The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutComments PWE 2/11/2010 . . MEMORANDUM City of Springfield DATE: February 11,2010 TO: Andy Limbird, Planner II FROM: Jon Driscoll, Transportation Engineer in Training SUBJECT: ZON2010-00001Fred Meyer Gas Station Development Issues Meeting Public Works Transportation Comments The Transportation Division has reviewed the subject application for the possible addition of a gas station at the Fred Meyer establishment at 650 Q Street. This is at the comer of a minor arterial and a collector. The two questions for this DIM that are directed toward traffic are #4 and #5 as shown below: 4. What is the scope of the required traffic impact analysis and parking generation study? o I have supplied a draft TIA which I've got 95% complete after working with Group McKenzie's Chris Clemow. . Questions: . When is the estimated date of completion? o Technical Questions: . ITE Code 944 . Trip Distribution over site entrances o TransPlan policy supports increased us of motor vehicle parking management strategies in selected areas throughout the Eugene- Springfield metropolitan area. . One of the strategies under the Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Policy #2 is to increase the use of Park- and- Ride lots to reduce parking demand in the city center s and other intensely developed areas. o To give a scope, or determine if there is a need for a scope, we must know what the extent of available parking is. . The plans state that there are 566 existing parking stalls, and that 82 of those will be deleted to make room for the gas station, leaving a final proposed parking of 484. . You state that there are 526 required. . I get 537 required if! use the I parking stall for every 300 square feet (and that there are 161,195 square feet). . I have been told that L TD has 25 parking stalls dedicated to a park and ride agreement that is part of a one year lease (This was signed by Melinda Merrill of Fred Meyer on May 20th, 2009, is renewable for "one year increments thereafter, as is breakable at anytime by mutual consent. If only one party desires to end Note: As is stated in your Development Issues Application: The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known development opportunities and constraints. The status may chang~ over time as development conditi.ons or standards change. ........,. ,< Date Neceived: Planl')er: AL z/" /Ao/O I / . . . the lease at the end the year, they must give 90 advance days notice.) These 25 spaces immediately abutting 5th Street just north and south of the bus station (which lies -150 north of the centerline of the southern 5th Street Driveway)-so they fall in the area of the gas station. By observation, this park and ride is presently under utilized, so I would propose reducing the number of spots to just a few, and be able to increase the number later. o EXTRA COMMENTS . ITE Manual (944) calls for 138.7 cars in one hour o That's 23+ cars every] 0 minutes. . The truck turning template will show needs of changes radii. . Close the first entrance just south ofthe gas station. . As traffic will increase, causing the influence area at the intersection to enlarge, we would likely require them to give an access easement to the lot (possibly lots) at the NE corner of 5'" and Q Street. . I've spoken witb fire and there are no restrictions that would keep you from moving the underground tank to the nortb or west side of the station. 5. What process is available to request SDC reductions and/or credits? . The Engineering Land Development Section will respond to this for the most part. However, we need some discussion on particulars, like using the ITE's averages on pass by trips, which are high for establishments like Fred Meyer or Safeway, because the fact that people having discount cards end up using them more as a destination. Note: As is stated in your Development Issues Application: The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known development opportunities and constraint<;. The status may change over, time as development conditions or standards change. f.... ',.