The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication APPLICANT 11/12/2009 City of Springfield Development Services pepartment 225 Fifth Street ' Springfield, OR, 974,77 Development !Issues Meeting (DIM) SPRINGFIELD ~. Prospective Applicant Name: !company: IAddress: I, I Prospective Applicant's Rep.: ICompany: IAddress: 1:1 Kristen Karle Phone: 743-7152 St. Vincent de Paul of Lane Coullty Fax: 683-9423 RO Box 24608 Eugene, OR 97402 Anne DeLaney Phone: 683-8661,ext 2 Bergsund DeLaney Architecture Fax: . 683-1136 1369 Olive Street Eugene, OR 97401 Property Owner: tarry Knight & Helen Knight Family Trust Phone: Comoanv: IAddress: I, Fax: IASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 170327 13, 170327 10 ITAX LOT NO(S): 10900 & 04200c'to'jSC>' ~Si ".,(~) I Property Address:" 'lo~o ~ ~' ISize of Property: 4,0 I jI I Description of If y6u are filling in this form .by hand, please attach your proposal descr.iPtion to this application. Proposal: See attached, ) Existinq Use: Radio station with vacant land 'I 'If o!, Lots/Parc~ls: ;" Il IAvg: LotI Parcel ~ize: Prospective :. I 11 /J Applicant: j A /J ~ Sign~re Acres L><'J Square Feet D , sf I Density: du/acre ~ Date: 11/12/2009 Kristen.,Karle Print Case No.: ,'2{'))" /itQ _ ffibt.<;" Date: 1111'0/01 IAPPlicatio~ee: $;' S2--(.cS"t:> ITechnical Fee: $0 ITOTAL FEES: $ , 'Sbl.&D PROJECT NUM Reviewed by: ~ !postage Fee: $0 - NOV 1 2 2009 Revised 1/1/08 Molly Mark?rian 1 of 3 Original Submittal I I' I I I I 'J I I I ,I I j , 'I Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist L><'J Application ,Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation f6rmula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services Department, The applicable application, technology,. and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. L><'J Development Issues Meeting Application Form L><'J Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the m'eeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions, L><'J Ten (10) C6pies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on the sit'e or plot plan. However, applicants' are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. Drawn~ in ink on q~ality paper no smaller than 11" x 17" Scale appropriate to the'area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' , ' North arrow Date of preparation Street'address and assessor's map and tax lot number Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or'acres) of the development area , Location and size of existing and pr\Jposed utilities, including connection points On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines ard catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained , Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for , , common open spaces DIMs Related: to Land Divisions o o D o o o D Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed,in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5,12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions & . Subdivisions,~ Tentati.ve Plan Submittal Requirements or 5:17-120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. , , o D o Appro~imate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots D How streets in the proposal area cor:mect with ,existing streets DIMs Related to Site Plan Review o Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbac~s from property lines, distance between buildings, and height o Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces o Parking and circulation plan' Date Received: NOV 1 2 2009 n-'",;..,,,, ':>, ;bm;ttal '-",.,;. ,,-. _\~ , , "Revised 1/1/08 Molly Mar~a'rian 3 of 3 225 Fifth Street Springfield, Oregon.97477.1;,-~",----, 541-726-3759 Phone. .,' ., ,', ',1' ',. Job/Journal Number ZON2009-00025 Payments: Type of Payment Check: cReceint 1 . ~, RECEIPT #: Dcsc'ripti~'~ .:~... CTY Devel~;m;ent Issues Mtg '. Paid By ...' 'c, ',_, ,ST,VINCENT DEPAUL 'SOCIETY OF LANE COUNT . ;;i~:-;",::::' ': ~ .. :1~,', =.:.; " 4'';'' . i'.' .,1 'I ! ll.