.21-100
D An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is
proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can
be served by sanitary sewer
Date Received:
NOV - 8 2010
Original Submittal
Revised 11/19/09
7 of 10
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT / Engineering Division Phone: (541) 726-3753 Fax: (541) 736-1021
MARCH 5, 2004
REQUIRED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET USE POLICY:
In October 2003, Springfield Public Works released a trial "stormwater scoping sheet," provided to help
engineers and developers meet stormwater requirements in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and
Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). After a five month trial period, it became
. apparent that users of the scoping sheet submitted much more complete applications than non-users. An
added bonus was a decrease in the overall review time spent on the applications, resulting in quicker notice
of decisions.
As a result of the benefits of the scoping sheets, the City has decided to make their use a mandatory process.
As of April 12, 2004, the use of stormwater scoping sheets will be required for all applications which require
development review. All applications submitted to the City shall provide four (4) copies of a completed
stormwater scoping sheet with the application packet. Attached with this letter is the latest version of the
scoping sheet, which reflects changes requested by the development community.
PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTED APPLlCA nONS WILL NOW BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A
COMPLETED STORMW A TER SCOPING SHEET, STORMW A TER STUDY AND PLANS IN
CONFORMANCE WITH THE SCOPE REQUIREMENTS
DIRECTIONS FOR USING STORMWATER SCOPING SHEETS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Obtain scoping sheet from application packet, city website, or other location
2. Fill out project information (top half oUront sheet) prior to commencement of work on stormwater
study (note: do not sign scoping sheet until it is received from the City with requirements checked).
3. Mail, fax, or email all pages to: City of Springfield, Public Works Dept., Attn: Matt Stouder
4. Receive completed scoping sheet (filled out by the City) indicating minimum requirements for a
complete stormwater study
5. Include four (4) copies of complete scoping sheet (signed by engineer at the bottom of page 2),
stormwater study and plans that comply with the minimum required scope with submittal of
application packet. The scoping sheet shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover of
the stormwater study.
Stormwater scoping sheets can be found with all application packets (City website and the Public Works
front counter) as well as on the Public Works webpage at either:
www.ci.springfield.or.uslPubworks/whatsnew.htrn or under the link for "fillable forms" at
www.ci.springfield.or.uslPubworks/Design/start.htm. Thank you in advance for working with the City of
Springfield with this new process.
Sincerely,
Matt Stouder, Civil Engineer
City of Springfield, Public Works/Engineering
Email: mstouder@ci.springfield.or.us
Phone: (541) 736-1035
Fax: (541) 736-1021
Date Received:
NOY - 8 2010
Original Submittal
Revised 11/19/09
8 of 10
.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT / Engineering Division
Fax: (541) 736-1021
STORMW A TER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK
---- (Area below this line filled out by Applicant) -
(Please return to Matt Stouder@ City of Springfield Public Works Engineering; Fax # 736-1021, Phone # 736-1035.)
Project Name: Applicant:
Assessors Parcel #: Date:
Land Use(s): Phone #:
Project Size (Acres): Fax#:
Approx. Impervious Area: Email:
^;'!;:<T,:Y':';~/> ,^",,::-'"'~"-'7*Zf.,J">Y-\'_V___'-.\ ___ _ _ '._ __ ~.- - . . .
Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map):
Drainage Proposal (public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary:
Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices:
_ (Area below tllis line ruled out bv the Citv and Returned to the Applicant) ,
(At a minimum, ,all boxes checked by the City on the front and back of this sheet shall be submitted
for an'application to be complete for submittal, although other requirements may be necessary.)
Drainal!e Study Tvoe fEDSPM Section 4.03.2): <Note. UH may be substituted for Rational Method)
D Small Site Study - (use Rational Method for calculations)
D Mid-Level Development Study - (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations)
D Full Drainage Development Study - (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations)
Environmental Considerations:
D Wellhead Zone: D Hillside Development:
D WetIand/Riparian: D F1oodway/Floodplain:
D Soil Type: D Other Jurisdictions:
Downstream Analvsis:
D N/A
D Flow line for starting water surface elevation:
D Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation:
D Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: - -I.
