HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit Building 2005-7-21
Building/Combination Permit
PERMIT NO: COM2005-00683
ISSUED: 07/21/2005
APPLIED: 06/07/2005
EXPIRES: 01/21/2006
VALUE: $ 187,250.00
,f
.\..
Status
Issued
\ 225 Fifth Street, Springfield, OR
" 541-726-3753 Phone
541-726-3676 Fax
;, 541-726-3769 Inspection Line
SITE ADDRESS: 717 S 47th St
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 1802051211200
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD'
__-.c,
Springfield TYPE OF WORK: Single Family Residence
TYPE OF USE: New Residential
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Single family residence - Rocky Road subd lot 1- SAME AS COM2004-01777 at 717
Aspen
~~lftIBllIIOlJ1M9mg~iEM:ElNiR'i?fes you to
. fOI ow rUles aaopleaoy me ur gonMa!WaJk T .
FulhNDtifitm'Ddn Center. Those rules are set forth ype.
in OAR~2-001-o01 0 through OAR 9~outs/Drains:
0090. You may obtain copies of the rules by
. calling. thEjl, center. _(Note: the telepQQ~@~
No hook-up to City InfrastructurRuWtl9dr'Jati~~M~)~8helYiil~VM:Jfit1eati~W City; storm drainage piped to curb
face 6/10/2005 CAS Center is 1-800-332-2344).
Owner: PARKER HOMES
Address: 24717 WOLF CREEK RD
VENETA OR 97487
I CONTRACTOR INFORMATION'
;, Contractor Type
General
. Electrical
'} Mechanical
, Plumbing
Contractor
PARKER HOMES INC
BATEMAN ELECTRIC INC
HOME COMFORT HEATING & AIR
HOME COMFORT HEATING & AIR INC
License
162168
151911
84164
84164
BUILDING INFORMATION I
# of Units: 1 # of Stories: 1
Primary Occupancy Group: R-3 Height of Structure 25.00
Secondary Occupancy Group: U Type of Heat: Forced Air Gas
Primary Construction Type VN Wate~\f~~t: Gas
Secondary Construction Type: \~'t. \~Rr-~~g.'YP')) Gas
# of Bedrooms: , Ieo' I\\.l't.t? S ?t.\E~etgy.~~~th: Path 1
\'Ji)\Sc;~~!>.~\\ S\\ \\c.~ \\\\ \\~'p&llid Building: n/a
\\'- _ n~n\\l\ _ \ \~U~ .. n I''N;V
\~~~\~a'?-~~~D a~ ~d~EVELOPMENT INFORMATION I
CG\'J\~\t: \)~i?t:
Front yard Setback: ~~'{ '\ IQI.) 18.00 Overlay Dist:
Side 1 Setback: 20.00 # Street Trees Rqd:
Side 2 Setback: 23.00 Paved Drive Rqd:
, Rearyard Setback: 22.00 % of Lot Coverage:
Solar Setbacks: 0.00
Subdivision Not Accepted
Street Improvements:
Storm Sewer Available:
Special Instruction:
Notes:
Pal!e 1 of 5
Phone Number: 935-7984
Expiration Date
11/18/2006
06/21/2008
06/25/2007
06/25/2007
Phone
541-935-7984
541-995-4757
541-345-2838
541-345-2838
Lot Size: 8,300
Sq Ft 1st Floor: 1,539
Sq Ft 2nd Floor:
Sq Ft Basement:
Sq Ft Garage/Carport 410
Sq Ft Other: 231
Occupant Load:
5
Yes
23.40
REQUIRED PARKING
Total: 2
Handicapped:
Compact:
Curbside 5'
Curb and Gutter
Status
Issued
225 Fifth Street, Springfield, OR
541-726-3753 Phone
541-726-3676 Fax
541-726-3769 Inspection Line
I Valuation Description I
Description
$ Per Sq Ft
or multiplier
$4.00
$96.00
$25.00
Square Footage
or Bid Amount
1,770.00
1,770.00
410.00
A.C. - Residen
DweJlinl!s
Garal!e
Tvpe of Construction
AC - Residential
V Wood Frame
Garal!e
Total Value of Project
~
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
Building/Combination Permit
PERMIT NO: COM2005-00683
ISSUED: 07/21/2005
APPLIED: 06/0712005
EXPIRES: 01/21/2006
VALUE: $ 187,250.00
Value
Date Calculated
$7,080.00
$169,920.00
$10,250.00
$187,250.00
06/29/2005
06/07/2005
06/07/2005
Fee Description Amount Paid Date Paid Receipt Number
Plan Review Same As $100.00 6/7/05 1200500000000000788
-Mechanical Issuance Fee- $10.00 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
+ 10% Administrative Fee $139.47 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
+ 7% State Surcharge $97.63 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
2 Baths One or Two Family $254.00 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
Addressing Assignment $31.00 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
Appliance Not Listed $18.00 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
Building Permit $851.65 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
Curbcut Permit $80.00 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
Dryer Vent $6.00 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
Exhaust Hoods $9.00 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
Furnace - up to 100,000 btu $12.00 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
Gas Fireplace $15.00 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
Gas Outlets 1-4 $4.00 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
Plan Review Major - Planning $103.00 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
Plan ReviewIResidential Hourly $90.00 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
PW Disc - 2nd Permit (Street) $-30.00 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
Residence Wiring 1000 Sq Ft $106.00 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
Residence Wiring Ea Addtl 500 $57.00 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
Sanitary Sewer - Improvement $420.44 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
Sanitary Sewer - Reimbursement $552.92 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
SDC MWMC Administration $10.00 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
SDC MWMC Improvem(mt $865.31 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
SDC MWMC Reimbursement $82.03 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
SDC Sanitary/Storm Admin $125.40 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
SDC Transpo Admin $63.47 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
SDC Transpo Improvement $772.49 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
SDC Transpo Reimbursement $175.13 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
Sidewalk Permit $80.00 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
Storm Drainage Impervious Area $899.00 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
Temp Power 200 amps or less $50.00 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
Vent Fan $12.00 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
Willamalane Single Family $1,000.00 7/21/05 2200500000000000966
Pal!e 2 of 5
_~~"-;.,. II' '~,"_", .,!.".,
1rIL. .. ,.. .t
,.;'1 . ,
. ". ~ . .
'....,.--. '...._"'....
Status
Issued
CITY OF ~p.K1NGFIELD '
Building/Combination Permit
PERMIT NO: COM2005-00683
ISSUED: 07/21/2005
APPLIED: 06/07/2005
EXPIRES: 01/21/2006
VALUE: $ 187,250.00
225 Fifth Street, Springfield, OR
541-726-3753 Phone
541-726-3676 Fax
541-726-3769 Inspection Line
Total Amount Paid $7,061.94
I Plan Reviews I
Initial Review 06/09/2005 06/09/2005 APP SKG
Planninl! Review 07/19/2005 07/19/2005 APP TAJ 1. The Tree Preservation area shall
be fenced and no excavation,
disturbance or tree felling allowed.
2. Choose street trees from the list
on Exhibit B for trees outside the
Hillside district attached to the
Street Tree handout.
Planninl! Review 06/09/2005 WE EMM Called contractor on 7/8/05. Since
plan will be flip-flopped we will need
new plot plan. He will submit new.
Public Works Review 06/09/2005 06/10/2005 APP CAS Notified contractor 30' separation
from intersec to d/w, will flip flop
footprint. 7/8/2005 No hook-up to
City Infrastructure until Public
Improvements accepted by the City;
storm drainage piped to curb face
6/10/2005 CAS
Public Works Review 07/08/2005 10 VRJ LDAP to be issued concurrently
with Building Permit. LDAP is
ready to be issued and at the front
counter. $600.00 due at issuance.
Revised Plans ReceivedIRo 06/24/2005 06/2412005 10 DJB adequate SAME AS plans provided
for processing
Structural Review 06/29/2005
Structural Review 06/09/2005 06/13/2005 WE LLH Returned to applicant. Plans were
not same as and cannot be processed
as submitted.
Structural Review 06/27/2005 07/01/2005 APP DLM Same as 717 Aspen Street
To Request an inspection call the 24 hour recording at 726-3769. All inspection requested before 7:00 a.m.
will be made the same working day, inspections requested after 7:00 a.m. will be made the following work
day.
Erosion/Grading Inspection: Prior to ground disturbance and after erosion measures are installed.
Sidewalk - Curbside: After forms are erected but prior to place~ent of concrete.
Curbcut - Standard: After forms are erected but prior to placement of concrete.
Ufer Electrical Ground: Install ground rod at footing and call for inspection in conjunction with footing and/or
foundation inspection.
Pal!e 3 of 5
Status Issued
225 Fifth Street, Springfield, OR
541-726-3753 Phone
541-726-3676 Fax
541-726-3769 Inspection Line
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD I
Building/Combination Permit
PERMIT NO: COM2005-00683
ISSUED: 07/21/2005
APPLIED: 06/07/2005
EXPIRES: 01/21/2006
VALUE: , $,187,250.00
Footing: After trenches are excavated.
Foundation: After forms are erected but prior to concrete placement.
Post and Beam: Prior to floor insulation or decking.
Floor Insulation: Prior to decking.
Shear Wall Nailing: Before covering sheathing with finish materials.
Framing Inspection: Prior to cover and after all rough in inspections have been approved.
Wall Insulation: Prior to cover.
Ceiling Insulation: Prior to cover.
Drywall: Prior to taping.
Final Building: After all required inspections have been requested and approved and the building is complete.
Perimeter Foundation Drains: After gravel and filter cloth is installed but prior to backfill.
Underfloor Plumbing: Prior to insulation or decking.
Rough Plumbing: Prior to cover and including required testing.
Water Line: Prior to filling trench and including required testing.
Sanitary Sewer Line: Prior to filling trench and including required testing.
Storm Sewer Line: Prior to filling trench.
Final Plumbing: When all plumbing work is complete.
Underfloor Mechanical. Prior to insulation, or decking and including required testing.
Underfloor Gas: After line is installed and required testing and capped if not attached to an appliance.
Rough Gas: After line is installed and required testing and capped if not attached to an appliance.
Gas Service: After line i,s installed and line has been connected to a minimum of one appliance including required
'testing. Presure test done at this point.
Rough Mechanical: Prior to Cover
, I'
Final Gas: When all gas work is complete.
Final Mechanical: When all mechanical work is complete.
Temporary Electric: Approval required prior to Utility Company energizing pole.
R~ugh Electric: Prior ~o Cover,
Electric Service: Approval required prior to utility company energizing service.
Final Electric: When all electri~al work is comp,lete.
Pal!e 4 of 5
Status
Issued
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD'
Building/Combination Permit
PERMIT NO: COM2005-00683
ISSUED: 07/21/2005
APPLIED: 06/07/2005
EXPIRES: 01/21/2006
VALUE: $ 187,250.00
225 Fifth Street, Springfield, OR
541-726-3753 Phone
541-726-3676 Fax
541-726-3769 Inspection Line
By signature, I state and agree, that I have carefully examined the completed application and do hereby certify that all
information hereon is true and correct, and I further certify that any and all work performed shall be done in accordance with
the Ordinances of the City of Springfield and the Laws of the State of Oregon pertaining to the work described herein, and
that NO OCCUPANCY will be made of any structure without permission of the Community Services Division, Building Safety.
I further certify that only contractors and employees who are in compliance with ORS 701.005 will be used on this project.
I further agree to ensure that all required inspections are requested at the proper time, that each address is readable from the
street, that the permit card is located at the front of the property, and the approved set of pla.1}S, will remain on the site at all
timef);;~ ;0;/ ~(]5
Owner or Contractors Signature Date
Pal!e 5 of 5
Date
':....);~:.~. ' "'~.a::,~':>"I:<~":'?T':~'7.~:~\,~.N""'{~'J?':-'I'f';;:::~...,:-.] I ""~~...,..".
1. ":EOC1tTIONOiHNSTA;"j';';4-
,..~.:J-.. ~j.,'. r,....}:.;.?:.!'i.., _ - ~~~..y;; 'J_;t..~~;':. . ;...;.:;,~""'::');3V-~'("
"'? 1/ 1- S~ Lf j-fh, S-r-
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
J W.A ~'7 .117.!?n
JOB DESCRIPTION
~~5~ ~#1l'7 ~~t~...~W~
Permits are non-transferable and expire if work is
not started within 180 days of issuance or if work is
Suspended for 180 days.
