Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotes, Meeting PLANNER 2/16/2010 (2) . . Meeting Date: Meeting Type: Staff ContactlDept.: Staff Phone No: Estimated Time: Council Goals: 2/16/2010 Regular Meeting Andy Limbird, DSD Ex!. 3784 5 minutes Community and Economic Development and Revitalization AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY SPRINGFIELD CITY COUNCIL ITEM TITLE: ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD (portion of 19th Street right-of-way between Assessor's Map 17-03-24-00 and Map 17-03-24-31) Case Number C SP 2009 - LRP2009-00013 ACTION REQUESTED: Conduct a second reading and adopt/not adopt the following ordinance: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, LANE COUNTY METROPOLITAN WASTEWATER SERVICE DISTRICT, AND WlLLAMALANE PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT; AND WlTIIDRA WING THE SAME TERRITORY FROM THE RAINBOW WATER AND FIRE DISTRICT ISSUE STATEMENT: The City Council initiated the annexation action by adopting Resolution 09-23 on June 1,2009 (Attachment 3, Exhibit B). The subject annexation area is a portion of 19th Street right-of-way north of Yolanda A venue, and includes the intersection of 19th Street and undeveloped Hayden Bridge Road. ATTACHMENTS: DISCUSSIONI FINANCIAL IMPACT: Attachment I: Staff Report and Recommendation Attachment 2: Area, Vicinity and Site Maps Attachment 3: Correspondence from Lane County Transportation Attachment 4: Correspondence from Jim McLaughlin and staff responses Attachment 5: Ordinance with Exhibits Exhibit A: Map and Legal Description Exhibit B: Resolution 09-23 Exhibit C: Annexation Agreement for Adjoining Property Exhibit 0: Staff Report The City Council conducted a public hearing and gave first reading to the annexation ordinance on January 19,2010. The City Council is authorized by ORS Chapter 222 and SDC Article 5.7-100 to initiate and act on annexation requests. In accordance with SDC 5.7-155 and ORS 222.040, 222.180 and 222.465, if approved the annexation will become effective 30 days after signature by the Mayor or upon acknowledgement by the State - whichever date is later. The adjoining property to the west (referred to as the Jackson property) is currently zoned Low Density Residential (LOR) and is located inside the Springfield urban growth boundary. Urban services are available at or near the west boundary of the subject site, or can be extended to serve the property. Although the subject annexation territory would have a nominal assessed value, there are currently no taxes assessed to the public right-of-way according to Lane County Assessment and Taxation records. One person provided testimony at the public hearing on January 19,2010. Stafffollowed-up with the adjacent property owner to clari!y the concerns and to advise them that no further development or improvement of 19th Street would be expected until the Jackson property develops (Attachment 4). However, there is no specific timeline for residential development to occur. When detailed development plans are prepared and submitted for the Jackson property, staff are prepared to discuss the necessary improvements for portions of 19th Street with affected property owners and Lane County staff. Staff advises that TransPlan currently designates 19th Street north ofY olanda A venue as a future collector street, which typically requires a larger right-of-way width to accommodate curb and gutter, vehicle travel and turning lanes, bicycle lanes, sidewalks, street trees and planter strips. Recommendation: The Director's recommendation to the City Council is to (a) approve the annexation of territory to the City of Springfield, Willamalane Park and Recreation District, and Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District; and (b) withdraw the same annexation territory from the Rainbow Water and Fire District. Del" f'1;:ceivea:....!/~/" Plannr-;:: AL < ! . . TYPE IV - ANNEXATION STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION File Name: 19th Street Annexation Owner(s)/Applicant(s): City of Springfield Case N urn ber: C SP 2009 - LRP2009-000 13 Proposal Location: Portion of 19th Street north of Yolanda A venue and including the intersection with an undeveloped stub of Hayden Bridge Road. Existing Zoning: Low Density Residential (LOR) with Urbanizable Fringe Overlay (UP -10) Zoning After Annexation: LOR Metro Plan Designation: LDR Refinement Plan Designation: N/A Application Snbmittal Date: October 23, 2009 Associated Applications: LRP2007-00009 (Annexation of Adjoining Territory); PRE2009-00026 (pre-submittal Application) CITY OF SPRINGFIELD'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE NAME And Limbird Jon Driscoll Cia on McEachern Gilbert Gordon Dave Puent PHONE 726-3784 726-3679 736-1036 726-2293 726-3668 APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM POSITION NAME PHONE MAILING ADDRESS Applicant City of Springfield 736-1036 225 5"' Street Public Works Deoartment Sorinl!field, OR 97477 Owner Lane County Public Works 682-6936 3040 North Delta Hwy Eugene, OR 97408 .Review Process (SDC 5.7-115): The subject annexation request is being reviewed under Type IV procedures, without Planning Commission consideration. Attachment 1-1 Dat\"> Received:~~JiJ Planner: AL . . Development Issues Meeting (SDC 5.7-120): A Development Issues Meeting (DIM) is required of all third- party annexation applications. Finding: Because the annexation action was initiated by a resolution of City Council, and the annexation territory is a portion of partially developed road right-of-way that will remain public right-of-way, a Development Issues Meeting was not conducted. Conclusion: The requirement in SDC 5.7-120 is met. Annexation Initiation and Application Submittal (SDC 5.7-125): In accordance with SDC 5.7-125.B.3 and ORS 222.111, an annexation application may be initiated by resolution of the City Council. Finding: The Springfield City Council initiated the annexation action by adoption of Resolution 09-23 on June 1,2009. Finding: Lane County Transportation has submitted a letter in support of the annexation action (Attachment 3). Conclusion: The application requirements in SDC 5.7-125 have been met. Site Information: The annexation area includes a linear portion of 19th Street north of Yolanda A venue and extending to the intersection with a stub of Hayden Bridge Road right-of-way. The dimensions of the linear public right-of-way proposed for annexation are approximately 35 feet wide by 987 feet long. The subject annexation area comprises approximately 0.66 acres and it abuts the Springfield City limits along the west boundary. At present, the public right-of-way is partially developed with a narrow gravel road that is classified as a Lane County local access road (LAR). The subject annexation territory is intended to remain as public right-of-way and street frontage improvements can and will be constructed by the abutting property owners/developers as site development proceeds. The contiguous property to the west has an executed annexation agreement (Attachment 5, Exhibit C) detailing the property owner/developer's obligations for street improvements. Existing public services are provided to the annexation area as follows: police (Lane County Sheriff, Springfield Police Department), schools (Springfield School District), roads (Lane County), and Fire (City of Springfield under contract). Rainbow Water and Fire District provides water and contracts with the City for provision of fire service to the proposed annexation area. Upon annexation, the City of Springfield will be entirely responsible for urban services, including electricity, water and fire response to the subject area. Because the annexation area will remain partially developed public right-of-way, demand for additional urban services will be negligible. Notice Requirements (SDC 5.7-130): Consistent with SDC 5.7-130, notice was provided as follows: Mailed Notice. Notice of the annexation application was mailed December 29,2009, which is at least 14 days prior to the public hearing date, to the affected property owner(s); owners and occupants of properties located within 300 feet of the perimeter of the affected territory; affected neighborhood groups or community organizations officially recognized by the city that includes the affected territory; affected special districts and all other public utility providers; and the Lane County Land Management Division, Lane County Elections, and the Lane County Board of Commissioners. Newspaper Notice. Notice of the 'January 19, 2010 public hearing was published in The Register- Guard on January 4 and 11,2010. Posted Notice. Notice of the January 19, 2010 public hearing was posted in six public places in the City [in three loca~ions along the 19th Street right-of-way; at the Springfield City Hall and in the Development Services office; and on the City of Springfield website] on January 7, 2010. Attachment 1-2 Date, Received:_Zij./)."o I'"' I Planner: AL . . Finding: Upon annexation of the subject property to the City the current LOR zoning will be retained, but the . Urbanizable Fringe Overlay District (UP-IO) will no longer apply. Due to this change, the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (OLCD) was no(ified in writing of the annexation proceedings more than 45 days prior to the public hearing. Notification to DLCD was sent on October 28, 2009. Conclusion: Notice of the public hearing was provided consistent with SDC 5.7-130. Recommendation to City Council (SDC 5.7-135): The Director shall forward a written recommendation on the annexation application to the City Council based on the approval criteria specified in Section 5.7-140, which are provided as follows with the SDC requirements, findings, and conclusions. The Director's recommendation follows SDC 5.7-140, Criteria. Criteria (SDC 5.7-140): The application may be approved only if the City Council finds that the proposal confimns to the following criteria: A. The affected territory proposed to be annexed is within the City's urban growth boundary; and is 1. Contiguous to the city limits; or 2. Separated from the City ouly by a public right of way or a stream, lake or other body of water. Finding: The subject annexation is located within the acknowledged urban growth boundary (UGH) of the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan). The annexation area abuts the Springfield city limits along the west boundary and therefore meets the statutory definition of contiguity as found in ORS 222.111(1). Finding: The legal description for the annexation area will be confirmed with the state Department of Revenue to ensure there are no gaps or overlaps of territory between the existing City limits (located along the west boundary of 19th Street) and the annexation area. Conclusion: The proposal meets this criterion. B. The proposed annexation is consistent with applicable policies in the Metro Plan and in any applicable refmement plans or Plan Districts; Finding: The Metro Plan was acknowledged by the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) in August, 1982 and bas been subsequently amended. The annexation area is located within the acknowledged UGH of the Metro Plan. Territory within the UGH ultimately will be within the City of Springfield. Finding: The Metro Plan recognizes that, ultimately, all territory within the UGH will be annexed to an existing city (policy #10, page II-C-4; Policy #16, page II-C-5; and Policy #21, page II-C-6). Springfield is the unit of government identified in the Metro Plan to provide urban services to annexed territory. Finding: The Metro Plan recognizes that as annexations to the City occur, existing special service districts within the UGH will be dissolved (policy # 18, page II -C-6). The continued annexation of properties and public street rights-of-way to the City of Springfield is consistent with the Metro Plan, which will result in the elimination of several special districts within the urbanizable area. . Finding: The annexation area is within the Rainbow Water and Fire District. The water district also has service arrangements with Springfield for provision of fire response to unincorporated areas of north Springfield. After the public hearing and if determined by the City Council that withdrawal is in the best interest of the City, the . annexation area will be withdrawn from the Rainbow Water and Fire District consistent with ORS 222.510, 222.520, and 222.525 and Springfield Utility Hoard will provide water service directly to the annexation area. Attachment 1-3 Date', ReGeived:_~6~/O . Planner: AL . . Finding: After the public hearing and if determined by the City Council that annexation is in the best interest of the City, the annexation area will be annexed into the Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District as authorized by an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the City of Springfield and Lane County. This special district was formed to provide the financing for the regional wastewater treatment plant serving wastewater users within the City of Springfield. Finding: After the public hearing and if determined