Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit Correspondence 1987-5-22 . . (Jd~ SPRINGFIELD CITY OF SPRINGFIELD Office of Community & Economic Development CERTIF lED LETTER May 22, 1987 Mrs. Janet GamDee 1057 Anderson Lane Springfield, Or gon~ SuDje 1655 Diam~e~Ghild Care Facility ~ - Dear Mrs. Gamoee: This is in response to your letter of May 18, 1987. 1. If you do not have your daughters or anyone else living in the home at 1655 Diamond Street there will be no double occupancy and the parking plan will not be required. If at any time in the future this property is anticipated to be usea for both a child care facility and residence a plan must be submitted and approved by the Director prior to its double occupancy. 2. There shall be no temporary use of the property. Once the process of signing the Development Agreement, Contract Annexation Agreement and other conditions are complete the child care facility can be used. 3. If you have concerns of grass and weeds located witnin the Springfiel,d city limits you can contact the Springfield Fire Department as they have a program to abate these nuisances. The city does not enforce nuisance issues in the County. 4. The septic tank permit you sent lS insufficient. A letter from Lane County stating that the existing septic tank system is approved for the proposed chila care facility relative to the number of children (as permitted by the Hearings Official) and supervisors that will be utillzing the facility. 5. Enclosed is the Development Agreement and Contract Annexation Agreement. The Development Agreement can be signed by you (please note a notary puDlic must also sign for you). The Contract Annexatlon Agreement must be signed by the property owner, therefore, if Mr. Reed is sti 11 the property owner his signature must be on the contract. ,I 225 North 5th Street . Springfield, Oregon 97477 · 503/726-3753 . . If you want to arrange a meeting to discuss Agreement, Contract Annexation Agreement or and arrange an appointment. items relative to the Development septic tank approval please call Cordially, (! J J/v*/~CL' // ~jo./U1'l Ur~ ~~ia L. Harmon Development Permit Coordinator cc: Greg Winterowd, Planning & Development Director Greg Mott, Development COde Admlnistrator Joe Leahy, Assistant City Attorney Keith Martln, Attorney Gary Darnielle, Hearings Official Mike Farthing, Attorney .... . . SITE PLAN REVIEW DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, hereinafter "Agreement", is entered into this day of , 1987 by and Oetween the CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, herel nafter "City", and JANEf GAMBEE herei nafter "App 1 i cant", in accordance wi th Section 31.090, and Section 3.070(3), 3.080(3), 3.090(3), and 3.100(3). REC ITALS WHEREAS, on the 13th day of May, 1987, the City approved Site Plan Application suOmitted by the Applicant for the purpose of allowing: The operation of a child care facilaity at 1655 Diamond Street. Assessor's Map 17-03-33-14 Tax Lot 902. This approval does not include the operation of the child care facility in conjunction wlth the use of the structure as a single family residence. WHEREAS, in consideration for Site Plan approval, the issuance of a Building Permit, and the issuance of an Occupancy Permit, as specified in the Springfield Development Code Section 31.090, Applicant agrees to comply with all the standards of the Springfield Development Code and Springfield Municipal COde whiCh may Oe applicaole to this development project, including Out not limited to, the following: 1. The Slgning of a contractual annexation agreement prior to the utilization of the property as a child care facl1ity. WHEREAS, in consideration for Site Plan approval, the issuance of a Building Permit, and the issuance of an Occupancy Permit, as specified in the Springfleld Development COde Section 31.090, Applicant agrees to comply with the following specific conditions imposed by the City as part of the Site Plan approva I: 1. The facility Oe limited to the service of 29 or fewer children of age five or younger per day. (This condition is intended to ensure conformity with the requirements of SDC 2.020 and it is the intent of the Hearings Official that any lessening of the age restrictions of this Code provision shall be automatically applied to this application.) Hours of operation shall De limited to 9:00 a.m. through 3:00 p.m. during weekdays. 