HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 9/28/2010
,
,
.
.
,. iCity of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Historical Review Application
Historical Review Type I - Minor Alterations; Sites or Structures:
'Historical Review Type II - Maior Alterations; Sites or Structures:
IHistorical Review Type III:
Addition of a Site or Structure to the Historic Landmark Inventory D
I Removal of a Site or Structure from the Historic Landmark InventorY D
Demolition of Historic Land Mark Structures D
... .
, . .
Phone:
Fax:
Aoolicant Name: .::)1'1 k~ }
Icompany: <f~ .[~-> . (\T"'~\-"""i..h~
IAddress: D 3,/ DtL 41\.f
IAPPlicant's Rep.:
Icompany:
!Address:
,---,;
I Property Owner:
Icomoanv:
IAddress: Be S'qc ~k 12....J
,,_ct,
IASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 110; y52L/ III 300 I TAX LOT NOeS):
I Address: 3o,~",,; ., sL 5 AJ.>>
I
I
'-,"'L.-I
I
I
I
H
I Phone:
I Fax:
Phone: ~4( b.R"'l <} \",0 I
Fax: I
&vL i1Yol.- I
(1IAA~ If.
--. .
Sr"''' d
CJYL
Description of If you are filling in this form ,by hand, please 'attach your proposal description to this application. .
Proposal:1l ~\"C-(. '? \cL..'li} ~:;tk Low e..r ~s.-\' '..n.li \Jo.) I T f-' I h 1'Vl~cl.-.
~'f'~ ~+OV') '> Y'~lo.C<.. ~'I,'~'N~~ (AJ<Y'\tLCI.....!. I.<.l\~ V\'^d~ Lu'\(ldv"-'..S
,J:. 'Bob c... .si~ C>- V\.='~ ~5~~...P a.6 "Cot\w,b-+-tn ~ ,'",
~ W""",,^ bcNW\< r\\~-h-rlC. b(b.\-r-t~. J
, . ~ -
Associated Aoolications: "
/caseNo.: '~fZIO-CPt:::.~S . I Date: q(ZffO I Reviewed by: ~
IAPDlication ~: $ I1lP, Db I Technical Fee: $ ~. ~D I PJlasI::aR'e>F~ftIFltlI ~if
TOTAL FEES: $ 3++,3 D I PROJECT NUMBER: . C'CO?R 'lnm
~i&"Y~_&_Mf=4~"""="t;-'_ii';_=~",*,="";!i'!;!'_-*"""W;i'"",,imw.W.~~H\I01_~~%i(,"'0""~._~;0~JY{.i;M'~=~W;'rnl~....rfH'\n",!-=4~W1;J''''~ii'''i!1i!'%!_W.BE.,
Revised 1.16.09ddk
Original Submittal
1 of 7
.
.
Signatures
An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted.
Applicant:
owledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate.
--
Date:
tt -2-lJ -10
~~
Print '
Owner:
Date:
tJ-,JCf-/O
,
,
Date Received:
.c_
H" .' SEP 2.8 2010
"
, .
. "
, Originai Submittal
. '.
i;'~\~'.. ;;';"--: .~i!d ... "l....
"
Revised 1.16.09ddk
2 of 7
,,~ II If": .
.
.
Historical Review
The Historic (H) Overlay District is established to encourage the restoration, preservation and
adaptive use of identified Historic Landmark Structures and Sites. The H Overlay District
implements applicable Metro Plan policies, the Washburne Historic Landmark District, Section
2.500 et seq" of the Springfield Municipal Code, 1997 and OAR Chapter 660-023.
The prospective applicant is encouraged to meet with planning staff to become familiarized with
the review process and determine what is required for a complete application,
1.' Applicant Submits an Application for Historical Review
The application must conform to the Historical Review Requirements Checklist included in
this application packet,
2. Review
A. Type I applications for Minor Alterations of Historical Landmark . 's and
Structures will be reviewed by City Staff, The types of Minor alte . ns reviewed
, are:
, ~. 11.
