Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 6/1/2010 'I . . :City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Historical Review Application Historical Review Tel - Minor Alterations; Sites or Structures: Historical Review Tell - Ma"or Alterations; Sites or Structures: Historical Review T e III: Addition of a Site or Structure to the Historic Landmark Invento Removal of a Site or Structure from the Historic Landmark Inventor Demolition of Historic Land Mark Structures Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section) A Iicant Name: Rose Ma Shrode Ebbert Memorial United Methodist Church Phone: 541-726-6380 Fax: 547-747-3013 Address: 532 C Street S rin field OR 97477 A Iicant's Re .: Ronald Henin er Phone: 541-746-3513 Address: Ebbert Memorial United Methodist Church Fax: 532 C Street S rin field OR 97477 Owner: Ebbert Memorial United Methodist Church Com an : Phone: 541-746-3513 Fax: Address: 532 C Street S rin field OR 97477 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17033524 TAX LOT NO S: 08900 Address: 547 D Street S rin field OR 97477 Description of Proposal: ~ 12 ~ ~ ~ CUtLI~il ~ ~--fo Ju~ 'ttrt c..J ~ N..~. Original submittal JUN -.\ 2010 . ...- Associated A Iications: Case No.: A lication Fee: Technical Fee: TOTAL FEES: PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 1.16.09ddk 1 of 7 . . . Signatures An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted. The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate. Applicant: Q~fY1~ Signature 'Kos .... Ma. ""1 , Print ~ ( Date: f.s, _/-10 S h../2Ide If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. Owner: (Ko-J/l d \ Signature ~ L Date: ~ I 20/0 'ROhaf,,{ Print H~~~VI.&ev Date Received: JUN -1 2010 Original Submittal Revised 1.16.09ddk 2 of 7 '. .' . . Description of Proposal: During one of our typical winter rain and strong wind storms a four inch stem was blown/broken off from the central portion of a main tree trunk. The group of Western Redceders are located in the southeastern corner of our vacant lot appear to be declining in health. We called a certified arborist, Thomas Twyford of A Able Arbarist, to complete a Tree Hazard Evaluation Form (THEF) and evaluate the health of the trees. His completed THEF is attached for your review. He explained that the major reason for the problem is due to the above power lines that require the trees to be continually topped to prevent them from getting into the lines. Doing this leaves a fresh cut surface on the top, which collects water and becomes an ideal spot for heart rot to become established. Apparently this has happened as he attests to in his evaluation process. This presents a public liability problem for us, as we are concerned that someone walking on the sidewalk could become injured or if a limb falls into 6th Street it could damage a vehicle if this happens again. This group of trees is frequently used as a "hang-out" spot by young people and homeless people throughout the year. People congregating under the trees, particularly in weUwindy weather, significantly increases the exposure to the hazards presented by these trees. Tom's report indicates that the trees should be removed. We are making this application for approval to follow up on his recommendation of tree removal. We have also attached photos of trees on lot, relationship to power lines, central core area showing dead stems, and area of recently broken off stem. Our plan is not to replace trees in the same location as they too eventually would be under the power lines and require topping. Date Received: ~ J"., -'! 