.......,... ...
Return to Matt Stouder (ijJ Citv of Snrin..tield email: mstouderfolci.sorinl!tield.or.us FAX: (54]) 736-1021
V-8lU1U
NO
()rigirH31 Sut,mittal
Revised 11/19/09
9 of 10
.
.
COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS I For Official Use Only
* Based upon the iriformation provided on the front of this sheet, the following represents a minimum of what is needed for an
application to be complete for submittal with respect to drainage; however, this list should not be used in lieu of the Springfield
Development Code (SDC) or the City's Engineering Design Manual. Compliance with these requirements does not constitute site
approval; Additional site specific information may be required. Note: Upon scoping sheet submittal, ensure completedform has
been signed in the space provided below:
Interim Design Standards/Water Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3)
Req'd NIA
o 0 All non-building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e.g. multi-chambered catch basin w/oil
filtration media) for stormwater quality. Additionally, a minimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be
treated by vegetated methods.
D 0 Where required, vegetative stormwater design shall be consistent with interim design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02),
set forth by the Bureau of Environmental Services (BES) or Clean Water Services (CWS).
D D For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feel, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified
by the BES for vegetative treatment.
D D If a stormwater treatment swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes,
bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with either BES or CWS requirements.
D D Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM
D D All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall
~e provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure.
General Study Requirements (EDSPM Section 4.03)
D D Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon.
o D A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map.
o 0 Calculations showing system capacity for a 2-year storm event and overflow effects of a 25-year storm event.
o 0 The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins.
Review of Downstream System (EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C)
o 0 A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the
Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSe). Date Received:
o 0 Elevations of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable.
Design of Storm Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04)
o D Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set.
o D Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrer1lll?!iI"SistlMltfMterials,
or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficleni"lo support an 80,000 Ib
load without failure of the pipe structure.
D D Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to
achieve a minimum velocity of three (3) feet per second at 0.5 pipe full based on Table 4-1 as well.
NOV - 8 2010
Other/Mise
o 0 Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site
drains
D 0 Private stormwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stormwater flows from one property to
another
00 Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of
residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03.4.A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer
to the website: www.deq.state.or.us/wq/groundwaluichome.hcm for more information.
o D Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre-development rates for the 2 through 25-year storm events
"This form shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover, of the stormwater study
" IMPORTANT: ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOW AND SIGN!
As the engineer of record, I hereby certifY the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stormwater study and
~- .
Signature: Date:
Revised 11/19/09
10 of 10
~ ~l!l' 0\ /.t!i~R I'" f' 1
I /w .'j~ I If,\ 11 ~ I l ~ \-
~ I ~, .a,Dlk I.', ---=- i .J.. i ~
'l - '1>"1 '\. - ! · ... .
~. r-:;!: il~ ~l ~ ,.J:i /- 3i
~:0 h.: 'J" M
d~ .. IT ' '7 7"" ci
,'~' -.;t;.~/I/ 0 .
. -, ';,...- .... :....; <<.-f' ,. 16 .,;
I~,! iylf ~J~.: '""" '=t5
Y' ~',f,.~l I" ""'.~.
I~ ,::: 7~Jj ~~~. ~
, A' if p'',!;fp "\ .. .
_ /, I I -"-- U
~ , i- _I" \U:!I~"~
"" ,I~' ,
I 0;;'4/,' .11' - --::
_--= I/-J In " - ~1
~
\ \ \ ~
\ \ vi ......
