The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPacket, Pre PLANNER 6/1/2010 . PRE-SUBMITTAL DISTRIBUTION LIST: .. Date Distributed: ~tJ-3HO J Dave Puent - Building v Gilbert GordonlMelissa Fechtel- Fire J .11'- n, 1 u .,11- Traffic ~ ..J.f~ V'Matt Stouder - Public Works/Engineering . Chris Moorhead, Surveying Planner, ~ ~ RECEIVED JUN ;..1 2010 By: Vl't-- PtUld- { 0 f 2s CP~ City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 541-725-3753 Phone 541-726-3689 Fax . . Pre-Submittal Meeting Case Number Assigned: PRE2010-00008 Date Submitted: 5/28/2010 Proiect Name: DUKES 2/LOT PART 740 28TH ST Project Description: Pre-Submittal Meeting - Partition one lot into tow parcels Application Type: Partition Tentative Job Address: 740 28TH ST Assessor's & Tax Lot #: 1703361111300 DISCLAIMER: Applications will not be exempt from Development Code or procedural amendments that may occur between the time of the Pre-Submittal Meeting and Submittal of the Application for Development Review. Please contact our office at 541-726-3753 with any questions or concerns. A Planner will be assigned the following business day and will contact you to confirm the meeting date and time. I L PFCD MAY 2 SlOW PlanJobPrint.rpt 5/28/2010 1O:38:57AN . . v Pre-Submittal Meeting Development Services Department Room 616 PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING DATE: Tuesday, June 8, 2010 1. PRE-SUBMITIAL MTG #PRE2010-00008 (pARTITION TENT) DUKES & DUKES Assessor's Map: 17-03-36-11 TL 11300 Address: 740 28th Street Existing Use: Residential The applicant submitted plans to partition one lot into two parcels. Meeting Date/Time: Tuesday, June 8, 2010 10:00-11:00 DSD 616 Planner: Andy Limbird 2. PRE-SUBMITIAL MTG #PRE2010-00007 (SITE PLAN TENT) SLAYDEN CONST. Assessor's Map: 17-02-34-44 TL 1000 Address: 240 & 250 S 67th Street Existing Use: Vacant The applicant submitted plans to construct a 120-unit apartment complex - Waterstone Apartments Meeting Date/Time: Tuesday, June 8, 2010 11:00 - noon DSD 616 Planner: Andy Limbird PRE.SUBMITTAl REeD MAY 2 8 2010 . . SPRINGFIELD WL. City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Land Division Tentative Plan Partition, Subdivision .. . ~. . . - . ..- A licant Name: Dukes and Dukes Construction Phone: 541-747-3130 Com an : Address: Dukes and Dukes Construction Fax: 2955 Yolanda OR 97477 A licant's Re .. Aaron J Grimes Sr Olson & Morris Phone: 541-302-9790 Fax: 541-485-3253 Address: 380 Street S OR, 97477 Owner: David E. & Laurie S. Dukes Dukes and Dukes Construction Phone: 541-747-3130 Fax: . Address: 2955 Yolanda Avenue, S rin field OR 97477 Ki~');W[ ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-03-36-11 Address: 740 28th St 23,660 Pro osed Name of Subdivision: nja TAX LOT NO S : 11300 Acres D S uare Feet C8J Description of If you are filling in this fo~m by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Pro osal: Existin Use: Residential Associated A Iications: 20tJZOIO - oemo 2- Date: J;; Si ns: Pre-Sub Case No.: P Reviewed b ~ Case No.: A lication Fee: $ 3 TOTAL FEES: () , ,",'Whi\" Mi4 Date: Technical Fee: $ Posta e Fee: $ PRE-SUBMITTAL EC'D ~ -'( n ~ \0 _MOO"" PROJECT NUMBER: I'--J~ W ~ Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 1 of 10 . . Owner Signatures I This application form is used for both the required pre-submittal meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted. Pre-Submittal The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. Owner: a-~~~. ~ignature David E. Dukes Print Date: :J} Submittal I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check performed on this application at the Pre-Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a complete application. Owner: Date: Signature Print PRE.SUBMITTAL RECtO MAY 2 8 2010 "" . Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 2 of 10 . . land Division Tentative Application Process 1. Applicant Submits a Land Division Tentative Application for Pre-Submittal o The application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet. o A pre-submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre-submittal meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon. o Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre-submittal meetings within five to seven working days of receiving an application. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre-Submittal Meeting o The applicant, owner, and design team are strongiy encouraged to attend the pre- submittal meeting. o The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes. o The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre-Submittal Checklist specifying the items required to make the application complete if it is not aiready complete, and the applicant has 180 days submit a compiete application to the City. 