by the City Council that annexation is in the best interest of the City, the annexation area'will be annexed into the Willamalane Park and Recreation District as authorized by an intergovernmental agreement between the City of Springfield and Lane County. The park district provides park and recreation facilities and services to territory within the City of Springfield. Finding: The subject road right-of-way is not located in an adopted Refinement Plan area, and there are no proposed changes to the current LOR zoning. Conclusion: The proposal meets this criterion. C. The proposed annexation will result in a houndary in which the minimum level of key urban facilities and services as defined in the Metro Plan can be provided in an orderly efficient and timely manner, and Finding: The Metro Plan recognizes annexation as the highest priority for extending the minimum level of key urban facilities and services to urbanizable areas (policies #8 and #10, page 1I-C-4). Finding: The territory requested for annexation will take advantage of urban service delivery systems that are already in place or can be logically extended to serve this area. In addition to urban utilities, the following facilities and services are either available or can be extended to this annexation area: Water - SUB Water provides water service to incorporated areas of north Springfield. Upon annexation, the 19th Street right-of-way is not expected to require water service, but future .water line extensions may be expected within the subject area as development proceeds on adjacent properties. Existing water infrastructure within the vicinity will be maintained by the affected utility providers. Electricity - SUB Electric provides service to developed properties in this area of Springfield. Upon annexation, the subject territory is not expected to require additional electrical service. However, power line installations may be expected within the road right-of-way as development proceeds on adjacent properties. Existing electrical system infrastructure within the adjacent public rights-of-way will be maintained by the affected utility providers. Police Services - Springfield Police Department currently provides service to areas of north Springfield that are already inside the City. The subject territory is within the joint jurisdiction of Springfield Police Department and Lane County Sheriff's Department. Upon annexation, this area will receive Springfield Police services on an equal basis with other properties inside the City. Fire and Emergencv Services - Fire protection is currently provided to the annexation area by the City of Springfield Fire & Life Safety under contract with Rainbow Water and Fire District. Upon annexation, the City will continue to provide fire and emergency services to the subject territory. The nearest Springfield fire station (Fire Station #3) is located on 28th Street at the intersection with Centennial Boulevard. Emergency medical transport (ambulance) services are provided on a regional basis by Eugene, Springfield, and Lane Rural Fire/Rescue to central Lane County. The annexation area will continue to ,receive this service consistent with the adopted ambulance service area (ASA) plan. Mutual aid agreements have been adopted by the three regional ASA providers to provide backup coverage for each other's jurisdictions. Attachment 1-4 Date, Reqeived: 2f.b/~/O Planner: AL . . Parks and Recreation - Park and recreation services are provided to the City of Springfield by the Willamalane Park and Recreation District. Indoor recreation facilities, such as the Willamalane Park Swim Center, Lively Park Swim Center; Memorial Building Community Center, and Willamalane Adult Activity Center will be available to residents (if any) and property owners as new development occurs. It is not expected that the . requested annexation area will generate an appreciable number of new residential units, owing to the industrial land use designation. The park district offers various after-school and other programs for children at schools and parks throughout the community. Also available are pathways and several categories of parks, including community parks, sports parks, special use parks, and natural area parks. The closest developed neighborhood park to the requested annexation area is Page Park at 1300 Hayden Bridge Road. Other existing and future parks in the vicinity include Harvest Landing and Pierce Park (currently undeveloped). Concurrent with annexation to the City of Springfield, the subject area will be annexed to the Willamalane Park and Recreation District consistent with City policy, if the City Council determines that annexation to the special district is in the best interest of the City. Schools - Springfield School District serves the north Springfield area. Existing schools - Yolanda Elementary, Briggs Middle, and Springfield High School serve the neighborhood, including the subject annexation area. However, because the subject area is proposed to remain public right-of-way it is not expected the annexed territory would generate any population, including school children. Sanitarv Sewer - The annexation area can be served by extension of an existing public sanitary sewer line that terminates at the westerly edge of the 19th Street right-of-way boundary. The existing IS-inch sanitary sewer line flows to a sanitary sewer lift station located at the comer of 19th Street and (future) Vera Drive. As development proceeds on the adjoining properties, future sanitary sewer connections and upgrades may be required as described in the Annexation Agreement signed by the contiguous property owner. Concurrent with annexation to the City of Springfield, the subject area will be annexed to the Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District, if the City Council determines that annexation to the special district is in the best interest of the City. Storm water - There are no existing stormwater facilities within or abutting the subject annexation area. Future development of the adjoining land to the west will provide for extension of stormwater service from the current stormwater lines in Vera Drive. The annexation area will require appropriate stormwater management techniques in accordance with City standards and as described in the Annexation Agreement signed by the contiguous property owner. Streets - The subject annexation area is a partially developed local access road currently improved with a narrow gravel surface. The portion of 19th Street requested for annexation represents the public street frontage for at least three properties, one of which is already annexed and planned for future residential development (Map 17-03-24-31, Ptn. Tax Lot 2000). It is expected that developable portions of Tax Lot 2000 will derive access from 19th Street, and therefore street improvements would be expected concurrently with development of the property. Provision for future 19th Street improvements is detailed in the Annexation Agreement signed by the contiguous property owner. Solid Waste Management - The City and Sanipac have an exclusive franchise arrangement for residential garbage service inside the City limits. Upon annexation, solid waste aisposal service can be provided by Sanipac. It is not expected the street right-of-way will generate a need for solid waste service on its own, but it will facilitate extending the service to adjacent residential developments. Communication Facilities - Various providers offer both wired and wireless communication services in the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area. Existing providers and those entering the market have the capability to provide service to future development in this area. '-- Attachment 1-5 Dale! Re.Geived:4'/~L" Planner: AL . . Land Use Controls - The annexation area is within Springfield's portion of the urban growth boundary. Through an intergovernmental agreement between Lane County and the City of Springfield, the City already has planning and building jurisdiction for this property. The City will continue to administer land use controls after annexation. Finding: The minimum level of key urban facilities and services, as defined on page V-3 of the Metro Plan, are either immediately available or can be provided witbin a reasonable future time frame as needed. The Annexation Agreement signed by the contiguous property owner details the timing and delegation of financial responsibility for provision of key urban services to the annexation area, including street improvements. Conclusion: The proposal meets this criterion. D. Where applicable fiscal impacts to the City have been mitigated through an Annexation Agreement or other mechanism approved by the City Council. , Finding: The owner of contiguous property to the west has executed an Annexation Agreement that outlines the City and Applicant's responsibilities for provision of key urban services and other considerations. Future improvements to 19th Street are detailed in the Agreement. Conclusion: The proposal meets this criterion. DIRECTOR'S RECOMMENDATION: Approve the annexation of the subject territory to City of Springfield, Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District, and Willamalane Park and Recreation District, and withdraw the requested annexation area from the Rainbow Water and Fire District. City Council Decision (SDC 5.7-145): City Council approval of the annexation application shall'be by Ordinance. ' Finding: The City Council held a Public Hearing on January 19,2010 for the subject annexation request. Based on the staff analysis and recommendation, and on testimony provided at the Public Hearing, the City Council approved the annexation area (portion of 19th Street located between Map 17-03-24-00 and Map 17~03-24-31) per Ordinance No. ------' totaling approximately 0.66 acres. Zoning (SDC 5.7-150): The annexation area is within a region of north Springfield designated as Low Density Residential (LDR) in the Metro Plan. The current zoning for contiguous properties to the east is LDR with Urbanizable Fringe Overlay District (LDR/UF -10). The contiguous property to the west is zoned LDR and lies inside the City limits. Finding: Upon the effective date of the annexation, the UF-IO overlay is automatically removed and the subject territory retains the zoning of the contiguous property to the west (LDR), which is consistent with the Metro Plan designation. Effective Date and Notice of Approved Annexation (SDC 5.7-155): If the annexation is approved by the City Council on January 19, 2010 and granted a second reading on February ]6, 2010, the Ordinance will become effective 30 days after adoption by the City Council and execution by the Mayor (anticipated on or around March 18, 20 I 0), or upon final acceptance by the State - whichever date is later. Finding: City Council gave second reading to Ordinance _ on effective consistent with SDC 5.7-155 and ORS Chapter 222 on , 2010. The Ordinance became ,2010. Attachment 1-6 Date, Raceived:...l-f6/Jt1'D / Planner: AL . . Withdrawal from Special Service Districts (SDC 5.7-160): Withdrawal from special districts may occur concurrently with the approved annexation Ordinance or after the effective date of the annexation of territory to the City. The Director shall recommend to the City Council for consideration of the withdrawal of the annexed territory from special districts as. specified in.ORS 222. ..In determining whether to withdraw the territory, the City Council shall determine whether the withdrawal is in the best interest ofthe City. Notice of the withdrawal shall be provided in the same manner as the annexation notice in Section 5.7-150. Finding: The annexation area is within the Rainbow Water and Fire District. Consistent with SDC 5.7-160, notice was provided, a public hearing was held, and the City Council determined that withdrawal from the Rainbow Water and Fire District was in the best interest of the City. The withdrawal decision was codified in Ordinance No. Exhibit: A. Assessor's Map showing property requested for annexation (redlined) and numbered survey courses contained in legal description Attachment 1-7 Date Received:_k~/Mt" Planner: AL T . . . EXHIBIT A tMYOEN BRIDCE SlU9 .~ CE (co. 1lD. ea1) PeL --_-----!...-_.....!......-_- POINT OF BEGINNING. """-_Of ....."""""""^' Nl)."-fIiOJOI -- ~~. 019-01 U7 ~ 4.03 K. -- NOTE, NUUBERED C~ES COINCIDE WITH COURSE NtNBERS SHOWN ON THE lECAl.. DESCRIPTION FOR THE APPROPRIATE TRACT. ,. .... .'0 4.10 AC. ,. .... PO . ~ o O~9-04 S.41475 -~ ,r.'"1'C. -~ ~f' ,LOk Attachment 1-8 '..