HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit Correspondence 2005-6-28
"
.
Jul-28~2005 02:58pm
+541-684-~1J' T-364 P 002/006
." l.g~:'~~~
CJ:b~~~
Subdivision Lot # ~
~PRI~GFle.LD,' ,,,,~.i,,l,,
~..~~ '
F rom-K (
'iineerini, Inc,
F-763
-':"./'"
Community Services Div, ~ Hng Safety
CITY OF SPRINGFIEL.L>. OREGON
225 5th Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Ph. 726-3759
Job Address
City Job #
...
Mountaingate Subdivision ... Phases~ I & II
I Site Inves,tigation Questionnaire for Consulting Design Professionals
Foundation requirements - new structures on residential lots
This for~ may be used as a temporary verification to allow construction to continue
on the job site until the consultant's stamped affidavit on the site soil compaction
and stabilization Is submitted to t~e City. This form must be completed by a
" licensed "design professional (engineer or architect) or his/her authorized employee,'
and submitted to the building inspector .prior to reque~ting City inspections or
placln~ foundation concrete. It is importa.nt that allqu~5tion5 be answered
completely for the foundation site to be approved for construction. -.
Owner and/or Contractor
A fJ S ~ ~ ~cH='"III~ \,)'"
1. Date(s) of the design professional's site evaluation?
1jlil/~ '
2. Has the design professional reviewed a copy of the geotechnical information
that was prepared for the subdivision relating to this site? Yespo_
Ifnot, please contact this office/or a copy of the report. The design professional
. must be familiar with the geotechnical information before completing this form,
1. In which Geotechnical Investigation area is tbls site located?
(Level I sites are lots # 3-20, 43~49 & 49~71) . Level I _
(Level II sites are lots # 1-2, 21-42 & 50-54) . Level II b..
Note: t&,ver"II reauires a site-snecific eeotechnical investilzatioIl;
Were site conditions identified that would change the category? YES _ NO-$
(For criteria detenninlng category, see the accompanying doc;l,lment titled:
Geotechnh:al Requlroments for IndIvidual BlIildine,LoU Mountaineate Subdivision -Phs;.! 1 & 2
If "yes", explain (use the reverse side of this sheet or an additional sheet if
necessary)
;,
I,
1
.,-
,"-.
Jul-28-2005 02:58pm From-K r 1iin66rini, Inc
+541-684-9~..'
T-364 P.003/006 F-763
Community Services Div,! ~ing Safety Job Address
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON City Job #
225 Sill Street, Spring~eld, OR 97477 Ph. 726.3759
&".~ "f2tr~v H1U- cr
(1. '5- 4(:\1-
Subdivision Lot # ~-l:::-'
.
,1
w~s a geotechnicafenghieer li1volvedat the site to verify that conditions are
suitable for const~uction'.'ofthe propos'ed ~uildi~i(S)? Yes ~ No...,.:.... .. . '
Name of geotechnical engmeer M (cIA ~\- fl.f"'W\~<YT ", ~ .,' '
. " I
3. What was the nature of the excavation and lor fill? 'A-VP'{1.c:l~' ,~\c SUr (Pl..~i,...j)'
~..,~o \ ~ N~-fLA('~iJG- ~.O~- H"I~I~"C....CLAr@ f~~
(;> l2- t:It-O f n..-c-........ '5 I
Was existing non-structural fill or expansive soil encountered on the lot?
