HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket, DRC PLANNER 6/21/2010
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD - ~PMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
DISTRIBUTION DATE June 21, 2010
TO:
-
d;~
RECEiVED
./
~
"7
v
"""7'
v
:7
~
.L
V/
L/
::2'
-;:7
V
v
7
V
~
~
L
~
---;7
17
Current Planning Staff: : Ka J. Donovan, Liz Miller, M. Metzger, Lissa Davis,
L. Pauly, Tara Jones, Andy Limbird Dave Reesor, Steve Hopkins, Molly Markarian
"Matt Stouder, Engineering - u IC orks Department
Brian Barnett, Traffic EngineerlPE, Public Works Department (agenda only 2/02)
"Jesse Jones, Transportation Planning Engineer, Public Works Department
"Gilbert Gordon, Deputy Fire Marshall, Fire & Life Safety Department
Melissa Fechtel, Fire Agenda only
"Ronni Price, Planner, Willamalane Park and Recreation District
*Tamara Johnson, Springfield Utility Board (Electric)
"Rebecca templin, Water Engineering Supervisor - Springfield Utility Board (Water)
Jack Foster, Springfield Utility Board (Energy Conservation)
Amy Chinitz, Springfield Utility Board (Drinking Waler)
Jim Henry, Central Lane Communications 911 (Subdivisions, Street name changes)
Dave White, U.S.P.S. (Growth Mgmt. Coordinator)
Dave Shore, Northwest Natural Gas (needs full packets for Partitions/Subdivisions)
"Celia Barry, Lane County Transportation
Thomas Jeffreys, Emerald People's Utility District (EPUD)
Lane County Land Management [Urban Transition Zone]
George Ehlers, Lane County Sanitarian [Urban Transition Zone] [If applicable)
Tim Hanely, Rainbow Water District(" only if in the North Spfld area) [If applicable)
Ralph Johnston, Lane Regional Air Pollution Authority (if applicable)
Dale Ledyard, Operations Chief, McKenzie Fire District (if applicable)
Tom Henerty, Comcast Cable (if applicable)
Debbie Crampton, EWEB (electric) (" If in Glenwood)
Dick HelgesonlMel Damewood, EWEB (water) rlf in Glenwood)
Steve Moe, Glenwood Water District ("If in Glenwood)
Bill Grile - Development Services Director (agenda)
John Tamulonis, Economic & Community Development Manager
"Dave Puent, Building Official (agenda)
Lisa Hopper, Building Services Representative (agenda)
" Greg Ferschweiler, Keith Miyata, Brian Conlon, PW Dept.
"Craig Fitzgerald, Maintenance PW Dept
George Walker, Environmental Works Dept., (agenda only)
Deanna Buckem, Engineering Assistant, Public Works Dept.
Police Chief, Jerry Smith, Police Department (agenda)
*Will Mueller, L TO
Nonn Palmer, Quest Corporation (agenda
Planning & Development Manager, ODOT, Stale Highway Division (agenda)
Jell DeFranco, Springfield School District (agenda)
William Lewis, Financial Services, Springfield School District ( agenda)
Susan Palmer, Reporter, Eugene Register-Guard (agenda) INCLUDE WEEKLY LAND USE INFO
Joe Leahy, City Attorney
Chris Moorhead, City Surveyor
JUN21 2010
By: ORt ,(>{U)w(-
, Df-/4PT
(agenda)
(agenda)
(agenda)
A request for land use action, as described on the attached agenda. has been received by the Development Services
Office. Specific concerns of your divisionldepartmenVagency should be addressed. If you have comments or
requirements of this proposal, please send them in writing to the assigned planner @ Development Services
Department, 225 Fifth Street, Springfield, OR 97477.
If your written comments are not received by Friday, July 2, 2010 specific concerns of your divisionldepartmenVagency
will not be addressed unless you attend the meeting on July 6, 2010. The Development Review Committee holds staff
review meetings on Tuesday @ 8:00 -10:00 a.m. You should also plan to attend the staff meeting on Tuesday if you
have specific concerns so that the Planning representative can discuss them prior to meeting with the applicant. If the
Planner feels II is necessary for you to participate in the public meetings he/she will let you know on Tuesday.