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision o A complete application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet. o A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hear'ing, unless appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application. o Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property. o There is a 14-day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed. o Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice. o Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. o At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision prior to issuing the final land use decision. o The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. o The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O MAY :: -, Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 3 of 10 . . ~ I I n I~ GST CD '" SITE Map 17-03-36-11 Tax Lot 11300 North J: t Iii '" CITY OF SPRINGFIELD VICINITY MAP PRE2010-00008 740 28th Street WHITlJl.QRTH IN (IJ J: Iii '" PRE-SUBMITTAL REC1t) MAY 2 g 2010 ..... .~~~~~~~~_. ~~~;~~ ~~..~.~ ~~~. I . iIlnliili!lUlH1il~IUilll:l'I~~iIlillill~iIll.il~ ill .-==-=~ - III g I~~ :llla"IU 8tllihi lI'1ilhllll '" , ! lllh;'~18111!1 r~iild~ii!8 ,,8 I i" --c~ ---:',.,~ i i,:iI!ll!iiillll!lIil'~II!iU;I;111 ~ \ i. \1 ~ ~n lilt, i 1 & 111I1"~iIl "!I!-U i .~iill II ~! t _1- -a I fT" ~ "Iijiiii-I ~~~:~;!~ali~II;1 ;~; '!!I il T .""~.: ~\ II . II I I'll- al=ll~ 11:<l~ ll,h It ~ / (, , I "~I ~i:' . o.a.U It Itr 11'11 :!.-:-=!. '--~--:'JJ~~nJ I ,ill B~ Iii ~dill", hhll 9 : ~" I ~lll Ij~ji ;iiR!'1; :. r--~-~ :: -JL-~ ~~- ail, i ;;~;:! 'II ~!I ': I - -f- - - tll i ~ \ l R~aj I! Ish;; I' liIll';1 ~ i --I ~n III1 ! r 'II, I~R:ll III lijlijlll I ; I" " L all ~, gil~ ;~~~; II,,~ ~ 1'1. l~ I -r-U: .~ ~ai! i ;! ,;: ~ !~ ~~ -,-,.---mi~-l-----) I I-I ;!I,; a:~ ~ ji ~B -. - r~-- -~ ~---: 'I! J ~!!i!!i, I J! ill i., I i ~ I ~ ~~! ~ U l! II 1 ill lL. - t~lt --r--1t \ "ll Ii .~ ~I : e~ ~I . -~. - , 1 III~' , in;: j" i i :!I 811'1' i _.J I!n a I',/r-~ '--- ~n'!! :ll a."" I . ~ .'1 'I - hl~ i ~ j ~I ii! l .~~**__- /!r ! . h . S . '~-.L-=!. ,---- - --------j l I~ ;II ij Iii h '"- ,"- ~~ . . 1'1 ~ _~a /". ----- - -------1 I ! /! t~l~ : . : I II ~,' ~! III~e i ~ '. 1 ~ I al ' I : I" . ~ L-r :.11 "! ':"'l. . ~ Ii I \ I ~ i : !n: l.~ ~ ~~-1 I! !: ~, ~ Ii "':? I~ ~" .ilHI IU t IIHT'1':1 !1~~1~1" 111 nlU : ['"', rn o Z. (Jo !:l1l ilUUIUIUIUl1I · I; II! : II! I i I ill i P ~ iii ~=I!.I~::! d" ~.. 11&111 ~ ;:::1 ali III ... ~ iiI ~ or.> :l>lIItll ~. I e '" .-- I il ~ ::::0 . o rn C1 o ~. ';," ':'--'~E" ~;.~ I' '!S IU' 1 ,1. -7/ .. Ie.. 'e'. e'.- ~>,r. ~...... ___n . , /'~ ~ r ......, \ ~ ~....,~.,...~..., \ - ~.,~ ,.-,f81I;.~-"'f'- ~.i:---'~'" ~ ~L~' :.= -=- ,~~;;.:f'-';'="':= - -:-"'. , .' ,.4:.~';;":'.";"'- .,~..~~ ~...............~. -.-.- _._._._._._~- '. 6 !l! ~E ~I ~U U! n~ . ~ ~! Ii! &1' II; &!I w .. 0 ,,~~1I f ~ ~ ~ ~ Ii Cd ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 (54!) 302-9790 ~~ ;!lOll :;;,:... ~~~l:;:, t:j~~S E!l ~. ~ ~ ~ !l;it:~C15 :.. ~~;. ~~~ -.:a'" /ll ...~il! l:;:, !S !I:>~' 5=::: ~, ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~:OlI CI5 l:'j;ol ~!I:: I I I .., :1 ~ '-'-'\r-...J .. ~-Z_ ~ &. ; , ~ ~ Ii Ii ij r' fJJ o Z 11<> ~ o ::0 ::0 Iii w (fJ o 9ST I.:. ',,: I T Ii: "..ni...;it I \ \ II '. " 1 ~ I.. T ,\ . I. :..... = 1 .' ,1 r....1 ~ I 1 ) I l~'" . j.J.. . ,,~ "" :"1'"1 . '.t" , . r I II ::::. I '11- I '. r :: ';' : I I ~ \ \ ' ,.. l....tJ' I \ , I IIUUlni~;11I .. II I ~ III1II i P :U iU"I!~ i; .~ '"'0 ;::c m . :s:: cr.> . =!<~ to:):5: C#)~ "" ...- O;::c o rn ("") d ~ ~t:~ ~ ;~;, a .. III I 1\ I I ~ ~ . ~ , . "\ . i . \ I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I i I Q .. . 11 . \ ---'"' . . '- I ..~ , I I ~l!I/' : I' 0 , , ~ tel.... .... ,.".. J '.. \ I " ~~_-jST 1.l I L ~1m~'.;: \: """"I::"it'; "".:1 1 i..' ,";..'", . ';.I."t......:, . i')" J~~' "II I ~.I~I:.:'. .110' ".,.t . "'.ail ~"T I }"/t. ':~ ',.1 . ...., ~. ,... :..~.) t" , .., ., !rt~""'''' / I' '" ',." I ,,/ '~'1 i ,~.:,.I ,'-----~ I.' .....1 I',' -,"1 Ii." :..~,'-. .. :.::'~~~'~::::~ ~: 1 .'. '~'I 1"1 ")1 ,;1 (..... ,," e lili":"il .. ,,,,,1,,' ': \,_. $I "', ~. 1 L"JI.'" If,' '''~''I ~. ~, \, ,j . I:. ':,:;':,1 11"':['''' 1 :1- ",",1,1 : I;'.~ .:.1 I' ,iI ,.", Il~I...:,.: '''f . > . '.' 1-, . .. I I',." ',,'.....,.. .. ~" 1,1'0' ""r'~ ,; :1 I', ,I ", '..1 I~' , "',: ~'i .,,0.4 ~~'; ': :.,":'-'~ ,.. "'.") .'. r L I .~.'. r l' ~: II .~..I Ii ,L.._ n ~ \ . \ . t i B L._.. . \ ~, .............~ . \ SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 (54!) 302-9790 !g:;;,,: ;!!... ~ ~... ~ ~;;a~~ ~ j;j~~~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~h:~r^ :'Ii '. ;l!:$'i -J !II:: iEbi.i:-t ~~~ ""C~-.. :a;; ...