2. Prior to the utillzatlon of the property for residential uses during the operation of the child care facility, a parking site plan, which meets the requirements of SDC 31.090, shall Oe approved Oy the Director. Unt i I such time of the property is in operation. as a plan is suomited and approved, the residential use shall not occur during the months the Chlld care facility 3. Prior to the operation of the child care facillty, the applicant must either receive approval from the County Sanitarian for the operation of the existing suDsurface sewage disposal system or hook up to the Springfleld sanitary sewer system. ~ Site Plan Development Agreement 1 . . 4. After one year from this decision, (Decision Date: May 13, 1987) the Director shall investigate whether the child care facility has produced substantial noise impacts upon the adjacent and surroundlng neighborhOOd. If such a finding is made, the Hearings Official shall reopen this site plan approval on the issue of the mltigation of noise. NOW THEREFORE IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING RECITALS WHICH ARE EXPRESSLY MADE A PART OF THIS AGREEMENT, CITY AND APPLICANT AGREE AS FOLLOWS: AGREEMENT 1. FINAL SITE PLAN. The applicant agrees to submit a Final Site Plan in accordance with Section 31.080 of the Springfield Development Code concurrently with this Agreement. 2. STANDARDS. The applicant agrees to fulfill all applicable standards specified in the Springfield Development Code and the specific standards listed in RECITALS prlor to occupancy, unless certaln standards have been deferred to a later date in accordance with Section 31.110 Of the Springfield Development COde. 3. CONDITIONS. The Applicant agrees to fulfill all specific conditions of approval required by the City listed in RECITALS prior to occupancy, unless certain conditions have been deferred to a later date in accordance with Section 31.110 of the Springfield Development Code. 4. MODIFICATIONS. Site Plan without first Plan shall De reviewed Development Code. The applicant agrees not to modify the approved Final notifying, the City. Modifications to the Final Site in accordance with Section 31.100 of the Springfield 5. MAINTAINING THE USE. The applicant agrees to the following: (a) The building and site shall be maintained in accordance with the provisions of the Sprlngfield Development Code in order to continue the use. (b) It shall be the continuing Obligation of the property owner to maintain the planting required by Section 31.140 of the Springfield Development Code in an attractive manner free of weeds and other lnvading vegetation. In addition, plantlngs in the vision clearance area shall be trimmed to meet the 2 1/2 foot height standard in accordance with Section 32.070 of the Springfield Development Code. (c) Parking lots shall De maintained by the property owner or tenant in a condition free of litter or dust, and deteriorated pavement conditions Shall be imoroved to maintain conformance with these standards. (d) Undeveloped land within the development area shall be maintained free of trash and stored materials in a mowed and attractive manner. Undeveloped land shall not be used for parking. Si te Pl an Development Agreement 2 J . . 6. In addition to all other remedies which may be provided by law or equity (including but not limited to penalties provided by applicable state law or city ordinances) Applicant agrees that City may enforce Applicant's responsibilities Dy withholding or terminating Applicant's Occupancy Permit. 