"will receive a full packet
..
..
AGENDA
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
225 FIFTH STREET
Conference Room 615
Staff Review: July 6, 2010 @ 9:00 - 10:00 a.m.
1. PARTITION TENTATIVE #SUB2010-00006 DUKES & DUKES CONSTRUCTION
Assessor's Map: 17-03-36-11 TL 11300 9:00 - 10:00 a.m.
Address: 744f746, 748f750, 752f754, & 756f758 28th Street
Existing Use: Residential - duplexes
Applicant submitted plans to partition one lot into two parcels
Planner: Andy Limbird
1
. City of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
..
..
Land Division Tentative Plan
Partition, Subdivision
,
A Iicant Name: Dukes and Dukes Construction
Dukes and Dukes Construction
Phone: 541-747-3130
Fax:
Address:
2955 Yolanda Avenue, S rin field OR 97477
_;,.:!1';::tll/"'" .'!"'._..;~;....n~:nt$Ji." ..,\:n:.;;'
w;.;w,'.::;,;;'t."<i<,--
'J.,.,' /.is..'~;:.'<:;F'%._"', ';~'.:.:'t;N(\',;::' ::.'+R,,/,':'.~ ~,'~. _ ,..;"'"-..,,''l,t,,,'"' -,<, "",..f'A;'",y"'.,
A licant's Re .: Aaron J Grimes Sr
Phone: 541-302-9790
Com an :
Address:
Olson & Morris
380 Street, S rin field OR 97477
Fax:
541-485-3253
'~- ...- .~' "' ,-w'
'-V",I:l'"C.,,,-
- ,-' ~'-- - '; - ,~. ".:"~..,
__ . -,"i:"", ....,_T,..- _
Com an
Owner: David E. & Laurie S. Dukes
Dukes and Dukes Construction
Phone: 541-747-3130
Fax:
Address:
2955 Yolanda Avenue, S rin field, OR 97477
....
,'~"'''
- ~,,,,,'.:'~,
.- ,'",'<..
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-03-36-11 TAX LOT NO S : 11300
Address: 740 28th St 74-3 7fJl. J 75 ""'-5trtt.;;:;t
Size of Pro e
23 660
Acres 0 S uare Feet ~
Pro osed Name of Subdivision: n/a
,,>~.-.,
"'ft
, ",', .. :,~.. - -.'
.~":"',;;, -- ,,-
;-~"'''':__'''i"';''';","'''"
Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Pto osal:
Existin Use: Residential
. -.
Av . Lot/Parcel Size: 11,830
rint our name and date in the a
# of Lots/Parcels: 2
Si natures: Please si nand
~. . .
. . - ..
Associated A Iications:
I CX1~ {..<;)
Si ns: Uc
Pre-Sub Case No.: .
- OObDCO Date:
Case No.:
Date:
Reviewed b
~;otJA~ ='.:'~".'r'*,';"1 ry;,;~::~..,;".-...<ii W"''!;Y:,;;..,;~",..
--fc"Y'-
Technical Fee: 2 4'S S, r ! Co cJ
Date ~i~~~~~:NUMBER: r(<,~7dtr O{i1Th'l.-
r'""'f,.",,'~d.~nnl!.~1""I" '1l""~.~ C. ;tt' ",.""". "<f'.. ~U\"'F*::,".;r~~""."",-",",~.;,:~.
JUN 1 ~ 2010
1 of 10
A
TOTAL FEES: $
Revised ~11108 Molly Markarian
..
..