~~~ ~ .!O:o.:. ~ 5l ~~~ ~ ~ co~~ CIj ~ 1;'$;111 :;;,,: ~!I:: l! .. ~-l- ~ , III ~acJl~i:b~;!iiiiii ;;p;j;.~;:~::: ":-0..,,.,. ""~, ;t: I 'll;Ulll!lUnli~Ullllil~I~&Ull~'I~~~ a.-=:=~ """""- I! ;;1;!'15111IiliE!i~l:i;!J:! !: i I F-:-~~ --': II i~ :i~!;iii~~!I~d!l:dQn!rl; III \~ I I ; d! li~! ~ J I h~ll~ U llll~ihill~'ll I Is 'i-, .j"-----a1Ilib ~! ,l;li;l, h::!;!lili~Bjllli:; nlll}-. "i! /,J 1 ~'a III ISlal- lllllll~~ II!CIalll U a ll. ~ ill! / \ :!I a tl~~i ;. fi.!!.n It I!.r I;a :!.-=!. ~~l --~--J Ii II ;~ j!j ~llhal h!i". ~9 ----; ---.-....., I nltl II !:~:!I ;;ahl l i I L_~~-~- ~=-tuL_ \~-~. i R ~ Ii la~i~:. J~ :ii ~ II i .~ ,tll r'--H: ~ ai: ~ Ii' 6! !!!&!! III ! I ~ I ~ I il~1 ~: ~ti ~ ;.; aa li,li,l! I aU ! ~ 'I '1- _alu - i at; j t):! ~ a:. I II l' I. I..,' --~- ,..-:..; : !;i,; ill!1 i !! ; ~ :!c=' I f-- ~- --r.~;:i>~. a ,! i5 !Iil Iil, ,I JVJ@;,.r;; l,i~j.i'i<i,;,', I ~ !~I ~ III;! Ii !; GII~ -d +L:- "1;~I!~,~~fs~1 \ i ""Iil il ~j; Hi I 61 II i .u i - t.J I i ~">)i~-'f ", ; n, R : .! 1111 I': I.~ I J a ~*/;,~~<~ .-: II =;II! i ~ ti~. ~; II I L - /~I'Jf'1'r;~' I Sf !I Q IS " /,' , '\ .., n a ~ ; i I -.1.....,..-:1. l-:=~=--::~-;/--~':'~k. :,:<, . 1;1 Ii ,. ."w ".,I,~,~ I (fl....! !, t T r I I \, '\ II ~ / w, i'--- -1l-----~<~j;:,1 ~ II ,!..r,~1 ~'\ .X/I I;.; / I tal .,1".", il llTIJI~ l"~'~I'n+II' Il:j //~ w\ -;al~c,:~!:~:.'g al . 1 1"" " '" I. \lJ.',/:." i lilli5ml:~~:lil 1, r"' ~!\,n~,i~ t II! . ila :lllllllIli p ;H:~.';~'l i ~-Z-r- '.. I ia~11 ! I ~ ! Ii ' "r! rr: ':~;I':;'" ,t ~ j;. v UI ,k/.('" ! :;;: ~ a Ii III aliS ~..' ....: . ~ s: Ii I~ ~ i I . j" II; ~. I C) ~ --I I 11 I 1M. -, ,l;;...\: ~I I,.. lil ClQ s;! a I f~ li-"",I"l la !!I ~ ~ !U~~" IIII11 [! li::J<'.;l If .. c> n=; , " I r;;.~l.'.: ',' ~ : '""' " - I.I"'.'~ ~ t'" , ! I u 'lI ",v" ...... ....1 J (fJ 0 ,; -.. . i-'~'-'\r--' ~ UIU:UIUI ~~ ~ 7;~ .:~.. ,"",:, f1~._' ,: I' ~; ....'\ 110 III II' a.~ "r!---:~~'" ....-I;L::il"~ ,'.- n.~ ,;,;: !t II ,,11' IIII.!!~ 'r!e~" ~ t ...... it ~---- i r! .." ~ I l!t ~ 'e" ~ r~~.~/~t. \ -" ai;'I~'r! ~ I I~ 3i i I i!~ I " \~~'~l: ,;~,fl:.~~ "'f~r-,!~~!j ~ ~ i Eiil 111,1 i Iii S i ~~.~~:.~~~~+-e ~ a i '\ ,- Q ST. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 (54!) 302-9790 ~:o.: i:!!~ ;t~ CIl!:'l" ~~~ ~ ~ ""~~!=::: ~ ~" ~ ~ :o! ~h:~ ~ CI) :::! ;it" .... t:j ~toj:""l~~~ -.;!:)... :IiO ...~~~ ~ ~!j" !=::: ::i ~~t ~ ~ ~ ~:... V5 c;'$:IIl ~!t: l! . . TENTATIVE PARTITION APPLICATION FOR DAVID E. & LAURIE S. DUKES Date: May 21, 2010 Owners/Applicants: David E & Laurie S Dukes 2955 Yolanda Avenue Springfield, OR 97477 (541) 747-3130 Applicant's Representative: Olson & Morris 380 Q Street, Suite 200 Springfield, OR 97477 (541) 302-9790 PlanningIProject Coordinator: Aaron Grimes 380 Q Street, Suite 200 Springfield, OR 97477 (541) 302-9790 FAX (541) 485-3253 aaronlalolsonandmorris.com Assessor's Map: 17-02-36-11 Tax Lots: 11300 Area of Request: 23,660 Square Feet Existing Zoning: R-l (Low Density Residential) Plan Designation: Low Density Residential Number of Parcels Proposed: 2 (Standard) Backe:round This application is for a tentative partition at 740 28th Street within the Springfield city limits. The proposed partition will create tWo-(2) parcelS'out of one (1) existing lots. Both of the parcels will be designated as a standard lots. The lots will have access coming from 28th Street. The site currently has four( 4) structures located on it. PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'D MAY 2 8 2010 . Dukes & Dukes Tentative Partition May 21,2010 Page I . . The Tentative Plan Criteria per Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-125 are addressed below. In addition, the applicable requirements for a tentative partition per the "land division checklist" are also addressed. ' SDC 5.12-125 Tentative Plan Criteria (A) The request conforms to the provisions of this Code pertaining to lot/parcel size and dimensions. Standard Lots SDC 3.2-215 requires that lots or parcels on north-south streets have a minimum of5,000 square feet in area and 60 feet of frontage. The following table lists the lots havingfrontage on 28th Street, a north-south street. Parcel 1 2 8,707 14,953 0* 70 * A predevelopment meeting was held on March 11 lb, 2010. An Irrevocable Access Easement was the City Staff's preferred access, and thus proposed as part of this partition. Said easement area to cover a 20-foot wide private driveway. Pursuant to SDC 3.2-220(B), the Director may waive the requirement of frontage if access has been guaranteed as specified in Section 4.2- 120A. Said Irrevocable Access Easement guarantees access to a public street. (B) The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and/or applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual Development Plan. The Metro Plan