HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 4/30/2010
., ,
'!'
.'
.
,City of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Land Division Plat
Partition, Subdivision
A licant Name: Breeden Bros., Inc.
Phone: 541-686-9431
Com an :
Address:
Same as above
366 East 40th Avenue Suite 250, Eu
Fax:
on 97405
A licant's Re .. Daniel W. Baker
r---
Phone: 541-343-7243
Com an :
Baker and Associates Surve ors, Inc.
Fax:
541-343-7242
Address:
1574 Cobur Road PMB 144, Eu
on 97401
:+'" ,;',;:::>~'~'f>:;"'.
Owner: Same as owner
Phone:
Fax:
Com an
Address:
."'''',
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-30
TAX LOT NO S : 700 & 800
None
35.39
Acres [gJ S uare Feet D
Pro osed Name of Subdivision: River Hei hts
Description of
Pro osal:
If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Subdivide the
into 57 iots and 2 tracts
Existin Use: Vacant
Tentative Case #: SUB2006-0006
Associated A lications:
Case No.: <;U~2010-
A lication Fee: $ 4
TOTAL FEES: $ :l;D 1..-156. ~
Date: &J 10
Technical Fee: $ \
APR 3 0 2010
Reviewed b :
O. . ..1 .....~~k_lr..+4...1
. n~\~n~~I~""'l.' ;ld..'::'..
Reviewed b: ~
Pre-Sub Case No.:
Date:
PROJECT NUMBER:
Ie...;:} 'UJ(Jl:; - 0007/
Revised 11.20.09
1 of 6
.
.
Owner Signatures
This application form is used for both the required pre-submittal meeting and subsequent
complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application
process.
An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted.
Pre-Submittal
The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and
accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the
owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf.
I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory
timelines, information, requests and requirements conveyed to my representative.
Owner:
Date:
Signature
Print
Submittal
I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check
performed on this application at the Pre-Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as
necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise
contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as
submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a
complete application.
owner~~D~_~_ (jul)Y Date: ~?
~ature
Robert L. Breeden, President
Print
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
Revised 11.20.09
2 of 6
,
. .
D Post Monumentation Deposit as required for subdivisions only. City Survey Section
has current fee schedule and templates.
D Location of Any Floodways in accordance with SDC 3.3-400.
D Existing Easements Clearly Identified with Their Recorded Reference.
D New Easements and Reserve Strips Referenced in Owner Certificates of
Dedication and Purposes of Easements Identified on Plat.
NOTE: When, as part of the approval process, the application has been conditioned so that the
recordation of a document is required, the applicant shall be responsible for paying the Lane
County recording fee for any such required document. Documents which may require
recordation include, but are not limited to: Development Agreements; Improvement
Agreements; Deed Restrictions; Future Development Plans; Easements; Joint Use Access/
Maintenance Agreements; and Dedications of Right-of-Way.
Land Division Plat Submittal Requirements Checklist
NOTE: If you feel an item does not apply, please state the reason why and attach the
explanation to this form.
D Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services
Department. The application, technology, and postage fees, where applicable, are
collected at the time of complete application submittal.
~ Land Division Plat Application Form
~ Two (2) Copies of the Deed
~ Two (2) Copies of a Title Report issued within 30 days of the date Lane County will
record the plat. .
~ Original Plat on Mylar with notarized owner(s) signature(s) and signed surveyor stamp.
ri
~ Original and Copy of all Required Documents with signatures where appropriate.
Copy of the Mylar on Bond Paper
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
Revised 11.20.09
6 of 6
.
.
River Heights Hillside Development Manual
Fire Protection Requirements
Due to the forested setting of the subdivision, certain fire protection measures should be
observed. Measures required by Lane County for dwellings located within forest zones and
Oregon State Dept. of Forestry guidelines specify primary and secondary fuel breaks which help
to protect dwellings within a forested environment. Lane County's standards are as follows:
"Primary Safetv Zone" The primary safety zone is a firebreak extending a minimum of 3 0 feet in
all directions around the dwelling. The goal within the primary safety zone is to exclude fuels
that will produce flame lengths in excess of one foot. Vegetation within the primary safety zone
could include green lawns and low shrubs. Trees shall be spaced with greater than IS feet
between the crown and pruned to remove dead and low branches.
As the slope increases, the primary safety zone shall increase away from the house as indicated
in the following chart.
% slope
o
10
20
25
Primary Safety Zone
30
30
30
30
Down Slope Safety Zone
30
50
75
100
"Secondarv Fuel Break" The secondary fuel break extends a minimum of 1 00 feet in all
directions around the primary safety zone. The goal of the secondary fuel break is to reduce fuels
so that the overall intensity of any wildfire would be lessened and the likelihood of crown fires
and crowning is reduced. Vegetation within the secondary fuel break shall be pruned and spaced
so the fire will not spread between crowns of trees. Small trees and brush growing underneath
larger trees shall be removed to prevent spread of fire up into the crowns of the larger trees. Dead
fuels shall be removed.
Fuel breaks applicable to city sized lots may deviate from those applied on larger rural parcels
due to many factors including:
The area available to install fuel breaks (size of Lot);
Urban policies promoting the retention of vegetation;
Availability of access by fire fighting equipment;
Proximity and efficiency of the city fire equipment and personnel;
Water availability; and
Natural fuel breaks on adjacent lands resulting from surrounding development.
An appropriate modification for this urban setting would be to utilize the 3D-foot primary fuel
break standard with no down slope extension and to apply the secondary fuel break standard
down slope from the dwelling except where the slope extends beyond the boundaries of the
property.
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
Page I of2
.
.
Conditions and Requirements Applicable to All Lots
All lots are subject to a maximum 35% impervious surface per the City of Springfield.
All structures shall have Class A or B roofing as specified in the Oregon State Structural
Specialty Code. All lots are subject to wildfire.
All buildings with a gross area in excess of 1,500 square feet shall be constructed within 50-feet
of an approved fire lane or public street. Fire apparatus access shall be provided to within 50-feet
of the building.
A wildfire defense plan for each lot, approved by the City of Springfield Fire Marshal, will be
required prior to the issuance of building pennit.
Additional restrictions may be contained on the recorded River Heights Subdivision final plat
map and Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R). Copies of these documents are
available from Lane County Deeds and Records and the City of Springfield Department of
Planning & Development.
Slope Easements contain cut and fill embankments outside street right of ways that were
constructed as part of the street support structure. Fill material shall not be removed from within
slope easements unless an alternative method for slope stability is designed by a licensed civil
engineer, is approved by the City of Springfield, and is installed in a manner that maintains the
structural support provided by the existing fill bank material. Cut slopes may be altered provided
that if they are steepened, measures are implemented which prevent the sloughing of soil into the
street and sidewalk and such alterations are designed by a licensed civil engineer, and are
approved by the City of Springfield. The easement areas may otherwise be landscaped, used and
maintained without restriction.
Preservation Areas will be maintained and enhanced in a manner that is consistent with the
natural forest. Plants that are native to the project area should be used for any understory planting
within Preservation Areas. Trees planted within Preservation Areas will be selected from the list
of approved trees identified below. Preservation Areas should be kept free of invasive vegetation
while at the same time preserving, encouraging, and enhancing/supplementing native understory
species. Building structures are not pennitted within Preservation Areas. All landscaping within
or outside of Preservation Areas is subject to the conditions on the fire break plans set forth
below.
Preservation of native understory vegetation within Conservation Areas is encouraged, but not
required. Lot Owners are encouraged, but not required, to use native species for understory
plants in Conservation Areas. Trees planted within Conservation Areas will be selected from the
list of approved trees below. All landscaping within or outside of Conservation Areas is subject
to the conditions in the Fire Break Plan set forth below.
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
Page 2 of2
J
,\
1
I.
r-
I.
1'-/
I
I.
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
[I
I
I
.
r
~-
.-.
~
i/i..'
-'~.
~~~~'
o
r
i;;'~.
; ,
~ ~
,""".--.-
[
(
:f
C
C
[
--..J
-' >G)"tl
" cnm:O
D cnOm
= m-ir
~ ~ cnmi:
cnO-
S:::tZ
~ mZ>
Z-:o
, -iO-<
>
" -a r
(
.,....-, ~~
C~~.
'"
"
.,
-
~
---- ~'
"--
---..-- :>-
"...
----
.)
~}
'-
,
--------
=
~~'-
.Q
-'
,
'"
--
/'
.~ ~
,
,
--....
,
t
....,==~='='
e: == =;
o
."'.,....:=,~P.z_2 _ -_
c;:-:'-"._*'-:::~~~~_ ~-:3
r
-,
~
'-.
-:: .
'-.
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT
Proposed River Heights Subdivision
Springfield, Oregon
August 13,2007
Prepared for:
Byron Roberts
Breeden Homes, Inc.
366 E. 40th Avenue
Eugene OR 97405
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
.
.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................... ii
INTRODUCTION ............................................................. I
FIELD EXPLORATION ........................................................ I
Methods ............................................................... I
Results ................................................................ 2
Soil Units ........................................................ 2
Rock Units ....................................................... 3
DISCUSSION ................................................................ 4
CONCLUSIONS .............................................................. 7
RECOMMENDATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
LIMITATIONS .............................................................. 13
LIST OF FIGURES
FoUows Page
Figure I:
Figure 2:
Figure 3:
Figure 4:
Location Map. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I
Site Map, Proposed Layout, and Test Pit Locations ....................... I
Rock Unit Distribution. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Design Areas ..................................................... 6
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A: Test Pit Logs
Appendix B: Site Photos
Appendix C: Atterberg Limits for CDS RU-306
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
River Heights Subdivision, Prdiminary Gcotec:hnicaJ Assessment
GeoScience. Inc., August!3, 2007
Original Submittal
.
.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The area proposed for the River Heights subdivision, north of the intersection of Marc 01 a Road and
42nd Street in Springfield is suitable for the proposed development. A preliminary geotechnical
assessment was perfonned in February, 2005 and May, 2006 which included installation of a total
of28 test pits to maximum depths of 14 feet.
The assessment indicates that the site is underlain by three main rock types. The oldest rock unit
consists of clastic sedimentary rock ("sandstone", RU-402) which was found in one test pit in the
extreme northwest portion of the site. An igneous rock unit (designated RU-IOI) underlies the
central, eastern and southern portion of the site, and this unit was quarried previously in the south-
central part. Near the top of the ridge above and to the southeast of the quarry, fresh-state rock is
located close to the surface and may require use of hydraulic hammers or blasting for installation of
excavations more than 5 feet deep. In other areas, the unit is sufficiently weathered to allow for
excavation using conventional means. The areas underlain by RU-lOI are suitable for residential
construction using conventional shallow spread footings.
The western and northwestern portion of the site is underlain by a completely decomposed
pyroclastic rock unit (designated RU-306) which consists of nonnally- to over-consolidated high-
liquid-limit clay. Over-consolidated portions of the unit are expected to swell and lose strength
significantly when subjected to wetness. As a result, in the area underlain by RU-306, it is
recommended to construct residential foundations either as post-tensioned concrete slabs, or on
auger-cast piers with above-grade concrete beams. In addition, in this area, it is recommended to
construct roads on full-bench cuts wherever possible.
Alluvial sediments, consisting of sand and gravel deposited by the McKenzie River are located in
the low-lying area in the extreme southern portion of the proposed subdivision.
Perched groundwater was encountered only in TP- I, and it is assumed to be present within RU- I 01
and the overlying soils above the contact with RU-306.
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
River Heights Subdivision, Preliminary Gcotcdmica.l Assessment
GeoScience. Inc.. August 13.2007 ii
Original Submittal
.
.
INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of a preliminary geotechnical assessment of a proposed 57-lot
subdivision on 23.3 acres of a 33-acre parcel located on "Moe Mountain" just north ofMarcola Road
(Figure I). The focus of this assessment was to determine the feasibility of constructing the
subdivision infrastructure, develop generaI recommendations for residential foundation system
design and placement, and provide conclusions regarding existing slope stability conditions and
recommendations for site grading. The work was conducted for Breeden Homes, Inc.
The proposed development is located on the north, east, and southeast flanks of a hill ranging in
elevation from approximately 475' above mean sea level (AMSL) in the southeastern portion to 620'
AMSL. The site is partially forested with douglas fir trees and other species. A former quarry is
located in the southeast-centraI portion of the property. The parcel is currently undeveloped, with
the exception of a 4-Million-gallon water reservoir built at the highest portion of the hill by the
Rainbow Water District in 1996. An original2-Million-gallon reservoir had been constructed
immediately west of the current reservoir in the mid-1960s. According to the recollection of
Rainbow Water District personnel the construction of the original water tank required blasting in
order to achieve a level area at the top of the hill. A foundation assessment for the new reservoir,
conducted by CH2MHiIl in 1993 included installation of six backhoe (Case 580) test pits in the area
of the current reservoir. The pits encountered some fill generated during the construction of the
original reservoir in the 1960s over in-place igneous rock with some intercalated "stiff red-brown,
moist, clay to silt material, which contains small pebbles and rock fragments, probably a volcanic
mud or ash flow. or volcanic tuff" Reportedly, approximately 1,000 cubic yards of Controlled-
Density Fill were utilized in the construction of the current reservoir to account for the uneven upper
surface of the in-place "basalt".
FIELD EXPLORA nON
Methods
Two episodes of subsurface exploration were conducted. On February 17 and 18,2005, 16 test pits
were excavated on the site using a John Deere 135C track-mounted excavator with a 2-foot bucket.
The machine weighs approximately 36,000 Ibs. On May 22, 2006 12 additional test pits were
installed using an approximately 36,000-1b Caterpillar excavator with a30-inch toothed bucket Soil
encountered in the test pits was classified according to the Unified Soil Classification System
(USCS) using ASTM Method 0-2488 (Visual-Manual Procedure). Rock units were identified and
classified on the basis of origin and degree of weathering (VFS- Visually Fresh State, STS-Stained
State, PDS-Partly Decomposed State - <50% re-moldable, and CDS-Completely Decomposed State _
> 50% remoldable). Where applicable, groundwater was noted as to depth and volume of flow. At
some locations the unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil or completely decomposed rock
was measured using a pocket penetrometer. Test pit locations were approximately determined using
contours and landmarks such as roads and boundaries of forested areas included on a topographic
map of the site prepared by Baker and Associates Surveying.
River Heights Subdivision. Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment
GeoScience, Inc., August 13, 2007 1
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
~
, :,;'..~":,
~.y",
1'1 ' , -t".,
,.,~ '. I
'~~.?
...~..
"
,.
:..- /i:".... .:P"~\i' ~ :::-..,....~. -._ .-.
.~~!~.~~~ ~.} ~ '~, ~r_~...~~
t~~~t-~l.:~~~H~ N
, {jJ.. f', ..l':,~~~c
i\ 1\\3
"......, \,
~ "'"
~"
; \
.,.,
./
83
--... -
;...- -
.... . &A1
,. ~
~- ~
..........
.l'I
"
, (
I
"
0:
,;~
~~1.1
. ,
1('
I.
I'
.
,
"
,
,
,
.
.
"
"
.'01
r
;. ~
:~
".;
.Jj
.
;";
.' -,
.,
, .-: -' . ,'.
..;.::.....,...'--
:' 1
.
.
~
~'~.'#&
',..'"
.', t
.-...... .,
r~
~
".
~ .
*
-.
, ,
,~ ~
>;
=:
L.
t
.
.
'"
~
~ UJ.I..,~ .u-
E,.-...
1;0. . I
I:' 1~'ln'~.'~
... 0&.
. o.q,(...(o~
."
17' E
'P("#\I'"
~. ~
~ "j,~t'..I.t.ll. <i!. ...
~ - .r"L' ~ii-~ . .>
location: 044'04'04.7' N 122'58'21.1' W
Caption: Fogure 1: Location Map
APR 3 0 2010
l!
Name: SPRINGFIELD
Date: 811312007
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet
Qti'"C:I'~O! 8uhr"!t~EI
w
:=
<
...
.,
==
~.
tIC
=-
-
'"
Vl
C
Q"
Cl.
-.
<
[
Q
:::
.
Vl
~
:::!.
:::
tIC
....
is'
is:
"'C
.,
~
3"
-.
:::
;0
.,
'<
~
...
Q
-
...
"
=-
:::
-
"
;0
-
>-
'"
'"
...
'"
'"
.
J-~~
I
"j
I,
;
.\
r\.
'.L
t
;u
-to'"
-', I
n' "" n
r
- -
. -..~'......'U
(,.. \ ~'"
')d : .
>>/ ,
II
._~-,...-;"
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
.
.
Results
A map of the site and the test pit locations is shown in Figure 2. Test pits from the first episode of
exploration were designated TP-I through -16 and test pits installed in 2006 were designated TP-2A
through -2L. Test pit depths ranged from 2 to 14 feet, with an average depth of6.7 feet. A total of
six soil units and four rock units were distinguished.
Soil Units
Surficial soil at the site consists of sandy lean to fat clay with varying amounts and sizes ofigneous
rock fragments, and varying amounts of finely disseminated organic matter and roots near the
surface. These units were designated SU-B and SU-D for purposes of this report
Soil Unit B was identified in TP-I, -4, -5, -8, -14, -15, -16, -2A, -2B, -2C, -2G, -2H, -21, -2J, -21(,
and -21. SU-B is a dark brown sandy clay containing up to 60 % (by volume) fragments ofRU-l 01
(see below) ranging in size from a few inches to several feet. The matrix of the soil has high
toughness, very high dry strength, and no dilatancy. As a result, the unit is classified according to
the USCS as a gravelly, sandy fat CLAY (CR). The unit is interpreted as having been derived from
weathering mostly of the pyroclastic rock units (RU-306 and RU-307). It has accumulated on the
slopes by slope wash and creep. The thickness of the unit ranges from 1 to 5 feet, generally
thickening with distance from the top of the hill, especially towards the north and northwest.
Soil Unit C was found only in TP-l, and there only 1 foot thick. It consists of a tan sandy clay with
very high dry strength, high toughness and no dilatancy. It does not contain igneous rock fragments.
The unit is interpreted as having been locally derived from weathering ofRU-306.
Soil Unit D was found in TP-2, -6, -7, -9,-10,-11, -12 and -13. The unit consist ofa dark brown to
brown sandy clay containing angular to subrounded fragments of RU-l 01. SU-D has medium
toughness, high dry strength and no dilatancy. As a result, it is classified as a gravelly sandy lean
CLAY (CL). The thickness ranges from 1 to 3 feet, generally increasing with distance from the top
of the hill.
Soil Unit E was found only in TP-3, where it was 1.5 feet thick. Its characteristics are similar to
those of the matrix of SU-D (dark brown to brown sandy lean clay). However, SU-E does not
contain igneous rock fragments.
Soil Unit K was found only in TP-2D. It consists of a silty sandy gravel with well-rounded cobbles.
The unit is classified according to the USCS as a silty sandy GRAVEL (GW). It is interpreted as
an alluvial deposit of the McKenzie River.
Soil Unit S was found in TP-2D and TP-2E. It consists of a brown silty SAND (SW-SM). In TP-
2D, it represents an interbed within SU-I(, whereas in TP-2E it represents most of the alluvial
deposit.
River Heights Subdivision. Preliminary GeotcchnicaJ Assessment
GeoScience, Inc., August 13. 2007 2
Date Received:
APR ? n ""'11
0"" .~; .J ..;..;..~ ;~..
,rpl""io .--
(.. ~- --J-. . - :-___"'-
~- . ~.
~---j~ ",~~:...;,
~::.,\ " " I -
~ \:::'-: J - I
....- \ ..1, '"
"'- c_:-, TP-1 '- if,
\ " ~. - '. /1:
\..~ -. ," TP-1P
~ -~:. -/
-~-I OJ'\o....,.t....:_,....:
~~--
1 -
~
~------
,\:: '\.:-*r'
,'-'"""1
,---- ~
::.-: - ~- ...
, .
"
J
..--
~.
/
TP~
...
""
--_J--"_.._.~:./'\.-----;"~;'-?-'.~~:J
.~-----
, -
. ~'- TP=3
~" """"'-..". -,
-. ---~. I'~
........~,-;;:::t"--~
.-
~
\
. "'-="
~.
r
.
-
.;;,.,
.
'"
LEGEND
Quaternary Alluvium (Sand, Gravel, and Fines)
RU-101 (Fine-grained Igneous Rock)
. RU-30X (Pyroclastic Rock)
RU-402 (Sandstone, Flne- to Medium-grained)
~-- ~-
'0 I
<V <=>
> ;S
'(j) C'o..I
0 <=> (ij
<V -
""
0:: ...., E
<V 0:: .Q
Q. :J
- <t en
m
0 (ij
,E
Cl
'C
0
River Hel~hts Subdivision, Sprln~f1eld, Preliminary Geotechnical Assess
.
.
Rock Units
1bree rock units were identified, consisting of an igneous (indeterminate if extrusive or intrusive)
rock body, designated RU-I 0 I for purposes of this report, which underlies the central, eastern and
southeastern portions of the site. It is underlain by a pyroclastic rock unit which was designated RU-
302 and -306. The pyroclastic rock is probably related to the igneous rock body and may be coeval,
representing the bottom phase of an extrusive igneous rock body.
RU-402 was found only in TP-2L in the extreme northwestern portion of the site. It consists of an
agglomeratic sandstone containing coarser angular to subrounded rock fragments. It probably pre-
dates the igneous and pyroclastic rocks at the site.
In visually fresh state, RU-I 0 I consists of a gray to greenish-gray very fme-grained igneous rock
with an estimated density near 170 pef. In TP-3, portions of the unit were identified as having been
vesicular when emplaced. Vesicles have been filled by secondary mineralization. The unit ranges
from completely decomposed state (CDS) where more than 50 % of the material can be remolded
with finger pressure to partly decomposed state (PDS) where less than 50 % of the material is
remoldable to stained state (STS) where the rock is discolored (usually yellow-brown to rust brown)
to visually fresh state (VFS) at the core of less weathered portions and in the quarry area. The
distances between open planes of separation (in three dimensions) ranges from a few inches to
several feet, with the distances generally increasing with depth. Some of the near-surface and
surface-parallel open mass planes of separation are probably related to "unloading" by erosion.
CDS RU-lOI ranges in color from tan to light olive-brown to yellow-brown to rust-brown. When
moist, the material remolds to a sandy fine-grained soil, mostly with low to medium dry strength,
low toughness, and rapid dilatancy. In some very near-surface portions the dry strength is high and
the toughness is medium to high with slow dilatancy. Therefore, the material (after remolding)
would be classified as a sandy silt (ML to MH) to sandy lean clay. The deepest CDS RU-IOI was
encountered in TP-2A where the material extended to a depth of 10 feet. However, even at a depth
00 feet in TP-3, the unconfined compressive strength of the material (at natural moisture content)
was 7,000 to 9,000 pst: PDS RU-I 0 I generally consists of nearly unweathered portions of the rock
surrounded by CDS material.
STSNFS RU-lOI is usually yellow-brown to rust-brown stained on the outside of rock fragments
but the staining only penetrates fractions of an inch to the inside of the fragments. The rest of the
rock is gray to greenish-gray. At TP-6, essentially at the eastern portion of the top of the hill, where
fractures in the material are spaced at 4 inches to 18 inches apart, the material could be excavated
with the 36,000-lb trackhoe (2-foot bucket) to a depth of 6 feet. At TP-9, located along the top of
the ridge upslope from the old quarry, excavation refusal was encountered 3.5 feet below the top of
original ground (the test pit was excavated through a minor layer of locally derived side-cast
downslope from a trail. At TP-2C, along the current road alignment southeast of the quarry trackhoe
refusal was encountered at a depth of 1.5 feet both at road level and at the top of the existing cut.
River Heights Subdivision, Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment
GeoScience. Inc.. August 13. 2007 3
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
.
.
RU-302 was identified only in TP-2B, along the alignment of 37th Street. The unit was found in
CDS, underlying RU-t 01 at a depth of 8 feet. The unit consists of a dark red to maroon, partly
vesicular (filled) pyroclastic unit. It was difficult to impossible to remold with finger pressure but
could be cut with a knife. The material resulting from remolding had low dry strength, low
toughness and rapid dilatancy. As a result, the fines are b ML.
RU-306 was found only in CDS. The material mostly consists of varicolored, over-consolidated
clay, with high to very high dry strength, high toughness, and no dilatancy. As a result, using ASTM
Method D-2488, once remolded, the material would be mostly classified according to the USCS as
a fat CLAY (CH). Colors range from white to tan to yellowish to brick-red to maroon to chocolate
brown. In TP-t4 the different colors were present as angular splotches less than one inch in
diameter, resembling rock pieces (see site photos). Based on these observations it appears that the
material has a pyroclastic origin, possibly partly as the top- or bottom-phase of an extrusive rock
body or as clastic sediments derived from nearby volcanic sources or as air-fall volcanic ash. The
material was not encountered in VFS or even STS, in any of the test pits.