Service Included
1000 sq. ft. or less
Each additional 500 sq. ft. or
portion thereof
Each Manufact'd Home or
Modular Dwelling Service or
Feeder
. It. ~.._ ..~~\.,,'_....~' :i~lA' ....'""~~ .:if;-;-~}.:S~--~;~.;l";.l.~::~;,,~-;::i~tr<~<;:,:,
2. S:~2~1~~~~]:~tfi~.~~:s' B. ~i~~~~~{L~~i\f;,
Electrical Contractor hllt+erT\(1n E It'dyj Goo Amps or ~
...-~ j 1 "l >'). \ -r ' CA(\ ('. 20 I Amps to 400 Amps
Address ~., t ~ D , U IfY\bb\v\,{ . 'J 401 Amps to 600 Amps
__ L (l :tJ ()I) Ll\. ~'\...:2-", 60 I Amps to 1 000 Amps
Ci~ U.Y\t1\ Dn U, ,Phone V'I""\~ - ll<6, Over 1000 AmpsIVolts
Reconnect Only
E"t';,c.tion Date
~DDloS
\D-\-blt?
\~\O\l \
lo-2\~' O)c.
;1;. ' - .
Supervisor License Number
Constr. Contr. Number
Expiration Date
Signature of Supervising Electrician
OWNER INSTALLATION
The installation is being made on property I own which
is not intended for sale, lease or rent.
c. ~~~tt1~~~~~i~I{l~~L
.Yi~\;::.r;~'~"f~~r,'~~'~~~"F::::,?":t,-.,.t';-~~: ~,;,,:z{!r~\77i:~
ti-Famil \'~eUdwellin 'unit\ ,;.~~
4>..:.t.~!;"~'''':''~~Yi:..*J].:.p..;.)~-.:,lrt'''_.'',i....'i:~...~'~0.!.:::~,':;J
I $106.00 /oltllW
~ $ 19.00 s:J-,OD
$50.00
:'r;i~~jt~~:.~;~:~hf;;:%~y?::-~;':f~J.:PJi:;~ ~r:;:.(:~f-:'~..:~:1
sWI!~,~t.r.;,~t~~tiOiiS;9.J;lRelo~atiy.n:;. :,,:,',1
~u=~~,.~_<;.;:.:;~.~:..::!:fF~...~..;.:.ti;.~-'!t~'~1...,~~!;.J
$ 63.00
$ 75.00
$125.00
$163.00
$375.00
$ 50.00
Installation, Alteration or Relocation
+V!J~IQ~Dregon law requ'res,oU~o.oo s:2J.Ot)
~lo\mPS\8>}400_si by the Oregonttti~~9.00
~iIf~rt<G9oWnp1hose rules are set f~.oo
~~~., :m;~~W:g:~'l'"
~~~~..:;~"'~,...~"')
One CirC~nter is 1-800-332-2344). $ 43.00
Each Additional Circuit or with
Service or Feeder Permit $ 3.00
E. -:~{~~~~:~:{~i~?~!~;t~i~~~~~1~~~~Ff~~~I~Itf~:,':
Pump or irrigation $ 50.00
Sign/Outline Lighting $ 50.00
Limited Energy/Residential $ 25.00
Limited Energy/Commercial $ 45.00
Minimum Electric Permit Inspection Fee is $45.00 + Surcharges
Owners Signa~; ~<~1:~ r~: 4. ~;'~~i~lI!?!!l~~
THIS PERMIT SHALL EXPI~E IF THE WOfOJo(State Surcharge
AUTHORi2ED UI~OER THIS PERivilT IS NQ)% Administrative Fee
. cm/i1I'1EI~CED OR IS ABf\NDOl~ED FOR
Inspection Requfi.W{ 7.rg-J{~AY PERIOD. TOTAL
J.zU,lP
lM/
1_ 1.10
/I J.. .., cr I Z, I
~. ....:.r
~",
,.,.." tr. ~'.J!_ _ T!___1C1..........;.....1 'D.-..nit' AnnH~~rinn l-03.doc
2. SANITARY SEWER - CITY
A. REIMBURSEMENT COST:
I NUMBER OF DFU's x
I 23
B. IMPROVEMENT COST:
I NUMBER OF DFU's x
I 23
DISCOUNT
$0.00
COST PER DFU
$24.04
$18.28
ITEM 2 TOTAL - CITY SANITARY SEWER SDC =! $973.36
3. TRANSPORTATION,
A. REIMBURSEMENT COST:
I ADT TRIP RATE x I NUMBER OF UNITS' x COST PER TRIP x NEW TRIP FACTOR
.1 9.57 I 1 $18.30 1.00 =!
B. IMPROVEMENT COST:
ADT TRIP RATE' x I NUMBER OF UNITS x I COST PER TRIP x I NEW TRIP FACTOR
9.57 I 1 I $80.72 I 1.00,
ITEM 3 TOTAL - TRANSPORTATION SDC = ! $947.62
4. SANITARY SEWER- MWMC
A. REIMBURSEMENTCOST:
INUMBER OF FEU's x
I 1
, B. IMPROVEMENT COST:
INUMBER OF FEU's x
I 1
I COST PER FEU
I $82;03
ICOST PER FEU
I $865.31
$957.34
8328
$899.00
$552.92
$420.44
Vl
~
o
o
u
~
~
E-<
Vl
......
0,
~
I
1070
1091
1092
$175.13 1093
$772.49 1094
=
$82.03
I 1054
1055
1054
1056
$3,777.32
=
$865.3]
$0.00
$10.00
CHARGE
$188,87
125.40
$63.4 7
Cheryl Slaymaker
TOTAL SDC CHARGES
1079
, 1078
MWMC CREDIT IF APPLICABLE (SEE REVERSE)
MWMC ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
ITEM 4 TOTAL - MWMC SANITARY SEWER SDC = ,
SUBTOTAL (ADD ITEMS], 2, 3, & 4) = I
5, ADMINISTRATIVE FEE~
/SUBTOTAL x 'I ADM. FEE RATE 1=
I $3,777.32 i 5% I
TOTAL SANITARY ADMINISTRATION FEE:
TOTAL TRANSPORTATION ADMINlSTRATION FEE:
PREPARED BY
6/1 0/2005
DATE
,--..- - -
._'0- _ _
$3,966.19
DRAINAGE FIXTURE UNIT (DFU) CALCULATION TABLE
NUMBER OF NEW FIXTURES x UNIT EQUIV ALENT ~ DRAINAGE FIXTURE UNITS
(NOTE: FOR REMODELS, CALCULATE ONLY THE NET ADDmONAL FIXTURES)
NO. OF FIXTURES DRAINAGE
UNIT FIXTURE
FIXTURE TYPE NEW OLD EQUIVALENT UNITS
I BATHTUB 2 0 3 = 6
IDRINKING FOUNTAIN 0 0 1 = 0
I FLOOR DRAIN 0 0 3 = 0
\INTERCEPTORS FOR GREASE I OIL I SOLIDS I ETC. 0 0 3 = 0
IINTERCEPTORS FOR SAND / AUTO WASH I ETC. 0 0 6 = 0
ILAUNDRY TUB 0 0 2 = 0
ICLOTHESWASHER I MOP SINK 1 0 3 = 3
I CLOTHESW ASHER - 3 OR MORE (EA) 0 0 6 = 0
I MOBILE HOME PARK TRAP (1 PER TRAILER) 0 0 12 = 0
RECEPTOR FORREFRlG I WATER STATION IETe. 0 0 1 = 0
RECEPTOR FOR COM. SINK I DISHWASHER I ETC. 0 0 3 = 0
ISHOWER, SINGLE STALL 1 0 2 = 2
I SHOWER, GANG (NUMBER OF HEADS) 0 0 2 = 0
I SINK: COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL KITCHEN 1 0 3 = 3
I SINK: COMMERCIAL BAR 0 0 2 = 0
I SINK: WASH BASINIDOUBLE LAVATORY 1 0 2 = 2
I SINK: SINGLE LA V A TORY /RESIDENTIAL BAR 1 0 1 = 1
IURlNAL, STALL! WALL 0 0 5 = 0
ITOILET, PUBLIC INSTALLATION 0 0 6 = 0
ITOILET, PRIVATE INSTALLATION 2 0 3 = 6
MISCELLANEOUS DFU TYPE NUMBER OF EDU'S
20 = 0
TOTAL DRAINAGE FIXTURE UNITS 23
*EDU (Equivalent Dwelling Unit) is a discharge equivalent to a single family dwelling unit (20 DFU's) set at 167 gallons per day
MWMC CREDIT CALCULATION TABLE: BASED ON COUNTY ASSESSED VALUE
YEAR
ANNEXED
BEFORE 1979
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
CREDIT RATE/$l,OOO
ASSESSED VALUE
$5.29
$5.29
$5.19
$5,12
$4.98
$4.80
$4.63
$4.40
$4.07
$3.67
$3,22
$2.73
$2.25
$1.80
$1.59
$1.45
$1.25
$1.09
$0.92
$0.72
$0.48
$0.28
$0.09
$0.05
IS LAND ELGIBLE FOR ANNEXATION CREDIT?
(Enter 1 for Yes, 2 for No)
IS IMPROVEMENT ELGIBLE FOR ANNEX, CREDIT?
(Enter 1 for Yes, 2 for No)
BASE YEAR
CREDIT FOR LAND (IF APPLICABLE)
VALUE 11000 CREDIT RATE
$0.00 x $5,29
CREDIT FOR IMPROVEMENT (IF AFTER ANNEXATION)
VALUE 11000 CREDIT RATE
$0.00 x $5.29
TOTAL MWMC CREDIT
=
2
2
1979
= ,
$0,00
o
$0.00
Community Services O/vision - BL.. ..ng Safety/Building Codes SPRINGF':"-
'~~{llej~;(c((JIli!I!JJf_
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
'.
, Address of Project:
~ otice to Permit Applicant
Soils stabilization required for subdivision sites
Name of Owner Q~J\lQh t(Jb1oj)} Permit: (!,~.DD(O~
'1 \r ffilll 4-tt~
- -
Tax Map': \ <tDflro \fL, Tax Lot: \ ~'lJY) Subdivision
~Qwd.
The building site at the above address is located on property that has soils prone to shrink-swell or
other potential movement. Excavations, placement of fill materials and drainage for this site must
be done under the direct supervision of a properly licensed Professional Engineer or Architect to
verify the stability of the resulting building pad and the site.
The owner, or the owner's qualified agent, is responsible to obtain the services of the appropriate
professional engineer or architect (design professional). The design professional shall provide
direction for the stabilization methods to be used for the building pad (and surrounding site, when
site stabilization is also necessary). The geotechnical report, which was prepared for this
subdivision, may be utilized to provide appropriate guidance for the methods of stabilization and
required compaction for the specific site.
The engineer or architect shall prepare a report to be submitted to the City stating how the soil
stabilization is being accomplished, including requirements not yet completed (if any). A signed
and stamped report from the engineer or architect must be received andaVlJroved bv this office
before footinf! or foundation insvection avproval will be f!ranted bv the' Citv Bui/dinf! Insvector.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The undersigned acknowledges the forgoing requirements for
soil stabilization, including excavation, fill, soil compaction and drainage, as provided in the
, geotechnical report for the subdivision. The stabilization will be accomplished under the
direction of a licensed professional engineer or architect as noted above.
Signature
Name
~rah
,.- .. V'
Date
()7~/-QS
Affiliation to owner,
ROc!KYROAD~JBD~
. 3.27', Lots 1,2, 3, 4;7,18 & 19Stonn ~ater Dl!linage. At the ~e of the bui1~itie
permit application for the above lots, plans shall also be submitted to constiuctperimeter
interceptor drains. . '. .
.3.27.1 Lots 18 & 19. Owners of Lots 18 and 19 shall provide a perimeter
interceptor drain pipe, along the south side of their lots intercepting off-site drainage from the
south. Outfalls shall be directed to the curbweep holes in S. 48th Street.' , , , ",
3~27.2 Lots 3 &4. Owners of Lots 3 and 4 sball provide a perimeter interceptor
drain pipe along the south side of their lots intercepting off-site' drainage froIIl the soutli The
dra;"~ee pipe shall be connected to the ptivate storm sewe1 pipe that runs through Lot 3 north
, from Rocky Road.