7. use of the date Any Final Site Plan approved becomes null and void if construction or the property for the use approved does not commence within one year of of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Applicant and the City have executed this Agreement as of the date first hereinabove written. APPLICANT BY: Uate BY: STATE OF OREGON, County of , 198 Personally appeared the aDove named , whO acknowledged the foregoing instrument to De their voluntary act. Before me: Notary Public tor Ore90n My Commission expires CITY BY: Development Code Administrator Uate STATE OF OREGON, County of , 198 Personally appeared the above named , who acknowledged the foregoing instrument to De their voluntary act. Before me: Notary Pub I i C tor Oregon My Commission explres Site Plan Development Agreement 3 . . NOTICE OF AGREEMENT NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT and , hereinafter referred to as .Petltloner(s)", and the City of Springfield, a municipal corporation of the State of Dregon, hereinafter referred to as "City", on the day of ,19 ,entered into an agreement governing an annexation to th~ City of real property identified as Tax Lot - Assessor's Map , a legal description of which is attached as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein. The use and development of the above property is governed by the terms and ronditions of the agreement signed by the parties. The agreement is filed in the central files of the City, to which reference is hereby made for all matters and things therein contained. This Agreement is binding on the Petitioner(s)' heirs, assigns and successors in interest in the property. IN day of WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hand and seal this , 19 By: By: Uwner Date Plannlng and Development Date Di rector By: Owner Date STATE OF OREGON ss. County of Lane a On this notary publiC day of In the said county and and described herein ,19, ,before me, the undersigned, state, personally appeared the 'within named , known to me to be the the and who executed the same freely and identical individuals vol untarily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year last above wri tten. NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON My Commission Expires: , ' . . PETITION FOR ANNEXATION AND CONSENT TO ANNEXATION To: City of Springfield, Lane County, Oregon. The Pet it i oner, petitions, consents, and represents as follows: 1. Real Property: The undersigned Petitioner(s) owns real property located outside the ~ity Ilmlts, but located within the adopted Urban Growth Boundary depicted in the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan, herein referred to as the Property and more particularly described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. Irrevocable Petition and Consent to Contiguous Annexation: The Petitioner(s) hereby irrevocably petltions and consents to contiguous annexation of the Property to the City of Springfield pursuant to ORS 222.170. Petitioner(s) petitions, consents and agrees that the City Council in its sole discretion, now or at any time hereafter, may adopt a resolution initiating contiguous annexation under ORS 222.170 and ORS 199.490 (2) or any other state statute, a proceeding to annex the Property to the City. The Petitioner(s) consents to including in such proceeding any other property the City Council may direct or which the owner(s) have petitioned and consented to the annexation. Consent and ORS Petitioner(s) understands, consents, and agrees that this Petition and may be used by the City to meet the requirements of ORS 199.490 (1)(b) & (c) 199.490 (3)(b) & (c). Petitioner(s) also irrevocably authorizes the City to present this Petition and Consent to th'e Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission to initiate any minor boundary change under ORS 199.490 (1) as an interim measure to provide service to the Property prior to its annexation to the City. In consideration for this Petition and Consent Agreement, the City agrees that the Petitioner(s) Property may receive municipal services from the City and Petitioner(s) may undertake the development of the Property in accordance with the Springfield Development Code and other applicable City plans, policies and standards and with the requirements of Lane County. 