~GI.",,(j zjul;o/D hi n.,<.. AL . . Legal Description A portion of the 19th Street right of way from the intersection with Hayden Bridge Road Southerly; being more completely described as follows: Beginning at the Initial Point of Land Partition Plat No. 92-P0306, as filed for public record in the Office of the Lane County, Oregon Surveyor, in County Surveyor's File No. 31021, on January 4, 1993; thence on the following five (5) numbered courses: 1) North 000 03' 28" West a distance of 170.00 feet along the Westerly line of the said partition plat to a point on the North right of way line of Hayden Bridge Road; thence 2) North 890 58' 29" East a distance of35.00 feet along the Northerly right of way of Hayden Bridge Road to a point; thence 3) leaving the North right of way line of Hayden Bridge Road, crossing the road and along the Easterly right of way line of 19th Street, South 000 03' 28" East a distance of986.99 feet to a point of curvature in the easterly right of way; thence 4) leaving the Easterly right of way of 19th Street and crossing it at right angles, South 890 56' 32" West a distance of35.00 feet to a point on the Westerly line of above said partition plat; thence 5) North 00003' 28" West a distance of817.01 feet along the Westerly line of above said partition plat to the point of beginning. Basis of bearing for this description is Partition Plat 92-P0306. Attachment 1-9 ,-,al '''JrZ~/fl.!!.IP PI,'nj..;, AL :t> - - Dl o ::T 3 l1> :a N o ~ -00 ~Q.) :::J d 'F J I'D -, )> '" r-.-. (f) a. ~ ~ I~ ! TERRITORY REQUESTED FOR ANNEXATION Portion of 19th Street Right-of-Way Between Map 17-03.24-00 and Map 17-03-24-31 ~~~ea ~~" \~ r d/ ...........-~u ,,"11,'1 L I kY' / 1':;:-..... '--= l'\o ~ b?,-- h ~ ~~~.~ r .......... 1l..E~ D ~ .. I~ ~ ' ~ ~ I' ;-1 ~ ~ I tl~J~ ""9E1 J- "'" EI1 ~ . o. -'~~'-' 1:1 ~~k& -L., h r ~ 1 /'../ ~'1/1 .~ tj~~~ ~"eo 'rrm~~! .;t~~~ ~~, ~ ~ I+: >- -- ,,~U! ~ 1lr1 ~ .::::- ill r: . j( ~ "''' -~ ~ l_~ .- ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ---p ~ ~ ~ ~ I .11 ~ '-j:,l.UlJf1ta ~.l -'-<. .,j 0 I 'I I ~""~~' IV f:JO..'h.fE_"';6 ~~ ~ ~(""~ J) / I lit- -i "\U'\~ ~ \ J ,lJ{>.. ,.."L:_",,~;: I, 1'5-- 'r r . 1 "'\,... "'."' ~ 'i ,.' -_/ .....,$... A " '---, /' "WL: ~~ -\?~ ~ -.;: ~"\...') Y'" ~ 7 -- J E?"<- ~ if'! -)/ ~ ,~ ~ \-., 'T r '/ ~ / "~"~~ T""," 8f& no W8ff'9nt1es Mil, '''''''''''', 'f)8ny thIS plOd, "'" ~ U99IS Bssume 81 reS;pOnstbtl'Y foIllnr bss Of dElm8f}& .. sristnQ from any 8fTO(, OfnISSIOfI Of pOl!don81 tn8CQJracy OUGON d thsproduct. S"rl-tl.'d. OR . . r: -} L Ou,......CJu.. . NORIH , .<ll_ . . TERRITORY REQUESTED FOR ANNEXATION Portion of 19th Street Right-of-Way Between Map 17-03-24-00 and Map 17-03-24-31 ~~ - Sprln field. OR -""~. "",L--- ,^"",...-, ~y _-----;;2J :> r-- ~~~: / .~ - rlr ro-;;"', &1 R 1m _ ~~ RiJ ~ @ffl iJ -o~ ~ !tJI ~ .. !III '~,jj1il!ElllJ gj '" C ~~ M I~ ~ A~~ E_fjIIDyTM ~ ~ f---- 126 QJ ~ vr /~~hJ:IIIIIIIIII:1I111 }>~/ ~ fTffi>tl'rnml,',',""1I11111l1~~~~';::;'::~iii!i!1 ~ {/ ~ ~ -;~~- 1;11.111 ~am '}'" ., ~ I I ~ ~ 1i'L,.!::grbn~lIIIim~ - ,I I~ W- ~~IIIIIfI~~_ml ~~; ~\[ I I~ ~I j ~~~u L/// II~PI ..-/ v ~ 6~ ~ SP~H~ltij "-'"'I !'ropolod Annoxatlon There are no warrantieS thBtBCCOlTlpany thlsprOOuct ~ ~ USOlS8SSJme8'respoflSlbill/ylrxanybssordamage 0 Tax La tit 6rl$1ng from snyetrOl', omISSIOn or poSlfiontlllnsa::vIllCY ts O....OM of Ins product. D 2,200 C:j eu..ld. 01 City L1mh [::J Wthln Clly LlmRI ',400 Fe.. Attachment 2-2 Dale HE :;elved:Jp5l~JD _ Plcmner: AL . . TERRITORY REQUESTED FOR ANNEXATION Portion of 19th Street Right-of-Way Between Map 17-03-24-00 and Map 17-03-24-31 Subiect Area ~ oIel11.19 Me" Springfield, OR -Y ~ 2); .'9 /"" ~ --- r ~ f- .... -"'ES' ~ ~.. n-lj ,.. .. - .... ,- .... :....' ~~ ~~= r-- HAYDEN BRIDGE RD .~~I~ ~! /\ V I >- : r- r--- r- .f-- - :;; '--- ( - ~ DElROSE AVE r- DE~ROSEAVE ~.. ~. , , I- \r:r r ~r- _~f- ~ ~ tt ~ - - /- ~ e--.. - - >--- = :=- -= r- 'V -- 1:-----'/ ~ - ~COYENTAAVE G)-,,- '- J~! \ I " .--- '< ) ) J '-- 0:- o ;! s:- o z '" 0: "'- _I; r- L{- r: ~- =~r~ - '" >- '" N_ .h -I~ - - VERA DR VIEWMON AY' - I RHODODENDRON ST ~~DA AVE I II r-- r-- r-- -. - -- DAPHNE Sf - - I - >- o:~ '" :r 0 >- ~ -~ ~- '-- 0: 8- - T - L-; r-- '-- ~ i" "'" - '- ". '"",, 10 C-s> I:;; ~ 1'" I ( SP:~N~Etij ~"now~~slhlt~lhIprodud ~.. ~mus~"re~bity.b~y.b$Sor~ ~ ~ fromarry enor, ClfTJS.!IOflotpo.!lionaljnaa::tx<<Y OIlGON a/his (XOdud ~ o Tax Lots "oposed Ann.xatlon [::J Outtldt or City Umlts C:JWthlnCltyUmb - Railroad o 370 740 ,,,' Attachment 2-3 e.:ne! "O;eIVGd:.t/IL /,?% Planner. AL I . . 'illlllll' Lane County I : Public Works Department / Transportation Planning Division 1 ' 3040 North Delta Hwy./ Eugene, Oregon 97408 , . . Phone: 541-682-6936/ fax: 541-682-8554 . . July 8, 2009 Matt Stouder City of Springfield Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Re: Annexation of 19th Street Thank you for requesting comment on an annexation proposal concerning North 19th Street. The City of Springfield is proposing to annex a portion of N. 19th Street, a Public Road (also called a "Local Access Road" or LAR) that is within the Springfield Urban Growth Boundary. Lane County is generally supportive of the transition to urbanization of LARs, due to the County's limited authority to improve them pursuant to ORS 368.031, which states; "A local access road that is outside a city is subject to the exercise of jurisdiction by a county governing body in the same manner as a county road except as follows: (1) A county and its officers, employees or ogents are not liable for failure to improve the local access road or keep it in repair. (2) A county governing body shall spend county moneys on the local access road only if it determines that the work is an emergency or if: (a) The county road offidal recommends the expenditure; (b) The public use of the road justifies the expenditure proposed; and (c) The county governing body enacts an order or resolution authorizing the work and designating the work to be either a single project or a continuing program." It is unlikely the County will ever prioritize any portion of N. 19th for improvement due to its LAR status, limited funds, and other priorities. Therefore, this proposal raises some concerns regarding the segment connectivity to the north that is not proposed for annexation, and connectivity that will result from the annexation of the north segment. The proposal is to develop the Jackson property with a 30-10t subdivision, and improve only the adjacent section of 19th Street to urban standards. This plan leaves approximately 350 feet of unimproved LAR between the south end of the proposed improvements and Yolanda Avenue, a Lane County fadlity that has been fully improved to urban standards. Once this connection is developed, it is a certainty that this development will significantly increase daily traffic on the unimproved section. There will also be a lack of transition between the section that will be improved and the unimproved portion, and there are no curb returns at the south end at the intersection with Yolanda, only a standard driveway approach, Essentially the segment that is not proposed for annexation is currently functioning like a driveway and will be handling a significantly increased level of traffic, which in turn, unfairly increases the maintenance responsibilities of the adjacent property owners. Lane County would support a proposal that transfers jurisdiction of North 19th Street in its entirety, in order for the City to be sole authority for land use and the public right-of-way and to require adequate road improvements on the entire length of North 19th Street. Absent that, we will request that barriers be erected at the southern terminus of the segment of North 19th Street adjacent to be annexed, assuming alternative access is available to properties to the north. Thank you for providing this opportunity to comment on the annexation proposal. Celia Barry, Manager Lane County Public Works Transportation Planning 1 Attachment 3-1 Date: Received: ~f~/6 Planner: AL . L1MBIRD Andrew From: Sent: To: Cc: . FIELDS Phil [PhiI.Fields@co.lane.or.us] Tuesday, January 19, 2010 11:10 AM L1MBIRD Andrew BAJRACHARYA Shashi; BERNARD Mark A; BARRY Celia; PETSCH John S; LEMHOUSE Brad; RANDALL Darrell L Annexation of 19th Street - Response to Notice of Public Hearing Subject: Comments from Lane County Transportation Planning: . Thank you for providing notice of the public hearing and for consideration of our comments regarding annexation of North 19th Street. The City of Springfield is proposing to annex a portion of N. 19th Street, a Public Road (also called a 'Local Access Road" or LAR) that is within the Springfield Urban Growth Boundary. Lane County is generally supportive of the transition to urbanization of LARs, due to the County's limited authority to improve them pursuant to ORS 368.031, which states; 'A local access road that is outside a city is subject to the exercise of jurisdiction by a county governing body in the same manner as a county road except as follows: (1) A county and its officers, empioyees or agents are not liable for failure to improve the local access road or keep it in repair. (2) A county governing body shall spend county moneys on the local access road only if it determines that the work is an emergency or if: (a) The county road official recommends the expenditure; (b) The public use of the road justifies the expenditure proposed; and (c) The county governing body enacts an order or resolution authorizing the work and designating the work to be either a single project or a continuing program." There is no formal process for transferring jurisdiction of a public road to a city, so jurisdiction of 19th Street will automatically transfe~ to Springfieid upon annexation. It is unlikely the County will ever be able to prioritize any portion of N. 19th for improvement due to its LAR status, limited funds, and other priorities. Therefore, this proposai raises some concerns regarding the connectivity of the segment to the south that is not proposed for annexation. A previous development proposal called for development of the Jackson property with a 3D-lot subdivision, with improvement of only the adjacent section of 19th Street to urban standards. That plan left approximately 350 feet of unimproved LAR between the south end of the proposed improvements and Yolanda Avenue, a Lane County facility that has been fully improved to urban standards. Once this connection is developed, it will likely significantly increase daily traffic on the unimproved section. There will also be a lack of transition between the section that will be improved and the unimproved portion, and there are no curb returns at the south end at the intersection with Yolanda, only a standard driveway approach. Essentially the segment that is not proposed for annexation is currently functioning like a driveway and will be handling a significantly increased level of traffic, which in turn, unfairly increases the maintenance responsibilities of the adjacent property owners. Lane County would support a proposal that annexes and transfers jurisdiction of North 19th Street in its entirety, in order for the City to be sole authority for land use and the public right-of-way, and to require adequate road improvements on the entire length of North 19th Street. Absent that, we request that barriers be erected adjacent to the southern terminus of the segment of North 19th Street to be annexed, until such time as it is fully improved, assuming alternative access is available to properties to the north. A Lane County Facility Permit is required for placement of 'facilities within the right-of-way of Hayden Bridge Stub. Facilities and development includes, but is not limited to, road improvements, sidewalks, new or reconstructed driveway or road approach intersections, utility placements, excavation, clearing, grading, culvert placement or replacement, storm water facilities, or any other facility, thing, or appurtenance [LC 15.205(1)]. Please contact 541-682-6902 or visit http://www.lanecountV.oro/Roads/ROWPermits.htm for information about facility permits. Phil Fields Lane County Transportauon Planning 3040 N. Delta Hwy. Eugene, OR 97408-1696 541-682-6976 phi/.fie/ds@)co./ane.or.us 1 Date Received:_?I!~vWd Planner: AL . . '. .'. Attachment3~;! . .. . , ." . . . .... .