. 3.27.3' Lots 1~ 2, & 7. Owners of Lots 1, 2 and 7 shall' proVide a perimeter
interceptor drain pipe along the perimeter of their lots intercepting off-site drainage. Outfiills
shall be directed to the curb weep holes in S. 47th Street and Rocky Road~ ' "
, 3.28 Tree Conservation Zones' on Lots 1 through 8 and 12 & 13. There are Tree
Conservation Zones located on Lots 1 through 8 and 12 & 13 of Rocky Road Subdivision. The
Owners of these lots are restricted from removing any trees larger than 5" DBH without written
authorization of the Architectural Control Conmiittee and the City of Springfield. Any tree '
removal will require a tree-felling permit from the city. Existing understory vegetation in the
conservation zones consists of the following native plants: Nootka Rose, Snowberry, Western',
, Sword Fern, other ferris and Oregon Grape and will be preserved. Removal of the' preserved
understory'vegetation can not be completed Without the written authorization of the Architectural
Control Coinmittee and the City of Springfield. There is alSo so~e' nuisance, understory
consisting of blackberry and Poison Oak. This nuisance vegetation can be removed by the owner.
3.29 Building Envelope and Tree RemovaL' All residential construction shall take place
within the building envelopes shown on Lots 3, S~ 6, 7 and 8. The building envelope includes all
, impervious areas including the residence, accessorY structures and paved areas. See Exhibit D
for Building Envelope locations. Tree remoVal from Within the. , building envelopes shall be
completed-only after receiving written authorization from the City of Springfield and the
Architectural Control Committee. The city requires a tree-felling permit to be obtained by the lot
owner prior to any tree removal and/or building permits.
3.30 Fire Sprinklers. Lots 3, 5, 6, 7 and 8 are subject to tire sprinkler installation if
the residences are not located and constructed in accordance with SDC 26.090(1)(2)(3).
3.31 Class A & B Roofing. All structures on Lots that abut a Tree Conservation Zone
shall have Class A or B roofing in accordance with the Oregon State Structural Specialty Code.
Note: This statement also appears in 5.7.1.
ROCKY ROAD - Covenants, Conditions, & Restrictions
9
'~))
'Yoc::.Ji.::. '1 \KOU..R
5-Jo
3.32' Ge~tecmncal Assessment.' ,Lot 'owners are required to, 09mply, with <the
, Geotechnical Assessment dated August 6, 2003 and .the follow-up report dated~February 19,
2004 unless an accePtable alternative is approved by the city. The Geotechnical Assessment and
follow-up report are in~luded in Exh1bit C. ' '
ARTICLE 4. ARCJ::UT~CTURAL CONTROL COl\11\'ll11EE
4.1 Membership._The Architectural Control Committee. members sball initially be
appointed by the Declarant. Substitutions and replacements shall be appointed by the Declarant
until all Lots have been sold, or Declarant has turned over control of the committee to the
homeowners.' When all the Lots in ,the Development have b~n sold, the Declarant shall turn
over control or the Committee to'the Homeowners. After the Declarant has turned over the
control of the Committee to the Homeowners, substitutions and replacements shall be voted' on
by the Homeowners, substitutions and replacements shall be voted on by the Homeowners, with
one vote for each Lot "
4.2 Duties. The Architectural COuL.vl Committee (herein" Committee'') shall be
established' to review and approve or deny plans, specifications, design, construction, and
alterations of all L.uy4ovements built within the Property, pursuant to design specifications set
out in the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions. ' , The Committee shall consist of three
members. It is recommended that at least one of the Committee members be an architect,
_ engineer, or contractor or shall have such other similar qualifications. , The Committee shall,
, consider the recommendations; if any, of the Declarant and Homeowners for design control and
site approval for proposed Improvements, but it shall exercise its own judgment regarding the
proposed Improvements. In approving or denying proposed 44ovements, the Committee shall
consider whether ~e IJJ.JfI4ovement complies with' this Declaration, the design guidelines
'contained herein, and the overall aesthetic quality and feeling of continuity of the Devdopment."
, ,
4.3 Approyal. No improvement shall be undertaken until the construction plans have
been approved by the Architectural Control Committee.
, ,
. ......
Architectural plans will be reviewed" by the Architectural Control Committee for a fee of
$200 which is payable by the individual property owner to the Committee at time of submittal
If any plans should require more than two hours of review, an hourly rate of$100 per hour shall
be charged. " " '
Landscape plans will be reviewed by the Architectural Control Committee for a fee of
'$100 which is payable by the individual property owner to the Conunittee at time of submittal.
If any plans should require, more than one hour of review, an hourly rate of $100 per hour shall
be charged. '
4.4 Application for Approval. Each Owner desiring to make site ot structural
improvements on his or her Lot shall, prior to requesting a building permit from the City of
Springfield, submit to the Architectural Control Committee for a.F.F~Vval, the following:
ROCKY ROAD - Covenants, Conditions, & Restrictions
10
GEOTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT
ROCKY ROAD SUBDIVISION
S. 47th Street, Springfield
.",
August 6, 2003
Prepared for:
David Nichols, PE
Pacific West Engineering
3610 Goodpasture Loop
Eugene OR 97401
P.O. Box 2238, Eugene, OR 97402
(541) 607-5700 FAX: 607-5701
CCB # 127073
. ...~,
TABL~ OF CONTENTS
"
'.
Page
EXECUTIVE'SUM11AR Y .......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'. . . . . . . . . . . ': . . . . . . . . . . . .. ii
INTRODUCTION ...............:....................~..... '. . . . . . . . . '. . . . . . . . . . . 1,
GEOLOGY AND SOILS (published Literature)'. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . 1
FIELDINVESTIGA TION .. .. . . . . ~ . . .. .. . . .. . . .. .. . . . -. . . .. . . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. ~ . 1 '
Methods ......-.........'................................................. 1
,Results . " ;. . . .. . . '. . . . : ',' . . .'. . . . .'. . . .. . . .'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'. . . . .2
Soil Units .....'... '. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . : . . .2
Rock Uni1$ .... . . . . . . . . .'.'. . . . . . . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . . . . ',' . . . . . . . . . . .. '. .'. 3
,DISCUSSION. .,.............................. .,...............'...............'.4
CONCLUSIONS .........:'....... .". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
RECOMMENDATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,'. .. . . . . . . . . '. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Design .Area 1 . . . . . . . . : . . .'. . . . . . . . . .:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . ~ . . . . . . . : . .'.,. . . . . . . . 6
Design' .Area 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'. . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . .. '. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Design .Area 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
LIMITATIONS.. ;'.......... ..'....:......................;........... .... .,.....9:
LIST OF FIGURES
Follows Page
Figure, 1: .
Figure 2:
Figure 3:
Location Map . . .,. . . . . . . . . . . . . .'. . . . . . . . . . , " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .' . . . . 1
Site Map and Test Pit Locations ...................................... 2
,Design .Areas' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'. .,.'. . . . . 4
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A: Pacific West Engineering Test Pit Photos
Appendix B: Test Pit and Hand Auger Logs
Appendix C: Site Photos
~ ~.,
EXECUTfVES~RY
The area proposed for construction of the Rocky Roa~ subdivision can be divided into thfee design ,
areas:
Design Area DA-1 includes all of Lot land portions of Lots 2 and 3, iIi the northwest portion of the
site. This area is underlain by expansive soil and Rock Unit RU-302, which consists of over-
consolidated high-liquid-limit clay. As a result, the foundation of the strucrure to be built onLotl
, , should be designed for highly expansive material. 00 Lots 2 and 3, structures can be placed within
- Design Area 3.
DA-2 includes the lower-sloping northern and eastern portions of the site, and is underlain by RU-
101, a fme-grained dark gray igneous rock ("basalt"), which is decomposed to depths varying.
between 5 and 10 feet. '
DA-3 includes the western and central portions of the site and is underlain by RU-101. In this design
area, partly decomposed to nearly fresh state fractured in-place rock is located at shallow depth,
potentially requiring larger equipment or hydraulic hammers for deeper excavations. '
No evidence of slope movement was noted on the site, and there is no indication that the proposed
development will result in slope stability is~ues, as long as grading recommendations in this report
are followed. ' '.
Rocky Road Subdivision, Springfield
Geotechnical/Soils Assessment, GeoScience. Inc. 8-6-03 11
:.
INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of a geotechnical assessment to determine soil and ;ock cOllditions
at a proposed subdivision located northeast and east of the current north end of S 47th Street off
Jasper Road (Figure 1 ).' The assessment was conducted for:Mi. David Nichols; FE, of Pacific West
Engineering. A total of five test pits had been excavated in August of 2002 under direction of Mr.
Nichols, and.copies of color photos of these test pets were available for review. The site was re-
visited with Mr. Nichols on June 18, 2003,and the older test pit sites were re-examined for evidence
of the materials encountered at that time. Based on. these observations, the site appeared to be
underlain by two rock units with significantly different characteristics. The distribution of the two
units appeared to be well-defmed by the site topography, with the higher and steeper portions,
underlain by, competent fme-grained igneous rock ("basalt") and the low-lying portion in the
northwest comer underlain by completely decomposed state pyroclastic or contact metamorphic
rock. However, additional explorationwas required todeliheate the 'boundary between the two rock
units in the west-northwest part of the site.
GEOLOGY AND SOILS (Published Information)
The geologic map included in Ground Water in ihe Eugene-Springfield Area, Southern Willamette
Vally, Oregon (USGS Water Supply Paper 2018, 1973) indicates that the entire site is underlain by
, the Tertiary Little Butte V o1canics, which are also known as the Post-Eugene Volcanics in this area
According to the ,Water Resources Paper, the Little Butte Volcanics consist of a sequence of ,
predominantly dacitic and andesitic flows and tuffs and olivine basalt flows with some scoriaceaous '
, material. '
The Soil Survey of Lane County Area, Oregon (USDA Soil Conservation Service, 1987) indicates
that the northern portions of the site are underlain by Hazelair silty clay loam, whereas the southern
two thirds of the area are ,underlain by Nelda silty clay loam. The Hazelair soil is classified
according to the Unified Soil Classification System as a CL soil (upper 15 inches) over a CH soil
to 3 feet, with weathered rock below 36 inches. The Nelda soil is classified as an ML soil in the,
upper 10 inches over a CL or GC soil; with weathered rock reported at a depth of 35 inches.
FIEJ)) ~SrIGATION
Methods
, The site was originally visited with Mr. Nichols on June 18, 2003. At that time, the material
backfilled into the previous test pit locations was observed. The site was re-visited on J~ly 31,2003
and two test pits were excavated using a rubber-tired 4-wheel drive Case 580 backhoe with a 2-foot
toothed bucket. Soils encountered in the test pits (and backfilled test pits) were classified according
to the Unified Soil Classification System using ASTM Method D-2488 (Visual-Manual Procedure).
Distances from known landmarks to the test pits were determined using a Wheel-a- Tape device.
Rocky Road Subdivision, Springfield .,
GeotechnicallSoils Assessment, GeoScience, Inc. 8-6-03 1
---.~
'"'~'<::~':\',. . '.' ..:. >~;;::.:~:: /~~~:;::;;;~,~c:~ ~ii'ijt,~,;~;",~_ ~~/
--.-~"""~\, ~"'. · w.'" . .. "" .. . . .' '. '.-0 "'. ...,., ."'......~ . ~ _ .
~, .,. "~".. '0'-.-':' '. -?' / -- ". .. '" ;' ... >1-....','''; .>:.,. '''''. '~"
.-..,. · · J "'''';', , . Y. .~_ 0"- -.......... . ,:. ';.""", :... <'+;"
'N '-- ~.= ._~; ....... .;. 6', ~'" _: ''':}'. '. '. .,.., '" ~_
~"'il",,==- , '1'.. '... ". ~"_._ '''''~'J':''''!,""" """"J.,..
,. 'H, I .. ~''''''''' <;" , ; .. _.. ". " .' J . ~. '. "'-. :. "., '~'''.:: ,_, .:.;.~;;:
, .. ".... ~"".~. ""':r" . . · - 1 .... .. _""" I< ~ . """",,... t..... _ . ..,;... .
