HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotice PLANNER 10/15/2008
, ,---
,....
.
.
.
.
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
STATE OF OREGON }
}ss.
County of Lane }
I,. Brenda Jones, being first duly sworn, do hereby depose and say as follows:
1. I state that I am a Secretary for the Planning Division of the Development
Services Department, City of Springfield, Oregon.
2. I state that in my capacity as Secretary, I prepared and caused to be
mailed copies of Notic.e of Proposed Amendment for LRP2008-00013
Metro Plan Amendment (See attachment "A") on October 15,2008
addressed to (see Attachment "B"), by causing said letters to be placed in
a U.S. mail box with postage fully prepaid thereon.
B~"~.
Planning Secretary
STATE OF OREGON, County of Lane
/Jf!tf(!Jl: /.;;- , 2008 Personally appeared the above named Brenda Jones,
Secretary, who acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary act. Before
me:
I) OFFICIAL SEAL
. SANDRA MARX
'. i NOTARY PUBLIC - OREGON
. ./. COMMISSION NO. 385725
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOV. 12, 2008
My Commission Expires:
g
ecelVed
OCT 1 5' 2008
Planner: BJ
! 1
DLtD ~otice of
Proposed Amendment
.
tJ., person D electronic D mailed D
A
'l1"
IE
S
'l1"
A
M
IP For DLe!) Use Only
. .
THIS FORM MUST BE RECEIVED BY DLCD AT LEAST
45 DAYS PRIOR TO THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING
PER ORS 197.610, OAR CHAPTER 660, DIVISION 18
Jurisdiction: City of Springfield Date of First Evidentiary Hearing: 01121/2009
Local File Number: LRP2008-00013 Date of Final Hearing: 0310212009
Is this a REVISION to a previously submitted proposal? DYes [gINo Date submitted: 10/1512008
[gI Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment [gI Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment
D Land Use Regulation Amendment D Zoning Map Amendment
D New Land Use Regulation D Urban Growth Boundary Amendment
[gI Transportation System Plan Amendment D Other:
Briefly Summarize Proposal. Do not use technical terms. Do not write "See Attached"(limit 500 characters):
Revise Table and Map of finalized contained projects by adding project #27 SR 126 and Main Street and
project #30 SR 126 and 52nd Street; deleting these same projects from the future project list and maps;
These tables and maps are adopted into both the Comprehensive Plan and the Transportation System
Plan.
Has sufficient information been included to advise DLCD of the effect of proposal? [gIYes, text is included
For Map Changes: Include 8y,"x11" maps of Current and Proposed designation. [gI Yes, Maps included
Plan map changed from: To:
Zone map changed from: To:
Location of property (do not use Tax Lot): SR 126 and Main Street; SR 126 and 52"d Street
Previous density: New density:
Applicable statewide planning goals:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
DDDDDDDD~~~~DDDDDDD
Is an exception to a statewide planning goal proposed? DYES [gI NO Goals:
Acres involved:
ODOT, Eugene and Lane County
Date Received
OCT 15 2008
Planner: BJ
Affected state or federal agencies, local governments or special districts (It is jurisdiction's responsibility to notify these
agencies. DLeD only records this information):
Local Contact: Greg Mott
Address: 225 Fifth Street
Fax Number: 726-368-9
Phone: 726-377-4 Extension:
City: Springfield Zip: 97477-
E-mail Address:gmott@ci.springfield.or.us
. .
. .
OLeo file No.
ra :JaUUBld
B002 9. I 1JO
pa^!aoa~ alBa
. . . ".
SUB~ITTAL REQUIREMENTS
This form must he received hv DLCD at least 45 davs prior to the first evidentiary hearin!!:
per ORS 197.610 and OAR Chaoter 660. ~ivision 18
I. This form must be submitted by local jurisdictions only (not by applicant).
2. When submitting, please print this form on light green paper.
3. Text: Submittal of a proposed amendment to the text of a comprehensive plan or land use
regulation must include the text of the amendment and any other information the local
government believes is necessary to advise OLCO ofthe effect of the proposal. "Text" means the
specific language being added to or deleted from the acknowledged plan or land use regulations.