\ ~~ -
\ ~ \ .::o~ ~~
\.~\ ~15 o.'~
:g \ '0. \ ~:U c:-
:t,n \.~ I ~ c:: :c:~
~ \ ~ ~~
o.t\I 0. \ ~ (,j ~
.c:........ \V"l ~Q,l\",. iIJ+::::
~j; \~,:~',H "'~~ I ~~
\~\~ \ ~ ~
\ " \ " '1:1
.IIU'BJili." \ ell,
z,'91 +,. ..OZd,',;ll\l\', \ .-- ">>~c= ~=;
~ ~ ld :~;1~'~;\~~ \ \, ~; ii '"
~~ ~~ /\\ \, \ ~ ~ il
ZI ju'B J \ ' - i~ci:
_ ,,'10+" ..OZ,d.. , \ ">>-- - rt Oi
, \ 1 - I,' 0.. .,
~ :: .. S3UOA> \ \ --l ::.: g
~ c: . II S9pO^.. _ ~ I" \9
~I &. I I c: I. "'"
'::! Vl II lues l \ II ~ 'I ~ :J
VI IlU ~
">>- - ,10;-3;:;'
I'ei.
1 \ II 1 loot
'"a "" III' " 0 I"'"
~_ ~ I II ..... I
9" II' " S:!" jT
\oR I I' - ~ \
..... V1 I II ~ ,""
- 01 ju.e J , _ " - ,'0:
,9'16+0. ..OZd" 111'\ ' ~ " ,,""-- - =-3:3
~ '" \ III ',lD \\ ~ I, ci: .,
7 \3 JJd 00'00+0. Iii \ ~ ',', ~ ~~, ~
;, .5\ "OZd" 1\\ 1 ,~" '" ~.5\ I, ei. il
(J') 6lU:l8J~\J '~1\ ~ CO 1/=~ 5
, BL'l6+6Z "OZd'~'< \ \ \ '" '" ~ ""-- - I" ei. E-
~"" ,,_,' ti. I,,, "
a 1\ \ \ '0,' ~ "', '" '" ^
" '" Q., I' ':^
70 I I' c:: ~:::-
~ ~ ~ I ~ II '0 ~.~ 'I .
0.. '" '" 9 /U'e J I ,>: " ~ ell.. I, ,~ 'is
~ & I c:: ,,0.. '"
'g.8 16"fO+66 ,,06dl;' I, .~" ~ t::JJ-- r~ II)
.2 ~ I 1 \ I ~ \1 II) "0: ~
o g ~" 'II I ~ II ~ ,,11 ;:
e ~ I c:: I \ ::& II Q. c:: I C)
:J ~ (0 8. 11 1 \1 ~ "~ 'I
H ~ '" lIu'f13 ::: iil~ ~"UJ,~)
~ ~ 99'U+LZ "O'jU], ,,, ~ i:.~ ""-- -B*~"V
-" '> , I II '''' ':E rei.
8~ ~"'-~1 ' , "!:Jl 0: 8'" ,~
--g~-~6 ~ t> li A:E~~_ ~~ ~~ i:
III Q. l.O Cl. -0'-::' " ... a.. Q g 'I
...:~ ::::Vl\ ::: Q:.--r I I QJ~. ~ ~~~ It
ti 8. \ ~ --;-~ ti - -.J ~ ~ 'I
I 0 9 JuaB ] I !:?.... to CIl ... I, ;.,s.
...: ~ r;rrlL+9Z I VlVl" ~I .... - Q)
_ \ ti ~ ~) "~rd" III I ;"'b~l.O ~ ~~2-- -~E.;a. .s.
. ~ ~ '0 tt) I <: <\J~ Q:) ~ c ~ ~1l11 C -.J
~. _ 0) QJ I .1 I -.J 0..\0 l.O ~ -.... '10.:;...