EGR & Associates collected three samples of CDS RU-306 at stations 4+00, 6+00, and 12+00 of
River Heights Drive. Using ASTM Method 04318 (Atterberg Limits), the plasticity indices were
determined to be 17,20, and 16, respectively and the samples plotted as CL, ML, and MH soils
respectively (see Appendix C).
With the exception of minor fill slope failures on the south side of the pad for the water reservoir,
no evidence of slope movement (leaninglback-rotated trees, c1osed-contour depressions, sag ponds,
benches, or convex slopes) was observed at the site. Due to the slope direction, the existing fill slope
failures will not affect the proposed subdivision.
DISCUSSION
Initially, based on the presence of the quarry in the south-central portion of the site and on the
presence of hard RU-lOl in the rail-road cut at the southeastern edge of the property, the main
concern of the assessment was to determine whether infrastructure for a subdivision (roads,
underground utilities) could be installed over much of the site using conventional excavation
equipment. Based on the test pit information it appears that this is feasible, with the possible
exception of the top of the east-southeast trending ridge above the quarry. Excavation refusal was
encountered at a depth of 6 feet in TP-6 and at a depth of3 feet below top of original ground in TP-9
In the two test pits installed at location TP-2C, excavator refusal was encountered at a depth of 1.5
on fresh-state RU-I 0 I. None of the other test pits had material which appeared to present challenges
for conventional excavation equipment (excavator, dozer). It is likely that deeper excavations are
possible even in the vicinity of TP-6 and -9 as long as the excavated area is larger than a test pit.
Alternatively, it is possible that hydraulic hanuners will be required for sewer installation in that
relatively small area. In the area of TP-2C, hydraulic hanuners will be required to place Quarry
Ridge Drive along the alignment currently proposed and it is possible that blasting would be required
in that vicinity. In that case, a blasting plan will need to be submitted to the City by a qualified
River Heights Subdivision, Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment
GeoScience, Inc., August 13, 2007 4
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Orig;nal SUbmittaL
.
.
contractor. Some concerns have been raised regarding the potential impact of blasting on the water
reservoir. Based on the rock distribution, topographic configuration, and distance, the risk ofimpact
to the reservoir from blasting in the area near TP-2C is thought to be very small. The area between
the potential blasting site and the reservoir is underlain by massive RU -10 I for a minimum distance
of more than 800 feet. In addition, energy transmitted through the rock body will mostly be lost at
the quarry which is located between the potential blasting site and the reservoir. Therefore, the
largest risk of the potential blasting operation is fly rock, which can be addressed by appropriate
placement of charges and adjusting the powder factor.
At all other locations, excavation even for deeper road cuts, such as approximately 15 feet, required
near the northeastern entrance to the subdivision, has been shown to be feasible using conventional
equipment. TP-2B was excavated at the proposed location of the deepest excavation along 37th
Street and no significant difficulty was encountered in reaching a depth of 14 feet. TP-2A was
excavated in the area of a relatively deep through-cut along Vitus Drive, and the test pit encountered
CDS RU-IOI to a depth of 10 feet. Isolated pockets of less decomposed RU-IOI may be
encountered during construction, but no large-scale excavation difficulties are expected.
Therefore, the main constraint at this site appears to be the presence of both normally consolidated
and over-consolidated high-liquid-limit clay (fat clay - CH) in the form ofSU-B, SU -C, and portions
of CDS RU-306. Based on the dry strength and toughness characteristics, it is probable that the
material contains expansive clay minerals. As a result, if excavated during construction, it is not
recommended to use this material as structural fill under structures or roads, unless the material is
treated (e.g. with lime or CBR PlusTM or similar) to eliminate the expansive characteristics.
The probable expansive characteristics of SU-B and CDS RU-306 also place constraints on the
construction of street improvements in the northern and northwestern portion of the proposed
subdivision. In particular, it is recommended to place the entire road prism on a cut bench in the
approximate area of Lots 1 through 7, rather than placing part of the road on cut and part on fill.
This approach will require higher and longer cut slopes on the uphill side but potential stability
issues due to expansion and creep of the expansive materials beneath the fill section can be avoided.
Similarly, the main constraint for residential foundations at this site is the presence of expansive soil.
Conventional spread footing foundation systems are appropriate in most areas in the subdivision, in
some cases after removal ofSU-B. In the northwestern and north-central portion of the subdivision
(Lots I through 9 and Lots 39 through 42), underlain by CDS RU-306, foundations should be
designed for the presence of over-consolidated high-liquid-limit clay. Appropriate foundation
systems consist of end-bearing auger-cast piers with above-grade concrete beams or post-tensioned
concrete slabs.
In the areas underlain by RU-IOI (regardless of state of decomposition) shallow spread footing
foundations bearing on RU-101 or on compacted select fill placed on RU-IOI are appropriate. If
construction is to occur during the winter, it may be necessary to remove portions of CDS RU-l 0 I
which is expected to lose strength when exposed to significant precipitation and disturbance.
River Heights Subdivision, Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment
GeoScience. Inc., August 13, 2007 5
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
.
.
Based on the geomorphology and findings in TP-2D and -2E), the low-sloping area in the southern
portion of the site is underlain by alluvial deposits of the McKenzie River. The two test pits
excavated in that area during the second round of subsurface exploration (TP-2D and TP-2E) proved
the presence of alluvial sediments (SU-K and SU-S) in that vicinity.
Groundwater was encountered only in TP-I, perched on top of SU-C. It is probable that deeper in
the hill, the water is perched on top of RU-306 within open fractures of RU-IOI. Maximum
groundwater levels are not known and are difficult to ascertain given the relatively dry winter months
preceding the site visits.
Based on the distribution and characteristics of the soil and rock units, the site bas been divided into
four design areas (DA-I through -4). These areas are discussed in the following section and more
specific geotechnical recommendations are presented for each design area under the
recommendations section, below.
Design Area DA-I: This area encompasses the areas underlain by CDS to PDS RU-I 01 at depths
ranging from I to 3 feet. It appears that this includes most of Lots 12 through 27, 32, 33, 40, 41, 42,
46,47,48, and 52 through57. It also includes the south half of Lots 10 and II the north half of Lots
49 through 51, and small portions of Lots 29, 31, and 42. Maximum depth of CDS RU-IOI in the
test pits is 10 feet in TP-2A. In some areas, PDS RU-IOl consists oflarger STSNFS fragments
surrounded by completely decomposed rock.
Design Area DA-2: This area is characterized by the presence of hard, fractured STSNFS RU-101
in the shallow subsurface, below 1 to 2 feet ofSU-D. This area is located near the top of the ridge
to the northwest of the old quarry and encompasses all of Lots 28, 34 through 39, the north half of
Lot 29, and the south half of Lots 49 through 51.
Design Area DA-3: This area is characterized by the presence ofRU-402 under SU-B. It is located
in the extreme northwestern portion of the site and includes Lots 1 and 2.
Design Area DA-4: This area is characterized by the presence of CDS RU-306 under SU-B. Based
on the test pit observations the area includes all of Lots 3 through 10,43 and 44. It also includes the
north half of Lot II and the east half of Lot 45.
Design Area DA-5: This area is underlain by alluvial sediments of the McKenzie River. The area
includes all of Lot 30, and the south half of Lots 29 and 31.
Date Received:
River Heights Subdivision, Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment
GeoScience. Inc., August 13.2007 6
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
1;>.6
DA.4 I -,.'
TP:4 _1R-~ \T~('l'l. ~
TP.2J "" _ ~ - _~-' ~', rr' - "" " "
TP,.2K . '- _ ~- TP,7" ,h_, ~ _ .,
....,' 'T? 14 P, I ,
~ ~ ~p-.~ . T~2f \ \...., ~ ~
IT P i5 \.' '. ", "i. DA-1 TP.'3
" ,\'" ~.,,~~.....
._..,....-...-r...-.......-.-\ ,_' \~ .,) ............ . ~ ~ . .~ ~
,.1:p,.~~\..... ......
, '. ~ ""'.', ,.
'.. ~:>...: .... ..----....--------.-
-'~~..~~.. ~:~ d"~~-n~.-..--..-:j
~~'q::: ,,~, ::;zt ......;,: _
" ...~,,-.
'''''"... "'". " --::::':-;~{.:;;.,t.:
'::" DA;J.- _. - . .",
.....-....
DA.3
TP.~
..
..~-..,
~
~
, "' .;D
.
LEGEND
OA.l
Design Area 1
Design Area 2
Design Area 3
Design Area 4
Design Area 5
loq
eA-~
IOA-4
OA.5
'P 1
,.
Tit'
'0
Ql
>
'Ql
(J
Ql
0:::
Ql
....
<U
Cl
c::>
CS
<"'-I
=
<'">
0::
c....
~
/
.....-.......,
TP-2
....
\..l'\
Tp. B
'~
\\
--. --
") II
\
II II
'"
II I'
"'11
~ TP-TO
,
-
'.
~...
..-
,\----,
",.. .
,-. ~
....... ~
----:= .~.
River Heights Subdivision, Springfield, Preliminary Geotechnical Assess
(ij
-
-
'E
.0
::J
(/)
(ij
c:
'0,
';::
o
.
.
.
CONCLUSIONS
The area proposed to be developed with the 23.3 acre River Heights subdivision is suited for the
development. A total of 28 test pits, installed with a 36,OOO-lb trackhoe indicate that the site is
underlain by three major rock units:
The central, southern, and eastern portion is underlain by RU-IOI, which consists of fine-grained
gray to greenish-gray (in visually fresh state) igneous rock, which may be intrusive or extrusive. The
unit is differentially weathered, with some areas underlain at less than I foot depth by STS to VFS
rock and other areas underlain by CDS rock to depths up to 10 feet.
The western and central northern area is underlain by a deeply decomposed pyroclastic rock unit,
which was designated RU-306. RU-306 may be coeval with RU-I 0 I, representing the bottom phase
of the igneous unit. At this time, RU-306 consists nearly entirely of over-consolidated high-liquid-
limit clay, portions of which have characteristics consistent with the presence of expansive clay.
Weathering of this unit and slope processes have resulted in formation of I to 5 feet of expansive
clayey soil (containing fragments of non -expansive igneous rock) covering the rock unit.
The extreme western portion of the site is underlain by an aggiomeratic sandstone, which probably
predates the igneous and pyroclastic rocks at the site.
The south-central portion of the site is underlain by alluvial sediments of the McKenzie River.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The following recommendations are presented for each design area:
Design Area 1:
Excavation and Gradiml
It is expected that all excavation necessary for construction of the subdivision infrastructure is
possible with conventional methods to depths up to 15 feet. However, due to the wide spacing of
test pits for this assessment, the possibility cannot be ruled out that isolated pockets of harder RU-
101 are encountered during construction, which may require the use of hydraulic hammers.
Cut slopes in STSNFS RU-I 01 can be constructed at II2H : I V or steeper provided that loose rock
is scaled. Cut slopes in PDS/CDS RU-IOI can be constructed at 1.75H: IV and cut slopes in SU-B,
-0, and -E should be constructed no steeper than 2H : I V, with the tops rounded. Run-off should
be directed away from cut slopes underlain by the soil units or CDS RU-I 0 I. This can be achieved
by insta1ling shallow drainage swales a few feet back from the top of cut slopes.
Date Received:
River Heights Subdivision, Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment
GeoScience, Inc., August 13,2007 7
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
.
.
Fill slopes constructed on STSNFS RU-lOl can be placed at 2H: IV or up to 1.25H: 1 V for rock
fills. Fill slopes constructed on CDS RU-lOI should be placed at 2H : I V.
Foundations
Conventional spread footing systems and concrete slabs-on-grade are appropriate in Design Area I.
Ideally, footings will bear on CDS through VFS RU-IOI or on compacted sclect fill placed on this
unit. It is anticipated that daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty.
Footings on STSNFS RU-lOI can be designed for allowable bearing pressures of 6,000 psf.
Footings on PDS/CDS RU-lOl should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of ],500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
Drainalle
With the exception of areas immediately adjacent to Design Area-3, shallow groundwater is not
expected to present significant problems. Foundation drainage should be installed on the up-and
side-slope sides of deep excavations (such as for garages and day-light basements). Areas adjacent
to foundations bearing on CDS RU-lOl should be graded to direct run-off away from footings.
Use of Materials
VFS/STS RU-IOl, portions ofPDS RU-IOI, and silty portions of CDS RU-101 can be used as
structural fill although moisture control may be difficult or impossible for CDS RU-101 during
wetter periods. Due to probable content of expansive clay minerals, SU-D and -E should be used
for landscaping purposes only.
Stabilitv
If the above recommendations regarding cut- and fill-slopes are followed no adverse impacts on
slope stability are expected.
Design Area 2:
Excavation and Gradinl!
Excavation should be conducted with relatively large equipment and excavations beyond five feet
in depth may require use of hydraulic hammers. After scaling ofIoose rock, cut slopes in STSNFS
RU-l 0 1 are expected to be stable at slopes of 1/2H : 1 V or steeper. Permanent cut slopes in
PDS/CDS RU-lOl can be constructed at 1.75H : IV. Pennanent cut slopes in SU-D should be
sloped no steeper than 2H : 1 V and the tops should be rounded. Run-off should be directed away
from. the tops of cut slopes underlain by SU-D or CDS RU-IOI. This can be achieved by
constructing shallow drainage swales (i.e. 18 inches deep) a few feet back from the top of cut banks.
Ri\"l~r Ilcighls Suhdh"isiun. Preliminary GcolcchnicOII ASSl.'Ssnk."rll
(iL"\ISciL.11CC. Inc.. August 13.2007
Date Received:
8
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
.
.
Prior to placement of structural fill, SU-D should be removed from RU-I 0 I where practicable. In
that case fill slopes can be constructed at 2H : I V (or up to 1.25H ; I V for rock fills). Fill slopes
placed on SU-D should be constructed at 2.5H ; IV.
Due to the required width of the road and associated public utility easements and sidewalks, it is
possible that the construction of Quarry Drive in the area southeast of the existing quarry will require
blasting. In that case, a subcontractor experienced with blasting projects should be retained and
should prepare a blasting plan to ensure that blasting does not result in fly rock impacts to Marcola
Road. Due to the distance involved (more than 800 feet), and the topographic configuration of the
site, the risk from blasting activity at this location to the Rainbow Water District reservoir is judged
to be very small.
Foundations
Shallow spread footing foundations and concrcte slabs-on-grade are appropriate in DA-2.
Installation of daylight basements will present difficulties with excavation. Ideally. spread footings
are constructed bearing on PDS orSTSIVFS RU-101 oron compacted select Ii II placed on RU-IOI.
On STSIVFS RU-I 01, foundations can be designed for allowable bearing pressures up to 6,000 psf.
On CDS RU-I 0 1. bearing pressures should not exceed 1.500 psf unless additional measurements of
soil strength are conducted at the specific site.
Drainage
No significant drainage issues are expected in this design area. It is possible that water run-offwiII
occur along the top of RU- I 0 1 during very heavy precipitation events.
Use of Materials
VFS/STS RU-IOI, portions ofPDS RU-IOI, and silty portions of CDS RU-lOl can be used as
structural fill although moisture control may be difficult for CDS RU-lOI during wetter periods.
SU-B, -0, and -E should be used for landscaping purposes only.
Stabilitv
If the above recommendations regarding cut- and fill-slopes are followed. no adverse impacts on
slope stability are expected.
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
River Heights Subdivision, Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment
GeoScience. Inc.. August 1 J. 2007
9
Original Submittal
.
.
Design Area 3:
Excavation and Gradinl!
Excavations in SU-B and the CDSIPDS portion of RU-402 are expected to be possible using
conventional equipment. Deeper excavations (e.g. for daylight basements) in SIS portions ofRU-
402 may require use of a small toothed bucket on a large excavator or a hydraulic hammer. Cut
banks in SU-B and CDS portions of RU-402 should be sloped no steeper than 2H :IV. Cut slopes
in PDS/SIS RU-402 can be sloped at 1.25H: IV. Structural fill should only be placed on RU-402
after removal ofSU-B. If the larger road embankment required in this area is not constructed on SIS
RU-402. it is recommended to install a drainage blanket consisting of a 6-inch layer of open crushed
rock between two layers of non-woven (felt-type) geotextile (e.g. Amoco 4551). Other fill slopes
placed on CDSIPDS RU-402 should not exceed 2H :lV. Rock fills placed on SIS RU-402 can be
sloped at 1.25H : IV.
Foundations
Foundations in this design area can consist of conventional spread footings or concrete slabs-on-
grade constructed directly on PDS/SIS RU-402 or on compacted select fill placed on these units.
SU-B should be removed from beneath bearing areas.
Drain8l!e
Foundation drains should be installed on the up- and side-slope sides of residences. The ground
adjacent to the finished structures should be sloped to direct run-off away from the footings.
Use of Materials
With the exception ofSIS RU-402. none of the other materials should be used as structural fill. All
other materials can be used as landscaping fill.
SloDe Stabilitv
No evidence of natural slope stability issues (with the exception of shallow soil creep) was noted in
this area. If the above recommendations are followed, no slope stability issues are expected to arise
from the development.
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
River Heights Subdivision, Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment
GeoScience, Inc.. August 13.2007 10
Original Submittal
.
.
Design Area 4:
Excavation and Grading
All excavations in this area are expected to be completed using conventional equipment. During dry
weather construction, temporary cut slopes up to 4 feet in RU-306 can be installed at vertical angles.
Sloping or benching at I H : I V will be required for temporary cut slopes more than 4 feet high.
Similar sloping (1 H : 1 V) will be required for temporary cut slopes less than 4 feet high during wet
weather construction. Permanent cut slopes in SU-B or RU-306 should not exceed 2H : IV and
should be rounded at the top to prevent minor sloughing. Cut slopes with a total vertical height of
more than 15 feet should be evaluated during construction to verify long-term stability at 2H : 1 V.
It may be necessary to retain such slopes using other means (e.g. rock buttress or similar).
Where possible, roads should be constructed on full-bench cuts. Roads in this area should be
constructed on CDS RU-306 and be placed on at least 12 inches of compacted crushed rock after
covering the native subgrade with geotextile (e.g. Amoco 2002). Prior to placement of geotextile,
it is recommended to conduct proof-rolls of the native subgrade to identify potential soft areas. If
present, such areas should be over-excavated and replaced with compacted select fill. If
unavoidable, fill slopes bearing on RU-306 should be constructed at no steeper than 3H : 1 V and the
toe of the fill keyed into in-place RU-306 by at least 4 feet.
Wet weather construction in this design area is expected to be difficult, both for infrastructure and
residences. The near-surface layer of soil and CDS RU-306 is expected to lose strength significantly
during and following precipitation events, making vehicular and equipment access difficult.
Foundations
Due to characteristics consistent with expansive soil and over-consolidated expansive clay,
conventional shallow spread footing systems are not recommended in this area Foundations should
consist of either post-tensioned slabs or of auger-cast concrete piers. For the pier systems, the piers
should be designed as end-bearing piles extended to hard over-consolidated RU-306. A person
familiar with such systems should ascertain that suitable bearing material has been reached. In that
case, the piers can be designed for allowable bearing pressures of at least 6,000 psf, and possibly
9,000 psf. Concrete beams connecting the piers should be designed above-grade by I to 2 inches
to allow for swelling of the underlying soil without stressing the pier connections:
Drainage
Due to the probable low permeability of RU-306, significant run-off or shallow groundwater
discharge is expected in this area. Therefore, provisions for drainage should be installed at the up-
slope and side-slope sides of foundation pads. Soil in the vicinity of structures should be sloped
away from footing areas as much as possible. The tops of cut banks for roads should include a
shallow drainage swale which discharges parallel to the road alignment.
Date Received:
River Heights Subdivision, Preliminary Gcotcchnical Assessment
GcoScicncc.lnc.. August 13. 2007 II
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
.
.
In addition, in this area it is recommended to line utility trenches with geotextile, and backfill with
open crushed rock, construct water stops at changes in grade and collect water accumulating in the
trenches for discharge to the storm-water system.
Use of Materials
Neither SU-B/C nor CDS RU-306, if excavated from this area is suitable for use as structural fill.
I[ deep excavations (e.g. for roads) encounter less expansive material (e.g. PDS RU-I01) this
material can be evaluated for use as structural fill. Otherwise, the materials cari be utilized for
landscaping purposeS.
Stabilitv
Provided the above recommendations regarding cut- and fill-slopes and drainage are followed, no
long-term adverse effects on slope stability are expected..
Design Area 5:
Excavation and Gradinl!
All units encountered in this design area can be excavated using conventional methods. Even
temporary cut slopes are expected to require shoring, retaining walls, or sloping to less than I.5H
: 1 V. Fill slopes can be placed at 2H : 1 V after removal of the organic-rich uppermost layer of soil.
Foundations
This area is suitable for construction using conventional spread footings or concrete slabs-on-grade.
Without further site-specific measurements, it is recommended to design footings for a maximum
allowable bearing pressure of 1,500 psf.
Drain8l!e
Based on the observations in the test pits, it is probable that this area is well-drained. As a result,
. no special drainage provisions appear required.
General Recommendation for Further Work
It is recommended to verify the conditions as presented in this report and refme the understanding
of the location of design area boundaries during construction of the infra-structure for the
subdivision. At that time, extensive excavations will be performed for the roads and underground
utilities, which are expected to allow detailed delineation of the design area boundaries and improved
understanding of foundation conditions at individual lots. A qualified geotechnical professional
should be retained to review and document these excavations as they proceed.
Date Received:
River Heights Subdivision, Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment
GeoSciem:e.lnc.. August 13.2007 12
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
!---
.
.
LIMITATIONS
This report "as prepan:d ror the use orBreeden Ilomes.lnc. and their authorized agents ror planning
and design purposes. Our proressional services were perrormed. and our recommendations provided
in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices. The analyses. conclusions. and
recommendations in this report are hased on site conditions as they presently exist and assume that
the limited numher or points investigated are generally representative or suhsurface conditions. The
report is not a warranty of suhsurrace conditions. II'. in the future. conditions arc found which ditTer
sicnilicantlv Irom those presented here. GeoScience must he advised at once so that these conditions
~ .
and our recommendations can he reviewed and revised. if necessary. Should a substantial lapse of
time occur hetween this investigation and ruture site activity. or ifeondilions have changed due 10
nearhy construction or natural causes. the data contained in this report should he reviewed to
detennine its continued applicability. This report is not intended to provide a seismic risk evaluation
or the suhject property. The report should be made available to potential contractors who will
perrorm the construction work. GeoScience cannot he responsihle ror any deviation rrom the
reeonu11t:nded construction methods or means discussed in this report. likewise. our linn cannot he
responsible for construction activity on other sites whieh neighhor or abut the subject property
rererenced in this report.
Iryou have any questions ahout this report. plcase do not hesitate to contact me at (541) 607-5700.
Respectfully suhmitted.
GeoScience. Inc.
,- Ij~~
0Uit't/ ak&u
. GUllnar Sehlieder. Ph.D.. CEG
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original submittal
Kl\l.:r I klghb SuI1JI\ ISltlll. I)n:ilnun.ill) (IClllcchnical ..\..scso;,mcnl
(;<oS,,<o<<. 101<. .\ngu,' 1.1. 2(K17 13
.c
..
,
,
c
c
,
,
~
~
CII
.~
a
"
:
,
,
.
;.-
~..
"'-
.
"
F~~
,
r.
~.,...
.Q
ico
~---:- ,.,.
,-
.,.:.<'.~
,~-
~-
n ,
~
r 0
O'l]rn
-ir<
cn)>m
~zr
-i 0
::J: 'l]
D:C s:
? C ~
::) ~ -i
'J
o
"
'"
~'
-. . . ."",..., u .. -,..-,-- .
~=--
- - - -~ - - ~ - ~. - ""''\:....,;.
~--
,.,
~
~
"
RIVER ~EIGHTS SUBDI"'SION - LOT 1
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT. RECORDED COVENANTS. CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS. AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
FULL DETAILS.
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown ore approximate
and the recorded tinal plot sholl be consulted for 011 legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations sholl meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot sholl
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For foundations in Design Area 3 they con consist of
conventional spread footings and concrete slabs-on-grade constructed directly on
PDS/STS RU-4020r on compacted select fill placed on these units. SU-B should be
removed from beneath bearing areas.