------ -. L1MBIRD Andrew From: Sent: To: Subject: L1MBIRD Andrew Thursday, January 21,20103:04 PM 'J McLaughlin' 19th Street Annexation - Follow up . . Jim: Further to your comments at the public hearing on Tuesday evening, staff advise that upon annexation, no improvements to 19th Street would be undertaken until such time as the adjoining Jackson property develops. Similarly, it is not expected thilt traffic volumes on 19th Street would increase appreciably until houses are built and occupied on .the Jackson residential development. Staff feels that it may be premature to talk about possible traffic flow patterns and connectivity to the nearby street network at the annexation phase. Instead, these details could be evaluated in the context of an actual development scheme when subdivision plans are prepared for the Jackson property. As an adjacent property owner, you would be notified of the land use application and afforded the opportunity to comment. It seems clear from the Lane County Transportation responses that because 19th Street is considered a Local Access . Road, no street improvements can be expected unless benefiting landowners pay the bill (regardless of whether the portion adjoining the Jackson property is annexed). The City may be amendable to restricting the southern portion of 19th Street to 'local traffic' or 'emergency vehicles only', but not necessarily barricading the right-of-way to all forms of travel. Your comments and the comments received from Lane County Transportation are already on record for this issue, and for the time being it remains unresolved. Please let me know if you are comfortable awaiting more detailed subdivision plans (including a traffic control plan) or wish to resolve the issue before the annexation of 19th Street is concluded. Thanks Andy Limbird City of Springfield 1 Oat€) F~eceivad:Jp/~NO Planner: AL Attachment 4-1 ,- . . L1MBIRD Andrew Subject: FW: 19th Street Annexation - Follow up From: J Mclaughlin [mailto:61blur@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 01,20109:50 PM To: UMBIRD Andrew Subject: Re: 19th Street Annexation - Follow up Andy - My primary concern is that the current transportation plan suggested that a major roadway ( 3 lane with bike lanes and sidewalks) should be constructed with in the right-of-way of 19th North of Yolanda. The proposed connection between Yolanda and Hayden Br, Stub would be building a road to no where. Re-directing traffic away from the existing improvement of Yolanda for traffic to the East would not be an efficient use of the . . existing capitol improvement investment. The annexationof any portion of 19th street r/w should be limited to a minimal right-of-way width, not one that is at the extreme width that is currently proposed If Iwhen the Jackson development becomes a reality, 19th street should be managed only as a secondary access which would require a smaller footprint to be annexed. During this era of smaller more "green" design considerations, a large pavement footprint should not be planned for or considered. Just because the right-of- way has been dedicated, doesn't mean you need to annex the entire portion, you'could consider reducing the annexation and vaoating any portion not required back to the adjoining owners. Please keep me informed of any future 'planning actions which would allow me to continue to share and expand my interest in the details of the overall planning of the 19th street project. Thank you for the support .... jim 1 Date, Received: ~o/~... Planner: AL Attachment 4-2 . . L1MBIRD Andrew Subject: FW: 19th Street Annexation - Follow up , From: VOGENEY Ken Sent: Tuesday, rebruary 02, 2010 1:33 PM To: UMBIRD Andrew' Cc: DRISCOll Jon; MCEACHERN Clayton; BARNETT Brian; BOYATT Tom; STOUDER Matt; DONOVAN James Subject: RE: 19th Street Annexation - Follow up Andy, The essence of the discussion, and the requirements in Jackson's Annexation Agreement for the street improvements, stems from the TransPlan desig~ation of 19'h from Yolanda to Hayden Bridge Rd. as a future collector street. Hayden Bridge Rd. is also designated as a collector, with the plan for future irI}provement to urban standards from 19th to Marcola Rd.' The requirements on the Jackson property, as well as the prior partition of the Helfrich property to the ,east, are consistent with improving 19th as a coliector street. The County staffs position, in my meetings with them on this specific topic, has been that they consider this segment of 19'h to be local access road today and are treating it as such for their purposes. Their position is that if the City wants this segment of 19th, ~o be a collector street, then it is our problem to do the planning, improvements and long term maintenance of the urban standards street. Ultimately, all of the land within the UGB will be annexed and developed. While this segment of 19'h St. may be discontinuous with the fully improved portion to the south, we do have a responsibility to ensure that the future planned improvements can be provided. Let me know if you would like to discuss the details of this topic further. Thanks, Ken 1 Date, Received:~ft1~/1L- Planner: AL Attachment 4-3 . . ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE ApPROVING THE ANNEXA nON OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, LANE COUNTY METROPOLITAN WASTEWATER SERVICE DISTRICT, AND WILLAMALANE PARK AND RECREA nON DISTRICT; AND WITHDRAWING THE SAME TERRITORY FROM THE RAINBOW WATER AND FIRE DISTRICT THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FINDS THAT: WHEREAS, a request to annex certain territory was submitted on October 23, 2009, said territory being described as follows: A portion of 19'" Street right-of-way between Township 17 South, Range 03 West, Section 24, Map 00; and Township 17 South, Range 03 West, Section 24, Map 31 as generally depicted and more particularly described in and on file in City Case Number C SP 2009 - LRP2009-000 13 and attached hereto as Exhibit A to this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, !he City Council is authorized by Springfield Development Code (SDC) Article 5.7-100 and ORS Chapter 222 to accept, process, and act on annexations to the City; and WHEREAS, in accordance with SDC 5.7-125 and ORS 222.111, the City Council initiated the annexation action by adoption of Resolution 09-23 on June 1,2009, attached hereto as Exhibit B to this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, this annexation has been initiated in accordance with SDC 5.7-125 and ORS 222 and has been set for public hearing; and, WHEREAS, !he territory proposed to be annexed is within the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (more commonly lmown as the Metro. Plan) urban growlh boundary and is contiguous to the City limits [SDC 5.7-140A]; and, WHEREAS, the annexation is. consistent wi!h Policy 10, page II-C-4; Policy 16, page II-C-5; and Policy 21, page II-C-6, in the Metro Plan [SDC 5.7-140.B] requiring annexation to the City of Springfield as the highest priority for receiving urban services; and WHEREAS, the minimum level of key urban facilities and services can be provided in an orderly and efficient manner as required in Metro Plan Policy 8, page II-C-4, and there is a logical area and time within which to deliver urban services and facilities [SDC 5.7-140.C]; and, WHEREAS, provision of City urban services to !he adjoining property to the west has been arranged through an Annexation Agreement (Exhibit C) between City staff and the property owner, as described in and on file in City Case Number LRP2007-00009 [SDC 5.7-140.D], that memorializes the owner's commitment, agreement, and obligation to meet the City's requirements for the provision of the minimum level of key urban services and facilities; and, WHEREAS, a Staff Report (Exhibit D) was presented to !he City Council with !he Director's recommendation to concurrently annex the subject territory to the Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District and Willamalane Park and Recreation District, as these special districts are service providers for the City [SDC 5.7-140.B]; and is consistent with the intergovernmental agreement between Lane County and Springfield regarding boundary changes dated May 21, 2008; and, WHEREAS, a Staff Report was presented to !he City Council wi!h !he Director's recommendation to concurrently wi!hdraw the annexation territory from the Rainbow Water and Fire District as !he Springfield Utility Attachment 5-1 Date Received:4~/)o.l" Planner: AL . . Board would provide water utility service directly to the area after it was annexed to the City [SDC 5.7-160.B]; and, WHEREAS, on January 19,2010, the Springfield Common Council conducted a public hearing and is now ready to take action on this application based on the recommendation and findings in support of approving the annexation request, and the Rainbow Fire and Water District's withdrawal as set forth in the aforementioned Staff Report to the CoUncil, incorporated herein by reference, and the evidence and testimony presented at this public hearing held in the matter of adopting this Ordinance. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby approve the annexation area to the City of Springfield, Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District and Willamalane Park and Recreation District, said territory being described as follows: A portion of 19th Street right-of-way between Township 17 South, Range 03 West, Section 24, Map 00; and Township 17 South, Range 03 West, Section 24, Map 31 as generally depicted and more particularly described in Exhibit A. SECTION 2: The withdrawal of territory described in Section I above from the Rainbow Water and Fire District shall become effective on June 30, 2010. SECTION 3: Upon annexation the subject territory will remain public street right-of-way. SECTION 4: The City Manager or the Development Services Director shall send copies of this Ordinance as required by SDC 5.7-155. . SECTION 5: This Ordinance shall become effective 30 days from the date of its passage by the City Council and approval by the Mayor, or upon the date of its acknowledgement as provided by ORS 222.180, whichever date is later. ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this _ day of by a vote of for and against. ,2010, APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this day of ,2010. ATTEST: Mayor City Recorder --.\ I C ..:..~"..("-' ~ L..Ef'\\. \, ~ \ I \ G\ \ \ () 2 Date Received:~pft<',O Planner: AL Attachment 5-2 . . EXHIBIT A-1 2 fI'. Iii\YDEN BRIDG[ STUB ." (co. RD. eal) ~ ---~-- POINT Of' BECNNINC. ..... "*'... ......""""""""" ...".....,.. -- ~f' 019-01 ~" I< 4.03 iii. -- NOTE, NUMBERED COURSES COINCIDE WITH COURSE NUWB~RS S"OWN ON TI<~ lECAL DESCRIPTION FOR Tt'f APPROPR"'TE TRACT. ,. .,.. .'0 ..10 " ,. .,.. "" , I ~ O~9-04 S.41475 - ,.I'l"... ~ t'. eo, I." .c. Attachment 5-3 Del"" """~eived _.z.~/" UI lj A.L (. fiii' . EXHIBIT A-2 Legal Description A portion of the 19'" Street right of way from the intersection with Hayden Bridge Road Southerly; being more completely described as follows: Beginning at the Initial Point of Land partition Plat No. 92-P0306, as filed for public record in the Office of the Lane County, Oregon Surveyor, in County Surveyor's File No. 31021, on January 4,1993; thence on the following five (5) numbered courses: I) North 000 03' 28" West a distance of 170.00 feet along the Westerly line of the said partition plat to a point on the North right of way line of Hayden Bridge Road; thence 2) North 890 58' 29" East a distance of35.00 feet along the Northerly right of way of Hayden Bridge Road to a point; thence 3) leaving the North right of way line of Hayden Bridge Road, crossing the road and along the Easterly right of way line of 19'" Street, South 000 03' 28" East a distance of986.99 feet to a point of curvature in the easterly right of way; thence 4) leaving the Easterly right of way of 19'" Street and crossing it at right angles, South 89056' 32" West a distance of35.00 feet to a point on the Westerly line of above said partition plat; thence 5) North 000 03' 28" West a distance of817.01 feet along the Westerly line of above said partition plat to the point of beginning. . Basis of bearing for this description is Partition Plat 92-P0306. Attachment 5-4 Dat"" Received:34s/~" Planner: AL . . EXHIBIT C-1 After Recording, Return to: City of Springfield Public Works Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Attn; Engineering Division Division of Chief Deputy Clerk 'llIM.MMeO Lane County Deeds and Records 'UU~ VwU~UU 1111I1111111111111111111I11111111111111I111111111 $76.00 01078111200900309680070133 06/08/2009 03 :54 :02 PM RPR-ANNX Cnt=1 Stn=6 CASHIER 07 $65.00 $11.00 RESTATED ANNEXATION AGREEMENT This Restated Annexation Agreement ("Agreement") is made between the City of Springfield, an Oregon municipal corporation ("City") and Daniel and Shannon Jackson ("APPLICANT"). This Restated Annexation Agreement restates and amends the previous Annexation Agreement entered into by the parties hereto on December 17,2007 and recorded December 21; 2007, Recorder's Reception No. 2007-083844, Lane County Deeds and Records. RECITALS A. APPLICANT owns the.parcel(s) ofland legally descn'bed in Exhibit A, the Property, and shown on the map attached as Exhibit B. The Property is proximate to the juri~dictional limits of the City and i,s subject to annexation by the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission or itS successor ("Boundary Commission") following minor boundary change processes. B. APPLICANT has submitted to the City an Annexation Application Journal No. LRP2007- 00009, dated February 26,2007, for Assessor's Map No. 17-03-24-31, Part ofLot 2000 ("Property'). ' C. APPLICANT wishes to annex the Property to the City and seeks support from the City for the annexation before the Boundary Commission or its successor. The Springfield Common Council has adopted Resolution No. 07-57 supporting the annexation. D. The Property is currently designated as Low Density Residential (LDR) on the Metro Plan and is zoned LDR (UP-IO) according to the Springfield Zoning Map. , E. Annexation of the Property requires a showing under SDC 6.030(2) that the Property can be provided with the minimum level of key urban facilities and services as defined in the Metl:o Plan Policy 8a and 8b, p.IT-C-4, and such showing is supported,bythe substantial evidence in the record of the proceeding on this annexation. City staffhas determined the minimum level of key urban services is currently available to the Property with the exception of public sanitary sewer service, public stormwater management service, and street connectivity to adjoining property that fully meet City Standards. The purpose of this Agreement is to memorialize APPLICANT's and City's commitment and agreement to the allocation of financial responsibility fot public facilities and services for the Property and other users of the facilities, sufficient to meet the City's requirements for the provision of .Attachment 2 Page 1 of 11 Attachment 5-8 Date, f1(eceived:_~Y~LL- Planner: AL . . EXHIBIT C-2 I key urban services, inCluding long-t= publ~c sanitary sewer, stormwaler, interconnected transportation systems and Fire and Life Safety services necessary for an affirmative City recommendation for the annexation request. ';.'