The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication APPLICANT 1/6/2010 ,0 City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Tree Felling Permit . o. Applicant Name: .,h'€. ?t>>;"t,.. Icompany: -rl"d'_ t>(,,)\,:,.,-\:.... - 1-1. ().~. IAddress: (~sO H\4rv lo- W ~ I _ "" -- ..r IAPPlicant's Rep.: L\4. /'b2-{t IN'\', Il..._V'L I Company: -rltJ ~ \) (");" '-- -\- "" ~-t 0 f-t IAddress: Co ~...O I-h"\,d II W {(.oI $:I- 14 (., I - C{ ~ UfP licanr Phone: Fax: - . I Phone: I Fax: - - I Phone: IFax: ProDertv Owner:~ /l\ , Icompany: IAddress: SPRINQPlIlLD ~. (... D L. - 4:J.1L7 -......- - ... -..-...1 5'//. 5J4-b 9./4 I - I I - I I I I I I I __ IASSESSOR'S MAP NO: I =i . ~ 7.2 . Lj":, ITAX LOT NOeS): ? ()eI 0 I Property Address: t. SO I-t 'A...lDW c<....J. ISize of Property: Acres D Sauare Feet 0 . - -- - .... - - I ~:~~i:::~n ~ J;t')Vl fillin! ~rs r; tt rdl(;;~ttac~p("J De7t~sctin a lirlt/l1JnOR II fd ') Si natures: Please si nand rint our nam~ and date in the a / ro riate box on t~i next a e. .., 1 ... ...... Associated cases~~d at.Q - ()~ L Signs: ~ I \ _ Icase NoJ>tCc1nl ()--QOon Ll Oate: J I bl / D Reviewed by: 'A. ft(.l/L~ IAPPlication Fee: $/ L.fg5-ocJ ITechnical Fee: $1Vl J-S; Ipostaae Fee: $ /10000 ~O~~L FEES: j.11 19. 1 ~ _':' .... _~~l\vr ".!:Wlli ~ Date Received: JAN - 6 2010 Original Submittal Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 1 of 5 ~ Signatures Applicant: 'OO""OO~'~~~iZ'~"ili"'~'."~.:::: =~~.7 _ 09 Si9~! L'A ~ m " L \-- e..ft., Print If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. Owner: Si~MbtW Jin.u-- WI- WW Print Date: It..:- n -tA Date Received: JAN - 6 2010 Original Submittal Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 2 of 5 .. Tree Felling Permit Application Process 1. Applicant Submits a Tree Felling Permit Application to the Development Services Department . The application must conform to the Tree Felling Permit Submittal Requirements Checklist on page 4 of this application packet. . Planning Division staff screen the submittal at the front counter to determine whether all required items listed in the Tree Felling Permit Submittal Requirements Checklist have been submitted. . Applications missing required items will not be accepted for submittal. 2. City Staff Conduct Detailed Completeness Check . Planning Division staff conducts a detailed completeness check within 30 days of submittal. . The assigned Planner notifies the applicant in writing regarding the completeness of the application. . An application is not be deemed technically complete until all information necessary to evaluate the proposed development, its impacts, and its compliance with the provisions of the Springfield Development Code and other applicable codes and statutes have been provided. . Incomplete applications, as well as insufficient or unclear data, will delay the application review process and may result in denial. 3. City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision . This is a Type II decision and thus is made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed. . Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property. . There is a 14-day publiC comment period, staring on the date notice is mailed. . Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice. . Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. . The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. . The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official. Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian Date Received: JAN - 6 2010 ')riginal SUbmittal... _30f5 .... Tree Felling Permit Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: If you feel an item does not apply, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. f\l(~ubmitted Concurrently with Site Plan Review or Land Division applications, where f'T applicable. o Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. ~~e Felling Permit Application Form Copy of the Deed Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting owne~hip and listing all encumbrances. Narrative explaining the proposal