HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket, Pre PLANNER 8/24/2009
r'
PRE-SUBMITT/ T,
"
DISTRIBUTION LIST:
Date Distributed: .
8'- cJ +-00
/~ Dave Puent - Building
/ Gilbert GordonlMelissa Fechtel- Fire
//Jon Driscoll- Traffic
V Matt Stouder - Public Works/Engineering
Dennis Ernst/Chris Moorhead, Surveying
Planner, 'In (jJJL Yvr 1/ ;it; ;'A'A
t ' .~~-~
<'
RECEIVED
AUG 24 2009
By: ?r~f- SlJ8A.UrfKL-
'Pit u..e.--t
I oJ:? l o;f
=pa5eS
I
,
,
,
i
City of Springfield !
Development ServiceS Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
541-725-3753 Phone'
541-726-3689 Fax
i;i-
Pre-Submittal Meeting
Case Number Assigned: PRE2009-00022
Date Submitted:
8/21/2009
APPLICANT: OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANS
680 COTTAGE ST NE
SALEM
OR
97301
Proiect Name: 1-5 WILL RIVER BRIDGE REPLMNT
Project Description: Pre-submittal Meeting - Site Plan Review Phase II ofI-5Willamette River
Bridge Replacement.
Application Type: Site Plan Review
Job Address: 3001 Franklin Blvd
Assessor'~ & Tax Lot #: 1703334402600
DISCLAIMER: Applications will not be exempt from Development Code or procedural amendments that may occur
between the time of the Pre-Submittal Meeting and Submittal of the Application for Development Review. Please contact our
office at 541-726-3753 with any questions or concerns.
A Planner will be assigned the following business day and will contact' you to confirm the meeting date and time.
~
PRE.SUBMIITAL REC'O
. AUG 2 1 2009
PlanJobPrint.rpt
8/21/2009
11:32:13AIV
're-Su- Jmitta~ YIeeting
Development Services Department
Room 615/616
PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING DATE: Friday, September 11,2009
1. PRE-SUBMITTAL MTG #PRE2009-00022 (SITE TENT) OD01' $346
Assessor's Map: 17-03-33-441L 2600
Address: 1-5 @Milepost192.18-193.00
Existing Use: ODOT 1-5 ROW, Parks and Open Space
The applicant submitted plans for the construction of Phase II ofI-5 Willainette River
Bridge Replacement.
Meeting Date/Time: Friday, September 11, 2009 10:00 -11:00 DSD 616
Planner: Mark Metzger
'.;. . .
City of S pri ngfield
Development Services Department,
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Site Pia n Review
. ..
Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOn
Phone: (503) 986-4445
I Fax: (503) 986-4469
Applicant Name: GeoffCrook
ICompany:
/Address:
,
IAPplicant's Rep,: Colin McArthur. AICP
Icompany:
IAddress:
,
I Property Owner: Oregon Depal1lnent of Transportation (ODOT)
I COmpany: Maior Proiects Branch
IAddress: 680 Coltage Street NE. Salem OR 97301-2412
,
1'1-03'33-'('/n.,oo,~/J""-~ 17-0'J'.33'1'fll."j 17-o3-J3 ''/1 1Z- 101
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: Multiple (see Table 2-1) TAX LOT NOeS): Multiple(seeTable2.1)
I Property Address: Interstate 5 (Pacific Highwav I); Milepost 192,18 - 193.00
ISi;ze of Property: 27,7 Acres I:g] Sauare Feet 0
I Proposed Name of Pr'oject: Willamelle River Bridge Phase I
680 Cottage Street NE. Salem OR 97301.2412
, Phone: '(541) 485-7385
Cameron McCarthv Gilbe'1 & Scheibe
Fax:
(541) 485-7389
I
I
I
I
Description of
Proposal:
160 East Broadwav. Eugene OR 97401
Phone: (503) 986-4445
Fax:
(503) 986.4469
If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to thIs application,
Phase II construction for the 1-5 Willamcttc River Bridge Proiect
Existing Use: ODOT 1-5 ROW: Pa,'ks and Open Space
_New Impervious Surface Coverage (Including Bldg. Gross Floor Area): 7.540
Si natures: Please si nand rint your name and date in the ao rooriate box on the next
Associated Applications:
I~ :.-----~
Iga~~-~~: eK:'E~ 0)(')(1- ()01) ;i:L
lAP plication F~e: $ 'l;iIl1, (; n
ITOTAL FEES: $ '!iL/(ttrC
I ".'.,:.'.' ':"";';''''';''':'.:';i..'::.;'.':',~,;,:."_",, ".
Sians:
Date: I Reviewed by:
Date: (611-/ I {!q I Reviewed by: I>t.--
ITechnical Fe~: $ 16 Ip~staae Fee: $ XS
I PROJECT NUMBER: f)::'j)lCiJi, CCC6>~
','''' '.i "''';'';.''.<.-.~. Y>.,.'-:..::, v..... .....:'..;;.:,,,::-...."',.~'~.;,;;::"..;.,:,;ft':.:-'l::'~'::.,-:.,,:;;:'.:"I."",:',;',-....'.': ~":'.;: ;",~' ",.,:-.;-.~,:,\,.,' :f::'.;-.:': :,-,.:,..;;. ,',", '. , . '. ,. , .. :.;':q
rKt-;'Ul}!\!ii!'iAL I<tL;'U
AUG 2 1 2009
....,"~;~,,'.:.:':
.... ,- ,..;.::-;<<".
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
1 of 10
Owner Signatures
This applicatio,n form is used for both the required pre-submittal meeting and subsequent
complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application
process, An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted.
Pre-Subm itta I
. ,
The undersigned acknowledges that the information in"this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the
Pre- Submittal Meeting.
Owner:
~--
Signature ~
Date:
srh<;A4
c =~~ C/'k>;"~_
Print
Submittal
. J represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City, Consistent with the <:omp!eteness check
performed on this application at the Pre-Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as
necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise
contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted.
This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227,178 pertaining to a complete
application, .
Owner:
Date:
Signature
,.'.
Print
PRE-SllBMITTAl REC'D'
AUG 2 1 2009
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
2 of 10
'Site Plan Review Application Process
1. Applicant Submits a Site Plan Review Application for Pre-Submittal
. The application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements
Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet.
. A pre-submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre-submittal
meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday~ from 10:00 am - noon.
. Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre-submittal meetings within five to seven
working days of receiving an application.
2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre-Submittal Meeting
. The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre-
submittal meeting.
. The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and
Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning
Division and is scheduled for'30 to 60 minutes. .
. The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre-Submittal Checklist specifying the items
required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the
applicant has 180 days submit a complete application to the City.
3. Applicant Submits a CompieteOApplication, City Staff Revie~ the:Application and
Issue a Decision ' '
. A complete application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements
Checklist on pages 4-7 ,of this application packet. .
. A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless
appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application.
. Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the
property being reviewed imd to any applicable neighborhood association. In Oaddition,
the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property.
. There is a 14-day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed.
. Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their
comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approvaf
criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those
given notice.
. Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied.
· At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use'decision
prior to issuing the final land use decision.
· The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision;' which is
effective onthe day it is mailed.
· The decision issued.is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15
calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official.
',';
Ou;:.I::, i 'RMiIT.A: l, RrC'D
i 1'(,. \.11.1"0'0.1" . !:
AUG 2 1 2009
Revised 1/1/08 Molly M,arkarian
3 of 10
Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist
NOTE:
o ' ALL of the following items MUST be submittE!d for BOTH Pre-Submittal and Submittal.
o If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please
state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form.
I:'8l Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services
Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at tte
pre-submittal and submittal stages.
I:'8l Site Plan Revi,ew Application Form,
I:'8l Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the
property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining t!1e
action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employeef
and future expansion plans, if known.
I:'8l Copy of the Deed
I:'8l Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting
ownership and listing all encumbrances.
I:'8l Co'py of the Site Plan Reduced to 8'h"x 11'~, which will be mailed as part of the
required neighboring property notification packet.
o Right~of-Way Approach Permit Application provided where the property has frontag ':'
on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility.
I:'8l Three (3) Copies of the Stormwater Management System Study with Completed
Storm water Scoping Sheet Attached - The plan, supporting calculations and
documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures
Manual. '
o Three (3) Copies of the Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in
accordance with SDC 4.2-105 AA. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze
and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's
transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a 'given
development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations,
access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also
address, if needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and
objectives.
I:'8l Seven (7) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre-Submittal OR .
Eighteen (18) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Submittal
I:'8l All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and
sufficient to show detail of the plan' and related data, north arrow, and date of '
preparation.
I:'8l All plan sets must be folded to 8'h" by 11" and bound by rul;lJ;l.,~ )?W,d~AI R-C'D
Pt<t'~liBMI iI 'b . t .
a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions '
, , , . '. . AUf:;'l ?,[lQ9
I:'8l Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Eng~5u!:)I~ldAL ~tC'D
I:'8l Vicinity Map ~11~ " ' 7" .
Revised 1/1/08 'Molly Markarian,
40f 10
~ The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb
cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining ,and what
, is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size,
setbacks fr.om property lines, and distance between buildings. .
~ The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses
and required riparian setbClck that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse
Map on file in the Development SerVices Department
~ The 100-year floodplain and flood way boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest
adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map'Amendment
or Letter of Map Revision
~ The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead
Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department
~ Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when
measured 4 '/2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian
areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings
~ Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of
Lane County. A' Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted
concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable
soils and/or a high water table
b. Site Plan
~ Prepared .by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, or Engineer
~ Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the
parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and
distance between buildings " ' '
~ Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage,
trash receptacles, and signs .
~ Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact and disabled parking spaces;
including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping
~ Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site
proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and
other impervious surfaces
D Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district
D On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation
D Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be serVed, including the location and
dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed
D Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces
~ Location of existing and proposed transit facilities
D Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for
common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses
D Phased Development Plan - where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a
phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries
and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street
connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other
required public improvements, including but not limited toP~iF\1f~r5Y.f;seweri;I,i5fdrrmwater
"'~,:~/i'\! Ii ~h h:.-" L.I
AUG 21 2009
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
5 of 10
management, water, and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply
to the Site Plan application being submitted.
c. Improvement and Public Utilities P,lan
~ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
~ Location and width of all existing, and proposed easements
~ Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of all existing and proposec
streets, alleys, dedications or, other right-of~ways within or adjacent to the proposed
development, including ownership and maintenance status, if applicable.
~ Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting
~ Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles,
transfo~mers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities
~ Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks,
sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails
" ,
~ Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on andadja"cent to the site includillg
sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas,
telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points
d. Grading, Paving, &. Stormwater Management Plan
~,Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
~ Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are
proposed as part of the stormwater management system
o Roof drainage p~tterns and discharge locations
~ Pervious and Impervious area drainage patterns
~ The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but
not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater
quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained
~ Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (fo'
land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals)'
~ Amount of proposed cut and fill
e. Landscape Plan
~ Drawn by a Landscape Architect
~ Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of
landscape coverage
~ Screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110
o Written description, including specifications, of the permanent irrigation system
~ Location and type of street trees
~ List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground
cover). Include in the chart genus, spec.ies, common name, quantity, size, spacing,
and method of planting
f. Architectural Plans
'~ Exterior elevations of all buildings and structures proPos~~EobWBM~bIR/iGiBt site,
including height AUG 2 1 2009
Revised 1/1{08 Molly Markarian
Gof 10
o Cenceptual fleer plans
,
g. On-Site Lighting Plan
~ Lecatien, erientatien, and maximum height ef exterier light fixtures, beth free standing
and attached .
, )
~ Type and extent ef shielding, including cut-eff angles, and type ef illuminatien,
wattage, and lumineus area
~ Phetem'etric test repert fer each light seurce
~ Additional Materials That May be Required
IT IS THE APf)LICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL
STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE
APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS
DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120:
o Where a multi-family develepment is prepo~ed, any additienal materials to,
derT)enstrate cempliance with SDC 3.2-240
~ Riparian Area Pretectien Repert fer properties lecated within 150 feet ef the tep ef
bank efany Water Quality Limited Waterceurses (WQLW) er within 100 feet ef the
tep ef bank ef any direct tributaries ef WQLW '
A Geetechnical Repert prepared by an engineer must be submitted cencurrently if
there are unstable seils Cilnd/er a high water table present
Where the develepment area is within an everlay district, address the additienal
standards ef the everlay district '
If five er mere trees are prepesed to, be remeved, a Tree Felling Permit as specified
in SDC 5.19-100
A wetland delineatien appreved by the Oregen Divisien ef State Lands must be
submitted cencurrently where there is a wetland en the property
Any required federal er state permit must be submitted cencurrently er evidence
the permit applicatien. has been submitted fer review '
Where any grading, filling er excavating is propesed with the develepment, a Land'
and Drainage ~Iteratien permit must be submitted prier to, develepment
Where applicable, any Discretienary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100
and,5.21-100
An Annexatien applicatien, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a develepment is
prepesed eutside ef the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can
be served by sanitary sewer
0
~.
.. 0
~
~
~
[8]
0
"
<
'\i'..
PRE-SUBMnTAL REC'D
AUG 2 1 2009
,
Revised 1/1/08 Moliy Markarian
7 of 10
1~~JNGF.1E' '
,r Ir If , ~'"_" r
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT I Engineering Division Phone: (541) 726-3753 Fax: (541) 736-1021
MARCH 5, 2004 ,
REQUIRED STORMW ATER SCOPING SHEET USE POLICY:
In October 2003, Springfield Public Works released a trial "stormwater scoping sheet," provided to help
engineers and developers meet stormwater requirements in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and
Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). After a five month trial period, it became
apparent that users of the scoping sheet submitted much more complete applications than non-users. An
added bonus was a decrease in the overall review time spent on the applications, resulting in quicker rlOtice of
decisions.
As a result of the benefits of the scoping sheets, the City has decided to make their use a mandatory process.
As of April 12, 2004, the use of storm water scoping sheets will be required for all 'applications which require
development review. All applications submitted to the City shall provide four (4) copies of a completed
stormwater scoping' sheet with the application packet. Attached with this letter is the latest version of the
scoping sheet, which reflects changes requested by the development community. '
PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL NOW BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A
COMPLETED STORMW ATER SCOPING SHEET, STORMW A TER STUDY AND PLANS IN
CONFORMANCE WITH THE SCOPE REQUIREMENTS
DIRECTIONS ,FOR USING STORMW ATER SCOPING SHEETS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Obtain scopingsheet,from application packet, city website, or other location
2. Fill out project information (top half offront sheet) prior to commencement of work on stormwater
study (note: do not sign scoping sbeet until it is received from the City with requirements checked).
'3. Mail, fax, or email all pages to: City of Springfield, Public Works Dept., Attn: Matt Stouder
4. Receive completed scoping sheet (filled outby the City) indicating minimnm requirements for a
complete stormwater study
'5. Include four (4) copies of complete scoping sheet (signed by engineer at the bottom of page 2),
, stormwater study and plans that comply with the minimum required scope with submittal of
application packet. The scoping sheet shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover of the
stormwater'study.' , .
Stormwater scoping sheets can be found'with all application packets (City website and the Public Works front
counter) as well as on the Public Works webpage at either: www.cLsorinQJield.or.us/Pubworks/whatsnew.htm
or under the link for "fillable forms" at www.ci,sprinQfield,oLus/Pubworks/Desi[m/start.htm. Thank you in
advance for working with the City of Springfield with this new process.
,... _Sincerely,
Matt Stouder, Civil Engineer
City of Springfield, Public WorkslEngineering
Email: mstouder@ci.springfield.or.us
Phone: (541) 736-1035
Fax: (541) 736-1021
; ;,t.SUBMIITAL RECID
AUG 2 1 2009
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
8 of 10
_ :;---1
~,r '
I'I-i
'Tj'',-i
<1-1
" I
It)
fl
'--.J
~\
PERMNIENTBRIOGE . ~./.
"""""""'" ,,//'::/ ! ,;~' , If.
Pl.-l_ I /, &.
g~~~;'-~_== -.4,?,~9'",~-c,
iI~r;p- ,""}~~~~-~/ :~/
""',j" ;',' . /"'~'~ ' .- RE'i'AININGWALLIt21126
j) V ~--~-- ' >"/'
f1/1 t /-~ - '_-,_ - V~Waa"'TEoswM
'" ' " --'~:-.r.::'l~'~-
-: - ~c 1,jZt~Ji -:i-'r?i;'Tj U'':::=:=..
_,,->-::0 .,..... .J5OI.Jll-I8Ol.JMSOUNDWALLClt13ll
.-'1 ' Il r -'"]-,- ~
. - 1, I ~-_:~~-~_Ltt.J---1I~ ~\~..._
rr";~r" ur'_'-=lNGWAl.L~1128 -~'~T--<:=-["TJ'-'--=:--';"":
-, ' ~!!.-s'~-,FI ' i 1,11 1!_It:..-=t~,:,,:~nu~_:-;=ir,T},x~ -~ rl! I
, ~ ,/):'~i . -' '---'RAlNGAAllENIEXTENOED CETENTIONF'ONO _ r
~,1J, ' crT! !,IITII !iOJTI~:rq1~'N:=~;';';'--1-!~'":~:r-=':=
~ ' ' I "----,J,.l---r - _a_ LLG II
' ' , nlll r I nnrT I I ' _ _ _ , ' , ,,' ,
- j',,_,:L_w LEGEND
/ ~~t"Tr'r~ """"
, BWAl..E v/. PIqod_~_
YEOETATED, 1_ :0::01_,..._2.
, ~T_'H.ay
(~:.......--"~..." II ----r- _,...,_ FEtMFlOOOWAY
I 'Cl-W6'lB. RESTORATION
,/ /;~:;~ (: -'V_rll'_ FEIM.\OO-VRF1.lXllPlAIN.
, .I \\..-.-----:.r-~~ ".,..~ _w<_;"_ WJ.J.AMEmmEENWAYBa..NoAAv
1'// j ,,-~,I. ~\~::'~~'~:~" _'YIl-"o-- GOO..6RlPNl3N<lCXlRRll:lOR
jilt. ! ~~0:" I \~ EKlU'tlWlY~
. , " i ) RESTORAlQ ---:rJ~~_n lE)TREES
'III t 1i:C', I -, "..::0,-( 'c::J--
I~ ' :, 1-1""~ rrT E~NGFELDSOlNlAAY
~ 1/ 1-", L RESTCRA ACII..l11Es t=i......i..
/11/ /~ i ~.2.~..,..F _'~
/1 IP<,j I) i P\~-\ .~ ,C:J:t[
/ J' Ir"""o.,( Y '-J=' j'-1-\ r
il .ft/ 717 / ~-I ~"'~r:ri[ffiLLJ
ij .lit, " . i i . l-
i lip {1 I r-----' if[TO
i /ft.l /-;':";":..; L~_,_,I '-'-..L ,In.Ll,
/ -'l:/ir,-,/,-~ (,_n_,__n" I'--'urm-,cr
/ ,./~j/ 1/ 1:"'G-..r::1 ~ .....j __z-
lR
iH
JU
~I
0' 125' 250'
~-
500'
T OREGON OEPARTIIEHT OF TRANSPORTAllON
~"'l:i1flllHl.i.f7i'fih
. ...............:""~
--- ......--
-..--
1"1' WILUKETTE RIVER BRIDGE - BUNDLE no
PACIFIC ;HIG:HWAY
LANEOZoUNTY
TuL.ci.1I'17033311l109C11
TuL.<ll.'1T033313OO2112
TuL.<ll.'1T03331400300
Tu l<lt. 11033314OO6Oll
Ta>tL.<ll.lIH03331<lOO700
Tu Lclll 11U3321100500
Tul.Dl'H033314OOlllX1
Tu. lOtll 17033301100100
i: t:: i :'Gmi400iOii
Tu l.Dl. H0333ol<lOOlOO
Tu l<lt. 11033$4100101
T&IlLcl'17033~
t:t::l~
Tul..<ll..170JJ30M0:2WJ
Tul.Dl.,llO:103ODOOIOl
TlIll!..ol"B03032OO2OO1
Tu 1..<11.11' ll1030321Xl2OO3
1000'
,
DURALL liTE PUN
I _n
o;~'.o.
13-AUG-2009 10:00 A.M.
F"I~ ND.
:;r~[ SlJBMlfJAt-RfC'D
AUG 2 1 2009
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
VICINITY MAP
PRE2009-00022
Interstate Highway, Transportation Corridor
SITE
Map 17-03-33-14
Tax Lot 600;
Map 17-03-33-41
TL 101;
Map 17-03-33-44
TL
100,200,300,2500
2600
North
t
l
PRE-SUBMIITAl REC'O
AUG 2 I 2009
City of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Floodplain Overlay District Development
.. . . .
Geoff Crook
Phone: (503) 986-4445
Fax: (503) 986-4469
Applicant Name:
Icompa~Y:
IAddress:
Oregon DeDal1ment of Transportation (ODOT)
680 Cottage Street NE. Salem OR 97301-241'2
Company:
IAddress:
IpropertYOwner: Oregon DeDarlment of Transnortation (ODOT)
ICompany:
IAddress:
,
IASSESSOR'S MAP NO: Muliiple(SeeTable2-11 ITAX LOT NO(S):
IPropertv Address: Interstate 5 (Pacific Highwav I); Milepost 192,18 - 193.00
ISize of Property: 27.7'
Cameron McCal1hv,Gilbel1 & Scheibe
Phone: '(541) 485-7385
Fax: (541) 485-7389
, Applicant's Rep.: Colin McArthur. AICP
']60 East Broadway. Eugene OR 97401
MaioI' Proiects Branch
Phone: (503) 986-4445
Fax: (503) 986-4469
,
I
I
I
,
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
680 Cottage Street NE. Salem OR 97301-24]2
Multiple (see Table 2-1)
Acres I2(J Sauare Feet
Izonina:
I Existina Use:
Description of
Proposal:
Public Land Ooen Soace (PLO)
ODOT 1;5 ROW: Parks and Onei, SDace
If you are rillfng in this form by hand, please ,attach your proposal description to this application,
Phase II construction for the 1-5 WillametteRiver Bridge Proiect
Associated Cases:
lease No.:
I Applicatio~' F~e::;$: F,i:.
ITOTAL FEES: $ ,
I Date:
ITeChnical Fee: $
I Reviewed by:
'jpostage Fee: '$0
PROJECT NUMBER: '
PRE.SUBMITTAL REeD
AUG2 1 2009
Revised 111/08 Molly Markarian
1 of 4
Signatures
The undersigned acknowledges that the inFormation in this application is correct and accurate,
Applicant:
~
Signature
,~-
Date:
R'/J"1/d ""
.
~d~ L:!/1..L90L.,
Print
If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf.
Owner:
Date:
Signature
Print
PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'O
AUG2 1 2009
''') -{"A ,L\nL\:j{
.....,""'.,
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
2 of 4
'Floodplain Overlay District Development Application Process
1. Applicant Submits a Floodplain Overlay District Development Application to the
Development Services Department '
. The application must conform to the Floodplain Overlay District Development
Submittal Requirements Checklist on page 4 of this applic~tion packet.
. Planning Division staff screen the submittal at the front counter to determine
whether all required items listed in the Floodplain Overlay District Development
Submittal Requirements Checklist have been submitted. '
. Applications missing required items will not be accepted for submittal.
2. City Staff Conduct Detailed Completeness Check
. Planning Division staff conducts a detailed completeness check within 30 days of
submittal.
The assigned Planner notifies the applicant in writing regarding the completeness of
the application.
An application is not be deemed technically complete until all information necessary
to evaluate the proposed development, its ir:npacts, and its compliance with the
provisions of the Springfield Development Code and other applicable codes and
statutes have been provided.
Incomplete applications, as well as insufficient or unClear data, will delay the
application review process a~d may result in denial. "
,:. City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision
. This is a Type I decision and thus is made without public notice arid without a public
hearing since there are clear and objective approval criteria and/or development
standards that do not require the use of discretion.
. Decisions address all the applicable approval criteria and/or development standards.
. Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied.
o The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which
is effective on the day it is mailed. '
o The decision issued is the final decision of the City and may not be appealed.
.
o
.
,
}'.:
P~(f.SUBMI1TAL REC'O
AllG 2 1 2009
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
30f4
Floodplain Overlay District Development Submittal Requirements Checklist
NOTE: If you feel an item does not apply, please state the reason why and attach the
explanation to this form.
o Submitted Concurrently with Site Plan Review, Minimum Development Standards, or
Residential Building Permit applications, where applicable
IZJ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services
Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at.t~ e
time of complete application submittal.
IZJ Floodplain Development Application Form
IZJ Copy of the Deed
IZJ Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and
listing all encumbrances~
IZJ Narrative explaining the proposal and any additional information that may have a bearing
in determining the action to be taken, including findings demonstrating compliance with
the Floodplain Overlay District Development Standards described in SDC 3.3-420.
NOTE: Before the Director can approve a Floodplain Overlay District Development
request, information submitted by the applicant must adequately support the request. PII
of the Floodplain Overlay District Development Standards must be addressed by the
applicant. Incomplete applications, as well as insufficient or unclear data, will delay the
application review process and may result in denial.
Three (3) ,Copies of a Plot Plan drawn to scale to include:
IZJ Name, location, and dimensions of an existing and proposed structures
IZJ Name, location, and dimensions of all fill'
IZJ Name, location, and dimensions of ,all storage of materials
IZJ Name, location, and dimensions of all drainage facilities
IZJ Base flood elevation area
IZJ Elevation in relation to mean sea level
IZJ Of the existing grade of the proposed development (for residential structures,
show elevations at the corners of the proposed structures) ,
o Of the lowest floor (including basement) of all structures
o To which any structure has been flood-proofed
o For residential structures, elevations at the corners of proposed structures
IZJ
IZJ
Certification by an Oregon licensed Engineer or Architect that flood-proofing
me.tbods,Jo~~.nY non-residential structure meet the flood-proofing criteria in SDC 3.3-42)
B.2;'!' ,', ", .
, Description of the extent to whiCh any watercourse wm})~ .~tIW~1 r.,€a~d as a res lit
of the proposed development ,~. 1<1: ';)UDIVIIIIHL Kt\.- U , '
AUG 2 12009
o
Revised 1{1{08 Moily Markarian
4014
City of Springfield
, DevelopmentServices Department
225 Fifth Street
, Springfield, OR 97477 '
SPRINGFIELD
~-
Willamette Greenway Overlay District Development
Applicant Name:
Icompany:
IAddress:
,
IAPPlicant's Rep.:
[company:
IAddress:
Geoff Crook
Phone: (503) 986-4445
Fax: (503) 986-4469
Ore~on Depat1ment of Transportation (ODOT)
680 Cottage Street NE. Salem OR 97301-2412
Colin McArthur, AlCP
Phone: (541) 485-7385
Fax: (541)485.7389
Cameron McCarthv Gilbert & Scheibe
160 E Broadwav, ElI~ene OR 97401
Property Owner:' Ore~on Dcpal1ment of TransDoration (ODOT)
Phone: (503) 986-4445
Company:
IAddress:
. Maior Proiects Branch
Fax:
(503) 986-4469
680 Cottage Street NE. Salem OR 97301-2412
IASSESSOR'S MAP NO: MultiDle (see Table 2-1) 'ITAX LOT NOeS): 'MlIltiole(SeeTable2.1)
I Property Address: Interstate 5 (Pacific Highwav I): Milepost 192.18- 193.00
ISize of Prooertv: 27.7 Acres ~ Sauare Feet 0
,
Izonina: Public Land .aDen SDace (PLO)
I Existing Use:, Parks and ODen SDace
I Description of If you a~e filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application,
Proposal: Phase II construction for the 1-5 Willamette River Bridge Proiect
ISignat~res: Please siqn and
... - t . ..-
Associated Cases:'"
lease NO'.:
IAOPlication Fee: $
Siqns:
I 'Date: Reviewed bv:
ITechnical Fee: $ Ipostaae Fee: $
I PROJECT NUMBER:
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D
AUG 2 1 2009
lof4
. Signatures
The un~ersi9ned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate.
Applicant:
~--
Signature -
Date:
?hqjc:J,,!
G-~PF ~..."
Print
If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf.
Owner:
Date:
Signature
Print
PRE.SUBMIlTAL REC'D
AUG 2 1 2009
( '10-"
:'.il.'
Revised 1/1/08 Molly' Markarian
2 of 4
, Willamette Greenway Overlay District Development Application Process
1. Appl,icant Submits a Willamette Greenway Overlay District Development Appl,ication
to the Development Services Department
. The application must conform to the Willamette Greenway Overlay District
Development Submittal Requirements Checklist on page 4 of this application
~~ '.'
, . .Planning Division staff screen the submittal at the front 'counter to determine
, whether all required items listed in the Willamette Greenway Overlay District
Development Submittal Requirements Checklist have been submitted.
. Applicatiohs missing required items will not be accepted for submittal. ,
2. City Staff Conduct Detailed Completeness Check
. Planning Divis'ion staff'conducts a detailed completeness check within 30 days of '
submittal.
. The assigned Planner notifies the applicant in writing regarding the completeness of
the application.
. An application is not be deemed technically complete until all information necessary
to evaluate the proposed developm~nt, its impacts, and its compliance with the
provisions of the Springfield Development Code and other applicable codes and
statutes have been provided.
. Incomplete applications, as well as insufficient or unclear data, will delay the
application review process and may result in denial.
3. Planning Commission or Hearings Official Review the Appl,ication, Hold a Publ,ic
Hearing, and Issue a Decision '
. This is a Type III decision and thus is made after a public hearing.