~... " "'-it, ~ ,\' III ' , ~ ';' ,,~<::; '" I' ~
8~~--QUi-J.-___~ ::::I~_ lil/T ,~~ '-.s. ~ l ~ 'I ~
ci~~ ,7"IN7" __~_ __ ",~/III 07 .0s;-~-.I""'-l..5\ I, ~
o ~ ~ / r /' i - - : ~ 5 e:f I 'I,
0\ '" "'_ _ S Iu'e ' . '" '" 0 '" 13.ll" I' So "
C\J ...... 6 ' ..:J --Lf-" I :::J ~ "' e:::
<l - , B SS f,il "Oild 0 -:... b- ., ,,-~ - T 'T " '" is
Q: _ 'It_ I ~;... I VlC\J ~Q)Vl~1 I:::::~....
_ -9U;7':is7,,----~~;-- -JiL~-!lr~~ ,,"~= ~ ~ ~d,. ; ~ ~
( _ ..... Vi 13 -,-'-.11 Vl I Ie::: ~ ~
_ "I' -,--- -.lh~l-r& "---"
- \_',' '-' '" ,
~ /u98 j '~I ~I.J I C
8 ' 6\L'6f +/7il "Oild ~'-i-. ~ 0:
.... ~ "'I'C;:: I i: --.... ~ '::::-3
(\J ~,., 0::- JIll -.J I I, 'Jp'WOU ,I,C
------;--:L ~ ~ " -,/7i? 1111- 2 : :" 'IJ'Mil., \0:
III ____......Vi a.. 1...."'1- I
.... _ _ _ ..S9I.JD _ ~ 10 Q 0 C "'1 8.
~ ~ ~ _ - - f' /U~'8I1~ .5'9/.10/1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ e: Vl l
" .... .l:S ~ f'?"f'c r.:J I 8 II) 0 "5 Q) c:i.
Q:: iJl ~ ~ +;.t2 "Ocd g I~ e 8't) CIl l(
'Oev "l' .g~cri.,:: ~- Ic-lI..I
c:, ~ '" '1/1 ~ \ il e ~ ~ ~~,~
I ~ ~ .~ Iilj ,~ll... t) t\J i t\J ~
Vi ~ ~ I II t\J c::: I
,- i? lUBe 3- :" - &
~ Oil'lil+ilil .._..~.._-'l_,_.ij
to ..... "Oca. -;;,::J;! In"""
~ & /' '> :/'-('fll'-J~-.- ~_.
/ ~1 ," -
,'/ ., '" -
110a"""- IJ ,I II C: 8.
B9Tr+/6 rs,j IJ 15 g j! II tE lrl
-,.. "Oil</..,. & :.::,'"
", C 8 ~ II If - <=IJ-- -
~r::::::: I ~ ~ti~~r'
:3:: ~ ..0--:9 Vi e II' ~ 11
(:),(\,1 --4 __ 'I I~ II
,r::.,., '.;:;--- , ""I II
'~C\J I ..0-,8 'II ~ H
'Q) ci I "0-'0 'I I "
~;Ja ~6~ '" ,,0-,91 ',"
SO+6 I !!
"O.?.- I " "
v.. I
I ,\ ,~
,-I /I
<Xi
~~ ~ 8
~ >< ,;J l.O LO
~ ..,-
>:: '"
..,
:5
t;;
~
'"
..,
~
S:!
'"
.,
...
.
, "
o
.:::
~
~
~
J3
o
....
-
"'800
~Q to C
co~ I'r) -
.,
...
.
l;-
"'Q
~815 8
~~,., ....
.
~
~
~ -J
C ~kioq-
8 0"'0
aln~
ci'l;f"m
o' -
0"
'" I-
<l
<>:
.,
...
.
..,
I-
..,
Q
~
:5
~
l:
'" '"
!::::;;-- ~
~;: ~
'=
'"
.::: ,g
\3
~
" ~
~~
...
5~
",-
~Ii
~~
""""
.
E
1;;
H,
~ "
~8.~<o::S~
~~~~15~
" ";,iill ...
;;S ~ :C~ ~
.,
.,
o
-
'"
'"
,"
~
.>2
~ ::;
"
~ -g
- tJ l?
