The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPacket, DIM PLANNER 2/9/2010 em OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING DISTRIBUTION DATE: February 9, 2010 TO: 7" ~ 3 7" , rv~ .;).-<1-10 J) I CV\j)cLdeLt \ 0+ lef~ . Current Planning Staff: G. Karp, J Donovan, L Pauly, T Jones, M Metzger, L MillerJA Umbird,\S Hoplsins, M Markarian Jeff Paschall, Supervising Civil Engineer, Public Works Department Ken Vogeney, City Engineer, Public Works Department Matt Stouder, AlC Engineering Supervising Civil Engineer, Public Works Richard Perry, Public Works, Engineering Kristi Krueger, Civil Engineer, Public Works Department Brian Barnett, Traffic Engineer Jon Driscoll, Transportation Planning Engineer, Public Works Gilbert Gordon, Deputy Fire Marshall, Fire & Life Safety Department Melissa Fechtel, Fire & Life Safety Department Greg Ferschweiler, Maintenance, Public Works Department Ronni Price, Planner, Willamalane Park and Recreation District Thomas Jeffreys, Emerald Peoples Utility District (EPUD) Tamara Johnson, Springfield Utility Board (Electric) Bart McKee, Springfield Utility Board (Water) Amy Chinitz, Springfield Utility Board Dennis Santos, ODOT (copy of packets) 3-11-09 Jeff Lange, ODOT (point person who will attend all DIM meetings) 3-11-09 Dave Puent, Building Official Will Mueller, LTD Norm Palmer, Quest Communications Tom Boyatt, Public Works 11m Hanley, Rainbow Water District Dennis Ernst, City Surveyor Celia Barry,(Shashi Bajracharya) Lane County Transportation Jim Henry, Central Lane Communications 91t. Dave Shore, Northwest Natural Gas Tom Henerty, Comcast Cable Jerry Smith, Police Chief Chuck Gottfried, Water Resource Coordinator, ESD Susie Smith, Public Works Director Len Goodwin, Public Works John Saraceno, Springfield School District 19 Joe Leahy, City Attorney George Walker, Stormwater Facilities Planner, ESD John Tamulonis, Economic Development Mgr. Courtney Griesel, Planner 1 (EDM) Bill Grile, DSD Director Brenda Jones, Planning Secretary (DIM Annexations) A Development Issues Meeting will take place on Thursday March 11, 2010 @ 1:30- 2:30 p.m. in the DSD Conference 616 @ Springfield City Hall. Please review the . enclosed information, and come prepared to discuss this application with the Planner and applicant. Should you have any questions, please contact @ Andy Limbird (541) 726-3784. Revised: 11-16-09 DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT SPRINGFIELD CITY HALL 225 FIFTH STREET DSD Conference Room 616 Meeting Date: March 11, 2010@ 1:30-2:30 p.m. 1. DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MTG #lON2010-00002 DAVID DUKES CONSTRUCTION Assessor's Map: 17-03-36-11 TL 11300 Address: 740 2Sll1 Street Existing Use: Under construction Applicant submitted plans to discuss partitioning one lot into two parcels. This lot is currently under construction with (4) duplexes. Planner: Andy Limbird City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) . -. , ,.- Prospective Applicant Name: Icompany: IAd~re~!j: Prospective Applicant's Rep.: Company: David Dukes Dukes & Dukes Construction Phone: (541) 520-2215 Fax: 2955 Y9la!29i Street, Sprinqfield, OR 97477 . Scott Morris Phone: (541) 302-9790 Fax: (541) 485-3253 S . _field, OR 97477 Olson & Morris 380 Street, Ste 200 Property Owner: Same as applicant !company: lAd r ~ : Phone: Fax: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17033611 I Property Address: 740 28th Street ,Size of Pr~p~rtv: 23,660 Acres 9 S~\lre Feet ~ Description of If you are filling In this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: To partition the existinq development into 2 parcels with 4 units on each I Existing Use: sinqle lot with 4 duplexes (8 units total) TAX LOT NO(S): 11300 - . -. 23,660 sf ~J1sjW: 14.6 du acre :r of LO::J P Prospective Applicant: Date: 2f1f'~Cir"O . , - - Case NO.:Ml-. b<)1(7 - ~ Z- Date: zJCj I /0 R~viewed by: ~ APPlicatio:;ee: $ t:) 2-1 . ~ ITechnical Fee: ~o Postage Fee: $0 I ~ PIJ fJtrzoo"-tlal~ate Received: OTAL FEES: $ '5t _ 6b PROJEq NWMBER:~ . p ZD10'OOOO~. & ~1ttJ..:. ....., ,',,,~. ,'" "" We.. ~ -; .