~'!t.~SR ~:.~;,,;.h '>;...; ..g ~. ..,.. Ii\; ~;""~i'h 0.., '.. ....,. ,.~ . .~~.
".;.. '. '1!!;.""- ". ,,~.. '~".' ~ tJ:. .~.... '. ~'''' ." . '~. .. ..... .... .... .' .....,,""
.- · .... '" "0 ,. '~'" , · ~ ", ".,. .. ..' f1! I . 1'&~"1 . b . '"~.r"'" .. .
i~.~,=~ ~'::.:s.. : ~ ~';;;:~:1l; f % ..:..;~ ~~~~~~""""ii"~\:r ;:."i[iiii:! ~l:i,;,j'4.~~r;...,.
-', .' ,. ;.:" - . ~ '"1 _.1000;. '~"'~"' ~ ''''''''''''''-il!!; """-f ""'.,....; ''', '''~'''~,,>c '. '.. ~.:'..~,,: ._. ,'" ~ I Thuntoft
... . '.,.- .. -", '". .' .~- '. . .. ..... .. .'," ". .,"'..., .'~ . ". " , ".
.~.""=--- ..~ ...,...,..,.,.... - .L;, ~"'.." ,:- ... .:>.~ -" >=J~ .,,~ "'~'. ....,n...... . . \e;. :1:- . . !;;~,. Jlh:~.
..... 'I......n '.- ---... , : - '>;: . . ,. '.~. : ;:..,.,~.. I "t'.:f::" ,;~~'''''.:.~~~ . .:~:." . .,' ;:_;.. .'. .
'. ,., t_. >. , ',,,, '. ". '~~. '. ~ . ","". .......~ '__. " ....... ,
"""~:""'....: ..,:;,.~ '.:e", 1ii"'" """~ .~-~ '~"':';{.."~...:;;,,," ,~"'". .1
........~,............,.. '''. """"'"."" ~,""~ " '"~~ '~'- '-,,,",,' '.-'.- . '..",'.... ...
.. ..... ........ -~ .. -- . .... "... .~"...... _.~ , . ,'. . 0_ . '._.. _ ..
"'.. ,:.-," A .... .. ..... ,~ "''''"-'.' "~""".W~"" ~. .... . 'U. ,.. ,,__ ""- -,,-.
....'.'...:..-. · -~""'--'~- 'I- ...~ , ,- ~"/.~r.~'1.. . .....1 .'
";-~. .~. _l-_~ ""'=.. ..... ." ~ ~;."'_ ~ = .W' " '~" . _' """''' ~, :. _ ~. . '. . '...~.. .
..... .... .,- . -.... ~ ~, . '.. ~<.., . " ". .
.... . ........-~?- '*'.. ~. -" .... " .. ~ ~ , ...... .....",.. . -,. .. "- ......
~1.:.~....G- tl'IE '...... \, " "'.. ", · "'" = ': ~C,,"'. ,_ ''-~ .., A:-_':'" .
1!N r', ..,~. ....... =< -'=' ~ ,,'....~'" ~~ ._.,.. ~ '" ,
.,(.i. "--",;..,. ~ ,.' ?-:"', '.':" ! ! ~ e ;0:;, "'...> ~~~:: "'. ;;.. 45' .-=.
~". .,....... ,'c",~ .., ;(., . ..,._. .. 1\-. _ % .. "_~
~ '1',','.i ...:.\.'..:. >" i' · ; 55 :, '.. -: ' :~ ~'!1:;:..., V' '. ;.};. _ .f;;.,;-"'"
"" ~ "~"l"~ · '., ..<0 _ ...., ~ . ,..~ , ........ "."" ""_
~' ~I~W~t~,"~t~1B~A~;i;~~; _:~,~ *- "_ " ~~~~'~;~~f~~~--~-
~. P-mt' - - '~ << "":"''''....,.".. - ?~ ";-:':r'!.tf,., 1;., ?-;6'j/ '
: ,..~t..r~m'-~' ',,- ," "'" .. .' . . '--, ~ : _ " L'..' , """~. .. _,.
'" ''''~'''' , :." .., "" I, ..~ ""..' "'. .... , '<>".... "~..., ,
___'i!,..',;~ ". Ii .......~.;--~, "-'1i~,,,, _ :..,'" ;""l' 'if J.~ ~';:s''''''
......1. , ,\' '" '~. , ...12\iy"" :"~-;""';~ i ::"'~--""'-';'T'ia"'ffE" '''\".;;.;.". . . f .....'j..,. '.. , :',.. i\ Y~.'j.:" ;~>
~~:- ." " - "::">r" '-~";~-E~:" :"-'-l~~ '~.\'..nJnn; ".1" I s -t=1;,(!~~ ~el.ll~&.~_ -" . ", "EI,,;: ~'",\,' ,'- "1"/:_
-~" -----" .... . , . -~--- . . '..... .
""!vofi """,-'. .~'" :'''''''', . ..-'. I......., _ ......,. . ~""_ . ",. " I"', ' ......,. '. .: -'
. - ...-....:.... ...... I: ... " ~ 'I '-', '., '" ~~""~. I, . ..... '_ '''E _
:, .... ","'. ". . :,,;:, .... .:. '-I..,', I, '. / "'" ~- . ,;".., .. ."". _" __., . r..;
".c__~. .~, J L_~,... '~. I I. ,j '/ij7 _"_". J'~~. .., ,W!!...L_ " "_'..-- "'1'
.. . -. '.. , '" . . - . . . ~. -.~ - . "
'.. "., '....~-.. ~"-',.,,,.~ '" ,- , ." ......, "'., ,'. ,
"' '" '..r":"'''- 'Ie,,!;. :.:: !.~ f. , . "_.... ".:, ''', . 'ir ...____
' .', ". ., "< 1. l" .t:.. ~. "0.. .. I '~'" '.
.. >; """'" ... .. '~"-. · '.' ''"''. .."> , . ",' . a-":.r.
"'- ".~ ,~" ,'.::, ".... : : .. ..... '-' . -:;;',~ ',.. '.. ", .'" ......; ...
~,'~' '~".'" .......,.... .- ......~O"".,: '.. - ',. ,.. ".. _ ,..,~' L~
~,,.... ,."". h", ,-"..... -.~....;. 'I"",." ..... y. , ~ .. "2 'o..,t..,
.. ...,....,--..;. ......-f'.. - '~ . I G'''''~l u ~ "
< '.. : 'r;;. "63 :~. "C t .' ':"J'\\ ...;..ci:'1 'i\::..... ~
.~. - 50 '. ", ../2 ':-., .'.. ',.-." ""
.'\.,j-::C\~"':.'.;'~~4I""'" , . -.,' ~L, '. r f / r; ! \"A~Y~'0"~~~'i"
-. ~ ,.,.... ,.,-~~ '. '
'. . ~ G,,~ ~ ~ ., '.' c . v~ ..~_-....;~ .
.\- "'.;, I--,~, . :', '" ._._~", ;.;t' \~.~ \ \:Vn....,:... :'t"
..>o~-"- ;~......,. . .' , ',;-'.._~. "'_. '''''':4' .... 1 ~ "'1)7 .. I...., "1,
,.. '~ ..'.\/1',__.: '\, -.";) ,.', r. ---.,. ~ 5 -, ", .-C"; , ,"c:... '----..,f '~...., ....~\ ,';::
". · , ......... . .'. ; r.' """ ~, "". '..,
6 ';"'. .. _ "" _"..~,. ; '_. , ',",,, ''-~,. ',,,,
-..:-;\-.,j. '. I: 2~:.:._ -.. 'Y . I 'A /' ..;\' "~~;";;~"<':'~"':'. ,.
..'-' =. '...,=>-.. ..L ~ -- .... ?.. r '-J "" . '\ ( ''''''.\,~. .....
...~~,:~~?C- ::;;:-, ..,"\ '. ...' . ~ I " '! \ '_"':::.;~~~;~:.~,
..y ~.. .'.. ",. ~'. . . "'- '"""-",, '.' " ./ I. _, ., . <...,..",. .
. ,'-"".-:;,... '~"";"":'..I:" "yY - " .'. "'G'~' "'_'~' '\J"~' ""(.,:~~\.. , ,.
........... . ..... . . "... ;~ /.: ..... ..... '-- '''---= ,~ . , '/-' "'. ~"" ..,-
'*"".'90 ". ..". ""~"",,,o~.o...~ ,. . ',- "f., ", t,..,f 'i'''... .'1" , __'-'4.":,-:" ,.' ,<
. "'--..' .l'.. ... ,':. ""'''... . . . ~ /:_-.:~""'''"'', """ /.! , ; . \ Ii '" r..,~,.""" .
. ;' # .;.,,' ,'.c,~, ..~ --::,,~.,. ,,:..... - .. '" ~... "'.# I ""'-'-.. .' "';"./ 'Oil
~-:. .c;<;:~ --"':.., 1~~. '''.- ""::.'--""":'. "~,:.-.;.." ::4:':. / . """- Y" ~ :/;iIt:r.., ";I
~. .... '., . ~...~. ._~~.."- ~.. ~"-, '","", '~....
. ~" '" '''' .. ~'...," '-.;"0;.' I r-""' ,1 i ~_..
.'.~' " ".\ . '~". ....-........~":O;"-... "".0;. r' ,.. .... . .",..-;-;.;,.~~..~., ~<'\
,.. ,." ."., /' . """". '-.. ~,~.. V . / f' '...., " .....
~.:~i.)l;,f)t~c,;~~..:,~;~~~.,; . .. '\. //,'1'0," if' '~~0
' ,.,. "...j" " .- "., .....,.... ..J'. . ..
/';,.~;7:;-~:...-
/ /,:', j."<,~;
....-.
.....~;.
-=~~-:-1f
~.
:;.
- ~-f ~ -
:;.~:~.=~; ;
'j-
'.'
.......:..
~ -- -'..
48
~IJ:':) ;.~
, .!>44
*
\--==::.... . .
'0,-
j..' "/ .
t.:
",,=::: ..:.
170 E
. SPRINGFIELD
Name. 3
Date: 8~/2~ equals 2000 feet
Scale: 1 In
/
Milei
..
: -'-,
53" W
" 1220 56' 5 .
002' 07.3 N
. . 044 cati n Map
Location. l' Lo 0
Caption: Figure .
ptech Ine.
Copyright (C) 1997, Ma "
"
2002 Test Pit~, 2003 Hand Auger Borings',
'.
The test 'pits excavated on August 21, 2002, under supervision of Mr. Nichols were designed,
primarily to determine excavation conditions at the site. Copies of photos of the test pits are
included in Appendix A. Assessment of the soil/rock materials in these pits was conducted by
GeoScience primarily based on the materials still expos~d in the backfilled test pits and also based
on color photos provided by Mr. Nichols. In addition, on August4, 2003 hand auger holes were,
advanced in the area immediately surrounding TH-1, between TH-1 and TH-2, and at TH-2. Hand
auger logs are included in Appendix B.
2003 Test Pits
, '
On July 31, 2003, two additional test pits were excavated alorig the existing driveway. The main
, , focus of this exploration was to more closely define the location of the contact between the two
major rock units at this site. Testpit logs are included in Appendix B and photos in Appendix C.
Results
. Soil Units
,
..
, .,
Three soil units were identified at the site, which were designated SU-B, SU-C, and SU-D for
purposes of this report. SU-B is present approximately in the area outlined as Nekia soil on the Soil
, Survey and SU-C.is presellt in the area outlined as Hazelair soil., SU~D is presentbeneathSU-B/C
in the northwest portion of the site. ,
'SU-B consists of dark brown to brown. clayey or silty sand with angular stained-state (STS) to
Visually Fresh State (VFS) igneous rock fragments (see RU-IOI, below). Rock fragment content
varies from-70 to 80,% by volume, the fragments are angular, and range in size from a: few inches
to four feet in diameter. The fmer~grained matrix is estimated to consist of75 % fine- to medium-
grained, sand arid 25 % fines. The matrix has low dry strength, m~dhlIn toughness, and slow
dilatancy. As a result, the matrix is classified as a silty SAND (SM) according to the USCS' and the
, fines are probably either MH or CL. The soil appears to be partly matrix-supported and partly clast-
supported and ranged 'in thickness from 2 to 4 feet. At the time of test pit excavation, SU-A was dry
and below the plastic limit (BPL). The unit is interpreted as a top-soil/colluvial deposit derived from
weathering ofRU-IOI on steeper slopes.