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
VICINITY MAP
SUB2010.,00006
740,744,748,752, & 756 28th Street
~LI I I I I J~
GST 10
N
SITE
Map 17-03-36-11
Tax Lot 11300
North
J: t
10
N
WHITIfIIORTH LN
fn
J:
10
N
Date Received:
JUN 1 4 2010
,Jdginal Submittal
Aidii~U~!il'iij,~il'H;:;'I~~!;ii~;I~;~' ! .~c=~ I . :::_~- _
!ll UI~l~llI ; I jli!i_ Si5~ii!S! "S! r;.r:--cC" --~ I
i~.I:i!liM!!!I!il!l;I!'I"iUrl; III ~ \~ ,I I :. Ii! ,;tl! H
it ~;all.il FHIUlgl;i!!i I~'.il I I 'is, ~I------'! !-I:~
~! '!iEiill ;-~'!i!~'ililglll;~; lill iT. .: I ~\ 11
iiI ill;II~' ~ilil!~ 11:<11111 a!- II II ~ !~ /\ i ~I
II 1'"1 II I. -81 II Is'r I ai :!.-:-=!. _~~n~___'; ~
.il B~ ~ 1.illh1 h~"_ ~I ----; ---.--
Iftil,1 ;I B:~:!I ;~Rbl ilL ~-? ~~~--L '\".
I R l II ifif:- ~I~ :~i i .ilIJ 1I!1,f--: ~iil
I !I: ~: I!!!~i; II', 1- I \ Ii f I I!~II ~-~ ~ Ibl
.. -If alii ill, ~ I I~ 1! \ 1- - u n g
i illla ~ I:; - II I. I ~ llfOil ..-:.;
: Iii I :IIU! II . ~ ~
.. aDI I I.i:".il 11 I B ~ ~
! 111 I lji! III Ii I i ~ Ii to "
~ UIiI !~ gl I Ilg : I ~ ~!'l!=::: ~
l III i ~ i1a ~ --- ~- ~ ~ ~
I . ; ~ 1. I ~ ~ ~~ Cti ~
III II ~ 'I I --- ~~~ ~~~~
II' f ~ I 1 tIoj ~ ill ~
I' a I I -.L-,-:l~ so~- !=::: ~
I n. I' TiT I I " " \ I ~ /// "I llg- ~ ~ ~
~ I Ii I.. I I I ;t C:; ~~ Cti
o MHI11 1" f ~ I I n -I> i t:j / p~ . i ~;OOI
III I ellj:,\, Ii l!.~!Ii:
! H!!i~PIP,l!!:I!! 'R. -z~
... !! IUll!!ll", ~ h~ . l ~
~. ~ I ~!i!I~I!': ~
~ __ ~ ~ ~J l ~ ; I
g:' c: m Oiil ~ I D ~ . C)
~. = ;:0 1111' 0 : I
rrr .: ~ !Ul\~"l' ,I n ,
c:::> <' 1 I::
t" a CD ," J
(fJ 0. u ~ ---.r 1U' " r '::'i/'-'V-'
~ ., I,U;P!I,UU :;Qli~T;~\ ~;:~:~~'i~!~ ~ ~..:: JiQ ::~
~ I ,I" I II - !I:~' ~ j ,~~ ';;;,/.;;;;; t, " - lli:lilll
~ B Ila i~li I. hli! \~r .'-::i--~':=';~"""~;:-- "'L~
~ .. ~ I::;~ 55 Ii M . ~-= -t;:::""'~ -;;..;;I"..;-;,:~""#;:;:. .
~ ~ i;i i~ i Ii i "'::~-:-"-c:-.~:~':~-':~~_
Q ST. SPRINGFIELD. OR 97477 (541) 302-979
..
L.B.OLSON
& ASSOCIATES
INCORPORATED
Consulting Engineers
Land Surveyors
Urban Planners
380 Q Street
Suite 200
Springfield, Oregon
97477
(541) 302-9790
Fax: (541) 485-3253
..
..
TENTATIVE PARTITION APPLICATION FOR
DAVID E. & LAURIE S. DUKES
Date:
June 8, 2010
Owners/Applicants:
David E & Laurie S Dukes
2955 Yolanda Avenue
Springfield, OR 97477
(541) 747-3130
Applicant's Representative:
Olson & Morris
380 Q Street, Suite 200
Springfield, OR 97477
(54 I) 302-9790
PlanningIProject Coordinator:
Aaron Grimes
380 Q Street, Suite 200 .
Springfield, OR 97477
(541) 302-9790
FAX (541) 485-3253
aaron@olsonandmorris.com
Assessor's Map:
17-02-36-Il
Tax Lots:
11300
Area of Request:
23,660 Square Feet
Existing Zoning:
R-l (Low Density
Residential)
Plan Designation:
Low Density Residential
Number of Parcels Proposed:
2 (Standard)
Date Received:
JUN 1 4 2010
Backl!:round
Original Submittal
This application is for a tentative partition at 740 28th Street within the
Springfield city limits. The proposed partition will create two (2) parcels out.