. A notice is posted in the newspaper, and notice is mailed to property owne,s and
occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable
neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided
by the City, on the subject property. .
. Written comments may be submitted to the Development Services Department
through the day of the public hearing or comments may be provided in person
during the public hearing.
. Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee.
. After a public hearing, the Planning Commission or Hearings Official issues a
decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development
sta~dards,:.~~.~ell as any written or oral testimony.
. ApplicMions 'may' be approved, approved with conditions, or denied.
· The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which
is effective 'on the day it is mailed.
. The decision issued is the final, decision of the City but the Planning Commission's
decision may be appealed within 15 calendar days to the City Council, and the
Hear, ings Official's decision may be appealed within 21 cale~.9W !JjjlCi.t.Il.thE1,.land
Use Board of Appeals. 11<1:.~UtlIVIIIIAlI<EC'D
WG Oyerlay District Development Submittal Requirements ChecWf5~ I 2009
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
3 of 4
NOTE: If you feel an item does not apply, please state the 'reason why and attach the
explanation to this form.
D Submitted Concurrently with Site Plan Review or Minimum Development Standards'
applications, where applicable.
, '
o Application F~e - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedu/efo~ th'e appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services
Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the
time of complete application submittal.
o WG Overlay District Development Application Form
o Copy of the Deed
o Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting
ownership and listing all encumbrances.
o Narrative explaining the proposal and any additional information that may have a bearillg
in determining the action to be taken, including findings demonstrating compliance with:
o WG Overlay District Development Standards as specified in SDC 3.3-330
o Discretionary Uses Criteria as specified in SDC 5.9-120
o Floodplain, stormwater, and hydraulic analyses, where applicable
NOTE: Before the Planning ComQ1ission or Hearings Official can determine the Greenway
Setback Line and can approve a Discretionary Use request, information submitted by the
applicant must adequately support the request. All of the WG Overlay District
Development Standards and Discretionary Use Criteria must be addressed by the
applicant. Incomplete applications, as well as insufficient or unclear data, will delay the
application review process and may result in denial., In certain circumstances, it is
, advisable to hire a professional planner or land use attorney to prepare the required
findings. ' -
o Plot Plan to Include the Following:
o Top of bank
.~- --- ._--. --.
o High and low waterlines
, 0 Proposed setback line
o Greenway overlay boundary
PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'D
AUG2 l' 2009 '
t'. ,,; ,.
, ' Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
4014
City of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Discretionary Use
SPRINGFIELD
~.
Phone: (503) 986.4445
, Applicant Name: GeoffCrook
Icompany:
IAddress:
,
IAPplicant's Rep.: Colin McArthur. AlCP
Icompany: Cameron McC8I1hv Gilbert & Scheibe
IAddress: 160 E Broadwav. Eugene OR 97401
I Property Owner: Oregon Dep"11ment ofTransporation (ODOn
Icompany: Maior Proiects Branch
IAddress: 680 Cottage Street NE. Salem OR 97301-2412
IASSESSOR'S MAP NO: Multiple(secTable2-]) '!TAX LOT NO(S): MultiplelseeTable2-1)
I Property Address: Interstate 5 (Pacific Highwav ]); Milepost 192.18 - 193,00
ISize of Property: 27.7 Acres IX] Sauare Feet D
IDescriPtion of If you are filling in this form by hand, please ~ttach your pr~posal description to this application;
Proposal: Phase II construction for the 1-5 WiIlamette River Bridge Proieet
IExistinCl Use: ODOT 1-5 ROW: Parks and Ooen Soace
ISi natures: Please si rint your name and date in the a prooriate box on the next oaqe.
, . ,
, . - .
Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOn
Fax:
(503) 986-4469
680 Cottage Street NE. Salem OR 97301-2412
Phone: (54])485-7385
Fax:
(54]) 485-7389
Phone: (503) 986-4445
Fax:
(503) 986-4469
.. . . ~
Associated Applications:
Icase No.:
IAPPlication Fee: $ ,';" ,","
'ITOTAL FEES:
Signs:' '
I Date:
ITechnical Fee: $
Reviewed by:
'postage Fee: $
PROJECT NUMBER:
PRE-SUBMITTAL REeD
AUG 2 12009
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
1 of 4
Signatures
Applicant:
Owner:
"~i:
". ~;..',
The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application Is correct and accurate.
S. . ~------
.gnature
g-h~/.;<'J
-.
Date:
G-iE...t=F CA...",.e.-_
Print
If the applicant is not t~e owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/herbehalf.
Date:
Signature
Print
, PRE.SUBMlTIALREC'D
AUG2 1 2009
'.'.-,
ReviSed 1/1/08 Molly Markarian,
2 of 4
, Discretionary Use Application Process'
1. Applicant Submits a Discretionary Use Application to the Development Services
Department
. The application must conform to the Discretionary Use Submittal Requirements
Checklist on page 4 of this application packet. .
. .
. Planning Division staff scr~en the submittal at the front counter to determine
whether all required items listed in the Discretionary Use Submittal Requirements
Checklist have been submitted.
. Applications missing required items will not be accepted for submittal.,
2. City Staff Conduct Detailed Completeness Check
. Planning Division staff conducts a detailed completeness check within 30 days of
submittal.' .
. The assigned Planner notifies the applicant in writing regarding the completeness of
, the application.
. An application is not be deemed technically complete until all information necessary
to evaluate the proposed development, its impacts, and its compliance with the
provisions of the Springfield Development Code and other applicable codes and
statutes have been provided. '
. Incomplete applications, as well as insufficient or unclear data, will delay the
application rev.iew process and may result in denial.
I. Planning Commission or Hearings Official Review the Application, Hold a Public
Hearing, and Issue a Decision '
. This is a Type III decision and thus is made after a public hearing.
. A notice is posted in the newspaper, and notice is mailed to property owners and
occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable
neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided
by the City, onthe subject property. '
. Written comments may be submitted to the Development Services Department
through the day of the public hearing or comments may be provided'in person
during the public hearing.
. Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee.
. After a public hearing, the Planning Commission or Hearings Official issues a
deci$i.on that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development
,stancJ'a-'rds,as well as any written or oral testimony.
.' Applicati.ons may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied.
. The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which
is effective on the day it is mailed.
. The decision issued is the final decision of the City but the Planning Commission's
decision may be appealed within 15 calendar days to the City Council, and the
Hearings Official's decision may be appealed within 21 calendar days to the Land
Use Board of Appeals. '
PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'O
AUG 2 I 2009
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
30f4
Discretionary Use Submittal Requirements Checklist
NOTE: If you feel an item does not apply, please state the reason why and attach the
explanation to this form. '
D Submitted Concurrently with Site Plan Review application, where applicable
IZI Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services
Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at th ~
time of complete application submittal. '
IZI Discretionary Use Application Form
IZI Copy of the Deed
IZI Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting
ownership and listing all encumbrances. '
IZI Copy of the Associated Site Plan Reduced to 8112" by 11", which will be mailed as
part of the required neighboring property notification packet.
IZI Narrative - explaining the proposal and any additional information that may have a
bearing in determining the action to be taken, including findings demonstrating ,
compliance with the Discretionary Use Criteria described inSDC 5.9-120.
NOTE: Before the Planning Commission or Hearings Official can approve a Discretionary
Use request, information submitted by the applicant must adequately support the reques ..
All of the Discretionary Use Criteria must be addressed by the applicant. Incomplete
applications, as well as insufficient or unclear data, will delay the application review
process and may result in denial.
PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'D
AUG 2 1 2009
.\, '
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
40f4
PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'O
AUG 2 1 2009
IMe
. oG
0[8
)
'i
'-.
1-5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT ryvG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PlAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
I
INDEX
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY FORM ..........................................;...........................................-
DISCRETIONARY USE FORM ..............................................................................................-
S,ITE PLAN REVIEW FORM .........:.........................................................................................-
FLOODPLAIN FORM....................................................;.........................................................-
WRITTEN STATEMENT ............................................................................,............................-
li1dex................~...~....:.............................................................................................................-
Project Information.............,....................................................................................:. I
Description of Proposal ...........................................;..........:..................................... 3
Project Background...................................................................................................7
Detailed Project Description ....;............................................................................ II
Submittal Requirements........................................................................................ 25
Approval' Criteria and Standards...............................................................,.......... 37
EXH I BITS ........:.... .............. ................ ............................................................ ................ .......... -
, ,
Exhibit A - Deeds...............:................................................................................................ A,
Exhibit B - Preliminary Title Reports ......................;...............;........................:............... B
Exhibit C- Plan Set...;................:......;.............;..........,.............:..;....................................... C
Exhibit D ,=- Stormwater Management Report................................................................ D,
Exhibit E - Wetland Delineation Reports and RemovallFiII Permits .........,..................E
Exhibit F - Riparian Area Protection Report ...............................~..................................F
, Exhibit G - Traffic Management Plan and Traffic Impact Studies ............................... G
Exhibit H - No-Rise Certification .....................................................;.............................. H
Exhibit 1- Hydraulic and Scour Analysis Report ...................................................;.........1
ie' . ExhibitJ - FEMA Flood Cross Sections ......;..........................................:............................J
Exhibit K - Development Agreement ....................................................P.R~:S.U~MJ.DN. RECIO
AUG2 1 2@9
CMGS "
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
INDEX
\
~
\,
,1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE"
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION'
"-
1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
Applicant's Request:
Phase II construction for the 1-5 Willamette River Bridge
Project
Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT)
680 Cottage St. NE
Salem, OR 97301-2412
503.986.4445
Property Owner:
Willamalane Park and Recreation District
250 S. 32nd St.
Springfield, OR 97478
541.736.4544
Applicant:
Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT)
680 Cottage St. NE
Salem, OR 97301-2412
503.986.4445 '
Applicant's Representative:
Colin McArthur, AICP
Cameron McCarthy Gilbert & Scheibe
160 E Broadway, Eugene OR 9740 I
541.485.7385
coliniCVcm!':sla.com
Project Name:
Subject Property:
Location:
1-5 Willamette River Bridge Project ~ Phase II
ODOT 1-5 right-of-way
Multiple Tax Lots (see Table 2-1)
Interstate 5 (Pacific Highway I)
Milepost /92./8 - /93.00
27.7 acres (1,208,285 square feet)
ODOT 1-5 right-of-way
Parks and Open Space
Development Area:
Plan Designation:
Zoning:
:" .'~j',:; l ,:.
Overlay Z<>nit.g:'
. . , '! ~:' "
. . ~
Refinement Plan:
;, ~ '" t '
ODOT 1-5 right-of-way
PLO - Public, Land & Open Space
N/A
N/A
...;
C'"
Associated Applications:
SHR 2008-00009; SHR 2009-0000 I; DRC 2009-00007; MA 07-
3; LRP 2003-0012; PRE 2008-00077
PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'D
Allr,21 2009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17,2009
~
(
.....,.'. ., ,(,
.. " ._'.....'.. _.. -,t:-- c. . ~"'" ._ ... " ',;,...."
j
I-S WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHAsE II
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION .
This page intentionally left blank.
/
PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'D
AUG2 1 2009
! .""T~'!;\:i.~;:} '; .'
.::.,
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
2
,
!
'\
1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II ,
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT r;YG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL
2.1 Introduction
The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) ("the Applicant") requests approva('for'
Phase II construction of the Interstate 5 (1-5) Willamette River Bridge Project (Project, Proposal).
The Project replaces the decommissioned Willamette River and Canoe Canal bridges and detour
bridges with new bridges. The existing 1-5 Willamette River Bridge is located within both the cities
of Eugene and Springfield, with the decommissioned bridge center line constituting the boundary
line separating th~ two cities. The Applicant proposes to locate the replacement bridge in
essentially the same location as the existing 1-5 bridge. Demonstration of compliance with
applicable land use regulations of both jurisdictions is required.
The Project site is comprised of state-owned right-of-way (ROW), state-owned property, railroad
ROW, and city-owned property. The majority of the Project site is within state-owned ROW
associated with 1-5, the Willamette River corridor, and Franklin Boulevard. Parcels within the
Project site (discussed below) and within Eugene and Springfield jurisdiction are identified in Table
2-1.
,
Within Eugene jurisdiction, temporary and permanent Phase II work is proposed on three parcels;
Tax Lot No.SOO (Map No. 17-03-32-11), Tax Lot No. 800 (Map No. 17-03-33-14), and Tax Lot
No. 100 (Map No. 17-03-33-41). Temporary or permanent improvements are not proposed on '
any of the remaining parcels identified in Table 2-1 within Eugene jurisdiction. These parcels are
included for reference purposes because they will be utilized for construction access during the
Project.
Within Springfield jurisdiction, temporary and permanent Phase II work is proposed on three
parcels; Tax Lot No. 101 (Map No. 17-03-33-41) and Tax Lot No's. 100 and 2600 (Map No. 17-03-
33-44). Temporary or permanent improvements are not proposed on the remaining parcel
identified in table 2-1 within Springfield jurisdicti<;>n. This parcel is included for reference purposes
because it will be utilized for construction access during the Project.
Table 2' I. Phase I Project-Site Parcels within Eugene and Springfield
, .
'I" .,
17-03-28-30 01501 Eugene
1'1A03S32~1I~~ 00500~ EUien~",~
. tt!03f3~1J4~I'11ji',l!I:!~ OO~ Ellielie~~
17-03-33-21 00102 Eugene
17-03-33-21 00121 Eugene
17-03-33-21 00122 Eugene
17-03-33-21 00123 Eugene
17-03-33-21 00129 Eugene
17-03-33-21 00131 lEUgene
17-03-33-24 00100 Eugene
liliQ3~3r\U~~IOO]OO~J~~
r?f!l3m]!l~~IOOIOJ~~~ '
Ii1A03}j3Jjg'.ti~Ji.~OOl00jl~~iliil'tIII~1Se~~
l'l.i03~J3~~~~IOU~~~lsar;l1it.elil~ '
37'03'33'<14" > 102500 ISpringfield
PRE-SUBMITTAL RECIO
AUG2 1 Z009
.:; .'
';'
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITI Al I August 17, 2009,
3
(
_,I
(~.
!
1-5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAYDI5TRICT DEVELOPMENT rNG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU),SITE PLAN
, REVIEW (5PR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION .
The Proposal complies with all applicable Springfield Development Code (SDC) criteria listed in
SDC 3.3-325, SDC 5.9-120, SDC 5.17-125, and SDC 3.3-420 and the submittal requirements listed
on the Type III WilIamette Greenway Overlay District Development, the Type III Discretionary'
Use, the Type II Site Plan Review, and the Type I Floodplain Overlay District Development forms.
The attached materials and enclosed findings demonstrate that the proposal is also consistent with
applicable policies contained in the Metro Plan and .other relevant refinement plans.
2.2 Purpose and Need ,
The purpose of the Project is to improve safety and maintain connectivity and mobility for all users
of 1-5 over the Willamette River in the Eugene/Springfield Metropolitan Area. 1-5 is a major
transportation artery and the only freeway that traverses the entire length ofthe west coast from'
Mexico to Canada. Regional economies depend on the reliable use of it in the Eugene/Springfield
area.
The Project replaces the decommissioned Willamette River and Canoe Canal bridges and
temporary detour bridges with p.ermanent bridges to accommodate current and future traffic
volumes. The Project proposes two new bridges that will carry traffic in one direction each,
northbound (NB) and southbound (SB).
The Project is part of the Oregon Transportation Investment Act (OTIA) III State Bridge Delivery
Program, which involves the repair and replacement of more than'300 bridges statewide over a ten
year period. The Project is the largest in the $1.3 billion OTIA III Program. The current estimated
completion date for the Project is December 12, 2012.
2.3 Summary of Proposal
The proposed Project consists of the following main components:
. Demolition of the decommissioned Willamette River Bridge, Canoe Canal Bridge, and detour
bridges (salvaged portions of the bridges will be recycled or reused as much as feasible):
. Construction of replacement bridges;
. Reconstruction of the roadway near the bridges including the Franklin Blvd. on- and off-
ramps; and '
. Construction of park bicycle and pedestrian path'improvements to pr~serve and enhance
public access along the river.
The new bridges will be constructed in essentially the same location as the existing bridges;
including relatively minor shifts of alignment, as well as minor changes to the Franklin Boulevard
ramps. The new bridges will be designed with enough width to eventually carry up to six lanes of
traffic (three in each direction) to meet the projected traffic needs for the next 20 years.
However, upon Project completion, the new bridges' will be striped to carry two lanes in each
di~~5tion, matching the current 1-5 configuration in this area.
Sch~duling, ~oristruction, and permitting for the Project is occurring in two phases (Phase I and
Phase II) to allow for adequate time to finalize project components including final design of the ,
replacement bridges, final design of compensatory mitigation and site restoration plans (including ,'.
final landscaping plans), final design of negotiated park improvements, and final storPMBMffl'Al. RE( 'D
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
AUG 2 1 2009
4
'.
!
'\
'--
1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT r;wG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
On February 18, 2009, the Springfield Planning Commission granted Willamette Greenway Overlay
District Development and Di,scretionary Use approvals of the Applicant's request to commence
Phase I work, which includes temporary improvements within city-owned property and
permanent improvements within state-owned ROW. On April 25, the City of Springfield granted
Site Plan Review approval and on April 14, 2009 the City of Springfield granted Floodplain Overlay
District Development approval for Phase I work. .
This concurrent Willamette Greenway Overlay District Development (yVG), Discretionary Use
(DU), Site Plan Review (SPR), and Floodplain Overlay District Development (FP) application
involves Phase II work only. Proposed work occurring within ODOT (state-owned) ROW is
provided for informational purposes to anow the reader a comprehensive understanding of the
Proposal and work planned.
2.4 Overview of Project Phases
Phase II activities, the subject of this application, involve the fonowing components:
Outside of ODOT ROW
. Bicycle/pedestrian path improvements
. Landscaping, revegetation, restoration, and mitigation
. Stormwater management facilities
Within ,ODOT ROW
. Construction of new bridges and miscenaneous structures
. Construction of roadway approaches and reconstruction of NB off-ramp
. Demolition of detour bridges
. Removal of temporary work bridges
. Bicycle/pedestrian path improvements
. Landscaping, revegetation, restoration, and mitigation
,
. Stormwater management facilities and site utilities
. Aesthetic enhancements
Phase I activities involve the fonowing components and were permitted separately from Phase II
through WG 08-4, SDR 08-7:
Outside of ODOT ROW
. Developrl)en.tof,temporary construction staging areas and access routes
,. .."." p.., ';; .
. Const~u~tioriof temporary bicyclelpedestrian paths in the Whilamut Natural Area and
Easi:gate Woodlands
. Temporary reconfiguration of bicycle/pedestrian paths in the Eastgate Woodlands
~ ',)Cons~ruction of a temporary bicycle/pedestrian path along the south side of the Willamette
River
. Associated site utilities and stormwater treatment facilities
PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'O
AUG 2 1 2009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
5
('
-, " ~(....
j
1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WllLAMETIE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT CNG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
. Temporary landscaping and revegetation
Within ODOT ROW
. Constructio,n of temporary work bridges (in-water)
. Installation of cofferdams to enclose the new bridge sub-structure (in-water)
. Demolition of the decommissioned Willamette River Bridge (in-water)
. Construction of new bridge sub-structures (in-water)
. Construction of temporary and permanent bicycle/pedestrian paths'
. Reconstruction of the Franklin Blvd. 5B 1-5 on-ramp
. 1-5 mainline work including temporary widening, erosion control measures, earthwork, and
paving
PRE.SUBMIlTAL REC'D
AUG '2 1 Z009
"
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITI Al I August 17. 2009
6
'1
'--
-,
"
1-5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
3.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
3.1 Project Origin
In 2002, during an inspection of the,existing 1-5 Willamette River Bridge, it was found to have
major structural problems that threatened the stability and safety of the bridge, including cracks in
the supporting structures.' Based on the inspection analysis, weight limits were placed on the
bridge that required a 200-mile detour for heavy haul trucks.
To eliminate the 200-mile detour for heavy haul trucks and improve traffic mobility, a temporary
detour bridge was built in 2004 and the existing Willamette River and Canoe Canal bridges were
taken out of servite (decommissioned). The detour bridges over the Willamette River and Canoe
Canal carry both the NB and SB lanes on a single bridge: All traffic is now using the temporary
detour bridge. The detour bridge does not meet current seismic standards and the construction
methods used to build the bridge only met environmental requirements as they apply to
temporary, not permanent, bridges. The detour bridge has a design life of approximately 10 years.
The decommissioned Willamette River Bridge (constructed in 1962) cannot feasibly be repaired or
widened to accommodate the traffic flow and vehicle capacity demands that are projected 20 years
in the future. ODOT estimates that it would cost roughly $50 million to repair the
decommissioned bridge to keep it in service for 20 more years, Those repairs would not widen
the bridge. The decommissioned bridge also does not meet current design standards. It was
designed using bridge standards that are 'no longer appropriate for the size of longer and heavier,
modern freight trucks. In addition, the bridge has substandard shoulders that do not provide
enough room for disabled vehicles to move completely out of the travel lanes, creating a safety
problem.
3.2 Budget and Funding Source
The 1-5 WilIamette River Bridge project is part ofthe Oregon Transportation OTIA III State Bridge
,Delivery Program, which involves the repair and replacement of more than 300 bridges statewide
over a 10 year period. The 1-5 WilIamette River Bridge project is the largest in the $1.3 billion
OTIA III program. .
The project is funded at $180 million, which includes preliminary engineering and design, ROW
acquisition (if needed), demolition; road work, structures,ties to the existing transpon:ation
system, and all construction and'inspection. Of the overall budget, approximately $70 million is
designated just for the bridge structures crossing the river, railroad, and Franklin Boulevard, and
Canoe Canal. This,includes approximately $10 million designated for additional bridge aesthetics.
The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient, Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy-for Users, a federal
transportation funding package, will provide $30 million for this Project supplementing the $150
, ,million, f~9.[l1 ;s,t~~e s()urces. The OTIA III program emphasizes using local subcontractors and
'materialsuppliers;therefore, a substantial portion ofthe project.cost is expected to 2e s~lnt in the
Eugene/Springfield area over a four year period. PRE.~UBlvIIlTAL REC'O
AUG 2 l' Z009
I The inspection resulted in a sufficiency rating of 20 on a 100 point scale, A bridge qualifies for replacement funding
from the Federal Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Funding Program if it hils a sufficiency rating below-,
50,
, CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 1.7, 2009
7
(
j
/
..'","
I-S WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
,WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT ewG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
3.3 Planning Context
In 2003, Lane County and the Cities. of Eugene and Springfield approved a Metro Plan amendment
and an exception to Statewide Planning GoaJ 15 (Willamette River Greenway) authorizing
construction of the temporary detour bridge and its removal following completion of the
permanent replacement bridges. The exception was adopted to Metro Plan text, Policy No. .13,
Chapter III, Section D.2 The detour bridge is located entirely within the jurisdictional boundaries
of the City of Springfield.
In 200a, Lane County and the Cities of Eugene and Springfield approved a Metro Plan amendment
and an exception to Goal 15 authorizing the construction of the permanent replacement bridges
and removal of the decommissioned and detour bridges. The exception was adopted to Metro
Plan text, Policy No. II, Chapter II, Section D.' The Eugene ordinance also amended the
Willakenzie Area Plan textfor portions of paragraph one in the Willamette Greenway section to
, ,
provide an. exception for, "[r]eplacement or expansion of the 1-5 Willamette River Bridge and its
approaches. ...
On December 2, 200a, the Applicant requested concurrent Willamette Greenway Overlay District
Development and Discretionary Use approvals by the City of Springfield for Phase I of the Project
including: temporary construction work such as staging areas, work bridges and roads; bicycle path,
relocation; permanent bridge substructures; Franklin Blvd. southbound on-ramp work; utilities; and
bridge demolition. Approvals for Site Plan Review and Floodplain Overlay District Development
were subsequently submitted to the City of.Springfield,
On February la, 2009, the Springfield Planning Commission granted Willamette Greenway Overlay
District Development and Discretionary Use approvals of the Applicant's request. On April 25,
2009 the City of Springfield granted Site Plan Review approval and on April 14, ,2009 the City of
Springfield granted Floodplain Overlay District Development approval for Phase I work. On April
25,2009, a development agreement for Phase I work was executed between the Applicant and
the City of Springfield, which contains the conditions of approval and additional requirements.s
The development agreement is included as Appendix K.
3.4 Public Involvement Efforts
The Applicant recognizes the need for citizen participation in all phases of this project, Public
, outreach and involvement for the Project have included: project information provided to the public
through newsletters and project website; public open house meetings to provide project
information and solicit public input; briefings to neighborhood and civic groups and local elected
bodies; and meetings of the project's Citizens Advisory Group (CAG). The CAG functions in an
advisory role and provides recommendations to the Project Development Team (PDT). The PDT
consists of ten members that include representatives from ODOT, Federal,Highway Administration
(FHWA), the Cities of Eugene and Springfield, Lane County, and the CAG. PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'O
\';,: : ".
AUG2 1 2009
. ~ - ~ ,
, Springfield File lRP 2003-0012. '
l Eugene Ordinance No. 20414 and 2041S; Springfield Ordinance No. 6227; and Lane County Ordinance No. PA 1247.
, Eugene File MA 07-3 and RA 08-1.
, Willamette Greenway and Standards Review Performance Agreement ewG 08-4/SDR 08-7)
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMiTTAL I August 17. 2009
8
)
1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT rNG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION '
'~
"
"1
Public ,opportunities to ask questions and provide input on the Project have been pr~vided by the
Applicant through the project website, at open houses, by mail, and by direct contact with ODOT
staff. I'ublic involvement activities to date are summarized below:
. Environmental Assessment (EA) open houses in Eugene and Springfield January 3 I, 2008,
. CAG meeting June 17, 2008
. CAG meeting July IS, 2008
. Stakeholder newsletter mailed week of July 21, 2008 "
. Design Kickoff/Type Selection public meeting and self-guided tour event held July 26, 2008
. CAG meeting August 5, 2008
. ODOT outreach to local public officials and media to announce type selection: week of
September 8, 2008
. Joint CAG and PDT meeting October 14, 2008
. Joint CAG and PDT meeting October 30, 2008
. Joint CAG and PDT design theme discussion workshop November 20, 2008
. CAG meeting December 2, 2008
. PDT meeting December 5, 2008
. Public open houses in Eugene and Springfield February 9, 2009
. CAG meeting January 28, 2009
. PDT meeting January 30, 2009
. Public Hearing in Springfield February 18, 2009 (SHR 2008-0009)
. Design workshop February 21, 2009
. Design workshop February 28, 2009
. CAG meeting March II, 2009
. PDT meeting March 13, 2009
. Public Hearing in Eugene March 18,2009 0NG 08-4, SDR 08-7}
. Sound wall meeting with the Laurel Hill Valley Citizens neighborhood association April 7,
2009
. CAGmeetirigApril15, 2009
, ".' .'. .. ~
. PDT meeting ~nd April 17, 2009
. Bicycle-pedestrian in-park outreach April 17 and April 18, 2009
. Presentations to Lane County Board of Commissioners (April 28, 2009) and Springfield City
Council (May 4, 2009) PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'O
AUG 2 12009
. News release for construction kick-off distributed May 6, 2009
CMGS
'INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
9
(/
(
1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG). DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
. Presentatiori to Harlow Neighbors May 13, 2009
, ,
. Construction Update mailed to stakeholders May IS, 2009
. Presentation to Springfield Mohawk Lions ,May 29, 2009 .
. Affected property owners in laurel Hill Valley surveyed and support sound wall installation,
June 2009
. News release for updated construction schedule distributed June 8, 2009
. Joint CAG and PDT meeting June 17, 2009
. Presentation to Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee July 9, 2009'
. Presentation to Springfield Mohawk Rotary Club July 15, 2009
. Joint CAG and PDT meeting planried for August 2009.
,. Current project information posted to projectwebsite, wwwwillamettebrid",e.on:
PRE.SUBMITIAL RECIO
AUG2 1 2009
"",
,
'.",
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
10
.
1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II ,
WllLAMETTEGREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG).DI5CRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLlCATIOt':/,
;;;
'\.
'-'
4.0 DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
4.1' Project Overview
The 1-5 Willamette River Bridge Project proposes to replace both the decommissioned bridge and
the temporary detour bridge across the Willamette River, Franklin Bouleva~d, and the Union
Pacific railroad tracks with two new parallel bridges (one NB and one 5B). In addition, the existing
bridges across the Canoe Canal will be removed and replaced with new bridges.
The new crossing will be composed of two bridges over the Willamette River: one dedicated to
carrying NB traffic and the other carrying 5B traffic. The new bridges will be wider than the
decommissioned bridge to accommodate additional travel lanes in the future. Additional travel,
lanes are not proposed as part of this Project and the new bridge will be striped to match the
existing travel lanes at both the north and south ends (i.e., two lanes in each direction). There
would be a slight shift in die alignment of 1-5; however the vast majority of all roadway and bridge
improvements will remain within. the existing ODOT ROW. The shift in alignment for the new
Willamette River bridges will require the replacement of the decommissioned and temporary
detour Canoe Canal bridges. Therefore, the existing 1-5 crossing of the Canoe Canal north of the
Willamette Riverwill also be replaced by a pair of new bridges. '
The new bridges will be constructed in the same gerierallocation as the existing bridges. As noted
above, the new bridge location will require some minor shifts of alignment, as well as
reconstruction of portions of the NB and 5B on/off ramps to Franklin Boulevard. The new bridges
will be higher than the decommissioned bridge to provide more clearance over Franklin Boulevard,
which will provide flexibility to local jurisdictions for future improvements to the Franklin
Boulevard corridor, as well as meet current vertical clearance requirements for state highways and
railroads. Although there are no specific plans for future improvements to Franklin Boulevard, the
proposed clearances would allow the addition of turning or through lanes, sidewalks or
bicyclelpedestrian paths, transitlanes, aesthetic. treatments, or other improvements.
