The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNotice PLANNER 10/15/2008 (2) 51 DLc!D 'otice of Proposed Amendment . ..- _.._..._-_...-...._.....__...~--~_... ~:: in person D electronic D mailed D . A 'V' -{~ ~ THIS FORM MUST BE RECEIVED BY DLCD AT LEAST 45 DAYS PRIOR TO THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING PER ORS 197.610, OAR CHAPTER 660, DIVISION 18 11 t.. :M 1f.<1 For OLeO Use Only Jurisdiction: City of Springfield Date of First Evidentiary Hearing: 01/21/2009 Local File Number: LRP2008-00013 Date of Final Hearing: 03/02/2009 Is this a REVISION to a previously submitted proposal? DYes ~No Date submitted: 10/15/2008 ~ Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment ~ Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment D Land Use Regulation Amendment D Zoning Map Amendment D New Land Use Regulation D Urban Growth Boundary Amendment ~ Transportation System Plan Amendment D Other: Briefly Summarize Proposal. Do not use technical terms. Do not write "See Attached"(limit 500 characters): Revise Table and Map of finalized contained projects by adding project #27 SR 126 and Main Street and project #30 SR 126 and 52nd Street; deleting these same projects from the future project list and maps; These tables and maps are adopted into both the Comprehensive Plan and the Transportation System Plan. Has sufficient information been included to advise DLCD of the effect of proposal? ~Yes, text is included For Map Changes: Include 8Y:z"x11" maps of Current and Proposed designation. ~ Yes, Maps included Plan map changed from: To: Zone map changed from: To: Location of property (do not use Tax Lot): SR 126 and Main Street; SR 126 and 520d Street Previous density: New density: Applicable statewide planning goals: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 DDDDDDDD~~~~DDDDD.DD Is an exception to a statewide planning goal proposed? D YES ~ NO Goals: Acres involved: onOT, Eugene and Lane County Date Received ocn'a' 2008 Affected state or federal agencies, local governments or special districts (It is jUrisdictio~JJann~~~ n~~hese agencies. OLeO only records this information): Local Contact: Greg Mott Address: 225 Fifth Street Fax Number: 726-368--9 Phone: 726-377-4 Extension: City: Springfield Zip: 97477- E-mail Address:gmott@ci.springfield.or.us . . . . OLeo file No. Date Received OCT 1 5 2008 Planner: BJ . . . . SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS This form must be received bv DLCD at least 45 davs prior to the first evidentiary hearin!! per ORS 197.610 and OAR Chapter 660, Division 18 I. This form must be submitted by local jurisdictions only (not by applicant). 2. When submitting, please print this form on light green paper. 3. Text: Submittal of a proposed amendment to the text of a comprehensive plan or land use regulation must include the text of the amendment and any other information the local government believes is necessary to advise DLCD of the effect of the proposal. "Text" means the specific language being added to or deleted from the acknowledged plan or land use regulations. A general description of the proposal is not adequate. Do not submit this form without supporting documentation. 4. Maps: Submittal of a proposed map amendment must also include a map of the affected area showing existing and proposed plan and zone designations. The map should be legible and on 8Y:. x II inch paper. Please provide the specific location of property, such as an address and/or tax lot number. Include text regarding background and/or the justification for the change, such as the application accepted by the local government. 