Diagram shows this property as appropriate for Low Density Residential. This plan designation is consistent with the applicable zorung, which is LDR. (C) Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including but not limited to, water and electricity; sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded and the public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by this Code and other applicable regulations. The Public Works Director or a utility provider shall determine capacity issues. . All existing public improvements necessary to serve the proposed development are located within the 28th Street right-of-way, with the exception to wastewater. There is an 8" wastewater line and manhole located on the subject property, near the North property line. This 8" wastewater line is adequate to accommodate the three additional proposed dwellings in the future. In addition, there is a 16" water main and gas line in the right-of-way. Further, the existing right-of-way, 28th Street, can easily accommodate the mirumal increase in traffic from the three new dwellings that will be created. The capacity requirements of these public improvements will not be exceeded with the proposed development and these improvements will be available at the time of development. . PRE-SUBMlTIAl REC'O Dukes & Dukes Tentative Partition May 21, 2010 . . (D) The proposed land division shall comply with all applicahle public and private design and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations. , The applicant's project engineer has ensured that all public and private design and construction standards will be met in regards to the proposed utilities and stormwater management system components, as reviewed and approved by the City of Springfield. See DRC 2005-00072, LDP 2009-00023 and COM 2009-00397 for additional information. . (E) Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil or geologic conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters oftrees and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their associated riparian areas; wetlands; rock outcroppings; open spaces; and areas of historic and/or archaeological significance, as may be specified in Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-760, 385.905-955 and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in this Code or in State or Federal law There are no physical features located on the subject property; including significant clusters of trees or shrubs, watercourses, wetlands, rock outcroppings, or historic features. This criterion is not applicable to the subject property. (F) Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas; minimize driveways on arterial and collector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable regulations and comply with the ODOT access management standards for state highways. All proposed dwellings will have ample area adjacent to the dwellings to accommodate parking as required. There is one existing ingress-egress points on the property, which will be removed. One driveway will be needed to be created for access to Parcels I and 2. This ingress-egress point will allow easy and convenient access to the existing right-of-way, 28th Street, for pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicular traffic. From 28th Street, residents will be able to connect to Main Street and Centennial Street; which will provide easy connections to surrounding residential areas, nearby commercial facilities, transit stops, arid neighborhood amenities. This proposed subdivision will provide good street connections for pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicular traffic. (G) Development of any remainder ofthe property under the same ownership can be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of this Code. Property owner does not own any adjacent land. Further, the entire area of this proposed partition will be developed; thus there will be no remainder that could be further divided. Given this fact, this criterion is not applicable. (H)Adjacent land can be developed or is provided access that will allow its development in accordance with the provisions of this Code. The subject partition will have no effect on the development or access to any adjacent property. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D Dukes & Dukes Tentative Partition May 21, 2010 MAY 2 8 2010 Page 3 . . (I) Where the Partition of property that is outside of the city limits but within the City's urbanizable area and no concurrent annexation application is submitted, the standards specified below shall also apply. 1. The minimum area for the partitioning ofIand in the UF-I0 Overlay District shall be 10 acres. 