3. Binding on Successors: Petitioner(s) agree that Petitioner(s) and Petitioner(s) heirs and successors in interest in the Property shall be bound by this Petition for Annexation and Consent to Annexation which shall run with the Property, and that notice of this document will be recorded by the City in the deeds and records for Lane County. A copy of the notice has been executed by the Petitioner(s) and is presented herewith to the City. 4. New Use: Petitioner(s) must obtain City's approval for any new use, change of use, or intensification of use of the Property. The City will grant approval of the use if it is in compliance with the Springfield Development Code and other applicable plans, policies, and standardS as interpreted by the City. . . , , 5. Cost of Service in the Event Annexation Denied: If an administrative agency or court of competent jurisdiction determlnes that the Property or part of it may not be annexed to the City or that the City may provide no service to the Property or the part, the City may retain all consideration theretofore paid to the City for serving the Property and may collect in addition thereto whatever additional considerations are due the City for services the City has provided prior to the determination that the Property may not be annexed to the City or the City may not provide services to it. 6. No Limitation on First Amendment Rights: Although this Petition for Annexation and Consent to Annexatlon is blnding upon Petitioner(s), and may be used for the purposes for which Petitioner(s) has agreed, nothing herein shall be construed as limiting or infringing upon Petitioner(s)' right to speak out, comment upon, or present arguments regarding the advisability of proceeding with the annexation proceeding. It is specifically understood by Petitioner(s) that in executing this Agreement, a situation may arise wherein petitioner(s) may be opposed to the annexation and would have all rights under the First Amendment to articulate that opposition but the Petition and Consent of Petitioner(s) as contained herein will be used for the purposes herein described by City in order to achieve and demonstrate compliance with ORS 199.490. 7. Provision of Services: In executing this Petition and Consent it is specifically understood that any annexation shall be contingent in its application to any particular annexation request upon the annexing City, within a logical and reasonable time, to provide key urban facilities and services, including, where applicable, sanitary sewers, solid waste management, water service, fire protection, police protection, parks and recreation programs, electrical service, land use controls, communication facilities, PUblic schools on a district-wide basis (in other words, not necessarily within walking distance of all students served), paved streets with adequate provision for storm water run-off and pedestrian travel. the the 8. Application: consenting landowner rest of the City. The City shall not levy assessments, taxes or fees against not applied to properties of similar character throughout DATED this dQ ~ , 19 ~etltloner Petltloner ACCEPTANCE BY CITY: The City of Springfield hereby accepts Petitioner(s) Petition for Annexation and Consent to Annexation and by this acceptance acknowledges this as an Agreement meeting the requirements of Lane County Code 10.183-05 through -55. Plannlng and Development Olrector , ' . . May 18, 1987 Dear Ms. Harmon, Your letter of May 13th , helps to clarify and to give overview. I itill have a few questions with which I need some help~ !.' '. . !':A . J.':_~;~. r<~~~: rt' .' ~ 1. If our daughters, Courtenay and Sarah, move over here for a week so that we don't have 40uble occupancy for the three hours a day, we would only need the three parking places instea~ of the five. Do we still need to sub.it a parking plan? ,,' We'll just wait until next spring and see if we have girls coming home. If so, we'll deal with the double occupancy issue then, particularly since our preschool closes the end of May,this spring, and it is nearly the end of May! 2. We would like a week over at Diamond to do a t~ run to prepare for next fall. We also feel it'd help with neighbor relations this summer if they could see us in action a week so that the unnecessary fears could be dispelled. Can you prepare the Development Agreement in accordan1e with Section 31.090 of the SDC? Also may we have a copy of~e contractual annexation agreement that the SDC requires? 