and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken, including findings demonstrating compliance with the Tree Felling Permit Criteria as specified in SDC 5.19-125 (see page 4 of this application). NOTE: Before the Director can issue a Tree Felling Permit, information submitted by the applicant must adequately support the request. All of the Tree Felling Permit Criteria must be addressed by the applicant. Incomplete applications, as well as insufficient or unclear data, will delay the application review process and may result in denial. In certain circumstances, it is advisable to hire a professional planner or land use attorney to prepare the required findings. The Director or the Public Works Director may require the applicant to provide the services of a professional forester (approved by the City), licensed hydrologist, or licensed landscape architect in order to address the standards in SDC 5.19-125 for undeveloped property greater than 10 acres in size or 15% slope or above an elevation of 670 feet. D Three (3) Copies of a Plot Plan drawn to scale to include: D The species or common name of the trees o The location of trees to be removed and their sizes o The method of tree removal and the hauling route to be used D A description of any plan (Vegetation and Re-vegetation Report) to replace, landscape, or otherwise reduce the effect of the felling that addresses the applicable criteria in SDC 5.19-125. D Copy of the Plot Plan Reduced to 8'12" X 11", which will be mailed as part of the required neighboring property notification packet. Date Received: JAN - 6 2010 Original Submittal Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 4 of 5 _/ I 5.19-125 Criteria The Director, in consultation with the Public Works Director and the Fire Chief shall approve, approve with conditions or deny the fequest based on the following criteria: (6) B. C. D. (CD F. G. H. Whether the conditions of the trees with respect to disease, hazardous or unsafe conditions, danger of falling, proximity to existing structures or proposed construction, or interference with utility services or pedestrian or vehicular traffic safety warrants the proposed felling. Whether the proposed felling is consistent with State standards, Metro Plan policies and City Ordinances and provisions affecting the environmental quality of the area, including but not limited to, the protection of nearby trees and windbreaks; wildlife; erosion, soil retention and. stability; volume of surface runoff and watef quality of streams; scenic quality; and geological sites. Whether it is necessary to remove trees in order to construct proposed improvements as specified in an approved development plan, grading permits and construction dfawings. In the event that no Development Plan has been approved by the City, felling of trees will be permitted on a limited basis consistent with the preservation of the site's future development potential as prescribed in the Metro Plan and City development regulations, and consistent with the following criteria. 1. Wooded areas associated with natural drainageways and water areas shall be retained to preserve riparian habitat and to minimize erosion; 2. Wooded areasthat will likely provide attractive on-site views to occupants of future developments shall be retained; 3. Wooded areas along ridge lines and hilltops shall be retained for their scenic and wildlife value; 4. Wooded areas along property lines shall be retained to serve as buffers from adjacent properties; 5. Trees shall be retained in sufficiently large areas and dense stands so as to ensure against windthrow; 6. Large-scale clear-cuts of developable areas shall be avoided to retain the wooded character of future building sites, and so preserve housing and design options for future City residents. Whether the applicant's proposed replanting of new trees or vegetation is an adequate substitute for the trees to be felled. Whether slash left on the property poses significant fire hazard Of liability to the City. Whether the felling is consistent with the guidelines specified in the Field Guide to Oregon Forestry Practices Rules published by the State of Oregon, Department of FOfestry, as they apply to the northwest Oregon region. Whether transportation of equipment to and equipment and trees from the site can be accomplished without a major disturbance to neatby residents. Date Received: JAN . ~ 6 2010 Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian Original Submittal 5 of 5 ? 