For the purpose of this request, the new bridges over the Willamette River and the Canoe Canal
will be considered the same facility. These bridges will meet current safety and design standards
for all travel needs typical on this section of 1-5. T raffle volumes will not change as a result of the
,proposed bridge replacement. No additional lanes or permanent speed zone changes are planned,
although th~ new bridges will be designed to accommodate future traffic need.s.,
4.2 Bridge Type '
The Project is the subject of a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) e~vironmental
. assessment (EA) which identifies proposed measures that avoid, minimize, andlor mitigate
environmental impacts. During the NEPA process, alternative conceptual bridge designs were
developed that involved varying numbers of piers and footing locations. To minimize the bridges'
footprints as much as feasible within the Willamette River and its associated riparian area, the EA
,includes two footing options (Option A and Option B) for the replacement bridges. Both options
ir;c1u'de ,one' footing location in the center of the river channel and two footing locations on or near
the. north and,~outh ban~s ~fthe river. T~e EA thereby established that no mRF.lf. tll~n three bents
would be constructed Within or near the river channel. rKt.~lIRMI1TAL REC'O
AUG 2 I Z009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17,2009
...--.11
, (.
- .,,~. ":"'
".
IS
j
1-5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT CWG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
The footing locations in the EA established an important parameter for the design of the
replacement bridges, but several different bridge types could meet this requirement. The
Applicant's design team conducted a comprehensive evaluation of possible alternatives. Seven main
span alternatives were investigated. These alternatives were compared based on their
performance on goals established by ODOT, the OTIA III State Bridge Delivery Program, and a
Citizen Advisory Group (CAG) convened 'for the project. A concrete deck arch bridge type was
, ,
ultimately selected based on its comparative impact, cost, aesthetic appeal, and ease of
maintenance, among other factors. '
The concrete deck arch can be designed With a true or tied arch support system. The Applicant
, '
initially envisioned a true arch, which is a demanding bridge type in terms of the lateral load to be
resisted by foundation elements. Geotechnical analysis of the project area indicates that the',
foundation bedrock is adequate to support a true arch or tied arch system. A tied arch, however,
is substantially more complex to construct requiring a longer duration of temporary impacts in the
Willamette River. After reviewing the relative impact on the Willamette River from these two
alternatives, as well as other differentiating factors, 'the Applicant selected the true arch system for
the bridges.' The selection of this design represents a significant reduction in the duration of
temporary impacts that will be placed below the Willamette River Ordinary High Water Mark
(OHWM).
4.3 Bridge Design
As noted above, the proposed replacem~nt bridge will be constructed within the same general
horizontal alignment as the existing decommissioned bridge, as illustrated on Sheet OS 1.0 Overall
Site Plan (Exhibit C). From the 1-5 approach on either side of the river, the proposed bridge splits
into separate NB and SB structures. The configuration of each structure is nearly identical.
The proposed concrete deck arch structure over the Willamette River will span 806 feet and will
be supported by four bents (piers, footings, sub-structures) founded on drilled shafts.' Bent I is
located approximately 200 feet north of the OHWM and Bent 2 is located approximately 100 feet
north of the OHWM. Bent 3 is located near the center of the river channel, approximately 270
feet from the northern OHWM. Bent 4 is located at the southern OHWM boundary. .Additional
bents (Bents 5-10) are located south of the Willamette River and will support the structure as it
spans approximately I ;000 feet over Franklin Boulevard and the Union Pacific Railroad ROW. Bent
locations are illustrated in the enclosed Plan Set (Exhibit C). Bent locations were established and
activities necessary to construct the sub-structure were authorized through the prior approved
Phase I application (lNG 08-4, SDR 08-7) and are included herein for context.
The bents and arch ribs have been designed to maximize hydraulic efficiency and minimize effects
to the aquatic environment. The proposed replacement bridges have a larger hydraulic opening
than the existing decommissioned bridge and include a reduction of the bent area below the water
surface elevation of the Willamette River. The reduction in hardened surfaces in the river channel ,
will improve flow dynamics, minimize hydraulic drag a~d scour, and result i~R1:~crB~I1TAl REC'D
AUG2 1 2009'
'rO..
· The Applicant notes that Bent I is the approach span connecting the 1-5 roadway to the deck arch structure.
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL August 17. 2009
12
.
1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II, '
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION I
,~
,
-' ,
environmental improvement at the river crossing. New bridge sub-structures will occupy 1.8% of
the 709-foot active channel width and less than 4% ofthe streambed width.7
The proposed 1-5 ~eplacement bridge over Canoe Canal is a single structure. The superstructure
will be supported by two driven steel pile end bents. The new alignment will shift slightly west of
the existing alignment and will fully span the Canoe Canal OHWM elevation.
Demolition of the existing bridge (Phase I) and construction of the new bridge will result in
permanent removal of fill in the Willamette River. Where existing footings and columns are
removed. the structures will be cut to 'at least three feet below the substrate surface. and the holes
in the streambed will be filled with clean. native substrates that match the surrounding streambed
materials. In areas where the footings and columns are surrounded by bedrock, the structures will
be cut flush with the bedrock substrate surface to minimize additional impacts from bedrock
excavation. The Project will result in 'a' net loss of structure and non-native fill below the
Willamette River OHWM. Therefore. an increase in overall habitat function and reduction in fish
passage impediments is expected following completion of the Project.
4.4 Phase II Work
The Proposal involves Phase II 'construction activities. as described below, and identified by
applicable jurisdiction (Eugene or Springfield). Phase 1 of the Projeot, the subject of a prior
approved WG and SDR application (WG"08-4. SDR,08-7). involves only~ development' of
construction access routes and staging areas; removal of the decommissioned Willamette River
Bridge, including construction of a temporary work bridge; construction of new bridge sub- .
structures; installation of cofferdams to enclose the new bridge sub-structure; reconstruction of 1-5
SB on-ramp; and reconfiguration and construction of bicycle and pedestrian path improvements to
maintain public access along the river.
Following is a detailed summary of Phase II activities:
Willamette River Bridge ,
The Proposal involves construction of a new crossing over the Willamette River. The new
crossing will be composed of two bridges; one dedicated to carrying NB traffic and the oth~r
carrying SB traffic. The new bridges will be constructed in the same generarlocation as the existing
bridges. The new bridges will be slightly higher (approximately 5-feet) than the de~ommissioned
bridge to provide more clearance over Franklin Boulevard as well as meet current vertical
clearance requirements for state highways and railroads.
The configuration of each proposed structure is nearly identical. The proposed bridge structures
are 1.760 feet long (SB) and 1.985 feet long (NB)., The proposed bridges will each be
approximately 67.5 feet wide, The bridges are composed of three structure types from north to
south: a cast-in-place concrete girder span (approach span); two concrete deck arch spans over the
Willamette River (Willamette River Bridge); and several spans of cast-in-place concrete box girders
over Frankl,inBoulevard. UPRR. and the NB exit ramp from 1-5 to Franklin Bouleva'rd (approach
. "'. :','1
7 Fish Passage Plan; Bridge'08329, Highwayl over Willamette River (Willamette River Bridge),.,~fI,fl~'.l1M \OiRPJ,.'D
Inc. February 4, 2009. " ,I'KI:-J OIVIlIIf\L I<t\"
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17,2009
AUG 2 1 2009
13
'f,
f/
~
1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT 0NG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR). & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
spans). As noted above, the arches are configured .in two spans, with 390 feet for the north span
and 416 feet for the south span. The bridges will be supported by three bents founded on drilled
shafts. Bent locations were established through the prior approved Phase I application (yVG 08-4,
SDR 08-7). "
The concrete deck arch bridge type proposed is aesthetically ,classic. Modern engineering and
constructioniechniques enable concrete deck arches to be built with slender arch ribs and without
bracing, making them more sleek and 'uncluttered in appearance. Slenderness provides added
aesthetic appeal due ,in part to an implicit understanding by the public that such structures, although
light and graceful, are also strong and durable. This understanding has evolved by the incremental
increases of noteworthy structures in the built environment that have trended toward sienderness. ,
The deck arch design employs a relatively lightweight floor system for concrete. The proposed
arch ribs are slender in profile view, but deeper perpendicular to their axis. This appearance
reinforces their role aesthetically as the supporting elemEmts of the spans.8 '
The new NB and SB bridges will be constructed in tMfO stages over a four-year period. Stage I
(2009-20 II) involves demolition ofthe decommissioned bridge (Phase I), construction of the 5B
bridge, and demolition ofthe detour bridge. Stage 2 (2011-2012) involves construction ofthe NB
bridge, removal of temporary work bridges, falsework, and cofferdams, and associated site
restoration and mitigation.
Approach Spans ,
The Proposal involves construction of several approach spans to connect the proposed concrete
deck arch bridge to thel-S roadway, On the north side ofthe Willamette River, a single concrete
girder span will connect the I-S roadway ,to the concrete deck arch bridge. On, the south side of
the Willamette River, seven concrete girder spans will be elevated over Franklin Boulevard, UPRR,
and the NB exit ramp from I-S to Frankiin Boulevard, to connect the concrete deck arch bridge to
the I-S roadway. The approach spans use a deck and girder system that appears visually similar to
the arch spans. This thematic consistency leads to a clear appearance of the whole structure.
Canoe Canal Bridge
The Proposal involves replacement of the Canoe Canal crossing. The proposed bridge is a single
structure, 180 feet long by 140.S feet wide at the northern end and 146.S feet wide at the southern
end. The structure yvill be supported on driven steel pile end bents. The new alignment will shift
slightly west of the existing alignment and will fully span the Canoe Canal. The proposed project
will not affect hydraulics through the bridge opening.
Demolition of Detour Bridge
'The Proposal involves demolition of the Detour Bridge. Demolition of the decommissioned bridge
'is a component of the Phase I approval. The,Applicant's contractor will remove the detour bridge
in 20 II following the completion of the SB bridge. Once completed, the SB bridge will maintain
both directions of traffic until the NB bridge is completed. The removal of in-water components of
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'[ .
AUG2 1 2009
· Final Design,Acceptance Package Report. 1-5: WillametteRiver Bridge - Bundle 220 Lane County, Oregon, OBEC
, ConsultingEngineers. December 17,2008.
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
14
.
..
'-- .
1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (ViIG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION '
the detour bridge will occu~ during the ODFW established in-water work period (IWWP). 9 The
detou'r bridge has six bents within the Willamette River. Prior to removal. of the bents in the
Willamette River, the Applicant's .contractor will install precast concrete barriers upstream and
downstream and a U-shaped floating turbidity curtain downstream 'of the work area to deflect .
flows and trap sediment.
1-5 NB Off-Ramp (NB Exit Ramp to Franklin Boulevard)
The Proposal involves reconstruction ofthe NB Exit Rami> (off~ramp)'toFranklin Boulevard.
Reconstruction of the SB On-Ramp to 1-5 is a component of the Phase I approval. The NB off-
ramp will be reconstructed horizontally and vertically in generally the same 'location, with minor'
shifts in alignment, from the Riverview Street intersection to its departure from 1-5 (approximately
1,900 feet). The reconstruction will consist of a single-lane ramp with a 16-foot travel lane. '
Miscellaneous Structures
Several miscellaneous structures; including soundwalls and retaining walls, are required in support
of the replacement of the Willamette River Bridge. Following is a brief description of each
structure, including location and applicable jurisdictional boundaries.
Northbound Soundwall #21124 (Anderson Lane Subdivision)
The Proposal includes a soundwall along 1-5 NB, west of the Anderson Lane Subdivision in
Springfield. As illustrated on Sheet A4.0A Retaining Wall Elevations and Sections (Exhibit C), the
soundwall is 720 feet long and nominally 16 to 17 feet in height. The soundwall is located entirely
within state-owned ROWand within Springfield. A small segment of the soundwall, roughly 34
feet, extends into the Willamette Greenway,
Southbound Saundwall #21 f 30 (Laurel Hill Subdivision)
The Proposal includes a soundwall along 1-5 SB, east of'the Layrel Hill subdivision in Eugene. The
soundwall is 1800 feet long and nominally 12 to 16 feet high. The soundwall height varies in height
along its length, in-line with 1-5. The soundwall is located in Eugene,'outside WG and /WR
boundaries, and entirely within state-owned ROW. The soundwall is detailed in the Phase I
submittal.
Retaining Wall #21125 (Canoe Canal)
The Proposal includes a retaining wall along the south embankment of the Canoe C~nal Bridge and
the east embankment of the 1-5 mainline. As illustrated on Sheet A4.0A Retaining Wall Elevations
and Sections (Exhibit C), the wall is 536 feet long and 4 to 12 feet high. The retaining wall is
located in Eugene and Springfield, within the WG boundary, outside /WR boundaries, and entirely
within state-owned ROW.
Retaining Wall #21126 (Between NB Off-ramp and the 1-5 Mainline)
'Th,e:P~op~~,ali9dudes a retaining wall along the south abutment of the Willamette River Bridge to
provic;ie 'grade separation between the finish grade for NB 1-5 and the NB off,ramp, as the ramp
drops below 'the bridge south abutment. As illustrated on 5heet A4.0A Retaining Wall Elevations
, In-water work periods (IWWP) for the Project are as follows: pile driving activities are allowed f~~SUBMltfAl REC'O
30 and from July I to October 31; non-pile driving activities are allowed from June I to October 31.' , .
AUG2 1 2009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
15
Iff
'-..C
-;'-':~'.'~"'1'''''; '.., " ....~;~'"'..~.. ~,;
\.)
....<I,.~~~ ...... ~
~o.,;j."'" ..;J.;'..~
1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WllLAMffiE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU). SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
and Sections (Exhibit C), the wall is 645 feet long and a maximum height at the south abutment of
24 feet. reducing to approximately 15 feet at the south end. The wall is located in Eugene and
Sp,ringfield, outside the WG boundary, and entirely within state-owned ROW.
Retaining Wall #2 I 128 (Alang the T emparary Fill Slope)
The Proposal includes a retaining wall located roughly five feet from the east ROW boundary of I-
S, adjacent to the NB off-ramp. As illustrated on Sheet A4.0 Retaining Wall Elevations and Sections
(Exhibit C), the proposed wall is 350 feet long and nominally 6 to, 12 feet high. The purpose of the
retaining wall is to contain the proposed finished grade and restorelremove an existing
embankment. The wall is located in Springfield, outside the WG boundary, and ~ntirely within
state-owned ROW. '
Retaining Wall #2//29 (A/ong Side of NB Off-ramp)
The Proposal includes a retaining wall to protect the unnamed tributary associated with Glenwood
Slough drainage that parallels the NB ramp alignment and continues through an existing'pipe culvert '
flowing northward. As illustrated on Sheet A4.0 Retaining Wall Elevations and Sections (Exhibit C),
the proposed wall, is 415 feet long and 6 to 12 feet high, The wall is located in Springfield, outside
the WG boundary, and entirely within state-owned ROW. Retaining wall studied as part of the
Hydraulics Report. The conclusion was that the wall will not cause any impacts or increased
flooding.
Stairway and StepPing Stones (Eastgate Woodlands)
The Proposal includes a stairway, composed of gravel and concrete, and an enhancement area,
consisting of basalt boulders and concrete stepping stones organized in a grid pattern, located in
the Eastgate Woodlands. The stairway is proposed to provide'an access route from the bark path
underneath North Walnut Bridge to the surface of the bridge, The stepping stones are proposed
as an aesthetic enhancement. The stairway and stepping stones are located in Springfield; within
the WG boundary.
Pedestrian Bridge at Restored Stream Channel
The Proposal includes two pedestrian bridges crossing the restored stream channel on the south
side of the Willamette River. The northern bridge will serve the proposed South Bank Viaduct,
located on the north side of Glenwood Boulevard, and the southern bridge will serve the
. .' .
'reconstructed South Bank Path, located on the south side of Glenwood Boulevard. As illustrated
on Sheet A7.0 Elevations (Exhibit C). the pedestrian bridges are approximately 116 feet long and 16
feet wide. The bridges are located in Eugene, within the WG boundary. partly within /WG
boundaries, and entirely within state-owned ROW. ' '
Bicycie/Pedestrian Path an Trail Improvements
As part of the project. permanent improvements to the overall path and trail~,l{p:e,mm fhe Pro~ect ,
area are proposed. Following is a brief description of each improvement. incltR1~tm:lWMt(EC'D
applicable j~risdictional boundaries. AUG2 1 2009
North Wa/nut Path
The existing North Walnut Path will be slightly realigned and reconstructed within the Project area.
This improvement includes reconstruction of the ,connecting segment between North Walnut Path
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
16
.
-
'.5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY. DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT 0NG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
and Knickerbocker Pedestrian Bridge. The proposed asphalt path is 12 feet wide. The path is
within Eugene and Springfield, within WG and /WR boundaries, and within both parkland and state-
owned ROW. . '
North Walnut Path to Canoe Canal Path
The improvement includes reconstruction of the north-south connector between North Walnut
Path and Canoe Canal Path, located west of the 1-5 Bridge. The reconstruction will follow
generally the same alignment as the existing path. The proposed .asphalt path is 12 feet wide. The
path is within Eugene, within the WG boundary, partly within /WR boundaries, and entirely within
state-owned ROW.
Canoe Canal Path
The existing path beneath the Canoe Canal bridge will be realigned t9 straighten it out and improve
sight distance and safety for path users, The proposed path realignment moves the path from its
present location between the south edge of the Canoe Canal and the existing south intermediate
bent to a location between the the new bridge 'end bents. The proposed asphalt path is 12 feet
wide. The path is,within Eugene and Springfield, within WG and /WR boundaries, and entirely
within statecowned ROW.
North Bank Trail
The existing path 'along the North Bank will be realigned and reconstructed at its eastern terminus
with North Walnut Path. The proposed asphalt path is 12 feet wide. The path is within Eugene,
within the WG boundary. partly within /WR boundaries, and within the Whilamut Natural Area.
South Bank PathlPedestrian Viaduct
The Proposal involves a proposed path along the north side of Franklin Boulevard, extending east
from Knickerbocker Pedestrian Bridge. The proposed path will be elevated on piers within the
Project area and will be 16 feet wide.' The path will include a span crossing the restored stream
channel. The path is within Eugene, within WG and /WR boundaries. and entirely within state-
owned ROW.
South Bonk Path
The existing south bank path will be realigned and reconstructed. The path extends east from
Knickerbocker Pedestrian Bridge and accesses the south side of Franklin Boulevard. The proposed
asphalt path is 12 feet wide. The path is within Eugene and Springfield. within the WG boundary,
partly within /WR boundaries, and entirely within state-ownEid ROW.
Pre's Trail (Whilamut Natural Area)
The Proposal involves extensive improvements to Pre's Trail within the Project area, An existing
segment along the north bank of the Willamette River and the segment extending under Canoe
Canal will be realigned and reconstructed. The proposed bark trail is 10 feet wide. The trail is
within Eugene'an~Sl?ringfield. within WG boundaries, partly within /WR boundaries. and both
p. .-,., -', .' \. .
within parkland and state-owned ROW. ,
, PRE.SUBMIITAL REC'O
AUG2 1 2009
','-
;1
CMGS'
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I Augu'st 17, 2009
17
, .."
( " ,
1-5 WILLAMElTE RIVER BRIDGE-PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLAr1ETTE GREENWAY 9VERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT i"NG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
... lI--...'~"'.
-.
\!
.....: 'F ~-
......~.~"'.,. ~. ~../
, ~. ~.... "I"~.'
Pre's Trail (Eastgate Woodlands)
The existing asphalt path under the North Walnut Bridge in the Eastgate Woodlands will be
removed and replaced with a bark trail, connecting to Pre's Trail. The proposed bark trail is 8 feet
wide. The trail is within Springfield and within the WG boundary.
Stormwater Management
The Proposal involvesstormwater management facilities designed to treat pollutants from the
roadway, bridge surfaces, and other impervious surfaces. The Project will construct 3.53 acres of
net new impervious area at the bridge and Franklin Boulevard interchange. This additional
impervious area will be treated with the existing 14.39 impervious acres, for a 17.92-acre
impervious area.
The Project site is naturally divided into two hydrologiC sections (north and south) by the
Willamette River. The proposed storm sewer and stormwater management systems for the
Project provide capture, conveyance, treatment and detention/retention of site runoff as required
by the ODOT Stormwater Management Program and by DEQ, NMFS, and the City of Eugene and
the City of Springfield stormwater regulations. The proposed system provides capture and
conveyance of runoff and directs runoff into stormwater management facilities consisting of
vegetated swales, filter strips, and bio-retention ponds, all with soil amendments. These facilities
provide treatment of roadway, bridge, and path runoff, and address total maximum daily load
(TMDl) constituents listed for the receiving waters. Proposed stormwater facilities' are detailed ,in
the Stormwater Management Report (Exhibit D) and illustrated on Sheets CO.2, CO.2A, C2.0-C2.6
Stormwater and Utilities Plan (Exhibit C).
Proposed drainage facilities for the Willamette River Bridge are a combination of storm sewer and
stormwater management facilities. North of the bridge, inlets located within the shoulders of the
roadway are proposed to capture runoff from the bridge and roadway. No deck drains are
proposed on the Canoe Canal Bridge, and one deck drain is proposed on the Willamette River
Bridge. Runoff from the bridges is conveyed in the shoulder and collected by the one 'deck drain
on the Willamette River Bridge and the inlets located at the end of the bridges.
In addition to the permanent stdrmwater facilities installed during the Project, a number of
temporary storm sewer facilities will be installed during the staged construction of the roadway and
bridge elements.. Temporary storm facilities are indicated in the Applicant's Construction Site
Management Plan (CSMP - Eugene only) and land Drainage and Alteration Permit (lDAP-
Springfield only) and are not shown on the attached Plan Set (Exhibit B); The temporary storm
sewer facilities are designed to the I O-year storm event and will consist of inlets, pipes, scuppered
barrier runs, and gutters hung on the bridges. In order to minimize the number of temporary
installations, p,ermanent facilities are installed where possible to serve ,the temporary conditions.
Utilities
The Proposal involves the relocation of site utilities. In the proposed design, storm sewer and
stormwater management facilities are located to prevent conflicts with existing utilities where'
possible.. l:iowever, in cases where conflicts are unavoidable, utilities will be relocated to alleviate
" confi.iC:s.Utility relocations are illustrated on Sheets C2.0-C2.6 StormwatWu~l}qll,J,tNiti~~D
(ExhibIt q. .: " . ., PRE.:) loMIIIRL KC
AUG2 12009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL August 17, 2009
18
lit
~
. '.. . 't.~ .'
'-5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVElOPMENT (VyG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE pLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
Two major utility relocations are required due to proposed stormwater management work on the
I ,- .- .
Project, A 16-inch gas line owned by Williams Gas will be relocated due to the construction of a
stormwater pond between the NB and SB ramps. The gas main currently passes directly under the
pond bottom, and will be relocated completely outside the stormwater pond. Construction of the
stormwater pond will also require that facilities owned by Eugene Water and Electric Board
(EWEB) be relocated. The EWEB facilities, a buried three phase electric line and a ,fiber optic line
sharing the same trench, will be .relocated by placing them adjacent to the existing facility alignment
and in a deeper trench to maintain adequate cover. Additional facilities to be relocated as part of
the Project include two EWEB water lines: a 16 inch waterline between the NB Off-ramp and
UPRR tracks has been relocated to avoid construction of new bridge piers; ~nd, a 24 inch waterline
between the UPRR track and the Willamette River will be relocated to avoid stream restoration.
In addition, a Qwest underground fiber optic cable located along the bike path between UPRR
tracks and the Willamette River and a Comcast underground fiber optic cable located on the north
side of Franklin Boulevard may be relocated as part of the Project.
Site Restoration
The Project will result in a maximum of approximately 27.9 acres of temporary ground disturbance
and vegetation removal due to grading, staging, and construction access. All temporary disturbed
areas within the Project area .will be returned to pre-construction conditions and planted per
Sheets LO.3-LO.3D, L3.0-L3.6 Landscape Plan (Exhibit C).
Within ODOT ROW, site restoration consists of slope stabilization and erosion control through
planting, seeding, and bioengineered streambank structures. Areas disturbed by the Project within
the Whilamut Natural Area (Eugene) will be converted from disturbed grassland into native upland
prairie. Site restoration within the Whilamut Natural Area will also include converting disturbed
, .
grassland into native riparian forest. Disturbed riparian forest within the Eastgate Woodlands
(Springfield) will be returned to pre-existing conditions.
, ,
Native species will be used throughout the Project with the exception of small areas adjacent to
soundwalls and within medians where native-analog plantings with particular aesthetic and
functional qualities will be incorporated. Native plantings will be installed in areas of less than 2: I '
slopes and in areas throughout ODOT ROW where visual buffers are deemed necessary,
Native grass and forb mixes are proposed to restore environmental functio~s, such as noxious
weed control, water quality, habitat preservation, and erosion control. All temporarily disturbed
wetlands will be seeded with Wetland seeding mix, All disturbed areas on the north and south
banks of the 'Willamette River will be restored with the ,Riparian Plant mix. Several seed mixes will
be used exclusively within the Whilamut Natural Area and Eastgate Woodlands per City of Eugene
and City of Springfield requirements. Native species will be used ex'c1usivelywithin the park and all
riparian 'areas.
Compensatory Mitigation
The Applicant has purchased 0.05 credits at the West Eugene Wetland Mitigation Bank to
compensate fo!: the permanent loss of a small amount of wetland area and function.
Compensatory mitigation 'for temporary and permanent waters impacts includes planting and
, establishment ofa 1;,9-acre riparian forest with the Wilamut Natural Are:pf?f!gtlRMl1fArr~te'Jjd
'AUG 2 1 2009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009'
19
.-;
~..
\Jj
,
, .
1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II ,
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (yVG). DISCRETIONARY USE (DU). SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR). & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICTDEVELOPMENT(FP) APPLICATION
associated riparian area restoration In the concrete-lined unnamed tributary of the Willamette
River, located south of the river.
. - ~,
The Project will improve fish, passage by conducting mitigation to restore the unnamed tributary.
The restoration of the creek's lower reach involves replacing the overflow channel's concrete lined
banks with natural stream material (gravel, cobbles and boulders), planting native riparian
vegetation along the fringe of the creek's lower reach, replacing two failed culverts under the
pedestrian path with a new full-spanning bridge structure, and plugging the culvert under Franklin
Boulevard so that the water is directed down the restored channel. The upland area along the
southern tributary will be widened and flattened to create a wider floodplain and facilitate
development of a forested/scrub-shrub riparian fringe. Pool and riffle areas will be interspersed at
appropriate locations along the channel.,
Additional water mitigation will be accomplished by reducing, the number,offootings currently
associated with the detour and decommissioned bridges within the Willamette River, which equals
a O.03-acre net reduction of artificial structures. '
Aesthetic Enhancements
The Proposal involves a number of proposed aesthetic enhancements within the Project area.
Since Project inception, the CAG and PDT have provided significant input to ODOT on aesthetic
enhancement opportunities. A subset of these members developed an overall theme for the
Project - "Whilamut Passage" - incorporating elements of different places, users, images and
languages to guide design and establish an enduring identity for the area surrounding the bridge.
The development of the Whilamut Passage theme was followed by a sequence of design workshops
with local professionals aimed at creatinga palette of aesthetic enhancement opportunities.
The'potential opportunities are plannedto be designed and detailed by local designlartist teams
during construction of the Project and are therefore included as concepts in the Proposal.
Following is a summary of aesthetic enhancement concepts.
1-5 Median Sculpture(s)
This item consists 'of sculptural art piece(s) located within the 1-5 median on the north side of the
Willamette River, between the Canoe Canal Bridge and the Willamette River Bridge~ The
proposed median sculpture(s) are located within ODOT ROWand mostly within Springfield;
maximum length 420-feet, maximum height 30-feet; and maximum width, 20-feet.
Willamette River and Canoe Canal Bridge Railings
The proposed bridges will include one of two railing types; a three-tube open railing or solid
concrete barrier with tubular top railing. Enhancements to the railing may include color choices,
railing insets, andlor textures.
, Northbound Soundwall Materials
Material choices for the proposed NB soundwall may include use of surface-mounted or applied
durable materials.
PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'D
AUG 2 1 2009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August' 7. 2009
20
.
1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
,~ '
Canoe Canal Underpass Improvements
Improvements proposed at Canoe Canal consist of a multi-use path, railing adjacent to Canoe'
Canal, andreiaining wall. Path railing types under c~nsideration corisist of metal, wood, stone, or
concrete material choices. Path surfaces under consideration consist of ADA-accessible textural
pavers, tiles, painted accents, andlor decorative features enibedded within pavement. The retaining
wall may indude textur~, surface-mounted, or applied durable materials.
Slope Pavements at Canoe Candl and Willamette River Bridge
The slope embankments underneath the Canoe Canal and Willamette River Bridges will be paved.
, Aesthetic enhancements include alternative pavement materials, decorative features embedded
within pavement, textural enhancement to paving, and color selection.
North Bank Path Enhancements
Aesthetic enhancements to the reconstructed North Bank Path include ADA-accessible textural'
pavers, tiles, painted accents, andlor decorative features embedded within the pavement.