\ Date Received: Planner: AL 2./" /:JoI. I / . . . CITY OF INGFIELD SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGE WORKSIIEET JOURNAL OR JOB NUMBER Fred Meyer Gas Station Estimate NAME OR COMPANY: Part ofZON2010-00001 WCATlON: 5t1iandQ MAP & TAX LOT NUMBER: DEVELOPMENT TYPE: Gas Station NEW DEVELOPED AREA (SF): EXISTING DEVELOPED AREA (S.F.): TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (S.F.): 1. STORM DRAINAGE IMPERVIOUS SQ. FT. 3,480.00 MWMC: MWMC: 944 ITE: 944 ITE: LOT SIZE (S.F.): 944 944 x $ 0.374 PER SF TOTAL STORM DRAINAGE SDC: 2. SANITARY SEWER-CITY (see reverse side) A REIMBURSEMENT COST: NUMBER OF DFU's B. IMPROVEMENT COST: NUMBER OF DFU's o x $ 128.38 PER DFU x $ 62.66 PER DFU $ 191.04 TOT AI. LOCAL W ASTEW A TER SDC: $ o 3. TRANSPORTATION BLDG AREA TGSF x TRIP RATE x COST PER ADT x NEW TRIP FACTOR NEW: A REIMBURSEMENT COST: 8.00 x 168.56 B. IMPROVEMENT COST: 8.00 x 168.56 EXISTING: A REIMBURSEMENT COST: 0.00 x 168.56 B. IMPROVEMENT COST: 0.00 x 168.56 0.5 NTF $34,128.95 1 $124,390.481 x $ 50.62 PER TRIP x x $ 184.49 PER TRIP x 0.5 NTF x $ 50.62 PER TRIP x 05 NTF $0.00 I $ 184.49 PER TRIP x 0.5 NTF $0.00 I $ 235.11 TOTAL TRANSPORTATION REIMBURSEMENT SDC: TOTAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROvEMENT SDC: TOTAL TRANSPORTATION SDC: $ 158,519.43 x 4, SANITARY SEWER - MWMC NEW: A. REIMBURSEMENT COST: NUMBER OF FEU's 0.20 x $104.87 PER FEU $20.971 B. IMPROVEMENT COST: NUMBER OF FEU's 0.20 x $1,307.66 PER FEU $261.531 C COMPLIANCE COST: NUMBER OF FEU's 0.20 x $23.28 PER FEU $4.661 EXISTING: A REIMBURSEMENT COST: NUMBER OF FEU's 0.00 x $104.87 PER FEU $0.00 I B. IMPROVEMENT COST: NUMBER OF FEU's 0,00 x $1,307.66 PER FEU $0.00 1 C COMPLIANCE COST: NUMBER OF FEU's 0.00 . x $23.28 PER FEU $0.00 MWMC CREDIT IF APPLICABLE (SEE REVERSE) TOTAL MWMC REIMBURSEMENT FEE: TOTAL MWMC IMPROVEMENT FEE: TOTAL MWMC COMPLIANCE FEE: MWMC ADMINISTRATIVE FEE: 50% downtown credit applied TOTALMWMCSDC: $ SUBTOTAL (ADD ITEMS 1,2,3,&4) $ 297.16 158,81659 5. ADMINISTRA TIYE FEES: BASE CHARGE (SUBTOTAL ABOVE) $ 158,816.59 x 5% $7,940.83 TOTAL SEWER ADMINISTRATION FEE: TOTAL TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION FEE: $ Clayton McEachern PE Civil Engineer 2/11/2010 DATE TOTAL SDC CHARGES Date Received:.J.f-!';"/d Planner: AL Gas Station . . DRAINAGE FIXTURE UNIT (DFU) CALCULA TION TABLE NUMBER OF NEW FIXTURES x UNIT EQUIVALENT ~ DRAINAGE fiXTURE UNITS (NOTE: FOR REMODELS, CALCULATE ONLY THE NET ADDITIONAL FIXTURES) FIXTURES NEW OLD DRAlNAGE FIXTURE UNITS FIXTURE TYPE UNIT EQUIVALENT BATHTUB 3 0 DRJNKING FOUNTAIN I 0 FLOOR DRAIN, FLOOR SINK 3 0 INTERCEPTORS FOR GREASElOIUSOLlDSfETC. 3 0 INTERCEPTORS FOR SAND/AUTO WASH/ETC. 6 0 LAUNDRY TUB 2 0 CLOTHES W ASHERfMOP SINK 3 0 CLOTHES WASHER - 3 OR MORE (EA) 6 0 MOBILE HOME PARK TRAP (I PER TRAILER) 12 0 RECEPTOR FOR REFRJGERA TORlWA TER ST A TlONfETC. I 0 RECEPTOR FOR COMMERCIAL SINK/ DISHW ASHER/ETC. 3 0 SHOWER, SINGLE STALL 2 0 SHOWER, GANG (NUMBER OF HEADS) 2 0 SINK: COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL KITCHEN 3 0 SINK: COMMERCIAL BAR 2 0 SINK: WASH BASINIDOUBLE LA V A TORY 2 0 SINK: SINGLE LA V ATORY/RESIDENTlAL BAR I 0 URINAL, STALllWALL 5 0 TOILET, PUBLIC INSTALLATION 6 0 TOILET, PRIVATE INSTALLATION 3 0 MISCELLANEOUS: 0 NUMBER OF EDU'S' TOTAL DRAINAGE FIXTURE UNITS = I 0 *EDU (Equivalent Dwellin~ Unit) is a discharge equivalent to a single family dwelling (20 DFU) set at 167 gallons per day CREDIT CALCULATION TABLE: BASED ON ASSESSED VALUE IF IMPROVEMENTS OCCURRED AFTER ANNEXATION DATE IN TABLE, CALCULATE CREDITS SEPARA TEL Y YEAR ANNEXED 1979 ~ or before 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 RATE PER $1,000 ASSESSED VALUE RATE PER $1,000 ASSESSED VALUE YEAR ANNEXED 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 x x $0.00 $0.00 CREDIT FOR PARCEL OR LAND ONLY IF APPLICABLE IMPROVEMENT (IF AFTER ANNEXATION DATE) CREDIT TOTAL $0.00 ........:,. .. Date \,<eceived: Planner: AL 2/tjdD'~ / I