~.. f t f . It'r , """.':. .:1' ~, "'. ~: " Item Total: Check Number Authorization Received By Batch Number Number How Received Ij 031017 In Person 3200900000000000754 .) " Page I of 1 City Springfield Official Receipt DevelOpment Services Department Public Works Department Date: 11/12/2009 2:27:02PM Amount Due 521.00 $521.00 Amount Paid $521.00 Payment Total: $521.00 ---' . Date Received: NOV 1 2 2009 Original Submittal 11/12/2009 Laura Street Property DIM Application Project Description St: Vincet;t De Paul of Lane County is exploring the purchase and develop'inent of a 4,0 acres site lOcated on Laura Street. SVdP iS'proposing a mix of uses Ott the,site consisting ofa 3500~f - 4000 sf Veteran's S~rvice and Community Center with 50-60 units of affordable':housittg for veterans - both indiv,iduals and families, The Veterans Center would provide non-clinical services for vet~rattS throughout the Eugene-Springfield area,' Rental housing would be a mixture of 1,2 a'nd 3-bedroom units with att emphasis on family units, most likely in townhouse configuration with shared parking courts, The project will be funded through a variety ofs.ources, ittcludittg the state of Oregon's Consolidated Funding Cycle (CFC) which is scheduled for mid-April. Given that the property is currently zotted Mixed Use - Ll\iII & CC, our primary concern is whether the city slaff~iIl support the zone change and what the likely schedule would be for the approval process. I' Date Received: 'NOV 1 2 2009 Original Submittal Laura Str~et Property DIM Questions 11/12/09 Questions 1, Per the Gateway Refinement Plan, up 10'40% of the area within the "Q" Laura Street Subarea (14 acres) is allowed to be developed as CC uses, Is it possible that this would, perh,it the development of 1he two parcels as proposed (mixed use with commercial and residential), given that the proposed Veterans Service! Comrnunity Cettteris a permitted use 'in the CC zone, as is residetttia1 with specific developmettt stattdards? 2, If a'Zotting Map amendment is required, is this a quasi-jlldicia1 Zotting Map process - a Type III review process - or would this also require a Metro Plan Diagra~ Amendmettt, raisittg the process to a Type IV Review? Ifso, please confirm our understattding of the quasi-judicial Type IV process and time1ine, as ou11ined below: Step #1: Applicant submits concurrent applications for Zone Plan Change and Metro Plan Amendment to City staff. City Planning staff reviews for completeness (JO'days MAX.) provides letter with deficienciesl request for additional information. Applicant re.sublllits completed application. City deems aoolication comolete,'j 120 day clock bel!ins. Step #2: Staff reviews 'and prepares staff report for Planning Commission Hearing. Notice (20 days 'prior.to Hearing) goes out to adjacent properties. (30 days max.) Step#3: Planning Commission holds public hearing. Hopefully evidence record is closed, but can be kept 9pen. Decis}on requi!'ed \VIi 30 days of close of hearing and record. Step #4: Planning COlill11ission l11~kes written recommendation to City Council. Step #5: City Council Hearing (45 days max. from Planning Commission recommendation.) Step #6: City Council Decision PO dllYS m:lX. from hearing) 3, Is the continuation of Lochaven A v~; as a public street (and thus a ~OW dedicatiott) required to develop the parcels? If connectivity is required, can this be 1eveloped as a private street or driveway? ' , 4, Ar~ there any existing or additional ROW dedications or easements required along Laura Street or through the site? 5. Where and what size are the nearest water, storm and sanitary servi'<,e adjacent to the property? " , I , Date Received: NOV 1 2 2009 Original Submittal I --r TAX LOT #300 TMlor #200 TAX LOT #100 L ----L ' 0 I ~ LOCHA VEN A VE I i:LOT ~ I #3600 I -i TAX LOT I ~ #3700 - -l a::: Cl >- TAX lOT I -J #3800 u:J I <: <: - 0 TAX lOT I Cl #3900 TAX LOT LOOO T 1\ N 256.46' TAX LOT # 10900 AREA" 3.79 ACRES T- I I I ~'.L._.~6~.7~ 168.70' " TAX lOT #04200 16 L- , 465.20 0_0,0_0_'_0_,0_010 TAX lOT -I # 10802 TAX LOT #10801 I" TAX LOT #10803 T TAX lOT ;t10804 1- TAX LOT --I #10805 TAX lOT #10806 -0 Q) en > <= '8 ~ Iii Q) C'o,J ~ c::: - "E :::.- ..c <II '-'> ~ ,- :z: en -.-. I ttI Iii 0 c: I "01 ";:: 0 I --1 ~ -,~ '" m ,; ro i- llJ llJ g: CI) <:( a::: ::::> <:( -J ' ,-~ r TAX LOT #10807 ./ EB J Q ..:. ~~fi ~~~W .. .1 I ! l!!II'I'llill! 13;11"'1 il,.I:"1 1""1" .,.fl..j .il'!'l"tl il~ !.ti.S' t Ii!;llllilil ~' m C)~g OON <0, <(," ~ ::?~ r ~ >- z U 5 w u ..., w o ~ 0:: "' a. 00 ~ ~ ~ w;; Q > o~ c ~ ~ ...J :1 ~ W,t--c.. - W U. 0 ~ ~ 0:: 1! a. ~ ff) > ~ W <