.': . .. ':::. :...... .'. ..... . ..' .. '...:.:.:_....,,:_.:..::c':::,:::.:.:.:.~...... ..... F. A public sanitary sewer system with sufficient capacity to serve the Property and other existing and proposed land uses in the vicinity of the Property is necessary to support a finding that this key urban service is available to serve the 'property. . An existing public sanitary sewer system and lift station is located at the comer of Vera Street and 19th Street. Sufficient capacity exists in this system such that the Property will be allowed to connect. . An existing fifteen inch (15'') diameter public sanitiuy sewer extends from the iift station to the existing westerly right-of-way of19th Street. . . The APPLICANT will be required to extend the above described fifteen Uich (15") public sanidiy sewer along 19th Street to the terminus point outside the limits of the 19th Street improvement, which will be determined by the City during the Subdivision Tentative Plan review and approval. . The APPLiCANT will be aiiowed tDooMed hidividual sanitary seWerlaierillstO the' fifteen inch (15") public sairitary sewer, and will be required to provide any laterals deemed necessary by the City to provide future service to adjoining properties. . The City will participate in the cost of the construction of the fifteen inch (15") public sanitary sewer through the payment of a portion of the construction cost. The City will reimburse the APPLICANT at the rate of one hundred twenty five dollars '($125.00) per line8.I foot of the totallen~h of said fifteen inch (IS") sanitary sewer, plus five thousand dollars ($5000.00) for each manhole associated with the construction of said fifteen inch (15"). sanitary sewer. The tota1length of the fifteen inch (15") sanitary sewer and the number of manholes shall be determined based upon the approved Public Improvement Plans which shall be prepared by the APPLICANT and approved by the City. The City will participate in the cost of said construction by means of a single cash contribution, which will be reiinbllISed to the APPLICANT within sixty (60) days of the acceptance of the Public Improvement Project by the Common Council. City participation will be limited to the .' construction of the fifteen inch (15") public sanitary sewer and the aSsociated manholes, and will not any include any costs associated with the laterals connected to said sanitary sewer, including any laterals deemed necessary by the City to provide future service to adjoining properties. Further, City participation will'be limited to construction costs only, as per the above quoted unit prices, and not incidental costs including, but not limited to, those costs which are specifically allocated solely to the APPLICANT and defined in Paragraph 1.3.3 of this Agreement. . The APPLICANT will be required to construct a public gravity sanitarY sewer system to serve the Property, as needed, in addition to the fifteen mch (IS'') public sanitary sewer described above. . G. A public stormwater management system with sufficient capacity to serve the Property and other existing and proposed land uses in the vicinity of the Property is also necessary to support a finding that this key urban service is available to serve the Property. . . - .-.... Attachment 2 Page 2 of 11 Attachment 5-9 . Date, Receivsd:~/!!/~/'" Planner: AL . . . EXHIBIT C-3 o An existing eighteen inch (18") diameter public stonnwater management system is located adjacent to the West line of the Property, approximately 240 feet north of the centerline of Vera Street. Another existing twelve inch (12") diameter-public stonnwater management system is located adjacent to the West line of the Property, approximately 170 feet south of the centerline of V era Street. o The APPLICANT will be allowed to connect to either or both of these existing public stonnwater management systems, but will be required to provide pre- treatment for 100 % of newly paved surfaces, using such methods as double chambered catch basins with oil filtration media or a water quality manhole. Additionally, a minimum of 50% of the non-building rooft9P runoff impervious surfaces on the property shall be treated vegetatively, using methods such as a bioswale. The APPLICANT will be required to maintain the post-developed runoff rate of flow equal to or below the pre-developed runoff rate of flow. H. An interconnected-tr\ll1sportation system with the existing and proposed land uses in the vicinity of the Property is also required in order to provide access and a transportation system for the provision of Fire and Life Safety services to and from the annexed property. o The Property has frontage on 19th Street which is under the jurisdiction -of Lane County. Along this frontage, 19lb Street is not improved. o The APPLICANT will be required to fully improve 19111 Street along the property frontage to a required width of forth-two feet (42') for a collector street. The APPLICANT will be required to construct a section complete with curb, gutter, pavement, sidewalks, street lights and street trees, along the frontage of the Property. - Sidewalks and street trees on the east side of 19t1, Street will not be required to be constructed. o The APPLICANT will also be required to dedicate a strip ofland thirty-five feet (35') in width adjacent to the westerly line of the existing Right-of-way, across the froIltage of the Property, to accommodate the improvement and the alignment of 19th Street and result in a total Right-of way width of seventy feet (70'). o The APPLICANT will also be required to dedicate a Right-of-way of sixty feet (60') through the Property to facilitate the east-west connection of 19th Street with the existing Vera Street Right-of-way and pavement. The APPLICANT will be required to construct the easterly extension of Vera Street to an urban standard from the West line of the Property to 19th Street, complete with curb, gutter, pavement, sidewalks, street lights and street trees. -0 The APPLICANT will further be required to provide public access to all proposed lots within the Property via public Rights-of-way and w:ban standard streets, complete with curb, gutter, pavement, sidewalk, street lights, and street trees. At the request of the APPLICANT during the Subdivision Tentative Plan approval process, the provisions for private streets may be considered. Any provision for said private streets will be at the sole discretion of the City, and, if allowed, must abide by all of the Standards and Codes of the City_ o Notwithstanding other requirements of this Agreement, if a subsequent subdivision application for the subject property will create lots which will allow development of more than 30 dwelling units, the APPLICANT shall be required to provide a secondary fire and life safety apparatus access route to the subdivision in accordance with Springfield Fire Code Appendix D107. Attachment 2 Page 3 ofl1 Attachment 5-10 Date R.eCeived:_.:yIf~"'- Planner: AL . . EXHIBIT C-4 1. In arder to facilitate orderly development of the Property and ensure the full provision of key urban services that are satisfactory to the City and meet the City's conditions for an affirmative reco=endation for annexation to the Common Council, and in exchange for the obligations of the City set forth below, APPLICANT shall cQmply with all requirements imposed on APPLICANT in this Agreement, Now, therefore based upon the foregoing Recitals, which are specifioally made a part of this Agreement, the parties agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Obligations of APPLICANT. Consistent with the above Recitals and subject to the issuance of Subdivision Plat"lUld Public Improvement Plan approvals, APPLICANT agrees to perform the obligations set forth in this section. I I, 1.1 ' Apply for, and obtain,-Subdivision Tentative Plan approval from the City, pursuant to Springfield Development Code Article 35, for a residential subdivision on the Property within six (6) months, unless extended by the City, of the effective date of the Boundary Commission's, orits successor's, approval of APPLICANT's annexation request. This paragraph is subject to the requirements of Paragraph 8, below. 1.2 Apply for, and obtain, Subdivision Plat approval from the City, pursuant to Springfield Development Code Article 35 for a residential subdivision on the Property within tv\IO (2) years, unless extended by the City, of the date of the Limited Land Use Decisiqn issued by the City fQr Subdivision Tentative Plan approval issued pursuant to Paragraph 1.1, above. This paragraph is subject to the requirements of Paragraph 8, ~elow. 1.3 Subject to Subdivision Plat approval, City Engineer approval of the requisite Public Improvement Plans, Final Inspection, ,submittal and approval of the requisite As- built Plans, and Acceptance.by the Common Council, and prior to Occupancy Approval for any new structure on the Property, develop on-site and off-site public sanitary sewer conveyance systems to provide sanitary sewer service to the development as follows: ' 1.3.1 APPLICANT shall construct public sanitary sewer systems to connect to the Vera Street lift station and to extend the existing public sanitary sewer, as described in Paragraph F of the Recitals of this Agreement 1.3.2 APPLICANT shall prepare the studies, plans, permit applications, and other supporting documentation necessary to obtain the penitits and other approvals necessary to construct the sanitary sewer sYstems described in , Paragraph 1.3.1, above. Attachment 2 Page 4 of 11 Attachment 5-11 Oat?! He:::e!ved: ~~/O Planner: AL . I. ! . . EXHIBIT C-5 '1.3.3 APPLICANT shall bear the full cost and obligation to design and construct the proposed sanitary sewer systems that connect to the existing public systems, including but not limited to associated easements, engineering costs, permit applications and fees, iegal costs, construction and inspection costs, and the preparation of As-built Plans. 1.3.4 Prior to or concurrent with Subdivision Plat or Public Improvement Plan approval by the City, whichever comes first, for any portion of the Property, APPLICANT will provide financial security acceptable to the City for all costs associated, with the above described sanitary sewer system construction. APPLICANT is directed to Paragraph 12 of this Agreement concerning current requireinents in relation to regulations of the Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) and the payment of prevailing rate of wage. The cost of all construction to be completed which the City interprets as being occupied or Used by a public agency shall be estimated based upon the prevailing rate of wage;'and financial security shall be adequate to provide for the payment of said prevailing rate of wage. 1.4 Subject to Subdivision Plat approval, City Engineer approval of the requisite Public Improvement Plans, Final Inspection, submittal and approval of the requisite As- built Plans, and Acceptance by the Common Council, and prior to Occupancy Approval for any new structure on the Property, develop on-site and off-site public stormwater management systems to provide drainage service to the development as .follows: 1.4.1 APPLICANT shall construct public stormwater management systems to collect, treat, convey, detain as deemed necessary, and discharge stormwater from the Property and the upstream tributary areas via an on-site engineered bioswale or mechanical filter system and public drainage easement, and into, the public stormwater fues, as described ii1 Paragraph G of the Recitals of this Agreement. . 1.4.2 APPLICANT shall prepare the studies, plans, permit applications, and other supporting documentation necessary to obtain the permits and other approvals necessary to construct the stormwater management system described in Paragraph 1.4.1, above. 