_ U ~ ~
:::.____ :rA
-- AC
"
's
gSItJ
~" "
t).u &11)
....c::II)_
~'B;;:~
11).::2 Q)
E: ~,~ ~
O.I;J-.lIll
8_, ~
0' "
~ 2.Q
.8~0.."
.... ~ ou
ill" "
~-.c: .....
a:~'H
.
.
-2
~
~d 6s:ao:z
mOl/LlIB
\BUlwqnS IBU!6!JO
a..
<!
::;;
DlOZ Q - AON
~
~~
I-~
<!
U
o
-'
:pa^!a~a~ alea
'\
<;
,~
-.I
"
0:
,::::?
\0::
,
I
~ I
::::-3 C
~
I..
~
1:),1l1:~
,,"'-
:c:~~
6l\1 Cl.
Q)ci;:;:
Q:::;:~
~~(s
V)~'-
~~~~~
"""'"
18;) U! UO/lDA:l13
ti.
';;
~
,
Z
o
I-
<!
>
~Ss
w(
~~
o
-'
w
>
w
o
"
,8
"
Ii
..,
i2~
~o
~c:i
~~
'"
,,'"
0-
~~
~~
" '
~~
~8
0-
'- "
~15,\!
~t:
L.J~
l-
ii:
e
ii:
o
o
.;
'"
'0
"'...
"0;
,.,
~...
0..-'
,~
~
~
'",
-"
:;: .",
Q.. ~ ~
8 ~~
c:i ~ Lj
o
'",
&l"l
~~
~...
~;;j
4i-
<0
--:
. ~
~
8
tG ~
.....
~"1
~ ~
~...
}lj
6
"l
o
+
8
'"
....
6,~
- ,
, '"
0"
",'"
?-;;j
I '"
~-
~ ~~
~ 0-
,~ II) ,
v, ~~
15'
o..cXi
~
ell
~ "
ell <:>
.5\
~
f
~~
'"
tJ~ Vl
0--' .
~Cl"'~~ C3:.
:oeQ::~-.C5 ~ ~-:~t:e:
<:~Vl~V1 VI: :
Q::Vl~~O
<<:(-.==--....,.....
"":t:: "'....
h......lt./O
~J::=<!:
!O; I-
~
q
o
~
o
o
ci
'"
';0
.,,,,
~~
~...
0..-'
---,-'"
"
~
~
~
'"
"
~
~
;::
~ c~ <\I~~R1
.c: ":~ to,...: ,-'
_ ".. "...... ~ tt)
OIQJ-C\JO--
~ .0'1-..-
-.I' .
. .
~
I
7
~l----
~ ~
~
-
'"
ci
r
o
o
g
'",
-",
"'0;
,.,
~...
0..-'
,'"
'-
~o
'- '"
0::",
,,'"
:::-
"0
ll'"
::::...:
""OJ
~- ~
d- Q
-.... 0) C\/.... "'"'l
".:. ".:
," ,
... ...
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
::;;
<!
0::
<.J
<t
~~
~~
-'
w
o
<!
0::
<.J
~
o
o
'"
'"
.....
"'....
"',
,a
0'"
",'"
0..-'
,'"
I-
0::
<!
3~
::;;~
<!
W
aJ
~
~II)~
CIJ 0....
""C>
,,"'''
~.~lt./
"'15~
8ll-
>.:;8
,,- "
".8 "
:aE:~
"0'>
d5~ ~
.
.
.
I,
<>
z
'-'
z
3<
<
'"
o
en
Lf1:
U):
",:
0Cl:
~
~
..::
I-
1L.0-
wNO
...JNr;
.WO
0-'
!"loa..
.Z::;;
0:::J-
a..aJLf1
~ ->-
""" I-
"o::oz
~oz:::J
I- 0
>-u>-u
;;:w~w
:r:z z
@,z6<!
