Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStudies APPLICANT 8/10/2010 (2) 1 l ,I:, " ,I " 'I 1-- .... I, , 'I ,. I,' 1 .1 1 I I,::':' ;-. 1 'I' I, '''-'', I: ;, 1 \, .^ '"',,, ',. ;" ", " .," , , ,i " .' " ,;... . - ~ - .... '. 'J._ "J' " -, " " '. '--"'.. ':, ~. :< " "",' " I'. ..i," '< "'~'" '. '. " " " " ~t .. t ,-- '. "-.:. .., \ ..' t. ,- ", ': " , ". J , "', ',' " ...," ..:' " -' " .<" ; : .'~ ; .... ' " , 'i" ',";- .' . .f >.\,.';.", 1 .', "', .'. ,', " " .', i. G,e,ote,chnic~I'.Ir.tvest_igati9r" Rep.ort . " ',.' ','... - \.;: For', ':' ',' . ;'" ','.' .' , .;1 ~ .' - '!~ '.1 , . ,-.- ~ I, ': ..... .' " " '. h H " ", ",' -"'., i "..'.Eas(Sid~,BaptisfChi~'r(~h, -' , 'Ffro'posed',Sa,rictua~}i- Building '\'404:5;C.bmql,erGi~1 Averlue,;" i~'Spririg,field, ,OR:,'~747,.7 '" .: .-' " , " ,- ','-' ,,-.~ . , ,I. " " " ,; ,I" ',' e,.... " < ", ;;: ~ - :', l ,. ,( 1""" . " " " ' ,L. .. ."" " ... "-, ,~,: . ,', ,l , " , ' -,.11 ,', : Prepared by:, ,'.' .-' ',' .:' t .. j. .<:.. \ '. '" " . ~ ... Br.~nch Engirieeri['lg,- .Inc.~" . 'th,' " , ,310 5 Street ' Sp~ingfield, OR 9747.7 ' :' 541-746~0637 ' .!. , " ,.,,' " .' ...... ., ",' ....:. ....-, .' ',"" " . , ,. " , " .,,' .;.- " " ,', 1'- --'.' ~, ~ , " ,,' ~ . ,,"" " !'. ", " . ~" ';'........ " :-'." , .~. ' - ," ....".t , ~ . t . 'l. ',,'1. ;" " ',' C.:"'. " " .\,0:" " e, 0', , , ", ." , (/'; 'r;\.\ " ".- ,.1: .' " '." ..; " ,) "~." '." ~-" . ~ " " , , '.." " June 4 '~W09 '" ',',. " I . ".': \., -,'. ,-.' " ',..t'. " .... . '., t '. y. " ~ ... ;; I " ,,' " " .~" " ,! . . , '.', '*\ ,', :"v' ,,'( ,"" ,.' ,'" , ' bateRecei\(~d: ...., ". ,'J. ' " .' - ~ " ','- .r '''''.0 "';, ,'." . .' \. .'. ..: r., : ;~,~ " 't,! . ~, .... " J." 'AUG: f',d,2olO ,., - ,- '!~ .;., -" -~i " ~ Oi. .,\ ..-';. ....., . '.~; :"."" p.. "., .' "-.. ,'. J " '.:, r' f." . :~, ". \' , '. ,~ - '1'." , ., f.'. ,'O;iginal s~binitial, , . . " , .', ..,', ~ .. '. , " " <.,-"",: ,~. ., .,....J - ,'. ~ '" < ' -: " .:.' , ," " , " ", . r. ~. .,~ .- .... ."J ,,; .' .-"', _,,1.f. . ~ e" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Branch Engineering, Inc. 310 5th Street. Springfield, Oregon 97477 . (541) 746-0637 . FAX (541) 746-0389 147 Commercial Street NE #10' Salem, Oregon 97301 . PH/FAX (503) 779-2577 June 4, 2009 Branch Engineering Project No. 09-060 PRINCIPALS: James A. Branch, P.E., P.L.S. Rene' Fabricant, P.E., S.E. Michael Lane Branch, P.E. Damien Gilbert, P.E. Renee C. Clough, P.E., P.L.S. Ronald J. Derrick, P.E. Mr. Len Arnie. East Side Baptist Church 4045 Commercial Avenue Springfield, Qregon 97477 Subject: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT PROPOSED SANCTUARY BUILDING 4045 COMMERCIAL AVENUE SPRINGFIELD, OREGON Dear Mr. Arnie: Branch Engineering Inc. (BEl) has conducted a site investigation to assess the geotechnical engineering properties of the subsurface conditions at the subject site for the proposed building construction. The accompanying report presents the results of our site research, field exploration, testing, and data analyses, as well as our conclusions and recommended geotechnical design parameters for the project. Based on the results of our study, the site is suitable for the planned development, provided that the recommendations of this report are implemented in the design and construction of the project. If you have any questions regarding this report please contact the undersigned at your convemence. Sincerely Branch Engineering Inc, Date Received: AUG 1 0 2010 EXPIRES: DECEMBER 3/, 2009 Ronald J. Derrick, P.E. Principal Geotechnical Engineer Original Submittal CIVIL STRUCTURAL SURVEYING GEOTECHNICAL TRANSPORTATION I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................1 1.1 Project and Site Description...............................................................................................................1 1.2 Scope of Work .....................................................................................................................................2 1.3 Site Information Resources ................................................................................................................2 2.0 FIELD AND LABORATORY TEST RESULTS ........................................................3 3.0 SITE SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS.......................................................................4 3.1 Ground Water..............................................:........................................................................................4 4.0 GEOLOGIC SETTING ..................................... ......................................... ...............4 4.1 Regional Geology ................................................................................................................................4 4.2 Site Geology .........................................................................................................................................5 5.0 CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................5 5.1 Seismic Design ....................................................................................................................................5 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ............... ............................................................................6 Site Preparation, Earthwork, and Foundation Subgrade Requirements ...............................................6 FilIICutSlopes..............................................................................................................................................7 Excavations.................................................................................................................................................. 