2. EXCEPTIONS: a. Any proposed new parcel between 5 and 10 acres shall require a Future Development Plan as specified in Section 5.12-120E for ultimate development with urban densities as required in this Code. b. In addition to the standards of Subsection 2a, above, any proposed new parcel that is less than 5 acres shall meet one of the following standards: a. The property to be partitioned shall be owned or operated by a governmental agency or public utility; or b. A majority of parcels located within 100 feet of the property to be partitioned shall be smaller than five acres. c. No more than three parcels shall be created from one tract ofIand while the property remains within the UF-I0 Overlay District. EXCEPTION: Land within the UF-I0 Overlay District may be partitioned more than once as long as no proposed parcel is less than 5 acres in size. The subject property, 17-03-36-11 Tax Lot 11300 was annexed into the City of Springfield in 1948. Given this fact, this criterion is not applicable to the subject application. City of Sprinl!:field Land Division Checklist Site Assessment of Existing Conditions (1) Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer Scott Morris, an Oregon licensed Engineer, has prepared this sheet. (2) Vicinity map A vicinity map of the general area around the proposed subdivision is shown on the Site Assessment (sheet I). The vicinity map is also on the Tentative Land Division Plan (sheet 2). (3) The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features inclnding buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. Fore existing structures to remain, also indicate present use and required setbacks from proposed property lines. All existing site features are clearly indicated on Sheets 1 thru 3, including, but not limited to curb-cuts and building setbacks. (4) The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department. Dukes & Dukes Tentative Partition May 21,2010 PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'O MAY f!a~eZ41lO . . No watercourses or riparian areas as shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department are located on this property. (5) The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision. The subject property is located on FIRM Map No. 4lO39CI161F in Zone X. Zone X is an area , determined to be outside of the 500-year floodplain. Given this fact, this requirement is not applicable to the drawings. (6) The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in Article 17 ofthis Code and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department The subject property is located within the I O-year Time of Travel Zone (the zone of concentration) as delineated on the Wellhead Protection Area Map. However, none of the boundaries of the zone of concentration are near the subject property; thus no boundaries can be delineated on the drawing. (7) Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 Yz feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings. There are no significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands, or rock outcroppings on the property. (8) Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the soils survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table Accord~ng to the Soil Survey of Lane County, one hundred percent (100%) of the site is Coburg- Urban Land Complex (No. 32). This information is noted on Sheets I and 2. Tentative Land Division Plan (1) Prepared by an' Oregon licensed Land Surveyor Larry Olson, an Oregon licensed Land Surveyor, has prepared this sheet. (2) City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary, and any special service district boundaries or railroad right-of-way which cross or abut the proposed land division There are no boundaries that cross or abut the proposed land division. (3) Location and width of all existing and proposed easements on and abutting the proposed land division There are six existing easements on the subject property; three 10.00 foot private utility easements, one variable width private utility easement, one sanitary sewer easement, one 27.00 PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'O Dukes & Dukes Tentative Partition May 21, 20lO MAY 2 !l Lom Page 5 . . foot sidewalk and public utility easement. There are six proposed easements on the subject property; one 5.00 foot SUB Electric Easement, one 5.00 foot SUB Water and Electric Easement, bne 10.00 foot Private Utility Easement, one 14.00 foot Sanitary Sewer Easement, one Variable Width Irrevocable Access Easement and one 5.00 foot Private Stormwater Easement. These easements are shown and noted on the tentative partition draWing plans. (4) Boundaries of entire area owned by the property owner, of which the proposed land division is a part, as well as dimensions and size of each parcel and the