of one (I) existing lots. Both ofthe parcels will be designated as a
standard lots. The lots will have access coming from 28th Stre~t. The site
currently has four( 4) structures located on it.
Dukes & Dukes Tentative Partition
June 8, 2010
Page I
..
..
"
The Tentative Plan Criteria per Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-125 are addressed
below. 1n addition; the applicable requirements for a tentative partition per the "land division
checklist" are also addressed.
SDC 5.12-125 Tentative Plan Criteria'
(A) The request conforms to the provisions of this Code pertaining to lot/parcel size and
dimensions.
Standard Lots
SDC 3.2-215 requires that lots or parcels on north-south streets have a minimum of 5,000 square
feet in area and 60 feet of frontage. The following table lists the lots having frontage on 28th
Street, a north-south street.
Parcel Area ISF) . Frontaoe 1FT)
1 8,707 0*
2 14,953 70
* A predevelopment meeting was held on March 11th, 2010. An Irrevocable Access Easement
was the City Staff's preferred access, and thus proposed as part of this partition. Said easement
area to cover a 20-foot wide private driveway. Pursuant to SDC 3.2-220(B), the Director may
waive the requirement of frontage if access has been guaranteed as specified in Section 4.2-
120A. Said Irrevocable Access Easement guarantees access to a public street.
(B) The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and/or applicable Refinement
Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual Development Plan.
Tbe Metro Plan Diagram shows this property as appropriate for Low Density Residential. This
plan designation is consistent with the applicable zoning, which is LDR.
(C) Capacity requirements of puhlic and private facilities, including but not limited to,
water and electricity; sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets
and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded and the public improvements shall be
available to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by
this Code and other applicable regulations. The Public Works Director or a utility
provider shall determine capacity issues.
All existing public improvements necessary to serve the proposed development are located
within the 28th Street right-of-way, with the exception to wastewater. There is an 8" wastewater
line and manhole located on the subject property, near the North property line. This 8"
wastewater line is adequate to accommodate the three additional proposed dwellings in the
future. 1n addition, there is a 16" water main and gas line in the right-of-way. Further, the
existing right-of-way, 28th Street, can easily accommodate the minimal increase in traffic from
the three new dwellings that will be created. The capacity requirements of these public
improvements will not be exceeded with the proposed development and these improvements will
be available at the time of development. Date Received:
Dukes & Dukes Tentative Partition
JUN 1 " 2010
June 8, 2010 Page 2
Original Submittal
..
..
(D) The proposed land division shall comply with all applicable public and private design
and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations.
The applicant's project engineer has ensured that all public and private design and construction
standards will be met in regards to the proposed utilities and stormwater management system
components, as reviewed and approved by the City of Springfield. See DRC 2005-00072, LDP
2009-00023 and COM 2009-00397 for additional information.
(E) Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil or
geologic conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees
and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their associated riparian
areas; wetlands; rock outcroppings; open spaces; and areas of historic and/or
archaeological significance, as may be specified in Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-760,
385.905-955 and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in this Code or in State or
Federal law
There are no physical features located on the subject property; including significant clusters of
trees or shrubs, watercourses, wetlands, rock outcroppings, or historic features. This criterion is
not applicable to the subject property.
(F) Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular
traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivity within
the development area and to adjacent residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood
activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas; minimiie driveways on
arterial and collector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable regulations
and comply with the ODOT access management standards for state highways.
All proposed dwellings will have ample area adjacent to the dwellings to accommodate parking
as required. There is one existing ingress-egress points on the property, which will be removed.