7 Drainage ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 Soil Bearing Capacity ...................................................................................................................................8 Slabs-On-Grade ...........................................................................................................................................9 Settlement ....................................................................................................................................................9 Pavement Design.........................................................................................................................................9 7.0 REPORT LIMITATIONS .................................... .......................................................9 Date Received: AUG 1 0 2010 Original Submittal I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT EAST SIDE BAPTIST CHURCH 4045 COMMERCIAL AVENUE SPRINGFIELD, OREGON BRANCH ENGINEERING INC. PROJECT No. 09-060 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results and findings of Branch Engineering, Inc. (BEl) field observations, testing, and research for the subject site. The site, located at 4045 Commercial Avenue in Springfield, Oregon is an irregular shaped parcel. The site is in Section 31 of Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian. The site is currently occupied by two, single-story, wood-frame buildings configured into a "L"- shape, paved parking facilities, and a fenced baseball diamond. The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate subsurface soil and geologic conditions at the site and provide geotechnical recommendations for the design and construction of the proposed site development. 1.1 Project and Site Description The proposed project consists of constructing a two-story, steel rigid-frame sanctuary building with a footprint of approximately 11,500 square feet and associated new parking area of about 102 spaces. The expected building column and wall loads are not expected to exceed 50 kips and 4 kif, respectively. The floor of the building is expected to be concrete slab-on-grade. Other than the existing buildings and parking areas, the majority of the approximately four acre site is covered with mowed grass with few trees. A developed baseball diamond with a fenced perimeter and dugouts is located in the approximate center of the property. The site is relatively flat and the site can be accessed from either Commercial Avenue or 41st Street. It is our understanding that the southwest corner of the existing building experienced about four inches of settlement and was releveled in 2008 using helical piers installed to depths of 8- to 13-feet. An area of isolated soft fill material was detected off the corner of the existing building as indicated by Boring 3 summary log, which likely explains the cause of the settlement. No other fill material was encountered in our site borings. The initial site building on the north side was constructed sometime between 1952 and 1960 with the second building added before 1968. 1 Date Received: AUG 1 0 2010 Original SubmittaL I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Geotechnical Investigation Report East Side Baptist Church Springfield, Oregon Page 2 1.2 Scope of Work Our scope of work included a site visit on April 9, 2009 to observe site conditions and to direct and log the advancement of five (5) exploratory borings to depths of 10- and 15- feet below the existing ground surface. Field log summaries are presented in Appendix A, along with copies of nearby well logs from the Oregon Department of Water Resources on-line database and on-line soil survey information. The depth of the borings were advanced using a Model 6600 truck-mounted Geoprobe hydraulic boring machine to collect near continuous, 1.5-inch diameter subsurface samples. Representative samples were collected for additional visual inspection and laboratory in-situ moisture determination and shrink/swell potential. The test pit soil stratigraphy was visually classified in accordance with the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Method 0-2488. In-situ field testing consisted of pocket penetrometer readings to assess unconfined compressive strength of the fine- grain soils, vane shear testing, dry strength and dilatency testing. 1.3 Site Information Resources The following site investigation activities were pl:'rformed and literature resources were reviewed for pertinent site information: . Review of the United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey (USGS) on-line Quadrangle Map, 7/1/1986. · Review of University of Oregon aerial photographs from 1936 to 2000. · Five exploratory borings were advanced on site at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. · Review of the Lane County area Web Soil Survey, United States Department of Agricultural (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) · Review of the USGS Geologic Map of Oregon, USGS 1991 · Review of Oregon Department of Water Resources Well Logs (attached in Appendix A) Date Received: AUG 1 0 2010 Original Submittal I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Geotechnical Investigation Report East Side Baptist Church Springfield, Oregon Page 3 2.0 FIELD AND LABORATORY TEST RESULTS In addition to the field visual-manual methods for soil classification, in-situ vane shear testing was conducted to assess soil strength. Results of the vane shear tests are included on the test pit summary logs and summarized below with the calculated shear strength. Table 1: In-Situ Vane Shear Testing Results and Calculated Shear Strength Location Depth of Soil Type Field Torque Bjerrum's (1972) Calculated Test (ft) (ft-Ib) Correction Shear Strength Factor (lb/ft2) B-1 3 Silty Clay 30 083 3,300 B-2 3 Silty Clay 25 0.83 2,750 B-3 3 Clay Fill 15 0.83 1,650 B-4 2 Silty Clay 18 083 1,980 B-5 2 Silty Clay 19 083 2,090 Representative samples of the near surface soils were also collected to measure the in- situ moisture content and free swell potential of the soil. Results of these laboratory tests are summarized in the following Table 2. Table 2: In-Situ Moisture Content and Free Swell Potential Location Depth (ft) Soil Type In-Situ Free Swell (%) Moisture (%) B-1 3 Silty Clay 45.6 15 B-2 3 Silty Clay 28.9 30 B-5 2 Silty Clay 29.7 20 Date Received: AUG 1 0 2010 Original Submittal I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Geotechnical Investigation Report East Side Baptist Church Springfield, Oregon Page 4 3.0 SITE.SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The near surface soils within the project area consist of Pleistocene age unconsolidated to semi-consolidated alluvial terrace deposits