- (bi'Z- - S ?f<. '6 VM+-( t.{ )...; 5'~~ ~ - \ t'I ~c...fv,.._ 0" IS b 'tt I Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian . ngma u ml a lor3 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 (541) 726-3753 FAX (541) 726-3689 www.ci.springfield.or.us February 9, 2010 Scott Morris Olson and Morris 380 "Q" Street, Ste 200 Springfield, OR 97477 RE: ZON2010-00002 (17-03~36-11 TL 11300) Development Issues Meeting- Applicant submitted plans to discuss partitioning one lot into two parcels. This lot is currently under construction with (4) duplexes. Dear Mr. Olson: Thank you for your Development Issues Meeting submittal. The following meeting has been scheduled: TYPE: DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING PLACE: CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT.SERVICES DEPARTMENT DSD CONFERENCE ROOM 616 225 1'11' u[ STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 DA TErrIME: Thursday, March 11,2010 at 1:30 -.2:30 p.m. CONTACT PERSON: Andy Limbird If you have any questions, please call me at 541-726-3784. Sincerely, Andy Limbird. Planner CC: David Dukes Dukes and Dukes Construction 2955 Yolanda Street Springfield, OR 97477 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD VICINITY MAP ZON2010-00002 740 28th Street I I j~ ''''l' GST Ii; '" ] SITE Map 17~03-36-11 Tax Lot 11300 .- North -, :r: t I- eo '" WHITVVORTH LN I I - ''=' l/l :r: Ii; .", Date Received: FEB - 9 2010 original SubmittaL OLSON & MIORRJS A division of L.B. Olson & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers Land Surveyors lIrban Planners 380 Q Street Suite 200 Springfield, Oregon 97477 (541) 302-9790 Fax: (541) 485-3253 olsonandmorris:com Dukes & Dukes Construction Partition Location: 740 28th Street Background ofProiect This site was approved under the site review process that was submitted by Goebel Engineering. At the.time of the site review, the zoning on the property was MDR, but the Metro Plan designation was LOR. As a condition of the site review approval, a zone change was completed to change the zoning to LOR. This created a non-conforming w;e as the development was approved for a density of 14.6 units/acre. The fcur duplexes are currently under construction on the site. Due to the economic climate of the area, the banks will not give a permallent loan on the property ifit has more than 4 units (there are currently 8). Tbis is what has generated this request to partition the property into 2 equally sized lots with 4 units on each parcel. Questions I. We have designed the partition to have equal parcels after recording. This will keep the current density at 14.6 units/acre (non-conforming use) on each parcel, but will not .increase the non-cQnformity to the density standard. Will the City of Springfield accept this logic and allow the partition to be approved in regards to density standards? 2. The existing lot is only 70 feet in width. Therefore, a minor variance would be required to adjust the minimum lot width requirement in the code. The code requirement is 60 feet. and to keep this as a minbr variance, the maximuri1 adjus1ment could be an 18 foot reduction (30%). We are proposing to reduce the width of the frontage 5 feet to a lot width of 55 feet. Would the City of Springfield support this variance for this proposal? 3. Since the lot is now LOR, the code only requires a panhandle width of 14 feet. Therefore, we do not believe a variance would be required for the panhandle width. We still will construct a 20 wide driveway in the easement that was shown on the site review to maintain safe ingress/egress and for fire safety. Does the City of Springfield agree that a variance is not needed for the panhandle as proposed? 4. We did not see any other. variances that would be needed to meet code criteria. for a partition. Does the City of Springfield see any other issues with this proposed partition that would prevent approval? , '. , Thank you for the opportunity to submit this for your revi4w. ~ , Date Received: FES - Q ~r,'n ... t.tJ!"J Original Submittal