1. Construction, modification or demolitio accessory structures;
2. Additions, partial or total demoliti or substantial alterations to the
building fa!;ade of non-contri ing and intrusive structures within the
Washburne Historic Dis . ;
3, Replacement of da ged exterior features with virtually identical
materials;
4, Additions, ial demolitions or alterations to Historic Landmark Sites
and Str ures which fully conform to the standards of Section 3,3-945
and ich are not visible from the street;
stallation of fewer than four (4) parking spaces;
Installation of signs of less than four (4) square feet; or
Any similar alteration or use which does not detract from the character
of a Historic Landmark Site or Structure,
B. Type II applications for Major Alterations of Historical Landmark Sites and
Structures will be reviewed by the Historical Commission. The Historical
Commission acts as the Development Review Committee for issues involving
Section 3.3-900 Historical Overlay District, Adjacent property owners and
occupants are notified and may attend a public review meeting and state their
concerns, or send written comments, The types of Major alterations reviewed are:
1. Additions, partial demolitions, or substantial alterations to a building
\
fa!;ade;
2. A change to a more intensive use category as defined in the underlying
-:.;; c.. district;
3, Installation of four (4) or more parking spaces;
4, Removal or radical trimming of large established trees or vegetation,
except where necessary for immediate public safety as determined by
. . , ,....the City Engineer; . , '
,,' '.5; Specific Development Standards in the WashburnP;:J~dRjj!t~~rk
District specified in section 3,3-9356,;
6, New construction of 1,000 sq, feet or more within thSBI9as8bm1lJe
Historic Landmark District; or '.
c.
.- ".' .:':, ~'-:~ I '
.: ,j",
, .
Original Submittal____~
Revised 1.16.09ddk
3 on
.
.
7, Any other alteration or use that the Director determines may detract
from the historic character of a Historic Landmark Site or Structure.
C. Type III Applications for Establishment of Historic Landmark Inventory,
Removal from Historic Landmark Inventory, Demolition of Historic
Landmark Structures and any Discretionary Use listed in the underlying
zoning district as specified in section 5.9-100 will be reviewed by the Plannin~
Commission following a recommendation by the Historical Commission, Adjacent
property owners and occupants are notified and may attend a public review meetin J
and state their concerns, or send written comments, '
Major and Minor Alteration Standards (3.3-945)
/'
The following standards apply to major and minor alterations as specified in Section 3,3-
9156, and C., within the H Overlay District,
1. Any proposed use shall minimize exterior alteration of the Historic Landmark Site o'
Structure and its environment; uses that require substantial exterior alteration sha I
not be permitted,
2. The distinguishing original qualities of the Historic Landmark Site or Structure and
its environment shall not be substantially altered, The removal or alteration of any
historic material or distinctive architectural features is prohibited unless an
immediate hazard to public safety exists.
3. All historic Landmark Sites or Structures are recognized as products of their own
time, Alterations which have no historic basis and which seek to create an 'earlier
appearance are prohibited.
4. Changes that have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history an j
development of a Historic Landmark Site or Structure and its environment, Where
changes have acquired significance in their own right, this significance shall be
recognized,
s. Distinctive stylistic features and examples of local or period craftsmanship which
characterize a Historic Landmark Site or Structure shall be retained.
@ Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced, In the
even replacement cannot be avoided, the new material shall match the material
being replaced in composition, design, color, texture and visual qualities, Repair 01'
replacement of missing architectural features is based on accY{at~ Q.l.Jplica,te .
features, substantiated by historic, physical or pictorial evide~@~~~
conjectural design, or the availability of different architectural elements from other
buildings or structures. SEP 2 8 2010
:''':'\ . 7.. ,t:Je:V'f..~esign for undeveloped Historic Landmark Sites in tlilrigtillBlSDJImnitlali<;tnric
Landmark District and for alterations and additions to existing Historic Landmark
; ,. ,Sit,es and Structures are permitted when they complement significant historic,
,lll'architectural or cultural features and the design is compatible with the size, scale,
, color, m.aterial and ch.<;![acter of the property, neighborhood or environment,
. h' L I' . 1....11" ~J ' .
Revised 1.16.09ddk
4 of 7
.
.
8. New additions or alterations to Historic Landmark Structures shall not impair the
essential form and integrity of the structure. '
Demolition Standards (3.3-950)
emolition of Historic Landmark Sites or Structures is an extreme measure that may be
p rmitted only after all other reasonable alternatives for preservation have been
th roughly examined.