One driveway will be needed to be created for access to Parcels I and 2. This ingress-egress
point will allow easy and convenient access to the existing right-of-way, 28th Street, for
pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicular traffic. From 28th Street, residents will be able to connect to
Main Street and Centennial Street, which will provide easy connections to surrounding
residential areas, nearby commercial facilities, transit stops, and neighborhood amenities. This
proposed subdivision will provide good street connections for pedestrians, bicyclists, and
vehicular traffic. .
(G) Development of any remainder of the property under the same ownership can be
accomplished in accordance with the provisions of this Code.
Property owner does not own any adjacent land. Further, the entire area of this proposed
partition will be developed; thus there will be no remainder that could be further divided. Given
this fact, this criterion is not applicable.
(H)Adjacent land can be developed or is provided access that will allow its de\:tlopmentin .
accordance with the provisions of this Code. uate Received.
The subject partition will have no effect on the development or access to any adjacent _n. 2010
Dukes & Dukes Tentative Partition
June 8, 2010 Page 3 O,iyillcd Submittal
..
..
(I) Where the Partition of property that is outside. of the city limits but within the City's
urbanizable area and no concurrent annexation application is submitted, the standards
specified below shall also apply.
1. The minimum area for the partitioning of land in the UF-I0 Overlay District shall
be 10 acres.
2. EXCEPTIONS:
a. Any proposed new parcel between 5 and 10 acres shall require a Future
Development Plan as specified in Section 5.12-120E for ultimate development
with urban densities as required in this Code.
b. In addition to the standards of Subsection 2a, above, any proposed new parcel
that is less than 5 acres shall meet one of the following standards:
a. The property to be partitioned shall be owned or operated by a
governmental agency or public utility; or
b. A majority of parcels located within 100 feet ofthe property to be
partitioned shall be smaller than five acres.
c; No more than three parcels shall be created from one tract ofland while the
property remains within the UF-I0 Overlay District.
EXCEPTION: Land within the UF-I0 Overlay District may be partitioned
more than once as long as no proposed parcel is less than 5 acres in size.
The subject property, 17-03-36-11 Tax Lot 11300 was annexed into the City of Springfield in
1948. Given this fact, this criterion is not applicable to the subject application.
City of Sprinl!:field Land Division Checklist
Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
(1) Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer
Scott Morris, an Oregon licensed Engineer, has prepared this sheet.
(2) Vicinity map
A vicinity map of the general area around the proposed subdivision is shown on the Site
Assessment (sheet I). The vicinity map is also on the Tentative Land Division Plan (sheet 2).
(3) The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb
.cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what
is being removed. Fore existing structures to remain, also indicate present use and
required setbacks from proposed property lines.
. All existing site features are clearly indicated on Sheets 1 thru 3, including, but not limited to
curb-cuts .and building setbacks.
I
(4) The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses
and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited
Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department.
Date Received:
Dukes & Dukes Tentative Partition
June 8, 2010 Page 4
JUN I ~ 2010
Original Submittal
..
..
"
No watercourses or riparian areas as shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on
file in the Development Services Department are located on this property.
(5) The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified' in the latest
adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map
Amendment or Letter of Map Revision.
The subject property is located on FIRM Map No. 410.39Cl161F in Zone X. Zone X is an area
determined to be outside of the So.o.-year floodplain. Given this fact, this requirement is not
applicable to the drawings.
(6) The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in Article 17 ofthis Code and delineated on the
. Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department
The subject property is located within the 10.-year Time of Travel Zone (the zone of
concentration) as delineated on the Wellhead Protection Area Map. However, none of the
boundaries of the zone of concentration are near the subject property; thus no boundaries can be
delineated on the drawing.
(7) Physical features including, but not limited to treesS' in diameter or greater when
measured 4 Y, feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian
areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings.
There are no significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands, or rock
outcroppings on the property.
(8) Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of
Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted
concurrently if the soils survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable
soils and/or a high water table'
According to the Soil Survey of Lane County, one hundred percent (100.%) of the site is Coburg-
Urban Land Complex (No. 32). This information is noted on Sheets 1 and 2.