0_.:..1
U:r:
Z
<!ow
-0-
O::ON
I-;;:z
VlZW
ww""
O-'U
~<.J::;;
z
o
I-
<!
>
W
-'
W
o
Z
<!
Z
<!
-'
a..
~ .,; I 0,
z -, ~
0,
w ..... "': 0
'" "': w 0 I
=> ~ ....: co
~ .,. < u I
u -. 0 '"
=> '" @ ~
'" <
~ u
'" ..,.
:z:
0--
~
IX:
o
"-
rn
:z:
g
~~
Z~
O~
~~
Z~
ffi~
~I
::i~
~.
LL
o
!z
w
::IE
I-
~
"-
w
c
:z:
o
CI
w
lC,
~
Cl
..,.
<..>
0...
<..>:
,-
:8
:'"
~ il
0
~ ~
I
>
m
z
o
"
"
w
"
~.
~.
~.
"'.
OJ:
u):
~.
N'
"',
OJ'
w
~
.
o
~ "T,
. co.
o ~:
co.
>
" ,.
00
~ ~.
z ~.
<l en:
~ 11):
o ~
U ;I:
u o.
.
uOp'lL2nlllU \OO'J\eOPI..J8 8l::1M.lllOl\:Z
-<j
.
.
SOUTH BANK VIADUCT--PROJECT NARRATIVE
Summary
In December 2009, the joint elected officials of Eugene, Springfield, and Lane County approved a Metro
Plan amendment that included an exception to Statewide Planning Goal 15, allowing for the construction
of the proposed Willamette River Bridge (WRB) South Bank Viaduct. The Metro Plan amendment and
Goal 15 exception established a legal foundation for the Willamette Greenway and Site Plan Review
applications that are the subject of this review.
The proposed viaduct will be about 16 feet wide and 1,100 feet in length. About 800 feet of the viaduct
structure is within Springfield's planning jurisdiction. The remainder ofthe viaduct is within Eugene's
jurisdiction, west of the 1-5 Bridges. It will connect to the South Bank Path at the point where it currently
diverts away from the river. The viaduct will elevate the bike/pedestrian path and move it out away
from the steep bank near the 1-5 Bridges, and return to the riverbank at a point where the path can
continue.
The proposed structure will hug the shoreline, minimizing its impact on the river. Supporting columns
will be placed adjacent to, but outside of the ordinary high water mark of the river to support the viaduct
as it bypasses the slope barrier. Temporary work within the ordinary high water mark will be required
during construction.
The Willamette Greenway Discretionary Use and Site Plan Review applications focus primarily on the
various impacts of the proposed viaduct and the measures proposed to mitigate those impacts. The
approved environmental permits for the Willamette River 1-5 Bridges are informative with respect to
assessing the likely environmental impacts of the viaduct.
In 2007, an Environmental Assessment (EA) was developed to assess possible Willamette River Bridge
(WRB)-related impacts and recommend mitigation measures. After the EA was published in January
2008, ODOT prepared a Revised Environmental Assessment (REA) that incorporated changes based on
public comments. The REA supported a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) which avoided the need
for a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and recommends proceeding with a build alternative.
In 2009, the consulting firm URS was contracted by the City of Springfield to conduct an analysis of the
viaduct that built on the work completed for the EA for the Willamette River Bridge (WRB) in 2008. In
late May 2010, URS completed a "B220 WRB South bank Path and Viaduct Project Im~lementation Form"
and submitted it to the various permitting agencies for the WRB, requesting that the 19l!ltePR~~@fllYed:
NOV - 8 20101
Original Submittal
.
.
be considered an extension of the WRB project and that the permits that were issued for that bridge
project be extended to include the viaduct. No comments in opposition to the submitted "Project
Implementation Form" within the required 30-day comment period. The absence of comments from the
permitting agencies in response to the Form is confirmation the permitting agencies are in agreement
with the amending the original WRB permits to include the viaduct project. In short, the viaduct project
was found by the reviewing agencies to have "no significant impact" on affected resources and is
considered an extension of the bridge for state and federal permitting purposes.