~L
~
~
~
~
<P
~
, /
/
I ...............\
I _ ..............,.. \ I
I _--- / ......--<': ", \ I
-<--- // ....." ',\ /
\ / ......~ " " \ /
\ // ......<:... '''... ''', " \ /
\ / /,,,, ""'"",',',' """,\ /
y~ /" """, '\ / /
\~ ""'''' L0J # f'...., l /
/'\'0.. '\, "''', ".. / \ -I-- 14 ft PSVIE
\ ':::..../\ '\., '\., '" 'i., \ /
,...-"1 ',\ .. ',~.. I', ,I
\ ",tt '-".. <f":. ~ -:.:?........ / '..}\
...-\ ',\. ~ .... ".. --<1l)'1~ 0.(0 ''I, )..,\ or:-
\"... '''<'A ~ /' / 'I Or<-
'" ,~~. ", ~<S; , / ""j/' . 51.: 1'1'
-'\~ '<', /"" "V.h /.'/ ,1 cclJ,t....: 497' /
~;~,x". "o'>-.j->' / t.{>.:J<- <ei b,~/\., ///
~", "....~~<7(/J / \ 'J:/>' /
.. '.......,... I /' ,/
", ............ -'i-___ / "1.5 ...... //
'. . /' / 37...J / /
..... I __-- ./
............ I "/------- ,/ /'
..........} / .-/
-----1_____--
40 ft, R,W,D. EASEMENT
LOT #2
~-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
~
o
40
{
Date Received~
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER.EIGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 2
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
FULL DETAILS.
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For foundations in Design Area 3 they can consist of
conventional spread footings and concrete slabs-on-grade constructed directly on
PDS/STS RU-4020r on compacted select fill placed on these units. SU-B should be
removed from beneath bearing areas.
In Design Area 4, due to characteristics consistent with expansive soil and over-
consolidated expansive clay, conventional shallow spread footing systems are not
recommended in this area. Foundations should consist of either post tensioned slabs or
of auger-cast piers. For the pier systems, the piers should be designed as end bearing
piles extended to hard over-consolidated RU-306. A person familiar. with such systems
should ascertain that suitable bearing material has been reached. In that case, the piers
can be designed for allowable bearing pressures of at least 6,000 psf, and possibly 9,000
psf. Concrete beams connecting the piers should be designed above-grad by 1 to 2 inches
to allow for swelling of the underlying soil without stressing the pier connections.
-
40 ft. R.W.D. EASEMENT ~
CONSERV A nON AREA
--- LOT #3 ~
~___ J
IMPACT AREA
~
0 40
LOT#! ---
--- {
:1S \)\l-. \
l\~\G\\' Date Received:
~~\l-
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER ~IGHTS SUBDIV1!rON - LOT 3
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
FULL DETAILS.
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reparts by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recammendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For foundations in Design Area 3 they can consist of
conventional spread footings and cancrete slabs-an-grade constructed directly on
PDS/STS RU-4020r on compacted select fill placed on these units. SU-B should be
removed from beneath bearing areas.
In Design Area 4, due to characteristics consistent with expansive soil and over-
consolidated expansive clay, conventional shallow spread footing systems are not
recommended in this area. Foundations should consist of either post tensioned slabs or
of auger-cast piers. For the pier systems, the piers should be designed as end bearing
piles extended to hard over-consolidated RU-306. A person familiar with such systems
should ascertain that suitable bearing material has been reached. In that case, the piers
can be designed for allowable bearing pressures of at least 6,000 psf, and possibly 9,000
psf. Concrete beams connecting the piers should be designed above-grad by 1 to 2 inches
to allow for swelling of the underlying soil without stressing the pier connections.
LOT #2
,
'. ,
, ,
......, \
, ,
"',~
, , ,
" " \
L'o.T #j......, \
'''', "...\
. "... i
'\, ''''.. "".. \
""'" "" --~&-a"-' \ -
....-~ ~,-
, . "", ~ ___II ("
I ... - -DE I .11
___I --" \ 7FfP
-
CONSERVATION AREA
:\-~
~~J
IMPACf AREA
12'
SLOPE EASEMENT
___1-
--
1
!
~ Da;e ReCeive::
~
---
RIVER HEIGHTS DR.
APR 3 0 2010
----
Original Submittal
RIVER ~EIGHTS SUBDI~SION - LOT 4
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
FULL DETAILS.
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2 Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. In Design Area 4, due to characteristics consistent with
expansive soil and over-consolidated expansive clay, conventional shallow spread footing
systems are not recommended in this area. Foundations should 'consist of either post-
tensioned slabs or of auger-cast piers. For the pier systems, the piers should be designed
as end-bearing piles extended to hard over-consolidated RU-306. A person familiar with
such systems should ascertain that suitable bearing material has been reached. In that
case, the piers can be designed for allowable bearing pressures of at least 6,000 pst, and
possibly 9,000 pst. Concrete beams connecting the piers should be designed above-grad
by 1 to 2 inches to allow tor swelling of the underlying soil without stressing the pier
connections.
40 ft. R.W.D. EASEMENT
-
CONSERVATION AREA
:\-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
,',
, ,
, '
, "
, '
, '
k
"
, '
, "
, ,
, '
, "
\Q""
\ ,. ''''...
I'" "
" ,
, ,
, ,
l_-_-_-_-_-_.t~....,~ ---
-' ~
, '
, "
{
~
~
o 40
RIVER HEIGHTS DR.
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER ~EIGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 5
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
FULL DETAILS.
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2 Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. In Design Area 4, due to characteristics consistent with
expansive soil and over-consalidated expansive clay, conventional shallow spread footing
systems are not recommended in this area. Foundations should consist of either post-
tensioned slabs ar of auger-cast piers. For the pier systems, the piers should be designed
as end-bearing piles extended to hard over-consolidated RU-306. A person familiar with
such systems should ascertain that suitable bearing material has been reached. In that
case, the piers can be designed for allowable bearing pressures of at least 6,000 psf, and
possibly 9,000 psf. Concrete beams connecting the piers should be designed abave-grad
by 1 to 2 inches to allow for swelling of the underlying soil without stressing the pier
connections.
~
.
CONSERVATION AREA
40 ft. R.W.D. EASEMENT
:\-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
20 ft. R.W.D. EASEMENT
12'
---
~ ~
y 0 40
(tate Received:
APR 3 0 2010
RIVER HEiGHTS DR.
\
I
\
I
\
,
\
I
\
I
\
\
Original Submittal
RIVER ~EIGHTS SUBDI~SION - LOT 6
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
FULL DETAILS.
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown ore approximate
and the recorded final plat sholl be consulted for 011 legal boundary issues.
2 Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations sholl meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations. by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. In Design Area 4, due to characteristics consistent with
expansive soil and over-consolidated expansive clay, conventional shallow spread footing
systems are not recommended in this area. Foundations should consist of either post-
tensioned slabs or of auger-cast piers. For the pier systems, the piers should be designed
as end-bearing piles extended to hard over-consolidated RU-306. A person familiar with
such systems should ascertain that suitable bearing material has been reached. In that
case, the piers can be designed for allowable bearing pressures of at least 6,000 psf, and
possibly 9,000 psf. Concrete beams connecting the piers should be designed above-grad
by 1 to 2 inches to allow for swelling of the underlying soil without stressing the pier
connections.
~
.
CONSERVATION AREA
40 ft. R.W.D. EASEMENT
:\-~
~~J
IMPACf AREA
{
~
~
o
40
RIVER HEIGHTS DR.
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER ~EIGHTS SUBDI~SION - LOT 7
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL lOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A lEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2 Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. In Design Area 4, due to characteristics consistent with
expansive soil and over-consolidated expansive clay, conventional shallow spread footing
systems are not recommended in this area. Foundations should consist of either post-
tensioned slabs or of auger-cast piers. For the pier systems, the piers should be designed
as end-bearing piles extended to hard over-consolidated RU-306. A person familiar with
such systems should ascertain that suitable bearing material has been reached. In that
case, the piers can be designed for allowable bearing pressures of at least 6,000 psf, and
possibly 9,000 psf. Concrete beams connecting the piers should be designed above-grad
by 1 to 2 inches to allow for swelling of the underlying soil without stressing the pier
connections.
40 ft. R. W.D. EASEMENT
r\-'\j
~~J
IMPACf AREA
~
.
CONSERVATION AREA
,
,
,
, ,
, ,
" ,
, ,
---
{~
~ 0 40
Date Received:
---
RIVER HEIGHTS DR.
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER "EIGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 8
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL lOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A lEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2 Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. In Design Area 4, due to characteristics consistent with
expansive soil and over-consolidated expansive clay, conventional shallow spread footing
systems are not recommended in this area. Foundations should consist of either post-
tensioned slabs or of auger-cast piers. For the pier systems, the piers should be designed
as end-bearing piles extended to hard over-consolidated RU-306. A person familiar with
such systems should ascertain that suitable bearing material has been reached. In that
case, the piers can be designed for allowable bearing pressures of at least 6,000 psf, and
possibly g,OOO psf. Concrete beams connecting the piers should be designed above-grad
by 1 to 2 inches to allow for swelling of the underlying soil without stressing the pier
connections.
-
CONSERVATION AREA
40 It R.W.D. EASEMENT
K-'\j
~~J
IMPACT AREA
27'
LOPE EASEMENT
_______L--
---
~
1
Date Received:
~
o 40
RIVER HEIGHTS DR.
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER ~EIGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 9
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2 Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. In Design Area 4, due to characteristics consistent with
expansive soil and over-consolidated expansive clay, conventional shallow spread footing
systems are not recommended in this area. Foundations should consist of either post-
tensioned slabs or of auger-cast piers. For the pier systems, the piers should be designed
as end-bearing piles extended to hard over-consolidated RU-306. A person familiar with
such systems should ascertain that suitable bearing material has been reached. In that
case, the piers can be designed for allowable bearing pressures of at least 6,000 psf, and
possibly 9,000 psf. Concrete beams connecting the piers should be designed above-grad
by 1 to 2 inches to allow for swelling of the underlying soil without stressing the pier
connections.
40 ft. R.W.D. EASEMENT
-
CONSERVATION AREA
~-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
RIVER HEIGHTS DR.
{~
~ 0 40
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER ItEIGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 10
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for grophic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-101 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STSjVFS RU-l0l can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 pst. Footings
on PDSjCDS RU-l01 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
In Design Area 4, due to characteristics consistent with expansive soil and over-
consolidated expansive clay, conventional shallow spread footing systems are not
recommended in this area. Foundations should consist of either post tensioned slabs or
of auger-cast piers. For the pier systems, the piers should be designed as end bearing
piles extended to hard over-consolidated RU-306. A person familiar with such systems
should ascertain that suitable bearing material has been reached. In that case, the piers
can be designed for allowable bearing pressures of at least 6,000 psf, and possibly 9,000
psf. Concrete beams connecting the piers should be designed above-grad by 1 to 2 inches
to allow for swelling of the underlying soil without stressing the pier connections.
40 ft. R. W.D. EASEMENT
.
~
CONSERVATION AREA
j----........ ---- -""'" --- --... --
t " " "--"'1
I', " " " :
: "".. "".. '''.. '''..:
: " "'''.. '''.. '''.. I
27't.., "'''''''' LCR:,#10'''",-, '1
EA$E'tYI.NT "'~' "" "" i
~ "" I
lL ".. .. '''.. '~
l' " .. " .
L~",-----_~,---____ ,95.16' " I
I', ,,----,____', :
. '\. .. ',----~ L
".. ".. '''.. '<":-----
_____~~ ........ "".. I 7
----r~ " ,-':...-_1 {
I ,---' I "75--
I ", 7FT~'--__ . 0
~-~
~~J
IMPACf AREA
SLOPE
RIVER HEIGHTS DR
{
~
Date Received:
~
o 40
---
/
APR 3 0 2010
~
Original Submittal
RIVER ~EIGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 11
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-101 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS/VFS RU-101 can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on' 6,000 pst. Footings
on PDS/CDS RU-l01 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
In Design Area 4, due to characteristics consistent with expansive soil and over-
consolidated expansive clay, conventional shallow spread footing systems are not
recommended in this area. Foundations should consist of either post tensioned slabs or
of auger-cast piers. For the pier systems, the piers should be designed as end bearing
piles extended to hard over-consolidated RU-306. A person familiar with such systems
should ascertain that suitable bearing material has been reached. In that case, the piers
can be designed for allowable bearing pressures of at least 6,000 psf, and possibly g,OOO
psf. Concrete beams connecting the piers should be designed above-grad by 1 to 2 inches
to allow for swelling of the underlying soil without stressing the pier connections.
40 ft. R,W.D. EASEMENT
--
,------.------~------------,
1 " .. " I
.' , ~ ' ,
f ",', " I
'''' ... .. ... I
I '''.. " " '''.. \
I .. " " 'I
['''.. ""'..Lot'#] 1 "''''', '\
t'" "",~"
I " " '"
l.. " " ',-
.. .. .. ...
I.. N ... ...
1 ".. v(: '" ''',
: '\'.. ~ 7>( "..
,1, " ',L", ',\
~-./ .. ... ,-.A'" ",
-,-...', 6"",', ',1S.;l' " ", I
: -~,.... "".6'l.. "<"'~'" "1
...:---__ '~..........._ IV, '''', ~-1/' ,J
............. ---~--,-....... " " " ./
.................. to ~V'
--
J?IVe
'l? IIsla
'l/l'S
DJ?
-
CONSERVATION AREA
K-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
{~
l 0 4{)
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER .EIGHTS SUBDI\eSION - LOT 12
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-l0l or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS/VFS RU-l0l can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 psf. Footings
on PDS/CDS RU-l01 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
~~
q>
4~
041'<5'
~1.
----_...;:----_...;~
,----'", "
, ' ,
I " ",
~, ", " "'"''
l' ... ..
I" " .. ,
\ ", '''', '..., "''''
I', " "
I.. .. .. .. \
I .. .. .. ',\
\ " " " .. \
\"" "'"'''' L6T,#13l"" "':\
I" " " " \
\ ", ".. ", "... \
\ ", ", ".. ", \
\ , , , "
" .. .. .. ..\
~_ I'" ", ", ", '\
/~,,"...._I ", ", ", ", \
'''', ", "... ", '\, .. \
}', " " ',___\.. I
: . \ ", ''>------)..- . ~
".. -~....----- ~
l.. I --- -.to.
, .. '.
,
I
,
,
,
,
,
I
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
,
I
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
,
I
,
I
,
,
,
l--- 10 FTPRlVATESTORM
I DRAIN EASEMENT
, SEE CC&Rs 5.2 PRIVATE EASEMENT
I
,
I
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
,
,
,
,
,
I
~-~
~~J
40 ft. R.W.D. EASEMENT
IMPACT AREA
-
CONSERVATION AREA
~
1
~
o 40
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER ~EIGHTS SUBDI~SION - LOT 13
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-101 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STSjVFS RU-101 can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 pst. Footings
on PDSjCDS RU-101 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
LOT#12
I I
I ,
, I
o
.........,
............ " \
",,'" '\
........ '\
,<...... '''.. "\
.-('............ '''.. '.., \
..... .. .. \
..<............, '''.. " \
........... " ".. " '''.. \
,,<", '''.. " '''.. '''.. \
\ '" " " " " \
\ """'- ".. LOt"fi13 '''', ''',\
\', '''', " '''.. '\
\ "', .. " .. \
, ".. ''', '''.. ''''- "
" " '... '"
.. " .. " I
. ';".. ~ .'t\..? '''.. ".. 'I
\ " -? ~<'A ~"''', " f
\. \ ',& ~ " ',......'
'f-('> "'~ (C' "............
...r", ,,:<:~~..., ~.........
'" \',', ','A _ ',........
.. ,.V,.>o 10-'
"'.. ~', .........
'\ ~',I,J....,. ...~......
......"\.\','~f'>
'< '.. J'i
, "
,
LOT#15
~-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
~
1
~
o
40
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original SUbmittaL
RIVER !!EIGHTS SUBDI~SION - LOT 14
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner noiification and ;s NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-l01 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS/VFS RU-l01 can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6.000 pst. Footings
on PDS/CDS RU-101 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
LOT #15
,
,
,
,
, ,
27' \ \
,..sLOPE EASEMENT -: \
1 ~;------~--_____ \ \
" .. .. ......-- \ I
", "... " ", -----n
1', " " ',I, \
I" .. .. ... ~ I'"
J "", ", ", '''', ~ ';:l
" " " " .. II \p.-
I'... " " " '1\1 \1-'
:', " " " ,\
" , , ", (D.I,'"
I " " " ',I \
Il, ",LOl'#14 "" ",J \
I', " " .. 7' , \
", '... ..., i' 1 \
1.. .. .. .. r:1 I \
l ", ""'" '\., SLORr-l \ \
J"" "" "" E),'C:EM~NLT \ \
1 ", ", " ~,f \
I .. " " ',' \ /
~, ", ", ", "J r_.J /
t" ", r-lo..-_" \ /
I .. .. I -----~..---_-f \_ _ ___/
: ", ",,'
I .. ----I
- , " '1-
7 FT PUE 1", --"', I
" ,
RIVER HEIGHTS DR.
'""
-.l
:;-
~
.~
.-1
Date
:\-'\j
~~J
IMPACT AREA
{
\
~
o
40
ceived:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER "EIGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 15
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL lOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FilES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representotion and owner notification and is NOT
A lEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-101 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STSjVFS RU-101 can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 psf. Footings
on PDSjCDS RU-101 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
k!ve1(
lfelG
'1/1'8
D1(.
, ,
I ,
, I
LOT # 13
-..------...,
" ", "~.........
/.' " ',............
" .. ',"',
,", "" ',\
I '\. " "I
,1.... ", '''', ",\
(", ", ", '\
\ "" L01; #15'" \
t, ", " ',\
\".. " ".. ", \
\', ", " ',\
\ ", "...
, , ,
, ' ,
... \ " '\.
-";-------'. ". SLOP""
.. .. .. ~
""'''' "',..., "
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
u.l
-1
~
~
m
M
LOT#14
{
~
:\-'\l
~~J
IMPACf AREA
~
Date Received:
40
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER "EIGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 16
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area ,. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-l01 or compocted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements con be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS!VFS RU-l01 con be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 pst. Footings
on PDS!CDS RU-l01 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values con be developed from additional field measurements.
LOT #12
~
en - I
"," I
"'::\ I
().. I
\\l?! I
~ ~ I
. "' I
~ ~ ,
'< ~ I
~ lit I
",0-\ I
'" I
~ I
~ I
"' I
~ \
I
r ---""'--- -~--- "'"'C"'--
J '\." " ",
f', " "
I', ... ...
, ,
r----.._..... "
40 ft.1R.w.D:~ASEMENT
r,... '..., ",
, , ,
: ", ",
, ,
:\-'\j
~~J
IMPACT AREA
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\Q
I
I
I
I
I
,
,
\~
\-;),
\",
\~
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
':S
~
~
\
;...>.
{
\
~
o 40
LOT #15
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER ~EIGHTS SUBDI~SION - LOT 17
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
FULL DETAILS.
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown ore approximate
and the recorded final plot sholl be consulted for 011 legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations sholl meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot sholl
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot 0 conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-101 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements con be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS/VFS RU-101 con be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 psf. Footings
on PDS/CDS RU-l01 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values con be developed from additional field measurements.
F:Z.~;\"r.l
lc.~~'cC c~,j
:\-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
--
--
-
"
"
PRESERVATION AREA
-.---.---.-
--'-'-.---.---.---.---.---.-
~
~
if'
$
~
l;
.."
.-\
~
m
'"
\'j,
~
~
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
~
Original Submittal
o
40
,
\
\
I
\
I
I
\
\
\
\
\
I
I
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
I
\
,
{
~
RIVER ~EIGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 18
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed On this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-101 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS/VFS RU-101 can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 pst. Footings
on PDS/CDS RU-101 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
LOT # 17
~
'E1
~
c>
\;l
~
\;".
o
....
\
I
\
\
I
I
I
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
I
\
\
\
\
\
\
I
\
\
\
\
\
\
\-'
~
t;
-B
\
\
\
\
\
I
\
I
r-
rn
\
\
\
LOT #19
APR 3 0 20\0
O. ;n.,.1 submittaL
'- ng1',:;t.
~-'\J
~~J
IMPACT AREA
[r?'~7:J
tl~,"'c:~sd
PRESERVATION AREA
i
\
~
o
40
RIVER ~EIGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 19
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL lOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FilES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A lEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU~101 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS/VFS RU-101 can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 pst. Footings
on PDS/CDS RU-101 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
:\-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
I-<
~
t;;
13
r-
'"
, " II
,\ ''',II
'IUl N'.J.\
1(f1 0 i1.\
n 't~ "11 I
\ ..._n___....~_l ~-l ',I () <~1l\. 1\'
I \-----" '\, \ I '(:0 \
\ --1'"-"", .. ',I I; 'Xl ~'"
--1--1'" I 'tUiW,
'I.,.. \ -.....l " """" '''.. _____\ ~ ~ " \
\ ',I UJ " "I __ ~ I(:> \
\ ,I. " .. '" ------...---,....)0 \
.. }P"! " " ,,\---...., ....., ~,..{)
-~.~\----l~ "" LOY., H 19 "" "" ", , '< i/,. \
,... ~--,..).-,-.. " -c: \, " "'\)otci w 'I
0\ I ' .. .. .. .. -- t/'J I
p.. \ ~ " " ,...______....____.. ttI
f-.\ , ,', ' '"-----M-ENT '"' )> I
'::\ ': '--~'--sT6PE-[ASE , ~"~ I
\ ',17 ,~~,\\\
6m:\ ,",,,,1\
\ \ ~ r'~ ~\
I \ "\.. \\
I, I I .. 11
\ lJ'" 18:?5~~ _l-'-:~'\
", 'IS-:;--- \ _----- t" '
, I --
" ...J- -'1FTPUE
,----- \
..
o
::\
~
\il
"'
rn
~
~
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
\
RIVER HEIGHTS DR.
Date Received:
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
{
\
APR 3 0 2010
~
o 40
Original Submittal
RIVER "EIGHTS SUBDIv!;ION - LOT 20
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-l01 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS/VFS RU-101 can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 psf. Footings
on PDS/CDS RU-101 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
~
\
\
\
\
\
RIVER HEIGHTS DR.
\
\
I
I
-,' ---,
p.U.E. -1
\
\
\
\
I
\
\
I
\
I
I
\
\
\
I
~
~
-B
t-
en
7FfPU~_
--!.':;.Vf--::...----- 14'
/ - - ! '''.. ..........-......
j ,', \.".. -,,::-.....-
I , .. .. ........
/ I', " ',-7
{ / "'''''\. ''', '''..,'
1:3 \ /".. " '''.. 'l
p.\ I', " " I
t-' \ / '''.. \.".. '''.. /
~_~ l...., ",,~Ol\i(20 ''/
\ -"',_j', " '"
" ".. '''.. ''',/
.. \', " .... :
~\ , , .. I
'" '''.. " ''',!
.. " ''', '../
"-1,..~', v
V''.. ".. ".. /
4... '\ ".. ',I
I -.....--:~~_____:'..._____~~_I
I
,
I
\
,
I
\
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
I
\
\
\
\
\
"
o
'"
.-\
~
\ll
en
(;,
en
~
.-\
LOT #21
Original Submittal
I
I
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
I
\
I
\
:\-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
I
\
I
\
\
\
\
I
I
I
I
\ {
\ . ~
~
o 40
RIVER ~EIGHTS SUBDI~SION - LOT 21
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-101 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS/VFS RU-l0l can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 psf. Footings
on PDS/CDS RU-l01 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
~
~
\;i;
13
r-
<"
LOT #20
\
\
\
..
'"
""
-l
~
oJ
to
t,
to
~
\
I
\
\
\
I
\
I
\
i
\
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
\
14' p.U.E.
I
<0\ /.......,.,';,......_
(,0\ / ',"'-__...
OJ, A', -...,,_
oO I'.. ,--__
--1--\ " ".. " ", ......_...
~\ I, ",', "'.. I
___ f..',... I
p...\ \VI "', ", " 'f
1-\ ",OJ.
~ /',', '..... /
r-\ \1--'" / ""..., LO~,#21 ""'..,,/
..._\.._~(}1... i.. " " 'i
".. \ \--~:-..../ ''', ".. "'.. /
"l \ .. " .. .. I
f'r- ~2.:, SL 'of(E EA!$EMt/v T
_ I 11t:.rJ " " '"
......__It.,J.., " " " I
I T.....-,'.. " ", 'J
\ IlIJ, " " " I
10'>,", " ',/
1\..... " " ',/
I \ ...._-...__~______':.._______
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
\
\
\
\
\ /
I .
