HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 6023 09/16/2002
.
-
'=~.
IV
.;
~
ORDINANCE NO. 6023 (Special)
)
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING LIENS FOR INSTALLATION OF PAVING, CURBS AND
GUTTERS, SIDEWALKS, STORM DRAINAGE, STREET LIGHTS, AND STREET TREES, FOR
WATER STREET, FROM F TO G STREETS,AND M TO N STREETS, AND F STREET FROM KELLY
BOULEVARD TO WATER STREET, AND VICINITY, PROJECT #P20 1 00, IN THE CITY OF
SPRINGFIELD, LANE COUNTY, OREGON AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: In accordance with Section 3.004 of the Springfield Municipal Code, an engineer's report, for
street improvements to serve Water Street, from F to G Streets, and M to N Streets, and F Street from Kelly
Boulevard to Water Street, and vicinity, Project #P20100, was filed in the office of the Finance Director on
April 10, 2001, and accepted by the Common Council ofthe City of Springfield as Ordinance No. 5981 on
April 16, 2001, for the total area more particularly described in Exhibit "A", attached, and is by reference
hereto incorporated herein and made a part of this ordinance. Owners of benefited property and all
interested persons were invited to appear at a public hearing on September 16,2002.
Section 2: The total cost of the improvement construction, based upon the contract awarded, was
$288,948.39. The City will pay, ~s its share of said construction, the sum of $210,768.39. The remaining
balance of $78, 180.00 is hereby assessed against the property benefited by the improvement and in the
reputed ownership of persons named as follows:
(See Exhibit "A")
Section 3: The council hereby declares the assessments set forth to be liens upon the property and orders the
Finance Director to enter the liens in the City lien docket to be collected in accordance with existing
statutory provisions governing assessments for City improvements. The lien docket entry shall include a
complete legal description of the property assessed, the name of the reputed owner or owners, the amount of
the assessment, and the number of this authorizing ordinance.
Section 4: It is hereby found and determined by the Common Council, tha't matters pertaining to public
improvements, and assessments therefore, are matters affecting the public health, safety and welfare, and
that an emergency therefore exists, and that this ordinance shall therefore take effect immediately upon its
passage by the Council and approval by the Mayor.
ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield by a vote of 5
against this 16th day of September 2002.
in favor and 0
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this 16th day of
,2002.
A~,~
City Recorder
September
r
f~ '1ft
REVIEWED t. MP~OY@D
AS TO f<<)fJ~ \ L
0~"'..I"".lr....l ~\""""'
DATE:~_J_Iti2.COc-
f)FFICE OF CITY ATTORNEY
.
.
.
Ordinance No.
Page 3 of 5
Margolis Family Limited Partnership $ 4,650.00
2050 West25th Avenue
Eugene, Oregon 97405 " On: 153 West "G" Street
~, . . " l .
Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 17, Plat of Emerald Heights Addition
to Springfield, as platted and recorded in Book 4, Page 14, Lane County Oregon Plat Records
and run thence North 10.56' West 10.185 feetai6rig the Westerly line, if extended, of said Lot
1; thence Easterly parallel with and 10 feet NoiiH of the North line of said lot, 130 feet; thence
South 10.56' East 58.105 feet along the Easterly line and the Easterly line, extended, of said
Lot 1 to a point on said Easterly line 3.0 feet North 10.56' West of the Southeast corner thereof;
thence Westerly 130 feet parallel with the South line of said Lot 1 to the Westerlly line thereof;
thence North10.56' West 47.92 feet to the point of beginning, in Lane County, Oregon.
TL 1703352210100
Jennifer Wagner $ 7,200.00
240 West "F" Street
Springfield, Oregon 97477 On: 240 West "F" Street
Lot 5, Block 16, Plat of Emerald Heights Addition to Springfield, as platted and recorded
in Book 4, Page 14, Lane County Oregon Plat Records in Lane County, Oregon.
TL 1703352212400
Aaron J. & Tricia A. Howery $ 9,000.00
7735 SW Bayberry Drive
Aloha, Oregon 97007 On: 652 Water Street
Lot 8, Block 19, Plat of Emerald Heights Addition to Springfield, as platted and recorded
in Book 4, Page 14, Lane County Oregon Plat Records in Lane County, Oregon.
TL 1703352301300
Richard J. Davis $ 3,600.00
1605 Cal Young Road
Eugene, Oregon 97401 On: 655 Kelly Boulevard
Lot 1, Block 19, Emerald Heights Addition to Springfield, as platted and recorded in
. Book 4, Page 14, Lane County Oregon Plat Records in Lane County, Oregon.
TL 1703352301400
Vernon A. &,Katherine M. Edwards $ 5,000.00
220 West "M" Street
Springfield, Oregon 97477 On: 1408 Water Street
Lot 1 0, Block 11, Sunnyside Addition to Springfield, as platted and recorded in Book 4,
Page 31, Lane County Oregon Plat Records in Lane County, Oregon.
TL.17 03 274408500
./
.'
.
Ordinance No.
Page 5 of 5
Donald E. Splane $ 0.00
1415 Water Street
Springfield, Oregon 97477 ,',' '. ," ", On: 1415 Water Street
Lot 7 and the South one-half of Lot 8, Block 1 b, Sunnyside Additon to Springfield, as
platted and recorded in Book 4, Page 31, Lane County Oregon Plat Records in Lane County,
Oregon. TL 17 03 27 44 07800
Harold B. Turley $ 4,060.00
2478 15th Street
Springfield, Oregon 97477 On: 154 West "M" Street
Lot 6, Block 10, Sunnyside Additon to Springfield, as platted and recorded in Book 4,
Page 31, Lane County Oregon Plat Records in Lane County, Oregon.
TL 17 03 27 44 07700
.
.
.
ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 7th day of October, 2002, with a vote
of ~ for and L against.
Approved by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this ih day of October, 2002.
ATTEST:
~~
REVIEWED & APPROVED
AS TO FORM
~ O"'<<..c' ~ .J L~~ "C
DATE:---.:Ll ~c \ "200<-
OFFICE OF CITY ATTORNEY
Mayor
L. ·
l1IIIIIm'll
.
EXHlJ3IT A
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
'P ARCEl I
The South :-i of the foHowing descn'bed parcel, to~wit:
, Begiruling at a point J 04.0 feet North 89 degrees 44' West of a point on tbe east line of the Thomas D. Ed\vards
Donation Land Claim No. 55, Township 17 South, Ra:b.ge 2 West of the Wi11amette Meridian; said last
mentioned point being 1492.1 feet SO'uth 0 degrees 10' West from the northeast comer of said Claim, from sa1d
begin."ling point run South 0 degrees 10' West 165.0 fcet; thence North 89 degrees 44' West, 266.5 feet to the
center of a 20.0 foot roadway; thence North 0 degrees lay" , West along center of said roadway, 165.0 feet;
thence South 89 degrees 44' East 268~25 feet to the place of beginning, being a part of said Donation Land
Claim No. 55, Section 32, said Township and Range, Lane County, Oregon.
EXCEPTING the West 10.0 feet thereof conveyed to the City of Springfield, by Deed recorded April 20, 1965,
Reception No. 1474, Lane County Oregon ;Deed Records, in Lane County, Oregon.
ALSO EXCEPTlN,G that portion conveyed to the City of Springfield by Deed recorded February 6, 1979,
Reception No. 79-07133, Official Records of Lane County, Oregon.
ALSO EXCEPTING the East 50.00 feet thereof.
..
"
.
.
.
.
"
ORDINANCE NO.
6025
(General)
AN ORDINANCE ADDING "TRANSIT STATION" TO THE SCHEDULE OF USE
CATEGORIES FOUND IN SECTION 19.060 (BOOTH KELLY MIXED.:USE ZONING
DISTRICT) OF THE SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT CODE AND AMENDING SECTION
19.110 (5) SPECIAL USE STANDARDS, TO CLARIFY THAT THE 200 FT. SETBACK
REQUIREMENT FOR BUS TERMINALS AND HELIPORTS FROM RESIDENTIAL USES
SHALL NOT APPLY TO "TRANSIT STATIONS;" AND ADOPTING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE.
WHEREAS, The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan is the basic guiding land
use policy document for the City of Springfield; and
WHEREAS, The "Purpose" section of the Metro Plan describes it as a framework plan and it is
intended that more detailed refinement plans, programs, and policies should supplement the Metro Plan
(E. Relationship to Other Plans and Policies, page 1-5, Metro Plan); and
WHEREAS, Springfield's various neighborhood refinement plans, including the Springfield
Downtown Refinement Plan and the Booth Kelly Conceptual Development Plan, are adopted
supplements to the Metro Plan, and are authoritative in stating the land use policies that will guide
development in the City; and
WHEREAS, The Springfield Downtown Refinement Plan and the Booth Kelly Conceptual
Development Plan, supports pedestrian-oriented connections with the Booth Kelly District as well as the
support of multimodal transportation opportunities; and
WHEREAS, The Springfield Development Code was adopted in May 1986 and revised in March
1998, to ensure that development within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Springfield is of a proper
type, design and location; and
WHEREAS, The Springfield Development Code implements the planning policies and land use
designations set forth in the Eugene-Springfield Metro Area General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the current Springfield Development Code, adopted in 1987 and amended in 1992
and 2000, is in need of modification to reflect changes in State law and local public facilities and services
needs; and
WHEREAS, Article 8 of the Springfield Development Code sets forth procedures for
amendments of the Development Code text and those procedures were followed; and
WHEREAS, on October 15,2002, the Springfield Planning Commission unanimously approved
a resolution recommending approval of the proposed amendment of Article 19-Booth Kelly Mixed-Use
Zoning District; and
WHEREAS, the Springfield City Council has conducted a public hearing on November 5, 2002
and having considered the matter in regular session on that date, is now ready to take action based upon
the above recommendations and the evidence and testimony already in the record as well as the evidence
and testimony presented at the public hearing held in the matter of adopting the amendment to the
Springfield Development Code adding "transit station" to the schedule of use categories found in
Section 19.060 (Booth Kelly Mixed-Use Zoning District) of the Springfield Development Code
and amending Section 19.110 (5) Special Use Standards, to clarify that the 200 ft. setback
ORDINANCE NO, 6025
PAGE 1 OF 2
requirement for bus terminals and heliports from residential uses shall not apply to transit
stations.