1.4.3 Grant to the City the easements necessary to access, operate, lUld maintain a stormwater management system on the Property. Easements for piped portions of the system will be a minimum offourteen feet (14 ') wide and may be wider depending upon the size and depth of the pipes withiiJ. the easemenl Easement widths for open channel portions of the system shall be determined based upon the design width of the channel plus ten feet (10') on one side and twenty-five feet (25') on the oth!:I' side to accommodate access and maintenance by City personnel and equipment. Actual easement widths and locations will be determined during the Subdivision Tentative Plan review. Attachment 2 Page 5 of 11 Attachment 5-12 Date, HeC€';iV<;d:_#f#~ P!c>nner: AL . ,. H. . EXHIBIT C-6 1.4.4 Applicant shall bear the full cost and obligation to design and construct the proposed stormwater managelnent systems that connect to the elCisting public systems, including but not limited to associated easements, engineering costs, permit applications and fees, legal costs, construction and inspection costs, and the preparation of As-built Plans. 1.4.5 . Prior to or concurrent with Subdivision Plat approval or Public Improvement Plan approval by the City, whichever comes first, for any portion of the Property, APPLICANT will provide financial security acceptable to the City for all costs associated with the above storm water management system construction. APPLICANT is directed to Paragraph 12 ofilis Agreement concerning current requirements in relation to regulations of the Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) arid the payment of prevailing rate of wage. The cost of all construction to be completed which the City intelpret:; as . being occupied or used by a public agency shall be estimated based upon the . prevailing rate of wage, and financial security shall be adequate to provide for the payment of said prevailing rate of wage. 1.5 Subject to Subdivision Plat approval, City Engineer approval of the requisite Public Improvement Plans, Finallnspe6tion, submittal and approval of the requisite As- built Plans, and Acceptance by the Common Council, and prior to Occupancy Approval for any new structore on the Property, develop On-site and off-site public street systems to provide interconnected transportation service to the development as .follows: 1.5.1 APPLICANT shall bear the full cost and obligation to develop and construct fully-improved on-site and off-site public street systems to provide for the logical and orderly extension ofthe following public streets: 1.5.1.1 Dedication of Right-of-way and construction to facilitate the connection to and extension ofYera Street from the existing improved street, located at the West line of the Pr<?perty, through the property to the East line of the Property and the intersection ofYera Street with 191h Street, as described in Paragraph H of the Recitals of this Agreement. Also, dedication of Right-of-way and construction to provide public access to all proposed lots within the Property, as ' described in Paragraph H of the Recitals ofilis Agreement. 1.5.1.2 Dedication of Right-of-way and construction to facilitate the cormectio!l to and extension of 191h Street along the Applicant's Property frontages described in Paragraph H of the Recitals of this Agreement. 1.5.2 APPLICANT shall prepare the stodies, plans, permit applications, and other supporting. documentation necessary to obtain.the permits and other approvals necessary to construct the transportation systems described in Paragraph 1.5.1, above. . Attachment 2 Page 6 of 11 Attachment 5-13 Dat!f;' qeCeived:-?'t~N Planner: AL I. . . EXHIBIT C-7 1.5.3 APPLICANT shall bear the full cost and obligation to design and construct the proposed transpoJClation sy~tems, including but not limited to associated Right-of-way, easements, engineering costs, permit applications and fees, legal costs, construction and inspection costs; and the preparation of As-built plans. 1.5.4 APPLICANT has indicated a desire to utilize the City's Reimbursement District Process for the fuI] street improvements along 19lh Street as described in Paragraph H of the Recitals of this agreement. Upon Subdivision Tentative Plan submittal, the APPLICANT shall notify the City of such a request, and shall follow the requirements and standards set forth in the Common Council Ordinance Number 6230 regarding Reimbursement Districts. 1.5.5 Prior to or concurrent with Subdivision Plat approval or Public hnprovement Plan approval by the City, whichever comes first, for any portion of the Property, APPLICANT will provide financial security acceptable to the City for all costs associated with the above transportation system construction. APPLICANT is directed to Paragraph 12 of this Agreement concerning current requirements in relation to regulations of the Bureau of Labor and Industries (BaLI) and the payment of prevailing rate of wage. The cost of all construction to be completed which the City interprets as being occupiedor used by a public agency shall be estimated based upon the prevailing rate of wage, and financial security shall be adequate to provide for the payment of . said prevailing rate ofwage. 1.6 Provide and be financially responsible for the provision of any additional Urban facilities and services identified during the review and approval of the Subdivision . Tentative Plan and/or the Public hnprovement'Plans as necessary to serve the development of the Property, including the construction and maintenance thereof. 1.7 In determining APPLICANT's share of costs for the improvements described in this Agreement, the full cost for the provision of the improvements at the time of construction shall be used. For the purposes of this Agreement, the full cost shall include design, construction, acquisition of land and/or easements, studies, permits from all agencies having jurisdiction, attorney's fees, and all other costs reasonably associated with the implementation of the needed improvements. 2. Oblilffitions of City: Consistent with the above Recitals, City agrees to: . 2.1 Initiate and support annexation of the Property to the City before the Common Council and support APPLICANT's defense of any appeal of a decision to the City. However, the City will not assume any financial responsibility to provide legal counsel on appeal. 2.2 Conduct the timely review and decision making of the Subdivision Tentative Plan, Subdivision Plat, andPublic hnprovement Plan applications in accordance with City procedures for the development of the Property. . Attachment 2 . Page 7 of 11 Attachment 5-14 Date! Received:J;y.v.2!tL-- Planner: AL I, . . EXHIBIT C-8 2.3. Participate in the cost of the construction of the fifteen inch (15") public sanitary sewer in the manner described in Paragraph F of the Recitals of this Agreement. 2.4 Initiate annexation of the un-annexed portion of 19th Street abutting the PROPERTY frontage at no'cost to the APPLICANT, 3, Covenants Running With the Land. It is the intention of the parties that the covenants herein are necessary for the annexation and development of the Property and as such shall run with the Property and shall be binding upon the heirs" executors, assigns, administrators, and successors of the parties hereto, and shall be construed to be a benefit to and burden upon the Property. This Agreement shall be recorded, at APPLICANT's expense, upon its execution in the Lane County Deeds and Records. This Agreement may be assigned by APPLICANT and shall benefit any assigns or successors in interest to APPLICANT. Execution of this Agreement is a precondition to the support of the City for annexation of the Property descn'bed in Exhibit A to the City. Accordingly, the City retains all rights for enforcement of this Agreement. 4. Limitations on the Develomnent. No portion of the Property shall be developed prior to the approval of a Subdivision Tentative Plan and Public Improvement Plans for the sanitary sewer systems, stormwater management systems; and street improvements for the proposed _ development. Mutual Cooperation. City and APPLICANT shall endeavor to ~utually cooperate with,each other In implementing thevarious matters contained herein. 5. 6. Waiver of Right of Remonstrance. APPLICANT agrees to sign any and all waivers, petitions, consents and all other documents necessary to obtain the public facilities and services descn'bed herein as benefiting the Property, under any Improvement Act or proceeding of the State of Oregon, Lane County or the City and to waive !iU rights to remonstrate against these improvements. APPLICANT does not waive the right to protest the amount or manner of spreading the assessment thereof, if the assessment appears to APPLICANT to be inequitable or operate unfairly upon the Property. APPLICANT waives any right to file a written remonstrance against these improvements. APPLICANT does not waive its right to comment upon any proposed Local Improvement District (LID) or any related matters orally or in writing. 7. Modification of Alrreement. This Agreement may only be modified in writing signed by both parties. Any modifications tothis Agreement shall require the approval of the Springfield Common Council. This Agreement shall-not be modified such that the minimum level of key urban facilities and services as defined in the Metro Plan Policy 8a and 8b, p.ll-O-4 and as required herein are not provided in a: timely manner to the Property. 8. Land Use. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as waiving any requirements of the Springfield Development Code or Springfield Municipal Code which may be applicable to the use and deyelopment of this Property. Nothing herein shall be construed as City providing or agreeing to provide approval of any building, land use; or other development applicatiOn or Land and Drainage A1t~tion Pro~ (LOAP) p,ep;o.it applica1iop. submitted Attachment 2 Page 8 of 11 Attachment 5-15 Date Received:2)~~'~ Pl2nner: AL I " . . EXHIBIT C-9 by APPLICANT. APPLICANT is responsible for obtaining, at APPLICANT's expense, all State andlor Federal permits and any other approvals as may be required. 9. Dolan. APPLICANT knows and understands its rights under Dolan v. City ofTigard (512 U.S._I 14 S. Ct. 2309, 1994) and by entering into this Agreement hereby waives any requirement that the City demonstrate the public improvements and other obligations of APPLICANT" for payments, financial responsibility and reimbursements set forth in Section I, required herein, are roughly proportional to the burden and demands placed upon the urban facilities and services by the development and to the impacts of the development of the Property. APPLICANT further w~.ives any cause of action it may have pursuant to Dolan v. Citv ofTigard and cases interpreting the legal effect of Dolan arising out of the actions described herein. ' " " " 10. Ballot Measure 37. APPLICANT knows and understands any rights it may have WIder Otegon Revised Statutes (ORS) Chapter 197 as amended by Ballot Measure 37 passed November 2, 2004. APPLICANT for itself and its heirs, executors, assigns, adnllnistrators and successors hereby waives any claim or cause of action it may have under such ORS provisions against the City. II, Invaliditv. If any provision of this Agreement shall be deemed unenforceable or invalid, such enforceability or invalidity shall not affect the enforceability or vatidity of any other proviSion of this Agreement. The validity, meaning, enforceability, and effect, of the . Agt;ee~ent and the rights and liabilities of the parties her~~o }l1J~!! b.~ di1telfllined)n, , " accctdancewith the laws of the State oforegon';:{;:~;!,\::i;'~':':}>i:!;..::;:".,"~f;'/~ ,. 12. BOLIIPrevailing Wage Rate. " The APPLICANT will require, as a condition of any contract for construction of the public improvements descnoed in Sections 1.3, 1.4 and 1.5 that the specifications for such contract shall contain a provision; A. complying with the provisions ofORS 279C.830, with respect to the payment of the prevailing rate of wage; B. requiring that each and every contractor or subcontractor shall file such bonds as may be required under ORS 279C.836; C. requiring that any contractor or subcontractor shall comply with each and every provision of ORS279C.800-870, with respect to such'PROJECT. Any and all cost estimates shall be prepared on the basis of prevailing rates of wage. DATED this srJ day of~ u t\ e ,2009.' "" '-,':' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the APPLICANT and City have executed this Agreement as of the date first herein above written. ' APPLICANT: Attachment 2 Page 9 of 11 Attachment 5-16 Date Receivad:J;'l.~~' Planner: AL COUNTY OF LANE . . E:XHIBIT C-11 r ' :Ju.l'\C BE IT REMEMBERED that on this p,- day of Foornary, 2009 before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said County and State, personally appeared the within named, Gino ,-. Grimaldi, whose identitY was proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence and who by me duly sworn, did say that he is the City Manager of the within named municipal corporation and does acknowledge said instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipal corporation, and that the seal affixed to said instrument -is the Corporate seal of said municipal corporation, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said municipal corporation by authority of its "Common Council. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year last above written. ,- OFFICIAL SEAL . . AMY LSOWA ; NOTARY PU8L1C . OREGON ./ COMMISSION NO. a97942 . MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOV.22,2OOlI Attachment 2 Page 11 of 11 Attachment 5-18 = ~ .JowiL Notary Publi or oregon My Commission Expires: 11';;.J~~a Cj Date Received:Jt~~d P!