of clay, silt, sand and gravel from lacustrine and fluvial environments. The NRCS Web Soil Survey maps the east side of the site as part of the Oxley-Urban land complex and the west side as Awbrig-Urban land complex, both of which are described as poorly drained silty clay loam with gravel in the Oxley complex. The site borings indicate silty clay overlying dense .sandy gravel deposits commonly referred to as "Bar-Run" material at depths between 2.5- and 8-feet below the ground surface. The fine-grain alluvial soils are generally moist to very moist, soft in the upper 1- to 2-feet grading to stiff. The sandy gravel deposit, Bar-Run, is moist and dense. Based on nearby well logs, the Bar-Run is generally encountered with the upper 20 feet of the surface and extends to depths of over 50 feet. 3.1 Ground Water A static ground water level was encountered between 4.5- and 6-feet below the ground surface in those borings within the building site. Nearby well logs indicate a static ground water levels between 9 and 17 feet below ground surface. The water level below the site will be influenced by seasonal precipitation changes and the water level of the McKenzie River located less than 1 mile north of the site. Ground water is not anticipated to adversely affect the proposed site development; however, some utility trench dewatering maybe required. 4.0 GEOLOGIC SETTING The following sections described the regional and local site geology. Our field findings are consistent with the geologic mapping of the site area by the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (Walker & MacLeod, 1991). 4.1 Regional Geology The subject site lies within the southern portion of the Willamette Valley Geomorphic Province 0NVGP), east of the Coast Range and west of the Cascade Mountains Provinces. The WVGP is a regional lowland that extends from just south of Eugene, Oregon to Vancouver, British Columbia. In Oregon, this alluvial plain is approximately 130 miles long and 20- to 40-miles wide (Orr and Orr, 1996). The WVGP is drained by the north flowing Willamette River. The bedrock of the Willamette River Valley in the area of the subject site is believed to be part of the Fisher-Eugene Form~~ ~~tved: AUG 1 0 2010 Original Submittal I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Geotechnical Investigation Report East Side Baptist Church Springfield, Oregon Page 5 described as marine sedimentary rocks from the Oligocene and Eocene epochs (approximately 35 million years ago). Deposits of silt and clay from fluvial and lacustrine environments covered the bedrock to various depths during the presence of low energy streams and lakes in the southern Willamette Valley. Compression forces, along with uplifting of the Cascade and Coast Range Mountains, during the Miocene and Pliocene epochs depressed the Willamette River Valley and caused gentle folding of the Fisher-Eugene Formations. The rapid uplift of the Cascade and Coast Range mountains steepened stream gradients causing increased erosion of the mountains and resulting deposition of thick gravel layers incised within the fluvial and lacustrine deposits. Approximately 13,500 years ago the Willamette Valley was cyclically flooded by catastrophic breaks in the ice dams of Lake Missoula. These flood events filled the valley to a depth of about 350 feet before retreating, causing sequences of upward fining deposits of silt and clay. 4.2 Site Geology The observed site conditions are consistent with the mapped geology of the site and that of the general geologic setting described above. Silt and clay overlay sand zones atop the gravel Bar~Run material that that may contain cobbles to 8 inches in diameter. The Bar-Run in this area has a matrix of sand and silt. The gravel/cobbles are anticipated to extend to a depth over 100 feet with bedrock being several hundred feet below ground surface. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS Based on our field observations, subsurface explorations, and data analyses, we conclude that the site is geotechnically suitable for the proposed development provided that the recommendations of the report are incorporated into the design and construction of the project. The primary impedance to site development will be the removal of the upper 1- to 2-feet of soft, silty clay soil to expose a firm foundation subgrade. 5.1 Seismic Design Based on our site reconnaissance, subsurface observations, review of nearby well logs, and our general knowledge of the site geology, the potential site hazards resulting from a seismic event are negligible. The site topography is flat; therefore, there is no hazard from slope instability or lateral spreading since there are no mapped fault lines within the vicinity of the site. Although not specifically encountered in our investigation, the presence of saturated sand lenses below the site is likely; however, the potential for adverse impacts to site development due to liquefaction occurring is neM~~wetI: AUG 1 0 2010 Original Submittal I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Geotechnical Investigation Report East Side Baptist Church Springfield, Oregon Page 6 the sand lenses would be at a depth greater than 5 feet below surface grade and are likely in a dense condition. 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The following sections present general recommendations for site preparation and grading, drainage, foundations, pavement design, and utility excavations. Site Preparation and Earthwork The following recommendations are for earthwork in the building pad area. Specific recommendations for roadway subgrade and base rock sections are provided in the subsequent Pavement Design section of this report. Earthwork shall be performed in general accordance with the standard of practice as generally described in Appendix J of the 2007 International Building Code. All areas of fill intended to directly or laterally support structures or road/parking areas shall be stripped of vegetation, organic soil, undocumented fill, or other deleterious material. These strippings shall either be removed from the site or used in nonstructural areas. The Geotechnical Engineer shall observe and approve subgrade soils prior to placing fills, base rock, or