North Bank Interpretive Area
Aesthetic enhancements along the reconstructed North Bank Path include an interpretive kiosk
dedicated to the Confederated Tribes of Grande Ronde, enhanced native upland prairie plantings,
and additional native plantings including native bulbs. The enhancements proposed are within the
Whilamut Natural Area and state-owned ROW. '
North Bank Forest-Meadow Transition Zone
This aesthetic enhancement involves a forest-meadow transition zone, consisting of native planting,
in the Whilamut Natural Area.
Union Padrc Railroad Protection Fence
Proposed along the Union Pacific Railroad tracks. this protection fence includes material choices
consisting of chainlink, ornamental iron, or artistic-design panels. The proposed fence may be
extended along the entire length of the approach spans for continuity. The proposed fence is
located entirely within state-owned ROW.
Willamette River Bridge Arch Lighting
Aesthetic enhancements to the Willamette River Bridge, involve low-level fiber optic rope lighting
along arch ribs. The single color lighting output will be no more than an average maintained
luminance of 0.9 foot-candle at grade. Proposed lighting design will comply with "dark sky"
requirements.
Glenwood Trailhead
This enhanceme!1t involves a proposed asphalt parking area with several parking spaces and an
interpretive kiosk. The trailhead is located within state-owned ROW, in Springfield, and within the
WG boundary.' The.Kiosk shall be no more than a-feet tall and 16-square feet per face,in surface
area.
PRE-SIIRMIITAL REC'O
AUG 2 1 2009
"
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17,.2009
21
If
\
\.\
)
1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT ~ PHASE II
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRiCt DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
South Bonk Millrace and Stream Restoration Interpretive Areo
This enhancement involves an interpretive area adjacent to the historic millrace ruins and the
proposed stream restoration of the unnamed tributary on the south side of the Willamette River.
The area is located within state-owned ROW, in Eugene jurisdiction, and within the WG boundary.
South Bank BicyclelPedestrian Path
Proposed path surfaces under consideration include textural, embedded, or painted aesthetic
enhancements. The path shall maintain ADA-accessibility.' ,
4.5 Duration and Sequence of Construction
Construction is planned to take up to four years: Construction began in June 2009 and is
proposed to continue through 2012. The Applicant requests approval for Phase II work
descri~ed herein through December 12, 2012.' '
Demolition of the existing bridges and construction ofthe new facilities will require four summers ,
of in-water work (IWW), which is only allowed from April I to April 30 and June I to October 31.
The proposed southbound bridge will be constructed wh'ile the existing detour bridge is in use.
Due to the largeWillamette River channel width, temporary work bridges are required during
demolition and construction. As established in Phase I, The first temporary work bridge will be
constructed during the 2009 IWW period. Two, additional work/containment bridge configurations
will be constructed during the 20 I 0 IWW period, Removal ofthe work/containment bridge
configurations will occur during the 20 II and 2012 IWW periods.
The actual sequence of construction for Phase II. work has not been, determined, but a likely'
sequence is as follows:
. Construction of temporary work access, staging areas, and work bridges (Phase I)
. Removal of decommissioned bridges (Phase I)
. Construction of new SB bridges and connecting roadway (Phase II)
Temporarily route both directions of 1-5 traffic on the new SB bridges (Phase II)
. Removal of detour bridge and construction of temporary work bridge (Phase II)
. Construction of new NB bridges and connecting roadway (Phase II)
. Construction of stormwater facilities (Phase II)
. , Construction of bicycle and pedestrian path ilTlprovements (Phase II)
. Removal of work bridges, staging, and access areas (Phase II)
. Site restoration and enhancement of the Project area (Phase II)
Traffic will be maintained on 1-5, Franklin Boulevard, the railroad, and the bicyclelpedestrian paths
throughout construction. The Applicant will implement a Traffic Control Plan (TCP) for paths and
trails; will coordinate with Eugene POS on path and trail closures; and will provide advance' public
notice of path and trail closures. ,Some short term road closures may be required, but these would
be limited to afev.' hours or occur on weekend days. Road c1osl!res may affect Franklin Boulevard, '
however any potential closure of Franklin Boulevard would also occur on a wee~~'N1[H~ITT^1 REe' )
continuous route across ODOT ROW for the bicyclelpedestrian pathways willlf~~Uc!lI6\\o
AUG'2 1 2009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
22
)
1-5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II .
WILLAMETTEGREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
.~,..' -';".
.
\,
,both the north side and south side of the river during construction, although there will be
occasions when the contractor will have to control bicycle and pedestrian traffic on the paths via
flagger control with a maximum allowed delay of 20 minutes. '
4.6 Overview of Proposed Mitigation Measures
The Applicant seeks to preserve scenic, aesthetic, historic, and environmental resources
throughout the proposed Project.' The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental
assessment (EA) prepared for the Project identifies proposed measures that avoid, minimize,
andlor mitigate environmental impacts.'o In response to the EA, FHW A issued a "finding of no
significant effect" (FONSI) letter for the proposed project on November 25, 2008. Construction
activities will follow the best management practices designed to minimize impacts to resources.
Such practices include, but are not limited to, dust, noise, and erosion control. To avoid, minimize,
andlor mitigate the impacts of this Project, the Applicant proposes the following general measures,
among others:
. Meet OTIA III Environmental Performance Standards (EPS) in order to meet the
requirements of the programmatic environmental permits that apply to the statewide bridge
program. (EPS for the Project were included in the Phase I application)
. Continue public involvement through construction
. Plan traffic management to keep all travel modesopen and safe during construction
. Limit Work hours
. Limit project noise
. Install soundwalls and stormwater management facilities
. Restore and enhance affected areas
Specific mitigation measures are described in Section 6 and illustrated in the attached Plan Set
(Exhibit C).
,".";.
" :',.r.
t,.., .
PRE.~I ,p~mIT~l REC'O
~ "';2 1 2009
, 10 1-5 Willamette River Bridge Environmental Assessment, Federal Highway Administration and ODOT. January 2008.
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17,)009
23
~"; \.
I-S WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT _ PHASE II '-f
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR); & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) ApPLICATION
This page intentionally left blank.
.-:'<,
PRE.SUBMITTAL RECIO
AUG2 1 2009
...,,;: '.
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
24
.
..,
"
" ..."...~..'fl. ~
. .'
1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WllLA.METTE GREENWAY OVERLA.Y DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (yVG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLA.N
REVIEW (SPR), & FlOODPLA.IN OVERLA.Y DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
5.0 'SUBMITTAL REQIJIREMENTS
5.1 Willamette Greenway Overlay District Development Subm~ttal Requirements
I) Submitted Concurrently
This Proposal is a concurrent request for Willamette Greenway Overlay District Development
Discretionary Use, Site Plan Review, and Floodplain Overlay District Development approval.
2) Application Fee
The required filing fee of $3,417.40 is enclosed with the initial submittal.
3) WG Overlay District Development Application Form
The WG Overlay District Development Application Form is enclosed herein.
4) Deed
I
Deeds are included as Exhibit A.
5) Preliminary Title Report
Preliminary title reports are included as Exhibit B.
6) Narrative
Written narrative explaining the proposal is provided as part of final application submittal. Findings
of compliance with appliCable criteria in SDC 3.3-330 and SDC 5.9-120 are provided in Section 6.
7) Plot Plan
The Plan Set, including the Site Plan (Plot Plan), is provided as Exhibit C.
(a) Top of Bank
The Willamette River top of bank is shown on Sheets LO,2-LO.2A, L2.0-L2.6 Site Plan (Exhibit C).
(bLHigh and Low Waterlines
'fhl?,Willamette River ordinary high and low water lines are shown on the project Vicinity Map,
located on Sheet T 1.0 Cover (Exhibit C) and on Sheets LO.2-LO.2A, L2.0-L2.6 Site Plan (Exhibit C).
(c) Proposed Setback Line
The subject properties have established Greenway Setback lines. This requirement does not apply
(d) Greenway Overlay Boundary
PRE.SUBMIITAL REC'D'
AUG 2 1 2009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17~ 2009 ,
25
"
\.J./
~
1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT 0NG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
. REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
The Greenway Overlay Boundary is shown on the project Vicinity Map located on.Sheet T 1.0
, Cover (Exhibit C) and on Sheets LO.2-LO.2A, L2.0-L2.6 Site Plan (Exhibit C). ,
5.2 Discretionary Use Submittal Requirements
I) Submitted Concurrently _
This Proposal is a concurrent request for Willamette Greenway Overlay District Development
Discretionary Use, Site Plan Review, and Floodplain Overlay District Development approval.
2) Application Fee
The required filing fee of $3,417.40 is enclosed with the initial submittal.
3) Discretionary Use Application Form
The Discretionary Use Application Form is enclosed herein,
4) Deed.
Deeds are included as Exhibit A
5) Preliminary Title Report
Preliminary tide reports are included as Exhibit B.
6) Associated Site Plan (Reduced to 8 Y." x II")
The Plan Set, including the Site Plan (Plot Plan), is provided as Exhibit C. A reduced copy of the
Site Plan is also enclosed. '
7) Narrative .
Written narrative explaining the proposal is provided as part of final application submittal. Findings
of compliance with applicable criteria in SDC 3.3-330 and SDC 5.9-120 are provided in Section 6. '
, 5.3' Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements
I) Application Fee
2) Site Plan Review Application Form
PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'D
AUG 2 1 2009
The required filing fee of $4,S93.1 0 is enclosed with the initial submittal.
This Site Plan Review application form is included in the submittal.
3) Narrative
Written 'naFrat'ive explaining the proposal is provided as part of initial application submittal.
Findings of compliance with applicable criteria in SDC 5.16-125 are provided in Section 6.
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
26
r-
) - "
1-5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE", ,
WILLAMETTE GREENWAYOVERLAY.DISTRICTPEVELOPMENT CWG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
4) Deed
Deeds are included as Exhibit A
5) Preliminary Title Report
Preliminary title reports are included as Exhibit B.
6) Reduced Copy ofthe Site Plan (BV," x II")
A reduced copy of the Site Plan is included in the submittal:
7) Right-of-Way Approach Permit Application
The Project does not involve new access onto a state highway, The standard does not apply.
B) Stormwater Management System Study and Scoping Sheets.
The Stormwater Management Report and completed scoping sheets are included as Exhibit D.
9) Traffic Impact Study
The Project does not involve a'Variance request or proposed uses that would generate 500 or
more vehicle trips per day, as specified in SDC 4.2-105 A(4.)(a.) and (b.). A Traffic Management
, Plan (TMP) that describes measures that will be put in place for the construction of the project, as
'well as to minimize disruptions to motorists, the freight industry and communities, without
compromising public or worker safety, or the quality of work being performed is included in
Exhibit G. Traffic Impact Studies for Franklin Boulevard and the 1-5 Ramps are also included in
Exhibit G.
IO)Plan Set
The Plan Set for the Project is'included as Exhibit C.
(a) Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
I. Prepared by an Oregon's Licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer
Existing conditions are illustrated on Sheets GO.I, G I.O-G 1.6 Site Assessment of Existing
Conditions (Exhibit C). The sheets were prepared by Landscape Architects with Cameron
McCarthy Gilbert &.Scheibe (CMGS) and Engineers with OBEC Consulting Engineers. '
,PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'[
AUG 2 1 2009
2. Vicinity Map
A Project Vicinity Map is included on Sheet T 1.0 Cover (Exhibit C).
.;""."
3. Name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including
b,ui.l.dings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas. For existing
. "structures to remain, indicate present use, size, setbacks from
property lines, and distance between buildings
,CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
27
-
(~
1-5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLA,METTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVE,LOPMENT ryvG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU). SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP)APPLlCATION
I.
1....('
Name, location, and dimensions of existing site features are illustrated on Sheets GO.I, G I.O-G 1.6
Site Assessment of Existing Conditions (Exhibit C). The only existing structures within the project
site are the detour bridge, decommissioned bridge, and canoe canal bridge. The decommissioned
bridge is proposed to be removed in Phase I, The detour bridge and canoe canal bridge are
proposed to be removed in Phase II.
4. Name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all
watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the
Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development
Services Department
Within the project site, the Willamette River is listed as a W(jLW. The required riparian setback
is shown on Sheets GO.I, G I.O-G 1.6 Site Assessment of Existing Conditions (Exhibit C). Name,
location, dimensions, and direction of flow of the Willamette River are shown on Sheets GO.I,
G I.O-G 1.6 Site Assessment of Existing ,Conditions (Exhibit C);
5. . I OO-year floodplain and f100dway boundaries on the site, as specified
in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA
approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision
The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries are sliown on Sheets GO.I, G I.O-G 1.6 Site
Assessment of Existing Conditions (Exhibit C).
6. The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated
on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development
Services Department
The project site is not within a designated Time of Travel Zone, as specified in SDC 3.3-200. This
standard does not apply.
7. Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" indiameter or
greater when measured 4 y, feet above the ground, significant
clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands and rock
outcroppings
PhysiCal features, including clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, and wetlands are shown on
Sheets GO.I, G I.O-G 1.6 Site Assessment of Existing Conditions (Exhibit C). Trees 5" in diameter
or greater are shown on Sheets LO.I" L 1.0-L 1.6, L1.9A-L I. 9C Tree Preservation and Removal Plan
(Exhibit C). 'The Phase II project site does not contain any rock outcroppings. Within the vicinity
. : 'qf the Project, Judkins Point is a significant Metro-wide rock outcropping; however this physical
'. feature: is located outside the project area and entirely within Eugene jurisdiction.
8. Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the
Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an
Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates
the proposed development area has unstabl~~~~.{1TAL ~Joater ,
table " .
AUG2 1 2009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I' August 17, 2009,
28
\
\ ,\
1-5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
'ijILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT .cVI/G), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION '
Soil types and water table information are noted on Sheets GO.I, G I.O-G 1,6 Site Assessment of
Existing Conditions (Exhibit C). Preliminary geotechnical analysis for the Project has been prepared
and is available upon request. The project site is not known to be affected by unstable soils andlor
a high water table.
(b) Site Plan
I. Prepared by an Oregon licens,ed Architect, Landscape Architect, or
Engineer
The Site plan is included as Sheets LO.2-L2:A, L2.0-L2.6 Site Plan '(Exhibit C). The sheets are
prepared by Landscape Architects with Cameron McCarthy Gilbert & Scheibe (CMGS),
2. Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area
applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)),
setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings.
No buildings are proposed. This standard does not apply.
3. Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor
equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs
Existing fences, walls, trash receptacles, and signs are shown on Sheets GO.I, G I.O-G 1.4, & G 1:7
Site Assessment of Existing Conditions (Exhibit C). Proposed fences, walls, and signs are shown on
Sheets LO.2-LO.2A" L2.0-L2.6 Site Plan (Exhibit C). Phase II does not propose new permanent
outdoor equipment, storage, or trash receptacles.
4. Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact and disabled
parking spaces including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, 'and
striping
Proposed parking spaces, associated with the Glenwood Trailhead, are shown on Sheets LO.2-
LO.2A, L2.0-L2.6 Site Plan (Exhibit C).
5. Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage
of the site proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular
areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces
Dimensions of the development area are shown on Sheets TI.O Cover (Exhibit C). A tabulation of
site coverage, including structures, vehicular areas, and other impervious surfaces is included on
Sheet T 1.0 Cover (Exhibit C).
6. Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable
zoning,district
Phase II of the Project' does not involve fences or structures that would otherwise affect solar ,
access regu,:re~~~ts. This standard does not apply.' , PRE.SUBMIITAL REC'D
.. - .' , . ....: , :,'" ..
,'.. ,'I' ,',: On~site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulaAi~& 2 1 2009
'CMGS
,INITIAL SUBMITT ALl August 17, 2009
29
I,
....'"'; '\
,- (
1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WllLAHETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU). SITE PlAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
,The proposed contractor staging area will be utilized for loading and un-Imiding of materials
necessary for construction, as illustrated on Sheets LO,2-LO.2A, L2.0-L2.6 Site Plan (Exhi,bit C).
Vehicular and pedestrian - circulation is shown on Sheets LO.2-LO.2A, L2.0-L2.6 Site Plan (Exhibit C).
8. Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the
location and dimensions of existing and proposed 'curb cuts and curb
cuts proposed to be closed
Access routes to the project site are shown on Sheets LO.2-LO.2A, L2.0-L2.6 Site Plan (Exhibit C).
Existing curb cuts along Franklin Boulevard in the vicinity of the project area are shown on Sheets
GO.I, G I.O-G 1.6 Site Assessment of Exiting Conditions (Exhibit C). No new curb cuts or curb cuts
to be 'closed are proposed.
9. Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces
The project site does not contain any existing bicycle parking spates and no new bicycle parking
spaces are proposed. This standard does not apply.
I O. Location of existing and proposed transit facilities
Existing transit facilities along Franklin Boulevard are shown on Sheets LO.2-LO.2A, L2.0-L2.6 Site
Plan (Exhibit C). No transit facilities are prClposed.
II.Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or
reserved for common open spaces, recreational areas, and other
similar public and semi-public uses
The Project does not involve the conveyance, dedication, or reservation of common open spaces,
recreation areas, or other similar uses. This standard does not apply.
12.,Phased Development Plan - where applicable
The Project Phasing Plan is illustrated on Sheet OS 1.0 Overall Site Plan (Exhibit C).
(c) Improvement and Public Utilities Plan
I. Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
Improvements and utilities are shown on Sheets CO.2, CO.2A, C2.0-C2.6 Stormwater and Utilities
Plan (Exhibit C). The sheets are prepared by Engineers with OBEC Consulting Engineers.
2. Location and width of all existing and proposed easements
Existing and proposed easements are shown on Sheets GO.I, G 1.0-G1.6 Site Assessment of Existing
Conditions (Exhibit C).
3. Location, widths (of paving and right~of-way), and names of all
existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications PRE'-mm1Ec'D
;, .'~;.
AUG 2 1 2009
CMGS'
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
30
)
I~S WllLAMElTE RIVE~ BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT rNG), DISCRETIONARY liSE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
,~
ways within or adjacent to the proposed development, including
ownership and maintenance status, if applicable.
Location, width, and names of existing streets and other right-of-ways are shown on Sheets GO.I,
G I.O-G 1.6 Site Assessment of Existing Conditions (Exhibit C). The Project involves the acquisition
of additional right-of-way from Lane County Waste Management. The proj~ct does not involve'
new streets.
4. Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting
Existing street lighting along Franklin Boulevard is shown on Sheets GO.I, G I.O-G 1.6 Site
Assessment of Existing Conditions (Exhibit C). No new street lighting is proposed in Phase II.
Proposed lighting along die south path reconfiguration is shown on Sheets LO.2-LO.2A, L2.0-L2.6
Site Plan (Exhibit C).
5. Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants,
power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar
public facilities .
Existing public facilities are shown on Sheets GO.I, G I.O-G 1.6 Site Assessment of Existing
Conditions (Exhibit C). Proposed public facilities are shown on Sheets LO.2,LO.2A, L2.0-L2.6 Site
Plan (Exhibit C).
":-:-..
6. Location, width, and construction material of all existing and
proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and
trails
The location, width, and construction material of existing sidewalks, paths, and trails are shown on
Sheets GO.I, G I.O-G 1.6 Site Assessment of Existing Conditions (Exhibit C). Proposed temporary
and permanent paths ,!nd trails are shown on Sheets LO.2-LO.2A, L2.0-L2.6 Site Plan (Exhibit C),
7. Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to
the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management
systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate
the proposed connection points
Existing and proposed utilities are shown on Sheets GO.I, G I.O-G 1.6 Site Assessment of Existing
Conditions (Exhibit C). Phase II of the Project involves the extension of power to supply lighting
along the sou'th bank path relocation.
(d) Grading, Paving, & Stormwater Management Plan
I. Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
The Grading Plan is included as Sheets CO. I , C I.O-C 1.6 Grading Plan (Exhibit C). Paving is shown
on Sheets LO.2-LO.2A, L2.0-L2.6 Site Plan (Exhibit C). Stormwater management facilities are shown
on She~ts C:O.+,S~.2, A;C,: 2.0-C2.6 Stormw~ter an? Utilities ,Plan (Exhibit C). T~%!Wllfr~ C'
prepar.ed byEnglne~rs With OBEC Consulting Engineers. rl<t-~UI1IVIIIIA1. RE 0
,AUG212009
CMGS
- INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17. 2009
31
-
......;7
(
I-S WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II ,
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (yVG). DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
2. Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect,
The Planting Plan is includedas Sheet LO.3-LO.3D. L3.0-L3.6A Landscape'Plan (Exhibit C). The
sheet is prepared by a Landscape Architect with CMGS.
3. Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations
The project site does not contain any buildings and no buildings are proposed. This standard does
not apply.
4. Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns
Pervious and imperiious area drainage patterns are shown on Sheets CO. I. C I.O-C 1.6 Grading Plan
, (Exhibit C) and described in the Stormwater Management Report (Exhibit D). '
5. The size and location of stormwater management systems
components, including but not limited to:'drain lines, catch basins, dry
wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and,
natural drainageways to be retained
Size and location of existing and proposed stormwater management systems are shown on Sheets
CO.2. CO.2A. C2.0-C2.6 Stormwater and Utilities Plan (Exhibit C) and described in the Stormwater
Management Report (Exhibit D).
6. Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at I
foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines
may be at 5 foot intervals)
Existing ana proposes spot elevations and contour lines are shown on Sheets CO. I , C I.O-C'I.6
Grading Plan (Exhibit C). ,
7. Amount of proposed cut and fill
The amount of proposed cut, and fill is noted on Sheets CO. I , C I.O-C 1.6 Grading Plan (Exhibit C).
(e) Landscape Plan
I. Drawn by a Landscape Architect
The Landscape Plan is included as Sheet LO.3-L0.3D. L3,O-L3.6A Landscape Plan (Exhibit C). , The
sheet is prepared by Landscape Architects with Cameron McCarthy Gilbert & Scheibe (CMGS).
2. Location 'and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to
include calculation of landscape coverage
Location and dimensions of proposed landscape areas are shown on Sheet LO.3-LO.3D; L3.0-L3.6A
Landscape Plan (Exhibit C). A calculation of existing and proposed landscape coverage in included
on Sheet,n.O Cover (Exhibit C).
PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'O
AUG2 1 2009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17; 2009
32
I~S WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR). & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION' ,
'3. Screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110
Landscape screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 is not required or proposed. This standard
does not apply.
4. Written description, including specifications, of the permanent
irrigation system
The Project does not include a permanent irrigation system'. This standard does not apply.
5. Location and type ofstreet trees
The location and type of existing street trees is shown on Sheets GO.I, G I.O-G 1.6 Site Assessment
of Existing Conditions (Exhibit C). No new street trees are, proposed.
6. List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees,
shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common
name; quantity, size! spacing, and method of planting
Proposed types of landscape materials. including' genus. speCies. common name. quantity. size.
spacing. and method of planting. is shown on Sheets LO.3-LO.3D. L3.0-L3.6A Landscape Plan (Exhibit
C).
(f) Architectural Plans
I. Exterior elevations of all buildings and structures proposed for the
development site, including height
No buildings are proposed. Elevations ,of the bridges, including height. are shown on Sheets A I.OA.
A2.0-A-A4.0A Elevations, Sections. Enlargements (Exhibit C).
2. Conceptual floor plans
No buildings are proposed. T~is standard does not ,apply.
(g) On-Site Lighting Plan
I. Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures,
both free standing and attached '
Location, orientation, and height of proposed lighting is'shown on Sheets EO. I , E 1.0, E 1.2 Lighting
Plan (Exhibit C).
2. Type and extent of shielding, including cut-offangles, and type of
illumination, wattage, and luminous area
Type and extent of shielding is indicated on Sheets EO.I, E 1.0. E 1.2 Lighting Plan (Exhibit C).
',: .,iJi ":~~6tometric test report for each light source PRE..SIIRMITTAL REC'O
AUG 2 1 2009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
33
. > -,"~
1-5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (wG).DISCRETlONARY USE (DU). SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR). & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
Photometric test reports for light sources are shown on SheetS EO.I, E 1.0, E 1.2 Lighting Plan
(Exhibit C).
II )Additional Materials That May be Required
(h) Where a multi-family development is proposed, any additional materials
to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240
The Project does not involve multi-family development. This standard does not apply.
(i) Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of
the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQL W)
or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW
The project site is located within 150 of the top of bank of the Willamette River, a WQL W. A
Riparian Area Protection Report is included as Exhibit F. .
(j) A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted
concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present
Preliminary geotechnical analysis for the Project has been prepared and is 'available upon request.
The project site is not known to be affected by unstable soils andlor a high water table.
(k) Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the
,additional standards,ofthe overlay district
The project site is within the Willamette Greenway and Floodplain Overlay Districts. Applicable
standards in the overlay districts are addressed in Section 6.
(I) If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit'
as specified in SDC 5.19-100
No trees within Springfield jurisdiction are proposed for removal in Phase II of the Project. A'
Tree Felling Permit is not required. Trees removed during Phase I are not shown on the Plan Set
(Exhibit C); reference the Phase I application for tree removal within state-owned ROW. This
standard does not apply.
(m)A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands
must besLibmitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the
property
Wetland Delineation Reports and letter of concurrence from ODSL are included as Exhibit E.
(n) Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or
evidence the permit application has been submitted for review
The, Project has obtained required ODSL and ACOE removal-fill permits for impacts to wetlands
and \Vaters of,thestate. The permits are included in Exhibit E. PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'O
AUG2 1 '2009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17,2009
34
1-5 WILLAMETIE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLAMETIE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT f'NG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU);SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
/
(0) Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the
development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted
prior to development
The Applicant will submit a Land and Drainage Alteration permit (LDAP) application prior to
development.
(p) Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC
5.9-100 and 5.21-100
The Project is subject to Discretionary Use criteria, which are addressed in Section 6.
(q) An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a
development is proposed outside ofthe city limits but within the City's
urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer
The Project does not involve annexation. This standard does not apply.
5.4 Floodplain Overlay District Development Submittal Requirements
I) Submitted Concurrently
This Proposal is a concurrent request for Willamette Greenway Overlay District Development
Discretionary Use, Site Plan Review, and Floodplain Overlay District Development approval.
2) Application Fee
The required filing fee of $1 ,319.85 is included with the initial submittal.
3) Floodplain Development Application Form
This Floodplain Development application form is included in the submittal.
4) Deed
Deeds are inCluded as Exhibit A.
5) Narrative
Written narrative explaining the proposal is provided as part of initial application submittal.
Findings of compliance with applicable criteria in SDC 3.3-420 are provided in Section 6.
, .' < 6)' +h~J~'(3) copies of plot plan
'. , -
Exhibit C.is included as the required plot plan. The Sheets containing the name, location and
dimensions of all existing and proposed structures, fill, material storage and drainage facilities are
submitted herewith. As required, the Sheets indicate the base flood elevation and elevation relative
to mean sea level. .
PRE.~IIRMITTAl REC'O
AlJG 2 1 2009
CMGS
IN!TIAL SUBMITIAL , August 17. 2009 '
35
,1
c
1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE ,PROJECT - PHASE \I
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
7) Certification by an Oregon licensed Engineer or Architect
As required by this standard and the review standards established in SDC 3.3-4ISB.6.b and 3.3-
420B.2.a.iii, the applicant has submitted a statement from the project engineer certifying that the
design and methods of construction proposed in Phase II conform to accepted standards and
practice for meeting the provisions of this subsection. The engineer's certification is included
herewith as Exhibit H.
8) Description
The Project does not involve the alteration or relocation ofa watercourse. The extent of Phase
II construction activities are included above in the project narrative.
PRE.SUBMIITAl REC'O
AUG2 1 2009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
36
\,
1-5 WllLAMETTERIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT rNG). DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
6.0 APPROVAL CRITERIA AND STANDARDS
6.1 Willamette Greenway Overlay District Development Standards (SDC 3.3~330)
Statewide Planning Goal IS, Willamette River Greenway, provides that:
"The qualities of the Willamette River shall be protected, conserved" enhanced and
maintained consistent with the lawful uses present on December 6, 1.974. Intensification of
uses, changes in use or developments may be 'permitted after this date only when they are
consistent with the Willamette Greenway Statute, this Goal and [other standards]."
The Applicant has demonstrated that the Project is consistent with the Willamette Greenway
Statute and Goal 15 through an approved Metro Plan amendment, including an exception to Goal
IS, by Lane County and the Cities of Eugene and Springfield. "
. ,. I '
Regarding "other standards" SDC 3.3-300, Willamette River Greenway Permits, provides that:,
"SDC 3.3-305 Purpose: The Willamette Greenway (WG) Overlay District is established to
protect and preserve natural scenic, historic, and recreational qualities of lands along 'the
Willamette River." (SDC 3.3-305)
"SDC 3.3-310 Applicability: The WG Overlay District applies to all lands which are within
150 feet of the ordinary low water line on the channel of the Willamette River, or are
adjacent to the river and are publicly owned for park and recreation purposes." (SDC 3.3-
310)
"SDC3.3-320 Permitted and Discretionary Uses: Uses allowed in the WG'Overly District
are the same as those in the underlying zoning districts. Anv chanee or intensification of
use, or construction that has sienificant visual imoact shall reauire Discretionarv Use
Aooroval." (Emphasis added).
Because the proposed project will have a "significant visual impact," the project requires
Discretionary Use approval. The Discretionary Use approval criteria are addressed below in
Section 6.2.
In addition to Discretionary Use criteria specified in Section 5.9-120, projects located in the
Willamette Greenway Overlay District shall also meet the standards specifi~d in Section 3.3-325.