A general description of the proposal is not adequate. Do not submit this form without
supporting documentation.
4. Maps: Submittal of a proposed map amendment must also include a map ofthe affected area
showing existing and proposed plan and zone designations. The map should be legible and on
Sy, x II inch paper. Please provide the specific location of property, such as an address and/or
tax lot number. Include text regarding background and/or the justification for the change, such as
the application accepted by the local government.
5. Exceptions: Submittal of proposed amendments that involve a goal exception must include the
proposed language ofthe exception.
6. Unless exempt by ORS 197.610(2), proposed amendments must be received at the OLCO's
Salem office at least 45 days before the first evidentiary hearing on the proposal. (The clock
begins on the day OLCO receives your proposal.) The first evidentiary hearing is usually the
first public hearing held by the jurisdiction's planning commission on the proposal.
7. If you have an electronic copy of the proposal, we would like you to submit one electronic copy
[email, CO, or upload to OLCO (for submittal instructions, see # 4)] and ONE PAPER COpy
of the proposed amendment to:
ATTENTION: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST
DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT
635 CAPITOL STREET NE, SUITE 150
SALEM, OREGON 97301-2540
8. Electronic Submittals: One hard copy must be sent by mail or in person, but you may also
submit an electronic copy, by either email, CO, or upload documents to us. You may access this
website to upload documents: htto://webserver.lcd.state.or.us/uoload2/uoloadForml.oho. If you
submit documents to this website, please email Mara Ulloa at mara.ulloa@state.or.us when you
have sent your documents electronically. On the same day, please mail [I] hardcopy to our
office.
9. Need More Copies? You can now access these forms online at htto://www.Icd.state.or.us/. Please
print forms on 8-1I2xll green paper only. You may also call the OLCO Office at (503) 373-0050; or
Fax your request to: (503) 378-5518; or Email your request to mara.ulloaCalstate.or.us.
Date Received
htto:llwww.lcd.state.or.us/LCD/fonns.shtml
Updated SeOOtjib}(@,2008
Planner: BJ
"
.
.
.
.
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: October 6, 2008
Meeting Type: Regular Session
Department: Development Services
Staff Contact: Gregory Mott
S P R I N G FIE L D Staff Phone No: 726-3774
C I T Y C 0 U N C I L Estimated Time: 10 Minutes
ITEM TITLE: COUNCIL INITIATION OF AMENDMENTS TO TRANSPLAN AND THE
METRO PLAN TO MOVE PROJECT #27 (SR-126 AT MAIN STREET) AND
PROJECT #30 (SR-126 AT 52ND STREET) FROM ~ FUTURE PROJECT
LIST (TABLE I b) TO THE FINANClALL Y CONSTRAINED 20-YEAR
CAPITAL INVESTMENT ACTIONS ROADWAY PROJECTS LIST (TABLE
la); AND REMOVE THESE SAME TWO PROJECTS FROM THE FUTURE
ROADWAY PROJECTS MAP AND PLACE THEM ON THE FlNANClALL Y
CONSTRAINED ROADWAY MAP, APPENDIX "A" OF TRANSPLAN.
ACTION
REQUESTED:
Approval of the following motion:
Move to initiate amendments to TransPlan and the Metro Plan to move Project #27
and Project #30 from the Future Project List (Table lb) to the 20-year Fiscally
Constrained Capital Investment Action Roadway Project List (Table la); and
remove these projects from the Future Roadway Map and add them to the
'Financially Constrained Roadway Map in Appendix "A" of Trans Plan.
ISSUE
STATEMENT:
The region is in the midst of updating TransPlan to achieve consistency with the
federal Regional Transportation Plan (RTP); to achieve compliance with the state
Transportation Planning Rule; and to coordinate the,efforts of Eugene and
Springfield as each city develops a local transportation system plan. These two
projects were added to the constrained list of the RTP several months ago; they
need to be included in TransPlan now and ultimately be included in Springfield's
new local Transportation System Plan.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Table la of Trans Plan
2. Table I b of TransPlan
3. Financially Constrained Roadway Map, Appendix "A" of Trans Plan
4. Future Roadway Projects Map, Appendix "A" of Trans Plan
DISCUSSIONI
FINANCIAL
IMPACT:
These two projects have been identified as "future projects" since the mid-1980s.