foundation forms. Areas of fill placement will require excavation of the surface topsoil to a depth of about 24-inches below existing surface grade. Additional excavation may be required in areas to remove debris or minor fill from site leveling. Should soft areas or areas of distinct soil color variation be discovered, this office shall be notified to perform site observation. !mported material is expected to comprise site fills, if constructed. BEl recommends the use of nonexpansive, granular material for structural fill areas. On site or imported fine-grain soil may be used for fill with approval from the Geotechnical Engineer prior to delivery to the site. Soil fill may require moisture conditioning (drying or addition of water), specific compaction equipment, and field observation and testing to achieve the required compaction standard herein. All material shall be approved by the Geotechnical Engineer prior to delivery to the site. Should soil fill be used, it is recommended that the site be graded so that all building pad areas are underlain with at least 24-inches of consistent material type, whether it is structural fill or native material. The native soils have a moderate shrink/swell potential, therefore, it is recommended that the upper 8-inches of all building pads be comprised of compacted 3/4" or 1"-0 crushed aggregate to mitigate soil moisture fluctuations. If on site soil is used for fill, it is recommended that work be performed during the dry season when site soil moisture content is more easily controlled for compaction. Currently, the native soils appear to be 6% to 18% over optimum moisture content. Date Received: AUG 1 0 2010 Orinin",.1 Submittal I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Geotechnical Investigation Report East Side Baptist Church Springfield, Oregon Page 7 Native soil shall be compacted to at least 90% of the material's maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Method 0-1557. The fine grain soils are moisture sensitive and will soften with exposure to prolonged rainfall. It is recommended that earthwork be performed during the dry season, generally May through October. Should earthwork be conducted during the wet season, additional project costs will likely be incurred, such as additional soil excavation, use of geotextiles or soil amendments for subgrade support, and moisture control of the fill materials. An option is to use imported fill material, within 8-inches of the final grade, consisting of 3"-0 crushed, well graded rock with less than 10% of the material passing the No. 200 sieve. The 3"-0 rock shall be capped with at least S-inches of 3/4" or 1"-0 crushed aggregate. All imported granular material shall be compacted to at least 95% of the material's maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Method 0-1557, and tested to measure compliance. Granular fill materials not suitable for standard field density testing shall be proof-rolled every 12-inches in thickness with a loaded 10 cubic yard dump-truck or equivalent piece of equipment. Fill/Cut Slopes Although not anticipated, and fill and/or cut slopes shall be constructed no steeper than 2:1 (horizontal:vertical) and shall be compacted to their outer edge by either back rolling or being over built and cut to grade. All slopes shall be protected with erosion control measures and surface water shall not be allowed to drain over the top of a slope. Foundations shall be placed such that there is at least 5 lateral feet from the face of slope or outside a 1: 1 plane projected from the toe of slope, whichever is greater. Excavations Utility excavations in the fine grain soils should stand near vertical up to 4 feet in depth. These soils may be classified as OSHA Type A. Excavations into the expected underlying sand/gravel zone will be prone to caving and are designated as an OSHA Type B soil. Drainage A complete site drainage system is expected to be engineered; drainage from and onto adjacent properties should be considered in the design, particularly if existing elevations are altered. Foundations constructed below grade may require footing drains and shall be determined in the field. On-site disposal of storm water runoff may be feasible; however, site infiltration testing was not included in our work scope. The near surface fine grain soils are expected to have a low rate of infiltration, which should increase near the Bar-Run. Date Received: AUG 1 0 2010 Original Submittal I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Geotechnical Investigation Report East Side Baptist Church Springfield, Oregon Page 8 Soil Bearing Capacity Based on the site observations, conventional spread footings are expected to be constructed for the proposed site building. After conformance with the subgrade preparation recommendations herein, foundation areas shall be covered with a separation fabric (woven geotextile meeting AASHTO M288-00 or equivalent) and at least 8-inches compacted crushed aggregate. The fabric and aggregate cap shall extend at least 12-inches beyond all sides of the footings. The aggregate shall consist of a crushed 1.5"-0 or 3/4"-0 aggregate compacted to at least 95% of the material's. maximum dry density at determined by ASTM Method 0-1557. The allowable soil bearing capacity of the soil subgrade at least 2-feet below existing surface grade and prepared as described herein is 1,500 psf, and may be increased 500 psf for short-term wind and seismic loading. The coefficient of friction for concrete poured neat against native soil is 0.35 and 0.50 for crushed aggregate layers at least 8- inches thick. Perimeter landscape grades shall be sloped away from all foundations and water should not be allowed to pond near footings. The following recommendations shall be implemented in the design and construction of the project. Periodic site observations by a geotechnical representative of BEl is recommended during the construction of the project; the specific phases of construction that should be observed are: Table 3: Recommended Construction Phases to be Observed by the Geotechnical Engineer At completion of building pad excavation On-site observation of subgrade soil before aggregate placement Imported fill material Observation of material