.
NOW THEREFORE, BASED ON THE FOREGOING RECITALS THE CITY OF
SPRINGFIELD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Article 19, "BKMU Booth Kelly Mixed-Use Zoning District" Section 19.060
"Schedule of Use Categories" is hereby amended in Subsection 8 "Transportation Facilities" by
the addition of "(e) Transit Stations" to the list of transportation facilities as follows:
"(8) Transportation facilities, (Section 19.110(5)):
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Bus terminals
Docks and marinas
Heliports
Helistops
Transit Stations
D
D
S
S
pIt
Section 2. Article 19, "BKMU Booth Kelly Mixed-Use Zoning District" Section 19.110 "Special
Use Standards" is hereby amended to clarify that the 200-foot setback requirement for bus
terminals, heliports and helistops does not apply to transit stations as follows:
"(5) Transportation Facilities. New bus terminals, heliports and helistops shall not be located
within 200 feet of any residential use (transit stations are exempt from this requirement).
Noise attenuating barriers shall be constructed where necessary to mitigate land use
conflicts. "
.
Section 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for
any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall
be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions hereof.
FURTHER, although not part of this Ordinance, the Springfield City Council adopts the findings
set forth in the Staff Report which demonstrate conformance of this amendment to the Metro Plan,
applicable State statutes and applicable State-wide Planning Goals and Administrative Rules, and is
attached as Exhibit B.
ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 18th day of November
2002 by a vote of ~ for and ~ against.
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this--.UL day of November
c
,2002.
~ATIEST:
City Recorder
.
REVIEVVED & APPROVED
A..S TO FORM
~\:::)'>~,-\. ~ ~~\.~
DATE: l () \ 2 C( 120tl"""2-
OFFICE OF CITY ATTORNEY
ORDINANCE NO. 6025
PAGE20F2
Exhibit B
.
City Of Springfield
Development Services Department
October 15, 2002
Staff Report
Applicant: Journal No.
City of Springfield 2002-09-0306
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Request: ProcedureType:
To amend the text of the Springfield Development Code, adding Type IV -- Legislative
"transit station" to the Schedule of Use Categories found in Section
19.060 (Booth Kelly Mixed-Use Zoning District). Section 19.110 (5)
Special Use Standards, is also amended to clarify that the 200 ft.
setback requirement for bus terminals and heliports from residential
uses shall not apply to "transit stations."
.
1. Executive Summary
Lane Transit District, together with the City of Springfield conducted a lengthy public process
for selecting the location of a new transit station in Downtown Springfield. The selected site is
located within the Booth-Kelly Mixed-Use Zoning District. Article 19. 060 of the Springfield
Development Code lists the allowed uses that can be located within the District. "Transit
Station" is not among the uses listed.
Until recently, transit stations in Downtown Eugene and Springfield were little more than an
aggregated group of bus stops. As such the Springfield Development Code did not envision a
purpose-built facility as a "transit station." Thus the Development Code does not mention
"transit station" in any of its zoning districts, with the exception of the recently adopted Mixed-
Use District.
In 2000, LTD constructed a true transit station facility in Eugene. LTD now plans to construct
such a facility in Springfield. As such, an amendment to the Springfield Development Code is
needed to locate a transit station in the Downtown. The proposed text amendment adds "transit
station" to the Schedule of Use Categories found in Section 19.060 (Booth Kelly Mixed-Use
Zoning District). Section 19.110 (5) Special Use Standards, is also amended to clarify that the
200 ft. setback requirement for bus terminals and heliports from residential uses shall not apply
to "transit stations."
.
Staffhas reviewed the criteria for approval oftext amendments of the Springfield Development
Code and find the proposal to be consistent with those criteria. Based on the staff review, it is
recommended that the proposed text amendment be approved.
Jo. No. 2002-09-0306
Text Amendment to Article 19 of the SDCs
October 15, 2002
1
II. Procedural Requirements
. Procedural requirements for processing text amendments to the SDC are described in Article 8
and Article 14.
Article 8 indicates that the Planning Director, Planning Commission, City Councilor a resident
of the City can initiate amendments to the SDC. Such amendments of are reviewed under a
"Type IV" procedure and require public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City
Council. Type IV procedures are detailed in Article 3.1 00 of the SDC. In this case, the proposed
revision to the SDC is being initiated by the Planning Director (staff).
Article 14.030 (2) requires that legislative land use decisions be advertised in a newspaper of
general circulation, providing information about the legislative action and the time, place and
location of the hearing.
Findings:
1. The Planning Director has initiated this amendment of the SDC to add "transit station" to
the Schedule of Use Categories found in Section 19.060 (Booth Kelly Mixed-Use Zoning
District). The amendment also includes a modification of Section 19.110 (5) to clarify
that the 200 ft. setback requirement for bus tenninals and heliports from residential uses
, shall not apply to "transit stations." The amendment is not site specific and falls under
the definition of a legislative action.
.
1. A "DLCD Notice Proposed Amendment" was mailed to the Department of Land
Conservation and Development on September 25,2002, alerting the agency to the City's
intent to amend the SDC. The notice is generally required to be mailed to DLCD 45 days
in advance of the first evidentiary hearing. ORS 197.610 (2) waives this requirement
under emergency circumstances. The City has requested that the proposed amendment
be considered under this emergency provision.
2. The proposed text amendment affects only those properties within the Booth-Kelly
Mixed-Use zoning District. Mailed notice ofthe proposed text amendment was sent to
both property owners and residents 1ivingwithin the Booth-Kelly District and those
residents living within 100 feet of the District. This notice was mailed on September 25,
2002.
3. Notice ofthe public hearing concerning this matter was published on October 2, 2002 in
the Springfield News, advertising both the hearing before the Springfield Planning
Commission on October 15th and the City Council on November 4th. The content of the
notice followed the direction given in Section 14.030 (2) ofthe SDC for legislative
actions.
.
Conclusion:
Jo. No. 2002-09-0306
Text Amendment to Article 19 of the SDCs
October 15, 2002
2
.
Procedural requirements described in Article 8 and Article 14 of the SDC have been followed.
Notice requirements established by DLCD for amending the Development Code have also been
followed.
IV. Decision Criteria and Findings
Article 8 describes the criteria to be used in approving an amendment to the SDC. It states that
in reaching a decision, the Planning Commission and the City Council must adopt findings
which demonstrate conformance with "1) the Metro Plan; 2) applicable State statutes; and to 3)
applicable State-wide Planning Goals and Administrative Rules. "
Criterion #1 "Conformance with the Metro Plan"
Findings
4. The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan is the basic guiding land use
policy document for the City of Springfield. The "Purpose" section of the Metro Plan
describes it as a framework plan. It is intended that more detailed refinement plans,
programs, and policies should supplement the Metro Plan (E. Relationship to Other Plans
and Policies, page I-5, Metro Plan).
5. The Eugene-Springfield Transportation System Plan, TransPlan, was adopted in 2001.
Under state law, TransPlan is a functional plan of the Metro Plan.
.
6. TransPlan TSI Transit Policies #1 and #2 (Chapter. 2 pg. 27,28) made findings and
established policies that support and promote (1) the improvement of transit facilities and
(2) the development of a Bus Rapid Transit System (BRT).
7. A Downtown Springfield transit station is listed as capital proj ect # 1135 in TransPlan
(Chapter 3, Page 37).
8~ A planned Springfield Transit Station is designed to improve the accessibility,
attractiveness and convenience of transit use for Springfield area transit users.
9. Lane Transit District (LTD) has stated that the Springfield Transit Station will be a hub in
the first segment of the new BR T system that is in development. A downtown location
for the Station is essential to its function as a hub linking service to Gateway and
Thurston, as well as Eugene.
10. The Springfield City Council participated together with L TDin a lengthy public process
to select a downtown location for a transit station. On June 4,2001, the Council
approved a resolution (01-41) specifying a site south of S. A Street, near the intersection
with Pioneer Parkway East, to be the appropriate site for the planned transit station. The
site is within the Booth-Kelly Zoning District.
.
11. Section 19.060 (8) of the SDC (Booth-Kelly Mixed Use Zoning District) does not list
"Transit Station" as a permitted use. The term "bus terminal" is listed as a discretionary
use in 19.060, but it is generally construed to mean an intercity bus transportation facility
such as those operated by private bus companies (Greyhound, Trailways, etc.).
Jo. No. 2002-09-0306
Text Amendment to Article 19 of the SDCs
October 15, 2002 '
3
.
12. Insertion of "transit station" in 19.060 (8) would facilitate the development of a
downtown Springfield station and improve the accessibility, attractiveness, and
convenience of transit use in the community. Insertion of "transit station" into the SDC
would also facilitate the action of the Springfield City Council to select a site for the
station in the Booth Kelly Mixed-Use District.