The need for these projects is equal parts safety and congestion management. The
intersection at 5200 is one of only two signalized, at-grade intersections (Beltline @
Roosevelt) on the state's 55 mph expressway system in this region. Both of these
intersections operate near or beyond ODOT mobility standards; both of these
intersections experien~e an average number of accidents, primarily rear ends.
In addition to mobility and safety issues, there are more than 1,000 acres of vacant
buildable lands within the City's UGB in this area that will generate thousands of
future trips through these intersections. Failure to make these improvements may
have profound effects on the City's ability to provide the necessary transportation
infrastructure to support planned growth.
bate Received
OCT 1-5 2008
Planner: BJ
.
.
.
.
Chapter 3: Table la-Financially Constrained
. 20-Year Capital Investment Actions: Roadway Projects
Name
Geographic
Limits
Description
Estimated
Jurisdiction Cost Length NlDDber
Project Category: New Arterial Link or Interchange
ADD PROJECTS 27 & 30 TO THIS TABLE
Date Recehrsd .
TransPlan
December:OOT11 5 2008
Chapter 3, Page 14
Piann~r: BJ
ATTACHMENT 1 - 1
'. ~.
.'U .
.
.
Chapter 3: Table Ib-Future (Beyond 20-Years)
Capital Investment Actions: Roadway Projects
Name
Geographic
Limits
Description
Estimated
Jurisdiction Cost Length Number
Project Category: New Arterial Link or Interchange
Status: Future
Beaver Streel Hunsaker Lane 10 Wilkes R,O.W Acquisition. General Lane County $1,700,000 0.84 503
Ar1e~al D~e construction.
Eugene-Sp~ngfleld et Main Streel ConstlllCllnterchange ODOT $9,000,000 0
Highway (SR-126)
Division Avenue Della Highway to Beaver New frontaga road wi Lane COunty $4,005,000 0.89 512
Street Wlllametla River B~dge
at 52nd Street Construct Interchange ODOT $9,000,000 0 '\
I
i
'I
Wesl Eugena
Parkway, (1 B)
Garfield Street to Seneca W 11th - Garfield: 4-lane ODOT
Road new construction. continued;
pendlng cDmpletlon 01 a study'
01 transpotlalJon Improvernenls
In West Eugene
$34,231,000
1.3
337
Status Sub- Total
$57,936,000
Project Category Sub-Total
$57,936,000
REMOVE PROJECTS 27 & 30 FROM Tt-flS TABLE
TransPlan
Date Received
OCT 15 2008>ecember2OO1
Chaptm 3, Page 30
Planner: BJ
ATTACHMENT 2 - 1
". .
. . . .
---
I
I .......
) I __c-...
. .
f
~
\
'" ~ .,
. I
. J ~~? J
{!
..
l
Legend
/Ilv' Urban Growth BouncI8ty
Programmed Intersections
... Added Fwy Lanes/Major Interchange Imps
_ Arterial Capaclty Improvements
Study
Unprogrammed Intersections
. New ArteOal Link or Interchange
. Added Fwy lanes/Major lnlen:hange Imps
.. MllrialCapacitylmpro'llefflllrU
.. SIWy
Programmed Projects
N New Arterial Link or Inten:hange
N Added Fwy LaneslMa;or Interchange Imps
'I Arterial Capacily Improvements
N Urban Slandards
N Sludy
Unprogrammed Projects
/" New Mertal Link or lnlerehangl!l
/." Added Fwy lanes/MaJOl" Int9fd',ange ImpS
, , Arterial Capacity ImprovemenlS
'''' NewColleccors
I" Study
/" Urban Standards
D Nodal Developmenl Areas
ii TransPlan
Financially-Constrai ned
Roadway Projects
Eugene-Springfield Metro Area
This map illustrates the roadway projects planned as
capital investment actions for a 2D-year planning horizon.