2"'0 ......Ij ... Origina; Sul:m;tt,,; . " ^-!~tl";;AZJrRD"'EVA"LtVA'r/(JN HlRMa;":,,~~oo ..,.. . * SitelAddress: Uo1l-.1.orl t?1r-f-ko# af~.J, 5:"5 c C:2...: MaplLocation: Owner: pub!' . private u~known . . '@f':.er (JIll K.\ "'\ (j Inspector T!1c.ncf,.La.J,4 7C.JV{;;tt fN 6(j){-1t I Hj~rD RATlN~ L( +-+ Failure + Size + Target Potential of part Rating ~ Immediate action needed Needs further inspeCtion Dead tree /0 . Hazard Rating Date: mEE CHA~CTERISTICS - Tree#: R-a.J Species: -rh""..5i> p/;cde DSH: h{( ~ l1o'~ of trunks: 1Ilu.\t.~le Height: ?--.il Spread: I r(- 7"6' Fa"": 0 generally. symmetric 0 minor asymmetry. 1tmajor asymmetry 0 stump sprout Ijstag-headed ,. Cr~\..m class: 0 dominant 0 co-dominant 0 .intermediate ~uppressed Live crown ratio: (') % Age class: 0 y.oung 0 semi-mature 0 mature 0 over-mature/senescent Priming history: 0 crown cleaned 0 excessively. thinned Ii topped 0 crown raised 0 pollarded 0 crown reduced 0 flush cuts 0 cabled/braced l 0 none 0 mUltiple pruning events Approx. dates: . ; ~\ . Special Value: 0 specimen 0 heritagefhistoric 0 wildlife 0 unusual 0 street tree Oscr",;n'O shade 0 indigenous I'Iprotected by. gov. agency. mEE HEALTH Foliage color: ill normal 0 chlorotic- -. El necrotic - Epico""ics? Y L!V Foliage density.: afnormal:' 0 s~~rSe~ Leai size: ~normal .0 small Annual shoot growth: - 0 excelleri\:' 0 average' 4:B'"poor Twig Dieback?(V N Woundwood development 0 ~;cellent 0 average @poor 0 none Vigor class: Oexcell,~nt_ o average; . Ofair i5poor . ( / .Major pestsldiseases: \+-P;": '-t-- rdJ/-. ~ j{)C . .', ) . . Growth obstructions: Ostakes O.wirelties o signs 0 cables a curblpavement 0 guards Ootller .. ;....'" .f, T L~ ';~ :.?: '" ~: . ti:' SITE CONDITIONS Site Character: 0 residence I!lI commercial 0 industrial 0 park 0 open space 0 natural 0 woodlandlforest Landscape !)'pe: 0 parkway. 0 raiSed bed 0 cantainer 0 mound itlawn 0 shrub border 0 wind break Irrigation: tll none 0 adequate 0 inadequate 0 excessiye. 0 trunk wettJed Recent site disturbance? Y If!) 0 construction 0 sail disturbance 0 grade change %driplinepaved: 0% 10-25~o ~-?5% 75.100% , , %driplinewlfillsoil: 0% 10-25% 25-50% 50-75% 75-100% % dripline grade lowered: . 0% ~~ 50-75% 75-100%. . Soil problems: 0 dramage 0 shallow 0 compacted 0 droughty. 0 saline 0 alkaline 0 aCidic 0 small volume 0 disease center 0 history of fail. .' 0 clay. 0 expansive III slope _ . aspect Obstructions: 0 lights Osignage 0 line-of-sight Oview I!I overhead lines 0 underground utilities 0 traffic ,0 adjacent veg. 0 Ex~;'sure to wind: 0 single tree ~. below canopy. 0 above canopy 0 recently exposed 0 windward, canopy edge 0 area prone to windtllrow . Prevailing wind direction: We '5-t'b E~s+ Occurrence of snowlice storms 0 hever ~ seldome. 0 regularly.,... o line clearing 0 site clearing Pavement lifted? Y N TARGET , _.' . ... ',... Use Under Tree: 0 building' ci ~a~ing rll'\rafflc ~I!I'Ped~~1\ q recreation 0 landscape GharctsCape- Canlargelbemoved? Y (!Y 'Canuseberestricted? YW. ..." OCcupancy.: 0 occasional use 0 inte""ittent use 0 frequent use Iii constant use ....,..,. .:E:: Osmall.features' lIutility.lines." ,:", Date Received: .-... ......--, _,0;""'__"'. ";':,:1;' - ,;". The Intemational.Society. of Arboriculture assumes no responsibiiity. for conclusions or recommendati;;[;.S'derived,fram U5e<Jf'this.MJ1ll. -:,1 2010 . '-, ...." Original t.l:Jmitial " . ., .j' " TREE DEFECTS .'i ROOT DEFECTS: Suspect root rot: c0 N Exposed roots: . 