HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/12/1993 Work Session
.
.
.
City of Springfield
Work Session Council Meeting
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE
SPRINGFIELD CITY COUNCIL HELD
MONDAY, JULY 12, 1993
The City of Springfield Council met in the Springfield City Hall, Meeting
Room 2, 225 N. Fifth Street, Springfield, Oregon, on Monday, July 12, 1993, at
6:05 p.m.
ATTENDANCE
, Present were Mayor Morrisette and Councilors Maine, Schanz, Beyer, Walters,
Shaver. Councilor Burge was absent. Also present were City Manager Mike
Kelly, Assistant City Manager Gino Grimaldi, City Recorder Eileen Stein, City
Attorney Joe Leahy and members of staff.
1. Arts Commission Appointments
Museum Coordinator Kathy Jensen reported the Arts Commission has had three
resignations for positions #2, #3 and #8. She told the Council all three
applicants met the requirements of the Arts Commission by-laws.
Councilor Shaver stated the applicants represented a good cross section of
the community without duplications.
Councilor Beyer asked why the commission currently has three vacancies.
Ms. Jensen replied the members resigned at different times for different
reasons.
Councilor Schanz asked if the by-laws state a requirement to live within
Springfield city limits. Ms. Jensen replied no. Mr. Kelly explained that
there is no consistency throughout the city's boards, committees and
commissions regarding residency. Mayor Morrisette stated the requirements
vary, depending on the type of board, committee or commission.
Councilor Shaver asked if Ms. Jensen was satisfied with the applicants.
Ms. Jensen answered yes, and told the Council she will be sorry to lose the
existing members, but is excited to work with the new applicants.
2. Sidewalks on South 52nd Place
Public Works Director Dan Brown provided the staff report and explained
this item is being discussed per the July 6, public hearing at Council's
regular session meeting. He stated at the public hearing Council asked
staff to recommend where to place sidewalks and staff is now responding to
that request.
Mr. Brown clarified the city is using Lane County unpaved road funds to
fund the project. Civil Engineer Don Branch distributed a copy of a
petition requesting sidewalks to be installed on the east side of South
52nd Place. The petition was signed by 24 property owners.
.
City of Springfield
Work Session Council Meeting
Page two
Mr. Brown told the Council, Mr. Fred Simons is circulating a petition
requsting the sidewalk be installed on the east side only, and not the west
side.
Mr. Brown discussed four options staff developed during their review of the
sidewalk project:
1. Construct sidewalks on the west side only, as Council directed.
2. Construct sidewalks on the east side only.
3. Construct sidewalks on both sides.
4. Construct sidewalks on the west side as Council directed, and on any
east side frontages where property owners want them.
Mr. Brown suggested staff hold another neighborhood meeting, while the
Council is on recess, then return to the Council with the preference of the
neighborhood. He explained staff could hold the public hearing on August
16, and the project would most likely begin in the fall, unless a major
delay occurred, which would bump the process into the spring.
.
Councilor Shaver spoke of his concern of the delay if staff held another
neighborhood meeting and another public hearing. City Engineer Al Peroutka
explained the public hearing could be paralleled with the bid process to
keep the project on track, but that weather could also pose a delay.
Councilor Shaver stated is it important to complete the project and have
contiguous sidewalks. Councilor Maine agreed the city must keep the
sidewalks contiguous and suggested obtaining the neighbor's opinions
through another meeting. Councilor Beyer stated her preference was to
install the sidewalks on both sides of the street.
Councilor Maine asked if the funding could be used for another street
project in the event that was necessary. Mr. Brown responded yes, but the
new project could not be completed this year due to time constraints and
the city would need to ask the Lane County Board of Commissioners for an
extension on the funding.
Mayor Morrisette suggested continuing with staff's recommended process and
waiting to see if the project is remonstrated. Mr. Kelly suggested using
option #4. He said an infill project after a street project is completed
is usually remonstrated, and feels the success rate would be very low.