or information on material type and source Placement or Compaction of fill material Observation by geotechnical engineer or test results by qualified testing agency Date Received: AUG 1 0 2010 Original Submittal I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Geotechnical Investigation Report Proposed Hotel Site - Crescent Av & Suzanne Way Eugene, Oregon BEl Project No. 07-259 Page 9 Slab-On-Grade The subgrade areas to be overlain by load bearing concrete slabs shall be prepared as described for foundation areas except that the slabs shall be underlain by at least 12- inches of compacted crushed aggregate. The concrete slabs shall be designed using a modulus of subgrade reaction (k) of 150 Ib/in3 The use of a vapor barrier below interior concrete slabs is at the discretion of the designer, and generally based on the use of the room above the slab and/or the floor covering material. Settlement Specific building foundation loading was not available at the time of this report, but loads are not expected to exceed 3 kif for walls loads or 50 kips for column loads. Site specific consolidation testing was not performed; however, based on field testing and observations, the estimated total settlement is not expected to exceed 3/4-inch and differential settlement is not expected to exceed 1/2-inch over spans of 20 feet. A portion of the settlement is expected to occur during the construction phase of the project; however, due to the fine-grain soils below the site settlement will occur over a longer time period as pore water migrates due to additional loading on the soil. Pavement Design The parking lot area and driveway are expected to be generally subjected to light vehicle traffic; however, the following design considers occasional equipment delivery and service vehicles, as well as emergency vehicles up to 80,000 pounds. Based on this criteria and a 20-year design life with a 75% reliability, and incorporating the 2003 revised Asphalt Pavement Design Guide (Asphalt Pavement Association of Oregon) and AASHTO design methods, BEl recommends a nominal thickness of 3 inches of asphalt concrete over 8 inches of crushed aqqreqate in parkinq areas and 3.5 inches of asphalt concrete over 10 inches of crushed aqqreqate in driveways. The crushed aggregate base shall be compacted to 95% of the materials maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Method D 1557. A woven geotextile separation fabric, meeting AASHTO M288-00 or equivalent, shall be placed between soil subgrade and the base aggregate. The geotextile fabric may be waived and the base rock thickness reduced should subgrade excavation reveal bar-run material. Such a decision shall be made by the field engineer at the time of excavation activities. 7.0 REPORT LIMITATIONS This report has presented BEl's site observations and research, subsurface explorations, geotechnical engineering analyses, and recommendations faci'f@ Received: AUG 1 0 2010 Original Submittal I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Geotechnical Investigation Report Proposed Hotel Site - Crescent Av & Suzanne Way Eugene, Oregon BEl Project No. 07-259 Page 10 proposed site development. The conclusions in this report are based on the conditions described in this report and are intended for the exclusive use of the East Side Baptist Church and their representatives for use in design and construction of the development described herein. The analysis and recommendations may not be suitable for other structures or purposes. Services performed by the geotechnical engineer for this project have been conducted with the level of care and skill exercised by other current geotechnical professionals in this area under similar budget and time constraints. No warranty is herein expressed or implied. The conclusions in this report are based on the site conditions as they currently exist and it is assumed that the limited site locations that were physically investigated generally represent the subsurface conditions at the site. Should site development or site conditions change, or if a substantial amount of time goes by between our site investigation and site development, we reserve the right to review this report for its applicability. If you have any questions regarding the contents of this report, or if we can be of further assistance, please contact our office. Date Received: AUG 1 0 2010 Original Submittal I I I I I I I I I I I I , ~ " , I ~ i ~ " , u , o i ~ TAX MAP /7-02-3/-/-4. ~ " " " ....0 I' .. .~ I ". A, /'" ",)I' " TAX LOT ~ 1 40 I 1""......... I o 80 CALE: 1" = 80' Date Received: AUG 1 0 2010 ,~ Original Subfllittal-, ~ Branch EngIneerIng, inc. 310 Fifth Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 (541)746-0637 FAX (541)746-0389 branchadmin@branchengineering,com . Structures . Transportation . Surveying PROJECT No,09-060 ~ I APPENDIX A BORJNG LOG SUMMARJES, NEAR.BY WELL LOGS, & WEB SOIL SURVEY Date Received: AUG 1 0 2010 Original Submittal I I SOIL CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA AND TERMINOLOGY I I Classification of Terms and Content USCS Grain Size NAME: MINOR Constituenls (12-50%); MAJOR .' Fines <#200 (.075 mm) Constituents (>50%); Slightly (5-12%) Sand Fine #200 - 1140 (.425 mn Relative Density or ConsistencY Medium 1140 - #10 (2 mm) Color Coarse #10 - #4 (4.75) . Moisture Content Gravel Fine 114 - 0.75 nch Plastidty Coarse 0.75 inch - 3 inches Trace Constituents (O-S%) Cobbles 3 to 12 inches; Other. Grain Shape, Approximate gradation, scattered <15% est, Organics, Cement, Structure, Odor.... numerous >15% est Geologic Name or F-ormaUon: (Fill, WiUarnette Silt, Till, Boulders > 12 inches Alluvium,on) Relative Density or Consistency Granular Material Fine-Grained (cohesive) Materials SPT SPT T orvane tst Pocket Pen tsf Manua.l Penetration Test N-Value Densitv N-Value Shear Strenath Unconfined . Consrstencv <2 <0.13 >0.25 Very Soft Easy several inches by fist 0-4 Vemoose 2-4 0.13 - 0.25 0.25 - 0.50 Soft Easv several inches by thumb 4 -10 Loose 4-8 0.25 - 0.50 0.50 -1.00 Medium Stiff Moderate several inches by thumb 10 - 30 Medium Dense 8 -15 0.50 -1.00 1.00 - 2.00 Stiff Readily indented by thumb 30 - 50 Dense 15 -30 1.00 - 2.00 2.00 - 4.00 Very Stiff Readily indented by thumbnaif >50 VerY Dense >30 >2.00 >4.00 Hard Difficult by thumbnail Moisture Content Structurll Dry: Absence of rooisture. d.usty, dry to the touch . Stratified:' Alternating layers of materia' or Ollor >6 mm thick . Damp: Some moisture but leaves no moisture on hand laminated: Alternating layers < 6 mm thick Moist: leaves moisture on hand . FISsured: Breaks along detinate fr.3ctUre planes Wet Visible free Water, likelY from below water table Slickensided:- Striated, p"6fished. or glossy fracture planes Plasticity Dry Strength Dilatancy Toughness Blocky: Cohesive soil that can be broken doYm into sma" . Non to low angular lumps whidl resist further breakdO'Nn ML Non to low Slow to Rapid Low, can't roll lenses: "Has small pockets of different soils, note thickness . . CL Low to Med. Mc..