0 severe Mushroomlconklbracket present: Y N 10: o moderate 'l2l-low Undermined: o severe o mcderjjte Olav: Root pruned: distance from trunk Root area affected: % Buttress wow,ded: Y N When: Restricted root area: 0 severe ,0 moderate 0 low Potential forroctrailiJre: 0 5e~er2' 0 moderate ' 0 low deg. from vertical' 0 natural 0 unnatural 0 self-corrected Soil h""VI".9:, ~ N ..'~ .'_ ,lFn,," +- fcJ+-- b )~vP 1 fJc1-( 1-'1. Decay in plane 01 lean: , Y N .\ Roo~bro n Y N , SOilcrack~n!f Y IN /(1)1-\ tvt.o'-loi" "rtJv vvJI 1/ Compounding factors: 1l-e 'f\ ic9t 6ts. I 'fV\ VI d-l'V\.T Lean severity: o severe 'Omoderate Olow' . LEAN: CROWN DEFECTS: Indicate presence of individual defects and rate their severity (s = severe, m = moderate, I = low) DEFECT , ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAffOLDS BRANCHES Poortaoe' c- :". . , Bow, sweeD . \j -.- Codominants/forks MultiDle attJlchments y : Included bark . ,i Excessive end weiaht - { Crackslsolits )(~ Hanqers , ^ Glrdlino , Wounds/seam 'X , Decav ^ " , Cavil'! y T Conks/mushrooms/bracket '7 aatac, Bleedinolsao fiow X .. --, Loose/cracked bark " n , Nestino hole/bee hive . /'~ - - Ifflir -, 7UJU Deadwood/stubs , Borers/termites/ants )( , Cankers/oallslburts . 'n, " Previous failure X '" ".. .,," , , . ,,, " f. " HAZARD RATING Tree part most l,lrely to fail: ~ Inspection perioc>>. annu I ~ biannual _ other Failure Potential + Size of Part + Target Rating = Hazard Rating -'::(- + ~+ L-f = -ff)- HAZARD ABATEMENT Failure potentia!: 1 ,. low; 2 - medium: 3 - hig ,4 evere Size 01 part; ;,- <6" (15 c~ 6-18", (15-45 em); , 3 -1B-30" (45-75 em); 4 - >30" (75 em) Target rating: 1 ~ occasion~1 use; 2 intermittent use; .. r'"""q"e"t' ,,,,.:,'1\ -on""o' U'= ~ -"", u.. u~-.... .J..... ~ ~1; Prune: 0 remove defective part 0 reduce end weight 0 crown clean - 0 thin 0 raise canopy 0 crown reduce 0 restructure 0 shape Cable/Brace: Inspect further: 0 root crown 0 decay 0 aerial 0 monitor Remove !ree: (J) N ,Replace? Y N Move target Y 0!) Olher: : :: Effect on adjacent trees: !!l'none 0 evaluate I / ' ' Notification: 0 owner 0 manager ~ovemlng agency Date: ~ " '/ 2-.- If): COMMEN-TS ' . . ' /. ' . .. ~'€)e... tree, Ju Mut ~e.Jc)~ U'1dfJ fDu.;f'uJlnv I +4y J{{?uJ {PD, ~(!L Ti~~;;e. ,,' ~('eV\.. '!viY~~~ C{v;icfj-/)'IIqW1€c{ thCi/(Y +Vi'leS qvJ /triu-e gedrll0C0>,~'0:()'1 Nt- c:..9/ v;;t'fJ f'c9t heS ~V)I~. Th.-e c.\OV1S+tt.V1+-c-V\~Se('I'DL-li ~,,:z..<tr [~o/p(f'-It'Y\f- ~ fGt\oL'c. +lIS uvrte~ a..~[-e. ~~(\y +rl~Wlr,,!\ GJD~ld0e. ef- peVlSI'!f Qv1C[ ~t,le~ ,fYflA <D1~~\<' \S 11A..a....V\.: ViI'S1o"I'C c::liJ5+'fI'-~{~eS* fr-ee.rk V/ot-(M-t,,'bl{te. ~, If)" ~LV1'<ll9 .J.r., -tiN? Q t vYl0 > Dho,tf' CAvA ho, J.P \Il, ,0 ro i-I..."op "'u :..t <:; L) q I ~ 'e. /7,...., c . . 'P~ L~ \ I ~~ I Date Received: JUN - I 2010 Original Submittal j \/J 1 to ~ -(- <Jl . . =1 1 ~ Date Receiv~1: JUN - 1 20:~ Original Submittal~._~ ~ <;J::. ~ j . . Date Received: J'''O - 1 "''''"1 ..1 J', ~ ~ '-' . 0" "n I'"'u "( t'" rlgl a .:::, ijf 11 \,"_.._~ .... . . WAR RA ~,?~1.g E ED. FOR VALUE RECEIVED . Nels C. Petersen and' Gertrude M. Petersen, husband and wife, . who.. acquired title as Nels C.' Peterson and Gertrude M. Peterson, herein referred to as grantors, hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto EBBERT MEMORIAL METHODIST CHURCH, SPRINGFIELD, OREGON, . herein referred to as grantees, the. following described real property, with tenements, 'hereditaments and appurtenances, to wit: . . Lot 1, Block 6, KELLY'S ADDITION TO SPRINGFIELD, as platted and recorded in Book '''W'', Page. 20, Lane County Oregon Deed Records in Lane County, Oregon Subject to easements', reservations and. restrictions. o'f rec'ord, and the unpaid balances on that"cert,Hn mortgage dated September 29, 1961, --.