Tentative Land Division Plan
(1) Prepared by an Oregon licensed Land Surveyor
Larry Olson, an Oregon licensed Land Surveyor, has prepared this sheet.
(2) City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary, and any special service district
boundaries or railroad right-of-way which cross or abut the proposed land division
There are no boundaries that cross or abut the proposed land division.
(3) Location and width of all existing and proposed easements on and abutting the
proposed land division
There are six existing easements on the subject property; three 10..0.0. foot private utili,ty _ Q"" 've
easements, one variable width private utility easement, one sanitary sewer easement, bffl!tIo/.UU"'Cel
JUN 1 4 1"]
Dukes & Dukes Tentative Partition
June 8, 20.10. Page 5
Original Subm;\',,,l
..
..
foot sidewalk and public utility easement.
There are seven proposed easements on the subject property; one 5.00 foot SUB Electric
Easement, one 5.00 foot SUB Water and Electric Easement, one 10.00 foot Private Utility
Easement, one 14.00 foot Sanitary Sewer Easement, one Variable Width Irrevocable Access
Easement, one 7.00 foot Public Utility Easement and one 5.00 foot Private Stormwater
Easement. .
These easements are shown and noted on the tentative partition drawing plans.
(4) Boundaries of entire area owned by the property owner, of which the proposed land
division is a.part, as well as dimensions and size of each parcel and the approximate
dimensions of each building site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to
scale
Proposed Parcell will be 8,707 sf. Proposed Parcel 2 will be 14,593 sf. All dimensions of these
parcels are shown on the tentative partition drawing (sheet 2).
(5) Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting, including type, height
and area of illumination
There are no street lights proposed as part of this partition.
(6) The location, widths, conditions, and names of all existing and proposed streets,
alleys, dedications or other rights-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land
division. Proposed streets should also include approximate radius of curves and
grades and relationship to any projected streets as shown on the Metro Plan,
TransPlan, Conceptual Development Plan, or Conceptual Local Street Map.
The subject property is located adjacent to 28th Street. 28th Street has a 54 foot right-of-way
width adjacent to the site. There are no existing or proposed alleys, dedications, or other right-of-
ways.
(7) Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles,
transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities
There are no existing or required traffic control devices; the nearest fire hydrant is approximately
100 feet North of the property along the Southerly right-of-way of G Street; there is one power
pole, with a transformer and street light, that is located adjacent to the subject property along
Westerly right-of-way of 28th Street; there are no neighborhood mailbox units or similar public
facilities located adjacent to the subject property; all items are shown on the Site Assessment
(sheet 1) and Tentative Land Division Plan (sheet 2).
(8) Location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways
Location and dimension of existing driveway is shown on the Site Assessment (sheet I). Both
existing and proposed driveways are shown on the Tentative Land Division Plan (sheet 2) and on
the Stormwater Management Plan (sheet 3).
Date Received:
JUN 1 4 2010
Dukes & Dukes Tentative Partition
June 8, 2010 Page 6
Onginal Submittal
..
..
(9) . Location of existing and proposed transit facilities
There are. no proposed transit facilities; existing facilities are addressed in Note 7 on the Site
Assessment (sheet I) and Tentative Land Division Plan (sheet 2).
(10) Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps,
pedestrian access ways and bike trails
There are no sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, or bike trails adjacent to the subject
property. There is a sidewalk along the 28th Street frontage of the subject property, which is
shown on the Site Assessment (sheet I) and Tentative Land Division Plan (sheet 2). There are no
proposed sidewalks as part of the subdivision... '.
(11) Location, size and type of plantings and street trees hi any required planter strip.
Two street trees are proposed as part of this partition. Additional landscaping to be completed as
approved in the Final Site Plan Review. For additional information, see DRC2005-00072.
(12) Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site
including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains,
power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points
All existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site and the connection points are
shown on the Tentative Land Division Plan (sheet 2). Proposed utilities will be located
underground in appropriate easements.
(13) The locations of all areas to be'dedicated or reserved for public use, with the
purpose, condition or limitations of the reservations clearly indicated
There are no areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use.
(14) Future Development Plan where phasing or large lots/parcels are proposed as
specified in SDC 5.12-120 E.