3. Mr. Mott told me and two others that we could avoid annexation if we went through the site plan review process? Is that correct, 4. Will you immediately send to Keith the names of and complaints of any persons? For example,I know someone said that we use lighted candles, but we were not given the name of the complaint- ant.Also, we need toknow who ,recently indicated to Mr. Winterowc that we are"operating" over there. Can you routinely let us know the specifics? We have the right to this information, is that not correct? ' PerhaQs some persons don't even know that we are not "operating" when we have the class of five students over there. We are not operating a child care facility there and have not since January 7th. 5. We thought that the City required grass to be kept at a reasonabl length in fields. Is the property in the Diamondh~e area not supervised by the City in that respect? Can you let me know with whom I can speak to learn what the code is on this and who has authority so that we can speak with the owners of the surrounding fields which are hazanhus in terms of broken toys, etc., that are thrown there, but more importantly are obstructing our view when we leave our driveway. Also, the weed spreading is of some concern, as is the fire hazard before too long. . . , . p.2, 6. Enclosed is a copy of the septic permit. Do you need one sent directly from the County, or is this sufficient? 7. May I sit down with you soon to pick up the requested information and so that you can answer the above questions? If Mr. Winterowd or Mott needs to be there, will you invite them? As you can see from the enclosed bill, this has been extremely costly to us as individuals. We'd like to do what we can to simplify and~~ expedite things as much as possible. 8. Mrs. DeWitt told me personally that the City was on their side and that Cynthia Harmon never wanted to hear my name again. I don't understand this at all, having not spoken with you since September. Can you give me some insight1ie the basi~ of'this?l We have daughters working 50+ hrs. a week to pay for schooling, sons on paper routes (one of them got up at 4:30 every morning for 4 yrs. to deliver the Guard), etc. saving for college and other expenses. It will take us many years to payoff the debts from ~this year's experience with a neighborhood and the City. It also made us feel really bad when we learned th~ the Planning Dept. got apparent pleasure out of believing that we had missed the appeal deadline. What have we done to deserve this? I am NOT trying to stir up feelings and trouble. We genuinely would like to work things out with the Planning Dept. a~ this level. and are going on the assumption, at this time, that it is 9. fo~gafJealso like some clarification on the statement of the May 13th letter to this effect: "The Planning & Development Director shall make'his determinatiol upon any complaints received from neighboring property owners." Is this Mr. Winterowd? What determination would he be making? What protection to we have from a few neighbors who are obviousl; making ignorant as well as untruthful accusations? If fue City really believes that the wild tongued comments it receives from whomever are based on fact, do we have any protection if the City does not investigate so that it can find we are not in violation? ---- Thank you for your time. Hopefully we can sit down some afternoon this week.. We'll call for an appointment. We do have some other questions re specifics and logistics, but I'll not itemize them here Anderson Lane Oregon MAIUNG ADDRESS P.O. BOX 11620 EUr.:ENE. OREGON 97440-3620 ~G, LONG:WATKINSON &~, P. C. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 400 SOUTH PARK BUILDING 101 EAST BROADWAY EUGENE. OREGON 97401.3114 (503) 485-0220 6639-AKM . . .---'~ TAXPAYER I,D, NO. 93-0644033 John E. (Jack) Gambee 1057 Anderson Lane Sprinqfield. OR 97477 \. K: _~ <-," -,\' , ,~\')' \;-\ 0e\ \....c.-:Y ~ ,.~'" April 30. 198.70' \:) '\ ;.:.Gu "S'- '\..l"'~ )... \:.... ~ I. \:"-...... \;.W-'~ \''-~, ft' ~ \ $:-'" ..:," ~ tv \)Y \ \..J\' \' /\~,(j.'" \<:::.,c, /' ,(.;~c"x \o\J :!' ,\\( v.:; /, -!. ~0v ~ Yj'..f. -R.-t' ."'/ ,'--\>, ,~ Q..,\.J\ ,~"u;--- <~ r CJ" _~ ,'\... \. / ~ ><.::: \,,,,,'1-' \ '-iN ( O( ~ '- "'~ \9' ,~") ,,~t' (F' (.~.y Y Description I /' , '\;V It hi,'; CQs1 \l. S do~<- '1'(', '\tlO,ooa ~L~Dt ',~dL\{\ \ I'\Q cell cf '\ \\' ...j L \ \~ C',., '\"' '~ I,' ,,'. ,--" J' \\ \ t'.\^C." el'\\ 10 \' ~ri\(' . \\Ii:'i'l1 ,,"', _, " " . f,'_~ I \ ",I, \, u 1\'" " ,0 , , ',,1.' \h't'a. C\ I '\ n".~trc\ 1 . 0 9 A . 