Based on a review of the approval criteria found in the Springfield Development Code, findings can be
made which support a conclusion that the proposed viaduct project satisfie's the review criteria for a
Willamette Greenway Discretionary Use Permit found in SDC Section 3.3-325 and 5.9-120.
SDC Section 5.9-115 states that "typically a Discretionary Use application is reviewed concurrently with a
Site Plan Review application. As such, this staff report includes findings which support a conclusion that
. the proposal also satisfies the review criteria for Site Plan Review found in Section 5.17-125.
Project Description
The South Bank Viaduct (viaduct) as includes an 800-foot viaduct (an additional 300 feet of the viaduct is
located within Eugene's planning jurisdiction) that will be constructed along the south bank of the
Willamette River from the center of the 1-5 WRB, extending east to the Oldham Crane property, where
the pathway will meet ground level. During construction, the project impact area including staging areas
would be approximately 40,000 square feet (0.92 acres). This would include a SO-foot wide corridor that
would extend from the centerline of Franklin Boulevard towards the Willamette River. As part of the
construction, drilled shafts will require drilling to a certain depth below the ground surface and
constructing a reinforced concrete shaft underground. The excavated material will be contained and
disposed in accordance with Section 00290.20 of the 2008 ODOT Standard Specifications.
Work for the South Bank Viaduct will likely be staged from westbound Franklin Boulevard, requiring
closure of one or both lanes. It is likely that work platforms and falsework will have to be constructed
from Franklin Blvd at each bent' to construct the drilled shaft, columns, and crossbeams. Beam
placement would be from Franklin, utilizing two cranes. At that point, it may be possible to reduce the
Franklin closures significantly since work may be staged from the top of the beams. Any traffic
interruptions due to construction activities would be temporary and access to local businesses would be
maintained.
During operation, the 800-foot long, 16-foot wide pathway would be supported by 8 bents. Permanent
impacts would be considered limited to areas directly underneath the pathway, encompassing
approximately 12,800 square feet (0.29 acres).
Specific elements of the project include:
. A total of eight bents consisting of four-foot drilled shafts, which will be constructed above the
ordinary high water line (OHW).
1 BENT - A substructure unit supporting each end of a bridge span; also called a pier; made up of two or more
columns or column-like members connected at their top most ends by a cap, strut, or otherA)elj1beW;iolding then:\.
in their correct positions. Vale KeCelVea.
NOV - 8 2010
2
Original Submittal
.
.
. Total length of the FVP extension is approximately 800 feet and 16 feet wide, with each bent spaced
approximately 115 feet apart. Permanent impacts to vegetation include the footprint of each bent and
the portion of the pathway supported by a retaining wall, approximately 1,141 sf (0.03 acres).
. The surface structure would be 16 feet wide and would use recycled 1-5 bridge components for the
platform.
. The pathway would involve the creation of approximately 12,800 square feet of new impervious
surface.
. Construction would consist of building temporary falsework and eight platforms. These platforms
would be supported by multiple H-piles that will be pile driven. Platforms would be 32'x42', for a total of
12,096 square feet (0.28 acres) of temporary vegetation removal. Vegetation removal may not be
necessary however the total platform footprint is considered and may be overstated.
. Minor amounts of vegetation, including trees, would be temporarily removed where the false work
would be constructed.
. Rip-rap along the bank will be removed to provide an opening to drill the shafts and drive the
falsework, where necessary. The rip rap will be replaced beneath the viaduct for erosion control.
Riparian plantings shall be placed outside the footprint of the viaduct, between the structure and the
river. Grasses will be planted between the viaduct and Franklin Blvd.
. Minor amounts of removal/fill would be required.