J:'
.' '-
.. '-
,
LOT #22
,
\
\
I
\
\
I
\
\
\
\
\
:\-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
~
1
~
o 40
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER ftEIGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 22
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-l0l or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS/VFS RU-l01 can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 psf. Footings
on PDS/CDS RU-101 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
-
I
I
J
J
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
r
/
I
/ LOT #23
I
I
J
I
I
/ ~
I 0 40
-J8ate Received:
LOT #21
f:-<
(;Q
&
C/J
oS
t--
M
I : ,----...-------'1:------.......---. I
I I " " ',I I
: i k 12"':ZLOPf."EA5Ef~ENT /
I I I', " ',1,4 U E J
I, " " " "'1
~I ! t " "
Q.,,/ II,', ", ", ,
t/ 1/', " " J I
I'" " "
!:i--f-( ""'"LOT4(22"! /
',I l ", ''''''', ", I
'" l ", " " I
'1.. " " '" I
-~"'i.>" """" "'" j 12' Q 1
i L,- "" ", S;rOPE EASEMENn
\ ---...-----__~~.../ I
\, _ _ _ _ ,-------1---------J--
7 FT roE -I- - - - ~ - - ~- ,-
, 49.66 I
VITUS LANE
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
~
:\-~
~~J
rMPACT AREA
i
\
RIVER ~EIGHTS SUBDI~SION - LOT 23
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown ore approximate
and the recorded final plot sholl be consulted for 011 legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations sholl meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot sholl
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot 0 conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-101 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements con be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS!VFS RU-101 con be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 psf. Footings
on PDS!CDS RU-101 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values con be developed from additional field measurements.
LOT #21
J
J
I
14' P.U.E. !
-,
I
I
LOT #22 !
I
J
J
I
I
J
J
I
I
----r-
I
\
I
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
II ~0-O
1\ __
I I.c.~ ~
~f~ "
~""I "
I '" 9'0..1;''''"
I " "I'(?
I "" %(<
I ....^, /' /:;'-1
I """""...........:>~ s€
I -</ "''''', '1t
r "...."" "'...... "-
"''''....<:, "......,\ "'..,',
( ..,.:.... "'...... "... "...',
r" ""... " " " "-
J\ '\ ... '\ ..
1\ " \...... "'...... "
1\ '\ '\ '\ '
I \'..., "",LOT'it23 "".. "'......
J \ '" " ... " "'......
\... ... ... ... ...
I \ "12' "'..... ""...,\ "'...... "''''...'//
SLOP.f EA5EMrNT .... ..... )'
I ~ , , , ,(
\... I'" ... ... "
--L-____\_~~t,?_~~~~---::~~~-, """'''''' '~'\ __
...1 I " " '\1 " ~__-
---~===~==-~==-~~-~~~p~
:\-'\j
~~J
lMPACf AREA
!
\
~
IT"1
40
o
VITUS LANE
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER ~IGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 24
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-101 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS/VFS RU-101 can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 psf. Footings
on PDS/CDS RU-101 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
:\-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
{
\
~
o
40
LOT #25
,,"
10FT PRIVATE STORM D. E.-r-
SEE CC&Rs 5.2 PRIV ATE EASEMENT
RIVER ~IGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 25
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for grophic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread foating system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-l01 or campacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS/VFS RU-101 can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 pst. Footings
on PDS/CDS RU-l0l should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
VITUS LANE
~-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
{
l
-----
, -
.. ",- -)\"'1-
\.. --.;-..
/------\-~~- \\, \~
/ \"', 1\
/ \ '\, ',\
/ \,,,.. ..
1/ \'\\.., ""\\" 1"\<:\
I _-" '\, \,\ '\~\
I -----~,.. ... ...
I ...........-"C', \,\ ", '\. \
...-..., '" '... " 1'\ \
ro, "", ", .. .. " ..
p..jl\ ", . '\'\LOT#25 ""\ \'\, \\
221 \"', ", ", " ..., \,\ \
~l \', " "', " I" '...---
t.L.j \', ", '''', ", :,>-__"'--
t-I \ ", "... ", __~~--i'"
I \ \,\ " :'\.-'"
1\ .. \...----
I \~:~----~~-----~
I
I
LOT #24
~
~
U
-<
....:!
A<
~
l'-
<')
o
40
Date Received:
, '<>"
/~9/ ~'<>~
~' ~'\o // t-?~
, '\.~ ./ <v~
;;-..\~ ./ .;;.
, ~o/ /' 0<;-
,,^ , ~~
~,_~V;. T,/ ",'Y
" , ""
, 11-'-
, , CO
. '"
,,~
LOT #26
RIVER ~IGHTS SUBDI\!t;ION - LOT 26
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area .1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-l0l or compacted select fill placed on this unit. II is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STSjVFS RU-101 can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 psf. Footings
on PDSjCDS RU-l01 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
I\-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
i
\
tJ
S
Q.,
IS
I"-
<")
.J__ LOT #25
#51 ('''.. .........-
a..'I', --...<.
f-<: I" ':~"'-......
I.!..,I " .. -_...
f'.t~, '''.. '''.. -..._~_
_JI " " ".. "',"''''-,
J '\., " " ""1
"J " " " I
I',.. ''', """, """, /
I', ".. " ',I
"J '''.. " '''.. 7
.....1',.. ".. ".. ".. I
II '\., '''.. '''.. ""1
(j , " " ,LOT #26
J'.., '''.. ".. '''.. /
'''" " " /
, "
" ,
, ,
'''.. /
"'I
,
~
o
40
LOT #27
CONSERVATION AREA
APR 3 0 2010
Ori inal Submittal
RIVER ~EIGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 27
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final. plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area I. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-l0l or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS/VFS RU-IOl can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 psf. Footings
on PDS/CDS RU-l0l should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
For this lot shallow spread footing foundalions and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 2. Installation of daylight basements will
present difficulties with excavation. Ideally, footings are constructed bearing on PDS or
STSVFS RU-l01, foundatons can be designed for allowable bearing pressures up to 6,000
psf. On CDS RU-l01 bearing pressures should not exceed 1,500 psf unless additional
measurements of soil strength are conducted at the specific site.
(,~
. ~'y~
-<'<'"
:\ ~"
0,
~-
IMPACT AREA CONSERVATION AREA
LOT #28
{
~
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
~
o
40
Original Submittal
RIVER ~IGHTS SUBDI\!t;ION - LOT 28
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site ond is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot shallow spread footing foundations and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 2. Installation of daylight basements will
present difficulties with excavation. Ideally, footings are constructed bearing on PDS or
STSVFS RU-l 01, foundatons can be designed for allowable bearing pressures up to 6,000
pst. On CDS RU-l01 bearing pressures should not exceed 1,500 psf unless additional
measurements of soil strength are conducted at the specific site.
LOT #29
\,\-p..C~
31'\\\
:~-'\J
~~J
IMPACT AREA
~~
'If'lP\..1S_-_/ __~
I I _- __---0-;;: \
... :r--_----""~ "', 1
I', __ _'"" -- \---..-:;, " "~,I
1____ .. " " ,
-r',.. '''-. .. .. \
\', ..., '''.. '''', \
\ '''.. ", '-'-. '..., \
\ "-'-., Ldl: #28'-'-., ".. \
'''' .. .. .. '"
\ '-'.. -'''.. ".. '\., ''\
\ ".. ".. ...., ".. \
\.. ..., " ',\
,-', "''', ", __~,"__J
-.......... "
--...~~-----_:~-----~---
LOT #27
~
.
CONSERVATION AREA
./'
{
\
Date Received:
~
o
40
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER ~IGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 29
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS. AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurfoce exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot shallow spread footing foundations and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 2. Installation of daylight basements will
present difficulties with excavallon. Ideally, footings are constructed bearing on PDS or
STSVFS RU-l 01, foundatons can be designed for allowable bearing pressures up to 6,000
psf. On CDS RU-l01 bearing pressures should not exceed 1,500 psf unless additional
measurements of soil strength are conducted at the specific sile.
:\-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
.-
yrfl1 l'L~CB
---
r.._
/ '~~"'.......
/0.., ',_ .............
I LOT #29 --'':.~-___
}. """ '\, ".....,
I" ','" "
/ ", " " 't
/ " "........'" /
, "", ".. /
/ ",', '{
l... ",' ',,_ ,,/
.. ..? " " ',/
~?~~~---~---~---~------
" " " " I
".. 10FT Pl\lVATE S1:0RMD. ~S.EMENT
--___.:;E~ CC&Rs 1-2 PRIVATE EA1EMENT
........., " ", l
"', ',r...... ','
...............;7 .............f
Q
LOT #28
~
.
----
CONSERVATION AREA
LOT #31
-----
---------------
-----------
./
{
~
Date Rec~
o 40
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER ~IGHTS SUBDIvt;ION - LOT 30
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurtace exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot
shall be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For foundations in Design Area 5 construction using
conventional spread footings or concrete slabs-on-grade is suitable. Without further site-
specific measurements, it is recommended to design footings for a maximum allowable
bearing pressure of 1,500 pst.
I
I
\
\
\
\
\
\
,
"
"
"-
"-
"
ACE
311tl \,1-
LOT #31 _------ __ _
---- --------
_--- -------- SBMBNl
I __~-- L_____; A.CC"ESS EA.
t---:::::----;; PRIY "w U1\L1~\V "w E"SEMENT
--,----22' SLOPE20 SEE CC&Rs 5.2 ,
\ EASEMEN
{
~
-----
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
~
o 40
:\-~ .
~~J.
IMPACT ~ CONSERVA1l0NAREA
Date ~eceived:
APR 3 0 2010
()
Original Submittal
RIVER ftEIGHTS SUBDIv!sION - LOT 31
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL lOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUB[lIVISrON PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A lEGAL BOUNDAI~Y DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-1D1 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STSjVFS RU-101 can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 psf. Footings
on PDSjCDS RU-101 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
For foundations in Design Area 5 construction using
conventional spread footings or concrete slabs-on-grade is suitable. Without further site-
specific measurements, it is recommended to design footings for a maximum allowable
bearing pressure of 1,500 psf.
-
--
, lFfPu~_-----
;~---- ---~'...
:'J (\\;..~ ---- \....._"'\._---"'l~- " .........
.~" " ... '...'"
':> v \', " " " \
/~ \ "".. 'LOT #31 "''''...,S
)< \~"w' 0 ...'...... """'... \
/ ......... \ " ',', \
/ ") \ ''''... ',\
/ /\ . '6
II / 22: OPE , "', ._-
I \..__ ',_-
/ " EASe, ::..---...- _-
I t" ' " ,'\'"...--- __ - -..-__
I I '''', _- ...___ ...
/ \ ...~--"\-- ---.,.------,,~~NT "
I I _---... "''''''''-'''C"SS EAStl'lll-', "
I I --- \ ...... & AC p ... l' "
t"'--:t:::---"~:r;RN~'fE VTlL~~W ATE ~Asm~\~ "
--+.~--- T', 20 ... E CC&R5 5 2... ...
1 " : ''''... s~ ...
\ "''''...\ "
,
:\-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
~~-
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
\
\
\
Original Submittal
~
\
~
o 40
RIVER ~IGHTS SUBDIv!5ION - LOT 32
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-101 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STSjVFS RU-101 can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 psf. Footings
on PDSjCDS RU-101 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
For this lot shallow spread footing foundations and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 2. Installation of daylight basements will
present difficulties with excavation. Ideally, footings are constructed bearing on PDS or
STSVFS RU-1 01, foundatons can be designed for allowable bearing pressures up to 6,000
pst. On CDS RU-101 bearing pressures should not exceed 1,500 psf unless additional
measurements of soil strength are conducted at the specific site.
:\-'\j
~'~J
IMPACT AREA
P;~'~'--7:l
L~j:x~:Lj
PRESERVATION AREA
{
~
~
o 40
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER ftEIGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 33
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-l01 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS/VFS RU-101 can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 psf. Footings
on PDS/CDS RU-101 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
~
~-~
~~J
IMPACf AREA
FJ,?:\'~'~:l
I>,::" ,..,'J
tij~::::;~;J
PRESERV A nON AREA
LOT #34
VITUS LANE
"," ,'.
~ {
u
<r: ~
....l
p..,
~
E-<
c-- ~
M
:',,'.'\
.,..-,1
,
.:-;.:>-<\
'. ,
:,'
.-~'. "'. .
".'".
o
40
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER ~IGHTS SUBDI\!t;ION - LOT 34
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER T9 THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown ore approximate
and the recorded final plot sholl be consulted for 011 legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations sholl meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the Individual lot sholl
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot 0 conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-101 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements con be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS/VFS RU-101 con be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 pst. Footings
on PDS/CDS RU-101 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values con be developed from additional field measurements.
For this lot shallow spread footing foundations and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 2. Installation of daylight basements will
present difficulties with excavation. Ideally, footings ore constructed bearing on PDS or
STSVFS RU-101, foundatons con be designed for allowable bearing pressures up to 6,000
psf. On CDS RU-101 bearing pressures should not exceed 1,500 psf unless additional
measurements of soil strength ore conducted at the specific site.
-
/
K-'\J
~~J
IMPACT AREA
VIrus LANE
,
, "
,____ T---_L.:."
-.
5.29'
12' SLOPE
EASEMENT
7 FT PUB
-----
f"7:-' ":7;"7.~J
.'
I"...'....' , I
t~~~.LLJ
\'"':;-'--::',--:7:7'-'--._ "
\(-.:-:'''-- .. \
y:.:'.':" \
f:" \
\," :",. >..... \
I . ..
\~" .'
I..,..."
t.' .
t..'":-:':
I..... ,,;.:
I(..~."
\," .
I':
---,,j ,"
.,'
..-
PRESERVATION AREA
Date Retived:
APR 3 0 ~OIO
Original Submittal
~
o
40
RIVER frEIGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 35
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot shallow spread footing foundations and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 2. Installation of daylight basements will
present difficulties with excavation. Ideally, footings are constructed bearing on PDS or
STSVFS RU-l01, foundatons can be designed for allowable bearing pressures up to 6,000
pst. On CDS RU-101 bearing pressures should not exceed 1,500 psf unless additional
measurements of soil strength are conducted at the specific site.
VIrus LANE
-
:\-'\j
~~J
IMPACT AREA
--
, '
---!-->1~~9' I
l ',' -- -1- 7 FTPUE
r__J".., '~,~~ ---"~~:-:.~=r-=-=-=-=-=- - - - -_
t" ", ", '''.. I 6450;--'---
I" " .. .. I .
I', .. " ',I
I "".. '''.. "'.. '~
I .. .. .. I
~, ...., "'''' ".. I 12' SLOPE
I, .. ... "', l
! "" L AT #35', ", i EASEMENT
I .. V"1 .. '1
, " " " I
~, "'.. '''.. ".. l
l'.... "", '''.. ...., I
1', '''.. '''.. "..J
I ''', " '''.. i
~ ".. ".. " I
l~~______~______~______~____
p7:-'-:-r~
hL~;"c2~lU
PRESER V A TION AREA
------ ,-:.----:--,---~--~--
,.
~
1
~
o
40
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
:
Date Received:
APR 3 D 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER ~IGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 36
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areos shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is. summarized in 3
r!3ports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot shallow spread footing foundations and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 2. Installation of daylight basements will
present difficulties with excavation. Ideally, footings are constructed bearing on PDS or
STSVFS RU-l0l, foundatons can be designed for allowable bearing pressures up to 6,000
pst. On CDS RU-l01 bearing pressures should not exceed 1,500 psf unless additional
measurements of soil strength are conducted at the specific site.
)~.:::> ~ I
- - -...,-. "
,...,..:.., ............... '../ 7
12' SLOPE C' S,.<t.-",!:..UE /
EASEMENT ! "" 6:'11~~_--___
! ''-.. ", ", -"'-...) --
f.., " " ", I
I" " " "I
I', " " ',I
I " " " ,/
I " " \, l
f'... " " '" /
/', " ", ", I
f "" LOl: #36'", 'I
I' " '" " I
f " .. ... ',/
I'" " " "I
! ", ", ", ''/
~ ", " " I
......-...-... ", ", ", /
...-..._~ ", ''I
-...----...- ", !
--~....../
~-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
vrrus LA.NE
[.?:'~'~r:TI
tij~L~~,j
PRESERV A nON AREA
---
;.....-:-...
..:-....
"': ".">::>.--...
~ '">'''~~-~.:;~::.......
'::~:'~'~::"'':"-~7"'-:---;,;:-,-,:"-,-, -:-...-- ~,...-,-;:-:- -: 7.-: - - - - --
{
~
~
o
40
........;'.
""';.,
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER LIGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 37
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consul1ed for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reporls by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reporls. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this 101 shallow spread foofing foundations and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 2. Installation of daylight basements will
present difficulfies with excavation. Ideally, footings are constructed bearing on PDS or
STSVFS RU-101, foundatons can be designed for allowable bearing pressures up to 6,000
pst. On CDS RU-101 bearing pressures should not exceed 1,500 psf unless additional
measurements of soil strength are conducted at the specific site.
:\-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
VI1'u
0' {<tve
r:;;\'-'-r~
:<;......., ...>j
ti;::,"'jj~J
PRESERVATlON AREA
{
\
~
o 40
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER ftEIGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 38
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL lOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A lEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown ore approximate
and the recorded final plot sholl be consulted for 011 legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations sholl meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot sholl
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot shallow spread footing foundations and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 2. Installation of daylight basements will
present difficulties with excavation. Ideally, footings ore constructed bearing on PDS or
STSVFS RU-1 01, foundatons con be designed for allowable bearing pressures up to 6,000
psf. On CDS RU-101 bearing pressures should not exceed 1,500 psf unless additional
measurements of soil strength ore conducted at the specific site.
LOT #39
~l>.
Us
<
'1<v~
LOT #37
:\-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
[7?;~'-~,-:l
tlj~L:Lj
PRESERVATION AREA
{
\
~
o 40
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original submittal
RIVER IPEIGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 39
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED fOR INfORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REfER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY Of SPRINGfIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT fiLES fOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. for this lot shallow spread footing foundations and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 2. Installation of daylight basements will
present difficulties with excavation. Ideally, footings are constructed bearing on PDS or
STSVfS RU-101, foundatons can be designed for allowable bearing pressures up to 6,000
pst. On CDS RU-101 bearing pressures should not exceed 1,500 psf unless additional
measurements of soil strength are conducted at the specific site.
~-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
~-----~------~----- ~~:---
'to ", "... "..
" .. ... ..
\~', '\, ", "..
\ ".. ... ", ",
, ,
, ,
, LO'r,#39"'"
, , ,
, , ,
" " '
, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
"""'''''''' ..
[~;;'.~"~;:J
tlS'~'cC~;~,j
TRACT "B"
PRESERVATION AREA
!
\
LOT #38
~
Date R~ceived: 40
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER IEIGHTS SUBDIv!;ION - LOT 40
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-101 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STSjVFS RU-101 can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 psf. Footings
on PDSjCDS RU-l0l should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
20.00 FOOT ACCESS EASEMENT
WILL BE CREATED OVER LOTS 40 AND
41 FOR THE BENIFIT OF LOTS 40, 41
AND 42, WHEN LOTS ARE DEVELOPED
:\-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
LOT #41
{
\
............ '''.. ',..........
........ "'- ................, ,
.......~, " .. \ \
~ ............ 12' \\\ \ \
,......., ........... .. /' \
/ SL~PE IA'Sf:MENT- \ \
~ '\. ,...~_.......... \ .. \\, \, \ \
l> q " "', \ '\ " '\ \ \
...', " ......> " \. \ \-"
" .. '......... .... \ \ "';>:
", '\'\ LOT #40 '\ \ \ ~
", ", '\, \\ \~
" " \ \
\, \ \
',\ \
", ',\ \
",',~\ \
" "'\:"-'T--
, , \
",\ \
'~', ,~\ \
"~""------~-~
\ '1\---
~
o
40
TRACT "B"
APR 3 0 2010
Original submittal
RIVER ~IGHTS SUBDlv!;ION - LOT 41
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
FULL DETAILS.
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-101 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. " is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS/VFS RU-l0l can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 pst. Footings
on PDS/CDS RU-l 01 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
42'
SLOPE EASEMENT
27' SLOPE
EASEMENT
RIVER HEIGHTS DR.
-
LOT #42
.c.
~
C
rfJ
r
~
t!'I
J\-'\j
~~J
IMPACf AREA
~
o
40
Dat~ Received:
LOT #40 ~
20.00 FOOT ACCESS EASEMENT . AP'l 3 0 2010
~~L~~: TC:EEA;i~IF~v~RF ~~;~ ~~, A~~ Original Submittal
AND 42, WHEN LOTS ARE DEVELOPED
RIVER ~IGHTS SUBDI\it;ION - LOT 42
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
FULL DETAILS.
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown ore approximate
and the recorded final plot sholl be consulted for 011 legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations sholl meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot sholl
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot 0 conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-101 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements con be constructed In this area without difficulty. Footings on
STSjVFS RU-101 con be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 psf. Footings
on PDSjCDS RU-101 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values con be developed from additional field measurements.
Date Reteived:
APR 3 ~ 2010
20.00 FOOT ACCESS EASEMENT ,
WILL BE CREATED OVER LOTSJ~{iln~g;ubmlttal
41 FOR THE BENIFIT OF LOTS 40, 41
AND 42, WHEN LOTS ARE DEVELOPED
,
\
\
\
\
I
\
\
\
\
\
I
49'
SLOPE EASEMENT
RIVER HEIGHTS DR.
o
7 FT r~~
\
---t --\O--~
\ .
\ ,- - -~'i?;
I \ \ ,,\.5"..
\ \ g' -,------'
~ \ --------~-~;~~-~~~<"",
\_-------..\----------- ,,,(: '\., '''... "... "''', ""'''''
--I ...... \...... ", "... "'..... "... "...
I ....\" " " ... "',
I I .........; ...'...... ", '0... L0T #42 "''''''' "'..,
\ .t.-. (\~;>,," """" ", "'" "'~,. """" """,:"":
\ \.t.J \,\' 1'1 ',.... " '..', I
\ ~,1'.. ...... ".. .. '''.. .... ".. "'..\
\ \ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..'
\ \ \ '.. "...... ',', ...., '\
\ 1-- 20 ft. R.WD. bASEMEN>:." ", ..
\"""'-1 \ '...... ...., \
'..
't: .,' ...
LOT #41
---
<
:\-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
~~::i~
PRESERVATION AREA
~
o
40
RIVER LIGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 43
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL lOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
FULL DETAilS.
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A lEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface explorafion has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-an-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-101 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS/VFS RU-l01 can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 psI. Footings
on PDS/CDS RU-l01 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
In Design Area 4, due to characteristics consistent with expansive soil and over-
consolidated expansive clay, conventional shallow spread footing systems are not
recommended in this area. Foundations should consist of either post tensioned slabs or
of auger-cast piers. For the pier systems, the piers should be designed as end bearing
piles extended to hard over-consolidated RU-306. A person familiar with such systems
should ascertain that suitable bearing material has been reached. In that case, the piers
can be designed for allowable bearing pressures of at least 6,000 psf, and possibly 9,000
psf. Concrete beams connecting the piers should be designed above-grad by 1 to 2 inches
to allow for swelling of the underlying soil without stressing the pier connections.
RIVER HEIGHTS DR.
49'
SLOPE EASEMENT
---
---
7 Ff PU!!.______"'---
- F--~,----~, ",
I " " "
~, '\ " "
I" " " "
:\-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
LOT #42
[~~~i]
PRESERVATION AREA
LOT #44
~
o 40
Date Received:
APR 3 0 20~
N
Original SUbmittal-J-
RIVER ~IGHTS SUBDIv!;ION - LOT 44
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
FULL DETAILS.
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown ore approximate
and the recorded final plot sholl be consulted for 011 legal boundary issues.
2 Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations sholl meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot sholl
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. In Design Area 4, due to characteristics consistent with
expansive soil and over-consolidated expansive cloy, conventional shallow spread footing
systems ore not recommended in this area. Foundations should consist of either post-
tensioned slobs or of auger-cast piers. For the pier systems, the piers should be designed
os end-bearing piles extended to hord over-consolidated RU-306. A person familiar with
such systems should ascertain that suitable bearing material has been reached. In that
case, the piers con be designed for allowable bearing pressures of at least 6,000 psf, and
possibly g,OOO pst. Concrete beams connecting the piers should be designed above-grad
by 1 to 2 inches to allow for swelling of the underlying soil without stressing the pier
connections.
LOT #45
RIVER HEIGHTS DR.
27'
SLOPE EASEMENT
---
---
:\-'\J
~~J
IMPACT AREA
r.7,:7.;:-:7.'1
::\:C,....."::
tiZ~:i~~d
PRESERVATION AREA
LOT #43
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
~
o
40
!
\
RIVER ~IGHTS SUBDIvfsION - LOT 45
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
FULL DETAILS.
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown ore approximate
and the recorded final plot sholl be consulted for 011 legal boundary issues.