SDC 3.3-325 Greenway Setback: A Greenway Setback Line i~ established to
protect, maintain, preserve and enhance the natural, scenic, historic and
recreational qualities of the Willamette Greenway. Only water-dependant or
. water-related uses are permitted between the Willamette River and the
Greenway Setback Line. The Greenway Overlay District shall substitute
, temporarily as the Greenway Setback Line for all properties. within the Overlay
District that do not have an established Setback Line.* * *.
,...1.-
PRE.~IIRM!ITAL REC'O
illIG 21 2009
. , . -'
" Ordinance No 622:1'
,CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
37
1-5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT 0NG). DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN ,
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLJW DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
In the context of the statewide coastal goals (Goals '16-19), the Oregon Land Conservation and
Development Commission (LCDC) has determined that bridges and bridge approach ramps on
piles are water-related or water-dependant uses. However, bridges and bridge approach ramps on ,
fill are not considered to be water-dependant or water-related uses.12 '
The Metro Plan's Willamette Greenway policies require a goal exception to locate a non-water
'dependant transportation facility within the Greenway setback. I) In 2008, Lane County and the
cities of Springfield and Eugene approved a Metro Plan amendment and an exception to Goal 15
authorizing the construction of the permanent replacement bridges on fill within the Willamette
Greenway. '
Phase II of the Project involves: construction of replacement Willamette River and Canoe Canal
bridges; removal of the existing temporary detour bridge; removal of temporary work bridges; and,
improvement andlor replacement of multi-use paths, interpretive signage, stormwater facilities,
natural area restoration and associated landscaping and utility improve,ments. Temporary
construction staging areas and access routes will be restored to pre-construction conditions at the
completion of the project and will not require permanent fill. Construction of temporary work
bridges and staging areas will require temporary fill, however all temporary fill will be removed
prior to the completion of the project and the affected areas will be restored to their pre-
construction condition. Demolition of the existing bridge was permitted as part of Phase I and
does not require fill. The existing network of multi-use paths and trails along the Willamette' River
are water-related uses. Based on these findings, the Project is allowed in the Greenway Setback.
The City of Springfield has adopted Greenway setback lines for both the north and south side of
the river that extend from the Springfield/Eugene jurisdictional boundary line (the 1-5 bridge
centerline) eastward past the detour bridge. On the north side, the setback extends northward
well beyond the bank of the river and includes the Eastgate Woodlands. On the south side, it
extends southward a short distance from the river bank. Established Greenway setback lines are
shown on Sheet T 1.0 Cover (Exhibit C) and on Sheets LO.2-LO.2A, L2.0-L2.6 Site Plans (Exhibit C),
These findings together with the site plans submitted herewith demonstrate that this criterion is
satisfied.
A. Local, regional and State recreational needs shall be provided for consistent
with the carrying capacity ofthe land. The possibility that public recreation
use might disturb adjacent property shall be considered and minimized to
the greatest extent possible.
Existing lands devoted to recreation within the Project area include the Whilamu't Natural Area of
Alton Baker Park and the Eastgate Woodlands. Within the Project area, the North Bank Trail
extends along the northern border of the Willamette River though the Whilamut Natural Area and
the Eastgate Woodlands. The southeast loop of Pre's Trail is located within the Whilamut'Natural
Area with an extension to the Eastgate Woodlands. There are additional connecting paths ,located'
12 1-5 Willamett;"R'iv~r Bridge Project land Use Approvals Memorandum.
Bridge Delivery Partners. April 2007.
Il Metro Plan, Chapter III, Section D, Policy II.
Draft MemorMe..s~At Rren
. AUG 2 12009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
38
~,
,
,
I'S WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
throughout the Whilamut Natural Area, on the Knickerbocker Bridge, and along Franklin
Boulevard. .
As part of the Project, the Applicant proposes to conduct minor reconstruction and improvement
of the path and trail system in the Ea~tgate Woodlands. The improvements are proposed to
facilitate bicycle and pedestrian movements through the project area during and following
construction. The improvements have been developed in coordination with the Willamalane Park
and Recreation District (WPp,D) and the Whilamut Natural Area Citizen's Planning Committee
(CPC). The Applicant has coordinated extensively with WPRD regarding potential impacts and
mitigation measures within and the Eastgate Woodlands. Based on this coordination, a
comprehensive program of mitigation measures has been proposed by the Applicant. These
mitigation measures are detailed in the Phase I approval and incorporated by reference herein.
Except for minor reconfiguration of bicycle and pedestrian paths, rio new public recreation uses are
proposed as part ofthis project. These activities have been carefully coordinated with the
Whilamut Natural Area CPC and will have a negligible effect on adjacent properties during
construction.
The applicant notes that to the extent the Willamette River is used for recreational fishing and '
boating purposes, Phase II construction activities will improve river conditions overall.
Specifically, the proposed bridges will each have two piers in the main channel of the river. By
comparison, the decommissioned bridge has five piers in the water, and the detour bridge has six -
a total of II piers. The net reduction of piers in the water will increase the hydraulic opening,
improve fish passage, and reduce in-st'ream work and associated environmental impacts during the
proposed construction as well as during future bridge maintenance. From both aesthetic and
navigation safety perspectives, this project will provide improved recreational benefits to those,'
using the river.
These findings together with the Plan Set (Exhibit C) and documentation submitted herewith
demonstrate that this criterion has been met to the greatest extent practicable.
B. Adequate public access to the river shall be provided.
Within the Project area, the North Bank Trail extends aiong the north~rn border of the ' : '
Wiilamette River though the Whilamut Natural Area and the Eastgate Woo9lands. The southe~st
loop of Pre's Trail is located within the Whilamut Natural Area with an extension to the Eastgate
Woodlands. There are additional connecting paths throughout the ,Whilamut Natural Area" on the
Knickerbocker Bridge, and along Franklin Boulevard.
As proposed and approved in the Applicant's Phase I applications, construction activities and"
staging locations have impacted the existing network of multi-use (bicycle and pedestrian) paths and
walking/jogging trails extendirig along the north side of the Willamette River. In order to continue
to provide for public access along the river between the communities of Eugene and Springfield'
during Pha~e II construction, the Applicant will maintain all temp~rary paved and soft paths
proposed in' Phase I to route traffic around and through the'Project site for the duration of
constructipri.:. At die conclusion of Phase II bridge construction activities, the paths will be
, '";,', " ' " , , ' PRE-SUBMIITAl REC'O
.~" , . -' . ",', - .
;_.'. c'
AUG2 12009
CMGS'
, INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August /7, 2009
, 3?
.,-""
, ,
~
~ ''''.!
1-5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE" '
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRlCTDEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
restored to their original locations prior to construction or reconfigured to locations agreed upon
by Eugene POS and WPRD.
The applicant's Phase I Proposal, as approved, also included construction of a reconfigured,
temporary bicycle/pedestrian path along the south side of the Willamette River. Within the state-
owned ROW on the south side of the Willamette River, the Proposal includes a new multi-use '
path along the north side of Franklin Boulevard (South Bank PathlPedestrian Viaduct) and an
improved South Bank Path along the south side of Franklin Boulevard, as illustrated on Sheet L2,4
Site Plan (Exhibit q, The new South Bank Path/Pedestrian Viaduct will extend east from the
Knickerbocker Pedestrian Bridge, along the north side of Franklin Boulevard. Although the path is
proposed to extend outside of the Project area, only the portion within the Project area is included
in the Proposal. The'proposed path is the subject of a pending Metro Plan Amendment '
application.14 The existing 'South Bank Path along the south side of Franklin Boulevard will be
realigned and reconstructed., the path extends east from Knickerbocker P~destrian Bridge and
accesses the south side of Franklin Boulevard. '
Paths and trails will, to the maximum extent practicable, be kept open,safe, and useable during
Phase II construction, A continuous route across state-owned right of way for the
bicyclelpedestrian pathways will be kept open and accessible at all times along the north side, and
to the extent practicable, along the south side of the river during construction. Pedestrian and
bicycle traffic will be detoured around the construction site work areas immediately adjacent 1-5
and along the Willamette River and rerouted on new temporary and permanent alignments.
To minimize disruptions, the Applicant will implement a Traffic Control Plan (TCP) for paths and
trails; will coordinate with WPRD on path and trail closures; and will'provide advance public notice
of path and trail closures. These findings together with the Plan Set and documentation submitted
herewith demonstrate that this criterion has been met to the greatest extern practicable.
C. Significant fish and wildlife habitats shall be protected. ,
The Metro Plan Natural Assets and Constraints Working Paper identifies the Willamette River
Greenway in Figure J I and identifies the Willamette River as a fish spawning river. According to
ODFW, two salmonid populations listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) are documented
as occurring within the reach of the Willamette River that flows through the project area:
. Upper Willamette River spring Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and Critical Habitat -
federally threatened (FT)
. Columbia River bull trout (Sa/velinus con~uentus)Distinct Population Segment (DPS) and
Critical Habitat - FT
Construction activities will require in-water work and are anticipated to require four in-water
work periods. Temporary effects from in-water work will include construction or removal of
piling/piers, which involves site preparation, pile driving, dewatering and isolation, and rewatering
once work is complete. Work area isolation will require fish capture and release operations in the
PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'D
14 South Bank Path/Pedestrian Viaduct Metro Plan Am~ndment Application, MA 09-4. July I, 2AV\; 2 1 2009
CMGS
, INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
40
<1..",:
\
I~S WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE" . ,
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OYER LAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
Willamette River, which could affect both listed and non,listed fish species. All fis~ capture and
release operations will be conducted by experienced biologists following guidelines established by
ODFW and NMFS. '
A species list provided by. ORNHIC indicated that there are no federal- or state-listed ESA
terrestrial wildlife species known to reside within the project area. There are reports of sensiti,ve
or species of concern terrestrial wildlife within two miles of the project area; however there is .
,habitat that would support only one of these sensitive species in the project area (i.e., the
northwestern pond turtle).
There is a great blue heron rookery (which may have become inactive) along the Canoe Canal
located about 800 feet east of the project area Eugene POS and WPRD staff have noted the
ephemeral ponds located throughout the Whilamut Natural Area of Alton Baker Park provide
habitat for amphibian species. Western meadowlark nesting habitat has been documented in the
vicinity of the meadow immediately northwest of the project area.
To avoid fish and wildlife species"and minimize temporary impacts from construction activities, all
applicable OTIA III State Bridge Delivery Program EPS will be folloyved. Project EPS are included in
the Phase J application. The Applicant proposed additional mitigation measures also identified in
the Phase J approval and incorporated by reference herein.
These findings together with the Plan Set and documentation submitted herewith demonstrate that
this standard has been met to the greatest extent practicable.
D. Identified scenic qualities and view-points shall be preserved.
The proposed Project is located within ODOT's 1-5 right-of-way in essentially the same locatio~ as
the decommissioned bridge. The decommissioned bridge is not considered a scenic resource.
Upon completion, the Project will significantly reduce the amount of structures, specifically piers;
within the Willamette River which will open up views of the river from surrounding vantage points
(i.e'-the views from Alton Baker Park and the Eastgate Woodlands) and the river itself. The new
bridges will have one pier near the center of the Willamette River and one on or near the south .
bank of the riv~r to 'support the bridge structures. By comparison, the dec~mmissioned bridge has
five piers 'in the water, and the detour bridge has six, for a total of II piers. The new bridges will
provide a substantial net reduction in piers and visibility and vividness of the ,surrounding landforms
and vegetation will be enhanced over the existing conditions. As such, the project will have' a "
positive effect on scenic qualities, and viewpoints.
These findings together with the Plan Set and documentation submitted herewith demonstrate that
this standard has been met to the greatest extent practicable.
E: The maintenance of public safety and protection of public and private
property, especially from vandalism and trespass shall be provided for, to the
maximum extent practicable.
Paths and trails,widiin the Project site will, to the maximum extent practicable, be kept open, safe,
and useable during construction. A continuous route across state-owned righooc~m'll1wl DtC'D
bicycle/pedestrianpathways will be kept open and accessibl~ at all times on th~ \)bi=tIT'S1\fM,IMiYt fCI-
, " AUG 21 2009
,CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
41
~..-,,;
..1'" '....
1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT -PHASE II , '
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU); SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
the extent practicable, the south side of th'e river during construction. Pedestrian and bicycle
traffic will be detoured around the construction site work areas immediately adjacent 1-5 and along
the Willamette River and rerouted on new temporary and permanent alignments.
To minimize disruptions, the Applicant will implement TCPs for paths and trails; will coordinate
with WPRD, EPOS and CPC on path and trail closures; and will provide advance public notice of'
path and trail dosures.
The Applicant's contractor will employ safety and security measures to minimize the potential for
vandalism and trespass within construction staging and access areas. The majority of construction
staging areas will be fully enclosed with security fencing to prevent vandalism and trespass. During
'construction activities, the Applicant's contractor will monitor access routes through the'
construction zone, provide flagging for vehicles and pedestrians/bicyclists at appropriate areas
within areas designated for construction operations, all of which will maintain safety and protect
public property.
Public property impacted by construction will be restored and enhanced prior to completion of
, ,
the Project, as illustrated on Sheets LO.3-LO.3D, L3.0-L3.6A Landscape Plan (Exhibit C).
These findings together with the Plan Set and documentation submitted herewith demonstrate that
, this standard has been met to the greatest extent practicable.
F. The natural vegetative fringe along the river shall be enhanced and
protected to the maximum extent practicable.
To minimize impacts to riparian vegetation during construction and operational activities the
project will continue coordination with resource agencies (federal, state, and local) and implement
OTIA III EPS, obtain regulatory permits (DSL Removal-Fill, USACE Section 404), provide site
restoration and compensatory mitigation, and identify additional opportunities to minimize
disturbances and enhance restoration. To minimize the extent of direct and indirect impacts to
riparian'vegetation, additional mitigation measures will be. Proposed mitigation measures are
identified in Section 4 and the Phase I application, and incorporated by reference herein.
The Applicant has entered into formal agreements with WPRD regarding mitigation and
conservation measures that will be executed during and following construction. Additional
landscape mitigation measures included in the Proposal consist of: removal of invasive plants:
replanting with native understory plants in riparian areas near the project; planting native
vegetation to reestablish a riparian forest in other areas; and restoration of areas disturbed by the
project to pre-construction conditions.
Impacts to riparian areas during Project c~nstruction are unavoidable. The Project is designed to
avoid aDd minimize impacts as much as feasible. Prior to completion of Phase II construction,
landscape and open spaces areas will ,be replanted and/or restored to pre-construction conditions
or better. The Project will result in a net increase of landscape areas, open space, and vegetation
and will provide the maximum possible amount of ,landscape' area and open space following
completion, as illustrated on Sheets LO.3-L0.3D, L3.0-L3.6A Landscape PlanlExhibit Cl
, " " PJ<E.SUBMITIAL REC'D
AUG 2 1 2009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
42
1~5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II .
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG). DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FlOOD~LA'IN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION '
These findings together with the Plan Set and documentation submitted herewith demonstrate that
. this standard has been met to the greatest extent practicable.
G. The location of known aggregate deposits shall be considered. Aggregate
extraction may be permitted outside the Greenway Setback Area subject to
compliance with State law, the underlying zoning district and conditions of
approval designed to minimize adverse effects on water quality, fish and
wildlife, vegetation, bank stabilization, strea~ flow, visual quality, quiet and
safety and to guarantee reclamation.
The Project will have no effect on existing locations of aggregate deposits. The Project proposed
to replace the existing 1-5 bridges in essentially the same location. The Project does ni:lt involve
aggregate extraction. The'standard does not apply.
;,
H. Developments shall be directed away from the river to the greatest possible
degree; provided, however, lands committed to urban uses shall be
permitted to continue as urban uses, including port, public, industrial,
commercial and residential uses, uses pertaining to navigational
requirements, water and land access needs and related facilities.
\ The Project site is located on land committed to an urban use. Statewide Planning Goal 15, Section
K(2) defines "lands committed to urban use" in part as "those lands upon which the economic,
developmental and locational factors have, when considered together, made the use of the
property for other then urban purposes inappropriate."
The Project site is physically developed with an interstate highway which will be active in its
present location for the foreseeable future. Under numerous interpretations'of LCDC Goal 12
(Transportation), state highways are considered "urban uses." Multi-use pathways are also
considered "urban uses" as they serve a transportation function.
Accordingly, the proposed Project is an "urban use", is on land "committed" to "urban uses", and
can continue as an "urban use" through' development of the replacement bridges and associated
infrastructur.e. These findings together with the Plan Set and documentation, submitted herewith
demonstrate tfiat this standard has been meno the greatest extent practicable.
PRE.SIIRMITTAl REC'O
AUG 2 1 2009
,!..
CMGS' "
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
43
.~....,
.- <led .'-"0." .....;I9;;:f-'
1-5 WILLAMETIE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR). & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
6.2 DISCRETIONARY USE
The Applicant notes that the City of Springfield has already reviewed and approved the Project and
Phase I construction activities associated therewith as a Discretionary Use. Because Phase II
simply permits the completion of Project construction as outlined in the applicant's Phase I
submittal, reconsideration of the use here is in some respects redundant. Even so, the, Applicant
provides findings of fact demonstrating compliance with all applicable discretionary use standards
for Phase II below. To the extent that the Phase I Discretionary Use approval serves as
justification to approve this application request, said 'justification is. incorporated herein by
reference.
SDC 5.9.120 Criteria: A Discretionary Use may be approved onlY,ifthe
Planning Commission or Hearings Official finds that the proposOlI conforms with
the Site Plan Review approval criteria specified in Section 5.17-125, where
applicable, and the following approval criteria:,
The Project is subject to Site Plan Review. The Applicant's Site Plan Review application, submitted
concurrently herewith, demonstrates that the proposal conforms to all applicable approval criteria
specified in Section 5.17-125.
A. The proposed use conforms with applicable:
I. Provisions of the Metro Plan;
Pages III-D-4 and 5 of the Metro Plan set out the Willamette Greenway policies. Many of these'
policies are directed to local governments rather than to individual propertY owners or to the use
of individual properties. Of theremaining policies, only two (presented below in italics) are
potentially relevant to the subject request:
Policy 0.5: New development that locates along river corridors and watelWays shall be limited to
uses that are compatible with the natural, scenic, and environmental qualities of those water
f~atures.
This policy has limited applicability to this proposal. Technically speaking, the proposed project is
new 'development' due to the magnitude and duration of construction activities necessary to carry
out the work. However, in essence the project proposed to replace the existing decommissioned
bridges with new bridges in roughly the same location. The new bridges will be slightly wider and
built to modern construction and safety standards. The Project may correctly be categorized as
'replacement' rather than new 'development', Demonstration that the proposed use is compatible
with the natural, scenic, and environmental qualities of the Willamette River is found in the current
use.
On July 21, 2008, the Springfield City Council, together with the City of Eugene and Lane County,
, adopted Ordinance No: 6227 amending the Metro Plan text including an exception to Goal 15 for
the 1-5 Willamette Bridge Project. The Ordinance specifically amended the text of Policy D.II of
the MetroPlan"for the "purposes of removing and replacing the decommissioned 1-5 bridge, the
temporary detour bridge and the Canoe Canal bridge with two new parallel bridges * * *." This
exception was found to comply with the statutory requirements governing the Greenway.
PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'O
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17,2009
AU\i21Z0D5
,44
/
I-S WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE"
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAYDISTRICT DEVELOPMENT IyVG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
Regarding the above policy, the Applicant has conducted extensive environmental investigation and
documentation to plan, design, and execute the Project in a manner that is compatible with the
natural, scenic, and environmental qualities of the Willamette'River. As described elsewhere in this
application and the applications submitted concurrently herewith, the proposed use has been
designed and sited to minimize impacts on resources to the greatest extent possible. The
mitigation strategies and findings from the Applicant's Environmental Assessment are incorporated
by reference herein.
Palicy 0.11:' The taking .of an exception shall be required if a ~anwater-dependent transpanatian
facility requires placing .of fill within the Willamette River greenway setback.
Ordinance No. 6227 specifically amended the text of Policy D.ll of the Metro Plan as follows:
':4n exception to 'Statewide Planning Goal 15 Willa~ette River Greenway was appraved far Or~gan
Depanment afTransponatian (ODOT) far purpases of removing and replacing the
decommissianed 1-5 bridge, the temparary detaur bridge and the Canae Canal bridge with twa new
parallel bridges (.one southbound and .one nanhbaund) within the 1-5 right-ar-way crassing the '
Willamette River and Canae Canol and within the Willamette River Greenway Setback line. The
exceptian authorizes constructian and later removal .of .one .or mare temparary work bridges,
demalitian .of the decammissioned 1-5 Willamette River Bridge, Canae Canol Bridge, and detour
bridges; canstructian .of the twa replacement bridges; recanstructian .of the raadway appraaches ta
the bridges (1-5 and ramps); rehabilitatian .of the praject area; and campletian .of any required
mitigatian .of praject impaas. In assaciation with these tasks, the exceptian '(unher autharizes
within the Willamette River Greenway Setback lin~ the additian and rem .ova; .offill within ODOT
right-ar-way and rem .oval .of fill within 0 temparary slope easement east, of 1-5, This exceptian
satisfies the criteria .of Oregon Administrative Rule '(OAR) 660-004-0022(6),.Willamette Greenway,
and the exceptian requirements .of OAR 660-004-0020 Gaal 2 Pan lI(c) far a 'reasans' exceptian
and pursuant ta OAR 660-004-0015, is hereby adapted as an amendment ta the Metro Plan text,
Palicy 0.11, Chapter III, Sectian 0."
The adopted Metro Plan text allows:
I. The intensificatian .of use and develapment proposed by the bridge replacement praject and'
assaciated multi-use path and pork facility impravements; ,
2. The siting of non water-dependent or water-related uses within the Greenway setback line; and
3. The placing .of fill for a nan water-dependent transponatian facility within the Greenway setback
line.
As a whole the proposal is consistent with the applicable Willamette Greenway policies set out in
the Metro Plan. These findings together with the Plan Set (Exhibit C) and documentation
submitted herewith demonstrate that this standard has been met to the greatest extent practicable.
2. Refinement plans;
The Project site is n'ot located within an area subject to an adopted refinement plan. This standard
does nota'pply. ..;' '
PRE-SUBMI1TAl RECIO
AUr2 1 ?nnQ
,U 4S
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
". "At .~,,*'~'":l.'" ....
:..;",
1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II ,
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT ('NG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU). SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
3. Plan District standards;
The Project is proposed on land within the PLO - Public Land & Open Space zoning district and
within ODOT's 1-5 right-of-way. Low impact publidacilities are permitted outright as secondary
uses in the PLO district. The Proposal involves reconfiguration of bicycle and pedestrian paths in
the Eastgate Woodlands, within the PLO district. SDC 6.1-110 defines low impact public facilities
as U[a]ny public or semi-public facility that has minimal olfactory, visual or auditory impacts which is
permitted subject to the design standards of this Code." Bicycle and pedestrian facilities by their '
nature meet the stated definition of low impact public facilities,
The Proposal complies with PLO district standards. Further demonstration oficompliance with
applicable standards is found in the Applicant's Site Plan Review application for the Project,
submitted concurrently herewith. These findings together with the Plan Set (Exhibit C) and
documentation submitted herewith demonstrate that this standard has been met to, the greatest
extent practicable. '
4. Conceptual Development Plans, or
The Project is not within an area subject to an approved conceptual development plan. This
standard does not apply.
5. Specific Development Standards in this Code;
The Project is located partially on land within the PLO district. SDC 4.7-203 sets out specific
development standards for the PLO district. The specific development standards apply to: a)
access on arterial or collector streets; b) stadiums, swimming pools and other major noise
generators; c) community and regional parks; d) special uses; e) RV parks and campgroul)ds within
regional parks; f) elementary and middle school~; g) wellness centers; and, h) pedestrian amenities
for public buildings in mixed uses Metro Plan land use designations.
The Proposal does not involve uses subject to specific development standards as noted above.
This standard does not apply. -
B. The site under consideration is suitable for the proposed use, considering:
I. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the use
(operating characteristics include but are not limited to parking,
traffic, noise, vibration, emissions, light, glare, odor, dust, visibility,
safety, and aesthetic conside~ations, where applicable); ,
As part of Discretionary Use approval for. the detour bridge, the City determined that this
criterion would be met if the application met the standards for an exception authorizing non-water
dependant or non-water related uses within the Greenway. .
On July 21, 2008, the Springfield City Council, together with the City of Eugene and Lane County,
'adopted Ordinance No 6227 amending the Metro Plan text including an exception to Goal 15 for'
the 1-5 WilIamette Bridge Project. The adopted metro plan text allows ufilhe sitin;..of nRP~fl.ter-
dependent or wat,er-related uses within the Greenway setback line." PRI:.SUBMh IAL t<tl",U '
AUG 2 1 2009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITT All August 17, 2009
> 46
i-s WlLLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT CNG), DISCRETIONARY. USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY, DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
The Project has been granted an exception authorizing non-water dependen.t or non-water related
uses within the Greenway. This standard is satisfied.
2. Adequate and safe circulation exists for vehicular access to and from
the proposed site, and on-site circulation and emergency response as
well as pedestrian, bicycle and transit circulation;
Construction access to the project site will be provided from state-owned property adjacent to
Jenkins Drive, extending south from Franklin Boulevard. As part of Phase I work, the Applicant
proposed to construct a temporary access route extending from this property to access the south
side ofthe project site. Besides Franklin Boulevard, no o~her streets or roads within Springfield
will be impacted by Phase II work and ~he Proposal will not impact on-site vehicular circulation or
emergency response. Judkins Road, a Lane County facility, was closed permanently as part of the
Project.
Intermittent staging/closures will be required on 1-5 and local roadways during construction.
Closures and traffic control will be required to provide movement of construction equipment and
traffic inlout construction sites, as well as during demolition of several existing bridge spans. '
Pedestrian and bike traffic will be detoured around the construction site work areas immediately
adjacent 1-5 and along the Willamette River and rerouted on new temporary and permanent
alignments.
Paths and trails will, to the maximum extent practicable, be kept open, safe, and useable during,
construction. A continuous route across state-owned rightoof-way for the bicyclelpedestrian
pathways will be kept open and accessible at all times on both the north side, and to the extent
practicable, the south side of the river during construction.
A Traffic Management Plan (TMP) will be implementedto provide the details behind the
development of Traffic Control Plan (TCP) and other measures that will be put in place for the,
construction ofthe Project, ,as well as to minimize disruptions to motorists, emergency response,
the freight industry, and communities, withoutcompromising public or worker safety, or the
quality of work being performed. These findings together with the documentation submitted
herewith demonstrate that this standard has been met to the greatest extent practicable.
3. The natural and physical features of the site, including but not limited
to, riparian areas, regulated wetlands, natural stormwater
management/drainage areas and wooded areas shall be adequately
considered in the project design; .
North of the Willamette River, Springfield has designated the Whilamut Natural Area as a
significant Goal 5 resource. On the south side of the river, Springfield has established 75 foot
riparian setbacks along the Willamette River to comply with federal the Clean Water Act and
Endangered Species Act.
The Metro Plan Natural Assets and Constraints Working Paper identifies the Willamette River
Greenway i~ Figure JI and identifies the Willamette River as a fish spawning'river. According to
PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'O
AUG 2 1 Z009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17,2009
47
". 'i:...
~. ~,-"
1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG). DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
, REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
ODFW, two salmonid populations listed wider the Endangered Species Act (ESA) are documented
as occurring within the reach of the Willamette River that flows through the project area:
. Upper Willamette River spring Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and Critical Habitat-
federally threatened (FT)
. Columbia River bull trout (Salvelinus confiuentus) Distinct Population Segment (DPS) .and
Critical Habitat - FT
Construction activities will require incwater work and are 'anticipated to require four in-water
work periods. Temporary effects from in-water work will include construction or removal of
piling/piers, which involves site preparation, pile driving, dewatering and isolation,and rewatering
once work is complete. Work area isolation will require fish capture and release operations in the
Willamette River, which could affect both listed and non-listed fish species. All fish capture and
release operations will, be conducted by experienced biologists following guidelines established by
ODFW and NMFS.
A species list provided by ORNHIC indicated that there are no federal- or state-listed ESA
terrestrial wildlife species known to reside within the project area. There are reports of sensitive
or species of concern terrestrial wildlife within two miles of the project area; however there is
habitat that would support only one of these sensitive species in the project area (i.e., the
northwestern pond turtle).
There is a great blue heron rookery (which may have become inactive) along the Canoe Canal
located about 800 feet east of the project area. Eugene POS and WPRD staff have noted the
ephemeral ponds located throughout the Whilamut Natural Area of Alton Baker Park provide
habitat for amphibian species, Western meadowlark nesting habitat has been documented in the
vicinity of the meadow immediately northwest of the p~oject area.
To avoid fish and wildlife species and minimize temporary impacts from construction activities, all
applicable OTIA III State Bridge Delivery Program' EPS will be implemented to reduce the extent of
direct and indirect impacts to fish and wildlife species.
The Applicant's Riparian Area Protection Report (Exhibit F) addresses the proposed riparian area
protection and restoration methods relative to the Project. The Project has been designed to
minimize impacts to areas currently within the riparian protection area associated with the project
site. The majority of impacts will occur in areas that are currently degraded, contain little
vegetation, and are dominated by non-native vegetation. The short-term impacts to the riparian
corridor,' including tree removal and ground disturbance;will be mitigated using the proposed
methods described in the submittal materials. These methods will restore and improve riparian
area functions by assisting the maintenance of temperature, channel stability; flood storage and
groundwater recharge, decreasing sedimentation, and increasing wildlife habitat by removing
invasive species and increasing native vegetation.