>-dlum to High None to Slow Medium Homogeneous: Same roror and appearance throughout MH Med to High low to Medium None 10 Slow Low to Medium CH Mod to Hioh Hioh to V. HiOh None HJoh Unified Soil Classification Chart Nisual-Manual Procedurel (Similar to ASTM Designation "0-2488) Major Divisions Group Typical Names Svrnbols Coarse Gravels: 50% Clean GW Welt <Jr.:lded cravels and aravel-sand mixtures little or no fines Grained or.more Gravels GP Pooc1v-Qraded qravels and qravel~sand mixtures, little or no fines Soils; retained on Gravels GM Siftv oravels, ~ravel-sand-silt mixtures More than . the No.4 sieve 'Nith Fines GC . Qavey oravels. aravel-sand-d_ay mixtures 50% retained Sands: more Clean SW Well--graded sands and gravelly sands. little or no fines on No. 200 than 50% Sands SP Poorlv-=<Jraded sands and gravellv sands, litUe or no fines sieve passing the Sands SM snty sands, sand-silt mixtures No.4 Sieve with Fines SC Clayey sands, sand-day mixtures Fine-Grained Silt and Clays ML InorQanic silts rock flour davev silts Soils: CL Inorganic dayS of low 10 medium!: lasticitv, gravelly days, sandy days, lean d~ys 50% or more low Plasticity Fines OL . Oroanic silt and oraanicsiltv days of low olasti~ Passes No. Sill a"nd Oays MH Inorganic silts, clayey silts 200 Sieve CH Inorganic days of high plasticity, fat days High Plasticity Fines OH Organic. days of medium to hioI!B.1asticitv Hi hly OrQanic Soils PT Peat, muck, and other hiohlv orqanic soils I I I I I I I I I I I I I Date Received: I AUG 1 0 2010 ." Original Submittal I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BORING LOG No. 1 Project Name: ESSe Project No. 09-060 Date of Log: 4-9-09 Logged by: RJD ~ Branch Engineering, Inc. Depth Sample In-situ Free USCS Soil Description by ASTM 02488 Methods (Ft) Type Moisture Swell Content (%) (%) 0 Continuous o to 12" Topsoil Drive Very moist, dark brown silty clay 1 Probe 12" to 60" Alluvium (Os) 2 Moist, brown silty Clay 45.6 15 Pocket penetrometer = 1.5tst 3 Vane Shear = 30 ft-Ib 4 5 ~ Ground water @ 5.5' Gravels to 1.5" diameter 6 7 Sandy gravels, dense, wet 8 9 10 - 11 Med-grain sand lense l' thick 12 13 Saturated sand lense l' thick 14 15 16 Total Depth = 15 feet 17 Ground Water Level at 5.5' 18 19 20 21 Date Recei\ ."A' ft h Page 10t 1 nuu~ ed: Original Submittal I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BORING LOG No. 2 Project Name: ESSe Project No. 09-060 Date of Log: 4-9-09 Logged by: RJD ~ B....anch Engineering, Inc. Depth Sample In-situ Free USCS Soil Description by ASTM 02488 Methods (Ft) Type Moisture Swell Content (%) (%) 0 (Continuous o to 30" Topsoil Drive Very moist, dark brown silty clay 1 Probe 2 30" to 96" Alluvium (Os) 3 28.9 30 Moist, brown silty Clay mottled with grey 4 Pocket penetrometer = 1.5tsf Vane Shear = 25 ft-Ib 5 6 ~ Ground water @ 6' 7 8 Fine - Med 9rain sand 9 Rounded gravels to 1" diameter Very moist, dense 10 11 Fine grain sand 12 Gravels 13 14 15 16 Total Depth = 15 feet Ground Water Level at 6' 17 18 19 Date Received 20 AUG 1 0 2010 21 Original Submittal Page 10f 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BORING LOG No. 4 Project Name: ESSe Project No. 09-060 Date of Log: 4-9-09 Logged by: RJD ~ Branch Engineer-ing, Inc. Depth Sample In-situ Free USCS Soil Description by ASTM 02488 Methods (Ft) Type Moisture Swell Content ("!o) ("!o) 0 Continuous o to 12" Topsoil Drive Very moist, dark brown silty clay 1 Probe 12" to 24" Alluvium (Os) 2 Slightly moist, light brown silty Clay Pocket penetrometer = 1.0tsf 3 Vane Shear = 18 ft-Ib 4 Rounded gravels at 2.5' Dry, dense gravels 5 ~ Ground water @ 5' 6 7 Fine to Med-grain sand lense 8" thick 8 9 10 11 Total Depth = 10 feet Ground Water level at 5' 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Date Recei' ed: 21 AUG10200 Page 10f 1 Original Submittal I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BORING LOG No. 5 Project Name: ESSe Project No. 09-060 Date of Log: 4-9-09 Logged by: RJD ~ Branch Enginef;!ring. Inc. Depth Sample In-situ Free USCS Soil Description by ASTM 02488 Methods 1Ft) Type Moisture Swell Content (%) (%) 0 Continuous o to 20" Topsoil Drive Moist, brown, stiff clay 1 Probe 12" to 24" Alluvium (Os) 2 29.7 20 Slightly moist, light brown silty Clay Pocket penetrometer = 1.5tsf 3 Vane Shear = 19 ft-Ib 4 Rounded sandy gravels. ~ Slightly moist, dense 5 ~ Ground water @ 4.5' 6 7 8 9 10 11 Total Depth = 10 feet Ground Water Level at4.5' 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Date Received: 19 20 AUG 1 0 2010 21 Original Submittal I Page 10f 1 .....- . - - - v- ~ ~ N ~ 502440 44' 3'," 0 ;; ) ~ ~, ~ ~ 5' 0 !!. Q) l';/) 3> CD 0 c: c= ~ en N cr ::0 ~ 3 ~ - . ~ c::::>>44'2'~ i "" Q!, g < " = (I) '" 0- ~ N N ~ A - - - - 'so"p-Lan""'nIY Area, uregon- (East Side Bapli,t Church) - - - 502470 502500 502530 502560 502590 502620 502650 502680 g . ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ . 8 . ~ ~ . o ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . o ~ ~ ~ . o 2 ~ . g N ~ ~ 44'2'54" Map Scale: 1:1,490 ifprlnted on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet. o o Meters 80 120 Feel 200 300 20 40 50 100 USDA Natural Resources ~ - Conservation Service Web Soii SUNey 2.1 National Cooperative Soil Survey 4/8/2009 Page 1013 I Soil Map--Lane County Area, Oregon East Side Baptist Church I I Map Unit legend I Lane County Area, Oregon (OR637) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 6 Awbrig-Urban land complex 1.6 20.0% 101 Oxley-Urban land complex 6.4 80.0% Totals for Area of Interest 8.0 100.0% I I I I I I I I I I I I I I USDA ""'= Date Received: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey 2.1 National Cooperative Soil Survey 4/8/2009 AUG 1 0 2010 Page 3 of 3 I Original submittal I Map Unit Description: Awbrig-Urban land complex-lane County Area, Oregon East Side Baptist Church I I Lane County Area, Oregon 6-Awbrig-Urban land complex I Map Unit Setting Elevation: 90 to 1,300 feet Mean annual precipitation: 30 to 60 inches Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 55 degrees F Frost-free period: 160 to 235 days I I Map Unit Composition Awbrig and similar soils: 55 percent Urban land: 30 percent Minor components: 8 percent I Description of Awbrig Setting Landfonn: Stream terraces Landfonn position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: linear Across-slope shape: linear Parent material: Silty and clayey alluvium derived from mixed sources I I I Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 0 to 11 inches Frequency of flooding: Rare Frequency of ponding: None Availabte water capacity: Moderate (about 8.1 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4w Land capability (nonlITigated): 4w Typical profile o to 7 inches: Silly clay loam 7 to 29 inches: Clay 29 to 60 inches: Silly clay loam I I I I I Description of Urban Land Interpretive groups Land capability (nonirrigated): 8 I Minor Components Bashaw Perceni of map uni/: 4 percent Date Received: I USDA --=-= Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey 2_1 National Cooperative Soil Survey 4/8/2009 Page 1 of2 I Original Submittal I I Map Unit Description: Oxley-Urban land complex-Lane County Area, Oregon East Side Baptist Church I I Lane County Area, Oregon 101-Qxley-Urban land complex I I Map Unit Setting Elevation: 170 to 800 feet Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 60 inches Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 54 degrees F Frost-free period: 165 to 210 days I Map Unit Composition Oxley and similar soils: 45 percent Urban land: 40 percent Minor components: 5 percent I Description of Oxley Setting Landform: T effaces Landform position (three-<1imensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Concave Across-slope shape: Concave Parent material: Mixed gravelly alluvium Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr) Depth to water lable: About 6 to 18 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water capacity: Moderate (about 6.6 inches) Interpretive groups Land capabIlity classification (imgated): 3w Land capability (nonilTigated): 3w Typical profile o to 17 inches: Gravelly silt loam 17 to 23 inches: Gravelly clay loam 23 to 41 inches: Very gravelly clay loam 41 to 60 inches: Extremely gravelly sandy loam I I I I I I I I Description of Urban Land Interpretive groups Land capability (nonilTigated): 8 I Minor Components Courtney Percent of map unit: 5 percent Date Received: I AUG 1 0 2010 USDA ~ Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey 2_1 National Cooperative Soil Survey OrigillClI GubFl1ittal--.ram09 Page 1 of2 I I I Map Unit Description: Oxley-Urban land complex-Lane County Area, Oregon East Side Baptist Church I I Landform: Depressions Data Source Information I Soil Survey Area: Survey Area Data: Lane County Area, Oregon Version 6, Dee 22, 2006 I I I I I I I I I I I I Date Received: AUG 1 0 2010 I I USDA ~ Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey 2_1 National Cooperative Soil Survey Original subrnittr,;i_~=~ 4/8/2009 Page 2 of2 I Diameter From To Gauge Sleel Plastic Welded Threaded ~ C.,ing. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Screen: 111 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Slot size Date Started '3 -IS -Slc. I ~ - lfH"J t:: S)~~ STATE OF OREGON GEOTECHNICAL HOLE REPORT (as required by OAR 690-240-035) I I Hole Numb" Df' - 4' I (1) OWNERfPROJECT: N=, WEYERHAEUSER CORP Add,,:.. 785 N 42ND ST c.ty SPRINGFIELD (2) TYPE OF WORK !Xl New 0 Deepening 0 Alteration (repair/recondition) [JG\bandonment (3) CONSTRUCTION: o ROTary Air 0 Hand Auger ORotary Mud o Cable Tool (4) TYPE OF HOLE: Stare OR Zip 97477 I o Hollow Stem Auger [){Push Probe DOther !XI Uncased Temporary r 0 Uncased Permanent \ (5) USE OF HOLE: o Cased Permanent o Slope STabilily 0 Other SOIL & WATER SAMPLE I (6) BORE HOLE CONSTRUCTION: .--\ Special Construction approval DYes [}t-lo Depth of Completed Hole ~t. I HOLE SEAL Diameler From To Malerial From To Sacks or pounds LiSs I I' I Backfill placed from -D-. ft. to -..ZZ:. Fe Filter Pack placed from _ fl. to fr. M"'rial BENTON IT Size of pack I (7) CASING/SCREEN: f. (8) WELL TESl: o Pump o Bailer Permeability I Conductivity Temperature of Water Was water analysis done? 0 Yes I By whom? Depth of strata analyzed. From Remarks: DAir Yield o Flowing Artesian GPM PH 50 <bI: ONo Depth artesian flow found _ f1. h.to I " ." ,. (9) LOCATION OF HOLE by legal description: County LANE Latitude Longitude TownshiR 1 7 S N or S Range 2 W E or W. WM. Section 31 NE 1/4 NE 1/4 Tax Lot Lot Block Subdivision Street Address of Well (or nearest address) SAME Map with location identified must be attached (10) STATIC WATER LEVEL: . , ~ ~ 1 ft. below land surface. Date 3 -/s=-1'" Dale Anesian pressure (11) SUBSURFACE LOG: lb. per square inch Ground Elevation Material Descri tion WATER RESOURCES DEPT. SALEM OREGO Date Started 3 -/ SO " Date Comple'w 3-1S--'7<.. (12) ABANDONMENT LOG: Material Descri tion From To Sacks or Pounds 8 BENTONITE o Lz:.. Date Completed 3 -I S- -'7" PTOfessional Certification (to be signed by a licensed water supply or monitoring well construcTor. or registered geologist Or civil engineer). I accept responsibility fOr the construCTion, alteration. or abandonmenl work performed on during (he ,:;,mstruction dates reported above. All work performed during this time is in compliance with Oregon geotechnical hole construction standards. This report is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. ft. License or Registmtion Number 10347 S;gned"l ~, Date 'I~{-'7(P I#L- Affil;a,ion GEO-TECH EXPLORATIONS, INC I THIS REPORT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF WORK I ORIGINAL & FIRST COPY-WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT SECOND COPY-CONSTRUCTOR THIRD COP~)O~~to Original Submittal InstrucUon. for completing this report are on the last page of thll fonn. We" No. (6) LOCATION OF WELL 1Jy legal desc,iption Co Job No. 3977 County Town.hlp 17.00 S 1. NW 1/4 of HE 1/4 or above section. I STATE OF OREGON MONITORING WELL REPORT (a8 required by ORS 537.785 & OAR 690-240..