2 Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations sholl meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot sholl
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. In Design Area 4, due to characteristics consistent with
expansive soil and over-consolidated expansive cloy, conventional shallow spread footing
systems ore not recommended in this area. Foundations should consist of either post-
tensioned slobs or of auger-cost piers. For the pier systems, the piers should be designed
os end-bearing piles extended to hard over-consolidated RU-306. A person familiar with
such systems should ascertain that suitable bearing material has been reached. In that
case, the piers con be designed for allowable bearing pressures of at least 6,000 psf, and
possibly 9,000 pst. Concrete beams connecting the piers should be designed above-grad
by 1 to 2 inches to allow for swelling of the underlying soil without stressing the pier
connections.
\ l' 5t)"t~\
t tl'
5,-0<<>
27'
SLOPE EASEMENT
\)~.
<1.,\S
x,\0'P
~~~
~\"'-l
:\-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
FT~~~F';l
::>;'.".;'1
L~-'~c":::-,d
PRESERVATION AREA
LOT #44 Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
~
o
40
{
\
RIVER ~IGHTS SUBDIvfsION - LOT 46
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL lOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A lEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-l01 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS/VFS RU-l01 can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 pst. Footings
on PDS/CDS RU-101 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
RIVER HEIGHTS DR.
".
:\-'\J
~~J
IMPACT AREA
.G.
~
c
Cf1
r
~
\:!I
LOT #57
{
\
~
o
Date Received:
40
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER IEIGHTS SUBDIv!;ION - LOT 47
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSlcence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-101 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STSjVFS RU-101 can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 psf. Footings
on PDSjCDS RU-101 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
:\-~
~~J
IMPACf AREA
rT;~'~'-::T:l
l~~~'c:~:~,j
PRESERVATION AREA
~
1
22' ~
o 40
SLOPE EASEMENTO
ate Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER 1tEIGHTS SUBDlvfsION - LOT 48
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for grophic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for canformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, faotings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-101 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STSjVFS RU-101 can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,DOD psf. Footings
on PDSjCDS RU-101 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
For this lot shallow spread footing foundations and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 2. Installation of daylight basements will
present difficulties with excavation. Ideally, footings are constructed bearing on PDS or
STSVFS RU-101, foundatons can be designed for allowable bearing pressures up to 6,000
psf. On CDS RU-101 bearing pressures should not exceed 1,500 psf unless additional
measurements of soil strength are conducted at the specific site.
["".7"":"".;;-::.'1
i '.- - :....:<-1
Li~,-'ci:::~;j
PRESERV A nON AREA
:"\-"\j
~~J
IMPACT AREA
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
{
l
Original Submittal
~
o 40
RIVER ~IGHTS SUBDIV!;ION - LOT 49
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND 'CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-101 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS/VFS RU-101 can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 pst. Footings
on PDS/CDS RU-101 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
For this lot shallow spread' footing foundations and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate In Design Area 2. Installation of daylight basements will
present difficulties with excavation. Ideally, footings ore constructed bearing on PDS or
STSVFS RU-101, foundotons can be designed for allowable bearing pressures up to 6,000
psf. On CDS RU-101 bearing pressures should not exceed 1,500 psf unless additional
measurements of soil strength are conducted at the specific site.
:\-'\j
~~J
IMPACT AREA
LOT #48
P":'T:C:- :.;-; 'C.'!
i....../.. ,'. :'1
1:..:1
L i~Lc: ~;Lj
PRESERVATION AREA
APR 3 0 2010
1
I
LOT ii50
Date Received:
Original Submittal
o
40
RIVER ~IGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 50
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for grophic representotion and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and oreas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site ond is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-l01 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STSjVFS RU-l01 can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 pst. Footings
on PDSjCDS RU-l01 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
For this lot shallow spread footing foundations and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 2. Installation of daylight basements will
present difficulties with excavation. Ideolly, footings are constructed bearing on PDS or
STSVFS RU-l01, foundatons can be designed for allowable bearing pressures up to 6,000
pst. On CDS RU-l0l bearing pressures should not exceed 1,500 psf unless additional
measurements of soil strength are conducted at the specific site.
~-'\J
~~J
IMPACT AREA
--~~.:._~"-'-
-. ...>.... p',' . ~ " . , . .
--~"""----'------~~'::-' .,"
p-'c:-';:-'.;-::-;-."l
'/':>'>>1
':..1
I. ..... ...;-<]
L~.....',,"'",-.::c'::.;:J
....r.
LOT #49
PRESERVATION AREA
LOT #50
--
--
--
LOT #51
Date Received: ~
APR 3 0 2010 I
- - -Original Submittal
---
VIrus L
4NE
~
o 40
RIVER ~IGHTS SUBDIv!;ION - LOT 51
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence ar other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread foofing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-101 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS/VFS RU-101 can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 psf. Footings
on PDS/CDS RU-101 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
For this lot shallow spread footing foundations and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 2. Installation of daylight basements will
present difficulties with excavation. Ideally, footings are constructed bearing on PDS or
STSVFS RU-101, foundatons can be designed for allowable bearing pressures up to 6,000
pst. On CDS RU-l01 bearing pressures should not exceed 1,500 psf unless additional
measurements of soil strength are conduc1ed at the specific site.
~-'\J
~~J
IMPACT AREA
.: :.',d".
rc:":: 7;::7 J
':..1
L ~~'~'c.~~:j
O WSWATION;>REA
ale ~ecelved:
..,'-.
LOT #50
.;r~~~:,<(~~:g~?t'. /
I', ... ", }
L '\', '''', '''', /
/''''''" "... "'-'''', ''''... l.........
I'" " ... ',,
,( "" Lor #5'1-- '.,;-.
" ... ... ... ~'1
I', " 2'2' " ..,
l , , ~ , I
/, 'SLOPE- EASEoMEN"F, /
/ " " '..., " '"
------t___ ''', r......~':...... 1...... ''''".,,1
t --""',;-1---- -..._ ~... '.../
/ "''''''''''' ! -----~." .::);:::>-~~:'~ ----
- --.' ... I (j ----__
,-- ... I
/', .......,--
... I -__
APR 3 0 2010
Original SUbmittjl
LOT #52 ,
1
---
~
--
o
40
-
VIrus LANE
-
RIVER ~IGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 52
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-l0l or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS/VFS RU-l01 can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 pst. Footings
on PDS/CDS RU-l0l should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
LOT #53
I
\
\
\
\
\
'"
LOT #51
---
VIrus LANE
17'
SLOPE EASEMENT.
-
-
:\-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
w
--l
~
r.n
>-3
~
m
>-3
rT~~\"r.l
t~j~c.~;~,j
PRESERVATION AREA
{
\
~
o 40
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER ~IGHTS SUBDIv!;ION - LOT 53
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-101 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS!VFS RU-101 can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 pst. Footings
on PDS!CDS RU-101 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless sile-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
~
l\-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
.. '1FfP\JE~(~, --',
'~--/""", "
,---, ~ ',,, "-
---------.. \ """ "', "
\ "'''.. '''.. // "'''.. "'''.. " ,
\ " ','<, " '''.. '''.. \
'\ ".. '''.. '''', '..., "".. \
\ '..., " ''', " " \
'> ", " " ',', \
......., " "'''.. " ".. ",
,'.. " .. " .. r,
',', " " \, '...~ "
"'''.. " ".. " \\,....
"',', " .. " ..(
'''.. ".. LOr #5l.... ",../' \
"" .. .. ...
'\, '''.. '''... '''.. ,/' \
"'''.. '''.. " )." \
" " '''.. /' \
.. .. ....
',', y \
".. ''', ,," \
''', :v'" \
" / \
v \
\
~:~~::j
RIVER HEIGHTS DR.
PRESERVATION AREA
ti
~
r.f)
p
r
<'1
i
\
~
<-,'
o
40
\
\
\
\
,
ate Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER ~IGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 54
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL lOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FilES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A lEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown ore approximate
and the recorded final plot sholl be consulted for 011 legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations sholl meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot sholl
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot 0 conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-l0l or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements con be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS/VFS RU-101 con be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 pst. Footings
on PDS/CDS RU-101 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values con be developed from additional field measurements.
RIVER HEIGHTS DR.
__ I "
-........ ... J
l -- -- ~~:::.-.-.! Pi PUE :
-,;;;;1", "", -<~:"~~~---i-
, r---" ',I I
" .. ----~ .. I I
I", ", 8/_'2.~----~--,..----___1
17'/ SLlJF?E """',,' "''''' "'1'3.54
EA{Jf;MEN-T.. "" "'" i
I "", "''''"L0'1...#54 "'1
, " ... .. I
", " " " :
I.. .. " '"
", " .. .. r
:', " " '"
: " '''', ".. 1
l " " " I
.......------.:>..._____.. '"
---
:\-~
~~J
IMPACf AREA
('":":-",:-",,,::'1
:\.>.<;
L~.jc..''''''~' ;:.;J
PRESERVATION AREA
Date Received:
APR 3 0 ~OIO
N
Original SUbmiltaL\
I':.
~
o
40
RIVER LIGHTS SUBDIv!;ION - LOT 55
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL lOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A lEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown ore approximate
and the recorded final plot sholl be consulted for 011 legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations sholl meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot sholl
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot 0 conventional spread fooling system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-101 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements con be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS/VFS RU-101 con be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 psf. Footings
on PDS/CDS RU-101 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values con be developed from additional field measurements.
1(1Vl]
l( l/SIO
'If'J'S /)
'1(.
i\-'\J
~~J
IMPACT AREA
r7~;:7;-:-;~
LL~'c:2~:J
PRESERVATION AREA
--
~
1
",
~
o
40
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER ~IGHTS SUBDI~ION - LOT 56
THIS DOCUMENT is PROViDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for grophic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown are approximate
and the recorded final plat shall be consulted for all legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this site and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations shall meel lhe
recommendations of lhese reports. Prior 10 home construction the individual lot shall
be reviewed for conformance wilh these recommendations by GeoSicence or other
applicable professional. For this lot a conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-101 or compacted select fill placed on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements can be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS/VFS RU-101 can be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 pst. Footings
on PDS/CDS RU-101 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless site-specific, higher values can be developed from additional field measurements.
,
17' SLOPE"A.,
EASEMENT
~t-.
~
~
7Q
~ll
J'-o
~
:\-'\j
~~J
IMPACT AREA
tT70'~'-:-:D
liS~~~~U
PRESERV A nON AREA
27' SLOPE
EASEMENT
{
\
~
o
40
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
RIVER ~IGHTS SUBDIvt;ION - LOT 57
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO ASSIST IN INDIVIDUAL LOT
DEVELOPMENT. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS, AND CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FILES FOR
1. This document is for graphic representation and owner notification and is NOT
A LEGAL BOUNDARY DOCUMENT. All dimensions and areas shown ore approximate
and the recorded final plot sholl be consulted for 011 legal boundary issues.
2. Limited subsurface exploration has been preformed on this sile and is summarized in 3
reports by GeoScience, Inc. Home foundations and locations sholl meet the
recommendations of these reports. Prior to home construction the individual lot sholl
be reviewed for conformance with these recommendations by GeoSlcence or other
applicable professional. For this lot 0 conventional spread footing system and concrete
slabs-on-grade is appropriate in Design Area 1. Ideally, footings will bear on CDS
through VFS RU-101 or compacted select fill piaced on this unit. It is anticipated that
daylight basements con be constructed in this area without difficulty. Footings on
STS!VFS RU-101 con be designed for allowable bearing pressures on 6,000 psf. Footings
on PDS!CDS RU-l01 should be designed for maximum bearing pressures of 1,500 psf
unless sile-specific, higher values con be developed from additional field measurements.
Date Received:
12' SLOPE EASEMENT
1Qv~1(
1f~/GIf
l'Sj)
~
48c8-1-'._ :
-~
-----~..., --"-1--1 - - -
r~ _ (~
. (~\ \~'w, ,
.y ~ 'I
l------",---I__~_
. ",
, .
", ~;;:,,- -........"..>....;\,:
" ,... ": /'
----....-.1 " ',....... I " Pu.
l ~." ", ',",j ,~
I", '.;to.;', "reo.
:', .." ',en', ~ ,- :\,.--
. " irf" "", ~ "~,
./ "" "
cp, "_! W:f #5"1-", 0''''<'''' "\
,', " " ,"1":\ _'oA _\;-
l... "... "... ", :-ct---7-"\.-
.................. ", "... "~,I \
.............'..... " 1 \
....~------~~____' "
\
,
:\-~
~~J
IMPACT AREA
F-c7~\'~r,l
:0: .' .;"C]
L2,...:"'.::.:.~....:d
PRESERVATION AREA
~
1
~
o 40
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
--~--
- V Street
\
"
'\
i
I
1
)
--.-- ~
PRESERVATION AREA
CONSER V A TION AREA
~
~
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
RIVER HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION
-
. ~
------.
,Y------
,
\ LOT #20
\
\
\
,
I
\ LOT #2\
\
i
f LOT #22
i
~
;. _~..c=::=:::::::.
\~
V
< ,
",
--"
LOT #23 "'-....
-,
-'-
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
~
.
.
After recording return to: .
Breeden Bros. Inc.
366 East 40th Avenue
Eugene, Oregon 97405
Send tax statements to:
Breeden Bros. Inc.
366 East 40th Avenue
Eugene, Oregon 97405
AFFIDAVIT OF CONSENT
Know all men that Umpqua Bank, is the beneficiary of a Line of Credit, Trust Deed, recorded
on Document No. 2008-005464, Lane County Oregon Official Records and modified by
Document No. 2008-035590, Lane County, Oregon Official Records.
Know all men that Umpqua Bank, the beneficiary of the above-mentioned Deed of Trust,
does hereby grant permission to the subdividing of the property described as River Heights, a
subdivision, recorded and platted on Document No. 2009- , Lane
County, Oregon Official Records.
~
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
. OfFIClAI.SliAL
III\IlCWlETIQIRWERS
NOrAIn' P\JBIJC. OREGON
CQMl8,'lIJN NO. 412189
II( COMMI8OON EXPIRES NOV. 2&, 2010
STATE of Oregon)
)ss
County of Lane )
There personally appeared before me the above named B:JJ HuhAcu.:I. ' as a
representative Umpqua Bank, who being duly sworn, says that he represents the beneficiary
for the above-mentioned Deed of Trust, and acknowledges the foregoing instrument to be his
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
.
.
BREEDEN BROS. INC.
TO: STEVE HOPKINS
FROM: BYRON
SUBJECT: RIVER HEIGHTS
DATE: 4/29/2010
Greetings Steve,
I think everything is done. Hurrah! Let me know when
it will be on the schedule for the Council.
Thanks,
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
.
.
~[ll]~W@W~[1iJ~ &~~~@w~~
/l@Il !}!!!lDfffJ!J (jJ!J1dl ~Wf})fiillJffl@!JmIiJ!l@~!J
...~
Name of Plat: River Heights Subdivision
(to planning)
I have checked through submitted documents, and the following have been submitted:
B'" Mylar of plat (and bond copy for Planning)
[9/Declaration ofCCR's - vV e ktA vC
IB"'Affidavit of Consent from trust deed holder
(Y/Stormwater Maintenance Agreement -
g/Gurrent Title Report
Ef"A copy of each of the previous for Planning
c"f'l t/- Heve does.
Tude! t\Q. S
These documents are the only ones the Survey Division requires for the Final Plat
submission and filing.
Sincerely,
~ ~v~'-9
City Instructions: This form is to accompany the plat and the supporting documents i'o thc"PubJlc Works Department of the
City of Springfield at the time of final plat submittal. The purpose is primarily to notify the planning offi~.e that the SUf\~eying
Division has received a!1 th.e ~oc.!lmen!si.t ~equJre:'i for finaJplat submittaL
County Instructions: This form is to accompany the plat and the supporting documents to the Lane County Surveyor's
Office at the time of final submittal for recording. The purpose is primarily to notifY that office of which items need to be
recorded simultaneously with the plat, but it also serves to remind the developer/surveyor that these documents need to be
included in the final submittal package to the County Surveyor.
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
V:\sURVEY\P!at Drawings\Cogo'd Drawings & Letters\Subdivisions_on plat 80B_& review comments\River Heights\plat submitlal
transmittal (to planning).doc
.
.
-
~
CASCADE
TITLE
ca.
*025817
STATUS OF RECORD TITLE REPORT
3"" SUPPLEMENTAL
BREEDEN BROS., INC.
ATTN: ROB BREEDEN
366 EAST 40TH AVENUE
EUGENE, OR 97405
Our No: CT-0258173
Date: August 6, 2009
Charge: $200.00 .
Government Service Fee: $25.00
As requested, Cascade Title Co. has searched our tract indices as tojthe following
described real property:
( A T T A C H ED)
and as of: August 5, 2009, at 8:00 A,M. we find the following:
Vestee:
BREEDEN BROS., INC.
said property is subject to the following on record matters:
1. Taxes for the fiscal year 2009-2010, a lien not yet payable.
2. Rights of the public in and to that portion lying within streets, roads and
highways.
3. Rights of the public and governmental bodies in and to any portion of the premises
herein described now or at any time lying below high water mark ~of the unnamed
slough, including any ownership rights which may be claimed by the .State of Oregon
as to any portion now or at any time lying below the high water :mark.
4. Any claim based upon the assertion that:
Said land or any part thereof is now or at any time has been below the
ordinary high water mark of the unnamed slough. :
Some portion of said land has been created by artificial means or has
Accreted to such portion so created.
Some portion of said land has been brought within the boundaries thereof by
an avulsive movement of the unnamed slough, or has been formed by an
accretion to any such portion.
5. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, granted td Benham Irrigation
Company, recorded July 17, 1919, in Book 121, page 66, Lane County Oregon Deed
Records. .
6. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, granted to the City of
Eugene, recorded December 3D, 1924, in Book 142, Page 276, Lane ~County Oregon Deed
Records.
7. Roadway grant, including the terms and provisions thereof, recorded September 8,
1947, in Book 355, Page 506, and corrected by instrument recorded January 9, 1948,
in Book 364, Page 185, Lane County Oregon Deed Records. Date Received:
continued-
MAIN OFFICE * 811 WILLAMETTE ST. * EUGENE,
OREGON 97401 * PH: (541) 687_2~~R 3 0 2010
FLORENCE * 1901 HWY 101 - S. 2 * FLORENCE, OREGON 97439 * PH: (541) 997-8417
EUGENE FAX: 485-0307 * E-MAIL: info@ca.cadetitle.com * FLORENCE FAXOri@iflal:al8bmittal
.
.
8, Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, granted Ci~y of Eugene, by
instrument recorded January 28, 1965, Reel No. 258, Reception No. 90327, Lane
County Oregon Deed Records.
9. Easement and maintenance provisions contained therein, includini the terms and
provisions thereof, granted to Rainbow Water District, recorded rebruary 19, 1965,
Reception No. 92973, Lane County Oregon Deed Records
10. Deed of Trust (Line of Credit), including the terms and provisio~s thereof,
executed by Breeden Bros., Inc.. to First American Title Insurance Company,
Trustee, for the benefit of Umpqua Bank, Beneficiary, dated Janu~ry 24, 2008,
recorded January 31, 2008, Reception No. 2008-005464, Lane County Official Records,
to secure payment of a note for $3,300,OOO.OQ. (Includes additipnal property)
Said Deed of Trust was modified by Agreement dated May 28, .2008, recorded June
25, 2008, Reception No. 200B-03SS90, Lane County Official Records.
11. Assignment of rents due or to become due and accruing from said property, including
the terms and provisions thereof, from Breeden Bros., Inc" to Umpqua Bank, dated
January 24, 2008, recorded January 31, 2008, Reception No. 2008-:005465, Lane County
Official Records.
12. River Heights Land Exchange Agreement, including the terms and provisions thereof,
between Breeden Bros., Inc., and Rainbow Water District, an Oregon municipal
corporation, recorded October 30, 2008, Reception No. 2008-05963:6, Lane County
Official Records.
NOTE: Taxes, Account No. 0113595, Assessor's Map No. 17 02 30, #700; Code 19-00,
200B-2009, in the amount of $8.52, PAID IN FULL.
Taxes, Account No. 0113603, Assessor's Map No. 17 02 3D, #BOO; Code 19-00,
2008-2009, in the amount of $3,439.20, PAID IN FULL.
This report is to be utilized for information only. This report is ~ot to be used as a
basis for transferring, encumbering or foreclosing the real property! described.
The liability of Cascade Title Co. is limited to the addressee and shall not exceed the
premium paid hereunder.
CASCADE TITLE CO., by:
?~
ar/Title Officer: KURT BEATY
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
.
.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
PARCEL 1:
An area of land in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 30, Township 17 South, Range 2 West,
Willamette Meridian, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a
5/8 inch rebar in the center of a 40 foot roadway; said rebar being! North 260 09' West
a distance of 494.8 feet, North 870 59' West a distance of 1499.0~ feet and South 10
37' san West a distance of 689.32 feet from the Section Corner common to Sections 19,
20. 29 and 30, Township 17 South, Range 2 West, Willamette Meridian; thence North 780
52' 03" East a distance of 52.03 feet to a 5/8 inch rebarj thence South 70 56' 09" East
a distance of 20.01 feet to the true point of beginning; thence South 780 52' 03" West
a distance of 50.07 feet; thence along the arc of a 154.81 foot :radius curve right
(chord bears North 760 51' 39" West 135_91 feet) an arc distance of ~40.70 feet; thence
along the arc of a 64.26 foot radius curve left (chord bear;:; North 730 46' 59" West
50.13 feet) an arc distance of 51.50 feet; thence South 830 15' OO"iWest a distance of
1043.18 feet; thence along the arc of a 1122.76 foot radius curve- left (chord bears
South 790 46' 26" West 136.09 feet) an arc distance of 136.17 feet; thence South 760
17' 06" West a distance of 226.64 feet; thence along the arc of a:429.97 foot radius
curve right {chord bears south 880 31' 08" West 133.91 feet) an arc distance of 134.45
feet to the center of an irrigation ditch; thence along said irrigation ditch the
following courses: south 300 43' 32" East a distance of 400.97 feet; thence South 430
56! 32" East a distance of 354.91 feet; thence South 710 42' 32" ;East a distance of
69.05 feet; thence South 83D 53' 3211 East a distance of 373.94 feet; thence South 650
59' 32" East a distance of 195.92 feet; thence South 480 20' 32" :East a distance of
104.96 feet; thence South 720 56' 32" East a distance of 100.52 feet; thence South 730
21' 32" East a distance of 124.16 feet; thence South 300 51' 32" :East a distance of
126.35 feet to the Northerly right-oE-way of the former Southern Pacific Railroad;
thence along said Northerly right-oE-way, North 590 26' 33" East aidistance of 456.24
feet; thence continuing along said right-oE-way and along a tapered curve left (chord
bears North 57D 53' 20" East 146.53 feet) an arc distance of 1'46.56 feet i thence
continuing along said right-oE-way and along the arc of a 90S foot radius (chord
definition) curve left (chord bears North 47D 57! 5911 East 251.99 fe~t) an arc distance
of 252.81 feet; thence leaving said Northerly right-of-way, North .520 41' 35" West a
distance of 397.14 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar; thence North 70 56' 09"~ West a distance of
439.86 feet to the true point of beginning, all in Springfield, Lane:County, Oregon.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM: Commencing at a 3/4 inch iron pipe se:t in County Survey
File No. 13777, said pipe being Soutb 790 18' 54" West a distance of 2552.71 feet
(record South 790 19' 55" West a distance of 2552.66 feet) from the Section
Corner common to Sections 19, 20, 29 and 3D, Township 17 South, Range 2 West,
Willamette Meridian; thence South 160 23' 52" East a distance of 42.71 feet to
the true point of beginning; thence South 160 23' 52" East a: distance of 189.25
feet to a 3/4 inch iron pipe set in County survey File No. i3777; thence South
730 33' 4B" West a distance of 308.00 feet; thence North 610 35' 17" West a
distance of 64.44 feetj thence North 260 38' 58" West a distance of 58.54 feet;
thence North IBg 24' 02" West a distance of 104.83 feet; thence North 520 50' 20"
East a distance of 56.09 feet; thence North aDo 3D' 41" East a: distance of 310.31
feet to the true point of beginning, all in Springfield, Lane County, Oregon,
continued-
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
.
.
