The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication APPLICANT 2/9/2010 City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) . SPRINGFIELD ~- . Prospective Applicant Name: \company: IAddress: . . David Dukes Dukes & Dukes Construction 2955 Yolanda Street, Phone: (541) 520-2215 Fax: . .oR 974.77 Prospective Applicant's Rep.: Scott Morris ICompany: Olson & Morris IAddress: 380 Street, Ste 200 I Property Owner: Same as.applicant Icompany: Phone: (541) 302-9790 Fax: . (541) 485-3253 OR 97477 Phone: Fax: ITAX LOT NO(S): 11300 MAP NO: 17033611 I Property Address:. 740 28th Street ISize of 23,660 Acres 0 Feet [g] I Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: To partition the existinq development ir;]to 2 parcels with 4 units on each I Existinq Use: sinqle lot with 4 duplexes (8.units total) 1# of i..ots/parceis: 1 Lot/Parcel Size: 23,660 sf 14.6 Prospective Applicant: Date: ~G!:O '. . . , ~ ~ Case No.: 'k1\-, ;2.)1(7 - ~ 2... Date: "b/q 110 Reviewed by: ~ APPlicatio~ee: $ C) U . Oil Technical Fee: $0 I Postaqe Fee: $0 . ~ fh fltrzoo4~0Gtl~ate Received: I TOTAL FEES: $ 7U.6b.... PROJECT NUMBER:~$i,J.l.~ 'P~p'2D1D'OOOO~ 1't1E_""'"d"":W'''''~''-~':d='''ji''i:ii:''+0''-''~'''~'~'~''-'''''""i'--0"__""T""""~_."~~"_'=',"'_~_- ~---'~~.=~~~"'~'="-""",1Q:iikq;",~,,,,~,,-_.. 11!li'llftl. _. ._='-, - .~"~=____="_....__L)""'''''~._W0._._.m__IT;==''''m~''''''"""",,,, W"..,_ .__M~. _.... .''''.. ...- - 'lWlW,-!,,~ . .. "="",,,=,",,,_.. ..*0M'">'__ . ._~. rt. -=~;~zti- ..~"B. . fDQc.. ~S'.- (}sa'1'Z..- .- S?J<.. fSw . '6 \JIV.+Ll.l ,w&,~)()~ to- . . \ (\ ~wcJY..." Original Submittal Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 1 at :J Development Issues Meeting Submittal ReQUirerr'ent1\'CheCklist ~ ~ .~ ~ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee 'calculation formula, A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services Departmert. The a'pplicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. .. Development Issues Meeting Application Form ,Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant .would like staff to answer' . during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions. Ten (iO} Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to . , Teview the proposal is listed below. It is .not necessary to include all of th.ese items on the site or. plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible giver'that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of. detail provided in the application. Applicants'are also encouraged to include additional information on the 'plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions -, Partitions & ,Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17" 120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. ~ Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x'l7" J&I Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' North arrow ~ .ra ~ RJ. ~, ~ ~ [)ate of prepa ration . Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number Dil11ensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including, connection points On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained 'Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMs Related to Land Divisions. jgJ .. ~ ApProximate location, number'and dimensions of prOPOsed,lots , How streets in the proposal area connect .with existing streets . .. I . DIMs Related to Site Plan Review , , o o o Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size .(gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between bLiildings, and height Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, stru<;!;,ures,..driveway~, sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces, uate ReCelvea. Parking and circulation plan FEB ..c': 9 2010 Original Submittal Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 3 of 3 OILSON & MloRRllS A division of L.B. Olson & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers land Surveyors Urban Planners 380 Q Street Suite 200 Springfield, Oregon 97477 (541) 302-9790 Fax: (541) 485-3253 olsonandmorris.com Dukes & Dukes Coilstruetion ~artition Location: 740 28th Street Backl!round of Proiect This site was approved under the site r~view process that was submitted by Goebel Engineering. At llie time orthe site review, the zoning on the property was MDR, but the Metro Plan designation' was LOR. As acondition of the site review approval, a zone change was completed to change the zoning to LOR. This created a non.conforming use as the development was approved lor a density of 14.6 units/acre. The fcur duplexes are currently under construcrion on th" site. Due to the economic climate of the area,:ihe. banks will not give a permanent loan on the property ifit has more than 4 units:(there are currently 8). This is what has generated this request to partition the property into 2equal!y sized lots with 4 units ,1n each parcel. Questions 1. We have designed 'the partition 'to have equal parcels after recording. This will keep. the current density at 14.6 units/acre (non-conforming use) on each parceL but ,will not increase. thc non~cQnfoimity to the density standard. Will the City of Springfield accept this logic 'and allow the partition' to be approved in regards t(i density st:mdards? 2. The eXlsti,ng lot is only 70 fcet in width. Therefore,a minor variance would be required'to adjusfthe minimum lot width requirement in the code. The code requirement is 60 feet, and to keep this as a minor variance, the maximiuil ddjustment could be an J 8 foot reduction (30%). We are propofing to reduce the width of the frontage 5 feet to a lot'width of 55 fcct. Would the City orSpringfieJd support this variance [or this proposal? -~. " " 3. Since tlie lot is no\v LOR, the code only requires a panhandle width of J 4 feet. Therefore, we do not believe a variance would be required for the panhandle width.' We.,still will construct a 20 wide driveway in the easement that was showif 011 the site 'review to maintain safe ingress/egress and for fire safety. Does the City of Springtleld agree that a variance is not needed for the panhaJ1dle '!sproposed?' . 4. We did'not see any other. variances that would be needed to meet code criteria, for a partition. Does the City of Springfield see any other issues with this proposed partition that would prevent approval? Thank you for the opp6itunity to submilthis for your.reviiw. l~ " Date Received: FEB -Q 'lr.;n OJ Lu!';J :Original Sub~ittal 225 Fifth Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 541-726-3759 Phone rv of Springfield Official Receipt bGvelopment Services Department Public Works Department RECEIPT #: 3201~00Q00000000043' Date: 02/0912010 2:1l:17PM Paid By DUKES & DUKES CONSTRUCTION CO Item Total: Check Number Authorization Received By Batch Number Number How Received Amount Due 521.00 $521.00 Job/Journal Number ZON20 I 0-00002 Description CTY Development Issues Mtg Payments: Type of Payment Check Amount Paid tj 16562 In Person $521.00 Payment Total: $521.00 '),- " ; '-'i, 1. '. '- " ,: '~.' I I i Date Received: FEB ; 9 2010 Original Submittal. cReceinll Page 1 of 1 2/9/20 I 0 ~J) CITY OF SPRINGFIELD VICINITY MAP ZON20 1 0-00002 740 28th Street I' l~,O r WHI RTH LN I 100 , J: I . ,__I~ IJ L tii J: b5 N SITE Map 17-03-36-11 Tax Lot 11300 North t J Date Received: FEB - 9 2010 Original Submittal