SU-C consists of dark brown silty sand (70 S, 30 F) with igneous rock fragments. The rock fragment
content is lower than inSU-B, ranging from 5 to 20 %. In addition, rock fragments are smaller,
ranging in size from 2 to 8 inches. SU-C has low dry strength, low toughness, and rapid dilatancy.
''As a result, SU-C is classified as a silty SAND (SM) according to th~ USCS. SU-C was
'approximately 1.5 to 225 feet thick in the hand auger holes, and was dry and BPL at the time of the
site visit. The unit is interpreted as a top-soil/colluvial deposit derived from weathering ofRU-1 0 1
on lower slopes.
Rocky Road Subdivision, Springfield .
Geotechnical/Soils Assessment, GeoScience, Inc. 8-6-03 2
--..,
-'--'-."."
-,-
......:.-.. .'
~
...
SU-D consists of gi-ay to light gray sandy clay. TheestiImited gradation is 30 llIo medium-grained
sand and 70 % fmes. The unit has very high dry strength; high toughness and no dilatap.cy. As a
. result it is classified as a sandy fat CLAY (CH). SU-D wasO.S feet thick inHAH-ID, a:f1d was not
encountered in HAH-3. The unit is interpreted as a colluvial deposit derived fi:om weathering of
RU-302.
Rock Units
Two rock units were identified. Rock unit RU-I0l is present beneath the eastern, central, and
southwestern portion of the site. RU-302 is present beneath the low-sloping area in the northwest
comer of the site..
In visually fresh state (VFS), RU-IOI consists of a. dark gray very fine-grained igneous rock
("basalt"). It was not determined if the unit is intrusive or extrusive. RU~IOI is the source of the
igneous rock fragments in SU-B and -C. The depth of weathering of the unit is dependent on '
location. At most locations~ the unit is either completely decomposed or partlY decomposed to
depths of five feet or more. Completely decomposed state (CDS) RU-l 0 1 i~ light brown to tan and
" remolds with finger pressure to a sandy silt, which is APL when moist. The resulting "soil" has low
to medium dry strength, low touglmess, and rapid dilatancy. Partly decomposed state (PDS) RU-l 01
is tan to light gray with rust-brown spots and contains more than 50 % material which cannot be '
remolded with fmger pressure. The depth to partly decomposed RU-l 0 1 appears to be variable from
"approximately 2 to 5 feet. The miniinum depths to PDS RU-IOl,appear to be present along the
steeper slope in the southwestern portion of the site. The unconfined compressive strength (UCS)
of CDS RU-I01 was measured in TP-2, using a pocket penetrometer. The DCS of the material
exceeded the range of the instrument (9,000 pst).
Rock Unit RU-302 underlies the northwestern part of the site. The unit is present only in completely
decomposed state (CDS). In "unweathered" state, the unit consists of a maroon to brick-red to
whitish-tan over-consolidated clay, which decrepitates rapidly upon exposure to moisture. In the
, presence of mo{sture, the unit can be completely remolded to fines which have very high dry
strength, high toughness and no dilatancy. Where re-weathered, the unit is rust brown, but retains
its other characteristics. The unit is interpreted"as either a contact-metamorphic zone at the base of
the RU-l 01, or a pyro-clastic rock unit which was deeply weathered shortly after deposition, and
then consolidated bi burial' under several thousand feet of rock which has subsequently been
removed by erosion. '
Rocky Road Subdivision, Springfield
Geotechnical/Soils Assessment, GeoScience, Inc, 8-6-03 3
DISCUSSION
Based on the observations and subsurface exploratlon;.the site can be divided into three design areas, ,
which are based on soil/rock unit distributio~ and slope. These areas .are shovm on Figure 3. Design
area DA-1 is located in the northwest portion of the site, including Lot 1 and parts of Lots 2 and 3.
This area is characterized by the presence ofSU-B/C over SU-D and RU-302. Of these units, SU-D
and RU-302 are probably highly expansive. Based on experience with similar or identical rock units
in the Eugene/Springfield metro area, only the near~surface portions of RU-302 are subject to '
seasonal moisture changes because swelled portions isolate the deeper portions from water'
infiltration. The unit is hard when dry and in-place but decrepitates rapidly upon exposure to
moisture and loses significant strength. The swell pressures developed during this hydration process
exceed typical residential bearing pressures, and result in distress to structures due to differential up-
lift. This issue has been successfully mitigated by deep foundation designs consisting of drilled piers
and above-grade concrete beams. It may also be possible to mitigate the condition by flooding of the
building pad to expand the foundation material and construction of post-tensioned slabs. 'In the
Rocky Road Subdivision, only the northwestern comer of the site is affected and only one lot (L6t
1) is situated such .that the residence will need to be co~structed within DA-l.. Seasonal shallow
perched groundwater is expected in DA-1 within SU-B/C. Therefore, it is recommended to install
up-slope and side-slope cut-off dIains into SU-D around the residence on Lot 1. For road
construction in this area, it is recommended to place geo-fabric on the native sub grade to prevent,
mixing of the overlying road base with softened SU-D,or RU-101 during the wet season.
Shallow groundwater may be present seasonally, perched on PDS RU-IOl. Therefore, it is ,
recommended to install foundation drains on the up- and side-slope sides of residence inDA-2.
Such drains should extend into native material at least 6 inches below the base of the adjacent
footing, should be lined with filter fabric and backfilled with open drain rock after placement of a
perforated rigid pipe with glued joints.
DA-3 includes all or parts of Lots 2 through 8. DA-3 is characterized by the presence ofSU-B over
RU-I 0 I. Deep excavations for foundations and/or underground utilities in this area may require use
of a large trackhoe, and, in some cases, a hydraulic hammer. Excavations are likely to produce large
fragments ofVFS RU-101 (from both SU-B and in-place PDS-VFS'RU-IOI).
}toc!':y Road Subdivision, Springfield
. GeotechnicallSoils Assessment, GeoScience, Inc. 8-6-03 4
---
, -~----.--~~
'~~:'--::-:"c~,:?""'" ',",,'
/...- .,)/, ;:::~, '. ~--
./. 'J ( ,""~, '. '"
J.. . .. '''-' __ ''_'. '---
--- ';;'>,::, .,>. '/""'~.~ "'" <<t-. ""
,/<// -- /~\ ~,'t;,~ "',
----- --- . - / -", "',',
./ ," ~.' ...........:-.,....:.., /' ,,/ .'9t~2J"j',~~.,~~(!S " '.,
./ -. / J ""', ", ..,__
-:=-=~--'~ :~~ -~,C~~t:~;i\j:\1' "
;.------ .' / . --,- ," -- L' 'h
'~ ~~~~~~;;;~:;:,-:'::~: ;"'>\i' ,.,,'
:-'----- ~ ----~.""" -,,~~--~---- --- , , ,', -"
~, -- ,S '~"'--, ';"'7 ,',," ___ "'_\" '., "
= --;. '" -> -- =-:'''' '- "1-------_________, .. -- , \, \ _ '1 \
~ :C'~ t -f"~;:::::-:::.. - ~ :::::::. :t'" -- -- ---- '- ~___ __ \ 'ii,:: ,
. .- - f_J....U~_ "',,-," ,'------.. --l,--------,_, -, ,. --- ,__ _, '----I Ji ': .
" ---~--~-- '~~''-''''';--' ",,-, "1-.----......-.-....---. . -~"-"-, _ . -" , '. , II !' I
' , > - -""---- '--- /~"---, ',,, '~ '--" " , I
.' ~~;:.;::--:;';::::>-=-.::::;;--:'::::::::~}/">;'~~I--'--< I -, ---'''--,--, ,- --".. __ " " I
~ . ~ ~~.. ""':*'" .=' ~"-.'-:,='''' ~ /~- "-. -- -" '-'-. -- - -. ", - :: I
~~ "~j ~~:q-.?~.. '=,::::::::.:.. . ~/ ~~~' ~ ',l',<,~__", .--------. ,.,,____, I , ,
' , I' ^,~ . d//. "'" -- ----- --" q __ ~ 'J." ,_ "'" I ,
'T ", , '> 'Ut.' ~*-="'CC="~c:.__:::~ ---"'~" ~ . : ", ',_ ",_, '" __".. __, """ __ ___ __ , Ii: :
' ~,,! , ~: :!%~~~'==== '=':-.~"'';S, . ------ - -j.''---. '---., '"" ':- '0, ----',~'_, , il
~I r: ,i~ '1%1i""~?~.:=:=:::~ ::---~().;S '>' : 't~:--=:: '" _, . ," __, ., ~, "i '
\'1 ',: . W~ffi W"''''''~_~ ~-c: -----z.,.......v;:, '->, ---- '---.. --, '''.__", '" , r , ,i ,
I \', 1.!llqlf//--=-~~'::::::'<~\_1\'~--\'10<:::::"<:>", ", ''', i,i, I 'I! '
I k I~W&" 1'8'--:';'--.cc':::, ::-.----'::-"'~~V-J ~' J-,::~ ">______>____ '..,', 'Ii I ! .
,'t, 'j: ;;; ,~H ~i~~~III7I.?'I-::~ t;-%~3 S:~~~~~: i ~ ~~'::::<:::- :;::.:'~:;:~, ~-:--c''':~.~ : n '
j I " , :; 'J 1f!d~ll /f;1 ,,0<< #f:'~::::::<::~?:::::'::..~\~~;. '~''': I, .X'.,.~::-',.:>< =. '> _..., " _ .:,~' .", '~"11 I : ::
' " '.7t:0 d//jf.'{{:1(jj -- r_ ---~ ~"-"'~' '~ ',......, "- ,. __ ..,___ 'I '
-.-J., I ,,;,1 ~~IIifj:r-1.?::::=~~~~::~~~::: -::-~:.~:J-I. 'i'
-7 Ii " ~fll ~.j#~~1f ,~--~>,== ~--<'-; '\.'\, ~\i\::",,) <<, ","--~-~-:::<"" I Ii .
I},. I IJJ I ~ ii, " -, ",__ _ '1'" ~ \ ____ '" , , , "
' I h> !J ~I 1h"Ul #1 .' ' / / / /',...;2, \ ',- ,'-. ~:, ,~." "- '_.,:- " _'~ '" _, . ,,__~ ~ . i Ii:__
/ ,'('. f - . i / I Ii (( (-- / '-----, '-, '-t....~., \ '\ .' \( 0::'-----> '" __ '" -':o'~"c" ~ ': II I" !
'L-;L ,J r ~I, ! I~yr \J\% 1/' ,,/ ..:,.~--->-~~~.:>~~;:k~..:~<::;:>---- ::!j_ '" \~[:,
I 1~f1lt;" I !'l \1' 'j' (d~'~d (, <V ;~\ 'I: ~';.~:..~-:::'..::-n~.:... ' ;. _
I0J~l.l,F~" \ ': I:: 'II lhl( I <(,.' \\ ' . ~ '\':--'''-~,-,'' ,", . S ringfield
w.ifil I I ~'~\' \ '1\ ~*''' \ ~ "i\ "t, ' \:'," ~,', '_ '. f S 47th S~reet. p
,I !~\)~() /I( \1\ I \11 \\~\. ~ .i,,~ --1 : ~\\ '~oad SnbdivISIO~. reas
i! '~/I.I', l;~\ !~ ,~ ~~ ~(~'rl~ 'I "-,---- Proposed Rocky Figure 3: DeSIgn A
!, '\,,'~ " Shown
I -- Scale as ,
-, - -- -- UBDMSION
ROCKY ROAD S
M~(, ,'.('~ Design Area 1 !
i~,'\: , 2 l'!
Design Area
.
'go Area 3 1- = 100'
Desl
'..
,ji
il,...
~.....,
V,.;>..
"
I
~
l~
'"
~
"'--
"-
l-'.\s
, ,
.
, .
;~
~
'~
, "-
"-
~
\..
"
T,L,_
,
"'1
" '
, , .