PARCEL 2:
A 40.0 foot wide strip of land, the centerline of which is described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the centerline of said 40 foot wide tract of land that is
1499.09 feet North B90 571 West and 689.77 feet South 10 44' West of:the stone set at
the Southwest corner of County Survey No. 1271 that is 494.8 feet No~th 260 Og! West of
the corner for Sections 19, 20, 29 and 30 of Township 17 South, Range 2 West,
Willamette Meridian; and running thence on a 134.81 foot radius curve right (the long
chord of which bears North 760 421 West 117.98 feet}a distance of 122.11 feet; thence
on an 84.25 foot radius curve left (the long chord of which curve bears North 73Q 451
West 65.85 feet) a distance of 67.65 feet; thence south 830 151 West~lQ43.44 feet;
thence on an 1142.76 foot radius curve left (the long chord of which:curve bears South
790 461 West 138.36 feet) a distance of 138.95 feet; thence South 76~ 17' West 204.09
feet; thence on a 409.26 foot curve right (the long chord of which ctirve bears North
830 311 3011 West 282.52 feet) a distance of 288.46 feet; thence on a;402.09 foot radius
curve left (the long chord of which curve bears North 760 331 30" West 183.98 feet) a
distance of 185.62 feet; thence North 890 47' West 328.4 feet to the centerline of
County Road No. 753.
EXCEPT THEREFROM: that portion thereof lying within Parcel 1.
ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM that portion described in deed to the city of Springfield
recorded July 21, 1994, Recorderrs Reception No. 94-53874, Lan~ County Official
Records.
ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM that portion described in deed to Breadner Parker &
Associates (Ambleside) LLC, recorded October 1, 1997, Receptio~ No. 9766814, Lane
county Official Records.
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original submittal
.
.
.
--
=r=
CASCADE
TITLE
CO.
*025817
STATUS OF RECORD TITLE REPORT
3~ SU1'PLEMENTAL
BREEDEN BROS., INC.
ATTN: ROB BREEDEN
366 EAST 40TH AVENUE
EUGENE, OR 97405
Our No: CT-0258l73
Date: August 6, 2009
charge: $200.00
Government Service Fee: $25.00
As requested, cascade Title Co. has searched our tract indices as to. the following
described real property:
( A T T A C H ED)
and as of: August 5, 2009, at 8:00 A.M. we find the following:
Date Received:
Vestee:
BREEDEN BROS., INC.
APR 3 0 2010
said property is subject to the following on record matters:
Original Submittal
1. Taxes for the fiscal year 2009-2010, a lien not yet payable. ~
2. Rights of the public in and to that portion lying within street~, roads and
highways.
3. Rights of the public and governmental bodies in and to any port~on of the premises
herein described now or at any time lying below high water mark :of the unnamed
slough, including any ownership rights which may be claimed by the State of Oregon
as to any portion now or at any time lying below the high water :mark.
4. Any claim based upon the assertion that: ;
Said land or any part thereof is now or at any time has been below the
ordinary high water mark of the unnamed slough.
Some portion of said land has been created by artificial means or has
Accreted to such portion so created. .
Some portion of said land has been brought within the boundaries thereof by
an avulsive movement of the unnamed slough, or has been formed by an
accretion to any such portion.
S. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, granted to Benham Irrigation
Company, recorded July 17, 1919, in Book 121, Page 66, Lane Cou~ty Oregon Deed
Records.
6. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, granted to the City of
Eugene, recorded December 30, 1924, in Book 142, Page 276, Lane ;County Oregon Deed
Records.
7. Roadway grant, including the terms and provisions thereof, reco~ded September 8,
1947, in Book 355, Page 506, and corrected by instrument record~d January 9, 1948,
in Book 364, Page 185, Lane County Oregon Deed Records.
continued-
MAIN OFFICE' 811 WILLAMETTE ST. . EUGENE, OREGON 97401' PH: (541) 687-2233
FLORENCE' 1901 HWY 101 - S. 2 . FLORENCE, OREGON 97439 . PH: (541) 997-8417
EUGENE FAX: 485-0307 * E~MAIL: info@cascadetitle.com * FLORENCE FAX: 997-8246
,
.
.
8. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, granted City of Eugene, by
instrument recorded January 28, 1965, Reel No. 258, Reception No:' 90327, Lane
County Oregon Deed Records.
9. Easement and maintenance provisions contained therein, including the terms and
provisions thereof, granted to Rainbow Water District, recorded :February 19 I 1965/
Reception No. 92973, Lane County oregon Deed Records
10. Deed of Trust (Line of Credit), including the terms and provisions thereof,
executed by Breeden Bros., Inc., to First American Title Insurance company,
Trustee, for the benefit of Umpqua Bank, Beneficiary, dated Janu~ry 24, 2008,
recorded January 31, 2008, Reception No. 2008-005464, Lane County Official Records,
to secure payment of a note for $3,3001000.00. <Includes additipnal property}
Said Deed of Trust was modified by Agreement dated May 28, :2008, recorded June
25, 2008, Reception No. 2008-035590, Lane County Official Recor~s.
II. Assignment of rents due or to become due and accruing from said property, including
the terms and provisions thereof, from Breeden Bros., Inc., to Umpqua Bank, dated
January 24, 2008, recorded January 31, 2008, Reception No. 2008-:005465, Lane County
Official Records.
12. River Heights Land Exchange Agreement, including the terms and provisions thereof,
between Breeden Bros., Inc., and Rainbow Water District, an Oregon municipal
corporation, recorded October 30, 2008, Reception No. 2008-05963;6, Lane County
Official Records.
NOTE: Taxes, Account No. 0113595, Assessorts Map No. 17 02 30, #700, Code 19-00,
2008-2009, in the amount of $8.52, PAID IN FULL.
Taxes, Account No. 0113603, Assessor's Map No. 17 02 30, #800 ; Code 19-00,
2008-2009, in the amount of $3,439.20, PAID IN FULL.
This report is to be utilized for information only. This report is ~ot to be used as a
basis for transferring, encumbering or foreclosing the real property: described.
The liability of Cascade Title Co. is limited to the addressee and s~all not exceed the
premium paid hereunder.
CASCADE TITLE CO., by:
?;7
--:>
ar/Tit1e Officer: KURT BEATY
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
;
.
.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
PARCEL 1:
An area of land in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 30, Township 17 South, Range 2 West,
Willarnette Meridian, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a
5/8 inch rebar in the center of a 40 foot roadway; said rebar being: North 260 09' West
a distance of 494.8 feet, North 870 59' West a distance of 1499.09 feet and South 10
37' 58" West a distance of 689.32 feet from the Section Corner common to Sections 19,
20, 29 and 301 Township 17 South, Range 2 West, Willamette Meridian; thence NorCh 780
52' 03" East a distance of 52.03 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar; thence South 70 56' 09" East
a distance of 20.01 feet to the true point of beginning; thence South 780 52' 03" West
a distance of 50.07 feet; thence along the arc of a 154.81 foot ~radius curve right
(chord bears North 760 51' 39~ West 135.91 feet) an arc distance of ~40.70 feet; thence
along the arc of' a 64.26 foot radius curve left (chord bears North 730 461 59" West
50.13 feet) an arc distance of 51.50 feeti thence South 830 15' OQ":West a distance of
1043.18 feet; thence along the arc of a 1122.76 foot radius curve' left (chord bears
South 790 461 26" West 136.09 feet) an arc distance of 136.17 feet; thence South 76Q
17' 06n West a distance of 226.64 fee~i thence along the arc of a:429.97 foot radius
curve right (chord bears South 88031' 08" West 133.91 feet) an arc: distance of 134.45
feet to the center of an irrigation ditch; thence along said irrigation ditch the
following courses: South 300 43' 32" East a distance of 400.97 feeti thence South 430
561 3211 East a distance of 354_91 feet; thence South 710 42' 3211 :East a distance of
69,05 feet; thence South 83e) 53' 321/ East a distance of 373.94 fee~i thence South 6Se)
59' 32/1 East a. distance of 195.92 feet; thence South 480 20' 32/1 iEast a distance of
104.96 feet; thence South 720 56' 32" East a distance of 100.52 feet; thence South 730
211 32" East a distance of 124.16 feet; thence South 300 511 32" :East a distance of
126.35 feet to the Northerly right-of-way of the former Southern: Pacific Railroad;
thence along said Northerly right-of-way, North 590 26' 3311 East a\distance of 456.24
feet; thence continuing along said right-of-way and along a tapered curve left (chord
bears North 570 53' 20" East 146.53 feet) an arc distance of 1'46.56 feet; thence
continuing along said right~of-way and along the arc of a 905 foot radius (chord
definition) curve left (chord bears North 470 571 59n East 251.99 fe~t) an arc distance
of 252.81 feet; thence leaving said Northerly right-of-way, North 520 41' 35" West a
distance of 397.14 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar; thence North 70 56' 09": West a distance of
439.86 feet to the true point of beginning, all in Springfield, Lane [County, Oregon.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM: Commencing at a 3/4 inch ~ron pipe se':t in County survey
File No. 13777, said pipe being South 790 18' 54" West a distance of 2552.71 feet
(record South 790 191 55" West a distance of 2552.66 feet) from the Section
Corner common to Sections 19, 20, 29 and 30, Township 17 So'uth, Range 2 West,
Willamette Meridian; thence South 160 23' 52" East a distanc~ of 42.71 feet to
the true point of beginning i thence South 160 23' 52" East a: distance of 189.25
feet to a 3/4 inch iron pipe set in County Survey File No. i3777; thence South
730 33' 48'1 West a distance of 308.00 feet; thence North 610 35' 17'1 West a
distance of 64.44 feet; thence North 260 38' 58n West a distance of 58.54 feeti
thence North 180 24' 02" ,west a distance of :104.83 feet; thence North 520 50' 20"
East a distance of 56.09 feet; thence North 800 30' 41" East a: distance of 310.31
feet to the true point of beginning 1 all in Springfield, Lane County, Oregon.
continued-
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
.
.
PARCEL 2:
A 40.0 foot wide strip of land, the centerline of which is described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the centerline of said 40 foot wide tract of land that is
1499.09 feet North B90 57' West and 689.77 feet South 10 44' West of:the stone set at
the Southwest cerner of County Survey No. l271 that is 494.B feet North 260 091 West of
the corner for Sections 19, 20, 29 and 30 of Township 17 South, Range 2 West,
Willamette Meridian; and running thence on a 134.81 foot radius curve right {the long
chord of which bears North 760 421 West 117.98 feet)a distance of 122.11 feet; thence
on an 84.25 foot radius curve left (the long chord of which curve bears North 730 451
West 65.85 feet) a distance of 67.65 feet; thence south 830 151 West~1043.44 feet;
thence on an 1142.76 foot radius curve left (the long chord of which:curve bears South
790 46' West 138.36 feet) a distance of 138.95 feet; thence South 76~ 171 West 204.09
feet; thence on a 409.26 foot curve right (the long chord of which c~rve bears North
830 311 30" West 282.52 feet) a distance of 288.46 feet; thence on a:402,09 foot radius
curve left (the long chord of which curve bears North 760 33' 30" West 183.98 feet) a
distance of 185.62 feet; thence North 890 471 West 328.4 feet to the:centerline of
County Road No. 753.
EXCEPT THEREFROM: that portion thereof lying within Parcell.
ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM that portion described in deed to the City of Springfield
recorded July 21, 1994, Recorder'S Reception No. 94~53874, Lan~ County Official
Records.
AlSO EXCEPT THEREFROM that portion described in deed to Breadner Parker &
Associates (Amblesidel LLC, recorded October 1, 1997, Reception No. 9766814, Lane
county Official Records.
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
.
"'
2~~~.~~~D~D
1111I1111111111111111I11I11111111111111I111111111 $51.00
01034138200800596360060060 10/30/200& 02:04:39 PM
RPR-AGRE Cnt=1 Stn=6 CASHIER 07
$30.00 $10.00 $11.00
.
(f)
~S"I
RIVER HEIGHTS LAND EXCHANGE AGREEMENT
This agreement is between Breeden Bros., Inc. ("Breeden") and'Rainbow Water District, an
Oregon municipal corporation ("Rainbow"), regarding an exchange of land owned by the
respective parties located in River Heights Subdivision on Moe Hill, in Springfield, Oregon. This
agreement supercedes the agreement with this same title, signed by the parties on March 12,
2008.
The parcels involved in the exchange are described on Exhibit A, for the property belonging to
Rainbow and Exhibit B, for the property belonging to Breeden and incorporated by this reference.
RECITALS:
A. Rainbow owns property adjacent to its Moe Hill water reservoir. Rainbow has determined
after public meeting that the property is not needed for public purposes and that property
owned by Breeden would benefit the public.
B. ORS 271.300 to 271.360 authorizes an exchange of property subject to the requirements
stated therein.
C. The parties agree to exchange their respective properties as described above, subject to
the following terms and conditions:
1. Appraisal. The parties will share the cost of an independent appraiser for the
purpose of verifying the property being received by the District is of equal or superior
useful value for the public use.
2. Preliminary Title Reports. Each party will provide the other with a preliminary title
report showing the condition of the title of property to be free and clear except for
easements, reservations, and restrictions of record. If either party in review objects
to the state of the title, and such objections cannot be resolved, this agreement may
be cancelled by written notice to the other party.
3. Legal Description - Breeden will prepare the legal description and property
exchange documents at Breeden's cost for review and approval by Rainbow.
4. Deed Restrictions.
a. Site Conditions. The parties acknowledge that conditions exist on the
respective properties and the proposed lots in the River Heights Subdivision
which abut Rainbow's property, that prior to development will require slope
stability evaluation, house foundation pad evaluations, a review of rock
fragment hazards, and fencing standards.
Date Received:
Agreement - Rainbow Water District I Breeden Bros. _ Page 1 APR 3 0 2010
After Recording Return to Rainbow Water District. P.O. Box 8, Springfield, OR 97477
Original Submittal
.
.
b. Report. The parties have reviewed Gunnar Schlieder's report of 4/27/07,
which is attached hereto and incorporated by this reference as Exhibit C,
setting forth the geologic and topographic issues and their solutions on the
affected properties.
c. The parties will develop deed restrictions to apply to each specific lot
(property) which abuts Rainbow's property. The deed restrictions will include
detailed requirements to protect Rainbow's property and all of the abutting
lots from potential hazards incurred by their development, prior to issuance of
building permits on any of the lots. Such deed restrictions will have specific
provisions to allow specific enforcement by either party, their agents, or
assigns.
4. Fencing Standards. The parties acknowledge that fencing is required as a part of
the exchange. The City of Springfield's site approval conditions for the River
Heights Subdivision include a requirement for fencing the entire Rainbow site and
Rainbow's access road to the tank, (referred to as Tract "B"), with 6' chain link
fencing and entrance gate. The fencing shall be installed during construction of the
public improvements in the subdivision and shall be completed prior to final
ownership transfer from Breeden of any lots in the subdivision. The cost of the
fencing and its installation will be shared equally between Breeden and Rainbow.
All fencing materials will be black in color and will meet the following minimum
standards:
a. Corner Posts - 2 7/8" diameter, schedule 40 galvanized steel, bury depth
(set) 3' in concrete. All fence corners which are located at all iron rod
property corners will consist of two posts, separated from the property iron
rod a minimum of 2', or other agreed distance, to allow the property corners
to remain undisturbed by the fencing installation and to allow the fencing fabic
and other fencing materials to run behind the property corner (on Rainbow's
property).
b. Line Posts - 2 3/8" diameter, schedule 40 galvanized steel, bury depth (set) 3'
in concrete. Post spacing at equal intervals, with maximum post spacing 10'
e.e.
c. Top Rail - 1 5/8" diameter, schedule 40 galvanized steel.
d. Chain Link Fencing Fabric - 9 gauge galvanized steel.
e. Bottom Tension Wire - 6 gauge cold drawn wire with hog ring connections to
fencing material at 24" C.C.
1. Fencing Fabric to Post Ties - 9 gauge steel at 16" e.c.
g. Gates (2) - Two full height gates which together span the full ~%~ceived:
access road to Rainbow's parcel, (Tract "B" as shown in the River Heights
. APR 3 0 2010
Agreement - Rainbow Water District / Breeden Homes - Page 2
Original Submittal
.
.
Subdivision Improvement Plans by EGR & Associates, Inc, dated 4/25/2007)
at a location on Tract B to be mutually agreed by the parties. The gates shall
be fabricated with 1 5/8" diameter, schedule 40 galvanized steel frames
continuous welded at the corners, all welds coated with cold galvanizing
material and top coated with aluminum top coat.
h. Gate Posts - 4" diameter, schedule 40 galvanized steel, full height, minimum
bury depth (set) 3' in concrete base.
i. Protective Fencing - The parties acknowledge that the fencing standards
cited herein do not meet the criteria for a protective fence cited in Mr.
Schlieder's letter (page 3, paragraph 4). If a protective fence is chosen as
part of the remedial measures cited in paragraph 4 above, these criteria will
be modified, as necessary and mutually agreed to by the parties in writing.
5. Applications and permits. The parties agree to cooperate and assist in the filing of
any necessary applications for subdivision or similar modifications with any
government entity. All such modifications shall include a reference to deed
restrictions that are to be specifically developed, recorded, and applied to respective
lots.
6. Disputes. If the parties are unable to agree upon language for deed restrictions or
other provisions of this agreement, this agreement may be terminated by ten (10)
days written notice, listing specifically the issues of disagreement. The parties may
agree to meet and discuss any areas of disagreement prior to the effective date of a
termination of this agreement. All notices shall be sent to the parties at the
addresses listed below:
Superintendent
Rainbow Water District
P.O. Box 8
Springfield, OR 97477
Breeden Bros., Inc.
366 E. 40'h, Suite 250
Eugene, OR 97405
Dated thisZ'1~ay of 0(>1
,2008.
RAINBOW WATER DISTRICT:
BREEDEN BROS.:
By: ~~~
Title:' 0'-" 4', on '.l51 ~
BY~e~
Title: (' eo Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Agreement - Rainbow Water District / Breeden Bros. - Page 3
After Recording Return to Rainbow Water District, P.O. Box 8, Springfie@r~'ijubmittal
.
.
State of OREGON
County of LANE
This instrument was acknowledged before me on October 30.2008 by Byron G. Roberts of Breedcn Bros.. Inc.
and J. Timothv Hanlev of Rainbow Water District.
. OFACIAL SEAL
KATRINA ANTONElTE KING
\. i NOTARY PUBUC-OREGON
COMMISSION NO. 409560
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUG. 31, 2010
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Original SUbmiltal_
. .. L .
ExhibIts, A. B. and C. to River Heights and Exchange Agreement, page 1
Exhibit A. to River Heights Land Exchange Agreement
That property described in a Warranty Deed, recorded on February 19, 1965 in Reel 126, Reception No. 92973,
Official Records of Lane County, Oregon.
Exhibit B. to River Heights Land Exchange Agreement
That property described in a Warranty Deed. recorded on February 24, 2006, on Document No. 2006-012730,
Official Records of Lane County, Oregon.
Exhibit C. to River Heights Land Exchange Agreement
April 27. 2007
Date Received
Mr. Tim Hanley, P.E.
Superintendent
Rainbow Water District
P.O. Box 8
Springfield OR 97477
APR 3 0 2010
REo
Original Submittal
LAND EXCHANGE AND SLOPE STABILITY, MOE MOUNTAIN RESERVOIR
Dear Mr. Hanley:
I am writing this letter to summarize the findings and recommendations regarding the slope stability ramifications of
the proposed land exchange at Mae Mountain between Breeden Homes, Inc. and the Rainbow Water District. The
water district owns the western top portion of the hill and maintains a water reservoir there. The top portion of the hill
was graded flat in the 19605 to accommodate a smaller water tank to the west of the current reservoir location, and
more grading was performed in the eastern portion of the water district property to construct the current, larger
reservoir. The initial tank was demolished.
The top of the hill is underlain by a fine-grained ib'l1eous rock unit which was also previously quarried on the
southeastern flank. The fresh-state rock is mantled by a weathering zone of variable depth. In the saddle between the
east~m and western high points of the hill, test pits excavated for the geotechnical assessment for the River Heights
subdivision indicate that the rock is completely decomposed (more than 50 % remoldable with finger pressure) to a
depth of 10.5 feet. At the top of the eastern knob and in the quarry area, fresh-state rock is present from I to 3 feet
below the surface. On the north-facing slopes below the reservoir area, the in.place decomposed rock is covered by an
additional thickness of colluvial (slope-wash) deposits, consisting of a silty sand, with medium dry strength, low
toughness, and rapid dilatancy. In the area in question, immediately north of the water district property, the soil is
almost non-plastic, indicating that the content of fines is probably on the order of20 to 25 %.
The grading for the construction of the \Vater tanks resulted in exposure and excavation of more than an estimated
1,000 cubic yards of fresh-state rock, which was placed mostly along the edges of the graded area 10 provide Oat areas
which can be used for service vehicle access. Maximum fill depths are probably on the order of 10 to 12 feet with
much of the fill placed at least 6 to 8 feet deep along the margin of the tank pad. In the northwest portion of the site,
all the fill exposed on the slope consists of rock fragments up to 4 feet in maximum diameter, and practically no fines
are exposed on the fill slope. In this portion, the full slope is at angles ranging from 80 to 90 %. In the northeastern
portion, larger igneous rock fragments are mixed with finer crushed rock, soil, and concrete residue. The fill slope in
this area was measured with a clinometer at an overall. angle of67 % with a maximum slope angle of76 %,
Observations were made on the slopes below the entire perimeter of the water tank pad. No evidence of slope
movement (tension cracks, scarps, buried or leaning trees, closed-contour depressions, mid-slope benches etc) were
noted in the east-southeastern, northeastern, and north.northwestern portion of the site, where the slopes below the
edge of the fill slope are on the order of 40 % or less. However, at several locations, rock fragments up 10 3 feet or
more maxImum diameter were noted to be either piled behind larger trees or laying on the slope up to 100 feet or marc
north of the north edge of the fill slope. These rock fragments appeared to have originated at the fill slope and some
appeared to have been in place longer than others.
Minor tension cracks and looser rock fragments were noted on the west side at the west edge of the fill, in an area
where the slope is in excess of 80 %. More significant movement, resulting in minor (1 to 2 feet high) scarps, tension
cracks and leaning smaller trees, was noted on the southwest-facing portion of the slope around the tank pad. And
more deep-seated movement with displacement possibly on the order of several feet was noted in the south-southeast
faCing ponion of the fill slope located approximately south-southwest of the existing tank. A mid-slope bench is also
located in this area, an estimated 200 to 300 feet south of the south edge of the fill, which may be the result of a much
older slope movement. Several large fir trees, estimated at 150 years or more old are growing on this bench, indicating
that much of the movement that formed the bench predates the trees. Older fir trees are absent between the bench area
and the top oflhe fill slope, indicating that more recent movement may have precluded larger trees from growing there.
The property line(s) have been surveyed and the stakes placed along the eastern boundary of the water district property
indicate that the toe of the fill for the tank pad is located several feet, if not close to 20 feet east of the propcrty line,
extending onto Lot 38 of the proposed River Heights PUD.
.
.
Exhibit C to River Heights Land Exchange Agreement, page 2
Due to road grades relative to lot elevations, it appears to be more easily feasible to access lot 38, 40 and possibly lot
41 from a shared driveway starting at lot 39. In order to minimize the impact to the lot sizes, Breeden Homes is
interested in a land exchange with the Water District where the northern boundary of the water district property is
straightened and moved southward. In exchange, Breeden Homes would provide the Water District an equivalent
amount ofland in the area currently located west of the water district property, which would allow future filling in that
area for construction of another water tank of a size equivalent to the existing reservoir in the western portion of the
water district property. .
Discussion
With the exception of possible, older, larger~scale slope movement on the slope to the south of the existing water rank,
which may have resulted in the larger bench down the slope, no evidence of large-scale preexisting- slope movement
was noted on the slopes below the water tank pad. Portions of the fill in the western and southwestern portion of the
pad appear to have been subject to minor slope movement, mostly as a result of placement of the fill in places at angles
exceeding 100%.
None of the areas with evidence of either old slope movement or more recent fill slope failures is located on or above
portions of the hillside which wiil be subject to residential development under Breeden Homes' plan. As a result, no
remedial action appears required at this time. If and when a new water tank is constructed in the western portion of the
site, it is recommended to conduct a slope stability foundation assessment in that area at that time.
Therefore, two main concerns related to slope issues remain associated with the planned lot line adjustments. The first
issue is the fact that the new lot line will be located very close to the northern toe of the fill slope in the northeastern
portion of the site where the eastern toe of the fill slope is already located over the property boundary. Because the fill
appears to have been placed essentially at the angle of repose (steepest un-retained angle which can be achieved with
the fill), any cutting at or close to the toe of the fill may result in minor failures of the edge of the fill, which would
then progress headward, potentially impacting the width of the access road around the existing tank. This risk can be
addressed by requiring the toe of the cut slope to be located no closer than a 2H : I V slope from the toe of the fill.
Alternatively, any driveway in that area could be constructed entirely as an embankment, possibly utilizing
mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) technology. An actual design of such a driveway is beyond the current scope of
servIces.