approximate dimensions of each building site indicating the top. and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale . Proposed Parcell will be 8,707 sf. Proposed Parcel 2 will be 14,593 sf. All dimensions of these parcels are shown on the tentative partition drawing (sheet 2). (5) Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting, including type, height and area of illumination There are no street lights proposed as part of this partition. (6) The location, widths, conditions, and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other rights-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division. Proposed streets should also include approximate radius of curves and grades and relationship to any projected streets as shown on the Metro Plan, TransPlan, Conceptual Development Plan, or Conceptual Local Street Map. The subject property is located adjacent to 28th Street. 28th Street has a 54 foot right-of-way width adjacent to the site. There are no existing or proposed alleys, dedications, or other right-of- ways. (7) Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborh,ood mailbox units and similar public facilities There are no existing or required traffic control devices; the nearest fire hydrant is approximately 100 feet North of the property along the Southerly right-of-way of G Street; there is one power pole, with a transformer and street light, that is located adjacent to the subject property along Westerly right-of-way of 28th Street; there are no neighborhood mailbox units or similar public facilities located adjacent to the subject property; all items are shown on the Site Assessment (sheet 1) and Tentative Land Division Plan (sheet 2). (8) Location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways Location and dimension of existing driveway is shown on the Site Assessment (sheet 1). Both existing and proposed driveways are shown on the Tentative Land Division Plan (sheet 2) and on the Stormwater Management Plan (sheet 3). (9) Location of existing and proposed transit facilities PRE-SUBMITIAL REC'O MAY 2 820m Dukes & Dukes Tentative Partition May 21, 2010 Page 6,. . . There are no proposed transit facilities; existing facilities are addressed in Note 7 on the Site Assessment (sheet 1) and Tentative Land Division Plan (sheet 2). , (10) Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways and bike trails There are no sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, or bike trails adjacent to the subject property. There is a sidewalk along the 28th Street frontage of the subject property, which is shown on the Site Assessment (sheet 1) and Tentative Land Division Plan (sheet 2). There are no proposed sidewalks as part of the subdivision. (11) Location, size. and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip. Landscaping to be completed as approved in the Final Site Plan Review. For additional information, see DRC2005-00072. (12) Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV.. Indicate the proposed connection points All existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site and the connection points are shown on the Tentative Land Division Plan (sheet 2). Proposed utilities will be located underground in appropriate easements. (13) The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose, condition or limitations ofthe reservations clearly indicated There are no areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use: (14) Future Development Plan where phasing or large lots/parcels are proposed as specified in SDC 5.12-120 E. A Future Development Plan is not applicable, as there is no phasing or large lots/parcels being proposed. Stormwater Management Plan (1) Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer Scott Morris, an Oregon licensed Engineer, has approved this sheet. The items shown thereon are reflecting the approved storm water system per the approved Final Site Plan Review (DRC2005-00072), prepared by Scott Goebel, an Oregon licensed Engineer. (2) Planting plan prepared by an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system No planting plan has been proposed as part of this partition. The stormwater management system to be completed as approved in the Final Site Plan Review. For additionalinformation, see DRC2005-00072. PRE.SUBMITIAl REC'D . Dukes & Dukes Tentative Partition May 21, 2010 MAY 2 g 2010 Page 7 . . (3) Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations The roof drainage patterns and discharge locations are shown on the Tentative Land Division Plan (sheet 2) and on the Stormwater Management Plan (sheet 3). (4) Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns are shown on the approved Final Site Plan Review. For additional information, see