5. Exceptions: Submittal of proposed amendments that involve a goal exception must include the proposed language of the exception. 6. Unless exempt by ORS 197.610(2), proposed amendments must be received at the DLCD's Salem office at least 45 days before the first evidentiary hearing on the proposal. (The clock begins on the day DLCD receives your proposal.) The first evidentiary hearing is usually the first public hearing held by the jurisdiction's planning commission on the proposal. 7. If you have an electronic copy of the proposal, we would like you to submit one electronic copy [email.CD. or upload to DLCD (for submittal instructions, see # 4)] and ONE PAPER COPY ofthe proposed amendment to: ATTENTION: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 635 CAPITOL STREET NE, SUITE 150 SALEM, OREGON 97301-2540 8. Electronic Submittals: One hard copy must be sent by mail or in person, but you may also submit an electronic copy, by either email.CD. or upload documents to us. You may access this website to upload documents: http://webserver.1cd.state.or.us/upload2/uploadForm1.php. If you submit documents to this website, please email Mara Ulloa at mara.ulloa@state.or.uswhenyou have sent your documents electronically. On the same day, please mail [l] hard copy to our office. 9. Need More Copies? You can now access these forms online at http://www.lcd.state.or.us/. Please print forms on 8-l/2xll green paper only. You may also call the DLCD Office at (503) 373-0050; or Fax your request to: (503) 378-5518; or Email your request to mara.uIloalalstate.or.us . htlP:/ /www.lcd.state.or.us/LCD/forms.shtml Date Received Updated SepteIjlb"r 4;, 2008 U ell ;) zuoa Planner: BJ . . . . AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: October 6, 2008 Meeting Type: Regular Session Department: Development Services Staff Contact: Gregory Matt S P R I N G FIE L D Staff Phone No: 726-3774 C IT Y CO U N C I L Estimated Time: 10 Minutes ITEM TITLE: COUNCIL lNITIA TION OF AMENDMENTS TO TRANSPLAN AND THE METRO PLAN TO MOVE PROJECT #27 (SR-126 AT MAlN STREET) AND PROJECT #30 (SR-126 AT 52ND STREET) FROM THE FUTURE PROJECT LIST (TABLE 1 b) TO THE FINANCIALLY CONSTRAINED 20- YEAR CAPITAL INVESTMENT ACTIONS ROADWAY PROJECTS LIST (TABLE 1 a); AND REMOVE THESE SAME TWO PROJECTS FROM THE FUTURE ROADWAY PROJECTS MAP AND PLACE THEM ON THE FINANCIALLY CONSTRAINED ROADWAY MAP, APPENDIX "A" OF TRANSPLAN. ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of the following motion: Move to initiate amendments to TransPlan and the Metro Plan to move Project #27 and Project #30 from the Future Project List (Table lb) to the 20-year Fiscally Constrained Capital Investment Action Roadway Project List (Table la); and remove these projects from the Future Roadway Map and add them to the Financially Constrained Roadway Map in Appendix "A" of Trans Plan. ISSUE STATEMENT: The region is in the midst of updating TransPlan to achieve consistency with the federal Regional Transportation Plan (RTP); to achieve compliance with the state Transportation Planning Rule; and to coordinate the efforts of Eugene and Springfield as each city develops a local transportation system plan. These two projects were added to the constrained list of the RTP several months ago; they need to be included in TransPlan now and ultimately be included in Springfield's new local Transportation System Plan. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Table la of TransPlan 2. Table Ib of TransPlan 3. Financially Constrained Roadway Map, Appendix "A" of TransPlan 4. Future Roadway Projects Map, Appendix "A" of Trans Plan DISCUSSION/ FINANCIAL IMPACT: These two projects have been identified as "future projects" since the mid-1980s. The need for these projects is equal parts safety and congestion management. The intersection at 520d is one of only two signalized, at-grade intersections (Beltline @ Roosevelt) on the state's 55 mph expressway system in this region. Both of these intersections operate near or beyond ODOT mobility standards; both of these intersections experience an average number of accidents, primarily rear ends. In addition to mobility and safety issues, there are more than 1,000 acres of vacant buildable lands within the City's UGB in this area that will generate thousands of future trips through these intersections. Failure to make these improvements may have profound effects on the City's ability to provide the necessary transportation infrastructure to support planned growth. Date Received OCT 6 2008 Planner: 8J . . . . Chapter 3: Table la-Financially Constrained . 20-Year Capital Investment Actions: Roadway Projects Name Geographic Limits Description Estimated 'Jurisdiction Cost Length Number Project Category: New Arterial Link or Interchange Status: Programmed Jasper Road Extension MaIn Slreet to Jasper Conslruct4-lane erterla/; we County Rced . phasing to be determined; Improve RR X-Ing el Jasper Rd; at grade Interlm Improveme~; grade seperetion long-range Improvemenl $10,400,000 3.2 66 Tony Stree.t Royal Avenue to Construct new 2 to 3-Iene Eugene Roosevel180ulevard urban faolllty Seneca Road to 8el1llne W 11111 - Garfield: 4-lene OOOT Aced new construction; pending Completion 01 a study of Transportation Improvemenls In Wesl Eugene $1,116,000 0.44 487 West Eugene Parkway, (lA) $17,283,000 1.3 336 Status Sub- Total $28,799,000 Status: Unprogrammed 8eltilne Highway west 11111 Avenue to Rooseva/lBoulevard Continue widening to 4 OOOT Ianas; new RR Xing, Interchange U WEP, grade separallon U Rooaevell end turn lanas on West 11111 Ave (OOOT: West 11111 Norlh C1ly Urnlls Stege 3) 2B1h Streel to 35111 5_1 Construol3-lene urben $17,000,000 1.14 312 Centennial 80ulevard Sprlngfleld $3,000,000 O.S 930 ADD PRO..lECTS 27 & 30 TO THIS TABLE Date Received OCT 6 2008 Planner: BJ TransP/an December 2001 Chapter 3, Page 14 ..:.._1:.0.;..,...._" ATTACHMENT 1 - 1 .- . . .) Chapter 3: Table Ib-Future (Beyond 20-Years) Capital Investment Actions: Roadway Projects .Name Geographic Limit! DescriptiOD Estimated Jurisdiction Cost Length Number Project Category: New Arterial Link or Interchange Status: Future Beaver Street Hunsaker Lane 10 Wilkes R.O.W Acqulsltlon. General Lane County $1,700,000 0.84 503 Arterlel Orlve construction. Eugene-Sprlngfield at Meln Street ConstlllCllnterchange OOOT $9,000,000 0 Highway (SR-126) OMsion Avenue Oelta Highway ID Beaver New frontage ItJ8d wi Lane County $4,005,000 0.89 512 Street Wlllamelle River Brldge . . et52nd Street Construct Interchange OOOT $9,000,000 0 30 ' .\ West Eugene Perkwey, (1 B) GaJ1leld Slree1 to Seneca W 11th - Gerfleld: 4-lene OOOT Road new construcUcn, continued: pending compleUon 01 . s1udy' 01 trensporteUon Improvemants In West Eugene $34,z!1,000 1.3 337 Status Sub-Total $57,936,000 Project Category Sub-Total $57,936,000 Date Received OCT 6 2008 . Planner: BJ REMOVE PROJECTS 27 & 30 FROM THIS TABLE TransPlen December 2001 Chapter 3, Page 30 ATTACHMENT 2 - 1 . . . . Legend ,"v' Urben Growth Boundary Programmed Intersections ... Added Fwy 1..anMfMa;or 1A.8f'Ct\ange Imps .. Arterial Capacity ImptO'llemenls _ StLdy Unprogrammed Intersect/ons . New Arterialllnk or IrUrchange . Added Fwy l..anesIMIjor Intetd1enge Imps Mertal Capaoty ImprovemerU J Study Programmed Projects N New Art8l'lalli1k Of Interchange N Added Fwy l.MesIMa;o.