A. demolition permit will be granted for any Historic Landmark Site or Structure unless
th owner has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Historical Commission that 1 of
the 1I0wing criteria applies:
1. Th condition of the Historic Landmark Site or Structure constitutes a serious and
imm diate threat to the safety of the public or occupants that cannot be eliminated
witho repairs that would exceed 50 percent of the value of the structure itself,
a. A MM certified appraisal shall be required to determine the value of the Historic
Landm k Structure.
b. At least 2 ids from qualified contractors shall be required to determine the cost
of repairs t the Historic Landmark Structure,
2. The property ower has demonstrated that there would be no reasonable, long-
term economic be efit from preservation of the' Historic Landmark Site or Structure,
In making this dete ination, the owner shall demonstrate that all potential uses or
adaptive uses for the istoric Landmark Site or Structure have been thoroughly
examined, For exampl :
. ,
a. The fact that a greate economic return would result from demolition than
preservation is insuffici t to meet this criteria,
b. A lack of adequate funds t pursue potential uses or adaptive uses is insufficient
to meet this criteria (i,e., se ing the Historic Landmark Site or Structure is an
option that shall be considere ),
B. If a Historic Landmark Site or Structur is permitted to be demolished, the property
owner shall provide the Historical Comm' sion with:
1. Four sets of measured drawings prepar by a qualified draftsperson showing the
primary f1c;>or plans and the primary exte . r elevations. .
. .-.;,.""
2. A set of photographs that document the ext ior and interior details, including
significant architectural elements.
c. T_h~, ~rop~,~Y,c;>,'^.'Q~r shall also ~upply the i;istoric~1 C .mmission ~&'tliID;i!ilGePf:
other architectural element as Identified by the Hlstorl al Commission. T~~'aWifacfor
architectural element shall be carefully removed and de 'vered to th~1tiS2o.[icaJ
Commission.in good condition to be used in future conse ation wo~!:.t' ," ZOIO
_ .;~:'lj 'i.I~! <H~"
Original Submittal
Revised 1.16.09ddk
5 of 7
.
.
Historical Review Requirements Checklist
NOTE: If you feel an item does not apply, please state the reason why and attach the
explanation to this form,
o
Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula, A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services
Department, Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at tho:
time of complete application submittal. zl:(' :3LfL(. ~
:~""..-"""'--"-
o
o
o
Historical Review Application Form
A B!~ef Narrative explaining the, purpose of the proposal.
One (1) Copy of the Deed to show ownership,
In Addition:
,0 Type I ;.. Minor Alterations -Ei t (8) Copies of the Required Information:
o Plot plan drawn to sca - See Plot Plan Requirements Checklist attached,
o Photos of the existi structure and/or each damaged exterior feature to be
replaced to suffic' ntly show existing structure and/or conditions.
o Exterior elevat' n drawings of the new and/or modified structure,
o Type of fa~a materials to be utilized including manufacturer's specification
brochures
D Type of onstruction materials to be utilized including manufacturer's specification
broch es.
For Insta tion of fewer than four (4) parking spaces:
o lot plan drawn to scale - See Plot Plan Requirement Checklist attached,
Location of trees and vegetation, indicating what vegetation is to be removed.
Number of parking spaces shown as proposed (to scale).
-7 0 Type II '- Major Alterations - Eight (8) Copies of the Required Information:
Nfft D Plot plan drawn to scale - See Plot Plan Requirements Checklist attached.
*' .B-Photos of the existing structure and/or each damaged exterior feature to be
replaced to sufficiently show existing structure and/or conditions, .
,Y1tD Exterior elevation drawings of the new structure, addition, alteration or area to be
demolished drawn to scale.
eFExisting type of fa~ade materials.
~'Type of fa~ade materials to be utilized including manufacturer's specification
brochures.
,~-Type of construction materials to be utilized including manufacturer's specification
brochures, '
(4) or more parking spaces:
..~;tYpr6t p' drawn to scale - See Plot Plan Requirement'Che~~~~l1led:
,0 Loc ,i,on of trees and vegetation, indicating what vegetation is to be removed,
'0 mber of parking spaces shown as proposed (to scale). SEP 2 8 2010
.... ! "'~~: Il: . rd''';, I,
Original Submittal
Revised 1.16.09ddk
6 of 7
.
.
o Type III - ighteen (18) Copies of the Required Information:
Addition of "te or Structure to Historic Landmark Inventory: ,
o Plot plan rawn to scale - See Plot Plan Requirements Checklist attached,
o Complete ity of Springfield Historic Inventory Form,
o Current pho of each exterior wall of the structure or if a vacant site, one current
photo of the . e.
o Written finding which address the criteria for Establishment of Historic Landmark
Inventory (SDC -920).