DRC2005-00072. (5) The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainage ways to be retained. The stormwater management system shown on the Stormwater Management Plan (sheet 3) is reflecting the facilities approved in the Final Site Plan Review. For additional information, see DRC2005-00072. (6) Existing and proposed spot elevations and contour lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) Existing contours are shown on all sheets. (7) Amount of proposed cut and fill As shown on Sheet 6 of the Final Site Plan Review, there are 33 cubic yards of cut proposed and 386 cubic yards offill proposed. (numbers include asphalt pavement volumes) Additional materials that mav be required (1) Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's Association Agreement No deed restrictions or Homeowner's Association are proposed. (2) Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster Subdivision proposal as specified in SDC 3.2-230 This application is for a tentative subdivision; thus this is not applicable. (3) . Riparian Area Protection Report For properties located within 150 feet of the top of. bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (wQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQL W The subject property is not located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any riparian areas. (4) A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present. The soils on the site are stable; thus a geotechnical report is not required. (5) Where the development area is within an overlay district applicable, address the I additional standards of the overlay district... PRE.SUBMITTAl REC D MAY 2 8 2010 Page 8 May 21,2010 Dukes & Dukes Tentative Partition . . The development is not located within an overlay zoning district; thus this is not applicable. (6) If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 No trees are proposed for removal; thus this requirement is not applicable. (7) A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division',of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property There are no wetlands on the subject property; thus this is not applicable: . (8) Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review, There are no federal or state permits required with this proposed subdivision. (9) Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted with the land use application The Land and Drainage Alteration permit process has already been completed with the City of I Springfield, see LDP 2009-00023. ' (10) Where applicable, any Discretionary Use, Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 No Discretionary Use, Variance, or Modification of Provisions application is required. (11) An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer The subject property is located within the city limits and has sanitary sewer existing on the site. Said property was annexed in 1948, thus this criterion is not applicable. (12) All public improvements proposed to be installed !lnd to include the approximate time of installation and method of financing The approximate time of installation and method of financing for all public improvements will be addressed as'part of COM 2009-00397, Ifthere are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at Olson and Morris (aaron@olsonandmorris.com) or by phone at 302-9790. . Thank you, (Lw.,tLA. Aaron I Grimes Sr Land Survey Technician PRE-SUBMITIAL REC'O MAY 2 8 2010 Dukes & Dukes Tentative Partition May21,2010 Page 9 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT / Engineering Division Fax: (541) 736-1021 STORMWATERMANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK Project Name: Assessors Parcel #: TL 11300 Land Vse(s): Single Family Project Size (Acres): 23,522 Area: Applicant: Date: Phone #: Fax#: Email: 747-3130 485-3253 Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map): Partition of Tax Lot 11300 of Tax Map 17-03-36-11 into 2 parcels 4Iv~.Jl ~pro~ ~J Lov-: L~ _ p..../f- S,~ ~,c...-..> J'-~ &..,~ J... f-<-"..-, d- Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach dditional sheet(s) if necessary: Proposed Storinwater Best Management Practices: Draina!!e Study Type mDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note. VH may be substituted for Rational Method) o Small Site Study - (use Rational Method for calculations) . o Mid-Level Development Study - (use Unit Hydragraph Method for calculations) o Full Drainage Development Study - (use Unit Hydragraph Method for calculations) Environmental Considerations: o Wellhead Zone: o WetiandlRiparian: o Soil Type: Downstream Analysis: ON/A o Flow line for starting water surface elevation: o Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation: o Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: o Hillside Development: o FloodwaylFloodplain: o Other Jurisdictions: Return to Matt Stouder MAY 2 8 2010 Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 9 of 10 . . Owner Signatures This application form is used for both the required pre-submittal meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted. Pre-Submittal Owner: The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for sCheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. 