(95) I f/I OWNER/PROJECT LANE Name I GREAT WESTERN CHEMICAL CO.; ZIMMERLI, LE Street "808 SW 15TH AVE City PORTLAND s.... OR Zip 97205 I (]) TYPE OF WORK k8J New ConstrueUon 0 Alter (ReeondIUon) 0 Alter (Repair) o Conversion [] Deepening 0 Abandonment I (Jl DR1H.1NG METHOD o Rotary Air 0 Rotary Mud U Cable I [8J Hollow Stem Auger Other - (4,) BORE HOLE CONSTRUCTION Special StandardaO Depth or completed well II D~~~~~~ T01~ 19 It I Vault o It 1 TO It Jonument It TO It ~In End Material Material Depth Depth Amount Units ~oncrete I [l!:l!g I 1.0~ ~ [J1j IHentonlte I~I 7.0~ ~ [J1j CesIng Diameter UnerO Ca.lng Beilin End Con.truction Location << D1~te( OapttOapth Gaugt Uat.rt.1 Weld ThrMdad Of Shoe ~~DD Drlastlc 11111 D I Seal I TO It It I rom moun ea nl Grout Iller Pack 7 It T~. J Screen 0 DI"""I~ I .rom ~ptlen.. D.~;DS"I I FDter PaCk Material SA Size 20.00 In. lermeabllity onductMty YIeld PH Temperatureofwater 55 -F/C OeptharteslanftowfOUnd tea water analy.r. done? 0 y Whom? TIM O'GARA Depth of strata to be analyzed. From n. to lema~ lame of supeNl,'ng Geologl.VEnglneer It It { 57336 Received Date Well 10 Tag# Start Card # 08/16/1999 L 33563 122861 Range 2.00W Section 31 legal Oesc: 2. Either Street address of well location 3600 COMMERCIAL AVE, SPRINGFIELD; ALSO TL 2 or Tax lot number ofwellloca.tion 2700 3. ATTACH MAPWIl1-llOCATlONIOENTlFIEO. Map wi ~approxi'nate acalellndnortherrow. mSTATIC WATER LEVEL 9.0 Fl below land surface. IbIsq.ln. Dale 07/26/1999 Artesian Pressure Date (8) WATER BEARING ZONES Depth at which water was first found 9ft. I From ~ To 1 ~ Esl Flow ~te SWl ~ (9) WELl. I.OG .Ground elevation ft. ~~~::, rn Date started 07/26/1999 Completed 07/26/1999 (unhonded) Monitor Wl!ll Con.vtructor Certification: I certify d1at the work I performed on the conatruction, alteratlon, or abandonment of this weU Is In compliance with Oregon well construction standards. Materials used and information reported above are true to the best knowledge and belief. MWC Number 10410 Signed By ARMANDO PABLO Date (bonded) MonItor Well Const,uctor C~_ . ,r!' I accept responsibility for the construction, alterati~~~eJ}'~rMrined on this well during the construction dates reported above. All wOO< performed during this time I. In oompllance with Oregon weD ""nslrocllon '''nd~'GTI1i'I'IP<>Mloll"e to !he best of my knowledge and belief. AU lULU I MWC Number 10011 Signed By GREG MCINNIS Original Sullmittal___ I( I If lo-.'(\~ ~-'3~2 -S/~33. SITE MAP 513~~-. 5;/3?J.., I! S & I~)'HI ef:} IJ. J.g ~o r 1 ~IO.. . '( I - . Il+ Ul I\~ :d rf Q1 (:) "f~ e> c:::J I """6 <-.J ! \0 ,. I J ~ (1J ~ I :l -l I I I I 3(,00 Q.On\lLcc.~a.ll S+ Date Received: e I J. ;). 8' 59 AUG 1 0 2010 Original Submittal e 1J..d...~ 58 ~e · - ~cJ Sf- -.. ---- 20 L2L"ON Bv:~O 66. 9L/BO - 6SLv269 SNOrl~~O'dX3H)31039 1ST ATE OF OREGON GEOTECHNICAL HOLE REPORT LA~E 56745 Reeaived da'e 03/05/1999 (as required by OAR 690-240.035) I Hole No. Co.Job No. B-1 o AIte, (RecolUllOon) {gJ Abandonment o Alter (Repair) County Lane Township 17.00 S Section 31 Tax lot Legal dese: Street Address of Well (or nearest address) SAME latitude n longitude 2.00 W SE 1/4 I Name MARSHALL'S OIL & INSULATION SOee' 4131 EST City SPRINGFIELD Sta'e OR Z;p 97477 I (z) TYPE OF WORK l8J New o Deeponlng Range NE1/4 lot Block SubdivisIon I MAP with location indentified must be attached (JOISTATIC WATER LEVEL o Rotary AI' .0 Rotary Mud o Hand Auger o Cable Tool o Hollow Stem Auger [8J Push Probe Other ft. below land surface. Date Artesian Pressure Iblsq.ln. Date I (41 TYPE OF HOLE IZI Uncased Temporary 0 Cased Permanent o Unused Permanent 0 Slope Stability Other I(~I USE OF HOLE (J 11 SUBSURFACE LOG Ground Elevation fl I M~MI ~~~~y GRAVELS I Fn>n ~~ 1(61 BORE HOLE CONSTRUCTION Special Standards 0 Depth of completed well 18 It HOLE I SEAL OIls I Backfill placed from Filter pack placed from 1(71 CASING/SCREEN It TO It TO fl Material ft. Size in. Date started 02/05/1999 Completed 02105/1999 (111 ABANDONMENT LOG I I Screen 0 I Date started Completed (111 WELL TEST t?enneabllily onductMly Temperature of water "FIe Depth artesian now found ft. Professional Certification (to be ~Igned .bY. a Ii~nsed water suppty or monitoring weU constructor, or registered geologist or eml engmeer). I accept responslblUty for lhe construction, alteration or abandonment work perfOrmed on this well during the construction dates reported abOve. All work perfOrmed durlng this time is in compliance with Oregon geotechnical hole construction standards this report is true to the best of my knowledge and belfef. . Yield GPM PH ri"as water anlllysl~ done? ~y Whom? Depth of strata to be analyzed. From o ruo It License or Registration Number 10347 re=~ Name of supervising Geologist/Engineer Signed By THOMAS WILSON Dat~atReceived: Affiliation GEO TECH EXPLORATIONS I THIS REPORT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF COMPlETION OF WORK Original Submittal I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOTECHEXPLORATIONS 6924759 ,.:, 03/14 '99 20:55 NO.646 U~ SITE MAP 2('i Ifr 1>(I'^j {;e.\J Geo -(0)1\ \-. (,l. V'-"--' [ ([1 L{ L.. L(<:'- ::> '/Lt'l) . J 8u\ Id'( V'j --. --~ '113 { E S{..r-e~ f- p ~ P: r~ rn:~;:< I I /" :r~l doo<.> 'Bull d\ 1\.,\ ..J.-.--- ~------- . . " ,. .1,,: ~ ti. . :'~ ;~~"".' .,:"~> \':' . ..i, "'\;~" ..' . -?=;" . ..;"U;r - '\'l. ....; ~ ~ ('oJ , ~ \-^ T Date Received: AU6 , 0 2010 .'!"I','.;r,i-,.;,. Ori~Ubmittai 'd~. .....;c. "_"'.j:.. ...Ii"" ' ..'~'),..... . ~c. .,,:':i/f,:';;}[' , -.L'r. f/ !.. ...... 1 1 I: 1 1 1 I, 1 'I I, I I,', 1 .,' " I", I, -" ..~ ," 1 ..' I I', 1 ," " 7.;. ,'> "," ,".' " , " " " " " , ' , "".. ,', " .j., ....,.. . ~ .: ~, . . " " c' ',' ',' ~ 1 ,-, " ",i.- .... , ' I~ J.., .,t. '-'", " ,,' ~ , " ' :, ," , , ::., " " " .",-. ," " -' " .r " " '.<'. '''', /\ -.,,,' . . ~' " " '. " " '" . ,..' ': \." ," d, '" " "'t .f " " " , ", .... ,;1, " " "'. '" " ,,' ..: " ", " " , ',', " '" I," .\.. ,-,