Removal of Site or Struct e from Historic Landmark Inventory:
o Plot plan drawn to scale See Plot Plan Requirements Checklist attached,
o Copy of the City of Spring I Id Historic Inventory Form.
o Copy of the National Registe esignation (if applicable),
o Current photo of the site or str ture.
o Written findings determining Hist ic Designation was erroneously applied according
to the criteria for Establishment of 'storic Landmark Inventory (SDC 3,3-920),
Demolition of Historic Landmark Structure
o Plot plan drawn to scale - See Plot Plan Re uirements Checklist attached,
o Information to meet the criteria of Demolitio standards (SDC 3.3-950).
Plot Plan Requirements
A Plot plan must be drawn in ink on quality paper n
and must contain the following information:
. The scale (appropriate to the area involvied and sufficient to show detail of the plan
related data such as l' = 30", 1" = 50' OR 1" = 100'), north arrow and the date of
preparation;
. The street address and assessor's map and tax lot number;
. The dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the property;
. Proposed and existing buildings; location, size (gross floor area), conceptual floor
plan, setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height;
. Off-street parking areas, vehiclular access points and their dimensions; and
. The name and location of all existing and proposed public and private streets and
sidewalks within or on the boundary of the proposed property.
The following additional information may be required, please check with
planning:
. The on-site drainage system to an approved storm system;
. The connection to the City sanitary sewer system;
. The location and height'of proposed or existing fences"walls, outdoor equipment,
storage, trash receptacles and signs;
. Requir~d landscaped. a~ea~ and street tree locations to include .tYpe of land~caping
orctrees and type of Irrigation system; or , vate Received:
. ~I~~ ~:s~~~.nal information necessary to address land use ~pat~~~itf ,?r:~:;tro
0.. -, 't
nJm~1 ciUt)::-d tal
"-.-----.---
Revised 1.16.09ddk
70f7
.
.
After recording return to:
9S096186
B&J/BARRISTERS' AIDE FOR CHARLES S. SPIN,ER
1,1", W"", j3!: ~"c1",,,}, J",?~ ~",,:J ():J""",."""",..",..",.
.F;l.lg~!) ~ J,. .RR" ~ ll,() 1..,...""""""""""""",."""..",
NAME, ADDRESS, ZIP
Until a change is requested. mail all t8X statements to:
CHARLES S, SPINNER
""".,.:Q.u""'.y"'.:__..."'~__,.,.,...'u."."""",.u,.u,
,8B9,Io...fL~!,!5Hltc., ,lJx" u.,.. ,."u.,..", 'u.'uu"
.fU9"N1f.",.[)tf",.."f('{O'.~,'u..,.,.,',...,.,"'u.
NAME, ADDRESS, ZIP
~Q~~NOV.23'99n07REC 5.00
!Q92NOV.23'99n07F'FUND 10.00
~Q~~NOV.23'99n07A&T FUND 20.00
r
-.
WARRANTY DEED-STATUTORY FORM
~'
~;~~v~~~' ~~~ R:.~:;:,~,~:~:y ,~~~:'~~~~:::~~~;~~~;boa-~~::~~~""'~~~'::,: ::,:::"::': :.:: ::::"::::, :::,: ,:" :u".:. ::,: .::~ ~all,to.r
Grantee, rhe following described real property free of encumbrances, except as specifically set forth herein.
"e"
Lots Five (5) and (6) of Block Twenty-Nine (29)
of the Town of Springfield, according to the
extended survey thereof in the County of Lane,
State of Oregon.
c
:g~
~.~ ~
~Q)"E
-5-58
" - .
o . "
..........c ...
fIl-o-O
III C :>,.......
~ ':= -0
I .5 "E ~
C tl) - U "@
o c ~ :>. k:
=(OJ!:?..g...
~..J U i>> ~
0.... z,..c 3:
... 0 co.....
o .a- 5 "Cl~ ~
c>>cUZ,E
.... =' Q) C ::I
~o-55~
'" U-"U.5
.....
:r
.....