To minimize the impacts to riparian vegetation during construction and operational activities the
project will continue coordination with resource agencies (federal, state, and local) and implement
OTIA III EPS, comply with regulatory permits (DSL Removal-Fill, USACE Section 404), provide site
restoration and compensatory mitigatiof], and identify additional opportup~~ffAteREC'D '
AUG 2 1 2009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
48
~ ~ ,:",,'" ,. ; 'f r;,. ,....
1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
.REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRicT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
disturbances, The Applicant proposes additional mitigation measures identified in the Phase I
'approval and incorporated by reference herein. .
The City of Springfield Local and National Wetlands Inventory.. (L WI) identifies wetlands within the
project site associated with Canoe Canal. The Applicant has conducted detailed wetland
delineations of the project site, which are included as Exhibit E. As shown o~ Sheets LO.2-LO.2A,
, L2.0-L2.6 Site Plan (Exhibit q, Phase II development will result in permanent impacts to
designated wetlands. The applicant will mitigate these permanent wetland impacts through the
purchase of credits in an approved off-site wetland mitigation bank. The applicant has, purchased
0,05 credits at the West Eugene Wetland Mitigation Bank as compensatory mitigation for
permanent wetland impacts. Compensatory mitigation for temporary and permanent waters ,
impacts includes planting and establishment of a 1.907-acre riparian forest within the northwest
quadrant of the river crossing and 1.026-acre of stream and associated riparian area restoration in
the concrete lined unnamed tributary of the Willamette River (Waters 4) in the southwest
quadrant of the river crossing. Additional waters mitigation will be accomplished by reducing' the
number of bjlnt footings currently associated with the detour and decommissioned bridges within
the Willa.mette River (0.027-acre net reduction in bent area). Wetland. impacts described herein
are based on the entire project (Phase I and Phase II). At Project completion, disturbed wetland
vegetation and hydrology will be reestablished (for temporary impacts) or mitigated (for permanent
impacts), as illustrated Sheets LO.3-LO.3D, L3.0-L3.6A Landscape Plan (Exhibit q.
As illustrated on Sheets LO.2-LO.2A, L2.0-L2.6 Site Plan (Exhibit.q and Sheets CO. I , C I.O-C 1.6
Grading Plan (Exhibit q, the Project will not alter natural drainageways that serve a stormwater
treatment function or affect existing stormwater treatment facilities. The Project involves
reconfiguration of bicycle and pedestrian paths in the Eastgate Woodlands and south of Franklin
Boulevard. The paths will be paved and will require new stormwater treatment facilities as
described below.
North of the Willamette River in Springfield the proposed path is located approximately 180 feet
from Canoe Canal and 200 feet from the Willamette River. Runoff from the path flows overland
and is infiltrated prior to reaching either Canoe Canal or the Willamette River. This path currently
, receives stormwater treatment ,from the combination of the existing vegetation and infiltration.
The proposed path will be treated by overland flow and infiltration using the existing vegetation
and ground surrounding the path, as illustrated on Sheets CO.2, CO.2A,' C2.0-C2.6 Stormwater and
Utilities Plan (Exhibit q.
South of the Willamette River runoff from the existing path flows overland to an unnamed
tributary associated with Glenwood Slough and then flows into the Willamette River. This path
receives water quality treatment via sheet flow through existing vegetation. A segment of the path,
from the existing Willamette River Bridge to the end of the proposed relocation, currently
receives no stormwater treatment. Runoff from this section of the path flows directly into either,
the concrete-lined channel associated with the unnamed tributary or into a path-side ditch and is
conveyed to the Willamette River: The proposed path will be treated via construction of a 5-foot
vegetated filter strip, as illustrated on Sheets CO.2, CO.2A, C2.0-C2.6 Stormwater and Utilities Plan
(Exhibit C).
PRE.SIIRMITTAL REC'O
AUG 2 1 2009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17,2009
49
,
1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (yVG). DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
Within the project site, the Eastgate Woodlands are primarily forested and contain extensive'
wooded areas. Trees are also found within the ODOT 1-5 ROW., As described in the Applicant's
Environmental Assessment (EA), the Project has ,been designed to minimize impacts to trees and
wooded areas. The Project will not result in any tree removal within'the Eastgate Woodlands. '
The Applicant proposes extensive tree preservation and protection activities, as illustrated on
Sheets LO,I, L 1.0-L 1.6, L 1.9A-L 1.9C Tree Preservation and Removal Plan (Exhibit C), to preserve
and protect wooded areas not affected by the proposed construction activities. Furthermore, the
Applicant's proposed restoration activities, as illustrated Sheets LO.3-LO.3D,L3.0-L3~6A Landscape
Plan (Exhibit C). will enhance wooded areas and 'restore areas impacted by construction to pre-
construction conditions following the completion of work.
These findings together with the Plan Set (Exhibit C) and documentation submitted herewith
demonstrate that this standard has been met to the greatest extent practicable.
4. Adequate public 'facilities and services are available, including but not
limited to, utilities, streets, storm drainage facilities, sanitary sewer
and other public infrastructure.
The Project does not involve the extension of public utilities or expansion of existing storm
drainage facilities. Streets in the vicinity of the project site are adequate to serve construction
access requirements. This standard is satisfied.
C. Any adverse effects of the proposed use on adjacent properties and on the
public can be 'mitigated through the:
I. Application of other Code standards (including, but not limited to:
buffering from less intensive uses and increased setbacks);
Phase II work outside of ODOT's 1-5 ROW is subject to development standards in SDC Chapter'
4. A comprehensive review Jor compliance with development code standards will occur at the
time of construction permit submittal. The Applicarit's Site Plan Review and Floodplain Overlay
District Development applications for the Project, submitted herewith, provide further
demonstration of compliance with development standards subject to Phase II work. These
__ findings together with the Plan Set (Exhibit C) and documentation ,submitted herewith demonstrate
that this standard is met.
2. Site Plan Review approval conditions, where applicable;
Site Plan Review is required for the Project. The City can impose approval conditions as they
deem necessary. This standard is satisfied.
3. Other approval conditions that may be required by the Approval
Authority; and/or
Through this application and concurrent Site Plan Review and Floodplain Overlay District
Development applications. the City can impose approval conditions as they deem necessary. This
standard is satisfied. PRE.SUBMITIAL REC'D
AUG 2 12009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17,2009
50
,
1:5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE" ,
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT ryvG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP).APPLlCATIOI\I
4. A proposal by the applicant that meets or exceed~ the cited Code'
standards and/or approval conditions.
This Proposal documents extensive mitigation measures proposed by the Applicant, as described in
Section 4. Those measures together with the findings, Plan Set (Exhibit C). ~nd 'documentation
submitted herewith demonstrate that the Proposal meets and exceeds applicable Code standards.
The Project is not subject to any existing approval conditions. This standard is satisfied.
D. Applicable Discretionary Use criteria in other Sections ofthis Code:
I. Wiioeless telecommunications systems facilities requiring
Discretionary Use approval are exempt from Subsections A;-C.,
above but shall comply with the approval criteria specified in Section
4.3-145.
The Project does not involve a wireless telecommunications systems facility, This standard does
not apply.
" 2. Alternative design standards, for multifamily development are exempt
from Subsections A.-C~, above but shall comply with the approval
criteria specified in Section 3.2-245;' ,
The Project does'not involve multifamily development. This standard does not apply.
3. Fences requiring Discretionary Use approval are exempt from
Subsections A.-C., above b!Jt shall comply with the approval criteria
specified in Section 4.4-115C. '
The Project does not involve fences requiring Discretionary Use approval. This standard does not
apply.
4. The siting of public elementary, middle and high schools requiring,
Discretionary Use approval is exempt from Subsections A.:....C., above
but shall comply with the approval criteria specified in Section 4.7-
195. '
The Project does not involve public elementary, middle. or high schools, This standard does not
~~~ '
PRE-~IIRMITTAL REC'O
AUG2 1 2009
"
'.
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17,2009
, 51
1-5 yYlLLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WlLLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT 0NG), DISCRETIONARY' USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR). & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION,
6.3 Site Plan Review Approval Criteria (SDC 5.1.7-125)
The enclosed findings apply to Phase II work as described earlier in this Proposal.
A. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram, and/or the appl~cable
Refinement,Plan diagram, Plan D,istriCt map, and Conceptual Development
Plan. .
The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) diagram shows the area
impacted by this Proposal as being within the Parks and Open Space, Willamene River Greenway
and HeavY Industri<l;1 plan designations. To the extent that the proposed activities are for
transportation facilities and are located within existing public rights-of-way, the proposed activities
are consistent with the land use diagram as ancillary transportation facilities and uses. The project
site is not located within the boundaries of any applicable Refinement Plan, Plan Districts, or
Conceptual Development Plans.
The following findings of compliance address applicable Metro Plan Policies.
Economic Element
Policy B.18: Encourage the development o( transponotion (acilities, which would improve access to
industrial and commercial areas and improve (reight inovement capabilities by implementing the
policies and projects in the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area Transponation Plan (JronsPlan)
and the Eugene Airpon Master Plan.
Replacing the decommissioned 1-5 Willamette River Bridge with two new bridges will maintain
access, mobility, and freight movement capabilities that the decommissioned bridge and temporary
detour bridge have provided. By ensuring that mobility is maintained along the Interstate highway
system through Eugene, and Springfield, the replacement bridges will provide convenient access to
industrial and commercial areas on connecting roads. Reconstructing the bridges to modern design
standards is identified as Project 150 in TransPlan. '
Environmental Resources Element
Metro Plan policies C.15, C.16 and C.I? identify the applicable wetland, significant wildlife habitat
and significant riparian corridor maps that shall be used to identify said resources for notice and
pro,tection. This Proposal is a concurrent Willamette Greenway Overlay District Development,
Discretionary Use, and Floodplain Overlay District Development application. The criteria of
approval for stated applications in addressed by the Applicant in Section 6.
The Metro Plan Natural Assets and Constraints Working Paper identifies the Willamette River
Greenway in Figure J I and identifies the Willamette River as a fish spawning river. According to
ODFW, two salmonid populations listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) are documented
as occurring ,within the reach of the Willamette River that flows through the project area; Upper
Willamette River spring Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and Columbia River,bull trout
(Salvelinus con~uentus).
North of the Willamette River, Springfield has designated the Whilamut Natural Area as a
significant GoalS resource. On the south side of the river, Springfield hapRE~SUBMmAL~~C'D
NJ~9~ 1.2.009
CMGS INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009 52
'.'..
I~S WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE"
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DiSCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION '
riparian setbacks along the Willamette River to comply with federal the Clean Water-Act and
Endangered Species Act.
A species list provided by ORNHIC indicated that there are no federal- or state-listed ESA
terrestrial wildlife species known to reside within the project area. There isa great blue heron
rookery (which may have become inactive) along the Canoe Canal located about 800 feet east of
the project area, Eugene POS and WPRD staff have noted the ephemeral ponds located,
throughout the Whilamut Natural Area of Alton Baker Park provide habitat ,for amphi_bian species.
Western meadowlark nesting habitat has been documented in the vicinity of,the meadow
immediately northwest of the project area.
To avoid fish and wildlife species and minimize temporary impacts from construction activities, all
applicable OTIA III State Bridge Delivery Program EPS will be implemented to reduce the extent of
direct and indirect impacts to fish and wildlife species. Construction activities will require in-water
work and are antiCipated to require four in-water work periods. Temporary effects from in-water
work will include construction or removal of piling/piers, which involves site' preparation,pile
driving, dewatering and isolation, and rewatering once work is,complete. W,ork area isolation will
require fish capture and release operations in the Willamette River, which could affect both listed
and non-listed fish species, All fish capture and release operations will be conducted by
experienced biologists following guidelines established by ODFW and NMFS.
As shown on Sheets LO,2-LO.2A, L2.0-L2.6 Site Plan (Exhibit C), Phase II development will result
in permanerit impacts to designated wetlands. The Applicant proposes to mitigate these '
permanent .wetland impacts through the purchase of credits in an approved off-site wetland
mitigation bank. Specifically, the Applicant has purchased 0.05 credits at the West Eugene Wetland
Mitigation Bank as compensatory mitigation for permanent wetland impacts. Compensatory ,
mitigation for temporary and permanent waters impacts includes planting and establishment of a
1.907-acre riparian forest within the northwest quadrant of the river crossing and I.026-acre of
stream and associated riparian area restoration in the concrete lined unnamed tributary of the : .
Willamette River (Waters 4) in the southwest quadrant of the river crossing. Additional waters
mitigation will be accomplished by reducing the n,umber of bent footings currently associated with
the detour and decommissioned bridges within the Willamette River (0.027-acre net. reduction in
bent area).
Site restoration within the Project area is designed.to restore all areas disturbed during
construction of the Project.' The objectives of site restoration for the Project are to prevent
erosion, to provide stream bank stabilization, to improve water quality, to improve native plant
species composition, to improve fish and wildlife habitat, and to provide aesthetically pleasing
vegetation composition within key Project areas. All wetlands temporarily impacted by the proje.ct
will be restored and enhanced, as illustrated on Sheets LO.3-LOJD, L3.0-L3.6A Landscape Plan
~~0 ' ".,'
Metro Plan policies C22, C23 and C24 address noise and appropriate noise mitigation measures
for the d~sign of rew highway facilities. For the Project, it is predicted that changes in noise levels
will range frori'd:Feduction of I dBA to an increase 'of 3 dBA over existing conditions. Changes in
noise levels are anticipated due to minor changes in roadway alignment, adjustments in noise
shielding through construction of new soundwalls (discussed further below) an~~:StmlVltrrAL~tC'D
All/" 'l 1 7nnq
CMGS INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009 " ..--.:. - ~ S3
ri"''''''''__''''
1-5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
not associated with the Project. The January 2008 Environmental Assessment concluded that no
substantial noise level increases (i.e., an increase of 10 dBA over existing levels) would result from
the Project. These findings demonstrate that no noise mitigation' measures, beyond those already
proposed, are needed as part of this application request.
The Applicant notes that two soundwalls are identified in the original project requirements and are
defined within the Agency report titled 1-5 Willamette River Bridge Projea Bundle 220, Noise Technical
: Repart, dated January 2008 (copy available on request). Within Springfield's jurisdictional boundary,
the applicant proposes to construct a northbound soundwall on the north side of the Willamette
River, as illustrated on Sheets LO.2-LO.2A, L2.0-L2.6 Site Plan (Exhibit C). The soundwall will
mitigate noise impacts on residential development located in the adjacent Anderson Lane
Subdivision.
Palicy C.30: Except as atherwise allowed according ta Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) regulations; development shall be prohibited in floodways if it could result in an increased
flood level. The floadway is the channel of a river ar 'ather water course and the adjacent land area
that must be reserved to discharge a one-percent-chance flood in any given year. '
The 1-5 Willamette River Bridge is located within a FEMA designated regulatory f100dway and
floodplain. Therefore, the design of the replacement bridge must satisfy the regulations set forth in
the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). The NFIP requires that any modifications that cause
a rise in the Base Flood Elevations (BFEs, which corresponds to water surface elevations associated
with the I OO-year flood event) must be approved by FEMA. The proposed structure satisfies the
requirements of the NFIP and will not cause a rise in BFEs; therefore FEMA approval is not
required. The no-rise condition is also a requirement of ODOT for any bridge replacement
project.
In planning the Project, two pier location scenarios were considered (Proposed Option A and
Proposed Option B) as shown in the Environmental Assessment for the project. The Phase I
construction approval permitted the construction of bridge sub-structures (piers) which conform
to Option A. For the Environmental Assessment (EA), the hydraulic conditions of the 1-5
Willamette River Bridge Project were analyzed using the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers' HEC-RAS
model. Natural, existing, and proposed conditions (with pier locations Options A and B) were
modeled. Conservative assumptions regarding pier size were used for this modeling, The Applicant
has conducted detailed hydraulic analysis for, the Project confirming that, at the conclusion of
Phase II construction activities, the Project will result in.no net rise of the base flood elevation.
The hydraulic analysis is a component of the Applicant's Floodplain Overlay District Development
application and included in the submittal as Section 6.4. The FP application is' subject to review and
approval by the City of Springfield and is submitted concurrently herewith. Acting as the local
authority to irnplement FEMA regulations, the City of Springfield's review of the Project for
compliance with the development standards at SDC 3.3-420 will provide assurance that the above
criterion is satisfied,
PRE.SUBMITIAl REC'O
AUG 212.009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I Augustl?,2009
54
1~5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II, '.
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (yVG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION '
As detailed in the applicant's approved Phase I Floodplain Overlay District Development permit
. application, '5 temporary f100dway encroachments are,needed to facilitate construction of the
replacement bridge. Exhibit J, 1-5 Willamette River Bridge FEMA Cross Sections, shows that
Phase II construction activities will result in a net decrease in floodplain elevations as compared
with the pre project condition. Given (I) the temporary nature of the Phase I floodplain impacts,
(2) that the Phase I impacts, as approved, are necessary to achieve the net decrease in floodplain
elevation resulting from the Phase II construction activIties proposed herein, and (3) that the
project engineer has demonstrated and certified that'Phase II construction activities will result in
a net decrease in floodplain elevations compared to the pre project condition, the Project meets
the intent of Policy C.30. '
Policy C.3/: When development is allowed to occur in the f100dway or,f1oodwoy fringe, local
regulations shall control such development in order to mini;'ize the potential danger to life and
property. Within the UGB, development should result in in-filling of partially developed land. Outside
the UGB, areas affeaed by the f100dway and f100dway fringe shall be proteaed for their agricultural
and sand and gravel resource values, their open space and recreational potential, and their value to
water resources.
The proposed replacement bridges are located within the Urban Growth Boundaries of Eugene and
Springfield. Portions of the Project area consist of developed urban lands and portions of the
Project area consist of non-urban areas. Both Eugene and Springfield have adopted ordinances'
regulating construction within floodplains and f1oodways. The following permit(s), submitted
herewith, demonstrate compliance with those sections of the Springfield ordinance regulating
development in the f100dway or floodplain:
. A Type I Floodplain Overlay District Development permit will be obtained from the City of
Springfield for all Phase II construction activities occurring in designated floodplain or
f100dway boundaries within Springfield. ' ,
The project, will comply with approval conditions imposed during the permitting process.
Willamette River Greenwav. River Corridors. arid Waterwavs Element
Policy 0.5: New development that locates along river corridors and waterways shall be limited to
uses that are compatible with the natural, scenic, and environmental qualities of those water
features.
This policy has limited applicability to this proposal. Technically speaking, the Project is new
'development' due to the magnitude and duration of construction activities necessary to carry out
the work., The, Project is not a change of 'use'. In essence, the Project proposes to replace the
existingd~~<;>mmissioned bridge and detour bridge with new bridges in roughly the same location.
The niNv'liridges will be slightly wider and built to modern construction and safety standards. The
Project may.sorrectly be categorized as 'replacement' rather than new 'development'.
15 SHR 2009-00001. City of Springfield. ,
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O
AUG2 1 2009
CMGS
iNITIAL SUBMITTAL I August. I 7, 2009
55
J ".'
1-5 WILLAMmE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLAMmE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG). DISCRETIONARY USE (DU). SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPI..ICATION
,Demonstration that the proposed,use is compatible with the natural, scenic, and environmental
qualities of the Willamette River is found in the current use.
On July 21, 2008, the Springfield City Council, together with the City of Eugene and Lane County,
adopted Ordinance No 6227 amending the Metro Plan text including an exception to, Goal 15 for
the 1-5 Willamette Bridge Project. The Ordinance specifically amended the text of Policy D.I.I of
the Metro, Plan for the "purposes of removing and replacing the decommissioned 1-5 bridge, the
temporary detour bridge and the Canoe Canal bridge with tWo new parallel bridges * * *." This
exception was found to comply with the statutory requirements governing the Greenway.
In regards to the above policy, the Applicant has conducted extensive environmental investigation
, and documentation to plan, design, and execute the Project in a manner that is compatible with the
natural, scenic, and environmental qualities of the Willamette River, As described elsewhere in this
application, the proposed use has been designed and sited to minimize impacts on resources to the
greatest extent possible. The mitigation strategies and findings from the Applicant's Environmental
Assessment are incorporated by reference herein.
Policy 0.11: The taking o( an exception shall be required i( a nonwater-dependent transportation
(acility requires placing o( fill within the Wil/amette River Greenway setback.
As noted above, on July 21, 2008, the Springfield City Council, together with the City of Eugene
and Lane County, adopted Ordinance No 6227 amending the M,etro Plan text including an
exception to Goal 15 for the 1-5 Willamette Bridge Project. The Ordinance specifically amended
the text of Policy D.11 ofthe Metro Plan as follows:
"An exception to Statewide Planning Goal 15 Wil/amette River Greenway was approved (or Oregon
Department o( Transportation (ODOT) (or purposes o( removing and replacing the
, decommissioned 1-5 bridge, the temporary detour bridge cmd the Canoe Canal bridge with two new
parallel bridges (one southbound and one northbound) within the 1-5 right-of-way crossing the
Wil/amette River and Canoe Canal and within the Wil/amette River Greenway Setback line. The
exception authorizes construction and later removal o( one or more temporary work bridges,
demolition o( the decommissioned 1-5 Wil/amette River Bridge, Canoe Canal Bridge.. and detour
, bridges; construaion o( the two replacement bridges; reconstruction o( the roadway approaches to
the bridges (1-5 and ramps); rehabilitation o( the projea area; and completion o( any required
mitigation o( projea impacts. In association with these tasks, the exception (urther authorizes
within the Wil/amette River Greenway Setback line the addition and removal offill within ODOT
right-of-way and removal o( fill within a temporary slope easement east o( 1-5. This exception
satisfies the criteria o(Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 660-004-0022(6), Wil/amette Greenway,
and the exception requirements o( OAR 660-004-0020 Goal 2 Part lI(c) (or a 'reasons' exception
and pursuant to OAR 660-004-00 IS, is hereby adopted as an amendment to the Metro Plan text,
Policy 0.11, Chapter III, Section D."
PRE.SUBMITIAl RECID
AUG2 1 2009 '
I. The' intensification o( use and development proposed by the bridge replacement projea and
associated multi-use path and park (acility improvements;
The adopted metro plan text allows:
2. The siting o( non water-dependent or water-related uses within the Greenway setback line; and
CMGS
INITIAL'SUBMITT AL r August 17, 2009
56
..
r-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
, WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAYDI5TRICT DEVELOPMENT rNG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
3. The placing 0((,11 (or a non water-dependent transportation (acility within the Greenway setback
h '
As a whole the proposal is consistent with the applicable Willamette Greenway policies set out in
the Metro Plan, This criterion is satisfied.
Environmental Desip'n Element
Policy E4:Public and private (acilities shall be designed and located:in a manner thOt preserves and
enhances desirable (eatures o( local and neighborhood areas and promotes their sense o( identity.
The Applicant notes that public participation and involvement has occurred throughout the
planning, design and'development process in accordance with Statewide Planning Goal I and
ODOT administrative rules. As parr of the Project, ODOT established a Community Advisory
, Group (CAG) composed of representatives of local neighborhood associations, parks departments
(Eugene and Willamalane), the Citizen Planning Committee for the Whilamut Natural Area,
chambers of commerce, and the University of Oregon that has been involved in the development
of the project with continued involvement during selection of the bridge tYpe; its design, and '
construction.
In addition to the aesthetic elements of the bridge itself, the Project also includes a number of
riparian area, pedestrian and bicycle path, and alternative mode infrastructure, enhancements as'
well as natural and historic restoration activities including but not limited to:
Restoration and enhancement of the unnamed tributary associated with Glenwood Slough on
the south side ofthe Willamette River(Phase II)
. Development of a South Bank Interpretive Area including an informational kiosk (Phase II)
. Permanent extensions of the multi-use paths, including the Canoe Canal Path, on the north
and south sides of the river (Phase II) -
. Extensive landscaping and riparian area restoration within the greenway (Phase II)
In addition to the enhancements described generally above, a subset of the CAG has developed on
overall theme, identified as the "Whilamut Passage," intended to establish an enduring identity for
the area surrounding the bridge. The theme uses different places, uses, images, and language to '
integrate and reflect aesthetic enhancements in the project. Subsequent to development of the
Whilamut Passage theme, the Applicant has facilitated a sequence of design workshops to generate
a palette of potential aesthetic enhancement opportunities. The aesthetic enhancements are listed
in Section 4.4 and incorporated by reference herein. The Applicant is currently in the process of
refining the list and identifying the artists, craftspeople and subcontractors needed to create the
enhancements. The proposed projects will preserve and enhance the existing features of the
environment imm'ediately surrounding the 1-5 Bridge. In addition, the Bridge itself will preserve and
enhance desirable features of the local area and promote a sense of identity. These improvements,
together with the Bridge, will contribute to and promote the area's identity as a primary gateway
between Eugene and Springfield.
.. ; ~ ~, .
'.'
PRE-SUBMllTAL REC'O
AUG 2 1 2009
F./O: Protect'and manage existing and (uture transportation infrastructure.
CMGS
, INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17. 2009'
57
~;
iJ
1-5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT 0NG). DISCRETIONARY USE (DU),.5ITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
The 1-5 Willamette River Bridge Projecueplaces a structurally deficient bridge withtwo new
permanent bridges built to accommodate anticipated future traffic volumes, freight loads and
natural hazard events (e.g. floods" earthquakes, etc.). The project contributes to the long-term
resiliency of the interstate transportation network and ensures local access to essential goods and
services during an emergency. This bridge replacement reflects an effort to manage and protect
the 1-5 corridor, an essential part of the region and state's existing transportation infrastructure.
Policy F.14: Address the mobility and safety needs of motorists, transponation users, bicyclists,
pedestrians, and the needs of emergency vehicles when planning and constructing roadway system
improvements.
1-5 across the Willamette River is an existing transportation facility identified in T ransPlan and the
Oregon Highway Plan (OHP). Because the original 1-5 bridge is structurally deficient and had to be
decommissioned, a new permanent bridge is needed to address the safety and mobility needs of
motorists and facilitate efficient movement of emergency vehicles between die north and south
sections of Eugene and Springfield. The new permanent replacement bridges can and will be
designed to meet applicable state and federal safety and mobility standards. The temporary detour
bridge cannot accommodate the safety needs of motorists because it does not meet current
seismic standards and the construction methods used to build it only met environmental
requirements as they applied to temporary, not permanent, structures.
In regard to the mobility and safety needs of bicyclists and pedestrians, construction activities and
staging locations will impact the existing network of multi~use (bicycle and pedestrian) paths
extending along the north and south sides of the Willamette River. This Proposal involves a
comprehensive program to reconstruct and improve paths and trails affected by the project to
ensure that necessary and adequate public access will be provided along both sides of the
Willamette River at the completion 'of the Project. The findings from SDC 3.3-3.25 D, are
incorporated by reference herein. '
Paths and trails will, to the maximum extent practicable, be kept open, safe, and useable during
construction. To minimize disruptions to paths and emergency access routes, the Applicant will
implement a Traffic Control Plan (TCP); will coordinate with WPRD on path and trail closures; and
will provide advance public notice of path and trail closures.
Policy F.15: Motor vehicle level of service policy:
'a) Use motor vehicle level of service standards to maintain acceptable and reliable performance on
the roadway system. These standards shall be used for: '
( I) Identifying capacity deficiencies on the roadway system.
(2) Evaluating the impaas, on roadways of amendments to transponation plans,
acknowledged comprehensive plans and land-use regulations, pursuant to the TPR (OAR
660-012-0060).
, (3) Evaluating development applications for consistency with the land~use regulations of the,
applicable local government jurisdiction. '
PRE-SUBMITIAl REC'O
AUG 2 1 2009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17. 2009
58
I
1:5 WlLLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II ,
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DlSTRICT,DEVELOPMENT f'NG). DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
, '
, REVIEW (SPR). &FLOODP,LAlN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
b) Acceptable and reliable performance is defined by the following levels o( service under peok hour
traffic conditions: LOS E within Eugene's Central Areo Transportation Study (CATS) area and LOS D
elsewhere.
c) Performance standards (ram the OHP shall be applied on state (acilities in the Eugene-Springfield
metropolitan orea.
This Prop'osalis intended to implement the prior Metro Plan Amendment decision which ensures
that mobility is maintained over the planning period. The 1-5 Willamene River replacement bridges
will be striped to provide two travel lanes in each direction, consistent with current striping
panerns, The bridges will be built to accommodate future restriping to three travel lanes in each
direction when the adjacent sections of 1-5 are widened to three lanes in each direction. TransPlan
projects 150 and 260 provide for the future widening of 1-5 from four to six travel lanes north and
south of the Willamette River. Because the '-5 Willamette River Bridge is already recognized in
T ransPla~, there is no need to amend the plan. These findings address the consistency ofthe
needed plan amendments with applicable Metro Plan requirements and land 'use regulations. Other
applicable land use regulations are addressed in th'e findings contained herein.
The 1999 Oregon HighwaiPlan (OHP) classifies Ic5 as an "interstate highway" - its highest'
category of state highway - and identifies it as a major freight route. As an interstate highway, 1-5
provides connections to major cities, regions of the state, and other states. Within the Eugene-
Springfield'metropolitan area, it also provides connections for regional trips. As ODOT
representatives testified during the Metro Plan Amendment process, the bridge will be striped with
two travel lanes to meet existing ODOT volume to capaCity performance standards, ' The
additional travel lane will meet ODOT volume to capacity performance standards in the future.,
F./6: Promote or develop a regional roadway system that meets the combined needs (or travel
through, within and outside the region.