13. Section 19.110 (5) states that new bus terminals, heliports and helistops shall not be
located within 200 feet of any residential use. Amending 19.110 (5) to read:
"Transportation Facilities. New bus terminals, heliports, and helistops shall not be
located within 200 feet of any residential use (transit stations are exempt from this
requirement). Noise attenuating barriers shall be constructed where necessary
when-abutting residential or commercial uses."
would make clear the 200-foot exclusion shall not apply to the location of a transit
station. Transit stations would still be required to install noise attenuating barriers as
needed when abutting residential or commercial uses.
Conclusion
.
The findings shown above demonstrate that TransPlan supports the improvement of transit
facilities and the development of support facilities for BR T. L TD and the City of Springfield
have determined that a downtown location within the Booth-Kelly Mixed-Use District is the
appropriate location for a new transit station. Amending the SDC to include "transit station"
among the list of permitted uses in the Booth Kelly District is consistent with TransPlan TSI
Policies #1 and #2 that promote and support transit facility improvement and BRT development.
Criterion #2 "Conformance with Applicable State Statutes"
Findings
14. The Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) Chapter 267 describes the status and general powers
of Mass Transit Districts including Lane Transit District. Section 267.200 (7) empowers
L TD to "construct, acquire, maintain and operate and lease, rent and dispose of
passenger terminal facilities, motor vehicle parking facilities and other facilities for the
purpose of encouraging use of the mass transit system within the district."
15. ORS 267.200(8) allows transit districts to "enter into contracts under ORS 190.003 to
190.620 with units oflocal government of the State of Oregon [i.e., the City of
Springfield], whether within or without the district, or with the State of Washington or
with public agencies ofthe State of Washington, to act jointly or in cooperation with
them or to provide mass transit services to areas under their jurisdictions.. .".
.
16. ORS 267.210 requires transit districts to prepare a general plan for transit service within
the District. That plan is intended to be completed in cooperation with cities and counties
within and adjacent to the district. The plan is also intended to promote coordination and
planning of future construction, improvement and equipment acquisition of the district,
governmental agencies and private interests to assure maximum efficiency and use of
Jo. No. 2002-09-0306
Text Amendment to Article 19 of the SDCs
October 15, 2002 '
4
.
mass transit in the district. LTD's General Plan for Mass Transit specifies the
development of a transit station in Downtown Springfield. The location of the
Downtown Station was determined through an extensive public involvement program
coordinated with the City of Springfield that culminated in a resolution passed by the
City Council in June 2001.
Conclusion
The Oregon Revised Statues empower and direct transit districts to coordinate with cities in the
development of transit facilities. Lane Transit District collaborated with the City in the selection
of a site for the planned Downtown Springfield transit station. ,Amending the SDC to allow a
"transit station" use in the Booth-Kelly Mixed-Use District implements a planning decision
jointly made by the City and Lane Transit District as required by state statutes. The proposed
text amendment to the SDC is consistent with this criterion of approval.
Criterion #3 "Applicable State-wide Planning Goals and Administrative Rules"
Findings
Compliance with Administrative Rules
17. The Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) 660-012 is replete with references to transit
use. These references generally support and encourage transit use as an alternative to
auto dependence.
.
18. OAR 660-12-0015 (6) states that mass transit, transportation, airport and port districts
shall participate in the development of TSPs for those transportation facilities and
services they provide. These districts shall prepare and adopt plans for transportation
facilities and services they provide. Such plans shall be consistent with and adequate to
carry out relevant portions of applicable regional and local TSPs. Cooperative agreements
executed under ORS 197.185(2) shall include the requirement that mass transit,
transportation, airport and port districts adopt a plan consistent with the requirements of
this section.
19. Lane Transit District participated in the development of TransPlan, the transportation
system plan for the Eugene-Springfield area. That planning includes the location of
transit stops and stations within the service area. Further, L TD has listed the Downtown
Springfield Station among capital projects included in, and approved through, TransPlan.
Compliance with Statewide Planning Goals
.
20. Goal] - Citizen Involvement. Goal 1 calls for "the opportunity for citizens to be
involved in all phases of the planning process." The decision to locate a transit station in
the Booth-Kelly District was the culmination of a public process that lasted more than a
year. That process included a Steering Committee that included the general citizenry,
Open Houses, and finally, an adoption by both the Springfield City Council and the Lane
Transit District Board. This text amendment is needed to implement the decision that
was jointly made by the community and LTD.
Jo. No. 2002-09-0306
Text Amendment to Article 19 of the SDCs
, October 15, 2002
5
.
21. Goal 2 - Land Use Planning. Goal 2 outlines the basic procedures of Oregon's statewide
planning program. It says that land use decisions are to be made in accordance with a
comprehensive plan, and that suitable "implementation ordinances" to put the plan's
policies into effect must be adopted.
The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) is the
acknowledged comprehensive plan that guides land use planning in Springfield. Various
adopted refinement plans and specific area plans provide more detailed direction for
planning under the umbrella of the Metro Plan. The Downtown Refinement Plan, of
which the Booth-Kelly Conceptual Development Plan is a subset, supports pedestrian
oriented development as well as transportation improvements that encourage the use of
alternative modes of transportation. The SDC implements the policies and direction of
the Booth-Kelly Conceptual Development Plan, Downtown Refinement Plan as well as
the Metro Plan.
Amendment of the SDC to allow transit facilities that would benefit the Booth-Kelly
District is consistent with local land use planning policies for the area.
22. Goal 3 - Agricultural Land. Goal 3 defines" agricultural lands. " It then requires
counties to inventory such lands and to "preserve and maintain" them through farm
zomng.
.
This goal does not apply within adopted, acknowledged urban growth boundaries. The
City of Springfield does not have any agricultural zoning districts. This amendment
applies only within the Booth-Kelly Mixed-Use District, and does not apply outside the
urban growth boundary. All land in the City's urban transition area carries City zoning.
An exception to this goal was taken in 1982 when the comprehensive plan was
acknowledged.
23. Goal 4 - Forest Land. This goal defines forest lands and requires counties to inventory
them and adopt policies and ordinances that will "conserve forest lands for forest uses."
This goal does not apply within adopted, acknowledged urban growth boundaries. The
City of Springfield does not have any forest zoning districts. This amendment does not
apply outside the urban growth boundary and, because oflimitations on commercial and
industrial development without full urban services, generally do not apply outside the city
limits. All land in the City's urban transition area carries City zoning. An exception to
this goal was taken in 1982 when the comprehensive plan was acknowledged.
24. Goal 5 - Open Spaces, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Natural Resources. Goal 5
covers more than a dozen natural and cultural resources such as wildlife habitats and
wetlands. It establishes a process for each resource to be inventoried and evaluated.
.
This amendment does not repeal, replace or void existing Metro Plan policy or
'Development Code regulations with respect to any identified natural resources. No
changes to supporting ordinances or policy documents adopted to comply with Goal 5 are
affected by these amendments.
Jo. No. 2002-09-0306
Text Amendment to Article 19 of the SDCs
October 15, 2002
6
.
25. Goal 6 - Air, Water and Land Resources Quality. This goal requires local
comprehensive plans and implementing measures to be consistent with state and federal
regulations on matters such as groundwater pollution.
This amendment supports the location of a mass transit facility that holds the potential for
contributing to the reduction of auto-dependence in the Springfield area. It has long been
assumed that increased transit ridership and reduced auto use would have a beneficial
impact on air quality.
An Environmental Assessment (EA) completed by Lane Transit District in October 1999.
The Federal Transit Administration issued a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)
on January 24,2000. LTD then sought and received a'Categorical Exclusion to the EA
on March 22, 2001. The EA concluded that a transit station in the Booth Kelly Mixed-
Use District south o[.S. A at Pioneer Parkway E., would have no significant impact on
the area.
26. Goal 7 - Areas Subject to Natural Disasters and Hazards. Goal '7 deals with
development in places subject to natural hazards such as floods or landslides. It requires
that jurisdictions apply "appropriate safeguards" (floodplain zoning, for example) when
planning for development there.
.
All sites within Springfield that are subject to these hazards (floodplain, erosion,
landslides, earthquakes, weak foundation soils) are inventoried through a variety of
sources. The proposed text amendments do not remove or exempt compliance with other
Code standards that may apply to development.
The selected transit station site in the Booth Kelly District is not listed on the inventories
of hazard areas.
27. Goal 8 - Recreational Needs. This goal calls for each community to evaluate its areas
and facilities for recreation and develop plans to deal with the projected demand for
them.
Willamalane Park and Recreation District is the entity responsible for park planning,
development and maintenance in the urban transition area as well as the city limits. The
proposed amendment will not affect the provision of recreational service. Transit stations
may support access to recreational facilities by those who are unable to drive or who
choose to use alternative modes of transportation.
28. Goal 9 - Economic Development. Goal 9 calls for diversification and improvement of
the economy. It asks communities to inventory commercial and industrial lands, project
future needs for such lands, and plan and zone enough land to meet those needs.
.
The proposed text amendment allows transit stations to be sited within the Booth-Kelly
Mixed-Use District. A new transit facility located in the district would improve
transportation access to the District for both employees and consumers. Improved access
would support future development and re-development efforts within the District.
Jo. No. 2002-09-0306
Text Amendment to Alticle 19 of the SDCs
October 15, 2002
7
29. Goal] 0 - Housing. This goal specifies that each city must plan for and accommodate
needed housing types, such as multifamily and manufactured housing.
.
TransPlan seeks to promote the location of higher density residential development along
transit corridors and near transit stations. The station could serve asa focal point for
future transit-oriented residential development in the Downtown. Such a pattern can be
documented as occurring in the Portland area near newly established transit stations.