~nnt{: AL . ExHU31T A February'l2.2007 . Bnmch No. 06.203 . EXHIBIT C-12 LEGAL DESCRIPTtON FOR ANNEXAnONPURPOSES LANDS OF DANIEL L. AND SHANNON L. JACKSON (;pORTION OF TAX MAP 17.03-24.31. TAX LOT 2000) SITUATED iD unincorporated areainLaneC~UDty, State of Oregon in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 24, Township 17 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian and descn"bed as follows: BEING a P?rtion of the lands that were conveyed to Daniel L. and Shannon Batty in that certain. Special Warranty Deed t:hat waS recorded May 16, 1990 in Ree11632R at Reception NiJmber 9022540 in the Official Records of Lane County, State of Oregon, said portion being more particularly described.as follows:. Commencing at a point 17.42 chains north ofa point where the East line of the William C. Spencer Donation Land Claim Number 50, Notification Number 3265, intersects the line between Section 24andS6ction25, Township 17 South, Range 3 West1>fthe WillametteMeridian; thenceNorth89' 42' 33" W!'St 393.00 feet and North.OO' 06' 16" West 225.00 feet to the southwest comer of said !aDds that w~e cOIIVeYed in the above deed, Which point lies on the existing city limiis line oftlie City ofSprlngfield and is the TRilE POINT OF BEGINNING of the lands beingdescn"bedherein; THENCE leaving said TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING and along said city limits line and west line of said lands that were cOll'l'eyed in said deed, NORm DO' 06' 16" WEST 900 FEET, more or less, to an angle point in the Urban Growth Boundary of the City of Springfield; THENCE,leaving said city limits line and said west line of said 1ands.that were conveyed in said deed, NORTH 63' 35' EAST 435 FEET, more or less, along said Urban Growth Boundsry to an angle point in said b01lIldsrytbat lies on the east line of said lands that were conveyed in said deed; THENCE, leaving said Urban Grow!liBq1lIldary and along said east line of said lands that were cOIIVeYedin said deed, SOUTH 00' 06' 24" EAST 1100 FEET, more or less, to the southeast corner of said IBnds that were )> ::; Ql o :::r 3 (1) '" - c.n , N o -00 film :-;,- ::J (j! t1lA.:l ='"! fJ c), )> S1. ,-< <ll 0- I it. ~ ~. " '" . ... . . " . J I ~ : i L__~___ ~ 5 ... ~- .~ ARIU TO B aNNImfD OF mil' JA.CKSON PROPERTY. N.B. 1./4. 8.1f.' J/4. SC, U. 2'.1'78.. &8J!1.. J!1.Jl, UN1f COrnmr. O.Rll'GDN nB1lUARY BJ. BOO'1 SCMJ.f Jm = BOO' '. . , .. I 'J ' \, ~ " , TAX >>AI' Ir-GJ-J!.Hl. A PORmN 0/1 T.u LOT .iOOO " - SOO'OS'J1,,"g. HOO' ____ aJrlZDlJN(f - - ...~~ -- .. \\\ \. r~~ 1 I -rlf;;:,.,. J ~"illOr 1@.1I.r8llCh ~In"rlng. inc. ~Do'qgzIDt:'JT ~9!~~'la t"l1r~~Il_ ctrtl.~..~I;f..q.~ mp,e:r m l7r%DJ .:j\ m. 'x :r: - OJ - -i OJ . . m X :r: OJ -i o , ~ W " . . EXHIBIT D-1 TYPE IV - ANNEXATION STAFF' REPORT AND RECOMMENDA nON File Name: 19th Street Annexation Owner(s)/Applicant(s): City of Springfield Case Number: C SP 2009 - LRP2009-00013 Proposal Location: Portion of 19th Street north of Yolanda Avenue and including the intersection with an undeveloped stub of Hayden Bridge Road. Existing Zoning: Low Density Residential (LDR) with Urbanizable Fringe Overlay (UF-IO) Zoning After Annexation: LDR Metro Plan Designation: LDR Refinement Plan Designation: N/A Application Submittal Date: October 23, 2009 Associated Applications: LRP2007-00009 (Annexation of Adjoining Territory); PRE2009-00026 (Pre-submittal Application) CITY OF SPRINGFIELD'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE NAME And Limbird Jon Driscoll Cia on McEachern Gilbert Gordon Dave Puent PHONE 726-3784 726-3679 736-1036 726-2293 726-3668 APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM POSITION NAME PHONE MAILING ADDRESS Applicant City of Springfield 736-1036 225 5m Street Public Works Department Springfield, OR 97477 Owner Lane County Public Works 682-6936 3040 North Delta Hwy Eugene, OR 97408 Review Process (SDC 5.7-115): The subject annexation request is being reviewed under Type IV procedures, without Planning Commission consideration. . Attachment 5-21 Date! Roceived:2t.~~ Planner: AL . . EXHIBIT 0-2 Development Issues Meeting (SDC 5.7-120): A Development Issues Meeting (DIM) is required of all third- party annexation applications. Finding: Because the annexation action was initiated by a resolution of City Council, and the annexation territory is a portion of partially developed road right-of-way that will remain public right-of-way, a Development Issues Meeting was not conducted. Conclusion: The requirement in SDC 5.7-120 is met. Annexation Initiation and Application Submittal (SDC 5.7-125): In accordance with SDC 5.7-125.B.3 and ORS 222.111, an annexation application may be initiated by resolution of the City Council. Finding: The Springfield City Council initiated the annexation action by adoption of Resolution 09-23 on June 1,2009. Finding: Lane County Transportation has submitted a letter in support ofthe annexation action (Attachment 3). Conclusion: The application requirements in SDC 5.7-125 have been met. Site Information: The annexation area includes a linear portion of 19th Street north of Yolanda Avenue and extending to the intersection with a stub of Hayden Bridge Road right-of-way. The dimensions of the linear public right-of-way proposed for annexation are approximately 35 feet wide by 987 feet long. The subject annexation area comprises approximately 0.66 acres and it abuts the Springfield City limits along the west boundary. At present, the public right-of-way is partially developed with a narrow gravel road that is classified as a Lane County local access road (LAR). The subject annexation territory is intended to remain as public right-of-way and street frontage improvements can and will be constructed by the abutting property owners/developers as site development proceeds. The contiguous property to the west has an executed annexation agreement (Attachment 5, Exhibit C) detailing the property owner/developer's obligations for street improvements. . Existing public services are provided to the annexation area as follows: police (Lane County Sheriff, Springfield Police Department), schools (Springfield School District), roads (Lane County), and Fire (City of Springfield under contract). Rainbow Water and Fire District provides water and contracts with the City for provision of fire service to the proposed annexation area. Upon annexation, the City of Springfield will be entirely responsible for urban services, including electricity, water and fire response to the subject area. Because the annexation area will remain partially developed public right-of-way, demand for additional urban services will be negligible. Notice Requirements (SDC 5.7-130): Consistent with SDC 5.7-130, notice was p~ovided as follows: Mailed Notice. Notice of the annexation application was mailed December 29, 2009, which is at least 14 days prior to the public hearing date, to the affected property owner(s); owners and occupants of properties located within 300 feet of the perimeter of the affected territory; affected neighborhood groups Or community organizations officially recognized by the city that includes the affected territory; affected special districts and all other public utility providers; and the Lane County Land Management Division, Lane County Elections, and the Lane County Board of Commissioners. Newspaper Notice. Notice of the January 19, 2010 public hearing was published in The' Register- Guard on January 4 and II, 2010. Posted Notice. Notice of the January 19, 2010 public hearing was posted in six public places in the City [in three locations along the 19th Street right-of-way; at the Springfield City Hall and in the Development Services office; and on the City of Springfield website] on January 7, 2010. Attachment 5-22 Date: F:ecE:iiled:.2-;l~)" Planner: AL , , ' . . . EXHIBIT D-3 Finding: Upon annexation of the subject property to the City the current LOR zoning will be retained, but the Urbanizable Fringe Overlay District (UF -10) will no longer apply. Due to this change, the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (OLCD) was notified in writing of the annexation proceedings more than 45 days prior to the public hearing. Notification to DLCD was sent on October 28,2009. Conclusion: Notice of the public hearing was provided consistent with SDC 5.7-130. Recommendation to City Council (SDC 5.7-135): The Director shall forward a written recommendation on the. annexation application to the City Council based on the approval criteria specified in Section 5.7-140, which are provided as follows with the SDC requirements, findings, and conclusions. The Director's recommendation follows SDC 5.7-140, Criteria. Criteria (SDC 5.7-140): The application may be approved only if the City Council finds that the proposal conforms to the following criteria: A. The affected territory proposed to be annexed is within the City's urban growth boundary; and is 1. Contignous to the city limits; or 2. Separated from the City only by a public right of way or a stream, lake or other body of water. Finding: The subject annexation is located within the acknowledged urban growth boundary (UGB) of the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan). The annexation area abuts the Springfield city limits along the west boundary and therefore meets the statutory definition of contiguity as found in ORS 222.1l1(1). Finding: The legal description for the annexation area will be confirmed with the state Department of Revenue to ensure there are no gaps or overlaps of territory between the existing City limits (located along the west boundary of 19th Street) and the annexation area. Conclusion: The proposal meets this criterion. B. The proposed annexation is consistent with applicable policies in the Metro Plan and in any applicable refmement plans or Plan Districts; Finding: The Metro Plan was acknowledged by the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) in August, 1982 and has been subsequently amended. The annexation area is located within the acknowledged UGB of the Metro Plan. Territory within the UGB ultimately will be within the City of Springfield. Finding: The Metro Plan recognizes that, ultimately, all territory within the UGB will be annexed to an existing city (policy #10, page II-C-4; Policy #16, page II-C-5; and Policy #21, page II-C:6). Springfield is the unit of government identified in the Metro Plan to provide urban services to annexed territory. Finding: The Metro Plan recognizes that as annexations to the City occur, existing special service districts within the UGB will be dissolved (policy #18, page II-C-6). The continued annexation of properties and public street rights-of-way to the City of Springfield is consistent with the Metro Plan, which will result in the elimination of several special districts within the urbanizable area Finding: The annexation area is within the Rainbow Water and Fire District. The water district also has service arrangements with Springfield for provision of fire response to unincorporated areas of north Springfield. After the public hearing and if determined by the City Council that withdrawal is in the best interest of the City, the annexation area will be withdrawn from the Rainbow Water and Fire District consistent with ORS 222.510, 222.520, and 222.525 and Springfield Utility Board will provide water service directly to the annexation area. Attachment 5-23 D"'lo, "''''~e'I'\I''-d' J-I/6 ~/(J l;...