HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence PLANNER 4/7/2010
L1MBIRD Andrew
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
L1MBIRD Andrew
Wednesday, April 07, 20104:06 PM
'Mary Bridget Smith'
DONOVAN James
RE: The Child Center Appeal
If the appeal is formally withdrawn, I believe the appeal fee is fully refunded. Jim can verify this, since it will be his call.
Andy
From: Mary Bridget Smith [mailto:mbs@emeraldlaw.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 4:04 PM
To: 11MBIRD Andrew; DONOVAN James
Subject: Fwd: The Child Center Appeal
What are you thoughts on recycling the appeal fee?
>>> Bill Kloos <billkloos(iillanduseoreoon.com> 4{5{2010 5:01:44 PM >>>
Yep. That's it. OK if we recycle our appeal fee?
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 5, 2010, at 4:59 PM, "Mary Bridget Smith" <mbs(iilemeraldlaw.com> wrote:
Hello Bill,
I wanted to confirm our phone call today and copied Jim and Andy on this email to make sure we are all
on the same page.
The plan as I understand it is as follows:
1. Your client will execute a 30 day extension of the 120 day time limit
2. The City will issue an amended staff report addressing the conditions we discussed at our recent
meeting
3. The scheduled Planning Commission Meeting will be postponed
4. The fee issue is not addressed in the amended staff report and if your client chooses, he can
still appeal it
5. The current appeal on the remaining conditions will be withdrawn
Did I summarize that correctly? Please let me know if anyone has something to add.
thanks,
Mary Bridget Smith
LEAHY, VAN VACTOR & COX, LLP
188 West B Street, Bldg. N
Springfield, OR 97477
(541) 746-9621
mbs(iilemeraldlaw.com
1
Date Received:-Wd<>,o
Planner: AL