4~~ Signature Date: Print Submittal I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check performed on this application at the Pre-Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. ThiS statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a complete application. Owner: Date: Signature David E. Dukes Print PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'D MAY 2 8 2010 Revised 1{1{08 Molly Markarian 2 of 10 . COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS * Based upon the informatian provided on the front of this sheet, the following represents a minimum of what is neededfor an application to be complete for submittal with respect to drainage; however, this list should not be used in lieu of the Springfield Development Code (SDC) or the City's Engineering DesignManual. Compliance with these requirements does not constitute site approval; Additional site specific information may be required Note: Upon scoping sheet submittal, ensure completedform has been signed in the space provided below: Interim Design Standards/Water Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3) Req'd N/A D 0 All non-building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e.g. multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil filtration media) for stormwater quality. Additionally, a minimum of 50% oflbe NBR impervious surface shall be treated by vegetated melbods. . o 0 Where required, vegetative stormwater design shall be consistent wilb interim design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth by the Bureau of Environmental Services (BES) or Clean Water Services (CWS). o 0 For new NBR impervious area less Iban 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified by Ibe BES for vegetative treatment. o 0 If a stormwater treatment swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes, bottom slope, and seed mix consistent wilb either BES or CWS requirements. o 0 Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM o 0 All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside oflbe building, shall be provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure. General Study Requirements (EDSPM Section 4.03) o 0 Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in Ibe state of Oregon. o 0 A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map. o 0 Calculations showing system capacity for a 2-year storm event and overflow effects of a 25-year storm event. D 0 The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins. Review of Downstream System (EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C) o 0 A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by Ibe Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSe). o 0 Elevations oflbe HGL and flow lines for bolb city and private systems where applicable. Design of Storm Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04) o 0 Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on Ibe plan set. o 0 Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 80,000 lb load without failure of the pipe structure. D 0 Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 oflbe EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to achieve a minimum velocity oftbree (3) feet per second at 0.5 pipe full based on Table 4-1 as well. Other/Misc o 0 Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains o 0 Private stormwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stormwater flows from one property to another D 0 Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, wilb the exception of residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03.4.A). Additionalprovisions apply to Ibis as required by Ibe DEQ. Refer to the website: www.deo.state.or.us/wo/groundwa/uichome.hcm for more information. o 0 Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre-development rates for Ibe 2 tbrough 25-year storm events 'This form shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover, of the storm water study ~~JI1111Ik'~i~~~."wiiE~ml~ig1!!~1iT~m~~lm~~~~~~1Pl!igli~1Ii!~~~A.i.~i'1~f.-I.~ As Ibe engineer of record, I hereby certifY the above required items are complete and included wilb Ibe submitted storm water study and plan set. PRE.SUBMITTAL RECIO SIgnature: Date: MAr 2 8 2010 Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian ..10 of 10