A Fuiure Development Plan is not applicable, as there is no phasing or large lots/parcels being
proposed.
Stormwater Manal!:ement Plan
(1) Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
Scott Morris, an Oregon licensed Engineer, has approved this sheet. The items shown thereon
are reflecting the approved stormwater system per the approved Final Site Plan Review
(DRC2005-00072), prepared by Scott Goebel, an Oregon licensed Engineer.
(2) Planting plan prepared by an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect where plants
are proposed as part of the stormwater management system
No planting plan has been proposed as part of this partition. The stormwater management
system to be completed as approved in the FimilSitePlan Review. For adcIDi!rt1Bl ~ill~g,:
see DRC2005-00072.
JUN 1 4 2010
Dukes & Dukes Tentative Partition
June 8, 2010 Page 7 \ submittal
Ongma
..
..
~:
(3) Roof drainage-patterns and discharge locations
The roof drainage patterns and discharge locations are shown on the Jentative-Land Division
Plan (sheet 2) and on the Stormwater Management Plan (sheet 3).
(4) Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns
Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns are shown-on the approved Final Site Plan
Review. For additional information, see DRC2005-000n.
(5) The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including
but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds;
stormwater quality measures; and natural drainage ways to be retained.
The stormwater management system shown on the Stormwater Management Plan (sheet 3) is
reflecting the facilities approved in the Final Site Plan Review. For additional information, see
DRC2005-000n.
(6) Existing and proposed spot elevations and contour lines drawn at 1 foot intervals
- (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals)-
Existing contours are shown on all sheets.
(7) Amount of proposed cut and fill
As shown on Sheet 6 of the Final Site Plan Review, there are.33 cubic yards of cut proposed and
386 cubic yards offill proposed. (numbers include asphalt pavement volumes)
Additional materials that may be required
(1) Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's Association Agreement
No deed restrictions or Homeowner's Association are proposed.
(2) Additional plans_and documentation for submittal of a Cluster Subdivision proposal
as speCified in SDC 3.2-230
This application is for a tentative subdivision; thus this is not applicable.
(3) Riparian Area Protection Report For properties located within 150 feet of the top of
bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (wQLW) or within 100 feet of
the top of bank of any direct tributaries iJf WQL W
The subject property is not located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any riparian areas.
(4) A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if
there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present
The soils on the site are stable; thus a geotechnical report is not required.
(5) Where the development area is within an overlay district applicable,E!Pcft~~~eived_
additional standards of the overlay district -
Dukes & Dukes Tentative Partition
JUN 1 4 2010
June 8, 2010 Page 8
Original Submittal
..
..
The entire development site is located within the Drinking Water Protection Overlay District.
Hazardous materials will not be used within this development, therefore no standards need met.
(6) If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified
in SDC 5.19-100
No trees are proposed for removal; thus this requirement is not applicable.
(7) A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be
submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property .
There are no wetlands on the subject property; thus this is not applicable.
(8) Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence
the permit application has been submitted for review
There are no federal or state permits required with this proposed subdivision.
(9) Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land
and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted with the land use application
The Land and Drainage Alteration permit process has already been completed with the City of
Springfield, see LDP 2009-00023.
(10) Where applicable, any Discretionary Use, Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and
5.21-100
No Discretionary Use, Variance, or Modification of Provisions application is required.
(11) An Annexation application, as specified inSDC 5.7-100, where a development is
proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can
be served by sanitary sewer
The subject property is located within the city limits and has sanitary sewer existing on the site.
Said property was annexed in 1948, thus this criterion is not applicable.
(12) All public improvements proposed to be installed and to iuclude the approximate
time of installation and method of financing .
The approximate time of installation and method of financing for all public improvements will
be addressed as part of COM 2009-00397, .
If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at Olson and Morris
(aaron@olsonandmorris.com) or by phone at 302-9790.
Thank you,
LdLl
Aaron [Grimes Sr .
Land Survey Technician
Date Received:
JUN 1 4 2010
Original Submittal
Dukes & Dukes Tentative Partition
June 8, 2010 Page 9