.....
x::
<l:
M
N
=>
o
z
I:r-~
'7-'
II:
en
o
(.0
N
~ ~
'0 ~
(;
~ ~~
~~ ,,' g
u..... .~ 0
M~U
"''''
i::c:
" "
00
uu
iii ~ ~
11l <tI <tI :>-
0:::: ~ --l en
(IF INSUFFICIENT SPACE, CONTINUE DESCRIPTION ON ADDITIONAL PAGE)
The said property is free from all encumbrances except conditions, restrictions, ea~enti-,.of
records and zoning regulations uate Keceived:
g:t:dco~~~eration f0'1~nveyan8c; is $."81"OQQ.,QQ,,.-r--,l;~~.,~~Ofig~;n;:J)$,~pmitta'
. . .Y....,.......... 19"'''''''Riitii'L':'StaclF",,,;t---.;t.JLo<C7',{' '.. __u........
_' ,.1' \ ~"j' H' ~:'" 1+/,
ST ATE Op..OR,XOG'0N L<:;O)jn(y of Lane, ss, Personally appeared the above named
.-'. ;...,:~f~~ ~,;~ ,':......... .~..l:/J"'"
.'.\-, ~\:>E~s.tac)r':~d, Ruth L. ;,Stacy
and aCkn'Q:!t;I,;:i:Igt~ \l),c~re~~:instrulllcnt to bc...t.h,e,iE....vol
""':',' '("~ ~:::Orj,. :
Dated ...)ii;l,~"'::''''';;''041:~) AD. 19 ,8.o.,......,..m, ,
My Commiss(9n<E;~pl:i\,s:'(-D-,'I'~sI:
(,r,,;::'.~"~:\~:r:j<:bj{SCADE TITLE COMPANY
SEP 2 8 2010
act and deed Before me
'?L . r!);t;t&~.....,....
y Pubhc for Oregon
1075 Oak Street, Eugene
Form No. 107
. .
Description of Proposed Exterior Changes at 306 CSt.
Siding
1. Existing siding on east facing wall of house was dilapidated, leaking and did not match
siding above on dormer added in the mid seventies
Tl.ll added in
the seventies as
shown from the
north facing side
of house
Cedar lap siding
{original}
2. Change siding on east wall only to LP OSB Sheathing it matches the T1-11 that '....as
installed on the existina dormer.
.... ..' ... . ... ..., '.. '..., "".
,j. "iii":.',;-~ ~i ;"ow~~ \O;;fj;;i3.i t;iilij) '..'.iOUj~ iiO~ ..;n;;:iiige .';;;U~iil ',,~;;~n ~ne excepuon Oi rep;Jif5 iC
lOWer section of pOore,", (\.A!ou1d use like ITlBteriBIs. ~nd p~il'1t'
.... ~,
f'....~ -:'..
. ,-r~~' .
4 _ .~ ~
.
. " ~
...,-..:II.'i'.
.6'"\~:'-'
- 't.'. .if',
,,';' ,,':'"'b,.&
~'..~- '. ...""
.,7#...~4("-'" .......
~.~..-'f'ii. ..
V"'.....- -_ 1
. a;o,?":J ~ .. ;~:
~ '
~ ..-a . .
~ . t
~. ..
..,,,,:,
,
~.4."
.....
,
",,~:~
. ,~'T
~..... (:,
, ..:':t.
,. .
'.'
..
'.'
.-,""'"'
..~--.
.1+
~
,
.
Date Received:
SEP 2 8 2010
Original Submittal.
-
- - ----,
.' . .
Description of Proposed Exterior Changes at 306 CSt.
Windows
1. Current windows are a combination of aluminum trame, single pane, horizontal sliders
and original single hung, wood frame with broken glass,
d
!.\'
,
a
2. Change all windows to all vinyl clad, dual pane "low E" energy efficient windows, original
window casements would not change as windows were special ordered to fit within
original casements.
~' -
1~'I"~,.II"""
, It..,"'
I, '7""' I
,
I
1 r'-J(
. ,
I ,
~
...
Date Received:
SEP 2 8 2010
Original Submitt"l
Home
Products
Enerov Savino$
Dealer Locator
Resources
Comoanv
.
(;;i
Date Received:
SEP 2 8 2010
Original Submilt/>I
.
PRODUCTS 1 Tech data
- CUrrent AMMA Ratings
- Current U-Value Ratings
- Current STC Ratinos
Current U-Values (Air/Argon, Duralite and LoE over clear), AAMA ratings
and other specifications below.