None of the design'areas show evidence of previous slope movement. 'The steeper portions o(the
, subdivision are underlain by competent in-place RU-I01. Slopes in the area undeilaiii.~t shallow
depths by RU-302 are sufficiently gentle to preclude deep-seated slope movement. -
Due to the content of expansive clay minerals it is not recommended to use excavated SU-D or RU-
302 as structural fill. SU-B, -C,and CDS RU-I0l can be used as structural fill after removal of
oversize material, which may not be cost-effective.
Pennanent cut banks in SU-B and SU-C should be sloped at no steeper than 2H : IV. In CDS to
PDS RU-I0l such cut banks can be sloped at 1.75 : 1. Stained-state (STS) to VFS RU-I0l can be
sloped near-vertical, although rock falls cJ.ueto freeze-thaw may be expected after the bank has been
in place for several years.
CONCLUSIONS,
Surficial observations' and subsurface exploration of the proposed Rocky Road subdivision in
Springfield indicates that the site is underlain by two rock units with widely differing characteristics.
The northwest portion of the site is underlain in the shallow subsurface by RU-302,which originated
either as a contact metamorphic at the lower margin of, RU-l 01, or is the product of weathering and
subsequent over-consolidation of a pyroclastic deposit. RU-302 is maroon to brick-red to whitish
tan and consists entirely of high..,Jiquid-limit clay which, in-place, is over-consolidated. When ,
weathered, the color is rust-brown. In-place material decrepitates rapidly in the presence of water, ,
softening to a material whith can be remolded to APL with finger pressure. Once completely
hydrated and remolded, the material has very high dry strength, high toughness, and no dilatancy.
As'a result, it.is likely that RU,.302 is expansive.
, ,
RU-IO 1 consists (in fresh state) of a dark gray very fme-grained igneous rock. In' CDS, the unit is
tan and can be completdy remolded (when moist) to a san<;iy (very fine-grained) silt with low dry
strength, low toughness, and rapid dilatancy. These characteristics are not consistent with expansive
soil.
1bree soil units were identified at the site. The steeper slopes in thewestern portion are underlain
by SU-B, which consists of angular fragments ofRU-10l up to 4 feet or more in diameter, in a dark
brown to brown matrix of silty sand (SM), with low dry strength, low toughness and slow dilatancy.
Rock fragments constitute from 70 to 80 % (by volume) of SU-B. Rock fragment frequency
decreases with distance from the steeper slope, and much fewer rock fragments ~e present in the
lower-sloping northeastern and eastern portion of the site. The soil in that vicinity contains between
10 to 20 % rock fragments in a dark ,brown silty sand matrix equivalent to that ofSU-B. This soil,
was designated SU-C. In the northwest portion of the site, SU-D is found under SU-B/C, overlying
RU-302. SU-D consists ofa gray to light gray fat clay (CH), which, appears to have been derived
from weathering of RU-302.
No evidence of previous slope movement was noted at the site.' ,
Rock')' Road Subdivision, Springfield
GeotechnicallSoils Assessment, GeoScience, Inc. 8-6-03 5
RECOMMENDATIONS
The proposed subdivision can be divided into, three design areas based, on geotechnical
considerations. The pertinent recommendations for each design area are summ~zed below:
DA-l
Foundations
It is recommended to design foundations for structures in DA-I to rrutigate the effects of the
presence of highly exp~sive RU-302 and SU-D. This can be achieved by construction of deep
foundations (e.g.. drilled piers) and above-grade concrete beams. Piers should be installed to at least
five feet below the top of in-place RU-302, and, in that case, may be designed for allowable bearing
pressures of 9,000 psf. If slabs are to be constructed for garages, it is recoInmended to either
construct a slab:-on-joist system or to avoid tying slabs to the perimeter foundation. Alternatively,
foundation maybe constructed by inundation of the building pad and placement of a post-tensioned
slab foundation. In the latter case, it is possible that the slabs may be somewhat out of level after
, differential shrinking or swelling. For road construction it is recommended to place Geo-fabric
. (woven, e.g. Amoco 2002) on the native subgrade to prevent mixing of softened SU-D or RU-302
with the road base material. Wet weather construction in DA-I may present significant challenges
due to loss of strength of the native subgrade when exposed to moisture. '
Excavation and Grading
All materials within DA-I can be excavated by conventional means. Permanent cut slopes in SU-D
through RU-302 should be retained. Fill slopes in this area should not exceed four feet in depth
without further engineering design and should be sloped at no more than 3H : "1 V.
Slope Stability
No slope stability issues are anticipated if recommendations regarding grading are followed.
Use of Materials
It is not recommended to use any materials excavated from DA-I as structural fill. Whereas SU-B/C
may be suited for use as structural fill, the thickness of these units and close association with
underlying expansive SU-D and RU-302 makes it difficult to completely separate the units.
Drainage
Areas around strUctures should be sloped to.drain away from the buildings. It is recommended to
install a shallow cut-off drain around the up-slope and side-slope perimeter of structures in this area
in order to intercept groundwater which is probably seasonally perched on SU-D and/or RU-302.
Rocky Road Subdivision, Springfield
Geotechnical/Soils Assessment, GeoScience. Inc. 8-6-03 6
DA-2
Foundations
'.
Foundations in DA-2 can be constructed as conventional spread-footings on CDS to PDS or less
weatheredRU-101. If foundations are to be constructed on CDS RU-101, the bearing capacity
should be verified, by a qualified professional prior to placement of rock or concrete forms.
Excavation and Grading
Excavation is anticipated to be possible with conventional methods to depths up to 5 feet or deeper.
Cut banks in CDS/PDS RU-1 0 1 will be temporarily stable at near-vertical angles unless construction
is conducted during wet weather. Permanent cut banks in CDS/PDS RU-IOl should be'sloped at
no steeper than 2: 1 and the tops should be rounded to preclude sloughing of SU-BIC. Fill slopes
should be constructed no steeper than 2 : 1. '
Slope Stability
There is no evidence of slope stability issues in this area.
, Use of Materials
. . . .
SU-C and CDS-PDS RU~101 may be utilized as structural fill provided over-size materiaI is
removed prior to compaction. Verification of compaction may be difficult unless pr90f-rolling is
used, or if sufficient Proctor testing is conducted to provide for mixing-curves of the materials.
Drainage
Because shallow groundwater is expected to be perched on PDS RU-101 seasonally, it is
recommended to installfoundation drainage at structures within DA-2. These drains should ~onsist
ofa trenchexcavated into native,CDS/PDS RU-101 on theup- and side-slope sides of structures to
, a depth of at least 6 inches below adjacent base of footing grade. The trenches should ,be sloped to
drain, lined with filter fabric, and backfilled wi~ drain rock after placement of a perforated rigid pipe
with glued joints. Drain rock should be extended to within 12 inches of the surface, and covered
with filter fabric priotto placement of other material (top soil, crushed rock, etc.).
Rocky Road Subdivision, Springfield
Geotechnical/Soils Assessment, GeoScience, Inc. 8-6-03 7 '
'.
DA-3
Foundations
Foundations in DA-3 can be placed on CDS to VFS RU-l 0 1 and can consist ofconventional spread
footings. Due to potential differential settlement, foundations should not be placed partly on SU-B '
and partly on in-place RU-IOl. For foundations placed on CDS RU-IOl bearing capacity should be
verified by a qualified professional prior to placement of a leveling course 'or concrete forms.
Excavation and Grading
Excavation within DA-3 may require use of a large excavator or a hydra~ic hammer. However, with
the information presently available it is not possible to identify areas or depths where such measures
may become necessary. ' ,
Permanent cut banks in CDS/PDS RU-I01 should be sloped at no steeper than 1.75H : IV. Cut
.banks in VFS RU-IOI may be sloped near-vertical but, in that case, maybe subjectto rock falls due
to freeze-thaw after several years. Fill slopes in this area should not exceed 2 : 1.
Slope Stability
There is no evidence of previous slope movement in this area. The area is underlain at shallow depth
by competent RU-IOI and no deep-seated failures are anticipated.
Drainage
Seeps may occur from fractures in PDS to.VFS RU-lOl during the wet season. Therefore, it is
recommended to install foundation drainage at structures with daylight basements in DA-3. '
Roc!.')' Road Subdivision, Springfield
Geotechnical/Soils Assessment, GeoScience, lnc, 8-6-03 8
l.
LIMIT A TIONS
This report was prepared for the use of Pacific WestEngineering, and thekauthorized" agents for
planning and design purposes. Our professional services were perfonned, and our recommendations .
provided in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices. The an~yses, conclusions,
and recommendations in this report are based on site conditions as they presently exist and assume
that the limited nUmber of points investigated are generally representative of subsurface conditions.,
The report is not a warranty of subsurface conditions: If, in the future, conditions are found which'
~iffer significantly from those presented here, GeoScience must be advised at once so that these
conditions and our re~ommendations can be reviewed and revised, if necessary. Should a substantial
lapse of time occur between this investigation and future site activity, or if conditions have changed
due to nearby construction or natural causes, the data contained in this report should be reviewed to
detennine its continued applicability.' This report is not inten~ed to provide a seismic risk evaluation
of the subject property. The report should be made available to potential contractors who will
'perfonn the construction work. GeoScience cannot be responsible for any deviation from the
recommended construction methods or means discussed in this report, likewise, our firm cannot be
responsible for construction' activity on other sites which neighbor or abut the subject property
referenced in this report.
If you have any questions about this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at (541) 607-5700.
Respectfully submitted,
GeoScience, Inc.
{dcuktCU ~
/
/
./ Gunnar Schlieder, Ph.D" CEG
"
Rocky Road Subdivision, Springfield
GeotechnicaVSoils Assessment, GeoScience, Inc. 8-6-03 9
....,
;
--1
i
"_.1
Rock')' Road Subdivision, Springfield
, GeotechnicaVSoils Assessment, GeoScience, Inc. 8-6-03
"
/
...'.
".~
.
't.:,,;,
<i....
...~,.
:lr\
. -~
....
"
.
.
'.
" '.
a' ~~~
~'...
.~~.,-
I'
.
,-
-<
'.
, . ... .,p..:
'lJ' . ~'. ."'It-
\i ·
...;... r'
:)~:~f.'~;~'~
....,.,
~.:',- .-' -~...
~ \{ I. .:~~~ ,;.~.. ,
;': ~';!f~> ~ ::,~~(,:i~~~;f.i :~, ~
~~:: ,.
'/~;-:-11- .
;,;", ,-~
'~.- ~~t~,~ -
...."'-~._~
~t., -.
... ..~...k "'~.,:,#'
I
i-.'..a;~..."
~,:-i~,',:.....
-.r..- ,
, '" ',=] p~,~4.~ ' ::::>
. "~:<~~~i!':t;i~1
~.~.
<
.,
;,'1
,',
."f;l;..'
~~~. 7',t-
,'-.~...ir
~J
:;
.'
; I
,~:'"
.fl'
. ,. -r.,;;' .
;..~
~;.::;.,;~..
'. ,....
:... ~:: ,r--
~ ~.
..!.
::-';;
. ." .'
", :::~,~~~~~,;~;.:~~'~.' "
~ .
.... ::
;. '~
?-'- .'
lI!I
1.
i.
f
~"".OJ....looI....._I,,
~~'
"
...
.' ,~~~~~
'.
=lrz..
;;~'?; :.';
~~.- .
.>--.
~.:t..,~.....
~~~ii.<: '
'::,;':."
~r ."
I
.. ~ ," 4 ....-
~;.~~~~.=(,~ ',~..
,.'..~~.:;.:',~':-. "~:;',<-
-i........
"',." .
~....."'W" ,
.- '.
"':'-;;~- ,;.
~.: ...~';.~: ,,:,~~;;'
. "-'~.
" .. ,. ~..,::..;..
.....~ .. .
,'.-!:.i~,::
'.,~ ~C'~: ~
~
;
"<;:/.~;,
~..
... :
-!!
~-~~~"";:.- . +
..~-/ ';':::~.':~i:~'
".'.~(";;=.- .
~~::;~
,::,;:\~$:'
'':' 01 ........
. '_' _-A
~ .~. .
.,
"
.~
.,;: .~A:
:.- ":,'f:"!
,-
..'
".~o( .'
'?-t
.:'f~',,,,,
. ~i.~.
.:. :.:
..