225 Fifth Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 541-726-3759 Phone Job/Journal Number DRC2010-00002 DRC20 1 0-00002 DRC20 1 0-00002 Payments: Type of Payment Check cReceinti RECEIPT #: ty of Springfield Official Receipt Development Services Department Public Works Department 3201000000000000002 Date: 01/06/2010 Description CTY > I b Trees Base + Per ACRE':' Postage Fee Type 11 - $160 + 5% Technology Fee . Paid By THE POINTE CONDOMINIUMS Item Total: Check Number Authorization Received By Batch Number Number How Received emm 1120 In Person Payment Total: 'I ~..' Date Received: JAN' - 6 2010 Original submittal- ""," Page I of I 10:53:54AM Amount Due 1,485.00 160.00 74.25 $1,719.25 . Amount Paid $1,719.25 $1,719,25 1/6/2010 r- - CITY OF SPRINGFIELD VICINITY MAP DRC2010-00002 650 Harlow Road m, '-, ''-'/~ ~-Gb0VERL-EAR:P~k ~RO'1D ~_ ~ Q ~ " 1/ ""' o..rJ ~ Z -I' ill 5 cr' ~ -I " ~. ~ 0- -I ~--- :r: _ _____ Date Received: ,IAN - 6 ?01O Original Submittal -- _ui SITE Map 17-03-22-43 Tax Lot 2000, 2100 North .. JANES ,.MlNGS _ SERYICE ~ -"..l~~f".,:r' _._. ."..,... -r......nllTl ~ 1f41I.... ..00..........""""'.. . ~..-- . _. ..... January 4, 2010 Larry Miller The Pointe Condominiums 650 Harlow Road Springfield, OR 97477 541-514-6814 Dear Larry. As ......_....~, I've examined the Shore Pines (pinus contorta) in the hedge-row along Harlow Road between the sidewalk and the garages. In my observation they are infested with Sequoia Pitch Moth (Synanthedon sequoiae). In addition to this finding, many of the trees have a considerable amount of dead and dying limbs - along with overall poor fonn. The poor growth fonn of many of these Pines poses a threat to the sidewalk and to the road (meaning they could fall-over with inclement weather). This threat stems from how the trees were planted on a mount of fill dirt - causing a r ._...':ally unstable root system. Pruning as a risk-mitigation ~.....v_h for these trees is not ....__...mended because of their sensitivity to insect pathogens. Therefore, implementing a r--r'" tree care plan a1 this point would not result in .... _...'" tree preservation. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions ,vb~":':ng this matter. Regards, 9-4AtN ~ James M Cummings ISA Certified Arborist (PN-6755A) Date Received: JAN . 6 2010 Original submittal www.jamescummino......v..com ... .. '- I I m 1- I u T~__ /f'flW ,__IlI~1 \Jr III III )/ 1', / -,/ ._u_J Lu-. , -- / I I ""'_ --i - O(ZA~f L /",u_,O_~~_-, -~ C,(,.tt ,f....-"-- ; - \) ~ - "'5!l-M "" - i 5 ". ~ " ;' , : '~__' , ,/ - ~ ,oJ ." I I / " I I .' /) :==; ! / '! (' ,.--__h__j r-_uu__,;:::,m-)yL-- \.- : I .... --- ~~I : . '--'-- -,~ , . , - " " I~ rc ' -- J (o;{ J'i. ~~u_. C') ~ \! _ _ -, [i~ _: - ---:- - l.J'r~ '^ J" ,,--:::::----J './ 0\ ~ _uu__mu" ! : _ ====- : 61Jo." ) ~/ -;---,-1 ,- u ~-- \ ~ 0 \' ~/ C :' ',: 1/ ! I " , J ~\'-.S ',. ,; ---(j)-~ /, ~ i ,Jmj l__'_:":II, "1'- i- -~\ " , , / I ; I, ~ i == -; - -; " ,'--_Ul thU----..:-. "t~u-:.'--' : - I :,/.') __ # ) ] : r -- , , '_"','\ I I / r , _ "-- \ -- u - -'- ') III II III' III CJ 1- _oj t::.~---'u-:'tti.ie~~~ ~ . , \ 4-hel4d'1 c!,u1 -" ~ H )< >< -.e-x ) ( X )/')(){ ll)( x)< · )(. x eroV?os~d To ~u T __ -- -- I, l "- , IOrrl III UI ILl, J I ___u..1 L--__. ' - -- .. ",..- --- -----..- / I J " "- .-.. ./ I I'\.I "' I~ ~ : C\\v 'r, : tt ." -, 1-/..) . ,. '\ , r'- U:~-'".--J I --_/ '-.----J ~ / V - _ oG~ ,j- C , '- , , , : , - - , ~ , r-- , , /1 =r o i ,: , - , - , - , -'-' I' cw He . I ,- -...j I I I h 1 --- T1___ ,_n__~~_I:~__,-/ J.tJl 1.11 III IO~ "I IJ I Jl 'I 'r: ....~ ':.' _.J .. '_0....1 f.-'h' . ,;--) 1_____~--U,/-h-,J [iu-,..~ -' ~~ i - _ ! _ '_';"--I-I-U~~--" / I I "'" .,-' '~. : ~ ~ , - .