: Window Glass u- u- Solar Visible AAMA
Type Type Value Value Heat Light Rating
Argon Air
I 4200 LoE::! 0.28 0,32 0.33 0,63 HC45
I PW I
LoE'(366) 0.26 I 0,31 0,26 , 0.58
LoE2 0.28 ~.;2- 0.35 0.59
C30
4200
PD
LoE'(366) 0.27
0.24
0,53
0.31
I 4200 LoE::! 0.29 0.33 0.30 0,57 LC40
I SH
I LoE'(366) I 0,29 I 0.32 I 0.24 [ 0.52 I
I 4200 LoP 0.30 0.33 0,30 I 0.57 C30
XO I
I LoE'(366) 0,29 0.32 0.24 0.52 I
: 4200 LoP 0.29 0.31 0.27 0,50 LC25
AWN
LoE'(366) 0,28
0.30
0.21
0.46
4200
CSMT
LoE::!
LC25
0,27
0,29
0.32
0.50
LoE'(366) 0.28
0.31
0,21
0.46
5200
LoP
0,27
0.30
0.33
0,63
HC45
.
.
I PW I LoE'(366) 0.26 f30 I 0,26 I 0.58 I I
1.5200 I LoP O'3~ 0.33 I "'f;,1:J
I XO
I I LoE'(366) 0,29 I 0.32 I 0.24 0.52 I
~5200 I LoP 0.30 F3 I 0.30 T 0.57 LC40
SH
I LoE'(366) 0.29 I 0.32 I
6200 1LOE' 0.30 10'33FF I LC25
OH
I LoE'(366) 0,29 I 0.32 ~2 I 0.48 I
Current STC Ratings
Series Model Outside Inside STC orrc
lite lite
4200 Patio 6.4mm 4mm 33 27
Door Lam
XO 6.4mm 4mm 33 29
Lam
XO OS OS 28 23
SH 6.4mm 4mm 35 30
Lam
SH OS OS 29 24
5200 XO 6.4mm 4mm 32 28
Lam
Date Received:
xo DS DS 28 23
SEP 2 8 2010 SH 6.4mm 4mm 33 29
Lam
Original Submittal
"Field testing method is AAMA 502-02 and ASTM Ell05-00
1.QQ.1D J ~.u~rJA~t~ ! E....P_WI1!~ I :i.&'1ttl.lJ.J.G;
Emplre Piluf/C Windows 0<1
LP Building Products I LP SmartS ide Panel
.
Page 1 of 1
.
~ Ilnvesl~ Relallons I Contad Us
FLOORS I WALLS I ROOFS I SPECIAL TV PRODUCTS I DESIGN SOFTWARE
LITERATURE
1.5L I L\II.. I OSS Sheathing! FI.meBlock Firw--fUted OSB I L.ol'IVlertgtta OSB I SmltrtSide Trim & Siding I C.nEx'" Siding
LP SmartSide Panel
LP SmartSide Warranty
English
DOWNLOAD
5/50~~'~~
...............
~ SmartSideil panel options are available in three of our
product collections. Each grouping offers a variet}' of unique
styles and profiles.
U' SmartSide Product
Portfolio
DOWNLOAD
An:hileclural Collection
See AD RellIledLiI&rlltvre
I
l
Reverse &ani and Batten
StUl'CO
Shiplap Edge
Made of treated fibe.r substrate; not rated for structural use
I"rn-i...ion Series
lP SmartS ide Panel Re5QUrces
lP SmartSide Photo Gallery
APA@ratedpanelsforstructural use
Strong enough to be nailed directly to stud
May allow elimination of a layer of sheathing
Made of treated strand substrate
Offerings include no groove, 4~ DC. B~ OC
Shiplap Edge
_-~~.,~,:""",~!),lS
Offerings include 8- OC t:edar and smooth
Avnilable as primed or prefinished
Made of treated fiber substrate; nol rated for structural use
Shiplap Edge
Why Choose lP ~ ..~. .~.__ Instead Of Fiber Cement?
Why Choose lP SmartSide Instead Of TradItional Wood?
Why Build With Us?
How Is II Made?
How Is II Green?
limited WarT1lnty RegiSIJ1ltion
Date Received:
SEP 2 8 2010
Original Submittal
http://www.lpcorp.com/smartside/panel!
9/27/2010