30. Goal]] - Public Facilities and Services. Goal 11 calls for efficient planning of public
services such as sewers, water, law enforcement, and fire protection.
The Eugene-Springfielq Metropolitan Public Services and Facilities Plan (PFSP) is a
refinement plan of the Metro Plan that guides the provision of public infrastructure,
including water, sewer, storm water management, and electricity. The plan made no
findings nor did it establish policies relating directly to transit stations or transit use.
The transit station, when constructed, will be subject to the policies promulgated by the
PFSP.
31. Goal]2 - Transportation. The goal aims to provide" a safe, convenient and economic
transportation system. "
.
Section 660-012-0060 of the Transportation Planning Rules requires evaluation of a
comprehensive plan or land use regulation amendment to detennine if an amendment to
the SDC significantly affects a transportation facility. The proposed SDC amendment
does not: change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation
facility; change standards implementing a functional classification system; allow types of
levels of use which would result in levels of travel or access which are inconsistent with
the functional classification of a transportation facility; or reduce the level of service of a
facility below the minimum acceptable level identified in the Metropolitan Area
Transportation Plan (TransPlan).
A transit station located in the Booth Kelly Mixed-Use District, would serve to improve
transit services for commuters and residents accessing Downtown Springfield, or who are
making transfer connections to other parts ofLTD's service area.
Goal 12 encourages development that avoids principal reliance on one mode of
transportation. The ability to locate a transit station in the heart of Downtown
Springfield, and the ability to link that station to other areas of the community with Bus
Raid Transit will likely make transit use more attractive and thereby reduce the reliance
of some Springfield residents on the automobile.
32. Goal]3 - Energy Conservation. Goal 13 declares that "land and uses developed on the
land shall be managed and controlled so as to maximize the conservation of all forms of
energy, based upon sound economic principles. "
.
The location of a transit station in Downtown Springfield and the establishment of the
Downtown Station as a Bus Rapid Transit hub is likely to increase overall transit
Jo.lVo.2002-09-0306
Text Amendment to Article 19 of the SDCs
October 15, 2002
8
ridership. Transit has long been assumed to be an important means of reducing the
consumption of fossil fuels in our country.
. ' 33. Goal 14 - Urbanization. This goal requires cities to estimate future growth and needs
for land and then plan and zone enough land to meet those needs.
The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Residential Lands and Housing Study, Policy
Recommendations Report (1999) found "there is sufficient buildable residential land
within the existing urban growth boundary to meet the future need of the projected
population. This amendment will not directly affect the availability ofland for future
growth. Proponents of transit-oriented development assert that a compact urban form,
supported by a weli developed transit system will postpone the need to expand urban
growth boundaries.
34. Goal 15 - Willamette River Greenway. Goal IS sets forth procedures for administering
the 300 miles of greenway that protects the Willamette River.
The proposed text amendment does not change the obligation to comply with the City's
existing standards for development with respect to the Willamette River Greenway. The
Greenway provisions allow development of permitted uses in the underlying zone,
provided that all other Greenway requirements are satisfied. The City's adopted,
acknowledged Greenway ordinance will not be changed.
.
3S.Goals 16 through 19 - Estuarine Resources, Coastal Shorelands, Beaches and Dunes,
and Ocean Resources. There are no coastal, ocean, estuarine, or beach and dune
resources within the City's jurisdiction. These goals do not apply in Springfield.
Conclusion
The Oregon Revised Statutes, Oregon Administrative Rules and the Statewide Planning Goals
clearly support transit use and the development of improved transit facilities in collaboration
with local government. Lane Transit District and the City of Springfield jointly sponsored an
extensive public process that led to the selection of a site in the Booth Kelly Mixed-Use District.
The proposed text amendment that would add "transit station" to the list of uses permitted in the
Booth Kelly District and by that, implements the decision of the two jurisdictions.
It is the conclusion of staff that the proposed amendment is consistent with this criterion.
V. Conclusion and Recommendation of Staff
.
Jo. No, 2002-09-0306
Text Amendment to Article 19 of the SDCs
October 15, 2002
9
.
.
.
Based on the findings of staff with respect to the criteria defined in Article 8 for approving the
amendment of the SDC, staff finds the proposed text amendment of the Springfield
Development Code, adding "transit station" to the Schedule of Use Categories found in Section
19.060 (Booth Kelly Mixed-Use Zoning District); as well as the modification of Section 19.110
(5) Special Use Standards, to clarify that the 200 ft. setback requirement for bus terminals and
heliports from residential uses shall not apply to "transit stations," to be consistent with these
criteria and recommends approval of the amendment..
VI. Attachments
Attachment A:
Attachment B:
Proposed Text Amendment to the Springfield Development Code
Map of the Booth-Kelly Mixed-Use Zoning District.
Jo. No. 2002-09-0306
Text Amendment to Article 19 of the SDCs
October 15, 2002
10
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT A
Proposed Text Amendment to the Springfield Development Code
The proposed amendment to the Springfield Development Code, adds "transit station" to the
Schedule of Use Categories found in Section 19.060 (Booth Kelly Mixed-Use Zoning District).
The underlined section below shows the proposed insertion of "Transit Station" to the list of
uses.
(8) Transportation facilities, (Section 19.110(5):
! .
(a) Bus tenninals
D
(b) Docks and marinas
D
(c) Heliports
S
(d) Helistops
S
(e) Transit Stations
p
Section 19.110 (5) Special Use Standards, is also amended to clarify that the 200 ft. setback
requirement for bus terminals and heliports from residential uses shall not apply to "transit
stations." The underlined phrase in parenthesis shows the proposed clarification that exempts
transit stations from the 200 ft. setback, but not from noise attenuating barriers where they are
deemed necessary.
(5) Transportation Facilities. New bus terminals, heliports and helistops shall notbe
located within 200 feet of any residential use (transit stations are exempt from this
requirement). Noise attenuating barriers shall be constructed where necessary to
mitigate land use conflicts.
Jo.JVo.2002-09-0306
Text Amendment to Article 19 of the SDCs
October 15, 2002
11
.
Jooth Kelly Mixed Use
Zoning District
:>ortions of three tax lots
,hown on this map (TL 7500,
13200, and 13400) are ,
Jroposed for the location of ~
:ransit station by Lane Transit
Jistrict and the City of Springfi
Zoning special areas
~ Booth Kelly Mixed Use
~ Campus Industrial
~ LMIICC Mi~ed Use LM.I & CC
:ttJjj Major Retail Commercial
~ Special Heavy Industrial
, 1
(f)
3P.o
o
300
600 ' Feet
I
L--
U llLillJ wJ(n l I -' ~ ff1tj am rnm /Hili ~ ~
e- fBfIj m ~ BEl ffid fPj BRtHHB 8fllHrf33 I _
~"~, 00 ~ I 'BIB 2E t!1 ~ ltHB ~ ttm.~ I
'L-~, ,
~J~ DBL~~ ~mmrm~O~Ql]]] IlllTn ~ Efa' [[I]) I'
~ -'fflU_ - ~ ~ m _ ~
~-1rL:LCJCJ,!~\. ~-TL13', I . t=tj l -1 =11_1 t- -,-
~ -- ~~~~ " ~ ~ILl L-.\-t-
II-. 1) 'i;';~it~ ~~ ,?; ><^>< '>0 r- ---.....L--
~DI1J dUDO ~v~ ..~~.~ ~ .-=
- CD, ~~
r-- BE [[[]] L7 :. . :'-~';Z~~~*?'_ ,
;::::: .> 6<> a~jh~K~I,!Y;~!~~_g~~~<,,>,
L - illIJ ~W~\S.:?'X ><~ ~~'.:)-_ -;r.'1o- 't;;.. ;;.::(::x.><~x --.__
~ Zonmg.:uls 1,1~:t:,,-<>~ )-><
- fTTTI OJ]] ><"-><"~~~<;>-~>Q<~__
bLLO ,.- ~>O<'<:''>~>'?X$$%:--Q->x:':v~>
BJJ BJJ - ~:>:~m-3$<S~~:>~
': ITIDfIDJ '. ~
.8E ITII1~! HI 'I 2~~~~.
CEJ EB' 'M'--~~~~x
~ 'x~~~X-x~'~x
" - '- / - -- ---- -, ~"'''''--'<>-'-'::-;:::;:.>y,:~'<.<~-
r-- ITTl -<~:;"~:"''(S-::-::'':::::'>:Y'::''(;''_: " "Y,< 0,
I- - I...-LLJ >&9:S-2':<:??>~?-<5<~>,>
~ . ><><x>-,z"x.",,,,~;,,
~~I
,I I I' I II
~
--
~
\\
~
~
:c
:s:
m
z
-I
OJ
\
I
~\
'\.'\.~
\\
.
.
.
~
ORDINANCE NO. 6026
(General)
AN ORDINANCE REGARDING AIR POLLUTION AND AMENDING CHAPTER 4, SECTION
4.500 "LANE REGIONAL AIR POLLUTION AUTHORITY", AMENDING SECTION 4.506
"DEFINITIONS", AND AMENDING SECTION 4.508 "PROHIBITIONS" OF THE
SPRINGFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE.
The City of Springfield, Oregon, does ordain as follows:
Section 1:
Section 4.506 "Definitions" of the Springfield Municipal Code is
hereby amended to add the following definitions:
"Opacity". The degree to which an emission reduces transmission
of light or obscures the view of an object in the background.
