The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication APPLICANT 7/23/2010 City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 . . Development Issues Meeting (DIM) Required Project Information . (Applicant: complete this section) Prospective A licant Name: Ken Maddox Phone: (541 746-2426 Com an : Address: Hamilton Construction Co. Fax: (541) 746-7635 P.O. Box 659, S rinnfield, Ore 'on 97477-0121 Prospective A licant's Re .. Micheal M. Reeder Phone: (541 484-0188 Com an : Address: Arnold Gallaaher Percell Roberts & Potter, PC Fax: (541 484-0536 P.O. Box 1758, Eunene, Ore on 97440-1758 Owner: clo Jim Walsh Phone: (541) 746-8411 Com an Address: Rosboro. LLC Fax: (541 746-7224 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 18-02-06-00 TAX LOT NO S 1004 28th Street south of F Street 7.38 Acres [gJ S uare Feet D Description of Pro osal: Existin Use: # of Lots/Parcels: If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Detennine the abilit to use ro eft for the outdoor stara e ofbridoe construction material under current zonin J . Lot/Parcel Size: nla nla du/acre Prospective Applicant: k--JA . Signature Y2------- Date: 7/22/2010 Micheal M. Reeder, Attorney for Prospective Applicant Print Required Project Information . (City Intake Staff: complete this section) Case No.: NWID- Reviewed b : ~ A lication Fee: $ (;;)(. OD bd-I. cJU Technical Fee: $0 Posta Date R ceiVAr!' PR01E'l:T NUMBER: 3 2010 e Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: c, Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian Original Submittal 1 of 3 · ARNOLD GALLAGHER PE~ELL ROBERTS & POTTER A Professional Corporation ATTORNEYS AT LAW 800 U.s. Bank Center 800 Willamette Street Eugene, OR 97401 Telephone: (541) 484-0188 Facsimile: (541) 484-0536 E-Mail: mreeder@agsprp.com lNW\N.arnoldgallagher .com Correspondence: P.O. Box 1758 Eugene, OR 97440-1758 MICHEAL M. REEDER July 23, 2010 City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 Re: Development Issues Meeting - 5 Questions Hamilton Construction Co. Please Refer to Our File: 15457-66 Ladies and Gentlemen: This office represents Hamilton Construction Co. CHamilton") and Rosboro, LLC CRosboro"). Rosboro currently owns the property subject to this DIM located at 28th Street and south of F Street, Map 18-02-06-00, Tax Lot 1004 (the "Subject Property"). The Subject Property is approximately 7.38 acres and is currently used by Rosboro as a log yard. Rosboro desires to sell the Subject Property to Hamilton by the end of August 2010. Hamilton desires to purchase the Subject Property and use it for the outdoor storage of wood and steel construction material used in the construction of bridges as part of its normal construction business operations (the "Proposed Use"). No structures would be proposed on the Subject Property at this time. The Subject Property is currently zoned Heavy Industrial (HI) and is designated by the Metro Plan as Commercial. In addition, the Subject Property has been proposed to be designated Light Medium Industrial under the draft Springfield 2030 Refinement Plan (the "SRP"). Hamilton and Rosboro both wish to receive confirmation from the City that such a use is a permitted use under the current land use regulations and that such a use would continue to be permitted should the SRP designate the Subject Property as Light Medium Industrial. To that end, representatives from both Hamilton and Rosboro will participate in the DIM. Date Received: JUL 2 3 2010 OrIginal Submittal Development service~epartment July 23, 2010 Page 2 . Question I. Is the Proposed Use permitted in the HI zone? Question 2. Is the Proposed Use permitted in the Community Commercial, CC zone? Question 3a. If the Proposed Use is permitted in the HI zone, and the Subject Property is designated Commercial by the Metro Plan Designation, is the Proposed Use still allowed under this plan/zone "conflict"? Question 3b. Similarly, if the Proposed Use is permitted in the HI zone, and the Subject Property is redesignated Light Medium Industrial by the SRP, would the Proposed Use still be permitted under this "new" plan/zone "conflict"? Question 4a. If the Proposed Use is not permitted in the HI zone, but is permitted in the CC zone, does the fact that the Subject Property is designated Community Commercial, CC permit the Proposed Use? Question 4b. Similarly, if the Proposed Use is not permitted in the HI zone, but is permitted in the Light-Medium Industrial (LMI) zone, would the Proposed Use be permitted if the Subject Property is designated Light Medium Industrial? Question 5. Is site plan review required for the Proposed Use (i.e. no structures proposed, rather just outdoor storage of material to construct bridges)? Thank you for your cooperation in this important matter. Very truly yours, A))'A. Micheal M. Reeder MMR:jgh cc: Clients N:\F - J\Hamilton Construction 15457\28th and F ] 5457-66\DIM 5 Questions.doc Date Received: JUL 2 3 2010 Original Submittal