-_."-_'__"'_'- wherein-the Grantors--herein"are-.tne-Ilfortagors;' and M....S. Chrisfiiinson Mortgage and Investment Co.,. are..the mortgagees,. which mortgage was recorded October. 5, 1961, Clerk's File No. 46038, Lane County Oregon Mortgage Recoeds,to secure the payment of. a note. for $7,000.00, which mortgage was duly assigned to Equitable Savi~gs and Loan Association by instrument dated October 9,'1961; recorded Oc.tober 9, 1961, Clerk's file No. 465.46, Lane County Oregon Mortgage Recbr'ds ,. and which said mortgage the Grantees herein assume and agr'ee .to pay according to the terms thereof. . .. Date Received: JUN -,I 2010 Original Submittal TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises. unto said Grantees, their .heirs and assigns forever. And the said Grantors hereby covenant that they are lawfully seized in fee simple of said premises; that they are free from all incumbrances, except as above stated _:.'- ,..-" l1.l 110 ~ 0( ~ l1.l W t:l Z w > W II:: '.I~-: '_-r-'~,_''''' ;.,'--~..-; and that they will warrant and defend the above ..granted' premises against all lawful claims' -What- soever, except as above stated. October 3r1 65 Dated ..............................m................... 19........................ .......................................m.................................................... (Seal) . //:) " . 'i _ ~~ .az4.<f.:....~.:ml..,"'~..-:::?.=Z....... (Seal) tt .-..1- .. (l /".4-:i!/t.{~:..i?2J.:.."..~0l&t4.J..... (Seal) ...............m.................................:...............................n....n.n (Seal) , ~ \\,"HIl.~., P II d th b d . ",., ,,' D "."S;rATE:OF OREGON, County of Lane, ss. ersona yappeare ea ove name . \)';~ l.;;i(/6.; . .:". '. J/ ":......:........::;-~.~el~ C. Petersen and Gertrude M. Petersen, 'husband and wife, :;"- -<.:::'... . .' .~..~;.. ':;. . fC: t."Q"iARy '.~~. . ~ 7 .;. -.-';rna~amowledged the 'foregoing instrument to'be .~.~~.~E.voluntary act and deed. Before me: r~,.PUB\...\C'.:< f .. \:" .~>.. ,":~e{ ___uq~.t<:>l>~!'__um___~('u__.m__.__..., A.D. 19:.6.5......._____......~__~.~-----...nn--n~.-- .~. :~,__~~_c~~~~~..:(,;?~ }ti,~COtp:ni~si~_n-~?=p~r~.~~- ,.~_-_,.~cfl"lJJ;,f~~<>f",;:~;,' :':41~~.>,- ...""~~J~~:;"ru~~i~~ f2-r~Q~g~n . _ _ . .'-,_ -~-. -:'~'J",.~;._ -;,,---- -~~ --=" (l) .. >- 00 ~ 00.0 III .... C V ~ .... 5~ 1-1 0.... (l) .... .. u ..c: c - v v Ed.gS u ~ " ~ "'0 ~ ~ 'n C >- 1;; Q III d C tI'l ;::1.... ~ 't.l 0 C ~ '" k U ." ......0 .L:"t:I .e U"tl .-;: J,.j d IV.... ~ 0 ill 0:: III '" u ~.... lJl IV Q) o (l) .J:l k ~....,..c: .... J.t ..:; C .... ..... 0 . V k ro '+-l 0160:5" . ~ v I-i t"'O C > cO s:l ........ Po. rn t ~ Q) C Q) Q) ~.... () I-< = 0 ~ '" ~ Q 0 .~ ~ Y.I 0 Y.I ... 0 v Q 0 '" 1'*' " u " ~ 0:1 >- 0.. 11 ~ 0 .... .S z M':l p. Cl: e ~ a:: " 0 l:l ". a:: f""'f u k 0( ~ Cl: '" u ... == l1.l " ..: 0 u '" t- O> " i " v o " "''' ~..:i o~ o ~ o '" v " ~ " " 0 tlu ~ " -q- N 5: v . .s ~ o ll'l .......... '0 0 U ~ .1-1 ~ ~ .3 ~ 0:: ~ o<S " " ...:l ..-l "t:I <<: q" ~ 0 u u ~ v r. q 0: r. ..1 ~ 000 '" r. ~ ~ z" " f,1 v g p. 6 u ;:?l ~ v p. ~ v .,:I 01 q tl "^') ~.~~/ .~~~ ~"." L . ,C . \/Y I..\j \.) ~ ''--.J . 0\, --.... ;;,. <:> z ~ .... --- ----.5! .. o E-< e :::l .., '" P:1 ~, v v '", '" P'l CASCADE TIT1J: COMPANY I. 0 0 <i Q ZL-I.--1.0N' "'1\1\1_ .R'~G..~"'''~