"PM2.5". Solid or liquid particulate matter (excluding
uncombined water) with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal
to 2.5 micrometers.
Section 2:
section 4.506 "Definitions" of the Springfield Municipal Code is
hereby amended to amend and add the following definitions:
"Green Advisory. A 24-hour period beginning at 4:00 p.m. when
PM10 levels are forecast by LRAPA to be less than 100 micrograms
per cubic meter and PM2.5 levels are forecast to be less than 41
micrograms per cubic meter."
"Yellow Advisory. A 24-hour period beginning at 4:00 p.m. when
PM10 levels are forecast by LRAPA to be greater than or equal to
100 micrograms per cubic meter but less than 125 micrograms per
cubic meter, or when PM2.5 levels are forecast to be greater than
or equal to 41 micrograms per cubic meter but less than 55
micrograms per cubic meter."
"Stage I Red Advisory. A 24-hour period beginning at 4:00 p.m.
when PM10 levels are forecast by LRAPA to be greater than or
equal to 125 micrograms per cubic meter but less than 150
micrograms per cubic meter, or when PM2.5 levels are forecast by
LRAPA to be greater than or equal to 55 micrograms per cubic
meter but less than 65 micrograms per cubic meter, within the
Eugene/Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan Urban Growth
Boundary."
"Stage II Red Advisory. A 24-hour period beginning at 4:00 p.m.
when PM10 levels are forecast by LRAPA to be greater than or
equal to 150 micrograms per cubic meter, or when PM2.5 levels are
forecast by LRAPA to be greater than or equal to 65 micrograms
ORDINANCE Page -1-
per cubic meter, within the EUgene/Springfield Metropolitan Area
General Plan Urban Growth Boundary."
. Section 3:
Section 4.508 nprohibitions" of the springfield Municipal Code is
hereby amended by the addition of subsections (3) and (4) as follows:
n(3) No person in charge of property shall at any time allow to
be initiated or maintained in a solid-fuel space-heating
device the burning of any plastics, wire insulation,
petroleum by-products, petroleum-treated materials, rubber
products, animal remains, or animal or vegetable matter
resulting from the handling, preparation, cooking or service
of food, or of any other material which normally emits dense
smoke, noxious odors, or hazardous air contaminants. This
section does not prohibit use of natural gas fuels to light
solid fuels."
n(4) During a green or yellow advisory, no person in charge of
property shall operate or allow to be operated a solid-fuel
space-heating device which discharges emissions that are of
an opacity greater than forty (40) percent. This provision
does not apply to the emissions during the building of a new
fire, for a period or periods aggregating no more than ten
(10) minutes in any four(4)-hour period."
.
Section 4:
Except as specifically amended herein all other terms and
conditions of Springfield Municipal Code Section 4.506 and 4.508 shall
remain in full force and effect.
Adopted by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 2nd day
of December , 2002 by a vote of ~ in favor -1L against.
Approved by the Mayor of the
~:u'
Mayor / 0
City of Springfield this ~ day of
ATTEST:
REVIEWED & APPROVED
Af\ TO FOR~ L
...-Jcn \"5..r\~ ~~
DATE: \CJ \ '3~ ~2~-l..e
OFFICE OF CITY ATTORNEY
c:J\.w.~ ~
. N:\CITY\ORDINANC\GENERAL\Amending 4.506 and 4,508 Ordinance,wpd
ORDINANCE Page -2-
.
.
.
"I
, . ~ 't \
ORDINANCE NO. 6027
AN ORDI~ANCE OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
AMENDING APPENDIX 1, DEVELOPMENT CODE FEES SCHEDULE, AS ESTABLISHED IN
THE SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT CODE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY
(Jo. No: 2002-09-313).
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FINDS THAT:
1.) The Springfield Development Code (SDC) was adopted by the Springfield City Council on May
5, 1986, and amendments thereto were subsequently adopted by Ordinance.
2.) Findings in support of adoption of these amendments to the SDC are set below:
a.) The proposed fee increases are consistent with City council policy to achieve full
recovery of the average cost of processing land use applications.
b.) A comprehensive study of the average cost of processing land use applications was
conducted by the City in 1999 and the results of that study have been updated to reflect
service cost adjustments since that time.
c.) The fee increases are consistent with the facts of the fee recovery study and reflect the
true and average cost of processing such land use applications.
3.) Based on the above record of findings, the City Council concludes that the SDC amendments are
consistent with the Council policy on fee recovery for City services.
Now therefore, based on the above findings,
THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD CITY COUNCIL DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: Appendix 1, DEVELOPMENT CODE FEES, is hereby amended as follows:
Application
DEVELOPMENT CODE FEE SCHEDULE
Ci Limits
Fee I
Urban Transition Area
Fee
Pre-Application Meeting (Conference)
Pre-Application Report (50% credit) ##
$353
$1,824
$424
$1,824
I TYPE I REVIEW
Application
I City Limits
Fee
I Urban Transition Area
Fee
Accessory Dwelling Unit
Subdivision or Partition Replat Plat
Time Extension for Certain Improvements
Property Line Adjustment
Partition Plat
Subdivision Plat
Manufactured Dwelling Park-Space Line Adjustment
Manufactured Home-Temporary Residential Use
Land Fill and Alteration (plus a volume fee) 40
Minimum Development Standards
Site Plan Review Modification - Minor
$492
$241
$165
$241
$942
$1,530
$193
$251
$284 + volume
$492
$364
N/A
$241
$203
$321
$942
N/A
$214
$251
$284+ volume
N/A
$396
.
.
.
. ^
, ,
Ordinance No.
6027
Page 2
TYPE I REVIEW - continued
Application
Ci Limits
Fee
Urban Transition Area
Fee
Land Use and Zoning Compatibility Statement
Plan Review
Final Site Plan Review/Development Agreement
Final Site Plan Inspection for Occupancy
Floodplain Development Fee '"
Historic Conunission Review Under Type I
DWP Overlay District Development
Department of Motor Vehicle License
Department of Motor Vehicle - Renewal
Note: Type I applications are not subject to a separate postage fee.
# 10% of the fee charged for the Site Plan Review
## If the subsequent development application substantially confonns to the pre-application report, then up to 50% of the
cost of the pre-application fee can be credited to the development application fee (i,e, subdivision or site plan),
### For subdivisions there shall be a $54 fee per lot and for partitions and site plan reviews a $107 fee per acre in addition
to the base fee, For development areas over 5 acres a $10,700 deposit is required.
'" Any LDAP, Floodplain, or Tree Felling pennit processed after land use activity conducted without required City
approvals shall be charged a non-refimdable fee of $1 ,070 for parcels less than one acre, $2,675 for parcels more than
one acre and equal to or less than 5 acres, and $5,350 for parcels greater than 5 acres, In addition the following
provisions apply:
a) For development areas greater than 5 acres, there shall be an additional fee of $107 per acre plus a $10,700
refimdable deposit required;
b) For tree felling without City approval, there shall be a non-refimdable fee of $107 per unauthorized felled tree,
This fee schedule shall be implemented whether or not the City pursues other remedies available to it through state,
local, or federal laws,
TYPE II REVIEW
, Application
Modification of Provisions
Hospital Support Overlay District
Hillside Development Overlay District
Site Plan Review
Site Plan Review Modification - Major(*****)
Partition - Tentative Plan
Subdivision - Tentative Plan
Subdivision or Partition Tentative Replat
Manufactured Dwelling Medical Hardship +
Manufactured Dwelling Park
Solar Access Guarantee
Tree Felling Permit '"
Expedited Land Division
Historic Conunission Review Under Type II
$59
$59
#
$118
$428 ###
$54
$433
$210
$110
$59
$59
#
$118
$642 ###
$134
$647
$210
$110
Ci Limits
Fee
Urban Transition Area
Fee
$1,648
$856(*)
$1,766(**)
$1,140(****)
$1,140(****)
$1,660
$2,610+ $107/1ot
$241
$187
$2,894
$401
$535
(***)
$161
$1,648
N/A
$2,001(**)
$1,335(****)
$1,335(****)
$2,062
$3,175+ $107/lot
$321
$187
N/A
$401
$540
(***)
$321
(*) Development in the HS Overlay District that requires Site Plan Review shall be charged only the Site Plan Review Fee,
Development in this District that requires Discretionary Use approval shall be subject only to the fee for Discretionary
Use/Site Plan Review,
(**) This fee applies only to land divisions in the Hillside Overlay District (Article 26) and is in addition to the land
division review fee,
(***) The fee for an Expedited Land Division (ELD) shall be twice the fee calculated for a regular land division plus an
appeal fee established in ORS 197.360 to defray costs in the event the decision is appealed. If the decision is not
appealed, the appeal fee for the ELD shall be refimded. A separate postage fee of $117 is required for an ELD.
. ,
Ordinance No. 6027
Page 3
.
(****) Site Plan $1,140 for less than 5,000 sq. ft, impervious surface; fee for greater than 5,000 sq, ft, is $1,140 plus $107 per
additional 1,000 sq, ft,
Major Modification entails re-notification of surrounding property owners and DRC meeting.
The Director may waive the fee upon verification oflow-moderate income status of the applicant.
Any LDAP, Floodplain, or Tree Felling permit processed after land use activity conducted without required City
approvals shall be charged a non-refundable fee of$I,070 for parcels less than one acre, $2,675 for parcels more than
one acre and equal to or less than 5 acres, and $5,350 for parcels greater than 5 acres, ill addition the following
provisions apply:
a) For development areas greater than 5 acres, there shall be an additional fee of$107 per aCre plus a $10,070
refundable deposit required;
b) For tree felling without City approval, there shall be a non-refundable fee of $107 per unauthorized felled tree.