'PZO-
{
I
I ~ 16'
8'" ~ 14'~8'"
Pedestrion I ! (HI/At deck
rail.1yp. I \ r min.
o..olnoge..- I ' \
au. !~D" ~~'D,O.O..:!
So_4B'~':'::'::,,::, .......:.:...c.:.1
precostprestressed I.,.. h. -.' A,' '. "" -' '." ,". >,"'i
tJOXlitKJm.lyp. I'. >'..< ,"J
\" ...
',,".' ,.... " ',,'," ",".' ."".i
~mk ./......
E~gr~--, I: :.J- <-~~~:~w
\ ~~ ~_..... I ~rilJe(J shoff
\// I. .:J
~~~~..., '-^~ /
8'"
Date Received:
NOV - 8 2010
Original Submittal
3
.
.
Supplemental Background
Eugene-Springfield has one of the largest networks of riverfront bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the
state. The current connection between Eugene and Springfield is limited to the north side of the
Willamette River. The extensive Willamette River South Bank Path system in Eugene ends at Interstate S
because of the physical barriers created by both the existing I-S bridges and the proximity of Franklin
Boulevard (OR 126B) to the Willamette River. Users traveling between the two cities along the south
side of the Willamette River must cross to the north side of the river near the 1-5 bridge or divert to the
shoulders of Franklin Boulevard (OR 126B), a high speed arterial street.
Many planning documents, including the Central Lane MPO Regional Transportation Plan, TransPlan, the
Glenwood Refinement Plan and Wi llama lane Park and Recreation District Comprehensive Plan, call for
the continuation of the Willamette River South Bank Path through Glenwood to Springfield.
Construction of the South Bank Viaduct is essential to. the continuation and development of the South
Bank Path. The combined viaduct and path facilities will provide a safer, more pleasant experience for
recreational and commuter bicyclists and pedestrians traveling between Eugene and Springfield through
Glenwood.
The South Bank Viaduct has wide support from local jurisdictions and agencies. The following
jurisdictions, agencies and communities have expressed support the South Bank Viaduct:
. City of Eugene
. City of Springfield
. Metropolitan Policy Committee (MPO)
. Willamalane Parks and Recreation District
. Springfield Economic and Development
Agency
. Eugene Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory
Committee
. Lane County Board of Commissioners
Date Received:
NOV - 8 2010
Original Submittal
4
.
.
An ODOT Transportation Enhancement Grant of almost $1 million, together with $250,000 in OTIA funds
and about $140,000 in donated materials will be used to fund the South Bank Viaduct project. The
timing of the project will allow reuse of multiple concrete box beams from the Willamette River detour
bridge on the viaduct project. As the 1-5 replacement bridges are completed, and the detour bridge is
removed, the South Bank Viaduct will be constructed.
Public hearings were held before the joint planning commissions and elected officials for a Metro Plan
amendment and Goal 15 exception were required to as a precursor to these land use applications. At
these hearings, no public opposition to the viaduct project was expressed and the amendment and Goal
15 exceptions were adopted unanimously by the City of Eugene, City of Springfield and Lane County.
Attachments:
Attachment 1: Plan Set
Attachment 2: Technical Memorandum prepared by URS regarding environmental impacts.
Date Received:
NOV - 8 2D1D
Original Submittal
5
Show Invoice Detail
.
.
Invoice Detail
Permit ID #: TYP210-Q0004
Invoice #: 24874
Invoice Date: 11/09/2010 14:23:45
Period
FINAL
Fee'Item
Site Plan Tentative Review - UGB
Date Received:
NOV - 8 2010
Original submittal
.;;,~.
"'j'
.,.,.,'
"~'~~'1
,
,
Page I ofl
Qty Fee
0.0 $0.00
Total Fee: $0.00
'.~;
.',
https://av .prod.oregon.accela.com/portlets/fee/showReceipt.do?mode=show&RECEIPT NBR=24... 11/9/2010