0 0 ---h G':', (" J ), ,,(., '-l , I \ l\ (,^ 1\\ I I \.1,\" , __1J..Q2fl~QQ 1.945.1\3 Date Services Performed Costs and ~ ,Expenses Balance 3/31/87 Ralance prior state~pnt Payments received ______~.!l.!l 1.945.1'3 h~nQ_~~~_Mall~!__________________ Legal services for the period April 1. 1987 to date. as shown on the attached itemized statement of services MATTER TOTAL TOTAL DUE "'-:- V"' ,-to 3.043.83 ~y rayments recei~ed after 4/30/R7 ill appear on your ne~T statement. , John E. (Jack) Gambee 6639- ~M 1057 Andprson Lane ~--- Springfield. OR 97477 &: Statement Ralance 3.043.R3 PLEASE RETURN THIS PORTION WI TH YOUR REMlTT ANCE .../ HARRANG. LONG. WATKINSON (1, ARNOLD. P.C. . ' , . -'~7()r;jjJ/?) . / / . -,--.-'GG S--~/VI1'; ~ L:/;/jc:.~ ['~E /~z/c:-7C7? ~ l- Lane County Authorization for: /h7?7//'L'17d>(':7YV ./~ / //~r FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application/ Permit . /S/J;1-rf;7 ~ ~;';:;SHI/ / S~BDIVISION/PARTITION RAllGE // .7 17 ~ / q;AX ?~c (if apphcable) I LOT/PArteE:" r BLOCK I ,,~O!l rj- J/~/P'?;?~y? /7 SL (h;?a;~~h7 #-::;7 ,~7y<7 //':\ S7R~TURES CURRENTVi ON PROPBRTY . / ).-/'- '--- -." . ~/' ./- ,#'l _o..,e:::" I _ <, / . ~ / A L F /,,??:?7 7Z ~ / ~A.Jc-7 ( ?71 ~ 17/ /5"'~-/ /;~/;;;I/~J!77.:"r=-~.L' DltU;{;TlONS TO SITe; . - /' - ...--.~ ',:C7//~///},774-( /U K~7L//0h_ 0o/~ /'0 /?/9 >7?~-::p' - ~ /V ~-:::k"'( ./ C .~_/ ;~-:;??////./7 "'~c,';:; ~F.tRO~S~RK/~BE,,~~; /" L."..-;7'7"/- /;~# /'//..77 /J /?~I_~EC~O .?~ ,~/ /.0:;"/../-,-.. ~/';-- '" / /' '" ' ., /.' . ~ r-- ,'::??r / ,-:"7~L.;:%. ,/.41':':'6 /~:.- " OF BED~oa..."S --:;:/- [fI ()F S'I)!R1o/ /Y 1 #I 'OF E"IPr.pY}r:.~,,? I loJATER SUPPLV' ./ /:.~....-- ~.-: J 0 proposed ,..-,.,7 /W/7 %///T ,""'..,'i...?'/?~,0' ?!'Existing 2}~j$~;; ~oRE~/.dm ) ~/? p- Ai! /1~-?/V"~ I TELEPHONE NUMBE~ G.;;)~]T)l:~~"'M'~ NAME ANO'OSR If / -~- : 4" ..../ 12LEeHONE NUMBER t '- T: (~4/7)/?~ ~;:7~ ~ ,--0~~/.//-=- "o/t?r:r-~/ ?"~_TO BE MAILED TO ;,?:'(AND JW~SS, I ~';:;':;_ ~~,R.-?' , /_! '-, /7?'/7 r- ". ~{/// /1'.:' - " '7" -'///7"'_ PROpoSED USE OF PROPERTY o Residential D Industrial o Commercial D Public. I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED APPLICATION POR PERM1T. <Iud .10 hcreUy cert.ify t_hat all infol"lllatioll hereon is true and correct, and that I have the following legal interest in the property: Downer of record; 0 Cc.n<:rd<..:t PllrCha3er)~thorized agent. r f-..:.rthor certify that any and all work performed shall be done in <>.t:cotdaac;, ....ith tr.o:t ordln.a~ LAnu County and the La....s of the State of Oregon pertaining to the work described herein, and that NO OCCUPANCY ....ill be made of any st_rllctur-;; without the permission of ;he Buildinq Division, I fur- ther certify thot registration with the Builder's Board is in full force and effect as rCt;uired by ORS 701.0SS, that if exempt the bosis for exemption .15 noted hereon, and that only subcontractors and employees who are J.n com)J.anc~ WJ.th ORS ,1,055 WJ.ll be used on this project. I HAVE READ AND CHECKED THIS APPLICA'tlON THOROUGHLY. :\ I \ J. /1; .h77//5r'-c-,/'- (/;rl\t~^ V1 ~ .:;\ ('~OAIT~J ....... NAME tplc.ase pi-J.ntl \(./' y ""'SIGNATURE I . <Co Minimum Setb~17 COM.'IENTS, I;?- 0 Y2U;I)U!HORIZATION Zone );/ /#- Partition #I / CL, front, CL, side /,-;/ .?~'~:7/7,r';;/1 A' Parcel Size ~~~ 't 0 .,v,,( 1.n eri r rear." "" /l;:~> /---;1' /'/ /~";.2:,?:/ 07/?~;b.;' Da:', -S// /,.;:.: Parcel It READ THIS SECTION CAREFULLY. YAS BEEN BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: [] PLANNING/ZONING: " , ,~ANITATION: 5, L * ;' II - Installation Specifications: Clll-L'IENTS, ~U Q , ~-t;:'?';;;n,J ., [] ~ ~XAMINATIOh1 8. P. #I Installation .,~,~ /.~ v , , Record I~sued? D Yos 0 No MaximUm Depth of Trenches Gallon Tank -.--r j~~ J\"L.L~ 0" ..- -::;-- , ....L ,I.";: ....... ~rT.~ Y. '1 Lineal Feet of Draintield ,(,,/i ~ " ,-:;......J..1P.~-!/fL1 ,i / z: I: (: /f .' ", ./..........~,fA" l.TYr7d~..-:";""~ /i _ D "j r.::::-1 v" ,) -;' -" -.r 7' ~'C:'I~ -----r-:- ././(......-L___ Date: Type Group Use COMNENTS : Date: n ,=-.e-/>~) 4:z.,;l" /~\r ,) - / -~ ./7 " ---fERHIT APPROVED BY BUILDING OFFICIAL/DESIGNEE (cer ORS 456.805 (1)) DATE LANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS LAND MANAGEMENT DIVISION, 687-4061, -125 EAST 8TH AVENUE, EUGENE, OREGON 97401 - C:t='t=' Ot:'Ht:'DC'C' 'C'~O Tl<TCnl.'r'ITlTr'l1\T TM'C'I"'"'IOM7\fT1Tr'lM