This fee schedule shall be implemented whether or not the City pursues other remedies available to it through state,
local, or federal laws,
Note: All Type II applications, except where noted in this Appendix, are subject to a separate postage fee of $58.
Note: Any request to prioritize and expedite the review of a particular application submittal out of the order in which applications
were received shall be approved at the discretion of the Director and shall be charged a non-refundablefie of$5,885 or two times the
application fie, whichever is greater; where the development area is greater than ten acres an additional fee of $107 per acre will be
charged.
(*****)
.
",.
TYPE III REVIEW Ci Limits Urban Transition Area
Application Fee Fee
Discretionary Use/Site Plan Review Combined '\1 Combined '\1 + $2,354
deposit
Discretionary Use $1,482 $1,840 + $2,354 deposit
Establishment of Historic Landmark Inventory $1,348 $1,675+ $2,140 deposit
Non-Conforming Use - ExpansionIModification $1,482(*) $1,840+ $1,177 deposit
. Willamette Greenway Overlay District Development;
Greenway Setback Line Already Established $1,482(*) $1,840(*)+ $1,177
deposit
Greenway Setback Line Not Already Established $2,418(*) $3,007(*)+ $1,177
deposit
Variance $1,589 $1,600+ $1,177 deposit
Formal Interpretation $674 $674+ $2,354 deposit
Zoning/Overlay District Change $1,862(**) $1,958(**)+ $1,177
deposit
Demolition of Historic Landmark $1,054 $1,054+ $1,177 deposit
Conceptual Development Plan $3,702 $5,457+ $2,354 deposit
Conceptual Development Plan Amendment $1,434+ $107/ac~e $1,787+ $107/acre +
$2,354 deposit
Master Plan Approval JC $5,083 + $107/acre + $6,361+ $107/acre +
$11,770 deposit $11,770 deposit
Master Plan Amendment $1,434+ $2,354 deposit $1,787+ $2,354 deposit
Appeal of the Director's Decision $268(***) $268(***)
Appeal of an Expedited Land Division $32!(****) $321(****)
.
(*) The fee for these applications includes the review ofDiscnitionary Use criteria and does not require a separate
Discretionary Use application.
(**) No fee is charged for removal of the UF-1O Overlay District.
(***) This fee is established by ORS. Council acknowledged Neighborhood Associations shall not be charged a fee for this
type of appeal if the land subject to the decision is within the Boundaries of the Association.
(****) This fee established by ORS,
~l.{lJO l~PlI!EW~l ~q1 'AlP!IEA Sl! 01 se UO!lElJ!UU~l~P IEUY ~l.{l ~upu~d uno:) q:)ns Aq P~lI!'EJ1S~1
~~J Alre JO 1lli)UI~:)10JU~ ~l.{l10 Uo!pps!lnf lU~~dUIO:) JO uno:) Alre 10 MEI JO UO!lE1~do Aq P!IEAlI!
PI~q ~q PInoqs ~fu:mp 1~l.{l0 10 ::mJ ~InfX)qos s::mi{ ~poJ 1u~wdOI~A~Q 'I xpu~ddy AUt? JI : ( uo~p~S
.
'~OUt?up10 s!l.{l
OllO!ld AP1E!fX)UIW! fX)lS!X:} A:}l.{llEl.{l Slunoum ~l.{llE S~~lEq:) plre s::mJ P~U!Wo qons lIE qsnqElS:}:}l
01 QOmmquO s~Jo 1U:}1lI!:}l.{l s~ n '~om.'U~J~l Aq If!:~l~q p~)ldopt? plre ~OUt?UW10 s!l.{l Ollf!: P~lE10drO:)lf!:
pUt? p~pnplf!: :)q 01 p:)w::mp ~q nmrs Q~lEq:) 1:)l.{l0 10 :):)J q:)ns :)Inp~q:)S s:):)i{ :)poJ 1U:)UIdoPMQ
'I xpu:)ddy 'I uop,:)~S If!: P~lE~~s~p ~sol.{l wOl] p~!Wo AnU~QAptnf! UQQq Sln[ QOlrelf!:p10
Aq fX)ldopE AIsno!AQld ~~.rnqJ 10::mi{ QpoJ lUQwdOPMQ .rnIno~d E lUQA~ ~l.{l UJ: :Z uoqo~S
'pa2.iol{:J
aq lJ.IM. a.i:Jo .lad LO [!/;Jo aaJ ]OUOmppo uo Gal:JO ual u0l{1.ial0a~ G! oa.iO luawdo]iJ<Wp al{l alal{M. .'.ial0a.i2 G! .iaAal{:J!l{M. 'aaJ UO!1o:J.l]ddo
al{l Gaw.l1 OM.] .10 ~8f/~$ Jo aaJ a]qvpunJa.i-UOU 0 pa2.ivl{:J aq ]]ol{G puv .iopa.i!a al{l Jo uO.lJa.i:JG!P al{llo paiW.iddo aq ]]ol{G paA,la:Ja.i a.ia.K
Guo.lJo:J!]ddv l{:J!l{M. U! .iap.iO al{l Jo lno ]Ou!wqns uO.lJD:J!]ddo .iD]tl:J.l1.lDd 0 Jo M.3!<W.i al{l a1!padxa puo aZ,lJ,UO,ud 011Ganba.i "UV :aION
'9~ a.inGvaw 10]]vg Jo sluawa.i!nba.i al{llaaw 01 aaj a2D1God ]DUO.lJJPpv uo 0110a/qnG aq tWW G1UaWPUiJWV
apoo puv uOld palv.lJ!U! uaZm;] 'L [ [$ Jo aaJ a201God al0.iodaG 0 01 pa/qnG a.iV suo.lJvo!]ddo AI aM], puv III ad,,],]lV :alON
Y/N
16(1$
668$
16t'1$
16('1$
8!;6$
16t'1$
8!;6$
ZL I 'Z$
179z'17$
10t'f$
LZ9'f$
L 18'8$
ZL 1 'Z$
nL'f$
fL8'Z$
L!;I't:$
%9'L$
~InfX)qos ~~ i{ UO!ss!UlWOJ
Ampunog QQS
V/N
aag
u;uv UOmSlmJ.L lmq.la
aag
Sl!Wn lD
J!ounoJ
Al!J O:j. UO!S!O~Q UO!SS!WUIOJ ~lJ!lIU'Cld JO [UQddy
~~Ut?qJ ~umN lQ~U1S
S~!U~d01d :)!Iqlld
1:)l.{l() plre 'SlEld UO!S!ApqnS 'AE.M.-JO-S:j.q2ffi
SlUQUIQSE3
:UO!llmE A
:jX~l ~poJ 1UQwdopAQQJO 1u6wpuQury
um1~E!(JfIX~l :lreId 1U~Ul~UY~)JJO 1U~WPU~ury
P!ll5!Q ){llMpmq o!lOl5!H lre JO lu~wqS!IqElS3
lU~WPUQury tmld n QcL\.L
lU~wpu~ury Ut?Id I ~cL\.L
::j.UQwpU~ury tmId OllQW
(UO!SS!UlWOJ AIEpunog se QInpQq::>s ~~J QumS)
SUO!SUQ:jX3 IEpOl!JlQ:j.RI:jX3 ptm UOP,EXQUUY
.
uO!-Jv:J!lddV
M3:IA3lI AI 3:dA.L
pa2.lfJl{o
aq lJ.IM. a.l:Jo .lad LO [$ Jo aaJ ]ouo.lJ!PPO un Ga.iOV ual UOl{1 .ialViJ~ G! va.iV luawdola<wp alfl a.ial{M. .'.ialVa.i2 G! .ia<Wl{o.llfM. 'aaJ uO.l1o:J!]ddo
al{l G;JW.l1 OM.] .10 ~88 '~$ Jo aaJ aNoputifal-UOU 0 pafunlfo aq ]]vl{s puo .iopa.i!a al{l Jo uO.lJa.l:JS!P al{llo paMuddo aq ]]vl{G pa/\!aoa.i a.iaM.
SUO.l1oo!lddn l{O.ll{M. U! .iap.io alfl Jo ]nO lO11!wqns uO.lJD:J!]ddo .in]tl:J!J..lDd n Jo M.3!M.l al{l a1!padxa puo aZ,lJ,uo,ud 01lGanba.l "UV :aloN
'apo;] G.ll{IJo (/1)OL01 uo.l1oasJo O.ual.UO alfl
olluons.ind %O~ pa:Jnpa.i aq tWw sam]!onJ.lo 2u!snolf awo:JU! M.O] Jo luawdo]iJ<Wp al{l 01 palo]iJ.i aaJ UO,lJno!]ddn ,{UV :uo.lJonpaN aad
lUD:JUddv al{l 01 paSGasGo aq ]]ol{s
1!sodap al{l Jo SGaoxa U! sa2.ivl{;] 'lun:J!]ddo alfl 01 palUnla.i aq ]]ol{s papuadxa IOU lunowo ,(uV :G1!mdap ]VP!JJO Gou,unaH .10) alON
']naddo al{1 U! paluasa.id sansG! luvo!fiu2!G ]]V uo ]!n<W.id
lGnW lun]]addn UD ..].l1JAa.id" 0], 'Gl.mo;) al{l .10 VfIf17l{1!M. pa!!! G]oaddo "UO 0110U ''']UO G]oaddo ]noo] 01 sa!]ddo S!l{], papunJcu
aq ]]ol{G 2u.uoal{ JV.lJ!U! al{l.iOJ aaJ2um! al{l '2u.uval{ luanbasqnG.io 2u,uoal{ al{llv G]!vAa.id lUO]]addo uo.h :S]DMaV ]VOO]]]V .10) alON
'uo.lJvo!]ddo
lU!O/ G!l{I.iOJ pauJqWO:J UiJl{1 puo tfJalo.lodas palOlno]D:J a.iO ;JSfl MOUO!1a.i:JG!a puo iIW!AaN uO/cl ;J1!S .IoJ saad :/:i pau!qwo;]
'G]vaddv Jo p.ivog
aSfl pulY[ alvlS al{1l{1!M. pa!!! G! uO!G!:Jap aGn PUO] va.iV UOmGUO.iJ uoq.in uv 2U,lA]OAU,l UO,lG,lOap ]VP!1fo G2u.uvaH 1J Jo lvaddo uv :aloN .