1-5 is a state facility that serves both statewide and regional transportation needs as defined in the
TPR. Specifically, the highway meets the needs for movement of people and goods (I) betwee'1
and through regions of the state and between states (state need), and (2) between and through,
communities and accessibility to regional destinations within a metropolitan area (regional need).
As such, it is: an integral element ofthe Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area's regional roadway
system. Indeed, it is likely the principal arterial serving the combined needs for travel through,
within, and outside the region. Replacing the existing structurally deficient bridge with two new
, bridges promotes the maintenance and continuation of the regional roadway system serving the
combined needs for travel through, within, and outside the,region.
F.29: Support reasonable ond reliable travel times (or (reightlgoods movement in the Eugene-
Springfield region.
Connecting: 1-5 north and south of the 'Willamene River via a new, structurally safe bridge crossing
is essential to ensuring that reasonable and reliable travel times for moving freight and goods in the
region are maintained. Without the connection, tens of thousands ofvehicles daily would be
required tol seek alternative meandor crossing the river, clogging capacity and causing congestion
"an~ delay th~o.~ghout Eugene and Springfield. Existing roadways'lack sufficient C~~~lj~MITTAl REC'O
AUG2 1 2009
CMGS
INITIAL-SUBMITTAL I August 17, 20~9
59
, _'~ ." >.~ 't>t....., .'
''''''''-',' .'
1-5 WllLAMmE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WllLAMmE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT IY'IG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
accommodate the existing 49,000 daily vehicle trips or the 73,000 daily vehicle trips anticipated on
the 1-5 Willamette River Bridge by 2030.
These findings together with the Plan Set (Exhibit C) and supporting documentation submitted
herewith demonstrate that the proposed Project is consistent with the Metro Plan.
B. Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including but not
limited to, water and electricity; sanitary sewer and storm water '
management facilities; and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be
, exceeded and the public improvements shall be available to serve the site at
the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by this Code and
other applicable regulations. The Public Works Director or a utility provider
shall determine capacity issues.
The proposed Project is needed to address significant sti-ucturalproblems with the existing 1-5
Bridge. The existing bridge was decolTlmissioned in 2004 after ODOT found substantial structural
problems including cracks in the supporting structures. Built in 1962, the existing bridge was
designed using bridge standards that are no longer sufficient for the size of modern freight trucks.
Replacement of the 1-5 Willamette River Bridge is needed to meet state and federal safety and
mobility policies and to ensure that future vehicle and freight capacity, along the 1:5 corridor is not
compromised. The overall goal of the Project is to replace the existing bridge over the Willamette
, River, Franklin Boulevard, UPRR tracks, 1-5 NB exit to Franklin Boulevard, and bicyclelpedestrian
facilities such that freight mobility is unrestricted and the Oregon economy is stimulated.
With respect to capacity concerns at the local level, the City of Springfield will be impacted
primarily by traffic control and mobility constraints during construction of the Project. Specifically,
periodic closure to Franklin Boulevard will occasionally eliminate all public and private
transportation movements between Springfield and Eugene through the project area. Said closures
will be needed to facilitate the deconstruction of the existing bridge spans and movement of .
equipment into and out of the area. It is assumed at this time that only short-term closures will be
needed on Franklin Boulevard, the NB off-ramp to Franklin Boulevard, and SB on-ramp to 1-5. The
removal of the existing bridges will require two-day closures of Franklin Boulevard. The NB off-
ramp and SB on-ramp is a partial interchange serving to connect 1-5 traffic south of the Willamette
River to and from Franklin Boulevard west of 1-5. Access for all other movements can be served
by the full movement interchange at Glenwood Boulevard. The Franklin and Glenwood ramps are.
spaced about 1,200 feet apart, and are connected with a continuous auxiliary lane in each direction.
Based on movement capabilities and the, limited distance between interchanges, the Glenwood,
interchange is a functional alternate route during construction.
The Project does not involve a Variance request or proposed uses that would generate 500 or
more vehicle trips per day, as specified in SDC 4.2-105 A(4.)(a.) and (b.). The Applicant will
implement a Traffic Management Plan (TMP) to provide the details behind the development of
Traffic Control Plans (TCPs) and other measures that will be put in place for the construction, as
well as to minimize disruptions to motorists, the freight industry and communities, without
compromising public or worker safety, or the quaiity of work being performed. Local roadway
. capacity.will be impacted by the Project, but only on a periodic and temporary' basis. Further, the
TMP and TCPs will demonstrate that all adverse impacts on the local transpo~utMllflJ'~~C'D
1I11r.21 2009
60
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August Ii, 2009
.: I. ~ '.: i.";.
1:5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
be mitigated to the extent possible through advance notice of the closures, signage and local detour
routes around the construction area.'
In addition to the bridge facility, local bike and pedestrian capacity will be increased through this
project. Specifically, permanent reconfigured multi-purpose paths are proposed on both the north
and south sides of the river. These paths will remain open during the duration of construction and
improve existing andlor increase alternative mode access ,in the vicinity of the 1-5 Bridge. Once '
operational, the Project will not generate additional use of facilities and will not result in an
exceeded capacity of 1-5 or any other public facilities.
These findings together with the Plan Set (Exhibit C) and supporting documentation submitted
herewith demonstrate that this criterion is satisfied. '
C. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable public and
private design and construction standards contained in this Code 'and other
applicable regulations.
SDC 4.2-105 Public Streets
No new streets are proposed and no existing local streets will be impacted by the proposed
development. Judkins Road, a Lane County facility, was permanent closed as part of the Project.
The Project will conform to the ODOT Highway Design Manual, 2003 (English) and AASHTO
2002 Roadside Design Guide. All construction plans and associated documents will be prepared in
accordance with the ODOT Oregon Standard Specifications for Construction, 2008; and the
ODOT Bridge Design and Drafting Manual (BOOM).
Because all public automobile transportation facilities will be constructed within state-owned
ROW, local street standards do not apply. These findings together with the Plan Set and
supporting documentation submitted herewith demonstrate that this standard is met.
SDC 4.2-110 Private Streets
The Project does not involve private streets as part of Phase II development. This standard does
not apply. '
SDC 4.2-1 I 5 Block Length
No new local streets are proposed as part of Phase II development. This standard does not
apply.
SDC 4.2-120 Site Access and Driveways
No new lots or parcels are proposed. As a result, no new permanent access points or driveways
are needed or proposed. 'The Applicant notes the improvements to existing '-5 access ramps
shown on'Sheets LO.2-LO.2A, L2:0-L2.6' Site Plan (Exhibit C) have been designed and shall be
constructed in' accordance with ODOT policies, procedures and design guidelines. These findings
demonstrate that this standard do~s ~ot apply. '
"
"'.,
,.,.",."..,
;, .;..,,,
'PRE.SIIRMIITAl REC'O
AUG 2 1 2009
'SDC 4.2-125 Intersections
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 11,2009
61
.. ~'
- .. .~
. ",,~., '\ r>-t-..... . - #.~ ..~~..;:t
1-5 WlLLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (yVG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR). & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
, No new intersections are proposed as part of Phase II development. This standard does not
apply.
SDe 4.1-130 Vision Clearance
No new local streets ~ill be constructed as part of Phase II development. This standard does not
apply.
SDe 4.2-135 Sidewalks
No new sidewalks will be constructed as part of Phase II development. This standard does not '
apply.
SDe 4.2-140 Street Trees
No new local streets will be installed as part of Phase,lI development. This standard does not
apply.
SDe 4.2-145 Street Lighting
No new streets will be constructed as part of Phase II development. Therefore, this standard
does not apply. The Applicant notes that a segment of the existing lighting along the access ramps
between, Franklin Boulevard and Riverview Street will be removed in Phase II, as part of the
proposed redesign and reconfiguration of the ramps to connect with the new bridge approaches.
Proposed replacement lighting is show on Sheets EO.I, E 1.0, E 1.2 Lighting Plan (Exhibit C). Further,
the applicant notes that temporary multi-use path and construction lighting has been instalied
during Phase I and permanent lighting will be installed during Phase II where necessary to ensure
public safety and provide secure contractor mobilization and staging areas. Proposed lighting is
designed in compliance with SDC design and constructio,n standards and other applicable
regulations. Standards review of proposed temporary lightingis provided under SDC 4.5 below.
SDe 4.2-150 Bikeways '
Within the Project area, the North Bank Trail extends along the northern border of the
Willamette River though the Whilamut Natural Area and the Eastgate Woodlands. The southeast
loop of Pre's Trail is located within the Whilamut Natural Area'with an extension to the Eastgate
Woodlands. There are additional connecting paths throughout the Whilamut Natural Area, on the
Knickerbocker Bridge, and along Franklin Boulevard.
As part of Phase I construction and mobilization activities, the Applicant has constructed both
temporary paved and soft paths to route traffic around and through the Project site. As shown on
the applicant's site plans, Phase II proposes either (I) restoration of all impacted paths to their'
original, pre-construction iocations or (2) reconfiguration to locations agreed upon by Eugene POS,
WPRD, and Springfield. As part of Phase II construction, the applicant proposes the following
specific multi-use path improvements:
. On the north side of the river. the existing asphalt bicycle and pedestrian path located e,astof
" the Canoe Canal bridge will be converted to bark (Sheet L2.0 Site Plan)PRE-SUBMlHAL REC'D
AUG 2,1 2009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17,2009
62
I-SWILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG). DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
. Construction of a new 12-foot wide asphalt path on the south side of the Canoe Canal
connecting the Woodlands Trail to Canoe Canal path (Sheet L2.3 Site Plan)
,. Reconstruction of North Walnut Path, a 12-foot wide asphalt path on the north side of the
Willamette River connecting Eastgate Woodlands to Alton Baker Park underneath the
Willamette River Bridge (Sheet L2.4 Site Plan)
. Construction of a new 16-foot wide elevated path (South Bank PathlPedestrian Viaduct) on
the south side o~ the Willamette River connecting Knickerbocker Pedestrian Bridge to the
Glenwood riverfront (Sheet L2.5 Site Plan)
. Reconstruction of a 12-foot wide asphalt path on the south side of the Willamette River,
connecting the Knickerbocker Pedestrian Bridge to Springfield and the south side of Franklin
Boulevard (Sheet L2.5 Site Plan)'
Paths and trails will, to the maximum extent practicable, be kept open, safe, anduseable during
Phase II construction. A continuous route across state-owned right of way for the
bicyclelpedestrian 'pathways will be kept open and accessible at all times on both the north side,
and to the extent practicable, the south side of the river during construction. Pedestrian and
bicycle traffic will be detoured around the construction site work areas immediately adjacent 1-5
and along the Willamette River and rerouted on new temporary and permanent alignments.
Detour routes may be subject to short-term closures during Project construction, at which times,
f1aggers will be utilized to direct pedestrianslbicyclists safely through the construction zone. All
temporary paths will be removed at the conclusion of construction; all existing bicycle and
pedestrian facilities will be restored to their pre-construction condition at the, conclusion of
construction,
To minimize disruptions, the Applicant will implement a Traffic Control Plan (TCP) for paths and
trails; will coordinate with WPRD and the CPC on path and trail closures; and will provide advance
public I)otice of path and trail closures.
The Applicant notes that local bike and pedestrian capacity will be increased significantly as a result
of this Project. All bicycle and pedestrian facilities have been designed using WPRD and City of
Springfield typical sections, per direction from the respective agencies. As noted above, the
Applicant is in ongoing coordination with representatives from WPRD, CPC, City of Spdngfield
Public Works, and other affected agencies to ensure that all local, regional and statewide
transportation policies, procedures and standards are being satisfied.
These findings together with the Plan Set and supporting documentation submitted herewith
demonstrate that this criterion has been satisfied. '
SDC 4.2-155 Pedestrian Trails
To the extent that pedestrian trails include multi use paths, Phase II construction activities and
staging locations will impact the existing netWork of multi-use (bicycle and pedestrian) paths within
the project boundary. The findings contained in SC 4.2-150 above pertain to'multi-use (bicycle and
pedestrian) paths. Said findings are incorporated herein by reference as proof that this criterion is
met. To the extent that the existing and proposed multi-use path impacts are located on or within
.. citY:owned'parks property, no new public trail easements or rights-of-way are reqpRE~'SUBMITTAL REC'O
, AU" ~ 16?j:009
CMGS INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August" 17, 2009 u
~ - ".-. .
1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT ryvG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PlAN
REVIEW (SPR). & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
In addition, as part of Phase II construction, the applicant proposes the following specific
pedestrian (running) trail improvements: '
. A new 8-foot wide bark trail located within the Eastgate Woodlands on the south side of the
Canoe Canal connecting to Pre's Trail in Alton Baker Park (Sheets L2.0 and L2.3 Site Plan)
These findings together with the Plan Set and supporting documentation submitted herewith
demonstrate that this standard is satisfied, .
SDC 4.2-160 Accessways
Because no new parcels or lots will be created as part of this Proposal, no new accessways will be
constructed or required as part of construction activities. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
SDC 4.3-1 OS Sanitary Sewers
The proposed Phase II improvements are non-occupied transportation structures and associated
facilities. The Project does not involve the extension, expansion or corinection to existing public
sanitary sewer facilities. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
SDC4.3-110 Stormwater Management
All stormwater management for this project (Phase I and Phase II) is designed to meet the OTIA
III Environmental Performance Standards (EPS). To meet the goals of the EPS, water quality and
quantity facilities will follow the guidelines established in the 2008 OOOT Stormwater Management
Initiative supplemented with the guidelines from the local jurisdictions of the Cities of Eugerie and
Springfield, which the project will also need to satisfy. OOOT stormwater standards are described
further below.
The 2008 OOOT Stormwater Management Initiative guidelines require all stormwater runoff to be
treated for water quality and water quantity only when runoff from the new impervio~s surface
increases flow by 0.5 cfs. The OOOT Stormwater Management Initiative divides the state into nine
climate zones for stormwater treatment. The WRB site is in climate zone 2, which requires 50
percent of the two-year, 24-hour duration storm to be treated for water quality. For water
quantity treatment, the OOOT Stormwater Management Initiative guidelines provide an exception
for water quantity treatment if the discharge directly outfalls into a large body of water, in this' case
the Willamette River, or it is shown by hydraulic calculations that the geomorphic channel '
conditions are not changed by the net effects of the increased runoff. The City of Springfield has
adopted, in the interim, the stormwater management guidelines from the City of Portland Bureau
of Environmental Services and Washington County Clean Water Services. The City of Springfield
accepts stormwater management plans to be designed using either guideline. The City of
Springfield also uses 0.5 cfs as the threshold for water quantity flow control.
The new OOOT and OEQ requirements for contributing drainage area will be followed for the
amount of stormwater, runoff to be treated. The new guidelines apply to stormwater flowing irito
the project from OOOT right-of-way that is hydraulically connected to the project. The additional
contributing drainage areas that are required to meetthe new directive include 1-5 from the end of
the defined project up to the Glenwood overpass; Franklin Boulevard from the cPRf~lffAteRECJ )
AUG 2' 1 'Z009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
64
"j" ~
1-5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (liVG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
just west of the Franklin Boulevard overpass bridge to the end of the bridge; and the 1-5 NB off-
ramp from the intersection of Riverview Drive to the Eugene city limits.
The Best Management Practices (BMPs) selected for stormwater manageme~t on this project
include biosl6pes, grassy swale with amended soils, bio-infiltration swales, and dry detention ponds.
All of the BMPs selected provide a high effectiveness for the removal of sediments, nutrients, and'
heavy metals both dissolved and particulates; and provide moderate effectiveness for removal of
hydrocarbons and polyaromatic hydrocarbons.
Stormwater management facilities included in Phase II, including the location and the type of
BMP's selected to meet the EPS, are discussed in the Stormwater Management Report (Exhibit D).
In the northernmost 900 feet of the project, there is no increase in impervious area; therefore,
only water quality is required to meet the EPS.Bioslopes on both the NB' and SB lanes were
chosen for these areas because of the limited right-of-way. The northern 700 feet, up to and
including the Canoe Canal Bridge, will utilize bio-infiltration swales to provide water qualitY and
quantity. The bio-infiltration ,swales will have an overflow system that will discharge into Canoe
Canal. A bio-retention pond, in between the northbound off-ramp and southbound on-ramp, is not
a required stormwater management facility, but was included as part the design to alleviate
potential stormwwater impacts to the UPRR culvert.
Phase II stormwater management improvements fall into three main categClries: (I) mechanical
systems, (2) BMP's (engineered vegetative systems), and (3) overlandflow/filtration systems.
Specific improvements proposed under each of these categories, are summarized below:
Mechanical Systems
The applicant's Phase II Storm Drainage and Utilities Plan shows stormwater inlets, including rim
, and invert elevations, for all catch basins located within the NB and SB lanes bf 1-5, including those
proposed on the new bridge. The technical evaluation ohhe location, type, and size of each catch
basin is documented in the applicant's, Stormwater Management Report (Exhibit D). All
underground stormwater pipe locations and sizes are also shown on the Sheets CO;2, CO.2A, C2.0-
C2.6 Storm Drainage, and Utilities Plan (Exhibit C). These mechanical.systems are needed to
collect and convey surface water runoff generated from impervious highway surfaces in accordance
with the 2008 ODOT Stormwater Management Initiative guidelines described above. Where
practical, runoff is conveyed to and treated with the BMP's described below.'
BMP's (engineered vegetative systems)
The applicant's Phase II Sheets <:0.2, CO.2A, C2.0-C2.6 Storm Drainage and Utilities Plan (Exhibit
C) show the locations of all stormwater BMP facilities as follows:
An approximately 200-foot long vegetated swale located on the east side of the highway
north of Canoe Canal (Sheet C2.3 Storm Drainage and Utilities Plan)
. An approximately 100-foot long vegetated swale located on the east side of the highway
south of Franklin Boulevard (Sheet C 2.4 Storm Drainage and Utilities 'Plan)
. An approximately 200-foot long vegetated swale located on the east side of the highway
sO,uth of the northbound off-ramp (Sheet C 2.5 Storm Drainage and Utilities Plan)
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17,2009 '
. PRE.SUBMI1TAL REC'O
AUll 2 J. lJGj 65
,.'-
. .....;.on~1"..lI"..c-~.{". ,.
(
,.""1...... ~.> \
l-S WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT CNG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN'
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
Overland FlowlFiltration Systems
All Phase II multi-use path stormwater treatment will be addressed through the use of filter strips
along proposed permanent bike path reconfigurations (in accordance with the City of Springfield's
Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual). The location of said filtration systems are
illustrated on Sheets CO.2, CO.2A, C2.0-C2,6 Stormwater and Utility Plan (Exhibit C), North of the
river, in the Eastgate Woodlands, path reconfigurations will be treated by overland flow and
infiltration using existing vegetation arid soil adjacent to the path (Springfield). .
These findings together with the Plan Set and documentation submitted herewith demonstrate that
this standard is met.
SDC 4.3-115 Water Quality Protection '
The Willamette River is the 'receiving water for the Project area. The Willamette River in the
vicinity ofthe Project is listed on the DEQ 303(d) List (Section 303[d] ofthe CW A) of water
bodies that do not meet water quality standards. The Willamette River is listed for temperature,
arsenic, chlorophyll a, dioxin, dissolved oxygen, E. coli, fecal coliform, manganese, mercury, and
iron.
Phase II construction activities will include vegetation removal and soil disturbance, which could
lead to erosion and increased sedimentation to wetlands and waterways, resulting in water quality
impacts. Additionally, there is the potential for releases of ' hazardous materials and wastes such as
oil, grease, and fuels used for construction equipment or releases of products (concrete, silicants,
etc.) which, i(entered wetlands or waterways, would result in decreased water quality.
i
Phase II construction activities will require incwater work. Direct impacts associated with in-
water work include construction or removal of piers which involves site preparation, pile driving,
dewatering and isolation, and rewatering once work is complete. There is also the potential for
materials to drop into waterway during demolition and new construction. Increased turbidity
associated with in-water work should be minimal because-the new and temporary piers for the
work bridges would be drilled or driven into bedrock. There may be a slight increase of turbidity
during rewatering of the isolation area from pulling isolation structure(s). This slight increase
would be expected to be within allowable limits, which is an increase of up to 10 percent over
natural background turbidity 100 feet downstream of the fill point.
Potential temporary impacts to water quality during construction will be mitigated through use of
standard Best Management Practices (BMPs) and erosion c'ontrol measures. These me.asures will
follow the ODOT Erosion Control Manual (ODOT 2005) and Oregon Standard Specifications
(ODOT 2008). The Applicant's Land Drainage and Alteration Permit (LDAP), detailing erosion and
sediment control measures to be used during construction, was approved for Phase I
construction and the Applicant will gain approval for Phase II construction. A Pollution and
, Erosion Control Plan (PECP) will be implemented prior to construction by the Applicant's
contractor to minimize or avoid project ~ffects to water quality. The Project also adheres to the
conditions of the CW A 40 I Water Quality Certification issued for the USACE Section 404 permit.
T~ese finding~ together with the Plan Set and documentation submitted herevrl~Ull1llfll"1'1\-f! ~t'D'
thIs standard IS met. rKC.\l DIVII 1t\L Kt'
AUG 2 1 2009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August I?, 2009
66
,
. . '"
"j ~.' .. .,"~':'~,' :..:,:.,-
1'5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
, WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU). SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR). & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT(FP) APPLICATION,
SDC 4.3-117 Natural Resource Protection Areas
. . . i .
During Phase II construction, temporary and permanent impacts to site features including parks,
open space, and natural resource protection areas are unavoidable. The uses proposed in Phase
II are allowed in natural resource areas per SDC 4.3-117(E)(2) subsections (m),(n) and (0). In
accordance with SDC 4.3-117(K), the proposed transportation facilities and structures will replace
,existing facilities and will be located within existing state-owned ROW to the greatest extent
practicable.
North of the Willamette River, Springfield has designated the Whilamut Natural Area as a
significant Goal 5 resource, On the south side of the river, Springfield has established 75 foot
riparian setbacks along the Willamette River to comply with federal the Clean Water Act and
Endangered Species Act. The Metro Plan Natural Assets and Constraints Working Paper identifies
the Willamette River Greenway in Figure J I and identifies the Willamette River as a fish spawning
river.
Endangered Species
According to ODFW, two salmonid populations listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) are
documented as occurring within the reach of ' the Willamette River that flows through the project
, area:
. Upper Willamette River spring Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshowytscha) and Critical Habitat-
federally threatened (FT).
. Columbia River bull trout (5alvelinus confluentus) Distinct Population Segment (DPS) and
Critical Habitat - FT "
Construction activities will require in-water work and are anticipated to require four in-water
work periods. Temporary effects from in-water work will include construction or removal of
piling/piers,whichinvolves site preparation, pile driving, dewatering and isolation, and rewatering
once work is complete. Work area isolation will require fish capture,and release operations in the
Willamette River, which would affect both listed and non-listed fish species. All fish capture and
release operations will be conducted by experienced biologists following guidelines established by
ODFW and NMFS.
A species list provided by ORNHIC indicated that there are no federal- or state-listed ESA
terrestrial wildlife species known to reside within the project area. There are reports of sensitive
or species of concern terrestrial wildlife within two miles of the project area; however there is
habitat that would support only one of these sensitive species in the project area (I.e., the
nort~~estern pond turtle).
There is a gr~at blue heron rookery '(which may have become inactive) along the Canoe Canal
located about 800 feet east of the project area. Eugene pas and WPRD staff have noted the
ephemeral ponds located throughout the Whilamut Natural Area of Alton Baker Park provide
habitatfor amphibian species. Western meadowlark nesting habitat has been documented in the
vicinity of the meadow immediately northwest of the project area.
PRE.~IIRMITTAl REC'D
AUG2 12009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
67
"-
I-S WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II ,.
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT 0NG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE P~N
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
,
.+t.'
To avoid fish and wildlife species and minimize temporary impacts from construction activities, the
Applicant has imPlement a Fish Passage Plan (FPP) and all applicable OTIA III State Bridge Delivery
Program EPS have been followed for Phase I and will continue during Phase II to reduce the
extent of direct,and indirect impacts to fish and wildlife species. To minimize the impacts to
riparian vegetation during construction and operational activities the project will continue
coordination with resource agencies (federal, state, and local) and implement OTIA III EPS, obtain'
regulatory permits (DSL Removal-Fill, USACE Section 404), provide site restoration and
compensatory mitigation, and identify additional opportunities to minimize disturbances. The
applicant's Phase I Willamette Greenway Permit and Discretionary Use application sections
Section 5.6, -5.7, and 5.8 propose additional mitigation measures which are incorporated herein by
reference.
Vegetation and Habitat
Vegetation and habitat types within the Project area are generally associated with urban
development or naturallopen space areas. The urban developed areas include residential,
commercial, and transportation (roadways and railroads) that have been planted with landscaping.
The open space areas include a combination of forested and emergent wetlands, upland forest
(mixed deciduous-coniferous type), mixed deciduous-coniferous riparian, and grassland type
habitats that are predominantly managed grass areas within the 1-5 corridor. These natural/open"
space areas are vegetated with a predominance of native species, although disturbance has allowed
encroachment of invasive species. Some of the most common identified invasive species known to
occur within the project area include: Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus); Scotch broom'
"(Cytisus scoparius); Pennyroyal (Mentha pu/egium); Tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea); Italian ryegrass
(Lolium multiflorum); English ivy (Hedera helix); Reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea); European
birch (Betulapendula); and False brome (Brachypodium sylvaticum).
No federal or state Endangered Species Act (ESA)-Iistedplant species or plant habitats have been
identified within the project area. North of the Willamette River, Springfield has designated the
Whilamut Natural Area as a significant GoalS resource. 'On the south side of the river, Springfield
has established 75 foot riparian setbacks along the Willamette River to comply with federal the
Clean Water Act and Endangered Species Act. Eugene POS and WPRD staff have noted the '
ephemeral ponds located throughout the Whilamut Natural Area of Alton Baker Park provide
habitatfor amphibian species. Western meadowlark nesting habitat has been documented in the
vicinity of the meadow immediately northwest of the project area.
, As shown on Sheets LO.2-LO.2A, L2.0-L2.6 Site Plan (Exhibit C), Phase II development will result
in permanent impacts to designated wetlands. The Applicant proposes to mitigate these
permanent wetland impacts through the purchase of credits in an approved, off-site wetland
mitigation bank. Specifically, the Applicant has purchased 0.05 credits at the West Eugene Wetland
Mitigation Bank as compensatory mitigation for permanent wetland impacts. Compensatory
mitigation for temporary and permanent waters impacts includes planting and establishment of a
1.907-acre riparian forest within the northwest quadrant of the river crossing and L026-acre of
stream and associated riparian area restoration in the concrete lined unnamed tributary of the
Willamette River (Waters 4) in the southwest quadrant ofthe river crossing. Additionalwaters
mitigation will be accomplished by reducing the number of b~nt footings cPRE~SOBMlrrArREC~D
AUG 2 1 2009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
68
1:5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU); SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
the detour and decommissioned bridges within the Willamette River (0.027-acre net reduction in
bent area).
Site restoration within the Project area is designed to restore all areas disturbed during
construction of the Project, The' objectives of site restoration for the Project are to prevent
erosion, to provide streambank stabilization, to improve water quality, to improve native plant
species composition, to improve fish and wildlife habitat, and to provide aesthetically pleasing
vegetation composition within key Project areas. All wetlands temporarily impacted by the Project
will be restored and enhanced, as illustrated on Sheets LO.3-LO.3D,L3.0-L3.6A Landscape Plan
(Exhibit C).
Water Bodies.
The project area includes 13 bodies of water: the,Willamette River (and MillRace), Canoe Canal
(Patterson Slough), Augusta Creek/Laurel Valley Creek, and several unnamed streams and roadside
ditches: eight of which are located within the City of Eugene limits and three of the waterways
connect/flow to waterways within City of Springfield limits. ,As noted above" the Applicant
proposes restoration of the concrete lined unnamed tributary of the Willamette River (Waters 4)
in the southwest quadrant of the river crossing. Additional waters mitigation will be accomplished
by reducing the number of bent footings currently associated with the detour and decommissioned
bridges within the Willamette River (0.027-acre net reduction in bent area). The findings contained
under SDC 4.3-115 above are incorporated herein by reference as further proof that this standard
is met.
Wetlands
Fourteen wetlands have been identified and deline'!ted within the project area. Wetland
delineation reports for the Project area are included as Exhibit E. A total of II wetlands have been
located within the City of Eugene (one of which is located in both the Cities of Eugene and
Springfield). The remaining three wetlands are located within the city limits of Springfield. . The
wetlands include emergent, shrub-scrub, an~ forested wetland types. ' r
The proposed Phase" activities will have impacts on wetland and water resources within the
project site from the construction of the replacement Willamette River Bridges, 'the removal of the
existing temporary detour bridge and removal of the temporary work bridge, plus associated
construction activities such as clearing, grading, excavation, and the construction and use of staging
areas, and hauling routes. In addition, Phase II activities will include the restoration,
reconstruction and associated improvements to landscaping, drainage features and multi-use
pathways illustrated in the applicant's Site Plans. '
Approximately 0.03 acre of wetlands and 0.08 acre of waters will be temporarily disturbed during
construction activities, Temporary disturbances will include vegetation removal, excavation/fill
associated with temporary work bridges, removal of the decommissioned bridge, arid creation and
use of construction staging areas. Approximately 0.04 acre of wetlands and Q.45 acre of waters will
be permanently impacted with implementation of the proposed Project. Wetland impacts
described herein are based on the entire project (Phase I and Phase II). The Applicant proposes
to mitigat~ ~lie's~ permanent wetland 'impacts through the purchase of credits in an approved off-
, " , " PRE-SUBMIlTAl REC'O
. -.t-
r'\lIG2 ~ ?n~9
CMGS INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009 69
."........ 0"'
1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT C'NG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
site wetland mitigation bank. Specifically, the Applicant has purchased 0.05 credits at the West
Eugene Wetland Mitigation Bank as compensatory mitigation for permanent wetland impacts.