Similarly, the location or elevation of the house pad on Lot 38 may need to be adjusted to allow for a 2H : I V.slope
from the toe of any cut to the toe of the current fill slope, or a retaining wall may need to be constructed along the west
side of the residence to preclude a risk offill slope failure as a result of the construction.
These measures serve to address potential issues with fill slope failures as a result of grading on the PUD property,
which may affect the usable flat area around the water tank. However, this does not address the risk to future homes
on the POO property from rock fragments dislodged from the fill slope either by natural causes or by human activity.
In order to reduce this risk, it is reconunended to either install a topographic barrier (e.g. adverse south-facing slope)
along the toe of the fill slope to capture rolling rock fragments, or to construct the fence required in the agreement
along the property boundary as a protective barrier. or both. Again, whereas these measures are clearly feasible. a
detailed design of this mitigation system is beyond the scope of this assessment.
In addition, it is recommended to move rock fragments which have already piled up behind trees on the slope above
the proposed home sites in order to preclude these fragments from being dislodged by wind-throw of the trees.
Recommendations
Prior to design of the driveway(s) for Lots 38 through 41, it is recommended to conduct a detailed survey of the
location of the toe of the fill slope around the tank pad. Per discussions with Byron Roberts of Breeden Homes, it may
be cost-effective to perform this task during road construction.
Once a detailed survey is available. design of the driveway and house pads can be conducted to comply with one of the
options for safe grading outlined above such as maintaining a minimum 2H : I V slope from toe of cut to toe of fill, or
embankment-type construction, or some other alternate method which would result in a similar reduction of the risk of
slope failure.
Provisions should be included either in the grading or fence design along the northeastern and northern boundary of the
water district property to preclude larger rock fragments which may be loosened from the fill slope by natural causes or
human activity from impacting residences on the slope below. In addition, it is recommended to move rock fragments
currently located immediately upslope of larger trees on the slope below the actual fill slope in order to preclude re-
mobilization of these boulders as a result of wind-throw of the trees.
I hope that this discussion and the recommended risk mitigation measures serve to address the issues of concern related
to the proposed lot line adjustments and the proximity of residential development to pre-existing Water District
facilities. If you have any questions regarding this matter please do not hesitate to contact me at 607-570~ate Rece \.0 '0,_ _..,.
Sincerely,
GeoScience, Inc.
APR H ", 1
Gunnar Schlicder, Ph.D., CEG
cc: Breeden Homes, Inc.
Original Subm',l'f
.
.'1'
~;.
(>
.
~~~~S~:n~~ ~:~:~ ~~:u~:c~;:~~ ZOO~-o~95J~
1111I1111111111111111I11I111111111111111111111 $41.00
01034142200800596380040047 10/30/2008 02:04:39 PM
RPR-OEEO Cnt=1 Stn=6 CASHIER 07
$20.00 $11.00 $10.00
After Recording Return to:
Until change is requested
Send tax statements to:
Breeden Bros.. Jne.
366 East 40111 Avenue
Eugene, Oregon 97405
Breeden Bros., Inc.
366 East 40111 Avenue
Eugene, Oregon 97405
PROPERTY LINE AD.lUSTMENT DEED
Breeden Bros., Inc., Grantor and Rainbow Water District, an Oregon municipal corporation, Grantee are the
owners of 2 adjoining units of land, to be called Units 1 and 2 in this Property line Adjustment Deed. Breeden
Bros., Inc.. Grantor (UniI1) and Rainbow Waler District, Grantee (Unit 2), are setting an adjusted property line
between Unit 1 and Unit 2 to comply with Lane County Land Use Regulations and the provisions of O.RS.
92.190(4). The purpose is to convey a portion of Unit 1. Grantor property to Unit 2, Gran.tee property.
The true consideration for this conveyance is to satisfy the River Heights Land Exchange Agreement between
Breeden Bros., Inc. and Rainbow Water District.
1. The description of Unit 1 prior to the property line adjustment:
Thai property descnbed as Umt 2 In a Property Line Adjustment Deed recorded on nT6.t'!,6€!,,~, ~g
2008 on Document No 2008- .59&-e S- ,OffiCial Records of Lane County, Oregon.
;59<;,3'8 "'_
Following this Property Line Adjustment, the description of Unit 1 will be as follows:
An area of land in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 30, Township 17 South, Range 2 West. Willamette Meridian and
being more particularly described 35 follows:
Commencing at a S/8" rebar in the center of a 40 foot roadway; said rebar being North 26"09'West a distance of
494.8 feet. North 8rS9'West a distance of 1499.09 feet and South 1"37'58" West a distance of 689,32 feet from
the Section Corner common to Sections 19, 20, 29. 30, Township 17 South, Range 2 West, WiIlamette Meridian;
thence North 78"52'03" East a dIstance of 52.03 feet to a 5/8" rebar; thence South r56'09" East a distance of
20 01 feet to the TRUE POINT of BEGINNING; thence South 78"52'03" West a distance of 50.07feet. thence
al~ng the arc of a 154.81 foot radius curve right (chord bears North 76"51'39" West 13S,91 feet) an a;c distance
of 140.70 feet; thence along the arc of a 64,26 foot radius curve left (chord bears North 73"46'59" Wes! 50.13
feet) an arc distance of 51.50 feet; thence South 83015'00" West a distance of 1043.18 feet; thence along the
arc of a 1122.76 foot radius curve left (chord bears South 79046'26" West 136.09 feet) an arc distance of 136.17
feet; thence South 76017'06" West a distance of 22664 feet; thence along the arc of a 429.97 foot radius curve
right (chord bears South 88"31'08" West 133.91 feet) an arc distance of 134.45 feet to the center of an irrigation
ditch; thence along said irrigation ditch the following courses; South 30"43'32" East a distance of 400.97 feet;
thence South 43056'32" East a distance of 354.91 feel; thence South 71042'32" East a distance of 69.05 feet;
thence South 83"53'32" East a distance of 373.94 feet: thence South 65"59'32" East a distance of 195.92 feet
thence South 48"20'32" East a distance of 104.96 feel; thence South 72"56'32" East a distance of 100.52 feet;
thence South 73"21'32" East a distance of 124.16 feet: thence South 30051'32" East a distance of 126.35 feet to
the northerly right-or-way of the former Southern Pacific Railroad; thence along said northerly right-of-way, North
59026'33" East a distance of 456.24 feet; thence continuing along said right-of-way and along a tapered curve
left (chord bears North 57"53'20" East 146.53 feet) an arc distance of 146.56 feet; thence continuing along said
right-of-way and along the arc of a 905 foot radius (chord definition) curve left (chord bears North 4r57'59" East
251.99 feet) an arc distance of 252.81 feet: thence leaving said northerly righl-of-way, North 52041'35" West a
distance of 397.14 feet to a 5/6" rebar; thence North 7"56'09" West a distance of 439.86 feet to the TRUE
POINT of BEGINNING, aU in Springfield, lane County, Oregon.
Excepting therefrom: Commencing at a 3/4~ iron pipe set in County Survey File No. 13777, said pipe being
South 79"18'S4" West a distance of 2552,71 feet (record South 79"19'55" West a distance of 2552.66 feet) from
the Section Corner common to Sections 19, 20, 29, 30, Township 17 South, Range 2 West, Willamette Meridian;
thence South 16"23'52" East a distance of 42.71 feet to the TRUE POINT of BEGINNING; thence South
16023'52" East a distance of 189.25 feel to a 3/4" iron pipe set in County Survey File No. 13777; thence South
73033'48" West a distance of 308.00 feet; thence North 61~35'1T West a distance of 64.44 feet. thence North
26038'58" West a distance of 58.54 feet. thence North 18"24'02" West a distance of 104.83 feet. thence North
52~50'20" West a dislance of 56.09 feet; thence North 80030'41~ East a distance of 310.31 feet to the TRUE
POINT of BEGINNING, all in Springfield, Lane County, Oregon.
Bearings are based on the County Survey File No. 13777 (North hne of Roadway on survey)
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Breeden-Rainbow PLA 2
Page 1
Original submittal
.
.
.
2. The reference to the description at Unit 2 prior to the property line adjustment:
That property described as Unit 1 in a Property line Adjustment Deed, recorded on ~ 3Zj Zd2>8
2008 on Document No. 2008- J7 a-s , Official Records of lane County, Oregon.
6?~
Following this Property Line Adjustment, the description of Unit 2 will be as follows:
An area of land in the Northeast 1/4 of Seelion 30, Township 17 South, Range 2 West, WH1amelte Meridian and
being more particularly described as follows'
Commencing at a 3f4D iron pipe set in County Survey File No. 13777, said pipe being South 79"18'54" West a
distance of 2552.71 feet (record South 79019'55" West a distance of 2552.66 feet) from the Section Corner
common to Sections 19. 20, 29, 30, Township 17 South, Range 2 West, Willamette Meridian; thence South
16023'52" East a distance of 42.71 feet to the TRUE POINT of BEGINNING; thence South 16023'52" East a
distance of 189.25 feet to a 3/4" iron pipe set in County Survey File No. 13777; thence South 73033'48" West a
distance of 308.00 feet; thence North 60036'20" West a distance of 64.44 feet- thence North 26038'58" West a
distance of 58.54 feet. thence North 18024'02" West a distance of 104.83 feet- thence North 52050'20" West a
distance of 56.09 feet; thence North 80030'41" East a distance of 310.31 feet to the TRUE POINT of
BEGINNING, all in Springfield, Lane County, Oregon.
Bearings are based on the County Survey File No. 13777 (North line of Roadway on survey)
The adjusted property line is underlined in the preceding descriptions.
The portion of Unit 1 that is being conveyed to Unit 2 is described as follows:
An area of land in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 30, Township 17 South, Range 2 West. Willamelle Meridian and
being more particularly described as follows'
Commencing at a 3/4" iron pipe set in County Survey File No. 13777, said pipe being South 79018'54" West a
distance of 2552,71 feet (record South 79019'55" West a distance of 2552.66 feet) from the Section Corner
common to Sections 19, 20, 29, 30, Township 17 South, Range 2 West, Willamette Meridian; thence South
16023'52" East a distance of 42.71 feel; thence South 80030'41" West a distance of 310.31 feet to the TRUE
POINT of BEGINNING: thence South 16"24'47" East a distance of 226.79 feet; thence North 61035'17" West a
distance of 64.44 feet: thence North 26038'58" West a distance of 58.54 feet; thence North 18Q24'02" West a
distance of 1 04.83 feet; thence North 52050'20" West a distance of 56.09 feel; thence North 80030'41" East a
distance of 7.35 feet to the TRUE POINT of BEGINNING, all in Springfield, Lane County, Oregon.
Exhibit A is a drawing of the property after the Property Line Adjustment.
BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE
SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF ANY, UNDER CHAPTER 1, OREGON LAWS 2005
(BALLOT MEASURE 37 (2004)). THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY
DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND
REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE
TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING
DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES, TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST
FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930 AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS
OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER CHAPTER 1, OREGON LAWS 2005 (BALLOT
MEASURE 37 (2004)).
THIS INSTRUMENT WilL NOT ALLOW USE Of THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN
VIOLATION Of APPLICABLE lAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING
THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSONS OR PERSONS ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD
CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY ALLOWED USES.
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
Page 2
Original Submittal
.
.
Dated this
.;/.
29 - dayof
~oi.
,2008
~~2f--
Breeden Bros., Inc.
STATE OF OREGON)
)ss
County of lane )
I) OFAClAl SEAL
KATRINA ANTONETTE tQNG
". i NOTARY PUBlJC-OREGON
COMMISSION NO. 409560
MY COMMISSION WIRES AUG. 31, 201 0
On this ~day of ~, 2008, personally appeared before me the aforementioned' Byron Roberts and
acknowledged the foregoing instrument 10 be his voluntary act and deed
Dated this
2. 977-/ day of C:J r-v&<'>'L
,2008
~
I) OFFICIAL SEAl
KATRINA ANTONETTE KING
\. " NOTARY PUBUC-OAEGON
COMMISSION NO. 409560
MY COMMISSION WIRES AUG. 31, 2010
, Timothy Hanley, Supe nt
Rainbow Water District
STATE OF OREGON I
Iss
County of Lane )
R
On Ih;s ~q
aforementioned J
day of Oc.:t"D ~ , 2008, personally appeared before me the
Timothy Hanley and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be his voluntary act and deed.
at Public for Oregon
My ommission Expires'
( .
Date Receive
APR 3 0 20\0
Page 3
Original Submittal_
!
l>>I:~rr_~cna
C.UUIIO.
(-) PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENT SURVEY
.1'" NORTHEAST 1/4 OF ;;CTION 3D, r,78, R2W, W.M.
~ ~ 0'tUl0 ~ _ . "SIO SPRINGFIELD. LANE COUNTY. OREGON
i C ~ POt.-nor IlrAOllIt! SEPTEMBER 19. 2008
l~:/;j BREEDEN BROS. INC. NO
= ': ~f,':'?,=,~ ~ . TAX LOT 700 BASIS OF BfAr; IJ11~
UMl~ '''"11- :t - ~'()O'c J04J-. - ,,,-
(/Il'U31'''~ 11:lI.." ~ V.-__ (HIJJ' 54,""OO'w I":'~ ,J491J)
_..$IW.t7'(~, _1IAI._r ,cvl'''' (H8J",,'4'"C 104J.J1-
=~"'~',.", -
~n; 14.J1~'
~~';:-r
VoSPIO<,",_..lIJtCl$IIIIICT \ \ mMPJ/4"__PDfCSTIJ171
am..M4 1C'tD'_,.." ."".1 lMC"---r / - .-
lMDItIS_ln$D',TT. cn.wn;~~~ ,\ S[l:JJaIG'~ n..JQ",s..~..."""-
lD<<;1H.."....f,,,.m II c:w_n-........ ~~~7/'~r:/':"'-'/ I/o
l(Jlol:O OOIP-JIllnO"I!I"Il ",Jr IItA , ...-
, ~:UT.I".~" \ \ _I..
_llr' .----.~; /' /' ~~:?~r;:~QUffl';'-:<<W
/"" f)frD__
/'
RAINBOW .....04 TER DISTRiCT
TAX LOT 801
/'
, /'
~ /~(UI__rr~
.V' \ I'LAI
.....:{:. \ ",41
/"" \ "~O'f
'..... ,// I
,~ , I DETAIL ,...
CMOUnID_~ncw"""'NIY ~ ...
_'n.IWJl:"'~OIX.Wn:~ .~ /' ."...."""r _.....~.. .-
~--. . /' Ul#!'- ,,1'~;
". 4 I \ ~.-gg:r(
/ ,.>>. \";;
~\~-1
.
NOT TO SCALE
cC
...
-
m
..
:z:
><
w
Ufi&lW
@ _ .--,,,.. _ ~ 'TACOW"
"","""""'_"lA'
ucn:J IIOIPl 0_
- tDWJItS~,:.U!'f.l$'-
'~IltIl:;U'f~~
"_~~~c.Jf:'Jt.J:l'
r":"o,:w twIQ])
III _ GotIa.t.AI(D"CINt(IItJrSCTJ
}_iIII1ll:*&Mr.._~_
UOU:SSODolJN!R"IIOIU1
}_JIROIII/M'A-CSTMOIJ771
QHNFR AND APPlfCANT
BRffi)(]IBROS.,fHC
.J66 CAST 40TH AIIO/UC
CUG'OiC.ClRCQtJNlll4a5
RAINBOW II'Aml' DiStRICT
r5!O NafrH 42P4J SrncT
!il"RlNMEW. OREGON 9U77
IIIAP NO. '7-02pJl} 'AX LOTS lJOO AND 110'
n..-.oCUl
_"r_'''''_~''A<<-'
lAoO/I"CI;;U<rY.C6rCt1OIIuncu.r."f\XIIllS.
ItUO J/f'_~
/-~'=
s,.~w"w ,-
\';" i ;..m.
i, 'l/
C, \
TRUE PO/NT 0' /
BECINNING
nJU1&.",.'_1VfCV.",t1!I ~
=tIf,',..;"-:Oi.:'nu,:.;=~ S"'~~..
~W"~'":~~..,~ ~M
1/r>l'".1I7 ....
~ ..
"n~'~ .".
STn.'1 '"
"'" .w
UN€ TABU
~
.
"
"
-\ \-,..
\
\
\
\
iI I
.! \
\ ~,ItICI'"rT~
\ /.-al IX IliRlt7'IlCft NI1 fORT. ~
Y (:QMn:_aPnA.I.~
\
\
I _ iif/?:J
\"-.. /-lfJ'/?,trJ
'- ~\o. f;lf;'~4&=
/".............. ~'~:t~ trlfWJ'~J
'- .""
,,'l> ',,>C/tI
=:::~ CUM;) "
lCl'fC~'''''''''T. .,H'" ;
'-
/'
BREEDEN BROS., INC.
TAX LOT 800
fCll'fJl(JPfJfn'1.Mr
....,
_PrIt7OIn'U\If"
....,
m.- 1/1':'=
\ --~'~,
Aa:nS"tllO~Il"
USDl,r_WAIP
Dl'SIII'C!;-'I'CP'_lIfllnPT3,
L4W:OOl.IWn:(lIl!fllCIf(l'71al(~
.
-;l
~a
"'"
n;uo .J/'"___
KIICSTfJ"T
CUlIYr T.tB"
rr....,. ''''''.J:I' .$"",:,'1"_'"
... '"'' SlIIlU".JTT 1(11
,~~. u.. "'J__."".)4'
-. a_ ,,~ ..
" 'fU." ,u "1111'''>> IJ,S."
" ,..,.. ",~' ",:r..."...~'r
~ "u.'" I.'_OZ' s"..,:......,""....
""-'" ,tllr "'1$"""10.
~ "n.,.' l:Jur 5,,',.:2II"'-'JIl':"
"u.,.' ,,,.fI' ,~w ''-1$'
..
-
. ~ ~.x..y.... .
NARRA TIVE -
1MlI_1t1'..u1lAlX"'.ulE.IN!I;IlOlSEl"~ _.ro.wn _......,.tJT
IloUP _ AS5OQAIfS" sunoatS fCII' ~ _ IJrIC: IN H" _lHtA$r 1/.
tJTlR'IDoIJll /tlW'II5NIO'Il$1OOII'(_lwsr. ~_, IHr
l'UPa5tcr1NSSU'nO"PS"'AtU.lSrlJ<[~f'lKJl'PrrlJllr..-r.uJo1J<[
""'tPPt"'~IIIIAS_M:I. ,,_(1I_.TAlI"LDT_~-'O$.llI(:J~
11lN'JIID. I1-ct--Jll r.lXLOr_P__I(IIILI'SIltICr:l IN"~DT__
n.r 1Ja~-.sIH("_""tIC"(Fa::u<n"$Ull1I'l"1U1IO 1~1'OI~
_I1Aao:lnllltll(ll$l!.....,_t1C1'JItDIftIU'Cl~rcrrCUlIIIU
.lHot_~()TClD$I.CDT1'_'O'_;IIf7llIIII"~ALl..t,Clllill!7<r.
~'--:f'CM'DT T1G_",rlSot 'h.~AS/IIIOIflIAS_IN
CCUl'rrSUO'lI'l"rulOG'lfP1SC1wrr.u_IOOYClDSCItt.-n;aoDD/SrMI/X
1JIDIA~otU'rr.oUlICN""'-l'H!'_l>of",ASr$rC"-~()T
#C_.Jll;.IHfWl!lll.r___~tlTTAJ(LO'IQ:l"AS~",<*r~
~~~~n"~~%~~~~~~~~r
SC:U1H_Mr(FI7C"TJlPSrNX/l_IO~~~ru:,."
SUlCS"'IO~..a._....."a,%II"Cf;UII'n:t:1IfCf'/Of'/PI.A,IItlXlfilP$Dlf'
lII('S/DItr-..,.ror rAll"lor_rs _CVt~()T IHfDl$I...:!llCll.OlAS
~~Clll.I<'n"_l'trru:NO "v~ _LUDrtI1f INrFllOl'Dtn"
ASfWt;lRlID(JH~rlfOllIllII_orUJCltAlotlXUl'n:(lIIlfcarrllmi:Ul.
IItCO'll?S. 1Hr$tll,l_rlCUlCWtror r.u tor CIO/S A tIC" "'l'O:rpMAUll '"
,....$UlltOI1lCfJo'ltI'U'C"arlH("$W_PAanc~ --p~
"_IN:_rcrrA.ll'LorllOlIMSDI7PY'C~A~1'O
ftR<<W rarvr tll:SlIlltr.u ~ ~ lIIl1 -. WS"'l.Wfr 110 ""~ L.Iu'Il
(XlM1T,(JI!(~D'JlCJA.I.",,(XIIlIlSJ.-~AIdJ~rrv"'ctVirr
:sur1'fTru:IIO'J111.I7C"SOlIJHII(SI~orCClHrr_lI[rru:IIO'J,"
..s lIt-nr.oalS'C Ir A C/<5TAIf(X-CJ//IJJNKZ f'I01D!:5f'C1I(W. H ~ ~!Xr
f'IO 1NlI_1O"~~IUl.I>t.f/l./fJD.~.I>t>nJ_PI.A$II(:
c:.....s...-m "D_ u.qrr I'l-S ""..
~~.~
~,',~..,;.,
...-.:.t;,.. ...
....';:
~,~
.....
.
:0\
~ (l)
iD SOm:HERN jCJFJC
LROAi!::> (')
~ll> ~ ~.
- <
= (l)
0..
BAK[R AND ASSOClA TrS. SURVEYORS
fJO MARK[ r S [n SPRINGFIELD, OR[GOIJ
( I) JO-724J
I
.~.
PItOFtSSIOMJ.l
lAND SURY["(OR
,
[ll"~S 1:1'/31/"
I comFY m.,u 1M5 IIAP WAS PRV'ARco
V$NC A 1d>~'64JA INK CAA1/IIt1XE ON
AZ()N 1.1-0444-. MIL DOU8t.E JJAtTl:
,
\..\''''''''~~~
\, $rot_"IHl
"
.
~ I
It>;
~
Ililllll~fllf~tll~ 1~lllul~lllf~lll~ IIII 2~~~.~~;~~~.
01034141200800596370040040 10/30/200S 02:04:39 PM
RPR-DEED Cn1=1 Sln=8 CASHIER 07
$20.00 SII.00 $10.00
After Recording Return to:
Until change is requested
Send tax statements to:
Breeden Bros., Inc.
366 East 40lfl Avenue
Eugene, Oregon 97405
Breeden Bros., Inc.
366 East 4011'1 Avenue
Eugene, Oregon 97405
PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENT DEED
Rainbow Water District, an Oregon municipal corporation,. Grantor and Breeden Bros., Inc., Grantee are the
owners of 2 adjoining units of land, to be called Units 1 and 2 in this Property Line Adjustment Deed. Rainbow
Water District. Grantor (Unit 1) and Breeden Bros., Inc" Grantee (Unit 2), are setting an adjusted property line
between Unit 1 and Unit 2 to comply with Lane County land Use Regulations and the provisions of O.R.S.
92.190(4). The purpose is to convey a portion of Unit 1, Grantor property to Unit 2, Grantee property.
The true consideration for this conveyance is to satisfy the River Heights Land Exchange Agreement betw-een
Breeden Bros., Inc. and Rainbow Water District.
1. The description of Unit 1 prior to the property line adjustment:
That property described in a Warranty Deed, recorded on February 19, 1965 in Reel 126, Reception No. 92973,
Official Records of Lane County, Oregon.
Following this Property line Adjustment, the description of Unit 1 will be as follows:
An area of land in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 30, Townsflip 17 South, Range 2 West, Willamette Meridian and
being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at a 314" iron pipe set in County Survey File No. 13777, said pipe being South 79018'54" West a
distance of 2552.71 feet (record South 79019'55" West a distance of 2552.66 feet) from the Section Corner
common to Sections 19, 20, 29, 30, Township 17 South, Range 2 West, WjIJamette Meridian; thence South
16023'52" East a distance of 42.71 feet to the TRUE POINT of BEGINNING; thence South 16023'52" East a
distance of 189.25 feet to a 3/4" iron pipe set in County Survey File No. 13777; thence South 73033'48" West a
distance of 308.00 feet; thence North 16024'47" West a distance of 226.79 feet to a 3/4" iron pipe set in County
Survey File No. 13777; thence North 80030'41" East a distance of 310.31 feet to the TRUE POINT of
BEGINNING, all in Springfield, Lane County, Oregon.
Bearings are based on the County Survey File No, 13777 (North line of roadway on survey)
2. The reference to the description of Unrt 2 prior to the property line adjustment:
Tha! property described in a Warranty Deed, recorded on February 24,2006, on Document No. 2006-012730,
Official Records of Lane County, Oregon.