'lun:l~Iddu::lID ol p::lputy::l1::lq n~ p::lpu::ldX::l lOll l~sod::lp ::lIDJo uO~l1od Any 'SlSQ:l IU::lddu Aue lltJ!:pnptJ!: '::l<lJ
::llllJo SS::l:lX::l tJ!: lltJ!:sS::l:lold 10J SlSO:l kt~;) .mAO:l Ol {>;}sn ::lq n~ lUID IUA01ddV ueld l::llSUW 10J l~sO<fuP U ::lq nmrs ::l1::ll{l )C
17 Q~Ed
L lO9 'ON ~OU~up10
, -
.
.
.
Ordinance No. 6027
Page 5
Appendix 1, Development Code Fees Schedule fees and charges shall not be affected thereby and
shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 4: Future Ordinances of the Common Council may be adopted to amend, add, or delete any
rate, permit fee, license fee, or other fee or charge.
Section 5: It is hereby found and determined that matters relating to the imposition of the
Development Code Fees Schedule are matters affecting the public health, safety, and welfare and that
an emergency therefore exists and this Ordinance shall take effect January 1,2003.
ADOPTEO by the Common Council of the City of Springfield by a vote of ~ for and ~
against this 2nd day of December, 2002.
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this 2nd day of December, 2002.
\
"'-
ATTEST:
~~
d\.t.tl-G U)~
REVIEWED &. APPROVED
S TO fOR~ \..
J "'-A\~
DATE: \ ~ J c;- ':)ou'2--
OFFICE OF CITY ATTORNEY
ORDINANCE
No. 6028
.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
AMENDING ARTICLE 1, "SPRINGFIELD BUILDING CODE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE" OF
THE SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT; COMMUNITY SERVICES
p
DIVISION "BUILDING SAFETY CODES", AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the Building Safety Codes specifies that rates, permit fees, license fees, and other fees
and charges are adopted by Ordinance of the Common Council; and
WHEREAS, the opportunity for public comment at a public hearing has been provided prior to the
adoption of this Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Building Safety Codes maintains all rates, permit fees, license fees, and
other fees and charges at their previous rates except for Tables 3-A, 3-B, 3-C, and 3-D, which are
increased as specified below.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD CITY COUNCIL DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS;
Section 1: Amend the Building Safety Codes, Article 1; as specified in Tables 3-A, 3.B, 3-C, and
3-D, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference:
.
Section 2: In the event a particular rate, permit fee, license fee, or other fee or charge previously
adopted in the Building Safety Codes or by Ordinance has been inadvertently omitted from those designated
in Article 1 attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, such rate, permit fee, license fee or other
fee or charge shall be deemed to be included and incorporated into this Ordinance and adopted herein by
reference. It is the intent of this Ordinance to reestablish all such omitted fees and charges at the amounts
that they existed immediately prior to this Ordinance.
Section 3: If any particular rate, permit fee, license fee, and other fee or charge should be held
invalid by operation of law or any court of competent jurisdiction or the enforcement of any fee restrained
by such court pending the final determination as to its validity, the remainder of the rates, permit fees,
license fees, fees and charges specified in the Building Safety Codes, Article 1, shall not be affected thereby
and shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 4; Future Ordinances of the Common Council may be adopted to amend, add, or delete any
rate, permit fee, license fee, or other fee or charge.
Section 5: It is hereby found and determined that matters relating to the imposition of Building
Safety Codes are matters affecting the public health, safety, and welfare and that an emergency therefore
exists, and that this Ordinance shall take effect on January 1,2003.
This Ordinance adopted by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 2nd day of December,
2002, by a vote of ~ for and -L against. '
.
Attest:
~~
~; - , l, ~
\'
RE\!IEV\fED ~ j}1='["I~0\fr-::D
~gR~ ~~\~
, DATE: - \. ~ \7') )20~-:L-
OFFICE OF CITY ATTORNEY
.
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
DEVELOPMENTSER~CEDEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY SER~CES DMSION
BUILDING SAFETY CODES
Article l;Table 3-A
Structural Permit Fees
In Reference to Article 2; Structural Specialty Code and Fire and Life Safety Code
To the following fees, please add 7% State Surcharge and 10% Administrative Fee.
Total Value
Fee
$1 - $2,000
$45.00
$2,001 - $25,000
$45.00 for the first $2,001 in value plus $7.80 for each additional
$1,000 or fraction thereof.
$25,001 - $50,000
$224.40 for the first $25,001 in value plus $5.85 for each additional
$1,000 or fraction thereof.
$50,001 - $100,000
$370.65 for the first $50,001 in value plus $3.90 for each additional
$1,000 or fraction thereof.
.
$100,001- and Up
$565.65 for the first $100,001 in value plus $3.25 for each additional
$1,000 or fraction thereof.
.
Article 1; Table 3-A Page 1 of 1
Effictive 01/0J/03
.
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY SERVICES DMSION
BUILDING SAFETY CODES
Article l;Table 3-B
Electrical Permit Fees
In Reference to Article 4; Electrical Specialty Safety Code
To the following fees, please add 7% State Surcharge and 10% Administrative Fee.
.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(t)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
(I)
(m)
(n)
(0)
(p)
(q)
(r)
(s)
(t)
(u)
(v)
(w)
(x)
(y)
(z)
(aa)
(bb)
.
ID Description
Residence wiring less than 1,000 square fee
Each additional 500 square feet or portion thereof
Manufactured Home or Modular Dwelling (Service or Feeder)
Temporary Power - 200 amps or less
Temporary Power - 201 - 400 amps
Temporary Power - 401 - 600 amps
Permanent Service or Feeder - 200 amps or less
Pennanent Service or Feeder - 201 to 400 amps
Permanent Service or Feeder - 401 to 600 amps
Permanent Service or Feeder - 601 - 999 amps
Permanent Service or Feeder - 1,000 amps or volts
Electrical Service Reconnection with no changes to existing service size
One New/ AlterationlExtension of Circuit
Each Additional Circuit
Each Irrigation Pump
Each Electrical Sign or Outline Lighting
Each Signal Panel
Limited Energy - Residential
Limited Energy - CommerciallMulti Family
Inspections not covered by this schedule
Reinspection Fee
Partial Inspection
Inspection Outside Nonnal Business Hours - 1 hr minimum
Minimum Permit Fee
Investigation Fee
Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated - 1 hr minimum
Minor Electrical Labels (sold in 10 only)
Building Without Pennit Penalty
Fee
$106.00
$19.00
$50.00
$50.00
$69.00
$100.00
$63.00
$75.00
$125.00
$163.00
$375.00
$50.00
$43.00
$3.00
$50.00
$50.00
$50.00
$25.00
$45.00
$45.00
$45.00
$45.00
$67.50
$45.00
$45.00
$45.00
$50.00
Permit Fee
Article 1; Table 3-B Page 1 of 1
Effictive 01/01/03
.
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION
BUILDING SAFETY CODES
Article l;Table 3-C
Plumbing Permit Fees
In Reference to Article 5; Plumbing Specialty Code
To the following fees, please add 7% State Surcharge and 10% Administrative Fee.
ID Description Fee
(a) Fees for the construction, alteration or repair of plumbing on one and
two family dwellings, shall be calculated as described below. Fees
include drain, waste and vent, installation, water distribution piping, the
first 50 feet of water service and up to 40 fixtures:
(1) One or two family with one bath $145.00
(2) One or two family with two bath $254.00
(3) One or two family with three bath $306,00
(4) Each additional fixture over 40 fixtures $14.00
. (b) Single Plumbing Fixture $14.00
(c) Sanitary Sewer:
(1) For the first 50 feet ofline $45.00
(2) Each additional 100 feet ofline or portion $14.00
(d) Water Service:
(1) For the first 50 feet ofline $45.00
(2) Each additional 100 feet of line or portion $14.00
(e) Storm and Rain Drain:
( 1 ) For the first 50 feet of line $45.00
(2) Each additional 100 feet ofline or portion $14.00
(f) Sewer Ejector Pump $14.00
(g) Special Waste Connection $14.00
(h) Manufactured Home hook-up on improved lot $45.00
(i) Backflow Prevention Device $14.00
G) Relocated Structure $45.00
(k) Sanitary or Storm Sewer Cap $45,00
.
Article 1; Table 3-C Page 10f2
Effictive 01/01/03
ID Description Fee
. (1) Any trap or waste not connected to a fixture $14.00
(m) Any plumbing installation not listed in this schedule with sanitary waste $14.00
or portable water supply
(n) Minimum Plumbing Permit Fee $45.00
(0) Partial Inspection Fee $45.00
(P) Reinspection Fee $45.00
(q) Inspections not covered by schedule $45.00
(r) Inspections Outside Normal Business Hours - 1 hr minimum $67.50
(s) Investigation Fee $45.00
(t) Building Without Permit Penalty Permit Fee
(u) Accessible Minor Plumbing Labels $100.00
(v) Not Accessible Minor Plumbing Labels $100.00
(w) Hourly Inspection Fee for requests not in permit table - I hr minimum $45.00
.