Mr. Brown explained the map regarding project 1-792 for S. 52nd Place. The
Council discussed the process and gave their consensus for staff,to hold
another neighborhood meeting and a public hearing on August 16.
3.
Priorities from Economic Development Summit
Community and Economic Development Manager John Tamulonis provided the
staff report. He recalled the past Council direction on the Economic
Development Summit findings. He explained how the summit participants
developed the priority for the recommendations.
.
.
.
.
City of Springfield
Work Session Council Meeting
Page three
Mr. Tamulonis reviewed the priorities of the summit findings. They are:
1. Maintain a policy of "assistance-vs-enforcement" attitude in city
regulatory function.
2. Ensure an adequate supply of available and serviced building site.
3. Make it easy for businesses to get information and help they need.
4. Maintain the current level of support for the Metropolitan
Partnership.
5. Establish a "buy local" policy.
6. Prepare a comprehensive promotional package targeting or recruiting
businesses appropriate for locating or expanding in Springfield.
7. Strongly consider and be prepared to support tourism as an additional
industry focus for the Lane County Regional Strategy.
8. Work with private developers to encourage the development of new
industrial lease space in Springfield.
9.
Create a rapid response team to deal quickly with interested business
prospects.
10. Explore creating financial incentives for businesses to locate in
Springfield.
11. Facilitate and publicize efforts among major public agencies to
combine services/facilities to save money.
12. Ensure a suitable labor force.
Council discussed the priorities and underlying projects within each
category. Councilor Maine told the Council the summit group is nextmeeting
July 13, at 7:00 a.m. in the Library Meeting Room, to update participants.
Councilor Shaver questioned item #5, "buy local". Development Services
Director Susan Daluddung said this item was intended for all community
agencies, not just the city. Mr. Grimaldi mentioned Finance Department
staff are proactively working on using Springfield vendors when purchasing
or bidding.
Councilor Maine stated he is seeking Council consensus to include the above
elements in the Economic Development Plan. Mr. Kelly explained there are
action items under each element in the ranking of recommendations.
Mr. Tamulonis clarified the direction being sought from Council is to
approve the action items from each element and include them into the five
year Economic Development Plan. He stated the summit participants would
come back to the Council with recommendations on which action items to do
the first year of the plan, based on the priorities. He said the items
would be brought back to the Council at a future date for final approval.
.
.
.
City of Springfield
Work Session Council Meeting
Page four
4. Business from Council
Councilor Maine reported on the last Metropolitan Policy Committee (MPC)
meeting regarding the Metropolitan Plan. He stated the planning staff's
from both Eugene and Lane County have been exploring options to resolve the
metro planning process issue including:
1. Lane County overseeing who participates in the Metro Plan process
2. The 2 out of 3, opt~in process, which would eliminate a single vote
vetoing the process.
Planning Manager Greg Mott stated the city of Eugene has yet to reply to
the Council's June 15, letter. He said he has been working with city of
Eugene's planning staff, but the Council has yet to officially reply to the
Springfield City Council.
Ms. Daluddung told the Council, staff of Development Services are currently
working on a detailed work plan for preparing Springfield's own
Comprehensive Plan.
Mayor Morrisette stated he attended a meeting of county-wide agencies
regarding funding from the Forest Summit decision. He reported the Lane
Economic Development Committee would be the lead group to coordinate the
development of programs for assistance in Lane County. He explained
Springfield already has plans for using federal assistance money and these
plans will be incorporated into the overall Lane County request.
Mayor Morrisette cautioned the federal assistance money may be subject to
other national economic development priorities, such as military base
closures and flood disaster relief in the Midwest
Ms. Daluddung explained the intricacies of receiving federal assistance
dollars and the programs Springfield will be promoting.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 6:55 p.m.
Minutes Recorder - Shari Higgins
Ht!~2r~
ATTEST:
~~
City Recorder
#4203