HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/21/1993 Work Session
.
.
.
~,.
City of Springfield
Work Session Council Meeting
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE
SPRINGFIELD CITY COUNCIL HELD
MONDAY, JUNE 21, 1993
The City of Springfield Council met in the Springfield City Hall, Meeting
Room 2, 225 N. Fifth Street, Springfield, Oregon, on Monday, June 21, 1993, at
6:00 p.m.
ATTENDANCE
Present were Councilors Schanz, Burge, Beyer, and Shaver. Mayor Morrisette and
Councilors Maine and Walters were absent (excused). Also present were
Assistant City Manager Gino Grimaldi, City Attorney Joe Leahy, and members of
staff.
1.
Teen Center Funding
Community Development Management Analayst Lynn Nakamura gave a brief staff
report regarding the funding request by the Teen Center. She introduced
Artie Mae Harlow, Tammy Fitch, Joe Grosso and Stephanie Gaither who were
present representing the Teen Center.
Ms. Fitch asked the Council for $7,500 from the city's opportunity fund to
purchase portable sound, stage and building equipment. She clarified the
money would be used to purchase equipment and not to pay for labor costs.
Ms. Harlow added that equipment such as tiolets and urinals will be
installed portable, so they could be moved in the future.
Councilor Shaver asked what would happen to the equipment in the future, if
the Teen Center should close. Ms. Harlow replied it would be donated back
to either the city or Willamalane Parks and Recreation. Councilor Burge
asked if Ms. Harlow could provide the city with an inventory list. Ms.
Harlow answered yes.
The Council and Teen Center representatives discussed donations and door
receipts, which would support the project through September. Ms. Harlow
explained donations are being handled though the Lively Fund at Willamalane
Parks and Recreation.
Councilor Burge suggested the Council remove the original 50% match
requirement per their tentative approval of the funds in June of 1993.
After discussion, the Council agreed to give the Teen Center the money in
good faith, and that the Teen Center would agree to continue seeking
donations.
IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILOR BURGER WITH A SECOND BY COUNCILOR SHAVER TO GIVE
THE SPRINGFIELD TEEN CENTER, VIA THE LIVELY FOUNDATION, $7,500 FROM THE
CITY'S OPPORTUNITY FUND. THE MOTION PASSED WITH A VOTE OF 4 FOR AND 0
AGAINST.
.
City of Springfield
Work Session Council Meeting
Page two
2. Solicitation in Public Right-of-Way
Acting Police Chief Dick Golden gave the staff report and referred to
the document given to Councilors which was exempt from public disclosure
pursuant to Oregon Revised Statues 192.501(1) "Public Records Pertaining to
Litigation" and 192.500(2) "Internal Advisory Communications".
Chief Golden stated there are no Attorney General opinions regarding
solicitation in public right-of-way, and that he had discussed this issue
at length with both City Prosecutor Dave Logan and City Attorney Joe Leahy.
He explained the interpretation is varied regarding solicitation, but ORS
814.090 could be contested.
Mr. Leahy gave details on state laws regarding impeding traffic flow and
said the opportunities for enforcement due to safety are limited. He
explained the city could post the law if it was state statue or local
ordinance.
.
Councilor Shaver asked if it would be most cost effective to charge
violators on state law versus city ordinance. Chief Golden responded by
state law. He explained the state statutes wording is well known and only
requires slight interpretation. He felt in the long run it would be less
work to use state law and enforce by a uniform traffic citation.
The Council discussed the options of adopting a city ordinance versus
using the state statues and the processes for each option.
Mr. Leahy stated ORS 814.090 does give cities the opportunity to site for
traffic hazards. Mr. Logan felt he could successfully argue a case using
ORS 814.090, and discouarged the Council from creating and ordinance that
may conflict with state law. He explained the uniform traffic citation
would be classed as a Class C Misdemeaner and would carry a small fine.
Mr. Leahy told the Council the state statues may not address all of the
Council's safety concerns. He referred to a solicitor holding a sign
reading "Need York" and a motorist throwing change to the solicitor. He
explained that under the state law, that would not be a violation of
814.090.
The Council discussed safety issues, particularly the freeway exit/entrance
off of Pioneer Parkway which was felt to be a hazard with frequent
accidents. Councilor Shaver spoke of shift changes by solicitors and the
flow of traffic being disrupted.
Chief Golden explained solicitors would be allowed on the right-of-way, but
could not cross the plain onto the road's edge, or would be violating the
state law. Councilor Burge agreed and said that would address the safety
issues. He recommended the Police Department strictly enfore 814.090 and
the city to aggressively prosecute violators.
.
Mr. Logan stated he felt comfortable agruing the state statue based on the
potential of a hazard. Mr. Leahy explained the judges will have to decifer
the potential hurdles.
.
.
City of Springfield
Work Session Council Meeting
Page three
The Council agreed by consensus to direct Police to enforce ORS 814.090.
Mr. Logan clarified a violation would be a person standing on the curb,
reaching out or in a raodway.
3. Business from Council
Councilor Schanz announced there may be testimony on the S. 52nd street
project assessment. There was a brief discussion of the issue.
Councilor Shaver stated Lane-On-Line is seeking funding for bulletin board
information to be used by computer users who pay a yearly fee. He
explained the system gives access to the public of information that may
otherwise take staff time and resources to provide. He said former
Planning Commission member Tom Atkinson is the director of the program.
Councilor Burge asked for more information on the program, as the initial
explanation was not detailed enough. Councilor Shaver suggested this could
be a project that the city's Communication Manager could possibly take on.
Mr. Grimaldi stated the topic could scheduled for a future work session.
ADJOURNMENT
.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:55 p.m.
Minutes Recorder - Shari Higgins
,.g?..&~~~
Mayor
ATTEST:
--UU-0~
City Recorder
#4203
.