.
Article 1; Table 3-C Page 2 of2
Efftctive 01/01/03
.
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
DEVELOPMENTSER~CEDEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY SER~CES DMSION
BUILDING SAFETY CODES
Article l;Table 3-D
Mechanical Permit Fees
In Reference to Article 3; Mechanical Specialty Code and Mechanical Fire and Life Safety Code
To the following fees, please add 7% State Surcharge and 10% Administrative Fee.
ID Description Fee
(a) HVAC
Up to 100,000 btu $12.00
More than 100,000 $15.00
Unit Heater $12.00
(b) Boiler/Compressor
Up to 100,000 btu $12.00
3-15 Horsepower or 100,001 - 500,000 btu $22.00
Over 15 to 30 Horsepower or 500,001 - 999,000 btu $30.00
Over 30 to 50 Horsepower or 1,000,000 - 1,750,000 btu $44.00
. Over 50 Horsepower or over 1,750,001 btu $75.00
(c) Air Handling Unit
Up to 10,000 cfin $8.00
10,001 cfin and over $15.00
Evaporative Cooler/Fan $9.00
(d) Vents
Hood and Exhaust $9.00
Vent Fan to One Duct $6,00
Appliance Vent $6.00
(e) Gas Piping
Each Piping System 1-4 Outlets $4.00
Each Outlet Over 4 $1.00
(t) Air, Oxygen, Other Medical Specialty Piping
Each Piping System 1-4 Outlets $4.00
Each Outlet Over 4 $1. 00
(g) LP Gas Tank and Piping $12,00
.
Article 1; Table 3-D Page I of 2
Effictive 01/01/03
ID Description Fee
. (h) .Miscellaneous
Domestic Incinerator $15.00
Commercial Incinerator $60.00
W ood/Pellet Stove $30.00
Heat Pump $12.00
Preliminary Inspection $45.00
(i) Each Appliance not listed on this schedule $9.00
G) Inspections not covered by this schedule $45.00
(k) Reinspection Fee $45.00
(1) Mechanical Issuance Fee $10.00
(m) Minimum Permit Fee $45.00
(n) Partial Inspection $45.00
(0) Inspections Outside Normal Business Hours - 1 hr minimum $67.50
(P) Investigation Fee $45.00
(q) Building Without Permit Penalty Permit Fee
.
(r) Hourly Inspection Fee for requests not in permit tables - I hr minimum $45.00
.
Article 1; Table 3-D Page 2 of 2
Effective 01/01/03
...,
ORDINANCE NO. 6029 (General)
. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 105.9 AND 105.9.1 OF THE UNIFORM FIRE
CODE AS AMENDED, CHANGED AND MORE P ARTICULARL Y DESCRIBED AND SET
FORTH IN THE "CITY OF SPRINGFIELD 1997 UNIFORM FIRE CODE AMENDMENT"
PRESCRIBING FEES FOR INSPECTION OF OCCUPANCIES REQUIRING HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS PERMITS AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1- Section 105.9 of the Uniform Fire Code as amended and changed as more particularly
described and set forth in the "City of Springfield 1997 Uniform Fire Code Amendment" is
amended to read as follows:
"105.9 Fees for Permits. Annual fees for the inspection of occupancies requiring
Hazardous Materials Permits shall be set by the Springfield City Council by
resolution. "
Section 2 - Section 105.9.1 of the Uniform Fire Code as amended and changed as more
particularly described and set forth in the "City of Springfield 1997 Uniform Fire Code
Amendment" is amended to read as follows:
.
"Section 105.9.1. Fees for inspection of occupancies requiring hazardous
materials permits other than annual permits shall be set by the Springfield City
Council by resolution."
Section 3 - In the event any section, clause, sentence Of provision of this Ordinance should be
declared for any reason to be invalid, such declaration of invalidity shall not affect the validity of
any other section, clause, sentence or provision of this Ordinance which can be given effect
without such invalid part or parts.
Section 4 - It is hereby found and determined that matters relating to the imposition of the
Uniform Fire Code Fees are matters affecting the public health and welfare and that an emergency
exists, and therefore this Ordinance shall take effect December 2, 2002.
Adopted by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 2nd day of December, 2002 by a
vote of 6 in favor and 0 against.
Approved by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this
.
ATTEST:
...
O\d\<' lA)u ~
REVIEWED &. APPROVED
AS TO FOAl\l'"
&<fI:o\-\ J \~~
DATE: \,\12., L'2C~
OFFICE OF C~TY ATTORNEY
.
ORDINANCE NO. 6030
(REGULAR)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE METROPOLITAN AREA GENERAL PLAN DIAGRAM
BY REDESIGNATING 22 ACRES OF LAND FROM PARKS AND OPEN SPACE AND
COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO CAMPUS INDUSTRIAL.
The City Council of the City of Springfield finds that:
A. Article 7 of the Springfield Development Code sets forth criteria for Plan diagram
amendments.
B. On March 11,2002, the Springfield City Council initiated the following Metro Plan diagram
amendment:
Redesignate 22 acres of land from Parks and Open Space and Community Commercial to
Campus Industrial, Jo. No. 2002-03-0062, Tax Lot 100, Assessor's Map 17-03-15-13 and
a portion of Tax Lot 1000, Assessor's Map 17-03-15.
C. On November 19,2002, the Springfield Planning Commission conducted public hearings to
accept testimony and hear comments on this land use proposal. After the close of this public
hearing the Planning Commission considered the testimony provided, including the staff report
and all materials submitted in the application. The Planning Commission voted six in favor,
none opposed, to forward a recommendation of approval to the Springfield City Council.
.
D. On December 2, 2002, the Springfield City Council held public hearings on this proposal.
E. Evidence exists within the record and the findings attached hereto that the proposal meets the
requirements of Article 7 of the Springfield Development Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The above findings, and the findings set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto
and incorporated herein by reference are hereby adopted.
Section 2: The Metro Plan designation of Tax Lot 100, Assessor's Map 17-03-15-13,
more particularly described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is
hereby amended from Community Commercial to Campus Industrial, and the Metro Plan
designation of a portion of Tax Lot 1000, Assessor's Map 17-03-15, more particularly described
in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby amended from Parks
and Open Space to Campus Industrial.
Section 3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this
Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent
jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and that
holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance.
.
ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield by a vote of 5 for
and ~ against this --2.!h day of December, 2002.
Council President
APPROVED by the~ayo:r of the City of Springfield this ~ day of December, 2002.
. ATTEST:
REVIEWED & APPROVED
~S~ FORM '" l
.......,.() I ~ ~ ~
DATE:-1..L '2 \ ~'200<- .
OFFICE OF CITY ATTORNEY
.
.
C. I ;
.
.
.
ORDINANCE NO. 6031
(REGULAR)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE GA TEW A Y REFINEMENT PLAN DIAGRAM BY
REDESIGNATING 22 ACRES OF LAND FROM PARKS AND OPEN SPACE AND
COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO CAMPUS INDUSTRIAL CONSISTENT WITH THE
METROPOLITAN AREA GENERAL PLAN DIAGRAM DESIGNA nONS FOR THIS
PROPERTY.
The City Council of the City of Springfield finds that:
A. Article 7 of the Springfield Development Code sets forth the requirement for automatic
amendment of refinement plan diagrams for consistency with the Metro Plan diagram.
B. On March 11,2002, the Springfield City Council initiated the following Gateway Refinement
Plan diagram amendment:
Redesignate 22 acres of land from Parks and Open Space and Community Commercial to
Campus Industrial consistent with the Metro Plan diagram designation for this land, Jo.
No. 2002-03-0062, Tax Lot 100, Assessor's Map 17-03-15-13, and a portion of Tax Lot
1000, Assessor's Map 17-03-15.
C. On November 19, 2002, the Springfield Planning Commission conducted public hearings to
accept testimony and hear comments on this land use proposal. After the close of the public
hearing the Planning Commission considered the testimony provided, including the staff report
and all materials submitted in the application. The Planning Commission voted six in favor,
none opposed, to forward a recommendation of approval to the Springfield City Council.
D. On December 2, 2002, the Springfield City Council held public hearings on this proposal.
E. Evidence exists within the record and the findings attached hereto that the proposal meets the
requirements of Article 7 of the Springfield Development Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The above findings, and the findings set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto
and incorporated herein by reference are hereby adopted.
Section 2: The Gateway Refinement Plan designation of Tax Lot 100, Assessor's Map
17-03-15-13, more particularly described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference, is hereby amended from Community Commercial Campus Industrial, and a portion of
Tax Lot 1000, Assessor's Map 17-03-15, more particularly described in Exhibit B attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby amended from Parks and Open Space to
Campus Industrial.
Section 3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this
Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent
jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and that
hold shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance.
.
.
.
...
and
ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield by a vote of 5
o against this 9th day of December, 2002.
Council Pfesident /~
APPROVED by th~iUtO the City of Springfiel 1:~', 9th day of December,
//,~ /
~' "
~'
v ~
for
2002.
ATTEST:
REVIEWED & APPROVED
At:\. TO FORM \..
-..J ,:r, .....,. ~ "\ \"-A' ~
D/"Tt::-1.L\~ \ ~ ?~'-
OFFICE OF CITY ATTORNEY