The map renecls the general location of programmed and
unprogrammed projects contained in the Capital Investment
Actions Roadway Projects list. These projects are
considered necessary to adequately meet regional
tra~sportation needs for the TransPlan 20~year planning
honzon and are part of the financially constrained ~an.
Jurisdictions responsible for these projects are the Cities
of Eugene and Springfield, Lane County, and the Oregon
Department of Transportation.
,...-
, I
;
"1llOWa..t~
J
,. I
I
IV
<0,
Y'~
I
~ \...
't
~
l
t
1 ~.
I
1-'
,
J
~
.,
Area~ identified as nodal development areas are
considered 10 have potential for this type of land
use pattern. Other areas not designated for nodal
development may be found to have potential for
nodal development.
,
Il J
,
,0,:
f'
.J
,
r J
, J 'uroAD~..
uc>>:. 'f
Alii< .
I ;: ' ,~; ~
~ ~,r t
r~-<r"."o ~ ~
~-~~'"
..~
:1
Note: This map is illustrative and should be used for
reference only. The map depicts approximate locations of
existing and proposed transportation facilities.
, I
,
...,
N'
+
ocT i 5 2008
t _ ~ ~
planner: ; J
o
Miles
December 2001
lIap produced by Uno COll'1l:d c1 GoItemnern
ATTACHMENT 3-1
. .
..
.
.
.
.
1:0 u
.ol:I)NDlw
Legend
o .
)'
,I
; 1\.,/ Urban Growth Boundary
I
"\
Future Intersections
. New Arterial Link or Interchange
. Added Fwy Lanes or Major Interchange Imps.
. Urban Standards
'.
-
Future Projects
1\1 New Arterial Link or Interchange
1'\1 Added Fwy Lanes or Major Interchange Imps.
1\1 New Collectors
,V Arlertal Capacity Improvement
1\1 Urban Standards
~-~
~
""00
l Ii1 TransPlan
Future
Roadway Projects
Eugene-Springfield Metro Area
This map illustrates the roadway projects not planned for
construction during the 20-year planning period. The map
reflects the general location of future projects contained
in the Capital Investment Actions RoadWay Projects lisl.
Jurisdictions responsible for these projects are the Cities
of Eugene and Springfield. Lane County. and the Oregon
Department of Transportation.
. ;
).
.
~
.
. I
, i
,
! ~?8
.
Ill1I'ltAl{
-~
,
:1\.....'0' -...-w.-..t..-.....+++... H+
"; .':d--.-
:
t
,r1r I
J ". t.
,.
] '~
I "
d "'r.
f
,
'r
,}
11
~
. I
! ----I
I I
010
i
."...~
.ual'lJolfe)
'..-...----..~
-(
................ I
(
I ,
\ ,
"
,
J , ;
,. ,~---
~
~ .'"
'--'"
, ~ ~ ~: ~J-D~t&~e..c~iv
U " " / OCT 1 5 2008
. ,~
, ,.
"
\ I
~
o
-......_........ . 0)
......10 ..H-+H.........~ ~ .
! "-;::'.E,,o I
MlI1ll.!!L..-" ~..
, ,,,....'
-....
W""'Aot1.
.""lA'4
i i
1
t
( ~ .'
,
f . t
,
",' ,
.c i~fr I
,
Y, ,
,
. J ,.-aJ
=.~ r, J \.
f . ,oil"
, (~":!
,!t(.
~D.~~ ~~'
... ""0"04'
~~~
.I
\ .~.
~,
o
I
p.;J''4~
~~
."
:;j ~ 99
lla
.0
r~
.h
,
~
~
~"~..~" ~
Note: This map is illustrative and should be used for
rererence only. The map depicts approximate locations of
existing and proposed transportation facilities.
I jI
, ~
J., ;'
, "
..
\ "
~
~
~
')
", .....
RlanneC.Ci
"-
(
,
+
o
Miles
r u..~:~~~~.
ATTACHMENT 4-1