. ~~:':.
.....
.-
....
r'~.._.
.u .~
~"..:.._';':- 't '.
.r;.
, '.' '-'.~.
~ '>~':'>:~~X:"
~:~:~~~<~~.:,
.....
..;,.}
.....~
.1
"
~
Ii'
.:>
I
I'
,-\Ii
.if
: ,/
,JIi'
;#
P
-~-:t'r
:;
,.
t..~,
O'JiI (
r:-
r
~
~:
.......
"d1
)
, I
:,J
'd"
i
..J
Rock")' Road Subdivision, Springfield
GeotechnicallSoils Assessment, GeoScience, Inc. 8-6-03
'~-
~ HAB-la
Elevation: 514' AMSL
~
I Depth: 1.5 ft. I Depth to Rock: NA
2-1/4" OD Auger 10perator: GS
E'-'t. Gt'ad.
uses G S MlC Cons.
Depth to Water: NA
Weather: Sunny - 80s
UCS
psf
Date: 8/4/2003
Loc: See Map
Logger: GS
Equipment:
UU~
psf
Depth
Symbol
~Z~fj;'5' ~'*t::r4U-~
. .~p:. ". ....~..~.I,....,....:::'''"S
-~.: "'~-~~~~~~~~
1 . . . . . . . . . . .
-----------
- ~ ;~~-~~~~~~
Unit
, Description
o - 1.5' Brown dayey SAND with 20 -30 % (y
volume) igneous rock fragments. Low dry
strength, low toughness, slow dilatancy.
uses class. applies to matrix only.
Hand auger refusal on Igneous rock fragment
at 1.5'.
Moist Plast.
sc
Hard
DIy
EPL
70
30
SU-C
2-
3-
4-
5-
6-
7.;..
8-
9-
10-
11-
'. '
12-
Proposed Rocky Road Subdivision, Springfield
BAR-la
Drawn by: GS Date 8-6-03
/
~
HAH-lb
Elevation: 514'AMSL
Depth
Date: 8/4/2003 '
Loc: , See Map
I Lo~er: GS I Depth: 1.5 ft.; I
I Equipment: 2-1/4" OD A~er'
Depth to Rock: NA
'I Operator: GS
E..Qt. Gr!ld.
uses G S M1~ Cons.
Depth to Water: NA
Weather: Sunny - 80s
UCS
psf
Symbol Uni~
---7""'- ..---:)----'"~----,-':O::~ '
~~~. '. .~(.o,)~....~..:.I
. . . .;:-0;:' .,. ~ "' .
. " . .~ .' '. .:.:.I:.:..:.:.~.:.:..:.:....:..:::..... SU ~
::;a::r:-:::... .. . .".:::.. . ...." ..." ..:::: ..,.,
---- -----------
1- ::-2"".:.:.:-.:.:.:. ......:.:.:~~
2-
3-
4-
5-
6-
7-
8-
9-
10-
11-
12-
Description
o - l' Brown dayey SAND with 20 -30 % (y ,
volume) igneous rock fragments. Low dry
, 'strength, low toughness,slow dilatancy. "
~SCS class. applies to matrlxonly./
Hand auger refusal on Igneous rock fragment
at 1'. ' ,
70
30
Hard
SC
I
~" .
l ,",'" \' \. .
i\t.~!,\;r',"" '.' <....". ,',..",.., " "
'~~1t~ ~r~ li:lll:tt~qJ.:;!IJ}!~'~::' ,'; ;~;/:' , l' . .~, ~..,
~~ ,I' ~r'~'ff.~~tl~'''/~::',,''''~\: ": _: ,,-" ".
,.... .J 'T', I' ."\'-'1" ". '..
'~"-~l/ko -.1' .
_Iv,~:l,
. ..'I."...~~I... .~. .
Proposed Rocky Road Subdivision,Springfidd
HAH-lb
Drawn by: ,GS , Date 6-6-03
Moist Plast.
DIy
EIPL
'\
UUS
psf
,,/
"
"
Loe;e;er: GS I Depth:' 1.5 ft.
Equipment: 2-1/4" OD Auger
Depth (0 Water: NA
Weather: Sunny - 80s
UCS
psf
HAH-lc
Elevation: 514' AMSL
Depth to Rock: NA
I Operator: GS
E..c;:t. Grad.
USCS G S M1C Cons.
Date: 8/4/2003
Loc: See Mar
Unit
UUS
psf
Depth
Symbol
~~~'l~~~~r~';~L~t-1:
~~~~.),:;T.:.:.:,,-::~~::-.:.::.:.::...::::.~~
~~-~~-~~~=.:.::=.:.::_.:.::_.:.;;....:.::_~~
1 - ~j~~-j-~-:.:.::-,:,:,:,:,:,:,".:.:.:.:.:=.,...j-j~
:::::::::::-- ::::::::::::-:
--- ----
-- ----~
Description
o - 1.5' Brown dayey, SAND with 20 -30 % (y
volume) igneous rock fragments. Low dry
strength, low toughness,slow dilatancy.
uses class. applies to matrix only.
Hand auger refusal on Igneous rock fragment
at 1.5'.
Moist Plast.
DIy
EPL
Hard
SC
70
30
SU-C
2-
3-'
4-
5-
6-
7-
8-
9-
10-
11-
12-
. _ ~tp:r;!~"rl"\::;'~ '"I ;,' .
tl ~~'*f(I":'): ):.,:'.I:"'~,~.'?.~,".' " ','" ~ .
:'~ i ,:~~~~ '1~~\~fi.k\\::~~j: ,'~. ~ ~ ' , , .
- 11 ,"'~( - " I';""
-, Ip.~_,., -:- ~\ ~ .,a'" .::', II ": . .
Proposed Rocky Road Subdivision, Springfield
HAH-lc
Drawn by: GS Date 8-6-03
G'e
~.
,/
---
~
Date: 8/4/2003
Loe:' See Ma )
Logger: GS I Depth: 4.75 ft. I
Equipment: 2-1/4" OD Auger
) HAH-1d
Elevation: 514' AMSL
Depth
Unit
Description
o - 1.759rown dayey SAND with 20 -30 % (y
volume).igneous rock fragments. low dry
strength, low toughhess;slow dilatancy.
uses class. applies to matrix only.
Symbol
3~;'(;;~}.J ~~--~~rJ:~:r.t-7;I
:e::~-u:.:.s:;~.:..::!.:::.:.~.:..::.:...~
1-~.~.:..::.~~".~!~1ts S~
~ -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--~
~.:.::_.:.:.._.:..:.:_.:..::_.:..;;....~.:.::.:.::.:.::.:.::_.:..::_.:..::_~_.:..::_.:..;;::-
-----
2 - ~--:::-:::~~~~~~~~~~ SlJ-O'
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i
.------ --------
-.-.-'-0_0_'_'-._0-'-'-'-'-'-'-'
3-~~!!!~~~i~iilll
4 - :_-.:~:;;;;~~~5:;;::;;::;;::;;:~~~
:~~ ';;~~;;~.EE~E!~3:a-
-----------
_._._ _0-0_0-'-0_0-'-'-'-,-,
:-=z=:-.-o:.::===========
';;-0-"-"-'-0_' _"_"_.~_",_.
Depth to Rock: 2.25
I Operator: GS
E..~t. Grad.
uses G S M/e Cons.
Depth to Water: NA
Weather: Sunny - 80s
UCS
psf
SC
Hard
Moist Plast.
Dry
BPL
"'
, ,UUS
psf
1.75 - Ughtgray CLAY. Very highdry strength,
2.25' hioh touohness, no dilatancv.
Rust-brown CDS Pyro-clastic rock unit.
RU-302~~'- Decomposed to clay, over-consolidated.
" Decrepitates in presence of water and
remolds to APl, with very high dry strength
high toughness, and no dilatancy. '
- - - - -. - - - - - - -.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - -. - - - . - - - . - - - . - - - - - . - - - - - - . - - - - .... - - - - - - - - ~ - -
- - - - - -
425- "
4" 7,'!i' Maroon tobrlck red pyroclastic rock. CDS.
5-
Hole tennlnated at 4.75'. No V\Qter encountered.
6-
, 7-
8-
9-
10-
11-
12-
Ge
~
~"'"""""il' ,..I. . "
, '~:.I~'(I'\' "n" -'0} ...' ..
f[ ;f'~'h(~;\;~;.~1"::;,:~,~ ",~f(' '. ;>".::, ", _ ' .,
" '( '';''''V''';' .' .
= ~I'.~\~~~S-!~~N~~':~" .'
, i
70, 30
CH
'-
20
80 Hard ,St, ",<..
ElPL
, Proposed Rocky Road Subdivision, Springfield
HAH-1d
Drawn by: GS Date 8-6-03
./
".
HAH-2 '
Elevation: 524' AMSL
Date: 8/4/2003
Loc: See Map
Depth
Unit
su-c
2-
3-
4-
5-
6-
7-
8-
9- '
10-
11-
12-
.(~~ ~J~,\ ~;~;t;~~~'~i~~~':',:~~~"~ . . -". " " . .
.1.:i'l:i:'~,"lf~"Jr;~~...d l'~""",\ ,.' " .
,"<' l'...,."':";,:..'..':,.,;;,.~:"~:,i:'~:. :\ I ',' ,
., ^.,~,.. '..-
:1',~."" '":"~,,,,,,:,,,,, ..' } .
LOJ?,ger: GS I Depth: 1 ft.
Equipment: 2-1/4" OD Auger
Depth ,to Rock: NA
I Operator: GS
E~t. GJ;'ad.
USCS G S M/e Cons.
Depth to Water: NA
Weather: Sunny - 80s
UCS
psf
sc
Hlird
Moist Plast.
DIy
8PL
Description
o - l' Brown clayey SAND with 20 -30 'Yo, (y "
volume) Igneous rock fragments. Low dry ,
strength, low toughness,slow dilatancy. '
~USCS class. applies to matrix only/
Hand auger refusal on Igneous rock fragment'
at 1'.
70
30
" Proposed Rocky Road Subdivision, Springfield '
HAH-2
Drawn by: GS Date 8-6-0:\
~
'UUS
psf
.'
-I
Description
o - 2.25' Brown clayey SAND with 5 - 10 % (by
volume) igneous rock fragments. Low dry
strength, low toughness,slow dilatancy.
~
HAH-3
Elevation: 531' AMSL
Date: 8/4/2003
Loc: ,See Ma )
Depth
Symbol
~*~S1~g~y@
1-~~1;~~ s=
~~~--~--~~~~~~~~~--~~~~~~~~~~~
2 - ~~*~~~S;~;~~s~~~~~1f.$
w ~ W W , , , , , , ~ ~ I I , ,
',',,",',',',',',',',',',',',',',' RU-101 2.25-
, . .. '"" 2.5'
3- ' ~ "
Unit
4-
5-
6-
7-
8-
9-
10-
11-
12-
Logger: GS I Depth: 2.5 f1. I
'Equipment: 2-1/4" OD Auger
CDS: Tan weathered Igneous rock.
Remolds to sandy silt wllowdrystrength/
low toughness and rapid dilatancy. / '
Hole tennlnated at 2$. No Wlter encountered.
') '" .f' ", ,,'.
ti('" "1""1' "" , , 'I ," , ,
r:~~\~;~l~~fi\"~{':~:"":~-:; ':. .',:' , -~,' ~~ " ,
= ''f.'Jl'Y;~:.(' " ,
'~~.u(:tr:..~\~,r.::....l' . .
, Proposed Rocky Road Subdivision, Springfield
, HAH-3
Drawn by: GS Date 6-6-03
Depth to Rock: 2.25 Depth to Water: NA
10perator: GS Weather: Sunny - 80s
&1. GJjad. ' UCS
USCS G S M/e Cons. Moist Plast. psf
sc
Dry
I3PL.
10 65
25
HaJd
, '
,
UUS
psf
: '.
./
~
'Logger: GS I Depth: 4.5 ft. I
EquiJ;>>ment: Case 580
TP-1
Elevation: 506' AMSL
Date: 7/29/2003
Loc:' DW Entr.
Depth
Description'
Dark broWl clayey SAND w 70 to 80 ok (by
volume) VFS Igneous rock fragments to
24". Low dry strength, low toughness,
slow dilatancy. uses appllea to
matrix only.