Yespo_ If"yes'" what types, depths and locations, and how does it affect
the building foundati~n? _'~J\\...c; GrlJ~ ltl'..~\) of" f ,tal -N , .r-I T6~S'Ul \... (O~~ ~.,J
~\L."'~_' \.o.+.". \.r QA-14:... ~v (f)~f' MA>O" ~lVi
~ T"W J b(l..(\AJ .,J ) CJ(l....r.>>J~ 1.~ C'T1Ifj:.l#.../ ~p P'F<.d-M! I ~ ~
~1irfJ\,}~", .~' ~ ~ ~ c~ '
, ~ I L:' c:.L: I \J't.:"'~.' --------. '
What mess es we taken tremedy the soi conditIon (include type of
engineered fill used to stabilize the soil)? ~~.~ ~ A-vL ~\ '-''''.5'' t
c..~1C; ~ ~ t-.,-'" ~~ ~
~rJ(\.Ln.b"; ea.-p, ~. \tel ~~IlA. 1O~~D
@.. ~FFlc'~~un';,... hA-a,~ ~ ~I~-=?y ~.k' ~1Wvt'\ '
. ~WV ~"t.~, ,
Is the site as prepared adequate ~ Inadequate 0 to m.aintain constant moisture
content in the sub grade? Note: Verification of moIsture stabili~ation in the sub
grade is a requirement for sife preparation, and must be affirmed before '
. constructton can continue.
If inadequate, what measures are to be taken to provide constant moisture content
in the sub grade?
Is the site, as prepared, adequater:jl.. inad.equateO to support the proposed
structure? An affirmative answer Is requisite to proceeding with construction.
. If inadequate~ what additional work is needed to provide adequate
foundation s~pport?
4. Did the design professional witness placement and compaction of the
engineered fill, or is there a special inspection report forthcoming from a
qualified agency? I witnessed Placement ~ecial Insplcompaction report 0
i.,
/.
/
2
Jul-28-2005 02:59pm From-K I liineerini, Inc
+541-684-P..'
T-364 P.004/006 F-763
Community Services Di\', 1 jing SafDlY
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
225 5111 Street, Spri:ng,~eJd, OR 91~77 Ph, 726-3759
"
Job Address
City Job #
/11 '( F1F12-1J ~lU- Or
l!.. b...A C\. ~
Subdivision Lot # 'll',4-
.'
,
. ,t ','. .' . "
5. The design professional intends to use. the :follo'Ying method for in~t~lIation" ','
-of perforated perimeter footing drains: , ',: '
The design on the attached d:a~ng pr~vide~ by the ~esign professional "\t71'.D
The method shown on the ongmal construction drawmgs.......,.... .'. ,':.. 0 ,po.
The typical 'Foundation Drain' dravving attached to pennit ..... ................ D
Perforated perimeter drains are not required, 0.0 ...... ......... 0 0.'.. .... ....... 0
Conunents:
Note: City inspectors wilUnspect installed drains prior to cover upon request...
Call,' 726-3769 to schedule inspec;tion
Low-point crawl space drains are required to prevent the buUd-up of excess
moistu~e inside the foundations during (and after) construction. This drain
may be installed after foundation placement ,onlv with tbe express uermission
of the desi~n ,nrofessional.
a, The design professional has determined the following.'
The crawl spaee drain is required when thefoundation is installed..... 0
The low~point drain can be installed after foundation placement without a
significant moisture build-up problem within the foundation... .......... 0
(I'he low-point drain may be installed at the ~ ~ I f(,)u- stage
of construction) "/o;i;[{;;,L,:,;kmrng, ro'l/'''I, lllC,
b. Has the design professional observed and approved the installation o/the
required low point drain? ,.. ...... ,.. ,.. ...... ... 0" ......" Yes, ' No ~
if 'yes ", where is the low point drain located under the building and
where does It terminate at this time? (Must be an approved/oealion. i,e.
street gutter, storm sewer, sump Ptimp and discharge line to the street,
ele,) ,
The design professional must determine whether the approved permit drawings have ,.'
adequate foundation steel. Is any additional foundation steel required that is not .-
shown on the fou9dation drawings for the building? ' ,
Yes No , \X.. , If "yes ", describe additional steel required (or provide drawing).
, ';;..1
'ii.1-r,:,
~'
"
"'
Jul-28-2005 02:59pm From-K ( liineerini, Inc.