Following this Property Line Adjustment, the description of Unit 2 will be as follows:
An area of land in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 30, Township 17 South, Range 2 West, Willamette Meridian and
being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at a 518" rebar in the center of a 40 foot roadway; said rebar being North 26009'West a distance of
494.8 feet, North ar59'West a distance of 1499.09 feet and South 1037'58" West a distance of 689.32 teet from
the Section Corner common to Sections 19, 20, 29, 30, Township 17 South, Range 2 West, Willamette
Meridian; thence North 78052'03" East a distance of 52.03 feet to a 518" rebar; thence South rS6'09" East a
distance of 20.01 feet to the TRUE POINT of BEGINNING; thence South 78052'03" Wesl a distance of
50.07teet; thence along the arc of a 154,81 foot radius curve right (chord bears North 76051'39" West 135.91
feet) an arc distance of 140.70 feet; thence along the arc of a 64.26 foot radius curve left {Chord bears North
73046'59" West 50.13 feet} an arc distance of 51.50 feet; thence South 83015'00" West a distance of 1043.18
feet; thence along the arc of a 1122.76 foot radius curve left (chord bears South 79046'26" West 136.09 feet) an
arc distance of 136.17 feet; thence South 76017'06" West a distance of 226.64 feet; thence along the arc of a
429.97 foot radius curve right (chord bears South 88031'08" West 133.91 feet) an arc distance of 134.45 feet to
the center of an irrigation ditch; thence along said irrigation ditch the following courses: South 30043'32" East a
distance of 400.97 feet thence South 43056'32" East a distance of 354.91 feet; thence South 71042'32" East a
distance of 69.05 feet; thence South 83053'32" East a distance of 373.94 feet; thence South 65059'32n East a
distance of 195.92 feet; thence South 48020'32" East a distance of 104.96 feet; thence South 72056'32" East a
distance of 100.52 feet; thence South 73021'32" East a distance of 124.16 feet; thence South 30051'32" East a
distance of 126.35 feet to the northerly right-of-way of the former Southern Pacific Railroad; thence along said
northerly right-ot-way, North 59026'33" East a distance of 456.24 feet; thence contjnuing along said right-of-way
and along a tapered curve left (chord bears North 5r53'20" East 146.53 feet) an arc distance of 146.56 teet;
thence continuing along said right-at-way and along the arc of a 905 foot radius (chord definition) curve I~-t
(chord bears North 4r57'S9" East 251.99 feet) an arc distance of 252.81 feet; thence leaving said north~ e
right-of-way, North 52041'35" West a distance of 397.14 feet to a 518" rebar; thence North 7"56'09" West a
distance of 439.86 feet to the TRUE POINT of BEGINNING, all in Springfield, Lane County, Ore90n.
Breeden.Rainbo..... PLA 1
Page 1
Recei ed:
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
.
.
,
Excepting therefrom: Commencing at a 3/4" iron pipe set in County Survey File No. 13777. said pipe being
South 79018'54" West a distance of 2552.71 feet (record South 79019'55" West a distance of 2552.66 feet) from
the Section Corner common to Sections 19, 20, 29, 30, Township 17 South, Range 2 West, Willamette
Meridian: thence South 16023'52" East a distance of 42.71 feet to the TRUE POINT of BEGINNING: thence
South 16023'52" East a distance of 189.25 feet to a 3/4" iron pipe. set in County Survey File No. 13777; thence
South 73033'48" West a distance of 306.00 feet: thence North 16024'47" West a distance of 226.79 feet to a 3/4"
iron pipe set in County SUlVey File No. 13777; thence North 80030'41" East a distance of 310.31 feet to the
TRUE POINT of BEGINNING, all in Springfield, Lane County, Oregon.
Bearings are based on the County Survey File No. 13777 (North line of roadway on survey)
The adjusted property line is underlined in the preceding descriptions,
The portion of Unit 1 that is being conveyed to Unit 2 is described as follows:
An area of land in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 30, Township 17 South, Range 2 West, WiIlamette Meridian and
being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at a 3/4" iron pipe set in County Survey File No. 13777, said pipe being South 79"18'54" West a
distance of 2552.71 feet (record South 79"19'55" West a distance of 2552.66 feet) from the Section Corner
common to Sections 19, 20, 29, 30, Township 17 South, Range 2 West, Willamette Meridian, said iron pipe
being the TRUE POINT of BEGINNING; thence South 16"23'52" East a distance of 42.71 feet; thence South
80"30'41" West a distance of 310.31 feet; thence North 16"24'47" West a distance of 3.65 feet to a 3/4" iron pipe
set in County Survey File No. 13777; thence along the arc of a 671.58 foot radius curve right (chord bears North
73"16'48" East 308.07 feet) an arc distance of 310.83 feet to the TRUE POINT of BEGINNING, all in
Springfield, Lane County, Oregon.
Exhibit A is a drawing of the property after the Property Line Adjustment.
BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE
SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF ANY, UNDER CHAPTER 1, OREGON LAWS 2005
(BALLOT MEASURE 37 (2004)). THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY
DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND
REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE
TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING
DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES, TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST
FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930 AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS
OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER CHAPTER I, OREGON LAWS 2005 (BALLOT
MEASURE 37 (2004)).
THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN
VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR
ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSONS OR PERSONS ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE
PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH niE APPROPRIATE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY
ALLOWED USES.
<="-
, 2008
STATE OF OREGON )
)ss
County of Lane )
~
_ . OFFICIAL SEAL 1
KATRINA ANTONElTE KJNG =;
c.... NOTARY PUBUC-OREGGN J
COMMISSION NO. 409560
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUG 31, 2010
On this 2'1"'-
aforementioned J.
day of ()c.:rtl1S OZ , 2008, personally appeared before me the
Timothy Hanley and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be his voluntary act and deed.
" ived:
No
My
APR 3 0 2010
Page 2
Original Submittal
.
.
Dated this
2 91: day of
cq
,2008
~~
Breeden Bros., Inc.
STATE OF OREGON )
)ss
County of lane )
_ OFFlCLALSEAL
KATRINA ANTONETTE KING
.....i NOTARY PUBUc..oREGON
COMMISSION NO. 409560
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUG. 31, 2010
On this ~day Of~, 2008, personally appeared before me the aforementioned Byron Roberts and
acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be his voluntary act and deed.
I) 'U>IV
Date Received:
. APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
PageJ
~~~
~I "~~B~
.. ts;; l' /
!~ n ~~~ft~ l /
.:~ ~: Sl!~~~ ~,~" I
~~I SQ I .1;1; ~ If !
i~. I\. If- I ~.
!U~ \: I l ~
. -\--- ~~<.. iii
\ ~ - - "'" 7 i~~
s\\---- ~"'.
~--.:.,: ~h ~ ~ J
.~ ;~B i!
~~ .ij oj Ib~ ;;~iA
~ d6~lg'~ G~
"t .;~ · " ., I.'
~I i ~~.i; "' 8 I t.~
· ~" ~.!.ft ~ .., /'B;~.
' " J ~ ~Ii ~. "' >.: /' ~'R~
~~ 0 ~~~.~ ~ ~
'6 ~~\.~'~l, A
iA R~'.'~! ~ ~
t~ ~~In~ \" .
i. ~"\ ~~
I~ \0~~
J \ ~~.
(\ ~~~
>.. ~d.~~ \ m
~ ~~n~. \
~ r~~ \
..., r~.;.f \
VJ ~ ~!I:lt \
E-. It' ~!!~~ \ .
~ ~ ,. r',-.r.fJf' .
~ .8 "-_
;,<; ~ ~ (il- ~ . ~
.,.. .. - '" .
,~ . I . ~
S Ql::'~ . I t- q
..., "'M i--..\ ~~ ~;;
Q ~ 8.. q~ I ~ ~~
'<l; ;:: ~ . \... ~
r....~~~~ r.j l__I-::'-=--~"\ ~ii ~~\\
~ ~:l~ :s ,__ \ ~~
..... C<it: , ~ \
,--'I ""':;&Q CI:lQ
~ ~!::., C C ~
~ -r..; a::t'-, ..~ E
E-. ~~ :8 1~1 ~_
~ ~'l: ~...:. t
;::: f:! :J; ~ '" ~~ ~t
-.;:: "' ~ oil
~ ~ ! ~ JIA
~ I.ft . ~
-. I' 1:1 - 4'..
-. .. ! HL \
" " I ~~ \
i I..), ..;~ ;. A
/I! · e.'. ..~. 9 R
-f;\ ~. ~~'! ~ '.
"'n:;:,,,,,.. \~ 'to" ~~i~! ~ i ~~
~''''''''~;. ;, ~~ft I~
'~.,,~ ~. $"
~~ "~'\ l~~ ';8 ;1
I ~ ~Lb{)?!1I )i HI
~; ji~ ii~ ",..J,!o y ~181HX3
.
~
I
i . .
H~
It 8~ .-
U.
~
a to' ~.. :il
~ ~ ~~ i
~ . .
A
.~
f . ~ ~.. ~~.
i~~i~!hi .1'II;i!~i!II.~lil ~
i ~I~.i~i ~!!!aMI:IM;U=!
~~ 'hiAi~~~~~rl~!~~.~g~~N
> I i~iifd~!~~~;~i liia;l!ii!;!
~ ~ it!h~I!!~I~~~~lll~i~li~hli
I O! ~ih'I'~-;~N.~~'~I'~~Si;~eii
. ~ ;ii~~.!:i5~~hi:i:i~I~~!I~!I~
I ~5,.:.~~:rSH!I~~IT'~~~li
i~ii::i!;i~I~I:~i!;!lal.I~;~I~~
~!;~ !~ii ili~:s.I;~'m:;'i!; I
;!:li::II~bh~BM~M!~ i. _
~
~
~
"
~ 9
~~ ~~s ~
~~~ ~ii ~
<oii!~ ~..~ ?
ij~~ H~ ~
~~. ~~i ~
i~~ ~~e; i
.
,P'
. .'"
~ "
~ .'
I
~
i
. 8
~,~ ; ~ !!!~
~~l'ilii~ g ......~
~~~ · > ':;
-~~~. · l ~~
~ e . . ~
04 Ci .. .. ..
~ ..~ ~
~ ~~a;f ~ ..~~
tr; _ _ _
8 ~~il!
;Iii~~: ~ :t~~~
~~~ !! l ;::-__
r
t~
~:!
-~
)t
/~~~!
4l B~i
Ji !h
\
\
\
\
\
\
\/
\ )~ II ~ ~ I ~
In ~ ~Hi~
~ ~ft~ ~~~ I~~~ .1.
~ S,i t-I= a.a
M~~ijgm
, I ~ .:..
8
"l " '- ....
i5~
~~
"h
.
~
!~~
~~~
ia~
s i~g
III ..... VI ~
3 ~ ~~.
II ~.... ...;&.:-
.9; - lr~
l~- i ~~~
~ a ~~~
".
RETURN TO CASCADE TITLE
.~
'. -
=-=
CASCADE
TITLE
ca.
.
Division 0' Chi.' De ut C ----....,
Lan_ County Deeds an: R~co~:;k ~~~D.~1~730
~J~l!mj~J~~WWWJ~Wl!lllllllllllll._.~DO-
RPR-OEEO Cnt=1 Stn~ 02/241200603:05'04 P"
~g CASHIER 07 .
120.00 111.00 110.00
TITLE NO. 0246339 DIY'.
ESCROW NO. EU05.2148
TAX ACCT. NO. 0113603
TAX ACCT. NO. 0113595
TAX ACCT. NO. 0113629
MAPrrAX LOT NO. 170230 #800
MAPrrAXLOTNO. 170230#700
MAPrrAX LOT NO. 170230 #900
WARRANTY DEED -- STATUTORY FORM
f)~grl MOE AND KAREN MOE, TRUSTEES OF THE MOE TRUST UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT
DATED FEBRUARY 14,1974, Grantor,
conveys and warrants to
BREEDEN BROS., INC.. Grantee,
the following described real property free of encumbrances except as specifically set forth herein:
SEE EXHIBIT A WHICH IS MADE A PART HEREOF BY THIS REFERENCE
BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE
TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF ANY, UNDER CHAPTER I, OREGON
LAWS 2005 (BALLOT MEASURE 37(2004)). THIS INSTRUMENT DOE5 NOT ALLOW USE OF THE
PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE
LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON
ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY
OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY
LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930
AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY UNDER
CHAPTER I, OREGON LAWS 2005 (BALLOT MEASURE 37 (2004)).
Except the following encumbrances:
Covenants, Conditions, Reslrictions, Easements and Rights of Way of record, if any.
The true consideration for this conveyance is $1,200,000.00
Dated
2. \ day of
re--io"~:J' 'Z.~.
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
BY,
KAREN MOE, TRUSTEE
Original Submittal
State of Oregon
County of LANE
~ 5kM.n~
This instrument was acknowledged before me on to e..-Io" I.A.O- r ....t 2-1 _ . 2006 by ~ MOE A:Wa-
K '~Dr IlOE, TRUSTEE OFTHE MOE TRUST UNDER TRUST A REEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 14,
1974
OFFICIAl SEAL
I) OEM MULLIKIN
tfOTARY PUBUC . Ofl.~"iOH
\,./ CQMMISSIONNO.316111
' ,.' VtCOMMlSSIONEXPlRESAffil111,2IlIl&
A,ltLQ.
(Notary1'ublic for Oregon)
My commission expires '-\ - \}- 0 ~
~
MOE TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 14,
1974
Until a change is requested
GRANTOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS
all tax statements shall be
sent to the following address;
...SAME AS GRANTEE."
BREEDEN BROS., INC.
366 E. 40TH AVE
EUGENE, OR 97405
GRANTEE'S NAME AND ADDRESS
After recording return to:
CASCADE TITLE CO.
8 I I WILLAMETTE
EUGENE, OR 97401
WRE
~ . .
. -
.-.
CASCADE
TITLE
CO.
TITLE NO. 0246339
ESCROW NO. EUOS-2148
TAX ACCT. NO. 0113603
TAX ACCT NO. 0113595
TAX ACCT NO. 0113629
MAPrrAX LOT NO. 170230 #800
MAPrr AX LOT NO 17 02 3D #700
MAPrr AX LOT NO. 170230 #900
WARRANTY DEED -- STATUTORY FORM
STEVEN MOE AND KAREN MOE, TRUSTEES OF THE MOE TRUST UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT
DATED FEBRUARY 14, 1974, Grantor,
conveys and warrants to
BREEDEN BROS" INC., Grantee,
the following described real property free of encumbrancese;\;cept as specifically sel forth herein
SEE EXf-HBIT A Wi-DCH IS MADE A PART HEREOF BY THIS REFERENCE
BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS I]\'STRUMENT, THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE
TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF ANY, UNDER CHAPTER I, OREGON
lAWS 2005 (BALWT MEASURE 37(2004)). THlS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE
PROPERTY DESCRffiED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE
LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEfORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON
ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITII TilE APPROPRIATE CITY
OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY
LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST "'ARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS30.930
AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGlrrs OF NEIGlffiORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY UNDER
CHAPTER I, OREGON LAWS 2005 (BALLOT MEASURE)7 (2004)).
Except the following encumbrances:
Covemmls, Conditions, Restrictions, Easements and Rights of Way of record, if any.
The true consideration for this conveyance is $1,200,000.00
Datedth;s 1<.., d'yof ~. . "2-<>0(,..
MOE TRUST DATED FEBRUARY ]4; 1974
BY:
STEVEN MOE, TRUSTEE
BY~,j>",)~~'"
.N MQE, TRUSTEE
-'"
Stateof~ ~--'~
Countyof~ '})KJ'~
JE)i
Notary Public, State 01 Texas
My CommisSion Expires
OCTOBER 16, 2006
remeon f~b. ) ~ ,2006byS'FE':Etlt1QI;::.rm-""<-
E TRUST UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED FEBRUARY ]4,
..,-
""",.;;:q'~{4.
.''iJi......'
~"'.. "'.,
-. --
. . .
~...: " ; * ~
- . . .
. \:::.~Z:~:~.,:~i~~/
My,
MOE TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 14,
1974
Unlilll change is requested
GRANTOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS
all lax statemems shall be
sent to the following-address:
*"SAME ASGRANTEE***
BREEDEN BROS., fNe.
366 E. 40m AVE
EUGENE, OR 97405
GRANTEE"S NAME AND ADDRESS
After recording return tDate
CASCADE TITLE CO.
g 1 [ WJLLAMETIE
EUGENE. OR 97401
Received:
WRE
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
.~
.
.
EXHIBIT "A"
PARCEL 1:
Beginning at a point on the centerline ofa 40 foot wide roadway that is 1499.09 feet North 89' 57' West and 689.77
feet South l' 44' West ofthe stone set at the Southwest comer of County Survey No. 1271 that is 494.8 feet North 26'
09' West of the comer Sections 19, 20, 29, and 30 of Township 17 South, Range 2 West, WiIlamette Meridian; and
running thence along the centerline of said 40 foot wide roadway on a 134.81 foot radius curve right (the long chord of
which curve bears North 76' 42 West 117.98 feet) a distance of 122.11 feet; thence on a 84.26 foot radius curve left
(the long chord of which curve bears North 73' 45' West 65.76 feet) a distance of 67.65 feet; thence South 83' 15' West
1043.44 feet; thence on an 1142 foot mdius curve left (the long chord of which curve bears South 79' 16' West 138.36
feet) a distance of 138.95 feet; thence South 76' 17' West 204.09 feet; thence on a 409.26 foot radius curve right (the
chord of which curve bears South 87' 49' West 163.69 feet) a distance of 164.80 feet; thence leaving said roadway and
traversing the center of an irrigation ditch South 32' 23' East along the Easterly line of that tract conveyed to Bruce L.
Barnes, et ox, by instrument recorded November 14, 1977, under Reception No. 77-72572, Official Records of Lane
County, Oregon, a distance of 424.86 feet; thence continuing along the center of said irrigation ditch and the Easterly
line of said Barnes tract South 45' 36' East 43.52 feet to the Northeast corner of that tract conveyed to F. Grant Hurd, et
ox, by instrument recorded April 22, 1963, under Reception No. 7852, Deed Records of Lane County, Oregon; thence
along the Easterly line of said Hurd Tract and the center of said irrigation ditch South 45' 33' East 311.39 feet to the
Northeast comer of that tract conveyed to R.H. Pierce, et ox, by instrument recorded September 12, 1952, under
Reception No. 84848, Deed Records of Lane County, Oregon; thence ruIUling along the center of said irrigation ditch
and along the Northeasterly line of said Pierce Tract to the Northwesterly margin of Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-
way the following courses and distances; South 71' 30' East 69.05 feet; South 83' 41' East 373.94 feet; South 65' 47'
East 195.92 feet; South 48' 08' East 104.96 feet; South 72' 44' East 100.52 feet' South 73' 09' East 124.16 feet; South
30' 39' East 126.72 feet; thence traversing the Northerly margin of said right-of-way to the most Southerly comer of
the tract conveyed to Kathryn L. Hefuer by instrument recorded November 10, 1976, under Reception No. 76-59667,
Official Records of Lane County, Oregon, the following courses and distances: North 59' 21' East 523.87 feet; North
54' 29' East 193.46 feet; North 44' 17' East 145.39 feet; thence along the Southwesterly margin of said Hefuer Tract
North 54' 36' West 190.48 feet to the most Southerly comer of that tract conveyed to Douglas S. Leavitt, et UX, by
instrument recorded September 09, 1959, under Reception No. 77827, Deed Records of Lane County, Oregon; thence
along the Southwesterly margin of said Leavitt Tract North 540 361 West 135.12 feet to the most Southerly corner of
the tract conveyed to Douglas S. Leavitt, et ux, by instrument recorded January 23, 1974, under Reception No. 74-
02615, Official Records of Lane County, Oregon; thence to a point in the center of a 40.00 foot wide roadway the
following courses and distances along the Westerly margin of said Leavitt Tract; North 52' 42' 40" West 73.12 feet;
North 7' 57' 27" West 458.41 feet; thence along the centerline of said 40.00 foot wide roadway South 77' 21' West
52.12 feet to the place of beginning, all in Lane County, Oregon.
EXCEPT THEREFROM: the following described portion thereof: Beginning at a point South 79' 19' 55"
West 2552.66 feet from the section comer common to Sectinns 19,20,29 and 30, Township 17 South, Range
2 west of the WiIlamette Meridian, run thence South 16' 24' 35" East 231.98 feet, thence South 73' 35' 25"
West 308.00 feet thence North 16' 24' 35" West 230.44 feet, thence along the arc of a circular curve to the
right having a radius of 671.58 feet (the long chord of
Continued-
Property description continued-
which bears North 73' 18' 15" East 308.01 feet) to the point of beginning, all in Lane County, Oregon.
PARCEL 2:
A 40.0 foot wide strip of land, the centerline of which is described as follows: Beginning at a point on the centerline of
said 40 foot wide tract ofland that is 1499.09 feet North 89' 57' West and 689.77 feet South l' 44' West of the stone
set at the Southwest comer of County Survey No. 1271 that is 494.8 feet North 26' 09' West of the comer for Sections
19,20,29 and 30 of Township 17 South, Range 2 West, Willarnette Meridian; and running thence on a 134.81 foot
radius CUIVe right (the long chord of which bears North 760 42' West 117.98 feet)a distance of 122.11 feet; thence on an
Date Received:
LEGAL
APR 3 0 2010
Original Submittal
w
.
.
"
84.25 foot radius curve left (the long chord of which curve bears North 73' 45' West 65.85 feet) a distance of 67,65
feet; thence south 83' 15' West 1043.44 feet; thence on an 1142.76 foot radius curve left (the long chord of which curve
bears South 79' 46' West 138.36 feet) a distance of 138.95 feet; thence South 76' 17' West 204.09 feet; thence on a
409.26 foot curve right (the long chord of which curve bears North 83' 31' 30" West 282.52 feet) a distance of288.46
feet; thence on a 402.09 foot radius curve left (the loug chord of which curve bears North 76' 33' 30" West 183.98 feet)
a distance of 185.62 feet; theuce North 89' 47' West 328.4 feet to the ceuterline ofCouuty Road No. 753.
EXCEPT THEREFROM: that portiou thereoflyiug withiu Parcell.
ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM that portion described iu deed to the City of Springfield recorded July 21,
1994, Recorder's Reception No. 94-53874, Lane County Official Records.
ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM that portion described in deed to Breadner Parker & Associates (Ambleside)
LLC, recorded October 1, 1997, Reception No. 9766814, Lane County Official Records.
PARCEL 3:
A tract ofland located in the N.E 1/2 of Section 30, Township 17 South, Range 2 west of the Willamette Meridian in
Lane County, Oregon: Beginning at a point on the Southerly boundary of Southern Pacific Railroad right of way; said
point being 456.47 feet North and 697.14 feet West of the N.E. corner of the Wilmer Comegys Donation land Claim
No. 59 in Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian; thence South 58' 36' West along said right-
of-way, boundary for 370.22 feet to a ]/2 inch iron pipe; thence South 47' 34' East for a distance of 132.00 feet to 1/2
inch iron pipe; thence South 470 34' East for a distance of20.00 feet, more or less, to the centerline of County Road No.
278; thence along the centerline of said County Road to a point which lies South 40' 30' East of the point of beginning;
thence North 40' 30' west a distance of56.00 feet to the point of beginning.
EXCEPT THEREFROM a tract of land located in the Northeast quarter of Section 30, Township 17 South,
Range 2 west of the Willamette Meridian in Lane County, Oregon; Beginning at a point on the Southerly
boundary of Southern Pacific Railroad right of way; said point beginning 456.47 feet North and 697.14 feet
West of the Northeast corner of the Wilmer Comegys Donation Land Claim No. 59 in
Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian; thence South 58' 36'
West along said right of way line 20.22 feet to the true point of beginning;
Continued-
Property description continued-
thence south 58' 36' West along said right of way boundary for 350.00 feet to a 1/2 inch iron pipe; thence
South 47' 34' East a distance of 132.00 feet to a 1/2 inch iron pipe; thence South 47' 34' East for a distance of
20.00 feet more or less to the centerline of County Road No. 278; thence along the centerline of said County
Road to a point which lies South 400 30' East of the true point of beginning; thence North 40030' West a
distance of70.00 feet more or Less, to the true point of beginning.
ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM: any portion lying within that parcel of land described in deed recorded
December 22, ]997, Recorder's Reception No. 97-86376 and deed rerecorded December 9, 2003, Recorder's
Reception No. 2003-1] 8513, Lane County Official Records.
ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM: any portion lying West on the West line of certain parcel ofland described in
deed to Sig Moe and Kay Moe, recorded June 13, 1973, Recorder's Reception No. 7326772, Lane County
Official Records.
Date Received:
APR 3 0 2010
LEGAL
Original Submittal