0-2'
2
____-:.i _ 2 - 4.5' Maroo!1 to brlckred to \\11ltlsh-tan
, -.- -.- -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. AU 302 lid t d d Y P b bl It d
~~~~~~~~~==~~~~~ ove-conso a ea. ro a y a ere
3 -========~ :~~EE pyro-clastlc rock. unit. Hard VIAlen dry or
g~~~~~~~~EE:?~~~~ sllghtlmolst. Decrepitates rapidly In
~g~:g~~~:g~g:g~~~~~ presence of moisture. Remolds to APL
4 -~~~~~ ~~:g VlAth vey high drY strength, high
EEEE;; toughness and no dilatancy.
5-
Bottom of pit at 4.5 feet. No Water encountered.
6-
7-
8-
9-
10- ,
11-
12-
~
Oeo
t'ifli~~~~~~!n;;~~I:::E;~':.L. : . '
~J1.y.,-, \, "
. ~iiA~,I,;UIU"
Proposed Rocky Road Subdivision, Springfield
TP-1
DraWl bit: GS Date 8-6-03 '
Depth to Rock: 2 ft.
IO........tor: Lmice
Eflt. GJ;'8d.
USCSG S MIl: Cons.
Depth to Water:,N/A
Weather: Sunny - 80s
UCS
psf
so
Hard
Moist Plast.
8PL
70 30
Dry
> 9,000
"
UUS
psf,
/
,TP-2
!:levation: 506' AMSL
Depth
Date: 7/29/2003
Loc: DWEntr.
Logger: GS
Equipment:
I Depth: 6 ft.
Case 580
, I Depth to Rock: 4 ft.
l Operator: Lance
Et-t. GJ,"ad.
G S Mle
Unit
Description'
Dark broWl clayey SAND w/70 to 80 o,{,
(by Volume) VFS Igneous rock fragments
to 48- . Low dry strength, low toughness,
slow dilatancy. uses classification
applies to matrix only.
0-,4'
SU-B
4 - 5.5' CDS: Tan ..wathered'lgneous rock.
Remolds to sandy slit w/low dry strength,
lowtoughness and rapid dilatancy.
Bottom of pit at 6 feet. No \Nater encountered.
7-
8-
,;
9-
10-
11'-
12-
USCS
SC
70
Depth to Water: N/A
" Weather: Swmy - 80s'
'UCS
Cons. Moist Plast. psf
30
Han:I
Dry
8PL
"\
UUS
psf
. - - - . - - - - - . - - - - - - . - - - - -.. - - - - - -"-"- - - - - - - - -
SI.Molst
> 9,000 '
~
,,,!~..n{~ .~:~..dl..,,:,-:,,~~,~ \'., ':;.,,: 'j . :. -,' ,
~'~ ~.t"tt"'r;'\1\' \~.: f . . '. ~ ~ r' -," .
,J t' :t'. Jd:','.!~{ :1:~.~4' ..' ~ ~-' : .
ILJ: ..,:(. ,.'. " .
~~it.~; ~~~~ . . . '.
PropoSed Rocky Road Subdivision, Springfield
TP-2
DraWl by: as Date 6-6.{)3,
eoS
. ' '
;:. ..
./
, '
1
"
}
'1
.,
i
.J
i
i
I
J
Rod.")' Road Subdivision, Springfield
Geotechnical/Soils Assessment, GeoScience, Inc. 8-6-03
.:.....J
Photo 1:
Photo 2:
Photo 3:
Photo 4:
Photo 5:
Photo 6:
Photo 7:
Photo 8:
Photo 9:
Photo 10:
Photo 5:
PHOTO LOG
Backhoe backfilling TP-1. View SSW.TP-l was located just up-slope from the beginning of the
existing driveway. . '. ' , , , '
, .
TP- I. View ESE. The test pit was located in the cut bank for the existing'driveway. Total height
of cut 4.5 feet. '
Bottom portion ofTP-I: The maroon material with lighter-colored spots is RU-302.
TP-2, located 116 feet along driveway from TP-l. View E. Note size of rock fragments excavated
with SU-B. Most ofSU-B consists of rock fragments ofRU-1 01. Photos 7 through 10 are additional
pictures of TP-2. '
(Upside-down). Upper portion ofTP-I, with SU-B. Note size and angularity ofrock fragments in
this unit.
. .. .
(Upside-down, - tape measure case is at bottom of photo). Lower portion of TP-I. Th'e contact
between SU-B and underlying RU-302 is located at approximately the 3-foot mark bn the tape
measure.
TP-2. View SE. Most of the back wall of the test pit consists ofSU-B.
, Closer view ofSU-B in TP-2. View E. Note visually fresh-state rock fragments where the fragments '
have been broken by the backhoe. , '
TP~2. Contact between SU-B (upper half of back wall in this picture ) and light-colored CDS/PDS.
RU-I 0 I in lower half.
TP-2. CDS/PDS RU-l Olin lower portion of the test pit Most of this material can be remolded with
fmger pressure. However, at bottom of pit, material could not be remolded.
",#.
Rock')' Road Subdivision, Springfield
Geotechnical/Soils Assessment, GeoScience, Inc. 8-6-03
'4ft
'0
-
~
c
~
=
...
'"
C.
rJ'J
"'
=
~
...
~
...
~
...
'0
.Q
=
rJ'J
'0
=
~
=:
>.
~
y
Q
~
'0
~
~
~
c.
~
'"
~
:=
:=
l"-
ll)
.
I"-
:=
\C
--
...
~
~
~.
-
U1
~
....
--
="
C
....:l
.
U1
..:J
C
C
,
Photo 5 Photo 6 !
i
I
"'=
.., I
0
"C
0
fIj
~
Q.
~
0
~
~
'<
~ I
0
= I
Q.
t:n
c:
=-
Q.
-.
~
-.
(I)
-.
0
=
..
en
"C I
..,
-.
=
(JQ
::l
~
-
Q.
.'
~..:::.~, -.,;,,;',
-~~f#'-
, ~ji ':~
",\~ J~';-~: .
" ~.Jrl
'. '~-, i -~.}~~,;~ rr:
','$~;-~. ~'..
, ir~:"
.-.
!.11
~
...
--
='
<:
--.l
I
01
--.l
<:
<:
-=
"'I
Q
"'C
Q
~
~
Co
:=
Q
n
;J':"
<<
::r=
Q
=
Co
r:t.l
=
r:r
Co
..
<
..
~
='
=
..
r;;;
"Cl
"'I
..
=
IJC
::l
~
-
Co
t
..
February 19,2004
Mr. David Nichols, PE
,Pacific West Engineering
3610 Goodpasture Loop
, Eugene OR 97401 '
RE: ' GEOTECHNICAL MEETING ITEMS RELATING TO ROCKY ROAD, SUBDIVISION
Dear Mr. Nichols:
, "
, '
I am 'writing this letter per the discussion on February 17, 2004 at the meeting regarding the proposed,
Rocky Road subdivision. Comments had been received from City of Springfield staff regarding the'
,subdivision application documents, and the meeting had been called to clarify these comments and
determine the responses required to satisfy the requirements..
Specifically, City staffnoted that the original GeoScience geotechnical report (dated August 6, 2003) , ' '
did not contain recoinmendations regarding construction of public improvements (e.g. streets arid .
public utilities) fot Design Areas 2 and 3. These areas are underlain by RU-l 01 (as described in the ,
original report)at depths varying from a few inches to 2 feet. RU-10l is present in completely
decomposed state (CDS) to partly decomposed state (PDS) to depths of 1 0 feet or greater. The rock ,
unit is overlain by SU-C a brov.n cIay~y sand (SC) "\\ith low dIy strength, low toughness and slow
dilatancy. Neither SU-C, nor CDS RU-I0l have characteristics consistent with the presence of
expansive clay. Therefore, no special measures are required for road construction in this area. The
, ,
uppermost, organic-rich portion ofSU-C should be removed prior to placement offill. During wet
weather construction, SU-C and the upper po.rtions' of CDS RU-l 0 l' should be protected from
softening under traffic loads by placement of at least six inches of inches of base rock. .
Excavation for underground utilities will not present aproblem in Design Area 2, because ,all units
can be excavated to the required depths using conventional means.
In Design Area 3, road base rock can be placed on CDS to 't7isually fresh s:tate(VFS) RU-! 01.
Grading in SU-B may result in ripping up of larger rock fragments, and the resulting holes will need
to be filled.' However, no other special measures are required for road,construction in this area.
Public utility trenches (e.g. sanitary and stonn sewers) in DA-3 may encounter areas where a large
, trackhoe or hydraulic hammer is required for excavation. Limiting trench depths to the minimum
required will minimize this possibility. '
~ 1"\ 0_.... ","'"'0 .:=..____ 1"\0 n'7J1n"
1C:..1i\ ~n'1_r:;'1nn J:A y. ~n7_~7n1
CC8 i 127073,
'Mr. David Nichois
, February 19,2004
Page 2
The other issue discuSsed at the meeting related to the position of the buildirig envelope relative to
the design areas. Specifically, the three lots at the northwest corner of the subdivision (Lots 7, 1, and
2) are bisected by the boundary between DA-l and DA-3. Of these, the corner lot (Lot 1) is located
mostly withinDA-l, and will require a foundation designed to mitigate for the presence of expansive
soil and RU-302. On Lots 2 and 7; it is possible to place the building envelope within either DA-l
or'DA-3,or over the boundary. It is recommended to leave the determination of where to place the
house up to the future owner or builder. If the residence is proposed to be placed entirely or partly
, within DA-l it is recommended to require a foundation which mitigates the expansive material in
the subsurface (e.g. drilled pier foundation with above-grade beams)~ lfthe residence is proposed.
. to be constructed entirely within DA-3, it is recommended to require inspection of the foundation
excavation by a qualified geotechnical professional prior to placement of a leveling course or
foundation forms. In this manner, it is possible to verify the presence of RU-l 01 as the foundation
subgrade.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at 607-5700.
Sincerely,
GeoScience, Inc.
C2~J~
7G~ar Schlieder, Ph.D., CEG
I '
225 Fifth Street
. I Sprjngfleld, Oregon 97477'
541-726-3759 PhOlie
'j;,~~.~,.L;O,"i(il'"~'..',, ',i,'.',
IIkli. ;,\:..~.+ ,," ~,
.."...,"'...,'~,~, -.'.,.,.. ,~'
'~~ty of Springfield Official Receipt
___evelopment Services Department
Public Works Department
Job/Journal Number
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683 '
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
t:OM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
COM2005-00683
p:ayments:
Type of Payment
Check
..>
;t
!.
;,
7/21/2005
RECEIPT #:
2200500000000000966
Date: 07/21/2005
Description
Addressing Assignment
Willamalane Single Family
Residence Wiring 1000 Sq Ft
Residence Wiring Ea Addtl 500
Temp Power 200 amps or less
Sidewalk Permit
Curbcut Permit
PW Disc - 2nd Permit (Street)
SDC MWMC Administration
Plan Review/Residential Hourly
Building Permit
2 Baths One or Two Family
Furnace - up to 100,000 btu
Vent Fan
, Exhaust Hoods,
Dryer Vent
Gas Outlets 1-4
Gas Fireplace
Appliance Not Listed
-Mechanical Issuance Fee-
SDC Sanitary/Storm Admin
SDC MWMC Improvement
SDC MWMC Reimbursemen~
Sanitary Sewer - Improvement
Sanitary Sewer - Reimbursement
Storm Drainage Impervious Area
SDC Transpo Admin
SDC Transpo Improvement
SDC Transpo Reimbursement
Plan Review Major - Planning
+ 7% State Surcharge
+ 10% Administrative Fee
Paid By
PARKER HOMES
Item Total:
Check Number Authorization
, Received By Batch Number Number How Received
djb 6594 In Person
Payment Total:
Page I of I
3:32:51PM
Amount Due
31.00
1,000.00
106.00
57.00
50.00
80.00
80.00
(30.00)
10.00
90.00
851.65
254.00
12.00
12.00
9.00
6.00
4.00
'15.00
18.00
10.00
125.40
865.31
82.03
420.44
552.92
899.00
63.47
772.49
175.13
103.00
97.63
139.47
$6,961.94
Amount Paid
$6,961.94
$6,961.94