Concurrence was received from DSL and USACE for compensatory migration to wetlands.
At the conclusion of major construction activIties, any wetland vegetation and hydrology disturbed
during Phases lor II will be reestablished, Wetlands temporarily impacted during construction
(including areas occupied by temporary work bridges, staging areas, and the decommissioned and
detour bridge locations) will be restored to pre-existing conditions following the completion of
work. It is anticipated the wetlands will return to a functioning state within five years. Vegetation
plantings associated with site restoration will be made in accordance with SDC 4.3-117(M) and will
increase the number of native plant and tree seed banks, 'Which could improve localized genetic
diversity and minimize distances necessary for plant pollination. The project may eradicate some
noxious weeds througti vegetative and seed bank removal.
Additional Mitigation Activities
To minimize the impacts to vegetation and habitat during construction and operational activities
the project will continue coordination with resource agencies (federal, state, and local) and
implement OTIA 1\1 EPS, obtain regulatory permits (DSL Removal-Fill, USACE Section 404),
provide site restoration and compensatory mitigation, and identify additional opportunities to
minimize disturbances to vegetation and habitat. The Applicant has conducted extensive
coordination with ODFW to minimize habitat disturbance and has obtained all required regulatory
permits. To avoid and minimize impacts of vegetation removal and replacement, in accordance
with, SC 4.3-117(M), additional mitigation measures will be implemented to reduc,e the extent of
direct and indirect impacts to habitat. These include:
. Minimize effects to natural stream and floodplain by keeping the work area within the
smallest footprint needed.
. Implement a plan to prevent construction debris from dropping into the Willamette River
and to remove materials that may drop with a minimum disturbance to aquatic habitat.
. Prepare site restoration plans for upland, wetland, and streambank areas to include native
plant species and noxious weed abatement techniques, and use large wood and rock as'
components of streambed protection treatments. ' ..
. Flag boundaries of clearing limits and sensitive areas to be avoided during construction.
. Coordinate with WPRD, Eugene POS, and the Citizen Planning Committee (CPC) regarding
sensitive areas in the Whilamut Natural Area of Alton Baker Park, which should be avoided
during construction.
. Restore and revegetate disturbed areas using native plant species and noxious weed
abatement techniques. Disturbed areas will be restor~d to the same or better condition than
before construction.
. Where practical, revegetate riparian areas beneath new bridges with native plants
appropriate for limited light conditions.
. Employ a five-year, post-construction monitoring and maintenance P~Rr-SOBM"r+IRhlfi"A'D
areas, 1/ Il'\ll(t\'"
AUG2 1 2009
CMGS'
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
70
,.
t-5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU); SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
. The Applicant will provide training for the contractor staff and construction inspectors
regarding sensitive species in the project area. If Northwestern pond turtles or other
sensitive species are encountered during construction, they will be relocated by qualified
personnel to an appropriate area outside of the project construction area.
. The contractor will implement the Noxious Weed Management Plan and clean vehicles and
equipment to prevent tracking and spread of noxious weed seeds.
. The Applicant has entered into formal agreements with the WPRD and Eugene POS
regarding the mitigation and conservation measures that will be executed during and
following construction. In addition to the above noted mitigation measures, the Applicant
proposes the following measures:
. Plant the area immediately west'of 1-5 in the Whilamut Natural Area with native
vegetation to extend the riparian forest to the area bet"":een the Willamette River and the
Canoe Canal.
. Remove invasive plant species from the riparian forest,area immediately west of 1-5 and
south of the Canoe Canal.
. Plan and implement the above enhancement measures in coordination with Eugene POS
and the Citizen Planning Committee for the Whilamut Natural Area. These ,areas will be
monitored and maintained by the Applicant for on~ year.
These findings together with the Plan Set and documentation submitted herewith demonstrate that
this standard is met.
SDC 4.3-120 Utility Provider Coo.rdination
No above ground utilities are proposed as part of Phase II development. Therefore, this standard
does not apply. The Applicant notes that the location and flow line elevations of existing public'
water, wastewater, stormwater and electrical lines are shown on Sheets CO:2, CO.2A, C2.0-C2.6
Stormwater and Utilities Plan (Exhibit C). The Applicant's contractor will coordinate with utility
providers regarding any utility extension and relocation (above or below ground).
. . "
SDC 4.3-125 Underground Placement of Utilities
The Proposal involves the relocation of site utilities. In the proposed design, storm sewer and
stormwater management facilities are located to prevent conflicts with existing utilities where
possible. However, in cases where conflicts are unavoidable, utilities will be relocated to alleviate
conflicts, as illustrated on Sheets CO.2, CO.2A, C2.0-C2.6 Stormwater and Utilities Plan (Exhibit C).
Two major utility relocations are required due to proposed stormwater management work on the
Project. A 16-inch gas line owned by Williams Gas will be relocated due to the construction of a
stormwater pond between the NB andSB ramps. The gas main currently passes directly under the
pond bottom, and will be relocated completely outside the stormwater pond, Construction of the
stormwater pond will also require that facilities owned by EWEB be 'relocated. The EWEB
facilities,.a buried three phase electric line and a fiber optic line sharing the same trench, will be
relocated by placing them adjacent to the existing facility alignment and in a deeper trench to '
maintain adequate cover. Additional facilities to be relocated as part of the. pr~R~.~h RECIO
"0" ! ll~n~
CMGS INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17,2009 ,'. 0-\ Ii ' 71
-,<- ,
1-5 WllLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II . V"
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & ~lOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION ' '
EWEB water lines: a 16 inch waterline between the NB Off-ramp and UPRR tracks has been
relocated to avoid construction of new bridge piers; and, a 24 inch waterline between the UPRR
track and the Willamette River will be relocated to avoid stream restoration. In addition, a Qwest
underground fiber optic cable located along the bike path between UPRR tracks and the
Willamette River and a Com cast underground fiber optic cable located on the north,side of
Franklin Boulevard may be relocated as part of the Project. The Applicant has and .will continue to
coordinate with utility providers regarding relocations. '
SDC 4.4-130 Water Service and Fire Protection
The proposed Phase II improvements are non-occupied transportation structures and associated
facilities. Existing,fire hydrants are shown on Sheets CO.2, CO.2A, C2,O-C2.6 Stormwater and
Utilities Plan (Exhibit C). As part of Phase I approval, a condition of approval required the
Applicant install a fire hydrant at the construction staging area south of Franklin Boulevard. The
Project does not involve the development or construction of any new facilities requiring new water
service or fire protection. Therefore, this standard does not apply. '
SDC 4.3-135 Major Electrical PO'!ller Transmission Lines
The proposed Phase II improvements are non-occupied transportation structures and associated
facilities. The Project does not require increased electrical power capacity or new major electrical
power transmission lines. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
SDC 4.3-140 Public Easements
No new public utility easements are proposed or required as pare of Phase II construction
activities as no new public utilities are proposed. All watercourses and riparian areas included in
the Phase II construction boundary are located on public lands or are otherwise covered by
existing public easement. None?f the proposed improvements will limit the City of Springfield's
ability to maintain existing watercourse or riparian areas. This standard is met.
, SDC 4.3-145 Wireless Telecommunications Systems Facilities
No new wireless telecommunications system facilities will be' constructed as part Phase II
development. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
SDC 4.4-1 05 Landscaping
Location, species and size of existing vegetation is indicted on Sheets GO.I, G I.O-G 1.6 Site
Assessment of Existing Conditions (Exhibit C). Riparian vegetation is also shown on Sheets GO.I,
G I.O-G 1.6 Site Assessment of Existing Conditions (Exhibit C). Landscaping proposed for Phase II
is shown on Sheet LO.3-L0.3D, L3.0-L3.6A Landscape Plan (Exhibit C). Phase II landscaping, as
shown on the Landscape Plan, meets all City of Springfield Planting Standards contained in SC 4.4-
105(1).
Landscaping for the purposes of site restoration within the Project area is designed to ,restore all
areas disturbed during construction of the Project. The objectives of site restoration for the
Project are to prevent erosion, to provide streambank stabilization,. to im~~_HA1!im:e'D
AUG2 1 2009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17,2009
72
"
1-5 WllLAMETIE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II . '
WllLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
,
improve native plant species composition, to improve fish and wildlife habitat, and to provide
aesthetically pleasing vegetation composition within key Project areas. These findings together with
the Plan Set and documentation submitted herewith demonstrate that this standard is met.
SDC 4.4-11 0 Screening
None ofthe uses proposed in Phase II require screening per SC 4.4-11 O(a). Therefore, this
standard does not apply.
SDC 4.4-115 Fences
No permanent fences. are proposed as part of Phase lI.development. Therefore, this standard
does not apply.
SDC 4.5-1 10 Illumination and Height
Phase II construction activities involve temporary public rriulti-use path and construction staging
area lighting as needed to ensure the safety and security of the public. All proposed lighting meets
the exception criteria contained in SC 4.5-1 05(C)(3). The applicant proposes to construct
permanent highway and multi-use path lighting to ensure the safety and security for all applicable
transportation modes. Sheets EO.I, E 1.0, E 1.2 Lighting Plan (Exhibit C) show the location of all
permanent lighting. Light fixture details demonstrating compliance with minimum glare shielding is
presented on Sheets EO. I , E 1.0, E 1.2 Lighting Plan (ExhibitC).
SDC 4.6-100 Vehicle Parking, loadi"lg and Bicycle Parking Standards
Phase II involves the construction of a trailhead parking area in Glenwood,'as illustrated on Sheet
L2.4 Site Plan (Exhibit C). The parking area is designed to serve the proposed South Bank '
Path/Pedestrian Viaduct and the extensive riverfront path network. The proposed parking area is
designed in accordance with applicable Springfield development standards. This standard is met.
SDC 4.7-1 00 Specific Development Standards
None ofthe uses/activities listed in SC 4.7-100 are applicable to ,the subject application.. To the
extent that SC 4.7-200 and SC 4.7-203 relate to public parks, public land and open space, specific
findings demonstrating that said code sections are not applicable are presented below.
SDC 4.7-200 Public and Private Parks
While the Project will impact existing public parkland, no new parks or open space areas are
proposed. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
SDC 4.7-203 Public land and Open Space
None of the uses described in subsections (A) through(C) apply to the construction activities
proposed in Phase II. Therefore, this criterion does not apply.
These findings together with the Plan Set and documentation submitted herewith demonstrate that
this standard is satisfied. '"" . PRE-SlIRMITIAL REC'O
-:':,'
AUG 2 1 2009
'CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August, 1.7, 2009
73
1-5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLAMETIE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
~
D. Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been designed to: facilitate
vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide
connectivity within the development area and.to adjacent residential areas,
transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and
public areas; minimize driveways on arterial and collector streets as
specified in this code.or other applicable regulations and comply with the
ODOT access management standards for State highways.
Phase II involves the construction.of a trailhead parking area in Glenwood, as illustrated on Sheet
L2.4 Site Plan (EXhibit C). The parking area is designed to serve the proposed South Bank '
Path/Pedestrian Viaduct arid the extensive riverfront path network. The proposed parking area is
designed in accordance with applicable Springfield development standards. This standard is met.
E. Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil
or geologic conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant
clusters of trees and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WQl W Map and
their associated riparian areas; other riparian areas and wetlands specified in
Section 4.3-117; rock outcroppings; open spaces; and areas of historic and/or
archaeological significance, as may be specified in Section 3.3-900 or ORS
97.740-760,358.905-955 and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in
this Code or in'State or Federal law.
The Phase II project site does not include any areas of steep slopes, unstable soil, or rock
outcroppings. 'The project area has been surveyed for significant archaeological sites and none
were found within'the Project boundary. The project area does contain one site of potential
historic significance, the Eugene Millrace and Dam (Millrace), which is eligible for listing in the
National Register of Historic Places. Eleven Millrace features have been identified within the
project area, including, but not limited to, a diversion dam, weir-intake bay, channel remnants, log-
crib, intake gate, and pump house. Many of the remnant Millrace features have been impacted by
prior 1-5 bridge construction activities. Elements of the diversion dam and intake have remained,
for the most part in their original positions and retain a substantial degree of integrity. A study of
possible project impacts to the Millrace was prepared as part of the EA for the Project by Heritage
Research Associates (HRA) and submitted to the Oregon State Historic Preservation,Office
(SHPO).'6 The SHPO concurred with the HRA study finding that the proposed project would have
no adverse effects on the Millrace. Said findings are incorporated by reference herein. A copy of
both the HRA study ,and SHPO's response is available on request.
To the extent that flood zones, vegetation, watercourses, riparian areas, wetlands and open spaces
are impacted, the applicable findings contained under SDc 5.17-125 C. above are incorporated
herein by reference as proof that the referenced physical features will be protected to the greatest
extent practicable as specified in the Springfield Development Code or State or Federal law. In
'addition, the Project is subject to both Willamette Greenway Permit and Discretionary Use
approval, findings for which are included elsewhere in this submittal. The Willamette Greenway
, '
'~ ,Heritage Research Associates. 2007. An Archeological Assessment of the Eugene Millroce Diversion Dam and Intake for
the '-5 Willamette River Bridge Project. '
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17,2009
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D
AUG i 1 Z(;Q3
74
,
,
, 1:5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II ,
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP)APPLlOiTION '
(WG) Overlay District is established to protect and preserve natural scenic, historic and
recreational qualities of lands along the Willamette River and is subject to Type III Review by the
Planning Commission. The findings from the Willamette Greenway Permit and Discretionary Use
applications area incorporated by reference herein as further proof that this criterion is met.
These findings together with the applicant's written statement, Plan Set (EXhibit C) and
documentation submitted herewith demonstrate that this criterion is met.
.j'
,PRE.SlIBMITTAl REC'O
, AUG2 1.2009
'1."
::;<
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL,I August 17,2009
75
,
1-5 WILLAMETIE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT -, PHASE II
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
~
6.4 Floodplain Development Standards (SDc 3.3-420)
The enclosed findings apply to Phase II work associated with the Project and described herein.
Phase I work was detailed in a prior approved Floodplain Overlay District Development
application (SHR 2009-0000 I).
A. General Standards:
I. Anchoring. All new construction * * * subject to less than 18 inches of flood
water during a 100 year flood shall be anchored to prevent floatation, collapse
or lateral movement of the structure and shall be installed using methods and
practices that minimize flood damage * * * .
Phase II construction activities will involve the construction of the superstructure and decks
associated with two new replacement bridges. All required bridge supports and anchors, including
all proposed bents, were detailed, reviewed and approved as part of the applicant's Phase I
application submittals (refer to City of Springfield Floodplain Overlay District Development permit
SHR 2009-0000 '1). No additional bridge supports are needed or proposed as part of Phase II
construction activities. In addition to the bridge construction activities proposed above, Phase II
proposes the deconstruction and removal of the existing temporary detour bridge and removal of
the temporary work bridge (TWB). Because these structures will be removed from the
f1oodplainlfloodway, the anchoring provisions do not apply. The applicant notes that removal of
these structures will improve hydraulic conditions through the elimination of piers within the
channel. Specifically, Phase II activities will increase the hydraulic opening, improve fish passage,
and reduce in-stream work and associated environmental impacts during the proposed
construction as well as during future bridge maintenance.
In addition to the activities described above, the applicant proposes multi-use path, interpretive
signage, stormwater facilities, natural area restoration and associated landscaping and utility
improvements as part of Phase II construction activities. The applicant notes that all permanent
and multi-use path construction and any ancillary construction activities will be constructed using
methods appropriate within a flood zone. However, the specific anchoring standards described
above do not apply. '
These findings together with the Plan Set and supporting documentation submitted herewith
demonstrate that this standard is satisfied.
2.a. All new construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed
with approved materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage.
c~ncrete and structural steel will be the primary construction materials for the proposed bridge
footings, anchorages and superstructure. Concrete and structural steel 'are common bridge
building materials and are appropriate for use within flood zones due to their inherent durability
and resistance to long term water exposure and flood damage.
These findings together with the Plan Set (Exhibit C) and supporting documentation submitted
herewith demonstrate that this standard is satisfied.
PRE.SUBMITTAL RECID
AUG 2 1 2009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
76
,
, "
J
1~5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II ,
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
2.b. All new construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed
with approved methods and practices that minimize flood damage.
The applicant's Hydraulic and Scour Analysis Report (Exhibit I) outlines proposed construction
methods and practices that will be employed.to reduce and minimize flood damage during Phase II
activities. As discussed therein, temporary work-bridge and replacement-bridge design and
engineering addresses the specific site conditions that exist within the construction zone. The
construction methods and practices employed during Phase II construction are common to
interstate bridge construction of tris type and are designed to minimize flood damage to the
greatest extent possible given federal, state and local requirements. The findings and analysis
, '
presented in the applicant's Hydraulic Report is incorporated herein by reference as further proof
that this standard is met.
,'.
These findings together with the Plan Set and sup~orting documentation submitted herewith
demonstrate that this standard is satisfied.
2.c. Electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing and air conditioning equipment
and other service facilities shall be designed and/or otherwise elevated or
located to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components
during conditions of flooding.
The proposed Phase II construction activities do not include heating, ventilation, plumbing or air-
conditioning equipment or other serviCe facilities. The applicant proposes to install underground
, electrical facilities as necessary for multi-use path lighting. Said facilities will be constructed and
installed in accordance with the Springfield Engineering and Design Standards Manual (EDSM) and
ODOT requirements. This standard is satisfied.
3.a. All new and replacement water supply systems * * * .
No new or replacement water supply systems are proposed within the floodplain as part of Phase
II construction activities. The'refore, this standard does not apply,
3.b. New and replacement sanitary sewage,systems * * * .
No new or replacement sanitary sewage systems are proposed within the floodplain as part of
Phase II construction activities. Therefore, this standard'does not apply.
3.c. On-site waste disposal systems * * * .
No new or replacement on-site waste systems are proposed within the floodplain as part of Phase
II construction activities. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
4. Subdivision Proposals (including 4.a. through 4.f.)
No subdivision or lot creation activities are proposed within the floodplain as part of Phase II
construction. Therefore, these standards do not apply. ,
PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'O
AUG 2 1 2009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
77
1-5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
~
5. Review of Building Permits. Where base flood elevation data is not available'
***
As discussed under SDc 3.3-420AI above and as shown on Figure 2 of the applicant's Hydraulic
and Scour Analysis 'Report (Exhibit I) and the corresponding Floodway Data table (Table 7), the
establi~hed Flood Insurance Study (FIS) base flood elevation is 432.11.
Because an established base flood elevation exists, the building permit evaluation methodology
outlined in this'standard does not apply.
B. Specific Standards
I. Residential Construction (including La. through I.b)
No residential construction activities are proposed within the floodplain as part of Phase,lI
construction. Therefore, these standards do not apply.
,2; Nonresidential Construction
2.a. New construction and substantial improvement of any commercial,
industrial or other nonresidential structure shall have either the lowest floor,
including basement, elevated to a level at least I foot above the base flood
, elevation; or together with utility and sanitary facilities shall:
i. Be flood-proofed to I foot above the base flood level, ,so that the
structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the
passage of water. '
None of the structures proposed as part of Phase II 'construction activities meet the Floodplain
Overlay District definition of structure contained in SDc 6.1-110. Because none of the
infrastructure proposed is habitable, walled or roofed, this standard does not apply.
ii. Have structural components capable of resisting hy~rostatic and
hrdrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy. "
The Applicant's Hydraulic and Scour Analysis Report (Exhibit I) describes the structural
components that will be constructed and installed to resist anticipated hydrostatic and
hydrodynamic loads as well as any effects of buoyancy (discussion regarding hydraulic design occurs
on Pages 7 and 8 of the report). Specifically, the applicant proposed extensive anchoring as
detailed and approved in Springfield Floodplain Permit SHR 2009-0000 I of both the temporary
work bridge and the proposed bridge support str.ucture. In addition, the design and shape of
bridge itself, as well as those components of the structure built within the f1oodway, will further
reduce structural susceptibility to flood damage. For example, the proposed concrete deck arch
bridges will each have two piers in the main channel ofthe river. One pier is located at the center
of the span, and one pier is located just inside ordinary high water ,on the south bank of the river.
The configuration of these piers and the arch ribs they support has been developed with
consideration given to hydraulic efficiency. The hydraulic opening will be improved relative to the
existing bridge by reducing the pier area in the stream cross section under the LQq,-~H w'~~
. " ' PRE.SUtlMIlIf\L Rtl,'D
:'UG21 '~Q(lQ
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
78
"
,
1:5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOP.MENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
surface elevation. This reduced area will result'in a reduction of friction losses through the bridge
opening, thus tending to lower the water surface elevations.
These findings together with the Plan Set (Exhibit C) and supporting documentation submitted
herewith demonstrate that this standard is satisfied. '
iii. Be certified by an engineer or architect that the design and methods
of construction are in accordance with accepted standards of practice for
meeting provisions of this Subsection based on their development and/or '
review of the structural design, specifications 'and plans. The
certifications shall be provi~ed to the Building Officiai as specified in
Section 3-415B.6.b. '
, '
As required by this standard and the review standards establishec;l in SDc 3.3-415B.6.b, the
applicant has submitted a statement from the project engineer certifying that the design and'
methods of construction proposed in Phase II conform to accepted standards and practice for
meeting the provisions of this subsection. The engineer's certification is included herein as Exhibit
,- -, ,
H.
These findings together with the Plan Set (Exhibit C) and supporting documentation submitted
herewith demonstrate that this standard is satisfied. '
2.b. Nonresidential structures that are elevated, not flood-proofed, shall meet
the same standards for space below the lowest floor as specified in Subsection
B.l.b., above. .
None of the structures proposed as part of Phase II construction activities, meet the Floodplain
Overlay District definition of structure contained ip SDc 6.1-110. Because none of the
infrastructure proposed is habitable, walled or roofed, this standard does not apply.
2.c. Applicant's flood-proofing nonresidential buildings * * * .
No nonresidential buildings are, proposed within the floodplain as part of Phase II construction.
Therefore, this standard does not apply.
3. Manufactured Homes (including 3.a. through 3.c.).
No manufactured homes are proposed within the floodplain as part of Phase II construction.
Therefore, these standards do not apply.
4. Foundations. Foundations for all new construction, substantial
i'mprovements and manufactured homes subject to 18 inches or'less of flood
water during a I OO-year flood shall be as specified in the Springfield Building
Safety Codes. Foundations for all new construction, substantial improvements
and manufactured homes not in a Mobile Home Park or Subdivision subject to
18 inches or more offlood water during a I OO-year flood or located within a
designated f100dway shall be certified by an engineer to meet the following
requirements:
· PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'O
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
;'UG 2 1 2~O~ 79
<
/
(
1-5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
4.a. Concrete footings sized for 1000 psf soil pressure unless data to
substantiate the use of higher values are submitted;
The Applicant submitted preliminary foundation analysis as part of their Phase I submittal.
Subsequently, the applicant completed final foundation analysis which demonstrates that the vertical
bearing capacities for both the spread footings and drilled shafts are allowable with application of
commonly used safety factors. The final lateral load resistance for the spread footings is based
upon limit strength with no safety factor applied. For the drilled shaft, the load/deformation
relationship also does not i,nclude a safety factor. A complete account of the bridge foundation
assumptions used in developing the bridge information can be found in the applicant's Final
Foundation Analysis Technical Memorandum (available upon request).
City of Springfield review, and approval of the Applicant's construction permit submittals
demonstrate that all previously approved bridge foundations meet the specifications 'of the
Springfield Building Safety Codes. The Applicant's engineer's certification of No Net Rise is
provided as Exhibit H. No additional foundations are proposed' as ,part of Phase II construction
activities. All proposed concrete footings are sized for I 000 psf soil pressure.
These findings together with the Plan Set (Exhibit C) and supporting documentation submitted
,
herewith demonstrate that this standard is satisfied. '
4.b. Footings shall extend not less than 18 inches below the undisturbed natural
grade or engineered fill and in no case less than the frost line depth; and,
All footings, foundations and anchorages proposed and approved as part of Phase lI'extend
beyond 18 inches below the undisturbed natural grade and in to solid bedrock. Specifically, rock
anchors for the temporary work bridge are ,drilled into bedrock up to 30,000 pounds; replacement
bridge support structures consist of six to eight foot wide shafts/columns drilled into bedrock.
These findings together with the Plan Set (Exhibit C) and supporcing documentation submitted
herewith demonstrate that this standard is satisfied. '
4.c. Reinforced concrete, reinforced masonry, or other suitably designed
supporting systems to resist all vertical and lateral loads which may reasonably
occur independently or combined. .
The applicant has utilized reinforced concrete and steel for all footings, piers and anchorage points.
The materials selected are designed to achieve the vertical and 'lateral support needed to withstand
the vertic~1 and lateral loads from anticiRated flood events.
These findings together with the Plan Set (Exhibit C) and supporting documentation submitted
herewith demonstrate that this standard is satisfied. -
5. Streets
5.a. Adequate provisions shall be made for accessibility during a I OO-year flood,
'to:ensure ingress and egress for ordinary and emergency vehicles and services
during potential future flooding. PRE.SUBMITTAl REC1D
Ant. 2 1 2009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17,2009
80
:"
"
1-5 WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETlONp,RYUSE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOI'MENT (FP) APPLICATION .
All proposed Phase II construction activities are intended to facilitate or implement replacement
of existing transportation infrastructure. As currently constructed; the existing infrastructure
provides ingress and egress to the construction area for applicable non,motored and motored
ordinary and emergency vehicles. In that the Applicant does not propose any new residentiai,
commercial or industrial development, no new streets are proposed or required.
These fi~dings together with the Plan Set (Exhibit C) and supporting documentation submitted
herewith demonstrate that this standard is satisfied.
5.b. No street or surface of any new street shall be at an elevation of h!ss than I
foot below the base flood height.
No temporary or permanent streets or street surfaces are proposed as part of Phase II
construction activities. Therefore, this criterion does,not apply. '
C. Floodways. located within areas of special flood hazard established in
Section 3.3-41 OA. and B. are areas designated as f1oodways. Since the f100dway
is an extremely hazardous area due to the velocity of flood waters which carry
debris, potential projectiles, and erosion potential, the following provisions
apply: "
I. Encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvement,
and other development is prohibited unless certification from an engineer or
architect is provided demonstrating that encroachments shall not result in any
increase in flood levels during the occurrence of the base flood discharge.
Phase II activities do not involve the construction of any new, substantial encroachments into the
f1oodway; all coffer dams and footings associated with, the temporary work bridge and new
replacement bridge were permitted in Phase I. The applicant notes that the top of the temporary
work bridge (TWB) is at elevation 437.4 feet. The bottom of the TWB is at elevation 433.4 feet.
The TWB was built in stages and is anchored on the leading edge of the pile~ by drilling rock
anchors into the bedrock to 30,000 pounds to prevent up-lift.
As outlined above, the City of Springfield required a "No-Rise" analysis for the TWB as part of the,
applicant's prior approved Floodplain Overlay District Development application. The analysis for
the TWB showed a slight increase in water surface elevation during a 100-year flood event while
the TWB is, in place (2009-2012). The City of Springfield reviewed the applicant's floodplain
, application and determined that the rise is acceptable for the duration of the project. Exhibit J, 1-5
Willamette Ri"er Bri~g~ FEMA Cross Sections, illustrates the temporary effect on the 100:year
base flood elevatiori:: ' ": " ,
At the completion of Phase II, the proposed replacement bridges will improve hydraulic
conditions through the elimination of piers within the channel. The proposed bridges will each
have two piers in the main channel of the river. By comparison, the decommissioned bridge has five
piers in the water, and the detour bridge has six - a total of II piers. The net reduction of piers in
the water improves the hydraulic opening, improves fish passage, and reduces in-stream work and
associated environmental impacts during the proposed construction as well as during future bridge
PRE-SUBMITTAL RECIO
,\UG U 7009 81
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I Augustl7, 2009
(' ,,...
./
,c.
:, ''>-
1-5 WILLAMETTE ~IVER BRIDGE PROJECT - PHASE II
WILLAMETTE GREENWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (WG), DISCRETIONARY USE (DU), SITE PLAN
REVIEW (SPR), & FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT (FP) APPLICATION
maintenan'ce. At the conclusion of Phase II construction activities, the backwater flood elevation, "
, caused by the 100-year base flood; will be reduced from 433.41 feet for the existing 1-5 and detour
bridges to 431.32 feet for,the proposed bridge. This is a net reduction in 100-year base flood
water surface elevation of 1.11 feet:
2. If the requirements of subsection c.1 above are satisfied, all new
construction and substantial improvements shall comply with all applicable
special flood hazard reduction provisions ,of Subsection B above.
The Applicant's findings under Subsection B above are incorporated herein by reference as proof
that this standard is met.
3. Subdivision and partitioning of hind for residential purposes is prohibited if
land is located entirely within the f1oodway.
No land partition or subdivision is proposed as part of Phase II construction activities. Therefore,
this standard is met.
PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'O
AUG2 1 2009
CMGS
INITIAL SUBMITTAL I August 17, 2009
82