~ ...." t '. _.... ..... ~/_(-!;''- PI~,nne" AL . .,p.ih. ... , . . . . . EXHIBIT 0-4 Finding: After the public hearing and if detennined by the City Council that annexation is in the best interest of the City, the annexation area will be annexed into the Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District as authorized by an Intergovernmental Agreement (lOA) 'between the City of Springfield and Lane County. This special district was fonned to provide the financing for the regional wastewater treatment plant serving wastewater users within the City of Springfield. Finding: After the public hearing and if determined by the City Council that annexation is in the best interest of the City, the annexation area will be annexed into the Willamalane Park and Recreation District as authorized by an intergovernmental agreement between the City of Springfield and Lane County. The park district provides park and recreation facilities and services to territory within the City of Springfield. Finding: The subject road right-of-way is not located in an adopted Refinement Plan area, and there are no proposed changes to the current LOR zoning. Conclusion: The proposal meets this criterion. C. The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level of key urban facilities and services as defined in the Metro Plan can be provided in an orderly efficient and timely manner, and Finding: The Metro Plan recognizes annexation as the highest priority for extending the minimum level of key urban facilities and services to urbanizable areas (Policies #8 and #10, page 1I-C-4). Finding: The territory requested for annexation will take advantage of urban service delivery systems that are already in place or can be logically extended to serve this area. In addition to urban utilities, the following facilities and services are either available or can be extended to this annexation area: Water - SUB Water provides water service to incorporated areas of north Springfield. Upon annexation, the 19th Street right-of-way is not expected to require water service, but future water line extensions may be expected within the subject area as development proceeds on adjacent properties. Existing water infrastructure within the vicinity will be maintained by the affected utility providers. Electricitv - SUB Electric provides service to developed properties in this area of Springfield. Upon annexation, the subject territory is not expected to require additional electrical service. However, power line installations may be expected within the road right-of-way as development proceeds on adjacent properties. Existing electrical system infrastructure within the adjacent public rights-of-way will be maintained by the affected utility providers. Police Services - Springfield Police Department currently provides service to areas of north Springfield that are already inside the City. The subject territory is within the joint jurisdiction of Springfield Police Department and Lane CountY Sheriff's Department. Upon annexation, this area will receive Springfield Police services on an equal basis with other properties inside the City. Fire and Ememencv Services - Fire protection is currently provided to the annexation area by the City of Springfield Fire & Life Safety under contract with Rainbow Water and Fire District. Upon annexation, the City will continue to provide fire and emergency services to the subject territory. The nearest Springfield fire station (Fire Station #3) is located on 28th Street at the intersection with Centennial Boulevard. Emergency medical transport ( ambulance) services are provided on a regional basis by Eugene, Springfield, and Larie Rural Fire/Rescue to central Lane County. The annexation area will continue to receive this service consistent with the adopted ambulance service area (ASA) plan. Mutual aid agreements have been adopted by the three regional ASA providers to provide backup coverage for each other's jurisdictions. Attachment 5-24 Date fl.e:.:eived: ~6/~/'" Planner: AL I . .' . . EXHIBIT 0-5 Parks and Recreation - Park and recreation services are provided to the City of Springfield by the Willamalane Park and Recreation District. Indoor recreation facilities, such as the Willamalane Park Swim Center, Lively Park Swim Center, Memorial Building Community Ceoter, and Willamalane Adult Activity Center will be available to residents (if any) and property owoers as new development occurs. It is not expected that the requested annexation area will generate an appreciable number of new residential units, owing to the industrial land use designation. The park district offers various after-school and other programs for children at schools and parks throughout the community. Also available are pathways and several categories of parks, including community parks, sports parks, special use parks, and natural area parks. The closest developed neighborhood park to the requested annexation area is Page Park at 1300 Hayden Bridge Road. Other existing and future parks in the vicinity include Harvest Landing and Pierce Park (currently undeveloped). Concurrent with annexation to the City of Springfield, the subject area will be annexed to the Willamalane Park and Recreation District consistent with City policy, if the City Council determines that annexation to the special district is in the best interest of the City. Schools - Springfield School District serves the north Springfield area. Existing schools - Yolanda Elementary, Briggs Middle, and Springfield High School serve the neighborhood, including the subject annexation area. However, because the subject area is proposed to remain public right-of-way it is not expected the annexed territory would generate any population, including school children. Sanitarv Sewer - The annexation area can be served by extension of an existing public sanitary sewer line that terminates at the westerly edge of the 19th Street right-of-way boundary. The existing IS-inch sanitary sewer line flows to a sanitary sewer lift station located at the corner of 19th Street and (future) Vera Drive: As development proceeds on the adjoining properties, future sanitary sewer connections and upgrades may be required as described in the Annexation Agreement signed by the contiguous property owner. Concurrent with annexation to the City of Springfield, the subject area will be annexed to the Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District, ifthe City Council determines that annexation to the special district is in the best interest of the City. Stormwater - There are no existing stormwater facilities within or abutting the subject annexation area. Future development of the adjoining land to the west will provide for extension of stormwater service from the current storm water lines in Vera Drive. The annexation area will require appropriate stormwater management techniques in accordance with City standards and as described in the Annexation Agreement signed by the contiguous property owoer. Streets - The subject annexation area is a partially developed local access road currently improved with a narrow gravel surface. The portion of 19th Street requested for annexation represents the public street frontage for at least three properties, one of which is already annexed and planned for future residential development (Map 17-03-24-31, PIn. Tax Lot 2000). It is expected that developable pOrlionsofTax Lot 2000 will derive access from 19th Street, and therefore street improvements would be expected concurrently with development of the property. Provision for future 19th Street improvements is detailed in the Annexation Agreement signed by the contiguous property owoer. Solid Waste Management - The City and Sanipac have an exclusive franchise arrangement for residential garbage service inside the City limits. Upon annexation, solid waste disposal service can be provided by Sanipac. It is not expected the street right-of-way will generate a need for solid waste service on itS owo, but it will facilitate extending the service to adjacent residential developments. Communication Facilities - Various providers offer both wired and wireless communication services in the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area. Existing providers and those entering the market have the capability to provide service to future development in this area. . Attachment 5-25 Date, Rcceived;_.t16!~/.l!..-- Planner: AL . . . ~ . . EXHIBIT D-6 Land Use Controls - The annexation area is within Springfield's portion of the urban growth boundary. Through an intergovernmental agreement between Lane County and the City of Springfield, the City already has planning and building jurisdiction for this property. The <;:ity will continue to administer land use controls after annexation. Finding: The minimum level of key urban facilities and services, as defmed on page Y-3 of the Metro Plan, are either immediately available or can be provided within a reasonable future time frame as needed. The Annexation Agreement signed by the contiguous property owner details the timing and delegation of financial responsibility for provision of key urban services to the annexation area, including street improvements. Conclusion: The proposal meets this criterion. D. Where applicable fIScal impacts to the City have been mitigated through an Annexation Agreement or other mechanism approved by the City Council. Finding: The owner of contiguous property to the west has executed an Annexation Agreement that outlines the City and Applicant's responsibilities for provision of key urban services and other considerations. Future improvements to 19th Street are detailed in the Agreement. Conclusion: The proposal meets this criterion. DIRECTOR'S RECOMMENDATION: Approve the annexation of the subject territory to City of Springfield, Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District, and Willamalane Park and Recreation District, and withdraw tbe requested annexation area from the Rainbow Water and Fire District. City Council Decision (SDC 5.7-145): City Council approval of the annexation application shall be by Ordinance. Finding: The City Council held a Public Hearing on January 19,2010 for the subject annexation request. Based on the staff analysis and recommendation, and on testimony provided at the Public Hearing, the City Council approved the annexation area (portion of 19th Street located between Map 17-03-24-00 and Map 17-03-24-31) per Ordinance No. ---' totaling approximately 0.66 acres. Zoning (SDC 5.7-150): The annexation area is within a region of north Springfield designated as Low Density Residential (LOR) in the Metro Plan. The current zoning for contiguous properties to the east is LOR with Urbanizable Fringe Overlay ~istrict (LORlUF-IO). The contiguous property to the west is zoned LOR and lies inside the City limits. Finding: Upon the effective date of the annexation, the UF -10 overlay is automatiCally removed and the subject territory retains the zoning of the contiguous property to the west (LOR), which is consistent with the Metro Plan designation. Effective Date and Notice of Approved Annexation (SDC 5.7-155): Ifthe annexation is approved by the City Council on January 19, 2010 and granted a second reading on February 16, 2010, the Ordinance will become effective 30 days after adoption by the City Council and execution by the Mayor (anticipated on or around March 18,2010), or upon fmal acceptance by the State - whichever date is later. Finding: City Council gave second reading to Ordinance _ on effective consistent with SOC 5.7-155 and ORS Chapter 222 on , 20 I O. The Ordinance became ,2010. Attachment 5-26 DatE'! Received: 2);'/~/D Planner: AL . . .. . . EXHIBIT D-7 Withdrawal from Special Service Districts (SDC 5.7"160): Withdrawal from special districts may occur concurrently with the approved annexation Ordinance or after the effective date of the annexation of territory to the City. The Director shall recommend to the City Council for consideration of the withdrawal of the annexed territory from special districts as specified in ORS 222. In determining whether to withdraw the territory, the City Council shall determine whether the withdrawal is in the best interest ofthe City. Notice of the withdrawal shall be provided in the same manner as the annexation notice in Section 5.7-150. Finding: The annexation area is within the Rainbow Water and Fire District. Consistent with SDC 5.7-160, notice was provided, a public hearing was held, and the City Council determined that withdrawal from the Rainbow Water and Fire District was in the best interest of the City. The withdrawal decision was codified in Ordinance No. Exhibit: A. Assessor's Map showing property requested for annexation (redlined) and numbered survey courses contained in legal description Attachment 5-27 Date Received: ~hl&'" Planner: AL . , . POl~ OF ~NINC. ......_'" --,.... JIlO..l--"'GJDI NOre NUWBERED COURSES COINCIDE WITH COURSE NUwB[RS SHOWN ON TIlE LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR TtE APPROPRlA.TE 'T'RACT. . EXHIBIT A tM'I'DEN BRU:E STUB Of( (co. RD. "') ~ ---~...I.-_- -- ~~. 019-01 0.11 .. """ .... ,..".. .9J'lc ,. .... , I ~ 019-04 S.41475 - ,.w... 1 ~ t" .L"lc. Attachment 5-28 1 '2' PI", I'Q AL EXHIBIT 0-8 'fF', ~J(~/,)t7I" . . . . EXHIBIT 0-9 Legal Description A portion of the 19th Street right of way from the intersection with Hayden Bridge Road Southerly; being more completely described as follows: Beginning at the Initial Point of Land Partition Plat No. 92-P0306, as filed for public record in the Office of the Lane County, Oregon Surveyor, in County Surveyor's File No. 31021, on January 4, 1993; thence on the following five (5) numbered courses: I) North 000 03' 28" West a distance of 170.00 feet along the Westerly line of the said partition plat to a point on the North right of way line of Hayden Bridge Road; thence 2) North 890 58' 29" East a distance of35.00 feet along the Northerly right of way of Hayden Bridge Road to a point; thence . 3) leaving the North right of way line of Hayden Bridge Road, crossing the road and along the Easterly right of way line of 19th Street, South 000 03' 28" East a distance of986.99 feet to a point of curvature in the easterly right of way; thence 4) leaving the Easterly right of way of 19th Street and crossing it at right angles, South 890 56' 32" West a distance of35.00 feet to a point on the Westerly line of above said partition plat; thence 5) North 000 03' 28" West a distance of 817.01 feet along the Westerly line of above said partition plat to the point of beginning. Basis of bearing for this description is Partition Plat 92-P0306. Attachment 5-29 Date Received:j!I';,1of,.,,_ Planner: AL