+541-684-9'~O
T-364 P.005/006 F-763
'I
Community Services Div, \ ding Safety
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
225 Sill Stre:et, Springfield, OR 97~77 Ph, 726-3759
Job Address ~~; ~~""'fttt..l.- 6r"
City Job # c.;~ ...~c.{~
Subdivision Lot # ';J, +-
,
.'
. ~ . '.
,
, ,
,
" ,
.,.,'
The individual doing the observations and providing direction for the excavation and site
preparation work on the property must sign the following statement. ' '
The undersigned design professional (or authorized employee) attests that he/she
observed required moisture stability procedures on this site, and that such procedures
were accomplished before any c~anges occurred tn the moisture content of the sub-
grade under and around the buUding (where expansive soils were encountered). The
undersignedfurther attests that the sub-grade, asprepared, is adequate to support the
building proposed/or this site.
Additional comments:
(Note): A copy ofthis report shall be kept on site with the approved plans at all
, times.
'This report shall be followed by an affidavit, signed and stamped by the design
. . professional under whose auspices this report was completed, affirming the information
herein. The signed/stamped affidavit together witb a copy of this report shall be
submitted to this office prior to requesting framing inspection for the building.
Signature ~ -<'~ -
Nome31m. ~~f Title p~",,,t7~
Company ~~.l~t""".t'f.JNd-, ..a...;e-.. '
Phone ~. -t:.~'7' i ..' , .'
Licensee ,t<4 / cH~p:' L-- ft (r"1'lA ~,~ ri ~ p:'
License #-" / e; 4- 74- expires I~-? I /0 6
/
The geotechnical report for the Mountaingate Subdivision Phases I & II makes
recommends for placement of building construction on each site. The report also
recommends that site preparation during wet weather conditions be avoideq unless
special measures are taken to mitigate soft soil conditions and moisture collecting in or
around the foundation areas during and after the construction process. Positive site
drainage must be provided,
4
Jul-28-200S 02:S9pm From-K
liineerini, Inc.
+S41-684-P'-'
T-364 P.006/006 F-763
. ,
Community Services Div, Building Safet)"
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
225 5th Street, Spi"il'!gfleld, OR 91,477 Ph. 726-nS9
I' , . . ,
.
Job Address.;
City Job #
\l!J'?JrtJ~~,Cf
~ 4.C\YJ.... .
Subdivision Lot # ",,4-
~PRINGFIELD
-~~.~
AFFIDA VIT
For Site Investigation Questiormaire
, Foundation Sub-Grade Approval for
Residential Building Site in Mountaingate Subdivision
Phases 1 &2
The undersigned hereby affirms that the exca.vation~ stmctural fill and moisture
stabilization methods for. the building site at the address spown above were observed by ,
me or an authorized employee of my firm and that the following is true:
1. The geotechnical information for the subdivision. specific to this site, was utilized
as part of the determination for fo~dation preparation and drainage requirements,
2. The foundation sub-grade is capable of supporting a minimum of 1500 psf, and is
adequate to support the building proposed for this site. ,
\
3. The moisture content of the excavation was adequately maintained during the site
preparation process and the site is adequately graded and drained for discharge to
an approved location in order to maintain stable moisture content throughout the
construction process and thereafter.
4. The accompanying report titled "Site Investigation Questionnaire for Consulting
Design p~sion~f:ng field observations and instructions made on
(date) . /4-1, ~ for ~s building site was completed either by
me or by employ e of my firm under my superv~sion. T6 the best of my
knowledge, the inf011Ilation contained in that report is complete and accurate.
Date I '-I? Jh
I "
iZ-1.=/416VL,oT Ii e>-:
/
rI~~i-;,,'
@ .GIN"
~~
"~~~ OR!GON Jj -...
.~ ~ ,1\ ~
~.A '--~BER" o.r:;)
'7't,t" +v
DENNIS ,,~
EXPI~ES:!.::I; I f b. .
Name of Licensed Professional (print) .. M / CI~
-~- - ~
Signature ~~