-lnterchange Imps N Arterial Capacity ImpmvemenlS N Urban Slandan:ls N Study Unprogrammed Projects I v New Arterial LIM or Interchange /., Added Fwy laneslMajor Interchange Imps /., MeriaI Capacity Improvements /", NewCollectOB I., Study I" Urban Standards '\ ~/ D Nodal Oevelopment A'eas ...~ ~ ~.v . ,,"~ , 787 .V~ ~ ..,.... r.r=-' ~.~~~--~)l> , -'- ""rro N . 747" \ ....... ~~. . . ) -- V "' \ . --- ......., " , ~ : ~5-'~ ~*'- .,...11........11.\0 ! 11'/ ~Ul..ANE '" ) j " f - .....L ._ otoIo......-:r--.J. - ; .- _-.~ --=-- ... ,..0-........ ,-;% .;;.F . m_ r- 303 , an#- I .. a .... , , ," \ '" ,--,--,-,-,- . I,. 1 " " \ , J "f" I {;, J Areas identified as nodal development areas are , conSidered to have potential for this type of land use pattern. Other areas not designated for nodal J development may be found to have potential for r nodal development. , "'. Y"'~ ~!~ 250 , ~ l :..I 1 ( , . ~" 11 .I ii TransPlan Fi nancially-Constrained Roadway Projects Eugene-Springfield Metro Area This map illustrates the roadway projects planned as capital investment actions for a 2Q-year planning horizon. The map renects the general location of programmed and unprogrammed projects contained in the Capital Investment Aclions Roadway Projects list. These projects are considered necessary to adequately meet regional transportation needs for the T ransPlan 20-year planning horizon and are part of the financially constrained plan. Jurisdictions responsible for these projects are the Cities of Eugene and Springfield, Lane County, and the Oregon Department of Transportation. Note: This map is illustrative and should be used for reference only. The map depicts approximate locations of existing and proposed transportation facilities. . I, -", , \.,1 ,. ' , , r . \ . 4 " , Planner: J .f ( , .;i N + 0 :i Miles December 2001 Yap produced by l.3nll Coo.n=d of Gcwernmer'h ATTACHMENT 3-1 . . . . . - ,,'- " .. ..... '~\\" "II' '. ~ ji'! " '7' . ~r. '. . ~r' .~.,~ i\ JJ!!I:"-' -.' <<. ~ci-: ~, . -.' ..._fA ....'- -....,..", i:- ' ....... ._~w . . ); ., '" ~ \ '. jl . .. . J · ~ , ..~? ' 'I tRUCll~IDM .~ .,11....... . , .v''{.''HH:. ; . ~ , I i .1' f" "'" i<!?1 , ! Legend ~ /',/ Urban Growth Boundary Future IntersectIons . New Arterial Link Of' Interchange . Added Fwy lanes Of Major Interchange Imps. . Urban Standards Future Projects 1\1 New Arterial link or Interchange 1\1 Added Fwy Lanes or Major Interchange Imps. N New C""ecton; r' Arterial Capacity Improvement I'V Urban Standards (. r.i" . J , ~ ~ ,-.-,., '. i 728 ..... ! r ~ ~o CfHII-..r.n.\O ! "1 .MtAUNE IlK w"...'" ! I t II TransPlan Future Roadway Projects Eugene-Springfield Metro Area This map illustrates the roadway projects not planned for construction during the 20-year planning period. The map reflects the general location of future projects contained in the Capital Investment Actions Roadway Projects list Jurisdictions responsible for these projects are the Cities of Eugene and Springfield. Lane County, and the Oregon Department of Transportation. ) ~. , I 'J L ',.r/' fl'" "1,1'. '. I. I ~ " J (, , . '\ l.) .:>( , A' ". 'I:'" i) fJ. \: . .' , ., I' , , . 'jf ri .'/1. e.a ....." I .'6,] ............,-1..... " - 1I-.1tJol1II ,. ~~ ''''~---'-~ I ----I , I .10 j ,ii \ ~ 0 l ~ ,l~ ~ ~\: .,~ :c ~ 99 ~~ '0 ~~ ~!l I ~ I, ~ .......... .- . ~ . . , E i I , .........'"~. , ... ,off "__ f. I ~ ~- . J , , t . .~' ~\ f'.~ ~ , I , , , r ~~,!, ( ";, ~ " \ t"~,,, f' " (;, , J ~"(lI('MIlD \ a ~ , / Note: This map is illustrative and should be used for reference only. The map depicts approximate locations of existing and proposed transportation fadlities. J' J/ , ~ ~ .. ~..........' I If! f " I ,. .' , '\ ,; ~ ,---- ~ ~ ,,f ~ ~ \-""'",~at~ Recp\v d ~~ / ad 62008 '" .4 Plaflner: ~...J " ... . I ,- ) .. 1 , + o Miles I' u..~:~b~~~. ATTACHMENT 4-1