HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 12 (See Item 02 for Attachments) Concurrent Metro Plan/Refinement Plan Map Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment Regarding Property Near 44th and Main Street
Meeting Date: July 2nd, 2007
Meeting Type: Work Session /Regular Session
Department: Development Services
Staff Contact: David Reesor ~ ('\ ~
SPRINGFIELD Staff Phone No: 726-3783 J7E.r'\~
C I T Y C 0 U N C I L Estimated Time: 20 minutes / 20 minutes
ITEM TITLE: CONCURRENT METRO PLAN / REFINEMENT PLAN MAP AMENDMENT AND
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT REGARDING PROPERTY NEAR 44TH & MAIN
STREET.
Conduct a public hearing and adopt/not adopt on the following ordinances:
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ACTION
REQUESTED:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE METRO PLAN DESIGNATION OF
APPROXIMA TEL Y 5.24 ACRES OF LAND, IDENTIFIED AS LANE COUNTY
ASSESSOR'S MAP 17-02-32-00, TAX LOTS 400 & 402 FROM LIGHT MEDIUM
INDUSTRIAL (LMI), TO COMMERCIAL WITH AN AUTOMATIC REDESIGNATION
TO THE EAST MAIN REFINEMENT PLAN FROM LMI TO COMMUNITY
COMMERCIAL (CC).
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SPRINGFIELD ZONING MAP BY REZONING
APPROXIMATELY 5.24 ACRES OF LAND IDENTIFIED AS LANE COUNTY
ASSESSOR'S MAP 17-02-32-00, TAX LOTS 400 & 402, FROM LIGHT MEDIUM
INDUSTRIAL (LMI) TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (Ce).
ISSUE
STATEMENT:
The applicant requests approval of a Metro Plan / Refinement Plan Map Amendment to the
East Main Refinement Plan and a concurrent Zoning Map Amendment. The request
involves two parcels, and is located on approximately 5.24 acres identified as Tax Lots 400
and 402 on Assessor's Map No. 17-02-32-00. Specifically, the applicant proposes to
change the Metro Plan designation from Light Medium Industrial (LMI) to Commercial and
a concurrent Refinement Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment from LMlto CC.
The applicant seeks approval of these applications in order to facilitate development of a
future Medical Office building on the site.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment I: Ordinance Amending the Metro Plan & East Main Refinement Plan
Attachment 2: Ordinance Amending the Springfield Zoning Map
Attachment 3: Planning Commission Order & Recommendation
Attachment 4: Staff Report with exhibits
DISCUSSION/
FINANCIAL
IMPACT:
On June 5th, 2007, the Planning Commission held a work session and public hearing on the
subject applications (LRP2007-00013 & ZON2007-00012). One citizen, Nancy Falk,
testified in opposition to the proposal at the first public hearing and requested that the
record be left open for seven days. The Planning Commission granted the request and
instructed Staff to leave the record open until Tuesday, June lth, 2007. Staff received one
written testimony from Lauri Segel, Goal One Coalition Plann~r. on June 1 ih, 2007. A
written rebuttal to Ms. Segel's letter was then submitted by the applicant the following day,
June 13th, 2007. Both letters were received within the specified deadlines as noted in the
Planning Commission public hearing on June 5th, 2007. The original Staff Report and
exhibits are attached for Council's review.
After reviewing all oral and written testimony, the Planning Commission deliberated on the
applications on June 19th, 2007, and voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend that both
applications be sent to the City Council for consideration and approval.