-.,- .--- 4: , - - I I ~; : 5 .: ... " ; : " . I / ....) ,.: --@--,:".""I''') . :-"~---~-J I'----~-..'/" " J l,...---- ~ :',. '-Ii /' .--~h_:j r~o.__~__<.o.U)~L- " ~/ .. i C-/ ~: - '\"" --1- ~I , i ~ 7 1-: "':'--"': n--;: ~ /L \' ~) I \ "-- U;" ':,' / =r 3', U.- -'.. @ / ~ -:\, ~... II ,-'] --1 1" ~, -c-: ~~ul \. '~\i. - l-- I~: -T= j1 ~ ~- ) '\ ~ ~--/ 0\ ~__m_" ~C~i\\ "/ . c ) ~-fi\ ~;...). / I I ":- ____J --- ,,' 1 ( :,. _ / / ~ \.. :' : -,--/ J ""--~ / I ,""",", \ -1- ~ .." / ! I ~ -: - -:-... /-m--1 tuu----..:-_ '1 t:----~/--' y == : ; .u" .:' J -- ~) '_",' I I / f - "'~-_____uo._~/ j ITIII I" - III l ~ --__oj ~-----.~----'-J~Recci led '-- ~ Se~ A rTr'\ c~ ~CI -----........11 J lJ JAN ~ (, I~-}cll I I I I l=l Original Submittal__ " IIIII ~ .I " .. ) ( . . . I - '\"" ,- ,- o 1 ::I. ce i I~ ~ i~l(j) C' :z: I ?J 3 I CD [f\ .~ ~. c:> CD I I \ I1\" I , I .,... It- 1+ I; t 1 I I I 1 -T .:.-~ N Ii! I I I 1 I 1 j I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I : J I I I I 1 I I I I I I I ,I.' I \ 5"'- '54-1..+..., I I , t IJ.( f}-ed$ tfe lNI. I /, \ 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I : 1 I () , I : I I 1 ' , PL~~T:3 ~edl 1 ~ I I '_" 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I, I I ' -\: \""~ / +-/, ~Ai IV ;~oV'v 1 1 I I I I t ' ' I 1 I 161~1 I~I I I l~ l~ro/> I I I I I ' I 1 mApte Tree.j1 I ' I , H~ !lZiG, uJ I I I I I I : ~.l i ~. ~ tt) .:s -r ~ 1> ~ I I C' '~ ; I ==~... ..,. ...:; ... . DJvi'~j'cm o( Chi.' "Deputv CI.rk: Lane County Deed. and R.cor~. l009.~16~6 .. ..."..:.After'recordinQ return to: ~Order Number: 26897 ~ . ~ Western Tille&Escrow 497 Oakway Road, Suite 340 Eugene, OR 97401 -.~oo..:' Grantee>Name(s) 111111"""11111111111111111111111111""1111111 01101136200900516460010011 09/09/200901:13:20 PM CASH1ER 07 $26.00 RPR-DEED Cnl=l Sln=6 $5.00 $11.00 $10.00 Marcelo Alves 650 Harlow Road Apt. #115 Springfield, OR 97477 Until a'change is requested,' all tax statements shall be sent to the followlnQ address: Same as Above Reserved for Recorder's Use ~ STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED Jasmine Breitbach and Steven Breitbach, Grantor(s) convey and warrant to Marcelo Alves, Grantee the following described real property free of encumbrances except as specifically set forth herein: Unit 37 of THE POINTE, as platted and recorded in File 73, Slides 294 and 295, Lane County Oregon Plat Records, in Lane County, Oregon, together with the general and limited common elements pertaining thereto, as provided In Declaration Submitting Phase I of The Pointe to Oregon Unit Ownership Law, recorded October 2, 1979, Document No. 79.59295, Official Records. < Account No(s): 1327921 Map/Tax Lot No(s): 1703 224302000 This property is free of encumbrances, EXCEPT: All those items of record, If any, as of the date of this deed, including any real property taxes due, but not yet payable. The true consideration for this conveyance is $117,900.00, (Here comply with requirements of ORS 93.030,) BEFORE SIGN1NG OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT. THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 and 195.305 TO 195;336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11 OF CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007. THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAND BEING TRANSFERRED IS A LAWFULLY ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL, AS DEFINED IN ORS 92.010 OR 215.010, TO VERIFY THE APPROVED USES OF THE LOT OR PARCEL, TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930 AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336,AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007. '\r '.. Ex day of September, 2009 if) ~- ~f;-uPA Steven Breitbach . State of California, County Of~r.lrl This instrument was acknowledged before ~~~itbach Notary Pubfic for California My commission expires: ~ ~ ".M// me ) 55. on this 2!!! day of September, 2009 by ~@ MICHAEL ANTHONY fMR1NELtIa t .-. Commlulon # 1741814 . i -"'. Nola', Public - call1oml te Rece,ve4: . Los Angeles County _ t Mtcarm~Mcy23,2011 ~ JAN ... 6 2010 Original Submittal